博客

  • 扎克伯格关于超级人工智能愿景的文章的5大核心观点


    2026年8月10日 / 美国东部时间下午12:34 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    马克·扎克伯格周一在Meta官网发布的一篇文章中表示,人工智能工具应“尽可能多地向民众和企业开放”。

    在这篇长达6500字、阐述这位Meta创始人人工智能愿景的文章中,扎克伯格还表达了他的信念:“超级人工智能”——一种理论上具备超越人类认知能力的人工智能——将推动国家安全发展、带来更强劲的经济繁荣,并促进科学与创意成就。

    “人类见证过诸多变革性进步。每次进步出现时,都会有人担忧自己会被抛下,”扎克伯格写道,“但每次人类最终都能让更多人共享更富足的生活、更健康的体魄和更自由的环境。我们相信人工智能也会如此,未来的丰饶成果可以惠及每一个人。”

    扎克伯格宣扬了超级人工智能的潜在益处——以及Meta在推动这项技术发展中的地位——但同时也警告称,需要采取行动来维持美国的竞争优势,并确保人类能够掌控这项技术。

    以下是扎克伯格这篇文章的5大核心观点。

    “人人可免费或低价获取”人工智能

    扎克伯格设想了这样一个未来:每个人都拥有一个个人智能助手,能够帮助处理与健康、职业、财务和人际关系相关的日常事务。

    为推动人工智能的普及,这位科技大亨表示,Meta将向“数十亿人”提供免费的人工智能工具,并力求以“尽可能低的价格”提供其人工智能技术。

    扎克伯格还承诺将为个人智能助手打造“完全私密模式”,防止Meta和其他服务商获取用户的个人信息。

    就业岗位不会消失

    针对人工智能将取代工人的普遍担忧,扎克伯格表示,这项技术将创造出如今不存在的新型工作岗位,并让人们能够以更少的投入完成更多工作。在文章中,他将超级人工智能称为“创新工具”,而非自动化工具。

    “企业规模可能会缩小——就像从工业巨头时代过渡到科技公司时代那样,”扎克伯格说,“但这并不意味着整体就业岗位会减少。这意味着会涌现出更多每家雇员更少的公司。”

    数据中心社区投资

    随着人工智能需求增长催生对更多计算能力的需求,Meta与谷歌母公司Alphabet、亚马逊、微软等竞争对手一道,被称为“超大规模云计算服务商”,正加紧建设数据中心。但这一举措因环境、经济和其他方面的担忧引发了强烈的公众反对。

    为解决这些担忧,扎克伯格周一表示,Meta将设立一个名为“未来属于所有人基金”的投资基金,用于受益于数据中心建设的社区。据《华尔街日报》报道,该基金规模将达10亿美元。

    扎克伯格还承诺将维持低价电价、恢复当地供水,并培训工人以支持其数据中心建设。他指出,Meta2026年1450亿美元的资本支出预算“将主要用于建设数据中心”。

    发布开源模型

    扎克伯格在文章中主张,美国应降低相关壁垒,他称这些壁垒使美国开源人工智能模型难以与外国竞争对手的产品竞争。他表示,尽管发布模型存在风险,但允许人工智能实验室将其作为专有人工智能工具锁起来会更糟。

    为此,扎克伯格表示Meta将“很快恢复发布部分开源模型”。据《华尔街日报》报道,Meta计划推出一款名为Muse Glimmer的开源权重模型——决定模型行为的数值参数——以及其最先进的人工智能编码模型Muse Spark 1.2的开源权重版本。

    与监管机构合作

    扎克伯格还就人工智能企业与政府如何携手安全推进人工智能发展提出了政策建议。其中包括向政府“分享新模型的中期训练检查点”,以便政府能够及早应对潜在的安全问题。他表示,人工智能实验室还应与执法部门合作,防止不良行为者滥用这些模型。

    编辑:阿兰·谢尔特

    5 takeaways from Zuckerberg’s essay on his vision for superintelligence

    August 10, 2026 / 12:34 PM EDT / CBS News

    Mark Zuckerberg said in an essay published on Meta’s website on Monday that artificial intelligence tools should be shared with “as many people and businesses as possible.”

    In a 6,500-word post outlining the Meta founder’s vision of AI, Zuckerberg also expressed his belief that “superintelligence” — a theoretical form of AI with superior cognitive abilities to those of humans — will advance national security, lead to greater economic prosperity, and promote scientific and creative achievement.

    “Humanity has witnessed many transformative advances. Each time there is fear that people will be left behind,” Zuckerberg wrote. “But each time humanity has come out with more people sharing greater prosperity, health and freedom. We believe this will be true with AI as well, and the abundance of the future can be shared by everyone.”

    Zuckerberg touts the potential upsides of superintelligence — and Meta’s place in advancing it — but also warns that action is needed to maintain America’s competitive edge and ensure humanity retains control over the technology.

    Here are five takeaways from Zuckerberg’s essay.

    “Free or affordable access” to AI for all

    Zuckerberg envisions a future in which individuals have a personal agent designed to assist them with everyday needs related to their health, careers, finances and relationships.

    To encourage AI use, the tech billionaire said Meta will provide free versions of its tools to “billions of people” and seek to offer access to its AI technology for the “lowest price possible.”

    Zuckerberg also committed to building a “fully private mode” for personal AI agents that will prevent Meta and other providers from seeing people’s information.

    Jobs won’t disappear

    Disputing widespread concerns that AI will displace workers, Zuckerberg said the technology will create new kinds of jobs that don’t exist today and allow people to do more with less. In his essay, he referred to superintelligence as a “tool of invention” rather than of automation.

    “Company sizes may shrink — just as they did in the transition from industrial giants to tech companies,” Zuckerberg said. “But this doesn’t mean fewer jobs overall. It implies a larger number of companies with fewer people each.”

    Data center community investments

    Meta is among the so-called hyperscalers, along with rivals such as Alphabet, Amazon and Microsoft, rushing to build data centers as growing AI demand spurs a need for more computing power. Yet the push is drawing intense public opposition over environmental, economic and other concerns.

    Seeking to address such concerns, Zuckerberg said Monday that Meta will create an investment fund called the “Future is for Everyone Fund” to benefit communities where data centers are being built. The fund size will be $1 billion, according to The Wall Street Journal.

    Zuckerberg also committed to keeping electricity prices low, restoring local water supply and training workers to support its data center buildout. Meta’s 2026 capital spending budget of $145 billion will be used “largely to build data centers,” he noted.

    Releasing open-source models

    Zuckerberg argues in his essay that the U.S. should lower barriers that he said make it harder for U.S. open-source AI models to compete with those of foreign competitors. While there are risks to releasing models, allowing AI labs to keep them under lock and key as proprietary AI tools would be worse, he said.

    To that end, Zuckerberg said Meta will “resume releasing some open source models soon.” According to The Wall Street Journal, Meta is planning to launch a new model with open weights — numerical values that determine a model’s behavior — called Muse Glimmer, as well as an open-weight version of Muse Spark 1.2, its most advanced AI coding model.

    Working with the authorities

    Zuckerberg also offered policy suggestions for how AI companies and the government can work together to advance AI safely. Those include sharing “intermediate training checkpoints of new models” with the government — allowing it to tackle potential security issues early on. AI labs should also work with law enforcement to prevent bad actors from misusing the models, he said.

    Edited by Alain Sherter

  • 特朗普签署行政令 旨在减少推荐儿童疫苗接种数量


    2026年8月10日 美国东部时间下午2:19 / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    亚当·坎林、萨拉·奥弗莫勒 报道

    更新于4分钟前
    更新于2026年8月10日 美国东部时间下午3:23

    发布于2026年8月10日 美国东部时间下午2:19

    近几个月来,总统唐纳德·特朗普一直敦促卫生官员在儿童疫苗接种计划方面采取更多行动

    伊夫林·霍克斯坦/路透社/资料图

    据美国有线电视新闻网获得的文件草案显示,唐纳德·特朗普总统周一签署了一项行政令,旨在重塑联邦政府对待儿童疫苗的政策。

    这项范围广泛的行政令提议减少幼儿推荐接种的疫苗总剂次,并将全国儿童疫苗接种计划分为三类。

    该命令还建议将麻腮风联合疫苗(MMR)拆分为三种单独注射的疫苗,这一做法违背了广泛的科学共识,但符合特朗普近几个月来的主张——他坚持要对这种广泛接种的疫苗进行调整。

    “我们正在减少接种剂次,”特朗普在椭圆形办公室说道,“这不仅意味着你接种的疫苗或他们所说的‘针剂’更少了,还意味着你需要分多次就诊来完成接种。”

    公共卫生专家警告称,拆分麻腮风联合疫苗并非明智之举。

    根据该行政令草案,拜登政府的新政策规定,所有儿童都应接种麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹、白喉、破伤风、百日咳、脊髓灰质炎、B型流感嗜血杆菌、肺炎球菌疾病、人乳头瘤病毒以及水痘疫苗。

    目前仅建议高风险人群接种呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)单克隆抗体,以及甲型肝炎、乙型肝炎、B群脑膜炎球菌、ACWY群脑膜炎球菌和登革热疫苗。这与现行接种计划有所不同,现行计划建议所有儿童接种其中大部分疫苗。

    其中几种疫苗,如肝炎疫苗,将采用共同决策模式,即与孩子的医生进行沟通后决定。这类疫苗包括轮状病毒疫苗、脑膜炎球菌疫苗、流感疫苗和新冠疫苗。

    《华盛顿邮报》率先报道了这份行政令草案。

    特朗普的这项声明与美国卫生与公众服务部今年1月的一项举措一脉相承,该举措旨在缩减儿童疫苗接种计划中推荐的疫苗种类。医疗团体就此修订后的计划提起诉讼,一名法官作出了有利于医疗团体的裁决。

    近几个月来,特朗普一直敦促卫生与公众服务部部长小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪在儿童疫苗接种计划方面采取更多行动,并加紧研究疫苗与自闭症之间的关联。

    此前已有大量科学研究表明,没有证据显示疫苗与自闭症存在关联。

    尽管特朗普的政治顾问长期以来一直担忧,推行备受争议的疫苗政策在民众中极不受欢迎,可能会在11月的中期选举前疏远选民,但特朗普仍签署了这项行政令。

    本文已更新,补充了更多报道和背景信息。

    Trump signs executive order aimed at reducing number of recommended childhood vaccines

    2026-08-10 2:19 PM ET / CNN

    By Adam Cancryn, Sarah Owermohle

    Updated 4 min ago

    Updated Aug 10, 2026, 3:23 PM ET

    PUBLISHED Aug 10, 2026, 2:19 PM ET

    In recent months, President Donald Trump has pressed health officials for more action on the childhood vaccine schedule

    Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters/File

    President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Monday aimed at reshaping the federal government’s approach toward childhood vaccines, according to a draft of the document obtained by CNN.

    The sweeping order proposes reducing the total number of immunizations recommended for children in their earliest years and dividing the nation’s childhood vaccine schedule into three categories.

    It also advises that the mumps, measles and rubella (MMR) vaccine be separated into three individual shots, against broad scientific consensus but in keeping with Trump’s insistence in recent months that the widely administered shot be altered.

    “We’re reducing them,” Trump said from the Oval Office. “It’s not only that you’re doing fewer vaccines, or jabs, as they say, but you’re doing them in a series of visits to the doctor.”

    Public health experts warned that splitting the MMR vaccines was a bad idea

    Under the draft order, the administration’s new policy states that all children are recommended to receive vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Hib, pneumococcal disease, HPV and varicella, or chicken pox.

    Only high-risk populations are now advised to receive respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) monoclonal antibodies and vaccines against hepatitis A, hepatitis B, meningococcal B, meningococcal ACWY and dengue. That marks a change from the current schedule, which recommends that all children receive most of those shots.

    Several of those, such as the hepatitis immunizations, will be subject to shared decision-making, or conversations with a child’s doctor. Those include shots for rotavirus, meningococcal disease, influenza and Covid-19.

    The Washington Post first reported on the draft executive order.

    Trump’s announcement hews closely to a US Department of Health and Human Services effort in January to whittle down the number of recommended vaccines in the childhood schedule. Medical groups sued to challenge that revised schedule, and a judge ruled in their favor.

    Trump in recent months has pressed HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for more action on the childhood vaccine schedule, as well as for stepping up efforts to search for links between vaccines and autism.

    There have been extensive scientific studies of vaccines that have yielded no evidence of a connection to autism.

    The executive order signing comes despite long-running reservations among Trump’s political advisers that advancing controversial vaccines policies is widely unpopular and could alienate voters ahead of November’s midterms.

    This story has been updated with additional reporting and context.

  • 特朗普称美国推荐11种核心疫苗接种


    2026年8月10日 晚上7:19 UTC / 路透社

    美国华盛顿白宫椭圆形办公室,2026年8月10日,美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在签署有关疫苗灵活性的行政令活动上发表讲话。路透社/凯莉·库珀

    华盛顿,8月10日(路透社)——美国总统唐纳德·特朗普周一在椭圆形办公室对记者表示,美国政府目前仅认可针对11种核心疫苗的儿童接种推荐。

    特朗普称,乙肝、新冠、流感等疫苗不再被推荐给所有儿童接种。

    订阅路透社健康周刊,获取最新医学突破与医疗趋势资讯。点击此处注册

    • 本报华盛顿记者史蒂夫·霍兰报道;贾斯珀·沃德撰稿
    • 我们的报道准则:汤森路透信任原则

    US recommending vaccinations for 11 core inoculations, says Trump

    August 10, 2026 7:19 PM UTC / Reuters

    U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during an event to sign an executive order regarding vaccine flexibility, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 10, 2026. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper

    WASHINGTON, Aug 10 (Reuters) – The U.S. ​administration is ‌recognizing childhood vaccine recommendations ​for ​only 11 core inoculations, ⁠U.S. ​President Donald ​Trump told reporters in the ​Oval Office ​on Monday.

    Trumps said ‌vaccinations ⁠for hepatitis B, COVID-19 and ​influenza, ​among ⁠others, were no ​longer recommended ​for ⁠all children.

    Keep up with the latest medical breakthroughs and healthcare trends with the Reuters Health Rounds newsletter. Sign up here.

    Reporting by ⁠Steve ​Holland ​in Washington; Writing by ​Jasper Ward

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 哈里斯意外成《拯救美国法案》“宣传员”,特朗普的攻击反倒大获成功


    2026年8月10日 美国东部时间12:30 / 福克斯新闻

    哈里斯警告该法案将要求选民登记时提供身份凭证,称这会给美国民众设置障碍

    作者:阿什利·J·迪梅拉 福克斯新闻

    南卡罗来纳州共和党众议员谢里·比格斯批评参议院拖延通过《拯救美国法案》。比格斯强调众议院已多次通过该法案。他们指出这项立法广受欢迎,超70%的公众支持选民身份证、公民身份证明这类常识性举措。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    保守派人士猛烈抨击前副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯,此前她警告美国民众若《拯救美国法案》生效,将不得不“证明自己的身份”,认为她的批评反倒意外成了这项共和党支持法案的宣传卖点。

    “堪称《拯救美国法案》的绝佳宣传员,”保守派评论员埃里克·多蒂在X平台上写道。

    哈里斯周五在她的X账号上发布了一段讨论中期选举的视频,其中提及了《拯救美国法案》,还向选民抱怨“你们将不得不证明自己的身份”。

    她补充说,该法案将要求“提供护照——很多美国人都没有护照——或者出生证明。说白了,这就是在给你们的选民登记设置障碍”。

    舒默称“民主党支持选民身份证”——随后全体参议院民主党议员投票反对共和党法案

    前副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯于2026年6月16日在奥地利维也纳参加施瓦辛格气候倡议组织的奥地利世界峰会小组讨论。(法新社 盖蒂图片社)

    特朗普已将通过《拯救美国法案》列为其政府的首要任务,通过一系列施压策略推动这项陷入停滞的选举立法,包括将其与国防开支挂钩,并威胁阻挠住房立法。

    这段视频在保守派群体中疯传,特朗普甚至将该视频置顶在他的Truth Social个人主页上。

    “拿吉姆·克劳时代作比较早已过时。人头税早已废除。吉姆·克劳时代也一去不复返了。在美国选举投票前证明你是美国公民并非压迫,而是常识,”得克萨斯州众议员韦斯利·亨特在回应此事时说道。

    观看:埃莉萨·斯洛特金称《拯救美国法案》会让“任何民主党人都很难赢得选举”

    2026年6月16日周二,华盛顿特区麦金利科技高中的投票点内,一名选民正在投票。如果自称民主社会主义者的贾尼斯·刘易斯·乔治赢得该市民主党市长初选,唐纳德·特朗普总统曾威胁要联邦接管华盛顿特区。(格雷姆·斯隆 彭博社 盖蒂图片社)

    “这太荒唐了——想象一下世界上要先证明自己身份才能投票,”前白宫新闻秘书肖恩·斯派塞说道。

    “她该收手了,”监督项目诉讼副总裁杰夫·克拉克写道。

    “卡玛拉·哈里斯抱怨如果《拯救美国法案》通过,人们在登记投票时将不得不证明自己的身份,”保守派评论员本尼·约翰逊写道。

    “好奇卡玛拉·哈里斯为什么会觉得这是件坏事,”埃隆·马斯克的政治行动委员会“美国”发帖称。

    “卡玛拉·哈里斯谈《拯救美国法案》:该法案要求美国人‘证明自己的身份’才能投票。特朗普本人转发了她的视频片段,”福克斯新闻主播肖恩·汉尼提说道。

    共和党人称特朗普的首要选举优先事项在参议院“胎死腹中”,中期选举前共和党出现分裂

    唐纳德·特朗普总统于2026年7月16日周四在华盛顿白宫东厅发表讲话。(索尔·卢 美联社 泳池照片)

    多年来,特朗普一直在呼吁推行选民身份证法,包括在2016年竞选期间就已提出。

    国会休会且中期选举临近之际,特朗普仍在继续施压议员优先通过《拯救美国法案》,并在议员们返回华盛顿后持续向他们施加压力。

    民主党议员辩称,《拯救美国法案》会为符合资格的选民设置不必要的障碍,最突出的问题是可能会剥夺他们的投票权。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    美国有14个州和华盛顿特区不要求大多数选民在现场投票时出示身份证件。

    阿什利·J·迪梅拉为福克斯新闻数字频道报道政治新闻。

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6402261936112

    Harris becomes accidental SAVE Act ‘saleswoman’ as Trump attack spectacularly backfires

    August 10, 2026 12:30pm EDT / Fox News

    Harris warned the bill would require proof of identity to register to vote, calling it an obstacle for Americans

    By Ashley J. DiMella, Fox News

    Rep. Sheri Biggs, R.S.C., criticizes the Senate’s delay in passing the Save America Act. Biggs emphasizes the House has passed the bill multiple times. They highlight the legislation’s popularity, with over 70% public support for common-sense ideas like voter ID and proof of citizenship.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Conservatives piled on former Vice President Kamala Harris after she warned Americans would have to “prove who you are” under the SAVE America Act, arguing her criticism inadvertently turned into a sales pitch for the Republican-backed bill.

    “Incredible SAVE America Act saleswoman,” wrote conservative commentator Eric Daughetry on X.

    Harris posted a video on her X account Friday discussing midterm elections while highlighting the SAVE Act, including lamenting to voters that “you’re going to have to have proof of who you are.”

    She added the bill will require “a passport, which a lot of Americans don’t have, or a birth certificate. Same point, obstacles to make it difficult for you to register to vote.”

    SCHUMER SAID ‘DEMOCRATS SUPPORT VOTER ID’ — THEN EVERY SENATE DEMOCRAT VOTED AGAINST GOP BILL

    Former Vice President Kamala Harris speaks during a panel discussion at the Austrian World Summit of the Schwarzenegger Climate Initiative on June 16, 2026, in Vienna, Austria.(AFP via Getty Images)

    Trump has made passage of the SAVE Act a top priority for his administration, pushing the stalled election legislation through a series of pressure tactics, including tying it to defense spending and threatening housing legislation.

    The clip went viral among conservatives, with Trump even pinning the video to the top of his profile on Truth Social.

    “The Jim Crow comparisons are tired. The poll tax is gone. Jim Crow is gone. Proving you’re an American citizen before voting in an American election is not oppression. It’s common sense,” said Texas Rep. Wesley Hunt in response.

    WATCH: ELISSA SLOTKIN SAYS SAVE AMERICA ACT WOULD MAKE IT ‘HARD FOR ANY DEMOCRAT’ TO WIN AN ELECTION

    A voter casts their ballot at a polling location inside McKinley Technology High School during a primary election in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, June 16, 2026. President Donald Trump threatened a federal government takeover of Washington, D.C., if self-described democratic socialist Janeese Lewis George wins the city’s Democratic mayoral primary.(Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    “This is CRAZY- imagine a world where you have to prove who you are,” said former White House press secretary Sean Spicer.

    “She needs to hang it up,” wrote Oversight Project vice president of litigation Jeff Clark.

    “Kamala Harris complains that if the SAVE America Act passes, people will have to prove who they are in order to register to vote,” wrote conservative commentator Benny Johnson.

    “Wonder why Kamala Harris thinks this is a bad thing,” posted Elon Musk’s political action committee America.

    “Kamala Harris on the SAVE Act: it would require Americans to ‘prove who you are’ to vote. Trump reposted her clip himself,” said Fox News anchor Sean Hannity.

    REPUBLICAN SAYS TRUMP’S TOP ELECTION PRIORITY ‘DEAD’ IN SENATE AS GOP FRACTURES AHEAD OF MIDTERMS

    President Donald Trump speaks in the East Room of the White House, Thursday, July 16, 2026, in Washington.(Saul Loeb/Pool via AP)

    Trump has warned about the need for voter ID laws for years, including from the 2016 campaign trail.

    With Congress out of session and the midterms approaching, Trump is continuing to push lawmakers to prioritize passage of the SAVE Act, keeping pressure on Republicans to act when they return to Washington.

    Democratic lawmakers have argued the SAVE Act would create unnecessary barriers for eligible voters, most notably potentially disenfranchising them.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Fourteen states and Washington, D.C., do not require most voters to present identification when voting in person.

    Ashley J. DiMella reports on politics for Fox News Digital.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6402261936112

  • 意大利警方称与贝卢斯科尼有关联的商人是记者炸弹袭击案主谋


    2026年8月10日 美国东部时间下午1:24 / 哥伦比亚广播公司/法新社

    意大利警方周一表示,一名与意大利前总理西尔维奥·贝卢斯科尼存在关联的商人,被指是去年针对该国顶尖调查记者的炸弹袭击事件的主谋。

    罗马宪兵队警方表示,他们已逮捕瓦尔特·拉维托拉,其被控策划了去年在记者西格里多·拉努奇家门外实施的袭击。据称两人是朋友。

    此次爆炸发生在罗马以南约12英里的波梅齐亚一处居民区,炸毁了拉努奇的两辆车。拉努奇以调查腐败和黑手党案件闻名,他的雇主当时表示,爆炸发生时他刚回到家,而他的女儿半小时前刚从那里走过。

    自2021年以来,拉努奇因调查报道尖锐强硬一直处于警方保护之下。他本人拍摄的视频显示了被严重损毁的车辆和大门。https://x.com/reportrai3/status/1978965437837697046

    意大利企业家瓦尔特·拉维托拉(右)被控策划了针对一名意大利记者的炸弹袭击。萨尔瓦多·拉波尔特/美联社 摄

    警方称,拉维托拉被控指使另一名男子塔瓦雷斯·戈麦斯·克莱西奥招募四名男子,在拉努奇家门前放置炸弹。这四名男子今年6月在那不勒斯附近因实施此次袭击被逮捕。

    警方仍在追捕戈麦斯。

    根据警方说法,拉维托拉和戈麦斯曾于9月对拉努奇的家进行过“初步侦察”。

    西格里多·拉努奇,意大利国家电视台调查类电视新闻节目《报道》的记者,2025年10月17日在罗马意大利广播电视公司总部阳台向支持者挥手。蒂齐亚纳·法比/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社 摄

    据当地媒体援引逮捕令文件内容,拉维托拉认为这次炸弹袭击可以在拉努奇可能涉足政坛前提升他的知名度。

    作为意大利国家电视台拉伊旗下每周播出的调查节目《报道》的知名主持人,拉努奇未被指控有任何不当行为,警方调查人员认为他对拉维托拉的计划毫不知情。

    拉努奇过往的调查曾涉及意大利黑手党和政治腐败等敏感议题,多年来一直处于警方保护之下。袭击发生次日,他对安莎通讯社表示,自己曾收到“数不胜数的威胁”。

    这位曾将拉维托拉描述为“真正的朋友”的记者在袭击中并未受伤。

    拉维托拉曾是记者,后转行做进出口生意,在罗马拥有一家餐厅,在意大利颇具知名度,与2023年去世的贝卢斯科尼关系密切。

    2015年,一家下级法院判定这位前总理犯有贿赂参议员罪,判处其三年监禁。同样被判处三年监禁的还有拉维托拉,检察官指控他向该议员转交了贿款。

    针对拉努奇的爆炸事件发生当天,正是马耳他调查记者达芙妮·卡鲁阿纳·加利西亚遭遇汽车炸弹暗杀八周年。加利西亚曾大量报道政治和商业圈疑似腐败事件。

    Italy police say businessman with ties to Berlusconi is mastermind behind journalist bomb attack

    August 10, 2026 1:24 PM EDT / CBS/AFP

    A businessman who had ties to former Italian premier Silvio Berlusconi is the alleged mastermind behind an October bomb attack against one of the country’s leading investigative journalists, police said on Monday.

    Rome’s Carabinieri police said they arrested Valter Lavitola for allegedly ordering the attack outside journalist Sigfrido Ranucci’s house last year. The two men are said to be friends.

    The blast in a residential neighborhood of Pomezia, about 12 miles south of Rome, destroyed two cars belonging to Ranucci, known for investigations into corruption and the mafia. Ranucci had just returned home at the time, and his daughter had walked by a half-hour before, his employer said at the time.

    Video shot by Ranucci, who has been under police protection since 2021 because of his hard-hitting investigations, showed the mangled remains of the cars and the gate. https://x.com/reportrai3/status/1978965437837697046

    Italian entrepreneur Valter Lavitola, right, is accused of being the mastermind behind a bomb attack targeting an Italian journalist. Salvatore Laporta/AP

    Lavitola is accused of instructing a second man, Tavares Gomes Clesio, to recruit four men to place the bomb in front of Ranucci’s home, police said. The four men were arrested near Naples in June for carrying out the attack.

    Police are still looking for Gomes.

    According to police, Lavitola and Gomes took part in an “initial exploratory inspection” outside of Ranucci’s home in September.

    Sigfrido Ranucci, Italian journalist for the investigative television news show “Report,” waves to supporters from a balcony of Italian TV broadcaster RAI in Rome on Oct. 17, 2025. TIZIANA FABI/AFP via Getty Images

    Lavitola thought the bombing would raise Ranucci’s profile ahead of a possible career in politics, authorities wrote in the arrest warrant, according to local media.

    Ranucci, the popular star of the weekly investigative show “Report” on state broadcaster Rai, is not accused of any wrongdoing and detectives believe he was unaware of Lavitola’s plans.

    Ranucci has taken on sensitive topics such as Italy’s mafia and political corruption in past investigations, and has lived under police protection for years. He told the ANSA news agency the day after the attack that he had received “an endless list of threats.”

    The journalist, who once described Lavitola as a “true friend,” was not injured in the attack.

    Lavitola, a former journalist and import-export businessman who owns a restaurant in Rome, is well known in Italy, having been close to Berlusconi, who died in 2023.

    In 2015, a lower court convicted the former prime minister of having bribed a senator, handing him a three-year sentence. The same sentence was given to Lavitola, whom prosecutors accused of having handed the cash to the lawmaker.

    The explosion targeting Ranucci occurred on the eighth anniversary of the car bomb slaying of Maltese investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia, who wrote extensively about suspected corruption in political and business circles.

  • 像奥卡西奥-科特兹这样的民主党人正试图摆脱他们的“觉醒”时代。这对我们的政治不利


    2026-08-10T17:24:43.491Z / https://www.cnn.com/2016/08/10/politics/aoc-woke-democrats

    民主党人非常想弄清楚如何为他们在2019年和2020年左右说过的一些极左翼言论找借口——那段时期常被称为“觉醒巅峰期”、“觉醒1.0版”或“觉醒1.0”。

    卡玛拉·哈里斯在2024年总统竞选期间就曾为此头疼不已(想想她的一些跨性别政策言论),而如今这一问题正笼罩着几场关键的2026年选举。

    周日,联邦众议员亚历山大·奥卡西奥-科特兹给出了一个解决方案:一笑了之。

    “我认识的一位市议会成员有句话:‘觉醒1.0太疯狂了’,”这位纽约州女议员在美国广播公司《本周》节目中说完后笑了起来。

    曾支持过“Defund the Police”(削减警方预算)运动的奥卡西奥-科特兹随后暗示,新冠疫情扩大了可接受的政治言论范围。但她表示,“如今我们不会再用那样的言论了。”

    这对奥卡西奥-科特兹和她那类人来说可能是一种政治上灵巧的解释,但对整个政治体来说却是糟糕的。这延续了一个令人不安的趋势:主要政党政客要求美国人不要按字面意思理解他们所说的话——或者更具体地说,不要按字面意思理解他们曾经说过的话。

    这正是诚实和问责制持续下滑的完美配方。

    奥卡西奥-科特兹的话引自纽约市议员奇·奥塞。今年5月,有批评者翻出了他2021年的一条评论,他当时的回应很简单:“觉醒1.0太疯狂了。”

    就在同一周,拜登政府前助手耶米西·埃格贝沃莱称赞得克萨斯州参议院候选人詹姆斯·塔拉里科与自己过去的觉醒言论划清界限。“觉醒巅峰期太离谱了。承认这一点没问题!”埃格贝沃莱说道。

    而本周末,或许是2026年民主党候选人中“觉醒巅峰期”问题最严重的一位,也呼应了奥卡西奥-科特兹的说法。

    弗兰西斯卡·洪是周二威斯康星州州长初选的热门候选人,但她过去关于废除警察、取消感恩节等言论,让许多民主党人对她获得提名感到担忧。

    “我在推特上发过一些过激言论、糟糕言论,但当你是一名新冠疫情期间经营餐厅的企业主,还是一名要付账单的学生时,你只是在向世界抒发情绪,”洪在接受《政客》采访时表示,“但我已经成长了,我学到了很多。”

    在《本周》节目中,共和党籍前新泽西州州长克里斯·克里斯蒂紧随奥卡西奥-科特兹之后登场,对她的解释提出了反驳。

    “听了这位女议员的话,大家为什么还要信任她?”克里斯蒂说道。他补充称,共和党人会“将奥卡西奥-科特兹和洪这类人职业生涯中说过的话——而不是他们如今试图顺势转变的形象——作为评判标准”。

    但平心而论,克里斯蒂在这个问题上并不是一个完美的说客。

    他不仅多次改变对唐纳德·特朗普总统的立场,还基本承认自己曾为了政治权宜之计发表过关于特朗普的言论。

    在全力反对特朗普并于2016年转而支持他之后,克里斯蒂解释道:“没错,我当时确实不同意唐纳德·特朗普。这太令人意外了。我当时在和他竞争……我当然不同意他的观点,因为我在和他竞选。”

    后来,克里斯蒂在2021年与特朗普决裂后,这位新泽西州共和党人试图否认自己曾对特朗普的赞扬,称他当时判断特朗普会成为共和党总统候选人,只想顺势而为。

    但远不止克里斯蒂一人。这已成为美国两党政治中的一种普遍现象。

    已故的共和党参议员林赛·格雷厄姆曾多次表示,他转向支持特朗普是为了推动政策落地,而非出于本心。“如果你了解我,就会知道这么做并不寻常,”他曾说道。

    副总统J·D·万斯在私人信息和公开言论中都将自己支持特朗普的立场归因于政治考量。2021年宣布竞选俄亥俄州参议员时,他告诉《时代》杂志:“如果我真的关心这些民众和我声称在意的事情,我就只能忍气吞声支持他。”

    国务卿马可·卢比奥曾解释过自己2016年称特朗普为“骗子”的言论,称“2016年参选时我并不了解他,也不了解他这个人。”

    2020年,哈里斯为自己攻击乔·拜登过去关于校车政策的言论辩解道:“那只是一场辩论。”当被问及这是否意味着她并非真心说出那些话时,哈里斯重复道:“那只是一场辩论”,并暗示在那种场合下,这类言论就是你该说的话。

    近年来最突出的例子是特朗普多年来对真相的攻击——以及他的支持者为其辩护的行为。当被指出他有数万条虚假和误导性言论时,一些盟友反复敦促人们要“认真对待”特朗普的话,而非“按字面意思理解”。

    这些言论的潜台词是,或许这些政客当时说那些话时并不是真心的——他们只是在说说而已。但随之而来的问题是:这是否也适用于他们如今所说的话?

    “认真而非较真”的说法对特朗普来说极为有利,因为他可以事后决定哪些言论是认真的,哪些只是为了达到政治效果而说的。

    但这种做法卸去了政客们作为公共利益谨慎管理者的责任——不再需要通过审慎审视议题来形成自己的立场这项艰苦工作。而且这几乎让问责制无从谈起。

    一旦问责制被抛诸脑后,美国人不再要求问责,政客们就会倾向于说出他们认为当时最有利于自己的话。

    在某种程度上,他们现在已经在这么做了。但将“五天前或五年前的言论可以被解释为来自另一个政治时刻的无关紧要的胡言乱语”这一逻辑正式化,听起来并不是个好主意。

    更好的做法是奖励那些有远见和智慧,能够秉持真实信念并坚持立场——且能经受住时间政治考验的政客。

    Democrats like AOC are trying to shrug off their ‘woke’ era. That’s bad for our politics

    2026-08-10T17:24:43.491Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/10/politics/aoc-woke-democrats

    Democrats would very much like to figure out how to explain away some of the far-left things they said circa 2019 and 2020 — a period often referred to as “peak woke,” “woke 1.0” or “woke 1.”

    Kamala Harris struggled with this during her 2024 presidential campaign (think: some transgender policies), and now it looms over some key 2026 races.

    Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Sunday offered a prescription: Laugh it off.

    “I have a local city councilman that has this saying: ‘Woke 1 was crazy,’” the New York congresswoman said on ABC’s “This Week,” before laughing.

    Ocasio-Cortez, who once supported defunding the police, went on to suggest Covid had expanded the range of acceptable political discourse. But she said that it’s “not rhetoric that we would use today.”

    This might be a politically deft explanation for Ocasio-Cortez and her ilk. But it’s a bad one for the body politic. It continues a troubling trend of major politicians asking Americans not to take the things they say — or more specifically, that they once said — at face value.

    It’s a perfect recipe for a continued decline in honesty and accountability.

    Ocasio-Cortez was quoting New York City Council Member Chi Ossé. Back in May, he responded to a critic who unearthed a 2021 comment of his by saying simply, “Woke 1 was crazyyyy.”

    The same week, former Biden White House aide Yemisi Egbewole credited Texas Senate candidate James Talarico for distancing himself from his past woke comments. “Peak woke got weird. It’s okay to say that!” Egbewole said.

    And this weekend, perhaps the one 2026 Democratic candidate with the biggest “peak woke” problem echoed Ocasio-Cortez’s comment.

    Francesca Hong is the favorite in Tuesday’s Wisconsin gubernatorial primary, but her past statements about abolishing police and canceling Thanksgiving, among others, have a lot of Democrats freaked out about her potential nomination.

    “I had some hot takes, some bad takes on Twitter, but when you’re a business owner running a restaurant during Covid, trying to pay bills as a student, you’re putting feelings out there into the world,” Hong told Politico. “But I’ve evolved, I’ve learned.”

    Appearing after Ocasio-Cortez on “This Week,” Republican former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie took exception to her explanation.

    “After listening to the congresswoman, why should anyone trust her?” Christie said. He added that Republicans would “hold people like” Ocasio-Cortez and Hong “to what they’ve said over their careers, not what they’re trying to conveniently evolve into now.”

    But Christie is, to put it lightly, an imperfect messenger on this.

    Not only has he repeatedly changed his stance on President Donald Trump, but he has basically acknowledged having said things about Trump for political expediency.

    After running hard against Trump and then embracing him in 2016, Christie explained: “Yes, I disagreed with Donald Trump at the time. Big shock. I was running against him. … Of course I disagreed with him, because I was running against him.”

    Then, after Christie broke with Trump in 2021, the New Jersey Republican tried to disown the compliments he paid to Trump by saying he reasoned Trump would be the GOP nominee, and that he wanted to make the best of the situation.

    But it’s hardly just Christie. This has become an epidemic in US politics, on both sides of the aisle.

    The late GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham had repeatedly suggested his pro-Trump conversion was about getting things accomplished rather than what he truly believed. “If you know anything about me, it’d be odd not to do this,” he said at one point.

    Vice President JD Vance in both private messages and public comments has cited political calculations for his Trump stances. He told Time magazine when launching his Ohio Senate campaign in 2021: “If I actually care about these people and the things I say I care about, I need to just suck it up and support him.”

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio has explained comments like calling Trump a “con man” in 2016 by saying, “I didn’t know him when I ran in 2016, didn’t know him as a person.”

    And in 2020, Harris explained her personal attacks on Joe Biden’s past position on busing by saying, “It was a debate.” When asked if that meant she didn’t mean what she said, Harris repeated, “It was a debate,” and suggested that those kinds of comments are what you say in that forum.

    The most prominent example of this in recent years is Trump’s years-long assault on the truth — and his supporters defense of it. When confronted with his tens of thousands of false and misleading claims, some allies have repeatedly urged people to take Trump “seriously” rather than “literally.”

    Implicit in these arguments is that maybe these politicians didn’t believe what they said in real time — that they were just saying stuff. But the question then becomes: Does that also apply to what they’re saying today?

    Seriously-not-literally is a great set up for Trump because he can decide retroactively which comments he meant and what he was just saying for political effect.

    But that arrangement removes the onus on politicians to be studied stewards of the public interest — to do the hard work of coming to their positions through a sober review of the issues. And it makes it virtually impossible to hold them accountable.

    And once that accountability is out the window and Americans no longer demand it, politicians are liable to say whatever they think is most advantageous at the time.

    That’s what they do now, to some extent. But formalizing a system where comments from five days or five years ago can be explained away as unimportant ramblings from another political moment feels like a bad idea.

    It would be better to reward politicians who have the foresight and wisdom to take positions that they actually believe in and can stick to — and can stand the political test of time.

  • 泰勒农场为何因沙门氏菌和环孢子虫暴发事件面临审查


    2026年8月10日 / 美国东部时间下午3:56 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    梅根·塞鲁洛 记者,MoneyWatch栏目

    泰勒农场——公共卫生官员已确认其为今夏大范围环孢子虫暴发事件的源头——如今又面临另一起严重的食品安全问题。

    这家位于加利福尼亚州萨利纳斯的农产品供应商近日召回了多款使用受怀疑感染沙门氏菌的哈雷派尼奥辣椒制作的食品。

    但食品安全咨询公司Food Safety Strategy创始人詹妮弗·麦金泰尔对两起召回事件做出了重要区分。此次因沙门氏菌风险被召回的多款辣椒制品(包括皮科德加洛莎莎酱和鳄梨酱)所使用的哈雷派尼奥辣椒,并非泰勒农场种植的。

    相比之下,自5月1日以来,导致全美数千例环孢子虫感染病例的生菜,正是由泰勒农场在墨西哥的工厂生产的。

    “哈雷派尼奥辣椒事件的情况截然不同。这些辣椒来自另一位种植者,由不同的进口商处理,并卖给了多家不同的企业,”麦金泰尔告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,她认为泰勒农场卷入哈雷派尼奥辣椒召回事件是“极其不幸的巧合”。

    “他们只是碰巧收到了这批辣椒,这让他们再次登上新闻头条,”她补充道。

    海岸柑橘分销公司向泰勒农场供应了此次被召回的辣椒,这些辣椒产自墨西哥锡那罗亚州的一位种植者,被用于制作即食食品,并分销至美国各地的大型杂货店,包括克罗格、塔吉特、Trader Joe’s、沃尔玛和全食超市。

    涉多种食品

    对消费者而言,鉴于生菜和哈雷派尼奥辣椒是美国人每日食用的约10亿餐中的常见食材,最新的食品安全担忧自然令人担忧。哈雷派尼奥辣椒可以整颗售卖,但最常作为配料出现在莎莎酱、墨西哥卷饼、鳄梨酱、蘸酱、沙拉及其他食品中。

    生菜也是美国人饮食中不可或缺的一部分,例如此次被召回的生菜曾用于塔可钟餐厅的餐食。两起召回事件都引发了消费者的恐慌,他们担心部分农产品不安全,或是不再信任旨在保障美国食品供应安全的体系。

    尽管麦金泰尔承认环孢子虫和沙门氏菌暴发事件引发了公共卫生担忧,但她表示美国的安全监测体系大体上是有效的,并总体上将美国的食品供应描述为“异常安全”。

    与此同时,公众对食品安全日益关注可能会推动行业变革,她说道。

    “食品安全一直是行业的首要关切,因为人们会生吃或未经烹饪就食用农产品,”麦金泰尔说。“但鉴于我们遇到的这些问题,肯定会有更多更重大的联合行动呼吁,让整个行业团结起来,不再是每个种植者各自为战。农产品行业中,一家企业的问题会演变成全行业的问题,因此预计会出现更多围绕协作和信息共享的新举措。”

    她补充道,整个行业“都会有极强的动力确保不会出现任何薄弱环节”。

    泰勒农场的食品安全历史如何?

    泰勒农场曾多次卷入此前的食品安全调查和召回事件。

    据美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)消息,2024年,该公司供应的用于麦当劳四分之一磅汉堡的切片洋葱感染了大肠杆菌,导致1人死亡、100多人患病。FDA在该泰勒农场的一家供货工厂发现了数十项违规行为,包括设备肮脏。

    2020年,泰勒农场也曾因第三方供应商的产品可能受沙门氏菌污染,召回了多款含有洋葱的食品。

    阿兰·谢特 编辑

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/taylor-farms-voluntarily-recalls-products-with-jalapenos/

    Why Taylor Farms is facing scrutiny over salmonella and cyclospora outbreaks

    August 10, 2026 / 3:56 PM EDT / CBS News

    By Megan Cerullo Reporter, MoneyWatch

    Taylor Farms, whose lettuce public health officials have identified as the source of this summer’s widespread cyclosporiasis outbreak, now faces another serious food safety issue.

    The Salinas, California, produce supplier recently recalled several food items made with jalapeños suspected of being contaminated with salmonella.

    But Jennifer McEntire, founder of food safety consulting firm Food Safety Strategy, drew an important distinction between the two recalls. Taylor Farms did not grow the jalapeños used to make a variety of pepper-based products, including pico de gallo salsa and guacamole, that it has now recalled due to salmonella risks.

    By contrast, Taylor Farms’ Mexican operation is known to have produced the lettuce that has caused thousands of cases of cyclosporiasis across the U.S. since May 1.

    “The issue with jalapeños is very, very different. The jalapeños came from a separate grower, handled by a different importer that sold them to a number of different entities,” McEntire told CBS News, noting that she views Taylor Farms’ involvement in the jalapeño recall as “an extremely unfortunate coincidence.”

    “They happened to receive these jalapeños, so it puts them in the news once again,” she added.

    Coast Citrus Distributors supplied the recalled peppers to Taylor Farms, which used them in some of its prepared foods. The peppers, which came from a grower in Sinaloa, Mexico, were used in products distributed to major grocers across the U.S., including Kroger, Target, Trader Joe’s, Walmart and Whole Foods.

    Found in many foods

    For consumers, of course, the latest food safety concerns can be alarming given that lettuce and jalapeño peppers are used in many of the roughly 1 billion meals Americans consume daily. Jalapeños can be sold whole, but are most often consumed as an ingredient in salsa, burritos, guacamole, dips, salads and other products.

    Lettuce is also an integral part of Americans’ diets, with the recalled product making its way into meals served at Taco Bell restaurants, for example. Both recalls have caused alarm among consumers who fear some produce is unsafe to consume, or who no longer trust the systems designed to keep the nation’s food supply safe.

    Although McEntire acknowledged the public health concerns amid the cyclosporiasis and salmonella outbreaks, she said U.S. safety monitoring systems are largely effective and more broadly described the nation’s food supply as “remarkably safe.”

    At the same time, the mounting public focus on food safety could spur industry changes, she said.

    “Food safety has always been the industry’s main concern because people eat produce fresh or raw,” McEntire said. “But given the issues we’ve encountered, there will absolutely be some bigger calls to action to bring the industry together, so it’s not each grower on their own. One person’s issue becomes everyone’s in the produce industry, so expect new efforts around collaboration and sharing of information.”

    The entire industry, she added, “will be highly motivated to make sure there is no weak link.”

    What is Taylor Farms’ history of food safety?

    Taylor Farms has been connected to several previous food safety investigations and recalls.

    In 2024, the company supplied sliced onions served on McDonald’s Quarter Pounders that were contaminated with E. coli, leading to one death and more than 100 illnesses, according to the FDA. The FDA found dozens of violations at a Taylor Farms facility that supplied the onions, including dirty equipment.

    In 2020, Taylor Farms also recalled several onion-containing products from a third-party supplier due to concerns that they could be contaminated with Salmonella.

    Edited by Alain Sherter

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/taylor-farms-voluntarily-recalls-products-with-jalapenos/

  • 特朗普前律师:埃米尔·博夫法官在白宫为司法部长托德·布兰奇主持就职仪式


    2026-08-10T18:43:24.551Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:汉娜·拉宾诺维茨

    44分钟前发布
    发布于 2026年8月10日,美国东部时间下午2:43

    image
    前总统唐纳德·特朗普的律师埃米尔·博夫(左)与托德·布兰奇于2024年9月5日在华盛顿参加听证会结束后离开美国联邦法院。何塞·路易斯·马加尼亚/美联社摄

    托德·布兰奇于周一在椭圆形办公室的就职仪式上宣誓就任司法部长,主持仪式的是他曾在唐纳德·特朗普辩护团队共事过的同事——埃米尔·博夫法官。

    此次就职仪式不允许媒体进入。布兰奇的家人,包括妻子、女儿和孙女出席了仪式。布兰奇在周一从司法部前往白宫时告诉CNN,他“心情不错”。

    博夫与布兰奇的过往渊源,以及博夫本人在司法部的经历,使得他在此次仪式中扮演的角色备受关注。

    在他与布兰奇共同为特朗普辩护之后,两人都被任命为司法部高级职位。2025年布兰奇获得确认任命之前,博夫曾担任代理副司法部长,之后成为布兰奇的首席副手。他目前担任联邦上诉法院法官。

    在司法部任职期间,博夫很快就获得了特朗普“打手”的名声,牵头发动了首轮大规模驱逐职业检察官和其他部门官员的行动。其中一个引人注目的事件是,博夫解雇了纽约和华盛顿特区的几名检察官,这些检察官拒绝在撤销对前纽约市市长埃里克·亚当斯腐败指控的法庭文件上签字。

    唐纳德·特朗普总统于2025年5月提名博夫担任美国第三巡回上诉法院法官。他的确认听证会期间,民主党议员多次指控博夫是当时司法部内部最具政治性行动的幕后推手,包括无视法官裁决、施压检察官推进总统个人议程的行动。

    联邦调查局局长卡什·帕特尔以及负责政策的白宫副幕僚长斯蒂芬·米勒也出席了此次就职仪式。

    布兰奇于周六凌晨以50票赞成、49票反对的参议院投票结果确认出任司法部长。两名共和党参议员苏珊·柯林斯与丽莎·默科夫斯基与民主党人一同反对了这项提名。

    布兰奇在重塑司法部使其更贴合总统议程方面发挥了关键作用。他提出了扩大总统权力、加强对总统职位保护的法律论点,监督了对资深检察官和长期任职官员的大规模解雇行动,并牵头制定了一项法律策略,使得全美各地的法官开始对司法部的决定提出质疑。

    Trump’s former lawyers: Judge Emil Bove swears in Attorney General Todd Blanche at the White House

    2026-08-10T18:43:24.551Z / CNN

    By Hannah Rabinowitz

    44 min ago

    PUBLISHED Aug 10, 2026, 2:43 PM ET

    Former President Donald Trump attorneys Emil Bove, left, and Todd Blanche leave the U.S. Federal Courthouse, after a hearing, Sep. 5, 2024, in Washington.

    Jose Luis Magana/AP

    Todd Blanche was sworn in as attorney general on Monday in an Oval Office ceremony led by his former Donald Trump defense-team colleague, Judge Emil Bove.

    The swearing-in was held without press access. Blanche’s family members, including his wife, daughter and granddaughter, attended. Blanche told CNN he was “feeling good” as he left the Justice Department Monday for the White House.

    Bove’s history with Blanche — and at the Justice Department — make his role in the ceremony notable.

    After he and Blanche worked together on Trump’s defense, both were appointed to senior positions within the Justice Department. Bove was acting deputy attorney general before Blanche was confirmed in 2025, then Blanche’s top deputy. He now serves as federal appeals court judge.

    At the department, Bove quickly earned a reputation as Trump’s hatchet man, leading the first waves of mass ousting’s of career prosecutors and other department officials. In one notable episode, Bove axed several prosecutors in New York and Washington, DC, who refused to sign their names to court documents dropping corruption charges against former New York City Mayor Eric Adams.

    President Donald Trump nominated Bove to the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals in May 2025. His confirmation hearings were rife with allegations from Democratic lawmakers that Bove was behind the most political efforts inside the department at the time, including efforts to ignore judge’s rulings and to pressure prosectors to move forward with the president’s personal agenda.

    FBI Director Kash Patel and Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff for policy, also attended the swearing in.

    Blanche was confirmed as attorney general early Saturday morning in a 50–49 Senate vote. Two GOP senators, Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, joined Democrats in opposing the nomination.

    Blanche has played a key role in reshaping the Justice Department to align more closely with the president’s agenda. He has advanced legal arguments that expand presidential authority and strengthen protections for the presidency and overseen large-scale firings of experienced prosecutors and longtime officials, and spearheaded a legal strategy that has made judges across the nation question the department’s decisions.

  • 美国南部一州跻身全球发展最快行业榜首


    2026年8月10日 美国东部时间上午8:00 / 福克斯新闻频道

    德克萨斯州在高纬环球(Cushman & Wakefield)2026年排名中包揽所有类别榜首,总装机容量或最终赶超弗吉尼亚州

    作者:阿曼达·马西亚斯 福克斯新闻
    发布于 2026年8月10日 上午8:00 美国东部时间 | 更新于 2026年8月10日 上午8:34 美国东部时间

    人工智能专家警告:数据中心激增带来电网挑战

    人工智能基础设施联盟联合主席加勒特·格雷夫斯谈及德克萨斯州人工智能数据中心的大规模激增及其带来的电网挑战。格雷夫斯就州长格雷格·阿博特暂停新项目、等待全州电网审计一事发表看法。

    【新增】您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/b3642d69-5e23-46a8-a0b0-b98a23006c69

    收听本文
    3分钟

    达拉斯——北德克萨斯州击败了全球多个顶尖数据中心枢纽,在最新全球排名中登顶,德克萨斯州在该行业的影响力也日益增强。

    全球商业地产服务公司高纬环球发布的《2026年全球数据中心市场对比报告》显示,达拉斯位列全球第一。这个孤星之州在所有分类中都表现亮眼,奥斯汀-圣安东尼奥和西德克萨斯也在各自所属类别中排名第一。

    该排名凸显出,随着企业纷纷寻找支持人工智能及其他计算业务所需的土地和电力资源,德克萨斯州迅速成为数据中心开发的热门选址地。高纬环球表示,该州的发展速度有望最终赶上甚至超越弗吉尼亚州——后者是全球运营装机容量最大的数据中心市场。

    美国最老牌制造商之一称人工智能正在创造就业——而非取代岗位

    随着企业为满足日益严苛的计算需求寻求更多空间、电力和基础设施,人工智能热潮正加速推动德克萨斯州的数据中心需求。(布兰登·贝尔/盖蒂图片社)

    达拉斯并非全球最大的数据中心市场。尽管达拉斯排名第一,但按已投入运营的装机容量计算,弗吉尼亚州仍是全球最大的数据中心市场。

    不过,高纬环球的排名并非单纯考量现有规模,而是评估行业未来增长潜力。这家商业地产服务公司从电力和土地供应、在建项目、现有基础设施以及监管环境等多个维度,对全球107个市场进行了对比评估。

    报告显示,达拉斯的规划中数据中心开发项目规模位列全球第三,仅次于弗吉尼亚州和亚特兰大。而这类开发项目正遍及德克萨斯州各地。

    高纬环球指出,数据中心开发活动已从成熟的达拉斯-沃斯堡市场向外扩散,企业正寻找支撑人工智能及其他计算业务所需的大片土地和电力资源。按当前发展速度,德克萨斯州的总数据中心装机容量有望最终赶上或超越弗吉尼亚州。

    报告称,德克萨斯州在这场竞争中拥有多项优势,包括充足的土地资源、友好的营商环境、独立且解除管制的电网,以及开发激励政策。

    这种快速发展也引起了政界关注,德克萨斯州州长格雷格·阿博特要求数据中心提供更多自备电力,并承担基础设施成本,以应对全州范围内加速的开发项目。

    德克萨斯州州长阿博特暂停新数据中心项目,等待全州电网审计

    包括州长格雷格·阿博特在内的德克萨斯州官员一直致力于将该州打造成大型数据中心开发的热门选址地,同时官员们也在应对新项目可能给电网带来的压力。(杰伊·詹纳/《奥斯汀美国政治家报》通过盖蒂图片社)

    这种发展规模也给德克萨斯州的资源带来了压力。

    西德克萨斯州和潘汉德尔地区的水资源供应正成为担忧焦点,而新数据中心所需的海量电力也让人们更加关注该州的电力供应状况。德克萨斯州还出台了新规定,要求部分大型电力用户分摊基础设施成本,并说明其对电网可靠性的影响。

    电力供应不足是全行业普遍面临的问题。

    高纬环球表示,如今电力已成为企业选址时的首要考量因素,公用事业公司平均需要4.4年才能将大型新项目接入电网。这种等待时长促使部分开发商自行获取或发电。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    德克萨斯州的数据中心开发热潮正愈演愈烈,北德克萨斯州在该行业领先市场的最新全球排名中登顶。(米卡拉·康普顿/《奥斯汀美国政治家报》/盖蒂图片社)

    德克萨斯州或许已经拥有全球排名第一的数据中心市场,但能否保持领先地位,将取决于该州能否为未来的发展提供足够电力。

    阿曼达·马西亚斯报道商业、经济与政治的交叉领域,重点关注政策决策如何塑造市场、企业和美国工人。

    A Southern state just took the top spot in one of the world’s fastest-growing industries

    August 10, 2026 8:00am EDT / Fox News

    Texas swept all categories in Cushman & Wakefield’s 2026 ranking and could eventually surpass Virginia in total capacity

    By Amanda Macias Fox News

    Published August 10, 2026 8:00am EDT | Updated August 10, 2026 8:34am EDT

    AI expert warns of power grid challenges as data centers surge

    AI Infrastructure Coalition’s co-chair Garret Graves discusses the massive surge in AI data centers in Texas and the power grid challenges they present. Graves reacts to Governor Greg Abbott pausing new projects pending a grid audit.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/b3642d69-5e23-46a8-a0b0-b98a23006c69

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    DALLAS – North Texas has beaten some of the world’s biggest data center hubs to claim the No. 1 spot in a new global ranking, as Texas becomes an increasingly powerful player in the industry.

    Dallas ranked No. 1 in the 2026 Global Data Center Market Comparison by Cushman & Wakefield, a global commercial real estate services firm. The Lone Star State made a strong showing across the board, with Austin-San Antonio and West Texas also ranking first in their respective categories.

    The rankings underscore how quickly Texas has become a major destination for data center development as companies search for the land and electricity needed to support artificial intelligence and other computing. Cushman & Wakefield said the state is growing at a pace that could eventually match, or surpass, Virginia, the world’s largest data center market by operating capacity.

    ONE OF AMERICA’S OLDEST MANUFACTURERS SAYS AI IS CREATING JOBS — NOT REPLACING THEM

    The AI boom is accelerating demand for data centers across Texas as companies seek more space, power and infrastructure to support increasingly intensive computing needs.(Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

    Dallas isn’t the world’s largest data center market. Despite Dallas’ No. 1 ranking, Virginia remains the world’s largest data center market based on the amount of capacity already in operation.

    Cushman & Wakefield’s ranking, however, looks beyond sheer size to where the industry is positioned to grow. The commercial real estate services firm compared 107 markets on factors including access to power and land, projects under construction, existing infrastructure and the regulatory environment.

    Dallas has one of the largest pipelines of planned data center development, trailing only Virginia and Atlanta, according to the report. And that development is spreading across Texas.

    Cushman & Wakefield said activity has pushed outward from the long-established Dallas-Fort Worth market as companies search for vast amounts of land and electricity needed to support AI and other computing. At the current pace, the firm said Texas could eventually match or surpass Virginia in total data center capacity.

    Texas has several advantages in that race, including abundant land, a business-friendly environment, an independent and deregulated power grid and incentives for development, according to the report.

    The rapid growth has also drawn political attention, with Texas Gov. Greg Abbott pressing data centers to provide more of their own power and cover infrastructure costs as development accelerates across the state.

    TEXAS GOV. ABBOTT EFFECTIVELY PAUSES NEW DATA CENTER PROJECTS PENDING STATEWIDE GRID AUDIT

    Texas leaders, including Gov. Greg Abbott, have sought to position the state as a destination for large-scale data center development even as officials grapple with the strain new projects could place on the electric grid.(Jay Janner/The Austin American-Statesman via Getty Images)

    The scale of that growth is also putting pressure on Texas’ resources.

    Water availability is becoming a concern in West Texas and the Panhandle, while the enormous amount of electricity needed for new data centers is putting greater focus on the state’s power supply. Texas has also adopted new rules requiring some large electricity users to share infrastructure costs and account for their impact on grid reliability.

    Finding enough power is an industry-wide problem.

    Cushman & Wakefield said electricity is now the top consideration when companies choose where to build, with utilities taking an average of 4.4 years to connect large new projects to the grid. Those waits are prompting some developers to secure or generate power themselves.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Data center development is surging across Texas, with North Texas taking the top spot in a new global ranking of the industry’s leading markets.(Mikala Compton/The Austin American-Statesman/Getty Images)

    Texas may already be home to the world’s top-ranked data center market, but staying on top could come down to whether the state can provide enough power for what comes next.

    Amanda Macias covers the intersection of business, economics and politics, with a focus on how policy decisions shape markets, businesses and American workers.

  • 民主党人抨击梅斯称所有在职穆斯林都是“特洛伊木马”


    2026年8月10日 美国东部时间上午9:02 / 福克斯新闻

    民主党众议员普拉米拉·贾亚帕尔称梅斯的言论“令人作呕且危险”
    作者:亚历克斯·尼茨伯格 福克斯新闻

    福克斯新闻8月10日头条速览
    福克斯新闻头条速览已上线。请登录FoxNews.com查看当前热点新闻。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/11e211eb-06bc-4ccb-a6bf-2e9c8afe1d39

    收听本文
    2分钟

    南卡罗来纳州共和党众议员南希·梅斯声称,美国所有穆斯林公职人员都对国家构成威胁。
    “美国每一位担任公职的穆斯林都是特洛伊木马,对国家安全和我们的共和国构成威胁,”梅斯在周五的X平台帖子中宣称。“我们拒绝保持沉默。”

    华盛顿州民主党众议员普拉米拉·贾亚帕尔谴责了梅斯的言论,并坚称共和党人也应如此。


    埃尔-赛义德吹嘘获牧师背书,该牧师曾称犹太人为“白蚁”,声名狼藉

    南卡罗来纳州共和党众议员南希·梅斯2026年3月3日在华盛顿特区美国国会大厦参加特朗普政府官员针对众议院议员就美国对伊朗打击情况的简报会后向记者发言。(内森·波斯纳/安多鲁通讯社 盖蒂图片社)

    “这绝对令人作呕且危险。共和党人必须谴责这种赤裸裸的伊斯兰恐惧症。对于美国各地的穆斯林社群:我将永远与你们站在一起,”贾亚帕尔在周六的X平台帖子中写道。

    梅斯在回复贾亚帕尔的部分帖子中写道:“必须对抗伊斯兰教,必须将伊斯兰教从美国公民社会中清除。”


    曾在国会前主持祈祷的伊玛目庆祝格雷厄姆去世后面临正式谴责

    华盛顿州民主党众议员普拉米拉·贾亚帕尔2026年4月15日在华盛顿特区国会山参加众议院预算委员会听证会。(阿尔·德雷尔/彭博社 盖蒂图片社)

    正在旧金山参选美国众议院议员的加利福尼亚州州议员斯科特·威纳写道:“南希·梅斯又一次陷入妖魔化穆斯林的歧途,主张剥夺他们的完整公民权。她是个卑劣之人。”

    英国男子欧文·琼斯在X平台简介中自称“社会主义者、反法西斯主义者、多平台作家”,他转发了梅斯的帖子并在周六的帖子中写道:“这是一位共和党女众议员。如果她用这番言论针对犹太裔美国人,她会被立刻视为彻头彻尾的纳粹。美国的伊斯兰恐惧症正失控蔓延。”

    梅斯转发了琼斯的帖子并在周日写道:“如果不想在美国被激进伊斯兰分子炸伤、刺伤或驾车撞击就被称为伊斯兰恐惧症患者,那随它去吧。”


    民主党人因缺席针对美国境内隐藏激进组织的关键听证会陷入窘境:“丢人现眼”

    南卡罗来纳州共和党众议员南希·梅斯2025年12月10日抵达华盛顿特区美国国会大厦。(安德鲁·哈恩/盖蒂图片社)

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    自2021年起任职于美国众议院的梅斯,今年在南卡罗来纳州共和党州长初选中失利。

    亚历克斯·尼茨伯格是福克斯新闻数字频道撰稿人。

    Dems hammer Mace for saying all Muslims in public office are ‘a trojan horse’

    August 10, 2026 9:02am EDT / Fox News

    Democratic Rep Pramila Jayapal labels Mace’s comments ‘disgusting and dangerous’

    By Alex Nitzberg Fox News

    Fox News Flash top headlines for August 10

    Fox News Flash top headlines are here. Check out what’s clicking on FoxNews.com.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/11e211eb-06bc-4ccb-a6bf-2e9c8afe1d39

    Listen to this article

    2 min

    Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., asserted that all Muslim public servants in the U.S. pose a threat to the nation.

    “Every single Muslim holding public office in America is a trojan horse, and a threat to both national security and our republic,” Mace declared in a Friday post on X. “We refuse to be silent.”

    Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., condemned Mace’s comments and insisted that Republicans should do so as well.

    EL-SAYED TOUTS ENDORSEMENT FROM PASTOR WHO PRAISED NOTORIOUS ANTISEMITE INFAMOUS FOR CALLING JEWS ‘TERMITES’

    Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., speaks to reporters following a briefing by Trump administration officials to members of the House on U.S. strikes on Iran, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on March 3, 2026.(Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)

    “This is absolutely disgusting and dangerous. Republicans must denounce this blatant Islamophobia. To Muslim communities across America: I will always stand with you,” Jayapal wrote in a Saturday post on X.

    Mace, in part of a post replying to Jayapal, wrote, “Islam must be confronted and Islam must be removed from civil society in the US.”

    IMAM WHO PRAYED BEFORE CONGRESS FACES FORMAL REBUKE AFTER CELEBRATING GRAHAM’S DEATH

    Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., speaks during a House Budget Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, April 15, 2026.(Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    California state Sen. Scott Wiener, who is running for the U.S. House in San Francisco, wrote, “Nancy Mace is on yet another bender demonizing Muslims and advocating to strip them of full citizenship. She is a vile person.”

    Owen Jones, a British man who describes himself on X as a “Socialist, antifascist, writer in various places,” shared Mace’s post and wrote in a Saturday post, “This is a Republican Congresswoman. If she spoke like this about Jewish Americans, she would right be regarded as a loud-and-proud Nazi. Islamophobia is spiralling out of control in the US.”

    Mace shared Jones’ post and wrote on Sunday, “If not wanting to be blown up, stabbed, or rammed by a car by a radical Islamist in the United States of America makes us Islamophobes, then so be it.”

    DEMS IN THE HOT SEAT FOR SKIPPING CRUCIAL HEARING ON RADICAL GROUP HIDING IN US: ‘EMBARRASSMENT’

    Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., arrives at the U.S. Capitol Building on Dec. 10, 2025 in Washington, D.C.(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Mace, who has served in the U.S. House of Representatives since 2021, ran unsuccessfully in the Republican South Carolina gubernatorial primary this year.

    Alex Nitzberg is a writer for Fox News Digital.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2