2026-09-10T17:28:22.966Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)
周三晚间,在共和党中期选举大会上,唐纳德·特朗普总统离奇地向美国民众承诺发放数千美元的直接补贴。而这已经不是他第一次做出这类承诺了。
十个月前,特朗普就兜售过2000美元的关税红利支票。他宣称美国人“将会拿到”这笔钱,还称任何反对他关税政策的人都是“傻瓜”。
结果呢,那些真指望能拿到这笔钱的人才是真正的傻瓜,因为钱从来没到过他们手里。
的确,特朗普周三做出的“若共和党保住国会多数席位,就给每位美国成年公民发放5000美元”的承诺,只是他一系列可疑现金补贴承诺中的最新一例。
尽管这次兑现的可能性同样微乎其微,但它有一个更引人注目的点:在政客们越来越多地直接向选民钱包示好的政治环境下,特朗普的措辞听起来更像是一场政治贿赂——就连他自己之前也曾抨击过这类行为。
特朗普多次提议发钱却从未兑现
这是过去19个月里,特朗普至少第四次向美国民众提出现金补贴提议。
2025年初,他提出发放由其政府效率部(DOGE)据称节省下来的资金资助的退税补贴,还将该提案称为“5000美元政府效率部红利支票!”
但所谓的政府效率部及其节省的资金被政府严重夸大,实际节省的资金远未达到这个数额,退税补贴也从未发放。
随后便是2000美元关税红利的承诺。和政府效率部的红利计划一样,这项提议也是基于特朗普夸大的说法,声称他能让联邦政府突然获得巨额现金储备。
但这次他说得更像板上钉钉的誓言(“一定会发放”),而非只是一个构想。不过特朗普还是食言了。
到了同年12月,也就是下个月,特朗普又故技重施。他提议向奥巴马医改参保者发放1000至1500美元,以替代即将到期的医疗补贴。
最终,民众什么都没拿到。
如今,特朗普变本加厉。他不仅在大会上做出了5000美元补贴的承诺,还在周四宣布,政府计划向约100万名声称自己在奥巴马医改计划中被多收费的民众发放500美元退税支票。近日,政府还提出拟向居家育儿的父母每年支付9000美元。
特朗普在首届任期内确实向部分家庭发放过直接补贴,也就是新冠疫情期间的纾困支票,不少家庭拿到了数千美元。但尽管支票上印有特朗普的名字,该政策却是两党共同推动并经国会通过的,目的是在史无前例的疫情期间提供经济救助。
几乎没有理由相信这次的数千美元补贴会真正兑现。仅5000美元支票一项的总成本就将超过1万亿美元。2026财年联邦政府的全部可自由支配预算为1.6万亿美元,这一支出将大幅推高该部分预算——而就在不久前,美国国债刚突破40万亿美元。这一举措无疑需要国会批准,而这看起来几乎不可能。同时,它还可能引发通胀飙升。
CNN五件事
‘特朗普狂欢大会’:特朗普真的打算发放5000美元中期选举补贴吗?
本周,特朗普总统在德克萨斯州举行的共和党有史以来首届中期选举“大会”上成为焦点。不过,由于成本高昂,且担心特朗普的不受欢迎会拖累竞选,一些知名共和党人和竞争激烈选区的候选人纷纷缺席此次活动。我们将详细解读特朗普的演讲内容、他“若共和党赢得中期选举就向美国成年公民发放5000美元”的承诺,以及共和党是否已经开始抛开特朗普。— 嘉宾:史蒂夫·孔托尔诺,CNN资深记者 主持人:戴维·林德 制片人:宝拉·奥尔蒂斯 节目监制:费利西亚·帕廷金 编辑支持:杰夫·西蒙
2026年9月10日 • 时长12分钟
- Apple Podcasts
- Spotify
- iHeart Radio
- Radio.com
- Pandora
- Amazon
- RSS
但向民众口袋里塞钱恐怕并非真正的目的,真正的目标是营造特朗普正在兑现承诺的假象。
贿赂的定义是“为了影响处于信任地位的人的判断或行为”而承诺给予钱财。与他此前提出的现金补贴不同,特朗普将这次的补贴描述成一种交换条件:选民凭借选举共和党同僚的权力处于信任地位,而他们若能让共和党重新掌权,就能拿到5000美元作为回报。
这算不上刑事贿赂,其支持者可能会辩称,这类似于共和党候选人承诺如果当选就减税,前提是反对他们的对手反对该政策。(威斯康星州一名检察官近期就拒绝以贿赂罪起诉埃隆·马斯克,此前他提出为投票者提供100万美元奖金。)
但特朗普最新的这套把戏听起来确实像贿赂,尤其是特朗普并未说明该政策附带任何政策目标,比如刺激消费支出。
这一点毫不隐晦,就连一些特朗普的盟友和保守派人士也提出了批评。
帕兰蒂尔联合创始人乔·朗斯代尔在X平台上发文称,尽管他希望共和党在中期选举中获胜,但他“强烈反对这种面包与马戏式的贿赂手段”。弗吉尼亚州前共和党众议员鲍勃·古德则称其为“特朗普的5000美元‘红利’式社会主义买票计划”。
特朗普本人此前也曾谴责过买票的概念——甚至在没有明确交换条件的情况下,指责民主党试图这么做。
2016年,他称希拉里·克林顿的竞选团队提议留任洛蕾塔·林奇为司法部长是一种“贿赂”,而当时司法部正在调查希拉里使用私人电子邮件服务器的事件。
“我的意思是,总检察长坐在那里说,‘你知道吗,如果我帮希拉里摆脱困境,我就能再干四年或者八年’,”特朗普说道,“‘但如果她输了,我就失业了。’这就是贿赂。”
2020年,他抨击前纽约市市长迈克尔·布隆伯格花费数百万美元为重刑犯支付法庭罚款和费用,以此帮助他们投票。
“你居然敢这么跟别人说:‘去投票吧,我来帮你付清账单’?”特朗普问道,随后称这等同于买票。
在2024年竞选期间,他指责时任总统乔·拜登试图通过基础设施项目和学生贷款债务减免计划买票。
“我们有一位腐败的总统——非常腐败,”2023年6月谈到拜登的学生贷款计划时特朗普说道,“但这就是一种买票的手段。仅此而已。”
“我想我不能怪他,”2024年5月特朗普补充道,“但这非常不公平。”
Trump’s crooked-feeling promise of $5,000 checks if Republicans win
2026-09-10T17:28:22.966Z / CNN
President Donald Trump bizarrely offered Americans thousands of dollars in direct payments Wednesday night at the Republican midterm convention. It wasn’t the first time.
Ten months ago, Trump was peddling tariff dividend checks of $2,000. He declared that Americans “will be paid” the money and that anyone against his tariffs were “FOOLS.”
Turns out, anyone actually counting on that money were the real fools. Because it never arrived.
Indeed, Trump’s promise Wednesday of $5,000 to every adult US citizen if Republicans keep their congressional majorities is just one example in a long line of dubious promises on cash payouts.
And while this one is no more likely to actually materialize, it stands out in another way: Even in a political environment where politicians have increasingly made more direct overtures to their voters’ wallets, Trump’s phrasing makes it sound a lot like a political bribe — as even he would formerly admit.
Trump has repeatedly floated giving people money — and failed
This is at least the fourth time in the last 19 months that Trump has floated giving Americans cash.
In early 2025, he proposed giving Americans rebates funded by the money supposedly saved by his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). He labeled the proposal “$5,000 DOGE DIVIDEND CHECKS!”
Except DOGE, whose savings the administration grossly overstated, didn’t save anywhere near that amount of money. The rebates never came.
Then came the $2,000 tariff dividend promise. Like the DOGE dividends, they were premised on Trump’s overstated claims about him making the federal government suddenly newly flush with cash.
But this one was more of an ironclad pledge (“will be paid”) rather than just an idea. And Trump broke his promise.
By the next month, December, Trump was back at it. He floated giving Obamacare recipients $1,000-$1,500 rather than renewing their expiring healthcare subsidies.
In the end, people got neither.
Now, Trump is doubling down. Not only did he make the $5,000 pledge at the convention, but he announced Thursday that the administration was planning to send $500 rebate checks to up to 1 million people who claim they were overcharged for their Obamacare coverage. And in recent days, the administration floated effectively paying stay-at-home parents $9,000 per year.
Trump did successfully send some direct payments to households during his first term, which amounted to thousands of dollars for some: the Covid pandemic stimulus checks. But despite Trump putting his name on those checks, it was a bipartisan effort passed through Congress and was aimed at providing financial relief during an unprecedented time.
There is little reason to believe the thousands of dollars will actually materialize. The $5,000 checks alone would cost more than $1 trillion. The entire discretionary budget for the federal government in the 2026 fiscal year is $1.6 trillion, so this would explode that portion of the budget — right after the national debt hit $40 trillion. It would surely require Congress’s sign-off, which seems very unlikely. It would also risk spiking inflation.
CNN 5 Things
‘Trump-a-palooza’: Is Trump Serious About a $5K Midterm Payout?
President Donald Trump has made himself front and center at the GOP’s first ever midterm ‘convention’ in Texas this week. However, some prominent Republicans and candidates in tight races are skipping the event amid high costs and fear Trump’s unpopularity could weigh down their campaigns. We break down Trump’s message, his promise to pay American adults $5,000 if Republicans win the midterms, and whether the GOP is already looking past Trump. — Guest: Steve Contorno, CNN Senior Reporter Host: David Rind Producer: Paola Ortiz Showrunner: Felicia Patinkin Editorial Support: Jeff Simon
Sep 10, 2026 • 12 min
- Apple Podcasts
- Spotify
- iHeart Radio
- Radio.com
- Pandora
- Amazon
- RSS
But putting cash in people’s pockets probably isn’t really the goal. It’s the illusion of Trump doing so.
The definition of a bribe is the promise of money “in order to influence the judgment or conduct of a person in a position of trust.” Unlike the previous cash payments he floated, Trump is describing this one like a quid pro quo in which voters — who are in a position of trust by virtue of their ability to elect his fellow Republicans — get $5,000 in exchange for putting those Republicans back in power.
That doesn’t make it criminal bribery, and defenders would likely say it’s akin to GOP candidates vowing to cut taxes if they win, over the opposition of their opponents. (A prosecutor in Wisconsin recently declined to bring bribery charges against Elon Musk after he offered $1 million prizes for people voting.)
But Trump’s latest gimmick certainly sounds like bribery, especially given Trump hasn’t outlined any policy goal that’s attached, like stimulating consumer spending.
It’s not subtle, and even some Trump allies and conservatives are calling it out.
Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale posted on X that while he wants the GOP to win in the midterms, he is “strongly against bread and circus bribes.” And Republican former Rep. Bob Good of Virginia called it “Trump’s $5K ‘dividend’ socialist vote-buying scheme.”
The president himself has decried the concept of vote-buying — accusing Democrats of attempting it even when there was no such explicit quid pro quo.
In 2016, he called it a “bribe” for Hillary Clinton’s campaign to float keeping Loretta Lynch on as attorney general — even as the Justice Department was investigating Clinton’s use of a private email server.
“I mean, the attorney general sitting there, saying, ‘You know, if I get Hillary off the hook, I’m going to have four more years or eight more years,’” Trump said. “‘But if she loses, I’m out of a job.’ It’s a bribe.”
In 2020, he decried former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg trying to help former felons vote by spending millions paying their court fines and fees.
“Are you allowed to go tell people that: ‘Go vote. I’m going to pay off your tab’?” Trump asked, before saying it amounted to buying votes.
And during the 2024 campaign, he accused then-President Joe Biden of trying to buy votes with infrastructure projects and student loan debt forgiveness.
“We have a corrupt president — very corrupt,” Trump said in June 2023 about Biden’s student loan plan. “But this was a way of trying to buy votes. That’s all it was.”
“I guess I don’t blame him,” Trump added in May 2024, “but it’s very unfair.”
发表回复