索托马约尔痛斥保守派主导的最高法院,坦言希望推翻“疯狂裁决”


法官在公民课讲座期间表示,特朗普诉美国案的判决是她希望在有生之年看到被推翻的裁决之一

作者:罗伯特·施马德 | 福克斯新闻
发布时间:美国东部标准时间2026年11月10日12:32

海明威谈到最高法院泄密案的多年追查,以及法院内部调查未能查明泄密源后问责机制的缺失。她还提到2022年5月《政客》发布判决书草案后,针对布雷特·卡瓦诺大法官及其他大法官的威胁事件。

【新增】你现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/e852c8ac-df11-4ff9-a307-aec72456452f

收听本文
3分钟

在共和党因中期选举惨败而焦虑之际,最高法院大法官索尼娅·索托马约尔希望法院一些重大的保守派裁决最终能被推翻。

这位自由派大法官特别提到了法院2024年具有里程碑意义的总统 immunity 裁决——该裁决为总统在其核心宪法权力范围内的行为提供刑事起诉豁免,并为其他官方行为提供推定保护。她的同事塞缪尔·阿利托大法官和克拉伦斯·托马斯大法官均已年近80,这引发了人们对他们可能退休的猜测,以及民主党控制的参议院是否会给特朗普提名保守派接替他们的努力制造麻烦。

“我们在周二看到了选民的大量投票……我一直告诉人们,没有任何借口不去投票。真的没有。冷漠是不可接受的,”索托马约尔说。

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

民主党参议院接管后,特朗普的最高法院多数派面临迫在眉睫的威胁:“进退维谷”

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/sotomayor-clarence-thomas-supreme-court-picture.jpg

2022年10月7日,美国最高法院大法官索尼娅·索托马约尔(左)与克拉伦斯·托马斯大法官(右)在华盛顿特区最高法院大楼东会议室拍摄官方肖像。(亚历克斯·王/盖蒂图片社)

“我经常提出异议。我希望法院能收回它做出的一些疯狂裁决。我只是开玩笑——也许不是,”她在同一场合说。“不,认真的。我对此公开表态过,有些裁决我希望在有生之年能被推翻。总统 immunity 案就是其中之一。”

这位大法官在这场时长一小时的活动中大部分时间都在讨论公民教育的重要性,期间不时谈及美国民主的现状。有一次,索托马约尔表示,美国要恢复“稳定状态”需要“艰苦努力”。

最高法院大法官卡根警告称,一些保守派裁决“破坏我们的民主”

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/sonia-sotomayor-colbert.jpg

2025年9月9日周二,最高法院大法官索尼娅·索托马约尔在《今夜秀》节目中与主持人斯蒂芬·科尔伯特交流。(CBS/斯蒂芬·科尔伯特)

“在许多法律领域,我所在的法院的判例法发生了一些系统性变化,”她表示。“我们最终会稳定下来的。虽然尚不确定何时,但我们会的。届时将建立新的秩序,人们会开始理解。”

索托马约尔特别提到了最高法院2024年关于总统 immunity 的里程碑裁决,称希望看到该裁决被重新审议。

民主党参议员指责拜登政府在最高法院改革问题上“完全”退缩

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/gettyimages-2059260467.jpg

(左起)美国最高法院首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨与美国最高法院大法官索尼娅·索托马约尔,在2024年3月7日华盛顿国会大厦众议院议事厅,美国总统乔·拜登发表国情咨文前出席。(曼德尔·恩根/法新社照片)

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

特朗普诉美国案所涉的案件中,法院裁定前总统对其核心宪法权力范围内的行为享有绝对刑事起诉豁免权,对其他官方行为则至少享有推定豁免权。法官们裁定前总统非官方行为不享有豁免权,下级法院需界定受该裁决保护的官方行为与仍需承担刑事责任的私人行为之间的界限。

索托马约尔在2024年的异议书中严厉批评了该裁决,称法院的保守派多数派实际上将总统变成了“凌驾于法律之上的君主”。

点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用

“有些准则可能已经永远消失了,”她表示。“但我不认为我们的民主会失败。不过,我认为我们要搞清楚这意味着什么,会经历一段艰难时期。”

Sotomayor lets loose on conservative Supreme Court with revealing wish: ‘Crazy things’

The justice called the Trump v United States decision one she wants reversed in her lifetime during a civics lecture

By Robert Schmad | Fox News

Published November 10, 2026 12:32pm EST

Hemingway discusses the yearslong search for the Supreme Court leaker and the lack of accountability after the court’s internal investigation failed to identify the source. She also addresses threats against Justice Brett Kavanaugh and other justices following Politico’s publication of the draft opinion in May 2022.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/e852c8ac-df11-4ff9-a307-aec72456452f

Listen to this article

3 min

As Republicans reel from their bruising midterm election losses, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor is hoping some of the court’s biggest conservative rulings will eventually be overturned.

The liberal justice singled out the court’s landmark 2024 presidential immunity ruling, which shields presidents from criminal prosecution for actions taken within their core constitutional powers and provides presumptive protection for other official acts. Her colleagues, Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, are both in their late 70s, raising questions about their potential retirements and whether a Democratic-controlled Senate could complicate Trump’s efforts to replace them with fellow conservatives.

“We saw the outpouring of voters on Tuesday … I tell people all the time, there’s no excuse for not voting. There just isn’t. Apathy is not acceptable,” Sotomayor said.

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

TRUMP’S SUPREME COURT MAJORITY FACES LOOMING THREAT AFTER DEM SENATE TAKEOVER: ‘STUCK’

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/sotomayor-clarence-thomas-supreme-court-picture.jpg

United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor (L) and Associate Justice Clarence Thomas (R) pose for their official portrait at the East Conference Room of the Supreme Court building on October 7, 2022, in Washington, D.C.(Alex Wong/Getty Images)

“I dissent a lot. I’m hoping that the court will take back some of the crazy things that it’s done. I’m only joking — maybe not,” she said at the same event. “No, seriously. You know, I’ve spoken openly about this, there’s some opinions that I hope in my lifetime will get overturned. The immunity case is one of them.”

The justice spent most of the hourlong event discussing the importance of civics education, stopping at times to discuss the state of American democracy. At one point, Sotomayor remarked that it would take “some hard work” for the United States to get back on an “even keel.”

SUPREME COURT JUSTICE KAGAN WARNS SOME CONSERVATIVE RULINGS HAVE BEEN ‘DESTRUCTIVE OF OUR DEMOCRACY’

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/sonia-sotomayor-colbert.jpg

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor speaks with late-night host Stephen Colbert during “The Late Show” on Tuesday, September 9, 2025.(CBS/StephenColbert)

“There have been some systemic changes in my court’s jurisprudence in many areas of law,” she stated. “We’ll settle down, too. Not quite sure when. But we will. And a new order will be established that people will begin to understand.”

Sotomayor specifically singled out the Supreme Court’s 2024 landmark ruling on presidential immunity as something she would like to see revisited.

DEMOCRATIC SENATOR ACCUSES BIDEN ADMINISTRATION OF ‘COMPLETELY’ CHICKENING OUT ON SUPREME COURT REFORM

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/gettyimages-2059260467.jpg

(L-R) US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and US Supreme Court Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor look on prior to US President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address in the House Chamber of the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on March 7, 2024. (Photo by Mandel NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

In Trump v. United States, the case in question, the court ruled that former presidents have absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within their core constitutional powers and at least presumptive immunity for other official acts. The justices ruled that former presidents have no immunity from prosecution for unofficial conduct, leaving lower courts to distinguish between official acts protected by the decision and private conduct that remains subject to criminal prosecution.

Sotomayor sharply criticized the ruling in her 2024 dissent, arguing that the court’s conservative majority had effectively turned the president into a “king above the law.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“There are some norms we may have lost forever,” she said. “But I don’t think that we will fail as a democracy. But I think we’re going to have a hard patch figuring out what that means.”

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2