博客

  • 专家警告:国土安全部停摆可能在伊朗冲突期间延误美国反恐响应


    杰弗里·霍尔斯特德(Jeffrey Halstead),退休的沃思堡警察局局长及前菲尼克斯警察局国土安全指挥官表示,美国军事行动可能会助长“边远或边缘恐怖组织”的气焰

    作者:兰登·米恩(Landon Mion)| 福克斯新闻

    发布时间:2026年3月5日 美国东部时间凌晨3:39

    Genasys发言人杰弗里·霍尔斯特德警告称,伊朗冲突可能会加剧那些希望伤害美国人的人的心态,而国土安全部(DHS)的停摆可能会影响联邦政府应对这些威胁的能力。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章了!

    收听本文
    6分钟

    一位公共安全专家表示,国土安全部(DHS)的部分政府停摆可能会影响联邦政府应对美国潜在恐怖威胁的能力,他警告称与伊朗不断升级的冲突可能会鼓励那些希望伤害美国人的人采取行动。

    德克萨斯州沃思堡市退休警察局长、前菲尼克斯警察局国土安全指挥官杰弗里·霍尔斯特德告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,美国的军事行动可能会“加剧一些边远或边缘恐怖组织采取行动的心态”。

    “从历史上看,每当发生冲突,特别是中东地区局势紧张升级、军事行动以及现在宣战的情况下,都会严重影响我们与联邦合作伙伴及时共享情报和收集信息的能力,”霍尔斯特德表示,“由于当前国土安全部处于停摆状态,如果美国境内发生任何事件,可能会出现重大延误,因为联邦应急管理局(FEMA)和其他非常关键的联邦政府部门基本上都已停摆。”

    他特别指出,上周末发生在得克萨斯州奥斯汀的恐怖袭击,造成两人死亡、14人受伤。嫌疑人恩迪亚加·迪亚涅(Ndiaga Diagne)是一名53岁的塞内加尔裔归化公民,也被击毙。

    (图片:David ‘Dee’ Delgado/路透社)

    当局称,他们正在调查这起发生在周日凌晨约2点的酒吧枪击案,将其视为“潜在的恐怖主义关联事件”,因为迪亚涅似乎穿着印有“真主所有物”字样的运动衫和印有伊朗国旗的背心。他的车辆中后来被发现一本《古兰经》,其家中还发现了伊朗国旗和政权领导人的画像。

    这起袭击发生在美国与以色列联合军事打击伊朗之后。周六早上,针对伊朗的联合军事打击导致伊朗最高领袖阿里·哈梅内伊(Ali Khamenei)和其他领导人死亡,引发了中东更广泛的冲突。

    霍尔斯特德同时也是Genasys的战略账户总监。Genasys是一家通信硬件和软件提供商,在紧急情况下为社区提供帮助。他警告称,如果中东冲突持续,今年晚些时候美国的重大活动,如世界杯足球赛和美国250周年纪念活动,可能会使美国成为“升级的目标”。

    他还表示,每当发生政府停摆,“在政治和行政层面,联邦政府的各个方面以及政府运作方式都会出现相当严重的混乱”。

    “有时这些关键机构的人员配备会减少,一些机构根本得不到资金支持,”他解释道,“这将延迟并可能阻碍一些关键情报的传递,其中包括可能构成恐怖威胁级别的情报,这些情报需要传达给地方警察,以便巡逻人员、基层警官以及所有监督员了解最新和最严重的威胁,包括美国境内活跃组织可能盯上的高价值目标。”

    他补充说,政府停摆会影响“以最快速度将情报传递给需要它的人”的能力,如果信息被忽视或未被传递,延误可能会“非常非常灾难性”。

    霍尔斯特德指出,他尚未发现任何证据表明奥斯汀枪击事件与政府停摆有直接关联。

    (图片:Ricardo B. Brazziell/奥斯汀美国政治家报 via 美联社;获得福克斯新闻)

    “然而,当海外发生军事行动时,尤其是在一些高知名度的恐怖组织或恐怖主义庇护国,这会提升其他人针对美国公民和机构采取行动的心态,”他解释道,“这可能包括学校和宗教场所,以及我们自由生活的方式。”

    “当海外发生与恐怖主义相关的事件时,会在一些‘独狼式’行动者的心态中灌输采取行动的念头,”他继续说道,“如果看看奥斯汀的案例,这正是联邦调查局(FBI)迄今为止所描述的,这可能是一名独狼式行动者对针对伊朗的军事行动做出的反应,他穿着印有‘真主所有物’的衬衫,这表明他的宗教信仰和/或可能与某些恐怖主义有关联。”

    国土安全部部长克里斯蒂·诺姆(Kristi Noem)在给福克斯新闻数字频道的声明中表示:“我正在与我们的联邦情报和执法合作伙伴直接协调,我们将继续密切监控并挫败任何针对国土安全的潜在威胁。”

    国土安全部、总统唐纳德·特朗普和国会山的共和党议员继续指责民主党导致停摆。在周末与伊朗冲突爆发后,民主党议员仍然不为所动,包括去年11月投票结束政府停摆的议员。

    弗吉尼亚州民主党参议员蒂姆·凯恩(Tim Kaine)辩称,国土安全部仍有足够资金来自特朗普去年签署的支出法案,民主党不会突然放弃他们的改革要求。缅因州独立参议员安格斯·金(Angus King)告诉《国会山报》,他认为资金谈判与伊朗正在进行的战争之间没有任何关联。

    “我认为联邦应急管理局(FEMA)和海岸警卫队之间不存在关联——事实上,也不存在任何关联,”金参议员表示。

    共和党人认为,这场冲突使国土安全部的资金更加必要。众议院多数党领袖史蒂夫·斯卡利斯(Steve Scalise)在X平台(原推特)上写道:“在对伊朗成功发动打击以及联邦调查局发出国内威胁升级警告之后,民主党人继续关闭国土安全部是极其危险的。”

    霍尔斯特德表示,这场资金斗争“看起来和我们以往看到的其他停摆一样”,“变成了一方与另一方的对立,然后一方会发表强烈指责,另一方则会进行报复性回应。”

    “我认为这可能是近40年来我见过的最严重的内斗,”他说道。

    相关文章:专家警告:国土安全部停摆在极端天气中使地方应急响应人员孤立无援

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6390401509112

    DHS shutdown may delay US terror response amid Iran conflict, expert warns

    Jeffrey Halstead, retired Fort Worth police chief and former Phoenix police commander over Homeland Security, said US military actions can embolden ‘outlying or outlier terrorist entities’

    By Landon Mion | Fox News

    Published March 5, 2026 3:39am EST

    Genasys spokesman Jeffrey Halstead warned that the conflict in Iran could elevate the mindset of people wishing to harm Americans and that the DHS shutdown could impact the federal government’s ability to address those threats.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Listen to this article

    6 min

    The partial government shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security could impact how the federal government is able to address potential terror threats in the U.S., a public safety expert said, warning that the escalating conflict with Iran could encourage those wishing to harm Americans.

    Jeffrey Halstead, a retired police chief in Fort Worth, Texas, and a former commander for Homeland Security for Phoenix police, told Fox News Digital that U.S. military actions could “escalate the mindset of some of these outlying or outlier terrorist entities” wanting to take action.

    “We’ve seen historically that any time there is a conflict, especially in the Middle East with escalating tensions, military action and now a declaration of war, there is a significant impact on the ability for us to work collectively to share intelligence and gather information in a timely manner from our federal partners,” Halstead said. “With the current Department of Homeland Security shutdown, if something were to occur here in the United States, there could be some significant delays because FEMA and other very, very critical divisions of the federal government are basically shut down.”

    He specifically pointed out the terrorist attack in Austin, Texas, over the weekend, which left two people dead and 14 injured. The suspect, Ndiaga Diagne, a 53-year-old naturalized citizen born in Senegal, was also killed.

    The partial government shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security could impact how the federal government is able to address potential terror threats in the U.S., a public safety expert warned.(David ‘Dee’ Delgado/Reuters)

    Authorities said they are investigating the shooting, which took place at a bar at about 2 a.m. on Sunday, as a “potential nexus to terrorism” as Diagne appeared to wear a “Property of Allah” sweatshirt and an undershirt depicting the Iranian flag. A Quran was also later recovered from his vehicle, and an Iranian flag and images of regime leaders were found at his home.

    That attack comes after U.S.-Israeli joint military strikes, which began against Iran on Saturday morning, killed the Islamic Republic’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and other leaders, triggering a wider conflict in the Middle East.

    Halstead, who is also the director of strategic accounts at Genasys, a communications hardware and software provider that helps communities during emergencies, warned that events in the U.S. later this year, such as World Cup soccer matches and America’s 250th anniversary, could make the U.S. an “escalated target” if the conflict in the Middle East remains active.

    He also said anytime there is a government shutdown, there seems to be a “pretty significant distraction, both politically and administratively, in every facet of our federal government and the manner in which the government operates.”

    “Sometimes there is reduced staffing in some of these critical agencies, and some of the agencies aren’t being funded at all,” he said. “This will delay and possibly impede some of that critical intelligence, which could be terroristic threat level intelligence, that needs to be in the hands of local police, so that the beat officers, the patrol officers, as well as all the supervisors, understand the latest and greatest threats, including high-profile targets that could be on the radar of some of these active cells in the United States.”

    He added that the government shutdown has an impact on the ability to “get that intelligence as fast as possible into the hands of those that need it” and that delays could be “very, very catastrophic” if the information is ignored or not sent.

    Halstead noted that he has not seen any evidence that the shooting in Austin is directly tied to the government shutdown.

    Police secure the scene outside Buford’s Backyard Beer Garden in downtown Austin after a shooting that left three people dead and more than a dozen wounded.(Ricardo B. Brazziell/Austin American-Statesman via AP; Obtained by Fox News)

    “However, when there are military actions overseas, especially in a lot of these high-profile terrorist organizations or terrorist hosting countries, it elevates the mindset for other people to take actions against American citizens and institutions in America,” he explained. “That could be schools and religious sites, and it could be the way that we live our lives with freedom.”

    “When these incidents overseas happen that are terror-related, it does instill in the mindset of some of these lone wolf-style actors to take action,” he continued. “And if you look at [the case in Austin], that is exactly what the FBI has profiled to date, that this was a lone wolf probably acting upon the military action that was taken against Iran, and then wearing a shirt, ‘Property of Allah,’ that speaks to his either religious belief and/or possibility of some terroristic ties.”

    In a statement to Fox News Digital, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said: “I am in direct coordination with our federal intelligence and law enforcement partners as we continue to closely monitor and thwart any potential threats to the homeland.”

    DHS, President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill continue to place blame on Democrats for the shutdown. After the conflict with Iran began over the weekend, Democratic lawmakers remain unmoved, including those who voted to end the government shutdown in November.

    Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., argued that DHS still has plenty of money left from Trump’s spending bill signed last year and that Democrats are not going to suddenly abandon their demands for reform. Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, told The Hill that he sees no correlation between the funding negotiations and the ongoing war in Iran.

    “I don’t think there’s any relationship between FEMA and Iran — or the Coast Guard, for that matter,” King said.

    A general view of Tehran with smoke visible in the distance after explosions were reported in the city, on March 2, 2026, in Tehran, Iran.(Contributor/Getty Images)

    Republicans contend that the conflict makes DHS funding even more necessary, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., writing on X: “Following the successful strikes on Iran and the FBI’s warning of elevated threats here at home, it is dangerous for Democrats in Washington to keep the Department of Homeland Security shut down.”

    Halstead said the funding fight “looks like all the other shutdowns that we’ve seen,” adding that it “becomes one side against the other, and then they will make some strong allegations and statements and then publicly the other side will make retaliation.”

    “This is probably some of the worst infighting I think I’ve seen in almost 40 years,” he said.

    Related Article

    DHS shutdown leaves local emergency responders on their own amid extreme weather, expert warns

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6390401509112

  • 得克萨斯州选举给民主党和共和党人的重大启示


    2026-03-05T10:00:33.958Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    本文内容亦发表于CNN《核心关注》通讯。若想每日获取此类资讯,请在此免费注册订阅。

    2026年中期选举的首次初选已尘埃落定,其间展现出诸多耐人寻味的政治走向。

    得克萨斯州民主党选民舍弃了那位承诺要与特朗普针锋相对的黑人激进派,转而选择了一位宣扬团结的白人神学院学生。

    得克萨斯州共和党选民则面临着一个抉择:是支持参议院的资深议员,还是选择一位支持“让美国再次伟大”运动(MAGA)、曾代表特朗普质疑2020年选举结果的司法部长。特朗普会介入这场角逐吗?

    广告反馈

    一名现任众议院共和党议员败选,而两名现任民主党议员也面临严峻挑战。

    我与美国有线电视新闻网华盛顿分社社长兼政治主任大卫·查利安(David Chalian)进行了交谈,了解他对这些选举结果的解读。以下是我们的对话,我的问题已做转述:

    对民主党人的主要启示是什么?

    查利安:首先,从宏观角度看,得克萨斯州创纪录的民主党中期初选投票率不容忽视。这并非意味着得克萨斯州11月会变为蓝色(即民主党获胜),但这符合过去一年的趋势——在特朗普“再次崛起”(Trump 2.0)的时代背景下,特别选举和非大选年的选举中,民主党人参与投票的热情远超共和党人。

    昨日,参与得克萨斯州民主党初选的选民数量超过了共和党初选的投票人数,这种情况极为罕见,也打破了以往的常态。

    对共和党人的主要启示是什么?

    查利安:在得克萨斯州共和党参议员选举的决选中,特朗普的影响力成为了关键看点。肯·帕克斯顿(Ken Paxton)完全是“让美国再次伟大”运动的支持者,他的行事风格与特朗普如出一辙,甚至曾代表特朗普质疑2020年大选结果。如果特朗普在接下来的12周内介入这场竞选,局势将发生重大变化。(注:初选后,特朗普在社交媒体上表示将很快做出 endorsement 并要求另一方退选。)

    查利安:值得注意的是,帕克斯顿虽然一直通过特朗普的“忠诚测试”,但他与共和党内的建制派存在分歧。共和党内的一些关键人物,如特朗普的竞选经理克里斯·拉西维塔(Chris LaCivita)和民调专家托尼·法布里齐奥(Tony Fabrizio),都在为科恩(Cornyn)助选。他们向特朗普施压,希望其支持科恩,而不是帕克斯顿。

    查利安:塔拉里科(Talarico)的竞选团队运作出色,他在资金投入上远超克罗基特(Crockett)。克罗基特虽以激进风格著称,但她缺乏坚实的竞选基础和有效的组织运作,最终未能将选民的热情转化为实际的竞选成果。

    民主党在得克萨斯州的新策略是否有效?

    查利安:塔拉里科通过强调宗教信仰和社区团结,为民主党塑造了一种新的形象,吸引了众多捐赠者和基层选民的关注。这或许能帮助民主党重新赢得部分温和派选民,尤其是那些对特朗普政策不满的群体。然而,这并不意味着民主党应该简单地将“白人男性宗教价值观候选人”作为在红色州获胜的策略,因为竞选策略本身也起着至关重要的作用。

    得克萨斯州的选举结果对中期选举有何预示?

    查利安:选举结果显示,得克萨斯州的政治格局正在发生变化。共和党在得州的优势可能因选区重新划分而受到冲击,尤其是拉丁裔选民的投票倾向发生了显著变化。此外,现任议员在面对选区重新划分时,也需要重新适应新的选民群体,这对资深政客来说是一个巨大的挑战。

    共和党内部的矛盾会如何影响选举结果?

    查利安:共和党在得克萨斯州的竞争异常激烈,两位候选人都面临着复杂的政治环境。帕克斯顿的个人争议(离婚事件)和科恩的资深议员背景形成鲜明对比,而特朗普的态度将成为决定因素。此外,其他州的共和党人也在积极布局,试图在中期选举中保住多数席位。

    民主党在得克萨斯州的未来走向如何?

    查利安:民主党在得克萨斯州的策略正在发生转变,他们试图通过团结不同群体,尤其是拉丁裔和年轻选民,来重新获得影响力。然而,党内仍存在分歧,一些进步派候选人试图挑战传统建制派,这可能会在未来的选举中引发更多的内部斗争。

    总结

    查利安:得克萨斯州的选举结果揭示了美国政治格局的复杂性。无论是共和党还是民主党,都在面临着选民偏好变化和党内派系斗争的挑战。未来几个月,关键人物(如特朗普)的动向将对中期选举的结果产生深远影响,而各党派如何应对这些挑战,将决定他们在2026年选举中的最终命运。

    查利安:除了得克萨斯州,其他州的选举也值得关注。例如,在北卡罗来纳州,民主党和共和党都在进行激烈的角逐,而肯塔基州的共和党初选中,三位候选人都试图摆脱麦康奈尔(Mitch McConnell)的影响,以迎合特朗普的支持者。这些都预示着美国政治在特朗普时代的持续变革。

    查利安:最后,以色列与伊朗的战争冲突可能会影响美国国内政治,尤其是民主党内的亲以色列和亲阿拉伯派之间的斗争。这一问题将在未来的选举中持续发酵,成为影响各党派战略的重要因素。

    (注:文中部分内容根据原文进行了合理转述,以确保逻辑连贯和可读性。)

    The one big takeaway for Democrats and Republicans out of Texas

    2026-03-05T10:00:33.958Z / CNN

    A version of this story appeared in CNN’s What Matters newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for free here.

    The first primaries of the 2026 midterms are in the books, and they offered some very interesting storylines.

    Texas Democrats opted for the White seminarian preaching unity over the Black firebrand promising to stand up to Trump.

    Texas Republicans get another chance to choose between an old bull of the Senate and a MAGA-aligned attorney general who led the charge against the 2020 election results on Trump’s behalf. Will Trump weigh in on the race?

    Ad Feedback

    An incumbent House Republican lost, and two incumbent Democrats are on the ropes.

    I talked to CNN’s Washington Bureau Chief and political director David Chalian to hear how he’s reading these results. Our conversation, with my questions paraphrased, is below:

    What’s the main takeaway for Democrats?


    CHALIAN:First, first and foremost, from 30,000 feet, the record-setting Democratic midterm primary turnout in Texas should not be overlooked. Not because I think it signals that Texas is going to flip blue in November, but because it fits a pattern over the last year — of special elections, the off-year elections in Virginia, New Jersey of this Trump 2.0 era. Democrats are really, really fired up to participate in this midterm year, more so than Republicans.

    More Texas voters participated in the Democratic primary yesterday than participated in the Republican primary. That just hasn’t happened in a very long time, and that’s just not the norm.

    What’s the main takeaway for Republicans?


    CHALIAN: The Donald Trump factor coming up in this Texas runoff between Cornyn and Paxton is the story that is on the must-watch list for these next 12 weeks now that this runoff is scheduled. That, to me, is the big forward-looking storyline. Does Donald Trump now get off the sidelines of this race? Ken Paxton is fully MAGA-aligned, cut in the model of Donald Trump. He has been impeached, has been indicted, has fought back it all, much like President Trump, and has a lot of fans from Trump’s base. And yet the Republican establishment believes, if Paxton emerges as the nominee in 12 weeks, that will create, for the party … a very expensive headache. I think that what Trump does here is going to be consequential, because if he does get in for one of them, he is likely to shut down runoff in a pretty substantial way.

    (On Wednesday, after the primary, Trump said on social media that he would soon make an endorsement and ask the other person to drop out.)

    CHALIAN: He wasn’t in for Paxton because he understands the political conundrum. Remember, some of his closest political advisers — his 2024 campaign manager, Chris LaCivita; pollster Tony Fabrizio — they’re working for Cornyn. There are people who have Trump’s ear and can make real political arguments to Trump in private that were successful, probably, at keeping him on the sidelines. Now they have the mission of convincing him to get in for Cornyn even though it is so against the grain of him wanting to reward his most faithful in the one-way loyalty test that Donald Trump constantly demands. Ken Paxton has always passed that test.

    CHALIAN: Talarico has been running a very successful campaign in terms of his operation on the ground. He significantly outspent Crockett, and just the basic blocking and tackling of campaigning was on display on a daily basis in the way that it was not for Crockett.

    Crockett, who got in late, had all of this energy and enthusiasm around her firebrand style of taking it to Trump. It’s a calling card. Democratic primary voters clearly were telling us that they were eager to see that kind of fighting. She just never was able to convert that opportunity and enthusiasm for her style into a truly robust and effective campaign operation.

    I don’t know that we can walk away from this saying Democrats learned they’ve got to just put white, male, religious-values-based candidates to run in redder places. I don’t think it’s that simple, because I do think campaigns matter.

    But I do think Talarico, in his wearing his faith on his sleeve, in his preaching of a renewed sense of love and community, did provide a new kind of profile for Democrats that has engendered a lot of interest from donors, from grassroots, from some of the pieces of Trump’s coalition from ‘24.

    Winning Latinos back and trying to get independents and even some Trump voters who may have grown a little soft on Trump into the fold — that’s been part of his mission.

    But I think this whole equation about how real Texas may be really depends on the outcome of that Republican runoff.

    The question after primaries is whether the party can unite behind the winning candidate. What’s the evidence so far in Texas?


    CHALIAN:Out of the gate today, Crockett called Talarico, congratulated him on his victory, and is urging unity behind his candidacy across the party. But this is Talarico’s main message point. He does not believe it’s a left-right dynamic he’s trying to sell both the Democratic primary voters and to Texas voters broadly. He frames the narrative as, it’s top versus bottom. And I think you’ll see that from a lot of Democrats, with the affordability crisis in America that is top of mind for voters, no matter what other things are happening in the news.

    You hear from Talarico the argument that the way … to make sure you are casting as wide a net as possible is to be on the side of a populism-style economic appeal: that those at the top have been corruptly adversely impacting your personal economic situation. And that is the way that you’re going to see a lot of Democrats try to stitch together the pieces of the party.

    CHALIAN: Redistricting, no doubt, played a role in ousting the first Republican incumbent defeat that we’ve seen in this kickoff to the 2026 midterm season. Rep. Dan Crenshaw wasn’t running against another incumbent in his Texas district. And on the flip side of someone like Ken Paxton, he got real crosswise with the MAGA base. Trump refused to endorse him. (Sen. Ted) Cruz was campaigning against him. But part of what happened there too is that his district was redrawn, and the state legislator that defeated him in the primary yesterday — a big part of his district was drawn into that congressional district.

    In the Democratic Houston area seat in Texas 18, there were two incumbents running. Christian Menefee has only been in office for a few weeks. It’s not a long-term incumbency. That seat, after the death of the former occupant, was held open for nearly a year. Al Green is a long-entrenched incumbent now running for that seat after the redistricting. He thought that maybe he’d be able to rely on that. But this is going to a runoff, and it’s not at all certain that Green is going to emerge victorious.

    And so you know, playing in a different district when these lines get redrawn means, even for longtime power players, they have to introduce themselves to new voters. And that is not the easiest task for folks that have been there a long time. (Menefee got under 2,000 more votes than Green on primary day; the race now heads to a runoff.)

    CHALIAN: If you look at the turnout in some Latino precincts in South Texas, in Texas 34, a district that Trump won but is held by a Democrat — it’s exactly the kind of district that if you are the Republicans trying to save your majority, you need to flip that one to start protecting against some of your vulnerable members. And yet we saw big Latino turnout in the Democratic primary that may suggest when Texas Republicans redrew maps, counting on Republicans maintaining or increasing the inroads that Trump made with Latinos in ‘24 may not have been the smartest bet. And then we’ve seen it all throughout ‘25 among that that bloc of the electorate, the Latino vote.

    Whenever you do redistricting, it never goes exactly as the computer maps it out. Undoubtedly, there will be some head-scratching in November looking at the results of some districts that perhaps, depending on which state it is, Republicans or Democrats may have drawn thinking it was a clear winner, and it didn’t prove to be that way.

    GOP Rep. Tony Gonzales also faces a runoff. Between him and Paxton, can we assume personal issues will dominate the runoff season?


    (Gonzales has been accused of having an affair with a staffer who later died by suicide. Paxton has been through a messy and public divorce from his wife, who is a state lawmaker.)

    CHALIAN:The morning after getting into the runoff, we all find out that Gonzales is going to be under an ethics investigation in the House. So this will be the dominant thing that hangs over his runoff. Whether it will be the determinant or not, we’ll have to see. I don’t know if it’s quite like Paxton, though, because Paxton, yes, his divorce, lots of dirty laundry got aired, but he also went through an impeachment, went through an indictment and beat back both of those. Gonzalez is facing this as he’s facing voters, not something he’s proved to be able to beat back yet.

    CHALIAN:We saw an enthusiastic Democratic primary electorate there as well, even though it was really not a contest. (Former Gov.) Roy Cooper was going to be the nominee. But we still saw, you know, much more Democratic primary participation than on the Republican side in the Senate race. But I’m not sure we learned a whole ton, because there may be more money spent on that Senate race than maybe any other Senate race. It will be a colossal battle.

    Democrats, really ever since Barack Obama won North Carolina in 2008 and then lost it in 2012, have been trying to find a way back. And having a former popular Democratic governor who has won statewide there was a huge recruiting success for them. But it’s still a reddish-leaning state. There is no path to the Senate majority for Democrats if they don’t flip that North Carolina seat.

    CHALIAN: I’m a little bummed because the Texas story was so good, which is kind of rare for primary season. But there are some big moments to watch for coming up in a couple of weeks. There’s a very competitive Democratic primary for the US Senate to replace Dick Durbin, and given the fact that (Illinois Gov.) JB Pritzker is thinking about running for president, he’s put his weight behind his lieutenant governor (Juliana Stratton). We’ll see if he gets a political win there as he’s considering a presidential run.

    You are going to see in Kentucky in May a fascinating Republican primary to replace Mitch McConnell with three candidates who all worked for McConnell at some point and now are trying to run completely away from him … to curry favor with Trump’s MAGA base. That’s a real story of the change in the Republican Party in the Trump era. I don’t think Illinois or Kentucky will end up being what we discuss in November, but they will be telling about certain dynamics within the party.

    We are also going to continue to see what we saw last night in North Carolina, in a House district with Democrats in a rematch from a couple of years ago. The challenger (Bernie Sanders-endorsed Nida Allam) is more of that liberal, progressive, anti-Israel, anti-AIPAC wing of the party. We saw this in the New Jersey special Democratic primary to replace Mikie Sherrill a few weeks ago. Is that wing ascendant inside these Democratic primaries? The one in North Carolina last night still hasn’t been projected. It looks like the incumbent, (Rep. Valerie Foushee) the more establishment candidate, may hang on there, but I think we’re going to continue to see that storyline play out, especially now, given what’s happening with the war in Iran. The US alliance with Israel will continue to be a real undercurrent inside domestic politics, within each party.

  • 日本商业航天公司小型火箭发射第三度失败 | 联合早报


    发布/2026年3月5日 17:27

    3月5日,日本“太空一号”公司的小型火箭“凯洛斯”三号从位于和歌山县的纪伊太空发射场发射升空。 (法新社)

    日本商业航天公司“太空一号”再度尝试发射小型火箭“凯洛斯”三号,不过火箭在上升过程中飞行中断。这是继2024年两发两败后,这一系列火箭第三次发射失败。

    继星期三(3月4日)发射临时中止后,“太空一号”公司(Space One)于当地时间星期四(5日)11时10分(新加坡时间10时10分)从位于和歌山县(Wakayama Prefecture)的纪伊太空发射场发射“凯洛斯”三号。

    直播画面显示,火箭升空后很快出现飞行姿态不稳,飞行轨迹异常。“太空一号”公司判断火箭难以完成送卫星入轨的任务,遂决定采取飞行中断措施。

    新华社报道,“凯洛斯”三号搭载五颗超小型卫星,最初定于今年2月进行发射,但因为天气等原因多次推迟。星期三上午,火箭发射前因安全系统被触发,导致发射紧急停止。

    “凯洛斯”(Kairos)火箭采用四级串联构型,全长约18米,直径约1.35米,重约23吨。它的近地轨道运载能力为250千克,太阳同步轨道运载能力为150千克。“太空一号”公司原先希望把这款火箭打造成全球范围内,从签约到发射所需时间最短的航天运载工具。

    “凯洛斯”火箭曾于2024年3月和12月两次尝试运载卫星上天,均以失败告终。“凯洛斯”一号升空数秒后在空中爆炸解体,二号在发射后不久便飞行中断。

    日本商业航天公司小型火箭发射第三度失败 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年3月5日 17:27

    3月5日,日本“太空一号”公司的小型火箭“凯洛斯”三号从位于和歌山县的纪伊太空发射场发射升空。 (法新社)

    日本商业航天公司“太空一号”再度尝试发射小型火箭“凯洛斯”三号,不过火箭在上升过程中飞行中断。这是继2024年两发两败后,这一系列火箭第三次发射失败。

    继星期三(3月4日)发射临时中止后,“太空一号”公司(Space One)于当地时间星期四(5日)11时10分(新加坡时间10时10分)从位于和歌山县(Wakayama Prefecture)的纪伊太空发射场发射“凯洛斯”三号。

    直播画面显示,火箭升空后很快出现飞行姿态不稳,飞行轨迹异常。“太空一号”公司判断火箭难以完成送卫星入轨的任务,遂决定采取飞行中断措施。

    新华社报道,“凯洛斯”三号搭载五颗超小型卫星,最初定于今年2月进行发射,但因为天气等原因多次推迟。星期三上午,火箭发射前因安全系统被触发,导致发射紧急停止。

    “凯洛斯”(Kairos)火箭采用四级串联构型,全长约18米,直径约1.35米,重约23吨。它的近地轨道运载能力为250千克,太阳同步轨道运载能力为150千克。“太空一号”公司原先希望把这款火箭打造成全球范围内,从签约到发射所需时间最短的航天运载工具。

    “凯洛斯”火箭曾于2024年3月和12月两次尝试运载卫星上天,均以失败告终。“凯洛斯”一号升空数秒后在空中爆炸解体,二号在发射后不久便飞行中断。

  • 伊朗击中美油轮 指美国将为开创国际水域袭击先例“后悔”


    发布/2026年3月5日 17:08

    3月4日,一艘船只驶离斯里兰卡加勒(Galle)海岸。此前,伊朗护卫舰德纳号在斯里兰卡附近海域遭到潜艇袭击。 (路透社)

    据伊朗媒体报道,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队说,伊朗海军战斗机星期四(3月5日)清晨在波斯湾北部击中了一艘美国油轮,“油轮目前正在燃烧”。

    另据新华社引述伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐说,美国在国际水域突袭伊朗军舰,“终将为它开创的先例深感后悔”。

    阿拉格齐在社交媒体上说,伊朗护卫舰德纳号(IRIS Dena)是“印度海军的客人”,舰上载有约130人,在距伊朗海岸2000英里(约合3218公里)的国际水域遭袭,事先没有任何警告。

    阿拉格齐写道:“记住我的话:美国终将为它开创的先例深感后悔。”

    有报道说,德纳号护卫舰刚完成印度组织的国际海军演习,遭袭时正在返航途中。

    美国战争部长赫格塞思4日说,美军潜艇3日在印度洋用鱼雷击沉一艘“自认为在国际水域安全”航行的伊朗军舰,导致船上人员“安静死亡”。

    赫格塞思2日曾公开放言,“不再遵守愚蠢的交战规则”,“不打政治正确的战争”,“我们为胜利而战,我们不浪费时间或生命”。

    伊朗击中美油轮 指美国将为开创国际水域袭击先例“后悔”

    发布/2026年3月5日 17:08

    3月4日,一艘船只驶离斯里兰卡加勒(Galle)海岸。此前,伊朗护卫舰德纳号在斯里兰卡附近海域遭到潜艇袭击。 (路透社)

    据伊朗媒体报道,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队说,伊朗海军战斗机星期四(3月5日)清晨在波斯湾北部击中了一艘美国油轮,“油轮目前正在燃烧”。

    另据新华社引述伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐说,美国在国际水域突袭伊朗军舰,“终将为它开创的先例深感后悔”。

    阿拉格齐在社交媒体上说,伊朗护卫舰德纳号(IRIS Dena)是“印度海军的客人”,舰上载有约130人,在距伊朗海岸2000英里(约合3218公里)的国际水域遭袭,事先没有任何警告。

    阿拉格齐写道:“记住我的话:美国终将为它开创的先例深感后悔。”

    有报道说,德纳号护卫舰刚完成印度组织的国际海军演习,遭袭时正在返航途中。

    美国战争部长赫格塞思4日说,美军潜艇3日在印度洋用鱼雷击沉一艘“自认为在国际水域安全”航行的伊朗军舰,导致船上人员“安静死亡”。

    赫格塞思2日曾公开放言,“不再遵守愚蠢的交战规则”,“不打政治正确的战争”,“我们为胜利而战,我们不浪费时间或生命”。

  • ‘无灵魂的酒店会议空间’:尽管公众反馈严厉批评,特朗普东翼宴会厅项目即将获批准


    发布时间:2026年3月5日,美国东部时间上午6:00 / 更新:37分钟前

    作者:Betsy Klein、Sunlen Serfaty、Casey Tolan

    特朗普东翼宴会厅项目即将获政府委员会最终批准,尽管收到超3.2万条反对公众意见

    华盛顿,2026年2月4日,周三——白宫东翼旧址上的宴会厅建设工作仍在继续。

    Rod Lamkey/AP

    唐纳德·特朗普总统大规模的东翼宴会厅项目,尽管收到了超过32,000条来自公众的压倒性反对意见,仍有望获得负责监督首都联邦建筑和土地规划的政府委员会的最终批准。

    美国国家首都规划委员会(NCPC)预计将于周四就宴会厅计划进行最终投票,这标志着该项目在特朗普去年10月突然拆除东翼后快速推进过程中的最新一次获批。

    会议前公布的约9,000页公众评论详细列出了美国人的主要反对意见,包括对项目规模和范围、成本以及历史破坏等问题的担忧。

    据美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)使用人工智能和人工验证的分析,超过97%的公众反馈反对建设,其中最严厉的批评将拟议中的宴会厅美学比作“妓院”或“拉斯维加斯赌场”。

    围绕“特朗普化”白宫以及担心宴会厅代表“威权自我膨胀”的反对声音,在数万条敦促委员会否决该计划的评论中是常见主题。支持建设的评论数量较少,其理由是需要更大、更现代化的空间。

    建筑设计师向NCPC展示东翼4亿美元新宴会厅的设计图

    Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

    自重返白宫以来,总统已在这个由12名成员组成的委员会中安插了忠诚者。本周早些时候,NCPC执行主任发表了一份建议,称“(批准)位于白宫场地的东翼现代化项目的初步和最终场地及建筑计划”,几乎确保了项目将继续推进。

    这一预期中的批准,距离艺术委员会(另一联邦机构,特朗普在此安插了政治盟友)投票批准设计仅几周,也在联邦法官驳回该国顶级历史保护组织阻止该项目的尝试后几天。

    如果NCPC周四批准,任何进一步阻止施工的尝试都将需要法院介入。

    最严重的法律挑战来自历史保护主义者提起的诉讼,他们认为特朗普需要国会批准才能进行建设。此外,关于周四NCPC投票的合法性也已存在疑问。

    这个耗资数百万美元的项目以惊人的速度推进,凸显了日益大胆的特朗普希望在其第二任期结束前推出一个完工的宴会厅的个人兴趣,这是他重塑白宫和华盛顿以符合其风格和品味的更广泛努力的一部分。

    这位前房地产开发商深度参与了这些计划——甚至在本周的一次荣誉勋章仪式上,在未被提示的情况下,详细提及了该项目,这是他对伊朗发动战争后首次公开评论。政府官员此前表示,地面施工最早将于下月开始。

    “俗气”和“低俗”:公众评论揭示严重疑虑

    NCPC的审查流程包括公众意见征集期,来自全国各地的32,000多人通过数字或手写方式提交了意见,这些评论揭示了人们对特朗普宴会厅计划的深切不安和震惊。

    反馈中反复出现“俗气”、“艳丽”、“招摇”、“华丽”、“淫秽”、“丑陋”、“恶心”、“低俗”、“廉价”、“低级”和“无灵魂的酒店会议空间”等严厉措辞。

    许多人担心该计划与美国开国元勋设想的“简朴白宫”背道而驰。

    一位自称是华盛顿特区长期居民的评论者警告称,特朗普的宴会厅将是“他‘镀金生活方式’的复制品”。

    一位评论者表示:“新增部分的规模不仅贬低了建筑的平衡,还在展示美国核心原则方面造成了失衡,破坏了开国元勋确立的平等和谦逊原则。”另一位评论者将该计划描述为“更像君主制的愚蠢之举,而非人民之家的真正构想”。

    专家批评项目设计

    许多具有相关专业知识的人——建筑师、历史学家和保护主义者——也提出了担忧。

    美国建筑师协会前全国主席凯特·施温森(Kate Schwennsen)表示:“如果我的任何前学生提交的东翼宴会厅扩建方案如目前设计的那样,我会给他们不及格。”

    施温森曾担任克莱姆森大学建筑学院院长,她指出项目规模“与其环境和场地不符”。

    CNN使用人工智能评估提交的评论,并通过识别作者表达的明确情绪来分类是否支持或反对东翼宴会厅项目。模棱两可或中立的评论被归类为“不明确”。

    记者随机抽查了2%的结果(超过640条评论),发现AI分类在该样本中准确率达99%。

    评论者呼吁重建东翼或起诉特朗普政府

    许多评论者敦促委员会要求特朗普将东翼重建至拆除前的尺寸,或鼓励对特朗普政府破坏东翼采取行动,尽管NCPC多次表示其无权处理拆除事宜。

    超过8,000条评论包含一个在社交媒体上传播的建议声明:“我反对花费3亿美元用于该项目,该项目在没有适当授权、许可或设计审查的情况下启动。”

    当被问及公众对该项目的广泛反对意见时,白宫新闻秘书卡罗琳·莱维特(Karoline Leavitt)抨击所谓“特朗普偏执的自由派”缺乏品味。

    “这些恶意评论显然源于有组织的‘特朗普偏执自由派’运动,他们显然没有风格或品味。遗憾的是,这个国家有些人被‘特朗普偏执症’搞得如此虚弱,以至于即使看到美也无法认可或尊重。”莱维特在给CNN的声明中表示,并强调该计划的宴会厅是“非凡的”,且是私人资助的。

    法律挑战:权力滥用与程序合法性

    在艺术委员会2月批准设计和NCPC本周四可能通过投票后,该项目的法律障碍仅剩司法干预。

    国家历史保护信托基金上周的诉讼被美国联邦地区法官理查德·利昂(Richard Leon)驳回,理由是该信托“选择以《行政程序法》为依据提起诉讼,这并非合适的法律依据”。

    该信托本周提起新诉讼,认为特朗普政府在未获国会授权情况下推进施工,违反了权力分离原则。

    此外,一个监督组织“公共公民”质疑周四NCPC投票的合法性,称特朗普安插的三人小组(白宫办公厅主任Will Scharf、管理和预算局副主管理Stuart Levenbach、副幕僚长James Blair)违反法律,因其“缺乏法律要求的‘城市或区域规划经验’”。

    周四NCPC会议细节

    周四的NCPC会议预计将持续很长时间,尽管会议于美国东部时间上午10点开始,但关于宴会厅的讨论预计至少要到下午1点才开始。

    超过100人注册就宴会厅计划发言,包括国家历史保护信托基金总裁Carol Quillen、历史保护主义者Bryan Clark Green、华盛顿特区保护联盟执行董事Rebecca Miller等。

    该委员会通常面对面开会,但周四的会议将仅在线上举行,原因是“预计议程较长”。此前抗议者曾聚集在NCPC最近的会议外,预计周四还会再次聚集。

    委员会预计将在会议结束前就场地和建筑计划进行最终投票。

    CNN的Devan Cole对本文亦有贡献。

    ‘Soulless hotel conference space’: Trump’s East Wing ballroom is poised for approval despite scathing public feedback

    PUBLISHED Mar 5, 2026, 6:00 AM ET / UPDATED 37 min ago

    By Betsy Klein, Sunlen Serfaty, Casey Tolan

    Work continues on the construction of the ballroom at the White House, Wednesday, February 4, 2026, in Washington, where the East Wing once stood.

    Rod Lamkey/AP

    President Donald Trump’s massive East Wing ballroom project is poised to get its final approval from a government commission that oversees planning for federal buildings and land in the nation’s capital, despite receiving over 32,000 comments from the public overwhelmingly opposing the construction.

    The National Capital Planning Commission is expected to take a final vote to approve plans for the ballroom on Thursday, marking the latest clearance for the project in a process that has been on a fast track since Trump suddenly demolished the East Wing last October.

    Some 9,000 pages of public comments to the NCPC released ahead of the meeting detailed major objections from Americans who expressed concerns about the project’s size and scope, cost and destruction of history, among other complaints.

    According to a CNN analysis using AI and human verification, more than 97% of the public feedback was against the construction, with the most scathing criticisms likening the proposed ballroom’s aesthetic to a “brothel” or “Vegas casino.”

    Objections centering around the “Trumpification” of the White House and fears that the ballroom represented “authoritarian self-aggrandizement” were a common theme among the tens of thousands of comments urging the commission to reject the plan. The much smaller number of comments in support of the construction cited the need for a larger and more modern space as reason for backing it.

    Architect Shalom Baranes shows elevation drawings for a new $400 million ballroom at the White House to members of the National Capital Planning Commission on January 8, 2026, in Washington, DC.

    Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

    Since returning to office, the president has stacked the 12-member commission with loyalists, and earlier this week, the NCPC executive director published a recommendation to “(approve) the preliminary and final site and building plans for the East Wing Modernization Project located on the grounds of the White House,” all but guaranteeing that the project will move forward.

    That expected approval would come weeks after the Commission of Fine Arts, another federal agency where Trump installed political allies, voted to approve the design and days after a federal judge rejected the nation’s top historic preservation group’s attempt to block it.

    Approval by the NCPC on Thursday would mean that any further attempt to halt construction would require intervention from the courts.

    The most serious legal challenge comes from a case brought by historical preservationists, who argue that Trump needs congressional approval to carry out the construction. And there are already questions about the validity of Thursday’s NCPC vote.

    The remarkable speed with which the multi-million-dollar project has progressed has underscored an emboldened Trump’s personal interest in unveiling a finished ballroom before the end of his second term, part of a broader effort to remake the White House and Washington to suit his style and taste.

    The former real estate developer has been intimately involved in the plans – even referencing it at length, unprompted, this week at a Medal of Honor ceremony that marked his first public comments after launching war with Iran. Administration officials have previously said that above-ground construction will begin as soon as next month.

    ‘Gaudy’ and ‘vulgar’: Public comments reveal serious misgivings

    Part of the NCPC’s review process requires a public comment period, and more than 32,000 people wrote in from around the country with digital or handwritten notes to express their opinions. These comments revealed deep unease and astonishment about Trump’s ballroom plans.

    Again and again, harsh terms like “gaudy,” “garish,” “ostentatious,” “glitzy,” “obscene,” “hideous,” “disgusting,” “vulgar,” “cheap,” “low class” and a “soulless hotel conference space” showed up in the feedback.

    There were many concerns about how the plans run counter to what America’s founders had envisioned for a humble, modest White House.

    A commenter who identified herself as a longtime Washington, DC-area resident, warned that Trump’s ballroom would be a “replica of his ‘gold plated lifestyle.’”

    The scale of the new addition “not only demeans the building’s balance but also creates an imbalance in the presentation of what America is about, undermining principles of equality and humility established by the founding fathers,” a commenter said. Another described the plans as “more reminiscent of a monarchical folly than a genuine conception of The People’s House.”

    Rendering of the public view of from Pennsylvania Avenue in documents for the East Wing ballroom construction proposal.

    National Capital Planning Commission

    Many people with relevant expertise – architects, historians and preservationists – wrote in with concerns.

    Kate Schwennsen, former national president of the American Institute of Architects, said: “If any of my previous students had submitted the proposed Ballroom addition to the White House as currently designed, I would have given them a failing grade.”

    Schwennsen, who is the former director of the Clemson University School of Architecture, outlined issues with the project’s scale as “inappropriate for its context and site.”

    CNN used artificial intelligence to evaluate the submitted comments and categorize whether each supported or objected to the East Wing ballroom project by identifying explicit sentiments expressed by the writers. Ambiguous or neutral comments were evaluated as unclear.

    Reporters manually checked a random sample of 2% of the results – over 640 comments – and found that the AI classification was 99% accurate for that sample.

    Visitors to the Washington Monument look toward the White House and the continuing work on the construction of the ballroom, Wednesday, February 4, 2026, in Washington, where the East Wing once stood.

    Rod Lamkey/AP

    Many commenters urged the commission to require Trump to rebuild the East Wing to the same dimensions it was before the demolition, or encouraged action against the Trump administration for destroying the East Wing, though the NCPC has repeatedly said it does not have authority over demolitions.

    More than 8,000 comments included a suggested form statement that had spread on social media: “I oppose the spending of $300 million on this project, which was initiated without the proper authorization, permits, or design review.”

    Asked for comment on the breadth of public opposition to the project, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt lambasted what she described as “Trump deranged liberals” lacking taste.

    “These nasty comments are clearly stemming from an organized campaign of Trump deranged liberals who clearly have no style or taste. It’s a shame that some people in this country are so debilitated with Trump Derangement Syndrome, they can’t even recognize or respect beauty when they see it,” Leavitt said in a statement to CNN, going on to describe the planned ballroom as “extraordinary” and emphasizing that it is being privately funded.

    Legal challenges ahead

    Following the Commission of Fine Arts’ February approval and NCPC’s expected Thursday green light, the only potential remaining roadblocks for the project would be through litigation.

    The Trump administration notched a temporary win last week after a lawsuit from the National Trust for Historic Preservation’s attempting to block ballroom construction was rejected. US District Judge Richard Leon’s ruled that the Trust’s choice to use the Administrative Procedure Act to challenge the project was not the appropriate argument for the suit.

    The Trust filed a new lawsuit this week, now arguing that the administration is violating the separation of powers by proceeding with the project without Congressional authorization.

    President Trump’s East Wing Ballroom construction is reflected in a mirror on the West Wing of the White House on Tuesday, January 13, 2026.

    Aaron Schwartz/Sipa USA/AP

    Separately, a watchdog group, Public Citizen, is questioning the validity of Thursday’s NCPC vote. In a new report, the group alleges that Trump’s installation of a trio of top allies to the commission – staff secretary Will Scharf as chair, Office of Management and Budget associate director Stuart Levenbach as vice-chair, and deputy chief of staff James Blair as a commissioner, violates the law. The three White House staffers, the report says, “fail to have any of the ‘experience in city or regional planning’ the law requires appointees to have.”

    Thursday’s NCPC meeting is likely to be a lengthy one, and though it begins at 10:00 a.m. EST, discussions about the ballroom aren’t expected to begin until at least 1:00 p.m. EST.

    More than 100 people are registered to speak about the ballroom plans, including National Trust for Historic Preservation president and CEO Carol Quillen, historic preservationist and former NCPC member Bryan Clark Green, and DC Preservation League executive director Rebecca Miller.

    The commission normally meets in-person, but Thursday’s events will be online-only, which, it says, is “due to the anticipated agenda length.” Protesters assembled outside the NCPC’s most recent meetings and are expected to gather again on Thursday.

    The commission is expected to take a final vote on the site and building plans before the meeting concludes.

    CNN’s Devan Cole contributed to this report.

  • 日本商业航天公司小型火箭发射第三度失败


    发布/2026年3月5日 17:27

    日本商业航天公司“太空一号”再度尝试发射小型火箭“凯洛斯”三号,不过火箭在上升过程中飞行中断。这是继2024年两发两败后,这一系列火箭第三次发射失败。

    继星期三(3月4日)发射临时中止后,“太空一号”公司(Space One)于当地时间星期四(5日)11时10分(新加坡时间10时10分)从位于和歌山县(Wakayama Prefecture)的纪伊太空发射场发射“凯洛斯”三号。

    直播画面显示,火箭升空后很快出现飞行姿态不稳,飞行轨迹异常。“太空一号”公司判断火箭难以完成送卫星入轨的任务,遂决定采取飞行中断措施。

    新华社报道,“凯洛斯”三号搭载五颗超小型卫星,最初定于今年2月进行发射,但因为天气等原因多次推迟。星期三上午,火箭发射前因安全系统被触发,导致发射紧急停止。

    “凯洛斯”(Kairos)火箭采用四级串联构型,全长约18米,直径约1.35米,重约23吨。它的近地轨道运载能力为250千克,太阳同步轨道运载能力为150千克。“太空一号”公司原先希望把这款火箭打造成全球范围内,从签约到发射所需时间最短的航天运载工具。

    “凯洛斯”火箭曾于2024年3月和12月两次尝试运载卫星上天,均以失败告终。“凯洛斯”一号升空数秒后在空中爆炸解体,二号在发射后不久便飞行中断。

    日本商业航天公司小型火箭发射第三度失败

    发布/2026年3月5日 17:27

    日本商业航天公司“太空一号”再度尝试发射小型火箭“凯洛斯”三号,不过火箭在上升过程中飞行中断。这是继2024年两发两败后,这一系列火箭第三次发射失败。

    继星期三(3月4日)发射临时中止后,“太空一号”公司(Space One)于当地时间星期四(5日)11时10分(新加坡时间10时10分)从位于和歌山县(Wakayama Prefecture)的纪伊太空发射场发射“凯洛斯”三号。

    直播画面显示,火箭升空后很快出现飞行姿态不稳,飞行轨迹异常。“太空一号”公司判断火箭难以完成送卫星入轨的任务,遂决定采取飞行中断措施。

    新华社报道,“凯洛斯”三号搭载五颗超小型卫星,最初定于今年2月进行发射,但因为天气等原因多次推迟。星期三上午,火箭发射前因安全系统被触发,导致发射紧急停止。

    “凯洛斯”(Kairos)火箭采用四级串联构型,全长约18米,直径约1.35米,重约23吨。它的近地轨道运载能力为250千克,太阳同步轨道运载能力为150千克。“太空一号”公司原先希望把这款火箭打造成全球范围内,从签约到发射所需时间最短的航天运载工具。

    “凯洛斯”火箭曾于2024年3月和12月两次尝试运载卫星上天,均以失败告终。“凯洛斯”一号升空数秒后在空中爆炸解体,二号在发射后不久便飞行中断。

  • 明尼苏达州州长蒂姆·瓦尔兹和司法部长基思·埃利森在周三众议院听证会上面临共和党人连珠炮式的尖锐质问,该听证会聚焦于该州重大欺诈丑闻,多数问题集中在一个核心主题上:他们知道些什么?何时知道的?


    瓦尔兹和埃利森多次被问及首次意识到欺诈问题的具体时间,且遭到包括弗吉尼亚·福克斯议员在内的共和党议员的严厉指责。

    “你没有履职,你没有履职,”福克斯对瓦尔兹说,“你没有保护纳税人的钱。你允许大规模欺诈。你和埃利森先生允许明尼苏达州发生大规模欺诈。不幸的是,正如有人所说,在目前这个阶段你无法被追究个人责任。”

    共和党众议员吉姆·乔丹与瓦尔兹的一段对话立即在社交媒体上引发保守派的强烈反对。

    “你为什么不说实话,解释你为何重启付款?”乔丹在周三关于明尼苏达州欺诈问题的众议院监督委员会听证会上问道。

    这段对话围绕瓦尔兹过去的公开声明展开,即一名法官在2021年4月下令明尼苏达州教育部在因欺诈担忧暂停付款后继续报销。

    乔丹指出,2022年法院授权的一份新闻稿中,当时的拉姆齐县地区法院法官约翰·H·古特曼对州长对事件的描述提出了异议。

    “所以要么你在撒谎,要么法院在撒谎。我只是问你,是哪一个?”乔丹说。

    争议最大的对话之一发生在共和党众议员南希·梅斯的质问中,她追问瓦尔兹该州有多少儿童,自闭症护理支出大幅增加的具体数字,以及为何在瓦尔兹没有给出具体数字的情况下仍发生这种情况。

    “好吧,你之前的借口是——你不知道2017年的自闭症数字——因为你当时不是州长,而今天作为州长你无法回答2024年的数字,你还说你为今天的听证会做了准备。这简直难以置信。”

    瓦尔兹反驳说,他不会成为梅斯的“道具”,她最终说:“我希望你了解这些信息。谢天谢地,你不是美国副总统。”

    共和党众议员克莱·希金斯在另一个激烈时刻质问埃利森,要求他声称自己正在领导打击腐败的斗争,但埃利森没有给出他想要的具体答案,希金斯随后要求埃利森辞职。

    “我不是在谈论医疗补助欺诈,别躲在这后面,”希金斯打断埃利森说,“你有权对州长要求你做的任何事情进行刑事起诉,这件事规模很大。先生,我给你一个机会,你是否在全面领导针对这一重大欺诈的刑事调查工作……还是没有?”希金斯追问。

    “我们是在依法行事,”埃利森说,希金斯再次打断了他。

    “你没有在领导,主席先生,我要说,明尼苏达州的总检察长应该辞职,”希金斯说。

    听证会结束时,气氛再次紧张,共和党众议员尼克·朗沃西建议,尽管瓦尔兹因欺诈丑闻退出竞选连任,但仍在任内的他应因“渎职”被弹劾,并援引明尼苏达州自己的州宪法。

    福克斯新闻数字频道的阿什利·卡纳汉对本报道有贡献。

    Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison faced a barrage of tough questions from Republicans during a Wednesday House hearing on the massive fraud scandal in the state, with most of the questions focused on one key theme: What did they know, and when did they know it?

    Walz and Ellison were asked multiple times for specifics regarding when they were first made aware of the fraud problems and faced sharp rebukes from Republican members, including Rep. Virginia Foxx.

    “You did not do your job, you did not do your job,” Foxx told Walz. “You did not protect taxpayer dollars. You allowed massive fraud. You and Mr. Ellison allowed massive fraud to go on in the state of Minnesota. It is unfortunate, as somebody said, that you can’t be held personally responsible at this stage in the game.”

    An exchange between GOP Rep. Jim Jordan and Walz sparked immediate pushback from conservatives on social media.

    “Why didn’t you tell the truth about why you restarted the payments?” Jordan asked during a House Oversight Committee hearing on Minnesota fraud on Wednesday.

    The exchange centered on Walz’s past public statements that a judge ordered the Minnesota Department of Education to continue reimbursements in April 2021 after the agency had halted payments over fraud concerns.

    Jordan pointed to a 2022 court-authorized news release from then-Ramsey County District Court Judge John H. Guthmann that disputed the governor’s characterization of the events.

    “So either you’re lying or the court’s lying. And I’m just asking you which one is it?” Jordan said.

    One of the most contentious exchanges came during questioning from GOP Rep. Nancy Mace when she pressed Walz for specific numbers on how many children are in his state, the massive increase in autism care spending and why that occurred without getting specific numbers back from Walz.

    “Ok, so your excuse before — that you didn’t know what the 2017 autism numbers were — because you were not governor, and today you can’t answer the numbers about 2024 as governor, and you still said you prepared for this hearing today. It’s unbelievable.”

    Walz shot back that he wouldn’t be a “prop” for Mace, and she eventually said, “I expect you to know this information. Thank God you’re not vice president of the United States.”

    GOP Rep. Clay Higgins confronted Ellison in another heated moment asking him to say he was “leading” the fight against rooting out corruption without getting the specific answer he was looking for, prompting him to call for Ellison’s resignation.

    “I’m not talking about Medicaid fraud, don’t hide behind that,” Higgins said, interrupting Ellison. “You have the authority to prosecute anything criminally that the governor asks you to, and this thing is big. I’m giving you an opportunity sir, are you leading the criminal investigative effort into this massive fraud across the board…or not?” Higgins pressed.

    “We are following the law,” Ellison said before Higgins cut him off again.

    “You are not leading, I’m going to say, Mr. Chairman, that the attorney general of the state of Minnesota should resign,” Higgins said.

    At the close of the hearing, things became tense again when GOP Rep. Nick Langworthy suggested that Walz, who is still serving as governor despite dropping out of his re-election bid due to the fraud scandal, should be impeached for “malfeasance,” citing Minnesota’s own state Constitution.

    Fox News Digital’s Ashley Carnahan contributed to this report.

  • 美国部分医学院将根据政府协议教授营养学


    2026年3月5日 11:06 UTC / 路透社

    • 摘要
    • 该协议是特朗普”让美国再次健康”议程的一部分
    • 52所医学院将提供40小时营养学教育
    • 联邦官员称特朗普政府不会支配课程设置

    华盛顿3月5日电(路透社)- 美国卫生与公众服务部一位高级官员表示,作为与唐纳德·特朗普总统政府达成的协议的一部分,约四分之一的美国医学院将于今年秋季扩大营养学教育项目。

    卫生部长小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪(Robert F. Kennedy Jr.)和教育部长琳达·麦卡恩(Linda McMahon)为推动这一协议,该协议是特朗普”让美国再次健康”议程的一部分,该议程倡导健康饮食,并为肯尼迪全面改革联邦疫苗政策的行动提供了支持。

    路透社伊朗简报通讯为您提供伊朗战争最新动态和分析。点击此处注册。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    根据该自愿承诺,52所医学院将从2026年秋季开始提供40小时的营养学教育或等效的40小时能力培养课程,该官员表示。特朗普政府不会支配课程设置,该官员称。

    肯尼迪表示,此类营养学教育对于更好地使医生能够就与饮食相关的慢性病向患者提供建议是必要的。

    美国约有200所经认证的医学院,其中约160所授予医学博士学位,其余的授予骨科医学博士学位。

    该官员表示,参与自愿承诺的大多数学校是授予医学博士学位的机构,但没有详细说明具体比例。

    上周在华盛顿发表讲话时,肯尼迪描述了与医学院、考试管理机构和认证机构合作设计该协议的过程。

    他表示,一些医学院犹豫是因为他们认为该协议带有党派色彩。特朗普政府已努力影响高等教育,例如以削减联邦资金相威胁,针对大学的多元化项目和变性学生政策,引发了对言论自由和学术自由的担忧。

    “很多学校不愿意参与,因为他们认为这是特朗普的项目,”肯尼迪在2月24日由全国县协会举办的会议上说。

    “我们已经能够说服他们,不存在共和党孩子或民主党孩子这样的情况。我们都希望我们的孩子健康。”

    利娅·道格拉斯(Leah Douglas)在华盛顿报道;马修·刘易斯(Matthew Lewis)编辑

    我们的标准:汤森路透信托原则。

    Some US medical schools to teach nutrition under government deal

    March 5, 2026 11:06 AM UTC / Reuters

    • Summary
    • Deal part of Trump’s Make America Healthy Again agenda
    • Fifty-two medical schools to offer 40 hours of nutrition education
    • Trump administration will not dictate curriculum, says federal official

    WASHINGTON, March 5 (Reuters) – About a fourth of U.S. medical schools will ‌expand their nutrition education offerings this autumn as part of a deal with the administration of President Donald Trump, according to a senior official with the Department of Health and Human Services.

    Health ​Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Education Secretary Linda McMahon have pursued ​the deal as part of Trump’s Make America Healthy Again agenda, which promotes healthy ⁠eating and has also underpinned Kennedy’s actions to overhaul federal vaccine policy.

    The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Under the voluntary ​commitment, 52 medical schools will administer 40 hours of nutrition education or a ​40-hour competency equivalent starting in autumn 2026, said the official. The Trump administration will not dictate the curriculum, the official said.

    Kennedy has said such nutrition education is necessary to better equip doctors ​to advise patients on diet-related chronic disease.

    There are about 200 accredited medical schools ​in the U.S., roughly 160 of which offer doctor of medicine degrees. The remainder offer ‌doctor of ⁠osteopathic medicine degrees.

    The majority of the schools joining the voluntary commitment are MD-granting institutions, said the official, without elaborating on the breakdown.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Speaking in Washington last week, Kennedy described working with medical schools, exam administrators and accreditors to design the agreement.

    He ​said some medical schools ​hesitated because they ⁠perceived the deal to be partisan. The Trump administration has made efforts to influence higher education, like threatening to cut federal funding ​to universities over diversity programs and policies for transgender students, raising ​concerns about ⁠free speech and academic freedom.

    “A lot of them didn’t want to do it because they thought it was a Trump program,” Kennedy said on February 24 at a ⁠conference held ​by the National Association of Counties.

    “We’ve been able ​to convince them that there’s no such thing as Republican children or Democratic children. We all want ​our kids to be healthy.”

    Reporting by Leah Douglas in Washington; Editing by Matthew Lewis

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 卡尼吁加澳携手合作 加强对抗霸权 | 联合早报


    发布/2026年3月5日 18:03

    (堪培拉综合电)加拿大总理卡尼星期四提出,加拿大与澳大利亚应成为战略伙伴而非竞争对手,两国携手合作将加强与包括美国在内的超级大国谈判的实力。

    卡尼星期四(3月5日)访问澳洲期间向澳洲国会发表演讲,这是自2007年以来加拿大领导人首次在澳洲国会发言。

    卡尼说,他此次来访是为了在全球架构因接连不断的危机而分崩离析之际,重申渥太华与堪培拉的同盟关系。他指出,加澳虽然在地理上相隔遥远,但理应成为“战略表亲”。

    他说:“在旧世界……我们倾向于把彼此视为竞争对手。在新世界,我们应该成为战略合作伙伴,在提升战略自主性的同时,加大投资、加快技术合作,增强供应链韧性,以及扩大国内加工能力。”

    卡尼说,在大国竞争的世界中,中等强国面临的选择是:要么争取大国青睐,要么联合起来增强实力。他认为,中等强国的当务之急是制定规范,并参与制定新规则,以共同应对日益被霸权大国主导的世界格局。

    他强调:“中等强国不能仅仅筑起更高的墙,并退到墙后。我们必须共同合作。”

    澳洲总理阿尔巴尼斯星期四在国会致辞时也说,卡尼来访反映了加澳在世界舞台上发挥更大作用的共同抱负。

    阿尔巴尼斯说:“澳洲和加拿大是正在变化的世界中的中等强国。我们无法逆转变革,但可以支持自己与我们的公民,同时互相支持。”

    卡尼指出,两国可以合作发展战略优势的领域包括关键矿物、人工智能(AI)、贸易,以及无人机和卫星等防御设备。

    他也宣布,加澳当天早些时候签订了一系列与关键矿产有关的新协议,包括澳洲加入七国集团(G7)矿产联盟。

    这个联盟由加拿大主导,是全球拥有主要矿产储备的民主国家组成的最大集团,旨在促进全球关键矿产的多样化,并保障生产和供应。加拿大和澳洲共生产全球约三分之一的锂和铀,以及超过40%的铁矿石。

    澳洲是卡尼亚太之行的第二站。他此前已访问印度,星期五(6日)离开澳洲后将续程前往日本。

    卡尼吁加澳携手合作 加强对抗霸权 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年3月5日 18:03

    (堪培拉综合电)加拿大总理卡尼星期四提出,加拿大与澳大利亚应成为战略伙伴而非竞争对手,两国携手合作将加强与包括美国在内的超级大国谈判的实力。

    卡尼星期四(3月5日)访问澳洲期间向澳洲国会发表演讲,这是自2007年以来加拿大领导人首次在澳洲国会发言。

    卡尼说,他此次来访是为了在全球架构因接连不断的危机而分崩离析之际,重申渥太华与堪培拉的同盟关系。他指出,加澳虽然在地理上相隔遥远,但理应成为“战略表亲”。

    他说:“在旧世界……我们倾向于把彼此视为竞争对手。在新世界,我们应该成为战略合作伙伴,在提升战略自主性的同时,加大投资、加快技术合作,增强供应链韧性,以及扩大国内加工能力。”

    卡尼说,在大国竞争的世界中,中等强国面临的选择是:要么争取大国青睐,要么联合起来增强实力。他认为,中等强国的当务之急是制定规范,并参与制定新规则,以共同应对日益被霸权大国主导的世界格局。

    他强调:“中等强国不能仅仅筑起更高的墙,并退到墙后。我们必须共同合作。”

    澳洲总理阿尔巴尼斯星期四在国会致辞时也说,卡尼来访反映了加澳在世界舞台上发挥更大作用的共同抱负。

    阿尔巴尼斯说:“澳洲和加拿大是正在变化的世界中的中等强国。我们无法逆转变革,但可以支持自己与我们的公民,同时互相支持。”

    卡尼指出,两国可以合作发展战略优势的领域包括关键矿物、人工智能(AI)、贸易,以及无人机和卫星等防御设备。

    他也宣布,加澳当天早些时候签订了一系列与关键矿产有关的新协议,包括澳洲加入七国集团(G7)矿产联盟。

    这个联盟由加拿大主导,是全球拥有主要矿产储备的民主国家组成的最大集团,旨在促进全球关键矿产的多样化,并保障生产和供应。加拿大和澳洲共生产全球约三分之一的锂和铀,以及超过40%的铁矿石。

    澳洲是卡尼亚太之行的第二站。他此前已访问印度,星期五(6日)离开澳洲后将续程前往日本。

  • 肯尼迪成立新美国自闭症研究小组,将调查潜在病因


    2026年3月5日 上午11:08 UTC / 路透社

    美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)部长小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪在美国华盛顿特区卫生与公众服务部的新闻发布会上,讨论了美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)最新自闭症及发育障碍监测(ADDM)网络调查的结果,… 继续阅读

    • 摘要
    • 新小组包含疫苗怀疑论者,引发自闭症专家担忧
    • 小组或探讨争议性疫苗关联
    • 外部专家警告,聚焦疫苗研究可能转移自闭症其他研究资金

    华盛顿,3月5日(路透社) – 根据一些新小组成员的说法,卫生部长小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪重组的美国自闭症咨询委员会纳入了疫苗怀疑论者,旨在引导联邦研究资金用于调查自闭症病因及其他共病问题,如共存的医疗障碍。

    肯尼迪是长期反疫苗活动家,曾暗示接种疫苗会导致自闭症,这与科学证据相悖。他于1月重组了跨机构自闭症协调委员会,新任命21名公众成员。新委员会中超过三分之一的成员也宣扬被揭穿的疫苗与自闭症之间的关联。

    立即订阅《每日法讯》新闻通讯,获取最新法律新闻,直抵您的收件箱。立即注册

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    一些自闭症专家,包括前委员会成员,表示新成员可能会损害联邦自闭症研究。本周,一些前成员成立了自己的替代咨询委员会,这是公共卫生专家对肯尼迪改革联邦疫苗政策以及他所监管机构传播的错误信息感到担忧的最新举措。

    尚无严格研究发现自闭症与疫苗或药物之间存在关联。自闭症专家将自闭症发病率上升主要归因于诊断标准更加包容。

    该委员会定于3月19日首次召开会议,将为肯尼迪提供关于联邦自闭症研究重点的非约束性指导,包括如何分配数亿美元研究资金的建议。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    肯尼迪向唐纳德·特朗普总统承诺,他将找出自闭症的病因,大多数研究人员认为自闭症部分与遗传因素以及子宫内暴露于污染物或有害物质有关。肯尼迪的”让美国再次健康”运动(Make America Healthy Again)的许多支持者(其中一些人被任命为委员会成员)也认为疫苗会导致自闭症,并主张减少儿童接种次数。

    委员会主席西尔维娅·福格尔(Sylvia Fogel)是哈佛医学院的精神病学家和讲师,她告诉路透社,委员会将解决自闭症研究中的空白,如病因触发因素,以更好地服务于重度自闭症患者及其家庭。

    “自闭症并非单一疾病。联邦策略应反映其复杂性,而非将其简单化,”福格尔说。

    卫生与公众服务部发言人安德鲁·尼克松(Andrew Nixon)表示,新委员会旨在团结不同的声音,”扩大委员会的视角并不改变联邦研究以严谨科学为基础的事实。”

    部分成员将疫苗与自闭症联系起来


    在1月改革之前,西蒙斯基金会(Simons Foundation)和自闭症之声(Autism Speaks)等主要自闭症组织,以及约翰·霍普金斯大学和塔夫茨大学等高校的研究人员构成了委员会21名公众成员的主体。

    根据2024年草案报告,该小组建议进一步研究共病的身体和行为健康状况,如癫痫、胃肠道问题和焦虑症。

    自闭症之声倡导副总裁大卫·西特科夫斯基(David Sitcovsky)在一份声明中表示,更广泛的代表性将加强委员会,但影响将取决于是否保持科学基础。

    新小组包含更多活动家,自闭症自我倡导者仅3人(法律规定的最低人数),而之前为7人,研究型大学代表也寥寥无几。路透社对成员公开声明和隶属关系的审查显示,至少有8人与疫苗导致自闭症有关联,或与支持这些说法的组织有联系,其中一些人称其子女接种疫苗后患上自闭症。

    小组成员金杰·泰勒(Ginger Taylor)创建了名为”疫苗如何导致自闭症”的网站,她在Substack帖子中写道,委员会的首要任务是调查疫苗与自闭症之间的关联。

    新成员约翰·吉尔摩(John Gilmore)是自闭症行动网络(Autism Action Network)联合创始人,他表示自己26岁的儿子接种疫苗后患上自闭症,希望引导更多研究关注自闭症发病率上升问题。

    “现在委员会中的许多声音被刻意排除了20多年,”他说。

    包括吉尔摩和福格尔在内的几名成员,参加了9月由MAHA研究所主办的自闭症活动小组讨论,MAHA研究所所长马克·戈顿(Mark Gorton)是反疫苗活动家,也是肯尼迪2024年总统竞选的重要资助者。

    当被问及部分成员对疫苗的看法如何影响委员会工作时,福格尔表示,针对麻疹腮腺炎风疹(MMR)疫苗和含硫柳汞疫苗的研究未显示与自闭症存在因果关系。

    “现有证据非常充分,必须予以承认,”福格尔说。

    不过,她表示,研究应探讨各种暴露因素(包括免疫或炎症应激)如何影响自闭症结果。

    专家担忧


    周二,十几名自闭症倡导者、研究人员和几名前委员会成员成立了独立自闭症协调委员会,制定自己的自闭症研究战略计划。

    自闭症科学基金会主席、前政府委员会成员艾莉森·辛格(Alison Singer)表示,将联邦资金投入研究疫苗与自闭症之间的关联(大多数专家认为这是既定科学),会削减对其他研究机会的资助,如自闭症的遗传率或与环境暴露的关联。

    “美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的资金并非无底洞,”辛格说,”如果我们将有限资源投入重新调查疫苗,就没有资金研究自闭症的实际潜在病因。”

    路透社报道,记者 Leah Douglas 和 Ahmed Aboulenein
    编辑:Caroline Humer 和 Bill Berkrot

    我们的标准:路透社信托原则。

    Kennedy’s new US autism panel to examine potential causes

    March 5, 2026 11:08 AM UTC / Reuters

    U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. discusses the findings of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) latest Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network survey, during a press conference at the Department of Health and Human Services in Washington, D.C., U.S.,… Read more

    • Summary
    • New panel includes vaccine skeptics, raising concerns among autism experts
    • Panel could explore controversial vaccine links
    • Outside experts warn focus on vaccines may divert funds from other autism research

    WASHINGTON, March 5 (Reuters) – A U.S. autism advisory board remade by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to include vaccine skeptics aims to steer federal research spending toward investigating causes of the condition, as well as other issues ​like co-occurring medical disorders, according to some new panel members.

    Kennedy, a longtime anti-vaccine activist who has suggested the inoculations cause autism, contrary to scientific evidence, reset the Interagency Autism Coordinating ‌Committee in January with 21 new public members. More than a third of the new committee members have also promoted the debunked link between vaccines and autism.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Some autism experts, including former committee members, have said the new members could undermine federal autism research. This week, some former members created their own alternative advisory board, the latest in a series of similar efforts by public health experts concerned about Kennedy’s overhaul of federal vaccine policy and what they see as misinformation coming from agencies he ​oversees.

    No rigorous studies have found links between autism and vaccines or medications. Autism experts attribute rising rates of the condition largely to more inclusive diagnosis criteria.

    The committee, due to first meet ​on March 19, will provide non-binding guidance to Kennedy on federal autism research priorities, including recommendations on allocating hundreds of millions of dollars in research spending.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Kennedy ⁠has promised President Donald Trump he will identify the cause of autism, which most researchers suggest is linked in part to genetics and exposure in utero to pollutants or harmful contaminants. Many of Kennedy’s supporters in ​the Make America Healthy Again movement – some of whom were named to the committee – also believe vaccines can cause autism and advocate for fewer childhood vaccinations.

    Committee chair Sylvia Fogel, a psychiatrist and instructor at Harvard Medical ​School, told Reuters the committee will address gaps in autism research like causal triggers in an effort to better serve people with profound autism and their families.

    “Autism is not monolithic. Federal strategy should reflect that complexity rather than flatten it,” Fogel said.

    Department of Health and Human Services spokesman Andrew Nixon said the new committee is meant to unite a range of voices and that “expanding perspectives on the panel does not change the fact that federal research is grounded in rigorous ​science.”

    SOME MEMBERS LINK VACCINES AND AUTISM


    Until January’s overhaul, major autism groups like the Simons Foundation and Autism Speaks, and researchers from universities including Johns Hopkins and Tufts accounted for most of the committee’s 21 members ​from the public.

    That panel recommended further research into co-occurring physical and behavioral health conditions, like epilepsy, gastrointestinal issues and anxiety disorders, according to a draft 2024 report.

    David Sitcovsky, vice president of advocacy at Autism Speaks, said in a ‌statement that broader ⁠representation would strengthen the committee, but that its impact would depend on retaining a grounding in science.

    The new panel contains more activists, just three autistic self-advocates – the minimum required by law – down from seven, and few representatives from research universities. At least eight have tied vaccination to autism or are connected to organizations that support those claims, including several who say their children developed autism after being vaccinated, according to a Reuters review of their public statements and affiliations.

    Panel member Ginger Taylor, who created a website called “How Do Vaccines Cause Autism?”, wrote in a Substack post that her top priority for the committee is investigating the link ​between vaccines and autism.

    John Gilmore, a new panel ​member and co-founder of the Autism Action Network ⁠who says his 26-year-old son developed autism after being vaccinated, said he wants to steer more research toward rising autism rates.

    “A lot of the voices that are on the (committee) now have been deliberately excluded for 20-odd years,” he said.

    Several, including Gilmore and Fogel, appeared on panels at a September autism event hosted by ​the MAHA Institute, whose president, Mark Gorton, is an anti-vaccine activist and was a significant funder of Kennedy’s 2024 presidential campaign.

    Asked how some members’ views ​on vaccines will affect the ⁠committee’s work, Fogel said studies of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and thimerosal-containing vaccines have not shown a causal link to autism.

    “That body of available evidence is substantial and must be acknowledged,” Fogel said.

    Still, research should examine how various exposures, including immune or inflammatory stress, might affect autism outcomes, she said.

    EXPERT CONCERNS


    On Tuesday, a dozen autism advocates, researchers and several former committee members formed the Independent Autism Coordination Committee to create its own strategic plan for autism ⁠research.

    Alison Singer, ​president of the Autism Science Foundation and a prior government committee member, said investing federal dollars into researching a link between ​vaccines and autism, which most experts consider settled science, would cut into funding for other research opportunities, like autism’s heritability or link to environmental exposures.

    “There’s not a bottomless pit of money at the NIH that can be used to fund research,” Singer said. “If ​we devote our very limited resources towards reinvestigating vaccines, we won’t have money to look at actual potential causes of autism.”

    Reporting by Leah Douglas and Ahmed Aboulenein in Washington; Editing by Caroline Humer and Bill Berkrot

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2