博客

  • 美国监管机构将对邮寄投票规则举报人警告展开审查


    2026-09-08T18:32:23.97Z / 路透社

    作者:戴维·谢泼德森
    2026年9月8日 世界标准时间18:32 更新于16分钟前

    [1/3]2026年5月19日在美国宾夕法尼亚州费城拍摄的资料插画照片展示了宾夕法尼亚州初选期间的一张邮寄选票。路透社/汉娜·比尔/插画/资料照片

    华盛顿9月8日路透电 – 美国邮政总局监察长办公室周二表示,计划对一名举报人的指控展开独立审查。该举报人警告称,美国邮政总局拟议的邮寄投票限制措施可能导致数千张合法选票被弃置。

    周五,波士顿一名联邦法官延长禁令,阻止唐纳德·特朗普政府实施美国邮政总局的新规则。该规则将在11月国会选举前收紧邮寄投票要求。

    路透社每日简报通讯为您提供开启一天所需的全部新闻。点击此处订阅。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    上周,唐纳德·特朗普政府向最高法院提出申请,要求允许其强制执行美国邮政总局关于邮寄选票使用的新规则。

    议员们敦促美国邮政总局暂停制定新的邮寄投票规则,称这些规则威胁到11月国会选举的公正性。他们援引一名举报人的警告称,美国邮政总局计划中的“核验”系统“有可能导致缺席投票系统崩溃,剥夺数百万美国人的投票权”。

    美国邮政总局的新规将引入针对特定选民的数据和选票信封新标准,并可能拒收不符合要求的选票。批评人士称,随着11月3日选举临近,这可能扰乱数千张合法选票的统计。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    共和党人正为保住国会控制权展开激烈角逐。批评人士表示,限制邮寄投票将 disproportionately 令共和党受益,因为民主党选民历来更倾向于使用邮寄选票。

    根据美国邮政总局的新规则,各州必须向邮政服务机构提供邮寄选票收件人名单,并使用经该局批准的、带有独特条形码的寄出和寄回选票信封。邮政服务机构随后可拒收不符合新标准的选票,或与不在名单上的选民相关的选票。

    blob:https://www.reuters.com/9d221c87-cab7-40f6-8e91-902fcb6bfcdc

    戴维·谢泼德森报道;奥罗拉·埃利斯编辑

    我们的准则:汤森路透信托原则

    US watchdog to conduct review of whistleblower warning on mail-in voting rules

    2026-09-08T18:32:23.97Z / Reuters

    By David Shepardson

    September 8, 2026 6:32 PM UTC Updated 16 mins ago

    [1/3]A mail-in ballot, during the Pennsylvania primary election, is displayed in this illustration picture taken in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S., May 19, 2026. REUTERS/Hannah Beier/Illustration/File Photo

    WASHINGTON, Sept 8 (Reuters) – The U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General said on Tuesday it plans ​to conduct an independent review of allegations from a whistleblower ‌who has warned proposed USPS mail-in voting restrictions could result in thousands of legal ballots being discarded.

    On Friday, a federal judge in Boston extended a ban ​stopping President Donald Trump’s administration from implementing a new USPS ​rule that would tighten mail-in voting requirements ahead of the ⁠November congressional elections.

    The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Last week, President Donald Trump’s administration asked the Supreme Court ​to let it enforce the new USPS rule on use of mail-in ​ballots.

    Lawmakers have urged USPS to halt work on new mail-in voting rules, saying they threaten the integrity of the November congressional elections. They cited a whistleblower who ​warned that USPS’ planned “verification” systems “risk collapsing the absentee ballot system and ​disenfranchising millions of Americans.”

    The USPS regulation would impose new voter-specific data and ballot ‌envelope ⁠standards, and potentially refuse the delivery of ballots that do not comply, which critics say could disrupt thousands of legitimate votes as the November 3 vote approaches.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Republicans are locked in a tight battle to retain control ​of Congress in ​the elections. Critics ⁠say restricting mail-in ballots would disproportionately benefit Republicans given that Democratic voters traditionally have been more likely ​to use mail-in ballots.

    Under the new USPS rule, states must ​provide ⁠lists of mail ballot recipients to the postal service and use agency-approved outbound and return ballot mail envelopes outfitted with unique barcodes. The postal ⁠service ​could then refuse to send out ballots ​that do not comply with the new standards or are associated with voters who do ​not appear on the lists.

    blob:https://www.reuters.com/9d221c87-cab7-40f6-8e91-902fcb6bfcdc

    Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Aurora Ellis

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 记者手记:民主党反叛者撕开杰弗里斯众议院领导层裂痕


    哈基姆·杰弗里斯与民主党领导层称这一突袭行为是“严重的信任破坏”,需要严肃应对

    2026年9月8日 美国东部时间下午2:13 / 福克斯新闻
    作者:查德·珀格拉姆

    两名众议院民主党议员脱离本党,投票推进共和党提案
    众议院民主党议员贾里德·戈尔登和玛丽·格卢森坎普·佩雷斯在叛党与共和党议员就关键提案投票后,面临党内强烈反对。福克斯新闻首席国会通讯员查德·珀格拉姆报道了国会山引发的政治余波,领导层称此举破坏了信任。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/837e9c98-b36a-4517-872e-2bf453e4919e

    收听本文
    8分钟

    缅因州民主党众议员贾里德·戈尔登明年可能会退出国会,他在民主党同僚中的口碑绝非光鲜。
    华盛顿州民主党众议员玛丽·格卢森坎普·佩雷斯正在竞争连任,其所在选区竞争激烈。但如果她在1月重返国会山,一些同僚可能会认为“MGP”(格卢森坎普·佩雷斯的昵称)声名狼藉。

    众议院再次休会,直至9月14日。此前众议院已在夏季休会六周。但如果没有戈尔登和格卢森坎普·佩雷斯,众议院共和党领导层几天前可能别无选择,只能让议员们提前返乡。这两名议员做出了近乎议会异端的举动,为共和党在程序性事务上提供了必要票数,从而为多数党解锁了议会 floor(议事场地)。

    共和党单靠自己的票数无法做到这一点——若非戈尔登和格卢森坎普·佩雷斯出手相助。

    杰弗里斯在民主党人助共和党推进反社会主义投票后威胁“严肃回应”

    众议员玛丽·格卢森坎普·佩雷斯和贾里德·戈尔登是投票谴责众议员耶稣“奇伊”·加西亚的民主党人之一,尽管众议院民主党领导层曾敦促他们不要这么做。(比尔·克拉克/CQ-滚呼公司 via 盖蒂图片社;索尔·勒布/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社;格雷姆·斯隆/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    然而,最具分裂性的背叛在于,两人都未就其计划投票事宜向民主党领导层通报。两党国会领导层都对偏离本党路线的议员感到不满。尤其是在程序性投票中,这几乎总是多数党的责任。但至少,领导层希望提前知情。如果他们了解背后的原因,可能会放过某人。

    “他们有没有提前告诉你他们打算在该规则投票中支持共和党?”福克斯新闻的凯利·费尔斯询问众议院少数党党鞭马萨诸塞州民主党众议员凯瑟琳·克拉克。
    “没有。他们让我们措手不及,”克拉克回答道。

    笔者曾对纽约州民主党众议员蒂姆·肯尼迪说,在政坛中,“正面捅刀”总比“背后捅刀”要好。
    “这话很有道理,”肯尼迪回应道。

    我们先来看看戈尔登和格卢森坎普·佩雷斯的异议性质。
    众议院的大多数主要立法提案都需要所谓的“规则”,之后议会才能就该法案进行辩论。众议院必须先辩论并通过一项“规则”,规定辩论时长和可接受的修正案类型。众议院只有先批准一项规则,才能就法案进行辩论。除极少数情况外,多数党预计将推动该规则通过。这几乎是少数党极少会协助的事项——除非在极端情况下。

    上周,众议院计划就一项谴责社会主义的决议进行辩论,批准《拯救美国法案》,维持最高法院大法官人数为9人,并审议一项帮助美国龙虾产业的计划。众议院以210票对208票通过了该规则。但有5名共和党议员投了反对票。

    这关乎票数计算。
    这些共和党议员的倒戈本会导致该规则被否决,并让议会在本周剩余时间陷入停滞。事实上,这次投票可能迫使众议院共和党领导层让所有议员离开国会山。众议院当时正陷入停滞,无法审议任何立法事务。

    众议院听证会爆发紧张局势,共和党推进反社会主义决议,民主党愤怒抨击:“愚蠢季”

    众议员史蒂夫·斯卡利斯(右)和议长迈克·约翰逊(左)于2026年6月30日在华盛顿特区国会山出席新闻发布会。(格雷姆·斯隆/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    但戈尔登和格卢森坎普·佩雷斯投了赞成票,为本周剩余时间解锁了议会议事场地。

    民主党人对同僚突袭他们的行为怒不可遏。
    “这两名投票推进程序性法案的民主党人做得不对,”肯尼迪说。

    众议院少数党领袖纽约州民主党众议员哈基姆·杰弗里斯、克拉克和众议院民主党核心小组主席加利福尼亚州民主党众议员皮特·阿吉拉尔罕见地联合发表声明,谴责这两名持异议议员。他们将此次反叛定性为“严重的信任破坏”,并补充称这“需要严肃应对”。

    “投票反对本党核心小组是错误的。我们必须团结一致,”宾夕法尼亚州民主党众议员玛德琳·迪恩说。

    戈尔登表示,他投票支持共和党是为了让众议院能够通过保护缅因州龙虾产业的法案。
    “这关乎保护这些男性和女性所支持的工薪阶层社区。在我的选区,龙虾捕捞是沿海各城镇的支柱产业,”戈尔登说。“在一些城镇,20%至40%的居民持有龙虾捕捞执照。”

    政治观察人士认为,这场内讧对民主党在11月的选举来说是一步错棋。

    “作为议员,你应该能够与领导层沟通你的投票意向,”内华达州民主党众议员苏西·李说。“有些环节在过程中被遗漏了。”

    虽然一些议员将矛头指向戈尔登和格卢森坎普·佩雷斯,但也有人认为这是杰弗里斯的过错。还有人将其归咎于克拉克。仍有人将此事归咎于整个领导层团队。

    前众议院议长加利福尼亚州共和党议员凯文·麦卡锡对自己的议员削弱他的情况深有体会。共和党人在近三年前剥夺了麦卡锡的议长职位。但这位加利福尼亚州共和党人认为,戈尔登和格卢森坎普·佩雷斯的问题出在杰弗里斯身上。
    “你本应知道会有5到8名民主党人利用这次投票,”麦卡锡说。“你本应主动联系他们。”

    一位前民主党助手指出,问题甚至不在于杰弗里斯、克拉克和阿吉拉尔的声明内容。而是发布声明这一事实本身。前众议院议长加利福尼亚州民主党议员南希·佩洛西绝不会发布这样的声明。她的领导权是隐性的。每个人都知道不要挑战她。或者,如果有问题,至少应该进行沟通。

    众议院保守派在《拯救美国法案》对决中破坏共和党议程

    众议员南希·佩洛西于2022年6月26日在旧金山第52届年度骄傲游行中向人群挥手。(阿伦·内瓦德/盖蒂图片社)

    杰弗里斯并非众议院多数党中的最高民主党人。如果民主党在今年秋季赢得众议院多数席位,情况可能会改变。但麦卡锡认为,这份声明充分暴露了杰弗里斯的弱点。
    “如果哈基姆必须发表声明强调自己很强硬,这恰恰表明他很软弱,”麦卡锡说。

    一位资深众议院民主党领导层消息人士称,普通议员要求杰弗里斯承担责任。戈尔登的任期将于1月结束。格卢森坎普·佩雷斯在一个倾向于总统唐纳德·特朗普的选区多次逆势赢得选举。该消息人士认为,民主党领导层与格卢森坎普·佩雷斯之间不存在任何权谋算计。但该消息人士暗示,格卢森坎普·佩雷斯与民主党高层的争执可能有助于这位华盛顿民主党议员在其家乡选区获得支持。

    尽管如此,一些民主党人要求采取报复措施。
    “我认为应该有相应后果。归根结底,我们核心小组必须团结一致,对抗共和党试图做的一切,”监督委员会最高民主党人、加利福尼亚州民主党众议员罗伯特·加西亚说。

    行动胜于雄辩。请记住,戈尔登和格卢森坎普·佩雷斯在众议院投票反对了一项“规则”。次日,格卢森坎普·佩雷斯出席了一个与该议题无关的规则委员会会议。在她作证时,该委员会最高民主党人马萨诸塞州民主党众议员吉姆·麦戈文转过身去,背对着这位民主党同僚。

    杰弗里斯希望与反叛者和解。他与戈尔登进行了简短交谈。但与格卢森坎普·佩雷斯进行了更深入的对话。
    “我与众议员玛丽·格卢森坎普·佩雷斯进行了非常前瞻性的交谈,讨论了如何确保我们在中期选举及以后都保持一致,”杰弗里斯说。

    他表示,麦戈文和格卢森坎普·佩雷斯也进行了交谈。

    但当被问及为何甚至需要发布谴责声明时,这位领导人言辞含糊。

    众议院民主党人在被问及社会主义者的胜利是否会威胁民主党团结时大发雷霆

    众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯于2026年8月13日在佐治亚州亚特兰大举行的“新权力结构:抵抗时代的黑人政治”论坛上发表讲话。(盖蒂图片社)

    “这是否表明了民主党核心小组的现状,以及他们是否追随你的领导?”笔者追问杰弗里斯。
    Res ipsa loquitur,”杰弗里斯回答道。“这是拉丁语,意思是‘事实本身不言自明’。”

    实则不然。

    这份声明只是杰弗里斯在有望成为议长并于明年主持民主党多数党事务前,试图展示权威的警告信号吗?民主党领导层提到的“严肃回应”在哪里?

    一些对这种叛逃感到愤怒的民主党人将要求采取行动。如果杰弗里斯不采取有力行动——尽管此前已有声明——一些议员可能会将这份警告性声明视为空谈。

    话虽如此,民主党需要格卢森坎普·佩雷斯赢得其选区,才能获得众议院多数席位。更具体地说,如果明年民主党控制众议院且席位差距很小,杰弗里斯需要格卢森坎普·佩雷斯支持他担任议长。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    Res ipsa loquitur?如果杰弗里斯不采取行动——这也不言自明了。

    查德·珀格拉姆目前担任福克斯新闻频道(FNC)首席国会通讯员。他于2007年9月加入该网络,总部位于华盛顿特区。

    Reporter’s Notebook: Dem rebels expose cracks in Jeffries’ House leadership

    Hakeem Jeffries and Democratic leaders call the surprise move ‘a significant breach of trust’ requiring a serious response

    September 8, 2026 2:13pm EDT / Fox News

    By Chad Pergram

    Two House Democrats break from party, vote to advance GOP measures

    House Democrats Jared Golden and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez face intense party backlash after defecting to vote with Republicans on key measures. Fox News chief congressional correspondent Chad Pergram reports on the political fallout from Capitol Hill, where leadership calls the move a breach of trust.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/837e9c98-b36a-4517-872e-2bf453e4919e

    Listen to this article

    8 min

    Rep. Jared Golden, D-Maine, may retire from Congress next year with a reputation that is anything but gilded among his fellow Democrats.

    Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., is seeking re-election in a competitive district. But some of her colleagues may consider “MGP” to be notorious if she returns to Capitol Hill in January.

    The House of Representatives is now out — again — until Sept. 14. That follows a six-week sabbatical over the summer. But were it not for Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez, House Republican leaders may have had no other choice but to send members home early a few days ago. The duo committed something close to a parliamentary heresy, handing the GOP the necessary votes on a procedural matter to unlock the floor for the majority.

    Republicans lacked the votes to do it on their own – had Golden and Gluesenkamp not intervened.

    JEFFRIES THREATENS ‘SERIOUS RESPONSE’ AFTER DEMOCRATS HELP GOP ADVANCE ANTI-SOCIALISM VOTE

    Reps. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez and Jared Golden are among the Democrats who voted to rebuke Rep. Jesus “Chuy” García despite House Democratic leaders urging against it.(Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images; Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images ; Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    However, the most schismatic betrayal was that neither one briefed Democratic leaders on what they planned to do. Congressional leaders from both sides are never pleased with members who stray from the party line. Especially on a procedural vote, which is almost always the responsibility of the majority to pass. But at the very least, leaders like to be clued in. They might give someone a pass if they understand the reasoning.

    “Did they give you a heads up that they were going to vote with Republicans on that rule?” asked Fox News’ Kelly Phares of House Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass.

    “They did not. They surprised us,” answered Clark.

    Yours truly observed to Rep. Tim Kennedy, D-N.Y., that in politics it’s always best to “stab someone in the front” rather than “in the back.”

    “There’s a lot to be said for that,” replied Kennedy.

    Let’s start with the nature of the dissent by Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez.

    Most major pieces of legislation in the House need what’s called a “rule” before the body can debate the measure. The House must debate and approve a “rule,” dictating how much time and what amendments would be in order. The House can’t debate a bill until it first OKs a rule. And except on rare occasions, the majority party is expected to carry the rule. It’s simply something the minority party rarely assists with – except in extreme circumstances.

    Last week, the House planned to debate a resolution to condemn socialism, green-light the SAVE America Act, maintain the number of justices on the Supreme Court at nine and consider a plan to help the nation’s lobster industry. The House adopted the rule, 210-208. However, five Republicans voted nay on the rule.

    It’s about the math.

    Those GOP defections would have killed the rule and frozen the floor for the rest of the week. In fact, the vote may have compelled House Republican leaders to cut everyone loose from Capitol Hill. The House was stalled considering any legislative traffic.

    TENSIONS ERUPT IN HOUSE HEARING AS GOP ADVANCES ANTI-SOCIALISM RESOLUTION WHILE DEMS RAGE: ‘SILLY SEASON’

    Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., and Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., attend a news conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on June 30, 2026.(Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    But Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez voted yes, unlocking the floor for the remainder of the week.

    Democrats seethed at their colleagues for blindsiding them.

    “The two Democrats who have voted to move a procedural bill forward didn’t do the right thing,” said Kennedy.

    House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., Clark and House Democratic Caucus Chairman Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., issued a rare, joint condemnation of the dissenting duo. They characterized the revolt “a significant breach of trust,” adding it “necessitates a serious response.”

    “It’s a mistake to vote against our caucus. We have to be unified,” said Rep. Madeleine Dean, D-Pa.

    Golden said he voted with Republicans so the House could pass the bill safeguarding Maine’s lobster industry.

    “It’s about protecting the working-class communities those men and women support. In my district, lobster fishing is the backbone of towns up and down the coast,” said Golden. “In some towns, 20 to 40% of residents hold a lobster license.”

    Political observers view the infighting as a misstep for the party ahead of November.

    “As a member, you should be able to communicate with your leaders and how you intend to vote,” said Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev. “Something was skipped along the way.”

    While some lawmakers blamed Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez, others said this was the fault of Jeffries. Others put it on Clark. Still, there were those pinning this on the entire leadership team.

    Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., knows something about his own members undercutting him. Republicans stripped McCarthy of the speaker’s gavel nearly three years ago. But the California Republican believes the problem with Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez falls on the shoulder of Jeffries.

    “You would know who would be the five to eight Democrats who would leverage that [vote],” said McCarthy. “You would have reached out to them.”

    One former Democratic aide noted that it wasn’t even what Jeffries, Clark and Aguilar said in their statement. But it was the very fact that a statement appeared. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., never would have sent a statement. Her leadership power was implicit. Everyone knew not to cross her. Or, if there was an issue, at least have a conversation.

    HOUSE CONSERVATIVES DERAIL GOP AGENDA IN SAVE AMERICA ACT SHOWDOWN

    Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., waves to the crowd during the 52nd annual San Francisco Pride Parade on June 26, 2022.(Arun Nevader/Getty Images)

    Jeffries has not been the House’s top Democrat in the majority. That could change if Democrats win the House this fall. But McCarthy argued the statement said a lot about Jeffries.

    “If Hakeem has to put out a statement that he’s strong, it’s a sign that he is weak,” said McCarthy.

    One senior House Democratic leadership source said rank-and-file members demanded accountability by Jeffries. Golden is done in January. Gluesenkamp Perez has repeatedly defied political gravity in a district which favors President Donald Trump. The source didn’t believe anything Machiavellian was afoot between Democratic leaders and Gluesenkamp Perez. But the source indicated that Gluesenkamp Perez tussling with the Democratic brass probably helps the Washington Democrat back home.

    Still, some Democrats demanded retribution.

    “I think there should be consequences. I think at the end of the day, we have a caucus united against what Republicans are trying to do,” said Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee.

    Actions speak louder than words. Remember that Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez voted against a “rule” in the House. Gluesenkamp Perez appeared at an unrelated meeting of the Rules Committee the next day. During her testimony, Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., the top Democrat on the panel, swiveled around in his chair and sat with his back to his fellow Democrat.

    Jeffries hoped to turn a corner with the renegades. He spoke briefly with Golden. But had a deeper conversation with Gluesenkamp Perez.

    “Congresswoman Marie Gluesenkamp Perez and myself were able to talk in a very forward-looking way about how to make sure that we’re all on the same page as we approach the midterm elections and beyond,” said Jeffries.

    He indicated that McGovern and Gluesenkamp Perez also talked.

    But the leader was cryptic when pressed why he even had to issue an admonition.

    HOUSE DEMOCRAT LASHES OUT WHEN GRILLED ON WHETHER SOCIALIST VICTORIES WOULD THREATEN DEM UNITY

    House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., speaks onstage during “The New Power Structure: Black Politics in the Age of Resistance” panel at the National Association of Black Journalists Convention in Atlanta, Ga., on Aug. 13, 2026.(Getty Images)

    “Does that say something about where the Democratic Caucus is and if they follow your leadership?” I pressed Jeffries.

    Res ipsa loquitur,” answered Jeffries. “That’s Latin for ‘the thing speaks for itself.’”

    Not really.

    Was the statement just a warning shot as Jeffries tries to flex his muscles in anticipation of becoming speaker and presiding over a Democratic majority next year? Where’s that “serious response” that Democratic leaders spoke of?

    Some Democrats who are angry about the desertion will demand action. And if Jeffries doesn’t respond forcefully – despite a declaration otherwise – some members may interpret the warning statement as prattle.

    That said, Democrats need Gluesenkamp Perez to win her district in order to claim the majority. And more specifically, Jeffries needs Gluesenkamp Perez to support him for speaker if Democrats have control next year and the margin is close.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Res ipsa loquitur? If Jeffries doesn’t take action – that speaks for itself, too.

    Chad Pergram currently serves as Chief Congressional Correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC). He joined the network in September 2007 and is based out of Washington, D.C.

  • 共和党能否在中期选举前规避特朗普对加拿大加征关税的影响?


    2026-09-08T17:33:16.118Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    达娜·巴什

    撰文:达娜·巴什,CNN
    发布时间:美国东部时间2026年9月8日周二下午1:33


    共和党能否在中期选举前规避特朗普对加拿大加征关税的影响?

    政治内幕

    关键中期选举州可能会在特朗普总统对加拿大发起的最新一轮贸易战中遭受最严重打击。《政治内幕》栏目专家组将分析共和党候选人如何在这一关键议题上与特朗普划清界限——同时仍强调自己与白宫的紧密关系。

    2:08 • 消息来源:CNN

    Can Republicans dodge the impact of Trump’s Canada tariffs ahead of midterms?

    2026-09-08T17:33:16.118Z / CNN

    Dana Bash

    By Dana Bash, CNN

    Published 1:33 PM EDT, Tue September 8, 2026

    Can Republicans dodge the impact of Trump’s Canada tariffs ahead of midterms?

    Inside Politics

    Key midterm states could be some of the hardest hit by the latest salvo in President Trump’s trade war with Canada. The Inside Politics panel breaks down how Republican candidates are separating themselves from Trump on this crucial issue—but still emphasizing their close relationship with the White House while doing it.

    2:08 • Source: CNN

  • 达娜·巴什带来今日中期选举头条:距离选举仅剩56天


    美国东部时间2026年9月8日周二下午1:55 / 作者:达娜·巴什,CNN


    达娜·巴什带来今日中期选举头条:距离选举仅剩56天

    政坛内幕

    《政坛内幕》为您带来全美各关键竞选的最新动态,包括新罕布什尔州的参议院初选、内布拉斯加州无党派参议院候选人丹·奥斯本的泄露对话,以及特朗普总统近期对一家加拿大公司的攻击如何可能打乱堪萨斯州的参议院竞选。

    3:02 • 消息来源:CNN

    CNN政治频道最新视频 15个


    1. 达娜·巴什带来今日中期选举头条:距离选举仅剩56天

    时长3:02 • 正在播放 • 消息来源:CNN

    1. 共和党人能否在中期选举前规避特朗普对加拿大关税的影响?

    时长2:08 • 正在播放 • 消息来源:CNN

    1. 犹他州州长斯宾塞·考克斯:拜登本应赦免特朗普

    时长1:36 • 正在播放 • 消息来源:CNN

    1. 赔率:通胀之国

    时长3:42 • 正在播放 • 消息来源:CNN

    1. 纽瑟姆州长:谴责以色列总理在民主党内部“甚至都不算有争议”

    时长6:15 • 正在播放 • 消息来源:CNN

    1. 肯塔基州民主党人:参议员麦康奈尔的健康状况保密,是选民不信任华府的部分原因

    时长1:54 • 正在播放 • 消息来源:CNN

    1. 宾夕法尼亚州民主党众议员:选民对参议员约翰·费特曼“感到不满”

    时长4:34 • 正在播放 • 消息来源:CNN

    1. 特朗普如此不受欢迎的10大核心原因

    时长19:18 • 正在播放 • 消息来源:CNN

    1. 赔率:美国劳动者的困境

    时长3:56 • 正在播放 • 消息来源:CNN

    1. 巴塔哥尼亚CEO:对企业高管“屈从”特朗普感到“沮丧”

    时长1:30 • 正在播放 • 消息来源:CNN

    1. 退伍军人、民主党国会候选人凯特·康利:她将支持弹劾赫格西特部长

    时长1:32 • 正在播放 • 消息来源:CNN

    1. 赖特部长:汽油价格“更有可能下跌而非上涨”

    时长1:35 • 正在播放 • 消息来源:CNN

    1. 共和党众议员劳勒:不同意特朗普总统称伊朗战争“微不足道”的言论

    时长1:53 • 正在播放 • 消息来源:CNN

    1. 赖特:霍尔木兹海峡过往舰船数量未达到冲突前水平

    时长8:24 • 正在播放 • 消息来源:CNN

    1. 纽约竞争激烈的中期选举竞选举行辩论

    时长12:09 • 正在播放 • 消息来源:CNN

    查看更多视频

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/08/politics/video/inside-politics-midterm-headlines-56-days

    Dana Bash has today’s midterm headlines with 56 days until the election

    1:55 PM EDT, Tue September 8, 2026 / By Dana Bash, CNN

    Dana Bash has today’s midterm headlines with 56 days until the election

    Inside Politics

    Inside Politics brings you the latest news on key races across the country, including a Senate primary in New Hampshire, a leaked conversation from Independent Nebraska Senate candidate Dan Osborn, and how President Trump’s latest attacks on a Canadian company could upend the Senate race in Kansas.

    3:02 • Source: CNN

    Latest News from CNN Politics 15 videos

    Dana Bash has today’s midterm headlines with 56 days until the election

    3:02

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Can Republicans dodge the impact of Trump’s Canada tariffs ahead of midterms?

    2:08

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Why Utah Gov. Spencer Cox thinks Biden should’ve pardoned Trump

    1:36

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    The Odds: Inflation Nation

    3:42

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Gov. Newsom says condemning Israel’s prime minister is ‘not even controversial’ within the Democratic Party

    6:15

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Kentucky Dem: Secrecy surrounding Sen. McConnell’s health part of why voters don’t ‘trust’ DC

    1:54

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Pennsylvania Democratic Congresswoman says her constituents are “upset” with Sen. John Fetterman

    4:34

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    The 10 biggest reasons why Trump is so unpopular

    19:18

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    The Odds: American Workers’ Woes

    3:56

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Patagonia CEO: ‘Frustrated’ that CEOs are ‘kowtowing’ to Trump

    1:30

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Combat veteran and Democratic Congressional candidate Cait Conley says she would support impeaching Secretary Hegseth

    1:32

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Secretary Wright: Gas prices ‘more likely to go down than go up.’

    1:35

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    GOP Rep. Lawler disagrees with President Trump calling Iran War ‘small potatoes’

    1:53

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Wright: ‘We are not pre-conflict levels’ of ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz.

    8:24

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Candidates face off in close New York midterm race

    12:09

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    See more videos

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/08/politics/video/inside-politics-midterm-headlines-56-days

  • 美国联邦通信委员会提议开放更多无线频谱用于天基无线服务


    2026年9月8日 下午6:43 UTC 更新于1小时前 / 路透社

    image
    2026年7月22日,美国华盛顿特区,联邦通信委员会总部墙面上的委员会徽章。路透社/凯莉·库珀

    华盛顿9月8日电(路透社)——美国联邦通信委员会周二表示,正着手开放更多无线频谱,供天基宽带服务使用。

    该委员会表示,将于9月30日进行投票的这项命令,将开放数千兆赫频谱,以提升面向家庭、机载和船载高速卫星宽带的容量,并优化卫星地面网络的流量路由功能。

    《路透社内幕追踪》新闻简报是您获取全球体育新闻的必备指南。点击此处订阅

    戴维·谢泼德森 报道;克里斯·里斯 编辑

    我们的报道准则:汤姆森路透社诚信原则。

    US FCC proposes to open more wireless spectrum for space-based wireless service

    September 8, 2026 6:43 PM UTC Updated 1 hour ago / Reuters

    The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) seal decorates a wall inside their headquarters in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 22, 2026. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper

    WASHINGTON, Sept 8 (Reuters) – The Federal Communications ​Commission said on ​Tuesday it is moving to ​open more ​wireless spectrum for access ⁠for space-based ​broadband service.

    The ​FCC said its order to be voted ​on September ​30 would open many ‌thousands ⁠of megahertz to boost capacity for high-speed ​satellite ​broadband ⁠to the home, in-flight ​and on-ship ​connectivity, ⁠and traffic-routing functions in satellite ⁠ground ​networks.

    The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to global sports news. Sign up here.

    Reporting ​by David Shepardson; Editing ​by Chris Reese

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 21 Air——迈阿密坠机涉事航司——曾遭前员工举报安全违规


    2026-09-08T15:57:00-0400 / https://www.cbsnews.com/news/miami-plane-crash-air-21-safety-record/

    法律文件披露,上周日在迈阿密跑道外坠毁并造成5人死亡的亚马逊Prime Air波音767货机,运营方是一家北卡罗来纳州公司,该公司曾被前员工指控违反安全规定。

    这家受亚马逊雇佣的货运航司21 Air,由休斯顿太空人队老板吉姆·克兰通过一家有限责任公司控股。哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS News)从记录和采访中获悉,该公司面临多名高管接连不断的安全投诉,这些员工称自己因提出安全担忧而被解雇。

    “不幸的是,21 Air有着长期存在的安全问题历史,”拥有30多年飞行经验的飞行员卡尔·祖林说道,他曾提交法律诉状,指控自己因提出安全担忧而遭到21 Air管理层报复,管理层告诉他“情况不会改变”。

    美国职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)驳回了祖林关于遭到21 Air报复性解雇的投诉。他的上诉促成了2023年美国劳工部的庭审——一场由联邦法官主持的听证会,目前该案仍在审理中。

    文件显示,祖林和其他前21 Air飞行员称,管理层压制安全报告、强迫机组人员在未得到充分休息的情况下执行飞行任务、安排无法用英语进行安全沟通的飞行员执飞,并让存在故障的飞机升空。

    2021年,一名负责审查公司安全政策的前战斗机飞行员在写给21 Air老板克兰的辞职信中称,公司高管“口头上重视安全程序,实则完全不作为”。

    前21 Air首席飞行员布鲁斯·约瑟夫在劳工部庭审中作证称,他“亲眼目睹多人多次被劝阻”不要在公司系统中记录安全担忧。

    他在庭审证词中指控,公司时任安全主管告诉他,在与时任首席执行官迈克·门德斯沟通前“不要在安全管理软件中录入任何内容”。当被问及最终是否有报告提交时,他回答:“大多数都没有。”

    “只有少数几次确实提交了,这仅仅是因为我坚持这么做,”约瑟夫在2024年3月对法官说道,“如果我提交了报告,就会招致迈克的怒火。”

    门德斯作证称,约瑟夫“被21 Air解雇,离职时情况非常糟糕”,他认为这位前首席飞行员试图“编造”具有破坏性的指控。

    这位前21 Air首席执行官否认存在任何报复行为,并表示自己遵守安全程序。“我的职责是确保我们运营一家安全的航司,不是去伤害任何人,也不是隐瞒任何事情,”他作证道。

    当CBS News联系门德斯时,他拒绝进一步置评。

    祖林的律师迈克尔·阿内洛告诉法官,另一名21 Air飞行员约翰尼·萨尔蒙森“被迫在休息时间不足的情况下执飞,这违反了适当的休息时长要求,涉及安全问题。停留时间过短”。

    “管理层向飞行员施压,结果他遭到了报复,”阿内洛说道。

    祖林的法律诉状称,当他质疑包含飞行员执飞前执勤时长在内的飞行计划安全证明是否准确时,有人告诉他“直接签字就行”。

    这位飞行员作证称,2022年4月13日,他坐在21 Air一架波音767的 jump seat(乘务员折叠座椅)上,当时飞机从新泽西州纽瓦克起飞后出现机械故障,持续急剧加速,导致速度超过可能损坏机翼襟翼的阈值,这让他“为自己的安全感到担忧”。

    他在庭审证词中称,事件发生后,机长戴维·诺格伦和副机长之间出现了“沟通故障”。

    “我们没有进行情况汇报。没有任何讨论。就当这事没发生过,”祖林对法官说道。

    诺格伦未回应置评请求。

    祖林还作证提及2022年春季一架21 Air飞机从阿拉巴马州飞往特立尼达的航班,据称该飞机出现增压问题,被迫紧急转降波多黎各。

    他称,时任21 Air机队经理、机长阿米尔·安诺希拉瓦尼“无法掌控操作”,并称“副机长们不得不共同介入,才让飞机安全着陆”。

    安诺希拉瓦尼否认发生过此类事件,并告诉CBS News,他“从未与祖林有过接触”。“我不相信谎言,”他说道,“他被公司解雇后心怀怨恨。”

    21 Air未回应CBS News的置评请求。该公司在其网站上发布声明称,正“全力配合”美国国家运输安全委员会(NTSB)的调查。

    “我们向遇难者家属和挚爱之人致以最深切的哀悼,”声明说道。

    亚马逊发言人告诉CBS News:“关于调查的具体情况,我们将听从NTSB的结论;对于这些与我们和该公司建立合作关系之前就存在的指控,我们将交由21 Air回应。”

    此前一位发言人曾表示,公司对遇难事件“深感痛心”,并正在配合当局调查。


    image

    由21 Air作为Prime Air 7598号航班运营的波音767-300货机,于2026年9月6日在迈阿密国际机场冲出跑道后坠毁。伊娃·玛丽·乌斯卡泰吉 / 彭博社通过盖蒂图片社拍摄

    在祖林的案件中作证的前21 Air飞行员托尼·布莱斯告诉CBS News,对他而言,周日迈阿密的坠机并非意外。

    “我们很多前21 Air飞行员早就预料到会发生这样的事,”他说道,并举出“维护安全问题、首席飞行员办公室施加的压力,以及他们雇佣的飞行员素质”作为例证。

    布莱斯称,公司会例行推迟维护,其老化的改装客机经常出现故障。

    2022年从百慕大飞往新泽西州的一次航班上发生了一起引人注目的事件,他称自己所乘的21 Air飞机的雷达突然停止工作,当时他们正处于他40年飞行生涯中遭遇的最严重湍流中。

    “我明确告知公司,在他们安装新雷达之前,我不会再驾驶这架飞机,”他说道。

    “我们遇到过燃油泄漏问题、雷达故障和断路器问题,驾驶舱内还出现过烟雾,”祖林告诉CBS News,“公司还指导飞行员如何填写故障报告。”

    担任21 Air工会主席的祖林称,长途飞行时飞行员只能靠自己解决睡眠问题。

    “这些飞机上都没有像样的机组休息设施,”他说道,“我的工会副主席甚至买了睡袋放在飞机上,让飞行员在夜间长途飞行时能有个合理的方式休息一下。”

    前战斗机飞行员唐·赫尔米格于2021年6月写了一封辞职信发给21 Air大股东吉姆·克兰,警告他公司存在安全问题。

    “三个月来,我到处都能看到问题,”他写道,“在我看来,他们希望我什么都不说,但安全运营不该是这样的,只是‘口头上重视安全管理体系(SMS),实则完全不作为’。”

    邮件附件中有七份文件,标题涉及公司的排班、培训、沟通、应急响应和企业文化。

    “现在你已经知道我书面记录的所有核心问题。我认为你会聘用有能力的人,然后解决剩下的问题,”他写道。

    美国国家运输安全委员会正在对周日的坠机事件展开调查,目前尚未确定事故原因。目前尚不清楚此前的安全问题是否与周日迈阿密的坠机事件有关。

    失事航班的飞行员已确认身份:55岁的机长约瑟夫·卡罗尔和37岁的副机长海梅·费利佩·席尔瓦·莫利纳——两人在坠机后住院,目前已出院。

    迈阿密-戴德县警长罗西·科尔德罗-斯图茨表示,坠机事件中遇难的5人是被飞机撞击的货车上的清洁人员。

    CBS News获得的飞行跟踪数据显示,在距离迈阿密跑道4英里处,飞机突然改平,并停止下降约25秒。

    这一偏差意味着飞机在接近机场时高度仍然过高。机组人员并未取消着陆,随后飞机以约两倍于正常速率的陡峭角度下降。

    美国前交通部监察长玛丽·夏沃告诉CBS News,答案可能就在飞机的黑匣子中,包括驾驶舱录音和任何机械故障日志。

    “驾驶舱里当时发生了什么?”她说道,“是在对抗大量湍流和风切变,还是机组资源管理缺失?”

    21 Air, operator of plane in Miami crash, had prior safety complaints by former employees

    2026-09-08T15:57:00-0400 / https://www.cbsnews.com/news/miami-plane-crash-air-21-safety-record/

    The Amazon Prime Air Boeing 767 cargo plane that crashed off a Miami runway on Sunday, killing five people, was operated by a North Carolina company that has been accused by past employees of violating safety regulations, legal documents reveal.

    The cargo airline hired by Amazon, 21 Air, is controlled by Houston Astros owner Jim Crane through an LLC. The company has faced a string of safety complaints from senior staff who claim they were fired for raising concerns, CBS News has learned from records and interviews.

    “Unfortunately, 21 Air has a long established history of safety problems,” said Karl Seuring, a pilot with more than 30 years of experience who filed a legal complaint alleging that when he raised safety concerns he was told by a 21 Air manager, “It’s not going to change.”

    The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) rejected Seuring’s complaint over his alleged retaliatory firing by 21 Air. His appeal led to a 2023 Department of Labor tribunal — a hearing in front of a federal judge — where the case is still pending.

    Seuring and other former 21 Air pilots claimed managers suppressed safety reports, pushed crew to fly without proper rest, staffed pilots who could not communicate safely in English, and put faulty planes in the sky, documents show.

    Executives were accused of “paying lip service” to safety procedures “then doing exactly nothing,” according to a resignation letter written by a former fighter pilot reviewing safety policy for the company and sent to 21 Air owner Crane in 2021.

    Former 21 Air chief pilot Bruce Joseph testified in the Labor Department tribunal that he had “personal knowledge of people being discouraged” from logging safety concerns in the company system “on numerous occasions.”

    He alleged in his tribunal testimony that the firm’s then-director of safety told him “don’t put anything” in the safety management software before speaking to the company’s then-CEO, Mike Mendez. Asked whether reports eventually got filed, he replied: “Most of it did not.”

    “There were a couple of occasions where it actually did, only because I would press,” Joseph told the judge in March 2024. “If I put it in, I would have the wrath of Mike.”

    Mendez testified that Joseph “was fired from 21 Air and left under very bad circumstances” and that he believed the former chief pilot was trying to “make up” damaging claims.

    The former 21 Air CEO denied any retaliation and said he followed safety procedures. “My responsibility is to make sure we run a safe airline, not to hurt people and not to hide anything,” he testified.

    Mendez declined to comment further when contacted by CBS News.

    Seuring’s attorney, Michael Anello, told the judge that another 21 Air pilot, Johnny Salmonson, “was being pressured to fly in periods of time that were too short to comply with the proper amounts of rest, and that implicated safety. The layovers were too short.”

    “The management was pushing the pilots, and the result was he was retaliated against,” Anello said.

    When Seuring questioned whether flight plans with safety attestations — including how long pilots had been on duty before they started another flight — were accurate, he was told to “just sign it,” his legal complaint claimed.

    The pilot testified that he was in the jump seat of a 21 Air Boeing 767 on April 13, 2022, when a mechanical problem made the plane continue sharply accelerating after takeoff from Newark, New Jersey, causing it to exceed speeds that could damage its wing flaps and leaving him “concerned for my own safety.”

    He alleged in tribunal testimony that there was a “breakdown of communication” between the captain, David Norgren, and the first officer after the incident.

    “We had no debrief. No discussion. Assume it didn’t happen,” Seuring told the judge.

    Norgren did not respond to a request for comment.

    Seuring also testified about an 21 Air plane flying from Alabama to Trinidad in the spring of 2022 that allegedly had a pressurization problem forcing it to make an emergency diversion to Puerto Rico.

    He claimed the captain, then-21 Air fleet manager Amir Anoshiravani, had an “inability to take command of the operation,” saying “the first officers had to jointly intervene to get the airplane safely on the ground.”

    Anoshiravani denied any such incident and told CBS News he had “never come in contact” with Seuring. “I don’t believe in lies,” he said. “He has anger at the company because he was fired.”

    21 Air did not respond to CBS News’ requests for comment. The company has posted a statement on its website saying it is “cooperating fully” with the NTSB investigation.

    “Our deepest condolences are with the families and loved ones of those who lost their lives,” the statement said.

    An Amazon spokesperson told CBS News, “We’ll defer to the NTSB regarding the circumstances of their investigation and to 21 Air regarding these allegations that pre-date our relationship with the company.”

    A spokesperson previously said the company was “heartbroken” at the deaths and that it is cooperating with authorities.

    A Boeing 767-300, operated by 21 Air as Prime Air Flight 7598, crashed after overshooting the runway at Miami International Airport on Sept. 6, 2026. Eva Marie Uzcategui / Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Retired 21 Air pilot Tony Bless, who testified in Seuring’s case, told CBS News that for him, Sunday’s crash in Miami did not come out of the blue.

    “It’s something a lot of us ex-21 Air pilots have been anticipating for a while,” he said, citing “maintenance safety issues, the pressure out of the chief pilot’s office, and the quality of pilots they would hire.”

    Bless claimed the company would routinely defer maintenance, and that things would often go wrong on its aging converted passenger planes.

    In one notable incident on a flight from Bermuda to New Jersey in 2022, he claimed his 21 Air plane’s radar stopped working just as they navigated the worst turbulence of his 40-year career.

    “I let the company know in no uncertain terms that I would not fly that plane again until they put a new radar in,” he said.

    “We’ve had fuel leak issues. We’ve had radar problems and circuit breakers, smoke in the cockpit,” Seuring told CBS News. “Pilots were coached on how the write-ups should be done.”

    Seuring, who served as president of the 21 Air union, said pilots had to fend for themselves when trying to get sleep on long flights.

    “None of these airplanes had good crew rest on board,” he said. “My vice president of the union actually bought sleeping bags for airplanes to give the pilots a reasonable way to get some crew rest on long nighttime flights.”

    Former fighter pilot Don Helmig wrote a resignation email to 21 Air majority owner Jim Crane in June 2021, warning him of safety issues at the company.

    “After three months, everywhere I looked there are issues,” he wrote. “In my opinion, what they wished me to do is say nothing, but that is not how Safety is supposed to operate, by paying ‘lip service to SMS’ [Safety Management Systems] then doing exactly nothing.”

    Attached to the email were seven documents with titles concerning scheduling, training, communications, emergency response and culture at the firm.

    “Now you know every Core Issue I have placed on paper. I think you will surround yourself with competence and figure out the rest,” he wrote.

    The National Transportation Safety Board is conducting an investigation into Sunday’s crash, and there has been no determination yet about its cause. It is not known whether past safety issues had any connection to the Sunday incident in Miami.

    The pilots have been identified as Captain Joseph Carroll, 55, and First Officer Jaime Felipe Silva Molina, 37 — both hospitalized after the crash but since released.

    The five people killed in the crash were members of a cleaning crew in a van hit by the plane, Miami-Dade County Sheriff Rosie Cordero-Stutz said.

    Flight tracking data obtained by CBS News shows that 4 miles out from the 9,360-foot-long Miami runway, the plane suddenly leveled out and stopped its descent for about 25 seconds.

    The deviation meant the plane approached the airport while still too high. Instead of calling off the landing, it then took a steep decline around twice the normal rate.

    Mary Schiavo, a former inspector general for the Department of Transportation, told CBS News the answer may lie in the plane’s black box, with cockpit audio recordings and logs of any mechanical failures.

    “What was going on in that cockpit?” she said. “Fighting a bunch of turbulence and wind shifts, or lack of crew resource management?”

  • 纽瑟姆承认民主社会主义理念在民主党内部已“主流化”:“双方相当契合”


    2026年9月8日 美国东部时间12:15 / 福克斯新闻频道

    加州州长提及全民医保、气候变化和摆脱化石燃料作为两党共同优先事项

    作者:彼得·皮内多 福克斯新闻

    纽瑟姆因拒绝与民主社会主义者组织划清界限遭批评
    福克斯新闻评论员乔·孔查就首次共和党中期大会以及加州州长加文·纽瑟姆为美国民主社会主义者组织(DSA)辩护一事发表评论。纽瑟姆反对民主党人与该组织划清界限,呼吁打造“大帐篷政党”。孔查剖析了这些言论在2026年中期选举前的政治影响。

    【新增】您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/7d039710-7b56-41ef-9b53-367d53427126

    收听本文
    3分钟

    在一场讨论其传闻中2028年总统竞选的采访中,加州州长加文·纽瑟姆宣称,民主党与美国民主社会主义者组织“相当契合”,尤其是在全民医保、气候变化和摆脱化石燃料使用方面。

    在接受《PBS新闻一小时》采访时,纽瑟姆被问及近期全国各地民主社会主义者的胜利对民主党意味着什么。

    “如果这些候选人与这个纲领能够切实激发选民基础、提升投票率,是否应该将更多这类理念纳入更广泛的民主党纲领?”采访者问道。

    “我认为已经做到了,”纽瑟姆反驳道。“我的意思是,我们希望将金钱从政治中移除。几十年来我一直支持清廉竞选资金运动。”

    纽瑟姆告诫民主党人对待社会主义者应“做加法而非减法”

    加州民主党州长加文·纽瑟姆于2025年8月14日在洛杉矶出席国会重划选区活动时发表讲话。(美联社照片/马西奥·何塞·桑切斯)

    采访者进一步追问:“民主党领导层与这些民主社会主义者组织的候选人之间似乎存在一定距离。”

    “但理念上并非如此,”纽瑟姆回应道。

    “我相信全民医保,相信《医保为所有人》法案,民主党内部绝大多数人也持此观点,”他说。“因此,如果话题涉及让民众口袋里更有钱、降低生活成本、将金钱从政治中移除,如果话题是关于《医保为所有人》,我认为我们相当契合。”

    他补充道:“这关乎认识到我们的星球正变得更热、更干燥,我们必须应对气候变化问题,我们想要能源安全,想要摆脱化石燃料。这是民主社会主义者组织的立场,也是民主党内部的主流立场。”

    纽瑟姆对美国政坛中民主社会主义影响力的担忧不屑一顾,称:“我认为在很多方面,这不过是一个标签……对我来说这是个再熟悉不过的标签,我们称他们为进步人士。”

    纽瑟姆面临诉讼威胁,举报人求助特朗普揭露“重大”欺诈丑闻

    美国民主社会主义者组织成员于2019年5月1日劳动节在特朗普名下建筑外集会。(盖蒂图片社)

    “也许只是因为我来自加州,我认为这是健康的……我没有被此事困扰,”这位州长继续说道,并补充道,民主社会主义者组织的理念反映了“我们政党一直以来都存在的一些方面和组成部分,这是党内健康的辩证讨论。”

    福克斯新闻数字频道已联系纽瑟姆的办公室寻求进一步置评。福克斯新闻数字频道也联系了民主社会主义者组织和民主党全国委员会寻求置评。

    民主社会主义者组织是美国顶尖的社会主义政治团体。今年,该组织推出了更新后的纲领,包括废除参议院,用国会选出的行政和司法机构取代总统和最高法院。此外,更新后的纲领还包括为所有移民提供大赦,并削减国防部预算。

    詹妮弗·西贝尔·纽瑟姆回避丈夫加文的总统抱负相关问题

    加州州长加文·纽瑟姆于2025年11月8日在休斯顿IBEW第716地方工会大厅与哈里斯县民主党人举行集会时发表讲话。(美联社照片/凯伦·沃伦)

    除上述内容外,民主社会主义者组织现有的政策纲领还呼吁“立即终止所有驱逐行动”、在不实施限制性移民管控的情况下实现各国间自由迁徙,以及“向有犯罪记录者和非公民赋予完整投票权”。

    【点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP】

    曾被视为民主党进步派翼中的边缘运动,民主社会主义者组织的影响力与日俱增,其多名成员击败了长期执掌权柄的建制派政党人士。这促使许多人猜测,民主社会主义者组织代表着民主党未来的方向。

    彼得·皮内多是福克斯新闻数字频道的政治撰稿人。

    Newsom admits democratic socialist ideas ‘mainstream’ in Democrat party: ‘Pretty aligned’

    September 8, 2026 12:15pm EDT / Fox News

    The California governor cited universal healthcare, climate change and moving off fossil fuels as shared priorities

    By Peter Pinedo Fox News

    Newsom called out for refusing to distance from DSA

    Fox News contributor Joe Concha reacts to the first-ever Republican midterm convention and California Gov. Gavin Newsom defending the Democratic Socialists of America. Newsom argues against Democrats distancing themselves from the group, calling for a ‘big-tent party.’ Concha breaks down the political implications of these comments ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/7d039710-7b56-41ef-9b53-367d53427126

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    In an interview discussing his rumored 2028 presidential run, California Gov. Gavin Newsom asserted that the Democratic Party is “pretty aligned” with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), especially when it comes to universal healthcare, climate change and moving away from fossil fuel usage.

    During an interview with “PBS NewsHour,” Newsom was questioned about what recent democratic socialist victories across the country mean for the Democratic Party.

    “If you have these candidates and this platform that is clearly animating the base, energizing turnout, should more of those ideas be worked into the broader Democratic platform?” Newsom was asked.

    “I think they are,” Newsom shot back. “I mean, we want money out of politics. I’ve been supporting clean money campaigns for decades.”

    NEWSOM TELLS DEMOCRATS TO BE IN THE ‘ADDITION NOT SUBTRACTION’ BUSINESS WITH SOCIALISTS

    Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom of California speaks during a congressional redistricting event, on Thursday, Aug. 14, 2025, in Los Angeles.(AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez)

    The interviewer pressed Newsom further, saying, “There seems to be some distance between [Democratic] leadership and those DSA candidates.”

    “But, not the ideas,” Newsom responded.

    “I believe in universal healthcare, and I believe in Medicare for All, the party does overwhelmingly,” he said. “And so, if it’s about more money in your pocket, lowering costs, getting money out of politics, if it’s about Medicare for All, I think we’re pretty aligned.”

    He added, “It’s about recognizing that we’ve got a planet that is getting hotter and drier and that we’ve got to address the issue of climate change, we want energy security, and we want to move off fossil fuels. That’s a DSA position, that’s a mainstream position within the Democratic Party.”

    Newsom dismissed worry about democratic socialist influence in American politics, saying, “I think in many ways, it’s just a label … it’s just such a familiar label to me, we call them progressives.”

    NEWSOM HIT WITH LAWSUIT THREAT AS WHISTLEBLOWER BEGS TRUMP FOR HELP WITH ‘MONUMENTAL’ FRAUD SCANDAL

    Members of the Democratic Socialists of America gather outside a Trump-owned building on May Day, May 1, 2019, in New York City.(Getty Images)

    “Maybe it’s just because I’m from California and I think it’s healthy … I’m not consumed by this,” the governor continued, adding that the DSA’s ideas reflect “aspects and component parts of our party that we’ve always had, and it’s a healthy dialectic within the party.”

    Fox News Digital reached out to Newsom’s office for additional comment. Fox News Digital also reached out to the DSA and to the Democratic National Committee for comment.

    The DSA is the pre-eminent socialist political group in the U.S. This year, the group rolled out an updated platform that includes eliminating the Senate and replacing the president and the Supreme Court with an executive and judiciary chosen by Congress. Additionally, the updated platform includes amnesty for all immigrants and defunding the Department of War.

    JENNIFER SIEBEL NEWSOM DODGES QUESTION ON HUSBAND GAVIN’S PRESIDENTIAL ASPIRATIONS

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a rally with Harris County Democrats at the IBEW local 716 union hall on Saturday, Nov. 8, 2025, in Houston.(AP Photo/Karen Warren)

    This is in addition to the DSA’s already existing policy platform, which calls for an “immediate end to all deportations,” free migration between countries without restrictive immigration controls, and “extending full voting rights to people with criminal convictions and noncitizens.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Once considered a fringe movement on the Democratic Party’s progressive wing, the DSA has been gaining relevance, with several of its members toppling longtime establishment party figures. This has prompted many to speculate that the DSA represents the Democratic Party’s future.

    Peter Pinedo is a politics writer for Fox News Digital.

  • 美国将伊朗航空业列为施压运动目标


    2026-09-08T16:01:58.477Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:珍妮弗·汉斯勒

    更新于58分钟前
    更新于2026年9月8日美国东部时间下午3:05
    发布于2026年9月8日美国东部时间中午12:01

    《中东航空新闻》

    在这张2019年的照片中,马汉航空的一架空客A340-600客机停在委内瑞拉加拉加斯郊外的西蒙·玻利瓦尔国际机场。

    卡洛斯·加西亚·罗林斯/路透社

    特朗普政府于周二对伊朗航空业采取全面制裁措施,作为其对德黑兰施压运动的一部分。

    最新一轮制裁波及27家伊朗航空公司以及9家被指控为马汉航空提供服务的服务提供商和销售代理商。马汉航空自2011年起就已被制裁,该公司被指控为伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队提供关键支持。

    周二被制裁的服务提供商和销售代理商分布在土耳其、马来西亚、哈萨克斯坦和阿联酋。

    “这些地区此前已收到明确警告,现在我们将直接采取行动,从根本上切断这些运营商与西方金融体系的联系,”一名美国财政部官员周二表示。这并非美国政府首次以涉嫌支持马汉航空为由制裁其他国家的运营商。

    此外,美国财政部“实际上将于今日终止所有与航空相关的许可证”,该官员表示,其中包括“伊朗领空飞越付款许可,以及此前授权非美国航空公司将受美国出口管制的飞机飞往伊朗的许可”。

    “我们还取消了一项用于安全和其他紧急航空支援的通用许可证,”他们补充道,并表示未来可能会逐案考虑此类许可证申请。

    “从本质上讲,我们正在将伊朗经济的整个航空部门排除在市场之外,”该官员说道。

    此次最新制裁措施出台之际,美国政府正试图切断德黑兰的金融生命线,并阻止其为持续的战事提供资金。美国财政部长斯科特·贝森特等政府官员曾将此次制裁与政权更迭的可能性联系起来。

    美国前伊朗问题副特使理查德·尼休表示,新的航空制裁“可能会产生实际影响,但主要是因为美国在霍尔木兹海峡维持的封锁,使得伊朗难以开展秘密采购等活动”。

    “不出所料,旅游业已经枯竭,因此这主要会阻碍商业和货运往来,”他告诉CNN。“如果我们下一步威胁向提供服务的机场施加压力,可能会减少整体过境量。”

    不过,专家和外交官们对这场被称为“经济放逐行动”的新制裁运动对德黑兰的整体影响表示质疑,因为伊朗已经经受了数十年的经济施压。

    伊朗外交部长阿巴斯·阿拉奇奇对美国最新的制裁举措嗤之以鼻。

    “在实施了47年制裁后,美国代表以色列向伊朗开战。其后果对美国而言是灾难性的,包括其在全球的声望,”他在X平台上写道。“在通过制裁或战争未能实现其目标后,华盛顿的‘新奇’解决方案是……更多制裁。说真的吗?”

    这位财政部官员周二声称,有“一系列不同的经济指标”和“许多不同的传闻”表明,这些制裁正在产生效果。

    专家和外交官们还对美国是否会对中国等伊朗主要合作伙伴采取切实行动深表怀疑。

    “在伊朗问题上,我们与中国的共同点多于分歧,”贝森特在上周二十国集团财长会议间隙的一场活动中表示,当时他谈到了核武器和航行自由问题。

    当被问及与北京方面的对话以及可能达成的共识点时,另一位财政部官员周二表示,贝森特“已就这些问题与众多外国 counterparts 进行了多次对话,其中一些对话最好保密”。

    “请大家知道,我们正在取得一定程度的进展,即便你们可能无法从公开渠道看到,”该官员在未明确提及中国的情况下说道。

    US targets Iran’s airline industry as part of pressure campaign

    2026-09-08T16:01:58.477Z / CNN

    By Jennifer Hansler

    Updated 58 min ago

    Updated Sep 8, 2026, 3:05 PM ET

    PUBLISHED Sep 8, 2026, 12:01 PM ET

    The Middle East Aviation news

    In this 2019 photo, an Airbus A340-600 airplane of Mahan Air is seen at Simon Bolivar International Airport outside Caracas, Venezuela.

    Carlos Garcia Rawlins/Reuters

    The Trump administration took sweeping actions against Iran’s airline industry on Tuesday as part of its pressure campaign on Tehran.

    The latest sanctions hit 27 Iranian airlines and nine service providers and sales agents accused of providing services to Mahan Air, which has been sanctioned since 2011. Mahan Air is a private Iranian airline accused of providing key support to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.

    The service providers and sales agents sanctioned Tuesday are in Turkey, Malaysia, Kazakhstan and the United Arab Emirates.

    “These jurisdictions have been on notice for some time, and now we’re moving quite directly to essentially cut off those operators from the Western financial system,” a Treasury official said Tuesday. It is not the first time the administration has targeted operators in other countries for allegedly supporting Mahan Air.

    In addition, the US Treasury Department is “effectively today terminating all licenses that related to aviation,” the official said, including “payments for overflights of Iranian airspace, authorizations that have allowed non-US airlines that were flying US export-controlled airplanes into Iran.”

    “We’ve also pulled back on a general license for safety and other emergency aviation support,” they said, noting they could consider such licenses on a case-by-case basis.

    “Essentially, we’re taking the entire aviation sector of the Iranian economy out of the market,” they said.

    The latest measures come as the administration seeks to cut off Tehran’s financial lifelines and stop its ability to fund the ongoing war. Administration officials like Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent have raised the prospect of regime change in connection to the sanctions.

    Richard Nephew, a former US deputy special envoy for Iran, said the new airline sanctions “could be meaningful but mostly as a way of making it hard to engage in clandestine procurement and similar given the blockade” the US has maintained in the Strait of Hormuz.

    “Tourism has dried up, not surprisingly, so this mainly hinders business and cargo transfers,” he told CNN. “If we take the next stop and threaten airports providing services, (it) could reduce overall transit.”

    Still, experts and diplomats have questioned the overall impact the new sanctions campaign, dubbed “Operation Economic Outcast,” will have on Tehran, which has withstood decades of economic pressure.

    Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi scoffed at the latest sanctions efforts by the US.

    “After 47 years of sanctions, the US went to war with Iran on behalf of Israel. The fallout has been disastrous for America, including its standing worldwide,” he wrote on X. “After failing to achieve its aims through sanctions or war, Washington’s ‘novel’ solution is…more sanctions. Seriously?”

    The Treasury official on Tuesday claimed there are a “number of different economic indicators” and “a number of different anecdotes that we’re seeing that sort of suggest and sort of show the effect that this is having.”

    There has also been deep skepticism from experts and diplomats that the US will take meaningful action against key Iranian partners like China.

    “We have more in common with the Chinese on Iran than we disagree with them on,” Bessent said at an event on the sidelines of the G20 Finance Ministers meeting last week, referencing nuclear weapons and freedom of navigation.

    Asked about conversations and possible points of agreement with Beijing, another Treasury official said Tuesday that Bessent has “had a number of conversations with lots of foreign counterparts about these issues, and some of those conversations are best kept private.”

    “Just know that there is a level of progress being made, even if you may not see it publicly,” the official said without specifically referring to China.

  • 特朗普向9/11一线救援人员致敬——同时推销其政治优先事项


    2026-09-08T17:48:28.615Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/08/politics/trump-9-11-event-iran

    当地时间周二,美国唐纳德·特朗普总统向在2001年9月11日恐怖袭击中勇敢冲向危险现场的英雄们致敬,此时美国正准备纪念这一庄严的25周年纪念日。

    他还在华盛顿特区白宫附近的这场活动中,短暂推销了自己的部分优先政策,包括为他对伊朗的军事行动辩护,并将9/11期间执法人员面临的危险与共产主义威胁相提并论——这是他在中期选举前攻击民主党的常用论调之一。

    来自纽约、华盛顿特区和宾夕法尼亚州的一线救援人员,以及军人、金星家庭(指阵亡军人家属)和牺牲救援人员的家属齐聚椭圆广场,现场展示了一根从世贸中心南楼回收的21英尺长、13900磅重的钢梁。

    “当我们看到这根钢梁时,我们会想起,无论面临何种威胁或挑战,美国都会战斗到底。美国将挺过难关,美国终将获胜,”总统说道。

    作为土生土长的纽约人,特朗普回忆了自己当天的经历:“我看到了一些我永远不想再看到的场面。”他将随后几天前往世贸遗址的经历描述为“令人痛心的”。

    这根钢梁曾从曼哈顿下城运往多个关键地点,包括宾夕法尼亚州尚克斯维尔的93号航班国家纪念碑,以及佛罗里达州萨拉索塔的艾玛·E·布克小学——当时的总统乔治·W·布什正是在这所小学与二年级学生一起读书时,得知第二座世贸大楼被撞击的消息。这根钢梁是更广泛教育项目的一部分,旨在向美国人讲述9/11英雄们的奉献与牺牲。同时,它也提醒人们——随着越来越多要么年纪太小记不起这场致命袭击、要么根本没出生的美国人长大成人——永远不要忘记这段历史。

    活动入口处展示了400多名牺牲的一线救援人员的照片,提醒人们铭记他们的牺牲。特朗普多次赞扬一线救援人员,还将这场悲剧与本届政府持续七个月的对伊朗军事行动相提并论。

    “我们现在之所以开战,是因为某个国家曾想要拥有核武器。他们当时离拥有核武器非常近,但现在他们绝无可能再获得了。他们永远也不会拥有核武器。伊朗不会拥有核武器,”他说。

    特朗普还追授威尔斯·克劳瑟总统自由勋章。这位被称为“红头巾男子”的克劳瑟是一名股票交易员兼志愿消防员,在世贸中心南楼坍塌前,他三次往返于南楼78层的大厅,协助引导民众撤离。特朗普在演讲中打趣道,这位牺牲的英雄“已经比我还出名了。我可不喜欢这样。”

    总统还向现场的多名官员表示了认可,其中包括商务部长霍华德·卢特尼克——袭击发生时,卢特尼克是Cantor Fitzgerald公司的总裁,该公司在世贸中心设有办事处,共损失658名员工,其中包括卢特尼克的兄弟。

    近日,卢特尼克因在CNBC采访中虚假声称美国在对伊朗战争中无人阵亡而受到审查。特朗普上周在Truth Social上预先试图淡化这一言论,卢特尼克随后也为该言论道歉。

    “他有些缺点,但总体来说,他非常优秀,”特朗普周二说道。

    总统的演讲也短暂转向政治议题,他赞扬了美国的执法部门,称他们负责保护国家免受包括共产主义在内的各种威胁,重复了他在竞选活动中用来攻击民主党人的论调。

    “面对某些威胁时,是我们的执法部门让国家保持团结。我们现在面临一些非常真实的威胁。有些人想走上另一条路,他们想走共产主义道路。好吧,这行不通,”他说。

    据熟悉其计划的人士透露,特朗普预计不会于周五前往纽约参加世贸中心的周年纪念仪式,但会在五角大楼纪念这一时刻。他不参加纽约世贸中心的仪式,部分原因是他想发表讲话。自2012年以来,纽约的这场活动就不允许政客发言。

    CNN的阿莱娜·特里恩为本报道贡献了内容。

    Trump honors 9/11 first responders — and plugs his political priorities

    2026-09-08T17:48:28.615Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/08/politics/trump-9-11-event-iran

    President Donald Trump on Tuesday honored the heroes who bravely ran toward the danger during the September 11, 2001, terror attacks as the nation prepares to commemorate the day’s solemn 25th anniversary.

    He also used the event near the White House in Washington, DC, to briefly plug some of his own priorities, including arguing for his war with Iran and comparing the danger officers faced during 9/11 to the threat of communism — one of his frequent digs at the Democratic Party ahead of the midterms.

    A crowd of first responders from New York, Washington, DC, and Pennsylvania, along with service members, Gold Star families and the families of fallen first responders gathered on the Ellipse, where a 21-foot, 13,900-pound steel beam recovered from the World Trade Center’s South Tower was on display.

    “When we see this steel, we’re reminded that no matter what threat or challenge comes our way, America will fight. America will endure, and America will prevail,” the president said.

    Trump, a native New Yorker, recalled his own experience that day: “I saw things that I never want to see again.” He described a trip to Ground Zero in the days that followed as “raw.”

    The steel beam, which has traveled from Lower Manhattan to key sites — including the Flight 93 National Memorial in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, and Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida, where then-President George W. Bush was reading with second grade students when he learned the second tower had been hit — is part of a broader educational effort to teach Americans about the service and sacrifice of the heroes of 9/11. And it’s a reminder — as more Americans grow up who were either too young to remember the fatal day or not born yet — to never forget.

    At the entrance to the event, images of more than 400 first responders who lost their lives provided a reminder of the sacrifice. Trump repeatedly praised the first responders, but also drew a comparison between the tragedy and the administration’s war with Iran, now in its seventh month.

    “We’re right now fighting because we have a certain nation that wanted a nuclear weapon. They were very close to getting it, and now they have no chance of getting it. They will never have a nuclear weapon. Iran will not have a nuclear weapon,” he said.

    Trump also posthumously honored Welles Crowther with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Known as the “man in the red bandana,” Crowther, an equity trader and volunteer firefighter, made three trips to the South Tower’s 78th floor lobby to help guide people to safety before the tower collapsed. Trump quipped during his speech that the fallen hero had “become more famous than me. I don’t like it.”

    The president recognized some of the officials in the audience, including Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick — who at the time of the attack was the president of Cantor Fitzgerald, which had offices in the World Trade Center and lost 658 employees, including Lutnick’s brother.

    Lutnick has come under scrutiny in recent days after the secretary falsely asserted in a CNBC interview that no Americans had died during the war with Iran. Trump preemptively sought to downplay the remark on Truth Social last week, and Lutnick later apologized for the comment.

    “He’s got some faults, but overall, he’s excellent,” Trump said Tuesday.

    The president’s speech also briefly veered political as he heralded the nation’s law enforcement, suggesting that they are responsible for protecting the country from threats — including communism, repeating a theme he’s used to attack Democrats on the campaign trail.

    “Our law enforcement holds our country together in light of some threats. We have some very real threats right now. We have people that want to go a different way, they want to go a communistic way. Well, that’s not going to work,” he said.

    Trump is not expected to travel to New York City on Friday for anniversary ceremonies at the World Trade Center, but will mark the moment at the Pentagon. Trump is not attending the World Trade Center ceremony in part because he wants to deliver remarks, people familiar with his plans said. Politicians have not been permitted to speak at the event in New York since 2012.

    CNN’s Alayna Treene contributed to this report.

  • 法院裁定:特朗普执政时期美国国税局非法向移民当局共享纳税人信息


    2026-09-08T19:22:33.387Z / 路透社

    2026年2月1日摄于美国华盛顿特区的美国国税局大楼。路透社/肯·塞德诺

    • 摘要
    • 法院认定国税局2025年向移民海关执法局共享了约4.7万个纳税人地址
    • 移民海关执法局曾申请获取多达128万个纳税人地址
    • 法院称国税局此举违反了水门事件后出台的联邦法律

    9月8日(路透社)——美国一家上诉法院周二维持了一项禁令,叫停美国国税局允许向移民当局共享数千名纳税人地址的政策,称特朗普政府的这一做法违反了联邦法律。

    美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院的一个三名法官组成的合议庭
    裁定,国税局去年根据该政府为扩大移民执法力度而采取的一项程序,向美国移民和海关执法局(ICE)披露了约4.7万个纳税人地址。

    通过《每日案卷》新闻简报获取晨间最新法律资讯,发送邮件订阅。点击此处注册。

    国税局和负责监管移民海关执法局的美国国土安全部未回应置评请求。

    根据两机构间的一项协议,国税局于2025年7月开始处理移民海关执法局的申请,为多达128万名涉嫌非法居留美国的人员查询其最后已知地址。

    国税局出台了一项程序,允许移民海关执法局只要在地址栏中提供5位或9位数字即可获取纳税人信息,即便该数字并非实际邮政编码。

    包括纳税人权利中心和主街联盟在内的多个团体提起诉讼,称该做法非法。一名下级法院法官认同了这一说法并叫停了该政策,而此时国税局已向移民海关执法局共享了47289条记录。

    唐纳德·特朗普总统政府在上诉中辩称,该裁决妨碍了联邦执法工作。

    “但这是对国会的抱怨,而非对法院的,”美国巡回法官科妮莉亚·皮拉德在上诉法院的裁决书中说道。

    皮拉德与该三名法官合议庭的其他成员一样,均由民主党总统巴拉克·奥巴马任命。

    理查德·尼克松总统任期内的水门丑闻曝光了美国纳税人信息遭滥用的问题后,国会禁止国税局向其他政府机构共享信息,除非相关机构符合严格的条件。

    皮拉德表示,特朗普执政时期国税局采用的程序在多个方面违反了联邦法律,其中“最严重的是”,该程序甚至未要求移民海关执法局按照法律规定提供纳税人的实际地址。

    皮拉德称,该做法“自动对数百万条记录进行审查,未进行任何个人审核,也未采取其他任何手段确保释放每位纳税人信息符合法律先决条件”。

    自由派法律组织“民主前进”的代表原告律师斯凯·佩里曼在一份声明中表示,她对法院“采取行动制止这种非法行为”感到欣慰。

    她说:“后水门时代出台的隐私法旨在防止此类权力滥用。”

    内特·雷蒙德在波士顿报道

    IRS under Trump unlawfully shared taxpayer info with immigration authorities, court rules

    2026-09-08T19:22:33.387Z / Reuters

    A view of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) building, in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 1, 2026. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno

    • Summary
    • Court says IRS shared roughly 47,000 taxpayer addresses with ICE in 2025
    • ICE had requested as many as 1.28 million taxpayer addresses
    • Court says IRS move flouted post-Watergate federal law

    Sept 8 (Reuters) – A U.S. appeals ​court on Tuesday upheld an injunction blocking an Internal Revenue Service policy that allowed ‌it to share thousands of taxpayers’ addresses with immigration authorities, saying the Trump administration’s practice violated federal law.

    A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

    ruled that the IRS last year disclosed roughly 47,000 ​taxpayer addresses to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement under a procedure adopted as part of ​the administration’s efforts to expand immigration enforcement.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    The IRS and U.S. Department of Homeland ⁠Security, which oversees ICE, did not respond to requests for comment.

    Under an agreement between the agencies, the ​IRS in July 2025 began processing ICE requests for the last known addresses of as many as ​1.28 million people suspected of unlawfully residing in the United States.

    The IRS adopted a procedure that allowed ICE to obtain information on taxpayers if it provided a five- or nine-digit number in an address field, even if that number was ​not an actual ZIP code.

    Groups including the Center for Taxpayer Rights and the Main Street Alliance sued, ​arguing the practice was unlawful. A lower-court judge agreed and blocked the policy, by which time the IRS had ‌already shared ⁠47,289 records with ICE.

    President Donald Trump’s administration on appeal contended the ruling hindered federal law enforcement.

    “But that’s a gripe with Congress, not the court,” U.S. Circuit Judge Cornelia Pillard said in the appeals court’s ruling.

    Pillard, like the rest of the three-judge panel, was appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama.

    After the Watergate scandal ​during President Richard Nixon’s ​era exposed abuses of ⁠U.S. taxpayers’ information, Congress barred the IRS sharing information with other government agencies unless they complied with stringent conditions.

    Pillard said the procedures the IRS under Trump ​adopted violated federal law in numerous ways, including “most egregiously” by not even ​requiring ICE to ⁠provide an actual address for a taxpayer as legally required.

    The practice, Pillard said, “automates the review of millions of records without any individual review or any other means of ensuring compliance with the legal prerequisites to releasing ⁠each individual ​taxpayer’s information.”

    Skye Perryman, whose liberal legal group Democracy Forward represented ​the plaintiffs, in a statement said she was pleased the court “acted to stop this unlawful behavior.”

    “The privacy laws enacted in the ​post-Watergate era exist to prevent abuses of power just like this,” she said.

    Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston

湘ICP备2026001899号-2