2026-09-09 上午11:50 美东时间 / 哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)新闻
作者:多夫·利伯
随着以色列民众即将于下月参加一场竞争激烈的议会选举,这场选举将决定该国下一届政府,民众仍在争论本国为何会在2023年10月7日猝不及防——当时被美国列为恐怖组织的哈马斯突破边境发动袭击,造成1200余人死亡、数百人被绑架。
以色列《国土报》周一的报道为这场讨论增添了新的热度:就在这场引发加沙战争、乃至 arguably 整个中东范围更大冲突的袭击发生前几天,以色列总理本雅明·内塔尼亚胡曾接到阿联酋领导人的电话预警,告知加沙的哈马斯领导人正策划一场大规模袭击。
《国土报》的报道称,内塔尼亚胡并未将该预警传达给以色列安全高层。
哥伦比亚广播公司新闻尚未独立核实《国土报》的报道,该报周二发表声明称对报道内容坚持立场。
尽管以色列方面此前已观察到哈马斯为袭击所做的准备,其中部分还被该组织上传至网络视频,但哈马斯发动袭击当天,以色列仍猝不及防。
内塔尼亚胡的办公室周二发表声明,否认他在袭击前收到过阿联酋领导人的明确预警,并表示他已“指示律师对《国土报》及其报道该消息的记者提起诽谤诉讼”。
“总理与阿联酋总统之间并未发生任何对话,”内塔尼亚胡的办公室称,“这是一起带有明确政治时机的恶意诽谤,属于左翼竞选活动的一部分,后续还会出现更多此类虚假抹黑。”
以色列全国议会选举将于10月27日举行,目前尚无明确的领跑者。
以色列前总理纳夫塔利·贝内特此次将与内塔尼亚胡同台竞选,且近年来曾多次与阿联酋领导人会面。他周二在社交媒体发文称,他相信《国土报》的报道属实,并补充称内塔尼亚胡“对预警置之不理属于刑事过失”。
《国土报》的报道以及内塔尼亚胡随后的否认,罕见地展现了中东地区高风险的外交运作。
内塔尼亚胡的办公室在声明中证实,正如《国土报》所报道的那样,每当阿联酋领导人希望与以色列领导人通话时,都会由一名阿联酋代表前往内塔尼亚胡的办公室,提供一部专门加密的电话供双方对话。
内塔尼亚胡的办公室周二表示,从2023年9月初至10月7日期间,没有以、阿两国领导人通话的记录,也没有阿联酋访客到访总理办公室的记录。
内塔尼亚胡的办公室称,总理办公室、国家安全委员会(NSC)以及军事秘书处已对此次通话或到访进行了核查。
阿联酋政府周二发表声明称,自五年前该国与以色列建立正常外交关系以来,双方一直保持“开放且直接的沟通渠道”。该声明既未证实也未否认《国土报》有关此次通话的报道。
内塔尼亚胡辩称,10月7日当天,在哈马斯袭击打响之前,没有任何顾问或安全官员叫醒他,当天未能保护以色列的不是他,而是该国安全机构的负责人。
上周以色列国家广播公司Kan News披露,内塔尼亚胡在袭击开始后于清晨6:27被军事秘书叫醒,到他首次要求与该国最高将领通话之间间隔了三个小时,有关他当日行为的质疑重新浮出水面。
内塔尼亚胡的办公室发布了一份大致证实这一时间线的日程表,但补充称他当天上午8点左右在前往国防部的途中与以色列国防部长进行了通话。
根据内塔尼亚胡及其安全官员当时发表的声明,在袭击发生前的数周和数天里,内塔尼亚胡曾收到高级安全和政治官员的预警,称以色列的敌人正考虑发动袭击,当时该国正因内塔尼亚胡政府推动司法改革而爆发抗议活动。
内塔尼亚胡辩称,这些预警并未具体提及来自加沙的袭击,也未明确时间线。他还称,当时其安全首长的评估是,哈马斯无意发动大规模升级。
截至目前,这位以色列领导人拒绝了对10月7日袭击事件进行正式国家调查的要求,而这类调查在以色列遭遇全国性灾难后本是常规程序。
内塔尼亚胡的政治对手表示,如果他们在10月的选举中获胜,将立即启动相关调查。
Netanyahu rejects claim he was warned ahead of Oct. 7, as 2023 attack fuels pre-election furor
2026-09-09 11:50 AM EDT / CBS News
By Dov Lieber
As Israelis prepare to vote next month in a tightly contested legislative race that will determine the country’s next government, they’re still debating how their country was caught by surprise on Oct. 7, 2023, when the U.S.-designated terrorist group Hamas stormed across the border and killed more than 1,200 people and kidnapped hundreds more.
The discussion got new fuel when the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported Monday that, just days before the attack that sparked the war in Gaza and arguably the much wider conflict across the Middle East, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was warned in a phone call by the leader of the United Arab Emirates that Gaza’s Hamas leaders were planning a major assault.
The Haaretz report said Netanyahu did not pass on the warning to Israel’s security leaders.
CBS News has not independently confirmed Haaretz’s reporting, which the Israeli newspaper said it stood by in a Tuesday statement.
The day Hamas attacked, Israel was caught by surprise, despite having observed preparations by Hamas for the assault, some of which the group itself posted in videos online.
Netanyahu’s office denied in a Tuesday statement that he had received any explicit warning from the Emirati leader leading up to the attack, and said he had “instructed his attorneys to file a defamation lawsuit” against Haaretz and the reporter who filed the story.
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu stands on Mount Hermon, on the Israeli-Syria border, in a photo provided by his office, Sept. 9, 2026. Handout/Israeli government
“No conversation took place between the Prime Minister and the President of the United Arab Emirates,” Netanyahu’s office said. “This is a malicious libel with clear political timing, as part of the left’s election campaign, and more such false smears will follow.”
Israel’s national legislative elections take place on Oct. 27, and there is currently no clear front-runner.
Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, who is running against Netanyahu in the upcoming election and has met with the Emirati leader himself several times in recent years, wrote in a social media post Tuesday that he believed the Haaretz report was true, adding that Netanyahu’s “ignoring of the warnings is criminal negligence.”
The Haaretz report and subsequent denial by Netanyahu also gave a rare look into the high-stakes diplomacy of the Middle East.
Netanyahu’s office confirmed in its statement that, as reported by Haaretz, whenever the Emirati leader does wish to speak with the Israeli leader, a representative from the UAE travels to Netanyahu’s office and provides a specially encrypted phone for the conversation.
Netanyahu’s office said Tuesday that there is no record of a call between the Israeli and Emirati leaders from the beginning of September until Oct. 7, 2023. There was no record of an Emirati visitor to the prime minister’s office during that period either, Netanyahu’s office said.
The check for any such visit or phone call was conducted by the Prime Minister’s Office, the National Security Council (NSC) and the Military Secretariat, Netanyahu’s office said.
The UAE government said in a statement Tuesday that, since the country established normal ties with Israel five years ago, it has maintained “open and direct lines of communication.” The statement neither confirmed nor denied the Haaretz report about the phone call.
Netanyahu has argued that none of his advisers or security officials woke him up on Oct. 7 until Hamas’ attack was underway, and that it wasn’t he who failed to protect Israel that day, but the heads of the country’s security agencies.
Questions over Netanyahu’s actions on that day burst back into public debate last week after Israel’s national broadcaster Kan News revealed that three hours passed between Netanyahu being woken up by his military secretary at 6:27 a.m., as the invasion began, and when he first requested to speak with the country’s top general.
Netanyahu’s office released a schedule roughly confirming that timeline, but it added that he spoke with Israel’s defense minister around 8 a.m. that day, on his way to the ministry of defense.
In the weeks and days leading up to the attack, Netanyahu was warned by top security and political officials that Israel’s enemies were considering an attack while the country was being rocked by protests against an effort by Netanyahu’s government to overhaul the judicial system, according to statements issued by Netanyahu and security officials at the time.
Netanyahu has argued that those warnings did not specifically mention an attack originating from Gaza, or a clear timeline. He has also argued that the assessment of his security chiefs at the time was that Hamas was not interested in a major escalation.
So far, the Israeli leader has rejected demands for a formal state inquiry into the Oct. 7 attack, which is regular procedure in Israel after national catastrophes.
Netanyahu’s political opponents have said they would establish one immediately, if they win power in October.