否认辞职传闻 伊朗总统佩泽希齐扬：会继续任职

2026年8月4日 18:03 / 联合早报

此前有传闻称伊朗总统佩泽希齐扬与伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队存在分歧，而佩泽希齐扬可能辞职。伊朗总统办公室已多次辟谣。 （路透社档案照片）

伊朗总统佩泽希齐扬否认辞职传闻，称“我会继续任职”。

伊朗伊斯兰共和国通讯社星期二（8月4日）报道，佩泽希齐扬在一场访谈节目中说：“如果我要辞职，我会正式宣布。我不会辞职，我会继续任职。”

他说，传闻称伊朗政府与最高领袖立场不一致，实际目的是在制造分歧。

他强调，政府与军方力量“完全协调一致，我们不会把职位交给无能之人”。

伊朗总统府负责新闻与通信事务副主任塔巴塔巴伊星期二在社交媒体上，也驳斥有关总统扬辞职的报道，称这些说法“完全是谎言”，并指责散布谣言者企图破坏国家和民族团结。

他说，散布谣言者“已经沦为伊朗敌人的傀儡，令人不齿”。

此前一段时间，有传闻称佩泽希齐扬与伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队存在分歧，称佩泽希齐扬可能辞职。伊朗总统办公室已多次辟谣。

中期选举日益靠近 特朗普批评石油公司赚太多

2026年8月4日 18:14 / 联合早报

美国总统特朗普点名雪佛龙等大型石油公司，称由于伊朗战争导致油价高涨，大型石油公司正从中赚取过多利润，应当将部分利润回馈社会。图为7月21日位于美国加利福尼亚州的雪佛龙油站所展示的汽油和柴油价目表。 （Bloomberg）

（华盛顿综合电）美国总统特朗普说，伊朗战争推高油价，大型石油公司从中获取暴利，应将部分利润回馈民众。被他点名批评“赚得太多”的包括埃克森美孚与雪佛龙。

特朗普星期一（8月3日）在白宫对记者说：“我不喜欢这样，他们赚太多了，明白吗？他们靠着（石油）短缺，赚太多了……他们应该把部分利润回馈民众，而且最好调低零售价。”

美国11月将举行中期选举，然而美伊战事持续，拖累美国国内经济，给目前仍控制参众两院的共和党带来巨大压力，而直接影响民生的油价飙涨已成为中期选举的一个关键政治议题。

自美伊战争2月28日爆发以来，美国国内汽油的平均价格已上涨超过37%。在这场战争中，伊朗采取了针对美国波斯湾盟友的报复行动，并封锁了至关重要的霍尔木兹海峡，导致能源价格急剧飙升。

美国石油巨头因此获利大增，根据上周五发布的业绩报告，埃克森美孚的第二季利润较上年同期增长超过一倍，达到145亿美元（约186亿新元），创下2022年以来的最高水平；雪佛龙的季度盈利也创下六年新高，达到121亿美元，同比暴增四倍。

特朗普曾在6月下旬公开炮轰大型石油公司，指控他们在原油价格回落时，没有同步调降汽油零售价。他称消费者正被“宰割”，并宣布已指示司法部展开调查。

代表美国石油公司的行业组织美国石油学会发言人说：“当前油价上涨是由全球供需状况，以及围绕霍尔木兹海峡及其他关键航运通道的持续不确定性所驱动的，而非由任何个别公司造成的。”

美国民众更信赖民主党治理经济

路透社与益普索的最新民调显示，约37%受访者认为民主党更有能力处理经济问题，选择共和党的比例为36%。这是近10年来民主党在这一数据上首次超越共和党。另有27%的受访者表示不确定，或认为其他政党能做得更好。

同时，民调显示特朗普执政表现的支持率从上月的37%降至35%，只比他任内支持率最低水平高出一个百分点。

本次民调7月29日至8月3日在全美以线上方式进行，结果表明，特朗普处理经济事务的表现，包括应对美伊战争引发的能源价格上涨，会对共和党的中期选举选情造成不利影响。根据民调，如果现在举行国会选举，42%注册选民表示会投选民主党，37%会把票投给共和党。

Trump vowed to ‘bring free speech back.’ Judges in 75 cases ruled that he has stifled it

2026-08-04T10:05:02.843Z / Reuters

• Reuters identified 75 rulings against Trump administration among 93 cases decided on First-Amendment grounds
• Administration has appealed about two-thirds of adverse rulings, Reuters review shows
• Republican-appointed judges ruled against Trump in 10 of the 75 cases

Aug 4 – U.S. President Donald Trump repeatedly campaigned for his second term as a champion of free expression, vowing in his January 2025 inaugural address to stop what he described as years of “government censorship.”

Since then, a wave of court rulings has concluded his administration has done the opposite. Reuters identified 75 federal-judge rulings finding Trump’s government infringed on ​First-Amendment rights including freedoms of speech, religion, and the press.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

The unprecedented pushback on constitutional grounds has included repeated findings that the administration chilled or squelched the speech of citizens and groups opposing the Republican’s agenda.

“The President’s palpable misunderstanding that the ‌government simply cannot seek retribution for speech he disdains poses a great threat to Americans’ freedom of speech,” Boston-based U.S. District Judge William Young wrote.

The judge, appointed by Republican President Ronald Reagan, ruled in September that the administration illegally detained, deported and revoked visas of foreign students and faculty because of their pro-Palestinian advocacy. Other judges found federal agencies terminated grants awarded to universities including Harvard for refusing to align with his ideological agenda; retaliated against law firms based on their legal advocacy; and used excessive force at protests.

Trump administration officials have repeatedly called federal judges ruling against them “activists” who are interfering with the president’s executive authority. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson criticized the First-Amendment rulings in a statement, saying “the ​federal judiciary has repeatedly endangered and obstructed the election choices of the American people with its unlawful rulings.”

LOSING STREAK

The 75 cases that produced lower-court rulings against the Trump administration were among 93 total cases during his second term in which judges addressed First-Amendment arguments, ​Reuters found. Trump’s losing streak mostly came from judges appointed by Democratic presidents, but Republican appointees delivered decisions in 10 cases.

By comparison, during Democratic President Joe Biden’s presidential term, Reuters identified just 27 cases in ⁠which lower-court judges weighed First-Amendment challenges to his agenda. Judges ruled against his administration in 13 of those. Most of the lower-court rulings against the Biden administration involved its vaccine mandates, which were challenged on religious-freedom grounds.

Reuters tallied the First-Amendment cases by searching federal court records and Westlaw, a ​legal research service. Both Reuters and Westlaw are owned by Thomson Reuters. When similar lawsuits were consolidated by a court or when a judge issued multiple rulings in the same lawsuit, Reuters counted them as one case. The review focused on civil lawsuits filed against the Trump administration and excluded ​cases by self-represented litigants.

Some of the rulings are preliminary, meaning that the judge acted on a request for speedy action before hearing the full merits of the case.

The lawsuits were frequently filed by Trump’s ideological foes or by media organizations, such as when the New York Times and Associated Press asked judges to halt restrictions on their ability to cover the White House or the Pentagon. The AP and the New York Times won at the lower court level, though some of the rulings are on hold pending appeal.

The Trump administration launched appeals in about two-thirds of the cases while electing to let other rulings stand. It chose not to challenge rulings that, for instance, ​prevented it from interfering with what academics can discuss in classrooms and from slashing longstanding grants awarded to legal and medical organizations that have opposed the administration’s agenda.

In appeals of 15 of the 75 rulings that went against Trump, his administration successfully persuaded courts either to put a district court judge’s ​First-Amendment ruling on hold or overturn it entirely.

In significant victories for the administration, two appeals courts this year have overturned lower-court rulings that had led to the release of pro-Palestinian campus activists who had attended Columbia University, Mahmoud Khalil and Mohsen Mahdawi. The appellate judges found the lower courts had no jurisdiction to hear those cases, ‌without ruling on ⁠the lawsuits’ merits. Khalil’s lawyers have said he plans to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In one appeal the administration did win on the merits, the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in February overturned a ruling that had blocked the Trump administration from stripping hundreds of thousands of federal workers of the ability to engage in union bargaining with U.S. agencies.

The unions argued that Trump took that action in order to retaliate against them challenging his administration’s policies, in violation of the First Amendment. But a three-judge panel said Trump would have taken the same action whether or not he intended to punish unions for their advocacy.

Other appeals courts have been less receptive. In May, the 9th Circuit

agreed
with a lower-court judge that terminating federal grants awarded to University of California researchers – as part of Trump’s anti-DEI push – constituted viewpoint discrimination.

RAILING AGAINST ‘CENSORSHIP’

Trump rode to his second-term win after railing against an “online ​censorship regime” that he said the Biden administration imposed when it required ​media companies to suppress alleged misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic and ⁠after the 2020 election. He echoed themes from his first presidential campaign, including opposition to what he called “cancel culture,” as some conservatives complained that social and professional pressures discouraged the expression of their political views.

Hours after his 2025 inauguration, Trump signed an executive order titled “Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship,” which directed that no federal agency or employee would unconstitutionally abridge Americans’ speech rights.

Critics say that promise was almost immediately undercut by a ​flurry of other executive orders and policies seeking to exact retribution against foes or targeting viewpoints the president opposed.

Among those early orders were those directing an end to federal funding his administration deemed as supporting “gender ​ideology” or diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), two ⁠subjects at the heart of many of the lawsuits alleging First-Amendment violations by the administration.

Timothy Zick, a professor at William & Mary Law School and author of a book titled “Trump 2.0: Executive Power and the First Amendment,” said no president has taken such sweeping action to suppress speech since President Woodrow Wilson, early last century, oversaw the thousands of deportations and arrests during the First Red Scare, a period of anti-communist and anti-immigrant fervor.

At that time, Zick said, court precedents were far less clear on whether the First Amendment protects speech critical of the government. “Trump is operating in this situation where the First Amendment’s boundaries are very clear,” ⁠he said.

A Washington ​federal appeals court appears poised based on arguments it heard in May to uphold lower courts’ decisions that Trump’s campaign against law firms and lawyers infringed upon free speech.

Among those ​decisions was a May 2025 ruling by U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, who castigated Trump for targeting the law firm Perkins Coie through an executive order that suspended its lawyers’ security clearances and barred them from entering federal buildings based on its past work for his political opponents.

“Settling personal vendettas by targeting a disliked business ​or individual for punitive government action is not a legitimate use of the powers of the U.S. government or an American President,” Howell wrote.

(Reporting by Jan Wolfe and Nate Raymond; editing by Amy Stevens and Anna Driver)

中期选举日益靠近 特朗普批评石油公司赚太多

2026年8月4日 18:14 / 联合早报

美国总统特朗普点名雪佛龙等大型石油公司，称由于伊朗战争导致油价高涨，大型石油公司正从中赚取过多利润，应当将部分利润回馈社会。图为7月21日位于美国加利福尼亚州的雪佛龙油站所展示的汽油和柴油价目表。 （Bloomberg）

（华盛顿综合电）美国总统特朗普说，伊朗战争推高油价，大型石油公司从中获取暴利，应将部分利润回馈民众。被他点名批评“赚得太多”的包括埃克森美孚与雪佛龙。

特朗普星期一（8月3日）在白宫对记者说：“我不喜欢这样，他们赚太多了，明白吗？他们靠着（石油）短缺，赚太多了……他们应该把部分利润回馈民众，而且最好调低零售价。”

美国11月将举行中期选举，然而美伊战事持续，拖累美国国内经济，给目前仍控制参众两院的共和党带来巨大压力，而直接影响民生的油价飙涨已成为中期选举的一个关键政治议题。

自美伊战争2月28日爆发以来，美国国内汽油的平均价格已上涨超过37%。在这场战争中，伊朗采取了针对美国波斯湾盟友的报复行动，并封锁了至关重要的霍尔木兹海峡，导致能源价格急剧飙升。

美国石油巨头因此获利大增，根据上周五发布的业绩报告，埃克森美孚的第二季利润较上年同期增长超过一倍，达到145亿美元（约186亿新元），创下2022年以来的最高水平；雪佛龙的季度盈利也创下六年新高，达到121亿美元，同比暴增四倍。

特朗普曾在6月下旬公开炮轰大型石油公司，指控他们在原油价格回落时，没有同步调降汽油零售价。他称消费者正被“宰割”，并宣布已指示司法部展开调查。

代表美国石油公司的行业组织美国石油学会发言人说：“当前油价上涨是由全球供需状况，以及围绕霍尔木兹海峡及其他关键航运通道的持续不确定性所驱动的，而非由任何个别公司造成的。”

美国民众更信赖民主党治理经济

路透社与益普索的最新民调显示，约37%受访者认为民主党更有能力处理经济问题，选择共和党的比例为36%。这是近10年来民主党在这一数据上首次超越共和党。另有27%的受访者表示不确定，或认为其他政党能做得更好。

同时，民调显示特朗普执政表现的支持率从上月的37%降至35%，只比他任内支持率最低水平高出一个百分点。

本次民调7月29日至8月3日在全美以线上方式进行，结果表明，特朗普处理经济事务的表现，包括应对美伊战争引发的能源价格上涨，会对共和党的中期选举选情造成不利影响。根据民调，如果现在举行国会选举，42%注册选民表示会投选民主党，37%会把票投给共和党。

Socialist insurgents eye Midwest gains as Dem civil war threatens must-hold Senate seat

The power of President Donald Trump’s endorsements in GOP primaries faces new tests Tuesday in key nomination battles

August 4, 2026 5:00am EDT / Fox News

By Paul Steinhauser, Andrew Mark Miller, Luke Trevisan

Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed of Michigan takes questions from Fox News in the final stretch ahead of Tuesday’s high-stakes primary in the Great Lakes battleground state.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/5a7009ef-e489-4827-a080-5bcf1f54a8a8

Listen to this article

8 min

DETROIT, MI – The high-stakes fight between the left-wing and the center-left establishment for the future of the Democratic Party is front-and-center on Tuesday in Michigan’s primary.

Boosted by a string of victories this spring in mostly blue congressional districts across the country, the Democrats’ ideological war moves to the Great Lakes battleground state, where progressive victories could reshape the party and endanger must-hold seats in the midterm elections.

Also at stake as Michigan joins Kansas, Missouri, Virginia and Washington State in holding mid-summer primaries is President Donald Trump’s immense clout over the GOP and the power of his endorsements in Republican nominating contests.

But taking top billing is Michigan’s divisive and expensive Democratic Senate primary, which is seen as the biggest stage to date in the fierce fight for the future of the Democratic Party.

THE MIDTERM SENATE RACES THAT COULD FLIP THE BALANCE OF POWER IN CONGRESS

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6402686759112

“This is ground zero in the battle for the future of the Democratic Party pitting status quo corporate Democrats against shake up the system economic fighters, and we’ll see who wins,” Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC), a leading group on the left, told Fox News Digital.

The primary face-off pits Abdul El-Sayed, a former Wayne County Health Department director, against Rep. Haley Stevens, a more moderate candidate backed by the establishment. The race to succeed retiring Democratic Sen. Gary Peters, who is backing Stevens, is a must-hold for the Democrats and one of roughly a dozen Senate races from coast to coast that will determine if Republicans hold onto their slim Senate majority.

Matt Bennett, one of the leaders at the Third Way, a leading center-left Democratic organization, told Fox News Digital the Michigan showdown is “the first time the left is competing for a swing seat” and warned, “the significance is it could really put this seat in jeopardy.”

El-Sayed, who, if elected, would make history as the nation’s first Muslim senator, is an epidemiologist who unsuccessfully ran for governor as an insurgent candidate in 2018. He has made support for “Medicare-for-all” a major component of his campaign.

The far-left candidate has also called for abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and is a vocal critic of Israel amid its war with Hamas — even characterizing Israel’s actions in Gaza as “genocide” against Palestinians.

MIKE ROGERS ARGUES ABDUL EL-SAYED IS ‘A SPECIAL SAUCE OF CRAZY’

And El-Sayed, who is backed by top far-left leaders and teamed with progressive champions Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York on the Michigan campaign trail two weeks ago, and who served as a top surrogate on Sanders’ 2020 presidential campaign, has vowed not to accept PAC donations.

Stevens, who flipped a GOP-held district in her 2018 election to Congress, is backed by top national and Michigan Democrats, including Peters, term-limited Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, and longtime Senate Democratic Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer.

Schumer and the party establishment view Stevens as more electable than El-Sayed, who has sparked controversy with his past comments.

“I am the best Democrat to go forward. I am the only person in this race who has won tough primaries multiple times. You know, running with the Michigan grit, resilience and determination,” Stevens told Fox News Digital on Sunday, as she teamed up with Peters on the campaign trail.

DEMOCRACY ’26: STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE FOX NEWS ELECTION HUB

Over $80 million has been spent on the primary showdown, making it the most expensive Democratic Senate nomination race in history. Much of the money has been shelled out by outside groups in support of Stevens and against El-Sayed. The biggest spending comes from United Democracy Project, a political action committee aligned with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

El-Sayed, who has repeatedly attacked Stevens over the massive infusion of AIPAC-linked money, told reporters on Sunday, “If you need $70 million to come in here and help get you elected, then the question has to be, are you actually electable on your own terms.”

The winner will face off in the midterms against former Republican Rep. Mike Rogers, who is on a glidepath to win the GOP Senate nomination.

The Trump-backed Rogers, who lost the 2024 Senate election in Michigan by a razor-thin margin, said in a Fox News Digital interview that he doesn’t care whom he faces-off with in November.

“It doesn’t matter to us. We’ve looked at both candidates. We feel confident we’re going to beat either one of those candidates that come out of that race,” Rogers highlighted.

And Rogers claimed, “They are very radical, and they are way too extreme for Michigan. I mean, Abdul, he has his own special sauce of crazy.”

SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6402686175112

But Democrats are confident they can regroup after a combustible primary.

“Let’s make sure that anyone but Mike Rogers gets to the United States Senate,” Stevens told reporters on Sunday. “After the primary, you’re going to see a united Democratic Party. You are going to see us going full force, full fledged ahead.”

And El-Sayed told Fox News Digital, “I think we all understand the risk of Donald Trump. We all understand the risk of Mike Rogers.”

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6402684489112

The left-wing versus establishment battle is also playing out in Michigan’s 7th Congressional District, a key Republican-controlled swing seat race that’s among roughly two-dozen that will impact whether the GOP holds onto its fragile House majority.

William Lawrence, a co-founder of the Sunrise Movement, which advocates for political action to tackle climate change, is on the rise against two more moderate Democrats. Lawrence is backed by Sanders and El-Sayed, as well as some top progressive groups. The primary winner will face GOP Rep. Tom Barrett in the general election.

The party civil war is also on display in Michigan’s deep blue 13th Congressional District.

MEET THE FAR LEFT INSURGENTS WAGING WAR ON THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN THE 2026 MIDTERMS

Rep. Shri Thanedar, who is supported by top House Democratic leaders, is being challenged by state Rep. Donovan McKinney, who is backed by Sanders, El-Sayed, and Squad members Reps. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts, and Summer Lee of Pennsylvania.

And the ideological warfare is also front-and-center in Missouri, in the state’s St. Louis-based and heavily Democratic 1st Congressional District.

Rep. Wesley Bell is facing off in a rematch against former Rep. Cori Bush, a Squad member who Bell ousted in the 2024 primary.

TK(Michael B. Thomas/Getty Images)

Trump’s endorsements are getting tested in two statewide showdowns on Tuesday, in Michigan and Kansas.

The president is backing Rep. John James in Michigan’s GOP gubernatorial primary. James, a West Point graduate and one-time Republican rising star, is facing off against multi-millionaire businessman Perry Johnson, a former gubernatorial and presidential candidate.

The winner will take on likely Democratic nominee and current Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, in the race to succeed Whitmer.

In Kansas, Trump is supporting state Senate President Ty Masterson in a crowded field of Republican gubernatorial contenders.

Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly is term-limited, which makes the race to succeed her a top flip opportunity for the GOP.

In Washington State, the marquee primary showdown is in the state’s 3rd Congressional District, where Democratic Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, a former auto shop co-owner, is facing a crowded field of challengers from both parties.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Washington state has a top-two primary system in which all candidates, regardless of party, compete on the same ballot and the two highest vote-getters move on to the general election.

The race is another crucial House showdown that may decide the chamber’s majority.

In Virginia, voters head to the polls to cast ballots in Senate primaries and in a handful of House primaries in extremely competitive districts that may impact the balance of power on Capitol Hill.

Paul Steinhauser covers the national campaign trail from coast to coast for Fox News

美伊谈判之际 霍尔木兹海峡货船遭不明飞行物击中

2026年8月4日 18:19 / 联合早报

伊朗继续对霍尔木兹海峡实施有效封锁，并坚持要求船只与伊朗协调通行，且必须沿伊朗海岸线航行。 （路透社档案照片）

在美国与伊朗谈判之际，一枚不明飞行物击中霍尔木兹海峡的一艘货船。

法新社报道，英国海事贸易行动办公室（UKMTO）说，一艘货船星期二（8月4日）清晨在阿曼海岸附近的霍尔木兹海峡遭不明飞行物击中。

UKMTO称，这艘船只未被命名，当局正在进行调查，但未说明船只受损情况及是否有人伤亡。

伊朗继续对霍尔木兹海峡实施有效封锁，并坚持要求船只与伊朗协调通行，且必须沿伊朗海岸线航行。不过，许多船只转而选择走海峡对岸靠近阿曼的南部航线。

伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃说，德黑兰正与阿曼首都马斯喀特磋商开辟新航线，但这与重新开放霍尔木兹海峡无关。

特朗普星期一（3日）在白宫警告说，这是伊朗“被斩首前的最后机会”。他称，已应沙特阿拉伯、阿联酋、卡塔尔和其他一些国家的请求，同意继续与伊朗进行谈判。

不过，伊朗外交部否认与华盛顿正在进行谈判，尽管特朗普坚称谈判正在进行。

特朗普称，谈判重点是重新开放霍尔木兹海峡，“明天就能实现”。至于伊朗的无核化问题，他称这可能“需要一些时间”。

他还预计星期二就会知道谈判进展，“无论结果如何”，但他坚称“这并不复杂”。“不管伊朗是否愿意承认，我们实际上是在讨论如何解决他们几十年来造成的问题。”

自2月28日美国和以色列对伊朗发动突袭以来，德黑兰和华盛顿一直处于战争状态。尽管双方此后数月曾达成停火协议和初步共识，但外交努力未能结束这场战争。

Rep. Max Miller faces growing pressure to resign over abuse allegations

2026-08-04T11:21:00.057Z / CNN Politics

By Matthew Lally, CNN

Published 7:21 AM EDT, Tue August 4, 2026

Video Ad Feedback

Rep. Max Miller faces growing pressure to resign over abuse allegations

CNN This Morning

Rep. Max Miller says he will not drop his reelection bid over abuse allegations, as he faces a new lawsuit from a former Trump official.

6:29 • Source: CNN

https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/04/politics/video/max-miller-abuse-allegations-moreno

报告：宇树科技上市后估值料超500亿人民币

2026-08-04 19:43 / 联合早报

8月1日，在中国北京的一家宇树科技门店里，一名儿童坐在宇树G1人形机器人旁，与一台宇树GO2机器人互动。 （路透社）

一份报告指出，中国机器人制造商宇树科技上市后的估值，预计将超过500亿元（人民币，下同，约95亿新元）。

据路透社报道，宇树科技首次公开募股（IPO）的保荐机构中信证券星期二（8月4日）预计，这家总部位于杭州的公司在本月晚些时候上市后的六到12个月内，市值将达到506亿至559亿元。

这份分发给投资者的估值报告，在很大程度上被视为星期三（5日）IPO初步询价前的参考指导。中信证券对宇树科技给出的估值，大约是公司今年预期销售额的20倍、预期利润的80倍。

宇树科技将于星期四（6日）确定IPO发行价，并于星期五（7日）接受投资者申购。

中信证券在报告中指出，宇树科技是一家“全球知名、世界领先的高性能、通用机器人制造商”，公司不仅坚持稳健的研发投资战略，同时在对具身智能生态系统的理解上也确立了领先地位。

宇树科技在人形机器人制造领域正与美国竞争对手特斯拉和波士顿动力展开激烈竞争。宇树科技此次计划筹集42亿元资金，主要用于支持创新与生产。

机器人技术被视为中国的关键战略产业之一，对于北京与华盛顿的科技竞争至关重要。

华盛顿近期将外国制造的先进机器人列入其“涵盖名单”（Covered List），限制其获得在美国销售所需的设备授权。今年6月，美国更将宇树科技及其他几家主要的中国科技企业，列入一份被指援助中国军方的公司名单中。

美伊谈判之际 霍尔木兹海峡货船遭不明飞行物击中

2026年8月4日 18:19 / 联合早报

伊朗继续对霍尔木兹海峡实施有效封锁，并坚持要求船只与伊朗协调通行，且必须沿伊朗海岸线航行。 （路透社档案照片）

在美国与伊朗谈判之际，一枚不明飞行物击中霍尔木兹海峡的一艘货船。

法新社报道，英国海事贸易行动办公室（UKMTO）说，一艘货船星期二（8月4日）清晨在阿曼海岸附近的霍尔木兹海峡遭不明飞行物击中。

UKMTO称，这艘船只未被命名，当局正在进行调查，但未说明船只受损情况及是否有人伤亡。

伊朗继续对霍尔木兹海峡实施有效封锁，并坚持要求船只与伊朗协调通行，且必须沿伊朗海岸线航行。不过，许多船只转而选择走海峡对岸靠近阿曼的南部航线。

伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃说，德黑兰正与阿曼首都马斯喀特磋商开辟新航线，但这与重新开放霍尔木兹海峡无关。

特朗普星期一（3日）在白宫警告说，这是伊朗“被斩首前的最后机会”。他称，已应沙特阿拉伯、阿联酋、卡塔尔和其他一些国家的请求，同意继续与伊朗进行谈判。

不过，伊朗外交部否认与华盛顿正在进行谈判，尽管特朗普坚称谈判正在进行。

特朗普称，谈判重点是重新开放霍尔木兹海峡，“明天就能实现”。至于伊朗的无核化问题，他称这可能“需要一些时间”。

他还预计星期二就会知道谈判进展，“无论结果如何”，但他坚称“这并不复杂”。“不管伊朗是否愿意承认，我们实际上是在讨论如何解决他们几十年来造成的问题。”

自2月28日美国和以色列对伊朗发动突袭以来，德黑兰和华盛顿一直处于战争状态。尽管双方此后数月曾达成停火协议和初步共识，但外交努力未能结束这场战争。

波音737 MAX 7历时近10年终获美国监管机构认证

2026年8月4日 18:27 / 联合早报

一架阿拉斯加航空波音737 MAX 9客机星期一（8月3日）飞抵美国洛杉矶国际机场。同日，美国联邦航空管理局正式批准波音737 MAX 7，推动波音股价大幅上涨。 （法新社）

（纽约/华盛顿综合电）美国联邦航空管理局星期一（8月3日）正式批准波音737 MAX 7，为这款首飞逾八年的客机投入商业运营扫清最后监管障碍。

MAX 7是737 MAX系列中最小的机型，也是波音自2018年和2019年两起致命空难，以及2024年阿拉斯加航空客机舱门塞脱落事故以来，首款获得认证的新机型。事故促使美国收紧认证要求，也使审批一再延误。

联邦航空管理局（FAA）说，这项认证历经近10年审查。波音须更新飞行控制软件、机组警报系统，并重新设计发动机防冰系统。为了取得认证，波音完成441次试飞，累计飞行686小时。

波音原计划于2019年开始交付MAX 7，目前正为首批交付做准备。作为启动客户，西南航空预计将在未来几个月让这款飞机投入运营。