分类: 未分类

  • 特朗普威胁对其所称“破坏”倒影池者处以重刑


    2026-06-22T19:23:42.216Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/22/politics/reflecting-pool-trump-vandalism

    美国总统唐纳德·特朗普周一呼吁,对他指控破坏了新近翻新但迅速恶化的国家广场倒影池的人提起严重刑事诉讼,这些指控可能导致长期监禁。

    在Truth Social的一篇帖子中,这位总统对该水池的状况表示哀叹,称其遭到了“破坏”。

    “请记住,破坏此类设施甚至企图破坏,都将面临10年监禁——这项法律将得到全面执行!”总统在Truth Social上写道。

    尽管华盛顿特区的检察官尚未正式提起诉讼,但司法部将在未来几天内决定,将如何从严追究上周末因水池底部蓝色涂层剥落而被捕并收到传票的人员责任。这项耗资1400万美元的翻新工程是特朗普推动的华盛顿特区众多建筑项目之一。

    与此同时,国民警卫队队员、公园警察和其他执法人员周一全天驻守在倒影池周边。

    美国公园警察最初援引的是华盛顿特区当地高等法院的轻罪指控,包括破坏公物、行为不检或损毁公共财产。

    但特朗普的帖子暗示,如果美国检察官珍妮娜·皮尔罗认为有必要,这些案件可能会被以更严重的罪名起诉。

    华盛顿特区美国检察官办公室表示,其仍在审查上周末开出的多份传票,但尚未在法庭提起任何诉讼。

    皮尔罗上周末在福克斯新闻节目中表示,那些破坏或企图破坏水池的人将“在华盛顿特区接受刑事司法系统的审判”。

    “已有多人收到传票,这些案件将得到最严厉的起诉,”皮尔罗说,“如果有人向倒影池中投放更严重的物质,导致藻类大量繁殖或更严重的问题,我们将考虑提出更严重的指控。”

    如果造成的损失数额巨大,联邦法院可以以破坏政府财产罪对行为人提起重罪指控。这类联邦刑事指控最高可处以25万美元罚款或10年监禁,不过实际判处最高刑期的情况极为罕见。

    截至目前,前奥运会皮划艇选手戴维·赫恩告诉CNN,警方在他触碰了从水池底部部分脱落的蓝色材料后将其逮捕。该水池于本月早些时候完成耗资数百万美元的翻新工程后重新开放。

    赫恩表示,一名国家公园管理局工作人员曾警告他不要伸手入水,随后公园警察就给他戴上了手铐。他否认破坏了水池,称自己只是出于好奇。他的首次庭审定于7月9日举行。

    内政部发言人告诉CNN,已有5人因破坏水池被逮捕,另有5人收到联邦传票。该发言人表示,目前已有14份关于破坏公物的警方报告提交。

    “美国公园警察将继续履行其首要职责,维护我们国家首都的法律和秩序,”该发言人补充道。

    公园警察周一未回应进一步的问询,包括被控破坏水池人员的身份信息。

    这起持续发酵的事件已成为某种政治上的罗夏墨迹测验:对特朗普的支持者而言,总统所称的破坏行为是特朗普反对者不择手段破坏总统美化首都努力的最新例证。

    对总统的批评者而言,这场拉锯战再次表明,尽管美国与伊朗爆发冲突并导致汽油和食品价格上涨,特朗普似乎仍一心扑在他的多项翻新工程上。

    一家非营利组织的律师在接受负责该案件的华盛顿特区法官询问时表示,近期出现的藻类爆发和底部涂层剥落,进一步证明了他有必要要求政府遵守相关程序步骤——而政府为了快速完成翻新工程一直回避这些步骤。该组织此前就政府实施水池翻新工程的方式提起诉讼。

    “公众如今正在见证,当各机构为了赶白宫设定的武断截止日期,仓促推进考虑不周的计划时,会发生什么,”律师们在周一提交的法庭文件中写道,“当被告方试图摆脱他们自己造成的混乱局面并修复倒影池时,他们能够也应该做到法律要求的那样:与专家和公众进行磋商,基于法律规定的咨询程序做出知情的最佳决策,而不是再次仓促推出不成熟的方案。”

    特朗普对破坏联邦财产的立场,与他在第二任期首批官方行动中赦免2021年1月6日国会大厦骚乱的1000多名参与者形成鲜明对比——其中包括那些破坏美国国会大厦的人。

    在周一的同一条帖子中,总统在没有提供证据的情况下称,水池上有一处300英尺长的“裂口”,水中还被“非法投放”了化学品。特朗普此前曾称该裂口长250英尺。

    正如CNN此前报道的那样,国家公园管理局工作人员上周向水池中倾倒了加仑量级的过氧化氢,以应对长期困扰该水域的藻类问题。

    特朗普还抱怨本月早些时候有人在倒影池附近的一片草地上蚀刻了巨大的“8647”字样。特朗普政府将这个短语解读为对总统的生命威胁,而特朗普的反对者则表示,这只是表示反对第47任总统的意思。

    CNN的德文·科尔为本报道贡献了内容。

    Trump threatens serious criminal penalties for those he says ‘vandalized’ the Reflecting Pool

    2026-06-22T19:23:42.216Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/22/politics/reflecting-pool-trump-vandalism

    President Donald Trump called Monday for those he accused of vandalizing the newly renovated, and now quickly deteriorating, Reflecting Pool on the National Mall to face serious criminal charges that could result in lengthy prison sentences.

    In a Truth Social post, the president lamented the state of the pool, which he said had been “Vandalized.”

    “Please remember that there is a 10 year prison sentence for the destruction, or even the attempted destruction, of such things – Which will be fully enforced!” the president wrote on Truth Social.

    While prosecutors in Washington, DC, haven’t yet formally brought charges, the Justice Department will need to decide in the coming days how aggressively it will pursue people who were arrested and cited over the weekend as the pool’s bottom blue layer was peeling off. The recent $14 million renovation is one of many architectural projects in the nation’s capital that Trump has boosted.

    Meanwhile, National Guard members, Park Police and other law enforcement were present around the Reflecting Pool on Monday.

    The violations cited by the US Park Police, at least initially, are misdemeanors in DC’s local Superior Court – for vandalizing, disorderly conduct or defacing public property.

    But Trump’s post suggested that the cases could be charged as more serious crimes if US Attorney Jeanine Pirro decides they should be.

    The US attorney’s office for the District of Columbia says it is still reviewing a handful of citations issued over the weekend but hasn’t yet brought any charges in court.

    Pirro, speaking on Fox News over the weekend, said those who vandalized or tried to vandalize the pool will “face the criminal justice system in DC.”

    “There are several citations that have been handed out to individuals, and these are cases that will be prosecuted to the full extent,” Pirro said. “If there are more serious products that are put into the Reflecting Pool to create more algae or a bigger problem, then we’ll consider more serious charges.”

    A destruction of government property offense could be charged as a felony in federal court if the damage is pricey. That type of federal criminal charge carries a maximum fine of up to $250,000 or 10 years in prison, though maximum sentences are exceedingly rare in practice.

    So far, one person, David Hearn, a former Olympic canoeist, told CNN police arrested him after he touched a flap of blue material that partially detached from the bottom of the pool, which reopened earlier this month following the multi-million-dollar renovation.

    Hearn said a National Park Service worker warned him not to reach into the water before he was handcuffed by Park Police. He denied vandalizing the pool and said he was simply curious. His first court appearance is set for July 9.

    A Department of Interior spokesperson told CNN that five people had been arrested for vandalism, while an additional five people were issued federal citations. Fourteen police reports have been filed for vandalism, the spokesperson said.

    “The U.S. Park Police will continue to carry out their number one duty of upholding law and order in our nation’s capital,” the spokesperson added.

    The Park Police didn’t respond on Monday to further inquiries, including about the identities of the people accused of vandalizing the pool.

    The ongoing saga has become a sort of a political Rorschach test: For Trump supporters, the vandalism alleged by the president is the latest example of Trump opponents stopping at nothing to wreck the president’s efforts to beautify the nation’s capital.

    For the president’s critics, the back-and-forth demonstrates yet another way in which Trump seems to be preoccupied with his multiple renovation projects despite the war with Iran and the resulting high prices for gas and groceries.

    Lawyers for a nonprofit suing over how the administration carried out the pool renovation also told the DC judge overseeing the case that the recent algae blooms and peeling bottom reinforce the need for him to require the administration to follow certain procedural steps that they’ve been bypassing to get the renovation done quickly.

    “The public is now witnessing what happens when, instead, agencies barrel ahead with ill-conceived plans in a hasty manner to meet an arbitrary deadline imposed by the White House,” the lawyers wrote in court papers filed Monday. “As Defendants determine how to get out of their self-created mess, and restore the Reflecting Pool, Defendants can and should do what the law requires: Engage with experts and the public, and make an informed decision about what is best based on the consultations mandated by the law, instead of once again rushing ahead with half-baked ideas.”

    Trump’s stance on the destruction of federal property also contrasts with his pardoning of over 1,000 participants in the January 6, 2021, insurrection – including those who vandalized the US Capitol – in one of the first official acts of his second term.

    In the same post on Monday the president, without providing evidence, said there was a 300-foot “gash” into the pool and “illegally placed” chemicals in the water. Trump had previously said the gash was 250 feet long.

    As CNN has reported, National Park Service workers last week dumped gallons of hydrogen peroxide into the pool to help combat an algae issue that had been plaguing the body of water.

    Trump also complained about a giant depiction of “8647” that was etched into a patch of grass near the Reflecting Pool earlier this month. The Trump administration has interpreted that phrase as a threat against the president’s life, while Trump opponents say it is merely meant to signal opposition to the 47th president.

    CNN’s Devan Cole contributed to this report.

  • 加州起诉美国环保署,因其将加州汽车排放标准送交国会考虑废除


    2026-06-22T16:08:43.964Z / 路透社

    image REUTERS/Carlos Barria 购买授权,打开新标签页

    华盛顿6月22日电(路透社)——美国加州于周一起诉美国环境保护署,此前该机构于本月早些时候将具有里程碑意义的加州汽车排放标准送交由共和党掌控的国会,以考虑废除该标准。

    美国环保署表示,根据《国会审查法案》,应将此前民主党政府批准的、依据《清洁空气法》针对加州环境法规的豁免权送交国会审议。

    每日庭审简报:将最新法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱,开启您的清晨阅读。在此注册

    加州方面称该行为非法,应被哥伦比亚特区美国地区法院叫停,并辩称美国环保署试图“变魔术”,将豁免权变为一项正式规则。

    “这些最新的非法行为将意味着更多污染、更差的空气质量、更多的市场不确定性,以及为本已饱受排放问题困扰的社区带来更大的健康风险,”加州总检察长罗布·邦塔说道,他同时指出加州已获得超过75项环境行动豁免权。

    美国环保署未立即置评。

    特朗普政府正采取多方面举措,剥夺加州要求车企生产更清洁车辆和更多电动汽车的权利。美国环保署还出台规则,允许车企销售更多汽油动力汽车和卡车,同时推高电动汽车的购买成本。

    此次送交国会审议的四项豁免权,授予加州制定针对汽车、卡车以及园林设备自身排放标准的权力。这些规则曾促使车企生产更清洁的电动车型以减少排放。

    2022年,时任总统拜登领导下的美国环保署批准了加州现行的汽车排放标准。

    加州的规则要求车企销售越来越多的电动汽车,并满足日益严格的尾气排放限制。

    这些规则比特朗普政府时期推行的标准要严格得多,后者计划放松联邦燃油经济性规则。

    特朗普去年签署法案,推翻了加州旨在2035年前逐步淘汰新汽油动力汽车的规定。加州辩称,该规则为消费者节省的燃油成本远高于电动汽车更高的前期购置成本。

    在丰田、通用汽车等车企游说要求豁免加州的排放监管后,国会取消了加州在2035年后禁止传统汽油动力汽车销售的权力。

    此事源于美国环保署将该项目的豁免权送交国会审议。许多民主党议员辩称,根据《国会审查法案》,此类豁免权不应接受审议。加州也已就此次送交国会的豁免权提交一事提起诉讼。

    戴维·谢泼德森 华盛顿报道;马克·波特与迪帕·巴宾顿 编辑

    California sues US EPA over sending emissions rules to Congress for potential reversal

    2026-06-22T16:08:43.964Z / Reuters

    Car traffic is seen during rush hour in downtown San Francisco, California, U.S., July 29, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    WASHINGTON, June 22 (Reuters) – The state of California sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Monday after the agency earlier ‌this month sent the Republican-controlled Congress landmark state vehicle emissions rules for potential repeal.

    The EPA said waivers under the Clean Air Act for California environmental regulations approved under prior Democratic administrations should have been sent to lawmakers under the ​Congressional Review Act.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    California said the action was illegal and should be blocked by the U.S. ​District Court for the District of Columbia, arguing that the EPA was seeking ⁠to “wave a magic wand” and turn a waiver into a rule.

    “These latest illegal actions would mean more ​pollution, poorer air quality, more market uncertainty, and greater health risks for communities already overburdened by emissions,” ​said California Attorney General Rob Bonta, noting the state has received more than 75 waivers for environmental actions.

    The EPA did not immediately comment.

    The Trump administration has mounted a multi-pronged effort to deny California the ability to require cleaner vehicles and ​more electric vehicles. The EPA has also enacted rules making it easier for automakers to sell more ​gasoline-powered cars and trucks, while making it more expensive to buy EVs.

    The four waivers sent to Congress for review ‌granted ⁠California authority to enact its own emission standards for cars and trucks as well as lawn and garden equipment. The rules have prodded companies to produce cleaner electric models to reduce emissions.

    California won approval in 2022 under then-President Joe Biden’s EPA for the state’s current vehicle emissions rules.

    California’s rules require automakers to sell a rising ​number of electric vehicles ​and meet increasingly stringent ⁠limits on tailpipe emissions.

    Those rules are much stricter than those imposed by the Trump administration, which plans to roll back federal fuel economy rules.

    Trump signed legislation ​last year to overturn California’s rules that aim to phase out new ​gasoline-powered cars by ⁠2035. California contends the fuel savings for consumers from the rules far exceed the higher upfront costs of EVs.

    Congress rescinded authority for California to outlaw traditional gasoline-powered vehicles after 2035 after Toyota, GM and other ⁠automakers lobbied ​for relief from California’s emissions regulations.

    That came after the EPA ​sent Congress the waiver for that program for review. Many Democratic lawmakers contended the waivers are not reviewable under the CRA. California has ​also challenged that waiver submission to Congress.

    Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Mark Porter and Deepa Babington

  • Polymarket在《华尔街日报》报道其涉嫌虚假营销后启动调查


    2026-06-22 12:59:00 美国东部夏令时 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻(CBS News)

    撰稿

    更新于:2026年6月22日 / 美国东部夏令时下午2:39 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    Polymarket向CBS新闻表示,在《华尔街日报》的一项调查发现该预测市场平台付费聘请网络内容创作者制作视频、并被该报指称虚假宣传用户累计赢得190万美元后,公司正在对其宣传内容进行审计。

    该报周六发布的调查结果基于对社交媒体内容创作者的采访以及对10位创作者发布的超过1100条TikTok视频的分析。《华尔街日报》称,这些视频大多展示了在模仿Polymarket的虚拟网站上进行的虚假交易,并表示该公司的这些行为是一场吸引用户使用其海外不受监管平台的宣传活动的一部分。

    据该媒体的调查,Polymarket还聘请了一名营销承包商,指导所谓的“剪辑者”——即从创作者处转发视频以扩大传播范围的人——重新发布这些内容。

    《华尔街日报》称,其中一条社交媒体视频展示了一名大学生在押注特朗普总统当月会公开说出“麦当劳”一词后赢得了10万美元。但Polymarket网站上的实际交易记录显示,共有50个账户押注特朗普会提及这家连锁餐厅的名字,且所有账户均已亏损。

    该报的报道还发现,其他视频也虚假宣传了用户在对冲押注中可能获得的收益。该媒体称,在其分析的视频中,约10%即118条视频展示创作者赢得了近90万美元,但实际上,如果他们进行完全相同的押注,本应亏损超过16.6万美元。

    “作为全球领先的预测市场平台,我们致力于维护准确、公平且透明的市场环境。我们身处一个快速发展的行业,一直在不断评估改进方式,以提升与受众的互动并赢得他们的信任,”Polymarket的一位发言人在发给CBS新闻的声明中表示。“作为这一承诺的一部分,我们正在对当前的宣传内容开展全面审计,以确保其符合我们的标准以及适用的监管和法律披露要求。”

    外界对Polymarket的持续审查

    与其他预测市场平台一样,Polymarket允许用户就体育、选举、天气等诸多未来事件的结果下注。

    近几个月来,该公司因内幕交易指控受到审查。今年5月,联邦检察官指控一名谷歌员工利用机密商业信息在Polymarket平台上获利超过120万美元。

    今年早些时候,一名数据分析师在接受《60分钟》节目采访时表示,他发现Polymarket的其他账户通过准确押注美国军事行动收益数百万美元,有时胜率高得可疑。

    Polymarket曾表示,其平台禁止内幕交易。该公司于3月更新了规则,禁止基于“被盗机密信息”或非法内幕消息进行交易。

    2022年,在该公司就其运营未注册期权交易所的指控达成和解后,监管机构禁止其在美国境内运营。

    去年,负责监管预测市场的政府机构——美国商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)批准该公司推出受美国监管的平台。但消息人士向CBS新闻透露,该服务仅对受邀用户开放,且仅支持iPhone设备。因此,Polymarket的大部分交易量仍集中在其海外市场。

    美国商品期货交易委员会未回应置评请求,未说明是否计划对《华尔街日报》关于Polymarket的调查结果展开审查。

    广告真实性问题

    根据美国联邦贸易委员会(FTC)的规定,“联邦法律要求广告必须真实、不得具有误导性,且在适当情况下需有科学证据支撑。”

    美国联邦贸易委员会的一位发言人拒绝置评,未说明该机构是否计划根据《华尔街日报》的调查结果对Polymarket展开调查。

    “交易所的核心要义在于订单簿是真实的,任何人都可以审计,”英国预测市场平台Smarkets(Polymarket的竞争对手)的首席执行官杰森·特罗斯特在一封电子邮件中说道。Smarkets最近已向美国商品期货交易委员会申请在美国运营的牌照。

    “受监管的交易所会留存结算记录,并就此向美国商品期货交易委员会负责,这正是出于这个原因,”特罗斯特补充道。

    Polymarket的主要竞争对手Kalshi未回应置评请求,未说明其是否使用过类似的营销手段推广其服务。

    编辑:阿兰·谢特尔(Alain Sherter)

    Polymarket launches probe after Wall Street Journal report alleges deceptive marketing

    2026-06-22T12:59:00-0400 / CBS News

    By

    Updated on: June 22, 2026 / 2:39 PM EDT / CBS News

    Polymarket told CBS News that it is auditing its promotional content after a Wall Street Journal investigation found the prediction market paid online content creators to produce videos that the newspaper said falsely showed customers winning a total of $1.9 million.

    The WSJ’s findings, published Saturday, are based on interviews with social media content creators and an analysis of more than 1,100 TikTok videos from 10 creators. Most of the videos featured phony trades executed on dummy sites designed to resemble Polymarket, according to the Journal, which said the company’s actions were part of a campaign to lure users to its offshore, unregulated platform.

    Polymarket also hired a marketing contractor to instruct so-called clippers, people who redistribute videos from creators to extend their reach, to repost the content, according to the media outlet’s investigation.

    One social media video shows a college-aged student winning $100,000 after placing a $1,000 bet that President Trump would say the word “McDonald’s” publicly sometime that month, according to the WSJ. But the actual trade on Polymarket’s website shows 50 accounts bet that Mr. Trump would use the restaurant chain’s name and that all of them lost, the paper reported.

    Other videos also misrepresented the earnings users could have made on parallel bets, the Journal’s report found. The outlet reported that 118 videos — approximately 10% of the ones it analyzed — depicted creators winning almost $900,000, when in reality, if they had placed identical bets, they would have lost more than $166,000.

    “As the world’s leading prediction market, we are committed to maintaining accurate, fair and transparent markets. We are part of a rapidly growing industry and are constantly evaluating ways to improve how we’re engaging and earning the trust of our audience,” a Polymarket spokesperson said in a statement to CBS News. “As part of that commitment, we are conducting a comprehensive audit of active promotional content to ensure it complies with our standards, as well as applicable regulatory and legal disclosure requirements.”

    Existing scrutiny on Polymarket

    Like other prediction markets, Polymarket allows users to place wagers on the outcomes of future events, such as sports, elections, weather and many other activities.

    The company has faced scrutiny in recent months over allegations of insider trading. In one recent case, federal prosecutors in May alleged that a Google employee made more than $1.2 million on Polymarket using confidential business information.

    Earlier this year, a data analyst also told “60 Minutes” he has spotted other cases of Polymarket accounts raking in millions by correctly betting on U.S. military operations, sometimes achieving a suspiciously high win rate.

    Polymarket has said insider trading is prohibited on its platform. The company updated its rules in March to prohibit trades based on “stolen confidential information” or illegal tips.

    Regulators banned Polymarket from operating in the U.S. in 2022 after the company settled allegations that it was operating an unregistered options exchange.

    Last year, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the government agency that oversees prediction markets, granted the company permission to launch a U.S.-regulated platform. However, that service is invite-only and accessible only on an iPhone, sources have told CBS News. As a result, much of Polymarket’s trading volume remains concentrated in its overseas markets.

    The CFTC did not respond to a request for comment on whether it plans to examine the Journal’s findings about Polymarket.

    Truth in advertising

    According to the Federal Trade Commission, “Federal law says that ads must be truthful, not misleading, and, when appropriate, backed by scientific evidence.”

    An FTC spokesperson declined to comment on whether the agency plans to investigate Polymarket in light of the Wall Street Journal’s findings.

    “The whole point of an exchange is that the order book is real and anyone can audit it,” Jason Trost, CEO of Smarkets, a U.K. prediction market and Polymarket competitor, said in an email. Smarkets recently filed for a license with the CFTC to operate in the U.S.

    “Regulated exchanges keep settlement records and answer to the CFTC for exactly this reason,” Trost added.

    Kalshi, Polymarket’s main competitor, did not respond to a request for comment on whether it has used similar marketing tactics to promote its services.

    Edited by Alain Sherter

  • 芝加哥市长因宣扬跨性别暴力“紧急状态”遭嘲讽,六月节周末该市谋杀案频发


    2026-06-22T14:31:37-04:00 / 福克斯新闻网

    市长办公室重申2024年“跨性别女性凶杀紧急状态”,引发网络评论员嘲讽

    作者:彼得·达布罗斯卡 福克斯新闻
    发布时间:2026年6月22日 美国东部时间下午2:31

    特朗普就芝加哥犯罪问题抨击伊利诺伊州州长

    在芝加哥周末发生暴力事件、数十人中枪、数人遇害后,总统唐纳德·特朗普抨击伊利诺伊州州长J·B·普里茨克。特朗普提出提供联邦援助,并质疑普里茨克为何拒绝接受帮助。社区圆桌会议主任卡塔·特拉斯强烈敦促市长和州长接受联邦干预。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章!

    芝加哥市长因在致命的六月节周末期间宣扬其跨性别暴力紧急状态而成为嘲讽对象,该周末该市有数十人中枪,6人遇害。

    “自宣布跨性别女性凶杀紧急状态以来,我们的政府提升了市政府支持芝加哥LGBTQ+群体的能力,”市长布兰登·约翰逊周日在X平台上发文称。“这一框架以此前的工作为基础,以芝加哥跨性别群体的声音和亲身经历为核心,规划一条通往更安全、更具凝聚力城市的道路。”

    “跨性别女性凶杀”被定义为“出于跨性别仇视和厌女仇恨动机,针对性杀害跨性别女性的行为”。批评人士迅速指出,约翰逊似乎在六月节周末之际专注于宣扬打击一种鲜为人关注的跨性别暴力类别,而非芝加哥黑人遭杀害的问题。

    芝加哥市长布兰登·约翰逊2026年1月27日在芝加哥市政厅五楼举行的新闻发布会上发言。(克里斯·斯韦达/《芝加哥论坛报》)

    芝加哥致命六月节周末造成7人死亡,特朗普谴责民主党州长无所作为

    约翰逊的办公室于周日重申了这一紧急状态,该状态于2024年首次实施。

    一份相关报告显示,针对跨性别女性、尤其是黑人、原住民和有色人种(BIPOC)跨性别女性的暴力行为在芝加哥普遍存在。

    但该报告未提及该市已有多少名跨性别女性遇害,并且尽管该术语有明确定义,却公然将自杀归入“跨性别女性凶杀”类别。该报告顶部的一张图片展示了21个人及其照片,据推测是在芝加哥遇害的跨性别女性。

    网络批评人士指责约翰逊将政府精力集中在跨性别问题上,许多人指出,该帖子发布的时间恰逢周末,当时有39人中枪、6人遇害,而该市正在庆祝六月节。

    芝加哥周末暴力事件造成4人死亡、29人受伤,领导人却吹嘘犯罪进展

    “没人知道‘跨性别女性凶杀紧急状态’是什么,”得克萨斯州共和党众议员布兰登·吉尔在X平台上说道。“这就是芝加哥市长目前关注的事情。”

    “每月都有数十名芝加哥黑人在街头死于帮派暴力、驾车枪击和报复行动,”一名X用户在帖子中部分写道。“这才是真正压垮罗斯兰、恩格尔伍德、奥斯汀及其他地区家庭的紧急状态。而非小众身份政治报告。”

    芝加哥南区的一幅壁画鼓励居民不要实施暴力行为。拍摄于2026年6月21日。(彼得·达布罗斯卡/福克斯新闻数字频道)

    “‘跨性别女性凶杀紧急状态’。荒谬至极,且脱离现实,”保守派评论员马特·沃尔什在一篇帖子中部分说道。

    “所有人都在嘲讽这件事,但我觉得约翰逊市长终于找到了一种他不喜欢的谋杀类型,这挺好的。迈出了一小步,”X平台网红贾维斯·贝斯特说道。

    “‘跨性别女性凶杀紧急状态’,”前白宫副幕僚长詹姆斯·布莱尔模仿道。“我们都快没词形容了。”

    总统唐纳德·特朗普周六就暴力事件抨击民主党籍伊利诺伊州州长J·B·普里茨克,并提出提供联邦援助以平息混乱。

    警方称阵亡将士纪念日周末芝加哥有25人中枪。(福克斯新闻)

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用

    “芝加哥发生了大量杀戮事件,”特朗普在Truth Social上写道。“为什么普里茨克州长不打电话向我求助。我可以在一个月内让芝加哥变成一座安全的城市,用不了一年,这里就会成为最安全的城市之一!”

    他吹嘘自己通过派遣国民警卫队和联邦执法人员,减缓了华盛顿特区的暴力犯罪增速。

    约翰逊的办公室未回复置评请求。

    彼得·达布罗斯卡是福克斯新闻数字频道负责政治报道的记者。

    在X平台关注彼得:@pmd_reports。向peter.dabrosca@fox.com发送新闻线索。

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6399101112112

    Chicago mayor ridiculed for touting trans violence ‘state of emergency’ amid murder-plagued Juneteenth weekend

    2026-06-22T14:31:37-04:00 / Fox News

    The mayor’s office reupped the 2024 “Transfemicide State of Emergency,” drawing mockery from commentators online

    By Peter D’Abrosca Fox News

    Published June 22, 2026 2:31pm EDT

    Trump slams Illinois governor over Chicago crime

    President Donald Trump slams Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker after a violent Chicago weekend saw dozens of people shot and several killed. Trump, offering federal help, questions why Pritzker refuses assistance. The Community Roundtable director Cata Truss strongly urges both the mayor and governor to accept federal intervention.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Chicago’s mayor has become the subject of ridicule after promoting his transgender violence state of emergency amid a deadly Juneteenth weekend where dozens of people in his city were shot and six were killed.

    “Since declaring a Transfemicide State of Emergency, our administration has strengthened the City’s capacity to support LGBTQ+ Chicagoans,” a Sunday X post from Mayor Brandon Johnson said. “This framework builds on that work by centering the voices and lived experiences of trans Chicagoans to chart a path toward a safer, more connected city.”

    “Transfemicide” is defined as the “targeted killing of a transgender woman motivated by transphobic and misogynistic hatred.” Critics were quick to point out that Johnson appears focused on promoting on Juneteenth weekend the fight against an obscure transgender violence category rather than the killing of black Chicagoans.

    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson speaks during a press conference on the fifth floor of City Hall in Chicago on Jan. 27, 2026.(Chris Sweda / Chicago Tribune)

    CHICAGO’S DEADLY JUNETEENTH WEEKEND LEAVES 7 DEAD AS TRUMP SHAMES DEM GOV FOR INACTION

    Johnson’s office reupped the state of emergency on Sunday after it was first implemented in 2024.

    A report on the subject suggests that violence against transgender women, particularly black, indigenous people of color (BIPOC) transgender women, is endemic in Chicago.

    But the report does not mention how many transgender women have been killed in the city, and admittedly includes suicides in the “transfemicide” category despite the term’s definition. An image at the top of the paper features 21 people and their photos, presumably transgender women who have died in Chicago.

    Online critics lambasted Johnson for focusing his administration’s energy on the transgender issue, and many noted that the timing of the post coincided with a weekend where 39 people were shot and six killed while the city celebrated Juneteenth.

    FOUR DEAD AND 29 SHOT IN CHICAGO WEEKEND VIOLENCE AS LEADERS TOUT CRIME PROGRESS

    “Nobody knows what a ‘Transfemicide State of Emergency’ is,” said Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, on X. “This is what the Mayor of Chicago is focused on.”

    “Black Chicagoans are dying in the streets by the dozens every month in gang violence, drive-bys, and retaliation,” one X user said in part. “That’s the real emergency crushing families in Roseland, Englewood, Austin, and beyond. Not niche identity reports.”

    A mural on Chicago’s South Side encourages residences not to commit acts of violence. Photo taken on June 21, 2026.(Peter D’Abrosca/Fox News Digital)

    “‘Transfemicide state of emergency.’ Beyond parody. And delusional,” said a post from conservative commentator Matt Walsh in part.

    “Everyone is dunking on this but I think it’s NICE that Mayor Johnson finally found a type of murder he doesn’t like. Baby steps,” said X personality Jarvis Best.

    “‘Transfemicide State of Emergency,’” former White House Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair parroted. “We are running out of sentences.”

    President Donald Trump blasted Democratic Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker for the violence on Saturday, and offered federal help to quell the chaos.

    Police said 25 people were shot in Chicago over Memorial Day weekend.(Fox News)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “Lots of Killing going on in Chicago,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Why isn’t Governor Pritzker calling me for help. I could make Chicago a safe City in ONE MONTH, in ONE YEAR, it would be one of the safest!!!”

    He touted success in slowing violent crime in Washington, D.C. by bringing in National Guard troops and federal law enforcement.

    Johnson’s office did not return a request for comment.

    Peter D’Abrosca is a reporter at Fox News Digital covering politics.

    Follow Peter on X at @pmd_reports. Send story tips to peter.dabrosca@fox.com.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6399101112112

  • 特朗普在伊朗问题上的政治失误规模逐渐清晰


    2026-06-22T16:52:01.039Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/22/politics/trump-iran-deal-poll

    • 一项新的哥伦比亚广播公司新闻-舆观民调显示,绝大多数美国人希望伊朗战争现在就结束——但他们想要结束战争,并非因为他们认为美国取得了胜利。
    • 仅有22%的受访者认为特朗普政府达成的协议对美国比对伊朗更有利。
    • 大多数美国人认为这场战争带来的问题比解决的更多。

    本文由AI生成摘要,并经CNN编辑审核。

    特朗普政府与伊朗签署谅解备忘录后的首次大型民调,有一个结果对特朗普来说似乎是好消息:绝大多数美国人赞同他应该结束战争,而非推动更多让步。

    但这并非因为他们真的认可这项协议;而是因为他们认为这场战争是一场惨败,只想尽快摆脱它。

    最新的哥伦比亚广播公司新闻-舆观民调显示,即便美国人首次看到——尽管还不确定——战争即将结束的曙光,这也丝毫没有改善他们对这场战争的看法。

    随着本届政府进入该进程的新阶段,我们有必要审视当前的政治立场,以及它们可能如何影响后续事态发展。

    民调显示,78%的美国人表示更愿意现在结束战争,仅有22%的人希望坚持下去——“继续……直到伊朗做出更多让步”。

    至少有一位特朗普的政治顾问在周日为这一结果欢呼。他认为,这表明美国民众在伊朗协议问题上站在特朗普和副总统JD·万斯一边。

    但民调的其余结果清楚地表明,事实并非如此。

    当被要求实际评估这项协议时,仅有22%的美国人表示该协议对美国比伊朗更有利,另有更多人——37%——表示该协议对伊朗更有利。(其余41%的人认为协议对双方大致平等。)

    认为协议对美国更有利的受访者中,仅有39%是共和党人。因此需要强调的是,特朗普所在政党中仅有约四成的人认为他的政府在此谈判中取得了胜利。

    美国人还以45%对29%的比例认为,从战略角度来看这场战争并不成功。

    但这一结果可能低估了美国人眼中这场战略失败的程度。

    或许没有什么比针对核问题的民调结果更能说明问题了——而核问题正是特朗普最关键的目标。

    尽管特朗普多次声称他的目标是永久阻止伊朗的核计划,但哥伦比亚广播公司的民调显示,69%的美国人,甚至45%的共和党人都表示,如果这项协议最终敲定以结束战争,将无法实现这一目标。

    这与6月中旬框架协议谈判期间进行的福克斯新闻民调结果相呼应。当时的民调显示,登记选民以64%对35%的比例认为,和平协议不太可能阻止伊朗生产核武器。

    值得注意的是,该协议将许多细节留待后续敲定,因此在核问题上仍有大量问题需要解决。

    但特朗普政府似乎正在撤回部分既定目标,而这些民调结果反映了美国民众普遍存在的悲观情绪。

    最新的哥伦比亚广播公司民调还显示:

    • 68%的人表示,如果协议最终敲定,也不会阻止伊朗威胁其他国家。近一半(48%)的受访共和党人同意这一说法。
    • 79%的人表示,该协议并未让伊朗领导人更亲美。
    • 74%的人表示,该协议没有让伊朗人民更安全、更自由,而特朗普曾在今年早些时候表示这是他的目标之一。

    伊朗战争民调中一个引人注目的一致细节是,调查结果显示这场战争不仅被视为失败,而且适得其反。

    如今这一观点依然存在。

    特朗普声称战争已经在军事上摧毁了伊朗,并摧毁了其核计划。但仅有37%的美国人表示,如今的伊朗比战争开始前更弱。

    超过六成的人表示,伊朗的实力与战前持平(38%)或更强(25%)。

    尽管伊朗无疑遭受了重大军事损失,但它也通过如今已得到证实的封锁霍尔木兹海峡、危及世界经济的能力,展现了强大的影响力。

    说到这里,美国人认为这场战争在未来数月乃至数年里仍可能持续造成损失。

    明确的多数派(57%)表示,这场战争实际上“带来的问题比解决的更多”。这一比例几乎是认为战争解决的问题多于制造的问题的受访者(21%)的三倍。

    而谈到这场战争的影响,美国人似乎认为特朗普根本不知道自己卷入了怎样的局面。

    民调询问受访者是否认为特朗普政府理解战争对世界经济的影响。

    高达64%的人认为战争对世界经济的影响超出了政府的预期。其中包括51%的受访共和党人。

    当然,这有充分的依据——无论是从特朗普自己的公开言论还是新闻报道来看。美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)3月曾报道,政府低估了伊朗试图封锁霍尔木兹海峡的决心。

    美国人只是急于结束战争——并且认为特朗普也是如此

    最后一个重要结论是,美国人在一点上与特朗普达成了共识:他们都希望战争尽快结束,并且他们认为特朗普也是这么想的。

    6月中旬的福克斯新闻民调显示,70%的登记选民担心战争会变成长期对峙。87%的人表示,避免旷日持久的战争至关重要。

    这或许可以解释为什么人们可能愿意接受一份并非最优的协议。政府曾表示战争可能持续约四至六周,但如今已经拖延了近四个月。

    在此期间,美国人没有看到多少实质性成果。而且鉴于他们从一开始就没有太多理由参战,他们决定抽身而退也就顺理成章了。

    或许最能说明问题的是,他们认为特朗普现在正是这么做的——试图抽身了事。

    哥伦比亚广播公司的民调询问美国人,他们认为特朗普政府达成这项协议,是因为已经实现了所有目标,还是因为“希望结束冲突”。

    三分之二的美国人表示,政府这么做只是因为想要尽快结束战争。

    The scale of Trump’s political blunder in Iran is coming into focus

    2026-06-22T16:52:01.039Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/22/politics/trump-iran-deal-poll

    • A new CBS News-YouGov poll reveals Americans overwhelmingly want the Iran war to end now — but because they want to be finished with it, not because they think the US has won.
    • Only 22% of those polled believe the Trump administration’s agreement favors the United States over Iran.
    • Most Americans think the war has created more problems than it solved.

    AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.

    The first major poll conducted since the Trump administration signed a memorandum of understanding with Iran has a point that seems like good news for Trump: Americans overwhelmingly agree he should end the war rather than push for more concessions.

    But it’s not because they actually like the agreement; it’s because they think the war is a debacle, and they just want to be done with it.

    A new CBS News-YouGov poll shows that even as Americans get their first glimpse — however tentative — of the finish line, it hasn’t improved their views of the war one iota.

    And as the administration enters a new phase in this process, it’s worth a check-in on where the politics stand and how they could impact what comes next.

    The poll shows 78% of Americans said they’d prefer to end the war now, while just 22% wanted to hold out — to “continue … until Iran gives up more.”

    At least one Trump political adviser was celebrating that finding on Sunday. He suggested it showed the American people were on Trump and Vice President JD Vance’s side on the accord with Iran.

    But the rest of the poll makes it abundantly clear that’s not true.

    When asked to actually review the agreement, just 22% of Americans said it’s better for the United States than Iran, while significantly more — 37% — said it’s better for Iran. (The other 41% said it was about equal.)

    The percentage who said it’s better for the US included just 39% of Republicans. So just to underscore, only about 4 in 10 members of Trump’s own party think his administration negotiated a win here.

    Americans also said 45%-29% that the war hasn’t been successful from a strategic standpoint.

    But that last finding might undersell how much of a strategic defeat Americans see this as.

    Perhaps nothing drives that home like polling on the nuclear issue — Trump’s most critical goal.

    While Trump has repeatedly asserted his aim was to permanently stop Iran’s nuclear program, the CBS poll shows 69% of Americans and even 45% of Republicans said this agreement, if finalized to bring the war to a conclusion, won’t accomplish that.

    This echoes a Fox News poll conducted the weekend the framework was being negotiated in mid-June. It showed registered voters said 64%-35% that it was unlikely a peace agreement would stop Iran from producing nuclear weapons.

    Notably, the agreement leaves many details for later, so there are still plenty of issues to iron out on the nuclear front.

    But the Trump administration appears to be walking back some of its goals, and these findings get at the rank pessimism that exists in the American public.

    The new CBS poll also shows:

    • 68% said the agreement, if finalized, won’t have stopped Iran from threatening other countries. Nearly half (48%) of polled Republicans agreed with that statement.
    • 79% said it hasn’t made Iran’s leaders more pro-US.
    • 74% said it hasn’t made Iran’s people safe and free, which Trump had said was one of his goals earlier this year.

    A striking and consistent detail in polling on the Iran war are findings that suggest the war is not only viewed as a failure, but as counterproductive.

    And that continues today.

    Trump claims the war has destroyed Iran militarily and pulverized its nuclear program. But just 37% of Americans say Iran is weaker today than before the war began.

    More than 6 in 10 say Iran is as strong as it was before (38%) or stronger (25%).

    While Iran has surely suffered major military losses, it has also demonstrated significant leverage via its now-proven ability to lock down the Strait of Hormuz and jeopardize the world economy.

    Speaking of which, Americans think the war is likely to continue exacting a toll in the months and years to come.

    A clear 57% majority said the war has actually “created more problems than it solved.” That’s nearly three times the 21% who said it had solved more problems than it created.

    And when it comes to that impact, Americans seem to think Trump simply didn’t understand what he was getting himself into.

    The poll asked whether people thought the Trump administration understood the impact the war would have on the world economy.

    Fully 64% thought the war impacted the world economy more than the administration expected. That includes 51% of polled Republicans.

    Of course, there’s plenty to back that up — both from Trump’s own public comments as well as reporting. CNN reported in March that the administration underestimated Iran’s willingness to try and close the Strait of Hormuz.

    Americans are just anxious for it to be over — and think Trump is, too

    The last big lesson is that Americans are on the same page with Trump in a way: They just want it to be over, and they think Trump does, too.

    The Fox News poll in mid-June had shown 70% of registered voters said they were concerned the war would become a long-term commitment. And 87% said it was important to avoid a prolonged war.

    That likely helps explain why people might be willing to accept a suboptimal agreement. The administration said the war was likely to last about four to six weeks, and it’s now dragged on for nearly four months.

    Americans haven’t seen many deliverables during that time. And given they didn’t see much reason to go to war in the first place, it’s not a big logical leap that they would decide to cut bait.

    And perhaps most tellingly, that’s what they think Trump is doing right now — trying to cut bait.

    The CBS poll asked whether Americans thought the Trump administration was reaching this agreement because it had met all of its goals, or because it “wants the conflict to be over.”

    Two-thirds of Americans said it was because the administration just wants to wrap it up.

  • 谁是安迪·伯纳姆?这位有望在英国首相基尔·斯塔默辞职后接任的人物


    2026-06-22T12:55:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    伦敦——英国首相基尔·斯塔默于周一宣布辞职,距离他带领中左翼工党在大选中取得压倒性胜利还不到两年时间。

    斯塔默承诺将进行“有序过渡”,新首相最快将于9月前上任,这一决定此前数月因公众对经济的不满以及应对非法移民进展缓慢的指责而不断发酵。

    舆论迅速转向外界普遍认为最有可能接替斯塔默的人选。尽管工党仍有可能举行党内领袖竞选,但高级成员似乎急切希望避免这场闹剧,安迪·伯纳姆的支持势头正快速升温。

    直到上周,伯纳姆担任英国第五大城市曼彻斯特市长已有约十年时间。他上周辞去市长职务,参加一场地方补选并轻松赢得大曼彻斯特郡梅克菲尔德的席位,成为英国下议院当地议员。

    2026年6月19日,安迪·伯纳姆在英格兰阿什顿梅克菲尔德庆祝梅克菲尔德补选胜利

    尽管法律并未强制要求,但英国政党领袖长期以来均从现任当选议员中选出。

    伯纳姆近期在梅克菲尔德补选的胜利意义重大,不仅扫清了他通往首相之位的道路,还因为他在近年来工党难以守住的这类选区取得了压倒性胜利。

    该选区以英国白人为主,传统上属于工人阶级后工业社区,在2016年“脱欧”公投中压倒性支持退出欧盟。英国各地像梅克菲尔德这样的社区数十年来一直是工党票仓,但随着许多选民转向改革英国党等右翼民粹政党,这些选区的竞争日益激烈。

    由特朗普盟友奈杰尔·法拉奇领导的改革党去年取得重大突破,原因是选民对移民问题感到担忧,同时认为生活水平有所下降。

    但伯纳姆的表现超出预期,这给工党战略家们带来了希望:该党有望在下次全国大选前重新赢得选民支持,届时大选可能会改变下议院的席位构成,让其他政党有机会执掌政权。

    谁是安迪·伯纳姆?

    伯纳姆多年来一直将自己定位为斯塔默的可行替代人选,在工党领导层表现疲软时批评其领导,同时精心打造自己的全国形象。

    伯纳姆作为全国及国际领袖将与斯塔默有何不同,目前尚不完全明确。

    工党长期的主要对手、保守党议员近日将伯纳姆形容为“带北方口音的基尔·斯塔默”。

    在斯塔默发现刻意讨好美国前总统特朗普只能带来有限益处后,伯纳姆在处理与特朗普的关系上是否会采取不同方式,还有待观察。至少有一位此前在意识形态上似乎与特朗普合得来的欧洲领导人,在伊朗问题相关冲突期间与白宫产生了分歧。

    伯纳姆将面临维护英国最珍视的盟友关系的压力,但在梅克菲尔德补选前的竞选活动中,他警告英国不要照搬美国式政治。

    “政治正变得愈发两极分化。如果我们不小心,我们正走上通往美利坚合众国政治模式的道路,”他对支持者表示,“一种两极分化、充满恶意的政治,社区里的人们不再彼此合作。”

    2026年6月19日,前曼彻斯特市长安迪·伯纳姆庆祝梅克菲尔德补选胜利

    尽管伯纳姆常将自己标榜为伦敦政坛的局外人,但他职业生涯的大部分时间都在首都度过,曾在前首相托尼·布莱尔和戈登·布朗的内阁中任职,并在2017年成为曼彻斯特市长前,担任工党议员长达16年。

    他此前曾两次尝试竞选工党最高领袖职位,但均以失败告终。

    然而,作为大曼彻斯特市长期间,伯纳姆树立了英格兰北部权益捍卫者的形象,尤其是在新冠疫情期间,他公开与时任首相鲍里斯·约翰逊领导的保守党政府就该市的财政支持问题发生争执。

    这位被称为“北方之王”的政客倡导区域权力下放——赋予市议会更多权力——以及公民自豪感,这一理念如今有时被称为“曼彻斯特主义”。

    其支持者认为,这正是他与斯塔默的不同之处。

    他们将他描绘成后工业英国的真实代言人——一个理解被伦敦忽视的社区的人。他们称,他“普通人”的形象和轻松的沟通风格,与前政府律师斯塔默始终未能摆脱的刻板、技术官僚式的政治作风形成鲜明对比。

    但批评人士认为,伯纳姆未能明确阐述自己对当今一些最关键议题的看法。例如,当他重返伦敦政坛的猜测加剧时,他在移民问题和英国脱欧后与欧盟的关系上似乎改变了立场。

    今年早些时候,他批评了斯塔默推出的一些更严格的移民政策,但随后又暗示他将采取更严厉的措施减少合法移民,并扩大对非法入境者的拘留设施。

    他此前曾支持英国最终重新加入欧盟,但此后已与这一立场保持距离。

    目前尚不清楚伯纳姆如果成为下一任首相,可能会推行哪些真正区别于斯塔默的政策。由于工党将通过全国大选获得新的授权后才能执政,无论是他还是斯塔默的继任者,都可能不愿做出重大变革。

    斯塔默凭借2024年全国大选的压倒性胜利重新掌权,在保守党执政十多年后重新夺回下议院控制权。因此,放弃此次大选后推行的政策——工党最初当选时承诺要完成的事项——可能会让伯纳姆面临“不民主”的批评。

    斯塔默宣布辞职后数分钟内,改革党的法拉奇就要求举行新的大选。

    “威斯敏斯特想凭借一场补选就直接拥立安迪·伯纳姆,”他说,“假装安迪·伯纳姆拥有领导国家的任何有意义的授权,这太荒谬了。”

    伯纳姆如何成为首相?

    英国选民并不直接选举首相,而是选举当地议员。在下议院占据多数席位的政党领袖通常会成为首相。

    如果执政党议员中的多数人认为党首已成为选举负担,那么执政党可以更换其领袖(通常也就是首相),而且至关重要的是,他们可以在不举行大选的情况下完成这一变动。

    近年来,英国出现了多起完全合法、符合宪法且无需举行大选的领导层变动。如果伯纳姆入主伦敦唐宁街10号的首相官邸,他将成为十年内第七位担任该职位的人。

    伯纳姆的支持者认为,凭借他在工党传统北方票仓的强大支持以及全新的公众形象,他有望成为可行的替代人选,带领工党在下次全国大选中连任——至少可以避免民调显示的、工党即将面临的选举灾难。

    英国必须在2027年前举行新一届全国大选,但政府可以在那之前随时提前举行大选,以争取获得授权。但显然风险在于,政府也可能在议会中失去多数席位,进而失去首相职位。

    尽管伯纳姆被广泛视为最有可能的继任者,但他并非工党内部传出的唯一潜在接班人。

    直到周一,前卫生大臣、工党中右翼知名人物韦斯·斯特里廷还被普遍认为是挑战伯纳姆党魁职位的黑马。但在斯塔默宣布辞职后不到一小时,斯特里廷就表态支持伯纳姆,为这位“北方之王”增添了更多胜算。

    Who is Andy Burnham, the man likely to replace British Prime Minister Keir Starmer after his resignation?

    2026-06-22T12:55:00-0400 / CBS News

    London— British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced on Monday that he was resigning, less than two years after he led his center-left Labour Party to a commanding general election victory.

    Starmer vowed an “orderly transition” that should see a new prime minister in place by September, if not much sooner, after months of mounting public dissatisfaction over the economy and perceived slow progress in tackling illegal immigration.

    Attention quickly shifted onto the man seen widely as Starmer’s likely replacement. While it’s still possible that there will be a leadership contest within the Labour Party, senior members appeared keen to avoid the spectacle and momentum was building fast around Andy Burnham.

    Until last week, Burnham had been the Mayor of Manchester, Britain’s fifth largest city, for about a decade. He stepped down from that role to stand in a local by-election last week, easily clinching the seat in Makerfield, Greater Manchester, to become the local Member of Parliament in the House of Commons.

    Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham speaks as he celebrates his victory in a Makerfield by-election on June 19, 2026 in Ashton in Makerfield, England. Ryan Jenkinson/Getty

    While not required by law, British party leaders have long been chosen from among sitting elected lawmakers.

    Burnham’s recent victory in the Makerfield by-election was significant not only as it cleared his potential path to the premiership, however, but because he won decisively in exactly the type of constituency Labour has struggled to hold onto in recent years.

    The seat is predominantly white British, traditionally working-class, post-industrial and voted heavily to leave the European Union in the 2016 “Brexit” referendum. Communities like Makerfield across the U.K. were considered Labour heartlands for decades, but they have become increasingly contested as many voters drift toward right-wing, populist parties such as Reform UK.

    Reform, led by President Trump’s ally Nigel Farage, has made major gains over the last year thanks to concern among voters over immigration amid perceived declines in living standards.

    Burnham outperformed expectations, however, giving Labour strategists hope that the party can reconnect with voters before the next national elections, which could change the makeup of the House of Commons and give another party a chance to take the reins.

    Who is Andy Burnham?

    Burnham has spent years positioning himself as a viable alternative to Starmer, criticizing Labour’s leadership at moments of weakness while carefully cultivating his own national profile.

    How Burnham would differ from Starmer as a national — and international leader — isn’t exactly clear.

    A lawmaker from the Conservative Party, Labour’s longtime chief rivals, recently described Burnham as “Keir Starmer with a Northern accent.”

    Whether he would adopt a different approach in dealing with President Trump — after Starmer found that going out of his way to keep the American leader on-side can bring somewhat limited advantages — also remains to be seen. At least one European leader who previously appeared to be reasonable match for Mr. Trump, at least ideologically, has found herself at odds with the White House during the Iran war.

    Burnham would be under pressure to maintain Britain’s most cherished alliance, but as he campaigned ahead of the recent by-election in Makerfield, he warned the U.K. against adopting American-style politics.

    “Politics is getting more polarized. And the path we’re on, if we are not careful, is a path towards the politics of the United States of America,” he told supporters. “A polarized, poisonous politics where people in communities don’t work together anymore.”

    Former Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham speaks as he celebrates his victory in the Makerfield by-election, on June 19, 2026. Christopher Furlong/Getty

    Although he often presents himself as an outsider to London politics, Burnham’s spent much of his career in the capital, both as a member of cabinet under former Prime Ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, and during 16 years as an elected Labour member of parliament before he became Manchester’s mayor in 2017.

    He has also tried and failed twice previously to win the leadership role at the top of the Labour Party.

    As Greater Manchester’s mayor, however, Burnham built a reputation as a champion of northern England, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, when he publicly clashed with then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s rival Conservative Party government over financial support for his city.

    The so-called “King of the North” has championed a model of regional devolution — giving city councils more power — and civic pride that is now sometimes referred to as “Manchesterism.”

    This, his supporters argue, is where he differs from Starmer.

    They portray him as an authentic voice for post-industrial Britain — a man who understands communities that feel neglected by London. His “everyman” presentation and his easy communication style, they argue, contrasts with the rigidness and technocratic approach to politics that former government lawyer Starmer never managed to shed.

    Critics argue, however, that Burnham has failed to make clear his views on some of the most defining issues of the day. When speculation about his return to London intensified, Burnham appeared to change his position, for instance, on immigration and Britain’s post-Brexit relationship with Europe.

    Earlier this year, he criticized some of the tougher immigration policies ushered in by Starmer, but then suggested he would go further to reduce legal migration and expand detention capacity for people who enter the country without permission.

    He previously expressed support for Britain eventually rejoining the European Union, but he has since distanced himself from that position.

    It’s not clear what policies Burnham might try to implement if he does become the country’s next leader that would really differentiate him from Starmer. He may be reluctant to make any dramatic changes as Labour will seat him, or whoever replaces Starmer, without winning a new mandate for the party through national elections.

    It was Starmer that brought the party back to power with a resounding 2024 national election victory, seizing control of the House of Commons after more than a decade of Conservative rule. So, abandoning policies adopted off the back of that mandate — the things Labour was originally elected to get done — could leave Burnham open to criticism that he’s being undemocratic.

    Within minutes of Starmer’s resignation announcement, the Reform party’s Farage demanded a new general election.

    “Westminster wants to crown Andy Burnham off the back of a single by-election,” he said. It’s ridiculous to pretend that Andy Burnham has any kind of meaningful mandate to lead the country.”

    How would Burnham become prime minister?

    Britons do not directly elect their prime minister. They elect their local Members of Parliament. The leader of the party that commands a majority in the House of Commons typically becomes prime minister.

    A governing party can change its leader (who is generally the prime minister) if a majority of its lawmakers believe that person has become an electoral liability and, crucially, they can do so without a general election.

    Britain has seen a remarkable number of these entirely legal and constitutional but electionless leadership changes in recent years. If Burnham next inhabits the prime minister’s residence at Number 10 Downing Street in London, he will be the seventh person to do so in a decade.

    Burnham’s supporters argue that with his strong support in Labour’s traditional northern heartlands and a fresh public profile, he could become a viable alternative and lead the party to a second consecutive win in the next national elections — or at least spare them the electoral disaster that polls now suggest is awaiting the party.

    There must be a new national election called by 2027, but the government can call one any time before that to try and win a mandate. The risk, obviously, is the government can also lose its majority in parliament, and the premiership with it.

    While widely seen as the likely replacement, Burnham is not the only name to have been bandied about by Labour as a potential successor to Starmer.

    Until Monday, Wes Streeting, a former national Health Secretary and prominent figure on Labour’s centre-right, was widely regarded as an underdog, but a likely contender to challenge Burnham for Labour Party leadership.

    Less than an hour after Starmer’s announcement, however, Streeting backed Burnham putting more wind in the King of the North’s sails.

  • 特朗普政府威胁削减国土安全部资金,除非各州修改选举法。以下是他们的要求


    美国东部时间2026年6月22日周一下午1:25 / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    撰稿:达娜·巴什与盖比·科恩,CNN
    https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/22/politics/video/inside-politics-gabe-cohen-report-trump-admin-election-changes

    特朗普政府威胁将削减国土安全部资金,除非各州修改选举法。以下是他们的要求

    《政坛内幕》栏目

    CNN独家报道,特朗普政府威胁扣留数千万美元联邦资金,以此向各州施压,要求其推行一系列全面的选举改革。盖比·科恩在《政坛内幕》节目中与达娜·巴什一同拆解其报道内容。

    4:04 • 消息来源:CNN

    The Trump administration is threatening to cut DHS funding unless states change their election laws. Here are their demands

    1:25 PM EDT, Mon June 22, 2026 / CNN

    By Dana Bash and Gabe Cohen, CNN

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/22/politics/video/inside-politics-gabe-cohen-report-trump-admin-election-changes

    The Trump administration is threatening to cut DHS funding unless states change their election laws. Here are their demands

    Inside Politics

    CNN exclusively reports the Trump administration is threatening to withhold tens of millions of dollars in federal funding to pressure states to adopt a sweeping set of election changes. Gabe Cohen joins Dana Bash on “Inside Politics” to break down his reporting.

    4:04 • Source: CNN

  • 传奇音乐高管克莱夫·戴维斯去世,享年94岁


    2026-06-22 12:20:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
    更新时间:2026年6月22日,美国东部时间下午12:42 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    曾助力塑造包括詹尼斯·乔普林、布鲁斯·斯普林斯汀和惠特妮·休斯顿在内的几代艺术家职业生涯的传奇音乐高管克莱夫·戴维斯已去世,享年94岁。

    他的公关人员表示,戴维斯周一在曼哈顿的家中安详离世,死因与年龄相关的疾病,家人和挚爱亲友陪伴在侧。

    作为五届格莱美奖得主,戴维斯在推动不同流派艺术家的事业上发挥了关键作用——涵盖R&B、爵士乐、摇滚、乡村、嘻哈,以及多位流行乐坛顶级明星。

    “对于世界而言,我们的父亲是标志性的音乐传奇人物,他的远见、直觉和对卓越的不懈追求,塑造了无数人的人生配乐,”他的家人在一份声明中说道。“他发掘、指导并支持现代音乐史上最伟大的艺术家,给文化留下了不可磨灭的印记,这一印记将传承后世。”

    “对于他的家人来说,克莱夫是父亲和祖父,是我们生活中心沉稳的依靠,是智慧、力量、鼓励和无条件的爱的源泉,”家人补充道。“无论他的职业成就多么辉煌,他从未忘记最重要的是什么:他所爱的人们。”

    ![Clive Davis attends the pre-Grammy Awards gala honoring industry icons in Los Angeles on Jan. 31, 2026 Leon Bennett]

    毕业于纽约大学和哈佛大学法学院的戴维斯早年并未投身音乐行业,最初以律师身份开启职业生涯。

    “我刚从法学院毕业三年,就被从律所挖去担任哥伦比亚唱片公司的首席法律顾问,我做了五年,”戴维斯2022年在接受《哥伦比亚广播公司晨间新闻》联合主播盖尔·金采访时说道。

    很快他就升任哥伦比亚唱片公司总裁,此前并未接受过任何音乐相关培训。他曾表示自己从未想过自己会拥有“音乐鉴赏力”,但他被认为是史上最伟大的热门歌曲缔造者之一——签下了乐坛多位顶级艺人,包括西蒙与加芬克尔、巴里·曼尼洛、芭芭拉·史翠珊、帕蒂·史密斯、比利·乔尔以及大地风火合唱团。他旗下的艺人阵容还包括声名狼藉先生、艾丽西亚·凯斯、路德·范德鲁斯、洛·史都华等诸多顶级歌手。

    “我确实能分辨出一首热门歌曲。我永远不会忘记,当西蒙与加芬克尔为我演唱《忧愁河上的金桥》时,我当即说:‘这首歌必须作为首支单曲发行’,”戴维斯曾告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,并补充道“这首歌太经典了”,也是他最爱的歌曲。

    据其公关人员的声明,戴维斯后来创立了爱丽斯塔唱片公司并担任总裁,之后又出任董事长兼首席执行官。他还创立了J唱片公司并担任首席执行官,曾任RCA音乐集团董事长,最近的职务是索尼音乐娱乐公司全球首席创意官。

    “戴维斯不仅是音乐史上最多产的热门歌曲缔造者、创新者,也是艺术与管理人才的发掘者之一,他还是唱片行业最早且最具影响力的黑人艺术家倡导者之一,”声明中说道。

    音乐人大卫·福斯特表示,戴维斯成功的秘诀在于相互尊重。

    “他完全以艺人为中心,艺人永远是第一位的,”福斯特此前在接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访时说道。

    曼尼洛表示,戴维斯是他本人以及整个音乐行业所有人的灵感源泉。

    Clive Davis, legendary music executive, dies at age 94

    2026-06-22 12:20:00-0400 / CBS News

    Updated on: June 22, 2026 / 12:42 PM EDT / CBS News

    Clive Davis, a legendary music executive who helped shape the careers of generations of artists including Janis Joplin, Bruce Springsteen and Whitney Houston, has died. He was 94.

    His publicist said Davis died peacefully at his home in Manhattan on Monday of age-related illness, surrounded by his family and loved ones.

    Davis, a five-time Grammy Award winner, played a key role in furthering the work of artists across genres — R&B, jazz, rock, country and hip-hop, as well as some of pop’s biggest stars.

    “To the world, our father was the iconic music legend whose vision, instincts, and relentless pursuit of excellence shaped the soundtrack of countless lives,” his family said in a statement. “He discovered, mentored, and championed the greatest artists in modern music history, leaving an indelible mark on culture that will endure for generations.”

    “To his family, Clive was Dad and Granddaddy, the steady presence at the center of our lives, the source of wisdom, strength, encouragement, and unconditional love,” his family said. “No matter how extraordinary his professional accomplishments, he never lost sight of what mattered most: the people he loved.”

    Clive Davis attends the pre-Grammy Awards gala honoring industry icons in Los Angeles on Jan. 31, 2026 Leon Bennett

    Davis, who graduated from New York University and Harvard Law School, wasn’t drawn to music in his early years, and began his career as a lawyer.

    “I was plucked out of a law firm to become chief lawyer for Columbia Records three years out of law school. I did that for five years,” Davis told “CBS Mornings” co-host Gayle King in 2022.

    He soon became head of Columbia Records, with no real training in music. He said he never thought he would have a “musical ear,” but he was credited to be one of the greatest hit-makers — signing some of the biggest names in the business, including Simon and Garfunkel, Barry Manilow, Barbra Streisand, Patti Smith, Billy Joel, and Earth Wind and Fire. His roster also included top artists like Notorious B.I.G., Alicia Keys, Luther Vandross, Rod Stewart and many more.

    “I do know when I hear a hit song. And so Simon and Garfunkel, I’ll never forget that when they played me ‘Bridge Over Troubled Water,’ I said, ‘That has gotta be the first single,’” Davis had told CBS News, adding that “it was so classic,” and his favorite song.

    Davis went on to become founder, president and later chairman & CEO of Arista Records. He was also founder and CEO of J Records, chairman of the RCA Music Group, and, most recently, worldwide chief creative officer at Sony Music Entertainment, according to the statement from his publicist.

    “Davis was not only one of music’s most prolific hitmakers, innovators and developers of artistic and executive talent ever, he was one of the record industry’s first and most impactful advocates for Black artists,” the statement said.

    Musician David Foster said the secret to Davis’ success was mutual respect.

    “He’s completely artist-friendly and the artist always comes first,” Foster previously told CBS News.

    Manilow said Davis was an inspiration to him and to everyone in the music business.

  • 法官裁定特朗普政府不得使用社保数据清除选民名册


    2026-06-22T19:32:39.176Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:蒂尔尼·斯尼德
    27分钟前
    发布于 2026年6月22日 美国东部时间下午3:32


    华盛顿特区美国哥伦比亚特区地区法院大楼,4月27日摄
    伊丽莎白·弗兰茨/路透社

    内容摘要

    • 一名联邦法官裁定,特朗普政府通过将社保数据纳入公民身份核查项目,违反了隐私保护规定。
    • 该裁决叫停了政府使用升级后的系统识别州选民名册上的非公民。
    • 选民权益倡导者表示,该项目可能错误标记符合资格的公民,并威胁他们的投票权。

    本文AI生成的摘要已由CNN编辑审核。

    一名联邦法官周一表示,特朗普政府在全面改革公民数据项目以更积极地用于清除选民名册时,违反了联邦隐私保护规定。

    美国地区法官斯帕克尔·苏克南南的这项裁决对唐纳德·特朗普总统在州选民名单中找出外国人的努力是重大打击——选民权益倡导者和选举官员表示,该举措可能错误牵连美国公民,危及合格选民的投票权。苏克南南的命令叫停了升级后数据系统的使用。

    “总而言之,联邦政府明知故犯地践踏了美国公民的隐私权,这种行为威胁到神圣的投票权。本法院不能坐视不管,”苏克南南说道,她是乔·拜登总统任命的法官。

    此案围绕着被称为SAVE——即“系统性外国人权益核查系统”——的联邦数据项目展开,长期以来,该项目一直被政府用于核查公共福利相关的公民身份,同时也向选举官员提供服务,用于检查选民名册中的非公民身份。

    相关报道 南卡罗来纳州哥伦比亚——6月9日:2026年6月9日,南卡罗来纳州哥伦比亚的汉德中学,一名选民在中期选举初选中填写选票。周二有四个美国州举行了中期选举初选。(摄影:肖恩·雷福德/盖蒂图片社) 肖恩·雷福德/盖蒂图片社 独家:特朗普政府计划利用国土安全资金向各州施压,要求其修改选举规则 4分钟阅读

    在特朗普第二任期的最初几个月,他的政府扩大了该项目纳入的数据类型,新增了社保数据和其他机构来源的数据。

    苏克南南在周一的裁决中写道,政府知道对SAVE系统的升级违反了国会通过的隐私保护条款,但仍执意推进,作为“响应一项旨在重塑联邦选举的行政命令的紧急举措”,该命令要求他们建立一个大规模选民核查系统。

    自此次改革以来,政府不仅鼓励各州使用该系统,正如CNN周一报道的那样,如今还试图惩罚那些不使用该系统的州。

    美国司法部还发起了前所未有的运动,要求各州提交未脱敏的选民登记档案,以便联邦政府能够对照公民身份数据项目核查选民名册。特朗普最近发布的另一项行政命令还指示国土安全部利用SAVE和其他联邦数据源,为每个州编制适龄投票公民名单。

    目前尚不清楚这项新裁决将在实际层面如何影响这些项目,但其中一些举措已经在其他诉讼中面临法庭阻力。

    国土安全部未立即回应置评请求。

    苏克南南审理的此案由多个选民权益组织和一个隐私团体提起。原告方辩称,他们的隐私权受到损害,其成员面临被错误认定为非公民的威胁,因为SAVE系统可能存在过时或不准确的问题。

    “随着特朗普-万斯政府持续攻击投票权,这对美国人民和我们的民主来说是一场重要胜利,”代表原告的“民主前进”组织主席兼首席执行官斯凯·佩里曼说道。“本案核心的数据被非法整合,违反了旨在保护敏感个人信息的隐私法。”

    Judge says Trump can’t use Social Security data for voter roll purges

    2026-06-22T19:32:39.176Z / CNN

    By Tierney Sneed

    27 min ago

    PUBLISHED Jun 22, 2026, 3:32 PM ET

    The US District Court for the District of Columbia building, in Washington, DC, on April 27.

    Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters

    Summary

    • A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration violated privacy protections by expanding a citizenship verification program with Social Security data.
    • The decision halts the government’s use of the enhanced system to identify noncitizens on state voter rolls.
    • Voter advocates say the program can wrongly flag eligible citizens and threaten their ability to cast ballots.

    AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.

    The Trump administration violated federal privacy protections when it overhauled a citizen data program so that it could be used more aggressively to purge voter rolls, a federal judge said Monday.

    The ruling from US District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan is a major setback for President Donald Trump’s effort to find foreigners on state voter lists — an effort voter advocates and election officials say can wrongly ensnare citizens, risking the disenfranchisement of eligible voters. Sooknanan’s order halts the use of the expanded data system.

    “All in all, the federal government has knowingly trampled on the privacy rights of American citizens in a manner that threatens the sacred right to vote. This Court cannot stand idly by while that happens,” said Sooknanan, an appointee of President Joe Biden.

    The case centered on the federal data program known as SAVE — or the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements — that has long been used by the government to verify citizenship for public benefits, but has also been offered to election officials to check voter rolls for noncitizens.

    Related article COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA – JUNE 9: A voter fills out a ballot on Election Day for the midterm primary on June 9, 2026 at Hand Middle School in Columbia, South Carolina. Four U.S. states conducted midterm primary elections on Tuesday. (Photo by Sean Rayford/Getty Images) Sean Rayford/Getty Images Exclusive: Trump administration plans to use homeland security funds to pressure states into election changes 4 min read

    In the early months of Trump’s second term, his administration beefed up the program by expanding the types of data fed into the system, adding Social Security data and data from other agency sources.

    Sooknanan wrote in her ruling Monday that the administration knew the revamp of SAVE violated privacy protections passed by Congress, but went forward with it anyway as part of a scramble “to comply with an Executive Order aimed at reshaping federal elections, which directed them to create a system for mass voter verification.”

    Since the overhaul, the administration has both encouraged states to use it, and as CNN reported Monday, now seeks to punish states that don’t.

    The Justice Department has also gone on an unprecedented campaign to collect each state’s unredacted voter registration file so the federal government can check the rolls against the citizenship data program. A more recent executive order by Trump also instructs the Department of Homeland Security to use SAVE and other federal data sources to assemble lists of voting-age citizens for each state.

    It’s unclear how this new ruling will impact those projects on a practical level, but some of those maneuvers were already facing pushback in court in other lawsuits.

    DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The case before Sooknanan was brought by several voter advocacy organizations and a privacy group. The challengers argued that their privacy rights were being harmed and that their members faced the threat of being wrongly identified as noncitizens, because of how the SAVE system can be outdated or inaccurate.

    “As the Trump-Vance administration continues its attack on the right to vote, this is an important victory for the American people and our democracy,” said Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, which represented the challengers. “The data at the heart of this lawsuit was unlawfully consolidated in violation of privacy laws intended to protect sensitive personal information.”

  • 关注:民主党就反恐监视权限达成一致,同时因特朗普提名的国家情报总监人选陷入僵局


    2026年6月22日 美国东部时间下午2:59 / 福克斯新闻

    沃纳、韦尔奇和孔斯参议员表示,应重新授权《外国情报监控法》,但同时对代理国家情报总监缺乏经验表示反对

    佛蒙特州民主党参议员彼得·韦尔奇、弗吉尼亚州民主党参议员马克·沃纳以及特拉华州民主党参议员克里斯·孔斯称,国会应续签《外国情报监控法》第702条,同时指出该条款存在的风险和政治障碍。(图片来源:尼古拉斯·巴拉西 为福克斯新闻数字频道拍摄)

    全新功能:您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/345f1e51-bc21-41c6-915f-57541343b9e5

    收听本文
    3分钟

    一批民主党参议员一致认为,国会应续签政府的监视权限以保障国家安全。

    当被问及在当前国内外恐怖主义威胁持续存在的情况下,是否应重新授权该权限时,弗吉尼亚州民主党参议员马克·沃纳、佛蒙特州民主党参议员彼得·韦尔奇和特拉华州民主党参议员克里斯·孔斯均表示同意,但同时提出了围绕《外国情报监控法》(FISA)第702条的不同担忧。

    国会允许这项允许美国情报机构无需搜查令即可对境外外国人进行电子监视的关键监视工具于6月12日失效,这是该条款2008年生效以来首次过期。不过,情报官员指出,现有监视活动仍可继续,因为外国情报监控法院已将该项目重新认证至2027年3月。

    此外,参议院情报委员会主席沃纳参议员对福克斯新闻数字频道表示,“并没有出现权限中断”,因为通信服务商仍有法律义务向情报机构移交相关资料。

    记者手记:国会通过短期FISA第702条修正案,推迟长期续签

    2025年华盛顿,弗吉尼亚州民主党参议员马克·沃纳在参议院听证会上就拉斯·沃特的相关问题举手提问。(凯文·迪奇/盖蒂图片社)

    “这一状态随时可能终止,这也是我们需要尽快完成续签的原因,”沃纳强调道。

    韦尔奇参议员虽然支持续签该权限,但表示议员们应确保对美国民众的保护措施仍然有效。国会中的部分人士认为,该监视项目可能被用于监控本国公民。

    “目前仍在审议中,同时会保护我们本国平民,不过没错,这是一项好用的工具,”韦尔奇在国会山对福克斯新闻数字频道说道。

    6月初,民主党人投票反对续签《外国情报监控法》第702条,以抗议特朗普总统任命联邦住房金融局局长比尔·普尔特尔担任代理国家情报总监(DNI),导致该条款就此过期。

    提名普尔特尔一事仍极具争议,引发了议员们的广泛担忧,他们指出普尔特尔在该领域缺乏经验,不应获得美国情报信息的临时访问权限。

    众议员安迪·哈里斯、基思·塞尔夫,参议员里克·斯科特:修复FISA,别监视我们

    2025年9月2日,华盛顿,联邦住房金融局局长比尔·普尔特尔在白宫外行走。(美联社照片/马克·席费尔贝因)

    “是的,我们应该重新授权FISA,”孔斯说道,“同时我也认为比尔·普尔特尔根本不应该接触我们的情报系统。”

    对普尔特尔的批评来自两党,多名共和党参议员也对他的情报从业资质提出质疑。

    特朗普上周原定为其国家情报总监候选人杰伊·克莱顿举行参议院情报委员会确认听证会,随后强行推迟,普尔特尔已于周五就任新职。前国家情报总监图尔西·加巴德本月因丈夫罹患罕见癌症而辞职。

    记者手记:FISA争端恰逢最糟糕时机,议员们忙作一团

    2026年6月3日,美国纽约,美国纽约南区联邦检察官杰伊·克莱顿在彭博全球信贷论坛上发言。(迈克尔·纳格尔/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    特朗普还表示,除非将续签与《保障美国选民资格法案》(SAVE法案)绑定,否则他不会签署第702条的续签法案。该法案要求选民在联邦选举中投票时提供公民身份证明和带照片的身份证件。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    “如果法案未能续签,原因只有一个,不幸的是,那就是特朗普总统,”沃纳说道。

    这形成了僵局:多名民主党人已表示,只要普尔特尔仍是特朗普提名的代理国家情报总监人选,他们就不会支持续签第702条。

    汉娜是福克斯新闻数字频道的制作助理。

    WATCH: Dems unite on anti-terror spying authority amid standoff over Trump’s DNI pick

    June 22, 2026 2:59pm EDT / Fox News

    Sens. Warner, Welch and Coons said FISA should be reauthorized but continue to push back on acting DNI’s lack of experience

    Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., and Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., said Congress should renew FISA Section 702, while pointing out its risks and political obstacles. (Credit: Nicholas Ballasy for Fox News Digital)

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/345f1e51-bc21-41c6-915f-57541343b9e5

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    A group of Democrat senators all agreed Congress should renew the government’s spying powers to ensure national security.

    When asked whether the authority should be reauthorized amid ongoing foreign and domestic terror threats, Sens. Mark Warner, D-Va., Peter Welch, D-Vt., and Chris Coons, D-Del., all agreed while raising different concerns surrounding Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

    Congress let the key spying tool that allows American intelligence agencies to electronically spy on foreigners abroad without a warrant to expire on June 12 for the first time since its enactment in 2008. Intelligence officials, however, note that existing surveillance activity can continue because the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court recertified the program through March 2027.

    Additionally, Senate Intelligence Chairman Sen. Warner argued to Fox News Digital that “there has not been a lapse” because communications providers remain legally obligated to turn over material to intelligence agencies

    REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK: CONGRESS PASSES SHORT-TERM FISA 702 FIX, DELAYS LONG-TERM RENEWAL

    Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., raises his palm while questioning Russ Vought during a Senate hearing in Washington in 2025.(Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

    “That could end at any point, and why we need to get it renewed,” Warner insisted.

    Sen. Welch, while backing renewal of the authority, said lawmakers should ensure protections remain in place for Americans. Some in Congress argue the surveillance could be used to spy on citizens.

    “It’s still under consideration with protections for our own civilians, but yeah, it’s a good tool,” Welch told Fox News Digital at the Capitol.

    FISA 702 expired earlier in June after Democrats voted against its renewal in protest of President Donald Trump’s appointing of Bill Pulte, head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, to be acting director of national intelligence (DNI).

    Tapping Pulte remains a deeply divisive decision that has drawn widespread concern among lawmakers who point to his lack of experience in the industry as to why he should not have interim access to U.S. intelligence information.

    REPS ANDY HARRIS, KEITH SELF, SEN RICK SCOTT: FIX FISA. DON’T SPY ON US

    Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency Bill Pulte walks outside the White House, Sept. 2, 2025, in Washington.(AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

    “Yes, we should reauthorize FISA,” Coons said. “I also think Bill Pulte doesn’t belong anywhere near our intelligence system.”

    Criticism of Pulte has come from both sides of the aisle, with several Republican senators also questioning his intelligence credentials.

    Pulte began in his new role on Friday after Trump forcefully postponed last week’s scheduled Senate Intelligence Committee confirmation hearing for his Director of National Intelligence nominee Jay Clayton. Former DNI Tulsi Gabbard resigned from the position this month due to her husband’s rare cancer diagnosis.

    REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK: LAWMAKERS SCRAMBLE AS FISA FIGHT COMES AT THE WORST POSSIBLE TIME

    Jay Clayton, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), during the Bloomberg Global Credit Forum in New York, US, on Wednesday, June 3, 2026.(Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    Trump has also said he will not sign a renewal of Section 702 unless it is tied to the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require voters provide proof of citizenship and a photo ID to cast a ballot in federal elections.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “There’s one reason if it’s not renewed, and that’s unfortunately President Trump,” Warner said.

    This sets up a stalemate as several Democrats have said they will not support reauthorizing Section 702 while Pulte remains Trump’s acting DNI pick.

    Hannah is a Production Assistant for Fox News Digital.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2