中美峰会后高市与特朗普通话 重申同盟关系

2026年9月27日 22:39 / 联合早报 符祝慧 东京特派员

• 习近平结束访美次日，特朗普与高市早苗通话约20分钟，介绍中美峰会细节，双方重申日美紧密协作。 – 高市称一周内两次会晤体现同盟牢固性，并向特朗普表明“日美如今才是最值得信赖的盟友”。 – 中美峰会文件将两国描述为二战“盟友”，日本政府内部有观点认为这是特朗普迎合中国的口头支持。 – 日本舆论关注上述表述，《朝日新闻》评论认为修复中日关系已成为高市面临的重大外交挑战。

9月22日，日本首相高市早苗（左）在纽约出席联合国大会期间，与美国总统特朗普进行会晤。 （法新社）

中国国家主席习近平星期五（9月25日）结束对美国的国事访问后，美国总统特朗普次日就与日本首相高市早苗通电话。据高市说，特朗普向她介绍中美峰会的细节。这一密切的沟通节奏，与5月份在北京举行的中美峰会后如出一辙，那时特朗普是在回程的飞机上就与高市通话。

高市随后向媒体披露，此次通话历时约20分钟，美方向她作了“详细”通报。不过，高市没有公开细节，只强调：“我们主要围绕涉华的一系列议题交换意见，包括经济安全、经济形势及安全事务等，并重申日美间的紧密协作。”

针对在一周内先在纽约联合国大会期间会晤特朗普，随后两人又通电话，高市说：“（我们）一周内举行两次峰会，体现了日美同盟的牢固性。”

然而，这次中美峰会成果文件中提到“两国领导人回顾了中美作为盟友并肩作战、最终赢得二战胜利”的表述。高市在被问及如何看待这一描述时说：“鉴于这是外交交流，我不会透露会谈的具体细节。但我已（向特朗普）表明，‘日美如今才是最值得信赖的盟友’，双方也确认将共同努力，为地区和全球和平稳定做出贡献。”

日本舆论高度关注白宫将中美两国在二战期间描述为“盟友”的说法。据报道，日本政府内部有观点认为，这不过是特朗普为迎合中国的“口头支持”。不过，他们也对这一表述最终被写入正式文件感到吃惊。

《每日新闻》指出，中国批评日本是“新型军国主义”，并试图离间日美同盟；特朗普的言论可能被解读为“对中国此类宣传的认可”。

《读卖新闻》评论认为，特朗普过度展现对华友好姿态，给人一种“中国已经掌握主动权的印象”。该报认为，中美这两个超级大国之间实际上存在着难以调和的深层矛盾，但美国却将短期利益置于首位。

基于与伊朗的冲突久拖不决，加上油价飙升，特朗普支持率暴跌，他目前只在意11月要面临的中期选举，根本“无力与中国抗衡”。

《朝日新闻》指出，中美两国应被视为“已建立起一种管控竞争、防止升级为严重冲突的关系”。但是，两国必须确保关系不致沦为单纯的利益交换或大国间的利益权衡，而应更积极地维护国际稳定与发展。

此次中美峰会也使日本政界和舆论界，对“中日关系陷入谷底”感到不妥。

《朝日新闻》评论认为，由于无法与中国展开对话，日本被迫将对华关系托付给美国，具体而言是特朗普。如今，随着中美关系进入新阶段，要如何修复中日关系，已成为高市面临的一项重大外交挑战。

Transcript: Rep. Jim Himes on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Sept. 27, 2026

2026-09-27T11:51:11-0400 / CBS News

The following is the transcript of the interview with Rep. Jim Himes, Democrat of Connecticut, that aired on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on Sept. 27, 2026.

*

MARGARET BRENNAN: And we’re back now with Connecticut Democratic Congressman Jim Himes. Congressman, you sit on the House Intelligence Committee. We are 37 days out from the midterm races. I know you received a classified briefing on foreign threats, and you released a statement saying that the US intelligence community assessed no adversary had interfered or attempted to interfere with infrastructure or vote counting. Why did you think it was important to make that statement if nothing changed?

REP. JIM HIMES: Yeah. Well, Margaret, we know, that the president, as he careens on and I overheard you talking about the Strait of Hormuz and gasoline prices and everything as the president careens towards, a very substantial loss in the election. We know that he’s going to deny its legitimacy. And I say we know it because he always does that when an election goes against him. By the way, he does it when an election doesn’t go against him in 2016, of course, he famously claimed to have won the popular vote. So this is coming. This is coming. And the only question is how prepared are we for it? And, you know, we could spend two hours on the various scenarios that Donald Trump is going to do to claim that the election is corrupted. You know, that he’s going to say that there’s illegal aliens voting in Michigan, in Florida. My little piece of this is and we saw a preview of this in his July speech to the nation. He is, quite possibly going to claim that the Iranians have taken control of the voting machinery in Florida or in North Carolina, or that the Russians or the Chinese. And as the guy who has access to that information, I’m making sure to the extent that I can, that people understand what the history is, and that in real time, I’ll have some insight as to whether what the president says in that moment is true.

MARGARET BRENNAN: You have that assurance from U.S. officials that they will provide you that real time intelligence.

REP. JIM HIMES: Well, the answer, of course, is yes. Yes, I’ve received that assurance. Do I believe it? You know, it was really interesting listening to you talk to Senator Kennedy, who in his very veiled and folksy way was- was breaking with the president and pretty substantial ways, as he said, he may end up with a picture with a sombrero on his head. You know, look, it’s, one of the attributes of this administration in this second version of his presidency is that if you go against the president, you get fired. So, yes, I have received those assurances. They only partly make me comfortable.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, we will watch for that. You said no interference. Influence campaigns, of course, are also something that I understand we’ll have to be tracking.

MARGARET BRENNAN: You heard from president–

REP. HIMES: Influence is very different. It’s important that people understand the distinction. You know, interference is messing around with the actual machinery or the vote tallies. Influence happens all the time. People buying, you know, Facebook pages opposing some candidate that happens.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah. Understood. Thank you for making that distinction. You heard President Pezeshkian at the top of this program dangle this chance at diplomacy. President Trump openly speculated at the United Nations that Iran’s waiting on a deal until after the midterms. What do you think, if anything would change after November, that could affect how the executive negotiates?

REP. HIMES: Yeah. You know, it’s funny. I read the transcript of your interview with the president of Iran, and it was a whole lot of words. There were some interesting nuggets in it about, you know, no- we’re not we’re not inviting the president to Iran. And no, we’re not- there was interesting stuff in there. But make no mistake, right. Two things are true. The president’s threat to annihilate Iran is nonsensical. You know, he’s been trying that for six months now, and he’s not wrong. We sank their navy. We destroyed a lot of their planes. But, you know, the Iranians have for six months sustained the very worst that we in the Israelis can throw at them. You know, unless the president wants to start sort of killing civilians in, in cities, we’ve shown what we can do when the Iranians have shown that they can sustain that. More interestingly, and you ask about this in the context of the election, look, the Iranians now, in some sense, control what happens on Election Day. Why do I say that? Because if the Iranian regime and this is why they’re not negotiating before the election, if the Iranian regime wants to make sure that Mike Lawler loses in New York-17, or that Ashley Hinson is not a senator in the Midwest, they will call their friends the Houthis and say, fire five missiles at fi- at five ships, or they’ll fire a couple of missiles or drones at ships in the Strait of Hormuz, oil goes up to $120 a barrel. Diesel, already at record highs, goes to $8 a gallon. And guess what? Mike Lawler and Ashley Hinson lose their elections. Right? And so the Iranians are not stupid people. They’ve been negotiating literally for thousands of years. And they understand that they now have a massive impact on what happens in November, simply because they control the flow of oil and fertilizer and other stuff out of the strait. So do you think they’re giving up that position before the election? Of course they’re not.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, a lot of what they asked for, the president had already agreed to back in June in that MOU that, that failed.

MARGARET BRENNAN: But I want to ask you about another big meeting this week. And that was in Washington between Xi and Trump. The White House said afterwards that the countries would set up a bilateral communications channel for artificial intelligence incidents. Do you consider this in any way a step forward?

REP. HIMES: Yeah, of course it’s a step forward. I mean, it’s not something that came out of the- the pageantry of the last five days, right? Scott Bessent had set this up weeks before, the- the actual visit of President Xi occurred. And look, I, you know, we all know, because we can read and watch TV, that nothing significant came out of this. But, you know, look, when you have a situation as important as the relationships between Beijing and Washington, simply talking is, is is, is a win in and of itself. So, again, we all know that nothing terribly meaningful came out of this conversation. And look, Xi himself is waiting for 37 days when he will now face a president of the United States who has been rebuked by his own people, who will be in a much weaker position of political leadership than he is today. So, you know, President Xi wasn’t going to make a commitment any more than the Iranian regime was. But like I said, let’s not be too harsh. Anytime we’re talking to the Chinese and stopping misunderstandings and making incremental progress on things like AI or not starting another trade war, you know, it’s a valuable couple of days.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Congressman Himes, always good to have you with us. Thanks for your time today. Face the Nation. We’ll be back in a moment. Stay with us.

南非又发现一具女尸 两个多月发现女受害者增至11人

2026年9月27日 22:45 / 联合早报

针对性别的暴力长期困扰南非，示威者星期四（9月24日）在南非开普敦参加一场关注性别暴力和杀害女性受害者的步行活动。 （路透社）

南非警方星期天说，在约翰内斯堡东部一个市镇又发现一具女尸，使当地过去10周发现的女受害者增至11人。

法新社报道，警方星期天（9月27日）说，最新的女死者是当天中午时分在埃库尔胡莱尼市的一片空地上被发现。“一辆在这个地区巡逻的安保车辆发现遗体并报警。”

有关这名女子的身份、年龄和死因目前有待确认。

同一市镇星期六（26日）才在当地一处墓地附近发现一具半裸女性遗体。警方当时透露，死者疑似遭石块砸死，警方将进行验尸以确定确切死因。警方已逮捕一名与案件有关的男子。

其余九名死者大多为20多岁至30多岁的女性，其中一些被发现时衣物被脱去，并有遭性侵的迹象。不过，警方尚未将这些案件视为连环罪案。

针对性别的暴力长期困扰南非。政府上星期说，全国性别暴力指挥中心9月1日至16日接获6782通求助电话，平均每天424通，比8月同期平均每天350通增加21%。

南非又发现一具女尸 两个多月发现女受害者增至11人

2026年9月27日 22:45 / 联合早报

针对性别的暴力长期困扰南非，示威者星期四（9月24日）在南非开普敦参加一场关注性别暴力和杀害女性受害者的步行活动。 （路透社）

南非警方星期天说，在约翰内斯堡东部一个市镇又发现一具女尸，使当地过去10周发现的女受害者增至11人。

法新社报道，警方星期天（9月27日）说，最新的女死者是当天中午时分在埃库尔胡莱尼市的一片空地上被发现。“一辆在这个地区巡逻的安保车辆发现遗体并报警。”

有关这名女子的身份、年龄和死因目前有待确认。

同一市镇星期六（26日）才在当地一处墓地附近发现一具半裸女性遗体。警方当时透露，死者疑似遭石块砸死，警方将进行验尸以确定确切死因。警方已逮捕一名与案件有关的男子。

其余九名死者大多为20多岁至30多岁的女性，其中一些被发现时衣物被脱去，并有遭性侵的迹象。不过，警方尚未将这些案件视为连环罪案。

针对性别的暴力长期困扰南非。政府上星期说，全国性别暴力指挥中心9月1日至16日接获6782通求助电话，平均每天424通，比8月同期平均每天350通增加21%。

教宗良十四世：安乐死不能视为“正常”

2026年9月27日 23:09 / 联合早报

教宗良十四世星期天（9月27日）说，安乐死不能被视为“正常”。他此次访法期间也多次重申天主教会反对安乐死的立场。 （法新社）

教宗良十四世说，安乐死不能被视为“正常”，并强调“合法的事情不一定符合道德”。

法新社报道，良十四世星期天（9月27日）在法国朝圣地卢尔德（Lourdes）向病患及残障信徒说：“任何人的法律都不应使你们丧失对自身尊严的确信。”

他说：“我们必须拒绝以虚假的慈悲为借口致人死亡的诱惑。我们不可能把导致死亡视为正常的事情。”

他补充说：“合法的是不一定符合道德。”

法国国会今年6月通过立法，赋予部分成年绝症患者进行安乐死的权利。

法国天主教会强烈反对这项立法，认为有关措施是对保护生命原则的严重“决裂”。教宗此次访法期间也多次重申天主教会反对安乐死的立场。

教宗良十四世：安乐死不能视为“正常”

2026年9月27日 23:09 / 联合早报

教宗良十四世星期天（9月27日）说，安乐死不能被视为“正常”。他此次访法期间也多次重申天主教会反对安乐死的立场。 （法新社）

教宗良十四世说，安乐死不能被视为“正常”，并强调“合法的事情不一定符合道德”。

法新社报道，良十四世星期天（9月27日）在法国朝圣地卢尔德（Lourdes）向病患及残障信徒说：“任何人的法律都不应使你们丧失对自身尊严的确信。”

他说：“我们必须拒绝以虚假的慈悲为借口致人死亡的诱惑。我们不可能把导致死亡视为正常的事情。”

他补充说：“合法的是不一定符合道德。”

法国国会今年6月通过立法，赋予部分成年绝症患者进行安乐死的权利。

法国天主教会强烈反对这项立法，认为有关措施是对保护生命原则的严重“决裂”。教宗此次访法期间也多次重申天主教会反对安乐死的立场。

Senator Tillis: President Trump ‘made a colossal mistake’ by not supporting Senator John Cornyn

2026-09-27T14:46:55.880Z / CNN Politics

By Jake Tapper, CNN

Published 10:46 AM EDT, Sun September 27, 2026

Video Ad Feedback

Senator Tillis: President Trump ‘made a colossal mistake’ by not supporting Senator John Cornyn

Retiring Republican Senator Thom Tillis tells Jake Tapper, “We would not be spending tens or hundreds of millions of dollars in Texas if Cornyn had won… And so, Republicans that go after other Republicans for only being in the 95th percentile, I’d like for them to go find another party, because that’s unsustainable for me.”

1:44 • Source: CNN

No English content available

Transcript: Sen. John Kennedy on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Sept. 27, 2026

2026-09-27T11:56:46-0400 / CBS News

The following is the transcript of the interview with Sen. John Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana, that aired on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on Sept. 27, 2026.

MARGARET BRENNAN: We turn now to Republican Louisiana Senator John Kennedy. Good morning to you, Senator. Senator, the president seems to be dangling some interest in diplomacy. The U.S. president also seems to be somewhat interested, but the Wall Street Journal is also reporting President Trump has a secret plan to restart the bombing campaign in Iran after the midterm elections. That’s 37 days from now. Is that renewed bombing something you support?

SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: Well, I don’t know. I haven’t seen the classified intelligence. Iran- Iran made an offer recently to the president. It was not a serious offer. The president’s not Bambi’s baby brother. He turned it down. We need to continue doing what we’re doing. The sanctions, the blockade. The truth is, if you- if you’re fair minded at all, Iran is a sucking chest wound and the world is safer for it. It’s public and private sector is held together with duct tape and spit. Now, there’s- there’s just one problem. The strait is at least partially closed, and it’s affected the price of oil and oil’s in everything, including gasoline. And- and it’s painful as- as hell. And we’ve got to either figure out a way to- to settle this thing, to get the strait open or to escalate. I would not send in troops. We could send in troops and we could open the strait. But once you send them in, you’ve got to leave them there. And that creates a whole new host of problems.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, and the broader question of to what end, since the president has said, you know, Iran is about to capitulate any day now. But when we look at the politics of this out in Iowa and Michigan, we’ve seen Republican candidates who are going to be on the ballot in November, call for an end to the Iran war. In the Senate, we’ve seen 14 votes to date, objecting to it- two passed. I mean, I know those are symbolic, but this is reflective of frustration within your own party here. Should the president be more aware of public opinion?

SEN. KENNEDY: Well, look, here’s- none of this is advanced calculus. Here’s- I’ve- I’ve- I’ve been to just about every battleground state helping my mates. Here’s what I’ve learned. When- when moms and dads lie down to sleep at night and can’t, they’re not lying there worried about whether the football coaches are happy or whether the press is biased or the other things that we’ve been talking about. They’re worried about the cost of living.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

SEN. KENNEDY: And- and they’re a little worried about Iran because they don’t understand why, but they know the two are inextricably linked. And we’ve got to be straight up and address those things. Here’s my prediction for the midterms, Margaret. The experts will be wrong. They almost always are. Not- not- none of these guys have ever run a campaign in their natural lives. It’s going to be close. It would help if the president would stay focused on cost of living. And I would like to see him give a nationwide address.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

SEN. KENNEDY: Or let Rubio and General Caine do it and explain why we went into Iran, why we’re winning, and how we’re going to get out.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah. You’ve been making that recommendation for some time. You did it last time you were with us over the summer. The White House has not to date, but–

SEN. KENNEDY: Well- well- well, the- the- the president doesn’t take orders from me. He barely takes suggestions. But I’m pretty persistent, and I’m going to keep recommending it.

MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to ask you about something else the executive branch just did without Congress. On Friday, the White House informed Congressional leaders that he, the president, unilaterally canceled nearly $1 billion in Congressionally approved funds and did it without Congress’s consent. You sit on Appropriations. The chair of that committee, Susan Collins, said this was the latest attempt to undermine Congress’s constitutional power of the purse, and that this is a clear violation of the law. She wants to take action against these illegal actions. Do you share her concern? Are you going to join her effort?

SEN. KENNEDY: I love- I love Susan like a taco, but she’s wrong. First, Congress didn’t approve this stuff. When Congress appropriates money, we do it in broad care- categories. For example, I’m making this up- $250 million to improve relations with sub-Sahara Africa. And then the money goes to the bureaucracy. And a lot of times the bureaucracy wastes it. Spending porn is what I call it. That’s how we ended up with millions of dollars for circumcisions in- in Zambia and electric buses in Rwanda.

MARGARET BRENNAN: So you’re okay with this?

SEN. KENNEDY: What- what the president- yeah, I’m fine with it. What- what- if you read what- what Russ Vought wants to actually cut, what he wants- what he wants to cut is aid to NGOs who support illegal immigration. And he also wants to cut some money that the bureaucracy has decided to give to help pay down, not our debt, but foreign debt. This stuff- spending porn. Congress didn’t approve it. Now Susan is worried about them doing this to the NIH grants. I don’t think they ought to do it to the NIH grants, but this is spending porn that they’re cutting–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

SEN. KENNEDY: –and Congress ought to be- Congress ought to get up off its ice-cold, lazy butt and cut it itself. But since we’re not–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

SEN. KENNEDY: –I’m glad- I’m glad that Russ Vought’s doing it.

MARGARET BRENNAN: You’re talking about concern about wasteful spending.

SEN. KENNEDY: Yeah.

MARGARET BRENNAN: You were very sharp in your questioning of then-Secretary Kristi Noem in regard to some ads that DHS had been running, using taxpayer money to bolster her public image. Our viewers are going to see a 30-second commercial on this program. It’s on all major networks, it’s on the cable networks as well. It prominently features President Trump, and there’s a voice praising him as, quote, “the toughest, most resilient person I ever met.” And at the end, it says “paid for by the U.S. government.” Is that the best use of taxpayer money?

SEN. KENNEDY: Well, first, as to Secretary Noem, what she did was master class dumb. she spent $220 million on commercials about her, and I called her out on it. Number two–

MARGARET BRENNAN: This looks like a commercial about President Trump.

SEN. KENNEDY: I don’t, I- I was just going to say, Margaret, I don’t think any public official, including President Trump or Kristi Noem or John Kennedy, should spend public money on- on private ads for themselves. Now, the White House sees it differently, but I don’t- I think there ought to be a rule that you can’t- well, there probably is a rule- you can’t spend public money to to promote yourself. I’m going to- I may end up with a sombrero on my head, but I also think that we ought to have a rule that no politician–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

SEN. KENNEDY: –can have a building named after him while he’s alive. I think that would settle a lot of this controversy.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

SEN. KENNEDY: We have that rule in Louisiana. It works pretty well.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, we’ll watch, Senator, if you introduce that. Thank you for your time this morning. Face the Nation will be back in a minute. Stay with us.

特朗普：本周料与伊朗展开更多谈判

2026年9月27日 23:38 / 联合早报

美国特朗普在拒绝伊朗提出的停火协议后，星期天（9月27日）告诉美国媒体，预计美国谈判代表本周将与伊朗展开更多谈判。 （路透社）

美国总统特朗普说，他预计美国谈判代表本周将与伊朗展开更多谈判。特朗普前一天拒绝了伊朗提出的停火协议。

特朗普星期天（9月27日）接受美国新闻网站Axios电话访问时说：“我预计（本周）会与伊朗进行更多谈判。他们想达成协议，但那不是我想要的协议。”

他说，伊朗提出的条件更接近美方“一年前可能会接受”的方案，并认为伊朗“高估了自己的筹码”。

特朗普被问及是否考虑恢复对伊朗发动军事打击时则说：“我一直在考虑这件事。”

两名区域消息人士说，卡塔尔及其他地区调解方正努力推动美伊达成和平协议。

据报道，卡塔尔调解人员过去数天持续在美伊双方之间穿梭，讨论伊朗最初提出的方案，并分别向双方提交折衷方案。卡塔尔方面周末继续分别与美伊谈判代表磋商文本修改，并预计最早星期一（28日）分别会见伊朗外长阿拉格齐及美国中东问题特使威特科夫。

阿拉格齐星期天接受美国全国广播公司访问时说，尽管特朗普拒绝伊朗方案，德黑兰仍希望通过外交途径解决问题。

他强调，伊朗“只关心国家利益”，并准备展开谈判。“尽管我们从特朗普总统那里得知他拒绝了这项协议……但我们仍在等待通过调解人发来的正式回应。”