博客

  • 美国记者托马斯·波肯二世因充当中国代理人被判两年监禁,美国司法部称


    2026年9月3日 / 美国东部时间早上6:14 / 哥伦比亚广播公司/美联社

    华盛顿——美国司法部表示,一名美国记者因在美国境内充当外国政府代理人,被判处联邦监狱两年监禁。

    据其辩护律师查尔斯·伯纳姆透露,51岁的托马斯·威尔·波肯二世今年早些时候已认罪,且不打算上诉。司法部在周二的新闻稿中称,波肯还被判处36个月的监督释放,期间不得前往海外。他于今年2月被捕。

    这起案件是最新一系列联邦起诉案件之一,被告均被指控在未按规定披露的情况下为中国政府工作,当前华盛顿与北京之间的紧张关系仍处于高位。

    负责国家安全事务的助理司法部长约翰·A·艾森伯格在新闻稿中表示:“波肯为了金钱背叛了自己的国家”,他协助“中国国家安全部开展行动、招募线人并从潜在目标处收集敏感信息”。

    艾森伯格补充道:“国家安全部致力于追究任何协助或教唆中国间谍活动者的责任。”

    波肯于2010年移居中国后,为多家中国新闻机构担任记者,其中包括国家电视台央视。他最近的职务是中国官方通讯社新华社的编辑,该职位他自2024年起担任。

    “波肯先生已经承担责任,并尊重法院的判决,”他的律师表示,并补充道“正如政府在法庭上承认的那样,波肯先生并未向中国提供任何机密信息”。

    根据法庭文件,至少从2019年到2026年2月,波肯按照他明知为中国政府工作的人员的指示开展工作,其中包括2017年结识的一名被称为“凯西”的人。联邦调查局特别探员蒂莫西·J·希利2月27日提交的联邦法院宣誓书显示,“凯西”告诉他,这些报道会被中国国家主席习近平阅读。

    司法部称,波肯通过为“凯西”工作至少获得了10万美元报酬。

    除撰写报道外,“凯西”还要求波肯招募人员提供机密信息。在一个案例中,波肯接到指示与宣誓书中被称为“人物1”的人会面,并向其提供一部三星手机、一台电脑以及Signal、Telegram和网盘的密码。

    2025年1月,波肯返回美国时被海关与边境保护局特工拦下。宣誓书显示,在接受海关与边境保护局和联邦调查局特工的采访时,波肯称他“有80%的把握”那位寻求特朗普政府职位的人会向中国提供机密信息,尽管波肯曾建议此人不要这么做。

    宣誓书还称,波肯告诉调查人员,“凯西”通常会为他多年来往返美国的行程买单,且经常将款项汇入他妻子的银行账户。

    中国外交部周三未立即回应置评请求。

    波肯是德克萨斯州本地人,应父亲的要求使用汤姆·麦格雷戈这一别名担任评论员和撰稿人,他的父亲与他同名,希望与儿子在中国的工作划清界限。

    小波肯以本名托马斯·W·波肯二世出版了两本书。一本于2019年出版,主题是美中关系,另一本于2023年出版,内容是深圳——中国大陆与香港相对的一座城市。

    波肯的父亲曾在20世纪90年代担任德克萨斯州共和党主席,并在十多年前竞选过州长。

    在以麦格雷戈为名的最新一条公开可见的Facebook帖子中,波肯分享了妻子和孩子旅行时的照片,并写道“我和我的家人正享受华盛顿特区之旅”。他在当月晚些时候被捕。

    U.S. journalist Thomas Pauken II gets 2 year sentence for acting as agent for China, DOJ says

    September 3, 2026 / 6:14 AM EDT / CBS/AP

    Washington — An American journalist has been sentenced to two years in federal prison for acting as an agent of a foreign government within the United States, the U.S. Justice Department said.

    Thomas Weir Pauken II, 51, pleaded guilty earlier this year and is not planning to appeal, according to his defense lawyer, Charles Burnham. Pauken also was sentenced to 36 months of supervised release with no overseas travel, the department said in a news release on Tuesday. He was arrested in February.

    The case is the latest in a series of federal prosecutions involving people accused of working for the Chinese government without proper disclosure, as tensions between Washington and Beijing remain high.

    “Pauken betrayed his country for money” for supporting “Chinese Ministry of State Security (MSS) operations, recruiting, and gathering of sensitive information from potential assets,” said Assistant Attorney General for National Security John A. Eisenberg in the news release.

    “The National Security Division is committed to holding accountable anyone who aids or abets Chinese espionage efforts,” Eisenberg added.

    Pauken worked as a journalist for various Chinese news organizations after moving to China in 2010, including state broadcaster CCTV. He most recently worked as an editor for Xinhua, China’s state news agency, a position he had held since 2024.

    “Mr. Pauken has accepted responsibility and respects the court’s sentence,” his lawyer said, adding that “as the government agreed in court, Mr. Pauken did not provide any classified information to the Chinese.”

    According to court documents, from at least 2019 until February 2026, Pauken worked at the direction of people he knew worked for China’s government, including a person he met in 2017 identified as “Cathy.” “Cathy” told him the reports were read by Chinese President Xi Jinping, according to a Feb. 27 federal court affidavit filed by FBI Special Agent Timothy J. Healy.

    Pauken received at least $100,000 for his work with “Cathy,” the department said.

    In addition to writing reports, Pauken was asked by “Cathy” to recruit people to provide classified information. In one case, Pauken was instructed to meet with a person identified in the affidavit as “Person 1” and provide the person a Samsung phone, a computer, and passwords for Signal and Telegram, as well as NetDisk.

    Pauken was stopped by Customs and Border Protection agents when he returned to the U.S. in January 2025. In interviews with CBP and FBI agents, Pauken said he was “80 percent sure” that the person who was seeking a job in the Trump administration would provide classified information to China, although Pauken advised the person not to, according to the affidavit.

    Pauken also told investigators “Cathy” would usually pay for his trips to the U.S. through the years, and often wired payments to his wife’s bank accounts, the affidavit said.

    China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs didn’t immediately respond on Wednesday to a request seeking comment.

    Pauken, a Texas native, used the alias of Tom McGregor when working as a commentator and writer at the request of his father, who shares his name and wanted to distance himself from his son’s work in China.

    The younger Pauken published two books under his real name, Thomas W. Pauken II. One was published in 2019 about U.S.-China relations and another in 2023 about Shenzhen, a city across from Hong Kong in mainland China.

    Pauken’s father was a former chairman of the Texas Republican Party in the 1990s and ran for governor more than a decade ago.

    In the most recent publicly visible Facebook post under McGregor’s name, Pauken shared photos of his wife and child on a trip, writing “My family and I enjoying our trip to Washington DC.” He was arrested later that month.

  • 外交停滞不前,特朗普重拾伊朗政权更迭论调


    2026-09-03T09:00:29.639Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/03/politics/trump-regime-change-iran

    数月以来,唐纳德·特朗普总统一直在私下向其国家安全团队提出同一个问题:伊朗民众为何不推翻本国领导人?

    战争伊始,他对此结果颇为笃定,因以色列总理本雅明·内塔尼亚胡向其保证,在一轮密集空袭后,德黑兰将爆发街头抗议。

    据知情人士透露,其他美国官员看过情报评估后认为这种情况不太可能发生,对此并不确定,该问题在首轮空袭开始前曾引发激烈辩论。尽管如此,特朗普仍于2月底发动了这场冲突,并呼吁伊朗政府更迭。

    战争爆发当晚,他在一段视频中对伊朗民众表示:“这可能是你们几代人仅有的一次机会。”

    这一想法很快便淡出视野,取而代之的是与伊朗政权谈判重新开放霍尔木兹海峡这一更为紧迫的要务。到了6月,特朗普坚称自己“从未关心过伊朗的政权更迭”,声称自己正在与“非常理性的人”进行谈判,并表示美国试图推翻外国政府的做法“从未奏效”。

    尽管发表了上述言论,但据知情人士透露,特朗普仍在纠结为何自己呼吁政府更迭的声音无人理会。

    如今,霍尔木兹海峡的通航量仍低于战前水平,与伊朗的外交也陷入僵局,特朗普重拾了六个月前发动这场战争时所持的理念。

    “伊朗民众何时会起身反抗?”他周二在社交媒体上问道。

    这场战争似乎每月都会重复出现熟悉的模式,而此次转向政权更迭论调正是最新的既视感时刻。

    在美伊连续三天互相发动空袭打破了本周相对平静的局面后,双方回到了今夏早些时候持续数周的报复性袭击循环中。

    曾多次威胁要摧毁伊朗民用基础设施的特朗普周三表示,如有必要,他准备下令发动更大规模的打击。

    “昨晚的袭击非常猛烈,我们随时都可以再次发动袭击,”他说道,同时也表示他认为新一轮冲突不会持续太久。

    据官员透露,特朗普上月下令其特使停止与伊朗的谈判后,目前没有任何实质性的外交接触尝试。相反,特朗普表示他对当前的冲突态势感到满意,似乎并不急于达成持久的停火协议。

    “我喜欢我们现在的处境,”他本周在社交媒体上写道,“我们几乎完全控制了霍尔木兹海峡,而他们的经济则全面崩溃。”

    在未来两个月选民开始投票决定国会山权力平衡之际,特朗普阵营中的许多人都希望这场冲突能完全退居政治讨论的幕后。

    尽管特朗普淡化了中期选举在其伊朗政策决策中的作用,但高级顾问和国会山的共和党盟友均已发出警告,称新一轮冲突将在选举日带来麻烦。

    “我不知道他们还能承受多少,但不管怎样,这都无关紧要,”特朗普周三在谈到伊朗时说道,“我不会受到选举的影响。”

    降低冲突关注度的想法与政府战略的转变不谋而合——试图切断德黑兰的资金来源,包括威胁对其最大贸易伙伴实施制裁。美国财政部尚未实施这些威胁中最严厉的处罚措施。

    但特朗普团队试图切断伊朗经济生命线、加剧该国经济困境的部分考量,是为了引发幻想破灭的伊朗民众对本国领导人的不满。官员们私下承认,普通伊朗民众将首当其冲承受新制裁的冲击。

    伊朗国内的经济阵痛已经显现。通胀飙升,食品价格每周都在上涨。伊朗货币里亚尔汇率暴跌。伊朗高级官员承认他们正面临一系列经济问题。

    据国家媒体报道,伊朗总统马苏德·佩泽希基安在上周美国财政部宣布新制裁措施前曾表示:“对于这些问题的存在,我们深表歉意,因为我们正处于一场全面的经济、军事和安全战争之中。”

    尽管如此,一些美国官员表示,几乎没有情报表明伊朗抗议者会走上街头推翻本国领导人,即便该国的经济形势日益严峻。

    战争爆发前的美国情报评估结论是,美以联合行动不太可能导致政权更迭,而冲突爆发数月后,官员们表示伊朗政权并未失去对权力的掌控。

    几十年来,西方的严厉制裁几乎没有削弱该政权,这与历届美国政府的期望背道而驰。相反,抗议活动遭到了严厉镇压,包括今年年初伊朗政府发动了伊斯兰共和国历史上最严厉的镇压行动之一。

    分析人士表示,伊朗领导人非常清楚特朗普通过收紧经济制裁达成的目标。

    “伊朗领导层并不孤立地看待这种经济施压运动,而是将其视为美国更广泛运动的一部分,这场运动在某个时刻还会包含国内动乱因素,并最终要么导致政权更迭,要么迫使伊朗与美国达成更优惠的条件,”国际危机组织的高级伊朗问题分析师哈米德雷扎·阿齐兹说道。

    当被问及美国是否可能通过中央情报局武装试图推翻政权的伊朗异见人士时,特朗普含糊其辞。

    “我很想告诉你,”他周三在椭圆形办公室说道,“但这么做不合适。”

    即便在质问伊朗民众为何不起义之后,他也承认自己知道问题的答案。

    “我理解他们的困境,”他说,“他们现在正遭到枪击。”

    With diplomacy stalled, Trump returns to floating regime change in Iran

    2026-09-03T09:00:29.639Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/03/politics/trump-regime-change-iran

    It’s a question President Donald Trump has privately been asking his national security team for months: Why aren’t the Iranian people toppling their leaders?

    It was an outcome he seemed relatively certain of at the start of the war, convinced by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that street protests would flare up in Tehran after an intensive round of strikes.

    Other American officials, having read intelligence assessments suggesting that wasn’t likely, weren’t so sure, and the issue was hotly debated before the first strikes began, according to people familiar with the matter. Still, Trump launched the conflict in late February with a call for a government takeover.

    “This will be probably your only chance for generations,” he advised the Iranian people in a video the night the war began.

    The idea quickly faded from view, replaced by the more urgent imperative of negotiating with the regime to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. By June, Trump insisted he “never cared about regime change” in Iran, claiming he was in negotiations with “very rational people” and that American attempts at ousting foreign governments “never work.”

    Those comments aside, Trump continued wondering why his calls for government overthrow went unheeded, people familiar with the matter said.

    Now, with traffic through the strait still below pre-war levels and diplomacy with Iran at a standstill, Trump has returned to the concept he began the war with six months ago.

    “When are the Iranian people going to rise up and fight?” he asked on social media Tuesday.

    The pendulum swinging back to regime change advocacy was the latest déjà vu moment in a war that seems to cycle through familiar patterns in month-long increments.

    A month-long period of relative calm was punctured this week after the United States and Iran traded strikes over three consecutive days, returning to the same sequence of retaliation that stretched on for weeks earlier this summer.

    Trump, who has repeatedly threatened to wipe out Iran’s civilian infrastructure, said Wednesday he was prepared to order an even larger round of destruction if needed.

    “It was a very heavy attack last night and we’re prepared to do another one any time we want,” he said, while also saying he did not believe the renewed fighting would last long.

    There are currently no substantive attempts at returning to diplomacy after Trump ordered his envoys to halt their discussions with Iran last month, according to officials. Instead, Trump says he is content with the status of the conflict and sounds in no hurry to reach a durable conclusion to the fighting.

    “I like our position now,” he wrote on social media this week, “with almost total control of the Hormuz Strait, and their economy totally collapsing.”

    Many in Trump’s orbit would prefer the conflict recede from the forefront of political conversation entirely for the next two months as voters begin to cast ballots that will decide the balance of power on Capitol Hill.

    While the president has discounted the role the midterms are playing in his Iran decision-making, senior advisers and Republican allies on Capitol Hill have all issued warnings that renewed conflict would spell trouble on Election Day.

    “I don’t know how much more they can take, but, you know, whatever it is, it doesn’t matter,” Trump said of Iran on Wednesday. “And I’m not affected by the election.”

    The desire for a less visible conflict dovetailed with a shift in the administration’s strategy — to try choking off Tehran’s finances, including by threatening sanctions on its largest trading partners. The Treasury Department has yet to impose the biggest of those threatened penalties.

    But part of the Trump team’s calculation in trying to cut off Iran’s financial lifelines — and worsen the country’s economic conditions — was to prompt anger among disillusioned Iranians toward their leaders. Officials privately acknowledge that average Iranians will bear the brunt of the new sanctions.

    Already, the economic sting in Iran is real. Inflation has soared, and food prices are increasing by the week. The rial, Iran’s currency, has plunged in value. Iran’s top officials acknowledge they are suffering a host of economic problems.

    “We are apologetic that these problems exist, as we find ourselves in a full-scale economic, military, and security war,” Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian said before the new Treasury Department measures were announced last week, according to state media.

    Still, some US officials said there was little intelligence to indicate a renewed likelihood that Iranian protesters would take to the streets to oust their leaders, even as the economic situation in the country grows increasingly dire.

    American intelligence assessments before the war began concluded a joint US-Israeli operation was unlikely to lead to regime change, and months into the conflict officials said the regime had not lost its grip on power.

    And decades of crippling western sanctions have done little to weaken the regime, against the hopes of successive American administrations. Protests have instead been met with fierce crackdowns, including at the start of this year when the Iranian government unleashed one of the worst crackdowns in the Islamic Republic’s history.

    Analysts said Iran’s leaders were well attuned to Trump’s objectives in trying to tighten the noose economically.

    “The Iranian leadership sees this kind of economic campaign of economic pressure not in isolation, but as part of a broader campaign by the United States, which at some point is going to also have an element of domestic unrest and eventually lead either to regime change or to bring Iran to better terms with the United States,” said Hamidreza Azizi, senior Iran analyst at the International Crisis Group.

    Trump was coy when asked this week whether the US, perhaps through the CIA, would arm Iranian dissidents looking to overthrow the regime

    “I’d love to tell you that,” he said Wednesday in the Oval Office, “but it wouldn’t be appropriate to say.”

    And even after questioning why Iranians weren’t rising up, he acknowledged he knew the answer to his own query.

    “I understand their plight,” he said. “They’re being shot right now.”

  • 消息人士:肯尼迪要求将宾夕法尼亚州麻疹死亡病例从疾控中心统计中移除


    2026-09-03T10:02:59.729Z / 路透社

    华盛顿,9月3日路透电——三位知情人士透露,美国卫生部长小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪在质疑麻疹是否是导致死亡的原因后,要求其新任命的疾控中心主任将宾夕法尼亚州两例死亡病例的相关表述从该机构在线麻疹疫情统计中移除。

    一位宾夕法尼亚州官员表示,在肯尼迪提出这一要求之前,疾控中心工作人员已经认可了该州将死亡与麻疹相关联的定性。

    路透社每日简报通讯为您提供开启一天所需的全部新闻。点击此处订阅。

    尽管如此,三位不愿具名的知情人士称,刚上任的美国疾病控制与预防中心主任埃丽卡·施瓦茨同意了肯尼迪的指示,并无异议地执行了这一操作。

    这一举措发生在长期反疫苗活动人士、总统唐纳德·特朗普任命的肯尼迪与民主党宾夕法尼亚州州长乔希·夏皮罗在社交媒体上激烈交锋之后。两人互相指责对方将宾夕法尼亚州的疫情政治化,该州是特朗普政府上任以来最新一波麻疹疫情反弹的州之一。

    疾控中心和各州的数据显示,疫苗接种率持续下滑,众多医疗组织将疫苗犹豫情绪抬头列为主要原因。仅宾夕法尼亚州一地,该州卫生部门今年已报告540例麻疹病例。

    美国公共卫生协会首席执行官、前马里兰州卫生部长乔治斯·本杰明表示,即便疾控中心想要获取更多信息,该机构公开质疑州和地方卫生部门的结论也是“闻所未闻”的。

    “卫生部长无权干预正常流程,”本杰明说,“他有反疫苗议程,并且正在利用此事推行他的反疫苗主张。”

    负责监管疾控中心的美国卫生与公众服务部发言人格蕾丝·戴维斯·贾米森表示,这家公共卫生机构“已要求获取必要细节,以确定麻疹是否导致或促成了这些死亡”。她提到县和州卫生官员对事件经过的说法存在分歧。贾米森未就肯尼迪或施瓦茨移除死亡病例统计的行为置评。施瓦茨未回应置评请求。

    多年来,肯尼迪一直宣扬疫苗比其预防的疾病更危险的观点,尽管有数十年来的科学证据表明疫苗挽救了无数生命。美国儿童常规接种的麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹联合疫苗已被证明可提供97%的感染防护。

    作为卫生部长,肯尼迪一直在试图淡化美国麻疹病例上升的影响,目前病例数已达到三十多年来的峰值。他多次质疑病毒是否与目前报告的多起死亡病例直接相关。

    肯尼迪与夏皮罗互相指责

    据一位与夏皮罗关系密切的宾夕法尼亚州官员透露,8月25日上午,宾夕法尼亚州卫生部门曾向疾控中心通报两例与麻疹相关的死亡病例,并随后在其官网公开了这一消息。

    除两名死者均未接种疫苗外,宾夕法尼亚州未透露死亡的具体情况。该官员称,疾控中心未对收到的信息表示担忧,并“表示将继续支持(州卫生)部门的工作”。

    夏皮罗在当天晚些时候的新闻发布会上表示,肯尼迪致电他,提出提供联邦援助以协助该州应对麻疹疫情。夏皮罗称,他感谢了肯尼迪,并表示该州已采取积极应对措施,包括疾控中心和卫生与公众服务部工作人员已有的支持,但如果需要更多帮助,他会告知这位部长。

    夏皮罗还表示,他告诉肯尼迪,卫生部长过往的言论助长了关于疫苗安全性的阴谋论和错误信息,“这对全美各地的社区产生了负面影响”。

    次日,即8月26日,肯尼迪在X平台上回击,指责夏皮罗拒绝向疾控中心分享信息,并质疑这些死亡病例“完全是州长某位抱有希望的工作人员编造的”。

    上述与夏皮罗关系密切的官员称,就在同一天,宾夕法尼亚州卫生部门与疾控中心讨论了这两起病例的一些细节。该官员表示,疾控中心要求提供包含死者个人身份信息的健康记录,但该州法律禁止共享此类信息。州政府提出向疾控中心提供更多去标识化的信息,但该联邦机构尚未在所需文件上签字同意。

    宾夕法尼亚州卫生部门的一位发言人表示,该州已“向疾控中心提供了所有必要的流行病学数据”。

    周五,疾控中心推迟了麻疹数据网站的常规每周更新。周日更新页面时,该机构未将宾夕法尼亚州的死亡病例纳入统计,但在死亡统计表中添加了一个星号,并附带说明:“目前,现有信息无法确定麻疹是否导致或促成了(宾夕法尼亚州)这些死亡,或是这些个体死于其他疾病,同时感染了麻疹。”

    由于疾控中心未与州卫生部门合作开展调查,该机构尚未表明将依据何种信息来确定宾夕法尼亚州的死亡病例是否由麻疹引起。

    雅斯敏·阿布塔莱布华盛顿特区、丹·莱文旧金山报道;米歇尔·格斯伯格、奥罗拉·埃利斯编辑

    Kennedy asked to remove Pennsylvania measles death from CDC tally, sources say

    2026-09-03T10:02:59.729Z / Reuters

    WASHINGTON, Sept 3 (Reuters) – U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. asked his new CDC director to remove a reference to two Pennsylvania deaths from the agency’s online measles tally after he questioned whether the disease contributed to the ​fatalities, three sources familiar with the situation said.

    Kennedy’s request came after CDC staffers had already accepted the state’s characterization of the deaths as linked to measles, a Pennsylvania official ‌said.

    The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

    Despite that, Erica Schwartz, the recently appointed director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, agreed with Kennedy’s directive and implemented it without objection, said the three sources familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

    The move followed a heated exchange on social media between Kennedy, a long-time anti-vaccine activist appointed by President Donald Trump, and Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, a Democrat. The two officials accused each other of politicizing the outbreak in Pennsylvania, the latest state to grapple with a ​resurgence of measles since the Trump administration took office.

    Data from the CDC and from individual states shows that vaccine rates have been declining, with many medical organizations citing rising vaccine hesitancy as a major ​cause. In Pennsylvania alone, the state health department has reported 540 measles cases this year.

    Georges Benjamin, chief executive of the American Public Health Association and formerly ⁠Maryland’s secretary of health, said it is “unheard of” for the CDC to publicly raise doubts about the conclusions of state and local health departments, even if the agency seeks more information.

    “The secretary had no business ​interfering in the normal process,” Benjamin said. “He has an anti-vaccine agenda and he’s using this to play out his anti-vaccine agenda.”

    Grace Davis Jamison, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services which oversees CDC, said ​the public health agency “requested details necessary to determine whether measles caused or contributed to the deaths.” She cited conflicting reports between county and state health officials over what had transpired. Jamison did not comment on Kennedy’s or Schwartz’s role in excluding the deaths. Schwartz did not respond to a request for comment.

    Kennedy has for years promoted the idea that vaccines are more dangerous than the diseases they prevent, despite decades of scientific evidence that they save lives. The combined measles, mumps and ​rubella shot routinely given to U.S. children has been shown to provide 97% protection against infection.

    As health secretary, Kennedy has sought to minimize the impact of rising U.S. measles cases, now at their highest level in ​more than three decades. He has repeatedly cast doubt on whether the virus was directly related to the several deaths reported so far.

    KENNEDY, SHAPIRO TRADE BLAME

    The Pennsylvania health department notified the CDC of two measles-associated deaths on the morning ‌of August ⁠25 and then made the news public on its website, according to the Pennsylvania official, who is close to Shapiro.

    Pennsylvania did not share information about the circumstances of the deaths other than that the two individuals were unvaccinated. The CDC did not express concern over the information it had received and “signified its ongoing support for the (state health) department’s efforts,” the official said.

    Kennedy called Shapiro by phone and offered federal support to assist with the state’s measles outbreak, the governor said at a press conference later that day. Shapiro said he thanked Kennedy and said the state had implemented an aggressive response, including existing support from CDC and HHS staff, but ​that he would let the secretary know if ​they needed more help.

    Shapiro also said he told ⁠Kennedy that the health secretary’s past statements encouraged conspiracy theories and misinformation about the safety of vaccines, “having a negative impact on communities across America.”

    Kennedy fired back on X the following day, August 26, accusing Shapiro of refusing to share information with the CDC and questioning whether the deaths were “altogether fabricated by one of the ​Governor’s hopeful staffers.”

    That same day, the Pennsylvania health department discussed some details of the two cases with the CDC, the official close to Shapiro said. ​The CDC asked for health ⁠records that contained personally identifiable information about the deceased, which the state is legally barred from sharing, the Pennsylvania official said. The state offered to provide more de-identified information to CDC, but the federal agency has not signed off on the required paperwork, the official added.

    A spokesperson for the Pennsylvania health department said the state has “provided all required epidemiological data to the CDC.”

    On Friday, the CDC delayed its regular weekly update to its measles data website. When ⁠it updated ​the page on Sunday, it did not include the Pennsylvania fatalities but added an asterisk to its table on deaths with the ​following note: “At this time, available information does not establish whether measles caused or contributed to the (Pennsylvania) deaths or whether the individuals died from other causes while infected with measles.”

    The CDC has not indicated what information it will use to determine whether the Pennsylvania deaths ​were caused by measles, since it is not working with the state health department in its investigation.

    Reporting by Yasmeen Abutaleb in Washington, D.C. and Dan Levine in San Francisco; Editing by Michele Gershberg and Aurora Ellis

  • G20包括中俄一致支持美国放宽AI监管主张


    2026年9月3日 18:29 / 联合早报

    • G20成员国一致采纳“卡罗来纳原则”框架,支持美国对AI采取较宽松监管主张,将提交年底领袖峰会正式通过。
    • 该原则针对不同行业采取差异化监管并避免新设机构,虽不具法律约束力,但获中俄等成员支持释出罕有合作信号。
    • 美商务部长敦促各国允许AI合理使用版权内容训练系统并保护创作者,但未具体说明如何同时达成这两项目标。
    • 黄仁勋呼吁各国建设数据中心支撑经济,英官员则强调须在加速发展与维持公众信任间寻求不偏不倚的平衡点。

    image英伟达首席执行长黄仁勋(左)周三在G20科技创新峰会上与美国商务部长卢特尼克进行炉边对话,他说AI就像水、道路、电力和互联网,是国家发展经济必备的基础设施,呼吁各国大力建造AI数据中心。 (彭博社)

    (教堂山综合电)美国主张对人工智能(AI)和其他新兴科技采取较宽松的监管,获得包括中俄在内二十国集团(G20)成员国一致支持,这为特朗普政府和硅谷科技企业寻求以AI创新推动经济增长的战略赢得一场政治胜利。

    星期三(9月2日)在北卡罗来纳州举行的科技创新峰会上,G20所有成员国采纳了名为“卡罗来纳原则”(Carolina Principles)的新兴科技监管原则框架,将提交给G20领导人在今年底的领袖峰会正式通过。

    根据“卡罗来纳原则”,G20成员国将针对不同行业采取不同监管方式,并避免成立新的AI监管机构。框架同时敦促政府与私人界加强合作共同评估新兴科技,同时要考虑到延迟采用突破性产品可能产生的成本。

    虽然指导原则不具法律约束力,但在列强争相引领AI发展之际,获得包括中国和俄罗斯在内所有G20成员国的支持,释出罕有的合作信号。美国商务部长卢特尼克称这是“吃力的工作”,“将全球领袖聚在一起,难免涉及很多政治”。

    中国国家主席习近平本月稍后访问华盛顿与特朗普会面,主要议程之一预料就是导致中美摩擦渐大的AI课题。北京本周早前批评华府试图设置AI栅栏,阻止中企使用Anthropic的尖端模型。

    卢特尼克周三接受彭博电视访问时说,中美官员在科技峰会上探讨可如何合作,但他表明,美国无意放宽对华出口最尖端半导体晶片的管制。

    美促各国允许AI合理使用版权内容
    在G20科技峰会上,卢特尼克也敦促成员国制定规则,允许AI公司合理使用受版权保护的材料来训练AI系统,同时设法保护创作者。

    他说:“我们需要一个框架保护独创性推动着经济运行的创作者和发明家,同时避免对下个世代的创新者造成障碍。”但他并未具体提出两者可如何同时达成。

    多家美国科技巨头正因使用创作者的作品来训练AI模型而面临越来越多起诉。美国司法部刚在周三向法院提呈简报,对正面对《纽约时报》和其他报章起诉的OpenAI表示支持,称OpenAI是“合理使用”媒体的版权内容来训练大语言模型。

    黄仁勋:AI是支撑经济的基建
    出席科技峰会的多名AI科技大佬如马斯克、黄仁勋和奥尔特曼都表明支持特朗普政府要加快AI应用,同时较少干预监管的主张。

    英伟达首席执行长黄仁勋在跟卢特尼克对话时说:“我会建议,监管实际和真实的危害,而不是理论和假设的伤害。”

    他也大力呼吁G20成员国建设更多数据中心来支持AI革命。“每个国家都必须意识到AI是基础设施,就像水、道路、电力和互联网一样,他们必须建设基础设施,才能支撑本国经济。”

    与会官员则对AI的机遇与风险表达持平观点。英国主管科学、创新与投资的副部长麦克唐纳向法新社直言,企业领袖与官员的责任不同,英国同时寻求加速AI发展并维持公众的信任,须在两者间寻求不偏不倚的平衡点。

    欧盟委员会主管科技主权、安全与民主的执行副主席维尔库宁警告,AI领域正冒出新一波威胁,尤其近期发生的AI代理网络攻击事件,各国政府须紧密协作。

    G20包括中俄一致支持美国放宽AI监管主张

    2026年9月3日 18:29 / 联合早报

    • G20成员国一致采纳“卡罗来纳原则”框架,支持美国对AI采取较宽松监管主张,将提交年底领袖峰会正式通过。 – 该原则针对不同行业采取差异化监管并避免新设机构,虽不具法律约束力,但获中俄等成员支持释出罕有合作信号。 – 美商务部长敦促各国允许AI合理使用版权内容训练系统并保护创作者,但未具体说明如何同时达成这两项目标。 – 黄仁勋呼吁各国建设数据中心支撑经济,英官员则强调须在加速发展与维持公众信任间寻求不偏不倚的平衡点。

    英伟达首席执行长黄仁勋(左)周三在G20科技创新峰会上与美国商务部长卢特尼克进行炉边对话,他说AI就像水、道路、电力和互联网,是国家发展经济必备的基础设施,呼吁各国大力建造AI数据中心。 (彭博社)

    (教堂山综合电)美国主张对人工智能(AI)和其他新兴科技采取较宽松的监管,获得包括中俄在内二十国集团(G20)成员国一致支持,这为特朗普政府和硅谷科技企业寻求以AI创新推动经济增长的战略赢得一场政治胜利。

    星期三(9月2日)在北卡来罗纳州举行的科技创新峰会上,G20所有成员国采纳了名为“卡罗来纳原则”(Carolina Principles)的新兴科技监管原则框架,将提交给G20领导人在今年底的领袖峰会正式通过。

    根据“卡罗来纳原则”,G20成员国将针对不同行业采取不同监管方式,并避免成立新的AI监管机构。框架同时敦促政府与私人界加强合作共同评估新兴科技,同时要考虑到延迟采用突破性产品可能产生的成本。

    虽然指导原则不具法律约束力,但在列强争相引领AI发展之际,获得包括中国和俄罗斯在内所有G20成员国的支持,释出罕有的合作信号。美国商务部长卢特尼克称这是“吃力的工作”,“将全球领袖聚在一起,难免涉及很多政治”。

    中国国家主席习近平本月稍后访问华盛顿与特朗普会面,主要议程之一预料就是导致中美摩擦渐大的AI课题。北京本周早前批评华府试图设置AI栅栏,阻止中企使用Anthropic的尖端模型。

    卢特尼克周三接受彭博电视访问时说,中美官员在科技峰会上探讨可如何合作,但他表明,美国无意放宽对华出口最尖端半导体晶片的管制。

    美促各国允许AI合理使用版权内容

    在G20科技峰会上,卢特尼克也敦促成员国制定规则,允许AI公司合理使用受版权保护的材料来训练AI系统,同时设法保护创作者。

    他说:“我们需要一个框架保护独创性推动着经济运行的创作者和发明家,同时避免对下个世代的创新者造成障碍。”但他并未具体提出两者可如何同时达成。

    多家美国科技巨头正因使用创作者的作品来训练AI模型而面临越来越多起诉。美国司法部刚在周三向法院提呈简报,对正面对《纽约时报》和其他报章起诉的OpenAI表示支持,称OpenAI是“合理使用”媒体的版权内容来训练大语言模型。

    黄仁勋:AI是支撑经济的基建

    出席科技峰会的多名AI科技大佬如马斯克、黄仁勋和奥尔特曼都表明支持特朗普政府要加快AI应用,同时较少干预监管的主张。

    英伟达首席执行长黄仁勋在跟卢特尼克对话时说:“我会建议,监管实际和真实的危害,而不是理论和假设的伤害。”

    他也大力呼吁G20成员国建设更多数据中心来支持AI革命。“每个国家都必须意识到AI是基础设施,就像水、道路、电力和互联网一样,他们必须建设基础设施,才能支撑本国经济。”

    与会官员则对AI的机遇与风险表达持平观点。英国主管科学、创新与投资的副部长麦克唐纳向法新社直言,企业领袖与官员的责任不同,英国同时寻求加速AI发展并维持公众的信任,须在两者间寻求不偏不倚的平衡点。

    欧盟委员会主管科技主权、安全与民主的执行副主席维尔库宁警告,AI领域正冒出新一波威胁,尤其近期发生的AI代理网络攻击事件,各国政府须紧密协作。

  • G20包括中俄一致支持美国放宽AI监管主张


    2026年9月3日 18:29 / 联合早报

    • G20成员国一致采纳“卡罗来纳原则”框架,支持美国对AI采取较宽松监管主张,将提交年底领袖峰会正式通过。
    • 该原则针对不同行业采取差异化监管并避免新设机构,虽不具法律约束力,但获中俄等成员支持释出罕有合作信号。
    • 美商务部长敦促各国允许AI合理使用版权内容训练系统并保护创作者,但未具体说明如何同时达成这两项目标。
    • 黄仁勋呼吁各国建设数据中心支撑经济,英官员则强调须在加速发展与维持公众信任间寻求不偏不倚的平衡点。

    image

    英伟达首席执行长黄仁勋(左)周三在G20科技创新峰会上与美国商务部长卢特尼克进行炉边对话,他说AI就像水、道路、电力和互联网,是国家发展经济必备的基础设施,呼吁各国大力建造AI数据中心。 (彭博社)

    (教堂山综合电)美国主张对人工智能(AI)和其他新兴科技采取较宽松的监管,获得包括中俄在内二十国集团(G20)成员国一致支持,这为特朗普政府和硅谷科技企业寻求以AI创新推动经济增长的战略赢得一场政治胜利。

    星期三(9月2日)在北卡罗来纳州举行的科技创新峰会上,G20所有成员国采纳了名为“卡罗来纳原则”(Carolina Principles)的新兴科技监管原则框架,将提交给G20领导人在今年底的领袖峰会正式通过。

    根据“卡罗来纳原则”,G20成员国将针对不同行业采取不同监管方式,并避免成立新的AI监管机构。框架同时敦促政府与私人界加强合作共同评估新兴科技,同时要考虑到延迟采用突破性产品可能产生的成本。

    虽然指导原则不具法律约束力,但在列强争相引领AI发展之际,获得包括中国和俄罗斯在内所有G20成员国的支持,释出罕有的合作信号。美国商务部长卢特尼克称这是“吃力的工作”,“将全球领袖聚在一起,难免涉及很多政治”。

    中国国家主席习近平本月稍后访问华盛顿与特朗普会面,主要议程之一预料就是导致中美摩擦渐大的AI课题。北京本周早前批评华府试图设置AI栅栏,阻止中企使用Anthropic的尖端模型。

    卢特尼克周三接受彭博电视访问时说,中美官员在科技峰会上探讨可如何合作,但他表明,美国无意放宽对华出口最尖端半导体晶片的管制。

    美促各国允许AI合理使用版权内容

    在G20科技峰会上,卢特尼克也敦促成员国制定规则,允许AI公司合理使用受版权保护的材料来训练AI系统,同时设法保护创作者。

    他说:“我们需要一个框架保护独创性推动着经济运行的创作者和发明家,同时避免对下个世代的创新者造成障碍。”但他并未具体提出两者可如何同时达成。

    多家美国科技巨头正因使用创作者的作品来训练AI模型而面临越来越多起诉。美国司法部刚在周三向法院提呈简报,对正面对《纽约时报》和其他报章起诉的OpenAI表示支持,称OpenAI是“合理使用”媒体的版权内容来训练大语言模型。

    黄仁勋:AI是支撑经济的基建

    出席科技峰会的多名AI科技大佬如马斯克、黄仁勋和奥尔特曼都表明支持特朗普政府要加快AI应用,同时较少干预监管的主张。

    英伟达首席执行长黄仁勋在跟卢特尼克对话时说:“我会建议,监管实际和真实的危害,而不是理论和假设的伤害。”

    他也大力呼吁G20成员国建设更多数据中心来支持AI革命。“每个国家都必须意识到AI是基础设施,就像水、道路、电力和互联网一样,他们必须建设基础设施,才能支撑本国经济。”

    与会官员则对AI的机遇与风险表达持平观点。英国主管科学、创新与投资的副部长麦克唐纳向法新社直言,企业领袖与官员的责任不同,英国同时寻求加速AI发展并维持公众的信任,须在两者间寻求不偏不倚的平衡点。

    欧盟委员会主管科技主权、安全与民主的执行副主席维尔库宁警告,AI领域正冒出新一波威胁,尤其近期发生的AI代理网络攻击事件,各国政府须紧密协作。

    G20包括中俄一致支持美国放宽AI监管主张

    2026年9月3日 18:29 / 联合早报

    • G20成员国一致采纳“卡罗来纳原则”框架,支持美国对AI采取较宽松监管主张,将提交年底领袖峰会正式通过。 – 该原则针对不同行业采取差异化监管并避免新设机构,虽不具法律约束力,但获中俄等成员支持释出罕有合作信号。 – 美商务部长敦促各国允许AI合理使用版权内容训练系统并保护创作者,但未具体说明如何同时达成这两项目标。 – 黄仁勋呼吁各国建设数据中心支撑经济,英官员则强调须在加速发展与维持公众信任间寻求不偏不倚的平衡点。

    英伟达首席执行长黄仁勋(左)周三在G20科技创新峰会上与美国商务部长卢特尼克进行炉边对话,他说AI就像水、道路、电力和互联网,是国家发展经济必备的基础设施,呼吁各国大力建造AI数据中心。 (彭博社)

    (教堂山综合电)美国主张对人工智能(AI)和其他新兴科技采取较宽松的监管,获得包括中俄在内二十国集团(G20)成员国一致支持,这为特朗普政府和硅谷科技企业寻求以AI创新推动经济增长的战略赢得一场政治胜利。

    星期三(9月2日)在北卡来罗纳州举行的科技创新峰会上,G20所有成员国采纳了名为“卡罗来纳原则”(Carolina Principles)的新兴科技监管原则框架,将提交给G20领导人在今年底的领袖峰会正式通过。

    根据“卡罗来纳原则”,G20成员国将针对不同行业采取不同监管方式,并避免成立新的AI监管机构。框架同时敦促政府与私人界加强合作共同评估新兴科技,同时要考虑到延迟采用突破性产品可能产生的成本。

    虽然指导原则不具法律约束力,但在列强争相引领AI发展之际,获得包括中国和俄罗斯在内所有G20成员国的支持,释出罕有的合作信号。美国商务部长卢特尼克称这是“吃力的工作”,“将全球领袖聚在一起,难免涉及很多政治”。

    中国国家主席习近平本月稍后访问华盛顿与特朗普会面,主要议程之一预料就是导致中美摩擦渐大的AI课题。北京本周早前批评华府试图设置AI栅栏,阻止中企使用Anthropic的尖端模型。

    卢特尼克周三接受彭博电视访问时说,中美官员在科技峰会上探讨可如何合作,但他表明,美国无意放宽对华出口最尖端半导体晶片的管制。

    美促各国允许AI合理使用版权内容

    在G20科技峰会上,卢特尼克也敦促成员国制定规则,允许AI公司合理使用受版权保护的材料来训练AI系统,同时设法保护创作者。

    他说:“我们需要一个框架保护独创性推动着经济运行的创作者和发明家,同时避免对下个世代的创新者造成障碍。”但他并未具体提出两者可如何同时达成。

    多家美国科技巨头正因使用创作者的作品来训练AI模型而面临越来越多起诉。美国司法部刚在周三向法院提呈简报,对正面对《纽约时报》和其他报章起诉的OpenAI表示支持,称OpenAI是“合理使用”媒体的版权内容来训练大语言模型。

    黄仁勋:AI是支撑经济的基建

    出席科技峰会的多名AI科技大佬如马斯克、黄仁勋和奥尔特曼都表明支持特朗普政府要加快AI应用,同时较少干预监管的主张。

    英伟达首席执行长黄仁勋在跟卢特尼克对话时说:“我会建议,监管实际和真实的危害,而不是理论和假设的伤害。”

    他也大力呼吁G20成员国建设更多数据中心来支持AI革命。“每个国家都必须意识到AI是基础设施,就像水、道路、电力和互联网一样,他们必须建设基础设施,才能支撑本国经济。”

    与会官员则对AI的机遇与风险表达持平观点。英国主管科学、创新与投资的副部长麦克唐纳向法新社直言,企业领袖与官员的责任不同,英国同时寻求加速AI发展并维持公众的信任,须在两者间寻求不偏不倚的平衡点。

    欧盟委员会主管科技主权、安全与民主的执行副主席维尔库宁警告,AI领域正冒出新一波威胁,尤其近期发生的AI代理网络攻击事件,各国政府须紧密协作。

  • 约翰逊淡化共和党中期选举困境 民主党瞄准众议院控制权:“我非常乐观”


    众议院议长迈克·约翰逊态度强硬,民主党将目标选区扩大至58个共和党掌控的选区

    2026-09-03 05:00:45 EDT / 福克斯新闻
    作者:保罗·斯坦豪瑟 福克斯新闻
    发布于2026年9月3日 美国东部时间上午5:00

    当被问及不仅要保住甚至还要扩大共和党在国会的多数席位时,众议院议长迈克·约翰逊告诉福克斯新闻数字频道:“我对选举夜的结果非常乐观。”

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章!

    距离选举日还有两个月,六个州的提前投票将于本月晚些时候启动,民主党人越来越乐观地认为他们可以重新夺回国会多数席位。

    中期选举进入最后冲刺阶段,尽管民主党自身的全国性品牌形象不佳,但他们仍认为当前的政治环境出人意料地有利;而共和党人则坚称,结构性优势以及民主党向左翼靠拢的立场,将让他们打破中期选举的历史规律。

    参议院共和党人以53比47的优势掌控该院,而众议院的多数席位则更加脆弱。领先的无党派政治预测机构的最新预测也越来越倾向于民主党。

    但态度强硬的众议院议长迈克·约翰逊不仅预测共和党将保住该院的控制权,还告诉福克斯新闻数字频道:“我们将扩大多数席位优势。”

    议长约翰逊打破历史的中期选举预测

    众议院议长迈克·约翰逊(中)于2026年8月17日在缅因州奥本与缅因州第二国会选区共和党提名候选人、前州长保罗·勒佩奇一同竞选。(保罗·斯坦豪瑟/福克斯新闻)

    作为当前执政党,共和党本就面临着传统政治逆风——历史上中期选举年国会席位通常会出现流失。再加上民众日常在杂货店就能感受到的持续通胀、与伊朗的不得人心的战争推高的汽油价格,以及唐纳德·特朗普总统远低于及格线的支持率,让共和党处境更加艰难。

    “共和党原本以为已经稳拿参议院,但现在民主党人正走在胜利的道路上,我们彻底打乱了竞选版图。”参议院民主党领袖、纽约州参议员查克·舒默两周前对记者表示。

    但民主党人在试图中期选举夺回国会多数席位的过程中也面临自身问题,包括民调显示其政党品牌极不受欢迎。今年春夏,左翼和社会主义候选人在民主党初选中击败建制派对手的高调胜利,也给了共和党额外的弹药,将所有民主党人描绘成极端主义者。

    这12场中期选举将决定哪个政党掌控参议院

    国会候选人克莱尔·巴尔德斯、布拉德·兰德、市长佐赫兰·曼达尼和国会议员候选人达丽亚利扎·阿维拉·谢瓦利尔于2026年6月18日在纽约市国王剧院举行的“动员投票”集会上举手。(迈克尔·M·圣地亚哥/盖蒂图片社)

    “这是一场对比鲜明的选举,民众正在对比常识性解决方案与候选人,而另一方代表的则是真正的疯狂。”约翰逊在缅因州竞选期间接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访时声称,“我对选举夜的结果非常乐观。”

    在众议院的角逐中,特朗普和共和党领导人推动的中期选区重划给共和党带来了提振,全美范围内可能新增多达12个倾向保守党的新划定选区。

    但有迹象表明共和党面临着艰难的选情:众议院民主党人上月将中期选举目标选区扩大至58个共和党掌控的选区,其中包括特朗普在2024年赢得的12个席位。

    两年前特朗普和共和党获胜的动力来自受高生活成本困扰的美国民众。而两年后,通胀成为共和党最大的软肋。

    2026年民主进程:随时关注福克斯新闻选举中心

    唐纳德·特朗普总统于2026年8月21日在南卡罗来纳州默特尔比奇会议中心为美国参议员达琳·格雷厄姆举行的竞选集会上发表讲话前指向观众。(索尔·洛布/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    在最新的福克斯新闻全国民调中,四分之三的受访者表示通胀给他们带来了经济困难,54%的人预计经济会进一步恶化。

    福克斯新闻民调以及其他近期调查还显示,民主党人的投票热情高于共和党,且在通用选票问题上继续领先——该问题询问受访者在不提及具体候选人的情况下,会投票给民主党还是共和党候选人。

    “唐纳德·特朗普发动了一场无人想要的战争,现在美国人正在为此付出代价。汽油价格飙升,本已在特朗普执政时期的经济中苦苦挣扎的家庭,在为这场战争买单的同时,不得不进一步紧缩预算。”民主党全国委员会主席肯·马丁在一份声明中表示。

    使用 Flourish 制作图表

    共和党在竞选资金上领先民主党,并且对中期选举仍持乐观态度。

    “我们有机会打破历史规律,赢得中期选举。”共和党全国委员会主席乔·格鲁特斯今年夏天告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。

    格鲁特斯和其他共和党领导人重点宣传了国会共和党通过并由特朗普签署成为法律的针对小费、加班费和社会保障税的重大减税政策。

    订阅获取政治新闻通讯

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6399918061112

    但共和党面临着投票率低迷的问题:没有特朗普名字出现在选票上时,“让美国再次伟大”的选民并不总是会前往投票站投票。

    格鲁特斯称特朗普是“政治史上无与伦比的最佳表演家……他知道如何吸引这些投票率低迷的选民,知道如何调动人们的积极性,让他们为中期选举感到兴奋,而这正是我们所需要的。”

    他还提到了下周举办的首届共和党中期选举大会,表示“这让我们有机会展示这位总统在这场伟大的美国复兴进程中所做的一切好事。”

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    但民主党也在宣传自身的动员投票努力。

    “今年,民主党全国委员会的组织团队推出了‘本地倾听者’项目,这是一个前所未有的项目,与近1万名2020年投票但2024年未投票的选民进行了沟通。”民主党全国委员会的马丁说,“我们的发现可能会改变今年中期选举的局势。”

    保罗·斯坦豪瑟为福克斯新闻全程报道全国竞选活动

    Johnson downplays GOP’s midterm woes as Democrats eye House takeover: ‘I am very bullish’

    House Speaker Mike Johnson remains defiant as Democrats expand their target list to 58 Republican-held districts

    2026-09-03 05:00:45 EDT / Fox News

    By Paul Steinhauser Fox News

    Published September 3, 2026 5:00am EDT

    Asked about not only holding but growing the GOP’s congressional majority, House Speaker Mike Johnson tells News Digital ‘I am very bullish about the outcome on Election Night.’

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    With two months to go until Election Day, and early voting kicking off later this month in half a dozen states, Democrats are increasingly optimistic they can recapture congressional majorities.

    With the final stretch towards the midterms underway, Democrats see an unexpectedly favorable political environment despite their own weak national brand, while Republicans insist structural advantages and the Democrats’ shift to the left will allow them to defy midterm history.

    Senate Republicans control their chamber by a 53-47 margin, and the majority is even more fragile in the House. And the latest forecasts from the leading nonpartisan political handicappers keep leaning towards the Democrats.

    But a defiant House Speaker Mike Johnson not only predicts the GOP will hold control of the chamber, but he tells Fox News Digital, “We’re going to grow the majority.”

    SPEAKER JOHNSON’S MIDTERM PREDICTION TO BUCK HISTORY

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, center, campaigns with former Gov. Paul LePage, the Republican nominee in Maine’s 2nd Congressional District, in Auburn, Maine, on August 17, 2026.(Paul Steinhauser/Fox News)

    Republicans — as the party currently in power — were already up against traditional political headwinds that have historically led to a loss of congressional seats during midterm election years. Add to that the challenging climate fueled by persistent inflation Americans see daily at the grocery store, high gas prices tied to what polls show is an unpopular war with Iran and President Donald Trump’s well underwater approval ratings.

    “We are going to take back the Senate. Republicans thought they had the Senate locked down, but now Democrats, we are on the path to victory. We’ve blown the map wide open,” longtime Senate Democratic Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York told reporters two weeks ago.

    But Democrats have problems of their own as they try to win back control of congressional majorities in the midterms, including a party brand that public opinion polling indicates is extremely unpopular. And high-profile victories this spring and summer by left-wing and socialist candidates over establishment rivals in Democratic primaries are giving Republicans extra ammunition to portray all Democrats as extremists.

    THESE 12 MIDTERM RACES WILL DECIDE WHICH PARTY CONTROLS THE SENATE

    Congressional candidate Claire Valdez, congressional candidate Brad Lander, Mayor Zohran Mamdani and congressional candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier raise their hands during a Get Out the Vote (GOTV) rally at King’s Theater on June 18, 2026, in New York City.(Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

    “It’s a contrast election, and people are making a contrast between common-sense solutions and candidates, and really crazy, which is represented by the other side,” Johnson claimed, during a Fox News Digital interview on the campaign trail in Maine. “I am very bullish about the outcome on election night.”

    In the battle for the House, the mid-decade redistricting push by Trump and GOP leaders is giving Republicans a boost, with a potential net gain of up to a dozen newly drawn right-tilting districts across the country.

    But in a sign of the rough landscape facing the GOP, House Democrats last month expanded their midterm target list to 58 Republican-held districts, including 12 seats in territory Trump carried in 2024.

    The victories by Trump and Republicans two years ago were fueled by Americans fed up with the high cost of living. Two years later, inflation is the Republicans’ biggest liability.

    DEMOCRACY ’26: STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE FOX NEWS ELECTION HUB

    President Donald Trump points as he arrives to speak during a campaign rally for U.S. Sen. Darline Graham at Myrtle Beach Convention Center in Myrtle Beach, S.C. on Aug. 21, 2026.(SAUL LOEB / AFP via Getty Images)

    Three out of four voters questioned in the most recent Fox News national poll said inflation had caused financial hardship, while 54% expected the economy to worsen.

    The Fox News poll and other recent surveys also indicate Democrats holding an enthusiasm advantage over Republicans, and continuing to lead on the generic ballot question, which asks if a respondent would vote for the Democrat or Republican in their congressional district without offering specific names.

    “Donald Trump started a war that no one wanted, and now Americans are paying the price. Gas prices are soaring and families who were already struggling in Trump’s economy are forced to stretch their budgets even further while footing the bill for this war,”Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin said in a statement.

    Made with Flourish•Create a chart

    Republicans hold a campaign cash edge over Democrats, and remain optimistic about the midterms.

    “We have a chance to defy history and win the midterms,” Republican National Committee (RNC) Chair Joe Gruters told Fox News Digital this summer.

    Gruters and other GOP leaders are spotlighting the major tax cuts on tips, overtime and Social Security that congressional Republicans passed and Trump signed into law last year.

    SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6399918061112

    But Republicans are facing a low-propensity problem: MAGA voters who don’t always go to the polls when Trump’s name isn’t on the ballot.

    Gruters called Trump the “best showman that’s ever existed in politics, bar none… He knows how to deliver these low-propensity voters. He knows how to get people up, motivated, excited about the midterms, and that’s what we’re going to need.”

    And he pointed to next week’s first ever GOP midterm convention and said, “It gives us a chance to highlight all the wonderful things this president has done in our effort on this great American comeback.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    But Democrats are touting their own get-out-the-vote efforts.

    “This year, the DNC organizing team launched Local Listeners, a first-of-its-kind program that talked to nearly 10,000 people who voted in 2020, but not 2024,” the DNC’s Martin said. “What we found could change the game for the midterms this year.”

    Paul Steinhauser covers the national campaign trail from coast to coast for Fox News

  • 女权运动先驱格洛丽亚·斯泰纳姆逝世,享年92岁


    2026-09-03T06:19:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
    作者:大卫·摩根
    更新于:2026年9月3日 / 美国东部时间上午7:35 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    《女士》杂志联合创始人、20世纪后半叶女权解放运动先驱格洛丽亚·斯泰纳姆已逝世,享年92岁。

    格洛丽亚·斯泰纳姆基金会周四在社交媒体发帖称,她“在纽约家中平静离世,身边环绕着众多爱她的人”。报道未提及死因。

    “她是构建女性平等整个体系的设计师之一,我是说,她扫清了障碍,让年轻女性能够凭借自身才华和努力实现发展,”美国前国务卿希拉里·克林顿周四在《CBS早间节目》中表示。

    “格洛丽亚本质上是一名乐观主义者,”克林顿说道,“她的行动主义植根于乐观主义,这是一种道德选择,她每天都在践行这一点。”

    1971年,《新闻周刊》将斯泰纳姆誉为“新女性”。她联合创办了《女士》杂志,这是第一家由女性所有、运营和撰稿的主流出版物。在政治、大众媒体和消费主义前所未有地交织在一起的时代,《女士》杂志是推动平等权利的先锋,有助于提高人们对影响妇女和女童的包容、媒体代表性和社会正义等问题的认识。

    作为一名记者,斯泰纳姆打破了“女性议题”仅局限于女性,或女性声音不应出现在政治或战争讨论中的观念。斯泰纳姆不知疲倦地倡导女性在政治领域的声音——在投票箱前,在权力大厅中——为投票权而斗争,并推动女性候选人参选。


    ![2013年1月15日,格洛丽亚·斯泰纳姆在加利福尼亚州帕萨迪纳。理查德·肖特韦尔/Invision/美联社摄]

    她推动了妇女和女童的经济与社会正义事业,包括生殖自由和免受家庭暴力的安全保障,并致力于提升女性在媒体领域的地位。由妇女基金会发起的“带女儿上班日”这一简单理念,旨在提升职场机会,后来发展成为一项全球性活动,覆盖数百万女儿(和儿子),致力于打破性别刻板印象。

    《女士》杂志的诞生

    20世纪60年代末,在担任《纽约》杂志记者的早期阶段,斯泰纳姆参加了一场女性集会,她们讲述了自己非法堕胎的经历。她在2006年接受《星期日晨报》采访时表示:“我听到女性们站出来,公开且认真地谈论一件只影响女性的事情。在此之前,我从未听过这种事。如果这件事不影响男性,那它就不能算是‘严肃’的事。一件非法、可耻的事,理论上是这样。(堕胎的女性)不得不进入犯罪地下世界。突然间我想:‘等等,你知道吗?如果我们中有三分之一或四分之一的人,包括我自己,都有过这种经历,那为什么它是非法的?’而这就是觉醒的开始。”

    这种“觉醒”最终催生了《女士》杂志。她与活动家多萝西·皮特曼·休斯联合创办了该杂志,第一期完整刊物于1972年7月1日在报亭上架。除了封面刊登神奇女侠的形象外,该期刊还刊登了一份请愿书,由不同背景的女性签署,宣布她们曾堕胎,并要求堕胎安全合法化。(一年后,最高法院作出罗伊诉韦德案裁决,保护堕胎权,该裁决一直持续到2022年。)

    《女士》杂志执行主编凯瑟琳·斯皮拉尔在2023年编纂了《〈女士〉杂志50年:点燃革命的先锋杂志精选》,她在接受《星期日晨报》采访时表示,该杂志开启并放大了诸多趋势,包括“大量关于男性、婚姻、人际关系、育儿、政治和针对女性的暴力行为的文章——这些议题反复出现。这展示了这场运动的持久力,也展示了我们对手的持久力。”


    ![1978年,女权主义者兼活动家格洛丽亚·斯泰纳姆在纽约市联合国外的集会上发表演讲。贝蒂·莱恩/历史照片研究者/盖蒂图片社摄]

    当然,杂志也引发了争议。一期关于职场性骚扰的报道封面照片展示了一名男子抚摸玩偶的画面,导致该杂志被撤下报摊。广告销售也面临挑战;一家大型化妆品公司的负责人告诉斯泰纳姆,阅读《女士》杂志的女性不买化妆品,而汽车制造商则不愿投放广告,因为他们认为女性不会买车。

    尽管如此,杂志仍坚持出版,并获得了诸多奖项,刊登过芭芭拉·埃伦赖希、安吉拉·戴维斯、艾丽斯·沃克、苏珊·法卢迪、苏珊·布朗米勒、埃莉诺·霍姆斯·诺顿和简·瓦格纳等作家的文章。随着女权主义本身开辟新的道路,杂志也持续发展。尽管遭到右翼评论员的攻击,他们声称该杂志贬低“家庭价值观”,《女士》杂志也遭到左翼一些人士的批评,他们认为该杂志过于保守,缺乏观点多样性。

    斯泰纳姆表示,随着女权解放运动势头渐盛,“女权主义”这个词似乎因为两个原因威胁到人们:“其一,因为他们不理解它;其二,因为他们确实理解它!”

    《女士》杂志在20世纪80年代经历了多次易主(包括由斯泰纳姆本人领导的女性投资者财团),并经历了一段无广告出版时期,之后转型为季刊。随着美国女性地位的变化,杂志也持续发展。1972年,女性仅占医生群体的10%、律师群体的4%和工程师群体的1%。五十年后,这些比例分别增长到38%、41%和16%。

    但斯泰纳姆表示,女性平等的革命仍在进行中。“障碍已经移动,但仍然存在障碍,”斯泰纳姆在2006年接受《星期日晨报》采访时表示,“过去你找不到工作,现在你工作几年后就会遇到瓶颈。过去婚姻不平等,现在生孩子后依然不平等。谢天谢地,障碍已经移动了。这里有了更多获得解放的空间。但障碍仍然存在,需要我们去推动。”


    ![2017年1月21日,格洛丽亚·斯泰纳姆在华盛顿特区华盛顿妇女大游行的集会上发表演讲。凯文·马祖尔/WireImage/盖蒂图片社摄]

    自20世纪60年代以来,一些人一直在贬低“女权主义”一词本身,斯泰纳姆在2015年接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访时表示,她认为女权主义的核心原则在当今已大体获得认可:“如果人们去查字典,就会发现(女权主义者)指的是一个人——无论男女——相信男女完全平等,那么他们确实会认同这一点。现在大多数人都这样,而过去并非如此。”

    将女权主义推向主流

    格洛丽亚·玛丽·斯泰纳姆于1934年3月25日出生在俄亥俄州托莱多市。由于家庭频繁搬迁,她童年居无定所,一家住在拖车里,直到十几岁时父母分居并离婚。斯泰纳姆和母亲定居托莱多,格洛丽亚后来开始照顾患有精神疾病的母亲。随后她搬到华盛顿特区,与姐姐苏珊一起生活并完成高中学业。

    1956年,斯泰纳姆以优等生身份从史密斯学院毕业,并获得奖学金前往印度。途中在伦敦时,她接受了医生的帮助进行堕胎,而当时堕胎在英国(和美国)都是非法的。她在2015年接受美国国家公共广播电台采访时表示,她曾尝试过其他方法终止妊娠,但都失败了:“我当时真的很绝望。我只知道,如果我回家结婚,那是必然的,我会嫁给错误的人;那将不是属于我的人生,完全不是我的人生。”

    斯泰纳姆的记者生涯始于纽约市,她为多家刊物撰稿。(1965年的一篇《纽约时报》文章标题为《编辑部里的尼龙丝袜》。)她的首个重要任务是1962年为《君子》杂志撰写一篇关于避孕和婚前性行为的文章。

    1963年,她在《Show》杂志发表的两篇卧底报道引起轰动,她伪装成花花公子兔女郎,在休·海夫纳的花花公子俱乐部工作了两周。她穿着高跟鞋,被迫穿上特意小两号的兔女郎服装,以凸显女服务员的曲线。她写道:“腰部的束腰会让斯嘉丽·奥哈拉都望而却步。(整个)设计倾向于把所有可见的赘肉都推到胸部。我确定弯腰会很危险。”

    这篇文章揭露了俱乐部内的性骚扰以及幕后对女性员工的剥削(包括强制验血和妇科检查),引发了巨大反响。但斯泰纳姆对报道的结果有着复杂的感受。正如她在2011年接受《Interview》杂志采访时解释的那样:

    “起初,从职业角度来看,这是一个巨大的错误,我真的很后悔。我刚开始被认真当作自由撰稿人对待,但在那篇花花公子文章发表后,我收到的大多是邀请我以其他半露骨方式卧底的请求。情况糟糕到我甚至退还了将该文章改编成平装书的预付款,尽管我不得不借钱来还钱。……但女权主义让我意识到,我很高兴自己做了这件事——因为我认同所有最终沦为薪水微薄的女服务员的女性,她们穿着过高的高跟鞋,穿着太紧以至于无法呼吸的制服。她们中的大多数人只是想谋生,别无他法。……从某种意义上说,我们都过于被外在形象定义,而不是内在品质,而且大多从事薪水微薄的服务行业,我意识到我们都是兔女郎。”

    1968年,《君子》杂志特写编辑克莱·费尔克邀请斯泰纳姆参与创办《纽约》杂志,这是一份新闻、流行文化和时尚刊物。该杂志的作者阵容包括汤姆·沃尔夫、吉米·布雷斯林和彼得·马斯等知名人士,格洛丽亚·斯泰纳姆被宣传为“撰写女性杂志不允许她写的那种题材”。这些题材包括地方和国家政治、越南战争、“新婚姻”、育儿、福利以及女性与权力。作为她知名度的标志,她受邀参加《今夜秀》。

    斯泰纳姆结识了多萝西·皮特曼·休斯,一位在纽约上西区的育儿倡导者,她曾为《纽约》杂志报道过休斯,两人一同公开露面讨论女权运动。(斯泰纳姆不喜欢公开演讲,更喜欢休斯陪伴在侧。)两人构思了一本旨在将女权主义推向主流的杂志,名为《女士》——这是一个新兴的称谓,用于指代不愿被“夫人”或“小姐”这些婚姻身份头衔束缚的女性。

    费尔克自愿于1971年在《纽约》杂志的版面中刊登一期试刊号。随后斯泰纳姆和《女士》杂志团队展开宣传巡演:“当我到达加利福尼亚时,有人打电话给我参加的电台节目说,‘你知道吗,我们找不到这期杂志’,”斯泰纳姆在2023年接受《星期日晨报》采访时回忆道,“我惊慌失措地打电话给克莱·费尔克,我说,‘这里没有货’。结果发现,杂志已经售罄了!那一刻我意识到,你知道的,它拥有受众。”

    超越《女士》杂志

    1973年,斯泰纳姆与玛洛·托马斯、帕特里夏·卡宾和莱蒂·科廷·波格雷宾共同创立了妇女基金会,致力于推进妇女和女童事业,支持基层行动并倡导经济正义、安全保障和生殖自由。该基金会还发起了“带女儿上班日”活动,后来将其扩展到包括儿子在内的所有儿童。

    斯泰纳姆参与扶持了其他致力于推进民权的团体和出版物。她帮助创立了妇女行动联盟,倡导平等、支持受虐妇女收容所并反对刻板印象;以及全国妇女政治核心小组,推动女性担任公职。

    她曾是“支持选择选民”组织的主席和联合创始人(该组织后来与计划生育行动基金合并),也是生殖权利组织“选择美国”(现为URGE)的联合创始人。2004年,她与简·方达和罗宾·摩根共同创立了妇女媒体中心,这是一家非营利性进步女性媒体组织。

    1999年,斯泰纳姆在接受《CBS晚间新闻》采访时被问及技术进步是否推动了女性地位的提升。斯泰纳姆对此表示否定。“政治变革、解放都不是自动发生的,”她说,“自尊、与他人团结起来、为自己挺身而出,这些都无可替代。解放不会从外部降临。权力不会被赋予给你。获取权力的过程本身就是赋权的一部分。”

    2000年,曾认为婚姻是贬低人格的斯泰纳姆与大卫·贝尔结婚,他是一名人权活动家,也是演员克里斯蒂安·贝尔的父亲。“我们都惊呆了,”斯泰纳姆说,“我们俩都从没想过自己会结婚。”

    那他们为什么结婚了?“我想这和我有关。首先,我当时66岁。我就是我自己。我不再觉得自己需要在任何方面牺牲自我。”


    ![2003年3月4日,格洛丽亚·斯泰纳姆和她的丈夫大卫·贝尔在洛杉矶。美联社照片/丹·斯坦伯格摄]

    但他们的共同生活在三年后结束,贝尔因脑淋巴瘤去世。“也许你永远无法释怀,”她说,“但这教会了我很多。即使我知道会发生什么,我也会选择和他一起经历这一切。”

    她表示,失去丈夫让她明白了悲伤和抑郁的区别。“是的,因为人们会问我,‘你不抑郁吗?’我意识到,抑郁时一切都无关紧要。而悲伤时,一切都很重要。它让一切都变得真切动人。”

    斯泰纳姆在90多岁时仍坚持写作和演讲,《女士》杂志很久以前提出的一些议题,如职场性骚扰和家庭暴力,随着#MeToo运动的兴起重新受到关注。

    她为Viceland制作了一系列获得艾美奖提名的纪录片,主题是全球范围内针对女性的暴力行为,并联合制作并旁白了一部艾美奖获奖的HBO纪录片《多重人格:寻找致命记忆》。她也成为多部纪录片的主角,包括《格洛丽亚:她的自述》和《格洛丽亚们》。

    2013年,斯泰纳姆获得奥巴马总统颁发的总统自由勋章,2019年,她获得国家民权博物馆颁发的自由奖。


    ![2013年11月20日,在白宫举行的仪式上,巴拉克·奥巴马总统向《女士》杂志联合创始人格洛丽亚·斯泰纳姆颁发总统自由勋章。巴勃罗·马丁内斯·蒙塔涅斯/美联社摄]

    斯泰纳姆撰写了多部著作,包括《意外人生》、《离谱行为与日常反抗》、《来自内部的革命:自尊之书》、《玛丽莲:诺玛·琼》和《走过六十与七十》。2014年的散文集题为《仿佛女性 mattered》(《仿佛女性重要》)。她还是霍顿·米夫林出版社《美国妇女历史读者伴侣》的编辑。

    在2011年接受《Interview》杂志采访时,斯泰纳姆表示,她后悔浪费了一些时间:“我花了太长时间做自己已经得心应手的事情,或者写别人指派给我的报道,而不是争取那些我无法轻易获得的重要题材,或者自己动手做我认为重要的事。最让我担心的就是浪费时间。因为时间就是我们拥有的一切。”

    Gloria Steinem, trailblazing figure in women’s liberation movement, dies at age 92

    2026-09-03T06:19:00-0400 / CBS News

    By David Morgan

    Updated on: September 3, 2026 / 7:35 AM EDT / CBS News

    Gloria Steinem, a co-founder of Ms. Magazine and a trailblazing figure of the women’s liberation movement in the latter half of the 20th century, has died. She was 92.

    The Gloria Steinem Foundation said in a social media post Thursday that she “passed away peacefully at her home in New York City, surrounded by some of the many who loved her.” The cause of death was not given.

    “She was one of the architects of the entire structure of women’s equality, I mean tearing down those obstacles to young women being able to participate where their talents and hard work took them,” former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told “CBS Mornings” on Thursday.

    “Gloria was at heart an optimist,” Clinton said. “Her activism was rooted in optimism, and that’s a moral choice, and she made it every day.”

    Heralded by Newsweek magazine in 1971 as “The New Woman,” Steinem co-founded Ms. Magazine, the first major publication to be owned, run and written by women. Ms. was a spearhead for the promotion of equal rights, helping to raise awareness about issues of inclusion, media representation and social justice affecting women and girls, at a time when politics, mass media and consumerism were becoming conflated as never before.

    As a journalist, Steinem exploded the notions that “women’s issues” were confined to women, or that female voices did not belong in discussions of politics or war. Steinem was a tireless advocate for women’s voices in politics — at the ballot box, and in the halls of power — by fighting for voting rights and promoting female candidates for office.

    Gloria Steinem on Jan. 15, 2013, in Pasadena, Calif. Richard Shotwell/Invision/AP

    She advanced the cause of economic and social justice for women and girls, including reproductive freedom and safety from domestic violence, and worked to advance women in media. And a simple idea, Take Our Daughters to Work Day, begun by the Ms. Foundation for Women to advance opportunities in the workplace, would become a global endeavor encompassing millions of daughters (and sons) as it fought gender stereotypes.

    The birth of Ms.

    In her early years as a reporter for New York magazine in the late 1960s, Steinem attended a gathering of women speaking out about their experiences obtaining an illegal abortion. She told “Sunday Morning” in 2006, “I heard women standing up and saying in public and taking seriously something that only affected women. Up until then, I’d never heard that. If it didn’t also affect men, it couldn’t be ‘serious.’ Something that was illegal, shameful, theoretically. (Women who had abortions) had to enter a criminal underground. And suddenly I thought, ‘Wait a minute: You know, if one and three or four of us, and I too, had had that experience, why is it illegal?’ And that was the beginning of the unraveling.”

    That “unraveling” of consciousness would lead to Ms. Magazine. Co-founded with activist Dorothy Pittman Hughes, the publication’s first full issue appeared on newsstands on July 1, 1972. In addition to having Wonder Woman on its cover, the issue featured a petition signed by women of various backgrounds announcing that they had had an abortion and were demanding that it become safe and legal. (It would be another year before the Supreme Court’s decision to protect abortion rights with Roe v. Wade, which stood until 2022.)

    Katherine Spillar, an executive editor of Ms., who compiled a 2023 anthology titled “50 Years of Ms.: The Best of the Pathfinding Magazine That Ignited a Revolution,”told “Sunday Morning” that the magazine started and amplified trends, including “a lot of articles about men and marriage and relationships and childrearing and politics and violence against women — (issues) that keep coming back. And it shows the endurance of this movement, but also the endurance of our opponents.”

    Feminist and activist Gloria Steinem speaks at a rally outside the United Nations in New York City in 1978. Bettye Lane/Photo Researchers History via Getty Images

    And of course there was controversy. A cover photo advertising a story about sexual harassment on the job, depicting a man fondling a doll, got the magazine pulled off newsstands. And selling ads was a challenge; the head of a major cosmetics company told Steinem that women who read Ms. don’t buy makeup, while car manufacturers didn’t want to advertise because they didn’t believe women bought cars.

    Still, the magazine persisted, and won awards while publishing articles by such writers as Barbara Ehrenreich, Angela Davis, Alice Walker, Susan Faludi, Susan Brownmiller, Eleanor Holmes Norton, and Jane Wagner. It continued as feminism itself charted new courses. While coming under attack from commentators on the right, who claimed the magazine denigrated “family values,” Ms. was also attacked by some on the left, who claimed the magazine was too conservative and lacked a diversity of opinion.

    Steinem said that, as the women’s liberation movement picked up steam, the very word “feminism” seemed to threaten people for two reasons: “One, because they didn’t understand it, and two, because they did understand it!”

    Ms. underwent several owners beginning in the 1980s (including a female-driven consortium of investors led by Steinem herself), and a period of ad-free publication, before transitioning to a quarterly. And it continued as the status of women in America changed. In 1972, only 10% of doctors, 4% of lawyers and 1% of engineers were women. Five decades later, those figures had grown to 38%, 41%and 16%, respectively.

    But Steinem said the revolution about equality for women is still being fought. “There’s a barrier that has moved, but there’s still a barrier,” Steinem told “Sunday Morning” in 2006. “So, what used to be you couldn’t get a job, now you hit a ceiling after a few years. What used to be unequal marriage, is now unequal after children are born. The barrier has moved, thank goodness. So, there’s more room back here that’s liberated. But the barrier is still there to be pushed.”

    Gloria Steinem speaks at a rally during the Women’s March on Washington, Jan. 21, 2017, in Washington, D.C. Kevin Mazur/WireImage via Getty Images

    While some were denigrating the term “feminism” itself since the 1960s, Steinem told CBS News in 2015 that she believed the core tenets of feminism are by and large approved of today: “If people just go to the dictionary and discover that [feminist] means a person — male or female —who believes in the full equality of women and men, then they do subscribe to it. And it is a majority now, which it didn’t used to be.”

    Pushing feminism into the mainstream

    Born on March 25, 1934, in Toledo, Ohio, Gloria Marie Steinem lived an itinerant life as her family moved about, residing in a house trailer, until her parents’ separation and divorce when she was a teenager. Steinem and her mother settled in Toledo, where Gloria ended up caring for her mom, who suffered from mental illness. She then moved to Washington, D.C., to live with her older sister, Susanne, and complete high school.

    After graduating Phi Beta Kappa from Smith College in 1956, Steinem traveled to India on a scholarship. On her way, while in London, she received a doctor’s assistance in obtaining an abortion, something that was illegal in Britain (and America) at the time. She told NPR in 2015 that she’d tried other methods to terminate her pregnancy but failed: “I really was desperate. I just knew that if I went home and married, which I would’ve had to do, it would be to the wrong person; it would be to a life that wasn’t mine, that wasn’t mine at all.”

    Steinem’s career as a journalist began in New York City, where she contributed as a writer to several publications. (One 1965 New York Times article was titled “Nylons in the Newsroom”.) Her first major assignment was a 1962 Esquire article on contraception and premarital sex.

    She made a splash with her two-part 1963 exposé in Show magazine for which she went undercover as a Playboy Bunny at Hugh Hefner’s Playboy Club. She spent two weeks in high heels, forced to wear a Bunny costume that was purposely two sizes too small in order to accentuate the female servers’ curves. She wrote, “The boning in the waist would have made Scarlett O’Hara blanch. [The] entire construction tended to push all available flesh up to the bosom. I was sure it would be perilous to bend over.”

    The article, which exposed sexual harassment on the club’s floor and the toll on female employees behind the scenes (including mandatory blood tests and gynecological exams), was a sensation. But Steinem had mixed feelings regarding the outcome. As she explained in a 2011 conversation with Interview magazine:

    “At first, it was such a gigantic mistake from a career point of view that I really regretted it. I’d just begun to be taken seriously as a freelance writer, but after the Playboy article, I mostly got requests to go underground in some other semi-sexual way. It was so bad that I returned an advance to turn the Playboy article into a paperback, even though I had to borrow the money. … But feminism did make me realize that I was glad I did it – because I identified with all the women who ended up an underpaid waitress in too-high heels and a costume that was too tight to breathe in. Most were just trying to make a living and had no other way of doing it. … In the sense that we’re all identified too much by our outsides instead of our insides and are mostly in underpaid service jobs, I realized we’re all Bunnies.”

    In 1968 Esquire features editor Clay Felker invited Steinem to help found New York Magazine, a news, pop culture and style publication. With a writer’s rostrum that included such names as Tom Wolfe, Jimmy Breslin and Peter Maas, Gloria Steinem was advertised as “writing about the kind of things the ladies magazines don’t let her write about.” Those topics included local and national politics, the Vietnam War, the “New Marriage,” childcare, welfare, and women and power. As a sign of her celebrity, she was invited onto “The Tonight Show.”

    Steinem befriended Dorothy Pittman Hughes, a childcare advocate on New York’s Upper West Side whom she profiled for New York, and the two made public appearances together to discuss the women’s movement. (Steinem was uncomfortable speaking in public, and preferred to have Hughes with her.) The two devised a magazine that aimed to push feminism into the mainstream, called Ms. — a newly emerging designation for women who did not want to be bound by the titles Mrs. or Miss, identifiers of marital status.

    Felker volunteered to publish a sample issue within the pages of New York magazine in 1971. Steinem and the Ms. team then hit the publicity circuit: “And when I got to California, somebody called the radio show I was on and said, ‘You know, we can’t find it,’” Steinem recalled to “Sunday Morning” in 2023. “And I called Clay Felker in a panic and I said, ‘It didn’t get here.’ And it turned out, it had sold out! That was a moment of recognition that, you know, it had an audience.”

    Beyond Ms.

    In 1973, Steinem — along with Marlo Thomas, Patricia Carbine and Letty Cottin Pogrebin — created the Ms. Foundation for Women to advance the cause of women and girls, supporting grassroots efforts and advocating for economic justice, safety and reproductive freedom. The foundation also created the Take Our Daughters to Work Day initiative, which was later expanded to sons and daughters.

    Steinem was involved in helping nurture other groups and publications dedicated to advancing civil rights. She helped found the Women’s Action Alliance, which advocated for equality, supported battered women’s shelters, and fought stereotyping; and the National Women’s Political Caucus, which promoted women in public office.

    She was president and co-founder of Voters for Choice (which later merged with the Planned Parenthood Action Fund), and was co-founder of the reproductive rights organization Choice USA (now URGE). In 2004, she co-founded (along with Jane Fonda and Robin Morgan) the Women’s Media Center, a nonprofit progressive women’s media organization.

    In 1999 Steinem was asked by the “CBS Evening News” whether technological advances were responsible for the advancement of women. Steinem discounted that. “There’s nothing automatic about political change, about liberation,” she said. “There’s no substitute for self-respect, banding together with other people, standing up for ourselves. Liberation does not come from outside. Power can’t be given to you. The process of taking it is part of the empowerment.”

    In 2000, Steinem — who once thought marriage was demeaning — married David Bale, a human rights activist and the father of actor Christian Bale. “We shocked ourselves, both of us,” Steinem said. “Neither one of us thought that we wanted to get married.”

    So, why did they? “It was something about me, I think. First of all, I was 66 years old. I was who I was. I no longer felt that I would have to give myself up in any way.”

    Gloria Steinem and her husband David Bale in Los Angeles on March 4, 2003. AP Photo/Dan Steinberg

    But their life together ended three years later, when Bale died of lymphoma of the brain. “Maybe you never make peace with it,” she said. “But it taught me an enormous amount. Even if I knew what was going to happen, I would have chosen to go through it with him.”

    She said that losing her husband made her understand the difference between sadness and depression. “Yes, because people would say to me, ‘Aren’t you depressed?’ And I realized that in depression, nothing matters. And in sadness, everything matters. It makes everything poignant.”

    Steinem continued writing and lecturing into her 90s, as some of the topics introduced long ago by Ms. Magazine, such as sexual harassment in the workplace and domestic violence, took on new force with the rise of the #MeToo movement.

    She co-produced a series of Emmy-nominated documentaries about violence against women around the world for Viceland, and co-produced and narrated an Emmy-winning HBO documentary, “Multiple Personalities: The Search for Deadly Memories.” She was also the subject of documentaries, including “Gloria: In Her Own Words,” and “The Glorias.”

    In 2013, Steinem received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Obama, and in 2019, she received the Freedom Award from the National Civil Rights Museum.

    President Barack Obama awards Gloria Steinem, co-founder of Ms. magazine, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, on Nov. 20, 2013, during a ceremony at the White House. Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

    Steinem wrote numerous books, including “An Unexpected Life,” “Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions,” “Revolution from Within: A Book of Self-Esteem,” “Marilyn: Norma Jean,” and “Doing Sixty and Seventy.” A 2014 collection of her essays was titled “As If Women Matter.” She was an editor of Houghton Mifflin’s “The Reader’s Companion to U.S. Women’s History.”

    In her 2011 talk with Interview magazine, Steinem said that she felt regret for having wasted any time: “I continued for too long to do things that I already knew how to do, or to write stories that I was assigned instead of fighting for stories that I couldn’t get, or doing ones that I thought were important on my own. The wasting of time is the thing I worry about the most. Because time is all there is.”

  • 伊瓜苏瀑布大雨后水位暴涨形成壮丽景观


    2026年9月3日 19:23 / 联合早报

    位于巴西和阿根廷边境交界处的伊瓜苏瀑布(Iguazu Falls)星期三(9月2日)在一场大雨后河床水位暴涨,湍急的水流与迷蒙的雾气交织成一幅壮丽景观,吸引大批游客登上步道观赏。

    伊瓜苏瀑布由275股流水沿着宽约2.7公里的河床断崖冲泻而下形成,是世界最宽的瀑布,与东非的维多利亚瀑布和美加边境的尼亚加拉瀑布并列世界三大瀑布。它的河床断崖落差最短处60米,最长达82米,仅次于维多利亚瀑布,在2013年被选为联合国世界自然遗产。(路透社)

    伊瓜苏瀑布大雨后水位暴涨形成壮丽景观

    2026年9月3日 19:23 / 联合早报

    位于巴西和阿根廷边境交界处的伊瓜苏瀑布(Iguazu Falls)星期三(9月2日)在一场大雨后河床水位暴涨,湍急的水流与迷蒙的雾气交织成一幅壮丽景观,吸引大批游客登上步道观赏。

    伊瓜苏瀑布由275股流水沿着宽约2.7公里的河床断崖冲泻而下形成,是世界最宽的瀑布,与东非的维多利亚瀑布和美加边境的尼亚加拉瀑布并列世界三大瀑布。它的河床断崖落差最短处60米,最长达82米,仅次于维多利亚瀑布,在2013年被选为联合国世界自然遗产。(路透社)

  • 伊瓜苏瀑布大雨后水位暴涨形成壮丽景观


    2026年9月3日 19:23 / 联合早报

    位于巴西和阿根廷边境交界处的伊瓜苏瀑布(Iguazu Falls)星期三(9月2日)在一场大雨后河床水位暴涨,湍急的水流与迷蒙的雾气交织成一幅壮丽景观,吸引大批游客登上步道观赏。

    伊瓜苏瀑布由275股流水沿着宽约2.7公里的河床断崖冲泻而下形成,是世界最宽的瀑布,与东非的维多利亚瀑布和美加边境的尼亚加拉瀑布并列世界三大瀑布。它的河床断崖落差最短处60米,最长达82米,仅次于维多利亚瀑布,在2013年被选为联合国世界自然遗产。(路透社)

    伊瓜苏瀑布大雨后水位暴涨形成壮丽景观

    2026年9月3日 19:23 / 联合早报

    位于巴西和阿根廷边境交界处的伊瓜苏瀑布(Iguazu Falls)星期三(9月2日)在一场大雨后河床水位暴涨,湍急的水流与迷蒙的雾气交织成一幅壮丽景观,吸引大批游客登上步道观赏。

    伊瓜苏瀑布由275股流水沿着宽约2.7公里的河床断崖冲泻而下形成,是世界最宽的瀑布,与东非的维多利亚瀑布和美加边境的尼亚加拉瀑布并列世界三大瀑布。它的河床断崖落差最短处60米,最长达82米,仅次于维多利亚瀑布,在2013年被选为联合国世界自然遗产。(路透社)

  • 特朗普政府称各机构或停止与史密森学会合作


    2026-09-03T11:35:19.490Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/03/politics/trump-administration-smithsonian-letter-executive-agencies

    特朗普政府暗示,若史密森学会领导层不做出改变,联邦各机构可能停止与其合作,这场旨在将这座全球最大博物馆群纳入其政策轨道的数月施压行动正不断升级。

    在近日公开的8月28日致史密森学会管理机构的信函中,政府官员表示,联邦机构无法“问心无愧”地支持该学会,可能会停止“出借展品用于展览、支持采购流程以及提供可自由支配的拨款”。他们援引白宫一份报告称,位于华盛顿特区的美国国家历史博物馆正在宣扬“极端政治激进主义”。

    这一迹象表明,特朗普政府正考虑采取更激进的措施,对史密森学会的内容施加影响。该学会一直试图保持独立,尽管其展览内容正受到前所未有的审查。唐纳德·特朗普总统已指示助手清除博物馆内的“觉醒”意识形态以及他认为的美国历史改写行为。

    “这些担忧源于史密森学会的行政领导层和机构意识形态,因此适当的应对措施也必须针对行政领导层和机构意识形态,”内政部长道格·伯古姆和白宫国内政策委员会主任文斯·黑利在信中写道。

    他们还写道,政府“近日发现证据”表明,史密森学会的“机构文化可能已严重违反联邦反歧视法”,但未提供具体案例。CNN已联系史密森学会和内政部门征求置评并获取更多信息。

    这座拥有179年历史的机构是独特的公私合作信托机构,并不认为自己是行政机构,但联邦政府为其提供了三分之二的预算。美国政府还经常与史密森学会在博物馆项目和研究项目上开展合作。

    在信中,官员们要求史密森学会的摄政委员会与他们当面会谈,讨论7月4日发布的白宫调查结果。美国国家历史博物馆馆长安德丽亚·哈蒂格在7月的国会听证会上表示,这份报告“并未公平、准确地描述该博物馆的全部工作”。

    “该博物馆在美国的政治辩论中不偏袒任何一方。我们保护并记录美国生活方方面面的证据,以便公众能够接触历史并自行得出结论,”她说道。

    这封信发出前几周,特朗普下令国家公园管理局在美国历史博物馆附近设置临时标牌,警告馆内展览存在“不准确信息”。

    白宫对史密森学会的审查可追溯至2025年3月,当时特朗普签署行政命令,指示副总统JD·万斯为史密森学会摄政委员会任命符合其政策优先事项的公众成员。数月后,白宫启动了史无前例的全面审查,要求该学会提供有关其博物馆展览和运营的大量文件。

    摄政委员会成员包括首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨、两党国会议员以及大多为前企业高管和非营利组织董事会成员的公众代表。

    根据史密森学会网站上的任期图表,9名公众摄政中有两人的任期已届满,另有两个职位将在10月初前空缺。这可能让特朗普有机会在11月中期选举改变国会构成之前,扩大自己对该委员会的影响力。新董事会成员需通过国会联合决议任命,且需总统签署生效。

    CNN今年早些时候曾报道称,公民成员一致认为史密森学会应保持独立,不受政府干预。

    自2019年起担任该学会负责人的朗尼·邦奇三世在5月接受CNN采访时表示,该学会在配合白宫提供信息请求的同时,一直保持着自主权。

    “我的目标是,历史由学术研究驱动,而非党派政治,”他说。“史密森学会始终开展自己的学术研究,这一直是我们的行事准则。我们始终与不同届政府合作,但核心始终是我们的学术研究结论。”

    CNN的蕾妮·马什、阿丽娜·法亚兹和迈克尔·威廉姆斯为本报道贡献了内容。

    Trump administration says agencies may stop working with the Smithsonian

    2026-09-03T11:35:19.490Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/03/politics/trump-administration-smithsonian-letter-executive-agencies

    The Trump administration has suggested federal agencies may stop working with the Smithsonian Institution if its leadership does not change, ramping up a monthslong pressure campaign to align the world’s largest museum complex with its views.

    In an August 28 letter to the Smithsonian’s governing body that was recently made public, administration officials said government agencies cannot “in good conscience” support the institution and may cease “loaning artifacts for exhibits, enabling procurement processes and making discretionary grants,” citing a White House report that claimed the institution was promoting “extreme political activism” at the National Museum of American History in Washington, DC.

    It’s a sign that the Trump administration is considering more aggressive measures to exert influence on content at the Smithsonian, which has tried to maintain its independence despite unprecedented scrutiny of its programming. President Donald Trump has tasked aides with rooting out “woke” ideology and what he considers a rewriting of American history at the museums.

    “Because these concerns arise from executive leadership and institutional ideology at the Smithsonian, the appropriate response must likewise address executive leadership and institutional ideology,” wrote Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and Vince Haley, the director of the White House’s Domestic Policy Council, in the letter.

    They also wrote that the administration has “recently uncovered evidence” that the Smithsonian’s “institutional culture may have resulted in significant violations of Federal antidiscrimination law” without providing examples. CNN has reached out to the Smithsonian and the Interior Department for comment and more information.

    While the 179-year-old institution is a unique public-private trust and does not consider itself an executive agency, the federal government supplies two-thirds of its budget. The government also frequently collaborates with the Smithsonian on museum initiatives and research projects.

    In the letter, the officials asked the Smithsonian’s Board of Regents to meet with them in person to discuss the White House’s findings, which were released on July 4. The National Museum of American History’s Director, Andrea Hartig, said at a July congressional hearing that the report “does not fairly or accurately characterize the full body of work at the museum.”

    “The museum does not take sides in America’s political debates. We preserve and document the evidence of American life in all of its breadth, so that the public can encounter the past and draw their own conclusions,” she said.

    The letter comes weeks after Trump ordered the National Park Service to install temporary signage near the American history museum that warned of “inaccurate information” in the exhibits.

    White House scrutiny of the Smithsonian dates back to March 2025, when Trump signed an executive order directing Vice President JD Vance to seek the appointment of public members to the Smithsonian’s Board of Regents who are aligned with his priorities for the institution. Months later, the White House launched an unprecedented, sweeping review of the Smithsonian, asking for extensive documents about its museum exhibitions and operations.

    Members of the board include Chief Justice John Roberts, Republican and Democratic members of Congress, and members of the public who are mostly former business executives and nonprofit board members.

    Two of nine public regents’ terms have expired and two other spots will open up by the beginning of October, according to a term chart on the Smithsonian website. This could give Trump a chance to try to expand his influence on the board before the November midterm elections shake up Congress. New board members are appointed via congressional joint resolutions that the president must sign into law.

    CNN reported earlier this year that there is unanimity among the citizen members that the Smithsonian should remain independent and not be influenced by the administration.

    Lonnie Bunch III, the institution’s head since 2019, told CNN in a May interview that the institution has maintained its autonomy as it complied with the White House’s request for information.

    “My goal is that history is driven by scholarship, not partisanship,” he said. “The Smithsonian always does its own scholarship. It’s always driven by that. We have always worked with different administrations, but it’s always about what our scholarship tells us.”

    CNN’s Renee Marsh, Aleena Fayaz and Michael Williams contributed to this report.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2