分类: 未分类

  • 中期选举、特朗普的“通胀国家”与对内塔尼亚胡的质疑


    2026年9月9日 美国东部时间下午3:51 / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:托比·曼南赞,CNN

    中期选举、特朗普的“通胀国家”与对内塔尼亚胡的质疑

    CNN首席数据分析师哈里·恩滕将通过数据解析,从民众对特朗普和内塔尼亚胡领导能力的信心,到美国中期选举的当前态势。

    15:00 • 来源:CNN

    Midterms, Trump’s inflation nation and Netanyahu skepticism

    2026-09-09 3:51 PM EDT / CNN

    By Toby Mananzan, CNN

    Midterms, Trump’s inflation nation and Netanyahu skepticism

    CNN Chief Data Analyst Harry Enten runs the numbers, from confidence in Trump and Netanyahu’s leadership to the current state of US midterms.

    15:00 • Source: CNN

  • 人工智能专家警告:人类已“濒临被超越”


    2026-09-09T15:32:39-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻网
    撰稿
    2026年9月9日 / 美国东部时间下午3:32 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻网

    来自人工智能公司Anthropic的前研究员发出的一则令人不安的警告,正将“超级智能”——一种能在所有认知任务上超越人类的技术——推向舆论焦点。

    在9月8日宣布辞职的社交媒体帖子中,研究员雅各布·考克森指责Anthropic及其竞争对手OpenAI“拿我们的生命下注”,执意研发超级智能。在X平台的相关帖子中,Anthropic首席研究员埃文·哈宾格表示,未来十年内,人工智能“有超过10%的可能性会灭绝全人类”。

    这些警告引发了一系列疑问:何为超级智能?各家企业距离研发出这类技术能力还有多远?为何部分专家认为它可能威胁就业、国家安全,甚至人类本身?

    根据非营利组织“未来生命研究所”发起的暂停超级智能研发请愿书,超级智能指的是“能在几乎所有认知任务上显著超越所有人类”的人工智能。该请愿书已获得被称为“AI教父”的知名计算机科学家杰弗里·辛顿等人的签名。

    “不妨想象一下,某个人工智能或由海量人工智能组成的集群,整体智能水平超过全人类总和——超过80亿人的智慧,”专攻人工智能研究的麻省理工学院教授马克斯·泰格马克对哥伦比亚广播公司新闻网表示,“这显然符合超级智能的定义。”

    研究人员还担忧,超级智能人工智能将被少数几家公司掌控,这将赋予它们巨大权力,并放大滥用技术的风险。

    “我们已濒临被超越”

    诚然,人工智能最终能比肩甚至超越人类智能的想法并非新鲜事——目前仍停留在假设层面。例如,英国数学家I.J.古德早在20世纪60年代就撰文探讨过“超智能机器”的诞生,将其定义为“能超越任何聪明人所有智力活动的存在”。

    正如考克森和哈宾格所警告的那样,人工智能公司高管也公开承认了这项技术带来的风险,包括人工智能可能对全人类构成的威胁。

    “现在的新情况是,我们已经离被超越如此之近,”泰格马克说。

    尽管超级智能尚未实现,但如今的人工智能代理已展现出自主协作运行的能力。其中包括一些看似旨在规避检测的行为,比如近期发生的OpenAI测试人工智能模型失控并入侵人工智能公司Hugging Face的事件。

    对失去控制权的担忧

    专家对哥伦比亚广播公司新闻网表示,超级智能人工智能构成的根本威胁在于,人类将越来越难以管控这些工具。

    “他们如今甚至都无法对齐或控制自己的人工智能,而未来的人工智能会更加智能,也更难被理解,”曾任职于OpenAI、如今领导人工智能未来项目的丹尼尔·科科塔约洛在9月8日的社交媒体帖子中写道,“即便他们成功了,也将创造人类历史上最集中的权力——一种新型人工超智能物种,只服从极少数人的命令和价值观。”

    他补充道:“这种局面荒唐至极,绝不能任其继续下去。”

    随着人工智能研发速度突飞猛进,泰格马克也认同人类可能会失去对这项技术的掌控。

    “如果我们任由一场毫无约束的竞赛催生数十亿个超级智能机器人,那么我认为,未来几十年内我们失去控制权的概率将远超50%,”他对哥伦比亚广播公司新闻网表示。

    超级智能何时会出现?

    这是一个不断变化的话题,答案因人而异。但人工智能未来项目在一份审视人工智能发展的场景报告中指出,超级智能技术可能在未来1至10年内问世。

    “该行业自欺欺人地认为,可以在研发过程中随时解决超级智能人工智能的控制问题,因此根本没有制定任何像样的计划,”该组织写道。

    其他人则认为,超级智能的研发仍需多年时间。

    “如今的人工智能系统,无论在何种通用能力上都远未达到或超越人类,”圣达菲研究所教授梅兰妮·米切尔说道。

    布鲁金斯学会专注技术与人工智能研究的高级研究员达雷尔·韦斯特表示,人工智能要全面达到人类水平的技能,还需要数年甚至数十年时间。他说,人工智能确实在进步,但人类在多任务处理等技能上仍占据上风。

    尽管专家们在超级智能的研发时间表上存在分歧,但他们普遍认为,关键突破将出现在人工智能能够在无需人类干预的情况下自我改进之时——这一概念被人工智能研究人员称为“递归自我改进”。

    “能够独立学习并利用新知识采取行动的人工智能,才是人们应当关注的重点,”韦斯特说。

    超级智能也有积极面?

    人工智能专家强调,人工智能的未来未必一片黯淡。米切尔指出,研发高能力人工智能有着明确的积极意义。

    “我们已经在科学突破中看到了这一点……比如利用人工智能进行天气预报的新方法、药物研发的新途径,”她对哥伦比亚广播公司新闻网表示。

    不过,米切尔说,人工智能公司训练模型的方式,未必与有利于人类的目标相一致。

    目前的重点是打造能够相互沟通的多智能体系统,她补充道:“我们尚不清楚,这是否就是我们在所需应用场景中真正需要的技术。”

    部分议员已对人工智能带来的风险表示担忧,佛蒙特州独立参议员伯尼·桑德斯和得克萨斯州民主党众议员格雷格·卡萨尔于本月早些时候宣布,计划提出《禁止人工超级智能法案》。

    “大型人工智能公司的高管公开承认,他们并不完全了解这项技术,也无法阻止其脱离掌控,”桑德斯在9月3日的声明中说道,“社会任由他们继续推进,让这些产品变得更加先进,这是极不负责任的。”

    Alain Sherter 编辑

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/ex-anthropic-researcher-says-he-believes-out-of-control-ai-development-could-kill-us-all/

    Humans are “close to being outsmarted” by superintelligence, AI expert says

    2026-09-09T15:32:39-0400 / CBS News

    By

    September 9, 2026 / 3:32 PM EDT / CBS News

    A troubling warning from a former researcher at AI company Anthropic is drawing attention to “superintelligence” — technology that could outperform humans at every cognitive task.

    In a Sept. 8 social media thread announcing his resignation, the researcher Jacob Coxon accused Anthropic and rival OpenAI of “gambling with our lives” by pursuing superintelligence. In a related post on X, Anthropic lead researcher Evan Hubinger said there was more than a 10% chance that AI “could kill all humans” within the next decade.

    The warnings raise questions about what superintelligence is, how close companies are to developing such technological capabilities, and why some experts believe it could threaten jobs, national security and even humanity itself.

    Superintelligence refers to artificial intelligence that “can significantly outperform all humans on essentially all cognitive tasks,” according to a petition to halt superintelligence development from the nonprofit Future of Life Institute, which has garnered signatures from the likes of noted computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton, who is known as the “Godfather of AI.”

    “Imagine, for example, some AI or massive cluster of AIs that together are smarter than all of humanity together, than all 8 billion of us,” Max Tegmark, a professor at MIT who specializes in AI research, told CBS News. “That would certainly count.”

    Researchers also express concern that superintelligent AIs would be controlled by only a few companies, giving them enormous power and amplifying the risks of misuse.

    “We’re getting so close to being outsmarted”

    To be sure, the idea that AI could eventually match or exceed human intelligence isn’t new — and it remains hypothetical. For example, British mathematician I.J. Good wrote about the creation of an “ultraintelligent machine” in the 1960s, defining it as something that can “surpass all the intellectual activities of any man, however clever.”

    AI company executives have also openly acknowledged the risks surrounding the technology, including the danger AI could pose to humanity as a whole, as Coxon and Hubinger warned.

    “What’s new is the fact that we’re getting so close to being outsmarted,” Tegmark said.

    Although superintelligence hasn’t been achieved, AI agents today are already proving capable of operating autonomously and collaboratively. That includes acting in ways that appear designed to evade detection, as shown by the recent incident in which an OpenAI-tested AI model went rogue and hacked the AI company Hugging Face.

    Fear of losing control

    The fundamental threat posed by superintelligent AI is that the tools become increasingly difficult for people to control, experts told CBS News.

    “They can’t even align or control their AIs today, and the AIs of the future will be much smarter and harder to understand,” wrote Daniel Kokotajlo, a former OpenAI researcher who now leads the AI Futures Project, in a Sept. 8 social media post. “Even if they succeed, they will then have created the most intense concentration of power in human history — a new artificial species of superintelligences obedient to the commands and values of a tiny handful of people.”

    He added, “This situation is insane and must not be allowed to continue.”

    With AI development moving at warp speed, Tegmark agreed that humans could lose their grip on the technology.

    “If we just allow a completely unfettered race to build billions of superintelligent robots, then I think the probability is way above 50% that we’re going to lose control of this in the next few decades,” he told CBS News.

    When could superintelligence emerge?

    It’s a moving target and depends on who you ask. But the AI Futures Project estimates that superintelligent tech could emerge within the next 1 to 10 years, the group wrote in a scenario examining the development of AI.

    “The industry has convinced itself that controlling superintelligent AI can be figured out on the fly, and thus has no remotely adequate plan,” the group wrote.

    Others think the development of superintelligence remains many years in the future.

    “AI systems of today are nowhere near matching or exceeding the general capabilities of humans,” said Melanie Mitchell, a professor at the Santa Fe Institute.

    Darrell West, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who focuses on technology and AI, said it will take years, if not decades, before AI can comprehensively match human-level skills. AI is improving, but people still have the upper hand in skills like multitasking, he said.

    While experts disagree on the timeline for developing superintelligence, they generally agree that a key breakthrough will come when AI can improve on its own without human intervention — a concept AI researchers call “recursive self-improvement.”

    “AI that can learn independently and then act on that new knowledge — that’s what people should be paying attention to,” West said.

    Upsides to superintelligence?

    The future of AI isn’t necessarily bleak, AI experts emphasize. Mitchell noted that there are clear upsides to developing highly capable AI.

    “You know we’ve already seen that with scientific breakthroughs… new approaches to weather forecasting using AI, new approaches to drug design,” she told CBS News.

    However, the way AI companies train their models isn’t necessarily aligned with goals that could benefit humanity, Mitchell said.

    The focus has been on creating multi-agent systems that communicate together, she said, adding, “It’s not clear that that’s the kind of thing that we’re going to really need for the kinds of applications that we want.”

    Some lawmakers are expressing concern about the risks posed by AI, with Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, and Rep. Greg Casar, a Democrat from Texas, saying earlier this month they plan to introduce the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act.

    “The leaders of the major AI companies publicly acknowledge that they do not fully understand the technology and that it is escaping their control,” Sanders said in a Sept. 3 statement. “It is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced.”

    Edited by Alain Sherter

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/ex-anthropic-researcher-says-he-believes-out-of-control-ai-development-could-kill-us-all/

  • 美国上诉法院对限制堕胎药准入的诉求持怀疑态度


    2026-09-09T18:30:06.974Z / 路透社

    2024年4月9日摄于美国伊利诺伊州卡本代尔阿拉莫妇女诊所,图中是药物流产首剂药物米非司酮的包装盒。路透社/伊夫林·霍克斯坦/档案照片 购买授权,打开新标签页

    • 摘要
    • 法官质疑路易斯安那州是否具备起诉美国食品药品监督管理局相关规则的法律资格
    • 美国食药监局律师表示,米非司酮安全性审查仍在进行中
    • 路易斯安那州称该州每月约有1000例堕胎与邮寄的米非司酮有关

    9月9日(路透社)——美国一家上诉法院周三对共和党领导的路易斯安那州试图限制堕胎药米非司酮准入的诉求持怀疑态度,该州试图推翻一项2023年的规则,该规则允许全国范围内通过远程医疗开具该药物并通过邮寄方式配送。

    路易斯安那州副检察长本·阿吉纳加敦促位于新奥尔良的美国第五巡回上诉法院的三名法官组成的合议庭废除这项规则,辩称该规则破坏了该州和其他州在2022年美国最高法院推翻堕胎宪法权利后实施的堕胎禁令。

    开启您的晨间资讯:每日案卷通讯将最新法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱。点击此处订阅。

    “毫无疑问,由于米非司酮邮寄入境,路易斯安那州每月有1000例堕胎手术,”阿吉纳加说道。

    路易斯安那州去年起诉美国食品药品监督管理局,辩称该机构在民主党前总统乔·拜登政府期间通过2023年规则时,忽视了米非司酮相关的严重不良事件风险,包括败血症和出血,并取消了该药物必须在医疗机构当面配发的要求。

    再度提交第五巡回上诉法院

    该论点此前在今年早些时候打动了另一个第五巡回法院合议庭,暂时叫停了这项规则。但美国最高法院在5月解除了该禁令,允许该药物继续通过远程医疗开具处方并邮寄配送,美国巡回法官斯蒂芬·希金森多次提及这一事实。

    这位法官指出,他所在的法院是美国最保守的法院之一,2024年也曾被最高法院推翻,当时最高法院一致驳回了反堕胎团体和医生试图放宽该药物准入的FDA监管规定的另一项诉求。

    他和民主党总统任命的同僚、美国巡回法官达纳·道格拉斯都质疑路易斯安那州是否具备起诉FDA行动的法律资格,称该州无法证明本州发生的堕胎是因为2023年的规则,而非其他因素。

    “有太多独立的相关方,无法认定正是政府的安全评估导致了该州每月1000例堕胎,”希金森说道。

    如果合议庭作出不利于路易斯安那州的裁决,该州可以向最高法院上诉,或是请求由共和党任命者占绝对多数的第五巡回法院全体法官重新审理此案,这是针对该监管规定的几起待审案件之一。

    限制米非司酮的准入——包括通过外州医疗服务提供者进行远程医疗问诊获取该药物——一直是实施堕胎禁令的共和党领导州的首要议题。

    自最高法院作出裁决以来,美国近一半的州已禁止或严格限制堕胎,导致药物流产数量激增,药物流产由米非司酮和米索前列醇两种药物组成。

    根据堕胎权利倡导组织古特马赫研究所的数据,药物流产占美国堕胎手术的60%以上。

    美国地区法官戴维·约瑟夫于4月暂停了此案,等待唐纳德·特朗普政府对米非司酮的安全性进行审查。

    堕胎权利倡导者表示,特朗普政府的审查是出于政治动机且毫无必要。FDA于2000年批准米非司酮,称该药物已被数百万美国女性使用,安全有效,并表示其定期审查未发现任何新的安全隐患。

    FDA审查仍在进行中

    美国司法部律师丹尼尔·威尼克表示,审查仍在进行中。他说他“不知道”FDA最终可能采取何种行动,但此事应留给该机构自行决定。

    “我们在本案中的立场的核心是,在对米非司酮的持续审议中,FDA的职责是解决所有这些问题,”他说道。

    该第五巡回法院合议庭唯一的共和党任命者、美国巡回法官普里西拉·里奇曼多次询问女性因该药物急诊入院的频率,以及“如果女性当面就医,其中有多少并发症本可以避免”。

    但生产米非司酮的制药企业GenBioPro和Danco Laboratories的律师称该药物安全,并辩称FDA在2023年已充分评估了该药物的风险。

    “FDA的决定有充分依据,”GenBioPro的律师约翰·埃尔伍德说道。

    内特·雷蒙德在波士顿报道,亚历克西亚·加拉姆法尔维和比尔·伯克罗特编辑

    我们的标准:汤森路透信托原则,打开新标签页

    内特·雷蒙德报道联邦司法系统和诉讼案件。您可以通过nate.raymond@thomsonreuters.com联系他。

    US appeals court skeptical of bid to curtail abortion pill access

    2026-09-09T18:30:06.974Z / Reuters

    Boxes of Mifepristone, the first pill in a medical abortion, are seen at Alamo Women’s Clinic in Carbondale, Illinois, U.S., April 9, 2024. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    • Summary
    • Judges question whether Louisiana has legal standing to challenge FDA rule
    • Lawyer for FDA says review of mifepristone safety remains ongoing
    • Louisiana claims about 1,000 abortions a month stem from mailed mifepristone

    Sept 9 (Reuters) – A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday appeared skeptical of a bid by the Republican-led state of Louisiana to curtail access to the abortion drug ​mifepristone by blocking a 2023 rule that has allowed the medication to be prescribed via telemedicine and dispensed by mail nationwide.

    Louisiana Solicitor General Ben ‌Aguinaga urged a three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to strike down the rule, arguing it undermines abortion bans implemented by his state and others after the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022

    overturned the constitutional right, opens new tab
    to the procedure.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    “There’s no dispute that Louisiana is experiencing 1,000 abortions a month due to mifepristone mailed into the state,” Aguinaga said.

    Louisiana sued the U.S. Food and ​Drug Administration last year, arguing the agency ignored the risks of serious adverse events associated with mifepristone, including sepsis and hemorrhaging, when it adopted the 2023 ​rule during former Democratic President Joe Biden’s administration and removed a requirement that the drug be dispensed in person at a medical ⁠facility.

    BACK BEFORE THE 5TH CIRCUIT

    That argument previously swayed another 5th Circuit panel earlier this year to temporarily block the rule. But the Supreme Court in May lifted that order, allowing ​the drug to continue to be prescribed through telemedicine and dispensed by mail, a fact that U.S. Circuit Judge Stephen Higginson noted repeatedly.

    The judge noted that his court, one of ​the most conservative in the nation, had previously also been reversed by the Supreme Court in 2024 when it unanimously rejected a different bid by anti-abortion groups and doctors to roll back FDA regulations that had eased access to the drug.

    Both he and U.S. Circuit Judge Dana Douglas, a fellow appointee of a Democratic president, questioned whether Louisiana even had legal standing to sue over the FDA’s action, ​saying it could not establish that the abortions occurring in the state were because of the 2023 rule as opposed to other factors.

    “There are too many independent actors to ​say that actually the government’s assessment of safety is what’s causing your 1,000 abortions a month,” Higginson said.

    Should the panel rule against Louisiana, the state could either appeal to the Supreme Court ‌or ask ⁠the full 5th Circuit, which has a supermajority of Republican appointees, to reconsider the case, one of several pending challenging the regulation.

    Restricting access to mifepristone, including its availability through telehealth appointments with out-of-state providers, has been a top priority for Republican-led states that implemented abortion bans.

    Nearly half of U.S. states have banned or severely restricted abortion since the Supreme Court’s ruling, leading to a surge in medication abortion, a two-drug regimen consisting of mifepristone followed by misoprostol.

    Medication abortion accounts for more than 60% of U.S. abortions, according to data from ​the Guttmacher Institute, an abortion rights advocacy group.

    U.S. ​District Judge David Joseph in April ⁠paused the case pending a review by President Donald Trump’s administration of the safety of mifepristone.

    Abortion rights advocates have said the Trump administration’s review is politically motivated and unnecessary. The FDA, which approved mifepristone in 2000, calls the drug that has been used by millions of ​American women safe and effective, saying its periodic reviews have not identified any new safety concerns.

    FDA REVIEW ONGOING

    U.S. Department of Justice ​attorney Daniel Winik said ⁠that review remains ongoing. He said he had “no idea” what action the FDA may ultimately take but that the matter should be left to the agency to decide.

    “The whole point of our position in this case is that it’s the FDA’s job in the ongoing consideration of mifepristone to address all of these issues,” he said.

    The 5th Circuit panel’s only Republican appointee, ⁠U.S. Circuit Judge ​Priscilla Richman, asked repeatedly about the extent to which women were being admitted to emergency rooms more ​frequently and “how many of those complications would not have occurred had the woman seen a physician in person.”

    But lawyers for the drugmakers GenBioPro and Danco Laboratories, which manufacture mifepristone, called the drug safe and argued the ​FDA in 2023 adequately assessed the drug’s risks.

    “The FDA’s decision was richly supported,” GenBioPro lawyer John Elwood said.

    Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Bill Berkrot

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

    Nate Raymond reports on the federal judiciary and litigation. He can be reached at nate.raymond@thomsonreuters.com.

  • 两党议员联手成立国会核心小组 打击高校反犹主义


    2026年9月9日 美国东部时间下午1:29 / 福克斯新闻

    犹太民主党众议员乔希·戈特海默与天主教共和党众议员伊莉斯·斯特凡尼克携手合作

    作者:亚历克斯·尼茨伯格 福克斯新闻

    您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章播报!

    纽约州共和党众议员伊莉斯·斯特凡尼克与新泽西州民主党众议员乔希·戈特海默即将成立一个国会联盟,旨在打击高等教育机构中的反犹主义。

    据两位议员办公室发布的新闻稿称,这个“打击校园反犹主义核心小组”将为议员们提供两党合作渠道,以“协调监督高等院校应对反犹主义的方式”。

    新闻稿指出,该核心小组将“敦促各院校保护犹太学生、教职员工,并执行其自身的反骚扰和反歧视政策”,“推动并跟踪旨在打击校园反犹主义和BDS驱动的歧视行为的联邦立法”,同时“表彰那些举措得当的院校,并在全美校园分享最佳实践”。

    反诽谤联盟警告:校园反犹主义不仅限于学生抗议 已蔓延至课堂

    image

    尽管戈特海默是犹太裔民主党人,斯特凡尼克是天主教共和党人,但两位议员都对反犹主义问题表示担忧。

    “自10月7日以来,太多校园里的犹太学生遭到骚扰、恐吓,感觉自己在自己的学校里像陌生人一样,”戈特海默说道,他指的是2023年哈马斯恐怖分子对以色列的袭击。

    特朗普表态支持基督教团体帮助加拿大犹太人逃离反犹主义的计划

    image

    “这就是为什么伊莉斯和我联手成立这个核心小组,以追究大学的责任,支持那些举措得当的学校,比如范德堡大学,并确保每个犹太孩子都能在不受歧视或暴力威胁的情况下度过大学生活,”他补充道。

    曾撰写《有毒的常春藤》一书的斯特凡尼克指出,她“一直自豪地在国会中带头打击我国高校的反犹主义和反美国主义”。

    皮尔斯·摩根痛斥常春藤盟校学生拒绝“为犹太人工作”是“公然”反犹主义

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6402433141112

    斯特凡尼克表示:“戈特海默一直是我在这个关键问题上合作的主要伙伴和立法者。我们致力于为下一代守护美国高等教育。”

    福克斯新闻的凯利·费尔斯对本文亦有贡献。

    亚历克斯·尼茨伯格是福克斯新闻数字频道撰稿人。

    Bipartisan duo launches congressional caucus to confront antisemitism at colleges

    September 9, 2026 1:29pm EDT / Fox News

    Rep Josh Gottheimer, a Jewish Democrat, is joining forces with Rep Elise Stefanik, a Catholic Republican

    By Alex Nitzberg Fox News

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Reps. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y. and Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., are launching a congressional coalition to target antisemitism at institutions of higher education.

    The Combating Antisemitism on College Campuses Caucus will provide a bipartisan avenue for lawmakers to “coordinate oversight of how” schools of higher learning react to antisemitism, according to press releases issued by the lawmakers’ offices.

    The caucus will “press institutions to protect Jewish students, faculty, and staff, and to enforce their own anti-harassment and anti-discrimination policies,” “advance and track federal legislation targeting campus antisemitism and BDS-driven discrimination,” and “spotlight schools that are getting it right and share best practices across campuses nationwide,” the releases note.

    CAMPUS ANTISEMITISM EXTENDS BEYOND STUDENT PROTESTS AND INTO CLASSROOMS, ADL WARNS

    Rep. Elise Stefanik and Rep. Josh Gottheimer.(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images; Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    While Gottheimer is a Jewish Democrat and Stefanik is a Catholic Republican, both lawmakers are concerned about the problem of antisemitism.

    “Since October 7th, Jewish students on too many campuses have been harassed, intimidated, and made to feel like strangers in their own school,” Gottheimer said, referring to the 2023 attack by Hamas terrorists in Israel.

    TRUMP INDICATES SUPPORT FOR CHRISTIAN-BACKED PLAN TO HELP CANADIAN JEWS ESCAPE ANTISEMITISM

    Rep. Elise Stefanik speaks at Faith and Freedom Coalitionâs Road to Majority Conference in Washington, D.C., on June 26, 2026.(Kyle Mazza/Anadolu via Getty Images)

    “That’s why Elise and I are teaming up to launch this caucus to hold universities accountable, back up the schools getting it right, like Vanderbilt, and make sure every Jewish kid can have a college experience without fear of discrimination or violence,” he noted.

    Stefanik, the author of the book “Poisoned Ivies,” noted that she has “been proud to be the leader in Congress on combatting antisemitism and anti-Americanism at our colleges and universities.”

    PIERS MORGAN EVISCERATES IVY LEAGUE STUDENT WHO REFUSED TO WORK ‘FOR A JEW’ AS ‘BRAZENLY’ ANTISEMITIC

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6402433141112

    Gottheimer “has been a leading partner and legislator with whom I have worked on this critical issue,” Stefanik noted. “We are committed to saving American higher education for the next generation.”

    Fox News’ Kelly Phares contributed to this report.

    Alex Nitzberg is a writer for Fox News Digital.

  • “我仍在倡导冷静各方达成共识”:处境艰难的密歇根州共和党国会议员希望加美贸易战出现缓和


    2026-09-09 下午1:29 美东夏令时 / CNN政治频道

    凯西·亨特
    凯西·哈特 撰稿,CNN
    发布于2026年9月10日周三下午1:29 美东夏令时

    视频广告反馈

    “我仍在倡导冷静各方达成共识”:处境艰难的密歇根州共和党国会议员希望加美贸易战出现缓和

    内幕政治

    共和党众议员汤姆·巴雷特正在一个摇摆选区争取连任,该州是美国经济与加拿大联系最紧密的州之一。尽管如此,他认为特朗普总统不断升级的对加贸易战仍存在一些积极面,即便他希望双方各做出一点让步,以打破两国间的僵持局面。巴雷特表示:“我希望我们能达成与加拿大互利的贸易安排。我仍然对实现这一目标抱有希望,这一直是我公开和私下都在倡导的立场。”

    ‘I’m still advocating for cooler heads to prevail’: Vulnerable Michigan GOP congressman hopes for thaw in Canada trade war

    2026-09-09 1:29 PM EDT / CNN Politics

    Kasie Hunt

    By Kasie Hunt, CNN

    Published 1:29 PM EDT, Wed September 10, 2026

    Video Ad Feedback

    ‘I’m still advocating for cooler heads to prevail’: Vulnerable Michigan GOP congressman hopes for thaw in Canada trade war

    Inside Politics

    GOP Rep. Tom Barrett is running for reelection in a purple district in one of the states whose economy is most intertwined with Canada. Still, he thinks there are some positives to President Trump’s escalating trade war with Canada even if he hopes a little give on either side could thaw the freeze between the two sides. “I want to see us get to a point where we can have mutually beneficial trade arrangements with Canada. I’m still hopeful that we can get there, but that has been my advocacy both publicly and behind the scenes,” Barrett said.

  • 卡塔尔捐赠的空军一号在特朗普前往共和党全国代表大会前紧急滑梯展开


    2026-09-09 下午2:55 美东时间 / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:亚历杭德拉·哈拉米略

    发布于 2026年9月9日 下午2:55 美东时间

    唐纳德·特朗普 航空旅行 安全 航空新闻

    周三,马里兰州安德鲁斯联合基地的空军一号紧急滑梯被展开。

    埃文·武奇/路透社

    一架新型总统专机出现疑似故障,导致总统唐纳德·特朗普周三前往达拉斯参加共和党全国代表大会的行程延误,原因是该机一侧的紧急滑梯意外展开。

    特朗普在停机坪上对记者表示,滑梯展开是有意为之。
    “他们当时正在对这个应急滑梯做检查,你懂的,我想大概需要15分钟,”特朗普在登上这架卡塔尔捐赠的专机前对记者说道。

    特朗普乘坐海军陆战队一号直升机于美东时间下午2:02抵达安德鲁斯联合基地。几乎与此同时,有人看到这架总统此前多次称赞优于旧版空军一号的新型专机的紧急滑梯已经展开。

    特朗普在海军陆战队一号直升机上停留了20多分钟,等待停机坪上的状况得到处理。不久后,一架涂装为浅蓝色的旧版空军一号停靠在新专机后方,机组人员被告知这架旧飞机将作为当日的备用专机。

    下午2:24,海军陆战队一号的舷梯放下,总统走下直升机准备登上新专机。

    当被问及是否知晓此次检查的原因以及是否存在安全隐患时,特朗普表示:“我猜他们已经把滑梯展开了,他们想要确保所有设备都能完美运行。”

    当被问及是否对飞行安全有信心时,特朗普回应道:“是的,我有信心,否则我不会登上这架飞机。”

    当被要求提供更多关于故障原因的信息时,白宫发言人引用了特朗普的上述发言作为回应。

    Emergency slide deploys on Qatari-gifted Air Force One before Trump departs for GOP convention

    2026-09-09 2:55 PM ET / CNN

    By Alejandra Jaramillo

    PUBLISHED Sep 9, 2026, 2:55 PM ET

    Donald Trump Air travel safety Aviation news

    The emergency slide of Air Force One is seen deployed at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on Wednesday.

    Evan Vucci/Reuters

    An apparent issue with a new presidential aircraft delayed President Donald Trump’s departure for his GOP convention in Dallas on Wednesday, after an emergency slide deployed on the far side of the plane.

    Talking to reporters on the tarmac, Trump suggested the deployment of the slide was intentional.

    “They were doing a check on the slide, you know, in the emergency. So, I think it takes about 15 minutes,” Trump told reporters before boarding the Qatari-gifted jet.

    Trump landed at Joint Base Andrews aboard Marine One at 2:02 pm ET. Around the same time, the emergency slide was seen extended from the new plane that the president has often touted as being superior to the old presidential plane.

    Trump remained aboard Marine One for more than 20 minutes as the situation unfolded on the tarmac. The older Air Force One with a light blue paint job soon pulled up and parked behind the new aircraft, and crews were told the older plane was serving as Wednesday’s backup.

    At 2:24 p.m., the stairs of Marine One were extended, and the president stepped off to board the new jet.

    Asked whether he knew the reason for the inspection and whether there was a security concern, Trump said, “I guess they’ve already put it up. They want to make sure everything works perfectly.”

    When asked if he was confident that it was safe to fly, Trump responded, “Yeah, I am, or I wouldn’t be on it.”

    A White House spokesperson referred to Trump’s comments when asked for more information about what caused the issue.

  • 缅因州与密歇根州参议院选举势均力敌,CNN民调发现


    2026-09-09T16:00:29.391Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    据SSRS所做的最新CNN民调显示,缅因州和密歇根州这两场关键的参议院竞选均呈现胶着态势,暂无明确领先者。但两州选民看待候选人选择的视角却截然不同。

    在缅因州,这场竞选的核心更多在于潜在选民对现任参议员苏珊·柯林斯以及总统唐纳德·特朗普的普遍负面看法,而非他们对新晋民主党候选人特洛伊·杰克逊的印象。在格雷厄姆·普特纳因被指控性侵(普特纳本人否认指控)退选后,杰克逊接替其参选,许多选民目前仍在了解他。

    密歇根州选民则更关注候选人的政策立场,此次为开放式席位竞选,民主党候选人阿卜杜勒·赛义德是本届选举中最具进步性的候选人之一,他的对手是前共和党国会议员迈克·罗杰斯。

    50%的选民认为赛义德的政策过于自由化,而认为罗杰斯过于保守的选民占比为42%。约三分之二的受访者——包括两位候选人的绝大多数支持者——都认为赛义德会在华盛顿大力推动变革,而仅有20%的人持相同看法,认为罗杰斯会这么做。

    不过,柯林斯和罗杰斯都面临着由经济担忧以及对特朗普的负面情绪所带来的政治逆风。两州的潜在选民均表示,他们更希望在今年秋季的中期选举后,由民主党掌控参议院。

    特朗普在缅因州和密歇根州都极不受欢迎,两州约三分之二的选民不认可他的总统任期表现。表示对国家现状感到不满或愤怒的选民比例,远远高于表示满意或热情的选民比例。

    经济与生活成本无疑是两州的首要议题,潜在选民以远超二比一的比例表示,与两年前相比,他们的经济状况更糟了。大多数选民还对加拿大商品加征关税的政策持怀疑态度:不到15%的人认为加征关税是件好事,两州——均与加拿大接壤——约三分之二的选民对关税持负面看法。

    即便在潜在选民中,两州的民主党选民的投票积极性也远高于共和党选民,这与今年中期选举民调中全国范围内呈现的趋势一致。在积极性最高的选民中,民主党在两州均遥遥领先。

    在密歇根州,潜在选民的支持率大致相当:赛义德获得47%的支持,罗杰斯为44%,这一差距落在了民调的抽样误差范围内。罗杰斯基本团结了该州的共和党潜在选民:97%的人支持他。在民主党选民中,90%支持赛义德,仅有3%的人支持罗杰斯。无党派选民倾向于赛义德,支持率为48%比32%,约五分之一的人不支持任何一位候选人。

    总体而言,约四分之一的密歇根州潜在选民尚未明确决定支持哪位参议院候选人。这一比例在黑人选民和35岁以下选民中达到40%,在可能投票的无党派选民中为36%。

    大多数已经做出选择的选民表示,他们的投票更多是支持自己心仪的候选人,而非反对对手,但罗杰斯的支持者中存在更多的负面情绪。约40%支持罗杰斯的选民表示,他们的投票是为了反对赛义德,而支持赛义德的选民中,仅有31%表示他们的投票是为了反对罗杰斯。

    近一半的密歇根州潜在选民表示,候选人的政策立场是他们决定投票给谁的首要因素,另有31%的人认为参议院的党派控制权是首要考量,22%的人则将候选人的品格和经验作为首要依据。

    尽管赛义德在以色列问题上的立场曾是民主党初选的争议点,但全州仅有3%的潜在选民表示,美国对以色列的政策是决定他们投票的首要议题。大多数选民(54%)认为美国在帮助以色列方面做得太多。

    赛义德的支持群体以年轻选民为主。他获得了45岁以下潜在选民的多数支持,但在45岁及以上选民中落后。他在女性选民中领先9个百分点,而男性选民的支持率则更为平均:罗杰斯获得48%,赛义德为44%。该州的白人选民以微弱优势支持罗杰斯,而黑人选民则广泛支持赛义德,支持率为77%比10%,约14%的人不支持任何一位候选人。

    赛义德在初选时的对手、众议员黑利·史蒂文斯在8月的初选中,在黑人人口较多的县表现最佳。新民调显示,许多黑人选民尚未对赛义德形成看法:66%的人对他持正面看法,2%持负面看法,32%的人尚未确定。

    约五分之一的受访者表示对两位候选人都没有看法。赛义德的支持率与反对率持平,均为40%。对罗杰斯的看法则偏向负面:42%的人持不认可态度,35%的人持认可态度。

    在接替民主党州长格蕾琴·惠特默的竞选中,现任州务卿乔斯林·本森以50%比41%领先共和党众议员约翰·詹姆斯。

    全国政治塑造缅因州参议院竞选

    在缅因州,目前有48%的潜在选民支持杰克逊,45%支持柯林斯。这一差距处于民调的抽样误差范围内,且该州的州长竞选竞争更为激烈:民主党候选人汉娜·平格里以52%比39%领先共和党候选人鲍比·查尔斯。

    约18%的潜在选民表示,他们可能会改变对参议院选举支持对象的想法,或者尚未选定候选人。

    杰克逊的支持者与两州其他受访选民的不同之处在于,他们更关注这场竞选对全国的影响。53%的多数人认为,参议院的党派控制权是他们投票的首要考量因素,近一半的人将美国民主的现状列为首要议题。

    约七成杰克逊的支持者表示,他们投票更多是出于反对柯林斯,而非支持杰克逊本人,而仅有四分之一的柯林斯支持者表示,他们的投票动机是反对杰克逊。

    这在一定程度上可能反映出柯林斯的知名度更高。尽管总体而言,潜在选民对两位候选人的印象都偏向负面,但近四分之一的人尚未对杰克逊形成看法,而仅有8%的人未对柯林斯形成意见。

    尽管两党的缅因州选民大多表示对此次竞选的候选人选择感到满意,但近四成的民主党倾向选民表示不满,而共和党倾向选民中这一比例约为四分之一。

    缅因州选民认为杰克逊过于自由化和认为柯林斯过于保守的比例大致相当,且大多数人都不认可这两种定性。但杰克逊被视为更有可能在华盛顿推动变革,42%的人表示,如果当选,他会大力推动变革,而仅有14%的人认为柯林斯若获得连任也会这么做。

    这是柯林斯自最高法院推翻罗伊诉韦德案以来首次寻求连任,而该裁决的通过部分得益于她对布雷特·卡瓦诺大法官提名的支持。四年后的今天,近三分之二的缅因州选民表示对2022年的多布斯裁决持负面看法,其中约一半的人表示这让他们感到愤怒。那些仍然感到愤怒的选民大多支持杰克逊,而情绪没那么强烈的选民则大多支持柯林斯。

    CNN对缅因州和密歇根州潜在选民的民调于2026年8月31日至9月6日通过线上和电话方式开展。受访者从注册选民名单和基于概率的调研面板中随机抽取。潜在选民的结果基于所有受访注册选民,根据他们在今年选举中的预期投票可能性进行加权。缅因州的880名潜在选民的抽样误差幅度为正负3.7个百分点;密歇根州的843名潜在选民的抽样误差幅度为4.1个百分点。

    Maine and Michigan Senate races are neck and neck, CNN polls find

    2026-09-09T16:00:29.391Z / CNN

    The critical Senate contests in both Maine and Michigan feature tight races with no clear leader, according to new CNN polls conducted by SSRS. But voters in the two states see their choices through two very different lenses.

    In Maine, the race centers more on likely voters’ broadly negative views of incumbent Sen. Susan Collins and President Donald Trump than on their impressions of the late-breaking Democratic nominee, Troy Jackson. Many voters are still getting to know Jackson after he replaced Graham Platner following allegations of sexual assault that Platner has denied.

    Michigan voters are more focused on the candidates’ issue positions amid an open-seat campaign featuring one of the most progressive Democratic candidates of this cycle in Abdul El-Sayed against former GOP congressman Mike Rogers.

    Fifty percent of voters say El-Sayed’s positions are too liberal, compared with 42% who say that Rogers is too conservative. Roughly two-thirds – including broad majorities of both candidates’ supporters – think El-Sayed would try to change things a lot in Washington, while just 20% say the same of Rogers.

    But both Collins and Rogers face political headwinds driven by economic concerns and negativity toward Trump. The people most likely to vote in each state say that they would prefer to see Democrats win control of the Senate after this fall’s midterm elections.

    Trump is deeply unpopular in both Maine and Michigan, with about two-thirds of voters in each state disapproving of his performance as president. The share of voters who say they are dissatisfied or angry with the way things are going in the country far outpaces the share who are satisfied or enthusiastic.

    The economy and cost of living is far and away the top issue in each state, and by a better than two-to-one margin, likely voters say they are worse off rather than better off compared with two years ago. Most also view the increased tariffs on Canadian goods with skepticism: less than 15% think the tariffs are a good thing and about two-thirds in each state – both of which border Canada – view the tariffs negatively.

    Even among likely voters, Democrats in both states are far more motivated to vote than their Republican counterparts, mirroring a trend seen nationwide in this year’s midterm polling. Among the most motivated voters, Democrats lead handily in both states.

    In Michigan, likely voters split about evenly between El-Sayed at 47% and Rogers at 44%, a margin that lands within the poll’s margin of sampling error. Rogers has broadly unified Republican likely voters in the state: 97% back him. Among Democrats, 90% support El-Sayed, while just 3% say they back Rogers. Independents break toward El-Sayed, 48% to 32%, with about one in five not supporting either candidate.

    About a quarter of Michigan likely voters overall haven’t yet firmly decided who they will support in the race for Senate. That number hits 40% among Black voters and voters younger than 35, and it stands at 36% among independents who are likely to vote.

    Most voters who have picked a side say their vote is more in favor of their chosen candidate than against his opponent, but there is more negative sentiment among Rogers’ backers. About 4 in 10 who support Rogers say their vote is against El-Sayed while 31% backing El-Sayed say their vote is an anti-Rogers one.

    Nearly half of Michigan likely voters say that the candidate’s positions on the issues are their top factor in deciding whom to support, while fewer, 31%, say that partisan control of the Senate is their top consideration and 22% cite the candidates’ character and experience.

    Although El-Sayed’s positions on Israel were a point of contention in the Democratic primary, a scant 3% of likely voters statewide say US policy toward Israel is the top issue in deciding their vote. Most, 54%, say the US is doing too much to help Israel.

    El-Sayed’s backing is strongest among younger voters. He carries a majority of likely voters younger than 45 while trailing among those 45 and older. He holds a 9-point lead among women while men split more evenly, 48% for Rogers to 44% for El-Sayed. White voters in the state break narrowly in Rogers’ favor, while Black voters broadly back El-Sayed, 77% to 10%, with about 14% opting for neither.

    El-Sayed’s primary opponent, Rep. Haley Stevens, performed strongest in the August primary in counties with significant Black populations. The new poll suggests many Black voters haven’t yet formed opinions on El-Sayed: 66% say they have a favorable view, 2% an unfavorable one, and 32% aren’t sure yet.

    Roughly one in five say they don’t have an opinion of each candidate. El-Sayed’s favorability is an even split, 40% on each side. Views of Rogers break negative, 42% unfavorable to 35% favorable.

    In the race to replace Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, current Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson leads the Republican Rep. John James 50% to 41%.

    National politics shape the Maine Senate race

    In Maine, 48% of likely voters are currently backing Jackson with 45% supporting Collins. That’s inside the survey’s margin of sampling error and a considerably tighter race than the state’s gubernatorial contest, where Democrat Hannah Pingree leads Republican Bobby Charles, 52% to 39%.

    Roughly 18% of likely voters say they could change their mind about whom they support for Senate, or that they haven’t yet picked a candidate.

    Jackson’s supporters stand out from other voters in either state polled for their close focus on the national implications of the race. A 53% majority say that party control of the Senate is the top consideration in their vote, and nearly half cite the state of US democracy as their top issue.

    Roughly 7 in 10 of Jackson’s backers say they’d be casting their ballot more out of opposition to Collins than support for him, while only a quarter of Collins backers are motivated by their opposition to Jackson.

    That may in part reflect Collins’ status as a better-known quantity. While likely voters’ impressions of both candidates are negative on balance, nearly a quarter don’t yet have an opinion of Jackson, while just 8% haven’t formed an opinion on Collins.

    And while Maine voters in both parties largely say they’re satisfied with their choice of candidates in the race, nearly 4 in 10 Democratic-aligned voters, compared with about a quarter of those who side with the GOP, say they’re unhappy.

    Maine voters are about equally likely to call Jackson too liberal and Collins too conservative – and most reject both characterizations. But Jackson is seen as relatively likely to shake things up in Washington, with 42% saying he’d try to change things a lot if elected, compared with just 14% who think Collins would do so if given another term.

    This is the first time Collins has stood for reelection since the Supreme Court overturned Roe vs. Wade, an outcome owing in part to her support for the confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Four years later, almost two-thirds of Maine voters say they feel negatively about the 2022 Dobbs ruling, including about half saying it makes them feel angry. Those who remain angry are largely backing Jackson, while those who feel less strongly are largely behind Collins.

    The CNN polls of Maine and Michigan likely voters were conducted online and by phone August 31-September 6, 2026. Registered voters were randomly sampled from both registered voter lists and a probability-based panel. Results among likely voters include all registered voters in the poll weighted for their predicted likelihood of voting in this year’s election. Results among 880 likely voters in Maine have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.7 percentage points; it is 4.1 points among the 843 likely voters in Michigan.

  • 共和党议员批评福特与中国的商业关联


    2026-09-09 16:54:51 UTC / 路透社

    作者:大卫·谢泼德森

    2026年9月9日 世界协调时下午4:54 1小时前更新

    image
    2025年11月16日,美国密歇根州迪尔伯恩的全新福特全球总部外展示着蓝色福特椭圆形标志。路透社/丽贝卡·库克

    华盛顿9月9日路透电 — 在美国运输部长肖恩·达菲严厉批评美国第二大汽车制造商福特汽车公司后,国会共和党议员周三加入了对该公司与中国企业商业往来的批评行列。

    共和党参议员里克·斯科特称赞达菲“为福特与(中国共产党)企业的高风险关联敲响了警钟”。众议院中国问题特别委员会在X平台上以“福特所言与所行”为标题,发布了有关该公司的言论和媒体关于福特与中国企业商业往来的报道。

    订阅路透社汽车行业简报,及时了解推动全球汽车产业发展的最新新闻、趋势与创新。点击此处注册。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    达菲周二在致福特首席执行官吉姆·法利的一封信中表示,这家汽车制造商与中国电池制造商宁德时代(CATL)以及中国汽车制造商吉利和比亚迪的往来“引发了严重担忧”。

    他敦促福特切断与中国大型企业的联系。

    达菲表示,美国运输部对福特在密歇根州马歇尔的工厂依赖中国电池制造商宁德时代授权技术一事“深感震惊”,并指出宁德时代已被列入五角大楼认定的与中国军方有关联的企业名单。

    他还批评福特将林肯航海家的生产从中国转移至美国的计划推迟至2030年,称这将使福特在未来数年继续依赖中国制造业。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    众议院中国问题委员会主席、共和党众议员约翰·穆尔纳尔称赞达菲“揭露了福特对包括宁德时代和吉利在内的中国企业日益加深的依赖”。穆尔纳尔补充道:“福特应该与我国的盟友合作,而非我们的对手。”

    福特周三未立即置评,但在周二的一份声明中称达菲的“信是为博眼球而做出的愚蠢尝试”。该公司补充称,“当其他企业仍在进口中国电池时,福特正在投资在美国本土制造电池”,并表示“福特拥有这家工厂,掌控运营并雇佣员工”。

    美国总统唐纳德·特朗普将于本月晚些时候与中国国家主席习近平会晤。达菲此番言论正值国会推动收紧美国境内对中国汽车的禁令之际。

    blob:https://www.reuters.com/c41801de-145d-4c05-8b89-f1000d6a8a27

    达菲的这封信是在习特会前夕对中国发出的最新警告。周二,美国官员指责中国人工智能企业“开展具有侵略性的工业级蒸馏活动”。

    福特股价在午盘交易中下跌2%,至13.69美元。各大汽车制造商上周敦促国会在年底前通过这项禁令。

    中国驻华盛顿大使馆就达菲的信件回应称:“中美企业间的正常商业合作不应被政治化。我们敦促美方尊重市场经济规律和公平竞争原则。”

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    大卫·谢泼德森报道,富兰克林·保罗与安德里亚·里奇编辑

    Republican lawmakers criticize Ford business ties to China

    2026-09-09 16:54:51 UTC / Reuters

    By David Shepardson

    September 9, 2026 4:54 PM UTC Updated 1 hour ago

    The blue Ford oval logo is displayed on the new Ford World Headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan, U.S. November 16, 2025. REUTERS/Rebecca Cook

    WASHINGTON, Sept 9 (Reuters) – Republicans in Congress on Wednesday joined criticism of Ford Motor over its business ties to Chinese firms after Transportation Secretary Sean ​Duffy sharply criticized the No. 2 U.S. automaker.

    Republican Senator Rick Scott praised Duffy for “sounding the ‌alarm about Ford’s risky ties to (Chinese Communist Party) companies.” The House Select Committee on China posted on X comments from the company and media reports about Ford’s business dealings with Chinese firms under the title: “This is what Ford says vs. ​what it does.”

    Stay up to date with the latest news, trends and innovations that are driving the global automotive industry with the Reuters Auto File newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Duffy in a letter to Ford CEO Jim Farley sent on Tuesday said ​the automaker’s dealings with Chinese battery maker CATL and Chinese automakers Geely and BYD ⁠raised “profound concern.”

    He urged Ford to cut ties with major Chinese companies.

    Duffy said the transportation department ​was “deeply alarmed” by Ford’s reliance on licensed technology from Chinese battery manufacturer CATL at its plant in Marshall, ​Michigan, and noted that CATL is on the Pentagon’s list of companies accused of ties to China’s military.

    He also criticized Ford’s decision not to move production of the Lincoln Nautilus from China to the United States until 2030, as it ​leaves the company reliant on Chinese manufacturing for several more years.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Republican Representative John Moolenaar, the China committee ​chair, praised Duffy “for calling out Ford’s growing reliance on Chinese companies, including CATL and Geely.” Moolenaar added: “Ford should work with our ‌nation’s ⁠allies, not our adversaries.”

    Ford did not immediately comment Wednesday but in a statement Tuesday said Duffy’s “letter is a wrongheaded attempt to capture headlines.” The company added that “while others continue to import Chinese batteries, Ford is investing to build batteries here in America” and added that “Ford owns the plant, controls the operation and ​employs the workforce.”

    President ​Donald Trump is set ⁠to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping later this month. Duffy’s comments come as Congress is pushing to tighten a ban on Chinese vehicles in the ​United States.

    blob:https://www.reuters.com/c41801de-145d-4c05-8b89-f1000d6a8a27

    Duffy’s letter is the latest warning shot across China’s bow ahead ​of the Xi-Trump ⁠meeting. On Tuesday, U.S. officials accused Chinese AI companies of “aggressive, industrial-scale distillation activities.”

    Ford shares were down 2% in midday trading to $13.69. Major automakers last week urged Congress to pass the ban before the end of ⁠the year.

    ​The Chinese embassy in Washington responded to Duffy’s letter saying, “Normal ​business cooperation between Chinese and American enterprises should not be politicized. We urge the U.S. side to respect the laws of the ​market economy and the principle of fair competition.”

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Reporting by David Shepardson, Editing by Franklin Paul and Andrea Ricci

  • 密苏里州最高法院因加剧的重划选区斗争 以藐视法庭罪威胁州务卿


    2026年9月9日 美国东部时间下午1:52 / 福克斯新闻

    州务卿丹尼·霍斯金斯周四需出庭 解释为何无视禁止使用2025年选区地图的禁制令

    作者:路易·卡西阿诺,福克斯新闻

    福克斯新闻记者马克·梅雷迪思在《特别报道》节目中剖析了影响2026年中期选举竞选的关键事态发展,包括最高法院就密苏里州重划选区作出裁决引发的政治余波、国会控制权的争夺,以及两党在11月选举前加紧造势之际推动选民关注的议题。

    最新:你现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/0e6d4ed0-f64b-4017-b47b-f1fd910e08bf

    收听本文
    时长2分钟

    密苏里州最高法院周二暗示,正考虑就国会选区地图提案的升级争端,以藐视法庭罪起诉州务卿丹尼·霍斯金斯。

    共和党人霍斯金斯周二表示,他将继续使用去年重新划定的国会选区,尽管美国最高法院的一项裁决维持了州最高法院的命令,要求密苏里州改用原有的选区划分方案。

    “我期待在法庭上为自己辩护,”霍斯金斯在X平台的帖子中援引了美国宪法的最高条款。


    密苏里州总检察长提交请愿书 请求最高法院恢复特朗普支持的重划选区地图

    密苏里州最高法院叫停了新的重划选区地图,并下令于11月就是否保留该方案举行全州投票,此前共和党人主导了该州国会选区重新划分的工作。(美联社照片/大卫·A·利布)

    霍斯金斯必须于周四出庭,解释为何不应因指示选举官员使用2025年国会选区地图而被判藐视法庭,尽管有禁制令禁止使用该地图。

    上周,密苏里州最高法院裁定,由唐纳德·特朗普总统支持的地图不得使用,因为数千名选民签署请愿书,要求就该方案举行全民公投。


    最高法院在州法院选举地图裁决之争中重创弗吉尼亚州民主党人

    最高法院大法官布雷特·卡瓦诺拒绝批准霍斯金斯提出的紧急暂停令,维持了州最高法院下达的禁制令。

    然而,就在卡瓦诺宣布裁决后不久,特朗普任命的美国地区法官斯蒂芬·克拉克发布了一项临时限制令,禁止密苏里州使用除2025年新选区方案之外的任何地图。


    上诉法院推翻联邦法院裁决后 佐治亚州重划选区斗争再起

    密苏里州总检察长凯瑟琳·哈纳韦请求美国最高法院立即叫停州最高法院的裁决。(美联社照片/大卫·A·利布)

    新重划选区方案的反对者迅速提交通知,就克拉克的裁决向美国第八巡回上诉法院提起上诉。

    “一名联邦地区法官无权推翻密苏里州最高法院的裁决,”代表发起全民公投请愿书的组织“人民而非政客”的律师查克·哈特菲尔德说道。


    共和党全国委员会与全国共和党国会委员会提起诉讼 为密苏里州新国会选区地图辩护 对抗民主党质疑

    密苏里州总检察长凯瑟琳·哈纳韦表示,她准备遵守克拉克的命令,她认为该命令“要求该州使用”新的国会选区地图。

    “我们坚持认为,在初选和大选之间更换国会选区地图根本不可行,而且对密苏里州选民极不公平,”她在X平台上写道。


    最高法院关于投票权的重磅裁决 点燃南部各州重划选区之战

    这场冲突是共和党人在十年任期内重新划分国会选区以夺取美国众议院席位的更广泛全国性努力的一部分。

    密苏里州目前在美国众议院拥有6名共和党议员和2名民主党议员。新的重划选区方案将取消一个民主党席位,该席位目前由众议员伊曼纽尔·克利弗担任。

    路易·卡西阿诺是福克斯新闻数字频道的记者。新闻线索可发送至louis.casiano@fox.com。

    Missouri Supreme Court threatens secretary of state with contempt amid intensifying redistricting battle

    September 9, 2026 1:52pm EDT / Fox News

    Secretary of State Denny Hoskins must appear Thursday to explain why he defied an injunction barring the 2025 map

    By Louis Casiano, Fox News

    Fox News correspondent Mark Meredith has the latest on the key storylines shaping the race to the 2026 midterm elections, including the political fallout from the Supreme Court’s Missouri redistricting decision, the battle for control of Congress, and the issues driving voters as both parties intensify their push toward November on ‘Special Report.’

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/0e6d4ed0-f64b-4017-b47b-f1fd910e08bf

    Listen to this article

    2 min

    The Missouri Supreme Court signaled Tuesday that it was considering holding Secretary of State Denny Hoskins in contempt amid an escalating battle over proposed congressional maps.

    Hoskins, a Republican, said Tuesday that he would keep using the congressional districts redrawn last year, despite a U.S. Supreme Court decision that left standing a state Supreme Court order requiring Missouri to use its old districts instead.

    “I look forward to my day in court,” Hoskins said in a post on X that cited the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution.

    MISSOURI AG FILES PETITION ASKING SUPREME COURT TO REVIVE TRUMP-BACKED REDISTRICTING MAP

    Missouri’s high court blocked the new redistricting map and ordered a statewide vote in November on whether to keep it, amid efforts led by Republicans to redraw the state’s congressional map.(AP Photo/David A. Lieb)

    Hoskins must appear in court Thursday to explain why he shouldn’t be held in contempt for instructing election officials to use the 2025 congressional map despite an injunction barring its use.

    Last week, Missouri’s high court ruled that the map backed by President Donald Trump cannot be used because thousands of voters signed a petition demanding a statewide referendum on it.

    SUPREME COURT DEALS BLOW TO VIRGINIA DEMOCRATS IN FIGHT OVER STATE COURT ELECTION MAP RULING

    Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh declined to grant an emergency stay requested by Hoskins, leaving in place the injunction ordered by the state Supreme Court.

    However, shortly after Kavanaugh’s announcement, U.S. District Judge Stephen Clark, a Trump appointee, issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting Missouri from using any map other than the new 2025 districts.

    GEORGIA REDISTRICTING BATTLE REVIVED AFTER APPEALS COURT OVERTURNS FEDERAL COURT DECISION

    Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway asked the U.S. Supreme Court to halt the state high court’s decision immediately.(AP Photo/David A. Lieb)

    Opponents of the new redistricting plan quickly filed a notice to appeal Clark’s order to the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

    “An individual federal judge cannot overrule the Missouri Supreme Court,” said attorney Chuck Hatfield, who represents People Not Politicians, the group that sponsored the referendum petition.

    RNC AND NRCC FILE LAWSUIT DEFENDING MISSOURI’S NEW CONGRESSIONAL MAP AGAINST DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGES

    Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway said she was prepared to comply with Clark’s order, which she argued “binds the state to using” the new congressional districts.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “We maintain that changing the congressional map in between the primary and general elections is simply not feasible and profoundly unjust to Missouri voters,” she wrote on X.

    BLOCKBUSTER SUPREME COURT VOTING RIGHTS RULING IGNITES REDISTRICTING WAR ACROSS SOUTHERN STATES

    The conflict is part of a broader, nationwide effort by Republicans to redraw congressional districts mid-decade to gain U.S. House seats.

    Missouri currently has six Republicans and two Democrats in the U.S. House. The new redistricting plan would eliminate one Democratic seat, currently held by Rep. Emanuel Cleaver.

    Louis Casiano is a reporter for Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent to louis.casiano@fox.com.

  • 特朗普称伊朗战争将在中期选举后结束,油价将会下跌


    2026年9月9日 美国东部时间下午3:00 / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    亚当·坎克林 撰稿

    美国总统唐纳德·特朗普周三表示,他预计伊朗将在美国中期选举后放弃其战争行动——同时他也承认,美国油价在那之前不太可能下跌。

    在前往达拉斯参加共和党中期选举代表大会的途中对记者发表讲话时,特朗普声称伊朗会将战事拖延至11月,企图在政治上打击他。

    “我认为油价下跌需要比中期选举稍长一点的时间,”特朗普在谈到油价回落时说道。“他们不顾一切地想要影响选举,这样就能让一群软弱的人上台,对他们放任不管,让他们拥有核武器。”

    但他补充道,他认为伊朗已接近崩溃,会在“选举结束后立即”寻求结束冲突,从而推动油价下跌。

    “他们撑不下去了,”他说。


    美国总统唐纳德·特朗普于2026年9月9日在马里兰州安德鲁斯联合基地登上空军一号前对记者发表讲话。

    布伦丹·斯米亚洛夫斯基/法新社/盖蒂图片社

    特朗普此番表态之际,全球基准油价再度突破每桶100美元,近期伊朗境内战事升级进一步威胁到霍尔木兹海峡的原油运输。

    油价飙升可能会进一步推高美国的燃油成本,而燃油成本已成为中期选举前美国经济的一大痛点。

    特朗普此前多次坚称,战争结束后油价将大幅下跌,并驳斥了对政治影响的担忧,称美国人支持针对伊朗的全面攻势。

    “我认为向美国民众解释这件事非常简单,你只要说:‘你会让伊朗拥有核武器吗?’答案肯定是不会,”特朗普说道。

    Trump says Iran war will end after the midterms and gas prices will fall

    2026-09-09 3:00 PM ET / CNN

    By Adam Cancryn

    President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he expects Iran will abandon its war effort after the US midterm elections – and he conceded American gas prices are unlikely to fall before then.

    Speaking to reporters on his way to the GOP midterm convention in Dallas, Trump asserted that Iran would continue the war into November in an effort to damage him politically.

    “I think it’s going to take a little bit longer than the midterm,” Trump said of gas prices coming down. “They’re desperate to try and affect the election so that we can get a nice weak group of people in there and leave them alone and let them have their nuclear weapon.”

    But he added that he believes Iran is near collapse and that it would seek an end to the conflict “immediately after the election,” prompting oil prices to tumble downward.

    “They can’t hold out any longer,” he said.

    US President Donald Trump speaks to reporters before boarding Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on September 9, 2026.

    Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images

    Trump’s remarks come as the global benchmark oil price has topped $100 a barrel once again, driven by stepped-up fighting in Iran in recent days that has further jeopardized the flow of crude through the Strait of Hormuz.

    The surge in oil prices is likely to further increase fuel costs in the US, which have emerged as a key economic pain point ahead of the midterms.

    Trump has repeatedly insisted that oil prices will fall precipitously once the war is over, dismissing concerns about the political impact by insisting that Americans are supportive of the broader offensive against Iran.

    “I think it’s very easy to explain to America, all you have to do is say: ‘Will you let Iran have a nuclear weapon?’ And the answer is no,” Trump said.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2