得克萨斯州参议院选举中的匿名捐款引发塔拉里科向联邦选举委员会起诉佩顿


2026-09-02T17:23:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

今年早些时候,支持得克萨斯州共和党参议院候选人肯·佩顿的超级政治行动委员会收到了一家名为“保护得克萨斯公司”的组织开出的四张支票,总额超过100万美元。

“保护得克萨斯公司”未注册为政治委员会,也未向联邦选举委员会提交任何可能披露资金来源的文件。据弗吉尼亚州提交的公司文件显示,该组织是一家总部位于弗吉尼亚州的非营利组织,由约翰·普利斯卡创立,而普利斯卡正是佩顿参议院竞选团队的财务主管。

这种做法是美国政坛匿名大额捐款大幅增加的缩影,如今已引发佩顿的民主党对手詹姆斯·塔拉里科竞选团队的起诉,指控佩顿及其财务主管违反联邦竞选财务规定。

塔拉里科的竞选经理赛斯·克拉斯内在周三提交给联邦选举委员会的起诉书中指出,共和党人“在联邦捐款限额之外非法使用匿名捐款,为佩顿的竞选造势”。该起诉书已由哥伦比亚广播公司新闻审核。

起诉书中写道:“佩顿先生似乎通过其代理人普利斯卡先生创立并控制了‘保护得克萨斯公司’,这是一个匿名捐款实体,该实体已花费巨额资金影响佩顿先生的选举,同时将捐赠者的身份置于公众监督之外。”

在起诉书中,克拉斯内援引2002年《两党竞选改革法案》的相关条款,要求联邦选举委员会展开调查。该条款旨在防止候选人利用外部团体募集自身无法合法接受的资金。

根据相关规定,筹款金额设有上限:参议院竞选团队在初选和大选期间可从个人处每人每次接受3500美元捐款,但每笔超过200美元的捐款都必须在公开文件中披露捐赠者身份,且竞选团队不得接受企业或工会的捐款。而非营利组织则不受此类限制。

起诉书中援引“保护得克萨斯公司”2月至5月向支持佩顿的超级政治行动委员会“孤星自由”捐款的情况,写道:“由于该公司似乎由佩顿先生的代理人创立并控制,因此其不得接收或支出与佩顿先生选举相关的、不受该法案来源限制、捐款限额和披露要求约束的任何资金。”

“孤星自由”的发言人格雷格·凯勒在发给哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的一份声明中表示,该委员会“完全遵守所有法规和法律”。声明还指责塔拉里科“自称反对政治献金”,却利用新闻机构NOTUS近期报道中所称的为超级政治行动委员会提供竞选材料的“漏洞”。报道称,已有十多名民主党候选人使用这种被称为“红箱操作”的漏洞。

无论如何,联邦选举委员会不太可能在选举日前就塔拉里科竞选团队对佩顿的起诉采取行动。由于包括特朗普总统解雇一名民主党委员在内的一系列人员离职,这个独立机构目前缺乏足够的委员就启动调查进行投票。尽管如此,双方的攻击路线仍凸显出美国政坛因2026年中期选举中涌入数亿美元匿名捐款以争夺参众两院控制权而加剧的紧张局势。

得益于超级政治行动委员会的千万美元广告投放和现金注入,得克萨斯州参议院竞选的开支已大幅膨胀。这场竞选被广泛视为胜负难料。

“肯·佩顿的竞选财务主管同时运营着他的一个匿名捐款组织,”塔拉里科竞选团队的发言人J·T·恩尼斯说道,“这显然是非法的。佩顿的捐赠者应该知道,他们被卷入了他的犯罪行为——而得克萨斯州民众也应该知道,那些散布佩顿谎言的匿名捐款背后究竟是谁。”

据《政客》杂志率先报道,本周,支持佩顿的“孤星自由”政治行动委员会启动了一项1500万美元的广告宣传活动,未来两周将在得克萨斯州18个市场播出。根据竞选财务记录,截至目前,该委员会收到的最大单笔捐款来自“保护得克萨斯公司”。

在竞选财务记录中,“保护得克萨斯公司”仅向“孤星自由”一家组织提供过捐款。

加州大学洛杉矶分校专门研究竞选财务监管的法学教授理查德·哈森表示,塔拉里科竞选团队起诉的有效性将取决于“保护得克萨斯公司”是否由普利斯卡“创立、资助、运营或控制”,以及普利斯卡组建该公司时是否作为佩顿的“代理人”行事。联邦规则将代理人定义为拥有“明示或默示的实际授权”,用于与候选人选举相关的资金支出或支配。

“这些指控提出了一个看似合理的主张,即佩顿的财务主管违反了联邦选举委员会的规定,”哈森说道,“这并不一定意味着佩顿本人也违反了规定——未经监管的资金筹集和支出必须是在佩顿的指示下,或者至少是在他知情的情况下进行的。”

“保护得克萨斯公司”的发言人普雷亚·桑孙达尔在发给哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的一份声明中表示,该组织“是一家独立的社会福利组织,完全按照第501(c)(4)条规定的核心宗旨运作,即就影响得克萨斯州社区的事务开展公民参与和议题宣传”。

她表示,“保护得克萨斯公司”“已向美国国税局和其他相关主管部门提交了所有要求的文件,并完全遵守适用法律”。

“‘保护得克萨斯公司’并非由任何联邦候选人或候选人代理人创立、资助、运营或控制,它完全独立做出决策,”桑孙达尔说道,“约翰·普利斯卡提供的服务纯粹是行政性质的,仅限于记录保存、文件提交和后台支持,不涉及任何战略角色。”

随着11月选举的临近,人们对采用难以追踪的筹款方式的团体的质疑日益加剧。《纽约时报》8月底对广告数据、竞选文件和纳税申报单进行的分析显示,2026年匿名政治捐款总额约为10亿美元。

仅得克萨斯州参议院竞选的开支就占了其中很大一部分。今年早些时候,软件公司AdImpact预测,得克萨斯州的广告总支出将达到创纪录的4.46亿美元。2026年匿名捐款的最大受益者之一是现任共和党参议员约翰·康恩,他在初选中败给了佩顿。哥伦比亚广播公司新闻此前曾报道,支持康恩的政治行动委员会收到的数千万美元捐款来自一个名为“俄亥俄工作”的组织,该组织未披露捐赠者身份,其注册地址位于弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市的一家Parcel Plus快递邮寄店。

研究政治献金的非营利组织“竞选法律中心”的联邦竞选财务改革主任索拉夫·戈什表示,透明度最终是捐款增长背后的核心关切。(佩顿的竞选团队未回复置评请求。)

“用匿名捐款资助竞选——包括来自未披露身份的捐赠者的资金用于为超级政治行动委员会的捐款提供资金——会损害选民利益,还可能助长腐败,”戈什说道。

Dark money in Texas Senate race spurs Talarico complaint to FEC against Paxton

2026-09-02T17:23:00-0400 / CBS News

Earlier this year, a super PAC supporting Texas Republican Senate nominee Ken Paxton received four checks totaling over $1 million from an organization called Preserve Texas, Inc.

Preserve Texas is not registered as a political committee and has not filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission that could reveal where the money came from. Instead, it is a Virginia-based nonprofit, incorporated by John Plishka, the treasurer for Paxton’s Senate campaign, according to corporate documents filed in Virginia.

The arrangement, part of the dramatic uptick in American politics of anonymous, big-dollar giving, has now drawn a complaint from the campaign of Paxton’s Democratic opponent, James Talarico, which accused Paxton and his treasurer of violating federal campaign finance rules.

The Republicans are “illegally spending dark money outside of the federal contribution limits to promote” Paxton’s candidacy, argued Seth Krasne, Talarico’s campaign manager, in a complaint submitted to the Federal Election Commission on Wednesday and reviewed by CBS News.

The complaint states, “It appears that Mr. Paxton — via his agent Mr. Plishka — established and controls Preserve Texas Inc., a dark money entity that has spent substantial sums to influence Mr. Paxton’s election while shielding their donors from public scrutiny.”

In the complaint, Krasne asked the FEC for an investigation, citing a provision of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act intended to keep candidates from using outside groups to collect money they could not lawfully accept themselves.

Money raised under those rules is capped: Senate campaigns can accept $3,500 each from individuals for the primary and general elections, but every donor above $200 must be named in public filings, and campaigns cannot accept money from corporations or unions. Nonprofits do not face the same constraints.

“Because the corporation appears to have been established and controlled by Mr. Paxton’s agent, it may not receive or spend any funds in connection with Mr. Paxton’s election that are not subject to the act’s source restrictions, contribution limits, and reporting requirements,” the complaint read, citing the money Preserve Texas sent to the pro-Paxton super PAC — Lone Star Liberty — from February to May.

Greg Keller, a spokesperson for Lone Star Liberty, said in a statement shared with CBS News that the PAC “fully follows all regulations and laws.” The statement accused Talarico of “claiming to oppose money in politics” while embracing what a recent report in the news outlet NOTUS called a “loophole” to provide super PACs with campaign materials. More than a dozen Democratic candidates have embraced this loophole, called “redboxing,” the report said.

Either way, the FEC is unlikely to act on the Talarico campaign’s complaint against Paxton before Election Day, since the independent body lacks enough commissioners to vote on opening investigations after a series of departures, including President Trump’s firing of a Democratic commissioner. Still, the lines of attack from both sides illustrate how tensions have risen in American politics over the hundreds of millions in anonymous donations flowing into the 2026 midterm elections to decide control of the House and Senate.

Spending in the Texas Senate race has ballooned, thanks to eight-figure advertising buys and cash infusions from super PACs that may raise and spend unlimited sums. The race is widely viewed as a toss-up.

“Ken Paxton’s campaign treasurer is the same person running one of his dark money groups,” said J.T. Ennis, a spokesman for the Talarico campaign. “That is plainly illegal. Paxton’s donors should know that he is wrapping them up in his own criminality — and Texans should know who is behind the dark money spreading Paxton’s lies.”

This week, the Paxton-aligned Lone Star Liberty PAC launched a $15 million ad campaign that will air across 18 markets in Texas over the next two weeks, Politico first reported. To date, the largest individual donation that the group received came from Preserve Texas, according to campaign finance records.

The Virginia-based Preserve Texas is listed in campaign finance records as having made donations to no other groups except Lone Star Liberty.

Richard Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, specializing in campaign finance regulation, said the validity of the Talarico campaign’s complaint would depend on whether Preserve Texas was “established, financed, maintained or controlled” by Plishka, and whether Plishka was acting as Paxton’s “agent” when he formed it. Federal rules define an agent as a person with “actual authority, either express or implied,” to spend or direct funds in connection with any election for a candidate.

“These allegations raise a plausible claim that Paxton’s treasurer violated Federal Election Commission rules,” Hasen said. “That does not necessarily mean that Paxton did — the raising and spending of unregulated money would have to be at Paxton’s direction, or at least with his knowledge.”

Preya Samsundar, a spokeswoman for Preserve Texas, said in a statement shared with CBS News that the group “is an independent social welfare organization operating fully within its primary purpose under section 501(c)(4), which is civic engagement and issue advocacy on matters affecting Texas communities.”

She said Preserve Texas “has made all filings required of it with the IRS and other relevant authorities and is in full compliance with applicable law.”

“Preserve Texas is not established, financed, maintained, or controlled by any federal candidate or agent of a candidate, and it makes its own decisions independently,” Samsundar said. “Services provided by John Plishka are purely administrative in nature, limited to recordkeeping, filings, and back-office support, and involve no strategic role.”

Questions about groups embracing hard-to-trace fundraising methods have intensified as the November elections draw closer. A New York Times analysis of advertising data, campaign filings, and tax returns in late August slotted the amount of anonymous political money in 2026 at roughly $1 billion.

The Texas Senate race, alone, is responsible for a huge chunk of that spending. Earlier this year, software company AdImpact projected a record-breaking $446 million in total ad spending in Texas. One of the largest beneficiaries of dark money in 2026 was Sen. John Cornyn, the incumbent Republican who lost in a primary runoff to Paxton. CBS News previously reported on tens of millions in pro-Cornyn PAC dollars that came from a group called Ohio Works that does not disclose its donors and listed its address as a Parcel Plus shipping and mailing store in Alexandria, Virginia.

Saurav Ghosh, the director of federal campaign finance reform for Campaign Legal Center, a nonprofit that researches money in politics, said that transparency, ultimately, is the overarching concern amid the spending uptick. (The Paxton campaign did not respond to requests for comment).

“Funding campaigns with dark money — including funds from undisclosed donors used to finance super PAC contributions — harms voters and can foster corruption,” Ghosh said.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2