博客

  • 特朗普从休斯顿致电国际空间站机组人员,赞扬太空先驱并承诺提供“ Oval Office 会面时间”


    2026年8月28日 美国东部时间下午3:05 / 福克斯新闻频道

    总统在向阿尔忒弥斯二号机组人员授予国会太空荣誉勋章后,于NASA约翰逊航天中心发表讲话

    作者:路易斯·卡西亚诺 福克斯新闻

    唐纳德·特朗普总统从休斯顿与机组人员进行了通话,他早前还在此地向阿尔忒弥斯二号机组人员授予了荣誉勋章。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/00841a9e-4924-4079-a9f9-986b3e365059

    收听本文
    1分钟

    周五,唐纳德·特朗普总统在休斯顿与驻扎在国际空间站的美国宇航员进行了通话,就在几分钟前,他刚刚在此地向阿尔忒弥斯二号机组人员致敬。

    通话伊始,特朗普开玩笑称,许多美国人都渴望前往太空旅行。

    “我可不会这么做,”他在NASA约翰逊航天中心说道,“我不好意思承认这点,我不想去太空,但有些人对太空的热爱远超其他一切。”

    特朗普将太空飞行从奇观转变为常态,目标日均发射3次

    唐纳德·特朗普总统周五于休斯顿约翰逊航天中心任务控制中心与国际空间站上的宇航员进行通话。(美联社照片/马克·希费尔贝恩)

    宇航员们表示,能与特朗普通话他们“激动不已”,并称他们“正处于多次太空行走任务中”,下周还计划进行一次太空行走。

    特朗普称该机组人员是太空探索领域的“先驱”。

    他欢迎其他官员与国际空间站机组人员通话,并提出等宇航员返回地球后,将邀请他们前往白宫。

    “觉醒”军事院校成为新全面作战改革蓝图的目标

    唐纳德·特朗普总统展示阿尔忒弥斯二号机组人员克里斯蒂娜·科赫、维克多·格洛弗、里德·怀斯曼和杰里米·汉森赠送的飞行夹克,该机组人员于2026年8月28日周五在休斯顿约翰逊航天中心接受国会太空荣誉勋章后赠送了该夹克。(美联社照片/马克·希费尔贝恩)

    “你们回来的时候我们会见面的,”他说,“事实上,如果你们想要在椭圆形办公室会面,没问题吧?”

    稍早前,特朗普向阿尔忒弥斯二号机组人员授予了国会太空荣誉勋章,并签署了一项行政命令,成立美国太空军学院。

    唐纳德·特朗普总统于2026年8月28日周五在休斯顿NASA约翰逊航天中心参加国会太空荣誉勋章颁发仪式。国家经济委员会主任凯文·哈西特和NASA局长贾里德·艾萨克曼在一旁观看。(美联社照片/凯伦·沃伦)

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    “它将达到和西点军校、空军学院、海岸警卫队学院、海军学院以及安纳波利斯海军学院相同的水准,”特朗普将其与其他美国军事院校作比较时说道,“它将达到同等水平。”

    _路易斯·卡西亚诺是福克斯新闻数字频道的记者。新闻线索可发送至_louis.casiano@fox.com_。

    Trump calls ISS crew from Houston to praise space pioneers and offer ‘Oval Office time’

    August 28, 2026 3:05pm EDT / Fox News

    President spoke from NASA’s Johnson Space Center after honoring Artemis II crew with Congressional Space Medal of Honor

    By Louis Casiano Fox News

    President Donald Trump spoke with the crew from Houston, where he also honored the crew of the Artemis II.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/00841a9e-4924-4079-a9f9-986b3e365059

    Listen to this article

    1 min

    President Donald Trump on Friday spoke with American astronauts aboard the International Space Station from Houston, where he honored the Artemis II crew moments earlier.

    Trump joked at the beginning of the phone call that many Americans would love to travel to space.

    “I wouldn’t do it,” he said from NASA’s Johnson Space Center. “I hate to admit it. I would not want to do it. But some people love it more than anything.”

    TRUMP TO TRANSFORM SPACEFLIGHT FROM SPECTACLE TO STATUS QUO TARGETING 3 LAUNCHES PER DAY

    President Donald Trump speaks to astronauts aboard the International Space Station on Friday at Johnson Space Center’s Mission Control Center in Houston.(AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

    The astronauts said they were “thrilled” to speak with Trump and that they were “in the middle of several spacewalks,” with another one planned for next week.

    Trump called the crew a group of “pioneers” for their efforts in space exploration.

    He welcomed other officials to speak to the ISS crew and offered to welcome the astronauts to the White House when they return.

    ‘WOKE’ MILITARY ACADEMIES TARGETED IN NEW BLUEPRINT FOR SWEEPING WARFIGHTING OVERHAUL

    President Donald Trump holds up a flight jacket presented to him by Artemis II crew members Christina Koch, Victor Glover, Reid Wiseman and Jeremy Hansen after the crew accepted the Congressional Space Medal of Honor on Friday, Aug. 28, 2026, at Johnson Space Center in Houston.(AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

    “We’re going to see you when you get back,” he said. “In fact, if you want Oval Office time, right?”

    A short time earlier, Trump honored the crew of the Artemis II with the Congressional Space Medal of Honor and signed an executive order establishing the U.S. Space Force Academy.

    President Donald Trump participates in a Congressional Space Medal of Honor ceremony at NASA’s Johnson Space Center on Friday, Aug. 28, 2026, in Houston. Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, and NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman look on.(AP Photo/Karen Warren)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “It will be at that same level when you serve West Point, Air Force, Coast Guard, Navy, Annapolis,” Trump said, comparing it to the other U.S. military academies. “It’s going to be at that level.”

    _Louis Casiano is a reporter for Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent to_louis.casiano@fox.com_._

  • 埃尔-赛义德因近期攻击特朗普后被指痴迷“谈论他人妻子”


    2026年8月28日 美国东部时间下午2:15 / 福克斯新闻

    密歇根州联邦参议员候选人的帖子将白宫官方第一夫人网页上的梅拉尼娅·特朗普替换为哈普的名字

    作者:彼得·达布罗斯卡、安德鲁·马克·米勒 福克斯新闻

    乌莎·万斯回击埃尔-赛义德

    第二夫人乌莎·万斯在其接受《福克斯与朋友们》采访的预告片段中,回应了密歇根州民主党联邦参议员提名候选人阿卜杜勒·埃尔-赛义德近期的言论。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/616ea3a3-79a5-47b2-94f4-00575976bdc7

    收听本文
    2分钟

    就在民主党密歇根州联邦参议员候选人阿卜杜勒·埃尔-赛义德上周以同样恶毒的方式攻击第二夫人乌莎·万斯仅一周后,其团队周四又针对白宫助手娜塔莉·哈普发起了攻击。

    此前,总统唐纳德·特朗普在与加拿大的激烈贸易争端中下令将安大略湖更名为“美国湖”,埃尔-赛义德的竞选团队随即在X平台上加入论战。

    “如果现在什么都可以改名……那我们什么时候正式执行这项更名?”该竞选团队在帖子中写道,并附上一张经过篡改的白宫官方第一夫人梅拉尼娅·特朗普网页截图,划掉她的名字并替换为哈普的名字。

    该帖子很快遭到社交媒体上保守派人士的批评。

    众议院民主党人拿“娜塔莉湖”嘲讽特朗普助手引发社交媒体热议:“学学体面”

    密歇根州民主党联邦参议员候选人阿卜杜勒·埃尔-赛义德的竞选团队发布了一张模因图,暗示特朗普总统与助手娜塔莉·哈普存在不当关系,他因此面临批评。(盖蒂图片社)

    “这简直是拙劣到敷衍了事的攻击,”共和党通讯专员马特·惠特洛克在X平台上发帖称,“我四岁的孩子都能想出比这更好的吐槽。”

    “奇怪的是,这场竞选花了这么多时间谈论别人的妻子。显然阿卜杜勒要么在琢磨副总统和他的妻子,要么就在想特朗普总统和他的妻子?”

    “阿卜杜勒这小子已经黔驴技穷了,他的团队还在往他身上扔砖头,”记者詹姆斯·戴维·迪克森在X平台上发帖称。

    “这真的太恶心了,对吧?”保守派倡导组织“密歇根前进”在X平台上发帖称。

    第二夫人乌莎·万斯回击民主党联邦参议员提名候选人阿卜杜勒·埃尔-赛义德的尖锐攻击

    2026年3月31日,总统助理娜塔莉·哈普在白宫椭圆形办公室签署行政命令的活动中。(布兰登·斯米亚洛夫斯基/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    “左翼又来了点性别歧视和厌女言论,”政治评论员梅利克·阿卜杜勒在X平台上发帖称,“这次出自那个和哈森·皮克勾勾搭搭的家伙。”

    哈普长期支持特朗普,她曾表示,特朗普在第一任期内推出的“尝试权”行政令在她与骨癌的艰苦斗争中挽救了她的生命。随后她加入特朗普第二届政府,担任总统助理。

    最近几周,哈普成为媒体密集关注和网络猜测的焦点,人们纷纷揣测她与特朗普的关系性质。

    订阅获取政治新闻简报

    上周末,副总统JD·万斯曾在帖子中提到,他的祖父(他称之为“帕波”)如果知道埃尔-赛义德是严肃的联邦参议员候选人,一定会感到震惊。对此,这位倾向社会主义的密歇根州候选人回应时,提及了拥有印度血统的第二夫人乌莎·万斯。

    “所以我们觉得JD会带着乌莎回到过去见帕波吗,还是不会……”埃尔-赛义德在X平台上写道。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    2026年2月21日,密歇根州联邦参议员候选人阿卜杜勒·埃尔-赛义德在密歇根州大急流城拍摄肖像。(埃文·科布 为《华盛顿邮报》 via 盖蒂图片社)

    福克斯新闻数字频道联系了埃尔-赛义德的竞选团队。

    白宫发言人戴维斯·英格尔对福克斯新闻数字频道表示:“阿卜杜勒拉赫曼·穆罕默德·埃尔-赛义德主张大幅增税、解散警察部门,最近还被曝光称美式橄榄球是‘有毒的男子气概’,并诋毁感恩节。这个激进分子说的每句话都是蠢话。”

    彼得·达布罗斯卡是福克斯新闻数字频道的政治记者。

    El-Sayed dragged over ‘weird’ fixation on ‘talking about other people’s wives’ after latest Trump attack

    August 28, 2026 2:15pm EDT / Fox News

    The Michigan Senate candidate’s post replaced Melania Trump’s name with Harp’s on the official first lady webpage

    By Peter D’Abrosca, Andrew Mark Miller Fox News

    Usha Vance fires back at El-Sayed

    Second lady Usha Vance responds to recent comments by Democratic Michigan Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed in a preview of her interview on ‘Fox & Friends.’

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/616ea3a3-79a5-47b2-94f4-00575976bdc7

    Listen to this article

    2 min

    The Abdul-El Sayed campaign on Thursday launched an attack aimed at White House aide Natalie Harp just a week after attacking second lady Usha Vance in a similarly vicious manner.

    After President Donald Trump’s edict renaming Lake Ontario to Lake America during a heated trade battle with Canada the El-Sayed campaign waded into the fray on X.

    “If we’re just renaming everything now… When are we making this official?” the campaign said in its post, adding a doctored image of the official White House webpage for first lady Melania Trump, crossing out her name and replacing it with Harp’s.

    The post was quickly criticized by conservatives on social media.

    HOUSE DEM’S ‘LAKE NATALIE’ JAB AT TRUMP AIDE SETS SOCIAL MEDIA ABLAZE: ‘STAY CLASSY’

    Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed is facing criticism after his campaign posted a meme insinuating an improper relationship between President Trump and assistant Natalie Harp.(Getty Images)

    “This is just such a weak, phoned-in effort,” GOP communicator Matt Whitlock posted on X. “My four year-old could come up with better burns than this.

    “Weird how much time this campaign spends talking about other people‘s wives. When Abdul’s not talking about (and clearly thinking a lot about) the vice president and his wife, apparently he’s thinking about President Trump and his wife?”

    “That boy Abdul is drowning, and his team keeps throwing him bricks,” journalist James David Dickson posted on X.

    “So this is just gross, right?” Conservative advocacy group Michigan Forward posted on X.

    SECOND LADY USHA VANCE FIRES BACK AT POINTED JAB FROM DEMOCRATIC SENATE NOMINEE ABDUL EL-SAYED

    Executive assistant to the president Natalie Harp during an executive order signing in the Oval Office of the White House March 31, 2026.(Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)

    “A lil more sexism and misogyny from the Left,” political commentator Melik Abdul posted on X. “This time, it’s from the Guy who plays foootsie with Hasan Piker.”

    Harp is a longtime Trump supporter who credited his first-term “right to try” order for saving her life after a serious battle with bone cancer. She then joined the second Trump administration as an aide to the president.

    In recent weeks, Harp has become the subject of intense media scrutiny and online speculation about the nature of her relationship with Trump.

    SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

    In a post over the weekend responding to Vice President JD Vance’s comments that his grandfather, whom he called Pawpaw, would be shocked to know that El-Sayed is a serious U.S. Senate contender, the socialist-aligned candidate from Michigan responded by invoking second lady Usha Vance, who is of Indian descent.

    “So do we think JD is taking Usha with him back in time to meet Papaw, or no…,” El-Sayed wrote on X.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed poses for a portrait in Grand Rapids, Mich., Feb. 21, 2026.(Evan Cobb for The Washington Post via Getty Images)

    Fox News Digital reached out to El-Sayed’s campaign.

    “Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed, who wants to massively raise taxes and defund the police, was just recently exposed for saying American football is ‘toxic masculinity’ and trashing Thanksgiving,” White House spokesperson Davis Ingle told Fox News Digital. “Everything this radical says is moronic.”

    Peter D’Abrosca is a politics reporter at Fox News Digital.

  • 特朗普试图将已审结的纽约封口费案移交联邦法院遭驳回


    2026-08-28T17:04:18.749Z / 路透社

    2026年8月19日,美国总统唐纳德·特朗普与加密货币行业高管在华盛顿白宫罗斯福厅发表讲话。路透社/凯莉·库珀

    • 摘要
    • 法官表示最高法院的豁免权裁决与纽约州此案无关
    • 特朗普于2024年5月因伪造商业记录被判34项重罪成立
    • 主审法官于2025年1月10日判处其无条件释放,未监禁也未罚款

    纽约8月28日路透电 — 一名联邦法官驳回了唐纳德·特朗普将其已审结的纽约州封口费案移交联邦法院审理的请求,这对这位美国总统试图撤销自己刑事定罪的努力构成打击。

    总部位于曼哈顿的美国地区法官阿尔文·赫勒斯泰因作出上述裁决之前,美国第二巡回上诉法院的一个三人法官小组曾指示他更仔细地审查2024年7月最高法院作出的给予特朗普广泛起诉豁免权的裁决,如何影响了这起纽约州案件。

    路透社每日简报新闻通讯可为您提供开启一天所需的全部资讯。点击此处订阅。

    在驳回特朗普将案件移交联邦法院的请求时,赫勒斯泰因写道,此案涉及总统的私人行为,而非公务行为。特朗普于2024年5月被判有罪,罪名是隐瞒向色情明星斯托米·丹尼尔斯支付的13万美元封口费,后者声称曾与特朗普发生性关系,这一指控本可能颠覆特朗普2016年的总统竞选。

    “向成人电影演员支付封口费,或是为掩盖丑闻而掩饰,都不属于总统豁免权的覆盖范围,”赫勒斯泰因写道。

    陪审团认定共和党人特朗普的34项伪造商业记录重罪罪名成立,此案由曼哈顿地区检察官阿尔文·布拉格提起。

    特朗普否认了丹尼尔斯的指控,并在选举中击败民主党候选人希拉里·克林顿。他还曾请求纽约州上诉法院撤销对他的定罪,并声称此案是出于政治目的提起的。

    他的律师周五向法院提交通知,表示将对赫勒斯泰因的裁决提起上诉。

    特朗普法律团队的一名发言人在一份声明中表示:“特朗普总统将提起强有力的上诉,并将继续在各个层面挫败民主党人的政治迫害。”

    特朗普主张总统豁免权

    最高法院在“特朗普诉美国案”中的裁决称,总统对公务行为享有起诉豁免权,检察官甚至不能在涉及私人行为的刑事案件中使用与公务行为相关的证据。

    特朗普称,这一裁决应导致他的封口费定罪被推翻,因为陪审团听取了来自他首届白宫任期的证据,包括前白宫通讯主任霍普·希克斯的证词。

    由前民主党总统比尔·克林顿任命的赫勒斯泰因此前曾两次驳回特朗普将案件移交联邦法院的请求,同意布拉格的观点,即此案涉及私人行为。

    但上诉法院表示,赫勒斯泰因应当审查存在争议的证据是否“与以总统身份实施的行为相关”。

    特朗普未被监禁

    此案的主审法官胡安·默钱特于2025年1月10日判处特朗普无条件释放,未监禁也未罚款。

    默钱特表示,这一判决保留了定罪记录,可避免对特朗普于2025年1月20日开启的第二届白宫任期造成干扰。

    特朗普面临四起刑事诉讼,布拉格提起的这起是唯一进入审判程序的案件。他否认存在任何不当行为,并在四起案件中均提出了无罪抗辩。

    上诉法院的三名法官均由民主党总统任命。布拉格同样是民主党人。

    路透社记者吕克·科恩报道;伊斯梅尔·沙基尔、苏珊·希夫 additional reporting;丽莎·舒梅克、罗德·尼克尔和迪帕·巴宾顿编辑

    Trump loses bid to move already-decided criminal hush money case to US court

    2026-08-28T17:04:18.749Z / Reuters

    U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks with cryptocurrency executives in the Roosevelt Room at the White House in Washington D.C., U.S., August 19, 2026. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper

    • Summary
    • Judge says Supreme Court immunity ruling has no bearing on New York case
    • Trump was convicted on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in May 2024
    • Trial judge imposed unconditional discharge on January 10, 2025, with no jail time or fine

    NEW YORK, Aug 28 (Reuters) – A federal judge denied Donald Trump’s attempt to move his already decided New York state hush money case to federal court, in a setback on Friday for the U.S. president’s effort to erase his criminal conviction.

    Manhattan-based U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein’s ruling came after a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals directed ​him to review more closely how the Supreme Court’s decision in July 2024 giving Trump broad immunity from prosecution affected ​the New York case.

    The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

    In denying Trump’s effort to move the case to federal court, Hellerstein wrote that ⁠the case concerned the president’s personal conduct, not his official acts. Trump was convicted in May 2024 for concealing a $130,000 hush money payment ​to porn star Stormy Daniels, whose claim to have had a sexual encounter with him could have upended his 2016 presidential campaign.

    “Paying hush ​money to an adult film star or engaging in a cover-up of an embarrassment are not subsumed in presidential immunity,” Hellerstein wrote.

    Jurors convicted Trump, a Republican, on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, in a case brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

    Trump has denied Daniels’ claim and defeated Democratic candidate ​Hillary Clinton in the election. He has also asked a New York state appeals court to void his conviction, and has said the ​case was brought for political reasons.

    His lawyers filed a notification with the court on Friday indicating that they would appeal Hellerstein’s decision.

    “President Trump will be ‌filing a ⁠powerful appeal, and will continue defeating Democrat weaponization at every turn,” a spokesman for Trump’s legal team said in a statement.

    TRUMP ASSERTS PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY

    The Supreme Court decision, Trump v. United States, said presidents are immune from prosecution over official acts, and prosecutors cannot use evidence of official acts even in criminal cases involving private behavior.

    Trump said that should doom his hush money conviction because jurors heard evidence from his ​first White House term, including ​testimony from former White House ⁠communications director Hope Hicks.

    Hellerstein, who was appointed by former Democratic President Bill Clinton, had twice previously rejected Trump’s attempt to move the case, agreeing with Bragg that it involved private behavior.

    But the appeals court ​said Hellerstein should review whether the disputed evidence “relates to acts taken under color of the Presidency.”

    TRUMP RECEIVED ​NO JAIL TIME

    The ⁠trial judge in the hush money case, Juan Merchan, sentenced Trump on January 10, 2025, to an unconditional discharge, with no jail time or fine.

    Merchan said that punishment, which left the conviction on the books, would avoid a disruption to Trump’s second White House term, which began on ⁠January 20, ​2025.

    Trump faced four criminal cases, and Bragg’s was the only one that went to ​trial. He denied wrongdoing and pleaded not guilty in all four cases.

    The three judges on the appeals court were appointed to the bench by Democratic presidents. Bragg is ​also a Democrat.

    Reporting by Luc Cohen; additional reporting by Ismail Shakil and Susan Heavey; editing by Lisa Shumaker, Rod Nickel and Deepa Babington

  • 贾斯敏·克罗克特无意为詹姆斯·塔拉里科助选


    美国东部时间2026年8月28日周五下午12:55 / CNN政治频道

    贾斯敏·克罗克特无意为詹姆斯·塔拉里科助选

    《劳拉·科茨直播》节目

    贾斯敏·克罗克特告诉劳拉,她不会陪同詹姆斯·塔拉里科参加这场备受关注的得克萨斯州联邦参议员竞选活动。克罗克特表示,她将为中期选举中那些往往被忽视的下议院候选人提供支持。

    1:05 • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/28/politics/video/jasmine-crockett-has-no-plans-to-campaign-for-james-talarico-lcl

    Jasmine Crockett has no plans to campaign for James Talarico

    12:55 PM EDT, Fri August 28, 2026 / CNN Politics

    Jasmine Crockett has no plans to campaign for James Talarico

    Laura Coates Live

    Jasmine Crockett tells Laura she will not be campaigning with James Talarico in the closely-watched Senate race in Texas. Crockett says she’ll be supporting down ballot candidates in the midterms who are often overshadowed.

    1:05 • Source: CNN

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/28/politics/video/jasmine-crockett-has-no-plans-to-campaign-for-james-talarico-lcl

  • 调查发现:年轻员工比年长雇员更害怕人工智能


    2026年8月28日 / 美国东部时间下午12:18 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    记者:梅根·塞鲁洛 MoneyWatch频道
    梅根·塞鲁洛是驻纽约的哥伦比亚广播公司MoneyWatch频道记者,报道小企业、职场、医疗保健、消费支出和个人理财话题。她经常做客哥伦比亚广播公司新闻24小时频道讨论自己的报道。

    阅读完整简介

    近日一项调查显示,相比年长雇员,年轻员工对人工智能将如何影响自身工作岗位更为悲观和愤世嫉俗。

    职场点评网站Glassdoor对员工看待人工智能的态度进行分析后发现,美国Z世代员工对人工智能的批评声最为强烈,仅有三分之一的年轻员工对其在工作场所的影响持积极态度。相比之下,47%的X世代员工(出生于1965年至1980年之间)对人工智能持积极看法。

    “这一结果令人意外,因为通常我们会认为年轻员工对科技更得心应手、也更乐观,”Glassdoor高级经济学家克里斯·马丁在接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访时表示。

    马丁推测,年轻员工对人工智能的负面看法源于他们担心人工智能会损害自身的工作和职业前景。

    “越来越多证据表明,人工智能正在取代更容易受到AI影响的入门级岗位,”他说。“未来几年对他们来说将更加艰难,因为人工智能正在改变他们的工作方式,他们可能无法获得20年前普通劳动者就能拥有的工作岗位。”

    职场点评网站Glassdoor是一家在线职业研究平台,该平台的调查显示,许多员工担心自己会被人工智能取代,还有不少人反感被迫在工作流程中融入人工智能工具。部分员工还表示,他们所在的公司过于关注人工智能,而忽视了核心业务。另有少数员工批评雇主利用人工智能与员工沟通,甚至利用人工智能监视员工。

    马丁解释道,年长员工通常在公司组织架构中级别更高,且在岗位上更为稳定,他们往往将大型语言模型视为自身工作的补充。

    “他们能从人工智能中看到更多好处,”他说道,并指出人工智能可能会出现错误或编造事实,需要经验更丰富的员工进行监督。

    “资深员工可以轻松识别并摒弃这些错误,而年轻或经验不足的员工可能更难区分真实信息和人工智能编造的内容,”马丁说。

    Glassdoor的调查还发现,性别也是影响员工看待人工智能态度的因素。总体而言,女性员工态度更为消极:仅有21%的Z世代女性对这项技术持积极看法,而这一比例在Z世代男性中为42%。

    领英的另一项研究显示,人工智能驱动的就业热潮正在加剧女性在科技行业本已面临的性别差距,人工智能岗位的新雇员工中女性占比偏低。

    本文由阿兰·谢特编辑

    Younger workers are more scared of AI than older employees, survey finds

    August 28, 2026 / 12:18 PM EDT / CBS News

    By

    Megan Cerullo Reporter, MoneyWatch
    Megan Cerullo is a New York-based reporter for CBS MoneyWatch covering small business, workplace, health care, consumer spending and personal finance topics. She regularly appears on CBS News 24/7 to discuss her reporting.

    Read Full Bio

    Younger workers are more pessimistic and cynical about how artificial intelligence will affect their jobs than older employees, according to a recent survey.

    Generation Z Americans are the most critical of AI, with only a third of young employees speaking positively about its impact on the workplace, Glassdoor found in an analysis of workers’ attitudes toward AI. By comparison, 47% of Gen X workers — people born between 1965 and 1980 — were high on AI.

    “This was surprising, because generally we expect younger workers to be more comfortable and optimistic about technology,” Glassdoor senior economist Chris Martin told CBS News.

    Martin suspects younger workers’ negative views of AI stem from fears that it will hurt their job and career prospects.

    “There is a growing body of evidence that AI is displacing entry-level jobs that are more exposed to AI,” he said. “The coming years are going to be more difficult for them because AI is changing the way they work, and they may not have access to jobs that workers did 20 years ago.”

    Many workers expressed concerns about being replaced by AI, while others resented being forced to integrate AI tools into their workflows, according to Glassdoor, an online career research site. Some also said their firms were too focused on AI versus the core business. A smaller share of workers was critical of employers using AI to communicate with staff or even using it to snoop on them.

    Older workers, who are typically higher up on their employer’s org chart and more settled in their roles, tend to view large language models as complementary to their work, Martin explained.

    “They see more benefits from AI,” he said, noting that AI can make errors or invent facts, requiring oversight from more experienced employees.

    “An expert worker can easily identify and discard those mistakes, whereas a younger or less-experienced worker may have a harder time telling legitimate facts from hallucinations,” Martin said.

    Gender also factored into workers’ views of AI, Glassdoor found. In general, female employees were more negative: Only 21% of Gen Z women spoke positively about the technology, compared with 42% of Gen Z men.

    Separate research from LinkedIn shows that the AI-driven jobs boom is worsening the gender gap that female employees already face in the tech industry, with women underrepresented among new hires for AI jobs.

    Edited by Alain Sherter

  • 与反法西斯主义运动有关联的网站在美国务院将其技术集体列为恐怖组织后关停


    2026-08-28T15:22:05-04:00 / 福克斯新闻网

    总部位于意大利的A/I集体为极左翼团体提供加密托管服务,如今因美国制裁被切断服务

    作者:摩根·菲利普斯、彼得·达布罗萨 | 福克斯新闻网
    发布于2026年8月28日美国东部时间下午3:22

    卢比奥敦促反法西斯主义运动“收手”:乔纳森·特利

    美国国务卿马可·卢比奥牵头举办一场国际会议,号召60多个国家共同应对极左翼政治恐怖主义。宪法法律师乔纳森·特利解释道,反法西斯主义运动等团体利用加密渠道和国际资金,构成了跨国威胁。卢比奥警告不要低估暴力左翼极端主义,他称这种极端主义的动机是“对文明本身的仇恨”。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/b46cb312-099d-4303-ad6a-16aa34ed1acf

    收听本文
    3 分钟

    波特兰玫瑰城反法西斯主义运动(Rose City Antifa)和好战堕胎权组织“简复仇”(Jane’s Revenge)的网站在美国务院将其位于意大利的技术提供商列为全球恐怖实体后的几天内开始关停。

    福克斯新闻数字频道本周率先报道称,美国务院已将Autistici/Inventati(即A/I集体)列为“特别指定全球恐怖分子”,因其被指为暴力极左翼网络提供支持。

    “今日的消息表明,A/I集体已是全球反法西斯主义恐怖网络的数字基础设施,”一名美国务院官员告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。

    卢比奥向全世界发出警告,反对以“平等”为幌子的“有毒”极左翼恐怖主义

    2019年6月29日星期六,包括玫瑰城反法西斯主义运动和骄傲男孩在内的多个团体在俄勒冈州波特兰市中心举行抗议。(戴夫·基伦/《俄勒冈人报》/美联社)

    “在这个极端主义集体被列为特别指定全球恐怖分子仅一天后,数量不明的服务器和网站——被极左翼极端分子用于策划暴力袭击、 targeting联邦探员以及躲避执法部门追查其罪行——已被关停,”该官员说道。

    其中包括玫瑰城反情报网(Rose City Counter-Info),这是一个位于波特兰的网站,美国务院称玫瑰城反法西斯主义运动曾利用该网站发布移民海关执法局(ICE)人员的个人信息,并组织针对联邦探员的暴力活动。

    15名反法西斯主义激进分子被起诉,12人被捕:联邦对明尼阿波利斯反ICE行动展开全面调查

    美国务院表示,该团体曾利用该网站发布在线传单,敦促支持者用激光笔对准海关和边境保护局(CBP)的直升机。联邦记录显示,随后有一名男子承认曾用激光瞄准CBP直升机,迫使该飞机取消了原定的降落计划。

    据美国务院称,“简复仇”也利用A/I的服务发布公报,宣称对袭击堕胎诊所的行为负责,并煽动模仿式暴力。该组织曾宣称对2022年5月威斯康星州麦迪逊市一家危机妊娠中心的纵火爆炸事件负责。

    美国国务卿马可·卢比奥2026年8月7日在华盛顿特区国务院出席美国矿业行业圆桌会议时倾听唐纳德·特朗普总统发言。(埃里克·李/盖蒂图片社)

    由A/I托管、包含数千个网站的NoBlogs平台周五间歇性无法访问。部分单个页面仍可访问,而其他页面则返回错误或超时。

    美国务院未说明是否有美国机构直接关停了A/I的基础设施,也未说明此次宕机是否是该集体、其供应商或其用户在被列入名单后做出的决定所致。

    FBI称新任务中心已识别出“恶意”抗议资金和对象

    此次制裁行动禁止美国人和美国金融机构与A/I开展业务,并冻结其在美国管辖范围内的任何资产。

    美国务院表示,A/I为美国和欧洲的暴力左翼团体提供加密聊天和电子邮件服务、网站托管、安全视频工具以及匿名服务。该部门还称,一家使用A/I服务的媒体机构发布了来自哈马斯、伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队、真主党及其他已被列为恐怖组织的材料。

    “简复仇”在试图破坏杰克逊生命权组织办公楼时最初弄错了地址。(照片由凯西·波茨提供)

    A/I在NoBlogs托管页面上发布的一份声明中否认了这些指控。

    该集体自称是“一个位于意大利的小型志愿运营技术集体”,为“数字自卫”提供工具。

    我们不会退缩,该团体表示,“反法西斯主义和反资本主义都不是恐怖主义。抗议不是恐怖主义。”

    订阅获取政治新闻简报

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    “将A/I集体列为恐怖组织,对多年来困扰美国及其盟友的跨国极左翼网络造成了毁灭性打击,”美国务院官员说道。

    Antifa-linked sites go dark after State Department terror designation of tech collective

    2026-08-28T15:22:05-04:00 / Fox News

    The Italy-based A/I Collective provided encrypted hosting to far-left groups now cut off by U.S. sanctions

    By Morgan Phillips , Peter D’Abrosca, Fox News

    Published August 28, 2026 3:22pm EDT

    Rubio is telling Antifa to ‘knock it off’: Jonathan Turley

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio spearheads an international conference, rallying over 60 countries to confront far-left political terrorism. Constitutional law attorney Jonathan Turley explains how groups like Antifa, utilizing encrypted channels and international funding, pose a transnational threat. Rubio warns against underestimating the violent left-wing extremism, which he states is motivated by ‘hatred for civilization itself.’

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/b46cb312-099d-4303-ad6a-16aa34ed1acf

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    Websites tied to Portland’s Rose City Antifa and the militant abortion-rights group Jane’s Revenge began going dark in the days after the State Department designated their Italy-based technology provider a global terrorist entity.

    Fox News Digital first reported this week that the State Department had designated Autistici/Inventati, known as the A/I Collective, as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist over its alleged support for violent far-left networks.

    “Today’s news demonstrates the extent to which the A/I Collective was the digital infrastructure of the global Antifa terror network,” a State Department official told Fox News Digital.

    RUBIO PUTS ENTIRE WORLD ON NOTICE AGAINST RISE OF ‘POISONOUS’ FAR-LEFT TERROR ‘MASKED AS EQUALITY’

    Multiple groups, including Rose City Antifa and the Proud Boys protest in downtown Portland, Ore., Saturday, June 29, 2019. (Dave Killen/The Oregonian via AP)

    “Just one day after the extremist collective was designated as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, an untold number of servers and websites — used by far-left extremists to plot violent attacks, target federal agents, and conceal their crimes from law enforcement — have been shut down,” the official said.

    Among them was Rose City Counter-Info, a Portland-based website that the State Department says Rose City Antifa used to publish personal information about Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel and organize violent activity against federal agents.

    15 ANTIFA RADICALS INDICTED, 12 ARRESTED IN SWEEPING FEDERAL PROBE INTO MINNEAPOLIS ANTI-ICE OPERATIONS

    The State Department said the group used the site to distribute an online flyer urging supporters to use laser pointers against Customs and Border Protection helicopters. Federal records show one man later pleaded guilty to aiming a laser at a CBP helicopter, forcing the aircraft to abort a planned landing.

    Jane’s Revenge also used A/I services to publish communiqués claiming responsibility for attacks on pregnancy centers and to incite copycat violence, according to the State Department. The group claimed responsibility for the May 2022 firebombing of a crisis pregnancy center in Madison, Wisconsin.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio listens as President Donald Trump speaks during a roundtable on the American mining industry at the State Department on Aug. 7, 2026, in Washington, D.C.(Eric Lee/Getty Images)

    The NoBlogs platform, which is hosted by A/I and contains thousands of sites, was intermittently unavailable Friday. Some individual pages remained accessible while others returned errors or timed out.

    The State Department has not said whether any U.S. agency directly disabled A/I infrastructure or whether the outages resulted from decisions by the collective, its vendors or its users after the designation.

    FBI SAYS NEW MISSION CENTER HAS IDENTIFIED ‘NEFARIOUS’ PROTEST FUNDING AND SUBJECTS

    The sanctions action blocks Americans and U.S. financial institutions from doing business with A/I and freezes any assets it holds under U.S. jurisdiction.

    The State Department says A/I provided encrypted chat and email services, web hosting, secure video tools and anonymity services to violent left-wing groups in the United States and Europe. The department also said a media organization using A/I services disseminated material from Hamas, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Hezbollah and other designated terrorist groups.

    Jane’s Revenge initially targeted the wrong address while attempting to vandalize Jackson Right to Life’s office building.(Photo courtesy of Kathy Potts)

    A/I denied the allegations in a statement posted on a NoBlogs-hosted page.

    The collective described itself as “a small, volunteer-run, technology collective from Italy” that provides tools for “digital self-defense.”

    SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

    “We will not back down,” the group said. “Antifascism and anticapitalism are not terrorism. Protesting is not terrorism.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “The terror designation of the A/I Collective dealt a devastating blow to the transnational far-left networks that have plagued America and our allies for years,” the State Department official said.

  • 联邦法官称特朗普为斯托米·丹尼尔斯支付封口费的讨论并非官方总统行为


    2026-08-28T17:18:15.385Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/28/politics/trump-hush-money-federal-court-rejected

    一名联邦法官再次驳回了唐纳德·特朗普总统将其纽约州刑事封口费案件移交联邦法院审理的法律诉求,这一举措原本可能会降低推翻其定罪的难度。

    地区法官阿尔文·赫勒斯坦在周五的裁决中表示,特朗普提出的理由“既不新颖,也不具备法律依据”。

    赫勒斯坦此前曾驳回过特朗普的移案申请,但联邦上诉法院去年秋季裁定,鉴于美国最高法院2024年7月作出的具有里程碑意义的总统豁免权裁决,地区法院法官必须重新考虑这一申请。

    法官在2月份的听证会上听取了特朗普律师团队和曼哈顿地区检察官办公室检察官的陈述,但直到现在才作出裁决。周五,赫勒斯坦坚持原有立场,认为特朗普在州案件中被指控的行为属于私人行为,与其联邦公职无关。

    “检方的起诉源于特朗普总统为支付成人电影演员封口费而进行报销的私人行为,”赫勒斯坦在周五的裁决中写道。“该行为以及受到质疑的证据,与其联邦公职职位没有实质性关联。若认为这些事实与联邦公职‘相关’,则会将该词语的定义变得‘宽泛到毫无意义’。”

    特朗普已就周五的裁决立即提起上诉。

    特朗普法律团队的一名发言人在一份声明中表示:“最高法院关于豁免权的历史性裁决、联邦和纽约州宪法以及其他既定法律先例,都要求将曼哈顿地区检察官发起的这场政治迫害移交联邦法院审理,并立即予以推翻和驳回。”

    特朗普的律师已就其2024年的刑事定罪提起上诉,该罪名涉及34项伪造商业记录的指控,与2016年总统大选期间向成人电影演员斯托米·丹尼尔斯支付封口费有关。他们要求将案件移交联邦法院的单独行动早在州审判之前就已启动,以便联邦法官能够解释联邦优先管辖权和总统豁免权问题。联邦审理程序还能为其上诉至最高法院提供更快捷的途径。

    尽管被判有罪,特朗普最终被判处无条件释放,这意味着他未受到任何处罚,定罪实质上仅具象征意义。不过,这仍使特朗普成为首位被判重罪的总统。

    在定罪数月后,他的律师团队凭借2024年的豁免权裁决再次提起上诉。该裁决规定,总统免受针对其官方行为的刑事起诉,并禁止检察官提交涉及官方行为的证据,即便他们是在调查与该总统私人行为相关的所谓犯罪。

    特朗普的辩护团队长期以来一直辩称,特朗普不应因封口费计划被起诉,因为他受到总统豁免权的保护——他在任期间为其前私人律师迈克尔·科恩报销了2016年大选期间科恩策划的掩盖计划费用。

    在最新的裁决中,法官写道:“有关封口费支付以掩盖总统与斯托米·丹尼尔斯关系的讨论,绝不可能是官方行为。婚外情或掩盖婚外情,并不属于总统官方职责的‘核心范畴’。”

    对特朗普而言,争议焦点在于曼哈顿检察官在封口费审判中不当引入了涉及白宫工作人员行为的证据,他们称这些证据证明特朗普是以个人而非总统身份实施犯罪。

    赫勒斯坦对此不予认同:“总统的助手可以为总统处理非官方的私人事务。”

    去年11月,美国第二巡回上诉法院将此案发回赫勒斯坦审理,并表示地区法院必须重新考虑此案,但未就最高法院的裁决是否会对特朗普有利作出评判。

    特朗普的律师还等待了约两个月才向联邦法院提交重新提出的移案申请,他们最初曾要求州法院法官胡安·默查恩驳回定罪裁决。默查恩驳回了该动议,特朗普对定罪的上诉仍在州上诉渠道推进。

    2月份,赫勒斯坦称特朗普选择先向州法院提出申请是一项战略决策。“你做出了选择,试图‘两头下注’,”他当时就暗示了周五的裁决结果。

    在周五的裁决中,赫勒斯坦表示特朗普提交重新移案申请的时机过晚。“特朗普拖延提交移案申请属于‘典型的战略决策’,而‘他后来认为该决策失误这一事实本身,并不足以构成正当理由’。”

    州上诉程序仍在进行中,可能会上诉至纽约上诉法院,如果特朗普在下级上诉法院败诉,还有可能最终上诉至美国最高法院。

    本文已更新补充更多细节。

    Federal judge says Trump discussing payoff to Stormy Daniels isn’t an official presidential action

    2026-08-28T17:18:15.385Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/28/politics/trump-hush-money-federal-court-rejected

    A federal judge again denied President Donald Trump’s legal effort to get his New York state criminal hush money case moved to federal court, a move that could have made it easier to reverse his conviction.

    District Judge Alvin Hellerstein said in a ruling Friday that Trump’s cited grounds were “neither new nor legally sufficient.”

    Hellerstein has previously denied Trump’s request to move the case, but a federal appellate court ruled last fall that the district court judge must reconsider in light of the landmark presidential immunity ruling in July 2024 from the US Supreme Court.

    The judge heard arguments from lawyers for Trump and prosecutors from the Manhattan District Attorney’s office at a hearing in February but did not issue a ruling until now. Friday, Hellerstein maintained his position that Trump’s acts as charged in the state’s case against him were private and unrelated to his federal office.

    “The People’s prosecution arises from President Trump’s private conduct surrounding the reimbursement of hush money payments to an adult film star,” Hellerstein wrote Friday. “That conduct, and the challenged evidence, bears no substantive relation to his position in federal office. To consider these facts to be ‘relating to’ a federal office would give the words a definition that is ‘so broad that it is meaningless.’”

    Trump immediately appealed Friday’s ruling.

    “The Supreme Court’s historic decision on Immunity, the Federal and New York State Constitutions, and other established legal precedent mandate that the Witch Hunt perpetrated by the Manhattan DA be removed to federal court, and immediately overturned and dismissed,” a spokesman for Trump’s legal team said in a statement.

    Lawyers for Trump have appealed his 2024 criminal conviction on 34 counts of falsifying business records tied to hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels during the 2016 presidential election. Their separate efforts to get the case moved to federal court started before the state trial, so a federal judge could interpret federal preemption and presidential immunity. The federal track would also offer a faster route for his appeal to get to the Supreme Court.

    Despite the guilty finding, Trump was sentenced to unconditional discharge, meaning he faced no penalties and the conviction was essentially in name only. It did, however, make Trump the first president convicted of a felony.

    Months after his conviction, his lawyers tried again in the wake of the immunity decision that said presidents are protected from criminal prosecution for official acts and barred prosecutors from attempting to enter evidence involving official acts, even if they were pursuing alleged crimes involving that president’s private conduct.

    Trump’s defense team has long argued Trump can’t be prosecuted in connection to the hush money scheme because he’s protected by presidential immunity – he reimbursed his former personal attorney Michael Cohen while in office for a cover up scheme Cohen orchestrated during the 2016 election.

    In his latest ruling, the judge wrote, “There is no way that discussions regarding hush money payments to cover up the President’s relations with Stormy Daniels could be an official act. An affair, or a cover-up of an affair, is not within the “‘outer perimeter’ of the President’s official responsibilities.”

    For Trump, the debate is whether Manhattan prosecutors improperly introduced evidence involving White House staffers’ actions at the hush money trial that they allege was Trump’s crimes as an individual separate from his capacity as president.

    Hellerstein disagreed: “A president’s assistant can work on unofficial, personal matters for the president.”

    Last November, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals kicked the case back to Hellerstein and said the district court must reconsider but didn’t weigh in on whether the SCOTUS decision should tip the scales for Trump.

    Trump’s lawyers also waited about two months to file that renewed request in federal court, first asking the state court Judge Juan Merchan to dismiss the conviction. Merchan denied the motion and Trump’s appeal of his conviction is still moving through state appellate channels.

    In February, Hellerstein called it a strategic decision to petition Merchan before the federal court. “You made a choice. You sought two bites at the apple,” he said, signaling Friday’s ruling back then.

    In his order Friday, Hellerstein said Trump waited too long to file the renewed request for removal in federal court. “Trump’s delay in filing for removal constitutes a “quintessential strategic decision,” and the “fact that he later came to view that decision as a poor one is not sufficient, by itself, to establish cause.”

    The state appeal is also ongoing and could advance to the New York’s Court of Appeals and potentially reach the US Supreme Court if Trump is unsuccessful at the lower appellate levels.

    This story has been updated with additional details.

  • 美国上诉法院裁定:卡尔希无法阻止内华达州对预测市场的监管


    2026-08-28 17:40:53 UTC / 路透社

    作者:乔纳森·斯坦普尔与内特·雷蒙德

    2026年8月28日 17:40 UTC 更新于20分钟前

    2026年8月3日拍摄的卡尔希标识路透社插图

    • 第九巡回法院称联邦法律未优先于内华达州的博彩许可证要求
    • 该判决造成上诉法院间的意见分歧,增加了最高法院介入审查的可能性
    • 卡尔希、内华达州和商品期货交易委员会均未置评

    8月28日(路透社)——美国一家联邦上诉法院裁定,卡尔希无法阻止内华达州博彩监管机构对其预测市场平台进行监管,这使得一场关于此类平台是否构成非法赌博以及应由谁负责监管的全国性争议进一步升级。

    旧金山美国第九巡回上诉法院以3票全票通过的判决表示,卡尔希不太可能证明联邦《商品交易法》优先于内华达州要求其获得博彩许可证才能推出让用户对体育赛事结果下注的合约。

    路透社每日简报通讯为您提供开启一天所需的所有新闻。在此订阅

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    周五的判决与美国第三巡回上诉法院的立场产生分歧。费城第三巡回上诉法院在4月6日一项存在分歧的判决中称,新泽西州无权监管卡尔希的平台。

    这一判决增加了最高法院最终裁决应由各州还是美国商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)监管这个快速发展的预测市场行业的可能性。

    在共和党总统唐纳德·特朗普执政期间,CFTC曾声称对预测市场拥有独家监管权,并挑战了包括纽约在内的九个州的监管行动。

    目前至少有四个州——内华达州、马萨诸塞州、密歇根州和华盛顿州——已获得法院禁令限制卡尔希的业务活动。新泽西州有至9月3日的时间对第三巡回法院的判决提起上诉。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    卡尔希和CFTC未立即回应置评请求。

    代表内华达州博彩管制委员会参与此案的迈耶布朗律师事务所律师妮可·萨哈尔斯基表示:“法院证实了自始至终都很明确的一点——各州负责监管体育博彩,而CFTC与此无关。”

    自2024年美国总统大选以来,卡尔希、Polymarket、Coinbase(COIN.O)、Gemini Titan(GEMI.O)等公司推出的预测市场人气飙升。在那次大选中,它们对特朗普击败民主党人卡玛拉·哈里斯的预测结果比民调机构更为准确。

    尽管卡尔希平台最广为人知的功能是允许体育博彩,但该平台还允许用户对选举、经济、天气以及奥斯卡得主等文化活动下注。

    法官:CFTC并非全国博彩监管机构

    卡尔希和CFTC曾表示,体育赛事合约属于2010年《多德-弗兰克金融改革法案》中定义的“掉期合约”,因此CFTC有权通过监管全国掉期市场的权限对其进行监管。

    (此处为占位符链接,原文未提供有效内容)

    然而,巡回法院法官瑞安·纳尔逊表示,卡尔希的合约具有体育博彩的特征,这是“典型的赌博形式”,而CFTC并不对此类活动进行监管。

    他还指出,卡尔希甚至曾宣传自己是“全美50个州首款合法体育博彩应用”。

    纳尔逊写道:“因此,很难得出结论称国会意图通过华尔街改革法案中对词汇的宽泛定义,颠覆其数十年来对赌博的审慎监管框架。”

    “CFTC并非全国博彩监管机构,”纳尔逊补充道,“在该法案通过十多年后,才有人提出这一主张。”

    周五合议庭的三名法官均为特朗普任命的官员。审理新泽西州案件的上诉法院法官也均由共和党总统任命。

    亚利桑那州总检察长克里斯·梅斯曾于3月提起刑事指控,称卡尔希经营非法博彩业务。他表示:“将体育赌注称为‘掉期合约’并不能改变其本质。金融改革立法从未旨在剥夺各州传统的赌博监管警察权,我很高兴法院明确了这一点。”

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    周五的判决维持了2025年11月拉斯维加斯联邦法院首席法官安德鲁·戈登的裁决,撤销了七个月前允许卡尔希在内华达州继续提供体育赛事合约的禁令。

    戈登最初的禁令并未涉及卡尔希的选举合约,纳尔逊表示这些合约在内华达州法律下属于非法,且在卡尔希业务中占比很小。上诉法院将案件发回戈登,由其重新审查这些选举合约。

    乔纳森·斯坦普尔 纽约、内特·雷蒙德 波士顿报道;辛西娅·奥斯特曼 编辑

    本社报道遵循路透社诚信准则。

    Kalshi cannot block Nevada oversight of prediction markets, US appeals court rules

    2026-08-28 17:40:53 UTC / Reuters

    By Jonathan Stempel and Nate Raymond

    August 28, 2026 5:40 PM UTC Updated 20 mins ago

    Kalshi logo is seen in this illustration taken, August 3, 2026. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

    • 9th Circuit says federal law does not preempt Nevada gaming license
    • Decision creates split among appeals courts, increasing chance of Supreme Court review
    • Kalshi, Nevada, CFTC not available for comment

    Aug 28 (Reuters) – A federal appeals court said ​Kalshi cannot block Nevada gaming regulators from overseeing its prediction markets platform, raising the stakes in a nationwide battle over whether such platforms ​allow illegal gambling and who may regulate them.

    In a 3-0 decision, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said Kalshi was unlikely to show that the federal Commodity Exchange Act preempted Nevada from requiring a gaming license to offer contracts that let people bet on the outcomes of sports events.

    The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Friday’s decision creates a split with the 3rd ​U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, which in a divided April 6 ruling said New Jersey cannot regulate Kalshi’s platform.

    It increases the possibility that the ​Supreme Court may eventually decide whether states or the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission should regulate the fast-growing prediction markets industry.

    The ⁠CFTC, under Republican President Donald Trump, has claimed exclusive oversight of prediction markets and challenged regulatory activity in nine states, including New York.

    At least four states — Nevada, Massachusetts, Michigan ​and Washington — have won court orders restricting Kalshi’s activities. New Jersey has until September 3 to appeal the 3rd Circuit decision.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Kalshi and the CFTC did not immediately ​respond to requests for comment.

    “The court confirmed what has been clear since the beginning — that states regulate sports betting, and the CFTC has nothing to do with it,” said Nicole Saharsky, a lawyer with Mayer Brown who argued the case for the Nevada Gaming Control Board.

    Prediction markets offered by Kalshi, Polymarket, Coinbase (COIN.O), Gemini Titan (GEMI.O) and others have soared in ​popularity since the U.S. presidential election in 2024, when they fared better than pollsters in predicting Trump’s victory over Democrat Kamala Harris.

    Though best known for allowing ​sports wagers, Kalshi’s platform alone also lets people wager on elections, economics, the weather and cultural events such as who will win the Oscars.

    CFTC NOT A NATIONAL GAMBLING REGULATOR, ​JUDGE SAYS

    Kalshi ⁠and the CFTC have said sports event contracts are “swaps” under the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reforms, affording the agency oversight through its authority to regulate national swaps markets.

    blob:https://www.reuters.com/6e555a7b-3af1-4bc5-a583-93278b67738f

    Circuit Judge Ryan Nelson, however, said Kalshi’s contracts have the hallmarks of sports betting, “a quintessential form of gambling” that the CFTC does not regulate.

    He also said Kalshi even advertised itself as “the first app for legal sports betting” in all 50 U.S. states.

    “It is difficult, then, to conclude that Congress intended to ​upend its decades of careful regulation ​of gambling based on broad definitions ⁠of the words used in a Wall Street Reform Bill,” Nelson wrote.

    “The CFTC is not a national gambling regulator,” Nelson added. “No one suggested it was until over a decade after the law was passed.”

    All three judges on Friday’s ​panel are Trump appointees. The appeals court judges who decided the New Jersey case were appointed by Republican presidents.

    “Calling ​a sports bet ⁠a ‘swap’ doesn’t make it one,” said Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes, who in March filed criminal charges accusing Kalshi of running an illegal gambling business. “Financial reform legislation was never intended to strip states of their traditional police power over gambling, and I’m glad the court said so clearly.”

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Friday’s decision upheld a November 2025 ruling by Chief ⁠Judge Andrew ​Gordon in Las Vegas federal court, dissolving an injunction from seven months earlier that let Kalshi ​continue offering sports event contracts in Nevada.

    Gordon’s original injunction did not address Kalshi’s election contracts, which Nelson said are illegal under Nevada law and a much smaller part of Kalshi’s business. The ​appeals court returned the case to him to review those contracts.

    Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York and Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Cynthia Osterman

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 养牛场主对美国增加外国牛肉进口计划表示担忧


    2026年8月28日 / 美国东部时间下午3:09 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    养牛场主公开反对特朗普政府暂时豁免绞碎牛肉进口高额关税的计划,他们认为这将损害他们的生意,阻碍他们重建日益减少的牛群。

    特朗普总统上周在Truth Social平台上宣布,美国将对最多30万公吨——约合6.61亿磅——的绞碎牛肉进口放宽关税,允许其以低于市场价25%的价格出售。

    据白宫网站上的公告说明,该协议定于9月1日生效。普渡大学的经济学家表示,该政策适用于瘦牛肉碎,这类碎肉可与更高品质的国产牛肉混合制成绞碎牛肉。

    美国牛肉价格已飙升至每磅近7美元,较过去12个月上涨约63美分,较2021年上涨2.93美元。白宫表示,暂时扩大进口将降低消费者的牛肉成本。

    “这项行动包含关键保障措施,以最大限度节省成本,同时保护美国养牛场主免受外国进口商品的冲击,并为美国养牛场主扩大国内牛群提供空间,”白宫补充道。

    “高昂得离谱的投入成本”

    尽管有这样的保证,增加美国外国牛肉进口的计划还是遭到了一些养牛场主的批评,他们担心这可能会压低他们出售肉牛的价格。价格下跌再加上生产成本上升,将使养牛场主更难扩大牛群规模——而牛群规模正是推高消费者牛肉成本的主要因素。

    佐治亚州养牛场主、该州第14国会选区民主党候选人肖恩·哈里斯表示,该计划可能会让像他这样的养牛场主破产。

    “眼下,我们在关税、柴油、肥料等方方面面都面临着高昂得离谱的投入成本,”他在最近接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访时说道,“现在农场主们正要出售肉牛,而这项协议会让我们蒙受损失。”

    美国农场局联合会是一个农业行业贸易组织,该组织表示,特朗普政府的进口计划出台的时机尤其令人担忧,因为进口窗口期恰逢9月至11月的农场主销售旺季,此时他们需要就牛群问题做出关键决策。

    经营肉类销售企业拉特克利夫优质肉类公司的首席执行官金伯利·拉特克利夫认为,特朗普政府暂时放宽关税、增加牛肉进口的计划可能会在短期内为消费者缓解压力。但她表示,这无法帮助养牛场主重建牛群并应对高昂的生产成本。

    拉特克利夫从东德克萨斯州的生产商那里采购肉牛以制作牛肉产品,她告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,在市场不确定性的背景下,养牛场主们正被迫做出艰难抉择:是继续饲养肉牛还是将其出售。

    “现在,饲养一头牛每年的成本高达1100美元。当你不确定市场走向时,要在一头牛身上投入这么多成本,压力非常大,”她说道,并补充道,“他们只能接受目前能拿到的价格。”

    白宫发言人安娜·凯利表示,特朗普总统通过谈判达成新的贸易协定、扩大养牛场主和农民进入外国市场的渠道、降低投入成本以及其他举措,提振了美国农业产业。

    特朗普周五在Truth Social平台上表示,他将批准相关修改,允许养牛场主和农民自行加工食品。这将为他们提供一个避开与大型肉类加工公司合作的潜在途径。

    “养牛场主和农民一直是我的首要关注对象,”特朗普写道,“他们工作极其努力,聪明、高效且绝对干净,但多年来我一直听说他们与大型加工商之间存在严重问题,许多人都说这些加工商是令人厌恶的垄断企业。本质上只有四家这样的公司,竞争程度极低,它们让我们优秀的农场主和养牛场主的生活苦不堪言,我不能坐视不管,对吗?”

    白宫发言人凯利没有透露这项措施的具体实施细节。“政府正在起草多项政策举措,以进一步支持那些为全球提供粮食的人——敬请期待!”她在给哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的电子邮件中说道。

    Cattle ranchers express concern about U.S. plan to boost foreign beef imports

    August 28, 2026 / 3:09 PM EDT / CBS News

    Cattle ranchers are speaking out against a Trump administration plan to temporarily waive higher tariffs on ground beef imports, arguing it will undercut their business and prevent them from rebuilding their dwindling cattle herds.

    President Trump announced on Truth Social last week that the U.S. will ease tariffs on up to 300,000 metric tons of ground beef imports— about 661 million pounds — allowing it to be sold at 25% below market price.

    The deal is scheduled to take effect on Sept. 1, according to a description of the proclamation on the White House website. It applies to lean beef trimmings, which can be blended with higher-quality domestic beef to create ground beef, according to Purdue University economists.

    U.S. beef prices have surged to nearly $7 a pound, up roughly 63 cents over the last 12 months and $2.93 a pound since 2021. The White House said that temporarily expanding imports will lower beef costs for consumers.

    “This action includes key safeguards to maximize cost savings while protecting American ranchers from foreign imports and giving space for American ranchers to grow the domestic herd,” the White House added.

    “Crazy input costs”

    Despite such reassurances, the plan to boost U.S. imports of foreign beef has drawn criticism from some cattle ranchers, who fear it could drive down the prices they receive for their cattle. Falling prices, compounded by rising production costs, would make it harder for ranchers to expand their herds — the main factor driving up beef costs for consumers.

    Shawn Harris, a rancher based in Georgia and a Democratic nominee for the state’s 14th Congressional District, said the plan could run cattle ranchers like him out of business.

    “Right now, we got crazy input costs when it comes to tariffs and diesel, fertilizer, everything,” he said in a recent interview with CBS News. “And now farmers are about to sell cattle, and we’re going to lose money on this deal.”

    The American Farm Bureau Federation, a trade group for the agricultural industry, said the timing of the Trump administration’s import plan is particularly concerning because the import window coincides with the peak sales period for farmers between September and November, when they have to make key decisions about their herds.

    Kimberly Ratcliff, CEO of Ratcliff Premium Meats, a ranching business that sells beef, thinks the Trump administration’s plan to temporarily ease tariffs and boost beef imports could offer relief to consumers in the near term. But it won’t help ranchers rebuild their herds and deal with high production costs, she said.

    Ratcliff, who sources cattle from producers in East Texas to turn into beef products, told CBS News that ranchers are being forced to make difficult decisions about whether to keep or sell their cows amid the market uncertainty.

    “Right now, it’s costing $1,100 a year just to keep a cow. That’s a lot of inputs to put in a cow when you’re unsure what the market’s going to do,” she said, adding, “They’re willing to take the price that they can get now.”

    White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said Mr. Trump has bolstered the U.S. agriculture industry by negotiating new trade deals, expanding ranchers’ and farmers’ access to foreign markets, lowering input costs, and other actions.

    Mr. Trump said on Friday on Truth Social that he is authorizing changes that would allow ranchers and farmers to process their own food. That would give them a potential workaround to working with large meatpacking companies.

    “Ranchers and Farmers have always been a number one priority for me,” Mr. Trump wrote. “They work very hard, are smart, efficient, and immaculately CLEAN, but for years I have heard that they have had a tremendous problem with the Big Processors, who many say are a nasty Monopoly. There are, essentially, 4 of them, a very non competitive number, and they make life miserable for our wonderful Farmers and Ranchers, and I can’t let that happen, can I?”

    Kelly, the White House spokesperson, did not offer details on how the measure will work. “The administration is drafting several policy actions to further support those who feed the world — stay tuned!” she said in an email to CBS News.

  • 沃尔玛就非法分销阿片类药物与司法部诉讼达成和解


    2026年8月28日 / 美国东部时间下午12:38 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻(CBS News)

    作者:玛丽·坎宁安

    玛丽·坎宁安是CBS MoneyWatch的记者。她曾在《60分钟》、CBS新闻网和CBS新闻24/7频道工作,为哥伦比亚广播公司新闻实习项目成员。

    查看完整简历

    沃尔玛周五与美国政府达成协议,了结一起诉讼。该诉讼指控这家折扣零售商旗下药房非法分销阿片类药物。

    “我们很高兴解决此事,并将继续支持我们的药剂师每天为患者提供卓越护理的出色工作,”沃尔玛一名发言人在发给CBS新闻的电子邮件中说道。

    司法部在另一份声明中确认了该和解协议。“我们将继续追究那些非法开方、营销、分销或配送行为加剧阿片类药物危机、将美国社区置于风险之中的公司和个人的责任,”司法部一名发言人说道。

    沃尔玛和司法部未披露和解金额。

    司法部于2020年12月对沃尔玛提起诉讼,指控该公司违反《管制物质法》,填写数千张无效处方,且未报告可疑药品订单。联邦检察官指控沃尔玛的行为加剧了阿片类药物泛滥危机——这场危机从1999年持续至2023年,期间超过80万人死于阿片类药物过量。

    该诉讼是在司法部历时多年的调查之后发起的。根据司法部的说法,如果沃尔玛被判有罪,每填写一张非法处方将被处以67627美元罚款,每一起未报告的可疑订单将被处以15691美元罚款。

    沃尔玛官网显示,其在全美拥有近4600家药房,可开具仿制药、胰岛素、GLP-1类药物及其他药品的处方。

    艾米·皮奇编辑

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/investigation-opioid-settlement-money-fund-law-enforcement/

    Walmart settles Justice Department lawsuit over unlawfully dispensing opioids

    August 28, 2026 / 12:38 PM EDT / CBS News

    By Mary Cunningham

    Mary Cunningham is a reporter for CBS MoneyWatch. She previously worked at “60 Minutes,” CBSNews.com and CBS News 24/7 as part of the CBS News Associate Program.

    Read Full Bio

    Walmart reached an agreement with the U.S. government on Friday to settle a lawsuit that accused the discount retailer of unlawfully dispensing opioids from its pharmacies.

    “We are pleased to resolve this matter and will continue supporting the exceptional work our pharmacists do every day to provide outstanding patient care,” a Walmart spokesperson said in an email to CBS News.

    The Justice Department acknowledged the settlement in a separate statement. “We will continue to hold accountable companies and individuals whose unlawful prescribing, marketing, dispensing or distributing practices contributed to the opioid crisis and put American communities at risk,” a department spokesperson said.

    Walmart and the Justice Department did not disclose the settlement amount.

    The Justice Department sued Walmart in December 2020, alleging the company violated the Controlled Substances Act by filling thousands of invalid prescriptions and failing to report suspicious drug orders. Federal prosecutors alleged Walmart’s actions contributed to the opioid epidemic, a period spanning from 1999 to 2023 during which over 800,000 people died from opioid overdoses.

    The lawsuit came after a multiyear investigation by the Justice Department. If Walmart was held liable, it would have been forced to pay $67,627 for each unlawful prescription it filled and $15,691 for each suspicious order it failed to report, according to the Justice Department.

    Walmart’s website says it has nearly 4,600 pharmacies nationwide, where it fills prescriptions for generic drugs, insulin, GLP-1 medications and other drugs.

    Edited by Aimee Picchi

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/investigation-opioid-settlement-money-fund-law-enforcement/

湘ICP备2026001899号-2