博客

阿斯麦CFO：美国限制对华出售DUV光刻机将适得其反

2026年10月14日 18:33 / 联合早报

第八届中国进博会去年11月在上海举行，图为会上的阿斯麦展台。 （路透社）

全球最大半导体设备制造商阿斯麦（ASML）的首席财务官反对美国国会一项限制公司向中国出售浸没式深紫外（DUV）光刻机提案，认为这将加速中国自主研发。

路透社报道，阿斯麦公布第三季度业绩后，首席财务官戴厚杰（Roger Dassen）星期三（10月14日）在与记者举行的电话会议上说，如果《硬件技术多边协调管制法案》（MATCH Act）在美国中期选举后获得通过，将加速中国自主研发替代技术，不是明智之举。

他补充称，相信最终各方会作出理性决定。

《硬件技术多边协调管制法案》将禁止阿斯麦向中国销售所有DUV设备。目前，阿斯麦最先进的极紫外光刻机（EUV）已被禁止对华出口，荷兰也已对部分DUV设备实施出口管制。《法案》将在此基础上进一步收紧限制。

作为全球唯一的EUV设备生产商，阿斯麦是人工智能产业扩张的关键企业，也是欧洲市值最高的公司。美国希望限制中国获得晶片制造技术，以维护国家安全并保持其领先地位。

乌克兰指“星链”突遭限速削弱防空能力 波兰外长批马斯克“玩弄政治”

2026年10月14日 18:50 / 联合早报

图为2025年4月，乌克兰顿涅茨克州前线城镇波克罗夫斯克（Pokrovsk）附近架设的“星链”系统终端。 （路透社档案照片）

乌克兰总统科技顾问称，美国科技巨头马斯克的SpaceX公司，在没有预告的情况下对处于移动状态的“星链”（Starlink）终端进行了网速限制，导致乌军多项军事任务中断，对俄罗斯空袭的防御能力降低。

综合路透社和法新社报道，乌克兰总统泽连斯基的科技顾问贝斯克雷斯诺夫（Sergiy Beskrestnov）星期三（10月14日）在即时通讯平台Telegram发文称，SpaceX在前一天（13日）晚，对处于移动状态的星链终端设置了网速限制。

贝斯克雷斯诺夫说，乌克兰的国防部队没有事先收到通知，导致多项军事任务中断。乌军一直将星链终端作为无人机无线电控制的替代方案。

他警告称，这无异于“我们的伙伴剥夺了我们保护国家免受喷气式‘沙赫德’（Shahed）无人机袭击的少有手段之一”。

俄军沙赫德型喷气式无人机飞行速度更快，比传统无人机更难拦截。

一名要求匿名的乌克兰极高层官员告诉法新社，网络中断“严重阻碍了后勤保障”，并指这与与俄军星期三发动的弹道导弹袭击是同步发生的。

该官员甚至称，美方通过限制星链网速是在“帮助俄罗斯”。

截至目前，SpaceX和马斯克均未回应相关指控。

另一方面，波兰外长西科尔斯基（Radosław Sikorski）星期三也在社交媒体公开质问马斯克是否在“玩弄政治”。波兰一直在为乌克兰支付星链订阅费用，以帮助乌军在被占领的南部和东部地区实施远程无人机精准打击。

西科尔斯基在社交平台X上发文写道：“嘿，@马斯克，大人物（big man），你又在拿你的产品玩弄政治了吗？作为你的欧洲客户，我们正看着你。”

这句“大人物”的嘲讽源于2025年西科尔斯基、马斯克与美国国务卿鲁比奥之间的一场网络骂战。当时马斯克曾叫西科尔斯基“闭嘴，小人物（small man）”，并声称如果他切断星链，“乌克兰的整条前线就会崩溃”。

不过马斯克之后保证，无论他多么不认同美国的乌克兰政策，星链都绝不会关闭终端，也绝不会被用作谈判筹码。

AI linked to 84% of ransomware attacks, new report finds

October 14, 2026 / 6:00 AM EDT / CBS News

Cybercriminals exploited artificial intelligence in ransomware attacks experienced by 84% of surveyed victims, according to a sweeping new global cybersecurity report, while 44% reported that attackers exploited their own AI systems.

The 2026 Ransomware Risk Report by cybersecurity firm Semperis polled 1,200 IT and security professionals across nine countries and eight industry sectors, revealing an evolved picture of cybercriminal enterprise—one that increasingly leverages AI to magnify its technical capabilities and escalate pressure on targets.

But the findings also underscored ransomware’s human toll. According to the report, more than a third of surveyed victims faced psychological or physical threats against employees, and 14% of surveyed organizations even reported employees or family members forced to change jobs, office locations or residences as a result of sustained ransomware threats.

In all, 69% of surveyed ransomware victims experienced multiple successful attacks sometime in the previous year, with 59% of respondents paying a ransom at least once, and 87% experienced attacks targeting their identity systems, or the digital infrastructure that controls access to their networks.

For Chris Inglis, former White House National Cyber Director under former President Joe Biden, artificial intelligence represents a turning point in the capabilities ripe for cybercriminals’ exploit —and he warns that a particularly consequential development is already underway: autonomous ransomware attacks.

“AI actually increases the capacity, scope, scale of attackers in understanding what perhaps might be the weaknesses in your system or perhaps increase the sophistication of their approach to you if they’re trying to get you to do something you shouldn’t do, that gives them an advantage, lets them in,” Inglis said in an interview about the report.

The cybersecurity expert and Semperis board member previously spent three decades watching technologies mature at the National Security Agency watching as attacks required substantially less direct human involvement – no longer simply a theoretical possibility.

“AI is an inflection point in their capacities to hold the same things at risk,” Inglis said. He later added, “I think we’re already seeing autonomous attacks. Autonomous ransomware attacks are included in the mix.”

Inglis described how a person lacking the technical expertise to penetrate an organization’s networks could turn to AI to write the necessary code, effectively instructing an AI system to target a company and hold its data hostage without a sophisticated understanding of how digital infrastructure operates.

“We have democratized AI to the point where even low level models can allow that to happen,” Inglis said, noting that the technology compounds the number of criminals capable of launching more technical attacks, while inviting experienced cybercriminals to penetrate networks more efficiently and on a much greater scale.

AI is changing the ransomware playbook

For years, criminals have relied on a familiar playbook: exploiting vulnerabilities, penetrating corporate networks, encrypting data and demanding a ransom payment in exchange for restored access or withholding sensitive information. Now, in more than eight out of 10 attacks, AI has been incorporated into that process.

AI has also enabled attackers to quickly identify weaknesses, tailor social engineering schemes to specific employees, automate an intrusion and readjust tactics as defenders try to react, according to Inglis.

“What’s not changed is the things that people or organizations had that is of value that they would pay money or time or energy to protect,” Inglis said. “And those things are still the object of a broad swath of criminals attention. They want to use whatever tools they can to try to hold those at risk so they can get you to pay them money, sometimes time, but really it’s about money.”

By lowering technical barriers, AI risks enabling a wider range of actors to attempt intrusions that previously demanded a wide swath of resources and more specialized training or know-how.

Tomer Bar, Semperis’s associate vice president of security research, warns that AI could enable ransomware developers to produce more sophisticated malicious code, reduce development time and make investigations more challenging.

“We’re starting to see more attacks with more rapid development, and attribution of these attacks will be more difficult for law enforcement,” Bar says in the report.

“We’ll also be less likely to see mistakes in attack encryption algorithms because attackers can test their code with large language models.”

When a company’s own AI becomes a weapon against it

One of the report’s most striking revelations is that 44% of surveyed victims experienced ransomware attacks exploiting their own AI agents or systems, a finding that raises an uncomfortable question for businesses and government agencies racing to integrate the technology into its networks.

Courtney Guss, Semperis’s associate vice president of crisis management, warns that autonomous AI agents can create security risks when they seek additional permissions or interact with sensitive corporate systems.

“If your company is adopting AI agents, you should consider that at some point, those agents will try to compromise your identity systems — even if that action isn’t meant to be malicious,” Guss writes in the report.

“That’s just how they operate. AI agents typically try to accomplish their assigned tasks by any means they can.” Guss continued. “One way they can gain more ability to operate in the environment is by getting permissions to other systems. The fastest path to get those permissions is to compromise your identity system, which effectively puts the agent into ‘god mode,’ enabling it to grant itself whichever permissions it needs to accomplish its task. Unfortunately, the agent then becomes a ticking time bomb.”

Unlike conventional software operating, some AI agents possess the ability to use multiple applications at once and make educated decisions on behalf of their users.

If an attacker manipulates just one of those agents—or compromises the credentials and permissions it relies upon—the attacker gains another way of moving deeper into an organization’s systems.

Still, Inglis cautions against assumptions that AI necessarily makes an organization more vulnerable to outside intruders.

“Many attackers already do what’s called living off the land – they’ll move into your digital infrastructure, onto your property or digital property, and they’ll use the tools that you have there or the insights or the data set,” Inglis said. “To blend in, to navigate the landscape, they try not to stand out, and they do that by using your tools. If AI is one of your tools, they’ll use those, but the weakness that let them in is probably the same weakness that existed before.”

Inglis argues that the fundamental vulnerability often lies within a company’s failure to control access to its networks or digital infrastructure in the first place. Rather than abandon AI out of fear, Inglis argues that organizations must embrace its defensive potential.

“I would turn that around. Flip the script,” he said. “You must use AI in order to counter that threat, and you must use AI for affirmative purposes.”

Julia Kimani-Burnham contributed to this report.

This story published first on CBS News at 6:00 a.m. on Oct. 14, 2026.

世卫建议4至8岁女童接种HPV疫苗

2026年10月14日 19:03 / 联合早报

截至2025年底，全球已有超过9500万名女孩接种了HPV疫苗。 （示意图）

（日内瓦法新电）世界卫生组织专家建议，在有助于提高接种率的前提下，各国可考虑为低至4岁的女童开展人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）疫苗常规接种。

根据世卫免疫战略咨询专家组（SAGE）主席斯科特，目前约有165个国家将HPV疫苗纳入国家免疫规划，但全球HPV疫苗接种率仅为33%，远低于90%的目标。

世卫组织原将9至14岁女童列为优先接种人群，并认定单剂次接种方案是实现目标的最有效手段。斯科特说，若能扩大覆盖率，常规接种年龄可下探至4至8岁。

早在2022年，SAGE就建议对9至14岁的女孩以及15至20岁年轻女性采用一剂或两剂的接种方案，而对21岁以上的女性则建议间隔六个月接种两剂。

世卫数据显示，由HPV持续感染引起的宫颈癌是全球女性中第五大常见癌症。2024年，全球新增病例约60万4000起，死亡病例28万起。

国际能源署：全球柴油供需紧张将持续至2027年

2026年10月14日 19:22 / 联合早报

国际能源署警告，由于各国补充因中东柴油出口受阻而耗尽的能源库存仍需时日，全球市场的紧张状态持续至2027年。 （路透社档案照片）

国际能源署警告，由于各国补充因中东柴油出口受阻而耗尽的能源库存仍需时日，全球市场的紧张状态持续至2027年。 （路透社档案照片）

国际能源署警告，波斯湾地区的柴油供应受美伊战争影响中断，将使全球市场的紧张状态持续至2027年。

路透社报道，国际能源署星期三（10月14日）在最新的月度能源市场报告中指出，补充耗尽的库存仍需时日，柴油市场紧张的供需平衡将一直保持至2027年，并取决于中东石油产品的供应能否恢复。

近几周来，由于波斯湾原油出口减少，加上中东地区炼油厂在伊朗的报复性打击中受损，欧洲和美国的柴油价格已创下历史新高。尽管各国政府已通过调低燃油税、提供补贴以及释放战略石油储备应对价格上涨，但这些被消耗的储备后续仍需补充。

国际能源署预测，到明年第一季度，炼油产能将有所恢复，并推动柴油市场出现盈余，带动库存大致回升至符合正常季节性规律的水平。

然而，美伊战争以来累积的巨大供应缺口，无法仅凭这些产能得到完全弥补。

国际能源署也警告，如果波斯湾的供应无法尽快恢复到正常水平，“可能需要进一步削减需求，并为此付出沉重的经济代价，才能实现市场平衡”。

Top bidders to attend Trump meme coin dinner appear to be based in foreign countries

2026-10-14 7:30 AM EDT / CBS News

By Madeleine May Investigative Producer
Madeleine May is an investigative producer at CBS News based in Washington, D.C. She previously covered politics for VICE News and reported on organized crime and corruption for OCCRP. She covers threats to democracy, disinformation, political violence, and extremism.

Read Full Bio

Steve Reilly

More than half of the top holders listed as competing for seats at President Trump’s next meme coin dinner have used cryptocurrency exchanges that prohibit U.S. customers, indicating that many of the buyers are based overseas, according to a CBS News analysis.

The gala, set for Nov. 22 at the Trump National Golf Club outside Washington, D.C., will seat the 185 largest holders of the $TRUMP meme coin, according to the website for Fight Fight Fight LLC, the company behind the coin. A public leaderboard for the event only lists the top 100 holders.

Mr. Trump is billed as the featured speaker alongside three yet-to-be-named “legends.” The top 29 holders will get upfront seating and a VIP reception with the president, the website says.

The upcoming dinner is the latest example of the unprecedented intermingling of business and politics during Mr. Trump’s second term.

Mr. Trump earned at least $635 million in royalties last year from a licensing deal tied to the $TRUMP token, according to his financial disclosure. Mr. Trump stands to earn more money from the coin, since an affiliate of the Trump Organization earns revenue whenever the coin is traded, according to the meme coin’s website.

“Foreign actors used to need a back door to try to influence a president,” said Zach Everson, a researcher for the progressive consumer rights advocacy group Public Citizen. “Trump is holding the front door open and inviting them in for a steak dinner.”

Out of the 100 top holders listed as competing for seats, at least 52 moved funds through crypto exchanges that bar U.S. customers, including Binance, Bybit and MEXC, according to the CBS News analysis.

Because exchanges like Binance bar U.S. customers, analysts typically treat accounts that use them as likely belonging to people outside the U.S., said Matt Fiebach, co-founder of the crypto data firm Entropy Advisors.

“All you can know with certainty is that a non-U.S. person or entity sent funds,” Fiebach said.

A cryptocurrency exchange is a company, much like a stock brokerage, where customers trade dollars or other currencies for crypto. CIC Digital LLC, a Trump Organization affiliate, and another company, Fight Fight Fight, together own 80% of the total $TRUMP supply, according to the project’s website. The parent company of Fight Fight Fight, Celebration Cards LLC, uses Mr. Trump’s name and likeness under a licensing agreement, the website adds.

At least 44 of the users on the leaderboard transacted through Binance prior to purchasing $TRUMP, the analysis found.

CBS News examined the transaction histories of the crypto wallets listed on the gala leaderboard using data from the blockchain intelligence firm Arkham. While it’s not possible to see who owns specific wallets, it is possible to identify which exchanges are being used to purchase crypto tokens.

The users that transacted on the exchanges that bar U.S. customers account for nearly $6.8 million of the more than $15 million in value reflected on the coin leaderboard as of Wednesday. A meme coin is a type of asset that is typically used for commemorative purposes or comedic value, and not a currency.

In 2023, Binance was forced to offload its U.S. customers after it pleaded guilty to federal charges that included failure to prevent money laundering on its platform and sanctions violations.

Its co-founder, Changpeng Zhao, also pleaded guilty to failing to maintain an effective anti-money-laundering program. (Mr. Trump granted a pardon to Zhao in October 2025, claiming the crypto billionaire was a victim of a political prosecution under President Biden).

Exchanges can also shed light on who might be making moves to sell their tokens. The largest holder of $TRUMP moved about $70 million worth of the coin in September to an account where it could be sold, just before the gala dinner contest was announced, The Washington Sun reported.

The coin’s total market value has dropped more than 95% since its peak in January 2025, to about $532 million, data show.

Democrats and progressive watchdog groups have raised foreign influence questions about the $TRUMP coin, warning that people overseas could be paying for access to the president.

While it may be possible for a U.S.-based user to circumvent foreign exchange prohibitions by masking their location using a virtual private network, or VPN, many exchanges say they take measures intended to prevent this.

The Trump Organization did not respond to requests for comment. A White House official said in a statement that the Trump administration only acts in the “best interest of the American people.” The official added that the meme coin event is “a private event, not a government function, and there is no promise of official government action in exchange for attending.”

This wouldn’t be the first time the president has headlined a $TRUMP coin gala. Mr. Trump appeared at a similar meme coin dinner in May 2025 at his golf club in Virginia, and another this April at his Mar-a-Lago resort.

The meme coin has been a financial boon to Mr. Trump, who raked in more than $1.4 billion last year from crypto-related ventures, according to his financial disclosure.

The current top spot on the Trump gala leaderboard is occupied by a wallet that holds about 1.5 million $TRUMP tokens, valued at nearly $3 million. That wallet received its $TRUMP holdings in two transfers on Oct. 8 — the largest of which came from another wallet that has used the Binance exchange. It’s unclear whether the same person controls both.

“As was the case with Trump’s previous meme coin gala, it appears that the majority of $TRUMP investors are purchasing his meme coin through overseas exchanges,” said Virginia Canter, who worked an ethics lawyer in Republican and Democratic presidential administrations. “Foreign actors are literally buying a seat at the president’s own table.”

Within days of its January 2025 launch, the Trump token reached a peak value of $75.35. It has since fallen dramatically — to roughly $2 as of Wednesday. The sharp decline in value has led Democrats to call it an alleged “pump-and-dump” scheme.

Mr. Trump’s ties to crypto are expected to be a top oversight area for Democrats should they take a majority in the House or Senate in the 2026 midterm elections.

The Trump family co-founded and holds a stake in World Liberty Financial, a separate crypto company launched in 2024. It generated hundreds of millions in revenue for Mr. Trump last year, his financial disclosure shows.

World Liberty Financial drew scrutiny in 2025 after MGX, an investment firm backed by the Abu Dhabi government, used World Liberty’s stablecoin to make a $2 billion investment in Binance. Both Binance and Mr. Trump denied the pardon for Zhao, the Binance co-founder, was connected to the transaction.

“I don’t know who he is,” Mr. Trump told CBS News days after pardoning the crypto billionaire.

This story published first on CBS News at 7:30 a.m. on Oct. 14, 2026.

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-makes-millions-off-trump-meme-coins-financial-disclosure-reveals/

Trump makes millions off of Trump meme coins, financial disclosure reveals

(01:21)

Republicans are playing defense — and it’s costing them

2026-10-14T10:00:46.476Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/14/politics/midterms-ad-wars-republican-spending

Republicans are spending hundreds of millions of dollars on advertising in battleground Senate races as they scramble to defend increasingly competitive GOP seats in the final stretch of the midterms.

But when it comes to how far they can stretch a dollar, they’re effectively paying premium prices at Whole Foods while Democrats are shopping deals at Costco.

Across nine of the most competitive Senate races last month, Republicans cumulatively outspent Democrats on broadcast TV ads by nearly 100% more, $233 million to $121 million, according to AdImpact data, but only saw about 40% more rating points.

Ad Feedback

The disparity comes down to a difference in strategy. Republicans are relying heavily on outside groups, like super PACs, that pay elevated rates for ads and are making big buys late in the campaign, when inventory is stretched.

By contrast, Democrats are taking advantage of discounted rates for candidates and earlier, less expensive reservations.

At this stage in the game, Republicans are spending more to get less, which means the “shock and awe” of their massive dollar advantage isn’t necessarily translating to an actual impact on the ground, according to veteran Republican strategist John Thomas.

A better metric, he said, is to consider the gross rating points, or GRPs, a unit advertisers use to measure the reach and frequency of an ad campaign, independent of how much was paid for it.

In those nine races – where outside groups accounted for about 9 in 10 Republican ad dollars, compared to about half for Democrats – Democrats paid $201 per GRP, while Republicans paid about $274.

In some races in September, Democrats actually outpaced Republicans in GRPs, completely overcoming their spending edge.

In North Carolina, for example, Republicans outspent Democrats by about $17 million to $14 million on TV ads in September, as former Gov. Roy Cooper poses a major threat to former RNC Chair Michael Whatley and the GOP chances of holding Sen. Thom Tillis’ seat. But Democrats got more than 71,000 GRPs from their spend while Republicans got about 58,000. And at the beginning of October – recognizing the costly, difficult road ahead for Whatley – Republicans actually began cutting their remaining ad bookings by about $15 million.

Democrats were also outspent last month by Republicans in Maine by about 32%, another premier battleground race where former state Sen. Troy Jackson is looking to unseat veteran GOP incumbent Sen. Susan Collins, who has received major backing from national Republicans. But here, again, despite being outspent, Democrats got 6% more GRPs for their money.

Even in Texas – where Democrats were blasted by Republican ad money in September, outspent more than 4 times over – the GRP gap was proportionally much smaller. Republicans got only 2.6 times more GRPs.

A GOP super PAC had to spend more than $22 million to air its top ad, touting Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s record as a prosecutor, about 15,500 times in September. Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico’s campaign spent a little under $4 million to air its most aired ad, casting Paxton as “the most corrupt politician in Texas,” about 8,000 times. That amounts to less than one-fifth the spending for about half the airtime.

Lauren French, communications director for Senate Majority PAC, a leading Democratic super PAC, also emphasized that buying TV late in the cycle becomes exorbitantly expensive. “The nitty-gritty of campaigning is that not all ad space costs the same,” she said.

“If you are buying something in February, it’s going to be a lot cheaper, and you’re going to get a lot more bang for your buck than, say, if you’re buying it in September. So that’s why you’re seeing this huge disconnect between what Republicans are paying and what Democrats are paying on average in some of these races,” French said.

In seven of the top nine Senate races by total TV and radio ad spending in September, Democrats paid less per GRP than Republicans.

The two exceptions were New Hampshire and Alaska. Confident in their nominees, Republicans were able to secure comparable or better rates in both states’ key markets. In New Hampshire, this was reinforced by Republicans allocating relatively more to cheaper secondary markets.

“Broadly speaking, Republicans are using their money pretty ineffectively, and public polling is saying that people are not seeing their ads as much as one would expect. So, by that definition alone, some of their money is being set on fire. We are being outspent in a lot of these states, which means we have to make more strategic decisions,” French said.

Thomas said that Texas, in particular, was emblematic of this effect, with GOP outside groups mounting an urgent rescue effort for Paxton and pouring money into the state. He noted that Paxton allies had taken to buying ad time on national NFL broadcasts because local markets had grown so crowded. That’s why people across the country are seeing Texas Senate ads in games that don’t include the Dallas Cowboys or Houston Texans.

“In some cases, because the commercial rate is so high in a local, like a Houston spot, it actually sometimes can be cheaper to buy a national spot,” he said.

Democrats’ efficiency advantage might have been much greater, given their candidates have consistently raised more money their Republican opponents on a campaign-to-campaign basis, allowing them to spend more directly on their own ads at cheap rates.

But thanks to a recent Supreme Court ruling, for the first time this year, national party committees can take advantage of candidate ad rates through coordinated buys.

This means well-funded national committees like the National Republican Congressional Committee or National Republican Senate Committee can team up with candidates – like Mike Rogers in Michigan or Sen. Jon Husted in Ohio – and foot the bill for pricey ad campaigns while getting candidate discounts.

The expansion of coordinated buying has allowed Republicans to blunt the Democratic candidate fundraising advantage. Democrats can do the same, but the GOP has taken to it far more aggressively: In September, GOP advertisers spent more than $30 million on coordinated ad buys, compared to about $5 million from Democrats.

Outside groups like super PACs still play a dominant role, however, due to their unique ability to accept unlimited donations and make unlimited expenditures.

“The money is actually very, very inefficient, but the benefit, even with the inefficiency of a super PAC, is one or two people can cut checks and fund the whole thing,” Thomas said.

台湾拟借鉴菲“积极透明”政策 揭露大陆海上灰色地带行动

2026-10-14 15:38 / 联合早报

台湾海洋委员会星期三（10月14日）在台北举行“2026海线安全国际会议”，国安会副秘书长李问出席会议并致辞。 （台湾海洋委员会官网）

台湾国安会副秘书长李问称，面对中国大陆持续通过海警、科研船及海上民兵等方式在周边海域展开灰色地带行动，台湾希望借鉴菲律宾的“积极透明”政策，与国际伙伴合作揭露海上胁迫行为。

台湾海洋委员会星期三（10月14日）在台北举行“2026海线安全国际会议”，邀请美国、英国、日本、菲律宾、韩国及越南等国专家，讨论海上交通、能源运输及供应链安全等议题。

根据海委会官网，李问在会议上致辞时说，中国大陆近年来不断通过军事演训，以及海警、科研船和海上民兵等非军事手段，在第一岛链及西太平洋展开灰色地带行动，不仅威胁台湾安全，也影响国际经贸与航运秩序。

他指出，今年6月大陆海警在台湾东部海域干扰商船航行后，台湾政府已建立跨部门通报机制，向周边船舶提供正确信息，并提醒商船不必理会大陆海警提出的非法要求。

李问透露，台湾总统府“全社会防卫韧性委员会”也曾召集11个部门，针对大陆可能采取的海上胁迫、干扰航运及物资补给等情况进行桌上推演。

此外，今年8月举行的汉光军事演习期间，台湾海军与海巡署首次联合进行反封锁护航演练，模拟保护载运重要物资的商船，以检验危机期间维持能源及关键物资运输的能力。

李问强调，台湾除了强化自身防卫能力，也希望与理念相近国家加强战略沟通，借鉴菲律宾“积极透明”政策，主动公开海上胁迫行为的做法，并在海域态势感知、无人机系统、非致命武器及航行自由行动等方面深化合作。

他也提出名为“TENACIT-I”（强韧）的海上交通韧性整备框架，涵盖运输通讯、能源韧性、海军与海巡协作、海域态势感知、护航与伴航、保险措施、物流转运及国际支持等八大领域。

李问说，海上交通攸关台湾安全及民生稳定，政府必须在平时整合航运、港口、能源及供应链等资源，建立跨部门协调机制，才能在危机发生时维持重要物资运输及民生供应。

沈伯洋提无政治前提愿保留双城论坛 国台办指“台独”没资格谈合作

2026-10-14 15:40 / 联合早报

针对台北市长参选人沈伯洋说，在没有政治前提的情况下可以参加台北与上海“双城论坛”，中国大陆国台办表示，“台独顽固分子”没有资格奢谈两岸交流合作。

沈伯洋此前表示，双城论坛不但不必要,甚至造成渗透破口，但近期在受访时改口称，自己若当选且确保“没有政治前提、有效益、有内容、能帮助到产业”，现有的交流框架与处理人员可以保留。

据台湾《联合报》，大陆国台办发言人陈斌华星期三（10月14日）在发布会上回应，上海台北城市论坛连续举办16年来，围绕经济、文化、科技、社会、体育、城市管理等议题达成诸多共识，对促进两市交流合作、增进两市市民福祉、推动两岸关系和平发展具有重要意义，得到两岸同胞普遍肯定和欢迎。

陈斌华说，要和平、要发展、要交流、要合作，是两岸同胞的共同心声。“‘台独’顽固分子长期鼓吹‘台独’分裂主张，挑动两岸对立对抗，破坏台海和平稳定，根本没有资格奢谈两岸交流合作”。

男子酒后携刀出门 划伤送餐员致毁容

2026年10月14日 15:49 / 新明日报

被告萨兰拉杰用刀划伤送餐员脸颊和手腕，导致对方毁容。 （示意图）

男子酒后携刀出门，途中与一名送餐员发生争执，随后竟亮刀划伤对方脸颊及手腕，导致送餐员毁容。

被告萨兰拉杰（Saranraj，23岁）面对包括持危险武器蓄意重伤他人、抵触腐蚀性和爆炸性物体及攻击性武器法令，以及使用暴力妨碍公务员执行任务等七项控状。他承认其中三项，被判坐牢19个月又10周，外加鞭打7下。

案情显示，事件发生在今年2月5日凌晨1时许，地点在庙弯（Beo Crescent）第50座组屋附近。受害者案发时21岁，是一名兼职送餐员，月收入约500元至1000元。

案发当天，被告在家里饮酒后将一把刀子藏在口袋内，随后前往庙弯一带。当时受害者正与三名友人聚在附近的游乐场，被告上前与其中一人交谈。

受害者随后向被告喊话，两人于是爆发口角并演变成肢体冲突。其间，受害者数次挥拳殴打被告，被告也还手，随后更掏出刀子朝受害者的脸部及左手腕划去。被告干案后逃离现场，并丢弃凶器。

受害者事后被送往新加坡中央医院急诊室，接受左手腕伤口清创、受损组织修复，以及左脸颊裂伤缝合手术。他共住院三天，出院后复诊三次，并获得30天病假，其间因无法工作而遭受收入损失。

休假30天后，受害者在用左手转动电单车油门时，左手腕仍会感到阵阵刺痛，不得不缩短送餐工时，导致经济来源受影响。直到今年8月，受害者还是没有完全恢复左手腕的活动能力，用力过大就感到疼痛，脸颊上也留下永久伤疤，造成毁容。