分类: 未分类

  • 消息人士称:美军护送创纪录油量通过霍尔木兹海峡期间击退伊朗无人机


    2026-09-02T22:50:57.929Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    两名熟悉行动情况的美国官员告诉CNN,美军护送40艘商船、共计1800万桶石油通过霍尔木兹海峡,创下战时新高;周二美伊双方展开新一轮打击之际,这一行动创下纪录。

    在六个多月前战争爆发前,每日约有2000万桶石油通过该海峡。

    官员们表示,美军动用了一系列空中、海上和太空资产,不仅持续打击伊朗在海峡袭击商船的能力,还在为运载数百万桶石油的船只执行高风险护航任务期间,击退了多波无人机袭击。

    第一名官员补充说,美军在护航行动中还摧毁了反舰巡航导弹。

    据官员们透露,目前美国的战争战略重点是优先打击海峡周边目标、为途经这条关键航道的商船提供护航,并维持对伊朗港口的海上封锁,这是特朗普政府“全面施压”战略的一部分,旨在加大对伊朗领导层的经济压力。

    尽管周二的行动取得成功,但官员们并不幻想冲突能很快找到快速解决方案,而且尽管有军事护航,能源企业仍对派遣船只通过海峡面临的巨大风险保持警惕。能源价格居高不下,也给全球债券市场带来动荡。

    第一名官员表示,唐纳德·特朗普总统的其他既定优先事项,包括打击伊朗核计划相关目标的行动,目前实际上已被“搁置”。他重申,美国中央司令部已接到指示,将所有精力集中在海峡地区,阻止石油进出伊朗港口。

    特朗普近期则暗示,他乐见伊朗的高浓缩铀库存被封存,并通过卫星图像进行监控——尽管这些库存并未在去年美国对三处关键核设施的打击中被完全摧毁。此前特朗普曾坚称,获取这些材料是当前冲突的首要任务。

    两名官员告诉CNN,周二美军开展了符合当前战略的多维度行动,打击了海峡周边近60个军事目标,包括防空阵地、雷达系统、海上资产、布雷能力和通信设施,同时完成了护航任务。

    第二名官员表示,美军预计将继续在海峡附近开展进攻性打击,部分原因是伊朗已展现出恢复作战能力的潜力,需要持续持续施加压力。这类打击相当于“割草”或“打鼹鼠”游戏,目的是削弱伊朗威胁商船的能力。

    但这些打击也是更广泛军事战略的关键组成部分,该战略旨在逐步削弱伊朗利用海峡的能力。

    第二名美国官员称,自7月以来,美国的封锁已阻止伊朗出口任何石油。

    特朗普周三表示,美国最近一轮的打击行动不仅针对伊朗的雷达系统,还旨在消除伊朗追踪霍尔木兹海峡过往船只的能力。

    “他们曾试图监视船只,”他在椭圆形办公室说道,“他们现在无法监视了,因为他们没有雷达了——我们炸毁了他们的雷达,昨晚我们还炸毁了更多目标。”

    特朗普并未具体说明此次袭击还打击了哪些其他目标,但他再次坚称,美国掌控着霍尔木兹海峡,并已证明其既能打击沿海的伊朗资产,又能保护船只抵御任何来袭攻击。

    尽管如此,多管齐下的军事行动最终是否会迫使伊朗屈服仍未可知——即便伊朗真的屈服,这一过程可能也需要很长时间。

    美国财政部长斯科特·贝森特本周早些时候提及,在美伊紧张局势近期升级之际,通过海峡的石油流量有所上升。他在接受CNBC采访时表示,周一的石油出口达到战时纪录,每日超过1700万桶。“这并非伊朗对海峡的控制,”贝森特说道。

    美国官员告诉CNN,他们认为海峡对伊朗而言是一项贬值资产,近期的进展就是这一评估的证据。但与此同时,伊朗仍可能将其对商业航运的可信威胁作为影响海峡通航的筹码,而航运商普遍仍对美国能否建立可持续的安保系统持怀疑态度。

    特朗普政府官员多次坚称,由于船只日益普遍地关闭应答器以避免被发现,通过海峡的石油实际运输量比公开数据要多。第一名熟悉此次行动的官员表示,周二通过霍尔木兹海峡的40艘商船中,绝大多数甚至全部都关闭了应答器,以避免被侦测。

    今年8月,美国能源部长克里斯·赖特曾声称,中东的石油出口曾一度回升至战前水平。

    然而,尽管数周来为掌控海峡付出了大量努力,美国政府仍面临行业官员和分析师的强烈质疑,他们表示美国尚未证明能够可靠兑现其“完全控制”这条航运航线的说法。

    “可以说,本届政府的可信度已经荡然无存,”一位熟悉行业动态的人士说道,他补充称,即便每日航运量的峰值是真实的,“我认识的人里没人认为平均水平能达到这个数。”

    与此同时,两名熟悉相关动态的人士表示,选择通过海峡的商业航运公司大多是在逐案做出决定。通过海峡租用油轮的价格也飙升,有估计称每日成本超过50万美元,这为愿意承担航行风险的租船公司提供了额外的经济激励。

    但整个行业仍在寻求更多保障。战争初期飙升的船舶保险费用依然高企,这增加了海事公司的决策难度。即便袭击并未得手,有关伊朗袭击途经海峡船只的持续报道仍起到了威慑作用。

    石油只是通过这条航道运输的能源相关货物的一种。第一名熟悉伊朗周边美国军事行动的官员表示,运载其他能源产品(主要是液化天然气)的油轮似乎更加谨慎,因为如果载有此类货物的船只被伊朗无人机、水雷或导弹击中,可能会引发灾难性后果。

    一些美国官员承认,美军可能需要时间和持续努力,不仅要继续完成海峡周边伊朗军事资产的未竟打击清单——在近期的停火期间,这些能力至少已部分恢复——还要说服航运业相信航行是安全的。

    后者需要开展像周二那样的持续护航行动,由美军护送商船通过已清除水雷的航道。美军希望到下个月,将海峡的航道拓宽,让船只能够更自由地 maneuver——目标是稳步增加通过该水道的石油运输量。

    CNN已确认了周二通过海峡的 inbound 和 outbound 商业船只的具体信息——这些船只悬挂着从沙特阿拉伯到法国等多个外国的国旗。

    在冲突早期,美军曾试图启动一项类似的护航行动——代号为“自由计划”,但在宣布该计划令包括沙特阿拉伯在内的关键海湾盟友措手不及后迅速叫停,这些盟友威胁要阻止美国使用基地和领空开展针对伊朗的行动。

    数月后,战争似乎进入了新阶段,随着胡塞武装如今对沙特阿拉伯发动袭击,地区伙伴对海峡护航行动的支持度有所提升,一名熟悉此次行动的官员说道。

    US military fended off Iranian drones as it escorted a record amount of oil through Strait of Hormuz, sources say

    2026-09-02T22:50:57.929Z / CNN

    The US military escorted 40 commercial vessels carrying 18 million barrels of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, marking a wartime high as Iran and the US exchanged a new round strikes on Tuesday, two US officials familiar with the operations told CNN.

    Prior to the launch of the war just over six months ago, roughly 20 million barrels a day were passing through the strait.

    The US used a range of air, sea and space assets to not only continue hitting Iran’s capability to attack commercial vessels in the strait but simultaneously fended off waves of drone attacks as it conducted the risky escort operations for the ships carrying millions of barrels of oil, the officials said.

    US forces also neutralized anti-ship cruise missiles during the escort operation, the first official added.

    It comes as the US has focused its strategy in the war to prioritize striking targets around the strait, conducting escort operations for commercial vessels through the key waterway and maintaining its naval blockade on Iranian ports as part of a “full court press” by the Trump administration to ramp up economic pressure on the regime’s leadership, according to the officials.

    Even though Tuesday’s operation was a success, officials are under no illusion that a swift solution to the conflict is close, and energy companies are still wary about the huge risks involved in sending their ships through the strait, even with military escorts. And energy prices remain high, causing turbulence in the global bond market.

    President Donald Trump’s other stated priorities, including operations focused on eliminating elements of Iran’s nuclear program, have been effectively “backburnered,” for the time being, according to the first official, who reiterated that US Central Command has been directed to focus all of its efforts toward the strait and preventing oil exports from leaving or entering Iranian ports.

    Trump himself has recently suggested he is content to leave Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium, which was not completely destroyed in last year’s US strikes on three key nuclear facilities, buried and to monitor it from satellite imagery — despite previously insisting that securing the material was a top priority in the current conflict.

    On Tuesday, the US conducted the multi-faceted operation in line with the current strategy, hitting nearly 60 military targets around the strait — including air defense sites, radar systems, maritime assets, mine-laying capabilities, and communications sites — while simultaneously escorting the ships, both officials told CNN.

    The US military expects to continue conducting offensive strikes near the strait, in part, because Iran has demonstrated it has the capacity to reconstitute its capabilities in a way that requires persistent maintenance, the second official said. Conducting those strikes amounts to “mowing the grass” or a game of “whack-a-mole,” in service of degrading Iran’s ability to threaten commercial ships.

    But they are also a critical part of the broader military strategy for systematically chipping away at Iran’s ability to leverage the strait.

    The US blockade, meanwhile, has prevented Iran from exporting any oil since July, the second US official said.

    Trump said Wednesday that the most recent round of US strikes went beyond targeting Iran’s radar systems, in an effort to eliminate the nation’s ability to track ships through the Strait of Hormuz.

    “They were trying to see the ships,” he said from the Oval Office. “They can’t see it because they have no radar, because we blew it up, and we blew up much more than their radar last night.”

    Trump did not specify what else was targeted in its attack. But he insisted again that the US maintains control over the strait and has demonstrated that it can both strike Iranian assets along the shoreline while defending ships against any incoming attacks.

    Still, it remains to be seen whether the multi-pronged military operations will ultimately force Iran to capitulate — and even if it does — how long it might take for that to happen.

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent alluded to an uptick in oil flowing through the strait earlier this week, amid a recent flare-up of tensions between the US and Iran, telling CNBC that those exports hit a wartime record on Monday of more than 17 million barrels per day. “That is not Iranian control of the strait,” Bessent said.

    US officials have told CNN they believe the strait is a depreciating asset for Iran, pointing to the recent progress as evidence of that assessment. But Iran, meanwhile, still likely sees its ability to negatively influence the flow of traffic through credible threats to commercial shipping as a leverage point, and shippers broadly remain skeptical that the US can implement a sustainable system.

    Trump officials have repeatedly insisted that more oil is transiting the strait than is publicly known due to ships’ increasingly routine practice of turning off their transponders to remain undetected as they move through the waterway. Most if not all of the 40 commercial vessels that moved through the Strait of Hormuz on Tuesday turned off their transponders in an effort to avoid detection, according to the first official familiar with the operation.

    In August, Energy Secretary Chris Wright claimed that oil exports from the Middle East had risen to pre-war levels for a period.

    Yet despite weeks of concerted efforts to take over the strait, the administration continues to face heavy skepticism from industry officials and analysts who say the US hasn’t yet demonstrated it can reliably back up its claims of “total control” of the shipping route.

    “Safe to say the administration has not covered itself with credibility,” said one person familiar with the industry dynamics, adding that even if the daily spikes in shipping volume are legitimate, “I don’t know anyone who thinks the average is that much.”

    In the meantime, commercial shippers that do opt to transit the strait are largely making those decisions on a case-by-case basis, two people familiar with the dynamics said. The price of chartering an oil tanker through the strait has also skyrocketed, with some estimates putting the cost at more than $500,000 per day, offering an added financial incentive for charter companies willing to risk the voyage.

    But the industry writ large is still looking for more reassurance. The cost of insuring ships, which soared at the beginning of the war, is still high, adding to the difficult calculations being made by maritime companies. And even if not successful, the continued reports of Iranian attacks on ships going through the strait remains a deterrent.

    Oil also represents just one form of energy-related cargo that moves through the waterway. Tankers carrying other energy sources, namely liquefied natural gas, appear to be demonstrating even more caution due to the potentially catastrophic consequences should vessels carrying that type of cargo be hit by an Iranian drone, mine or missile, according to the first official familiar with ongoing US military operations around Iran.

    Some US officials acknowledge that it will likely take time and persistence for the US military to not only continue working through its unfinished target list of Iranian military assets near the strait — capabilities that have been at least partially reconstituted during the recent pause in fighting — but also to convince the shipping industry that it is safe to travel.

    The latter involves conducting consistent escort operations like what took place on Tuesday where US forces shepherd commercial vessels through a passage that has been cleared of mines. By next month, the US military hopes to widen that lane through the strait to allow vessels to maneuver more freely — with the goal of steadily increasing the amount of oil flowing through the waterway.

    CNN has identified the specific inbound and outbound commercial vessels that made the trip through the strait on Tuesday — ships flagged from various foreign countries ranging from Saudi Arabia to France.

    Earlier during the conflict, the US military attempted to launch a similar escort operation — dubbed Project Freedom — which was quickly shut down after the announcement caught key Gulf allies, namely Saudi Arabia, off-guard, prompting threats to block American access to basing and overflight for operations against Iran.

    Months later, the war has appeared to enter a new phase, and with the Houthi rebels now launching attacks against Saudi Arabia, there is more support from regional partners for escort operations through the strait, the first official familiar with the operation said.

  • 美国司法部追查针对X平台用户的攻击黑客


    2026-09-02 21:22:11 UTC / 路透社

    image
    2025年9月11日摄,青少年手持智能手机在X标志前合影,资料图。路透社/达多·鲁维奇/插图/版权所有,可购买授权

    9月2日(路透社)——美国司法部长托德·布兰奇周三表示,美国司法部正与埃隆·马斯克旗下的X平台合作,追查本周针对该社交媒体平台数十万用户发起的密码恢复攻击的幕后人员。

    密码恢复攻击通常指通过“忘记密码”或账户恢复流程尝试获取在线账户访问权限的行为。

    路透社每日简报新闻邮件为您提供开启一天所需的全部资讯。点击此处订阅。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    布兰奇在X平台的一份声明中表示,“ sophisticated cyber criminals”(此处按原文保留专业表述,译为“老练的网络犯罪分子”)发起了此次攻击,但该平台已阻止了攻击行为。他未提供此次网络攻击的更多细节。

    X平台未立即回应置评请求。

    全球各地的企业都在应对人工智能驱动的网络攻击和勒索软件浪潮,这类攻击会窃取敏感数据并扰乱运营。

    白宫于7月宣布,将成立一个由人工智能开发商和关键基础设施运营商组成的协调小组,共享有关人工智能系统发现的网络安全漏洞的信息。

    路透社伊斯梅尔·沙基尔报道;米歇尔·尼科尔斯编辑

    本报守则:路透社信托原则。

    US Justice Department pursuing hackers behind attack on X users

    2026-09-02 21:22:11 UTC / Reuters

    Teenagers pose for a photo while holding smartphones in front of a X logo in this illustration taken September 11, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights

    Sept 2 (Reuters) – The U.S. Justice Department is working with Elon Musk’s X to track down those behind an attempted password-recovery attack targeting hundreds of thousands of users of the social media platform this week, U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche said on Wednesday.

    A password-recovery attack generally refers to attempts at gaining access to online accounts through the “forgot password” or account-recovery process.

    The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Blanche, in a statement on X, said “sophisticated cyber criminals” attempted the attack but it was disrupted by the platform. He did not provide more details about the cyberattack.

    X did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Companies worldwide are grappling with a surge in AI-driven cyberattacks and ransomware that steal sensitive data and disrupt operations.

    The White House in July said it was launching a coordination group for AI developers and critical infrastructure operators to share information on cybersecurity vulnerabilities identified by AI systems.

    Reporting by Ismail Shakil; editing by Michelle Nichols

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 新闻


    你提供的内容是中文新闻,并非英文新闻。如果你需要将这段中文新闻翻译成英文,或者有其他英文新闻需要翻译,请提供相应的英文原文,我会按照要求为你完成翻译。

    中国发文规范汽车行业境外竞争 比亚迪:积极响应合规指引

    2026年9月3日 07:46 / 联合早报

    中国制定汽车行业境外竞争行为与合规建设指引后,中国电动车巨头比亚迪说,积极响应合规指引,承诺规范海外价格管理体系、严守公平竞争底线。

    中国商务部官网星期二(9月1日)发布由商务部、工业和信息化部、市场监管总局制定的《汽车行业境外竞争行为与合规建设指引》。

    上述三个部门介绍,制定这份指引的目的是要推动汽车行业健康有序国际化发展,引导汽车行业企业规范境外竞争行为、加强合规建设,深化汽车产业链供应链国际合作,促进全球汽车行业发展进步。

    根据这份指引,企业可建立以成本为基础、国际市场供求为导向的定价策略,依法依规做好本企业零部件、整车等产品价格合规管理,不为获得不正当竞争优势扰乱市场竞争秩序。

    指引强调,企业在境外开展品牌展示和宣传活动时,应按东道国(地区)相关规定真实完整披露相关信息,不作虚假宣传,不欺骗或误导消费者,维护中国汽车品牌形象。

    指引也提出,企业应加强境外反垄断合规建设;企业应加强产品出海评估,避免不符合目标市场和使用环境需求的产品出海;企业应遵守东道国(地区)相关劳动法规;企业应加强对东道国(地区)政治形势、宏观经济、社会安全、汽车产业等各方面风险研判。

    路透社报道,上述指引是在以比亚迪为首的中国汽车制造商迅速进行全球扩张后制定的。中国国内竞争加剧,迫使制造商在海外寻找增长机会。

    另据《经济参考报》报道,根据中国海关统计,2025年中国汽车出口832万辆,销往200多个国家地区。中国企业已在80多个国家地区投资汽车制造业。

    比亚迪星期三(8月2日)在社交平台称,积极响应合规指引,助力中国汽车产业出海高质量发展。

    比亚迪称,公司坚持长期主义,将以《汽车指引》为行动遵循,“持续完善海外全链条合规管理体系:规范海外价格管理体系、严守公平竞争底线、保障消费者合法权益;同时落实各项法规要求,夯实本地化服务,履行企业社会责任”。

  • 特朗普将在共和党中期代表大会两晚均发表演讲,此前大会面临 turnout 担忧


    2026-09-02T23:17:55.604Z / 路透社

    记者:史蒂夫·霍兰、南迪塔·博斯、内森·莱恩
    2026年9月2日 世界协调时23:17 更新于14分钟前

    2026年8月5日,美国得克萨斯州达拉斯,媒体预展期间,美国航空中心场馆内的电子屏幕展示即将举行的共和党中期代表大会标识。路透社/布莱恩·斯奈德

    • 内容摘要
    • 特朗普原本仅计划在这场不同寻常的中期代表大会上发表闭幕演讲
    • 一名共和党官员透露,他还将在首日晚间发表演讲
    • 大会将与 NFL 新赛季揭幕战争夺观众注意力

    华盛顿9月2日(路透电)——一名共和党官员周三表示,唐纳德·特朗普总统下周将在共和党非常规的中期代表大会两晚的活动中均发表演讲,这一扩展后的演讲安排将与NFL新赛季揭幕战争夺观众目光。

    该不愿透露姓名的官员称,特朗普原本定于9月9日至10日在达拉斯举行的代表大会的周四晚间发表闭幕致辞,如今他将在周三晚间发表基调演讲,并同样于周四晚间在副总统JD·万斯之后发表讲话。

    路透社每日简报新闻邮件为您提供开启一天所需的全部新闻。点击此处订阅

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    “特朗普总统希望为整个代表大会定下基调,”该共和党官员解释特朗普将在首日晚间发表演讲的原因。

    此次调整之际,一些共和党内部人士告诉路透社,他们担忧共和党全国委员会可能难以吸引党员和活动人士参会。

    当前特朗普正面临支持率疲软的困境,原因是选民对伊朗战争持续不满以及居高不下的通胀,这也增加了共和党候选人在11月选举中保住本党微弱国会多数席位的难度。

    本次代表大会于劳动节后周一开幕,而竞选活动通常在此时启动通往选举日的最后冲刺阶段。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    另一位要求匿名的共和党高级官员表示,他听闻共和党难以吸引参会者,白宫以及特朗普的政治团队已加大力度鼓励共和党人参会。

    主办方此前有信心此次代表大会的举办地美国航空中心场馆将座无虚席。

    但一位了解此次活动的共和党幕僚称,由于组织者未能找到足够多的共和党官员和捐赠者参会,大会将允许比最初计划更多的普通支持者入场。

    在经历了数月与伊朗战争和生活成本上涨相关的负面新闻后,共和党官员将此次集会视为在11月3日选举前动员选民支持特朗普议程的最佳契机。

    不过一些共和党人仍对大会能否切实改变选民意向持怀疑态度。

    代表大会首日晚间将与新英格兰爱国者队和西雅图海鹰队的超级碗 rematch 撞期,该赛事将在NBC及其流媒体服务平台Peacock播出。

    周四晚间,特朗普和万斯将与备受期待的NFL对决争夺观众——旧金山49人队与洛杉矶公羊队在澳大利亚墨尔本的对决,将独家在Netflix平台流媒体播出。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    史蒂夫·霍兰、南迪塔·博斯、内森·莱恩报道,罗斯·科尔文、杰米·弗里德编辑

    我们的准则:汤姆森路透社信任原则

    Trump to speak on both nights of Republican midterm convention amid turnout concerns

    2026-09-02T23:17:55.604Z / Reuters

    By Steve Holland, Nandita Bose and Nathan Layne

    September 2, 2026 11:17 PM UTC Updated 14 mins ago

    The video board inside the American Airlines Center displays the logo for the upcoming Republican Midterm Convention during a media walkthrough in Dallas, Texas, U.S., August 5, 2026. REUTERS/Brian Snyder

    • Summary
    • Trump had originally planned to only deliver closing address at the unusual midterm convention
    • He will also speak on the first night, party official says
    • Convention will compete for viewers with start of NFL season

    WASHINGTON, Sept 2 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump will now speak on both nights of ‌the Republican Party’s unusual midterm convention next week, a party official said on Wednesday, an expanded role that will compete for viewers with the start of the NFL season.

    Trump had originally been scheduled to deliver an address on Thursday to close out the ​September 9-10 convention in Dallas, but now will deliver the keynote speech on Wednesday and speak ​after Vice President JD Vance on Thursday evening as well, the party official said on ⁠condition of anonymity.

    The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    “President Trump wants to set the tone for the entire convention,” the party official said, ​explaining why Trump was now going to speak on the first night.

    The change comes as some party insiders have ​told Reuters they are concerned the Republican National Committee may struggle to attract members and activists to the event.

    Trump is grappling with weak approval ratings amid voter dissatisfaction over the Iran war and persistent inflation, raising the stakes for Republican candidates fighting to ​preserve their party’s narrow congressional majorities in November.

    The convention begins just after Labor Day on Monday, when campaigns ​typically start their final sprint toward Election Day.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Another senior Republican Party official, who asked to remain unidentified, said he has ‌heard the ⁠party is struggling to attract attendees to the convention and that the White House and Trump’s political team have stepped up efforts to encourage Republicans to attend.

    Organizers have expressed confidence that the American Airlines Center arena, where the convention is being held, will be filled.

    One Republican operative familiar with the event, however, said he had ​heard the convention will allow ​more everyday supporters than ⁠initially planned because organizers have not been able to find enough Republican officials and donors to attend.

    After months of negative headlines tied to the Iran war and ​rising living costs, party officials see the gathering as their best opportunity to rally ​voters behind ⁠Trump’s agenda ahead of the November 3 election.

    Some Republicans, however, remain skeptical it can meaningfully shift voter sentiment.

    The convention’s opening night will coincide with a Super Bowl rematch between the New England Patriots and Seattle Seahawks, airing on NBC ⁠and ​its streaming service, Peacock.

    On Thursday night, Trump and Vance will compete ​for viewers with a highly anticipated NFL rivalry matchup between the San Francisco 49ers and Los Angeles Rams in Melbourne, Australia, which will ​stream exclusively on Netflix.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Reporting by Steve Holland, Nandita Bose and Nathan Layne, Editing by Ross Colvin and Jamie Freed

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 民主党挫败共和党将最高法院大法官人数固定为9人的提案


    2026-09-02 20:40:21 UTC / 路透社

    作者:内特·雷蒙德 理查德·考恩
    2026年9月2日 晚上8:40 UTC 更新于1小时前

    2026年9月1日摄于美国华盛顿的美国最高法院。路透社/亚伦·施瓦茨 摄

    • 内容摘要
    • 共和党称宪法应将大法官人数固定为9人
    • 共和党任命的大法官在最高法院占据6比3的多数席位
    • 自1869年以来最高法院一直有9名大法官;此前大法官人数曾有变动

    华盛顿9月2日路透电 — 美国众议院民主党人周三挫败了一项宪法修正案提案,该提案旨在将最高法院大法官人数永久固定为9人。共和党提出这项提案,意在将最高法院保守派多数席位问题作为11月3日选举前的竞选议题。

    众议院共和党人发起此次投票,旨在凸显民主党人可能会扩大最高法院规模、削弱保守派多数席位——此前民主党因最高法院在堕胎、投票权等议题上的裁决感到愤怒,他们希望如果能在11月的中期选举中重新掌控国会,就能采取上述行动。

    即刻订阅《每日案卷》新闻简报,将最新法律资讯直接发送至您的收件箱,开启您的清晨阅读。点击此处注册。
    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    该修正案以212票反对、206票赞成未获通过,远未达到众议院通过所需的三分之二多数票门槛。

    目前共和党在众议院拥有218个席位,民主党为214个席位。即便该提案在众议院获得通过,它在参议院也面临极大阻力,之后还需要获得50个州中的38个州批准才能生效。

    历史上,无论共和党还是民主党在众议院占据多数席位时,都会发起一些明知无法通过的投票,这类提案被称为“宣传法案”,可用于在竞选活动中争取选民支持,并迫使政治对手在棘手议题上表明立场。
    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    共和党议长迈克·约翰逊在11月3日选举仅剩少数立法会议程日之际安排此次投票,凸显出共和党人的担忧:特朗普的低支持率可能会让该党失去众议院或参议院的多数席位。

    “捍卫最高法院的公正性不应成为一场有争议的投票,”约翰逊在事后发表的一份声明中谈及民主党人时说道。

    支持周三这项修正案的众议院共和党人辩称,有必要终结民主党人试图改变最高法院规模的提案——此前共和党总统唐纳德·特朗普任命了三名大法官,使最高法院形成了6比3的保守派多数席位。

    “意料之中,美国同胞们,这又是MAGA阵营的党派权力攫取,我们的同僚们因11月的选举结果感到恐慌,因为他们的政策只给我们带来了战争、通胀、腐败、无法无天和40万亿美元的债务,”马里兰州民主党众议员杰米·拉斯金在反对该提案的演讲中说道。

    大法官人数一直是个悬而未决的问题

    美国宪法并未规定最高法院应配备多少名大法官,美国历史上最高法院的规模曾有过多次变动,国会曾将大法官人数缩减至最少5人,也曾最多扩充至10人。自1869年以来,最高法院一直保持9名大法官的编制。

    1937年,民主党总统富兰克林·D·罗斯福曾试图新增最多6名大法官,该提案最终失败,当时该举措被广泛批评为“填塞法院”的行为,因为最高法院此前裁定其部分新政议程违宪。议员们最终断然否决了他的提案。

    “这或许就是试图打造帝王式行政权的开端,”亚利桑那州共和党众议员安迪·比格斯在众议院辩论期间说道,“这并非为了建设更好的法庭……而是为了出于意识形态目的改变最高法院的组成。”
    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    自2021年以来,最高法院已推翻了全国范围内的堕胎权、扩大了枪支权利、限制了联邦机构的权力,并允许共和党总统推行其第二任期的大部分议程。

    此后民主党人提出了一项法案,提议将最高法院大法官人数扩充至13人——他们称,在特朗普执政时期,国会必须保留这一选项。

    内特·雷蒙德于波士顿、理查德·考恩于华盛顿报道;迈克尔·利尔蒙特和霍华德·戈勒编辑

    我们的准则:汤森路透信托原则。

    Democrats sink Republican bid to cap Supreme Court at nine justices

    2026-09-02 20:40:21 UTC / Reuters

    By Nate Raymond and Richard Cowan

    September 2, 2026 8:40 PM UTC Updated 1 hour ago

    The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 1, 2026. REUTERS/Aaron Schwartz

    • Summary
    • Republicans say Constitution should cap justices at nine
    • Republican-appointed justices hold 6-3 majority on court
    • Supreme Court has had nine since 1869; size had fluctuated

    WASHINGTON, Sept 2 (Reuters) – Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives defeated ​a constitutional amendment on Wednesday to permanently cap the Supreme Court at nine justices, voting against a Republican proposal designed ‌to make the court’s conservative majority a campaign issue ahead of November 3 elections.

    House Republicans staged the vote to highlight the potential for Democrats, angered by rulings on issues such as abortion and voting rights, to expand the court and weaken its conservative majority if they regain control of Congress in November’s midterms.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    The measure failed 212-206, far short ​of the necessary two-thirds majority to pass in the House.

    Republicans control 218 seats in the House, compared with 214 held by ​Democrats. Even had the measure passed, it faced long odds in the U.S. Senate and would have needed ⁠to then be ratified by 38 of the 50 U.S. states.

    Republicans and Democrats, when holding majority control of the House, have historically staged ​votes on bills they know will fail but are known as “messaging bills” that can be used to shore up support with voters during election ​campaigns and force political opponents into taking stands on thorny issues.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Republican Speaker Mike Johnson’s decision to schedule the vote with few legislative days left before the November 3 elections underscored Republican concerns that Trump’s low approval ratings could cost the party its House or Senate majority.

    “Defending the integrity of the Supreme Court shouldn’t be a ​controversial vote,” Johnson said in a statement afterwards, referring to Democrats.

    House Republicans supporting Wednesday’s proposed amendment argued it was necessary to put an end to ​Democratic proposals to alter the court’s size after President Donald Trump, a Republican, appointed three justices to give the court a conservative 6-3 majority.

    “Surprise, surprise America. ‌It’s another ⁠partisan power grab by MAGA, our colleagues who fear for the results in the November election as their policies have brought us nothing but war, inflation, corruption, lawlessness and a $40 trillion debt,” Democratic Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland said in a speech opposing the measure.

    THE NUMBER OF JUSTICES IS AN OPEN QUESTION

    The U.S. Constitution does not establish how many justices should sit on the Supreme Court, and the size has fluctuated over ​the course of U.S. history, with ​Congress reducing it to as few ⁠as five justices and expanding it to as many as 10 over the years. The Supreme Court has had nine justices since 1869.

    A failed push by Democratic President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1937 to add up ​to six justices was widely criticized as an effort to “pack” the court after the justices struck down ​parts of his ⁠New Deal agenda. Lawmakers rejected his bid decisively.

    “That was the birth perhaps of the attempt to have an imperial executive,” Republican Representative Andy Biggs of Arizona argued during House debate. “It wasn’t about building a better courthouse … it was about changing the composition of the court for ideological purposes.”

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    The court since 2021 ⁠has overturned ​the nationwide right to abortion, expanded gun rights, curtailed the power of federal agencies ​and allowed the Republican president to execute much of his second-term agenda.

    Democrats have since put forward legislation that would expand the number of justices on the court to 13 — an option ​they say Congress must maintain under Trump.

    Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston and Richard Cowan in Washington; Editing by Michael Learmonth and Howard Goller

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 奥巴马任命的法官因阻止特朗普邮寄选票规则遭抨击:“拖延时间”


    2026年9月2日 美国东部时间下午4:35 / 福克斯新闻

    因达·塔尔瓦尼法官将于周四就可能延长禁令的初步禁令举行听证会
    作者:伊莱恩·马伦

    选举专家称法官正试图“拖延时间”阻挠特朗普的邮寄选票规则
    杰森·斯尼德指责民主党领导的州抵制新的美国邮政署(USPS)邮寄选票标准,而律师格雷戈里·托伊菲尔则认为联邦法院越权阻止了这些规则的实施。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/da13b3d3-7a34-479c-8acd-1e842a70bb72

    收听本文
    5分钟

    奥巴马任命的联邦法官因在2026年中期选举前再次阻止美国邮政署新的邮寄选票要求,被贴上“激进主义者”的标签。
    美国地区法官因达·塔尔瓦尼上周发布了14天临时限制令,阻止了一项新的美国邮政署关于邮寄外出选票政策的关键条款。该规则是针对唐纳德·特朗普总统的一项行政令制定的,要求选举官员提交选票信封设计以供审批,并将选民信息和唯一追踪条形码上传至美国邮政署的新门户网站。

    诚实选举项目执行董事杰森·斯尼德指责塔尔瓦尼试图“拖延时间”,他认为持续的诉讼可能会导致该规则在各州开始邮寄中期选举选票前无法生效。
    “由于本案中左派的闹剧,我们很可能无法在2026年中期选举前实施这项规则,”斯尼德告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。“选票几天内就要寄出了,我认为在某种程度上,他们拖延时间的策略可能已经得逞了。”

    邮寄选票打击行动继续推进,特朗普法院胜诉为联邦行动打开大门

    2014年拍摄的美国地区法官因达·塔尔瓦尼。(亚历克斯·王/盖蒂图片社)
    北卡罗来纳州各郡选举委员会定于周五开始邮寄缺席选票。斯尼德和OGC法律有限责任公司创始人格雷戈里·托伊菲尔都指出,该州的选举官员已经在着手遵守美国邮政署的相关要求。

    塔尔瓦尼认为,各州没有足够的时间和资金在中期选举前重新设计选票信封、获得美国邮政署批准、修改选举管理系统、培训官员使用新门户网站并上传选民信息。她得出结论,对于即将到来的选举来说,遵守规则“几乎不可能”,并警告称合格选民可能会被剥夺选举权。

    斯尼德反驳了这一结论,称该规则将美国邮政署长期以来的建议转变为强制性要求。
    “这是一项相当 straightforward 的规则,”斯尼德说。“它很大程度上基于已经实施的最佳实践,并收集各州已经掌握的数据。就合规而言,负担极小,美国邮政署只是想更好地规范邮件——而非试图掌控选举,或是从各州手中夺走谁有资格投票这类基本的宪法问题。”

    塔尔瓦尼6月25日发布的永久禁令阻止了美国邮政署为2026年选举完成部分规则制定流程。

    联邦上诉法院驳回特朗普在中期选举前强制执行邮寄选票命令的请求

    2026年3月31日,美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在华盛顿特区白宫椭圆形办公室展示已签署的行政令。特朗普当日签署了一项旨在加大选民邮寄选票难度的行政令,升级了他针对这项数百万美国人使用的投票方式的长期运动。(亚伦·施瓦茨/CNP/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)
    这场争议上诉至最高法院,最高法院于8月24日暂停了塔尔瓦尼此前的判决,理由是特朗普政府很可能会胜诉,即最初的诉讼时机不成熟,因为美国邮政署尚未发布最终规则。
    大法官们并未就行政令或随后的美国邮政署规则是否合法作出裁决。在美国邮政署敲定该政策后,由民主党领导的州修改了诉讼,直接挑战该规则。塔尔瓦尼随后发布了最新的临时限制令。

    “具有讽刺意味的是,正是法官制造了这个问题,因为她最初的禁令阻止了美国邮政署更早——几个月前——制定规则,而如果最高法院允许该规则推进,这原本可以让各州有更多时间准备遵守规则,”托伊菲尔说。
    “当法官指出开支和实际困难时,这些开支和困难部分是由法院自身造成的——而非规则本身,也不是试图实施规则造成的,”他补充道。

    塔尔瓦尼在最新的裁决中反驳了这一说法,写道“并未出现此类拖延”,因为尽管此前存在禁令,美国邮政署仍继续发布了拟议规则、征求意见并发布了最终政策。

    美国邮政署卷入邮寄选票之争,特朗普命令陷入法律纠纷

    2026年3月31日,唐纳德·特朗普总统在华盛顿特区白宫椭圆形办公室签署关于邮寄选票的行政令。(路透社/埃文·武奇)
    尽管提出批评,但托伊菲尔并未直接指责塔尔瓦尼出于党派动机行事。
    “根据我目前掌握的信息,我很难指控法院存在党派偏见,”托伊菲尔说。“当然,法院在针对行政令发布最初禁令时越权了,这看起来不太好。”

    塔尔瓦尼将于周四就挑战者提出的初步禁令请求举行听证会,该禁令可能会在诉讼持续期间更长时间地阻止美国邮政署的规则实施。与此同时,现有14天的临时限制令仍然有效,而特朗普政府对塔尔瓦尼先前判决的上诉正在第一巡回法院审理。

    订阅获取政治新闻通讯

    斯尼德认为,这场法律纠纷的核心在于美国邮政署是在规范选举,还是仅仅为其所承运的邮件设定条件。
    “政府的反驳是,这只是一项与其他规则无异的邮政规则,美国邮政署拥有广泛的权力规范使用其服务的邮件,”斯尼德说。“这本质上与要求邮件使用信封或已付邮资之类的规则是同一类。”

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    即使该政策在中期选举期间无法生效,斯尼德表示,各州应该有充足的时间在下次总统选举前遵守该规则。
    “这是一项非常普通的规则,合规非常简单,尤其是按照我们为2028年选举做准备的时间线来看,”斯尼德说。“这不是能否遵守规则的问题,而是在抵制为邮寄投票带来更大透明度和安全性的努力。”

    伊莱恩·马伦是福克斯新闻数字频道和福克斯商业频道的撰稿人,报道全国政治。

    Obama-appointed judge ripped for blocking Trump mail-ballot rule: ‘Run out the clock’

    September 2, 2026 4:35pm EDT / Fox News

    Judge Indira Talwani will hear arguments Thursday on a preliminary injunction that could extend the block

    By Elaine Mallon

    Election expert says judge is trying to ‘run out the clock’ on Trump mail-ballot rule

    Jason Snead accused Democratic-led states of resisting new USPS mail-ballot standards, while attorney Gregory Teufel argued the federal court overstepped its authority in blocking their implementation.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/da13b3d3-7a34-479c-8acd-1e842a70bb72

    Listen to this article
    5 min

    An Obama-appointed federal judge is being branded an “activist” after she again blocked new U.S. Postal Service (USPS) mail-ballot requirements ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

    U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani issued a 14-day temporary restraining order last week blocking key portions of a new USPS policy governing the mailing of outbound ballots. The rule, developed in response to an executive order from President Donald Trump, would require election officials to submit ballot-envelope designs for approval and upload voter information and unique tracking barcodes to a new USPS portal.

    Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Election Project, accused Talwani of trying to “run out the clock,” arguing that the continued litigation could prevent the rule from taking effect before states begin mailing ballots for the midterms.

    “Because of the antics of the left in this case, it’s very possible that we will not be able to get this rule put in place for the 2026 midterms,” Snead told Fox News Digital. “Ballots do go out in just a couple of days, and I think, to a certain extent, their campaign to run out the clock may have succeeded.”

    MAIL-VOTING CRACKDOWN MOVES AHEAD AS TRUMP COURT WIN OPENS DOOR TO FEDERAL ACTION

    U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani pictured in 2014.(Alex Wong/Getty Images)

    North Carolina county election boards are scheduled to begin mailing absentee ballots Friday. Snead and Gregory Teufel, founder of OGC Law, LLC, both noted that election officials in the state had already taken steps toward complying with the USPS requirements.

    Talwani found that the states lacked the time and money to redesign ballot envelopes, obtain USPS approval, modify election-management systems, train officials to use the new portal and upload voter information before the midterms. She concluded that compliance was “practically impossible” for the approaching election and warned that eligible voters could be disenfranchised.

    Snead pushed back on that conclusion, arguing that the rule puts longstanding USPS recommendations into mandatory requirements.

    “It’s a fairly straightforward rule,” Snead said. “It’s largely premised on best practices that are already in place and gathering data that states already possess. The burdens are extraordinarily minimal as far as compliance is concerned, and the Postal Service is really just trying to better regulate the mail—not attempt to seize control of elections or to take away fundamental constitutional questions, like who is eligible to vote, away from the states.”

    Talwani’s June 25 permanent injunction barred USPS from completing portions of the rulemaking process for the 2026 election.

    FEDERAL APPEALS COURT REJECTS TRUMP BID TO ENFORCE MAIL BALLOT ORDER AHEAD OF MIDTERM ELECTIONS

    US President Donald Trump displays a signed executive order in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, March 31, 2026. Trump signed an executive order Tuesday intended to make it harder for voters to cast mail-in ballots, escalating his long-running campaign against a practice used by millions of Americans.(Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    The dispute reached the Supreme Court, which stayed Talwani’s earlier judgment on Aug. 24 after concluding that the Trump administration was likely to prevail on its argument that the original challenge was premature because USPS had not yet issued a final rule.

    The justices did not decide whether the executive order or the subsequent USPS rule was lawful. After USPS finalized the policy, the Democratic-led states amended their lawsuit to directly challenge the rule. Talwani then issued the latest temporary restraining order.

    “Ironically, the judge created that problem because her original injunction prevented the U.S. Postal Service from developing the rules earlier, months earlier, which would have allowed the states more time to prepare to follow the rule if the Supreme Court were to allow the rule to proceed,” Teufel said.

    “When the judge points to expenses and practical difficulties, those are expenses and difficulties created in part by the court itself—not by the rule and not by the attempted implementation of the rule,” he added.

    Talwani disputed that characterization in her latest order, writing that “no such delay occurred” because USPS had proceeded with publishing a proposed rule, receiving comments and issuing its final policy despite the earlier injunction.

    POSTAL SERVICE THRUST INTO MAIL-IN BALLOT FIGHT AS TRUMP ORDER GETS TIED UP IN COURT

    President Donald Trump signs an executive order on mail ballots, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., March 31, 2026.(REUTERS/Evan Vucci)

    Despite his criticism, Teufel stopped short of accusing Talwani of acting for partisan reasons.

    “It’s hard for me to accuse the court of partisanship based on the information I have at the present time,” Teufel said. “Certainly, the court exceeded its authority in issuing the initial injunction against the executive order, which is not a good look.”

    Talwani is set to hear arguments Thursday on the challengers’ request for a preliminary injunction, which could block the USPS rule for a longer period as the litigation continues. The existing 14-day temporary restraining order remains in place in the meantime while the Trump administration’s appeal of Talwani’s earlier judgment is pending before the First Circuit.

    SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

    Snead argued that the legal dispute turns on whether USPS is regulating elections or merely setting conditions for the mail it carries.

    “What the government counters is that this is just a Postal Service rule like any other and that the Postal Service has broad authority to regulate the mail that is using the Postal Service,” Snead said. “This is essentially the same sort of rule as requiring that mail pieces be in envelopes, for instance, or have postage paid.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Even if the policy does not take effect for the midterms, Snead said states should have ample time to comply before the next presidential election.

    “This is a very mundane rule, very simple to comply with, especially on the kind of timeline that we’re talking about in preparation for 2028,” Snead said. “It’s not about being able to comply with this rule. It is just about resisting efforts to bring greater transparency and security to mail voting.”

    Elaine Mallon is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business covering national politics.

  • 得克萨斯州共和党围绕肯·帕克斯顿的博弈愈发紧张


    2026-09-02T22:10:12.555Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/02/politics/texas-senate-ken-paxton-trump

    今年春季的得克萨斯州共和党联邦参议员 runoff 选举(决选)是近年来花费最高、斗争最激烈的共和党提名竞争之一。

    在司法部长肯·帕克斯顿凭借唐纳德·特朗普总统的支持击败联邦参议员约翰·科宁三个多月后,尽管这场选举对参议院多数党地位至关重要,共和党仍在竭力推进竞选进程,却困难重重。

    党派内部正上演一场高风险的博弈式僵持,而傲慢似乎压倒了共同目标。

    局势正变得愈发紧张。

    正如美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)周末报道的那样,当前的重大僵局在于:谁将帮助帕克斯顿在筹款上与民主党州众议员詹姆斯·塔拉里科抗衡——后者的筹款额远高于这位共和党候选人。

    参议院共和党人将得克萨斯州排除在他们的广告支出预留计划之外,这显然是在逼迫特朗普的政治团队为帕克斯顿提供资金支持。传递给总统的信息也愈发毫不隐晦:你用一位当选难度更低、深陷丑闻的候选人击败了在任议员,现在你得确保他能守住这个红色州。

    但特朗普的团队至今仍未配合。这导致帕克斯顿数周来在筹款上处于劣势,可能带来重大影响。距离选举还有两个月,多项民调显示塔拉里科拥有显著的形象优势,该州的选情也比几十年来任何时候都更具竞争力。

    如果民主党拿下得克萨斯州,他们距离获得参议院多数席位将大幅迈进。

    最近几天,出现了相当引人注目的一幕:国会共和党人愈发直白地要求特朗普的团队掏钱支持。

    “我们需要总统的帮助,”路易斯安那州联邦参议员约翰·肯尼迪周日告诉福克斯新闻,“总统称他的竞选账户中有8.5亿美元。那可是一大笔钱。我希望总统能在得克萨斯州投入1亿或2亿美元,但他尚未做出承诺。”

    帕克斯顿在同一档节目中回应两个关于该竞选的问题时,都提到了自己的资金缺口。

    到周二,参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩在福克斯新闻上呼应了肯尼迪的说法,称这场选举是必赢之战,并表示“我们需要总统及其团队参与其中”。

    随后他再次强调:“我认为我们所有的盟友,包括总统及其团队和他们的资源,都需要投入到得克萨斯州的竞选当中。”

    这无疑是在暗示。

    周三,福克斯新闻主持人甚至询问特朗普的儿媳劳拉·特朗普,总统的竞选团队何时会在得克萨斯州投入资金。

    前乔治·W·布什的战略家卡尔·罗夫近日告诉《得克萨斯论坛报》,这场选举“将极大程度上”取决于特朗普是否在中期选举中投入数亿美元。

    得克萨斯州联邦众议员特洛伊·内尔斯周二也告诉CNN记者马努·拉朱,特朗普“有责任拿出一些资金帮助肯·帕克斯顿”。

    就总统本人而言,他上周表示:“我会帮助肯·帕克斯顿,也会在得克萨斯州投入大量时间。”他周三补充称,帕克斯顿是“过去10年乃至更久以来美国最优秀的司法部长”,但也承认“有些人不喜欢他的着装方式,或是不喜欢他的演讲和谈吐风格”。

    不过,目前尚不清楚特朗普将以何种财务方式提供支持。

    但内尔斯还谈到了这场竞选的其他动态,也就是这场僵局近期引发了大量互相指责。

    内尔斯指责科宁暗中支持对手,以此证明自己的观点。

    “他睡觉时都在想,‘我需要肯·帕克斯顿输掉,这样我就能对着镜头告诉得克萨斯州的选民,我早就说过他不具备当选资格’,”内尔斯说道。

    科宁已表态支持共和党候选人,但同时也一直在削弱帕克斯顿的支持基础。

    这位参议员上周告诉CNN,他不会为帕克斯顿助选。在接受《得克萨斯论坛报》采访时,他还称帕克斯顿“不善竞选”,“懒惰且不擅长筹款”。

    “而且他基本上没有为自己的选举提出极具说服力的理由,”科宁说道,“这让事情变得比原本更棘手。但好吧——我们现在就是这种处境。”

    但科宁并非唯一一位对党派当前处境颇有微词的人。保守派评论员埃里克·埃里克森周二发表了类似的批评,抨击帕克斯顿及其人品。他还指责那些呼吁参议院共和党人为帕克斯顿投入资金的人,是在要求共和党牺牲其他州那些更有胜算、花费更低的竞选。

    这引发了福克斯新闻主持人劳拉·英格拉罕的回应,她称埃里克森是“又一位希望塔拉里科获胜的永不支持特朗普的共和党人”。

    埃里克森回应称,他反对塔拉里科,但诚实非常重要,并暗示英格拉罕是个马屁精,私下和公开场合说的话不一样。(他指出,在 Dominion 投票系统起诉福克斯新闻的案件文件中,显示该电视台的主持人曾嘲讽特朗普及其团队关于选举被操纵的说法。)

    共和党内部有充分理由感到恐慌。近期民调显示,这场竞选的差距在民意调查误差范围内,但总体上塔拉里科领先几个百分点。

    显然选民并不看好帕克斯顿。近期民调显示他几乎得不到独立选民的支持。在一项民调中,他在独立选民中的支持率仅为11%,对手为37%;另一项民调中为23%对63%;还有一项为29%对68%。

    在这些民调中,他的形象支持率比反对率低6至18个百分点。最近的福克斯新闻民调还显示,近60%的登记选民——包括66%的独立选民和36%的共和党人——“非常”担心帕克斯顿缺乏担任参议员的个人品格。

    一些共和党人担心,这些负面印象正在固化,而塔拉里科却未受任何负面影响。

    但也有一派观点认为,即便适度的外部投入也能迅速改变局势——尤其是通过聚焦塔拉里科所谓的“觉醒”言论。CNN的K文件栏目本周报道称,塔拉里科在2020年曾表示得克萨斯州的石油“不会长久”,并称资本主义“具有压迫性”。

    右翼一些人仍认为,在当前情况下将得克萨斯州变成蓝色阵营几乎是不可能的任务。(民主党已有30多年未能在该州赢得全州性选举。)

    一位熟悉这场竞选的共和党消息人士称,内部民调显示得克萨斯州选民对塔拉里科了解不多。另一位共和党消息人士表示,共和党团体一直在观望民主党将如何投入竞选资金,这可能最终决定最终的投资金额。

    但等到现在才行动无疑是一场赌博。而且共和党人似乎也不太确信特朗普会出手相救。

    从特朗普的竞选团队推出的首批中期选举广告来看,你完全有理由认为他目前主要关注的是自己,而非所在的政党。

    The GOP’s game of chicken over Ken Paxton in Texas is getting testy

    2026-09-02T22:10:12.555Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/02/politics/texas-senate-ken-paxton-trump

    This spring’s Texas GOP Senate runoff was one of the costliest and ugliest Republican nominating contests in recent history.

    And more than three months after Attorney General Ken Paxton prevailed over Sen. John Cornyn with President Donald Trump’s backing, Republicans are still struggling mightily to move forward, despite how central the race is to the Senate majority.

    Pride appears to be winning out over common purpose, as the party engages in a high-stakes internal game of chicken.

    And things are getting increasingly testy.

    The big standoff, as CNN wrote over the weekend, is over who is going to help Paxton compete financially with Democratic state Rep. James Talarico, who is raising significantly more money than the GOP nominee.

    Senate Republicans have left Texas out of their ad spending reservations in an apparent ploy to force Trump’s political operation to bankroll Paxton. And the message to the president seems increasingly unsubtle: You defeated an incumbent with a less-electable, scandal-ridden alternative, now you get to make sure he holds this red state.

    But Trump’s operation has yet to comply. That’s left Paxton outgunned for weeks, with potentially major implications. With two months left, polls show Talarico benefitting from a significant image advantage and the state looking more competitive than it has been in decades.

    And if Democrats win Texas, they’ve moved themselves significantly close to a Senate majority.

    In recent days, we’ve seen something rather remarkable: Congressional Republicans have stepped forward to more overtly tell Trump’s operation that it needs to pony up.

    “We need help from the president,” Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana told Fox News on Sunday. “The president says he has $850 million in his campaign accounts. That’s a lot of jack. I’m hoping that the president’s going to spend $100 or $200 million in Texas, but he hasn’t committed to it yet.”

    Paxton on the same show responded to two different questions about the race by pointing to his financial deficit.

    By Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader John Thune echoed Kennedy on Fox, casting the race as a must-win and saying that “we’re going to need the president and his team to be engaged there.”

    Then he repeated: “I think all of our allies out there, including the president and his team and their resources, need to be brought to bear on Texas.”

    Hint hint.

    On Wednesday, a Fox News host even asked Trump’s daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, when the president’s groups might spend in Texas.

    Former George W. Bush strategist Karl Rove recently told the Texas Tribune that the race will “depend mightily” on whether Trump spends hundreds of millions on the midterms.

    Rep. Troy Nehls of Texas also told CNN’s Manu Raju on Tuesday that it “would be incumbent upon [Trump] to spend some money to try to help Ken Paxton.”

    For his part, the president said last week, “I’m going to help Ken Paxton, and I’m going to spend a lot of time in Texas.” He added Wednesday that Paxton is “the best attorney general in this country for the last 10 years or more,” although he acknowledged “some people don’t like the way he dresses, or some people don’t like the way he interviews or talks.”

    Still, it’s not clear what the financial aspect of Trump’s support will look like.

    But Nehls also had some other thoughts on the race, which brings us to the other emerging dynamic. And that’s that this standoff has led to plenty of finger-pointing of late.

    Nehls accused Cornyn of rooting for the other side, so he could prove a point.

    “He goes to bed, he’s thinking, ‘I need Ken Paxton to lose, because then I can look into the cameras and tell the voters of Texas, I told you, he wasn’t electable,’” Nehls said.

    Cornyn has assured he supports the ticket, but he’s also continued to undercut Paxton.

    The senator told CNN last week that he won’t campaign for Paxton. And in comments to the Tribune, he labeled Paxton “a poor campaigner” who is “lazy and doesn’t raise money.”

    “And he basically is not offering a very compelling case for his election,” Cornyn said. “He’s making this harder than it needs to be. But so be it — we are where we are.”

    But Cornyn’s not the only one fighting over the situation the party finds itself in. Conservative commentator Erick Erickson on Tuesday posted similar criticisms of Paxton and his character. And he accused those saying Senate Republicans should spend for Paxton of asking the GOP to sacrifice more winnable races in cheaper states.

    That drew Fox News host Laura Ingraham to call Erickson “Another NeverTrump Republican rooting for Talarico”.

    Erickson responded by saying he opposes Talarico but that it’s important to be honest, and suggesting Ingraham was a sycophant who said one thing privately and another publicly. (He pointed to documents in the Dominion Voting Systems lawsuit against Fox that showed the network’s stars mocking Trump and his team’s rigged election claims.)

    There is good reason for the panic setting in among the GOP. Recent polls show the race within the margin of error, but generally with Talarico ahead by a few points.

    And it’s clear that voters just don’t like Paxton. Recent polls show him taking very few independents. He trails among them 37%-11% in one poll, 63%-23% in another and 68%-29% in another.

    His image was between 6 and 18 points underwater in those polls. And the last poll, from Fox News, also showed nearly 6 in 10 registered voters — including 66% of independents and 36% of Republicans — were “very” concerned that Paxton lacked the personal character to serve as a senator.

    The fear among some Republicans is that these perceptions are being cemented, while Talarico remains unscathed.

    But there is also a school of thought that even a modest outside investment could change things pretty quickly — especially by focusing on rather “woke” things Talarico has said. CNN’s KFile reported this week that Talarico in 2020 said Texas oil was “not gonna last” and called capitalism “oppressive.”

    Some on the right still think turning Texas blue is simply too tall a task at this point. (Democrats haven’t won a statewide race there in more than 30 years.)

    One GOP source familiar with the race said that internal polling indicates that voters in Texas do not know much about Talarico. Republican groups have been watching to see how Democrats decide to spend in the race, which will likely determine the amount of money that’s ultimately invested, another GOP source said.

    But it’s surely a gamble to wait this long. And Republicans don’t seem overly convinced Trump is going to ride to the rescue.

    You could sure be forgiven for thinking he’s largely focused on himself rather than his party right now, judging by his political operation’s first midterm ads.

  • 得克萨斯州参议院选举中的匿名捐款引发塔拉里科向联邦选举委员会起诉佩顿


    2026-09-02T17:23:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    今年早些时候,支持得克萨斯州共和党参议院候选人肯·佩顿的超级政治行动委员会收到了一家名为“保护得克萨斯公司”的组织开出的四张支票,总额超过100万美元。

    “保护得克萨斯公司”未注册为政治委员会,也未向联邦选举委员会提交任何可能披露资金来源的文件。据弗吉尼亚州提交的公司文件显示,该组织是一家总部位于弗吉尼亚州的非营利组织,由约翰·普利斯卡创立,而普利斯卡正是佩顿参议院竞选团队的财务主管。

    这种做法是美国政坛匿名大额捐款大幅增加的缩影,如今已引发佩顿的民主党对手詹姆斯·塔拉里科竞选团队的起诉,指控佩顿及其财务主管违反联邦竞选财务规定。

    塔拉里科的竞选经理赛斯·克拉斯内在周三提交给联邦选举委员会的起诉书中指出,共和党人“在联邦捐款限额之外非法使用匿名捐款,为佩顿的竞选造势”。该起诉书已由哥伦比亚广播公司新闻审核。

    起诉书中写道:“佩顿先生似乎通过其代理人普利斯卡先生创立并控制了‘保护得克萨斯公司’,这是一个匿名捐款实体,该实体已花费巨额资金影响佩顿先生的选举,同时将捐赠者的身份置于公众监督之外。”

    在起诉书中,克拉斯内援引2002年《两党竞选改革法案》的相关条款,要求联邦选举委员会展开调查。该条款旨在防止候选人利用外部团体募集自身无法合法接受的资金。

    根据相关规定,筹款金额设有上限:参议院竞选团队在初选和大选期间可从个人处每人每次接受3500美元捐款,但每笔超过200美元的捐款都必须在公开文件中披露捐赠者身份,且竞选团队不得接受企业或工会的捐款。而非营利组织则不受此类限制。

    起诉书中援引“保护得克萨斯公司”2月至5月向支持佩顿的超级政治行动委员会“孤星自由”捐款的情况,写道:“由于该公司似乎由佩顿先生的代理人创立并控制,因此其不得接收或支出与佩顿先生选举相关的、不受该法案来源限制、捐款限额和披露要求约束的任何资金。”

    “孤星自由”的发言人格雷格·凯勒在发给哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的一份声明中表示,该委员会“完全遵守所有法规和法律”。声明还指责塔拉里科“自称反对政治献金”,却利用新闻机构NOTUS近期报道中所称的为超级政治行动委员会提供竞选材料的“漏洞”。报道称,已有十多名民主党候选人使用这种被称为“红箱操作”的漏洞。

    无论如何,联邦选举委员会不太可能在选举日前就塔拉里科竞选团队对佩顿的起诉采取行动。由于包括特朗普总统解雇一名民主党委员在内的一系列人员离职,这个独立机构目前缺乏足够的委员就启动调查进行投票。尽管如此,双方的攻击路线仍凸显出美国政坛因2026年中期选举中涌入数亿美元匿名捐款以争夺参众两院控制权而加剧的紧张局势。

    得益于超级政治行动委员会的千万美元广告投放和现金注入,得克萨斯州参议院竞选的开支已大幅膨胀。这场竞选被广泛视为胜负难料。

    “肯·佩顿的竞选财务主管同时运营着他的一个匿名捐款组织,”塔拉里科竞选团队的发言人J·T·恩尼斯说道,“这显然是非法的。佩顿的捐赠者应该知道,他们被卷入了他的犯罪行为——而得克萨斯州民众也应该知道,那些散布佩顿谎言的匿名捐款背后究竟是谁。”

    据《政客》杂志率先报道,本周,支持佩顿的“孤星自由”政治行动委员会启动了一项1500万美元的广告宣传活动,未来两周将在得克萨斯州18个市场播出。根据竞选财务记录,截至目前,该委员会收到的最大单笔捐款来自“保护得克萨斯公司”。

    在竞选财务记录中,“保护得克萨斯公司”仅向“孤星自由”一家组织提供过捐款。

    加州大学洛杉矶分校专门研究竞选财务监管的法学教授理查德·哈森表示,塔拉里科竞选团队起诉的有效性将取决于“保护得克萨斯公司”是否由普利斯卡“创立、资助、运营或控制”,以及普利斯卡组建该公司时是否作为佩顿的“代理人”行事。联邦规则将代理人定义为拥有“明示或默示的实际授权”,用于与候选人选举相关的资金支出或支配。

    “这些指控提出了一个看似合理的主张,即佩顿的财务主管违反了联邦选举委员会的规定,”哈森说道,“这并不一定意味着佩顿本人也违反了规定——未经监管的资金筹集和支出必须是在佩顿的指示下,或者至少是在他知情的情况下进行的。”

    “保护得克萨斯公司”的发言人普雷亚·桑孙达尔在发给哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的一份声明中表示,该组织“是一家独立的社会福利组织,完全按照第501(c)(4)条规定的核心宗旨运作,即就影响得克萨斯州社区的事务开展公民参与和议题宣传”。

    她表示,“保护得克萨斯公司”“已向美国国税局和其他相关主管部门提交了所有要求的文件,并完全遵守适用法律”。

    “‘保护得克萨斯公司’并非由任何联邦候选人或候选人代理人创立、资助、运营或控制,它完全独立做出决策,”桑孙达尔说道,“约翰·普利斯卡提供的服务纯粹是行政性质的,仅限于记录保存、文件提交和后台支持,不涉及任何战略角色。”

    随着11月选举的临近,人们对采用难以追踪的筹款方式的团体的质疑日益加剧。《纽约时报》8月底对广告数据、竞选文件和纳税申报单进行的分析显示,2026年匿名政治捐款总额约为10亿美元。

    仅得克萨斯州参议院竞选的开支就占了其中很大一部分。今年早些时候,软件公司AdImpact预测,得克萨斯州的广告总支出将达到创纪录的4.46亿美元。2026年匿名捐款的最大受益者之一是现任共和党参议员约翰·康恩,他在初选中败给了佩顿。哥伦比亚广播公司新闻此前曾报道,支持康恩的政治行动委员会收到的数千万美元捐款来自一个名为“俄亥俄工作”的组织,该组织未披露捐赠者身份,其注册地址位于弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市的一家Parcel Plus快递邮寄店。

    研究政治献金的非营利组织“竞选法律中心”的联邦竞选财务改革主任索拉夫·戈什表示,透明度最终是捐款增长背后的核心关切。(佩顿的竞选团队未回复置评请求。)

    “用匿名捐款资助竞选——包括来自未披露身份的捐赠者的资金用于为超级政治行动委员会的捐款提供资金——会损害选民利益,还可能助长腐败,”戈什说道。

    Dark money in Texas Senate race spurs Talarico complaint to FEC against Paxton

    2026-09-02T17:23:00-0400 / CBS News

    Earlier this year, a super PAC supporting Texas Republican Senate nominee Ken Paxton received four checks totaling over $1 million from an organization called Preserve Texas, Inc.

    Preserve Texas is not registered as a political committee and has not filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission that could reveal where the money came from. Instead, it is a Virginia-based nonprofit, incorporated by John Plishka, the treasurer for Paxton’s Senate campaign, according to corporate documents filed in Virginia.

    The arrangement, part of the dramatic uptick in American politics of anonymous, big-dollar giving, has now drawn a complaint from the campaign of Paxton’s Democratic opponent, James Talarico, which accused Paxton and his treasurer of violating federal campaign finance rules.

    The Republicans are “illegally spending dark money outside of the federal contribution limits to promote” Paxton’s candidacy, argued Seth Krasne, Talarico’s campaign manager, in a complaint submitted to the Federal Election Commission on Wednesday and reviewed by CBS News.

    The complaint states, “It appears that Mr. Paxton — via his agent Mr. Plishka — established and controls Preserve Texas Inc., a dark money entity that has spent substantial sums to influence Mr. Paxton’s election while shielding their donors from public scrutiny.”

    In the complaint, Krasne asked the FEC for an investigation, citing a provision of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act intended to keep candidates from using outside groups to collect money they could not lawfully accept themselves.

    Money raised under those rules is capped: Senate campaigns can accept $3,500 each from individuals for the primary and general elections, but every donor above $200 must be named in public filings, and campaigns cannot accept money from corporations or unions. Nonprofits do not face the same constraints.

    “Because the corporation appears to have been established and controlled by Mr. Paxton’s agent, it may not receive or spend any funds in connection with Mr. Paxton’s election that are not subject to the act’s source restrictions, contribution limits, and reporting requirements,” the complaint read, citing the money Preserve Texas sent to the pro-Paxton super PAC — Lone Star Liberty — from February to May.

    Greg Keller, a spokesperson for Lone Star Liberty, said in a statement shared with CBS News that the PAC “fully follows all regulations and laws.” The statement accused Talarico of “claiming to oppose money in politics” while embracing what a recent report in the news outlet NOTUS called a “loophole” to provide super PACs with campaign materials. More than a dozen Democratic candidates have embraced this loophole, called “redboxing,” the report said.

    Either way, the FEC is unlikely to act on the Talarico campaign’s complaint against Paxton before Election Day, since the independent body lacks enough commissioners to vote on opening investigations after a series of departures, including President Trump’s firing of a Democratic commissioner. Still, the lines of attack from both sides illustrate how tensions have risen in American politics over the hundreds of millions in anonymous donations flowing into the 2026 midterm elections to decide control of the House and Senate.

    Spending in the Texas Senate race has ballooned, thanks to eight-figure advertising buys and cash infusions from super PACs that may raise and spend unlimited sums. The race is widely viewed as a toss-up.

    “Ken Paxton’s campaign treasurer is the same person running one of his dark money groups,” said J.T. Ennis, a spokesman for the Talarico campaign. “That is plainly illegal. Paxton’s donors should know that he is wrapping them up in his own criminality — and Texans should know who is behind the dark money spreading Paxton’s lies.”

    This week, the Paxton-aligned Lone Star Liberty PAC launched a $15 million ad campaign that will air across 18 markets in Texas over the next two weeks, Politico first reported. To date, the largest individual donation that the group received came from Preserve Texas, according to campaign finance records.

    The Virginia-based Preserve Texas is listed in campaign finance records as having made donations to no other groups except Lone Star Liberty.

    Richard Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, specializing in campaign finance regulation, said the validity of the Talarico campaign’s complaint would depend on whether Preserve Texas was “established, financed, maintained or controlled” by Plishka, and whether Plishka was acting as Paxton’s “agent” when he formed it. Federal rules define an agent as a person with “actual authority, either express or implied,” to spend or direct funds in connection with any election for a candidate.

    “These allegations raise a plausible claim that Paxton’s treasurer violated Federal Election Commission rules,” Hasen said. “That does not necessarily mean that Paxton did — the raising and spending of unregulated money would have to be at Paxton’s direction, or at least with his knowledge.”

    Preya Samsundar, a spokeswoman for Preserve Texas, said in a statement shared with CBS News that the group “is an independent social welfare organization operating fully within its primary purpose under section 501(c)(4), which is civic engagement and issue advocacy on matters affecting Texas communities.”

    She said Preserve Texas “has made all filings required of it with the IRS and other relevant authorities and is in full compliance with applicable law.”

    “Preserve Texas is not established, financed, maintained, or controlled by any federal candidate or agent of a candidate, and it makes its own decisions independently,” Samsundar said. “Services provided by John Plishka are purely administrative in nature, limited to recordkeeping, filings, and back-office support, and involve no strategic role.”

    Questions about groups embracing hard-to-trace fundraising methods have intensified as the November elections draw closer. A New York Times analysis of advertising data, campaign filings, and tax returns in late August slotted the amount of anonymous political money in 2026 at roughly $1 billion.

    The Texas Senate race, alone, is responsible for a huge chunk of that spending. Earlier this year, software company AdImpact projected a record-breaking $446 million in total ad spending in Texas. One of the largest beneficiaries of dark money in 2026 was Sen. John Cornyn, the incumbent Republican who lost in a primary runoff to Paxton. CBS News previously reported on tens of millions in pro-Cornyn PAC dollars that came from a group called Ohio Works that does not disclose its donors and listed its address as a Parcel Plus shipping and mailing store in Alexandria, Virginia.

    Saurav Ghosh, the director of federal campaign finance reform for Campaign Legal Center, a nonprofit that researches money in politics, said that transparency, ultimately, is the overarching concern amid the spending uptick. (The Paxton campaign did not respond to requests for comment).

    “Funding campaigns with dark money — including funds from undisclosed donors used to finance super PAC contributions — harms voters and can foster corruption,” Ghosh said.

  • 特朗普:对伊朗新一轮行动不会持续太久


    2026年9月3日 07:03 / 联合早报

    美国总统特朗普周三在白宫告诉记者,美国已经并将继续控制霍尔木兹海峡局势。 (路透社)

    在美伊爆发自7月以来最大规模的交火后,美国总统特朗普周三说,美国对伊朗的新一轮行动不会持续“太久”。

    特朗普星期三(9月2日)在白宫椭圆形办公室告诉记者,伊朗试图制造一枚能投放水雷的火箭,但已被美军摧毁。他还说,伊朗试图重建雷达和导弹系统,这些系统也是美军打击的目标。

    “我们摧毁了他们试图在霍尔木兹海峡沿线建造的所有新装备,既有防御性的,也有进攻性的……昨晚的打击非常猛烈,而且我们随时准备再次发动攻击。”

    特朗普还说,美国已经并将继续控制霍尔木兹海峡局势。“我们每天都有大量船只运载数百万桶石油进出,而且总体上一切顺利。虽然偶尔会有无人机被击落,但我们牢牢掌控局面。”

    提议将霍尔木兹海峡更名为“特朗普海峡”

    特朗普周三还提议将霍尔木兹海峡更名为“特朗普海峡”,以此宣示美国对这一关键水道的控制权。

    他周三在自家社媒平台Truth Social发文说:“既然它现在处于美国的控制之下,我们是否应该把霍尔木兹海峡改名为特朗普海峡???就像美国本身一样,它会变得比以往任何时候都更火热!”

    白宫随后在社媒发布了一张标有该拟议名称的波斯湾地图,并称:“这名字听起来真不错。”

    近几周,特朗普多次威胁要宣称对霍尔木兹海峡拥有主权,甚至发布了一张将该水道标示为“美国新领土”的地图。

    然而,特朗普后来淡化了重新命名霍尔木兹海峡的想法。

    当法新社记者在椭圆形办公室询问他是否真的打算更名时,特朗普笑着说:“那不过是随口一提罢了。”

    特朗普:对伊朗新一轮行动不会持续太久

    2026年9月3日 07:03 / 联合早报

    美国总统特朗普周三在白宫告诉记者,美国已经并将继续控制霍尔木兹海峡局势。 (路透社)

    在美伊爆发自7月以来最大规模的交火后,美国总统特朗普周三说,美国对伊朗的新一轮行动不会持续“太久”。

    特朗普星期三(9月2日)在白宫椭圆形办公室告诉记者,伊朗试图制造一枚能投放水雷的火箭,但已被美军摧毁。他还说,伊朗试图重建雷达和导弹系统,这些系统也是美军打击的目标。

    “我们摧毁了他们试图在霍尔木兹海峡沿线建造的所有新装备,既有防御性的,也有进攻性的……昨晚的打击非常猛烈,而且我们随时准备再次发动攻击。”

    特朗普还说,美国已经并将继续控制霍尔木兹海峡局势。“我们每天都有大量船只运载数百万桶石油进出,而且总体上一切顺利。虽然偶尔会有无人机被击落,但我们牢牢掌控局面。”

    提议将霍尔木兹海峡更名为“特朗普海峡”

    特朗普周三还提议将霍尔木兹海峡更名为“特朗普海峡”,以此宣示美国对这一关键水道的控制权。

    他周三在自家社媒平台Truth Social发文说:“既然它现在处于美国的控制之下,我们是否应该把霍尔木兹海峡改名为特朗普海峡???就像美国本身一样,它会变得比以往任何时候都更火热!”

    白宫随后在社媒发布了一张标有该拟议名称的波斯湾地图,并称:“这名字听起来真不错。”

    近几周,特朗普多次威胁要宣称对霍尔木兹海峡拥有主权,甚至发布了一张将该水道标示为“美国新领土”的地图。

    然而,特朗普后来淡化了重新命名霍尔木兹海峡的想法。

    当法新社记者在椭圆形办公室询问他是否真的打算更名时,特朗普笑着说:“那不过是随口一提罢了。”

  • 联邦法官阻止特朗普最新限制出生公民权举措


    2026-09-02 22:32:05 UTC / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:蒂尔尼·斯尼德
    发布时间:2026年9月2日,美国东部时间下午6:32

    White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller (L) holds an executive order on birthright citizenship as US President Donald Trump speaks before signing it in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on August 6, 2026.

    吉姆·沃森/法新社/盖蒂图片社

    美国一名联邦法官于周三阻止了唐纳德·特朗普总统限制出生公民权的新一轮尝试,部分叫停了总统在最高法院去年驳回其更全面举措后发布的一项行政令。

    美国地区法官黛博拉·博德曼表示,政府无法实施这项新的、范围更有限的政策,但该法官允许各机构继续制定相关指导方针,明确其将如何落实该政策。

    在随初步禁令发布的意见书中,她写道,根据最高法院今年夏季驳回特朗普此前终止出生公民权尝试的裁决,这项新政策很可能违宪。

    她的命令适用于本案中经认证的合法原告群体,即所有会因第一项行政令被剥夺公民身份的儿童。

    CNN已联系白宫寻求置评。

    这项最新的行政行动旨在收紧现行法律,缩小出生公民权的公认例外范围——出生公民权是美国宪法第十四修正案中的一项原则,即无论父母的移民身份如何,凡在美国领土上出生的人都可获得公民身份。

    特朗普今年8月发布的最新行政令称,若父母一方是“敌方外国人”“外国政府雇员”,或参与所谓的“生育旅游”,联邦机构将不承认其子女的公民身份。

    相关报道 2026年8月6日,在白宫椭圆形办公室签署行政令的活动中,白宫副幕僚长斯蒂芬·米勒发表讲话,唐纳德·特朗普总统在一旁聆听。伊芙琳·霍克斯坦/路透社 特朗普再通过行政行动限制出生公民权与“生育旅游” 阅读时长3分钟

    “若不对这一群体实施禁令,2026年行政令可能会剥夺最高法院此前宣布拥有公民身份的儿童的出生公民权,”博德曼写道。她是由总统乔·拜登任命的法官。

    针对这项新政策的第二起诉讼正在新罕布什尔州等待审理。

    将限制出生公民权作为其第二任期的标志性举措。特朗普去年重返白宫后,立即发布了一项行政令,试图拒绝父母非法居留或持临时身份入境的婴儿的公民身份。

    但该行政令今年夏季被最高法院驳回,法院认定其违宪,这促使特朗普采取了如今成为法律挑战焦点的最新行动。

    Federal judge blocks Trump’s newest attempt to crack down on birthright citizenship

    2026-09-02 22:32:05 UTC / CNN

    By Tierney Sneed

    PUBLISHED Sep 2, 2026, 6:32 PM ET

    White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller (L) holds an executive order on birthright citizenship as US President Donald Trump speaks before signing it in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on August 6, 2026.

    Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images

    A federal judge on Wednesday blocked President Donald Trump’s renewed attempt to limit birthright citizenship, partially halting an executive order the president issued after the Supreme Court struck down his more sweeping effort last year.

    US District Judge Deborah Boardman said the administration could not enforce the new, more limited policy, but the judge is allowing the agencies to continue to work on guidance on how they would carry out.

    In the opinion accompanying the preliminary injunction, she wrote that the new policy was likely unconstitutional under the Supreme Court ruling this summer striking down Trump’s earlier attempt to end birthright citizenship.

    Her order applies to the certified class of legal challengers in the case, which are any children who would have been denied citizenship under the first executive order.

    CNN has reached out to the White House for comment.

    The more recent executive action was aimed at tightening laws already in place and narrowing recognized exceptions to birthright citizenship – the principle in the 14th Amendment that grants citizenship to anyone born on US soil, regardless of the immigration status of their parent.

    Trump’s latest order, issued in August, said that said federal agencies would not recognize the citizenship of children whose parents are not citizens if either parent is “an alien enemy,” “a foreign government employee,” or engaged in so-called birth tourism.

    Related article White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller speaks while President Donald Trump listens during an event to sign executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House, on August 6, 2026. Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters Trump again tries to curb birthright citizenship and ‘birth tourism’ through executive action 3 min read

    “If not enjoined as to the class, the 2026 Executive Order could deny the right to citizenship by birth to children whom the Supreme Court declared were citizens,” Boardman, an appointee of President Joe Biden, wrote.

    A second case challenging the new policy is pending in New Hampshire.

    Trump has made curbing birthright citizenship a hallmark of his second term. Immediately after returning to office last year, the president issued an executive order that sought to deny citizenship to babies of parents who are unlawfully in the country or visiting under temporary status.

    But that order was rejected this summer by the Supreme Court, which concluded it was unconstitutional, prompting Trump to take the latest action that’s now the focus of the legal challenges.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2