博客

  • 俄罗斯研究人员离奇死亡事件或比鼠疫“更可怕”,特朗普政府前高级官员警告


    2026-10-06T14:39:14-04:00 / 福克斯新闻频道

    曾为苏联生物武器叛逃者向马歇尔·比林斯利透露过同一实验室研制出耐药鼠疫菌株的内情
    作者:摩根·菲利普斯 福克斯新闻频道
    发布于2026年10月6日美国东部时间下午2:39

    俄罗斯淡化鼠疫暴发恐慌
    美国国务卿马可·卢比奥称,特朗普政府正在监控俄罗斯境内可能暴发的鼠疫疫情。此前有报道称,一处实验室装有致命病原体的试管破损,随后一名实验室工作人员因肺炎死亡。

    全新功能:您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/dc366897-165d-47e7-bdf4-c0dae3e59384

    收听本文
    5分钟

    西伯利亚与远东地区伊尔库茨克抗鼠疫研究所一名研究人员的离奇死亡,让美国前高级军备官员发出警告:这可能比引发黑死病的细菌“更可怕”。
    曾担任唐纳德·特朗普总统军备控制特别特使的马歇尔·比林斯利表示,数十年前,一名顶级苏联生物武器叛逃者曾向他透露,在此次涉疫死亡事件发生的同一实验室里,曾秘密开展耐药鼠疫菌株的研究工作。
    “这可能不只是‘普通鼠疫’,情况可能比这可怕得多,”比林斯利在X平台上写道。

    他在20世纪90年代大部分时间都在参议院外交关系委员会负责防扩散和军备控制议题,在此期间与肯·阿里贝克共事过。阿里贝克是苏联生物武器项目的前二号人物,后来叛逃至美国。

    生物武器威胁曝光:Anthropic公司就外国势力策划病毒实验敲响警钟

    2026年10月5日,俄罗斯伊尔库茨克州舍列霍夫镇医疗救援中心(一家传染病医院)的画面。(路透社)
    “他声称他们曾培育出耐药鼠疫菌株,还研究过鼠疫嵌合体(将两种或多种病原体融合),”比林斯利在谈及阿里贝克时写道。
    “他特别指出伊尔库茨克参与了生物武器项目,”他补充道。

    比林斯利发出警告之前,西伯利亚与远东地区伊尔库茨克抗鼠疫研究所一名28岁员工于上周因肺炎死亡,俄罗斯当局称该肺炎病因不明。
    俄罗斯方面并未表示该女子死于鼠疫,并表示检测未发现其体内存在与其工作相关的微生物。
    世界卫生组织(WHO)周二表示,俄罗斯官员告知该机构,在该女子的密切接触者中未检测出鼠疫或其他高威胁病原体,但目前仍在等待确认导致其致命肺炎的具体原因。

    国防部科学家意外死亡引发质疑,失踪科学家调查范围扩大
    据俄罗斯当局透露,截至目前,已对该女子约60%的已确认接触者进行了检测,其中发现2例新冠病毒感染和2例鼻病毒感染,但未检测到其他传染病病原体。
    尽管如此,这家研究危险病原体的机构发生的离奇死亡事件还是引发了生物安全专家的密切关注——包括为何死因至今不明的质疑。

    身着防护服的工作人员在俄罗斯开展检测,此前西伯利亚一家抗鼠疫研究所的员工死亡,当地加强了防护措施。(Khuvsguliinungu.mn/e2w)
    研究生物安全和大流行病风险的麻省理工学院教授凯文·埃斯韦尔特表示,俄罗斯方面最新的解释表明该研究人员并非死于鼠疫,但未解释真正的致死原因。
    “如果我们采信俄罗斯当局的说法,那她就不是死于鼠疫,”埃斯韦尔特周二写道。
    “但经过非针对性的科研级测序通常可以可靠地识别病原体,而且人们很少会在没有病原体感染的情况下死于肺炎,更何况是28岁的年轻人,”他补充道,“如果他们不知道死因,那才令人惊讶。”
    埃斯韦尔特提醒称,更令人担忧的解释仍只是推测。
    “值得警惕的可能性目前还只是一种假设,”他写道。

    围绕这起死亡事件的质疑,背景是苏联曾秘密研制包括武器化鼠疫在内的生物武器的有据可查的历史,以及美国的评估:苏联解体后,该项目的部分内容仍在继续。
    美国国务院在2025年军备控制合规报告中评估,俄罗斯仍在维持违反《禁止生物武器公约》的进攻性生物战项目,苏联的生物武器项目在苏联解体后“被继承,而非被解散”。
    国务院称,该项目在俄罗斯联邦治下“持续存在并不断演变”,莫斯科仍在从事公约禁止的活动。俄罗斯多次否认维持进攻性生物武器项目。
    美国的评估并未将俄罗斯的生物武器项目与伊尔库茨克发生的研究人员死亡事件联系起来,目前也没有证实两者存在关联。

    宾夕法尼亚州麻疹病例激增,纽约宣布麻疹灾害紧急状态

    28岁的达莉亚·希皮洛娃是西伯利亚与远东地区伊尔库茨克抗鼠疫研究所的员工,她因不明原因的肺炎死亡,促使该地区启动隔离措施并加强卫生防护。俄罗斯当局表示,检测未发现她的病情与其工作中接触的病原体有关。(East2West新闻)

    比林斯利提及的苏联项目是全球规模最大的秘密生物武器行动之一。阿里贝克本名卡纳特让·阿里别科夫,曾升任苏联生物武器项目主要组成部分的名义上的民用网络“生物制备计划”的第一副手,1992年叛逃至美国。

    叛逃后,阿里贝克向美国官员提供了关于苏联项目规模和能力的详细信息。他描述苏联科学家曾致力于将包括鼠疫在内的病原体武器化,并开发能够抵御抗生素的菌株。
    多年来,他关于苏联项目某些方面的说法一直受到审查,因此独立记录尤为重要。但苏联生物武器行动的存在及其庞大规模——尽管莫斯科在1975年批准了《禁止生物武器公约》仍秘密开展——已是公认的事实。
    伊尔库茨克研究所称,其成立于1934年,是防治鼠疫的科研和行动中心。其任务后来扩展到霍乱和炭疽等其他高度危险疾病,如今自称是负责保护该地区免受传染病侵害的研究和防疫机构。

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6406361933112

    特朗普政府表示正在密切监控事态发展,并敦促莫斯科就事件真相提高透明度。
    美国国务卿马可·卢比奥周一表示,尽管美俄之间的旅行仍然受限,但传染病可能会迅速蔓延至俄罗斯境外。
    “如果类似病毒外泄,可能会迅速传播,”卢比奥说。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    唐纳德·特朗普总统表示,如有需要,美国将向俄罗斯提供援助。
    “我不愿看到他们遭遇这种情况,”特朗普周一对记者说,“这是一种凶险的疾病。”

    Russian researcher’s mystery death could be ‘far worse’ than the plague, former senior Trump official warns

    2026-10-06T14:39:14-04:00 / Fox News

    A Soviet bioweapons defector told Marshall Billingslea about an antibiotic-resistant plague from the same facility

    By Morgan Phillips Fox News

    Published October 6, 2026 2:39pm EDT

    Russia DOWNPLAYS fears of plague outbreak

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the Trump administration is monitoring a potential plague outbreak in Russia after a laboratory worker reportedly died from pneumonia following reports of a broken test tube containing a deadly pathogen.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/dc366897-165d-47e7-bdf4-c0dae3e59384

    Listen to this article
    5 min

    The unexplained death of a researcher at a Russian anti-plague institute has one former senior U.S. arms official warning it could be ‘far worse’ than the bacteria that caused the Black Death.

    Marshall Billingslea, who served as President Donald Trump’s special presidential envoy for arms control, said a top Soviet bioweapons defector told him decades ago about secret work on antibiotic-resistant plague at the same facility where the recent plague-related death occurred.

    “This may not be just ‘the plague.’ It may be far worse,” Billingslea wrote on X.

    He spent much of the 1990s working on proliferation and arms control issues on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee — and during that time worked with Ken Alibek, the former No. 2 official in the Soviet biological weapons program who defected to the U.S.

    BIOWEAPON THREAT EXPOSED AS ANTHROPIC SOUNDS ALARM ON FOREIGN ACTORS PLOTTING VIRUS EXPERIMENTS

    A view of the Medical Assistance and Rescue Centre, an infectious diseases hospital, in the town of Shelekhov in the Irkutsk region, Russia, October 5, 2026.(Reuters)

    “He claimed that they had engineered a strain of plague that was antibiotic-resistant & that they had worked on plague chimeras (fusing 2 or more pathogens),” Billingslea wrote of Alibek.

    “He specifically called out Irkutsk for being involved in the BW program,” he added.

    Billingslea’s warning comes after a 28-year-old employee of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute of Siberia and the Far East died last week from what Russian authorities have described as pneumonia of undetermined origin.

    Russia has not said the woman died of plague and said testing found no microorganisms in her body linked to her work.

    The World Health Organization (WHO) said Tuesday that Russian officials told the agency no plague or other high-threat pathogen had been detected among her close contacts, though they are still awaiting confirmation of what caused her fatal pneumonia.

    DEFENSE DEPARTMENT SCIENTIST’S ACCIDENTAL DEATH RAISES QUESTIONS AS PROBE INTO MISSING SCIENTISTS GROWS

    About 60% of the woman’s identified contacts have been tested so far, according to Russian authorities, with two cases of COVID-19 and two rhinovirus infections detected — but no other infectious disease pathogens.

    Still, the unexplained death at a facility that works with dangerous pathogens has drawn scrutiny from biosecurity experts — including questions about why the cause remains unknown.

    Workers in protective uniforms conduct testing in Russia amid heightened precautions following the death of an employee at a Siberian anti-plague research institute.(Khuvsguliinungu.mn/e2w)

    Kevin Esvelt, an MIT professor who studies biological security and catastrophic pandemic risks, said Russia’s latest explanation suggests the researcher did not die from plague while leaving unanswered what killed her.

    “If we take the Russian authorities at their word, it is not plague,” Esvelt wrote Tuesday.

    “But untargeted research-grade sequencing reliably identifies pathogens, and people seldom die of pneumonia without pathogens, let alone 28-year-olds,” he added. “It would be surprising if they did not know the cause.”

    Esvelt cautioned that more alarming explanations remain hypothetical.

    “The concerning possibility is still only a possibility,” he wrote.

    The questions surrounding the death come against the backdrop of the Soviet Union’s documented history of secretly developing biological weapons, including weaponized plague, and U.S. assessments that elements of that program continued after the Soviet collapse.

    In its 2025 arms control compliance report, the State Department assessed that Russia maintains an offensive biological warfare program in violation of the Biological Weapons Convention and that the Soviet program was “absorbed, not dismantled” after the Soviet collapse.

    The department said the program “has continued and evolved” under the Russian Federation and that Moscow continues activities prohibited under the convention. Russia has repeatedly denied maintaining an offensive biological weapons program.

    The U.S. assessment does not establish any connection between Russia’s biological weapons program and the researcher’s death in Irkutsk, and no such connection has been confirmed.

    NEW YORK DECLARES MEASLES DISASTER EMERGENCY AS CASES SURGE IN PENNSYLVANIA

    Darya Shipilova, 28, an employee of the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Research Institute of Siberia and the Far East, died after developing pneumonia of an unknown cause, prompting quarantines and heightened health precautions in the region. Russian authorities say testing has found no evidence her illness was linked to pathogens she worked with.(East2West news)

    The Soviet program Billingslea referenced was one of the world’s largest clandestine biological weapons efforts. Alibek, born Kanatjan Alibekov, rose to become the first deputy chief of Biopreparat, the ostensibly civilian network that formed a major part of the Soviet biological weapons apparatus, before defecting to the United States in 1992.

    After his defection, Alibek provided U.S. officials with extensive information about the scale and capabilities of the Soviet program. He described Soviet scientists working to weaponize pathogens including plague and developing strains designed to withstand antibiotics.

    His claims about some aspects of the Soviet program have faced scrutiny over the years, making independent documentation particularly important. But the existence and enormous scale of the Soviet biological weapons effort — conducted despite Moscow’s 1975 ratification of the Biological Weapons Convention — is well established.

    The Irkutsk institute says it was founded in 1934 as a scientific and operational center for combating plague. Its mission later expanded to other highly dangerous diseases, including cholera and anthrax, and it describes itself today as a research and anti-epidemic facility responsible for helping protect the region from infectious disease.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6406361933112

    The Trump administration has said it is closely monitoring the situation and pressed Moscow for greater transparency about what happened.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Monday that while travel between the U.S. and Russia remains limited, an infectious disease could quickly spread beyond Russia’s borders.

    “If something like that gets out, it could quickly spread,” Rubio said.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    President Donald Trump said the U.S. would offer assistance to Russia if needed.

    “I hate to see them having it,” Trump told reporters Monday. “It’s a rough disease.”

  • 卡玛拉·哈里斯拿下的选区选出的共和党人或将给民主党带来劲敌


    2026-10-06T17:02:15.389Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/06/politics/new-york-battleground-mike-lawler-cait-conley

    迈克·劳勒是本届选举周期中国会最岌岌可危的共和党议员之一,也是仅有的三位代表卡玛拉·哈里斯2024年胜选选区的共和党议员之一。

    但在政治逆风似乎正朝着有利于民主党方向吹拂的一年里,退伍军人、拜登政府前官员凯特·康利要想将这位连任两届的现任议员赶下台,拿下纽约哈德逊谷的这个席位,恐怕仍将举步维艰。

    尽管根据纽约州选举委员会的数据,第17选区登记的民主党活跃选民比共和党多出7万多人,但劳勒凭借强调自己的两党合作诚意以及愿意与唐纳德·特朗普总统划清界限的立场,展现出了跨党派吸引力。其中包括来自党派另一方的数项背书,比如缅因州众议员贾里德·戈尔登以及当地民主党政客的支持。

    共和党高层对劳勒保住席位的能力充满信心,众议院共和党领袖认为他是他们最实力强劲的摇摆选区候选人之一,能够逆势而为。

    这场对决的高风险性可见一斑:它已成为全美花费最高的众议院竞选之一,共和党和民主党累计投入超过4000万美元用于广告宣传,将劳勒与特朗普绑定,并 scrutinize 康利与人工智能公司的关联。

    但康利仍坚信自己能够翻转这个选区,而在民主党希望夺回众议院、以应对特朗普剩余两年执政期的背景下,这一席位的归属可能至关重要。

    “我们在选区各个角落感受到的竞选热情令人难以置信,”她周日在一场竞选活动中接受CNN采访时表示。“民众正意识到11月选举的重要性,以及这场斗争关乎那些被本届政府政策坑害的工薪家庭,而迈克·劳勒正是本届政府政策的帮凶。”

    “有着激进亲民政治的悠久深厚传统”

    不过,康利作为首次参选的候选人,仍需要向选民介绍自己,而劳勒则受益于近四年的任期以及由此带来的知名度。

    近几个月来,她通过与前交通部长皮特·布塔吉格、民主党参议员马克·凯利一同竞选造势,并突出获得前众议员加比·吉福兹和新泽西州州长米基·谢里尔的背书,来激发选民热情。据杰弗里斯的发言人贾斯汀·切尔莫尔透露,众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯也将在未来几周与她一同开展竞选活动。

    全国民主党人也对这场竞选投入了资源,一名众议院民主党幕僚将该席位称为该党的首要目标。与杰弗里斯相关的超级政治行动委员会众议院多数党PAC的通讯主任CJ·沃克表示,该委员会目前已在该选区的有线电视广告上投入超过180万美元,并在纽约市媒体市场预留了更多广告时段。

    但民主党策略师德格·福兰德认为,这场竞选的关键可能在于与选民的面对面接触。

    “她面临的挑战是继续深耕亲民竞选路线,你知道,这个选区有着激进亲民政治的悠久深厚传统,”他说。

    琳达是贝德福德的居民,2024年曾投票给哈里斯,目前仍对今年的中期选举拿不定主意。“除了州长,我对其他参选者都不够了解,”她告诉CNN。但她表示自己的共和党孙子正在支持康利。“他只是了解她之后就喜欢上了,”她补充道。

    同样持观望态度的还有芒特基斯科的居民、小企业主史蒂夫·纳德勒,他在上次总统选举中也支持了哈里斯。“我肯定会在投票前自行做足调研,”他说。

    劳勒则表示,全国层面对这场竞选的关注并未给他带来困扰,他有信心保住席位。

    “我认为我所做的工作让这场竞选受到了关注,”他在纽约州普莱森特维尔的一场活动中表示。“最终,我并不觉得这是什么难以跨越的挑战,也没有因此感受到额外压力,我就是为这份工作而生的。”

    尽管特朗普极不受欢迎,但劳勒的本地人脉以及以温和共和党人身份愿意跨党派合作的形象,似乎仍对选民有影响力。

    在接受CNN采访的选民中,生活成本是首要关切问题,但几乎没有共和党人认为这位特朗普盟友应对此负责,尽管康利一直在努力将他们与特朗普绑定。

    “作为一名靠社保生活的寡妇,又是退休人员,这日子有点难熬。我所有的钱都用来付账单了,”77岁的普莱森特维尔居民苏珊·夏夏说道。尽管她感受到了财务压力,但她计划下个月投票给劳勒,并表示劳勒理解美国人的处境。

    “他是个顾家的男人,有孩子,有妻子,他也在经历这一切,”夏夏补充道。“他知道自己正在经历什么,所以他也清楚我们的处境。”

    康利也将经济负担能力作为竞选的核心议题,但一名高级助手告诉CNN,全国民主党人希望她在竞选最后几周的宣传中更加强调这一议题。

    尽管劳勒一直在强调自己愿意与特朗普划清界限的领域,比如在州和地方税的谈判中,但他也试图将作为温和派参选的康利与其党内更左翼的派系绑定。

    在上周的一场辩论中,劳勒指责纽约市市长佐赫兰·曼达尼——一名民主社会主义者、以色列政府的严厉批评者——散布反犹主义,并要求康利谴责他。

    康利表示她谴责任何形式的反犹主义,并指出她与党内部分民主社会主义者存在分歧,随后将话题转向特朗普对该选区的影响。

    但距离纽约市仅火车车程的第17选区拥有庞大的犹太人口,民主党内部围绕以色列问题的持续争论可能会对这场众议院竞选产生影响。

    劳勒突出了两名当地民主党犹太官员的背书:纽卡斯尔镇议员艾莉·切姆托布和蒙特贝罗副市长斯泰西·卡里迪,她们称赞这位国会议员为打击反犹主义所做的努力。

    “我支持迈克是出于个人原因,因为当我抛开党派标签去看待我认识并信任的人时,我看到的是一个关心我孩子的安全和福祉的人,”切姆托布在一份竞选新闻稿中说道。

    但康利则强调了自己对以色列的支持,并表示她本会投票反对削减对以色列的军事援助。

    当被问及是否希望曼达尼或另一位纽约市进步派议员亚历山大·奥卡西奥-科特兹在今年秋季为她的竞选活动站台时,康利告诉CNN:“目前,我只专注于让选民了解我,尽我所能与他们见面。”

    这种专注在上周末一个阴天的活动中体现得淋漓尽致,她在纽约州阿蒙克的一场挨家挨户拉票活动中对手持庭院宣传牌的志愿者发表讲话,并承认这场竞选势均力敌。

    “我向你们保证,这场竞选将是一场每一次敲门、每一通电话、每一张选票都至关重要的战斗,我知道我能够赢得这场战斗,但我无法独自取胜,”康利说道。

    CNN的爱德华-艾萨克·多夫和莎拉·费里斯为本报道撰稿。

    A Republican in a district Kamala Harris won could give Democrats a run for their money

    2026-10-06T17:02:15.389Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/06/politics/new-york-battleground-mike-lawler-cait-conley

    Mike Lawler is one of the most vulnerable Republicans in Congress this election cycle, one of only three representing a district that Kamala Harris won in2024.

    But in a year when political headwinds seem to be blowing in Democrats’ favor, combat veteran and Biden administration alum Cait Conley may still be facing an uphill battle to oust the two-term incumbent from his seat in New York’s Hudson Valley.

    While active registered Democrats outnumber Republicans in the 17th District by more than 70,000, according to the New York State Board of Elections, Lawler has shown crossover appeal as he has sought to highlight his bipartisan bona fides and willingness to break with President Donald Trump. That includes several endorsements from across the aisle, including Maine Rep. Jared Golden and local Democratic politicians.

    Senior Republicans feel confident in Lawler’s ability to maintain his seat, and House GOP leaders believe that he is one of their strongest battleground candidates and can defy the national environment.

    In a sign of the high stakes, the showdown has become one of the most expensive House races in the country, with Republicans and Democrats funneling more than $40 million cumulatively into ads tying Lawler to Trump and scrutinizing Conley’s connections to AI companies.

    But Conley still believes she can flip the seat, which could prove consequential as Democrats look to retake the House for Trump’s final two years in power.

    “The energy that we are feeling in every corner of this district is incredible,” she told CNN during a campaign event on Sunday. “Where people are recognizing the stakes of this November and how this is a fight for working families who are getting screwed by the policies of this administration, enabled by Mike Lawler.”

    ‘A long and deep history of really aggressive retail politics’

    Conley, however, is still introducing herself to voters as a first-time candidate, while Lawler benefits from nearly four years of incumbency and the ensuing name recognition.

    In recent months, she’s tried to excite voters by campaigning with former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigiegand Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly and highlighting endorsements from former Rep. Gabby Giffords and New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries will also join her on the campaign trail in the coming weeks, according to Jeffries spokesperson Justin Chermol.

    National Democrats are also invested in the race, with an operative for House Democrats calling the seat a top priority for the party. House Majority PAC, the super PAC linked to Jeffries, has already spent over $1.8 million in cable advertising in the race so far with further reservations in the New York City media market, HMP communications director CJ Warnke said.

    But what it could come down to, Democratic strategist Doug Forand says, is face time with voters.

    “Her challenge is to continue to work the retail side of it, you know, and that district has a long and deep history of really aggressive retail politics,” he said.

    Linda, a Bedford resident who voted for Harris in 2024, is still on the fence about voting in this year’s midterm election. “Other than the governors, I don’t know enough about the other people running yet,” she told CNN. But she said that her grandson, who is a Republican, is supporting Conley. “He just likes what he knows about her,” she added.

    Mt. Kisco resident and small business owner Steve Nadler, who also supported Harris in the last presidential election, feels similarly. “I’ll definitely do my own research prior to submitting a vote,” he said.

    Lawler, for his part, says he hasn’t been bothered by national attention on the race and is confident he can keep the seat.

    “I think the work I’ve done has put the spotlight on this race,” he said during a stop in Pleasantville, New York. “Ultimately, I don’t feel any uphill battle or additional pressure from it, I live for this.”

    Despite Trump’s deep unpopularity, Lawler’s local relationships and pitch as a moderate Republican willing to work across the aisle still appear to hold sway with voters.

    While cost of living was a top concern for voters who spoke with CNN, few Republicans seemed to fault the Trump ally for it, despite Conley’s efforts to tie them together.

    “It’s a little hard when you’re a widow, you’re on Social Security, you’re retired. You know, I spend all my money paying bills,” said 77-year-old Susan Sciascia of Pleasantville. While she feels the strain on her finances, she plans to vote for Lawler next month and says he understands what Americans are experiencing.

    “He’s a family man. He’s got kids. He’s got a wife. He’s in it too.” Sciascia added. “He knows what he’s going through, so he knows what we’re going through.”

    Conley has also made affordability a central focus in her campaign, but national Democrats want her to push on this issue harder in her messaging in the final weeks of the campaign, a high-ranking aide told CNN.

    While Lawler has sought to highlight areas where he’s willing to break with Trump, such as in negotiations on state and local taxes, he’s also worked to tie Conley, who is running as a moderate, to the further left contingencies within her own party.

    During a debate last week, Lawler accused New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist and staunch critic of Israel’s government, of antisemitism, and demanded Conley denounce him.

    Conley said she condemned antisemitism from anyone and noted that she has disagreements with some democratic socialists within her party, before turning the subject to Trump’s impacts on the district.

    But just a train ride away from New York City, the 17th District has a large Jewish population and the Democratic Party’s ongoing debate over Israel could play a role in the House race.

    Lawler has highlighted the endorsements of two local Democratic Jewish officials, New Castle Town Councilwoman Ally Chemtob and Montebello Deputy Mayor Stacy Caridi, who cited the congressman’s efforts to fight antisemitism.

    “My support for Mike is personal, because when I look beyond party labels to someone I know and trust, I see someone who cares about the safety and well-being of my children,” Chemtob said in a campaign press release.

    Conley, however, has stressed her support for Israel and said that she would have voted against cutting military aid to the country.

    Asked if she wants Mamdani, or another New York City progressive, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, to join her on the campaign trail this fall, Conley told CNN, “Right now, I’m just focused on voters getting to know me and meeting them everywhere that they are.”

    That focus was on display on an overcast Sunday last weekend, as she spoke to volunteers armed with lawn signs at a canvassing event in Armonk, New York, and acknowledged the tightness of the race.

    “I promise you this is going to be a fight where every door knocked, every call made, every vote is going to matter, and it is a fight that I know I can win, but I cannot win alone,” Conley said.

    CNN’s Edward-Isaac Dovere and Sarah Ferris contributed to this report.

  • 民主党高层议员就贾里德·库什纳的金融投资展开调查,此前CNN发布相关报道


    2026-10-06T18:39:19.390Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    一名民主党资深议员正在寻求有关贾里德·库什纳金融投资的信息,此前CNN上周发布的一项调查发现,他的私募股权公司是一家以色列公司的最大股东,该公司为参与以色列军事行动的企业提供支持。

    众议院监督委员会排名最高的民主党议员罗伯特·加西亚于周一向库什纳的投资公司Affinity Partners发送了一封信,信中称委员会民主党议员正在“调查特朗普总统及其家人利用其权力获取直接利益的前所未有的危险方式”。

    “……我要求你提供有关你在中东业务往来的详细信息,以了解你获得的巨额财务收益是否以美国的安全和保障为代价,”这位来自加利福尼亚州的议员写道。

    这封信再次表明,如果民主党能在今年秋季的中期选举中夺回众议院多数席位,他们将着手调查唐纳德·特朗普总统家人在海外和美国的商业交易。

    库什纳的一名律师驳斥了加西亚的批评,并试图将矛头指向这位国会议员本人在CNN关于库什纳的报道中被审查的投资持仓——Phoenix Financial,这是一家以色列金融服务公司,Affinity Partners是其最大投资者,以及以色列最大的军火制造商埃尔比特系统公司(Elbit Systems)。

    “加西亚议员的信堪称反讽的典范:一名国会议员质疑一名普通公民持有与该议员本人持有的相同股票的利益,”该律师在给CNN的一份声明中表示。“贾里德无权决定Phoenix买卖什么。但如果这对加西亚议员来说无关紧要,他应该先调查自己。”

    加西亚最新的披露表格显示,他的养老金计划由加州公共雇员退休系统和加州州教师退休系统管理。这两个计划都持有Phoenix Financial或埃尔比特系统公司的股票。

    加西亚的一名发言人表示,库什纳的律师试图转移人们对其委托人自身行为的注意力,并补充说,这位国会议员不进行股票交易,和养老金计划中数百万其他公职人员一样,他无法控制基金,也无法选择退出。

    “贾里德·库什纳在毫无问责的情况下赚取数百万美元,同时还代表他的岳父在中东奔波,”加西亚的发言人萨拉·格雷罗说道。

    “Affinity Partners的投资与你在中东的工作之间明显存在利益冲突,考虑到这些相互竞争的利益,特别是可能存在的腐败交易,这需要国会的监督和问责,”加西亚在信中写道。

    CNN的调查引发了人们对库什纳作为中东和平特使的志愿角色与他公司的金融投资之间潜在利益冲突的质疑。库什纳的律师没有提及他的客户作为特朗普政府谈判代表的角色。

    作为对库什纳金融资产审查的一部分,CNN利用以色列的金融透明度法律追踪了Phoenix Financial的投资。这家位于特拉维夫的公司在特朗普重返椭圆形办公室前不久,库什纳的Affinity Partners于去年增持了该公司股份,使其持股比例翻倍。CNN的报道特别排除了Phoenix通过退休账户进行的投资,而是聚焦于保险持仓。

    这些仅涵盖Phoenix部分持仓的记录显示,该公司已向埃尔比特系统公司投资数亿美元。CNN发现,Phoenix还持有至少另外八家为以色列军方提供设备的公司的股份,这些设备包括无人机、军舰和拆除机械。

    CNN确认的所有九家公司的股价去年都出现了上涨,其中许多公司表示,加沙战争推动了其业务需求。

    Affinity并未直接持有CNN确认的这九家公司的股份,但当Phoenix获利时,它确实有望获得收益。库什纳在2025年9月将Phoenix称为Affinity的“最佳投资”。

    CNN未发现任何迹象表明库什纳作为外交官的行为直接影响了所审查的投资。库什纳的律师告诉CNN,他的客户“从未参与或指导Phoenix的投资决策”。

    在CNN的报道发布一天后,库什纳在X平台上罕见地做出回应,称CNN的报道“具有严重误导性”。库什纳在帖子中并未指出报道中的任何不实之处。

    “误导性报道不会分散我对特朗普总统交给我的工作的注意力:帮助结束战争、团结各国人民并追求和平。这项工作太重要了,”库什纳在X平台上写道。

    加西亚提到了库什纳的社交媒体帖子,他写道:“尽管你否认存在不当行为,但事实仍然是,你被允许担任拥有巨大权力和责任的职位,免于财务披露要求和外部监督。”

    除了CNN的报道外,《纽约时报》还发表了一篇文章,详细描述了库什纳的志愿外交角色与他的商业利益之间的额外“交织”,这与乌克兰战争有关。

    据《泰晤士报》报道,美国与俄罗斯结束那场战争的谈判已扩大到包括一项数十亿美元的交易,将俄罗斯最大能源公司之一的石油资产出售给一个与史蒂夫·威特科夫和库什纳有关联的投资者集团,两人都是特朗普政府的主要谈判代表。

    威特科夫的一名发言人告诉《泰晤士报》,他“在这件事上没有利益冲突或财务利益”,并表示他为美国政府所做的工作是“自掏腰包”进行的。

    库什纳的律师没有回应CNN就这篇报道提出的置评请求。

    多年来,加西亚和其他民主党议员一直要求白宫和特朗普家族就“明显的权力掮客和交换条件交易”以及外国资金是否被用于“购买接近总统的机会并影响美国政策”的担忧给出答案。

    今年3月,鉴于库什纳的政府工作经历,加西亚和俄勒冈州参议员罗恩·怀登专门向白宫索要有关Affinity Partners在中东筹款的信息——库什纳在2021年为他的公司从沙特阿拉伯主权财富基金获得了20亿美元的投资。

    库什纳和Affinity Partners都没有回应议员们此前的请求。

    追踪库什纳公司与一家持有以色列武器供应商股份的公司的关联
    4:53 • 消息来源:CNN

    众议院监督与政府改革委员会是众议院的主要调查委员会,但委员会少数党议员提出的调查请求是自愿的,可被无视且不会产生法律后果。传票只能由委员会主席或委员会投票授权。如果11月的中期选举导致权力平衡发生变化,民主党将能够启动正式调查。

    2023年共和党赢得众议院多数席位后,监督委员会、司法委员会和 Ways and Means 委员会就亨特·拜登在海外的商业交易以及他涉嫌利用父亲的总统职位谋利展开了类似调查。

    本故事更新了加西亚信件的更多细节以及有关其持仓的进一步背景信息。

    https://www.cnn.com/

    Top Democrat is investigating Jared Kushner’s financial investments after CNN report

    2026-10-06T18:39:19.390Z / CNN

    A top Democratic lawmaker is seeking information on Jared Kushner’s financial investments following a CNN investigation last week that found his private equity firm is the largest shareholder in an Israeli company backing businesses involved in Israel’s military campaigns.

    Rep. Robert Garcia, the ranking member on the House Oversight Committee, sent Kushner’s investment firm, Affinity Partners, a letter on Monday saying Democrats on the committee were “investigating the unprecedented and dangerous ways in which President Trump and his family have profited directly from their access to power.

    “…I request detailed information about your business dealings in the Middle East to understand whether your significant financial gains have come at the cost of Americans’ safety and security, ” the California representative wrote.

    The letter is yet another sign that House Democrats are poised to investigate President Donald Trump’s family members’ business dealings overseas and in the US, should they retake the majority in the midterm elections this fall.

    An attorney for Kushner dismissed Garcia’s criticisms and sought to draw attention to the congressman’s own holdings in investments scrutinized in CNN’s report on Kushner – Phoenix Financial, an Israeli financial services firm which counts Affinity Partners as its biggest investor, and Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest arms manufacturer.

    “Rep. Garcia’s letter is a masterclass in irony: A member of Congress questioning a private citizen for having an interest in the same stock in which the member also holds an interest,” the attorney said in a statement to CNN. “Jared has no role in deciding what Phoenix buys or sells. But if that doesn’t matter to Rep. Garcia, he should begin by investigating himself.”

    Garcia’s most recent disclosure forms indicate his pension plans are managed through the California Public Employees’ Retirement System and California State Teachers Retirement System. Both plans hold stock in Phoenix Financials or Elbit Systems.

    A spokesperson for Garcia said Kushner’s attorney was trying to “deflect” from his client’s own conduct, adding the congressman does not trade stocks and, like the millions of other public employees in the pension plan, does not have any control over the fund and cannot opt out.

    Kushner “makes millions with no accountability all while he travels the Middle East on behalf of his father in law,” said Sara Guerrero, Garcia’s spokesperson.

    “The apparent conflict of interest between Affinity Partners’ investments and your work in the Middle East, and in particular the potential for corrupt dealmaking given those competing interests, demands congressional oversight and accountability,” Garcia’s letter stated.

    CNN’s investigation raised questions about potential conflicts of interest between Kushner’s volunteer role as a peace envoy to the Middle East, and his firm’s financial investments. Kushner’s attorney did not address his client’s role as a negotiator on behalf of the Trump administration.

    As part of the review into Kushner’s financial holdings, CNN used Israeli financial transparency laws to trace investments made by Phoenix Financial, a Tel Aviv-based firm that Kushner’s Affinity Partners doubled its stake in last year, shortly before Trump returned to the Oval Office. CNN’s reporting specifically excluded Phoenix’s investments through retirement accounts and focused on insurance holdings instead.

    Those records, which include only some of Phoenix’s holdings, show Phoenix has invested hundreds of millions of dollars into Elbit Systems. Phoenix also holds stakes in at least eight other companies providing equipment for the Israeli military ranging from drones and warships to demolition machinery, CNN found.

    All nine companies identified by CNN saw their stock value climb last year, with many stating the war in Gaza had driven demand for their businesses.

    Affinity doesn’t directly hold a stake in the nine companies CNN identified – but it does stand to reap rewards when Phoenix makes a profit. Kushner described Phoenix as Affinity’s “best investment” in September 2025.

    CNN found no indication that Kushner’s actions as a diplomat directly affected the investments reviewed. Kushner’s attorney told CNN his client has “never participated in or directed Phoenix’s decisions” on where to invest.

    A day after CNN’s reporting, Kushner posted a rare response on X, calling CNN’s story “deeply misleading.” Kushner did not point to any inaccuracies in the piece in his post.

    “Misleading stories will not distract me from the work President Trump asked me to do: help end wars, bring people together and pursue peace. That work is too important,” Kushner wrote on X.

    Garcia referenced Kushner’s social media post, writing “despite your denial of improper behavior, the fact remains that you have been allowed to hold a position of enormous power and responsibility, exempt from financial disclosure requirements and outside oversight.”

    In addition to CNN’s report, the New York Times published a story detailing additional “intermingling” between Kushner’s volunteer diplomatic role and his businesses, as it related to the war in Ukraine.

    US talks with Russia to end that war have expanded to include a multibillion-dollar deal selling oil assets from one of Russia’s biggest energy companies to a group of investors with ties to Steve Witkoff and Kushner, the two main negotiators for the Trump administration, according to the Times.

    A spokeswoman for Witkoff told the Times he “has no conflict of interest or financial stake in this matter” and said his work for the US administration is undertaken “at his own expense.”

    Kushner’s attorney did not respond to CNN’s inquiry about this reporting.

    Garcia and other Democrats have for years demanded answers from the White House and Trump’s family about concerns over “apparent influence peddling and quid pro quo deals” and whether foreign money is being used “to buy access to the President and influence American policy.”

    In March, Garcia and Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden specifically requested information from the White House about Affinity Partners’ fundraising in the Middle East – Kushner secured a $2 billion investment for his firm from Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund in 2021— in light of Kushner’s government work.

    Neither Kushner nor Affinity Partners responded to the congressmen’s earlier request.

    Tracing Kushner’s company’s links to a firm with stakes in Israeli weapon suppliers
    4:53 • Source: CNN

    The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is the main investigative committee in the House but the minority party requests from lawmakers on the committee are voluntary and can be ignored without legal consequences. Subpoenas can only be authorized by the committee chair or by committee vote. If the balance of power shifts as a result of the midterm elections in November, Democrats would be able to open an official investigation.

    After Republicans won the House in 2023, the Oversight Committee, the Judiciary Committee and the Ways and Means Committee opened similar investigations into Hunter Biden’s business dealings overseas and alleged he was profiting from his father’s presidency.

    This story was updated with additional details from Garcia’s letter and further context on his holdings.

    https://www.cnn.com/

  • 自由派大法官寻求“退路”,专家称高风险气候案件提交至最高法院


    最高法院气候案可能令石油企业面临全国范围诉讼,或在未解决核心法律争议的情况下终结
    2026年10月6日 美国东部时间下午2:19 / 福克斯新闻
    作者:伊莱恩·马伦,福克斯新闻

    各州总检察长警告最高法院气候诉讼可能引发全国性“碳税”
    犹他州和阿拉巴马州总检察长警告称,科罗拉多州的这起气候案件可能推高全国成本,而前华盛顿州州长杰伊·英斯利则认为,受气候变化损害的美国人有权出庭申诉。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章!
    收听本文
    7分钟

    大法官凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊和索尼娅·索托马约尔多次就最高法院是否有权审理这起可能令石油企业面临全国范围诉讼的备受关注的气候案件提出质疑,这让保守派律师认为,自由派大法官正在寻求“绕行通道”。
    “他们反复试图制造管辖权问题,这告诉我他们对己方在这一议题上的票数没有信心,”保守派司法组织“司法监督委员会”主席卡丽·塞韦里诺告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。“杰克逊和索托马约尔一直在寻找退路。”
    最高法院周一开启新的开庭期,首次就“森科诉博尔德案”进行口头辩论,届时将裁决各州侵权法是否可用于向石油企业索要气候变化损害赔偿,即便所称损害发生在州外或境外。大法官们还将裁决最高法院目前是否有权审理此案,因为该案仍在科罗拉多州最高法院审理中。

    提交给高等法院的这起案件程序姿态罕见,意味着大法官们可能根本不会触及案件核心的州与联邦权力重大争议就结案。该争议的核心是,科罗拉多州能否依据本州法律,就其他州排放造成的所称损害索要赔偿,还是应由联邦政府和国会负责监管此类问题。

    2025年10月5日,“森科诉博尔德案”口头辩论开始前,气候活动抗议者聚集在最高法院外。(伊莱恩·马伦/福克斯新闻数字频道)

    最高法院以备受关注的清洁空气与联邦权限议题开启新开庭期

    “杰克逊和索托马约尔提出法院发布意见可能为时过早的问题,不过是自由派大法官试图为该案寻找绕行通道,因为他们担心在核心议题上会被否决:《清洁空气法》等联邦法律是否优先于本案所主张的州级诉求?”“推进美国自由”组织高级法律研究员汉斯·冯·斯帕科夫斯基告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。
    在质询森科的律师坎农·尚穆加姆时,杰克逊提出这场争端提交最高法院可能为时过早,称“从本法院行使管辖权的角度来看,这还为时过早”。
    她还多次质疑法院为何不能暂缓审理此案,称法院“尚未掌握全部事实”,也“尚未有足够信心”认定所提出的理论适用。
    “在我看来,被告……在州法院尚未真正有机会厘清谁是污染源、他们关于因果关系的主张是什么的情况下,就将案件提交联邦法院,”杰克逊在代表森科出庭的副首席政府律师萨拉·哈里斯进行辩论时说道。
    与此同时,索托马约尔并未停止就管辖权问题向尚穆加姆发问,提议将案件发回科罗拉多州最高法院。

    “如果我们对你的定性存疑,因为确实有大量法庭之友意见书反对这一定性,那我们难道不应该将这个问题提交科罗拉多州法院裁决,而非由我们自行决定吗?在受理此案前,我们必须确认自身拥有管辖权,”索托马约尔说道。
    阿拉巴马州共和党总检察长史蒂夫·马歇尔告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,显而易见,自由派大法官正试图质疑他们是否拥有管辖权。

    2026年10月5日,气候活动人士聚集在最高法院外,参加“森科诉博尔德案”的口头辩论。(伊莱恩·马伦/福克斯新闻数字频道)

    最高法院可恢复理智,阻止左翼激进气候议程

    “嗯,我想你们都看到了杰克逊大法官和索托马约尔大法官试图为法院找到出路,基本意思是法院在本案现阶段无权作出最终裁决。我认为你们也看到了森科一方的辩方律师能够区分这一点。”
    如果最高法院不触及联邦制议题,科罗拉多州最高法院允许博尔德市依据州法提出诉求的裁决将维持有效,而各州利用侵权法向能源企业追索气候索赔的范围这一更广泛问题仍未解决。
    首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨就博尔德市胜诉是否会引发全国范围类似诉讼询问博尔德市的律师凯文·拉塞尔。拉塞尔称存在法律限制,但也向克拉伦斯·托马斯大法官承认,博尔德市的理论可能让其他化石燃料企业遭到起诉。
    “首席大法官和法院都不喜欢发布没有限定原则的裁决,也就是可能开启无限诉讼和索赔的裁决。森科的律师坎农·尚穆加姆在口头辩论即将结束时再次强调了这一点,他指出不仅有9万个政治管辖区可能提起诉讼,个人也可以就全球变暖造成的损害提起诉讼,”冯·斯帕科夫斯基说道。

    “他还指出了保守派多数派不认可的一点:博尔德市试图在法院而非立法机构解决重大政策问题,”冯·斯帕科夫斯基补充道。

    保守派律师认为,大法官凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊和索尼娅·索托马约尔正在寻求“绕行通道”。(盖蒂图片社)

    最高法院以对其合法性和未来的新疑问开启新开庭期

    森科的支持者称,此类诉讼可能“拖垮”石油企业,并导致消费者价格上涨。
    “这本质上是在向全国范围内的生产商和排放者征收碳税,顺便说一下,这包括阿拉巴马州为我国生产牛肉的养牛户、那些制造混凝土来建造建筑、推动经济发展的人,”马歇尔告诉福克斯新闻。“他们最终想拖垮这个行业,以便推行他们青睐的气候变化政策。”
    “他们实际上是在监管遍布全球的行为,”犹他州总检察长德里克·布朗告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。“他们不仅想监管科罗拉多州的情况,还想监管我所在的犹他州或沙特阿拉伯的情况。这不是我们的制度运作方式。所以,归根结底,这个案件的核心只有一个问题:谁有权决定能源政策之类的事情。而在我们的制度下,最终应该由国会决定。”
    与此同时,博尔德市指控埃克森美孚和森科数十年来明知化石燃料相关的气候风险,却误导公众。这些社区估计,纳税人可能面临超过1亿美元的成本,用于适应与气候相关的影响,包括野火、干旱以及道路和其他基础设施的损坏。
    前华盛顿州州长、民主党人、长期倡导采取激进气候行动的杰伊·英斯利辩称,这些成本已经在全国范围内的社区显现。

    “作为州长,我与那么多失去家园的家庭打过交道,”英斯利告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。“那么多社区几乎被烧毁,他们应该有权出庭听取证据,确定石油和天然气行业的谎言是否确实让他们有理由被追究责任。”
    诉状提到了埃克森美孚1977年的一份内部备忘录,该备忘录在公司最高层管理人员中传阅。备忘录称,“当前的科学观点压倒性地支持”化石燃料会导致二氧化碳排放上升。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    “他们自己的科学家知道他们的产品是危险的,会引发更多火灾。他们几十年来一直知道这一点,早在1967年,他们自己的科学家就告诉他们这可能带来灾难性后果,所以他们知情,却撒谎,”英斯利说道。“如今,出庭是美国人的一项权利。任何人都不应剥夺美国人的出庭权。”

    伊莱恩·马伦是福克斯新闻数字频道和福克斯商业频道的记者,报道全国政治议题。

    Liberal justices look for ‘escape hatch’ as high-stakes climate case lands at Supreme Court, experts say

    Supreme Court climate case could open oil companies to lawsuits nationwide or end without resolving the broader legal fight

    October 6, 2026 2:19pm EDT / Fox News

    By Elaine Mallon, Fox News

    AGs warn Supreme Court climate lawsuit could unleash nationwide ‘carbon tax’

    Utah and Alabama attorneys general warn Colorado’s climate case could drive up costs nationwide, while former Washington Gov. Jay Inslee argues Americans harmed by climate change deserve their day in court.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Listen to this article

    7 min

    Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor’s repeated questions concerning whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear a high-profile climate case that could expose oil companies to lawsuits across the country steered conservative lawyers to believe that the liberal justices are seeking an “off-ramp.”

    “The fact that they kept going back to trying to create a jurisdictional problem tells me they don’t feel confident that they have the votes in this space,” Carrie Severino, president of JCN, a conservative judicial group, told Fox News Digital. “Jackson and Sotomayor were looking for an escape hatch.”

    The Supreme Court began its new term Monday, hearing its first oral arguments for Suncor v. Boulder, in which they will rule on whether state tort laws can be used to seek damages from oil companies for climate change, even when the alleged harms are occurring outside the state or continent. The justices will also rule on whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear this case now, as the case is still before the Colorado Supreme Court.

    The case before the high court is in an unusual procedural posture, meaning the justices could resolve it without ever reaching the blockbuster state-versus-federal power fight at its center. That dispute centers on whether Colorado can use its own laws to seek damages for alleged harms caused by emissions from other states or whether it’s an issue for the federal government and Congress to regulate.

    Climate activist protesters gather outside the Supreme Court before oral arguments for Suncor v. Boulder on Oct. 5, 2025.(Elaine Mallon/Fox News Digital)

    SUPREME COURT BEGINS NEW TERM WITH HIGH-PROFILE LOOK AT CLEAN AIR AND FEDERAL AUTHORITY

    “The questions by Jackson and Sotomayor trying to say it would be premature for the court to issue an opinion are simply the liberal justices trying to find an off-ramp for the case because they are afraid they will be outvoted on the main issue: does federal law such as the Clean Air Act preempt all state claims like those asserted here,” Hans von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow with Advancing American Freedom, told Fox News Digital.

    While questioning Suncor attorney Kannon Shanmugam, Jackson suggested the dispute may have reached the Supreme Court too soon, calling it “premature from the standpoint of this court exercising its jurisdiction.”

    She also repeatedly questioned why the court couldn’t wait to hear the case, saying the court doesn’t “have the whole set of facts” and that the court doesn’t “really know enough to be confident” that the theories posed are applicable.

    “It feels to me like the defendants … are bringing it back to federal court before the state courts have really had a chance to sort out who is the source, what is their allegation with respect to how this causation is happening,” Jackson told Principal Deputy Solicitor General Sarah Harris, who argued in support of Suncor.

    Meanwhile, Sotomayor refused to drop her line of questioning on jurisdiction with Shanmugam, proposing that the Supreme Court send the case back to the Colorado Supreme Court.

    “If we’re unsure of your characterization, because there’s certainly a number of amici brief who disagree with that characterization, shouldn’t we be certifying this question to the Colorado court instead of us deciding it? We have to be sure of our jurisdiction before we take it,” Sotomayor said.

    Republican Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall told Fox News Digital it was clear that the liberal justices were trying to cast doubt on whether they have jurisdiction.

    Climate activists gather outside the Supreme Court for oral arguments for Suncor v. Boulder on Oct. 5, 2026.(Elaine Mallon/Fox News Digital)

    SUPREME COURT CAN RESTORE SANITY AND STOP THE LEFT’S RADICAL CLIMATE AGENDA

    “Well, I think you saw both Justice Jackson and Justice Sotomayor try to find an out for this court, basically saying the court doesn’t have jurisdiction at this stage of the case to be able to make a final ruling. I think that you saw the advocates on behalf of Suncor be able to distinguish that.”

    If the Supreme Court declines to reach the federalism issue, the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling allowing Boulder’s state-law claims to proceed would remain in place, leaving the broader question of how far states can use tort law to pursue climate claims against energy companies unresolved.

    Chief Justice John Roberts pressed Boulder attorney Kevin Russell on whether a Boulder win could trigger similar lawsuits nationwide. Russell said there are legal limits, but acknowledged to Justice Clarence Thomas that Boulder’s theory could allow other fossil-fuel businesses to be sued.

    “The chief justice and the court do not like issuing rulings with no limiting principles, rulings that could open up unlimited litigation and claims. Kannon Shanmugam, the lawyer for Suncor, emphasized this again at the very end of the oral argument when he pointed out that there are not only 90,000 political jurisdictions that could sue, but individuals could also sue claiming damages from global warming,” von Spakovsky said.

    “And he also pointed out something the conservative majority frowns upon: that Boulder is trying to resolve a major policy issue in the courts instead of in the legislative branches,” von Spakovsky continued.

    Conservative lawyers believe that Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor are seeking an “off-ramp.”(Getty Images)

    SUPREME COURT KICKS OFF NEW TERM WITH FRESH QUESTIONS OVER ITS LEGITIMACY AND ITS FUTURE

    Supporters of Suncor say the lawsuits could “bankrupt” oil companies and cause the price for consumers to go up.

    “It’s to basically create a carbon tax on both producers and emitters across the country, which would include, by the way, my cattlemen in Alabama producing beef for our country, those that are creating concrete to be able to build structures and be able to grow our economy,” Marshall told Fox News. “They ultimately want to bankrupt that industry to have their preferred climate change policies be in play.”

    “They’re literally addressing behavior that takes place all over the world,” Utah Attorney General Derek Brown told Fox News Digital. “They want to regulate not just what happens in Colorado, but what happens in my state of Utah or in Saudi Arabia. That’s not the way the system works. So, really, this case comes down to one main issue and that is who gets to decide things like energy policy. And ultimately, under our system, it should be Congress.”

    Meanwhile, Boulder alleged ExxonMobil and Suncor knew for decades about the climate risks associated with fossil fuels but misled the public about those risks. The communities estimate that taxpayers could face more than $100 million in costs to adapt to climate-related impacts, including wildfires, drought and damage to roads and other infrastructure.

    Former Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat and longtime advocate for aggressive action on climate change, argued those costs are already being felt by communities across the country.

    “As governor, I’ve worked with so many families who’ve lost their homes,” Inslee told Fox News Digital. “So many communities have essentially burned down, and they ought to be able to have a day in court to hear the evidence, to determine whether the lies of the oil and gas industry legitimately, they make it so that they’re held accountable.”

    The complaint pointed to a 1977 internal memo from ExxonMobil that circulated among the company’s highest-level managers. The memo reported that “current scientific opinion overwhelmingly favors” that fossil fuels contribute to the rise in CO2 emissions.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “Their own scientists knew that their product was dangerous, that it was going to cause more fires. And they knew this for decades, 1967, their own scientists told them it could be catastrophic, so they knew about it, they lied about it,” Inslee said. “Now it’s an American right to be in court. Nobody should bar an American from their day in court.”

    Elaine Mallon is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business covering national politics.

  • 前中情局官员承认参与大规模诈骗计划,同意没收1.94亿美元资产


    2026-10-06 15:23 EDT / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    作者:斯特凡·贝克特 数字政治执行主编
    斯特凡·贝克特是CBSNews.com政治板块执行主编。他报道全国政治领域超过十年,负责监督报道白宫、国会、最高法院、移民事务和联邦执法的团队。

    查看完整简历

    凯特琳·伊莱克 政治记者
    凯特琳·伊莱克是CBSNews.com驻华盛顿特区政治记者。她曾就职于《华盛顿考察家报》和《国会山报》,并入选美国国家新闻基金会2022年保罗·米勒华盛顿报道奖学金项目。

    查看完整简历

    更新时间:2026年10月6日 / 美国东部时间下午3:25 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    华盛顿——今年5月在家中被搜出价值4000万美元金条的一名前中情局官员于周二认罪,承认通过编造虚假机密项目挪用近2亿美元政府资金,用于购买佛罗里达州豪宅和金条。

    戴维·拉什在弗吉尼亚州联邦法院的听证会上承认了一项电信诈骗罪名。

    根据认罪协议条款,拉什同意没收至少1.94亿美元资产,包括298根金条、两辆宝马汽车、35块奢侈品腕表以及佛罗里达州的四处豪宅。他最高面临20年监禁。

    在一份详述指控内容的刑事起诉文件中,检察官表示拉什编造了一个虚假机密项目,通过一家空壳公司转移了1.45亿美元政府资金,并用这笔钱购买佛罗里达州房产,计划转售牟利。此外,他还“编造了另一项所谓的敏感政府行动,为购买金条提供借口”,检察官称。
    “尽管房产和金条交易涉及不同的交易流程和中介机构,但二者均属于同一整体诈骗计划的实施环节——拉什编造虚假的机密授权,指导并批准相关支出,指使承包商和分包商完成交易,随后掌控所购资产,”文件写道。

    检察官表示拉什曾接触“高度敏感和机密的政府项目”,尽管文件并未明确提及他的前雇主为中情局。该情报机构和联邦调查局此前表示,调查始于中情局将此事移交联邦调查局。在支持最初刑事指控的宣誓书中,拉什被描述为弗吉尼亚州东部某政府机构的“前高级行政服务级雇员”。

    文件显示,拉什指使一家代号为“第一公司”的未具名承包商向其定向设立的控股公司转账约1.45亿美元。随后他指示该控股公司及其分包商的员工将资金转入他控制的另一家控股公司,并用这笔资金购买了佛罗里达州棕榈滩和霍贝桑德的四处房产。

    拉什于5月被捕。联邦调查局人员在对其住宅执行搜查令时,查获了金条、200万美元现金和奢侈品腕表。检察官周二表示,该控股公司账户中仍有约3860万美元余额。

    image

    文件称,拉什告知这些未具名承包商“他正在参与一项绝密项目,需要向未具名人员交付高价值商品”,并以此为借口购买金条。其中一名承包商于1月向该控股公司转账4500万美元,这笔交易成为电信诈骗指控的核心依据。

    拉什最初被控一项盗用公款罪名,调查人员称他在政府入职申请中伪造了教育和兵役经历,并在退伍后欺诈性地申领军事休假。

    今年6月,一名联邦法官下令拉什在案件审理期间继续被羁押,认定其存在极高的潜逃风险。

    在羁押听证会上,政府律师将拉什称为“操控大师”,称他向邻居谎称自己是飞行员,欺骗同事,并利用其“资深资历带来的权限”。一名司法部律师表示,拉什“不值得信任”,且“完全有能力规避规则”。

    考利·泰特尔鲍姆为本报道撰稿。

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/fbi-finds-millions-gold-bars-watches-cash-former-cia-officials-home/

    联邦调查局称在前中情局官员住宅内查获数百万美元金条、腕表和现金

    (时长01:07)

    Ex-CIA official found with gold bars admits to sprawling scheme, agrees to forfeit $194 million

    2026-10-06 15:23 EDT / CBS News

    By Stefan Becket Managing Editor, Digital Politics
    Stefan Becket is a managing editor of politics for CBSNews.com. Stefan has covered national politics for more than a decade and helps oversee a team covering the White House, Congress, the Supreme Court, immigration and federal law enforcement.

    Read Full Bio

    Caitlin Yilek Politics Reporter
    Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter at CBSNews.com, based in Washington, D.C. She previously worked for the Washington Examiner and The Hill, and was a member of the 2022 Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellowship with the National Press Foundation.

    Read Full Bio

    Updated on: October 6, 2026 / 3:25 PM EDT / CBS News

    Washington — A former CIA official who was found with $40 million in gold bars in his home in May pleaded guilty on Tuesday, admitting he invented fake classified programs to divert nearly $200 million in government money that he used to buy Florida mansions and gold.

    David Rush entered a guilty plea on a single count of wire fraud during a hearing in federal court in Virginia.

    As part of his plea agreement, Rush agreed to forfeit at least $194 million, including 298 gold bars, two BMWs, 35 luxury watches and four luxury homes in Florida. He faces up to 20 years in prison.

    In a filing known as a criminal information detailing the allegations Rush admitted to, prosecutors said he invented a fake classified program to steer $145 million in government funds through a front company, using the money to purchase the homes in Florida that he intended to resell for profit. Separately, he “fabricated a separate purported sensitive government activity to justify the acquisition of gold bars,” prosecutors said.

    “Although the real estate and gold acquisitions involved different transactions and intermediaries, they were executions of the same overarching scheme — RUSH created false classified authorities, directed and approved the associated expenditures, caused contractors and subcontractors to carry out the transactions, and thereafter exercised possession or control over the acquired assets,” the filing said.

    Prosecutors said Rush had access to “highly sensitive and classified government programs,” although the filing does not name the CIA as his former employer. The spy agency and FBI said previously that the investigation began when the CIA referred the matter to the bureau. In the affidavit supporting the original criminal complaint against him, he was described as a “former Senior Executive Service level employee” at a government agency in eastern Virginia.

    The document said Rush caused an unidentified contractor known as Company 1 to transfer about $145 million to a holding company set up at his direction. He then instructed employees at that company and a subcontractor to route that money to a holding company that he controlled, and used the funds to purchase four properties in Palm Beach and Hobe Sound, Florida.

    Rush was arrested in May. FBI agents found the gold bars, $2 million in cash and luxury watches when executing a search warrant at his home. Prosecutors said Tuesday that the holding company had about $38.6 million left in its account.

    Gold bars and stacks of cash seized during a search of David Rush’s home. Justice Department

    The gold bars were purchased after Rush told the unnamed contractors “that he was working on a Top-Secret project in which he had to deliver high-value commodities to unnamed individuals,” the information said. One of the contractors wired $45 million to the holding company in January, a transaction that forms the basis of the wire fraud charge.

    Rush was originally charged with one count of stealing public money, with investigators saying he had provided false information about his education and military service on his government application, and fraudulently took military leave after his service ended.

    In June, a federal judge ordered Rush to remain in custody as the case proceeded, determining that he posed a severe flight risk.

    At his detention hearing, government lawyers called Rush a “master manipulator” who lied to his neighbors about being a pilot, lied to his co-workers and leveraged his “access to seniority.” A Justice Department lawyer said Rush “cannot be trusted” and is “fully willing and able to skirt the rules.”

    Callie Teitelbaum contributed to this report.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/fbi-finds-millions-gold-bars-watches-cash-former-cia-officials-home/

    FBI says it found millions in gold bars, watches, cash in former CIA official’s home

    (01:07)

  • 特朗普与共和党中期选举恐慌的最明显迹象


    2026-10-06T18:48:45.613Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/06/politics/trump-republicans-midterms-panic

    共和党担心2026年中期选举的情绪已经持续了一段时间。

    但越来越多的迹象表明,他们的担忧正在演变为恐慌——包括总统唐纳德·特朗普在内的共和党人已经感觉到情况可能会变得非常糟糕。

    这并不意味着局势一定会朝这个方向发展。历史上也不乏政党在竞选后期过度恐慌的例子。

    但特朗普时代的共和党总体上一直是相当乐观的政党,而近几日和几周来的表现却截然不同。

    特朗普一直坚称共和党会表现出色,并称许多持相反观点的民调结果是错误的。但他的行动却越来越指向另一个方向:

    • 周一,他罕见地彻底推翻了此前极具争议的政府资助政治广告计划,称这些广告现在将由超级政治行动委员会(super PAC)出资。
    • 上周末,他开始鼓励共和党人邮寄投票,而此前他曾声称邮寄投票充斥着欺诈行为。
    • 他多次大发雷霆,包括上周在《时代》周刊采访中使用脏话,周一还在接受CNN记者采访时愤怒地为自己的民调数据辩护。
    • 他开始将共和党面临的问题归咎于糟糕的信息传播(但并未提及自己)。
    • 他先后在多个深红州开展竞选活动:阿拉巴马州(2024年他以31个百分点的优势获胜)、俄克拉荷马州(特朗普领先34个百分点)以及内布拉斯加州(特朗普领先20个百分点)——他于周一到访了内布拉斯加州。
    • 而在周一晚间,他攻击了另一个本不应成为竞选焦点的州的民主党参议院候选人:南卡罗来纳州(特朗普领先18个百分点)。他使用反变性人 slur 攻击民主党人安妮·安德鲁斯,后者正在挑战参议员达琳·格雷厄姆——这位参议员是由特朗普提名任命的——并且这场竞选的激烈程度超出了预期。

    共和党原本就需要在五个特朗普以11至16个百分点优势获胜的州采取守势,最新加入的是堪萨斯州——这个州两年前特朗普以16个百分点的优势获胜,且自1932年以来从未选出过民主党参议员。

    但将内布拉斯加州,尤其是南卡罗来纳州纳入需要防守的名单,这一点尤其令人警觉。

    如果你认为特朗普针对南卡罗来纳州的言论并非刻意为之,那么共和党正向南卡罗来纳州(即“棕榈州”)拨款500万美元以支持格雷厄姆。特朗普的盟友也告诉CNN,他们对这位参议员的民调结果感到担忧。

    最能说明共和党整体恐慌的迹象之一是什么?共和党人被迫在这些红色州与特朗普保持距离——无论是呼吁结束伊朗战争,修改官网删除提及总统的内容,还是拒绝与特朗普共同竞选。

    周一,《休斯顿纪事报》报道称,得克萨斯州州长格雷格·阿博特不会在特朗普本周访问圣安东尼奥时与其一同亮相。阿博特的竞选团队将此归咎于日程冲突,但在过去,共和党候选人绝不会错过这类活动,尤其是在红色州。

    事实上,共和党的许多最糟糕的迹象都来自得克萨斯州。

    参议院候选人肯·帕克斯顿的 estranged 妻子(曾指控他不忠)发布了一则尴尬的广告,鼓励人们投票给共和党。还有泄露的音频片段显示,帕克斯顿在抱怨特朗普和全国共和党损害了他的竞选活动。周一,共和党州议员布里斯科·凯恩在X平台上发帖称:“如果明天就举行选举,所有全州范围的竞选都会落入民主党手中。”

    需要强调的是,这一情况有多惊人:自1994年以来,民主党从未在得克萨斯州赢得过任何全州范围的选举。而发表这番言论的并非温和派共和党人,而是曾协助特朗普推翻2020年选举结果的“让美国再次伟大”(MAGA)派议员。

    这一切并不意味着共和党注定失败。尽管民调中有足够多的迹象让共和党感到担忧,但民主党要获得参议院多数席位,仍需拿下那些特朗普以两位数优势获胜的州。这是一个很高的门槛。

    而且,我们之前见过各政党在选后期为那些原本并不激烈的次级竞选投入资金的情况。2020年,民主党曾在堪萨斯州投入大量资金,共和党则向南卡罗来纳州拨款支持;最终共和党分别以11和10个百分点的优势赢得了这两个州。就连一些民主党人对今年在南卡罗来纳州的胜算也相当谨慎。

    但在11月3日选举前日益加剧的绝望情绪,意味着对共和党来说,接下来的四周可能会十分漫长。

    The biggest signs that Trump and the GOP are panicking about the midterms

    2026-10-06T18:48:45.613Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/06/politics/trump-republicans-midterms-panic

    Republicans have had reason to worry about the 2026 midterm elections for a while now.

    But there are growing signs that their fears are spilling over into panic — and that the GOP, including President Donald Trump, senses things could get really bad.

    That doesn’t mean things will turn out that way. And there are plenty of examples of parties overzealously slamming the panic button late in the campaign.

    But the Trump-era GOP has generally been a rather sanguine political party, and what we’ve seen in recent days and weeks is anything but.

    Trump has insisted Republicans will do well and that the many polls suggesting otherwise are wrong. But his actions increasingly point in a different direction:

    • On Monday, he pulled a rare 180 on his highly controversial government-funded political ads, saying they would now be paid for with super PAC funds.
    • Over the weekend, he started encouraging Republicans to vote by mail, after previously claiming that method was riddled with fraud.
    • He’s repeatedly lashed out, including dropping the f-word on a Time magazine interviewer last week and angrily defending his poll numbers to a CNN reporter on Monday.
    • He has taken to blaming the GOP’s problems on poor messaging (although not from himself).
    • He’s spent time campaigning in a series of very red states: Alabama (which he won by 31 points in 2024), Oklahoma (Trump +34) and Nebraska (Trump +20) — the last of which he visited on Monday.
    • And on Monday night, he attacked the Democratic Senate nominee in another state that shouldn’t be on the map: South Carolina (Trump +18). He used an anti-transgender slur to go after Democrat Annie Andrews, who’s giving Sen. Darline Graham — whose appointment Trump pushed for — a tougher-than-expected race.

    The GOP was already playing defense in five states Trump won by between 11 and 16 points, with the most recent addition being Kansas — a state Trump won by 16 points two years ago and that hasn’t elected a Democratic senator since 1932.

    But adding Nebraska and especially South Carolina to the mix is particularly striking.

    And in case you thought Trump’s comments about South Carolina weren’t strategic, the GOP is sending $5 million to the Palmetto State to shore up Graham. Trump allies have also told CNN they are worried about the senator’s polling.

    One of the most telling signs of broader GOP panic? Republicans feeling compelled to distance themselves from Trump even in these red areas — whether calling for an end to the Iran war, overhauling their websites to erase mentions of the president, or declining to campaign with Trump.

    On Monday, the Houston Chronicle reported that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott won’t appear with Trump when the president visits San Antonio this week. Abbott’s campaign blamed scheduling conflicts, but these are the kinds of events GOP candidates would never have missed once upon a time, especially in a red state.

    And indeed, many of the worst signs for the GOP are emanating from Texas.

    There’s the awkward ad from Senate nominee Ken Paxton’s estranged wife (who has accused him of infidelity) in which she encourages people to vote Republican. There are the leaked audio clips in which Paxton is heard complaining about Trump and the national GOP hurting his campaign. And on Monday, GOP state Rep. Briscoe Cain posted on X: “If the election were held tomorrow, all state wide races go blue.”

    Just to underscore how stunning that would be, Democrats haven’t won any statewide race in Texas since 1994. And this isn’t some moderate Republican spouting off; this is a MAGA lawmaker who tried to help overturn the results of the 2020 election for Trump.

    None of this means the GOP is doomed. While there are enough signs in the polling to cause the party to worry, Democrats’ path to the Senate majority still goes through those double-digit Trump states. That’s a high bar to clear.

    And, we’ve seen before how parties can spend late money in lower-tier races that don’t wind up being particularly close. Back in 2020, Democrats spent some real money in Kansas, and the GOP sent money to bolster South Carolina; Republicans wound up winning those states by 11 and 10 points, respectively. Even some Democrats are pretty circumspect about their chances in South Carolina this year.

    But the increased desperation ahead of November 3 means it could be a long four weeks for the GOP.

  • ABC请求联邦法官阻止FCC提前进行牌照审查,称此举系特朗普政府的报复行为


    2026年10月6日 美国东部时间下午3:26 / 哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)新闻

    作者:伊玛尼·阿比奥努

    迪士尼旗下的ABC电视台律师周二请求联邦法官阻止美国联邦通信委员会(FCC)提前对该网络的广播牌照进行审查,称此次监管程序的发起是为了报复ABC此前播出了冒犯特朗普政府的内容。

    在华盛顿特区联邦法院举行的约两小时听证会上,ABC方面辩称,特朗普总统和FCC主席布伦丹·卡尔的言论暴露了监管机构在4月份采取前所未有的举措——要求ABC及其母公司旗下的8家电视台提前数年提交广播牌照续期申请的真正原因。

    这些牌照原本的续期时间为2028年至2031年之间。

    “他们动用政府权力进行报复,试图阻止ABC行使受第一修正案保护的言论自由,”该公司律师贝丝·威尔金森说道。

    威尔金森曾一度援引法国大革命来比喻FCC的行动,称该机构实际上迫使这家广播公司在等待牌照裁决期间“脖子架在断头台上”。

    她表示,在整个程序推进期间,这一监管行动已经立即对ABC的编辑决策产生了寒蝉效应。其中部分决策可能反过来导致FCC“对我们处以企业死刑,吊销我们的牌照”,她说道。

    在发言中,她重点提到了特朗普7月份在白宫发表的一场演讲,当时他批评ABC和NBC未转播他的演讲,并呼吁吊销两家公司的牌照。她表示,这些言论对其客户构成了“直接威胁”。

    “人们可能不喜欢ABC的某些报道,总统也有权表达不满,但公众有权接触到不同的言论和观点,”她说道。

    为FCC辩护的美国司法部则辩称,该机构4月份下令提前进行牌照审查的决定,是因迪士尼未能充分回应针对该公司多元化、公平性和包容性举措的持续调查。

    代表FCC参与本案的司法部律师迪米塔尔·乔治耶夫-雷梅表示,ABC“拒绝充分回应”FCC的反歧视调查。“委员会通过要求原告提前续期广播牌照,来获取其所需的信息。”

    周二的法律辩论主要围绕迪士尼和ABC是否具备法律权限在地区法院挑战FCC的提前牌照续期程序展开。

    司法部辩称,管辖牌照续期的监管程序要求公司先向FCC全体委员会提起上诉,之后任何不利裁决只能由联邦上诉法院审理,而非美国地区法院。

    但ABC方面称,其在本案中遭遇的报复性行为不属于国会规定的监管上诉程序范畴,这也是该公司寻求救济以应对当前面临的直接伤害的唯一途径。

    威尔金森举例说明了此类伤害,称该网络已经改变了政治话题的报道方式,并指出脱口秀《观点》已经调整了节目中片段选取的方式。

    她补充道,长期批评特朗普的喜剧演员吉米·坎摩尔也将他与得克萨斯州民主党参议院候选人詹姆斯·塔拉里科的采访视频上传至YouTube,而非在本台播出。

    威尔金森表示,即便该公司曾试图就4月份启动提前牌照续期的决定提起上诉,委员会也有权无限期搁置此事。

    她还指出,如果FCC最终在程序结束时决定续期牌照,ABC将无法获得有效的法律救济来弥补其所遭受的损害。

    由拜登任命的美国地区法官洛伦·阿里汗有时对政府关于FCC启动提前牌照续期程序是为了从反歧视调查中获取更多信息的说法表示怀疑。

    当她问及司法部还有哪些其他法律工具可以迫使ABC提供所要求的数据时,乔治耶夫-雷梅未能立即给出答复,这促使法官要求政府在10月9日前提交一份针对该问题的意见书。

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/disney-and-abc-sue-fcc-over-early-license-renewals-arguing-first/

    迪士尼与ABC就提前牌照续期起诉FCC,捍卫其第一修正案权利

    (时长03:29)

    ABC asks federal judge to block FCC’s early license review, citing retaliation by Trump administration

    2026-10-06 3:26 PM EDT / CBS News

    By Imani Agbionu

    An attorney for Disney’s ABC asked a federal judge on Tuesday to block the Federal Communications Commission from conducting an early review of the network’s broadcast licenses, saying the regulatory proceeding was initiated to retaliate against ABC over content that offended the Trump administration.

    During a roughly two-hour hearing in federal court in Washington, D.C., ABC argued that comments from President Trump and FCC Chair Brendan Carr laid bare the true reasons behind why the regulatory agency took the unprecedented step in April of ordering eight television stations owned by ABC and its parent company to submit renewal applications for their broadcast licenses years ahead of schedule.

    Those licenses were originally scheduled for renewal between 2028 and 2031.

    “They are retaliating with their government power to stop ABC from exercising their protected First Amendment speech,” said Beth Wilkinson, an attorney for the company.

    Wilkinson at one point used the French Revolution to illustrate the FCC’s actions, arguing the agency was effectively forcing the broadcast company to sit with its “head on a guillotine” while it awaits a decision about the licenses.

    As the process plays out, she said, the regulatory action is having an immediate chilling effect on how ABC makes editorial decisions. Some of those decisions could in turn lead the FCC to “give us the corporate death penalty and take away our licenses,” she said.

    In her remarks, she highlighted a speech that Mr. Trump made at the White House in July, in which he chastised ABC and NBC for not broadcasting the speech and called for their licenses to be revoked. Those remarks, she said, represented a “direct threat” to her client.

    “People may not like some of ABC’s coverage and the president is entitled to it, but the public has the right to be exposed to different speech and viewpoints,” she said.

    The Justice Department, which is defending the FCC, has argued that the agency’s decision in April to order an early license review was triggered by Disney’s failure to adequately respond to an ongoing investigation into the company’s diversity, equity and inclusion practices.

    ABC “refused to adequately respond” to the FCC’s anti-discrimination probe, said Dimitar Georgiev-Remme, one of the Justice Department’s attorneys representing the FCC in the case. “The commission decided to look for information that it needed by calling for early renewal of plaintiffs’ broadcast license.”

    Tuesday’s legal arguments centered primarily on whether Disney and ABC have legal authority to challenge the FCC’s early license renewal process in the district court.

    The Justice Department argues that the regulatory process that governs license renewals would require a company to appeal an FCC order to the full commission. After that, any adverse decision can only be heard by a federal appellate court — and not a U.S. district court.

    ABC, however, alleges that the type of retaliatory conduct it is facing in this case falls outside the scope of the regulatory appeals process prescribed by Congress, and this is the only way the company can seek relief to address the immediate harm it is facing.

    In one such example of harm, Wilkinson said the network has changed the ways in which it covers political topics, noting that the talk show “The View” has changed how it selects the clips it uses in the show.

    Comedian Jimmy Kimmel, a longstanding critic of Trump, also separately posted his interview with Democratic Texas Senate candidate James Talarico on YouTube rather than airing it with the network, she added.

    Wilkinson said that even if the company had sought to appeal the April decision to initiate an early license renewal, the commission has the power to sit on the matter indefinitely.

    She also noted that if the FCC ultimately decides to renew the licenses at the end of the process, ABC will have no effective legal remedy to address the harm it has suffered.

    U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan, a Biden appointee, at times appeared skeptical at the government’s claim that the FCC initiated the early license renewal process in order to get more information for its anti-discrimination investigation.

    When she asked the Justice Department what other legal tools it has at its disposal to compel ABC to provide the requested data, Georgiev-Remme could not provide an immediate answer, prompting the judge to ask the government to file a brief addressing her question by Oct. 9.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/disney-and-abc-sue-fcc-over-early-license-renewals-arguing-first/

    Inside Disney and ABC’s First Amendment rights as they sue FCC over early license renewal

    (03:29)

  • 摇摆选区共和党议员称特朗普的“政策与议程将登上选票”


    美国东部时间10月6日周二下午1:19 / CNN

    作者:马努·拉朱,CNN


    摇摆选区共和党议员称特朗普的“政策与议程将登上选票”

    政治内幕节目

    共和党众议员瑞安·麦肯齐在宾夕法尼亚州参加连任竞选,他的选区是全美竞争最激烈的选区之一。当被问及特朗普总统多次呼吁选民将他视为候选人时,麦肯齐众议员表示:“我们需要让共和党人明白,他将登上选票——也就是说,他的政策与议程将登上选票。”

    1:37 • 消息来源:CNN

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/06/politics/video/gop-rep-ryan-mackenzie-pa-midterms-ip

    Republican in toss-up seat says Trump’s ‘policies and his agenda are going to be on the ballot’

    1:19 PM EDT, Tue October 6, 2026 / CNN

    By Manu Raju, CNN

    Republican in toss-up seat says Trump’s ‘policies and his agenda are going to be on the ballot’

    Inside Politics

    Republican Rep. Ryan Mackenzie joins Manu Raju on his reelection campaign in Pennsylvania, where his race is among the most competitive in the country. When asked about President Trump’s repeated pleas for voters to pretend he’s on the ballot, Rep. Mackenzie says, “we need Republicans to see that he is going to be on the ballot in the sense that his policies and his agenda are going to be on the ballot.”

    1:37 • Source: CNN

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/06/politics/video/gop-rep-ryan-mackenzie-pa-midterms-ip

  • 《纽约时报》专栏博主暗示特朗普应为康奈尔大学涉嫌轮奸案负责 遭网络猛烈抨击


    批评者指出这起2024年涉嫌案件发生在乔·拜登总统任期内,米歇尔·科特尔因此遭遇强烈反对
    2026年10月6日 美国东部时间上午9:17 / 福克斯新闻
    作者:彼得·达布罗斯卡 福克斯新闻

    《纽约时报》专栏博主将特朗普与康奈尔大学涉嫌性侵案联系起来

    《纽约时报》一名专栏博主暗示唐纳德·特朗普总统应为营造了某种文化负责,这种文化导致七名男子在康奈尔大学对一名女性实施涉嫌性侵。(图片来源:美国广播公司新闻——10月4日)

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/9d2ebd8f-b81b-4121-9f09-8766829a5696

    收听本文
    3分钟

    《纽约时报》一名专栏博主暗示唐纳德·特朗普总统应为营造了某种文化负责,这种文化导致七名男子在康奈尔大学对一名女性实施涉嫌性侵,该报因此陷入争议。
    “这本质上是对女性的根本不尊重,”专栏博主米歇尔·科特尔周日在美国广播公司新闻节目中表示。“无论你作为兄弟会成员喝得多醉,都不能传递这类信息,否则你就会对女性的存在意义以及你面对的是否是一个真正的人产生某种误解。”
    “而这,我认为,根源——我们可以把矛头指向总统,”科特尔继续说道。“我的意思是,我们当前所处的文化环境中,崇尚霸道、张扬和虐待女性几乎成了一件很酷的事。”


    康奈尔大学校长称校方“必须在处理性侵指控方面做得更好”

    2026年5月6日,纽约市,《纽约时报》大楼外景。(图片来源:迈克尔·M·圣地亚哥/盖蒂图片社)

    一名在法庭记录中以“无名氏”身份出现的女性已对七名男子提起民事诉讼,她指控这七人在2024年康奈尔大学一场由氯胺酮和酒精引发的事件中轮奸了她。当时担任白宫总统的是前总统乔·拜登。

    这些男子否认有不当行为,部分人称性行为是双方自愿的,还有人称他们并未参与其中。目前尚未提出任何指控。


    奥卡西奥-科特雷斯对康奈尔强奸指控的戏剧性复述与投诉细节不符

    科特尔的言论引发了激烈反对,尤其是那些指出该事件发生在拜登担任总统期间的人士,其中包括福克斯新闻特约撰稿人乔·孔查。
    “这事发生在2024年拜登当总统的时候。她难道不知道吗?”另一位X平台用户问道。
    “这是‘特朗普把我变成了新t!’的最新版本,由一个非常非常聪明的人呈献给大家,”美国有线电视新闻网特约撰稿人斯科特·詹宁斯说道。

    2026年3月12日,华盛顿特区,唐纳德·特朗普总统与第一夫人梅拉尼娅·特朗普抵达白宫东厅参加女性历史月活动。(图片来源:希瑟·迪尔/盖蒂图片社)

    “媒体和评论员们争先恐后地试图把所有事情都和唐纳德·特朗普扯上关系。这太丢人了,而且极其懒惰,”前国土安全部公共事务助理部长特丽西娅·麦克劳克林说道。
    “这种观点简直荒谬到离谱,你甚至从这里都看不到理智的影子……”保守派评论员约翰·齐格勒说道。
    “当然,这是特朗普的错,”最先发布这段视频片段的媒体研究中心说道。


    被控康奈尔性侵学生的律师呼吁莱蒂西亚·詹姆斯因先前言论回避调查

    特朗普已就这起案件发表评论,目前案件正由他的长期对手纽约州总检察长莱蒂西亚·詹姆斯调查。詹姆斯曾在2022年对特朗普提起民事欺诈诉讼。特朗普在2024年被认定犯有欺诈罪,并被勒令支付超过3.5亿美元的罚款,但该判决在上诉中被推翻。

    前总统乔·拜登。(美联社照片/曼努埃尔·塞内塔)

    当被问及詹姆斯被任命调查这起涉嫌轮奸案时,特朗普对这位州总检察长展开了攻击。
    “好吧,莱蒂西亚·詹姆斯是个腐败分子,”特朗普说道。“她完全腐败,我无法想象——我为她正在调查的任何人感到难过,因为他们不会得到公平的审判。莱蒂西亚·詹姆斯是个腐败分子。”


    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    福克斯新闻数字频道已联系《纽约时报》和白宫置评。

    彼得·达布罗斯卡是福克斯新闻数字频道的政治记者。

    NYT columnist thrashed online for suggesting Trump is to blame for alleged Cornell gang rape

    Michelle Cottle faced fierce backlash after critics noted the alleged 2024 incident occurred under Joe Biden’s presidency

    October 6, 2026 9:17am EDT / Fox News

    By Peter D’Abrosca Fox News

    New York Times columnists links Trump to alleged Cornell sexual assault case

    The New York Times is under fire after one its columnists suggested that President Donald Trump is responsible for creating culture that led to an alleged sexual assault against woman at Cornell University by seven men. (Credit: ABC News – Oct. 4)

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/9d2ebd8f-b81b-4121-9f09-8766829a5696

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    The New York Times is under fire after one of its columnists suggested that President Donald Trump is responsible for creating the culture that led to an alleged sexual assault against a woman at Cornell University by seven men.

    “What this is, is it’s a fundamental disrespect for women,” columnist Michelle Cottle said on ABC News on Sunday. “You can’t send those messages no matter how drunk you are as a frat boy without having some kind of misunderstanding about what women are there for and whether this is a real person you’re dealing with.”

    “And that, I think, starts, you know — we can go to the president for this one,” Cottle went on. “I mean, we are in a moment in this culture where the glorification of being thuggish and swaggering and mistreating women is kind of making you a cool kid.”

    CORNELL PRESIDENT SAYS UNIVERSITY ‘MUST DO BETTER’ ON HANDLING OF SEXUAL ASSAULT ALLEGATIONS

    The New York Times building is seen on May 6, 2026, in New York City.(Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

    A woman identified as Jane Doe in court records has filed a civil lawsuit against seven men she alleges gang-raped her during a ketamine- and alcohol-induced incident at Cornell University in 2024. Former President Joe Biden occupied the White House at that time.

    The men have denied wrongdoing, with some saying the sex was consensual, and others saying they didn’t participate. No charges have been filed.

    AOC’S DRAMATIC RETELLING OF CORNELL RAPE ALLEGATIONS COLLIDES WITH COMPLAINT DETAILS

    The backlash to Cottle’s comments was fierce, especially among those pointing out that the incident happened when Biden was president, including Fox News contributor Joe Concha.

    “This happened in 2024 when Biden was President. Did she not know that?” another X user asked.

    “Latest edition of ‘Trump turned me into a newt!’ brought to you by a very very smart person,” said CNN contributor Scott Jennings.

    President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump arrive for a Women’s History Month event in the East Room of the White House on March 12, 2026, in Washington, D.C.(Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

    “Media and pundits fall all over themselves trying to make everything and anything about Donald Trump. It’s embarrassing and so incredibly lazy,” said Tricia McLaughlin, former assistant secretary for public affairs at the Department of Homeland Security.

    “This take is SO far beyond delusional that you can’t even see sanity from here…” said conservative commentator John Ziegler.

    “Of course, it’s Trump’s fault,” said the Media Research Center, which first posted the clip.

    ATTORNEY FOR ACCUSED CORNELL STUDENT CALLS ON LETITIA JAMES TO STEP ASIDE OVER PRIOR COMMENTS

    Trump has commented on the case, which is now being investigated by longtime foe New York Attorney General Letitia James, who in 2022 filed a civil fraud lawsuit against him. Trump in 2024 was found liable for fraud and ordered to pay more than $350 million, but the penalty was overturned on appeal.

    Former President Joe Biden.(AP Photo/Manuel Ceneta)

    Asked about James being appointed to investigate the alleged gang rape, Trump launched into an attack on the state attorney general.

    “Well, Letitia James is a corrupt person,” Trump said. “She’s totally corrupt, and I can’t imagine it — I feel badly for whoever she’s looking at because they won’t get a fair shake. Letitia James is a corrupt person.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Fox News Digital reached out to The New York Times and the White House for comment.

    Peter D’Abrosca is a politics reporter at Fox News Digital.

  • 福克斯新闻权力排名:10月过后才会出现最大意外


    共和党在蓝州推出强势参议院候选人,而稳固红州的竞选差距却比预期更接近
    2026-10-06T09:00:04-04:00 / 福克斯新闻

    作者:雷米·努马 福克斯新闻
    发布于2026年10月6日 美国东部时间上午9:00

    福克斯新闻权力排名:参众两院席位“悬而未决”
    《美国新闻直播间》联合主播比尔·赫默解读最新福克斯新闻权力排名,中期选举前有6个参议院摇摆州和17个众议院摇摆席位。前白宫副幕僚长卡尔·罗夫加入节目,分析美国民主社会主义者组织候选人对民主党领导层的影响,并梳理竞选团队与超级政治行动委员会之间的广告成本差异。

    NEW 你现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/3c36bb98-2060-4663-a63e-08296d60ce52

    收听本文
    7分钟

    距离选举还有四周,对大多数美国人来说,是时候看橄榄球、赏秋叶和穿法兰绒了。但对政治观察家而言,所有人的目光都聚焦在10月的“十月惊奇”上。

    这类事件此前曾改变选情。2008年,雷曼兄弟破产引发大萧条以来最严重的金融危机,成为约翰·麦凯恩总统竞选的转折点。消息公布时他与巴拉克·奥巴马支持率持平,但此后所有民调都显示他落后,最终以7个百分点的差距输掉普选票。

    惊喜事件可能来自国内或海外。1980年,吉米·卡特总统未能解决伊朗人质危机。八年前,理查德·尼克松总统宣布越南“和平在望”。

    有些事件的影响比其他事件更大。目前尚不清楚乔治·W·布什酒驾的新闻对2000年大选产生了多大影响,詹姆斯·科米就希拉里·克林顿邮件服务器致国会的信件也未必是特朗普2016年胜选的决定性因素。

    但这些意外事件有一个共同点:它们都发生在总统大选年。

    爆炸性潜伏议题可能推动中期选举震荡,资深共和党议员预测:‘你会看到意外情况’

    福克斯新闻权力排名:竞争激烈的竞选活动。(雷米·努马/福克斯新闻)

    这并非说中期选举周期的最后一个月不会出现突发新闻。以2018年为例,共和党警告移民大篷车问题,布雷特·卡瓦诺寻求最高法院席位,一名枪手在匹兹堡一座犹太教堂开枪扫射。

    但这只是例外,而非常态。多数情况下,中期选举的“十月惊奇”只会影响个别选区,而非某个政党的整体竞选走势。

    例如在上一次中期选举中,赫歇尔·沃克面临支付前女友堕胎费用的破坏性指控,而在佛罗里达州,飓风伊恩造成的破坏让罗恩·德桑蒂斯州长有机会向佛罗里达人展示他有能力应对危机。

    福克斯新闻权力排名:对民主党而言,哪里还会出岔子?

    福克斯新闻权力排名:全国竞选态势。(雷米·努马/福克斯新闻)

    几个月来,选民对特朗普以及他们希望选举到众议院的政党态度并未改变,因此类似上述的本地新闻才是竞选最后几周值得关注的焦点。

    更何况,最大的意外往往在10月过后才会出现。

    民主党面临的防守压力超出预期

    对民主党来说,今年看起来仍是一场——或许是一场极为出色的——选举,但该党在一些意想不到的地方陷入防守。

    大卫·马库斯:在深蓝明尼苏达州,红潮可能在中期选举前兴起

    福克斯新闻权力排名:可能让民主党意外的州。(雷米·努马/福克斯新闻)

    首先是明尼苏达州,共和党推出了明星候选人米歇尔·塔福亚。这位前NFL场边记者在全州奔走,宣传当选后将“制止选举欺诈”的主张。这在该州是热门议题,也让她得以瞄准现任副州长、民主党人佩吉·弗拉南根。

    接下来是新罕布什尔州,在当前政治环境下民主党本应占据主导,但共和党却拥有有利的对阵形势。前美国参议员约翰·E·苏努努今年再次参选,对阵克里斯·帕帕斯——后者似乎难以调动选民热情。
    就连俄勒冈州的州长竞选今年也变得激烈。

    稳固的共和党州可能出现比预期更接近的差距

    与此同时,共和党在一些出人意料的地方投入资金。

    共和党面临中期选举的严峻逆风,六大因素或助其逆势而为

    福克斯新闻权力排名:可能让共和党意外的州。(雷米·努马/福克斯新闻)

    在阿肯色州,参议员汤姆·科顿为连任投入1360万美元,以65比1的开支优势远超民主党对手哈利·肖夫纳。科顿可能有超越参议员职位的政治抱负,但2020年他的竞选开支还不到100万美元。

    上个月,副总统万斯给爱达荷州民众寄了一封信,警告民主党可能“投入数百万美元”支持独立挑战者托德·阿基利斯;万斯称这是一场“紧急的全国性竞选”。

    密西西比州参议员辛迪·海德-史密斯最近几周一直在投放广告攻击民主党对手斯科特·科洛姆,称他是“失败的检察官”,在犯罪问题上记录“令人不寒而栗”;该州今年迄今的广告支出已达500万美元。

    福克斯新闻民调:得州参议院对决将在塔拉里科和帕克斯顿之间展开

    福克斯新闻权力排名:佛罗里达州。(雷米·努马/福克斯新闻)

    佛罗里达州充斥着选举意外。2018年,里克·斯科特以0.1个百分点的优势赢得参议院席位,德桑蒂斯则以0.4个百分点的优势赢得州长职位。两年后,总统大选的胜负差距仅为3.4个百分点。

    内布拉斯加州和南达科他州的共和党选情也可能比预期更接近。

    在本周的权力排名中,一个卡罗莱纳州的竞选竞争加剧,另一个则逐渐远离共和党,民主党则对俄勒冈州的州长竞选感到担忧。

    参议院:南北卡罗莱纳州的形势变化让摇摆州增至8个

    参议院的席位分布情况相同。两党各握有47个席位,剩余6个摇摆席位将决定参议院控制权归属。

    福克斯新闻权力排名:参议院预测。(雷米·努马/福克斯新闻)

    这6个州分别是阿拉斯加、艾奥瓦、缅因、密歇根、俄亥俄和得克萨斯,上周民调机构发布的一系列民调显示这些州的选情都十分胶着。

    福克斯新闻权力排名:参议院预测。(雷米·努马/福克斯新闻)

    另外两场竞选也竞争激烈:新罕布什尔州(倾向民主党)和堪萨斯州(倾向共和党)。

    仅看民调数据,这两个州更像是摇摆州:上周公布的民调显示,民主党在新罕布什尔州仅领先5个百分点,堪萨斯州的选情则完全持平。两党支持者的构成让它们仍被归类为“倾向某党”。

    北卡罗莱纳州的竞争程度较两周前有所下降。福克斯新闻周五证实,与共和党领导层结盟的强大超级政治行动委员会参议院领导基金正从该州撤出资源。此前,蒂姆·斯科特参议员已将其从共和党重点投入资金的州名单中移除。

    共和党候选人迈克尔·沃特利正在该州尽全力竞选,差距可能比目前民调显示的更接近。但民主党候选人罗伊·库珀也是强劲候选人,他在多次民调中都保持两位数领先。
    北卡罗莱纳州从“倾向民主党”调整为“大概率民主党”。

    福克斯新闻权力排名:参议院形势变化。(雷米·努马/福克斯新闻)

    邻近的南卡罗莱纳州竞争则愈发激烈。在兄长林赛去世后被任命填补参议院席位的达琳·格雷厄姆,据称正获得特朗普总统更多的竞选助力。

    外界仍对格雷厄姆能否动员广泛的共和党选民群体存在疑问,她的民主党对手与堪萨斯州和内布拉斯加州的对手一样,大力抨击柴油价格问题。
    该州从“稳固共和党”调整为“大概率共和党”。

    福克斯新闻权力排名:参议院预测。(雷米·努马/福克斯新闻)

    州长竞选:俄勒冈州成战场;留意佛罗里达和佛蒙特州

    福克斯新闻权力排名:州长竞选预测。(雷米·努马/福克斯新闻)

    四年前,俄勒冈州选民首次选举蒂娜·科特克出任州长,但她的任期并不顺利。

    据当地报道和竞选活动披露,科特克在本次竞建中同时面临四大问题:住房危机、教育成果不佳、城市犯罪率高于邻州,以及与其他在任官员一样,她在数据中心问题上反复无常。

    上周一场毫无活力的辩论表现也无济于事。

    德拉赞此前曾竞选失利,这次不会再有第三方候选人从民主党阵营分流选票。但这一次,她与特朗普以及堕胎议题保持了更远距离,她称堕胎是一个“已解决的问题”。

    民主党有充分理由在11月保住该州,但这将比民主党预期的更加艰难。俄勒冈州从“大概率民主党”调整为“倾向民主党”。

    福克斯新闻权力排名:州长竞选形势变化。(雷米·努马/福克斯新闻)

    在其他地方,有两个州的民主党选情愈发激烈,首先是佛罗里达州。

    这个“阳光之州”是“让美国再次伟大”运动的发源地,拜伦·唐纳兹众议员在8月轻松锁定共和党提名。但他在竞选活动中有时表现不佳,西班牙裔选民仍在表达对经济的不满。佛罗里达州从“稳固共和党”调整为“大概率共和党”。

    在佛蒙特州,长期担任共和党州长的菲尔·斯科特可能会对新罕布什尔大学的一项新民调感到意外:该民调显示民主党候选人阿曼达·贾诺以49%比43%领先斯科特6个百分点。

    福克斯新闻权力排名:州长竞选预测。(雷米·努马/福克斯新闻)

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    斯科特在佛蒙特州的选举一直轻松获胜,但政党标签可能在本届选举周期成为更大的问题。这个“绿山之州”也从“稳固共和党”调整为“大概率共和党”。

    雷米·努马是福克斯新闻频道首席政治事务专家。你可以在推特关注他:@remynuma

    Fox News Power Rankings: The biggest surprises come after October

    Republicans field strong Senate candidates in blue states while solid red states see closer-than-expected margins

    2026-10-06T09:00:04-04:00 / Fox News

    By Rémy Numa Fox News

    Published October 6, 2026 9:00am EDT

    Fox News Power Rankings: Senate, House ‘up for grabs’

    ‘America’s Newsroom’ co-anchor Bill Hemmer breaks down new Fox News Power Rankings showing six Senate toss-up states and 17 House toss-up seats ahead of the midterm elections. Former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove joins to analyze Democratic Socialists of America candidate influence on party leadership and outline advertising cost differences between campaign organizations and super PACs.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/3c36bb98-2060-4663-a63e-08296d60ce52

    Listen to this article

    7 min

    Four weeks out from the election, and for most Americans, it’s time for football, foliage and flannel. For politics watchers, all eyes are on an October surprise.

    They’ve been game-changers before. In 2008, the collapse of Lehman Brothers, which ushered in the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression, was a turning point in John McCain’s presidential campaign. He was even with Barack Obama when the news broke, then trailed in every survey after. He lost the popular vote by seven points.

    Surprises have come from home and abroad. In 1980, it was President Jimmy Carter’s inability to resolve the Iranian hostage crisis. Eight years earlier, it was President Richard Nixon’s announcement that “peace was at hand” in Vietnam.

    Some have more impact than others. It’s not clear that news about George W. Bush’s DUI changed much about the 2000 election, nor that James Comey’s letter to Congress about Hillary Clinton’s email server was the decider in President Trump’s 2016 win.

    Still, these surprises all have one thing in common: they happened in presidential years.

    EXPLOSIVE SLEEPER ISSUE COULD FUEL MIDTERM SHAKEUPS, TOP REPUBLICAN PREDICTS: ‘YOU’RE GONNA SEE SURPRISES’

    Fox News Power Rankings on competitive races.(Remy Numa/Fox News)

    It’s not as though we don’t get breaking news during the last month of a midterm cycle. Take 2018, when the GOP warned about a migrant caravan, Brett Kavanaugh sought a seat on the Supreme Court, and a gunman opened fire at a Pittsburgh synagogue.

    But that was the exception, not the rule. For the most part, midterm October surprises affect individual races, not the overall trajectory of a party.

    In the last midterm, for example, Herschel Walker faced damaging allegations about paying for former girlfriends’ abortions, while in Florida, the destruction caused by Hurricane Ian gave Gov. Ron DeSantis the opportunity to show Floridians that he could be trusted to handle a crisis.

    FOX NEWS POWER RANKINGS: FOR THE DEMOCRATS, WHERE COULD IT POSSIBLY GO WRONG?

    Fox News Power Rankings on national state of play.(Remy Numa/Fox News)

    Voters haven’t changed their minds about Trump or the party they’d prefer to elect to the House for several months now, so local stories like these are the ones to watch in the final weeks of the campaign.

    Besides, the biggest surprises come after October.

    Democrats are playing more defense than they’d like

    For what still looks like a good – maybe great – year for the Democrats, the party is playing defense in some unexpected places.

    DAVID MARCUS: IN DEEP BLUE MINNESOTA A RED DAWN MAY BE RISING AHEAD OF THE MIDTERMS

    Fox News Power Rankings on states that could surprise Democrats.(Remy Numa/Fox News)

    That starts with Minnesota, where Republicans have a star candidate in Michele Tafoya. The former NFL sideline reporter has been up and down the state with a message to “stop the fraud” if elected to the Senate. That’s been a hot issue in the state, and it’s allowed her to target the Democrat, Peggy Flanagan, who currently serves as lieutenant governor.

    Then there’s New Hampshire, another state where Democrats are in the driver’s seat thanks to this political environment, but where the GOP has a favorable match up. Former U.S. Senator John E. Sununu is back on the ballot this year against Chris Pappas, who seems to have had trouble animating his voters.

    Even Oregon’s gubernatorial race is competitive this year.

    Solid Republican states could have closer-than-expected margins

    Meanwhile, Republicans are spending money in surprising places.

    REPUBLICANS FACE BRUTAL MIDTERM HEADWINDS. SIX FORCES COULD HELP THEM DEFY HISTORY.

    Fox News Power Rankings on states that could surprise Republicans.(Remy Numa/Fox News)

    In Arkansas, Sen. Tom Cotton has thrown $13.6 million at his reelection bid, outspending his Democratic opponent Hallie Schoffner 65 to 1. Cotton may have ambitions beyond his current role in the Senate, but in 2020, his spending fell short of $1 million.

    Idahoans got a letter in the mail from Vice President Vance last month warning them that Democrats could “pour millions of dollars” into independent challenger Todd Achilles; Vance called it an “urgent national race.”

    Mississippi Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith has been running ads attacking her Democratic challenger Scott Colom in recent weeks, calling him a “failed prosecutor” with a “chilling” record on crime; that state has seen $5 million in ad spending so far this year.

    FOX NEWS POLL: IT’S A LONE STAR SENATE SHOWDOWN BETWEEN TALARICO AND PAXTON

    Fox News Power Rankings on Florida.(Remy Numa/Fox News)

    And Florida is full of election surprises. In 2018, Rick Scott won his Senate race by 0.1 percentage points while DeSantis won his by 0.4 points. Two years later, the presidential race was decided by just 3.4 points.

    Nebraska and South Dakota could be closer-than-expected for Republicans as well.

    In this week’s Power Rankings, one Carolina gets more competitive while another drifts away from the GOP, and Democrats get nervous about a governor’s race in Oregon.

    Senate: Shifts in North and South Carolina make it eight battlegrounds

    The math is the same in the Senate. Each party has 47 seats to their name, leaving six toss-up races to determine control.

    Fox News Power Rankings on Senate forecast.(Remy Numa/Fox News)

    Those are Alaska, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, Ohio, and Texas, which all look close in the flurry of surveys released by pollsters last week.

    Fox News Power Rankings on Senate forecast.(Remy Numa/Fox News)

    Two other races are highly competitive: New Hampshire (Lean D) and Kansas (Lean R).

    On the polling alone, these look more like toss-up states: surveys released last week have the Democrat ahead by only five points in New Hampshire, and the Kansas race dead even. It’s the partisan makeup of these states that keeps them at “lean.”

    North Carolina is less competitive than it was two weeks ago. Fox News confirmed on Friday that the Senate Leadership Fund, a powerful Super PAC aligned with Republican leadership, was pulling resources from the state. Earlier, Sen. Tim Scott left it off a list of states where Republicans were focusing spending.

    GOP nominee Michael Whatley is running as strong a race as he can there, and the margin will probably be tighter than polls currently have it. But the Democrat, Roy Cooper, is also a strong candidate, and he has had double-digit leads in multiple surveys.

    North Carolina moves from Lean D to Likely D.

    Fox News Power Rankings on Senate shifts.(Remy Numa/Fox News)

    Nearby South Carolina is getting more competitive. Darline Graham, appointed to the Senate after the death of her brother, Lindsey, is reportedly getting more help on the campaign trail from President Trump.

    There are lingering questions about Graham’s ability to turn out a broad spectrum of Republican voters against a Democratic candidate who, like her counterparts in Kansas and Nebraska, is pushing hard on the price of diesel.

    The state moves from Solid R to Likely R.

    Fox News Power Rankings on Senate forecast.(Remy Numa/Fox News)

    Governor: Oregon is a battleground; keep an eye on Florida and Vermont

    Fox News Power Rankings on gubernatorial forecast.(Remy Numa/Fox News)

    Four years ago, Oregonians sent Tina Kotek to the governor’s mansion for the first time, and it hasn’t gone smoothly.

    Kotek faces four issues all at once in this campaign, as outlined in local reports and on the trail: a housing crisis, poor education outcomes, higher city crime rates than in neighboring states, and like other incumbents, she flip-flopped on data centers.

    A lethargic debate performance last week didn’t help matters.

    Drazan has lost this race before, and this time, won’t get help from a third-party candidate who drew votes from the Democrat. But this time around, she has created more distance both from Trump and conversations about abortion, which she calls a “settled issue.”

    Democrats have every reason to hold on to this state in November, but it’s going to be tougher than the party wants. Oregon moves from Likely D to Lean D.

    Fox News Power Rankings on gubernatorial shifts.(Remy Numa/Fox News)

    Elsewhere, two states are becoming more competitive for Democrats, beginning with Florida.

    The Sunshine State is the home of the “MAGA” movement, and Rep. Byron Donalds easily locked up the Republican nomination in August. But he has stumbled, at times, on the campaign trail, and Hispanic voters continue to express frustration with this economy. Florida moves from Solid R to Likely R.

    And in Vermont, longtime incumbent Republican Phil Scott might have raised an eyebrow at a new poll from the University of New Hampshire showing his Democratic opponent, Amanda Janoo, up six points against Scott, 49% to 43%.

    Fox News Power Rankings on gubernatorial forecast.(Remy Numa/Fox News)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Scott keeps winning elections comfortably in Vermont, but the party label could be a bigger problem this cycle. The Green Mountain State also moves from Solid R to Likely R.

    Rémy Numa is the lead political affairs specialist for Fox News Channel. You can follow him on Twitter: @remynuma.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2