2026年6月18日 / 美国东部时间上午11:31 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
马克·奥斯本 报道
在多名共和党议员强烈反对该协议之际，特朗普总统抨击那些反对美伊谅解备忘录条款的人“要么是嫉妒、品行不端，要么就是愚蠢”。
“这些傻瓜认为我对伊朗不够强硬，可股市刚刚创下历史新高，油价也在‘暴跌’，他们要么是嫉妒、品行不端，要么就是愚蠢，”特朗普先生周四早些时候在从七国集团峰会返回后，在真相社交平台上写道。
路易斯安那州共和党参议员比尔·卡西迪对该伊核协议的反对声音最为强烈，他称罗纳德·里根“在坟墓里都要翻身了”。
“伊朗的核野心没有得到遏制，而且他们已经意识到威胁霍尔木兹海峡是有效的，未来无疑会利用这一点，”卡西迪在X平台上写道。“如今，伊朗将根据这份协议建造全新的基础设施。战争爆发前，海峡畅通无阻，伊朗因制裁而处境艰难，还有13名军人还活着。”
“如今，13名美国人丧生，民众在加油站支付了数十亿美元的费用，制裁将被解除，而轰炸已经停止，”他继续说道。“这是几十年来最糟糕的外交政策失误。”
卡西迪在初选中输给了特朗普支持的朱莉娅·莱特洛和约翰·弗莱明后，加大了对特朗普的批评力度，目前莱特洛和弗莱明将进入决选。特朗普曾多次抨击卡西迪，后者是1月6日国会山事件后投票弹劾特朗普的仅有的七名共和党议员之一。
特朗普的盟友、参议员特德·克鲁兹也是伊核协议的批评者之一。克鲁兹告诉《每日连线》，他认为总统在“这份协议上得到的建议非常糟糕”。
“历史告诉我们，给那些想要杀害我们的神权疯子数十亿美元是个糟糕的主意，”这位得克萨斯州共和党议员说。“根据已公布的条款，在伊朗做出哪怕一项核让步之前，他们就能立即获得100亿至300亿美元的资金。”
“我认为这是不明智的，”克鲁兹继续说道。“这笔钱如果落入阿亚图拉手中，将用于资助试图杀害美国人的恐怖分子，以及用于制造试图杀害美国人的武器。而且这似乎还正式确立了伊斯兰政权控制霍尔木兹海峡的永久地位。很难看出这会给美国带来任何可能的好处。”
共和党参议员林赛·格雷厄姆是特朗普的盟友，此前曾主张不达成任何协议并重启对伊朗的军事行动，在与特朗普的特别特使史蒂夫·威科夫夫交谈后，他对该协议给出了温和的支持。
“经过这次讨论，我认为签署这份谅解备忘录将对美国有利，因为霍尔木兹海峡将开始开放，与伊朗的敌对行动也将停止，”格雷厄姆在X平台上写道。“美国能否就伊朗的核计划和其他问题与伊朗达成可接受、可核查的协议还有待观察，但我认为尝试一下几乎没有坏处。
“开放海峡和停止敌对行动带来的经济稳定，可能会开辟一条超越伊朗冲突的和平之路。”
共和党参议员汤姆·蒂利斯表示，他希望看到比周三公布的简短14点计划更多的细节，称该计划“不够充分”。
“如果最终要求我根据我们所知的14点内容来评判这份协议，那么这不会是一个好的评价，”蒂利斯在大西洋理事会关于即将举行的北约峰会的活动中说道。
参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩周四在国会山对记者表示，他预计政府将在下周初向参议员通报伊朗协议的情况。
“我的理解是，所谓的‘官方文本’今天会发布，但没错，我们已经提出了要求，”图恩说。“我认为一旦他们进行初步通报，我们就会有议员到场。我们已经要求他们这么做了。我预计可能会在下周初。”
图恩称该协议“对美国人有利”，理由是如果海峡重新开放，可能会带来经济缓解。他还指出，“长期”问题仍然“未得到解决”。
民主党参议员，如纽约州少数党领袖查克·舒默，一致对该协议表示蔑视。
“看看政府同意的14点内容，伊朗似乎在几乎每一点上都赢了，”舒默在国会山对记者说。“特朗普的谈判工作做得非常糟糕。我们比战争开始时处境更糟。霍尔木兹海峡现在比当时更受伊朗控制。伊朗的领导层现在比当时更激进。……这将被视为美国最严重的灾难之一。”
康涅狄格州参议员理查德·布卢门撒尔称其为“看似可耻的协议”，并表示这看起来“像是无条件投降，不是伊朗投降，而是美国投降”。
“与总统的承诺相反，这场投降似乎不是伊朗的，而是美国的：解除制裁，提供数千亿美元用于支持代理人武装。没有任何政权更迭，反而让这个政权获得了经济横财，实力得到增强，”布卢门撒尔说，他补充道，他认为根据宪法，该协议必须经参议院批准作为国际条约。
“任何支持该协议的人都需要穿防火防弹衣，因为当它提交国会时，必将遭到两党的谴责，因为它完全具备条约的外观，”他说。
埃莉诺·沃森和凯亚·哈伯德对本文亦有贡献。
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-faces-bipartisan-criticism-over-iran-deal/
特朗普因伊核协议面临两党批评：“这会让伊朗变得更强大”
(04:46)
Trump lashes out at “fools” who oppose Iran deal amid bipartisan criticism
June 18, 2026 / 11:31 AM EDT / CBS News
By Mark Osborne
President Trump slammed the “fools” who oppose terms of the U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding as “either jealous, bad people, or stupid” after several Republican lawmakers spoke out strongly against the deal.
“These fools, who think I haven’t been tough enough on Iran, when the Stock Market Just Hit A RECORD HIGH, and Oil prices are ‘tumbling’ down, are either jealous, bad people, or stupid,” Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social early Thursday as he returned from the G7 summit.
Louisiana Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy came out most strongly against the Iran deal, saying Ronald Reagan is “rolling over in his grave.”
“Iran’s nuclear ambitions were not curbed, and they have learned that threatening the Strait of Hormuz works and will undoubtedly leverage it in the future,” Cassidy wrote on X. “Now, Iran gets to build brand-new infrastructure under this deal. Before the war, the strait was open, Iran being crushed by sanctions, and 13 service members were still alive.”
“Now, 13 Americans are dead, families have paid billions at the pump, sanctions will be lifted, and the bombing has stopped,” he continued. “This is the worst foreign policy blunder in decades.”
Cassidy has stepped up his criticism of Mr. Trump after losing his primary race to Trump-endorsed candidates Julia Letlow and John Fleming, who now face a runoff. The president repeatedly slammed Cassidy, who was one of just seven Republicans to vote to impeach Mr. Trump over the Jan. 6 attack.
Sen. Bill Cassidy confers with an aide during a hearing on June 17, 2026. Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
Trump ally Sen. Ted Cruz is also among the critics of the Iran deal. Cruz told the Daily Wire he thinks the president is getting “very poor advice when it comes to this deal.”
“History teaches that giving billions of dollars to theocratic lunatics who want to murder us is a bad idea,” the Texas Republican said. “Under the terms of what’s been released, somewhere between $10 billion and $30 billion will flow to the Ayatollah immediately before they make even a single nuclear concession.”
“I think that’s ill-advised,” Cruz continued. “That money, if it goes to the ayatollah, will go to fund terrorists trying to kill Americans and weapons that will be used to try to kill Americans. And it also appears to formalize a permanent role for the Islamic regime controlling the Strait of Hormuz. It is difficult to see what possible benefit to America could come from that.”
Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Trump ally who has previously advocated not making any deal and restarting military action against Iran, gave tepid endorsement of the deal after he said he spoke to Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff.
“After this discussion, it is my opinion that signing the MOU will be beneficial to the United States, in as much as the Strait of Hormuz will begin to open, and the hostilities with Iran will stop,” Graham wrote on X. “Whether or not the United States can reach an acceptable, verifiable deal with Iran regarding its nuclear program and other issues is yet to be determined, but I see little downside to trying.
“The economic stability that comes from opening up the Strait and the cessation of hostilities could create a pathway to peace well beyond the Iranian conflict.”
Republican Sen. Thom Tillis said he’s hoping for more details than just the brief 14-point plan released on Wednesday, calling it “inadequate.”
“If I’m ultimately asked by the administration to judge it on the basis of the 14 points that we know, then it will not be a good assessment,” Tillis said during an Atlantic Council event on the upcoming NATO summit.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters at the Capitol on Thursday he anticipates the administration will brief senators on the Iran agreement early next week.
President President ahead of a dinner with French President Macron in Versailles, France, on June 17, 2026. Bastien Ohier / Hans Lucas /AFP via Getty Images
“My understanding is the quote ‘official language’ is coming out today, but yeah, we have a request in,” Thune said. “I assume once they do the initial briefing on it that we’ll have folks up here. We’ve asked them to do that. I would anticipate probably early next week.”
Thune called the deal “good for Americans,” citing the potential economic relief if the strait reopens. He also noted the “long-term” issues remain “unresolved.”
Democratic senators, like Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, of New York, have been united in their disdain for the deal.
“When you look at the 14 points that the administration has agreed to, it looks like Iran has won on just about every one of them,” Schumer told reporters on Capitol Hill. “Trump has done a very poor job of negotiating. We are worse off than we were when the war started. The Strait of Hormuz under greater Iranian control now than then. The leadership of Iran more militant now than then. … This will be regarded as one of the biggest American disasters.”
Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal called it a “seemingly disgraceful deal” and said it looks “like an unconditional surrender, not for Iran, but for the U.S.”
“Contrary to the president’s promises, this capitulation is not by Iran, seemingly, it is by the United States in lifting sanctions, providing hundreds of billions of dollars that can be used to support proxies. The absence of any kind of regime change, and an economic windfall for this regime, strengthening it,” said Blumenthal, who added he believes the agreement must be approved by the Senate as the Constitution outlines for international treaties.
“Anybody advocating for it is going to need flame-resistant body armor, because it will meet with bipartisan condemnation when it reaches Congress, as it must do, because it has all the appearances of a treaty,” he said.
Eleanor Watson and Kaia Hubbard contributed to this report.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-faces-bipartisan-criticism-over-iran-deal/
Trump faces bipartisan criticism over Iran deal: “It’s going to leave Iran stronger”
(04:46)