博客

  • 参议员约翰·费特曼称民主党“完全有可能”夺回参议院席位,谈及自身计划时表示“中期选举后再谈”


    2026年9月27日 美国东部时间上午9:48 / 哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)新闻

    撰稿人:

    宾夕法尼亚州民主党参议员约翰·费特曼周六表示,其所在政党“完全有可能”在中期选举中赢得参议院控制权,但他同时也为自己的政治前途留下了回旋余地。

    “中期选举后再谈,”费特曼在奥斯汀举行的德克萨斯论坛报节上对哥伦比亚广播公司新闻记者梅杰·加勒特说道。

    民主党在本届中期选举周期中争夺参议院控制权面临艰难开局,目前参议院共和党有53个席位,且选区地图似乎更有利于共和党。但随着特朗普政府期间民生 affordability 问题持续发酵,加之与伊朗不得人心的战争,民主党争取参议院多数席位的局势有所好转。

    费特曼在2022年一场备受关注的选举中为民主党拿下关键胜利,近年来因与本党立场分歧受到审视,引发了外界对其未来的质疑。当被问及是否会脱离民主党时,费特曼周六表示,他“没有理由这么做”。他强调:“我不是共和党人。”但他也告诫民众,应等到中期选举后再“看看我会怎么做”。

    “我们看看如果我刚好能拿到51票会发生什么——我也不确定,”费特曼说道。

    本月早些时候,费特曼以视频连线方式出席共和党中期代表大会,介绍共和党同僚戴夫·麦考密克参议员,同时承诺将与特朗普总统在钢铁行业议题上展开合作,这一做法令许多民主党人感到震惊。

    但费特曼周六表示:“作为共和党人,我没有出路。”

    这位宾夕法尼亚州民主党议员称:“没有哪位共和党议员的投票支持率能达到90%的民主党标准。共和党里不存在支持堕胎权、支持 LGBTQ+ 群体的群体。”

    “我得说多少次?这就是问题的关键。所以等到中期选举后,看看会发生什么,”他说道。“现在,如果我们赢了,我能拿到51票,人们可以回想:‘嘿,这就是为什么从数学角度来说保留多数席位是有可能的’,因为我能在宾夕法尼亚这样的州获胜。”

    宾夕法尼亚州是美国仅有的两个参议院席位由一党一民主党和一党共和党分别占据的州之一,另一个是威斯康星州。第三个州缅因州则有一名共和党参议员和一名与民主党团结盟的无党派议员。近年来的总统选举中,宾夕法尼亚州的支持对象一直在民主党和共和党之间摇摆。

    当被问及是否会在2028年寻求连任时,费特曼表示他一直在积极筹款,但也暗示这一决定将在中期选举后做出。

    费特曼提出疑问:“民主党现在到底是什么样子?”他提到了近期与有争议的流媒体主播哈桑·皮克一同出席的附近活动的到场人数,以及党内的“活力”——近几个月来,党内激进派民主党人取得了一系列胜利。他以自己对以色列的承诺为例,说明自己与党内部分人士的分歧,并补充道:“越来越多的本党议员变得越来越反以色列。”

    他还指出,近期的政府停摆问题是他与多数民主党人意见不合的议题,他辩称自己“将国家置于党派之上”,并为工人阶级发声。

    “你认为关闭政府是正确且明智的吗?不,民主党人过去常说:‘不,绝对、绝对不能这么做’,”费特曼说道。“这让我与本党团产生了分歧,我说:‘这是错误的’。”

    费特曼表示,他“选择将国家置于党派之上,明知这些决定会让我与他人产生分歧”。

    当被问及如果民主党赢得多数席位,他是否预计参议院少数党领袖查克·舒默会继续留任,以及他是否会投票支持舒默时,费特曼表示:“是的,我的意思是,没有人有动作。”

    费特曼称一项显示民主党参议院候选人乔希·图雷克在爱荷华州领先8个百分点的马里斯特民调“令人震惊”,类似的民调结果在其他一些选区也有出现,民主党在部分民调中处于领先。他提到了舒默的招募工作,表示:“如果人们对查克·舒默感到愤怒,这不可否认,但他招募了一届极其强大的候选人队伍。”

    “我不会为查克·舒默摇旗呐喊,可能那里有些人不愿承认这一点,但攻击我们的领袖并无益处,因为我们要等到中期选举后才能见分晓,”费特曼说道。“在中期选举结果出来之前,这些都无关紧要。”

    Sen. John Fetterman says it’s “entirely possible” Democrats take back Senate, says “let’s revisit after the midterm” on his plans

    2026-09-27 09:48 AM EDT / CBS News

    By

    Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania said Saturday that it’s “entirely possible” his party could win control of the Senate in the midterm elections, but he also left the door open on his own political future.

    “Let’s revisit after the midterm,” Fetterman told CBS News’ Major Garrett at the Texas Tribune Festival in Austin.

    Democrats faced an uphill battle heading into the midterm cycle as they sought control the upper chamber, with 53 Republicans currently in the Senate and a map that appeared more favorable to the GOP. But as affordability issues have persisted in the Trump administration and amid the unpopular war with Iran, the picture has appeared to improve for Democrats as they aim to secure a majority in the Senate.

    Fetterman, who delivered Democrats a crucial victory in a closely watched race in 2022, has been under scrutiny in recent years for breaking with his party, spurring questions about his future. Asked whether he would leave the Democratic Party, Fetterman said Saturday that he doesn’t “have a reason to.” And he emphasized, “I am not a Republican.” But he cautioned that people should wait until the midterm elections to “see what I do.”

    “Let’s see what happens if I happen to be 51 — I don’t know,” Fetterman said.

    Fetterman shocked many Democrats when he made a video appearance at the Republican midterm convention earlier this month introducing his counterpart, GOP Sen. Dave McCormick, while vowing to work with President Trump on steel.

    But Fetterman said Saturday, “I have no path as a Republican.”

    The Pennsylvania Democrat said, “There are no Republicans with a 90% Democratic vote line. There are no pro-choice, there’s no pro-gay community, that does not exist in the Republican Party.”

    “How many times do I have to say it?And that’s the point. So wait until after the midterm and see what happens,” he said. “And now, if we do win and I’m 51, people can remember, ‘hey, that’s why it’s mathematically possible to retain the majority,’ because I was able to win a state like Pennsylvania.”

    Pennsylvania is one of only two states in the country represented by one Democrat and one Republican in the Senate, alongside Wisconsin. A third state, Maine, has one Republican senator and one independent who caucuses with Democrat. Pennsylvania has flipped between supporting Democrats and Republican presidents in recent elections.

    On whether he’ll seek reelection in 2028, Fetterman said he’s been actively fundraising, but he also indicated that the decision will come after the midterms.

    Fetterman posed the question, “Where’s the Democratic Party at right now?” He pointed to attendance at a nearby event with controversial streamer Hasan Piker and “the energy” among the party, which has seen a series of wins by insurgent Democrats in recent months. He cited his commitment to Israel as an issue underscoring his divergence from some of the party, adding, “more and more members of my caucus are becoming more and more anti-Israel.”

    He also pointed to the recent government shutdowns as an issue he diverged from the bulk of Democrats on, arguing that he’s “putting the country over the party” and fighting for workers.

    “Do you think it’s right and smart to shut our government down? No, Democrats, we used to say, ‘No, never, never do that,’” Fetterman said. “And that put me at the odds of my caucus, saying, ‘It’s wrong.’”

    Fetterman said he’s “chosen to be country over the party, knowing that some of these decisions are going to put me at odds.”

    Asked whether he expects Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to remain leader if Democrats take the majority, and whether he would vote for him, Fetterman said, “Yes, I mean, there’s no one making a move.”

    Fetterman called a Marist poll that shows Democratic Senate candidate Josh Turek up eight points in Iowa “shocking,” among other races where Democrats are leading in some polls. He pointed to Schumer’s recruiting efforts, saying, “If people are angry at Chuck Schumer, it’s undeniable, he has recruited an incredibly strong class.”

    “I don’t sharpen blades for Chuck Schumer, and there might be some people there that refuse to say it, but it’s not helpful to go after our leader because we have no idea until we wait until the midterm,” Fetterman said. “It’s irrelevant until what happens in the midterm.”

  • 特朗普回绝伊朗方案 德黑兰:重开霍尔木兹海峡条件绝不妥协


    2026-09-27 21:35 / 联合早报

    • 特朗普公开拒绝伊朗重开霍尔木兹海峡方案,称封锁正给伊朗带来沉重经济压力,但未透露是否会在中期选举后恢复轰炸。
    • 伊朗外长阿拉格齐强调,重开海峡须以全面停火、解除封锁及解冻资金为前提,条件绝不退让,外交是打破僵局的唯一途径。
    • 沙特外长费萨尔在联大警告,任何封锁中东航道的行为都会威胁全球能源安全,促请国际社会加大行动力度维护航行自由。
    • 美国财长贝森特称已派特使游说各国配合制裁,土耳其、阿联酋等已停飞伊朗航班或停止银行交易,孤立伊朗初见成效。


    9月27日在德黑兰,当地民众经过印有黎巴嫩真主党已故领袖纳斯鲁拉(左)和伊朗已故最高领袖哈梅内伊(右二)肖像的广告牌。纳斯鲁拉于两年前的这一天死于以色列空袭。 (法新社)


    (华盛顿/德黑兰综合电)美国总统特朗普公开拒绝了伊朗有关重开霍尔木兹海峡的方案,但未透露是否打算在11月中期选举后恢复轰炸行动。德黑兰则坚持,重开海峡的条件绝不妥协,强调外交是解决冲突的唯一途径。

    特朗普星期六(9月26日)在白宫向媒体证实,已回绝伊朗提案。他称:“他们想达成一项立即开放霍尔木兹海峡的协议,因为他们也正在蒙受惨重损失。他们想达成协议,这也很好,我也爱达成协议。”

    他说,美国在霍尔木兹海峡实施的海上封锁,正给伊朗带来日益沉重的经济压力。面对媒体提问会否在中期选举后恢复轰炸伊朗,他拒绝置评。

    伊朗此前通过调解方向美国提出重开霍尔木兹海峡的方案,条件包括在各战线全面停火、美国解除对伊朗港口的封锁、解冻伊朗资金等。

    《华尔街日报》星期五(25日)引述匿名美国官员报道,特朗普拒绝了这一方案,并可能在中期选举后恢复对伊朗的军事打击。

    伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐星期天说,伊朗已看到特朗普的初步反应,但仍在等待调解方转达美方的最终意见。他强调:“我们的条件明确,任何重开霍尔木兹海峡的行动都以满足这些条件为前提。我们绝不退让。”

    阿拉格齐说,当前僵局唯有通过外交谈判才能打破,“我们从未关闭外交和谈判的大门,但也从未放弃我们的权利”。

    伊朗伊斯兰共和国军队总司令哈塔米同日强调,霍尔木兹海峡关乎伊朗的尊严与荣誉,在人民权利被剥夺之际,伊朗不会允许敌人使用这个关键的物流咽喉。他表明:“如果伊朗不能进行贸易,无法生存,那么谁也别想进行贸易或生存。”

    哈塔米形容,与美国的战争已进入“关键且决定性”阶段,伊朗已为美国可能恢复军事行动做好准备。他还向地区国家喊话说:“你们都看到了,同美国合作不会带来安全……只有驱逐美国和犹太复国主义政权(以色列),地区才能实现安全——而这一天已经不远。”

    沙特促加强维护航行自由

    沙特阿拉伯星期六警告,任何试图封锁中东航道的行为都会威胁全球能源安全,力促国际社会加大行动力度来维护航行自由。

    沙特外长费萨尔当天向联合国大会发言时强调,确保所有国际水道航行安全,尤其霍尔木兹海峡、曼德海峡、红海与亚丁湾,至关重要。沙特反对任何一方把这些关键航道用作施压、威胁或损害各国利益的工具。

    费萨尔说,霍尔木兹海峡必须恢复到2月28日战争爆发前的状态,不得收取任何费用或实施限制。

    据法新社报道,沙特当局星期天发电邮通知利雅得各地家长,当地学校将关闭一周,期间改为远程授课。电邮未说明具体原因,但近期波斯湾地区紧张局势加剧,也门胡塞武装几乎每天都对沙特发动袭击。

    另据伊朗媒体星期天报道,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队在霍尔木兹海峡扣押一艘进行间谍活动的美国雷穆斯600无人潜航器,伊朗专家正提取其中的数据。

    美国积极游说各国 经济孤立伊朗初见成效

    美国财长贝森特星期六在社媒平台X上说,他已向世界各地派遣特使,游说各国政府配合美国对伊朗银行和航空业的制裁措施,从而在经济上孤立伊朗;这些努力正取得成效。

    据《华尔街日报》报道,美国财政部已同50多个国家磋商。贝森特说,土耳其和阿曼已停飞伊朗马汉航空的入境航班,阿联酋则停飞所有伊朗航空公司的航班。阿联酋和土耳其主要商业银行也停止与伊朗的交易。

    他称,随着伊朗里亚尔汇率跌至新低,伊朗领导层被迫承认战争带来的经济损失。

    特朗普回拒伊朗方案 德黑兰:重开霍尔木兹海峡条件绝不妥协

    2026-09-27 21:35 / 联合早报

    • 特朗普公开拒绝伊朗重开霍尔木兹海峡方案,称封锁正给伊朗带来沉重经济压力,但未透露是否会在中期选举后恢复轰炸。 – 伊朗外长阿拉格齐强调,重开海峡须以全面停火、解除封锁及解冻资金为前提,条件绝不退让,外交是打破僵局的唯一途径。 – 沙特外长费萨尔在联大警告,任何封锁中东航道的行为都会威胁全球能源安全,促请国际社会加大行动力度维护航行自由。 – 美国财长贝森特称已派特使游说各国配合制裁,土耳其、阿联酋等已停飞伊朗航班或停止银行交易,孤立伊朗初见成效。

    9月27日在德黑兰,当地民众经过印有黎巴嫩真主党已故领袖纳斯鲁拉(左)和伊朗已故最高领袖哈梅内伊(右二)肖像的广告牌。纳斯鲁拉于两年前的这一天死于以色列空袭。 (法新社)

    (华盛顿/德黑兰综合电)美国总统特朗普公开拒绝了伊朗有关重开霍尔木兹海峡的方案,但未透露是否打算在11月中期选举后恢复轰炸行动。德黑兰则坚持,重开海峡的条件绝不妥协,强调外交是解决冲突的唯一途径。

    特朗普星期六(9月26日)在白宫向媒体证实,已回绝伊朗提案。他称:“他们想达成一项立即开放霍尔木兹海峡的协议,因为他们也正在蒙受惨重损失。他们想达成协议,这也很好,我也爱达成协议。”

    他说,美国在霍尔木兹海峡实施的海上封锁,正给伊朗带来日益沉重的经济压力。面对媒体提问会否在中期选举后恢复轰炸伊朗,他拒绝置评。

    伊朗此前通过调解方向美国提出重开霍尔木兹海峡的方案,条件包括在各战线全面停火、美国解除对伊朗港口的封锁、解冻伊朗资金等。

    《华尔街日报》星期五(25日)引述匿名美国官员报道,特朗普拒绝了这一方案,并可能在中期选举后恢复对伊朗的军事打击。

    伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐星期天说,伊朗已看到特朗普的初步反应,但仍在等待调解方转达美方的最终意见。他强调:“我们的条件明确,任何重开霍尔木兹海峡的行动都以满足这些条件为前提。我们绝不退让。”

    阿拉格齐说,当前僵局唯有通过外交谈判才能打破,“我们从未关闭外交和谈判的大门,但也从未放弃我们的权利”。

    伊朗伊斯兰共和国军队总司令哈塔米同日强调,霍尔木兹海峡关乎伊朗的尊严与荣誉,在人民权利被剥夺之际,伊朗不会允许敌人使用这个关键的物流咽喉。他表明:“如果伊朗不能进行贸易,无法生存,那么谁也别想进行贸易或生存。”

    哈塔米形容,与美国的战争已进入“关键且决定性”阶段,伊朗已为美国可能恢复军事行动做好准备。他还向地区国家喊话说:“你们都看到了,同美国合作不会带来安全……只有驱逐美国和犹太复国主义政权(以色列),地区才能实现安全——而这一天已经不远。”

    沙特促加强维护航行自由

    沙特阿拉伯星期六警告,任何试图封锁中东航道的行为都会威胁全球能源安全,力促国际社会加大行动力度来维护航行自由。

    沙特外长费萨尔当天向联合国大会发言时强调,确保所有国际水道航行安全,尤其霍尔木兹海峡、曼德海峡、红海与亚丁湾,至关重要。沙特反对任何一方把这些关键航道用作施压、威胁或损害各国利益的工具。

    费萨尔说,霍尔木兹海峡必须恢复到2月28日战争爆发前的状态,不得收取任何费用或实施限制。

    据法新社报道,沙特当局星期天发电邮通知利雅得各地家长,当地学校将关闭一周,期间改为远程授课。电邮未说明具体原因,但近期波斯湾地区紧张局势加剧,也门胡塞武装几乎每天都对沙特发动袭击。

    另据伊朗媒体星期天报道,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队在霍尔木兹海峡扣押一艘进行间谍活动的美国雷穆斯600无人潜航器,伊朗专家正提取其中的数据。

    美国积极游说各国 经济孤立伊朗初见成效

    美国财长贝森特星期六在社媒平台X上说,他已向世界各地派遣特使,游说各国政府配合美国对伊朗银行和航空业的制裁措施,从而在经济上孤立伊朗;这些努力正取得成效。

    据《华尔街日报》报道,美国财政部已同50多个国家磋商。贝森特说,土耳其和阿曼已停飞伊朗马汉航空的入境航班,阿联酋则停飞所有伊朗航空公司的航班。阿联酋和土耳其主要商业银行也停止与伊朗的交易。

    他称,随着伊朗里亚尔汇率跌至新低,伊朗领导层被迫承认战争带来的经济损失。

  • 特朗普回绝伊朗方案 德黑兰:重开霍尔木兹海峡条件绝不妥协


    2026年9月27日 21:35 / 联合早报

    • 特朗普公开拒绝伊朗重开霍尔木兹海峡方案,称封锁正给伊朗带来沉重经济压力,但未透露是否会在中期选举后恢复轰炸。
    • 伊朗外长阿拉格齐强调,重开海峡须以全面停火、解除封锁及解冻资金为前提,条件绝不退让,外交是打破僵局的唯一途径。
    • 沙特外长费萨尔在联大警告,任何封锁中东航道的行为都会威胁全球能源安全,促请国际社会加大行动力度维护航行自由。
    • 美国财长贝森特称已派特使游说各国配合制裁,土耳其、阿联酋等已停飞伊朗航班或停止银行交易,孤立伊朗初见成效。


    9月27日在德黑兰,当地民众经过印有黎巴嫩真主党已故领袖纳斯鲁拉(左)和伊朗已故最高领袖哈梅内伊(右二)肖像的广告牌。纳斯鲁拉于两年前的这一天死于以色列空袭。 (法新社)

    (华盛顿/德黑兰综合电)美国总统特朗普公开拒绝了伊朗有关重开霍尔木兹海峡的方案,但未透露是否打算在11月中期选举后恢复轰炸行动。德黑兰则坚持,重开海峡的条件绝不妥协,强调外交是解决冲突的唯一途径。

    特朗普星期六(9月26日)在白宫向媒体证实,已回绝伊朗提案。他称:“他们想达成一项立即开放霍尔木兹海峡的协议,因为他们也正在蒙受惨重损失。他们想达成协议,这也很好,我也爱达成协议。”

    他说,美国在霍尔木兹海峡实施的海上封锁,正给伊朗带来日益沉重的经济压力。面对媒体提问会否在中期选举后恢复轰炸伊朗,他拒绝置评。

    伊朗此前通过调解方向美国提出重开霍尔木兹海峡的方案,条件包括在各战线全面停火、美国解除对伊朗港口的封锁、解冻伊朗资金等。

    《华尔街日报》星期五(25日)引述匿名美国官员报道,特朗普拒绝了这一方案,并可能在中期选举后恢复对伊朗的军事打击。

    伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐星期天说,伊朗已看到特朗普的初步反应,但仍在等待调解方转达美方的最终意见。他强调:“我们的条件明确,任何重开霍尔木兹海峡的行动都以满足这些条件为前提。我们绝不退让。”

    阿拉格齐说,当前僵局唯有通过外交谈判才能打破,“我们从未关闭外交和谈判的大门,但也从未放弃我们的权利”。

    伊朗伊斯兰共和国军队总司令哈塔米同日强调,霍尔木兹海峡关乎伊朗的尊严与荣誉,在人民权利被剥夺之际,伊朗不会允许敌人使用这个关键的物流咽喉。他表明:“如果伊朗不能进行贸易,无法生存,那么谁也别想进行贸易或生存。”

    哈塔米形容,与美国的战争已进入“关键且决定性”阶段,伊朗已为美国可能恢复军事行动做好准备。他还向地区国家喊话说:“你们都看到了,同美国合作不会带来安全……只有驱逐美国和犹太复国主义政权(以色列),地区才能实现安全——而这一天已经不远。”

    沙特促加强维护航行自由

    沙特阿拉伯星期六警告,任何试图封锁中东航道的行为都会威胁全球能源安全,力促国际社会加大行动力度来维护航行自由。

    沙特外长费萨尔当天向联合国大会发言时强调,确保所有国际水道航行安全,尤其霍尔木兹海峡、曼德海峡、红海与亚丁湾,至关重要。沙特反对任何一方把这些关键航道用作施压、威胁或损害各国利益的工具。

    费萨尔说,霍尔木兹海峡必须恢复到2月28日战争爆发前的状态,不得收取任何费用或实施限制。

    据法新社报道,沙特当局星期天发电邮通知利雅得各地家长,当地学校将关闭一周,期间改为远程授课。电邮未说明具体原因,但近期波斯湾地区紧张局势加剧,也门胡塞武装几乎每天都对沙特发动袭击。

    另据伊朗媒体星期天报道,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队在霍尔木兹海峡扣押一艘进行间谍活动的美国雷穆斯600无人潜航器,伊朗专家正提取其中的数据。

    美国积极游说各国 经济孤立伊朗初见成效

    美国财长贝森特星期六在社媒平台X上说,他已向世界各地派遣特使,游说各国政府配合美国对伊朗银行和航空业的制裁措施,从而在经济上孤立伊朗;这些努力正取得成效。

    据《华尔街日报》报道,美国财政部已同50多个国家磋商。贝森特说,土耳其和阿曼已停飞伊朗马汉航空的入境航班,阿联酋则停飞所有伊朗航空公司的航班。阿联酋和土耳其主要商业银行也停止与伊朗的交易。

    他称,随着伊朗里亚尔汇率跌至新低,伊朗领导层被迫承认战争带来的经济损失。

    特朗普回拒伊朗方案 德黑兰:重开霍尔木兹海峡条件绝不妥协

    2026年9月27日 21:35 / 联合早报

    • 特朗普公开拒绝伊朗重开霍尔木兹海峡方案,称封锁正给伊朗带来沉重经济压力,但未透露是否会在中期选举后恢复轰炸。 – 伊朗外长阿拉格齐强调,重开海峡须以全面停火、解除封锁及解冻资金为前提,条件绝不退让,外交是打破僵局的唯一途径。 – 沙特外长费萨尔在联大警告,任何封锁中东航道的行为都会威胁全球能源安全,促请国际社会加大行动力度维护航行自由。 – 美国财长贝森特称已派特使游说各国配合制裁,土耳其、阿联酋等已停飞伊朗航班或停止银行交易,孤立伊朗初见成效。

    9月27日在德黑兰,当地民众经过印有黎巴嫩真主党已故领袖纳斯鲁拉(左)和伊朗已故最高领袖哈梅内伊(右二)肖像的广告牌。纳斯鲁拉于两年前的这一天死于以色列空袭。 (法新社)

    (华盛顿/德黑兰综合电)美国总统特朗普公开拒绝了伊朗有关重开霍尔木兹海峡的方案,但未透露是否打算在11月中期选举后恢复轰炸行动。德黑兰则坚持,重开海峡的条件绝不妥协,强调外交是解决冲突的唯一途径。

    特朗普星期六(9月26日)在白宫向媒体证实,已回绝伊朗提案。他称:“他们想达成一项立即开放霍尔木兹海峡的协议,因为他们也正在蒙受惨重损失。他们想达成协议,这也很好,我也爱达成协议。”

    他说,美国在霍尔木兹海峡实施的海上封锁,正给伊朗带来日益沉重的经济压力。面对媒体提问会否在中期选举后恢复轰炸伊朗,他拒绝置评。

    伊朗此前通过调解方向美国提出重开霍尔木兹海峡的方案,条件包括在各战线全面停火、美国解除对伊朗港口的封锁、解冻伊朗资金等。

    《华尔街日报》星期五(25日)引述匿名美国官员报道,特朗普拒绝了这一方案,并可能在中期选举后恢复对伊朗的军事打击。

    伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐星期天说,伊朗已看到特朗普的初步反应,但仍在等待调解方转达美方的最终意见。他强调:“我们的条件明确,任何重开霍尔木兹海峡的行动都以满足这些条件为前提。我们绝不退让。”

    阿拉格齐说,当前僵局唯有通过外交谈判才能打破,“我们从未关闭外交和谈判的大门,但也从未放弃我们的权利”。

    伊朗伊斯兰共和国军队总司令哈塔米同日强调,霍尔木兹海峡关乎伊朗的尊严与荣誉,在人民权利被剥夺之际,伊朗不会允许敌人使用这个关键的物流咽喉。他表明:“如果伊朗不能进行贸易,无法生存,那么谁也别想进行贸易或生存。”

    哈塔米形容,与美国的战争已进入“关键且决定性”阶段,伊朗已为美国可能恢复军事行动做好准备。他还向地区国家喊话说:“你们都看到了,同美国合作不会带来安全……只有驱逐美国和犹太复国主义政权(以色列),地区才能实现安全——而这一天已经不远。”

    沙特促加强维护航行自由

    沙特阿拉伯星期六警告,任何试图封锁中东航道的行为都会威胁全球能源安全,力促国际社会加大行动力度来维护航行自由。

    沙特外长费萨尔当天向联合国大会发言时强调,确保所有国际水道航行安全,尤其霍尔木兹海峡、曼德海峡、红海与亚丁湾,至关重要。沙特反对任何一方把这些关键航道用作施压、威胁或损害各国利益的工具。

    费萨尔说,霍尔木兹海峡必须恢复到2月28日战争爆发前的状态,不得收取任何费用或实施限制。

    据法新社报道,沙特当局星期天发电邮通知利雅得各地家长,当地学校将关闭一周,期间改为远程授课。电邮未说明具体原因,但近期波斯湾地区紧张局势加剧,也门胡塞武装几乎每天都对沙特发动袭击。

    另据伊朗媒体星期天报道,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队在霍尔木兹海峡扣押一艘进行间谍活动的美国雷穆斯600无人潜航器,伊朗专家正提取其中的数据。

    美国积极游说各国 经济孤立伊朗初见成效

    美国财长贝森特星期六在社媒平台X上说,他已向世界各地派遣特使,游说各国政府配合美国对伊朗银行和航空业的制裁措施,从而在经济上孤立伊朗;这些努力正取得成效。

    据《华尔街日报》报道,美国财政部已同50多个国家磋商。贝森特说,土耳其和阿曼已停飞伊朗马汉航空的入境航班,阿联酋则停飞所有伊朗航空公司的航班。阿联酋和土耳其主要商业银行也停止与伊朗的交易。

    他称,随着伊朗里亚尔汇率跌至新低,伊朗领导层被迫承认战争带来的经济损失。

  • 新闻


    请您提供需要翻译的英文新闻文章内容,我会按照要求为您完成精准翻译。

    No English content available

  • 新闻


    你提供的内容是中文新闻,并非英文新闻。请你提供需要翻译的英文原文,我会按照要求为你完成精准翻译。

    瑞士公投否决收紧中立政策提案

    2026年9月27日 22:06 / 联合早报

    支持收紧中立政策的阵营在瑞士全国投放海报,呼吁民众投票支持“不要战争、要中立”,不过这项提案最终被选民否决。 (法新社)

    瑞士选民星期天(9月27日)以明显多数票否决一项进一步收紧国家中立政策的提案。这项提案若获通过,将阻止瑞士实施经济制裁或与北约开展合作。

    路透社报道,据瑞士国家广播电视台SRF最新公投预测显示,超过三分之二选民反对将严格定义的中立条款写入瑞士宪法。由于提案也未能取得多数州支持,已确定遭到否决。

    瑞士的中立地位自1815年拿破仑战争结束以来获得国际承认,但政府应如何执行中立政策并无明确规定。

    右翼瑞士人民党认为,在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰后,瑞士对俄实施制裁,已经削弱了瑞士的传统中立立场。支持这项倡议的阵营在全国投放海报,呼吁民众投票支持“不要战争、要中立”。

    不过,瑞士政府及除瑞士人民党外的主要政党均反对这项倡议。瑞士外长卡西斯曾说,这项提案将损害国家安全,并阻碍瑞士与北约开展训练合作。

    伯尔尼大学欧洲政治学教授瓦瑟法伦在投票前说:“瑞士选民喜欢中立,但他们认可政府目前执行中立政策的方式。”

    他还说:“他们也普遍支持针对俄罗斯发动俄乌战争而实施的制裁措施,并不希望这一点发生改变。”

  • 新闻


    未提取到有效content值

    Transcript: Alexander Yui, Taiwan’s representative to the U.S., on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Sept. 27, 2026

    2026-09-27T11:22:21-0400 / CBS News

    The following is the transcript of the interview with Alexander Yui, Taiwan’s representative to the U.S., that aired on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on Sept. 27, 2026.

    *

    MARGARET BRENNAN: We’re joined now by the Taiwan representative to the United States, Ambassador Alexander Yui. Good to have you back here.

    ALEXANDER YUI, TAIWAN REPRESENTATIVE TO THE UNITED STATES: Thank you. Nice to be back, Margaret.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: You were here in May after President Trump–

    YUI: Yeah.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –visited Beijing, and we discussed that the two leaders did, at length, discuss Taiwan–

    YUI: Yes, they did.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –according to President Trump at that time. When it came to this meeting, this past week, President Trump said Taiwan did come up with Xi, but, quote, “We didn’t spend a lot of time talking about Taiwan.” Do you have any sense what context there was? How Taiwan was discussed? Have you been given any readout?

    YUI: Well, I mean, you’ve heard many people comment, including President Trump, comment on the question of Taiwan. He made it clear himself that it was mentioned, but it was not the main topic of discussion. As a matter of fact, during the released statements by both sides on the deliverables or the achievements, Taiwan does not figure neither side of- of- of the- of the papers, so–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: China did say this issue was foundational.

    YUI: Well, it was foundational, but there was no reaction from the U.S. side. Which, I think, again during May, President or General Secretary Xi gave an earful of Taiwan to President Trump when he was in Beijing. But during this- this trip, the United States made it very clear that no change in position towards Taiwan, and I think they made it clear during and before and after the visit. Right before the visit, Secretary Rubio met with the foreign ministers of Japan and Korea in UNGA in New York, and they made it very clear that supported peace stability of the Taiwan Straits, no coercion, no status quo, and even supported Taiwan’s meaningful participation in the- in the international organizations, as well as many other countries during UNGA, but so Taiwan is- there’s no change in Taiwan’s position for the United States.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: In May, President Trump said he wanted to speak with your president, President Lai. Did that call ever take place?

    YUI: Well, I’ll say that the communications between the two sides, between Thai and the United States is open, is regular, and it’s very, very close, at different levels, and I’ll just leave it at that.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: But not at the presidential level–

    YUI: Well, I–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –which could be provocative to Xi Jinping.

    [CROSSTALK]

    YUI: Well, I’ll just say that our communications are quite regular and quite open.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to ask you about the state of play with Taiwan and the tension with Beijing. The unclassified U.S. intelligence community assessment says Chinese leaders do not currently plan to execute an invasion of Taiwan in 2027. But it also says Beijing will continue setting the conditions for eventual unification short of conflict. What do you need from the U.S. to deter Xi Jinping?

    YUI: Well, this comes back all the way to the- the mentions of United States President Xi- Donald Trump and the Secretary General of China Xi Jinping during their visits, during his visit, where both mentioned the- the historical factors between World War II or the war of Japanese invasion of China during the late ’30s.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.

    YUI: Which President Trump highlighted the historical actions, the heroic actions of United States flying tigers, but Secretary General Xi wanted to mention that it was- made a reference that it was the Chinese Communist Party that fought World War II or fought the Japanese–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: And that’s not correct.

    YUI: That’s not correct. Let me show you this. This is the Flying Tigers using our- our flag. This is our- our crest. This is the bloodshed by which every American pilot, when they flew on missions on the Flying Tigers, they wore on their- the back of their- of their jacket to show if they’re down that- that people- Chinese people can help them.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: That’s what that- those words say.

    YUI: Yeah, it says–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: If this pilot goes down–

    YUI: It says this–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –he is an American.

    YUI: –foreigner is here to help us in the war effort, please help them.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: And the point you are making, as I understand it, is that the Chinese Communist Party was not running China during World War II.

    YUI: Well–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: It was actually the very same party that–

    YUI: Exactly.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –eventually left the mainland and set up a government in Taiwan.

    YUI: The communist regime did not exist until 1949. During the war, they were guerrillas, barely having any skirmishes against Japanese, if any. But, and then after they became a People’s Republic in ’49, a few years afterwards they were fighting and killing American soldiers in the Korean War. So let’s- let’s- let’s put that into perspective.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Was that offensive to people in Taiwan when they heard the president of the United States not correct–

    YUI: No, no–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –Xi Jinping, but accept that claim?

    YUI: President Trump was correct in saying that the- the Chinese and the Americans fought valiantly in the war, but that was- in the context that it was the- the Republic of China–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.

    YUI: –government fighting alongside the–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –not the government led by–

    YUI: Not the- not Xi Jinping. But also the perspective that that now because of that is making reference that China United States has to fight the new militarism implying Japan and other countries for example the Philippines–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.

    YUI: –or even Taiwan being aggressive that therefore there’s we should- that United States shouldn’t sell arms to Taiwan or–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Except–

    YUI: –and that’s- that’s- that’s- that’s messing, you know, again twisting the facts because it is the People’s Republic of China who is being the aggressor. They’re the ones who are creating all these tensions in the region, the first talent chain in the Asia Pacific. And now Japan is after- currently they’re not the aggressors.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.

    YUI: And their the- and then P- PRC is trying to drive a wedge between United States and its partners–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

    YUI: –and allies, which is Japan and–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: But to bring you back–

    YUI: –and Taiwan.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –to where we started here. What does Taiwan need from the United States? Because one of the things that President Trump referred to as a bargaining chip was this $14 billion weapons package–

    YUI: Exactly.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –that still has not been delivered to your country–

    YUI: Well–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –despite initial indications it would be.

    YUI: Well, it’s just not this purchase or this sale. Actually, it’s peace through strength is- is the best way to avoid any conflict. The- the- the notion that China will not attack Taiwan is on the basis that Taiwan is strong–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Right.

    YUI: –is- is, you know, that we are- we’re well prepared to fence any- fence off against any Chinese aggression.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: And there’s more than a billion dollars in additional aid that we heard Republican senators–

    YUI: Yes.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –including Tillis, Murkowski, McConnell, and Cornyn, say they want to know why the Trump administration is not delivering it.

    YUI: Exactly. Therefore, we want to share our burden of defense, our- share our burden of doing better at being better defended ourselves, and therefore we need- and we’re increasing our defense budget, and we need to procure arms as necessary. The United States has been our main supplier of selling weapons to Taiwan. We hope that we can get that weapons in- in- in as soon as possible.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Taiwan is also a huge supplier of computer chips to the rest of the world, 90% of the highest level computer chips. And Mike Gallagher, the former congressman who helped set up the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, wrote an op-ed in the journal arguing the biggest threat to humanity is not rogue AI, but rather AI controlled by China. He refers to Taiwan as the single point of failure in the most important technology the Communist Party wants to dominate. How do you shore up defense of those critical industries?

    YUI: Well, that’s- that’s why Taiwan matters to United States and to the world. It’s not just on the security side, which is part of the first island chain in Asia Pacific, but also Taiwan has been the relevant partner in terms of technology, in terms of semiconductor, especially. And United States is creating this huge wave of artificial intelligence development, you know, now superintelligence, this huge wave, and Taiwan is the one making the surfboards, you know–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

    YUI: –the semiconductors, the- the AI stacks, the servers that- that people will ride on this huge wave. So it’s interdependency symbiotic relationship between United States-Taiwan, and that makes Taiwan very relevant, and why it should be protected.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Ambassador, thank you for coming on and explaining the centrality of Taiwan to all of this. We’ll be back in a moment.

    YUI: Thank you very much.

  • 新闻


    你提供的内容本身就是中文新闻稿件,并非需要翻译的英文原文。请你提供需要翻译的英文新闻文章,我会按照要求为你完成精准翻译。

    瑞士公投否决收紧中立政策提案

    2026-09-27 22:06 / 联合早报

    支持收紧中立政策的阵营在瑞士全国投放海报,呼吁民众投票支持“不要战争、要中立”,不过这项提案最终被选民否决。 (法新社)

    瑞士选民星期天(9月27日)以明显多数票否决一项进一步收紧国家中立政策的提案。这项提案若获通过,将阻止瑞士实施经济制裁或与北约开展合作。

    路透社报道,据瑞士国家广播电视台SRF最新公投预测显示,超过三分之二选民反对将严格定义的中立条款写入瑞士宪法。由于提案也未能取得多数州支持,已确定遭到否决。

    瑞士的中立地位自1815年拿破仑战争结束以来获得国际承认,但政府应如何执行中立政策并无明确规定。

    右翼瑞士人民党认为,在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰后,瑞士对俄实施制裁,已经削弱了瑞士的传统中立立场。支持这项倡议的阵营在全国投放海报,呼吁民众投票支持“不要战争、要中立”。

    不过,瑞士政府及除瑞士人民党外的主要政党均反对这项倡议。瑞士外长卡西斯曾说,这项提案将损害国家安全,并阻碍瑞士与北约开展训练合作。

    伯尔尼大学欧洲政治学教授瓦瑟法伦在投票前说:“瑞士选民喜欢中立,但他们认可政府目前执行中立政策的方式。”

    他还说:“他们也普遍支持针对俄罗斯发动俄乌战争而实施的制裁措施,并不希望这一点发生改变。”

  • 特朗普对格陵兰的执念并非偶然——事关重大的利益所在


    2026年9月27日 美国东部时间上午8:55 / 福克斯新闻频道

    特朗普与丹麦达成新协议,在保留格陵兰丹麦主权的前提下扩大美国军事存在

    作者:阿曼达·马西亚斯 福克斯新闻

    格陵兰能源公司首席执行官、美国联邦矿产公司总裁罗伯特·普莱斯表示,随着中国和俄罗斯在关键矿产供应问题上步步紧逼,该协议有望提振长期投资并强化美国的安全保障。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/68a15198-3e86-449c-9b04-02549159231f

    收听本文
    3分钟

    格陵兰或许被冰雪覆盖,但其地表之下蕴藏着对全球经济至关重要的资源——包括稀土矿物、镍、铜、钯、钴、石油和天然气。

    这座北极岛屿的地理位置同样价值不菲。

    格陵兰地处北美与欧洲之间,位于关键军事和航运航线之上。随着乌克兰和伊朗冲突暴露全球能源与供应链的脆弱性,这座岛屿对美国和其他世界大国的重要性与日俱增。


    三张图表看懂:为何特朗普紧盯这座几乎全被冰雪覆盖的全球最大岛屿

    一张合成图片显示了唐纳德·特朗普总统与格陵兰的一场抗议活动的合成画面。特朗普宣布了一项关乎美国在格陵兰安全利益的协议,而丹麦和格陵兰则强调该协议保留了他们的主权和领土完整。(肖恩·加拉普/盖蒂图片社;rtur·维达克/阿纳多卢通讯社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    这些因素有助于解释,为何唐纳德·特朗普总统多年来一直推动加强美国在格陵兰的管控和影响力,以及为何他的政府近期与丹麦和格陵兰达成了一项新的安全协议。

    特朗普在联合国大会间隙签署的这项协议,将在保留格陵兰丹麦主权的前提下扩大美国在该岛的军事存在。

    以下是格陵兰成为全球战略意义最重大地区之一的三个原因。

    1. 格陵兰可能拥有美国亟需的关键矿产

    美国正寻求减少对中国和俄罗斯的依赖,摆脱其在电子产品、电池、能源基础设施和国防技术所用关键矿产供应上的掣肘。

    “我们不希望依赖中国获取稀土矿物,也不希望依赖俄罗斯,”格陵兰能源公司首席执行官、美国联邦矿产公司总裁罗伯特·普莱斯在接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访时表示。

    内嵌数据图表:30309299

    普莱斯所在的美国联邦矿产公司正在格陵兰西部的迪斯科岛周边勘探镍、铜、钯和钴矿。他表示,该地区最终可能媲美俄罗斯矿产资源丰富的诺里尔斯克地区,不过随着钻探工作的推进,其潜力仍有待证实。

    2. 格陵兰有望成为能源供应地

    格陵兰正在融化的冰层开辟了新的北极航运路线,同时也暴露了关键矿产资源,进一步提升了该岛日益增长的战略重要性。(乌尔里克·彼得森/努法托/盖蒂图片社)

    格陵兰的潜在财富并不仅限于矿产。普莱斯的格陵兰能源公司正在为该岛东部一处计划于2027年开钻的勘探油井申请许可,他表示当地的地质构造与出产石油的北海相似。

    “我们的许可证所属的石油系统与北海如出一辙,”普莱斯说道,并补充称该公司已在地表及地下取样到石油。

    特朗普的雄心勃勃的能源押注:在全球石油和天然气消耗量屡创新高之际,或能大获全胜

    该项目推进之际,伊朗局势动荡正扰乱全球能源市场,并威胁着霍尔木兹海峡的航运——这条航道是全球石油供应的关键动脉。

    “我们在格陵兰勘探石油的原因之一,就是眼下霍尔木兹海峡发生的状况,”普莱斯说道。

    格陵兰的油气潜力仍有待证实,且该项目还需要额外的许可、勘探工作和投资。

    3. 格陵兰占据关键军事位置

    格陵兰的皮图菲克太空基地是美国军方最北端的军事设施,承担导弹预警、导弹防御和太空监视任务。(托马斯·特拉斯达尔/里茨au扫描通讯社/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    格陵兰的战略价值还体现在其地理位置:地处北美与欧洲之间,靠近连接美国、俄罗斯和欧洲的关键航空、海上和导弹航线。

    美国在该岛保持军事存在已有数十年之久。皮图菲克太空基地前身为图勒空军基地,是美国国防部最北端的设施,承担导弹预警、导弹防御和太空监视任务。

    北极冰层融化开辟了新的航运路线,也引来了美国、俄罗斯和中国日益浓厚的兴趣。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    据特朗普政府透露,特朗普与丹麦和格陵兰达成的协议将扩大美国的军事存在,同时保留丹麦的主权。普莱斯表示,该协议还能提升投资者对长期石油、天然气和矿产项目的信心。

    “该协议能够巩固对格陵兰的长期投资,而这正是我们项目的方向,”普莱斯说道。“我们的项目都是石油、天然气和矿产领域的长期投资。”

    阿曼达·马西亚斯负责报道商业、经济与政治的交集,重点关注政策决策如何塑造市场、企业和美国工人。

    Trump’s Greenland obsession isn’t random. Here’s what’s at stake

    September 27, 2026 8:55am EDT / Fox News

    Trump’s new deal with Denmark expands the U.S. military presence while keeping Greenland under Danish sovereignty

    By Amanda Macias Fox News

    Robert Price, CEO of Greenland Energy Company and president of USFM Corporation, says the agreement could bolster long-term investment and US security as China, Russia loom over critical mineral supplies.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/68a15198-3e86-449c-9b04-02549159231f

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    Greenland may be covered in ice, but beneath its surface could be resources critical to the global economy — including rare earth minerals, nickel, copper, palladium, cobalt, oil and natural gas.

    The Arctic island’s location is just as valuable.

    Positioned between North America and Europe, Greenland sits along key military and shipping routes. As conflicts in Ukraine and Iran expose vulnerabilities in global energy and supply chains, the island has become increasingly important to the United States and other world powers.

    WHY TRUMP ZEROED IN ON GREENLAND, THE WORLD’S LARGEST ISLAND, MOSTLY COVERED IN ICE — IN 3 CHARTS

    A composite image shows President Donald Trump overlaid on a protest in Greenland. Trump announced an agreement concerning U.S. security interests in Greenland, while Denmark and Greenland have emphasized that the deal preserves their sovereignty and territorial integrity.(Sean Gallup/Getty Images; rtur Widak/Anadolu via Getty Images)

    Those factors help explain why President Donald Trump has spent years pushing for greater American control and influence in Greenland and why his administration recently reached a new security agreement with Denmark and Greenland.

    The deal, which Trump signed on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly, will expand the U.S. military presence on the island while keeping Greenland under Danish sovereignty.

    Here are three reasons Greenland has become one of the world’s most strategically important places.

    1. Greenland could hold critical minerals the U.S. needs

    The United States is seeking to reduce its dependence on China and Russia for critical minerals used in electronics, batteries, energy infrastructure and defense technology.

    “We don’t want to be dependent on China for our rare earth minerals, and we don’t want to be dependent on Russia for them either,” Robert Price, CEO of Greenland Energy Company and president of USFM Corporation, told Fox News Digital.

    FLOURISH CHART EMBED HERE: 30309299

    Price’s USFM is exploring nickel, copper, palladium and cobalt deposits around Disko Island in western Greenland. He said the region could eventually rival Russia’s mineral-rich Norilsk district, though its potential remains unproven as drilling continues.

    2. Greenland could become an energy source

    Greenland’s melting ice is opening new Arctic shipping routes and exposing critical mineral resources, adding to the island’s growing strategic importance.(Ulrik Pedersen/NurPhoto/Getty Images)

    Greenland’s potential riches extend beyond minerals. Price’s Greenland Energy Company is pursuing permits for an exploratory oil well planned for 2027 on the island’s eastern side, where he said the geology resembles the petroleum-producing North Sea.

    “Our licenses are similar to the same petroleum system as the North Sea,” Price said, adding that the company has sampled oil on and below the surface.

    TRUMP’S AMBITIOUS ENERGY BET COULD BE A WINNING HAND AS THE WORLD BURNS MORE OIL, GAS THAN EVER

    The project comes as the Iran war disrupts global energy markets and threatens shipping through the Strait of Hormuz a critical artery for the world’s oil supply.

    “One of the reasons that we are exploring for oil in Greenland is because of what’s going on in the Strait of Hormuz right now,” Price said.

    Greenland’s oil and gas potential remains unproven and would require additional permits, exploration and investment.

    3. Greenland occupies a critical military position

    Pituffik Space Base in Greenland serves as the U.S. military’s northernmost installation and supports missile warning, missile defense and space surveillance.(Thomas Traasdahl/Ritzau Scanpix/AFP via Getty Images)

    Greenland’s strategic value also comes from its location between North America and Europe, near key air, sea and missile routes connecting the United States, Russia and Europe.

    The U.S. has maintained a military presence on the island for decades. Pituffik Space Base, formerly known as Thule Air Base, is the northernmost Defense Department installation and supports missile warning, missile defense and space surveillance.

    Melting Arctic ice is opening new shipping routes and increasing interest from the United States, Russia and China.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Trump’s agreement with Denmark and Greenland would expand the U.S. military presence while preserving Danish sovereignty, according to the administration. Price said the deal could also boost investor confidence in long-term oil, gas and mineral projects.

    “What it does is it shores up long-term investment in Greenland, and that’s what our projects are,” Price said. “They’re long-term investments from oil, gas and minerals.”

    Amanda Macias covers the intersection of business, economics and politics, with a focus on how policy decisions shape markets, businesses and American workers.

  • 面对共和党铺天盖地的反变性人广告,部分民主党人调整回应策略


    2026-09-27T12:00:29.327Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/27/politics/democrats-trans-attacks-messaging-midterms

    两年前,唐纳德·特朗普总统的竞选团队借助变性人议题大肆攻击时任副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯,助其成功连任重返白宫。

    如今,民主党正面临新一轮类似特朗普式的攻击。而这一次,在党内就如何向选民回应该议题进行反思后,他们的回应变得更为强势。

    一些身处竞争激烈选区的民主党人明确表态反对跨性别运动员参加女子运动队,甚至有部分人宣称反对跨性别“意识形态”。得克萨斯州联邦参议员竞选人詹姆斯·塔拉利科等人正试图调和过往立场,以免其遭到新的审视。还有像俄亥俄州前参议员谢罗德·布朗这样的候选人,则完全淡化某些相关议题,指出其所在州已有相关法律对此作出规定。

    广告反馈

    部分候选人的策略在党内以及变性人群体倡导者中引发了争议。后者担心本社群会进一步被边缘化,而另一些民主党人则对此表示赞赏,认为民主党需要平息这一议题带来的风波。

    CNN周三发布的一项民调显示,在中期选举中,变性人议题对选民的重要性不及其他10项受访议题,经济问题位居首位。但当被问及在变性人议题上更倾向于哪一方时,选民更支持共和党。

    根据AdImpact机构的数据,自今年年初以来,共和党广告商已斥资超6000万美元,播出了超过190条提及变性人政策的电视广告。

    俄亥俄州众议员马西·卡普图尔所在的重新划分后的选区在2024年大选中有近11个百分点的选民支持特朗普。近期,她因播出广告称自己“投票支持共和党,将跨性别意识形态挡在校门外”,遭到其选区部分民主党人的批评。卡普图尔家乡托莱多所在的卢卡斯县民主党于周二呼吁她撤下该广告,称她“堕落到了共和党人的水平”。

    卡普图尔的竞选团队在一份声明中为广告的总体立场辩护,称她“支持父母更多地参与子女的教育事务”。

    LGBTQ维权组织“平等俄亥俄”将卡普图尔的评级从“B”下调至“D”,原因是她发布了最新广告。该组织还将俄亥俄州民主党州长候选人艾米·阿克顿的评级从“A”下调至“B”,因为她在6月表示“不支持男孩参加女子体育运动”。

    “针对变性人群体并非一些人认为的制胜策略,”“平等俄亥俄”首席执行官兼执行董事韦恩·斯图尔特在一份声明中说道。“真正的领导力意味着拒绝这种文化战诱饵,而非主动迎合。”

    和卡普图尔一样,得克萨斯州众议员文森特·冈萨雷斯所在的选区也被共和党重新划分,旨在削弱他的选情。他表示,两年前他直接回应反变性人言论的做法帮助他保住了席位,尽管当时南得克萨斯州的选民倾向大幅转向共和党。在2024年的一则广告中,他用西班牙语说道:“我从未推动过变性手术。”

    “我遭到了强烈反对,”他告诉CNN,“但我认为他们都错了,我们才是对的。”

    2024年,特朗普的竞选团队用“卡玛拉支持他们/她们,特朗普总统支持你”的口号大肆攻击哈里斯。这一攻击源于哈里斯2019年的言论,她当时表示支持在联邦监狱中为变性人提供性别确认护理。

    哈里斯后来在回忆录中承认,这是一个“制胜信息”,她的竞选团队本应“更多地关注如何削弱特朗普的攻击”。

    “问题不在于哈里斯副总统对某一议题持有特定观点,而在于特朗普将其塑造成了她最关心的头号议题,”肯塔基州州长安迪·贝希尔说道。民主党人称赞贝希尔在2023年连任竞选期间有效处理了这一议题,而他如今也是2028年总统大选的潜在候选人。

    随后在2025年弗吉尼亚州州长竞选期间,共和党候选人温索姆·厄尔-西尔斯在电视上铺天盖地投放广告,将民主党候选人阿比盖尔·斯潘伯格描绘成“支持他们/她们(跨性别身份)”的人。斯潘伯格则投放广告回应,呼吁“将政治赶出校园,信任父母和当地社区”。最终她以15个百分点的优势获胜。

    变性人维权组织“克里斯托弗街项目”执行主任泰勒·哈克表示,斯潘伯格为大家指明了方向,因为她直面这一议题“但也没有牺牲任何人”。美国人权运动将斯潘伯格的回应纳入了针对2026年候选人的指导方针,其中部分内容敦促候选人“直接回应关切”。

    “有一种观点认为,不要回应攻击,否则会给它们更多曝光机会。但实际上这并无益处,”一位不愿透露姓名的民主党全国战略家说道,他希望匿名讨论竞选策略。“这一点很重要,因为一旦你消解了攻击,就能按自己的意愿开展竞选活动。”

    阿拉斯加州联邦参议员候选人玛丽·佩尔托拉正在特朗普两年前以13个百分点优势获胜的州参选,她采用了直接回应的方式。她在一则直接面向镜头的广告中说道:“不,我不希望孩子接受变性手术,也不希望男性进入女卫生间。”

    在得克萨斯州,塔拉利科采取了更为微妙的策略。此前他曾在州众议院投票反对限制跨性别运动员的法案,如今他告诉福克斯新闻,他会“在可能损害安全性或公平性的情况下,反对跨性别运动员参加女子体育运动”。

    其他民主党人则试图更委婉地回应,提及自己为人父母的经历,称会始终保护孩子,甚至根本不提变性人群体。

    还有一些民主党人则态度更为不屑。布朗近期的一则广告就传递了这一信息,广告中俄亥俄州民众似乎对共和党聚焦变性人议题感到恼怒。

    “在俄亥俄州,对儿童实施变性手术是违法的,”一名男子说道。“没错——这是非法的。”

    威斯康星州民主党众议员马克·波坎是国会平等核心小组的联合主席,他表示布朗的策略是最佳选择,将其比作网球比赛。

    “我们的制胜一击是经济议题,”波坎说道。“(针对变性人攻击)把球打回去,然后准备赢得比赛。我认为谢罗德·布朗用最优雅、最明智的方式做到了这一点,非常真实,也十分坦诚。”

    Facing a barrage of Republican anti-trans ads, some Democrats are changing how they respond

    2026-09-27T12:00:29.327Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/27/politics/democrats-trans-attacks-messaging-midterms

    Two years ago, President Donald Trump’s campaign buried then-Vice President Kamala Harris with ads on transgender issues as he stormed back into the White House.

    Now, Democrats are confronting a fresh wave of attacks that sound like Trump’s – and this time, after a party reckoning about how to address the topic with voters, they are responding more forcefully.

    Some Democrats in competitive races are stating their clear opposition to trans athletes playing in girls’ sports teams or even saying they oppose trans “ideology.” Candidates like James Talarico in the Texas Senate race are trying to reconcile past positions receiving new scrutiny. And others, like former Sen. Sherrod Brown in Ohio, are downplaying certain issues altogether, noting their states already have laws addressing them.

    Ad Feedback

    Some of the candidates’ strategies have proven controversial within the party and among advocates for transgender people, who fear further marginalization of their community, but praise from other Democrats who believe the party needs to defuse the issue.

    A CNN poll released Wednesday found that transgender issues were less important voters in the midterm than 10 other issues that were tested, starting with the economy. But asked who they sided more with on transgender issues, voters gave the GOP an edge.

    According to data from AdImpact, GOP advertisers spent more than $60 million airing more than 190 TV ads that reference transgender policies since the start of the year.

    Ohio Rep. Marcy Kaptur, whose redrawn district went for Trump by almost 11 points in 2024, has been rebuked by some Democrats in her district for airing ads recently that note she “voted with Republicans to keep transgender ideology out of schools.” The Democratic Party in Lucas County, home to Kaptur’s hometown of Toledo, called on her Tuesday to take down the ads, saying she “stooped” to the level of Republicans.

    Kaptur’s campaign stood by the general message of the ads in a statement, saying she “supports parents having more insight into their children’s education.”

    The LGBT advocacy group Equality Ohio changed its rating of Kaptur from “B” to “D” after her latest ads. The group also downgraded Amy Acton, the Democratic nominee for governor, from “A” to “B” after she said in June that she does “not support boys playing in girls’ sports.”

    “Targeting trans people isn’t the winning strategy some people think it is,” Equality Ohio’s CEO and executive director, Dwayne Steward, said in a statement. “Real leadership means refusing this culture war bait, not reaching for it.”

    Texas Rep. Vicente Gonzalez, who like Kaptur is running in a district redrawn by Republicans targeting him, said his responding directly to anti-trans rhetoric helped him keep his seat two years ago even as South Texas shifted sharply to the right. In one 2024 ad, he says in Spanish, “I have never promoted sex changes.”

    “I took some very heavy pushback,” he told CNN, “and I think they were all wrong and we were right.”

    In 2024, Trump’s campaign hammered Harris with ads using the tagline, “Kamala is for they/them, President Trump is for you.” The attack stemmed from comments that Harris made in 2019 expressing support for gender-affirming care for transgender people in federal prison.

    Harris later conceded in her memoir that it was a “winning message” and that her campaign should have “given even more attention to how we might mitigate Trump’s attacks.”

    “It wasn’t that Vice President Harris had a certain view on an issue, it was that Trump made it look like it was the No. 1 issue for her,” said Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, whom Democrats credit with effectively handling the issue in his 2023 reelection campaign and is now a potential 2028 presidential contender.

    Then came the 2025 Virginia governor’s race, when Republican nominee Winsome Earle-Sears blanketed the airwaves with ads that characterized Abigail Spanberger, the Democratic nominee, as “being for they/them.” Spanberger responded with ads calling to “get politics out of our schools and trust parents and local communities.” She won by 15 points.

    Tyler Hack, executive director of the Christopher Street Project, a transgender advocacy group, said Spanberger showed the way because she took on the issue head-on “but also didn’t throw anyone under the bus.” The Human Rights Campaign cited Spanberger’s response in its guidance for 2026 candidates, which in part urges them to “address concerns directly.”

    “There’s a school of thought that says, don’t answer the attacks, you give them more airtime. In practicality, that’s not helpful,” one national Democratic strategist said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss campaign tactics. “It’s important because once you neutralize the attack, you can run the campaign you want to run.”

    Alaska Senate nominee Mary Peltola, running in a state Trump won two years ago by 13 points, embodies the direct approach. She says in a direct-to-camera ad, “No, I don’t want kids getting surgery to change genders or men in girls’ bathrooms.”

    In Texas, Talarico has deployed a more nuanced strategy. After previously voting against restrictions on transgender athletes in the state House, he told Fox News he would “oppose trans athletes playing in girls’ sports if it risks safety or fairness.”

    Other Democrats have tried to push back more obliquely, invoking their own experience as parents and saying they will always protect kids, without even mentioning transgender people.

    And then some Democrats have been more dismissive. That was the message of a recent ad by Brown, which opens with Ohioans appearing to express exasperation with the Republican focus on transgender people.

    “In Ohio, it’s against the law to perform transgender surgeries on kids,” one man says. “That’s right — it’s illegal.”

    Rep. Mark Pocan, a Wisconsin Democrat who co-chairs the Congressional Equality Caucus, said he liked Brown’s strategy the best, likening it to a tennis match.

    “A slam we have is the economy,” Pocan said. “Hit (the transgender attack) back over the net and just get ready to win the game, and I think Sherrod Brown showed the classiest, most intellectual way to do it that was very real and really honest.”

  • 中美峰会后高市与特朗普通话 重申同盟关系


    2026-09-27 22:39 / 联合早报 符祝慧 东京特派员

    • 习近平结束访美次日,特朗普与高市早苗通话约20分钟,介绍中美峰会细节,双方重申日美紧密协作。
    • 高市称一周内两次会晤体现同盟牢固性,并向特朗普表明“日美如今才是最值得信赖的盟友”。
    • 中美峰会文件将两国描述为二战“盟友”,日本政府内部有观点认为这是特朗普迎合中国的口头支持。
    • 日本舆论关注上述表述,《朝日新闻》评论认为修复中日关系已成为高市面临的重大外交挑战。


    9月22日,日本首相高市早苗(左)在纽约出席联合国大会期间,与美国总统特朗普进行会晤。 (法新社)

    中国国家主席习近平星期五(9月25日)结束对美国的国事访问后,美国总统特朗普次日就与日本首相高市早苗通电话。据高市说,特朗普向她介绍中美峰会的细节。这一密切的沟通节奏,与5月份在北京举行的中美峰会后如出一辙,那时特朗普是在回程的飞机上就与高市通话。

    高市随后向媒体披露,此次通话历时约20分钟,美方向她作了“详细”通报。不过,高市没有公开细节,只强调:“我们主要围绕涉华的一系列议题交换意见,包括经济安全、经济形势及安全事务等,并重申日美间的紧密协作。”

    针对在一周内先在纽约联合国大会期间会晤特朗普,随后两人又通电话,高市说:“(我们)一周内举行两次峰会,体现了日美同盟的牢固性。”

    然而,这次中美峰会成果文件中提到“两国领导人回顾了中美作为盟友并肩作战、最终赢得二战胜利”的表述。高市在被问及如何看待这一描述时说:“鉴于这是外交交流,我不会透露会谈的具体细节。但我已(向特朗普)表明,‘日美如今才是最值得信赖的盟友’,双方也确认将共同努力,为地区和全球和平稳定做出贡献。”

    日本舆论高度关注白宫将中美两国在二战期间描述为“盟友”的说法。据报道,日本政府内部有观点认为,这不过是特朗普为迎合中国的“口头支持”。不过,他们也对这一表述最终被写入正式文件感到吃惊。

    《每日新闻》指出,中国批评日本是“新型军国主义”,并试图离间日美同盟;特朗普的言论可能被解读为“对中国此类宣传的认可”。

    《读卖新闻》评论认为,特朗普过度展现对华友好姿态,给人一种“中国已经掌握主动权的印象”。该报认为,中美这两个超级大国之间实际上存在着难以调和的深层矛盾,但美国却将短期利益置于首位。

    基于与伊朗的冲突久拖不决,加上油价飙升,特朗普支持率暴跌,他目前只在意11月要面临的中期选举,根本“无力与中国抗衡”。

    《朝日新闻》指出,中美两国应被视为“已建立起一种管控竞争、防止升级为严重冲突的关系”。但是,两国必须确保关系不致沦为单纯的利益交换或大国间的利益权衡,而应更积极地维护国际稳定与发展。

    此次中美峰会也使日本政界和舆论界,对“中日关系陷入谷底”感到不妥。

    《朝日新闻》评论认为,由于无法与中国展开对话,日本被迫将对华关系托付给美国,具体而言是特朗普。如今,随着中美关系进入新阶段,要如何修复中日关系,已成为高市面临的一项重大外交挑战。

    中美峰会后高市与特朗普通话 重申同盟关系

    2026-09-27 22:39 / 联合早报 符祝慧 东京特派员

    • 习近平结束访美次日,特朗普与高市早苗通话约20分钟,介绍中美峰会细节,双方重申日美紧密协作。 – 高市称一周内两次会晤体现同盟牢固性,并向特朗普表明“日美如今才是最值得信赖的盟友”。 – 中美峰会文件将两国描述为二战“盟友”,日本政府内部有观点认为这是特朗普迎合中国的口头支持。 – 日本舆论关注上述表述,《朝日新闻》评论认为修复中日关系已成为高市面临的重大外交挑战。

    9月22日,日本首相高市早苗(左)在纽约出席联合国大会期间,与美国总统特朗普进行会晤。 (法新社)

    中国国家主席习近平星期五(9月25日)结束对美国的国事访问后,美国总统特朗普次日就与日本首相高市早苗通电话。据高市说,特朗普向她介绍中美峰会的细节。这一密切的沟通节奏,与5月份在北京举行的中美峰会后如出一辙,那时特朗普是在回程的飞机上就与高市通话。

    高市随后向媒体披露,此次通话历时约20分钟,美方向她作了“详细”通报。不过,高市没有公开细节,只强调:“我们主要围绕涉华的一系列议题交换意见,包括经济安全、经济形势及安全事务等,并重申日美间的紧密协作。”

    针对在一周内先在纽约联合国大会期间会晤特朗普,随后两人又通电话,高市说:“(我们)一周内举行两次峰会,体现了日美同盟的牢固性。”

    然而,这次中美峰会成果文件中提到“两国领导人回顾了中美作为盟友并肩作战、最终赢得二战胜利”的表述。高市在被问及如何看待这一描述时说:“鉴于这是外交交流,我不会透露会谈的具体细节。但我已(向特朗普)表明,‘日美如今才是最值得信赖的盟友’,双方也确认将共同努力,为地区和全球和平稳定做出贡献。”

    日本舆论高度关注白宫将中美两国在二战期间描述为“盟友”的说法。据报道,日本政府内部有观点认为,这不过是特朗普为迎合中国的“口头支持”。不过,他们也对这一表述最终被写入正式文件感到吃惊。

    《每日新闻》指出,中国批评日本是“新型军国主义”,并试图离间日美同盟;特朗普的言论可能被解读为“对中国此类宣传的认可”。

    《读卖新闻》评论认为,特朗普过度展现对华友好姿态,给人一种“中国已经掌握主动权的印象”。该报认为,中美这两个超级大国之间实际上存在着难以调和的深层矛盾,但美国却将短期利益置于首位。

    基于与伊朗的冲突久拖不决,加上油价飙升,特朗普支持率暴跌,他目前只在意11月要面临的中期选举,根本“无力与中国抗衡”。

    《朝日新闻》指出,中美两国应被视为“已建立起一种管控竞争、防止升级为严重冲突的关系”。但是,两国必须确保关系不致沦为单纯的利益交换或大国间的利益权衡,而应更积极地维护国际稳定与发展。

    此次中美峰会也使日本政界和舆论界,对“中日关系陷入谷底”感到不妥。

    《朝日新闻》评论认为,由于无法与中国展开对话,日本被迫将对华关系托付给美国,具体而言是特朗普。如今,随着中美关系进入新阶段,要如何修复中日关系,已成为高市面临的一项重大外交挑战。

湘ICP备2026001899号-2