博客

  • 新闻


    印尼弗洛雷斯岛再传5.7级地震 84岁瘫老妇受困三天奇迹生还

    2026年8月20日 07:40 / 联合早报

    印尼救援人员星期三(8月19日)正在东芒加莱地区,将一名伤者用担架抬上救护车,伤者相信就是这名获救的84岁瘫老妇。 (法新社)

    德国地球科学研究中心称,印度尼西亚弗洛雷斯岛再次发生5.7级地震。

    新华社报道,德国地球科学研究中心信息显示,弗洛雷斯岛星期三(8月19日)格林尼治标准时间晚上10时45分(新加坡时间星期四清晨6时45分)再次发生地震。震源深度10公里。

    上星期六(15日)当地发生7.7级地震,造成73人死亡,900多人受伤,近6万人流离失所。

    另据法新社报道,一名84岁、下肢瘫痪的老妇在印尼强震导致房屋倒塌后,奇迹般在三天后被发现生还。

    84岁的保利娜(Paulina Pobi)住在弗洛勒斯岛北部一座小岛上,她的房屋是数百栋被地震震塌的房屋之一。

    她受困在倒塌的竹墙下,直到家人星期二(18日)回家才找到她。家人起初以为她已经获救,并被安置到避难所。

    当地官员鲁道夫斯说:“由于她身体瘫痪,无法移动或说话,因此直到第四天,家人才终于找到她。”

    他也说:“她身体状况良好,没有受伤。只是因为好几天没吃没喝,所以有点虚弱……感觉很不真实,简直像个奇迹。”

    据印尼气象、气候和地球物理局称,自上星期六以来已记录到3000多次余震,其中至少86次震感强烈,居民都能感受到。

    当局已运送近400吨援助物资,包括食品、饮用水和药品。

    印尼弗洛雷斯岛再传5.7级地震 84岁瘫老妇受困三天奇迹生还

    2026年8月20日 07:40 / 联合早报

    印尼救援人员星期三(8月19日)正在东芒加莱地区,将一名伤者用担架抬上救护车,伤者相信就是这名获救的84岁瘫老妇。 (法新社)

    德国地球科学研究中心称,印度尼西亚弗洛雷斯岛再次发生5.7级地震。

    新华社报道,德国地球科学研究中心信息显示,弗洛雷斯岛星期三(8月19日)格林尼治标准时间晚上10时45分(新加坡时间星期四清晨6时45分)再次发生地震。震源深度10公里。

    上星期六(15日)当地发生7.7级地震,造成73人死亡,900多人受伤,近6万人流离失所。

    另据法新社报道,一名84岁、下肢瘫痪的老妇在印尼强震导致房屋倒塌后,奇迹般在三天后被发现生还。

    84岁的保利娜(Paulina Pobi)住在弗洛勒斯岛北部一座小岛上,她的房屋是数百栋被地震震塌的房屋之一。

    她受困在倒塌的竹墙下,直到家人星期二(18日)回家才找到她。家人起初以为她已经获救,并被安置到避难所。

    当地官员鲁道夫斯说:“由于她身体瘫痪,无法移动或说话,因此直到第四天,家人才终于找到她。”

    他也说:“她身体状况良好,没有受伤。只是因为好几天没吃没喝,所以有点虚弱……感觉很不真实,简直像个奇迹。”

    据印尼气象、气候和地球物理局称,自上星期六以来已记录到3000多次余震,其中至少86次震感强烈,居民都能感受到。

    当局已运送近400吨援助物资,包括食品、饮用水和药品。

  • 民主社会主义者正迎来高光时刻。但他们对“民主社会主义者”的定义并未达成共识


    2026-08-19T23:29:05.357Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/19/politics/democratic-socialists-platform-disagreement

    州众议员安吉·尼克松周二在佛罗里达州参议院初选中获胜,这是民主社会主义者越来越多的胜利中的最新一例——这些人是民主党左翼反抗运动的重要组成部分。

    但在民主社会主义运动以及更广泛的进步主义运动内部,对于该群体的优先事项存在分歧,一些候选人也不愿完全接受这一标签。

    尼克松并未刻意强调自己是美国民主社会主义者组织(DSA)的成员,但在选举前被问及此事时,她告诉CNN记者劳拉·科茨,该组织与“我的信念一致:勤劳的普通民众应该能够塑造自己的社区和经济形态。”

    “我们可以整天讨论标签,人们的标签,”她说,“我关心的是民众的需求。”

    DSA的纲领涵盖一系列议题,在民主党主流阵营中接受程度各不相同。

    一些政策主张几乎得到所有自称民主社会主义者的候选人以及更广泛进步运动的许多成员的广泛支持。

    这些主张包括支持政府资助的“全民医保”、反对向以色列提供军事援助以回应其在加沙的行动,以及支持提高税收——尤其是对富人征税——以扩大医疗、住房和儿童保育等领域的政府资助社会安全网项目。

    例如在纽约市,市长扎赫兰·曼达尼推出了免费儿童保育试点项目,对部分受租金管制的公寓实施租金冻结,并启动了开设5家市营杂货店的计划,旨在为主食提供30%的折扣。

    尼克松的竞选纲领涵盖了其中多项主张,包括全民医保、经济适用房以及对亿万富翁征收年度财富税。她周二击败了资金雄厚得多的温和派候选人、退休陆军中校亚历克斯·温德曼,这一胜利也提醒人们,包括尼克松在内的民主社会主义者普遍持有的一个立场——对2023年10月7日哈马斯袭击后以色列在加沙战争的强烈不满——也得到了许多民主党选民的认同。

    但DSA题为“劳动者应得更多!”的纲领中一些更具争议的内容需要大幅调整。

    “美国民主社会主义者组织正在打造一个以建立工人阶级民主社会为目标的政党。我们的敌人不仅是个别老板,而是整个全球资本主义体系;不仅是这个或那个警察、法官或总统,而是我们社会中整个反民主的结构。我们是为变革社会而战的劳动者:赢得民主之战、起草新宪法、建立民主社会主义共和国,”纲领中写道。

    该纲领呼吁废除美国参议院并扩大众议院规模——这一观点反映了一些进步人士的信念,即比例代表制比旨在保护人口较少州利益的选举制度更可取——同时呼吁将大型企业国有化、公开为选举提供资金、结束两党制、停止移民拘留和驱逐。纲领还寻求“使警察部门非军事化、削弱警察工会的权力,并将资金重新分配给公共服务,以此作为彻底废除保护富人、监禁穷人的警察和监狱系统的步骤。”

    一些候选人已经采纳了部分更左翼的主张。6月在纽约市初选中击败众议员阿德里亚诺·埃斯帕利尔的民主社会主义者达里亚利萨·阿维拉-谢瓦利埃告诉Vox新闻,她认为“所有驱逐都是错误的”;而上周在威斯康星州民主党初选中失利的弗朗西斯卡·洪此前曾呼吁削减警察预算并废除警察部门。

    但并非所有DSA成员或与DSA结盟的进步人士都在这些纲领条款上立场一致。不过,共和党人急于将整个民主党一概而论,在电视广告中突出这些主张中最具争议的部分,不仅针对民主社会主义者候选人,还针对所有以民主党旗号参选的人。

    “阿卜杜勒·埃尔赛义德和社会主义者已经接管了密歇根州民主党,”共和党州长协会上周在一则广告中如此表示,该广告针对该州州长竞选的民主党候选人乔斯琳·本森,将她与支持削减警察预算的组织联系起来。

    “这不再是格蕾琴·惠特默的民主党,”广告中说道,惠特默是受欢迎的两届民主党州长。“这个党更加自由和极端,乔斯琳·本森正追随他们的激进步调。”

    随着中期选举竞选格局趋于稳固,唐纳德·特朗普总统也发起了自己的攻击。

    近几个月来,他声称民主党已经被“无神论的共产主义者”掌控。

    “在我看来,这是我国建国250年以来面临的最严重威胁,”他6月在信仰与自由联盟会议上说道。“这对我国构成重大威胁。”

    包括纽约州众议员亚历山大·奥卡西奥-科特兹和曼达尼在内的知名民主社会主义者试图与一些更具争议的立场保持距离,收回了此前对削减警察预算的支持。

    奥卡西奥-科特兹更广泛地暗示,左翼在疫情期间的一些言论过于极端。

    “我有一位市议员同事有句话:‘觉醒一代1.0太疯狂了’,”这位纽约州女议员最近在ABC新闻《本周》节目中说道。

    “我认为我们都认同尽可能降低犯罪率的目标。你知道,在封锁期间,当时使用的言论当然不是我们今天会用的言论,”她说。

    美国最知名的民主社会主义者、佛蒙特州参议员伯尼·桑德斯从未支持过削减警察预算。

    另一位民主社会主义者梅拉特·基罗斯在科罗拉多州击败了长期任职的众议员戴安娜·德盖特,她告诉PBS新闻,她同意DSA关于全民医保、普及儿童保育、排名选择投票和32小时工作周的呼吁,但不支持废除参议院、退出北大西洋公约组织、削减警察预算或除公用事业外将大型企业国有化。

    “我们真正将‘民主’融入了民主社会主义,”基罗斯说道,她解释说DSA的纲领由其成员投票决定,“几乎可以肯定,并非每个成员都完全同意整个纲领。”

    一些不认为自己是民主社会主义者的进步人士,如赢得密歇根州参议院民主党提名的前公职人员阿卜杜勒·埃尔赛义德,表示关键区别在于他们相信资本主义。

    “我不是社会主义者。我相信资本主义。我只是认为资本主义必须受到监管,”埃尔赛义德上个月在接受CNN采访时说道。

    一些候选人在寻求当选公职期间也退出了DSA。

    在密歇根州第七国会选区,进步主义组织“日出运动”的联合创始人威廉·劳伦斯正试图翻转该国竞争最激烈的众议院选区之一,挑战任职仅一届的共和党众议员汤姆·巴雷特。

    他曾是民主社会主义者,但表示他最近已不再保留美国民主社会主义者组织的会员资格。

    “我非常尊重DSA以及他们在全国范围内开展的工作,但我觉得有必要非常明确地表明,我们在这里竞选的纲领是基于我们在第七选区各地开展的对话形成的,”劳伦斯本月早些时候告诉CNN。“这只是因为我想向我的选民表明,我在这里是为了代表他们。”

    Democratic socialists are having a moment. They’re not all in agreement on what it means to be one

    2026-08-19T23:29:05.357Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/19/politics/democratic-socialists-platform-disagreement

    State Rep. Angie Nixon’s win in the Florida Senate primary on Tuesday was the latest in a growing list of victories by democratic socialists who are a prominent part of the Democratic Party’s left-wing insurgency.

    But within the democratic socialist movement, and the broader progressive movement, there are disagreements over what the group’s priorities should be — and some candidates have been hesitant to fully embrace the label.

    Nixon hasn’t sought to highlight her membership in the Democratic Socialists of America, but when pressed ahead of the election, she told CNN’s Laura Coates that the group aligns with “my beliefs that people — hardworking, everyday people — should get to shape what their communities look like and what their economies look like.”

    “We can talk about labels all day long, people’s labels,” she said. “I am concerned about the needs of people.”

    DSA’s platform covers a range of issues with varying levels of acceptability within the Democratic mainstream.

    Some policy priorities are widely embraced by virtually all candidates who associate themselves with democratic socialism and many members of the broader progressive movement.

    Among those positions are support for government-funded Medicare for All, opposition to military aid for Israel over its actions in Gaza, and support for higher taxes — particularly on the wealthy — to pay for an expansion of government-funded social safety net programs in areas like health care, housing and child care.

    In New York City, for example, Mayor Zohran Mamdani has launched a free child care pilot program, enacted rent freezes across some rent-stabilized apartments, and launched an effort to open five city-backed grocery stores intended to offer 30% discounts on staple food items.

    Nixon ran on several of those issues, including universal healthcare, affordable housing, and an annual wealth tax on billionaires. Her win Tuesday over a much better-funded moderate candidate, retired Army Lt. Col. Alex Vindman, was also a reminder that one position widely embraced by democratic socialists, including Nixon — furor over Israel’s war in Gaza after Hamas’ October 7, 2023, attack — is also held by many Democratic voters, as well.

    But some more controversial parts of DSA’s platform, entitled “Workers Deserve More!”, would require significant overhaul.

    “The Democratic Socialists of America is building a party whose goal is a democratic society of the working class. Our enemies are not just individual bosses, but the entire global system of capital; not just this or that cop, judge, or president, but the entire anti-democratic structure of our society. We are workers fighting to transform society: to win the battle for democracy, draft a new constitution, and create a democratic socialist republic,” the platform says.

    The platform includes calls to abolish the US Senate and expand the House — a view that reflects some progressives’ belief that proportional representation is more favorable than a system designed to protect the interests of less populated states — nationalize large corporations, publicly finance elections, end the two-party system, and stop immigrant detentions and deportations. It also seeks to “demilitarize police departments, disempower police unions, and redirect funding to public services as steps towards fully abolishing the police and prison system which protects the rich and jails the poor.”

    Some candidates have leaned into some of the further left ideas. Darializa Avila-Chevalier, the democratic socialist who ousted Rep. Adriano Espaillat in a New York City primary in June, told Vox she believes that “all deportations are wrong” while Francesca Hong, who lost the Democratic primary in Wisconsin last week, has previously called for defunding and abolishing police departments.

    But not all DSA members, or DSA-aligned progressives, are on the same page about these platform planks. Republicans, however, are eager to paint the entire Democratic Party with the same broad brush, highlighting the most controversial of those positions in television ads targeting not just democratic socialist candidates but all of those running under the Democratic banner.

    “Abdul El-Sayed and the socialists have taken over Michigan’s Democratic Party,” the Republican Governors Association said in an ad last week targeting the Democratic nominee in the state’s governor’s race, Jocelyn Benson, as it linked her to groups that supported defunding police.

    “This is not Gretchen Whitmer’s Democratic Party,” the ad said, referring to the popular two-term Democratic governor. “It’s far more liberal and extreme, and Jocelyn Benson is marching to their radical drumbeat.

    President Donald Trump has made his own attacks as well as the midterm field solidifies.

    In recent months, he’s claimed Democrats have been overtaken by “godless communists.”

    “This is the most serious threat to our country since its existence, in my opinion, 250 years ago,” he said at a Faith and Freedom Coalition conference in June. “This is a major threat to our country.”

    Notable democratic socialists, including New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Mamdani, have sought to distance themselves from some more controversial stances, walking back their previous support for defunding the police.

    Ocasio-Cortez has more broadly suggested some of the left’s pandemic-era rhetoric went too far.

    “I have a local city councilman that has this saying: ‘Woke 1 was crazy,’” the New York congresswoman said recently on ABC’s “This Week.”

    “I think that we all share in the goals of having as low a crime rate as possible. I think that, you know, during lockdown, of course, rhetoric in that time is not rhetoric that we would use today,” she said.

    The nation’s most prominent democratic socialist, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, has never supported defunding the police.

    Another democratic socialist, Melat Kiros, who defeated long-time Rep. Diana DeGette in Colorado, told PBS she agrees with the DSA’s calls for Medicare for All, universal child care, ranked-choice voting and a 32-hour work week, but does not support abolishing the Senate, withdrawing from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, defunding the police or establishing public ownership of major corporations aside from utilities.

    “We really put the ‘democracy’ into democratic socialism,” Kiros said, explaining that the DSA’s platform is voted on by its members and that it’s “almost certain that not every single member agrees with the entirety of the platform.”

    Progressives who do not consider themselves democratic socialists, like Abdul El-Sayed, the former public health official who won the Democratic nomination in Michigan’s Senate race, say a key difference is that they believe in capitalism.

    “I am not somebody who is a socialist. I believe in capitalism. I just believe that capitalism has to be regulated,” El-Sayed said in an interview with CNN last month.

    Some candidates have also left the DSA as they seek elected office.

    In Michigan’s 7th District, William Lawrence, a co-founder of the progressive Sunrise Movement, is trying to flip one of the most competitive House districts in the country as he takes on first-term Republican Rep. Tom Barrett.

    He was a democratic socialist, but said he recently allowed his Democratic Socialists of America membership to lapse.

    “I’ve got a lot of respect for DSA and the work that they’re doing around the country, but I felt a need to make it very clear that the platform we’re running on here is the one that has come up based on the conversations we’re having across the 7th District,” Lawrence told CNN earlier this month. “It’s just because I want to make clear to my constituents that I’m here to represent them.”

  • 李刚仁和巴埃纳替补建功 体马胜马拉加迎西甲开门红


    2026年8月20日 07:56 / 联合早报

    李刚仁(中)和巴埃纳(左)替补上阵后各射入一个精彩进球,帮助体育马德里全取三分。 (路透社)

    (马德里综合电)凭借李康仁和巴埃纳(Baena)的精彩进球,体育马德里(Atletico Madrid)在新加坡时间星期四(8月20日)凌晨在西甲联赛主场以2比0打败升班马马拉加(Malaga),取得新赛季的开门红。

    此前曾渴望加盟巴塞罗那(Barcelona)的阿根廷国脚阿尔瓦雷斯(Alvarez),因在世界杯后的假期结束后仍在恢复体能,与另外几名球员一样尚未归队参赛。体马之前表示不会出售阿尔瓦雷斯,巴塞据报也已经对他打消念头。

    主帅迭戈·西梅奥内(Diego Simeone)本场派出了一支充满年轻面孔的阵容,第58分钟替补登场的新援李康仁和巴埃纳分别在禁区外轰入远射,为球队全取三分。

    今年夏天从巴黎圣日耳曼(PSG)转会到体马,并穿上离队的体马传奇格里耶兹芒(Griezmann)留下的7号球衣的韩国国脚李刚仁,在第70分钟于右路拿球内切至禁区边缘,随后起脚射出一记漂亮的弧线球,打破僵局。

    比赛还剩五分钟时,西班牙世界杯冠军成员巴埃纳轰出一记技惊四座的自由球,皮球击中横梁弹入网窝。

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkdEq4NUM-M

    西梅奥内在赛后说:“这是两个非常精彩的进球,让我们赢下了一场并不轻松的比赛。”

    李刚仁则说:“我们对胜利感到高兴,我们会继续努力在下一场比赛进步。我现在还缺乏节奏,但随着训练的深入,我们会有所提升。”

    马拉加在2018年从西甲降级后,曾一度跌入西班牙第三级别联赛,之后一路拼杀重返顶级联赛。他们在上半场防守顽强,没有给体马太多机会。

    巴埃纳评价道:“首场比赛总是很艰难。马拉加是一支很棒的球队,拥有很多年轻球员,他们给我们制造了很大的麻烦。我很高兴能在大都会球场攻入我的首个(主场)进球。”巴埃纳上赛季从比利亚雷亚尔(Villarreal)加盟体马,不过表现起伏不定。

    上赛季获得第四名的体马,将在星期天(23日)主场迎战上赛季力压他们夺得第三名的比利亚雷亚尔。

    本周末,西班牙两大豪门皇家马德里(Real Madrid)和巴塞罗那也将开启他们的新赛季征程,皇马将于新加坡时间星期天凌晨客场对阵西班牙人(Espanyol),而巴塞则在星期一(24日)凌晨客场对阵埃尔切(Elche)。

    李刚仁和巴埃纳替补建功 体马胜马拉加迎西甲开门红

    2026年8月20日 07:56 / 联合早报

    李刚仁(中)和巴埃纳(左)替补上阵后各射入一个精彩进球,帮助体育马德里全取三分。 (路透社)

    (马德里综合电)凭借李康仁和巴埃纳(Baena)的精彩进球,体育马德里(Atletico Madrid)在新加坡时间星期四(8月20日)凌晨在西甲联赛主场以2比0打败升班马马拉加(Malaga),取得新赛季的开门红。

    此前曾渴望加盟巴塞罗那(Barcelona)的阿根廷国脚阿尔瓦雷斯(Alvarez),因在世界杯后的假期结束后仍在恢复体能,与另外几名球员一样尚未归队参赛。体马之前表示不会出售阿尔瓦雷斯,巴塞据报也已经对他打消念头。

    主帅迭戈·西梅奥内(Diego Simeone)本场派出了一支充满年轻面孔的阵容,第58分钟替补登场的新援李康仁和巴埃纳分别在禁区外轰入远射,为球队全取三分。

    今年夏天从巴黎圣日耳曼(PSG)转会到体马,并穿上离队的体马传奇格里耶兹芒(Griezmann)留下的7号球衣的韩国国脚李刚仁,在第70分钟于右路拿球内切至禁区边缘,随后起脚射出一记漂亮的弧线球,打破僵局。

    比赛还剩五分钟时,西班牙世界杯冠军成员巴埃纳轰出一记技惊四座的自由球,皮球击中横梁弹入网窝。

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkdEq4NUM-M

    西梅奥内在赛后说:“这是两个非常精彩的进球,让我们赢下了一场并不轻松的比赛。”

    李刚仁则说:“我们对胜利感到高兴,我们会继续努力在下一场比赛进步。我现在还缺乏节奏,但随着训练的深入,我们会有所提升。”

    马拉加在2018年从西甲降级后,曾一度跌入西班牙第三级别联赛,之后一路拼杀重返顶级联赛。他们在上半场防守顽强,没有给体马太多机会。

    巴埃纳评价道:“首场比赛总是很艰难。马拉加是一支很棒的球队,拥有很多年轻球员,他们给我们制造了很大的麻烦。我很高兴能在大都会球场攻入我的首个(主场)进球。”巴埃纳上赛季从比利亚雷亚尔(Villarreal)加盟体马,不过表现起伏不定。

    上赛季获得第四名的体马,将在星期天(23日)主场迎战上赛季力压他们夺得第三名的比利亚雷亚尔。

    本周末,西班牙两大豪门皇家马德里(Real Madrid)和巴塞罗那也将开启他们的新赛季征程,皇马将于新加坡时间星期天凌晨客场对阵西班牙人(Espanyol),而巴塞则在星期一(24日)凌晨客场对阵埃尔切(Elche)。

  • 哈里王子与梅根将搬回英国


    2026年8月19日 / 美国东部时间晚上7:27 / 哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)新闻

    作者:乔丹·弗赖曼 新闻编辑
    乔丹·弗赖曼是CBS新闻网的新闻编辑,负责报道突发新闻、热点事件、体育和犯罪新闻。他曾供职于《Spin》和《Death and Taxes》杂志。

    阅读完整简介

    哈里王子与妻子萨塞克斯公爵夫人梅根正搬回英国,距他们移居美国并在加州定居已过去六年多。

    据CBS新闻的合作媒体英国广播公司(BBC)报道,查尔斯三世国王已于周日得知这一决定,且哈里王子或梅根并无恢复王室公职的计划。另据BBC消息,哈里的兄长威廉王子与凯瑟琳王妃也已获悉此事。

    这对夫妇曾在2020年1月宣布将退出“资深”王室角色,并努力实现脱离王室的财政独立。

    他们当时在一份声明中表示:“这种地域上的平衡安排,将让我们能够抚养儿子,让他了解自己出身的王室传统,同时也为我们的家庭提供空间,专注于新篇章,包括我们新慈善机构的启动。”

    据BBC报道,哈里和梅根如今育有两名子女:2019年出生的阿尔奇,以及2021年出生的莉莉贝特。两人已注册入学,将于9月在英国开启学业。

    白金汉宫随后于2021年2月证实,这对夫妇不再是王室在职成员。二人退出王室角色并移居加州的决定,已与王室其他成员产生了相当程度的紧张关系。

    2021年哈里与梅根接受奥普拉·温弗瑞专访时,这类紧张关系进一步升级。访谈中,他们谈及了王室背后的种种矛盾。

    除其他话题外,梅根讲述了相关对话:他们的儿子阿尔奇不会被授予王子头衔,也不会获得安保保护;还提到在她怀孕期间,曾有人讨论阿尔奇的肤色“会有多深”。

    而哈里在那次访谈中表示,他对父亲查尔斯三世国王“感到失望”,还称自己与兄长“走上了不同的道路”。

    据BBC报道,哈里、梅根与他们的子女于上月访英,多年来首次与查尔斯国王会面,但当时并未提及此次搬迁计划。此次访英并非毫无争议。

    BBC在此次访问前曾报道,哈里曾考虑不带妻子和子女同行,因为他提出的由纳税人出资提供安保保护的请求被英国当局驳回。

    2024年,萨塞克斯公爵曾就一项判决提起诉讼败诉:该判决决定,在他退出王室公职后访英期间,将下调为他配备的安保人员规格。

    杜阿尔特·迪亚斯与马克·奥斯本对本文亦有贡献。

    Prince Harry and Meghan moving back to U.K.

    August 19, 2026 / 7:27 PM EDT / CBS News

    By Jordan Freiman News Editor
    Jordan Freiman is a news editor for CBSNews.com. He covers breaking news, trending stories, sports and crime. Jordan has previously worked at Spin and Death and Taxes.

    Read Full Bio

    Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, are moving back to the U.K., more than six years after they moved to the U.S. and settled into a home in California.

    King Charles III was informed of the decision on Sunday, and there are no plans for Prince Harry or Meghan to resume their royal duties, CBS News’ partner network BBC News reported. Harry’s brother, Prince William, and Princess Catherine were also told, according to BBC News.

    The couple said in January 2020 they would be stepping away from “senior” royal roles and were working to become financially independent from the royal family.

    “This geographic balance will enable us to raise our son with an appreciation for the royal tradition into which he was born, while also providing our family with the space to focus on the next chapter, including the launch of our new charitable entity,” they said in a statement at the time.

    Prince Harry and Meghan now have two children, Archie, born in 2019, and Lilibet, born in 2021. Both are enrolled to start school in the U.K. in September, BBC News reported.

    Buckingham Palace then confirmed in February 2021 that the couple were no longer working members of the royal family. The pair’s decisions to step away from their roles and move to California have created considerable tension with other members of the royal family.

    Those tensions were elevated further when Harry and Meghan sat down for an interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021, during which they discussed their struggles behind the scenes with the royals.

    Among other topics, Meghan recounted conversations about how their son, Archie, would not be given the title of prince and how he wouldn’t have security, and said there were discussions while she was pregnant about “how dark” Archie’s skin color would be.

    Harry, meanwhile, said in that interview that he was “disappointed” with his father, King Charles III, and that he and his brother were “on different paths.”

    Harry, Meghan and their children traveled to the U.K. last month and met with King Charles for the first time in years, although the move was not discussed during that visit, BBC News reported. That trip was not without controversy.

    BBC News reported prior to the visit that Harry was reconsidering bringing his wife and children on the trip because his request for taxpayer-funded police protection was rejected by British authorities.

    The Duke of Sussex had previously lost a court battle in 2024 over the decision to downgrade his security detail when he makes visits back to the U.K. following the announcement that he was stepping away from royal duties.

    Duarte Dias and Mark Osborne contributed to this report.

  • 美国联邦贸易委员会考虑要求企业披露个性化定价行为


    2026-08-19 / 路透社

    作者:大卫·谢泼德森

    2026年8月19日 美国东部时间晚上9:20 更新于两小时前

    image

    • 监管式定价或违反美国法律,该机构表示
    • 酒店不得向赴葬礼出行的旅客抬高房价
    • 加州正调查此类行为,美国议员已提出担忧

    华盛顿8月19日路透电 — 美国联邦贸易委员会(FTC)周三表示,正在考虑要求企业披露是否使用个性化定价数据,这一做法正受到州级和联邦官员越来越多的审查。

    FTC以2票全票通过发布一份执法政策声明草案,草案称禁止欺诈行为的法律很可能禁止未经披露就使用个人数据制定价格的行为。

    订阅《每日案卷》新闻简报,将最新法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱,开启您的清晨。点击此处注册

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    监管式定价是指企业利用消费者的个人数据——例如浏览历史、位置信息和购物习惯——为产品制定个性化的算法定价,而非采用统一的全市场定价标准。

    “当消费者看到标价时,他们期望这是其他所有人都能看到的统一价格,而非零售商基于其个人数据估算出的、他们愿意支付的价格,”FTC主席安德鲁·弗格森说道。

    该机构列举了若干可能存在不当行为的监管式定价手段。潜在的风险信号包括:快递公司根据“家中有多名子女”的数据向客户收取更高的牛奶费用,或是酒店根据“消费者是为葬礼出行”的个人数据抬高房价。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    FTC拟议的执法政策将开放30天的公众意见征询期。FTC表示,并未就“某些个性化定价行为即便完全披露后是否仍属不公平”表态。

    今年1月,加州总检察长罗布·邦塔宣布对“使用个人数据制定个性化价格”的行为展开全面调查。美国国会的共和党和民主党议员也已提出相关担忧。

    消费者联盟的高级政策分析师格蕾丝·盖迪对FTC的举措表示赞赏。

    “不该有人因为公司知晓其在线搜索内容、收入情况、家庭构成或行踪,就为食品杂货或其他生活必需品支付更高价格,”她说道。

    美国经济自由项目的高级法律顾问李·赫普纳呼吁FTC采取进一步行动。“即便你被绑在铁轨上时能看到火车驶来,被火车撞到的痛苦也不会有丝毫减少,”赫普纳说道。

    去年12月,Instacart终止了导致不同 shopper 针对同一商品看到不同价格的价格测试。该公司放弃这一做法之前,消费者联盟和另外两家非营利组织的一项研究显示,部分 shopper 看到的价格比同一商店浏览同款商品的其他消费者高出多达23%。

    去年11月,议员们要求达美航空回应其是否制定个性化价格及其他定价行为。达美航空回应称,其不会基于个人信息制定价格。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    大卫·谢泼德森报道;大卫·格雷戈里奥编辑

    我们的标准:汤森路透信托原则

    US FTC considers requiring disclosure of personalized pricing

    2026-08-19 / Reuters

    By David Shepardson

    August 19, 2026 9:20 PM UTC Updated 2 hours ago

    Signage is seen at the Federal Trade Commission headquarters in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 29, 2020. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

    • Surveillance pricing likely violates US law, agency says
    • Hotels could not hike room rates for people traveling to funerals
    • California probes practice, US lawmakers have raised concerns

    WASHINGTON, Aug 19 (Reuters) – The U.S. Federal Trade Commission said on ​Wednesday it is considering requiring businesses to disclose whether they use personalized pricing data, a practice that ‌has drawn mounting scrutiny by state and federal officials.

    The FTC voted 2-0 to release a draft enforcement policy statement that would say the law barring deceptive practices likely prohibits undisclosed use of personal data to set prices.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Surveillance pricing is a strategy ​where companies use a consumer’s personal data — such as browsing history, location and shopping habits — to set ​individualized, algorithmic prices for products, as opposed to using standard, market-wide pricing.

    “When consumers see ⁠a listed price, they expect it to be the same price that everyone else sees, not the ​retailer’s estimate of how much they are willing to pay based on their personal data,” said FTC Chairman Andrew ​Ferguson.

    The agency cited a number of potential improper surveillance pricing methods. Potential red flags would include delivery companies charging customers higher prices for milk based on data showing that multiple children live in a household or hotels charging higher prices on the basis of personal ​data showing consumers were traveling for a funeral.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    The FTC’s proposed enforcement policy will be open for public comment for ​30 days. The FTC said it was not taking a position on whether some personalized pricing practices are
    unfair even when fully ‌disclosed.

    In ⁠January, California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a broad probe into the practice of using personal data to set individualized prices. Republican and Democratic lawmakers in the U.S. Congress have also raised concerns.

    Grace Gedye, senior policy analyst at Consumer Reports, praised the FTC action.

    “Nobody should have to pay more for groceries or other essential goods because a ​company knows what they’re searching ​for online, what their ⁠income is, the makeup of their household, or where they go,” she said.

    Lee Hepner, a senior legal counsel at the American Economic Liberties Project, called on the ​FTC to take further action. “Getting hit by a train is no less painful ​if you’re tied ⁠to the tracks and see it coming,” Hepner said.

    In December, Instacart ended price tests that resulted in different shoppers being shown different prices for groceries. The company’s retreat from the practice followed a study by Consumer Reports and two other nonprofit groups that ⁠showed some ​shoppers saw prices up to 23% higher than others browsing the ​same items from the same store.

    In November, lawmakers asked Delta Air Lines to answer if it set personalized prices and other pricing ​practices. Delta responded it does not set prices based on personal information.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by David Gregorio

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 共和党众议员拜伦·唐纳兹竞选佛罗里达州州长的优先事项


    美国东部时间2026年8月19日周三下午6:35 / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    杰克·塔珀,CNN报道

    共和党众议员拜伦·唐纳兹竞选佛罗里达州州长的优先事项

    《新闻第一线》节目

    共和党州长候选人、众议员拜伦·唐纳兹做客《新闻第一线》节目。
    1:34 • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/19/politics/video/priorities-gop-rep-byron-donalds-race-florida-governor-the-lead-jake-tapper

    Priorities for GOP Rep. Byron Donalds in his race for FL governor

    6:35 PM EDT, Wed August 19, 2026 / CNN

    Jake Tapper, CNN

    Priorities for GOP Rep. Byron Donalds in his race for FL governor

    The Lead

    Republican gubernatorial candidate Rep. Byron Donalds joins The Lead.
    1:34 • Source: CNN

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/19/politics/video/priorities-gop-rep-byron-donalds-race-florida-governor-the-lead-jake-tapper

  • 美国国债十年内翻倍后突破40万亿美元 财政部数据显示


    2026年8月19日 / 美国东部时间下午4:32 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    据美国财政部周三公布的数据,美国国债已突破40万亿美元,这一财政里程碑凸显了联邦政府不断攀升的借贷规模和利息成本。

    财政部每日财务报告显示,8月18日美国国债达到40.05万亿美元,较2017年增长了一倍多。联邦债务膨胀的原因在于政府支出超过了收入,迫使美国通过更多借贷来弥补赤字缺口。

    “过去26年我们一直处于赤字状态,而且基本上忽视了预算中许多众所周知的结构性挑战,”无党派机构彼得·G·彼得森基金会首席执行官迈克尔·彼得森在接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访时表示。“这显然正在加速恶化,就像任何债务问题一样,忽视的时间越长,情况就会越糟糕。”

    随着政府持续举债,利息支出在国家总开支中的占比越来越大,形成了进一步推高债务的复利效应。如今美国政府为债务支付的利息已超过国防或医疗保险的开支。

    分析师表示,美国债务增长不太可能放缓。“我们正走在错误的道路上,”经济智库经济与政策研究中心联合创始人迪恩·贝克说道。他指出军费开支增加加剧了美国的财政负担。

    彼得森基金会估计,如果美国不进行支出或税收改革,该国国债可能在6年内达到50万亿美元。

    是什么推高了联邦债务?

    2025年美国净利息成本接近1万亿美元,占全国总支出的近14%,但这只是问题的一部分。

    其他多个因素也推动了国债增长,经济学家们对主要驱动因素存在不同看法。

    随着美国人口老龄化,领取社会保障和医疗保险福利的人数不断增加,导致这两项计划的成本上升,而其他领域的开支也有所增加,例如利息支出。

    与此同时,过去二十年的一系列减税政策降低了国家财政收入。国会预算办公室估计,去年通过的特朗普政府的“宏伟法案”将在2034财年前使美国国债增加4.2万亿美元。

    彼得森在接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访时表示,尽管政策决策是成因之一,但债务问题不能归咎于某一届政府。

    “多届政府和多届国会都采取了错误的方向,”他告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻。

    正如财政部数据所示,2008年大衰退和新冠疫情等大规模经济危机也导致美国国债大幅飙升。

    分析师告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,不断增长的联邦债务可能会削弱美国应对未来经济冲击的能力。

    “人工智能技术颠覆、经济衰退、全球战争或其他任何一系列事件,都可能迅速将我们从挑战推向全面危机,”华盛顿智库两党政策中心主席兼首席执行官玛格丽特·斯佩林斯在一封电子邮件中说道。

    联邦债务对你意味着什么?

    据彼得森基金会数据,公众持有约80%的美国国债。其中超过三分之二由共同基金和联邦储备系统等国内债权人持有,其余部分由外国投资者持有。

    纳税人也可能成为不断攀升的联邦债务的主要承担者:因为政府为资助支出发行更多国债时,必须提供更高的收益率来吸引投资者。这可能导致抵押贷款和其他信贷产品的利率上升。

    “如果国债利率上升,意味着你的抵押贷款利率会上涨,汽车贷款利率会上涨,信用卡利率也会上涨,”彼得森说道。

    高额利息支出还会使联邦政府更难筹集资金用于核心项目,彼得森将这种现象称为“挤出效应”。

    “通常所说的挤出效应,是指利息成本在预算中占比过高,给预算中的其他所有项目带来下行压力,同时推高税收,因为我们需要更多资金来支付这些利息成本,”他解释道。

    并非所有人都认为不断飙升的国债会对经济构成威胁。以贝克为例,他对相关后果并不那么担忧,他指出美国强劲的经济应该能够让联邦政府继续承担日益增长的财政负担。

    他表示,美国当前面临的更直接的经济威胁是关税以及伊朗局势对物价的影响。他还警告称,如果所谓的人工智能泡沫破裂,投资者可能会从美国市场撤资。

    “如果人们开始对美国市场和美国经济感到担忧,他们可能会撤资,”他说。“因此我认为外国资金流出美国确实存在风险,但政府债务并不是最大的影响因素,甚至可能算不上主要因素。”

    编辑:艾米·皮奇

    National debt tops $40 trillion after doubling in less than a decade, Treasury data shows

    August 19, 2026 / 4:32 PM EDT / CBS News

    The national debt topped $40 trillion, according to Treasury Department data released on Wednesday, representing a fiscal milestone that underscores the federal government’s mounting borrowing and interest costs.

    The Treasury Department’s daily financial report shows that the nation’s debt reached $40.05 trillion on August 18, more than double its level in 2017. The federal debt has ballooned because government spending is outstripping revenue, forcing the U.S. to borrow more money to cover the shortfall.

    “We’ve been running deficits for the last 26 years, and we’ve basically ignored a lot of the structural challenges that exist in our budget that are very well known,” Michael Peterson, CEO of the nonpartisan Peter G. Peterson Foundation, told CBS News. “It’s clearly been accelerating because, like any debt problem, the longer you ignore it, the worse it gets.”

    As the government continues to borrow, interest payments are consuming a larger share of the nation’s spending, creating a compounding effect that further fuels the debt. The U.S. government now spends more on servicing its debt than on national defense or Medicare.

    Analysts say the nation’s debt growth isn’t likely to slow. “We’re going the wrong way,” said Dean Baker, the co-founder of the economic think tank Center for Economic and Policy Research. He cited the increase in military spending, which he said has exacerbated the country’s fiscal burden.

    The Peterson Foundation estimates that the national debt could reach $50 trillion in six years if the country does not make spending or tax reforms.

    What is driving up the federal debt?

    Net interest costs, which approached $1 trillion in 2025 and accounted for nearly 14% of the nation’s spending, are only part of the problem.

    Several other factors have fueled the national debt, with economists holding differing opinions on the primary drivers.

    The number of people collecting benefits from Social Security and Medicare has increased as the U.S. population ages, making the programs more expensive, while other spending has also increased, such as on interest payments.

    At the same time, a combination of tax cuts over the last two decades has decreased the nation’s revenue. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the Trump administration’s One Big Beautiful Bill, passed last year, will add $4.2 trillion to the national debt through fiscal year 2034.

    While policy decisions have contributed, the debt problem can’t be tied to one specific administration, Peterson told CBS News.

    “Many administrations and many Congresses have taken steps in the wrong direction,” he told CBS News.

    Larger economic crises, including the Great Recession of 2008 and the COVID-19 pandemic, have also triggered spikes in the nation’s debt, as the Treasury Department shows.

    Analysts told CBS News that the rising federal debt could hinder the country’s ability to handle future economic shocks.

    “AI disruption, a recession, global war or any number of other events could quickly push us over the edge from a challenge into a full-blown crisis,” Margaret Spellings, president and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, said in an email.

    What does the federal debt mean for you?

    The public holds about 80% of the nation’s debt, according to the Peterson Foundation. Of that, more than two-thirds is held by domestic lenders such as mutual funds and the Federal Reserve System, while foreign investors hold the rest.

    Taxpayers could also bear the brunt of rising federal debt because as the government issues more Treasury securities to fund government spending, it must offer higher yields to attract investors. That could contribute to higher interest rates for mortgages and other credit products.

    “If the Treasury rate is going up, that means your mortgage rate is going up, your car loan is going up, your credit card rates are going up,” Peterson said.

    Higher interest payments can also make it more difficult for the federal government to find the money to fund core programs, a phenomenon Peterson referred to as “crowding out.”

    “It’s typically called crowding out when the interest costs represent such a big chunk of the budget that it puts downward pressure on every other program across the budget, and puts upward pressure on taxes because you know we need more money in the system to cover these interest costs,” he said.

    Not everyone agrees that the nation’s soaring debt could pose an economic threat. Baker, for one, is less concerned about the consequences, noting that a strong U.S. economy should allow the federal government to continue to shoulder the growing financial burden.

    The more immediate economic threats facing the U.S. are tariffs and the Iran war’s impact on prices, he said. He also warned that investors could pull their money out of the U.S. if what some believe is an artificial intelligence bubble were to burst.

    “If people just become wary of U.S. markets and the U.S. economy, they might pull their money out,” he said. “So I think there is an issue with foreign money leaving the U.S. but the government debt isn’t the biggest factor, and probably not even a major factor.”

    Edited by Aimee Picchi

  • 埃尔赛义德透露:针对美国主要行业的社会主义计划,他比桑德斯走得“更远”


    2026年8月19日 美国东部时间下午6:00 / 福克斯新闻

    埃尔赛义德表示,针对美国某主要行业,他的公共所有制模式比伯尼·桑德斯的方案更进一步

    作者:亚历克·舍梅尔 福克斯新闻

    埃尔赛义德呼吁对主要行业实施“公共管控”:“更进一步”

    密歇根州民主党联邦参议员候选人阿卜杜勒·埃尔赛义德谈及大型企业的“公共所有制”与“公共管控”,称他的方案比此前的提案“更进一步”。(图片来源:Head in the Office via YouTube – 6月12日)

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章音频!

    当被问及是否支持伯尼·桑德斯针对大型人工智能企业提出的公共所有制模式时,密歇根州民主党联邦参议员候选人阿卜杜勒·埃尔赛义德表示,他希望“更进一步”。

    此前,众议院一名资深民主党议员驳斥了“年轻社会主义者正在谈论‘夺取生产资料’”的说法,而埃尔赛义德此番言论正是在这之后提出的,他主张建立“某种形式的公共管控体系”。

    在6月12日出席左翼播客《Head in the Office》时,主持人问及埃尔赛义德是否支持桑德斯提出的大型人工智能企业公共所有制模式,他表示自己希望“真正更进一步”。

    埃尔赛义德嘲讽特朗普,称将让他成为“中期选举的焦点人物”

    他补充道,虽然自己认同“我们需要公共所有制”,但同时也认为“我们需要某种形式的公共管控”。

    埃尔赛伊德并未明确呼吁政府接管或收购私营人工智能企业,而是描述了“公共管控”的可能形式,包括在公司董事会中派驻公共代表,或设立监管机构。


    2026年5月3日,佛蒙特州独立参议员伯尼·桑德斯在密歇根州底特律的芒福德高中发表演讲后,与参议院候选人阿卜杜勒·埃尔赛义德合影。(莎拉·赖斯/盖蒂图片社)

    “我确实想更进一步。我同意我们需要公共所有制,但我也认为我们需要某种形式的公共管控。如果民主不能保护我们免受生存风险的威胁,那民主的意义何在?而目前,我们没有任何监管措施。”当主持人提及桑德斯的相关提案、被问及大型人工智能企业的公共所有制与公共管控问题时,埃尔赛义德如此说道。

    “我只是认为,我们必须思考,对这个行业实行民主管控究竟意味着什么?它会是什么样子?”

    埃尔赛义德随后举例说明了“公共管控”可能的形态,包括在公司董事会中派驻公共代表,或设立针对企业的公共监管机构。他认为,人工智能构成了潜在的“生存风险”,需要更强有力的公共监管。

    “民主本应解决这些问题,但现在它们正试图绕过民主,我们绝不能允许这种情况发生。”埃尔赛义德谈及科技公司在华盛顿拥有的政治影响力时继续说道,“因此,我们需要既能理解技术风险,又不会被人工智能行业收买的领导人。这对我们的未来而言,现在已是当务之急。”

    埃尔赛义德助手将共和党对手的竞选活动比作“焚烧三K党十字架”,因其发布与福特皮卡相关的视频


    2024年8月7日,密歇根州民主党联邦参议员候选人阿卜杜勒·埃尔赛义德在底特律文艺复兴高中的团结集会上发表演讲。(迪乌-纳利奥·谢里/《华盛顿邮报》 via Getty Images)

    埃尔赛义德提出要在公共所有制问题上“更进一步”,此时正值民主党高层试图驳斥“该党崛起的社会主义 wing 正寻求政府掌控生产资料”的观点。

    马里兰州民主党众议员杰米·拉斯金近日辩称,自称社会主义者的美国年轻人并未接受传统马克思主义意义上的社会主义。他反问道:“他们是想说‘我想要将生产资料社会化’吗?”随后他自己给出答案:“我不这么认为。”

    拉斯金同样认为,自称社会主义者的年轻人主要追求“更大的平等与机遇”,而非接受“辩证唯物主义”或“无产阶级专政”等概念。


    2025年9月17日,马里兰州民主党众议员杰米·拉斯金在国会山出席众议院司法委员会听证会,与会的还有联邦调查局局长卡什·帕特尔(未在画面中)。(安娜贝尔·戈登/路透社)

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    但该运动的一些知名人物使用了更直白的措辞。马姆达尼在2021年美国青年民主社会主义者大会上表示,该运动的坚定信念之一是“夺取生产资料的最终目标”,同时承认当时该主张并未像其他进步事业那样获得广泛的公众支持。

    此次被重新翻出的播客对话近日再度引发关注,而埃尔赛义德这位曾被拿来与纽约市市长佐赫兰·马姆达尼相提并论的进步派人士,正试图将这类政治主张带入一场备受瞩目的全州参议院竞选。

    此次重见天日的对话,也正值美国政坛围绕民主党对民主社会主义者的接纳程度、以及该运动的经济议程是否超出全民医保、提高最低工资等政策范畴展开广泛辩论之际。

    亚历克·舍梅尔是福克斯新闻数字频道的政治记者,原籍北卡罗来纳州夏洛特市,现居住在华盛顿特区-巴尔的摩都会区。

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6403722253112

    El-Sayed reveals he would go ‘step further’ than Sanders on socialist plan for major US industry

    August 19, 2026 6:00pm EDT / Fox News

    El-Sayed said he wanted to ‘take it a step further’ than Bernie Sanders’ public ownership model for a major US industry

    By Alec Schemmel Fox News

    El-Sayed calls for ‘public control’ of major industry: ‘Take it a step further’

    Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed discusses ‘public ownership’ and ‘public control’ of major companies, saying he would ‘take it a step further’ than previous proposals. (Credit: Head in the Office via Youtube – June 12)

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed said he wanted to “take it a step further” when asked whether he supported Bernie Sanders’ public ownership model for major artificial intelligence companies.

    El-Sayed argued for “some system of public control,” days after a top House Democrat rejected suggestions that young socialists are talking about “seizing the means of production.”

    Asked during a June 12 appearance on the left-wing “Head in the Office” podcast whether he supported public ownership models for major artificial intelligence companies like one proposed by Sanders, El-Sayed said he wanted to “actually take it a step further.”

    EL-SAYED TAUNTS TRUMP, CLAIMS HE’S GOING TO MAKE HIM ‘MAIN CHARACTER OF THE MIDTERMS’

    He added that while he agreed “we need public ownership,” he also believed “we need some system of public control.”

    El-Sayed did not explicitly call for the government to seize or take ownership of private AI companies, instead describing possible forms of “public control” that included public representation on corporate boards or an oversight body.

    U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., stands with Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed after speaking at Mumford High School May 3, 2026, in Detroit, Mich.(Sarah Rice/Getty Images)

    “I want to actually take it a step further. I agree that we need public ownership, but I also agree that we need some system of public control. What is the point of democracy if it’s not to protect us from existential risk? And, right now, there is no regulation,” El-Sayed said when asked about public ownership and public control of major AI companies, with the podcast host citing proposals from Sanders.

    “I just think it’s really important for us to be thinking what is democratic control over this industry? What does it look like?”

    El-Sayed later offered examples of what “public control” could look like, including public representation on corporate boards or a public oversight body over companies, arguing that AI poses potentially “existential” risks requiring greater public oversight.

    “Democracy is supposed to fix these problems, and, right now, they’re trying to slip democracy, and we cannot allow that,” El-Sayed continued about the political power tech companies wield in Washington. “And, so, we need leaders who both understand the technological risk and are not bought off by the AI industry itself. It is mission critical right now for our future.”

    EL-SAYED AIDE LIKENS GOP OPPONENT’S CAMPAIGN TO ‘KKK CROSS BURNING’ OVER VIDEO WITH FORD PICKUP

    Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate Abdul El-Sayed speaks during a unity rally at Renaissance High School Aug. 7 in Detroit.(Dieu-Nalio Chery/For The Washington Post via Getty Images)

    El-Sayed’s call to “take it a step further” on public ownership comes as senior Democrats have sought to push back on the idea that the party’s rising socialist wing is seeking government control of the means of production.

    Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., recently argued that young Americans who identify as socialists are not embracing socialism in its traditional Marxist sense, asking whether they mean, “I want to socialize the means of production,” before answering, “I don’t think so.”

    Raskin has similarly argued that young self-described socialists are primarily seeking “greater equality and opportunity,” rather than embracing concepts such as “dialectical materialism” or the “dictatorship of the proletariat.”

    U.S. Representative Jamie Raskin, D-Md., speaks during a House Judiciary Committee hearing with FBI Director Kash Patel (not pictured), on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., Sept. 17, 2025.(Annabelle Gordon/Reuters)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    But some of the movement’s most prominent figures have used more explicit language. Mamdani said during a 2021 Young Democratic Socialists of America conference that one of the movement’s firmly held beliefs was the “end goal of seizing the means of production,” while acknowledging it did not then enjoy the same level of public support as other progressive causes.

    The June podcast comments are drawing fresh attention as El-Sayed, a progressive who has embraced comparisons to New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, seeks to carry that brand of politics into a marquee statewide Senate race.

    The resurfaced exchange also comes amid a broader debate over the Democratic Party’s embrace of democratic socialists and how far the movement’s economic agenda extends beyond policies such as universal healthcare and a higher minimum wage.

    Alec Schemmel is a Politics Reporter for Fox News Digital who is originally from Charlotte, North Carolina but now resides in the Washington D.C.-Baltimore Metro Area.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6403722253112

  • 美媒:美军开展秘密行动 开辟霍尔木兹海峡运油航道


    2026年8月20日 06:56 / 联合早报

    美国官员透露,从霍尔木兹海峡运输的石油持续增长,目前已接近日均1000万桶,某些夜晚从海湾运出的石油总量甚至达到1500万至2000万桶。 (法新社档案照片)

    美国官员透露,美军已悄悄建立一条进出霍尔木兹海峡的航运通道,确保每天有“上千万桶”石油运出霍尔木兹海峡。

    据美国新闻网站Axios星期三(8月19日)引述两名美国官员报道称,这项行动已持续数周。

    过去两周,每天有15到20艘油轮经由阿曼沿海一条南部航道进出该海峡。美官员称,石油日均运输量持续增长,目前已接近1000万桶,某些夜晚从海湾运出的石油总量甚至达到1500万至2000万桶。

    美国官员称,虽然经由霍尔木兹海峡运出的石油量仍低于战前水平,但它已对全球供应产生明显影响。

    据报道,这一行动由位于北卡罗来纳州布拉格堡的陆军第82空降师司令部负责指挥。行动不仅局限于为载有石油的油轮提供护航,还协助空载油轮经由该海峡从阿拉伯海进入波斯湾,在阿联酋、巴林和科威特装载石油后驶离。

    按照计划,这些船只每晚会在特定时段排成一个大型纵队驶出,在另一个时段排成一个大型纵队驶入,并在航行过程中经过多个检查站。美军部署战斗机在空中盘旋,搜寻并击落伊朗的巡航导弹及无人机。

    据美官员透露,美军中央司令部近期开展一项军事行动,削弱伊朗雷达和海上监视系统,使得伊朗监控霍尔木兹海峡南部航道船只通行的能力已大打折扣,而伊朗针对船只发起的许多攻击被美军拦截。

    美媒:美军开展秘密行动 开辟霍尔木兹海峡运油航道

    2026年8月20日 06:56 / 联合早报

    美国官员透露,从霍尔木兹海峡运输的石油持续增长,目前已接近日均1000万桶,某些夜晚从海湾运出的石油总量甚至达到1500万至2000万桶。 (法新社档案照片)

    美国官员透露,美军已悄悄建立一条进出霍尔木兹海峡的航运通道,确保每天有“上千万桶”石油运出霍尔木兹海峡。

    据美国新闻网站Axios星期三(8月19日)引述两名美国官员报道称,这项行动已持续数周。

    过去两周,每天有15到20艘油轮经由阿曼沿海一条南部航道进出该海峡。美官员称,石油日均运输量持续增长,目前已接近1000万桶,某些夜晚从海湾运出的石油总量甚至达到1500万至2000万桶。

    美国官员称,虽然经由霍尔木兹海峡运出的石油量仍低于战前水平,但它已对全球供应产生明显影响。

    据报道,这一行动由位于北卡罗来纳州布拉格堡的陆军第82空降师司令部负责指挥。行动不仅局限于为载有石油的油轮提供护航,还协助空载油轮经由该海峡从阿拉伯海进入波斯湾,在阿联酋、巴林和科威特装载石油后驶离。

    按照计划,这些船只每晚会在特定时段排成一个大型纵队驶出,在另一个时段排成一个大型纵队驶入,并在航行过程中经过多个检查站。美军部署战斗机在空中盘旋,搜寻并击落伊朗的巡航导弹及无人机。

    据美官员透露,美军中央司令部近期开展一项军事行动,削弱伊朗雷达和海上监视系统,使得伊朗监控霍尔木兹海峡南部航道船只通行的能力已大打折扣,而伊朗针对船只发起的许多攻击被美军拦截。

  • 自伊朗战争爆发以来,美军已有超过750名军人受伤


    2026年8月19日 美国东部时间下午6:36 / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)
    作者:派珀·赫德斯佩斯·布莱克本

    image
    凯文·卡特/盖蒂图片社

    据美国国防部战争伤亡数据库显示,自伊朗战争爆发以来,美军受伤军人数量已超过750人。

    五角大楼于周三更新了该数据库,新增了50多名受伤士兵。目前,德黑兰与华盛顿结束冲突的谈判仍陷入僵局。

    将“海外行动”项目与“史诗暴怒行动”的伤亡数据合并后,自美军2月28日发动对伊战争以来,已有18名军人阵亡、757人受伤。

    美国国防部上月在《国防伤亡分析系统》中新增了“海外行动”分类,用于统计“7月7日起”的阵亡和受伤军人。五角大楼尚未提供更多细节,也未明确此次伤亡所属的冲突。7月7日这一时间点与唐纳德·特朗普政府在《战争权力法案》通报中告知国会的对伊新冲突爆发日期一致。

    CNN已联系五角大楼,要求就该分类作出进一步说明。

    此次更新数据的几周前,媒体和国会曾对五角大楼提出质疑:尽管伊朗的袭击仍在持续,但《国防伤亡分析系统》中的阵亡和受伤人数却出现了下降。上月有4例死亡和数十例受伤记录从总数据中消失,之后又被恢复。

    美国国防部当时在社交媒体发文称,数据下降是“临时数据故障”导致的。

    CNN此前曾报道,在整个对伊冲突期间,五角大楼一直迟迟不披露受伤军人的相关信息,官员们称此举是出于安全考量。

    特朗普周三早些时候声称,当前美伊局势“非常乐观”。他已暂停与德黑兰的谈判,而霍尔木兹海峡仍是这场持续战争中的关键紧张点。

    More than 750 US service members wounded since start of Iran War

    2026-08-19 6:36 PM ET / CNN

    By Piper Hudspeth Blackburn

    An American flag is flown outside of the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, on July 29.

    Kevin Carter/Getty Images

    The number of US service members wounded since the start of the Iran war has passed 750, according to the Defense Department’s war casualty database.

    The Pentagon updated the database on Wednesday, recording more than 50 additional wounded soldiers, as talks between Tehran and DC to end the conflict remain at an impasse.

    When totals in The Defense Casualty Analysis System for “Overseas Operations” are combined with totals for Operation Epic Fury, 18 service members have died and 757 have been wounded since the US launched the war against Iran on February 28.

    The Defense Department created the “Overseas Operations” category last month in DCAS for service members killed and wounded “starting July 7.” The Pentagon has yet to provide any additional details or specify the conflict in which the casualties have occurred. The July 7 date aligns with the day that President Donald Trump’s administration told Congress that a new conflict with Iran had begun in a War Powers Act notification.

    CNN has reached out to the Pentagon for additional clarity on the category.

    Wednesday’s updated numbers come weeks after the Pentagon drew scrutiny from media outlets and lawmakers after the killed and wounded numbers decreased in DCAS as Iranian attacks continued. Four deaths and dozens of injuries disappeared from the totals last month before being restored.

    The Defense Department said in a social media post at the time that the decreases were due to “temporary data disruptions.”

    CNN previously reported that the Pentagon has been slow to disclose wounded troops throughout the conflict with Iran, with officials pointing to security needs.

    Trump claimed earlier Wednesday the situation with Iran is “so good” right now, as he’s paused US negotiations with Tehran and the Strait of Hormuz remains a key point of tension in the ongoing war.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2