2026年11月14日美国东部时间上午9:00发布 | 2026年11月14日美国东部时间上午9:12更新
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6408303426112
佛罗里达州共和党人警告称,民主党可能会把重点放在调查特朗普政府官员上,而非解决选民关切的问题。
佛罗里达州众议员兰迪·费恩(Randy Fine)对众议院共和党党团提出了直率的建议——面对明年1月民主党将占据的巨大优势:不必再担忧妥协,将少数党领袖一职交给众议员吉姆·乔丹(Jim Jordan),然后开始抗争。他表示,民主党大概率会在新一届国会中将政治迫害作为核心重点。
在接受福克斯新闻数字频道的深度采访时,费恩指出,即便共和党失去了众议院控制权,他自己的胜选优势仍扩大至19个百分点。他认为,选民惩罚共和党并非因为其政策,而是因为他们没有看到议员愿意为选民据理力争。
他指责犹太人:共和党众议员就选举后评估对JD·万斯提出爆炸性指控
对费恩而言,乔丹当选所传递的信息十分明确:
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/randy-fine-december-18-2025.jpg
佛罗里达州共和党众议员兰迪·费恩,于2025年12月18日星期四,在美国首都华盛顿特区的美国国会大厦外。(格拉姆·斯隆/彭博社 via Getty Images)
“嗯,在我看来,这表明我们已经准备好反击了。我的意思是,吉姆·乔丹在这个岗位上具备两大独特优势。
“其一,他是我们最能打的斗士。在特朗普总统首届任期那段荒谬的弹劾案期间,他曾为特朗普总统提供保护并与其并肩抗争。他就是那种敢于直面竞技场、奋起反击的人。
“但第二点,他是一名极其出色的沟通者。在接下来的两年里,我们的少数党势力会大幅削弱。而这也将成为我们最大的优势——即阐明为何民主党政策实际上无法改善任何人的生活,同时宣传我们将提出的、能够切实改善民众生活的政策。所以,作为一名斗士兼沟通者,我认为他完全有能力在未来两年领导我们。”
费恩淡化了政策因素在2026年民主党“蓝色浪潮”惨败中起到的主要作用:
“我不确定我们是否需要改变政策。甚至不确定我们的竞选说辞需要调整多少。我们需要做的是抗争。我认为我们输掉选举,是因为选民觉得我们不关心他们的问题,没有看到我们为解决问题而抗争的身影。
“即便你失败了,只要选民看到你在抗争,他们还是会投给你。但如果他们看不到你抗争,就不会投给你。我本人就是一个挑战了概率的人。我将选举中的胜选优势扩大了。我可能是全国唯一做到这一点的共和党人。我上次以14个百分点的优势胜选,这次则以19个百分点的优势胜出。”
在共和党众议员吉姆·乔丹当选接替即将卸任的议长迈克·约翰逊担任少数党领袖后,众议院共和党人正从通过法案转向防守。费恩对两种领导角色做出了明确区分。
“嗯,这是一份截然不同的工作。听着,我认为如果我们保住了多数席位,迈克·约翰逊会继续担任议长。议长的工作和少数党领袖的工作完全不同。所以迈克·约翰逊在未来50多天里的任务,就是尽可能推动更多好法案在众议院通过。
佛罗里达州众议员剖析共和党“蓝色浪潮”失利:“我们未能让他们认为我们关心他们”
“吉姆·乔丹什么都推动不了。民主党可能会拥有90到100个席位的多数优势。他的任务将是在民主党启动弹劾、盘问和实施报复时进行反击,同时再次阐明他们的政策不会改善民众生活。
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/rep-jim-jordan-june-2025.jpg
俄亥俄州共和党众议员吉姆·乔丹,于2025年6月10日星期二,在国会山俱乐部参加众议院共和党党团会议期间抵达。(汤姆·威廉姆斯/CQ Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
“他们会出来宣扬‘全民医保’。我们得站出来说:‘不,根本没有这种事。那只会是全民医疗补助。当你把它给所有人时,所有人都会遭殃。我们最终会沦落到加拿大那种有“死亡小组”的状况,或是英国那种你得等一两年才能看上病的地步。’这就是我们必须要做的:反击并沟通。这和迈克·约翰逊过去两年所承担的工作完全不同。”
僵局可能会是新一届国会的持续特征,但费恩并未完全排除妥协的可能性:
“嗯,首先,妥协并非必然。我们未来两年可能不会有太多作为。我认为这是最可能出现的结果。民主党通过各种荒谬法案,特朗普总统否决这些法案,然后我们在参众两院维持否决。我认为这就是未来两年最可能出现的结果。
“如果涉及妥协,你得看对方给我们开出了什么条件。比如,如果民主党同意推行选民ID法案——这是美国民众高度关注的大事,他们或许能从我们这里拿到一些让步。如果他们愿意停止大量荒谬的移民入境,或许能在其他事情上从我们这里获得妥协。所以问题在于:对民主党而言,妥协意味着我们要把他们想要的东西拱手相让。这永远是单向的。
“有意思的是,民主党赢了的时候,会说选举要有结果。而当我们赢了,他们就会说我们需要两党合作。他们就是持这种观点。他们永远不会站到我们这边来。所以我会看他们是否愿意妥协。我对此持开放态度。但这肯定需要我们得到一些东西——一些在我任职期间他们一直反对的诉求。”
在外交政策目标上,费恩指出了几位他准备合作的民主党人,同时阐明了自己对以色列的立场:
“当然。嗯,在参议院,你有约翰·费特曼(John Fetterman),我认为他是西方文明无比坚定的拥护者。有人说我是以色列的拥护者,我觉得这不公平。那听起来好像我只是在为一个国家发声。实则不止如此。
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/john-fetterman-during-debate.jpg
约翰·费特曼参议员于2025年6月2日在波士顿参加辩论。(美联社照片/史蒂文·森恩,档案)
“美国和以色列是世界上仅有的两个明确站出来反对穆斯林恐怖主义的国家,这种恐怖主义试图从根本上重塑我们全球所有人的生活。所以我站在西方文明这边,而约翰·费特曼在参议院就代表了西方文明。我觉得众议院那边的民主党同僚,像贾里德·莫斯考维茨(Jared Moskowitz)和乔希·戈特海默(Josh Gottheimer)也是如此……可惜,我认为他们在现阶段的人数相当少,但如果他们愿意和我并肩作战,我很乐意与他们同行。”
最后,费恩认为民主党在施政路径上面临着一个明确的选择,但他辩称他们大概率会做出错误选择:
“美国人选民主党不是因为他们想要调查和迫害。他们选民主党,是因为他们觉得我们没有解决他们的问题。如果他们犯下错误,走上报复和迫害的道路,两年后他们会落得和我们一样的下场。如果他们尝试解决美国民众的问题,就会做得很好。
“问题在于他们的方案行不通。别忘了,《平价医疗法案》并未让医疗变得可负担。但如果他们尝试做些有助于美国民众的事情,至少会在倾听他们的声音。但这是他们必须做出的选择。要么迫害,要么出台政策。我觉得他们会选择迫害,不过再过几个月就能见分晓了。”
戴维·昂斯沃思报道拉丁美洲相关内容。你可以在推特上关注戴维·昂斯沃思,账号为@LatinAmerUpdate
Florida Republican on Democrats’ strategy: ‘That’s the choice they have to make…persecution or policy’
Published November 14, 2026 9:00am EST | Updated November 14, 2026 9:12am EST
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6408303426112
Florida Republicans warns Democrats likely to focus on investigating Trump administration officials instead of addressing voters’ concerns.
Florida’s Rep. Randy Fine has a blunt prescription for a House Republican conference staring down a steep Democratic majority in January: stop worrying about compromise, hand the minority gavel to Rep. Jim Jordan, and start fighting, suggesting that Democrats will likely pursue political persecution as the main focus in the next Congress.
In a wide-ranging interview with Fox News Digital, Fine—who expanded his own victory margin to 19 points even as Republicans lost control of the chamber—argued that voters punished the GOP not for its policies, but because they didn’t see lawmakers willing to go to the mat for them.
‘HE BLAMED THE JEWS’: GOP CONGRESSMAN LEVELS EXPLOSIVE ACCUSATION AGAINST JD VANCE OVER ELECTION POSTMORTEM
For Fine, the message sent by Jordan’s election is unambiguous:
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/randy-fine-december-18-2025.jpg
Representative Randy Fine, a Republican from Florida, outside the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, Dec. 18, 2025.(Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
“Well, it says to me that we’re ready to fight back. I mean, Jim Jordan has two unique qualifications for the job.
“One, he’s our best fighter. He protected and fought for President Trump during the ridiculous impeachments of President Trump’s first term. He’s just somebody who knows how to go into the arena and fight back.
“But the second thing is, he’s an extraordinary communicator. And over the next two years, we are in a very diminished minority. That’s going to be our greatest strength, is to point out why the Democratic policies won’t actually improve anyone’s lives, and to point out the policies that we would propose that will. So, as a fighter and a communicator, I think he’s very well positioned to lead us for the next two years.”
Fine downplays policy as the primary driver of the disastrous 2026 blue tsunami:
“I don’t know that we need to change our policies. And I don’t even know how much of our messaging we need to change. What we need to do is we need to fight. I believe that we lost the election because voters thought we didn’t care about their problems, because they didn’t see us fighting to solve them.
“Voters will vote for you if they see you fighting, even if you fail. But they won’t vote for you if they don’t see you fighting. Now I’m a guy who defied the odds. I increased my margin in the election. I may be the only Republican in the country to do that. I won my last election by 14, I won this one by 19.”
With House Republicans shifting from passing bills to playing defense after electing Rep. Jim Jordan to succeed outgoing Speaker Mike Johnson as minority leader, Fine drew a sharp line between the two leadership roles.
“Well, it’s a very different job. Look, I think if we kept the majority, I think Mike Johnson would still be the speaker. The speaker’s job and the minority leader’s job are completely different. So Mike Johnson’s job for the next 50 plus days is to try to get as many good things passed through the House as he can.
FLORIDA CONGRESSMAN DIAGNOSES GOP’S BLUE TSUNAMI LOSSES: ‘WE FAILED TO MAKE THEM THINK WE CARED ABOUT THEM’
“Jim Jordan’s not going to be able to pass anything. The Democrats could have a 90 to 100 vote majority. His job is going to be to fight back when they’re impeaching and they’re interrogating and they are being vindictive, but also again to communicate why their policies will not make people’s lives better.
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/rep-jim-jordan-june-2025.jpg
Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, arrives for a meeting of the House Republican Conference at the Capitol Hill Club on Tuesday, June 10, 2025.(Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
“They’re going to come out and say Medicare for all. We’re going to have to say, ‘No, no there’s no such thing. It’s going to be Medicaid for all. When you give it to everyone, everyone will suffer. We’ll end up like Canada where there are death panels or the UK where you can wait a year or two to get to a doctor.’ That’s what we’re going to have to do: fight back and communicate. That’s a very different job than what Mike Johnson had to do the last two years.”
Gridlock may be the persistent feature of the next Congress, but Fine does not completely discard the potential for compromise:
“Well, first off, compromise isn’t inevitable. We may not do very much for the next two years. And I think that’s the most likely outcome. Democrats pass ridiculous things, President Trump vetoes them, and then we uphold the veto in the House and the Senate. I think that’s the most likely outcome for the next two years.
“If it relates to compromise, you have to see what we’re offered. So, for example, if Democrats would agree to voter ID, which is a huge thing the American people want, they might be able to extract a concession from us. If they’re willing to stop so much of the ridiculous immigration into this country, they might be able to get concessions from us on other things. So, the problem is this: to Democrats, compromise means we give them what they want. It’s always a one-way street.
“It’s funny, when Democrats win, they say elections have consequences. When we win, they say we need to be bipartisan. And that’s how their viewpoint is. They never come to our side of the world. So I’ll see if they want to compromise. I’ll be open to it. But it will truly require us getting some of the things that we want that they have fought us on for the time I’ve been in Congress.”
On foreign policy objectives, Fine points to several Democrats he’s prepared to work with, while clarifying his position on Israel:
“Sure. I mean, look, in the Senate, you’ve got John Fetterman, who I think is an incredibly strong advocate for Western civilization. I don’t think it’s fair to say I’m an advocate for Israel. That makes it sound like I’m just an advocate for a country. It’s more than that.
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/john-fetterman-during-debate.jpg
Sen. John Fetterman participates in a debate, June 2, 2025, in Boston.(AP Photo/Steven Senne, File)
“The United States and Israel are the only two countries in the world that are unambiguously standing up to Muslim terror, which seeks to fundamentally redefine life for all of us around the world. So I’m on the side of Western civilization and John Fetterman embodies that in the Senate. I think you’ve got guys like Jared Moskowitz and Josh Gottheimer on the House side, on the Democratic side, who do as well…Unfortunately, I think they’re pretty outnumbered at this point, but if they want to fight with me, I’m happy to fight alongside them.”
Finally, Fine contends that the Democrats face a clear dichotomy in how they want to proceed to govern, but argues they will likely make the wrong choice:
“The American people elected Democrats not because they wanted investigations and persecution. They elected Democrats because they didn’t think we were solving their problems. If they make the mistake of going down the vengeance and persecution path, they’ll end up in two years just the same way we did. If they try to solve the problems of the American people, they’ll do well.
“The problem is their ideas don’t work. Remember, the Affordable Care Act didn’t make health care affordable. But if they try to do things that will help the American people, at least they’ll be listening to them. But that’s the choice they have to make. Persecution or policy. I think they’re going to choose persecution, but we’ll find out in a couple of months.”
David Unsworth reports on Latin America. You can follow David Unsworth on Twitter @LatinAmerUpdate
发表回复