博客

  • 联邦上诉法院驳回司法部要求加州搁置选票的请求


    更新时间:美国东部时间2026年10月26日晚7:37 / CBS新闻

    华盛顿——联邦上诉法院于周一驳回了美国司法部的请求,拒绝强制加州选举官员搁置数千张选票,特朗普政府声称这些选票可能由涉嫌非公民身份的人员投出。

    美国第九巡回上诉法院以2比1的裁决表示,其对该上诉无管辖权,并批准洛杉矶县首席选举官员提出的驳回该请求的动议。

    法官马克·贝内特(Mark Bennett)和加布里埃尔·桑切斯(Gabriel Sanchez)指出,联邦政府未给联邦地区法院提供”充分机会”来审议其临时救济请求。帕特里克·布马泰(Patrick Bumatay)法官持异议。

    这两位法官批评司法部在11月3日中期选举不到三周前才提起诉讼,且仅在上周才向地区法院申请临时限制令。他们还指出,司法部申请临时限制令之际,加州已经开始处理选票。

    第九巡回上诉法院在一份无署名意见书中指出:”美国所称的紧急情况,至少部分是其自身造成的。此处的拖延至少部分可归因于美国自身拖延提起诉讼、未意识到加州现行州法对选票的发放和处理具有约束力、未认识到加州拥有数百万登记选民且按与之规模相符的时间表处理选票,以及未向法院说明其寻求的救济措施。”

    由特朗普总统任命的贝内特法官和前总统拜登提名的桑切斯法官分别发表了附议意见。贝内特表示,即使法院对司法部的请求进行实质性法律审查,他也会拒绝其要求加州搁置不合格选民可能投出的选票的主张。

    持异议的布马泰法官则表示,联邦政府有义务维护联邦选举的公正性。

    “问题在于:联邦政府是否有权阻止对我们选举公正性的潜在破坏?根据联邦法律和宪法,答案必须是’是’,”这位特朗普任命的法官写道,”简言之,联邦政府对维护联邦选举、确保非公民的选票不影响选举结果拥有主权层面的利益。”

    加州州长加文·纽瑟姆(Gavin Newsom)表示,第九巡回上诉法院的裁决是”积极进展,也是对特朗普攻击宪法和国家民主的可恶行径的及时阻碍”。

    “特朗普正非法试图夺取宪法赋予他人的权力,以维持自身掌权。本次诉讼只是最新一步,”他在一份声明中表示,”毋庸置疑:特朗普对民主的攻击不会放缓。”

    选民名单争议

    这场围绕加州邮寄选票的快速升级的争议始于本月早些时候,当时代理副司法部长特伦特·麦科特(Trent McCotter)致信加州州务卿及洛杉矶县首席选举官迪恩·洛根(Dean Logan),要求他们在48小时内审查一份包含2万多名登记选民的名单,特朗普政府认为这些人”可能”是非公民,且已被邮寄选票。

    洛杉矶县在10月15日致麦科特的信中指出,这份涉嫌非公民的名单包含全州各地登记选民的地址,且麦科特的信件未说明名单的编制依据。该县还告知麦科特,信件未提供任何关于该县如何核实公民身份的信息。

    洛杉矶县的一名律师表示,司法部要求选举官洛根、登记员兼县书记员”参与一项非法行为”。

    在该县回复麦科特的同一天,司法部起诉了加州、州务卿雪莉·韦伯(Shirley Weber)和洛根,指控州官员未与联邦政府合作,识别本州登记的非公民并维护选举公正性。

    司法部要求联邦法官下令加州搁置其认定为涉嫌非公民人员的邮寄选票,并在计票前独立核实这些人的公民身份。

    审理该案的法官大卫·O·卡特(David O. Carter)原定于周二下午就特朗普政府的临时限制令请求举行听证会。但次日,司法部采取了非常规措施,向第九巡回上诉法院提起上诉。

    政府律师辩称,由于卡特法官尚未就其紧急救济请求作出裁决,其”沉默”相当于对要求加州搁置特朗普政府名单所列选民退回的邮寄选票的努力作出”默示驳回”。

    由三名法官组成的第九巡回上诉法院合议庭随后举行了罕见的周日口头辩论,期间至少有两名法官对司法部要求法院介入的请求表示怀疑。

    针对加州官员的这份”最后时刻”诉讼,是在11月中期选举不到三周前提起的,届时全国选民将决定哪个政党掌控参众两院。在加州,选举官员于10月初开始邮寄选票。根据法院文件,洛杉矶县已处理约55万张邮寄选票。

    在中期选举前的数月里,特朗普先生试图扩大联邦对选举的控制,并推动国会通过一揽子选举法规,其中包括要求提供公民身份证明才能登记投票。

    总统一再声称,数十万非公民已登记参加联邦选举,其中包括加州超过19万人。联邦法律和加州法律均禁止非公民投票。

    但美国国土安全部(DHS)拒绝向加州选举官员解释其如何识别这些涉嫌不合格选民。

    相反,司法部在诉讼中称,国土安全部将选民 rolls 信息与内部数据进行比对,以识别登记选民与可能的非公民之间的潜在匹配,随后使用”第三方软件”识别选民信息与该软件编制的人员数据之间的匹配。特朗普政府还表示,其使用内部记录和社会保障管理局的数据。

    但加州官员认为,司法部的诉讼并未包含任何这些涉嫌非公民甚至会在大选中非法投票的指控。洛杉矶县登记员兼县书记员洛根的律师还表示,特朗普政府所寻求的救济措施超出了行政部门的宪法权力。

    宪法的《选举条款》赋予各州规定国会选举的”时间、地点和方式”的权力,除非国会介入。

    在持续诉讼期间,洛根和洛杉矶县的律师表示,他们试图分析特朗普政府涉嫌非公民名单的数据。他们表示,这份名单包含7035条带有县地址的记录。县政府官员审查了其中200条记录的样本,发现112条对应已注销或处于非活动状态的选民登记,因此未向该人邮寄选票。

    据洛杉矶县一名选举官员称,该样本中的大多数人从未投过票,超过四分之一的人列出的出生地为美国本土。

    联邦检察官周五向加州至少18个其他县的登记员发送了更多信件,附有涉嫌登记投票的非公民名单。司法部要求选举官员搁置它认为不合格人员投出的选票。

    司法部可能会请求整个第九巡回上诉法院重新考虑其上诉,合议庭已给予政府当地时间晚上7点前提出此类请求的期限。

    Appeals court dismisses DOJ’s request to force California to set aside ballots

    Updated on: October 26, 2026 / 7:37 PM EDT / CBS News

    Washington — A federal appeals court on Monday dismissed the Justice Department’s effort to force California election officials to set aside thousands of ballots that the Trump administration claims may have been cast by alleged noncitizens.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit said in a 2-1 decision that it lacked jurisdiction over the appeal and granted a motion by the top elections official from Los Angeles County to dismiss the effort.

    The federal government, Judges Mark Bennett and Gabriel Sanchez said, failed to allow a federal district court “adequate opportunity” to consider its request for temporary relief. Judge Patrick Bumatay dissented.

    The two judges faulted the Justice Department for waiting until less than three weeks before the midterm elections on Nov. 3 to file its lawsuit and only seeking a temporary restraining order from the district court last week. They also pointed out that the department had sought a temporary restraining order as California was already processing ballots.

    “The United States’s claimed emergency, at least in part, is a self-constructed one,” the 9th Circuit said in an unsigned opinion. “At least part of the delay here is attributable to the United States’s own delay in filing suit, in realizing that existing California state law governs the issuance and processing of ballots, in recognizing that California has millions of registered voters and processes ballots on a schedule aligned with that scale, and in communicating to the court its desired relief.”

    Both Bennett, appointed by President Trump, and Sanchez, tapped by former President Joe Biden, authored concurring opinions. Bennett said that even if the court had reached the legal merits of the Justice Department’s effort, he would have rejected its bid to force California to set aside the ballots that may be cast by ineligible voters.

    Bumatay, who dissented, said the federal government has an interest in protecting the integrity of federal elections.

    “The question — does the federal government have the power to stop this potential attack on the integrity of our elections? Under both federal law and the Constitution, the answer must be ‘yes,’” the judge, a Trump appointee, wrote. “Simply, the federal government has a sovereign interest in safeguarding federal elections and ensuring that the votes of noncitizens do not undermine our electoral results.”

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the 9th Circuit’s decision is a “positive development and a welcome speed bump to Trump’s disgusting attacks on the Constitution and our country’s democracy.”

    “Trump is illegally trying to seize powers in the Constitution entrusted to others so he can stay in power. This lawsuit is just the latest step,” he said in a statement. “Make no mistake: Trump’s assault on democracy won’t slow down.”

    Dispute over list of voters

    The fast-moving dispute over California’s mail ballots was filed earlier this month after Acting Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter sent letters to California’s secretary of state and the top election official in Los Angeles County, Dean Logan, which gave them 48 hours to review a list of more than 20,000 registered voters who the Trump administration believes are “likely” noncitizens and were sent mail ballots.

    Los Angeles County told McCotter in a letter dated Oct. 15 that the list of suspected noncitizens contained addresses of registered voters throughout the state, and said his letter did not include information about how the list had been compiled. The county also told McCotter the letter did not provide any information as to how the county was to confirm citizenship status.

    A lawyer for Los Angeles County said the Justice Department was asking Logan, the registrar-recorder and county clerk, “to engage in an unlawful course of conduct.”

    On the same day that the county sent McCotter its response, the Justice Department sued California, Secretary of State Shirley Weber and Logan, and claimed that state officials had failed to work collaboratively with the federal government to identify any noncitizens registered to vote in the state and protect the integrity of elections.

    The Justice Department asked a federal judge to order California to put aside mail ballots of people it has identified as suspected noncitizens and to independently verify their citizenship status before counting their ballots.

    The judge overseeing the case, David O. Carter, scheduled a hearing for Tuesday afternoon on the Trump administration’s request for a temporary restraining order. But the following day, the Justice Department took the extraordinary step of filing an appeal with the 9th Circuit.

    Government lawyers argued that because Carter had not yet ruled on their request for emergency relief, his “silence” amounted to a “constructive denial” of their effort to require California to set aside the mail ballots returned by the voters on the Trump administration’s list.

    The three-judge 9th Circuit panel then held a rare Sunday oral argument session, during which at least two of the judges appeared skeptical of the Justice Department’s request for the court to step in.

    The 11th-hour lawsuit against California officials was filed less than three weeks before the November midterm elections, when voters across the country will decide which party controls the House and Senate. In California, elections officials began mailing ballots in early October. Los Angeles County has already processed an estimated 550,000 mail ballots, according to court filings.

    In the months leading up to the midterms, Mr. Trump has attempted to exert more federal control over elections and pushed Congress to enact a package of voting regulations, including requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote.

    The president has repeatedly claimed that hundreds of thousands of noncitizens are registered to vote in federal elections, including more than 190,000 in California. Both federal and California law prohibit noncitizens from voting.

    But the Department of Homeland Security has declined to provide California election officials with an explanation of how it identified those alleged ineligible voters.

    Instead, in its lawsuit, the Justice Department said the DHS compares information about voter rolls with internal data to identify potential matches between registered voters and possible noncitizens, and then uses “third-party software” to identify matches between voter information and data about that person compiled by the software program. The Trump administration also said it uses internal records and data from the Social Security Administration.

    But California officials have argued that the Justice Department’s lawsuit does not contain any allegations that those suspected noncitizens will even vote unlawfully in the general election. Lawyers for Logan, the Los Angeles County registrar-recorder and county clerk, also said that the relief sought by the Trump administration exceeds the executive branch’s constitutional authority.

    The Constitution’s Elections Clause gives states the power to set the “times, places and manners” of congressional elections unless Congress steps in.

    Amid the ongoing litigation, lawyers for Logan and Los Angeles County said they attempted to analyze the data from the Trump administration’s list of alleged noncitizens. The list includes 7,035 records with county addresses, they said. County officials reviewed a sample of 200 of those records and found 112 of them correspond to voter registrations that were canceled or inactive, so no ballot was mailed to that person.

    Most of the people in the sample had never voted, and more than one-quarter of them listed a birthplace in the U.S., according to a Los Angeles County election official.

    Federal prosecutors sent more letters to at least 18 other California county registrars on Friday with lists of alleged noncitizens registered to vote. The Justice Department demanded the elections officials set aside ballots cast by those it believes are ineligible to vote.

    The Justice Department could ask the full 9th Circuit to reconsider its appeal, and the panel gave the government until 7 p.m. local time to make such a request.

  • 特朗普在举行关键参议院选举的约半数州开出交易式承诺


    2026-10-26T21:16:17.366Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    唐纳德·特朗普总统在上个月的共和党中期大会上启动大选造势时,向选民提出了一项引发巨大争议的提议:若能让共和党保住多数席位,每位美国成年人都将获得5000美元。

    时隔一个半月,他的交易式条件不仅范围大幅扩大,还更具本地化针对性。

    事实上,特朗普现已向举行关键参议院选举的约半数州的选民开出了非常具体的条件——只要他们投票支持共和党,就能获得这些好处。

    这些条件有时会伪装成明显的玩笑,但越来越多时候并非如此。而且即便看似玩笑,考虑到特朗普的过往行事记录,这些条件也绝非空穴来风。

    政治家向选民承诺获胜后将推进哪些议程本是常态,其中许多事项特朗普若有意为之,如今就能兑现。但他却以一种极具交易色彩的方式,将这些承诺作为拿捏选民的筹码。

    以下是交易式承诺的演变过程:

    9月16日:特朗普在北卡罗来纳州加斯托尼亚发表讲话时称,他将把该州的飓风灾害救济款与选民是否投票给共和党候选人迈克尔·惠特利竞选参议员挂钩。“听着,如果迈克尔输了,我就不会拨款,知道吗?”特朗普说,随后又声称自己“只是在开玩笑”。

    即便他是在开玩笑,特朗普政府在红州的灾害救济援助显然一直更为大方,拨付速度也更快,而且该政府最近在法庭上承认,其拨款决定“纯粹基于受援助州的政治属性”。

    10月3日:特朗普在俄亥俄州范达尔利亚发表讲话时表示,“作为总统,你对各州拥有很大的权力”。他称俄亥俄州的共和党参议员可以利用与特朗普的关系为该州争取资金,但同时又谈及民主党州长候选人艾米·阿克顿时称,“我大概不会帮她,她好像很恨我”。

    10月17日:特朗普在肯塔基州高地高地发表讲话时称,“如果共和党胜出,国防部将投入1亿美元……用于振兴肯塔基州温彻斯特的一个大型制药厂”。他随后补充道,“但如果民主党当选,这笔钱就不会到位,因为他们无法做到这一点”。

    10月19日和22日:特朗普在堪萨斯州帕克城和爱荷华州苏城的竞选集会上均表示,若共和党获胜,他将让E15燃料——即混合了最高15%乙醇的汽油——全年永久供应。“有(堪萨斯州共和党参议员)罗杰·马歇尔在参议院,我们将让E15燃料全年永久供应,”特朗普在帕克城的集会上这样说道,随后又夸张地补充道,“但如果(民主党人)亚当·汉密尔顿当选,我就不会这么做。就这样,我只为马歇尔这么做”。

    10月20日:特朗普在北卡罗来纳州格林斯博罗发表讲话时称,“如果我们赢回众议院和参议院,我将指示司法部尽快解决”与勒热纳海军基地水污染相关的所有剩余合法诉求。他补充道:“所以,如果我们没赢,就没有这笔钱。如果我们赢了,你就能拿到这笔钱。”

    10月24日:特朗普在佐治亚州佩里发表讲话时称,他不会接听民主党参议员乔恩·奥索夫寻求为农民提供帮助及其他恩惠的电话。特朗普设想了一段对话:“告诉他我不接。我不接。”对话中另一方回应道:“但他需要为佐治亚州筹钱。”特朗普说:“我才不在乎他想要什么。我不接。”

    10月24日:特朗普在社交媒体发帖中暗示,如果前民主党众议员玛丽·佩尔托拉当选,他将停止为阿拉斯加州提供数十亿美元资金。“我已为阿拉斯加州创下历史性的援助水平,”特朗普说道,随后又补充道,“民主党正试图窃取这个重要的共和党席位,如果得逞,我们为阿拉斯加州所做的一切都会戛然而止[原文如此]”。

    无论这些言论是作为玩笑提出,还是可能被解读为针对立法行动——比如永久推行全年E15燃料——所有这些言论的核心意图都再明确不过。特朗普希望让美国民众将投票给共和党与他为他们提供所需福利关联起来。

    不过,即便共和党在2026年大选后获胜,特朗普如今实现这些事项的权力,应该与大选后并无二致。(毕竟,共和党目前已经控制了众议院和参议院。)

    而且,即便涉及飓风救济、勒热纳海军基地受害者多年来的赔偿问题等极其严肃的事项,特朗普也愿意提出这类交易式条件。

    特朗普现在还向美国民众开出了更大金额的悬赏——最高达100万美元——只要他们举报欺诈并因此获得定罪。

    但这种策略是否有助于赢得选民支持,目前尚不清楚。比如,民调显示特朗普的5000美元提案反响不佳。

    上月路透社/益普索的一项民调显示,登记选民以66%对18%的比例认为特朗普的这项提议不妥。更近一期全国广播公司新闻的民调显示,不到六分之一的登记选民认为共和党胜出后他们真的能拿到这笔钱。还有46%的受访者表示,支持特朗普这一想法的候选人会让他们更不愿意投票给这个人,而非更愿意投票。

    但这些民调并没有阻止特朗普提出更多交易式承诺。情况恰恰相反,在2026年大选的最后冲刺阶段,他的这种做法反而在加速。

    Trump has made transactional promises in roughly half of states holding key Senate contests

    2026-10-26T21:16:17.366Z / CNN

    President Donald Trump kicked off his general election push at last month’s Republican midterm convention by making voters a highly controversial offer: Keep Republicans in the majority, and every US adult will get $5,000.

    Fast forward a month and a half, and he’s gone quite a bit further — and more localized — with his quid pro quos.

    In fact, Trump has now offered voters in about half of states holding key Senate contests very specific things if they vote for Republicans.

    Sometimes they’re couched as apparent jokes. But increasingly, they’re not. And even the supposed jokes are difficult to dismiss given Trump’s track record.

    While it’s normal for politicians to tell voters what agenda items they’ll pursue if they win and gain power in Congress, many of these are promises Trump could deliver now if he wanted to. But he’s instead holding them over voters’ heads in a strikingly transactional way.

    Here’s the progression of quid pro quos.

    September 16: Trump says in Gastonia, North Carolina, that he’ll tie the state’s hurricane disaster relief to voters electing Republican Michael Whatley to the Senate. “Now, if Michael loses, I’m not sending it. Okay?” Trump says, before claiming he’s “only kidding.”

    Even if he was joking, the Trump administration has clearly been more generous and quicker with disaster aid in red states, and it recently admitted in court that it made grant decisions “based solely on the political identity of the grant recipient’s state.”

    October 3: Trump says in Vandalia, Ohio, that, “when you are president, you have a lot of power over states.” He says that Ohio’s GOP senators can their access to Trump to get money for their state, but adds of Democratic gubernatorial nominee Amy Acton: “I’m not gonna help her, probably. She hates me, I guess.”

    October 17: Trump says in Highland Heights, Kentucky, “If the Republicans win, the Department of War will be investing $100 million … to revitalize a gigantic drug manufacturing facility in Winchester, Kentucky.” He then adds, “But if the Democrats win, it doesn’t, because they wouldn’t be able to do it.”

    October 19 and 22: Trump tells rallies in both Park City, Kansas, and Sioux City, Iowa, that he’ll make E15 fuel — gasoline blended with up to 15% ethanol — available on a year-round basis permanently if Republicans win. “With (Kansas GOP Sen.) Roger Marshall in the Senate, we will make year-round E15 permanent,” Trump says in the former appearance, before saying exaggeratedly: “But if (Democrat) Adam Hamilton is in, I’m not doing it. That’s it. I’m only doing it for” Marshall.

    October 20: Trump says in Greenville, North Carolina, that “if we win the House and the Senate, I will be directing the Department of Justice to settle all remaining legitimate claims” related to water contamination at Camp Lejeune “as soon as possible.” He adds: “So, if we don’t win, there’s no money. If we do win, you’re getting it.”

    October 24: Trump says in Perry, Georgia, that he wouldn’t accept calls from Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff looking for help for farmers and other favors. Trump imagines a conversation in which he says, “Tell him I’m not in. I’m not in.” The imaginary other person responds, “But he needs money for Georgia.” Trump says, “I don’t give a damn what he wants. I’m not in.”

    October 24: Trump in a social media post signals he will stop delivering billions of dollars for Alaska if Democratic former Rep. Mary Peltola wins. “I have delivered for Alaska at Historic Levels,” Trump says, before adding: “The Democrats are trying to steal this important Republican Seat and, if that happens, everything we’ve done for Alaska will come to an immediate hault” [sic].

    Whether any of these comments is couched as a joke or might be read to refer to legislative action — like permanent year-round E15 — the thrust of all of them is unmistakable. Trump wants Americans to associate voting Republican with him giving them things they want.

    But he would seem to have just as much power to accomplish those things today as he would after the 2026 election, even if Republicans win. (The GOP, after all, already controls the House and Senate.)

    And Trump has been willing to float these quid pro quos even when they involve deadly serious subjects like hurricane relief and compensation for victims who have suffered for years from Camp Lejeune.

    Trump is also now offering Americans even larger sums of money — up to $1 million — if they report fraud that results in a conviction.

    It’s also not even clear that this strategy is good politics. Polls suggest Trump’s $5,000 offer, for instance, has gone over poorly.

    A Reuters/Ipsos poll last month showed registered voters said 66%-18% that Trump’s promise was inappropriate. A more recent NBC News poll showed fewer than 1 in 6 registered voters thought it was likely they would actually get the money if Republicans won. And they said 46%-21% that a candidate supporting Trump’s idea would make them less likely to vote for that person rather than more likely.

    But those polls haven’t dissuaded Trump from offering more quid pro quos. If anything, it’s accelerating in the final stretch of the 2026 campaign.

  • 美国中期选举倒计时 特朗普称举报选举舞弊可获百万美元


    发布/2026年10月27日 07:49

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/fd586cea6b70f80916e8d9072ab0bfaff3144638d6c291806af64a3eac0e862d

    美国总统特朗普周一宣布,任何人举报过去或即将举行的选举中涉嫌舞弊行为,只要举报最终促成涉案者被逮捕及定罪,即可获得100万美元奖金。 (路透社)

    美国总统特朗普宣布,任何人举报过去或即将举行的选举中涉嫌舞弊行为,只要举报最终促成涉案者被逮捕及定罪,即可获得100万美元奖金。

    路透社报道,特朗普周一(10月26日)在社交媒体发文称,举报过去选举或即将于11月3日举行的中期选举舞弊行为者,只要涉案人员被捕及定罪,就能获得100万美元(约128万新元)奖金。

    特朗普政府近期加强对选举事务的监督,包括要求各州提供选民登记资料,并强调必须采取更严格措施,以确保公众对选举的信心。

    不过,政治专家以及民主党、共和党两党部分选举官员批评,这些举措可能构成联邦政府越权干预。部分选举官员告诉路透社,他们正为中期选举可能出现的联邦政府干预行为做准备。

    特朗普过去曾多次提出未经证实或不实的选举舞弊指控,并拒绝承认在2020年总统选举中败选。2021年1月6日,他的支持者冲击美国国会大厦,企图阻止国会认证选举结果。

    共和党目前在参众两院均掌握微弱多数优势,但特朗普的支持率持续低迷。生活成本高涨,以及美国与以色列对伊朗开战后油价上涨,成为选民担忧的议题。

    美国中期选举倒数 特朗普称举报选举舞弊可获百万美元

    发布/2026年10月27日 07:49

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/fd586cea6b70f80916e8d9072ab0bfaff3144638d6c291806af64a3eac0e862d

    美国总统特朗普星期一宣布,任何人举报过去或即将举行的选举中涉嫌舞弊的行为,只要有关举报最终促成涉案者被逮捕及定罪,就可获得100万美元奖金。 (路透社)

    美国总统特朗普宣布,任何人举报过去或即将举行的选举中涉嫌舞弊的行为,只要有关举报最终促成涉案者被逮捕及定罪,就可获得100万美元奖金。

    路透社报道,特朗普星期一(10月26日)在社媒发文说,举报过去选举或即将于11月3日举行的中期选举舞弊行为者,只要涉案人员被捕及定罪,就能获得100万美元(约128万新元)奖金。

    特朗普政府近期加强对选举事务的监督,包括要求各州提供选民登记资料,并强调必须采取更严格措施,以确保公众对选举的信心。

    不过,政治专家以及民主、共和两党部分选举官员批评,这些举措可能构成联邦政府越权干预。部分选举官员告诉路透社,他们正为中期选举可能出现的联邦政府干预行为作准备。

    特朗普过去曾多次提出未经证实或不实的选举舞弊指控,并拒绝承认在2020年总统选举中败选。2021年1月6日,他的支持者冲击美国国会大厦,企图阻止国会认证选举结果。

    共和党目前在参众两院均掌握微弱多数优势,但特朗普的支持率持续低迷。生活成本高涨,以及美国与以色列对伊朗开战后油价上涨,成为选民担忧的议题。

  • 政治


    民调显示:民主党人将爱国主义列为核心价值观的可能性远低于共和党人

    本次美国价值观调查中,爱国主义相关的40点差距是最明显的两党分歧

    作者:埃里克·麦克 福克斯新闻
    发布时间:美国东部时间2026年10月26日下午12:26

    视频

    李·格林伍德就民主党人称爱国主义“有争议”作出回应,重启烈酒品牌创作歌手李·格林伍德做客《福克斯与朋友们》节目,就一位爱荷华州民主党人称爱国主义“有争议”一事作出回应。他还谈及重启以回馈美国英雄为宗旨的爱国烈酒品牌“士兵谷烈酒”。

    全新内容:现在您可以收听福克斯新闻的文章!

    在一项调查美国价值观的新研究中,民主党人将爱国主义列为国家所需核心价值观的可能性远低于共和党人,这一差异是两党之间最显著的分歧。

    根据周日发布的盖洛普与“与荣誉同行”联合民调,46%的共和党人将爱国主义列为国家最需要的三大价值观之一,而持相同观点的民主党人仅为6%——这40个百分点的差距远超民调中其他所有意识形态分歧。

    盖洛普方面表示:“民主党人更倾向于认为国家需要平等、公平与善良,而共和党人则更倾向于认为国家需要责任与爱国主义。”

    [image_3]

    只有27%的民主党人会在7月4日悬挂美国国旗:民调

    [image_4]

    今年夏天的世界杯让爱国主义成为焦点,在这个国家建国250周年之际帮助凝聚了美国民众。(何塞·埃尔南德斯/阿纳多卢通讯社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    总体而言,美国民众认为(34%)、责任(32%)和正直(31%)是当前最迫切需要的价值观。不过,在这一表象之下,两党对国家最需要的东西有着截然不同的看法。

    认为美国优于其他所有国家的美国成年人比例低得惊人:民调

    [image_5]视频

    共和党人最重视爱国主义(46%),其次是责任(41%)和诚实(38%)。全体民主党人中,平等位列榜首(44%),其次是公平(34%)和诚实(32%)。

    因显示美国爱国主义创纪录低迷的民调,民主党人遭抨击:“会撕裂我们的社会”

    无党派人士介于两党之间,最常选择的是诚实(34%)、责任(32%)和正直(31%),仅有15%的人选择爱国主义。

    [image_6]视频

    尽管两党在爱国主义的重要性上存在巨大差距,但它是参与者表示认为多数美国人无论政治倾向如何都认同的价值观中,被选得最多的选项之一。在给出的12项选择中,32%的人表示他们认为多数美国人将爱国主义视为共同价值观,仅次于自由(38%)。

    [image_7]

    这12项价值观分别是:自由、爱国主义、服务、善良、尊重、平等、公平、责任、正直、勇气、诚实和谦逊。超过四分之三的美国人(76%)认为,无论政治立场如何,人们至少认同其中一项价值观,59%的人表示至少认同两项,46%的人则表示至少认同三项。

    无党派选民并非在选择某一政治阵营,而是感觉自己遭针对

    [image_8]视频

    除爱国主义外,第二大两党分歧围绕平等展开,44%的民主党人选择平等,而仅10%的共和党人选择这一选项——差距达34个百分点。公平同样出现选民分化,34%的民主党人选择公平,而共和党人这一比例为15%。

    调查结果还显示出与政治分歧相呼应的年龄差异。65岁及以上的成年人表示国家需要更多爱国主义的可能性,是18至39岁成年人的近三倍(32% vs. 12%)。

    尽管价值观优先级存在深刻分歧,但调查显示在政治宽容方面存在广泛共识。近八成美国人(79%)——包括84%的民主党人、81%的无党派人士和72%的共和党人——表示,尊重不同价值观比拥有相同价值观更重要。此外,70%的受访者表示,当选官员必须愿意跨党派妥协,即使要付出个人政治代价。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用

    “那么,或许最终的共同价值观是美国人能够求同存异,”盖洛普的分析总结道。

    [image_9]

    该调查于5月12日至22日期间,对超过3000名美国成年人组成的全国代表性样本进行了实施。

    埃里克·麦克是一名突发新闻记者和撰稿人,周日至周四的工作时间为美国东部时间早6点至下午2点,特别关注那些引领政治、选举、外交和政府新闻周期的报道。

    https://a57.foxnews.com/cf-images.us-east-1.prod.boltdns.net/v1/static/694940094001/064fb8a4-07e2-46fc-83e7-bd058c8ca4ad/59120bda-de52-46d1-98f8-9517f078f625/1280×720/match/896/500/image.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
    https://a57.foxnews.com/cf-images.us-east-1.prod.boltdns.net/v1/static/694940094001/ef14bce7-ed4f-4a1a-afe6-26ae030f6899/e0eb1f81-0502-49c9-b57f-0a0b2b19ee04/1280×720/match/720/405/image.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
    https://a57.foxnews.com/cf-images.us-east-1.prod.boltdns.net/v1/static/694940094001/56f65c72-cb3b-4fdd-9505-13da33e4c2cb/5ef7d563-f1e5-490e-82ae-d4c54f073bf2/1280×720/match/720/405/image.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
    https://a57.foxnews.com/cf-images.us-east-1.prod.boltdns.net/v1/static/854081161001/8fffe105-0103-4ec9-8cde-0b8cd9b9c39d/b67d096b-5d12-47a9-b7c1-2a62ebb4cb76/1280×720/match/720/405/image.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

    Politics

    Democrats far less likely than Republicans to prioritize patriotism as key value, poll finds

    40-point gap on patriotism is the single widest partisan divide in a new survey of American values

    By Eric MackFox News

    Published October 26, 2026 12:26pm EDT

    Video

    Lee Greenwood reacts to Dem calling patriotism ‘controversial,’ relaunches spirits brand

    Singer-songwriter Lee Greenwood joins ‘Fox & Friends’ to react to an Iowa Democrat calling patriotism ‘controversial.’ He also discusses relaunching his patriotic spirits brand, Soldier Valley Spirits, which gives back to American heroes.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Democrats are far less likely than Republicans to prioritize patriotism as a core value the nation needs, marking the single widest partisan divide in a new survey examining the country’s values.

    According to a Gallup and With Honor survey released Sunday, 46% of Republicans ranked patriotism among the top three values the nation needs most, compared with just 6% of Democrats – a 40-percentage-point difference that dwarfs every other ideological disagreement in the poll.

    “Democrats are far more likely to say the country needs equality, fairness and kindness, while Republicans are far more likely to say the country needs responsibility and patriotism,” according to Gallup.

    [image_3]

    ONLY 27% OF DEMOCRATS WILL DISPLAY AMERICAN FLAG ON JULY 4: POLL

    [image_4]

    This summer’s World Cup brought patriotism to the forefront and helped unite Americans on the 250th anniversary of the nation’s founding.(Jose Hernandez/Anadolu via Getty Images)

    Overall, Americans view honesty (34%), responsibility (32%) and integrity (31%) as the values most urgently needed. Beneath that surface, though, the parties see starkly different remedies for what is most needed in the nation.

    STUNNINGLY LOW PERCENTAGE OF ADULTS IN US THINK AMERICA STANDS ABOVE EVERY OTHER NATION: POLL

    [image_5]Video

    Republicans place the highest priority on patriotism (46%), followed by responsibility (41%) and honesty (38%). Democrats as a whole valued equality highest (44%), followed by fairness (34%) and honesty (32%).

    DEMS PUT ON BLAST OVER POLL THAT SHOWS RECORD-LOW PATRIOTISM IN US: ‘TEAR OUR SOCIETY APART’

    Independents land between both sides, most frequently selecting honesty (34%), responsibility (32%) and integrity (31%), with only 15% selecting patriotism.

    [image_6]Video

    Despite the large disparity between Democrats and Republicans on the value of patriotism, it was one of the most selected values that participants said they believed was shared by most Americans regardless of their political leanings. When given a list of 12 choices, 32% said they believed most Americans shared patriotism as a value, trailing only freedom at 38%.

    [image_7]

    Those 12 values were: freedom, patriotism, service, kindness, respect, equality, fairness, responsibility, integrity, courage, honesty and humility. More than three-quarters of Americans (76%) believed people shared at least one of those values regardless of politics, while 59% said at least two, and 46% said at least three.

    INDEPENDENT VOTERS AREN’T PICKING A POLITICAL TEAM, THEY JUST FEEL PICKED ON

    [image_8]Video

    Beyond patriotism, the second-largest partisan divide emerged around equality, chosen by 44% of Democrats compared to just 10% of Republicans – a 34-point spread. Fairness similarly split the electorate, chosen by 34% of Democrats versus 15% of Republicans.

    The findings also reveal an age divide that mirrors the political split. Adults aged 65 and older are nearly three times as likely as adults aged 18-39 to say the nation needs more patriotism (32% vs. 12%).

    Despite the deep differences in priorities, the survey revealed broad consensus on political tolerance. Nearly eight in 10 Americans (79%) – including 84% of Democrats, 81% of independents and 72% of Republicans – said respecting different values matters more than sharing the same ones. Additionally, 70% of respondents said elected leaders must be willing to compromise across party lines, even at personal political cost.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “Perhaps, then, the ultimate shared value is that Americans agree to disagree,” the Gallup analysis concluded.

    [image_9]

    The survey was conducted May 12–22 among a nationally representative panel of more than 3,000 U.S. adults.

    Eric Mack is a breaking news reporter and writer Sunday through Thursday, 6 a.m. ET to 2 p.m. ET, with a particular interest in stories that lead the news cycle on politics, elections, foreign affairs and government.

    https://a57.foxnews.com/cf-images.us-east-1.prod.boltdns.net/v1/static/694940094001/064fb8a4-07e2-46fc-83e7-bd058c8ca4ad/59120bda-de52-46d1-98f8-9517f078f625/1280×720/match/896/500/image.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
    https://a57.foxnews.com/cf-images.us-east-1.prod.boltdns.net/v1/static/694940094001/ef14bce7-ed4f-4a1a-afe6-26ae030f6899/e0eb1f81-0502-49c9-b57f-0a0b2b19ee04/1280×720/match/720/405/image.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
    https://a57.foxnews.com/cf-images.us-east-1.prod.boltdns.net/v1/static/694940094001/56f65c72-cb3b-4fdd-9505-13da33e4c2cb/5ef7d563-f1e5-490e-82ae-d4c54f073bf2/1280×720/match/720/405/image.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
    https://a57.foxnews.com/cf-images.us-east-1.prod.boltdns.net/v1/static/854081161001/8fffe105-0103-4ec9-8cde-0b8cd9b9c39d/b67d096b-5d12-47a9-b7c1-2a62ebb4cb76/1280×720/match/720/405/image.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

  • 特朗普尚未完成白宫改革 下一步动作或击中媒体“命门”


    总统否认《纽约时报》近日关于他计划将白宫简报室改建成游泳池的报道

    作者:爱尔兰·欧文斯 | 福克斯新闻

    发布时间:美国东部时间2026年10月26日下午1:05

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    全新推出 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章!

    收听这篇文章
    2分钟

    唐纳德·特朗普总统正考虑将白宫记者团从其长期使用的简报室迁出,而该空间的另一个用途与游泳池无关——他坚称游泳池从未在考虑范围内。

    特朗普周日表示,他正在考虑搬迁记者,为白宫其他需求腾出空间。在此之前,他曾暗示记者可能会被迁至“不那么令人反感的地点”。

    “我不会在白宫简报室建游泳池,也从未有过这样的打算,”特朗普在Truth社交平台上写道,“我正在考虑搬迁记者,将他们安置在另一个地点,但我会把那个地方用于非常急需的用途。”

    总统发表上述言论之前,《纽约时报》于10月20日报道称,特朗普曾讨论将白宫的詹姆斯·S·布雷迪新闻简报室改建成室内游泳池。

    戴维·马库斯:卡罗琳·利维特的持久贡献是向独立媒体开放白宫

    >

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/trump-press-media-briefing-room-fox-news.jpeg

    2026年4月6日,唐纳德·特朗普总统在华盛顿白宫詹姆斯·S·布雷迪新闻简报室的新闻发布会上发言。他警告记者不要发表有关营救两名在伊朗被击落的空军士兵的美军突袭行动细节,称此类报道可能会危及行动。(亚伦·施瓦茨/CNP/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    当被要求发表更多置评时,白宫让福克斯新闻数字频道参考特朗普周日在Truth社交平台发布的帖子。

    特朗普在周六发布的另一条Truth社交平台帖子中,驳斥了他计划建造游泳池的报道,坚称他绝不会考虑“如此愚蠢的事情”。

    “有一篇‘假新闻’报道称,我要拆除白宫记者室,重新启用位于其正下方的旧游泳池,”他在该社交媒体帖子中写道,“虽然我可能会把‘假新闻’迁至不那么令人反感的地点,但旧游泳池绝不会重新启用。”

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/white-house-press-briefing-president-donald-trump-reporters-dc-one-year-001.jpg
    2026年1月20日,唐纳德·特朗普总统在白宫的一场新闻发布会上回答记者提问,此时正值他第二任期上任满一年。(杰西卡·科西埃尔尼亚克/路透社)

    特朗普威胁将《纽约时报》“叛国”的伊朗战争报道加入150亿美元诽谤诉讼

    据白宫历史协会介绍,白宫的室内游泳池于1933年6月2日启用,此前《纽约每日新闻》发起了一项筹款活动,为患有小儿麻痹症的富兰克林·D·罗斯福总统修建游泳池。罗斯福总统经常在他位于海德公园的家中或佐治亚州沃姆斯普林斯的康复中心的治疗池中游泳。

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    为了满足电视新闻日益增长的需求,理查德·M·尼克松总统后来安排在旧泳池上方修建了一个新闻简报室。

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/ice-bodycam-rollout-wh-briefing.jpg
    2026年7月16日,白宫新闻秘书卡罗琳·利维特在白宫的一场简报会上发言。(索尔·洛布/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    特朗普绕过媒体守门人 政府发言人桑德斯透露老牌媒体正在失去影响力

    上周五,特朗普在佛罗里达州的一场集会上宣传白宫正在进行的翻新工程,称他的政府正在“建造一些漂亮的东西”。去年7月,他还自掏腰包在白宫安装了两根88英尺高的旗杆。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    民主党领导人及倾向左翼的媒体人士抨击了特朗普对宾夕法尼亚大道的各种翻新工程,最显著的是在2025年10月,新白宫舞厅动工。

    Trump isn’t done overhauling the White House — and his next move could hit the media where it works

    The president denied a recent New York Times report that he planned to replace the briefing room with a swimming pool

    By Ireland Owens | Fox News

    Published October 26, 2026 1:05pm EDT

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Listen to this article

    2 min

    President Donald Trump is considering giving the White House press corps the boot from its longtime briefing room — and has another use in mind for the space that doesn’t involve the swimming pool he insists was never on the table.

    Trump said Sunday he is thinking about relocating reporters to make room for other White House needs, a day after suggesting the press could be moved to a “less obnoxious location.”

    “I am not building a swimming pool in the White House Briefing Room, and never had any intention of doing so,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “I am thinking about moving the Press, and putting them in a different location, but I will use that location for very badly needed space.”

    The president’s comments come after The New York Times reported on Oct. 20 that Trump had discussed replacing the White House’s James S. Brady Press Briefing Room with an indoor swimming pool.

    DAVID MARCUS: KAROLINE LEAVITT’S LASTING LEGACY IS OPENING THE WHITE HOUSE TO INDIE PRESS

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/trump-press-media-briefing-room-fox-news.jpeg
    President Donald Trump spoke during a news conference in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on April 6, 2026, in Washington, D.C., where he warned journalists against publishing details of a U.S. military raid to rescue two airmen shot down over Iran, saying such reporting could jeopardize operations.(Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    When reached for additional comment, the White House referred Fox News Digital to Trump’s Sunday Truth Social post.

    In a separate Truth Social post published Saturday, Trump shot down reports he planned to build a swimming pool, insisting he would never consider doing “such a stupid thing.”

    “There is a Fake News report out there that I am going to remove the White House Press Room and bring back the old Swimming Pool, which lies directly underneath,” Trump wrote in the social media post. “Although I may move the Fake News to a less obnoxious location, the old swimming pool will never be brought back.”

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/white-house-press-briefing-president-donald-trump-reporters-dc-one-year-001.jpg
    President Donald Trump takes questions from reporters during a press briefing at the White House, on the one-year mark into his second term in office, in Washington, D.C., Jan. 20, 2026.(Jessica Koscielniak/Reuters)

    TRUMP THREATENS TO ADD NY TIMES’ ‘TREASONOUS’ IRAN WAR COVERAGE TO $15B DEFAMATION LAWSUIT

    The White House’s indoor swimming pool opened on June 2, 1933, following a New York Daily News campaign to raise funds for a pool for President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who had polio and regularly swam in therapy pools at his Hyde Park home or at a rehabilitation center in Warm Springs, Georgia, according to the White House Historical Association.

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    To meet the growing demand for television news, President Richard M. Nixon later arranged for a press briefing room to be constructed above the old pool.

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/ice-bodycam-rollout-wh-briefing.jpg
    Press secretary Karoline Leavitt speaks during a briefing at the White House on July 16, 2026.(Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)

    TRUMP BYPASSES MEDIA GATEKEEPERS AS GOV SANDERS REVEALS LEGACY OUTLETS ARE LOSING THEIR GRIP

    Trump touted the ongoing renovations to the White House during a rally in Florida last Friday, saying his administration is “building some beautiful things.” He also personally paid to install two 88-foot-tall flagpoles at the White House last July.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Democratic Party leaders and left-leaning media personalities have blasted Trump over various renovations on Pennsylvania Avenue, most notably in October 2025 when ground was broken for the new White House ballroom.

  • 新闻


    特朗普并非本次大选候选人,但摇摆州选民仍以“MAGA”为投票考量
    宾夕法尼亚州选民对两党在民生与通胀问题上均持不信任态度,但最终希望变革

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/headshot-1.jpg 汉娜·布伦南 福克斯新闻撰稿人

    发布时间:美国东部时间2026年10月26日下午1:55

    宾夕法尼亚州作为战场州,选民透露了其中期选举计划,部分选民一方面对唐纳德·特朗普总统表达强烈反对,另一方面坦言自己也不信任民主党。(图片来源:尼古拉斯·巴莱西,福克斯新闻数字频道)

    全新服务:现在你可以收听福克斯新闻的文章内容!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/b4e7ef70-9305-4d54-b0c3-f2f15e8442d3

    收听这篇文章

    时长:4分钟

    宾夕法尼亚州作为战场州,当地选民告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,他们投票的核心驱动力是要遏制唐纳德·特朗普及其政府的议程。

    虽然许多将于下周二在“关键州”宾夕法尼亚州投票的选民不信任民主党,但他们愿意给民主党一次机会,让民主党在民生成本高企、油价上涨、伊朗问题以及华盛顿腐败等诸多问题上扭转国家发展轨迹。

    宾夕法尼亚州多伊尔斯敦的托马什在被问及是否认为反对党会比现任执政党表现更好时表示:“我可没说我信任民主党。”

    “我只是要投票给他们,因为[特朗普]正在把我们带向灾难。”

    莱维特称特朗普在踏遍全国为共和党候选人造势的同时,正在削弱中期选举的顺风优势

    2026年10月24日,唐纳德·特朗普总统在佐治亚州佩里的守卫中心举行的中期选举竞选集会上发言。特朗普此次发声是为了支持参议院候选人、共和党众议员迈克·柯林斯,他正试图击败民主党现任参议员乔恩·奥索夫,以及共和党州长候选人里克·杰克逊。(图片来源:亚历克斯·王/盖蒂图片社)

    宾夕法尼亚州另一位选民克莱在被问及为何信任民主党比共和党更能解决民生成本问题时告诉福克斯新闻数字频道:“我不[信任]。”

    “我们当前所在的这个政党太糟糕了,不如换掉它。不过,我确实不信任民主党,”他补充道。

    特拉华县和巴克斯县的选民被问及民生成本问题,以及民主党是否更有能力降低物价,尤其是在前总统乔·拜登任内通胀飙升之后。

    多伊尔斯敦的克里斯在被问及是否认为民主党会降低物价时表示:“共和党在过去两年里已经把情况弄得更糟了。汽油价格大幅上涨、能源价格大幅上涨、食品价格大幅上涨,没有一样东西是便宜的,所以他们没法反驳这一点。”

    他继续说道:“我的意思是,唐纳德·特朗普还在任,情况能有多糟?有人告诉我情况会比现在更糟,可这已经是历史上最糟的情况了。你觉得如果民主党上台,物价就不会再涨了?我可不这么认为。”

    宾夕法尼亚州的选举结果将对国会控制权的争夺起到关键作用,共和党正努力维持多数席位,而特朗普正全力动员选民支持共和党候选人。

    距离中期选举只剩8天,选举结果可能对特朗普总统剩余任期产生重大影响,无论国会参众两院由民主党掌控,都会给特朗普推动其议程的努力制造障碍。

    福克斯新闻民调:受成本挤压、不满的选民转向民主党

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/pa-voters-trump-3-split.jpg

    宾夕法尼亚州选民告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,他们将在临近的中期选举中投票给民主党,以阻止唐纳德·特朗普的议程。(尼古拉斯·巴莱西/福克斯新闻数字频道;凯文·迪奇/盖蒂图片社)

    许多接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访的选民都有在下周中期选举中投票给民主党的更广泛理由。

    新镇广场的南希表示:“我们有一位精神失常的总统。我们还有一群毫无骨气的共和党,他们也管不住他。”

    “我要投票给民主党国会候选人名单,”宾夕法尼亚州梅迪亚的汤姆说道。“我真的觉得唐纳德·特朗普对我们国家不好,我们需要……放慢他的脚步。”

    “我要全票投给民主党,”福克斯新闻数字频道采访的一位名叫比尔的选民说。“原因在于共和党拒绝制止唐纳德·特朗普的法西斯行径。”

    伯尼·桑德斯承认民主党在经济问题上未能兼顾工薪阶层选民,导致他们转向唐纳德·特朗普

    另一位选民表示,民生成本并不是他此次选举的核心关切,他更关注的是其他对他而言更重要的问题,比如移民管理和肯尼迪中心更名事宜。

    他继续说道:“我关心的是像美国移民及海关执法局(ICE)这样的机构,我关心肯尼迪中心,我非常关心乌克兰局势。这些才是促使我投票给民主党的原因。”

    [image_4]

    一些人将拜登任内较高的通胀归咎于新冠疫情,指出通胀率在拜登任期末期呈下降趋势。

    “毫无疑问,拜登在努力推动新冠疫情后经济复苏时,政策过度了,”汤姆说道。

    但他强调,尽管他认为民主党执政存在错误,但他认为特朗普政府的政策对国家构成了更大威胁。

    “我觉得特朗普政府正在推动政府层面的制度变革,这种变革更难扭转,而不仅仅是停止花钱。”

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用

    宾夕法尼亚州有几个广受关注的国会选举席位,包括福克斯新闻数字频道采访过选民的巴克斯选区。

    库克政治报告近日将共和党众议员布莱恩·菲茨帕特里克在第一国会选区对阵民主党挑战者鲍勃·哈维的竞选形势从“共和党优势”调整为“共和党 leaning(倾向共和党)”,这表明随着选举日临近,竞选竞争将更加激烈。

    汉娜是福克斯新闻数字频道政治团队的制作助理。

    https://a57.foxnews.com/cf-images.us-east-1.prod.boltdns.net/v1/static/694940094001/abea8999-ee83-4b68-826c-ebe6a5d129c9/31a20977-f57b-483a-8e65-80043bc1ad5e/1280×720/match/720/405/image.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

    Trump’s not on the ballot but swing state voters still cast ballots with MAGA in mind

    Voters in Pennsylvania expressed distrust of both parties on affordability and inflation — but ultimately want change

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/headshot-1.jpg By Hannah Brennan Fox News

    Published October 26, 2026 1:55pm EDT

    Voters in battleground Pennsylvania revealed their midterm plans, with some expressing fierce opposition to President Donald Trump while admitting they don’t trust Democrats either. (Credit: Nicholas Ballasy for Fox News Digital)

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/b4e7ef70-9305-4d54-b0c3-f2f15e8442d3

    Listen to this article

    4 min

    Voters in the battleground state of Pennsylvania tell Fox News Digital they are driven at the ballot box by a desire to rein in President Donald Trump and his administration’s agenda.

    While many voting in next Tuesday’s midterm elections in the Keystone State don’t trust Democrats, they are willing to give them a chance to change the trajectory of the country on a myriad of issues — including affordability and rising prices, the Iran war and corruption in Washington, D.C.

    “I didn’t say I trusted the Democrats,” Tomas from Doylestown, Pennsylvania, said when asked if he felt the opposition party would do better than the current one in power.

    “I’m just gonna vote for them because [Trump] is just taking us down the tubes.”

    LEAVITT SAYS TRUMP IS DEFYING MIDTERM HEADWINDS AS HE BARNSTORMS COUNTRY

    President Donald Trump speaks during a midterm campaign rally at the Guardian Centers on Oct. 24, 2026, in Perry, Georgia. Trump is speaking in support of the Senate candidate, Rep. Mike Collins, R-Ga., who is trying to unseat Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., and Republican gubernatorial candidate Rick Jackson.(Alex Wong/Getty Images)

    Clay, another Pennsylvania voter, told Fox News Digital, “I don’t,” when asked why he trusts Democrats to tackle affordability better than Republicans.

    “The party that we’re currently working with is so f—ed up, we might as well change it. I don’t trust the Democrats though,” he added.

    Voters in Delaware County and Bucks County were pressed on the issue of affordability and whether Democrats would be better equipped to address bringing prices down, particularly after inflation surged during former President Joe Biden’s administration.

    “Republicans have showed in the past two years that they really have made things worse,” Chris from Doylestown said when asked if he believes Democrats will bring down prices. “Gas is way up, the energy is way up, food’s way up. There’s nothing that’s cheaper, so they can’t argue that.”

    “I mean, Donald Trump’s in office, how much worse can it get?” he went on. “Telling me that it can get worse than this? It’s the worst it’s ever been. You think that by having… Democrats in office… that somehow it’s gonna make things go even higher? I don’t think so.”

    The results in Pennsylvania will play a key role in the battle for control of Congress, with Republicans fighting to maintain their majorities as Trump works to rally voters behind Republican candidates.

    The outcome of the midterm elections, just eight days away, could have major implications for the remainder of Trump’s presidency, with a Democratic takeover of either chamber threatening to complicate his efforts to push his agenda through Congress.

    FOX NEWS POLL: SQUEEZED BY COSTS, FRUSTRATED VOTERS TURN TO THE DEMOCRATS

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/pa-voters-trump-3-split.jpg

    Voters in Pennsylvania tell Fox News Digital they are voting Democrat in the closely approaching midterm elections in an effort to halt President Donald Trump’s agenda.(Nicholas Ballasy/Fox News Digital; Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

    Many who spoke with Fox News Digital had broader reasons to vote Democrat in next week’s midterms.

    “We have a mentally ill president,” Nancy from Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, said. “We have a ball-less GOP party who will not rein him in.”

    “I am voting for the Democratic congressional slate,” Tom from Media, Pennsylvania, said. “I really think that Donald Trump has not been good for our country, and we sort of need to… slow down what he’s doing.”

    “I am voting straight Democrat,” a voter Fox News Digital spoke with named Bill said. “And the reason why is because the Republican Party refuses to stand up to the fascist actions of Donald Trump.”

    BERNIE SANDERS ADMITS DEMOCRATS FAILED WORKING-CLASS VOTERS ON ECONOMICS, DRIVING THEM TO DONALD TRUMP

    Another voter shared that affordability was not one of his concerns heading into the elections, instead citing issues more important to him, such as handling immigration and the renaming of the Kennedy Center.

    He continued, “I’m concerned about things like ICE (Immigrations and Customs Enforcement). I’m concerned about the Kennedy Center. I’m very concerned about Ukraine. Those are the things which make me want to vote for the Democrats.”

    [image_4]

    Some blamed COVID-19 for higher inflation during Biden’s presidency, citing the inflation rate trending downward toward the end of his term.

    “No doubt about it Biden… overshot in trying to orchestrate the recovery from COVID,” said Tom.

    But he doubled down that despite his perceived errors with a Democrat in office, he believes the Trump administration’s policies pose larger threats to the nation.

    “I think that the Trump administration is doing more institutional changes in government that are going to be harder to overcome rather than just stopping spending money.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Pennsylvania is home to several closely watched congressional races, including in Bucks County, where Fox News Digital interviewed voters.

    Cook Political Report recently shifted Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick’s race against Democratic challenger Bob Harvie in the 1st Congressional District from “Likely Republican” to “Lean Republican,” signaling a more competitive contest as Election Day approaches.

    Hannah is a Production Assistant for the Politics team at Fox News Digital.

    https://a57.foxnews.com/cf-images.us-east-1.prod.boltdns.net/v1/static/694940094001/abea8999-ee83-4b68-826c-ebe6a5d129c9/31a20977-f57b-483a-8e65-80043bc1ad5e/1280×720/match/720/405/image.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

  • 索马里说唱曲“驱散”敌人 背景为马尔宁静湖畔视频 却牵出奥马尔面临刑事调查


    歌词夸耀“没有敌人敢威胁我”,而奥马尔正因涉嫌移民欺诈面临刑事调查

    文/彼得·达布罗斯卡 福克斯新闻

    发布时间:2026年10月26日 美国东部时间下午2:50 | 更新时间:2026年10月26日 美国东部时间下午3:51

    福克斯新闻首席国会记者查德·珀格拉姆报道:针对众议员伊尔汗·奥马尔(民主党,明尼苏达州)被指在法律身份、姓名及参选资格方面存在争议,总统唐纳德·特朗普要求她辞去国会议员职务。

    2026年10月23日,伊尔汗·奥马尔在明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯的卡尔麦清真寺参加周五聚礼。(拉希德·乌玛尔·阿巴斯 摄,福克斯新闻数字平台)

    【奥马尔在索马里商城遭质问时坚称“真名”】
    正值联邦特工搜查她位于华盛顿的住所、开展刑事调查数日后,伊尔汗·奥马尔上周五发布了一段宁静的马尔湖畔视频,配的索马里嘻哈歌曲歌词夸耀“驱散”和“粉碎”敌人。

    “少些划屏,多些漫步。享受明尼苏达州美丽的湖泊吧。”这位深陷困境的国会议员上周末在推特(X)上发布了这条内容。

    她附上的视频显示,自己与丈夫蒂姆·明内特正在一座湖面上的码头行走,背景是五彩斑斓的秋季树叶。两人摆着姿势、面带微笑,一边闲适地漫步在码头上,一边聊天,目光温柔地注视着彼此——这位竞选连任的议员手里拿着一杯咖啡。视频最后是他们散步的多张画面集锦。

    但伴随这段视频的节奏强烈的索马里嘻哈歌曲,却讲述了截然不同的故事。

    据福克斯新闻数字平台获取的翻译版歌词显示,歌曲以索马里语演唱,歌词内容为:“让我亮出真面目。没有敌人敢威胁我,无论我走到哪里,他们都会四散奔逃。”“他们逃窜到远方。我一直是他们的困扰之源。”

    这首歌名为《Nimaan Ciilayba Icaaya》,作者是伊尔卡卡斯·凯斯,本名穆罕默德·阿卜迪卡迪尔。他的个人网站显示,他是“定居美国的索马里歌手、说唱歌手及活动家”。这首对唱曲目由索马里歌手霍丹·阿卜迪拉赫曼参与演唱。

    对这首歌的文化分析指出,它“是索马里抒情诗的有力范例,围绕自豪、勇敢、个人尊严及对真主的坚定信任展开创作”。

    歌词中还写道:“愚人的话毫无分量。那些被我激怒的人如今对我破口大骂。若正义之人因我而愤怒,他难道不会将敌人踩在脚下?”“凭着全能真主赋予我的力量,若我在午后汲取这份力量,到傍晚时分,我定会给你一个教训。”

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/ilhan-omar-fox-news-001.jpg

    2026年5月30日,伊尔汗·奥马尔在明尼苏达州罗切斯特举行的明尼苏达民主-农民-劳工(DFL)党代表大会上发言。(亚历克斯·科曼恩摄,《明尼阿波利斯星坛报》 via 盖蒂图片社)

    【联邦特工突袭奥马尔华盛顿住所 调查涉嫌移民欺诈】

    分析人士指出,这位创作者在歌曲中运用“夸张意象嘲讽对手,将其描绘成会失眠、受屈辱,甚至在绝望中寻求超自然助力的人”。

    歌词进一步写道:“你彻夜不眠,心神不宁,独自啜泣。”“你像恶魔般整夜嚎叫,因为你根本比不上我!”“克制你的愤怒,将它咽下去——若正义之人因我而愤怒。”

    消息人士称,奥马尔的实际姓名是伊尔汗·努尔·赛义德·埃尔米,10月12日联邦特工突袭她位于华盛顿特区的住所(由国土安全调查局[HSI]特工执行)后,她已近两周未公开露面,于本周五重返明尼苏达州。

    周五,明尼阿波利斯一处投票站内,媒体记者紧追着她与州检察长基思·埃里森一起提前投票的身影。两人随后前往明尼阿波利斯的卡尔麦索马里商城,在索马里社区成员陪同下享用午餐,并拍摄了合影。

    【国土安全部长:若移民欺诈指控成立,奥马尔可能被剥夺入籍资格并遭驱逐】

    当天晚些时候,奥马尔在推特(X)上发布了这段视频。目前尚不清楚视频拍摄的具体时间。

    这位出生于索马里的明尼苏达州议员限制了谁能直接在她的社交媒体帖子下评论,公开可看到的评论仅来自被罢免的前众议院“ squad”(核心进步派议员团体)成员科里·布什,其评论为:“我们爱这个。”

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/image.jpg

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    奥马尔正因涉嫌移民文书方面的欺诈接受调查——这些文书由她或父亲在她申请美国公民身份时填写。国土安全调查局是美国国土安全部的主要调查机构。

    突袭行动中,联邦特工没收了奥马尔的护照和手机。

    福克斯新闻报道,突袭结束后,联邦调查人员对奥马尔的妹妹萨拉·努尔进行了问询。联邦特工还获取了奥马尔的DNA样本。

    【点击下载福克斯新闻APP】

    国土安全部长汤姆·霍曼上周表示,若欺诈指控成立,奥马尔可能会被剥夺公民身份。

    彼得·达布罗斯卡是福克斯新闻数字平台的政治记者。

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/6f8bb106-20c9-4e69-8f5f-7731d6c6fb83

    Somali rap promising to ‘scatter’ enemies underscores Omar’s serene lakeside video

    Lyrics boast ‘no enemy dares threaten me’ as Omar faces a criminal investigation into potential immigration fraud

    By Peter D’AbroscaFox News

    Published October 26, 2026 2:50pm EDT | Updated October 26, 2026 3:51pm EDT

    Fox News chief congressional correspondent Chad Pergram reports on President Donald Trump’s demand that Rep. Ilhan Omar resign from Congress over disputed claims about her legal status, name and eligibility to serve.

    Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., posted a serene lakeside video Friday set to a Somali hip-hop song whose lyrics boast of enemies scattering and being “crushed,” days after federal agents searched her Washington home as part of a criminal investigation.

    “Less scrolling, more strolling. Enjoying our beautiful Minnesota lakes,” the embattled congresswoman wrote on X in a post made at the end of last week.

    She attached a video of herself and her husband, Tim Mynett, walking on a dock over a lake with vibrant fall foliage in the background. The pair posed, smiled and appeared to chat as they serenely strolled across the dock, looking fondly at each other as the lawmaker running for reelection held a coffee. It ended with a montage of images from their walk.

    But a loud Somali hip-hop song accompanying the video told a much different story.

    Rep. Ilhan Omar arrives to Karmel Mall of Somalia to attend Friday prayers at Karmel Masjid in Minneapolis. Minn., Friday, Oct. 23, 2026.(Rashid Umar Abbasi for Fox News Digital)

    ILHAN OMAR DOUBLES DOWN ON ‘REAL NAME’ WHEN CONFRONTED AT MALL OF SOMALIA

    “Let me reveal who I really am. No enemy dares threaten me, wherever I step, they scatter,” the lyrics to the song say in Somali, according to a translation obtained by Fox News Digital. “They flee and stay far away. I have always been the source of their distress.”

    The song, “Nimaan Ciilayba Icaaya,” is by Ilkacase Qays, whose real name is Muse Abdikadir. His website describes him as a “U.S. based Somali singer, rapper and activist.” The duet-style track features Somali singer Hodan Abdirahman.

    A cultural analysis of the song says it is “a powerful example of Somali lyrical poetry built around pride, bravery, personal dignity and unwavering trust in Allah.”

    “A fool’s words carry no weight,” the lyrics say. “Those I have angered now insult me. If the just one had felt anger on my behalf, would he not have crushed the enemy underfoot? With the strength the almighty has given me, If I draw on it late in the afternoon, by evening, I will have taught you a lesson.”

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/ilhan-omar-fox-news-001.jpg

    Rep. Ilhan Omar speaks during the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) Party Convention in Rochester, Minn., May 30, 2026. (Alex Kormann/The Minnesota Star Tribune via Getty Images)

    FEDERAL AGENTS RAID ILHAN OMAR’S DC HOME AMID IMMIGRATION FRAUD INVESTIGATION

    The analysis describes the artist as using “exaggerated imagery to ridicule his opponents, portraying them as people who would lose sleep, suffer humiliation, and even seek supernatural assistance out of desperation.”

    “You go without sleep, overcome with anguish, weeping in spite,” the lyrics continued. “You howl like a demon through the night, because you cannot match me! Swallow your anger and choke on it if the just one had felt anger on my behalf.”

    Omar, who sources say is actually named Ilhan Nur Said Elmi, reemerged in Minnesota on Friday. It came after nearly two weeks out of the public eye following an Oct. 12, 2026, raid on her Washington, D.C., home, conducted by Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agents.

    Members of the media followed her intently as she cast an early ballot alongside state Attorney General Keith Ellison at a polling place in Minneapolis on Friday. The pair then appeared at the Karmel Mall of Somalia in Minneapolis, where they enjoyed lunch among members of the Somali community and posed for photographs.

    HOMAN SAYS ILHAN OMAR COULD BE STRIPPED OF NATURALIZATION, DEPORTED IF IMMIGRATION FRAUD IS PROVEN

    Later in the day, Omar posted the video to X. It is unclear when it was filmed.

    The Somali-born Minnesota lawmaker restricted who can respond directly to her social media post, with the only publicly facing comment being from ousted former U.S. House “Squad” member Cori Bush, who wrote: “We love this.”

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/image.jpg

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    Omar is being investigated for potential fraud related to immigration paperwork filled out by her or her father when she was becoming a United States citizen. HSI is the main investigatory agency for the Department of Homeland Security.

    During the raid, Omar’s passport and cellphone were confiscated by federal agents.

    Her sister, Sahra Noor, was interviewed by federal investigators in the wake of the raid. Federal agents have also obtained Omar’s DNA, Fox News reported.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    If fraud is proven, Omar could be denaturalized, border czar Tom Homan said last week.

    Peter D’Abrosca is a politics reporter at Fox News Digital.

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/6f8bb106-20c9-4e69-8f5f-7731d6c6fb83

  • 伯尼·桑德斯声称部分民主党人可能希望本党联邦参议院提名候选人落败


    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/el-sayed-stevens-split.jpg

    密歇根州民主党众议员黑利·史蒂文斯(右)与前韦恩县卫生局局长阿卜杜勒·埃尔-赛义德在该州民主党联邦参议院初选中对决。(埃文·科布摄于《华盛顿邮报》,盖蒂图片社;比尔·克拉克摄于CQ-Roll Call, Inc.,盖蒂图片社)

    当被追问到埃尔-赛义德本人时,她表示:“好吧,这么说吧,如果你问我是否仍然属于这个团队,我确实属于这个团队。”

    但这并不能让进步派满意,他们立即指责史蒂文斯在破坏民主党同僚。

    “太荒谬了。对于那些仍在假装埃尔-赛义德的竞选与[罗伊·库珀]或[玛丽·佩尔托拉]的竞选相同的人,他们难道是让前民主党对手拒绝在全国电视上全力支持他们的原因吗?‘不论党派,皆为蓝营’是虚伪的中间派谎言,而这种虚伪可能会在2028年损害民主党,”迈赫迪·哈桑在X平台上写道,这里指的是北卡罗来纳州和阿拉斯加州的民主党联邦参议院竞选。

    领导进步派活动组织“ indivisible”的莉亚·格林伯格写道:“现在是10月下旬,人们每天都在投票,如果你不能全力支持那位可能成为翻转参议院关键选票的民主党提名人,那你就别再上电视了。”

    输给阿卜杜勒·埃尔-赛义德的密歇根州民主党人因以色列立场抨击伯尼·桑德斯

    前国会候选人凯尔·布洛姆奎斯特指责史蒂文斯“几乎对迈克·罗杰斯谄媚”,并称“她唯一真正的意识形态承诺是支持犹太复国主义”。

    进步派评论员艾玛·维格兰德在X平台上写道:“支持种族灭绝存在金融和制度层面的动机。史蒂文斯在中期选举前一周的全国电视上破坏埃尔-赛义德,是为了保护自己的钱包和事业,而非为了民主。”

    更多倾向温和派和建制派的民主党人对部分批评做出了反驳。

    策略师利斯·史密斯回应哈桑称:“人们——民主党人、共和党人、无党派人士——都希望支持佩尔托拉和库珀之流,这其实是对他们候选人素质的认可!有人们愿意与之关联的候选人是件好事,这应当成为评估候选人素质的一个因素!”

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/haley-stevens-gary-peters-presser-madison-heights-michigan-august-2-2026.jpeg

    时任民主党联邦参议院候选人的密歇根州众议员黑利·史蒂文斯(左)与即将退休的联邦参议员加里·彼得斯,于2026年8月2日在密歇根州麦迪逊海茨出席新闻发布会并回答记者提问。(保罗·斯坦豪瑟摄于福克斯新闻)

    今年早些时候,在民主党同僚马洛里·麦克莫罗退出竞选后,埃尔-赛义德在密歇根州初选中以仅1%的微弱优势击败史蒂文斯。

    埃尔-赛义德获得了48.5%的选票,而史蒂文斯的得票率为47.5%,麦克莫罗获得4%。

    值得注意的是,史蒂文斯是建制派支持的人选,获得了参议院民主党领袖、纽约州民主党参议员查克·舒默等高层民主党人的支持。埃尔-赛义德则获得了“ Squad ”进步党团成员的支持,比如密歇根州民主党众议员拉希达·特莱布和亚历山德里亚·奥卡西奥-科尔特斯。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用

    福克斯新闻数字版就网友对史蒂文斯的抨击向她寻求置评,但截至发稿尚未立即收到回应。

    伊丽莎白·埃尔金德是福克斯新闻数字版的政治记者,负责报道众议院相关新闻。她的数字报道曾刊发于《每日邮报》和CBS新闻。

    在推特上关注她@liz_elkind,如需爆料请发送至elizabeth.elkind@fox.com

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6407413318112

    Haley Stevens ripped by fellow Dems for refusing to explicitly back El-Sayed: ‘Stay the f— off television’

    The former Michigan Senate primary candidate said she’s ‘on the team’ but stopped short of naming El-Sayed directly

    By Elizabeth Elkind | Fox News

    Published October 26, 2026 2:45pm EDT

    Abdul El-Sayed’s former Democratic rival is getting hammered by fellow left-wingers online for failing to explicitly endorse him during a weekend television appearance.

    Rep. Haley Stevens, D-Mich., who unsuccessfully ran for the Democratic nomination for Senate in Michigan, told CNN’s “State of the Union” that she broadly supports her state party’s ticket for the coming midterm elections.

    “Look, I’m on the Democratic ticket. I can’t say that I agree with everything that’s gone on,” Stevens answered. “I’m looking to be on the team to support my next governor, Jocelyn Benson, and frankly, these great Democrats who are working their tails off, who are going to make Hakeem Jeffries the first Black Speaker of the House.”

    BERNIE SANDERS CLAIMS SOME DEMOCRATS MAY WANT THEIR OWN SENATE NOMINEE TO LOSE

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/el-sayed-stevens-split.jpg

    Rep. Haley Stevens of Michigan, right, and former Wayne County Health Department Director Abdul El-Sayed faced off in the state’s Democratic Senate primary.(Evan Cobb for The Washington Post via Getty Images; Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)

    When pressed about El-Sayed specifically, she said, “Well, look, I would just say, if you had asked me if I’m still on the team, I’m on the team.”

    But that was not enough for progressives, who promptly accused Stevens of undermining her fellow Democrat.

    “Ridiculous. For all the folks still pretending El-Sayed’s race is the same as [Roy Cooper’s] or [Mary Peltola’s], do they have former Dem rivals refusing to fully endorse them on national TV? ‘Blue no matter who’ was a hypocritical centrist lie and this hypocrisy may hurt Dems in 2028,” Mehdi Hasan wrote on X, referring to Democrat Senate races in North Carolina and Alaska.

    Leah Greenberg, who leads the progressive activist group Indivisible, wrote, “It is late October and people are voting every day, if you cannot give a full-throated endorsement to the Democratic nominee who could be the key vote in flipping the Senate, then stay the f— off television.”

    MICHIGAN DEMOCRAT WHO LOST SENATE PRIMARY TO ABDUL EL-SAYED TAKES AIM AT BERNIE SANDERS OVER ISRAEL STANCE

    Former congressional candidate Kyle Blomquist accused Stevens of “practically fawning over Mike Rogers” and said “her only real ideological commitment is to zionism.”

    Progressive commentator Emma Vigeland wrote on X, “There are financial and institutional incentives to remain on the side of genocide. Stevens is sabotaging El-Sayed on national TV, one week before the midterm, to protect her pocketbook and career over democracy.”

    More moderate and establishment-friendly Democrats pushed back on some of the criticism.

    Strategist Lis Smith responded to Hasan, “People—Democrats, Republicans, Independents—clamoring to support the Peltolas and Coopers is actually a validation of their candidate quality! It’s good to have candidates people want to associate with and that should be a factor when assessing candidate quality!”

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/haley-stevens-gary-peters-presser-madison-heights-michigan-august-2-2026.jpeg

    Then-Democratic Senate candidate Rep. Haley Stevens of Michigan, left, and retiring Sen. Gary Peters, take questions at a news conference, on August 2, 2026, in Madison Heights, Mich.(Paul Steinhauser/Fox News)

    El-Sayed edged Stevens out by just 1% in the Michigan primary earlier this year, after fellow Democrat Mallory McMorrow dropped out of the race.

    El-Sayed won 48.5% of the vote compared to Stevens’ 47.5%, with McMorrow netting 4%.

    Stevens was notably the establishment-backed pick with support from top Democrats like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. El-Sayed is backed by “Squad” Democrats like Reps. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Fox News Digital reached out to Stevens for comment on the online backlash but did not immediately hear back.

    Elizabeth Elkind is a politics reporter for Fox News Digital leading coverage of the House of Representatives. Previous digital bylines seen at Daily Mail and CBS News.

    Follow on Twitter at @liz_elkind and send tips to elizabeth.elkind@fox.com

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6407413318112

  • 奥巴马任命法官裁定特朗普政府司法部非法解雇詹姆斯·科米之女,驳回宽泛的第二条宪法条款主张


    这位奥巴马时期任命的法官驳回了政府关于第二条宪法条款的主张,并下令恢复毛琳·科米的职务,补发欠薪

    美国东部时间2026年10月26日下午2点41分 / 福克斯新闻

    一位奥巴马任命的纽约联邦法官周一裁定,特朗普政府司法部非法解雇前联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米的女儿毛琳·科米,驳回了政府关于行政部门权力的宽泛主张,并警告称其论点威胁到国家宪法的权力制衡。

    司法部在法庭文件中承认,解雇科米并非因正当理由,也与她的工作表现无关,但主张司法部长依据宪法第二条拥有罢免她的权力。

    “被告方声称,宪法第二条禁止国会监管联邦助理检察官的罢免,这与近两个世纪的最高法院先例背道而驰,”法官杰西·弗曼写道,并补充称,接受政府的论点将“破坏我国宪法体系确立的平衡”。

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    特朗普的解雇权面临最高法院两次重大考验,但某机构可能获得特殊待遇

    前联邦检察官毛琳·科米与其父、前联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米的合成图。科米曾长期在司法部担任联邦检察官,今年9月15日周一,她因年初突然被解雇一事起诉特朗普政府。(Getty Images)

    司法部发言人告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,该部门不同意这一裁决,并将在“适当时候”上诉。弗曼法官下令恢复科米的职务,并补发截至2025年12月20日的欠薪,当日她接受了另一份工作。

    虽然联邦法律赋予司法部长罢免联邦助理检察官的权力,但弗曼裁定,国会通过《公务员制度改革法》对这一权力施加了限制,该法案原则上要求解雇需有正当理由,并为政府雇员提供程序性保护。

    奥巴马任命法官阻止特朗普解雇行动,数十年旧法律依据或催生重大反转

    2025年10月8日,在弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市的弗吉尼亚东区美国地方法院布莱恩大楼,前联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米的妻子帕特里丝·费洛尔(左)拥抱女儿毛琳·科米。(图片来源:Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

    法官认定解雇科米违反了上述规定,指出政府承认她的罢免并非因不当行为或工作表现不佳,且她既未收到事先通知,也未获得申辩机会。

    科米曾在著名的纽约南区检察官办公室任职约十年,参与了该办公室多项重大案件,包括起诉杰弗里·爱泼斯坦的同伙兼传闻伴侣吉丝兰·麦克斯韦,以及说唱歌手肖恩“吹牛老爹”·库姆斯的性 trafficking 审判。

    弗曼近期还在特朗普政府驱逐支持巴勒斯坦的哥伦比亚大学学生活动家马哈茂德·哈利勒的行动中对其提出谴责,导致联邦政府申请更换审理地点至新泽西州。

    这位2011年获得提名的法官,此前曾在曼哈顿美国检察官办公室担任联邦检察官,而科米父女两人职业生涯期间均在此工作过。弗曼的兄弟杰森曾在奥巴马政府担任经济顾问委员会主席。

    詹姆斯·科米在乔治·W·布什政府初期担任纽约南区首席检察官,期间调查了比尔·克林顿总统对金融家马克·里奇的有争议特赦,以及室内设计师玛莎·斯图尔特相关案件。

    小科米是特朗普执政期间第二个被解雇的科米家族成员,第一位是2017年俄罗斯通俄门调查期间被总统解职的父亲——前联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米。

    老科米后来因在海滩上摆放贝壳组成“86 47”字样的照片引发争议而受到抨击,批评者称“86”在餐饮行话中意为“淘汰某物”,而“47”指的是第47任总统特朗普。

    毛琳·科米的律师在向美联社发表的声明中表示,他们的胜诉对其当事人和所有公务员而言都是“来之不易”的。

    注册获取政治新闻通讯

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/sean-diddy-combs-trial-day-8-3.jpg

    检察官毛琳·科米于2025年5月21日周三在曼哈顿出席肖恩“吹牛老爹”·库姆斯审判的联邦法院。(Rashid Umar Abbasi 为福克斯新闻数字频道拍摄)

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    “正如法院正确裁定,若接受政府关于行政权不受限制的论点,‘便会破坏我国宪法体系确立的平衡’。这一裁决重申了我们的制衡基石体系:总统凌驾于法律之上的行为是不可接受的,”他们表示。

    在宾夕法尼亚州阿伦敦出生并长大,2013年起在福克斯新闻的纽约和华盛顿分社工作。

    Obama judge rules Trump DOJ illegally fired James Comey’s daughter, rejects sweeping Article II claim

    The Obama-appointed judge rejected the administration’s Article II claim and ordered Maurene Comey reinstated with backpay

    October 26, 2026 2:41pm EDT / Fox News

    An Obama-appointed New York federal judge ruled Monday that the Trump Justice Department unlawfully fired former FBI Director James Comey’s daughter Maurene, rejecting the administration’s sweeping claim of executive authority and warning that its argument threatened the nation’s constitutional balance of power.

    The Justice Department acknowledged in court filings that Comey’s firing was not for-cause and was not based on her performance, but argued that the attorney general had the authority to remove her under Article II of the Constitution.

    “Defendants’ argument that [Constitution] Article II bars Congress from regulating the removal of AUSAs (assistant U.S. attorneys) flies in the face of nearly two centuries of Supreme Court precedent,” Judge Jesse Furman wrote, adding that accepting the administration’s argument would “unsettle the very equilibrium established by this nation’s constitutional system.”

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    TRUMP’S FIRING POWER FACES TWIN SUPREME COURT TESTS, BUT ONE AGENCY MAY GET SPECIAL TREATMENT

    Former federal prosecutor Maurene Comey and her father, former FBI Director James Comey, are seen in this split image. Comey, a longtime U.S. prosecutor for the Justice Department, sued the Trump administration Monday, Sept. 15, over her abrupt firing earlier this year.(Getty Images)

    A DOJ spokesperson told Fox News Digital the department disagreed with the decision and will appeal it in “due course.” Furman ordered Comey retroactively reinstated and awarded back pay through Dec. 20, 2025, when she accepted another job.

    While federal law gives the attorney general authority to fire assistant U.S. attorneys, Furman ruled that Congress placed limits on that power through the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA), which generally requires cause for termination and procedural protections for government workers.

    OBAMA JUDGE HALTS TRUMP FIRING BID AS DECADES-OLD LEGAL AUTHORITY TEES UP POSSIBLE MAJOR REVERSAL

    Patrice Failor (L), wife of former FBI director James Comey, is embraced by her daughter Maurene Comey as they arrive at the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia’s Bryan Courthouse on October 8, 2025, in Alexandria, Virginia.(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

    The judge found that Comey’s firing violated those requirements, noting that the government conceded her removal was not based on misconduct or poor performance and that she received neither advance notice nor an opportunity to respond.

    Comey had served about a decade in the prominent Southern District of New York, where she worked on some of the office’s biggest cases, including the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell – associate and rumored partner of Jeffrey Epstein — as well as the sex trafficking trial of rapper Sean “P. Diddy” Combs.

    Furman also recently rebuked the Trump administration during its efforts to deport pro-Palestinian Columbia University student activist Mahmoud Khalil, leading the federal government to argue for a change of venue to New Jersey.

    The judge, nominated in 2011, previously served as a federal prosecutor in the same Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office where both Comeys worked during their careers. Furman’s brother, Jason, served in the Obama administration as chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers.

    James Comey served as the top prosecutor at SDNY early in the George W. Bush administration, where he investigated President Bill Clinton’s controversial pardon of financier Marc Rich as well as interior designer Martha Stewart.

    The younger Comey was the second in her family to be fired under Trump, after the president terminated her father as FBI director in 2017 during the Russia collusion investigation.

    The elder Comey later came under fire for posting a photo of seashells on a beach arranged to form the sentiment “86 47” – with critics saying “86” was a reference to killing something, such as in restaurant lingo, and “47” referred to Trump, the 47th president.

    Maurene Comey’s attorneys said in a statement to The Associated Press that their victory was “hard-earned” for both their client and all civil servants.

    SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/sean-diddy-combs-trial-day-8-3.jpg

    Prosecutor Maurene Comey, arrived at federal court for the Sean “Diddy” Combs trial on Wednesday, May 21, 2025, in Manhattan.(Rashid Umar Abbasi for Fox News Digital)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “As the court correctly held, to accept the government’s argument about unlimited executive power ‘would be to unsettle the very equilibrium established by this nation’s constitutional system.’ This decision reaffirms our bedrock system of checks and balances: the President is not above the law,” they said.

    Born and raised in Allentown, Pennsylvania, worked in both the New York and Washington bureaus for Fox News since 2013.

  • 新闻


    希夫指责司法部试图“破坏”选举,共和党称同名候选人意在迷惑选民

    美国东部时间2026年10月26日下午2:10 / 福克斯新闻

    福克斯新闻记者马特·芬恩带来阿拉斯加中期选举的最新情况,该州两名参选者同名,引发选民困惑,相关异常对决引发多方质疑,《America Reports》节目对此展开报道。

    新功能上线:您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章。

    加州民主党参议员亚当·希夫指责唐纳德·特朗普总统领导的司法部就阿拉斯加异常的参议院选票提起诉讼,试图“破坏”选举;与此同时,共和党声称民主党扶持了一名与共和党提名人同名的参议院候选人,以迷惑选民。

    阿拉斯加共和党参议员丹·S·沙利文将与无党派人士小丹尼尔·J·沙利文展开角逐。州法院最终允许第二名丹·沙利文留在选票上。希夫认为,司法部插手阿拉斯加法院已处理完毕的事务毫无意义。共和党声称小丹尼尔·沙利文参选意在分散现任参议员的选票,帮助前民主党众议员玛丽·佩尔托拉——目前已成为参议院候选人的佩尔托拉及其竞选团队否认了这一说法。

    “他们没有资格提起这种诉讼。联邦政府无权插手阿拉斯加的选举事务,这是阿拉斯加州自己的事,”希夫周日告诉NBC新闻。

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    “阿拉斯加州已经就这一问题作出裁决,司法部心知肚明,这恰恰暴露了他们现在是如何与特朗普阵营同流合污,试图破坏选举的。”

    ALASKA SENATE RACE’S ABSURD NAME PROBLEM GETS EVEN HARDER TO UNTANGLE

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/adam-schiff-and-todd-blanche.jpg

    左为参议员亚当·希夫;右为司法部长提名人托德·布兰奇。(阿尔·德拉戈/Getty Images;埃里克·李/Getty Images)

    长期以来,希夫一直是特朗普最突出的反对者之一,他曾担任特朗普首次弹劾审判的众议院弹劾案首席经理,后来又参与了调查2021年1月6日国会大厦骚乱的众议院委员会。这位来自伯班克的民主党人多次指责特朗普破坏民主制度和选举诚信,此次对司法部的攻击,是他与特朗普长达数年的政治和法律斗争的最新交锋。

    希夫将此与特朗普挑战2020年总统选举结果的努力相提并论,他指出,当时包括司法部长威廉·巴尔在内的司法部高级官员拒绝支持推翻选举结果的企图,而他指责现任司法部领导层愿意采取更极端的行动。

    “这一次,在司法部长托德·布兰奇的领导下,他们完全卷入了这场可耻的行动,”希夫说,他预测这起“终焉之地”(阿拉斯加的别称)的案件“没有胜诉的机会”。

    相关指控出炉之际,来自彼得斯堡的候选人丹·J·沙利文在阿拉斯加独特的初选制度中获得了足够的选票,将与阿拉斯加共和党参议员丹·S·沙利文一起出现在大选选票上,与民主党挑战者、前众议员玛丽·佩尔托拉同场角逐。

    法院将“冒名丹”留在阿拉斯加选票上,专家警告排序复选制制造选民“陷阱”

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    州选举官员最初取消了来自彼得斯堡的沙利文的参选资格,理由是他的参选意在迷惑选民,依据是他要求使用的选票姓名、近期的政党登记情况以及竞选材料的相似性。

    阿拉斯加高等法院法官推翻了州政府取消彼得斯堡沙利文参选资格的决定,尽管选举官员担忧选民会被误导,仍允许这位同名候选人留在选票上。阿拉斯加州最高法院随后维持了这一裁决,解决了该州的选票准入纠纷,但司法部目前正在单独提起联邦诉讼,以防彼得斯堡沙利文的参选可能改变选举结果。

    托德·布兰奇抨击达娜·巴什在激烈的选举交锋中只引用宪法部分内容

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/dan-sullivan-alaska-senate-fox-news-001.jpeg

    2026年6月26日,计划参选阿拉斯加联邦参议员的丹·J·沙利文在阿拉斯加彼得斯堡拍照。(凯蒂·霍尔姆伦德/美联社)

    州内诉讼程序结束后,司法部的布兰奇团队上周提起诉讼,称同名参选可能误导选民,并寻求延迟认证,以防彼得斯堡沙利文的选票影响选举结果。

    不过,司法部的诉状要求法院仅在特定情况下阻止选票认证:即现任参议员沙利文落败,但如果把投给彼得斯堡沙利文的选票改投给他,他本会胜选。司法部要求在这种情况下暂停认证,同时调查选民的真实支持对象。

    司法部长托德·布兰奇周日为该诉讼辩护,援引了联邦选举法,而希夫则辩称州政府已经对纠纷作出裁决。

    “他参选的唯一目的就是减少对参议员沙利文的选票,从而让佩尔托拉的竞选受益,”司法部诉状部分内容如此写道,同时还引用了阿拉斯加州选举司司长卡罗尔·比彻的一封信,信中称彼得斯堡沙利文的参选声明提交不合规,因为他并非出于真诚参选的意图。

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    共和党参议员、前众议院民主党人在阿拉斯加“丛林初选”中胜出,尽管极左派干预

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/sen-dan-sullivan-capitol-fox-news-001.jpeg

    2025年6月30日,阿拉斯加共和党参议员丹·沙利文在华盛顿国会山对记者发言。(马克·席费尔贝因/美联社)

    诉状还附上了一份对比材料,显示彼得斯堡沙利文的深蓝色竞选横幅上有一颗星星,而参议员沙利文的竞选横幅则展示了大熊座——这是阿拉斯加州国旗上描绘的星座。

    被要求置评时,司法部提供了布兰奇为该诉讼所作的辩护,强调该机构“并非试图阻止任何选票被投出,也不阻止阿拉斯加选举的认证”。

    “本诉讼旨在确保阿拉斯加选民投票后,选票能得到妥善保存,只有阿拉斯加州的执政官员才掌握必要信息,以判断阿拉斯加选民是否被混淆或误导,”布兰奇说。

    “该诉讼由司法部律师起草,本部门未与任何竞选活动或候选人协调,仅依据联邦法律行事。”

    该案援引了《全国选民登记法》,该法明确将保护选举诚信列为其宗旨之一。

    当被问及希夫的指控时,白宫提供了特朗普近期的表态,特朗普称他“建议”司法部提起诉讼,并表示彼得斯堡沙利文被“推举出来制造混淆”。

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    注册订阅获取政治新闻通讯

    “我觉得这是一种耻辱,”特朗普说。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    在8月份的初选中,佩尔托拉获得第一名,随后是参议员沙利文和彼得斯堡沙利文。一名原本排名在帕默的干wall承包商、共和党人杰拉尔德·海克斯之前的民主党人退选后,将作为第四名候选人出现在选票上。

    我在宾夕法尼亚州阿伦敦出生长大,2013年起在福克斯新闻纽约和华盛顿分社工作。

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6406868442112

    Schiff accuses DOJ of trying to ‘subvert’ elections as GOP alleges same-name candidate meant to confuse voters

    October 26, 2026 2:10pm EDT / Fox News

    Fox News correspondent Matt Finn has the latest on an Alaska midterm race in which both candidates share the same name, the confusion among voters and questions surrounding the unusual matchup on ‘America Reports.’

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., accused President Donald Trump’s Justice Department of trying to subvert elections through its lawsuit over Alaska’s unusual Senate ballot, even as Republicans allege Democrats have propped up a Senate candidate with the same name as the GOP nominee to confuse voters.

    Sen. Dan S. Sullivan, R- Alaska, is running against Daniel J. Sullivan Jr., who has no party affiliation. State courts ultimately allowed the second Dan Sullivan to remain on the ballot. Schiff argued the Justice Department has no business stepping into a matter Alaska’s courts have already settled. Republicans contend Daniel Sullivan entered the race to draw votes away from the incumbent and help former Democratic Rep. Mary Peltola — a claim the now- Senate candidate and her campaign deny.

    “They don’t have standing to bring this kind of a suit. It’s not the federal government’s business to run Alaskan elections. It’s Alaska’s business to do that,” Schiff told NBC News on Sunday.

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    “They have already adjudicated this question, and the Justice Department knows this, but it just shows how complicit they are now in the Trump campaign to try to subvert the elections.”

    ALASKA SENATE RACE’S ABSURD NAME PROBLEM GETS EVEN HARDER TO UNTANGLE

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/adam-schiff-and-todd-blanche.jpg

    Sen. Adam Schiff, left; Attorney General nominee Todd Blanche, right.(Al Drago/Getty Images; Eric Lee/Getty Images)

    Schiff has long been one of Trump’s most prominent adversaries, serving as the lead House impeachment manager during Trump’s first impeachment trial and later sitting on the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. The Burbank Democrat has repeatedly accused Trump of undermining democratic institutions and election integrity, making his attack on the Justice Department the latest volley in a yearslong political and legal feud.

    Schiff drew a comparison to Trump’s efforts to challenge the 2020 presidential election, arguing that senior Justice Department officials at the time, including Attorney General William Barr refused to support efforts to overturn the results — while accusing current DOJ leadership of being willing to go further.

    “This time, with Attorney General Todd Blanche, they are all in on this disgraceful campaign,” Schiff said, predicting the case in the Last Frontier has “no chance of succeeding.”

    The allegations come as candidate Dan J. Sullivan of Petersburg received enough votes in Alaska’s unique primary system to appear beside Sen. Dan S. Sullivan, R-Alaska, on the general election ballot — along with Democratic challenger and former Rep. Mary Peltola.

    COURT KEEPS ‘DECOY DAN’ ON ALASKA BALLOT AS EXPERT WARNS RANKED-CHOICE SYSTEM CREATES VOTER ‘TRAPS’

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    State election officials initially disqualified the Petersburg Sullivan after raising concerns that his candidacy was intended to confuse voters, citing his requested ballot name, recent party registration and similarities between campaign materials.

    An Alaska Superior Court judge overturned the state’s decision to disqualify Petersburg Sullivan, allowing the namesake candidate to remain on the ballot despite election officials’ concerns about voter deception. The Alaska Supreme Court subsequently upheld that ruling, resolving the state ballot-access dispute, though DOJ is now pursuing a separate federal challenge in the event Petersburg Sullivan’s candidacy could alter the election’s outcome.

    TODD BLANCHE CHALLENGES DANA BASH FOR ONLY CITING PART OF CONSTITUTION DURING HEATED ELECTION CLASH

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/dan-sullivan-alaska-senate-fox-news-001.jpeg

    Dan J. Sullivan, who has filed to run for U.S. Senate in Alaska, poses for a photo in Petersburg, Alaska, on June 26, 2026.(Katie Holmlund/Associated Press)

    Blanche’s DOJ filed suit last week after the state proceedings concluded, arguing that the namesake candidacy could mislead voters and seeking to delay certification if votes for Petersburg Sullivan could affect the result.

    The department’s complaint, however, asks the court to prevent certification under a specific scenario: if incumbent Senator Sullivan loses but would have won had votes cast for Petersburg Sullivan gone to him instead. DOJ seeks to delay certification in that circumstance pending an investigation into whether voters intended to support the incumbent.

    Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the lawsuit Sunday, citing federal election law, while Schiff argued that the state had already adjudicated the dispute.

    “The sole purpose of his candidacy is to benefit the Peltola campaign by reducing the number of votes for Senator Sullivan,” DOJ’s filing read in part, while also citing a letter from Alaska Division of Elections Director Carol Beecher alleging Petersburg Sullivan’s declaration of candidacy was not properly filed because it was not intended to declare an actual good-faith candidacy.

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    GOP SENATOR, EX-HOUSE DEM EMERGE FROM ALASKA’S ‘JUNGLE PRIMARY’ DESPITE FAR-LEFT MEDDLING

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/sen-dan-sullivan-capitol-fox-news-001.jpeg

    Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, speaks to reporters at the Capitol in Washington on June 30, 2025.(Mark Schiefelbein/AP)

    The filing also included a side-by-side comparison of Petersburg Sullivan’s dark blue campaign banner featuring a star and Senator Sullivan’s campaign banner featuring the Big Dipper — a reference to the constellation depicted on Alaska’s flag.

    When reached for comment, the DOJ provided Blanche’s defense of the suit, which highlighted that the agency does “not seek to stop any ballot from being cast or to stop the certification of Alaska’s election.”

    “This litigation seeks to ensure that after Alaskans cast their ballots, they are preserved in a manner so that only Alaska’s governing officials have the information necessary to make a determination as to whether Alaskan voters were confused or mislead,” Blanche said.

    “The lawsuit was written by Justice Department attorneys and the Department did not coordinate with any campaign or candidate, but rather relied solely on federal law.”

    The case cited the National Voter Registration Act, which expressly identifies protecting election integrity as one of its purposes.

    When asked about the accusation from Schiff, the White House provided recent comments from Trump saying he “recommended” DOJ file the suit and that Petersburg Sullivan was put “up as a matter of confusion.”

    https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

    SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

    “I think it’s a disgrace,” Trump said.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Peltola placed first in the August primary, followed by Senator Sullivan and Petersburg Sullivan. Palmer drywall contractor Gerald Heikes, a Republican, will appear as the fourth candidate on the ballot after a Democrat who placed ahead of him withdrew.

    Born and raised in Allentown, Pennsylvania, worked in both the New York and Washington bureaus for Fox News since 2013.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6406868442112

湘ICP备2026001899号-2