分类: 未分类

  • 万斯在红州艾奥瓦州竞选,却几乎不提竞争激烈的参议院席位争夺战


    2026-09-18T21:28:32.909Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/18/politics/jd-vance-iowa-campaign

    副总统JD·万斯于周五开启艾奥瓦州竞选行程——这个他的上司以两位数优势拿下的州,如今正上演竞争激烈的参议院和州长选举——他以“艾奥瓦价值观”为核心打出了民粹主义竞选口号。

    只不过参议院共和党候选人、众议员阿什利·辛森并未到场,而这位副总统也几乎未提及她的竞选活动。

    “向一位出色的公职人员致敬——我知道她今天无法到场,但我们会选举阿什利·辛森成为艾奥瓦州下一任联邦参议员吗?”万斯在康瑟尔布拉夫斯的一场集会上向观众问道。

    这是他在30分钟的竞选演说中唯一一次提及这位连任三届的国会女议员及其竞选活动,演说中他大力吹捧了共和党州长候选人以及立场坚定的红区艾奥瓦州第四国会选区。

    辛森曾是记者,2020年击败时任民主党现任议员首次登上新闻头条,此次她的对手是州议员、前残奥会选手乔希·图雷克。自2008年以来,艾奥瓦州还从未有民主党人赢得参议院席位,但民主党正试图利用选民的不满情绪和经济焦虑发起攻势。唐纳德·特朗普总统限制进口牛肉关税的决定在艾奥瓦州引发了强烈反响,该州是美国最大的牛肉生产州之一。

    而辛森似乎正是那些试图与不受欢迎的特朗普总统保持距离的共和党候选人之一。

    她公开反对特朗普的牛肉关税政策。她的竞选团队本周发布了一则新广告,宣传自己跨越党派界限的努力,而CNN的一项最新分析显示,近几周来特朗普在共和党竞选广告中被提及的频率普遍较低。

    据《纽约时报》报道,周五当天辛森并未出席康瑟尔布拉夫斯的这场活动,其发言人表示这是因为此前已安排了其他活动。CNN已联系辛森的竞选团队置评。

    万斯发表讲话数小时后,特朗普发布了一段视频声明,对辛森的候选人资格表示“完全且彻底的支持”,并罕见地同时在Truth Social和X平台上发布了这条消息。

    周五在椭圆形办公室发表讲话时,特朗普对中期选举做出了较为坦率的评价,告诉记者他认为11月的选举“会势均力敌”。

    “我希望共和党能取得好成绩,”他说,“但结果会非常接近。”

    万斯的艾奥瓦州之行是他近期一系列全国巡回竞选活动的最新一站——本周刚去过堪萨斯州,上个月则前往了密歇根州、缅因州和俄亥俄州。正如他在近期公开活动中所做的那样,这位副总统刻意在风格和基调上与总统保持距离,他向选民承认仍有“大量工作要做”,同时吹捧本届政府的政绩,并可能为未来以总统候选人身份重返艾奥瓦州铺路。

    针对这个农业州调整竞选信息的万斯,特别强调了“美国食品”——包括削减对农民的监管、扩大牛肉、乳制品和玉米的出口。

    但他也将11月中期选举的意义上升到了全国层面,警告观众民主党领导人认为“这个国家需要彻底变革——而正是艾奥瓦州这样的州的普通民众挡住了这条路”。他提及了堪萨斯州和密歇根州参议院选举中的民主党候选人,但未提及艾奥瓦州的对手,也从未提到图雷克。

    特朗普2024年在艾奥瓦州以13个百分点的优势获胜,该州近年来一直是坚定的红州。但根据内森·冈萨雷斯主持的《内部选举》评级,辛森的竞选被评为“倾向共和党”。而民主党州审计员罗布·桑德与共和党商人、农场主扎克·莱恩之间的州长竞选同样竞争激烈,《内部选举》将其评级为“倾向民主党”。

    万斯在演说中用了大量篇幅为莱恩造势,并抨击桑德是“极左翼分子”和“职业政客”。作为目前艾奥瓦州唯一一位担任全州公职的民主党人,桑德有着多次在艾奥瓦州当选的亮眼履历。

    “女士们,先生们,你们有机会向罗布·桑德乃至整个民主党传递一个信息:把那些疯狂之举拒之门外,学着为美国民众而战,做出改变。11月投票给扎克·莱恩,”他在竞选演说的结尾说道。

    CNN的杰夫·泽莱尼为本报道撰稿。

    Vance campaigns in red Iowa but barely mentions competitive Senate race

    2026-09-18T21:28:32.909Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/18/politics/jd-vance-iowa-campaign

    Vice President JD Vance hit the trail in Iowa Friday — a state his boss won by double digits that’s now home to competitive Senate and gubernatorial contests — and made a populist pitch for “Iowa values.”

    Except the Republican nominee for Senate, Rep. Ashley Hinson, wasn’t there, and the vice president barely mentioned her race.

    “A shout out to an amazing public servant — I know she couldn’t be here today, but are we going to elect Ashley Hinson the next United States senator for the great state of Iowa?” Vance asked a crowd in Council Bluffs.

    It was his only reference to the three-term congresswoman or her race in a 30-minute stump speech that heavily touted the GOP nominee for governor and the solidly red 4th Congressional District.

    Hinson, a former journalist who first made headlines when she ousted an incumbent Democrat in 2020, is running against Josh Turek, a state legislator and former Paralympian. A Democrat hasn’t won a Senate race in the Hawkeye State since 2008, but the party is looking to capitalize on voter discontent and economic anxieties. President Donald Trump’s decision to curb tariffs on imported beef has been resonant in Iowa, which is among the nation’s largest beef producers.

    And Hinson appears to be among the Republicans in tightening races who’s trying to put some distance between herself and the unpopular president.

    She has spoken out against Trump’s beef policy. Her campaign released a new ad this week highlighting her efforts to reach across the aisle, which comes as a new CNN analysis shows that Trump has seldom been mentioned in Republican ads more broadly in recent weeks.

    Then on Friday, she didn’t attend the Council Bluffs event, with a spokesperson pointing to previously scheduled events, according to the New York Times. CNN has reached out to Hinson’s campaign.

    Hours after Vance’s remarks, Trump posted a video statement with his “Complete and Total Endorsement” of Hinson’s candidacy, taking the rare step of posting the message on both Truth Social and X platforms.

    Speaking in the Oval Office on Friday, Trump gave a somewhat candid assessment of the midterms, telling reporters he believes the November elections will be “pretty close.”

    “I hope the Republicans are gonna do well,” he said. “It’s gonna be pretty close.”

    Vance’s trip to Iowa was the latest in a series of swings across the country — from Kansas earlier this week to Michigan, Maine and Ohio last month. As he has in recent appearances, the vice president put some stylistic and tonal distance between himself and the president, acknowledging to voters that there is still “a lot of work to do,” while touting administration accomplishments and potentially laying the groundwork for a return to Iowa as a future presidential candidate.

    Tailoring his message to the agricultural state, Vance placed special emphasis on “American food” — including cutting regulations for farmers and boosting exports of beef, dairy and corn.

    But he also nationalized the stakes of the November midterms, warning the crowd that Democratic leaders believe “this country needs to be utterly transformed — and it’s ordinary men and women in states like Iowa who are standing in the way.” He alluded to Democratic nominees in the Kansas and Michigan Senate races, but not in Iowa. He never named Turek.

    Iowa, which Trump carried by 13 points in 2024, has been reliably red in recent years. But Hinson’s race is rated “Tilt Republican” by Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales. The governor’s race — between Democrat Rob Sand, the state auditor, and Republican businessman and farmer Zach Lahn — has also proven competitive. It’s rated “Tilt Democratic” by Inside Elections.

    Vance spent a significant portion of his speech rallying for Lahn and attacking Sand as “far left” and a “career politician.” Sand, the only Democrat to hold statewide office, has a long track record of winning elections in Iowa.

    “Ladies and gentlemen, you have an opportunity to send not just Rob Sand but the entire Democrat Party a message: Check the crazy at the door, and learn to fight for Americans for a change. Vote Zach Lahn in November,” he said in his closing pitch.

    CNN’s Jeff Zeleny contributed to this report.

  • 特朗普宣布与格陵兰岛达成历史性协议,获得“永久”美国军事权利


    2026-09-18T17:19:56-04:00 / 福克斯新闻频道

    本协议禁止俄罗斯、中国及其他非北约国家在该岛建立军事基地,福克斯新闻数字频道获悉详情

    作者:摩根·菲利普斯 福克斯新闻
    发布于2026年9月18日 美国东部夏令时下午5:19

    特朗普在高风险会议上就格陵兰岛、伊朗问题抨击北约
    唐纳德·特朗普总统在安卡拉举行的高风险峰会上,就北约盟友在格陵兰岛问题和防务开支上的立场抨击了他们。美国军事项目主任威尔·蒂博在《福克斯与朋友们早间节目》中发表了看法。

    全新功能:您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/90a8cd59-1346-4a7c-b0b5-e6068c6c86f4

    收听本文
    4分钟

    【福克斯新闻独家首发】 美国总统唐纳德·特朗普本周与丹麦和格陵兰岛达成一项全面协议,授予美国在这个战略位置重要的北极岛屿上永久军事权利。

    据一位高级美国官员向福克斯新闻数字频道独家披露该协议内容,美国现在将在格陵兰岛获得永久通行权、基地使用权和飞越权,并有权根据需要建立更多军事设施。

    该协议禁止中国、俄罗斯和其他非北约国家在格陵兰岛建立军事基地或部署军队。它还限制对手投资可能对美国国家安全构成威胁的敏感领域。

    “这项历史性协议对美国和美国人民来说是一场巨大的胜利,”国务卿马可·卢比奥告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。“多亏了特朗普总统的远见和领导力,这项历史性协议在无需美国纳税人承担任何成本的情况下,永久保障了美国在北极地区的安全利益。

    丹麦誓言在特朗普重申美国应管控格陵兰岛领土后捍卫格陵兰

    唐纳德·特朗普总统已与丹麦和格陵兰岛达成一项全面协议,授予美国在这个战略至关重要的北极岛屿上永久军事权利,福克斯新闻数字频道获悉。(美联社照片/埃文·武奇)

    “格陵兰岛将永远属于北美战略防御区域,排除任何对手进入该岛及其周边区域,”卢比奥说。“这项协议永久且彻底地解决了我们在格陵兰岛的国家安全担忧。

    这项没有到期日的新协议并未将格陵兰岛的主权移交给美国,但政府官员仍将其永久性视为解决特朗普最初推动收购该领土时所担忧的安全问题的关键。

    “不同之处在于,我们没有为扩大美国军事存在的权利花费任何资金,”这位高级官员解释道。

    他们补充说,即使格陵兰岛最终成为独立国家,该协议仍将有效。

    “100多年来,历届总统都意识到格陵兰岛的战略重要性,但他们都未能采取任何行动。我很自豪能成为永久且彻底解决这一非常重要局势的总统。这是一份‘永久有效’协议,没有终止日期!”特朗普周五在Truth Social上写道。

    福克斯新闻数字频道已联系格陵兰岛和丹麦政府征求评论。

    特朗普曾多次辩称,控制格陵兰岛对美国国家安全至关重要,他指出,随着俄罗斯和中国在该地区扩大存在和实力,该岛在北极的战略位置至关重要。

    该协议大幅扩展了美国与格陵兰岛长期以来的防务关系。美国早已运营着图勒空军基地,并根据1951年的一项防务协议维持着在该岛的军事通行权。

    2023年10月4日拍摄的格陵兰岛北部图勒空军基地。(托马斯·特拉斯达尔/丽姿au扫描pix/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    不过,根据新协议,丹麦和格陵兰岛将无权审批美国新增的军事设施。这位官员表示,美国将与他们协商,但在认定有必要时有权建造新设施,无需他们同意。

    政府认为,美国在格陵兰岛扩大军事 footprint 最终可能在特朗普计划的“金穹顶”导弹防御系统中发挥作用。

    “我们将立即开始在格陵兰岛合适的区域建设大规模军事存在,合适的区域有很多。我们将与格陵兰岛人民合作开展开发和建设工作,”特朗普补充道。

    俄罗斯更安静的核潜艇威胁北约,前指挥官警告

    该协议仅允许美国及其盟友在该岛进行“敏感投资”,例如电信基础设施、海底电缆、港口和关键矿产。

    政府正试图防止格陵兰岛成为另一个被其视为战略漏洞的案例,比如巴拿马运河地区——中国商业利益在该地区的渗透引发了美国担忧,即表面上的民用基础设施可能涉及国家安全风险。

    “因此,我们在格陵兰岛永远不会面临这种情况,”这位官员告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。

    格陵兰岛和丹麦的官员——丹麦对这个自治岛屿领土拥有主权——最初对特朗普坚持美国必须“拥有”格陵兰岛的说法嗤之以鼻。

    丹麦首相梅特·弗雷泽里克森在2026年北约领导人峰会期间发表了 defiant 信息,反对特朗普对格陵兰岛的图谋,该峰会于周三在土耳其安卡拉举行。(塞尔达尔·奥兹索伊/盖蒂图片社)

    但第二位官员告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,经过卢比奥、白宫顾问斯蒂芬·米勒以及国务院和国家安全委员会官员数月的谈判,达成了一份令各方都满意的协议。

    从2月份开始,三国代表进行了“多轮从未泄露、从未对外公开的秘密谈判”,丹麦和格陵兰岛逐渐意识到该协议符合自身的安全利益。

    “他们最终认识到,他们在此也面临国家安全问题,”卢比奥说。“丹麦和格陵兰岛明白,如果格陵兰岛遭到攻击或威胁,他们没有必要的财政手段来保卫它。而美国有能力做到这一点。”

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    Trump declares victory in historic deal with Greenland as he secures ‘permanent’ US military rights

    2026-09-18T17:19:56-04:00 / Fox News

    The deal bars Russia, China and non-NATO countries from establishing military bases on the island, Fox News Digital learned

    By Morgan Phillips Fox News

    Published September 18, 2026 5:19pm EDT

    Trump lashes out at NATO over Greenland, Iran during high-stakes meeting

    President Donald Trump lashed out at NATO allies over their stance on Greenland and defense spending during a high-stakes summit in Ankara. American Military Project director Will Thibeau weighs in during ‘Fox & Friends First.’

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/90a8cd59-1346-4a7c-b0b5-e6068c6c86f4

    Listen to this article

    4 min

    FIRST ON FOX: President Donald Trump struck a sweeping agreement with Denmark and Greenland this week granting the United States permanent military rights on the strategically placed Arctic island.

    The U.S. will now have permanent access, basing and overflight rights in Greenland and the ability to establish additional military installations as needed, according to a senior U.S. official who outlined the deal exclusively to Fox News Digital.

    The deal bars China, Russia and other non-NATO countries from establishing military bases or maintaining troops in Greenland. It also restricts adversaries from investing in sensitive sectors that could pose a threat to U.S. national security.

    “This historic deal is a huge win for the United States and the American people,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Fox News Digital. “Thanks to President Trump’s vision and leadership, this historic agreement permanently guarantees U.S. security interests in the Arctic at zero cost to the U.S. taxpayer.

    DENMARK VOWS TO DEFEND GREENLAND AFTER TRUMP REITERATES US SHOULD CONTROL TERRITORY

    President Donald Trump has struck a sweeping agreement with Denmark and Greenland granting the United States permanent military rights on the strategically vital Arctic island, Fox News Digital has learned.(AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

    “Greenland will forever be part of the strategic defense area of North America and exclude any adversary from it and the surrounding area,” Rubio said. “This deal permanently and completely addresses our national security concerns in Greenland.

    The new agreement, which has no expiration date, stops short of transferring sovereignty over Greenland to the U.S. But administration officials still view its permanence as key to addressing the security concerns that drove Trump’s push to acquire the territory in the first place.

    “The difference here is we’re not spending any money for the right” to expand the U.S. military presence, the senior official explained.

    The deal is designed to remain in effect even if Greenland eventually becomes an independent country, they added.

    “For over 100 years, Presidents have known the strategic importance of Greenland, but NONE of them were able to do anything about it. I am proud to be the President that permanently and conclusively addressed this very important situation. This is an “Infinite Life” Agreement, there is no end!” Trump wrote on Truth Social Friday.

    Fox News Digital reached out to the governments of Greenland and Denmark for comment.

    Trump had repeatedly argued that control of Greenland was necessary for U.S. national security, pointing to the island’s strategic location in the Arctic as Russia and China expand their presence and capabilities in the region.

    The deal significantly expands on the longstanding U.S. defense relationship with Greenland. The U.S. already operates Pituffik Space Base and has maintained military access to the island under a defense agreement dating back to 1951.

    The Pituffik Space Base is pictured in northern Greenland Oct. 4, 2023.(Thomas Traasdahl/Ritzau Scanpix/AFP via Getty Images)

    Under the new agreement, however, Denmark and Greenland would not have approval authority over additional U.S. military installations. The U.S. would consult with them but would have the right to build new installations when it determines they are necessary without needing their buy-in, the official said.

    The administration believes an expanded U.S. military footprint in Greenland could eventually play a role in Trump’s planned Golden Dome missile defense system.

    “We will immediately begin the process of developing a large Military presence in the appropriate part of Greenland, of which there are many. We will work with the people of Greenland in its development and construction,” Trump added.

    RUSSIA’S QUIETER NUCLEAR SUBMARINES THREATEN NATO, FORMER COMMANDER WARNS

    The deal only allows the U.S. and its allies to make “sensitive investments” on the island, such as telecommunications infrastructure, undersea cables, ports and critical minerals.

    The administration is seeking to prevent Greenland from becoming another version of what it sees as the strategic vulnerability that developed around the Panama Canal, where Chinese commercial interests have fueled U.S. concerns that ostensibly civilian infrastructure could have national security implications.

    “We’re never going to face that in Greenland as a result of this,” the official told Fox News Digital.

    Officials from both Greenland and Denmark, which holds sovereignty over the self-governing island territory, initially scoffed at Trump’s insistence that the U.S. must “own” Greenland.

    Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen issued a defiant message against President Donald Trump’s designs on Greenland at the 2026 NATO Leaders Summit Wednesday in Ankara, Turkey.(Serdar Ozsoy/Getty Images)

    But months of negotiations between Rubio, White House advisor Stephen Miller and officials at the State Department and National Security Council led to a deal that satisfied all sides, a second official told Fox News Digital.

    Representatives from all three countries went through “various rounds of quiet negotiations that never leaked and never got out there” starting in February, as Denmark and Greenland came to see the agreement as serving their own security interests.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “They recognize, at the end of the day, that they have a national security concern here as well,” Rubio said. “Denmark and Greenland understand that they don’t have the financial means necessary to defend Greenland if it were to come under attack or be threatened. The United States has the power to do that.”

  • 人工智能会伤害人类吗?CBS新闻民调显示美国人希望放缓AI发展但不会完全叫停


    2026-09-18T17:59:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
    作者:詹妮弗·德·平托、弗雷德·巴克斯
    更新于:2026年9月18日 / 美国东部时间下午6:13 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    在谷歌上关注哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    如同任何强大的新技术一样,美国人明白人工智能既可以被用于善途,也可能被用于恶举。人们在某些方面持乐观态度,但如今悲观情绪占据上风。

    大多数美国人确实担心人工智能模型会自主行动伤害人类,更有甚者担心人类会利用人工智能模型伤害他人。

    但美国人并不想完全叫停人工智能发展,因为多数人认为美国需要发展AI以保持竞争力,且必须比中国发展得更快。他们还认为AI能够带来医疗和科学领域的突破。

    因此,问题的关键在于如何管控和监管AI。

    但谁应该来承担这项工作?企业和政府应当携手合作。

    民众普遍认为人工智能企业无法自行负责任地进行管理,这使得社会呼吁出台更多政府监管措施。

    乐观派和悲观派之间的一个分歧点在于对经济影响的认知差异:那些认为AI即将取代工作岗位的人,在AI的其他方面也更为悲观。民众的观点与年龄或党派立场并无紧密关联。

    但美国需要发展AI以维持竞争力。

    企业和政府应共同承担责任。

    更多人认为政府应扮演限制而非推动AI发展的角色。

    不过,至少有一部分人对AI在医疗治疗方面取得有益发现、简化工作任务持乐观态度。

    这种乐观态度,再加上民众认为需要保持竞争力的认知,意味着几乎没有人认为应该完全叫停AI。相反,他们主张放缓发展步伐。

    民众仍普遍担忧AI会取代工作岗位。这是此前民调中长期存在的担忧。

    在那些认为政府应限制而非推动AI应用的人群中,这种担忧尤为突出。

    与此同时,更多劳动者认为AI会让他们的工作变得更轻松,而非更繁重,尽管他们也倾向于认为AI总体上会减少而非增加就业岗位数量。

    因此,总体而言,人们认为AI带来的问题多于其解决的问题。

    大卫·范·里珀为本报道撰稿。


    本次哥伦比亚广播公司新闻/舆观调查民调于2026年9月16日至18日期间进行,受访对象为具有全国代表性的2051名美国成年人。样本根据美国社区调查和当前人口调查以及2024年总统选举结果,按照性别、年龄、种族和教育背景进行加权,以确保能代表全国成年人口。误差范围为±2.5个百分点。

    调查结果汇总表

    哥伦比亚广播公司新闻AI民调

    Will AI harm humans? CBS News poll finds Americans want to slow development but not stop it

    2026-09-18T17:59:00-0400 / CBS News

    By Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus

    Updated on: September 18, 2026 / 6:13 PM EDT / CBS News

    Add CBS News on Google

    Like any powerful new technology, Americans understand that AI could be used for good or bad. There is optimism on some fronts — but pessimism outweighs it today.

    Most Americans do worry AI models will act on their own to harm people, and even more that models will be used by people to harm others.

    Yet Americans do not want to stop AI altogether, because most do think the U.S. needs to develop AI to be competitive, and must do so faster than China. They also think that it can lead to medical and scientific breakthroughs.

    So it’s a matter of containing and managing it.

    But who should do this? Both companies and government together.

    People tend not to think AI companies will manage it responsibly by themselves, which leads to a wider call for government restrictions.

    One difference between the more optimistic and pessimistic people has to do with perceived economic impact: Those who think AI is poised to take jobs are more pessimistic on other aspects about it. Views don’t closely follow age or partisanship.

    But the U.S. needs it to compete.

    Companies and the government share responsibility.

    And more see a government role to restrict, not promote, AI development.

    However, there’s at least some optimism about AI making helpful discoveries in medical treatments and making tasks easier.

    That, combined with the perceived need to compete, means very few think AI should be stopped completely. Rather, they say, slow down.

    There continues to be wide concern AI will take jobs. This has been a long-standing concern in previous polling.

    This concern is especially pronounced among people who think the government should restrict AI use, rather than promote it.

    At the same time, more workers think it will make their jobs easier to do than harder, even if they tend to think it will reduce, rather than increase the number of jobs overall.

    And so on balance, it’s seen as creating more problems than it solves.

    David Van Riper contributed to this report.


    This CBS News/YouGov survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 2,051 U.S. adults interviewed between September 16-18, 2026. The sample was weighted to be representative of adults nationwide according to gender, age, race, and education, based on the U.S. Census American Community Survey and Current Population Survey, as well as 2024 presidential vote. The margin of error is ±2.5 points.

    Toplines

    CBS News AI poll

  • 特朗普政府下周将在联合国举办人工智能主题活动


    2026-09-18T22:16:57.308Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:珍妮弗·汉斯勒

    1小时45分钟前发布
    发布时间:2026年9月18日,美国东部时间下午6:16

    人工智能 联合国 唐纳德·特朗普

    2025年12月16日,联合国旗帜在联合国办公大楼前飘扬。
    胡安·巴雷托/法新社/盖蒂图片社

    据多位知情人士向美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)透露,特朗普政府将于周三在联合国大会期间的场外举办一场高级别人工智能主题活动,人工智能议题预计将成为本次全球峰会的核心议题之一。

    这场已邀请多国参与的美国主办活动举办之际,有关人工智能的安全问题因各方对该技术可能构成生存威胁的严峻警告而获得了新的紧迫性。

    与此同时,唐纳德·特朗普总统曾怒斥政府监管人工智能的想法,声称对该技术的担忧是一场“骗局”。

    这场美国活动的举办时间与联合国安理会人工智能与安全会议完全重合,该会议将讨论人工智能企业和高管所关注的风险。开放AI(OpenAI)发言人向CNN透露,该公司首席执行官山姆·奥特曼预计将在此次安理会会议上做情况通报。

    美国常驻联合国大使迈克·沃尔茨、负责经济增长、能源与环境事务的副国务卿雅各布·赫尔伯格,以及负责公共外交事务的副国务卿莎拉·罗杰斯将共同主持这场美国主办的活动。

    据一位熟悉该活动的消息人士透露,美国将本次活动定位为讨论与美国在人工智能领域开展合作的契机,预计会议将围绕“能够实现大规模人工智能应用的政策、法律和监管条件展开讨论,其中包括言论自由相关考量”。

    CNN已就此事联系美国国务院置评。

    联合国基金会负责人工智能与数字合作的副主席克莱尔·梅拉梅德表示,本次全球峰会期间“有许多场外活动聚焦人工智能,但目前尚不清楚人工智能会在正式的核心议程中占据多大比重”。

    她表示,联合国“目前仍在积极筹备、阐明立场,正如其他许多组织一样,致力于明确联合国应发挥的作用”。

    梅拉梅德提到,“各方越来越关注联合国在危机管理中可能发挥的作用”。

    她解释道:“如果发生规模巨大的人工智能驱动的网络攻击,比如赞比亚一家医院或博茨瓦纳一家银行遭遇此类攻击,且攻击开始跨境蔓延,相关人员将不知所措,不知道该联系谁。而通常情况下,人们会求助联合国。”她补充道,“各方对此高度关注,也期待联合国能够在均衡获取人工智能治理工具和保障措施方面发挥作用。”

    梅拉梅德表示,由于“安理会常任理事国之间存在截然不同的立场,更不用说联合国其他成员国了”,她预计联合国安理会人工智能会议不会产生“明确的最终成果”。联合国安理会常任理事国包括美国、中国、俄罗斯、法国和英国。

    她表示,她认为大多数人都将关注特朗普与中国国家主席习近平下周四举行的会晤,人工智能预计将成为此次会晤的核心议题之一。

    Trump admin to host UN event on AI next week

    2026-09-18T22:16:57.308Z / CNN

    By Jennifer Hansler

    1 hr 45 min ago
    PUBLISHED Sep 18, 2026, 6:16 PM ET

    AI The UN Donald Trump

    The United Nations flag waves in front of its office building on December 16, 2025.

    Juan Baretto/AFP/Getty Images

    The Trump administration will convene a high-level event on artificial intelligence on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly Wednesday, multiple sources familiar with the matter tell CNN, as the issue is expected to loom large over the global gathering.

    The US event, to which multiple countries have been invited, comes as questions of AI and security have taken on new urgency amid dire warnings about the potential existential threat posed by artificial intelligence.

    Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has raged against the idea of government regulations, alleging concerns about the technology are a “hoox.

    The US event is slated to take place the same day as a UN Security Council meeting on AI and security, to discuss the risks being seen by AI companies and executives. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is expected to brief that meeting, an OpenAI spokesperson told CNN.

    US Ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz, Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment Jacob Helberg, and Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy Sarah Rogers will host the US event.

    The US is billing it as chance to talk about partnering with the US on AI, according to a source familiar with the event, and there is expected to be a discussion about the “policy, legal, and regulatory conditions that enable adoption at scale, including free expression considerations.”

    CNN has reached out to the State Department for comment.

    Claire Melamed, the Vice President for AI and Digital Cooperation at the United Nations Foundation said there are “many side events at the global gathering focused on AI, but it’s “less clear how much it’s going to be an agenda in the main formal business.”

    The UN is “still very much sort of setting the stage, setting out positions, trying to work out, as many other organizations are too, really what the UN’s role should be,” she said.

    Melamed said “there’s increasing interest in the UN having a potential role in crisis management.”

    “If there’s a huge AI-generated cyberattack and you’re working in a hospital in Zambia or you know a bank in Botswana, and this cyberattack is starting to spill beyond your borders, you don’t know what to do, who you’re going to call? Well, often it’s the UN,” she explained. “There’s a lot of interest in that, and sort of the role of the UN in equalizing access to some of the AI governance instruments and safeguards.”

    Melamed said she does not expect “a firm deliverable” coming out of the UN Security Council meeting on AI because of the “very different positions that there are among the permanent members of the Security Council, never mind everyone else in the UN.” The US, China, Russia, France, and the United Kingdom are the permanent members of the UNSC.

    She said she believes most people will be waiting to see what comes out of the meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping next Thursday, where AI is expected to be a key topic of discussion.

  • 特朗普签署 Lindsey Graham 倡导的俄罗斯制裁法案


    2026年9月18日 美国东部时间下午6:01 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    华盛顿讯——特朗普总统周五签署了一项全面法案,对俄罗斯实施制裁,并威胁对其最大能源客户征收关税,这项法案由已故共和党参议员Lindsey Graham倡导。

    众议院本周早些时候以两党支持票数通过了该法案。参议院于8月通过该法案,不过不少民主党人担忧此举会扩大总统的关税权限。

    这项新法案名为《2026年Lindsey O. Graham制裁俄罗斯与伊朗法案》,允许总统对俄罗斯石油和天然气的五大最大购买国征收最高100%的关税。法案同时制裁发起俄罗斯对乌战争的俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔·普京,以及他的政府官员、寡头、俄罗斯银行和金融机构。

    就外国而言,该法案对全球最大的俄罗斯原油进口国中国和印度影响最大。特朗普先生定于9月24日在白宫与习近平会晤。

    法案还延长了对伊朗能源和武器部门的制裁。

    最初因美国与伊朗战争导致的全球石油短缺曾让俄罗斯受益。战争初期,特朗普政府曾临时允许购买已在海上运输的俄罗斯石油。

    Graham在7月突然去世前不久一直在推动该制裁法案通过。他在从乌克兰访问返回后不久,因主动脉撕裂在华盛顿去世,享年71岁。特朗普先生在他的葬礼上致了悼词。

    俄罗斯对乌克兰的战争仍在持续,看不到明确的结束迹象。本月早些时候,特朗普的女婿贾里德·库什纳和特使史蒂夫·维特科夫分别在莫斯科会晤了普京,在基辅会晤了乌克兰总统弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基。特朗普先生对这场战争表示失望,尽管他在竞选时承诺就职首日就能结束这场战争,但至今未能如愿。

    “阻碍在于两个互相憎恨的人,”特朗普先生在与普京通话后说道。“我认为最主要的就是,这两个人互相憎恨。”

    Trump signs Russia sanctions bill championed by Lindsey Graham

    September 18, 2026 6:01 PM EDT / CBS News

    Washington— President Trump signed a sweeping bill Friday to sanction Russia and threaten tariffs on its largest energy customers, legislation championed by the late Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham.

    The House passed the bill with bipartisan support earlier this week. The Senate passed it in August, although a number of Democrats expressed concern that it would expand the president’s tariff authority.

    The new law, the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, lets the president impose tariffs of up to 100% on the five largest purchasers of Russian oil and natural gas. It also sanctions Russian President Vladimir Putin, who started Russia’s war with Ukraine, as well as his government officials, oligarchs and Russian banks and financial institutions.

    When it comes to foreign countries, the bill would have the most impact on China and India, the largest purchasers of Russian crude oil. Mr. Trump is set to meet with Xi Jinping at the White House on Sept. 24.

    The bill also extends sanctions on Iran’s energy and weapons sectors.

    The global oil crunch due to the U.S. war with Iran initially benefited Russia. Toward the beginning of the war, the Trump administration temporarily allowed the purchase of Russian oil that was already at sea.

    Graham was pushing for the sanctions bill’s passage shortly before his sudden death in July. He had just returned from a trip to Ukraine when he died in Washington from a torn aorta. He was 71. Mr. Trump delivered the eulogy at his funeral.

    Russia’s war in Ukraine continues without a clear end in sight. Earlier this month, Mr. Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and special envoy Steve Witkoff visited Putin in Moscow and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Kyiv. Mr. Trump voiced frustration with the war, which he has been unable to end despite campaign pledges that he would end it by his first day in office.

    “The holdup is two people that hate each other,” Mr. Trump said after speaking with Putin. “I think more than anything else, it’s two people that hate each other.”

  • 万斯称中期选举是“常识与纯粹彻头彻尾的疯狂”的公投


    2026年9月18日 美国东部时间晚上7:26 / 福克斯新闻

    副总统在爱荷华州竞选拉票时抨击民主党人,称部分候选人“彻头彻尾的疯子”

    作者:布里·斯廷森 福克斯新闻

    副总统J·D·万斯周五在爱荷华州的竞选演讲中抨击了现代民主党,称其与富兰克林·D·罗斯福和约翰·F·肯尼迪的执政理念彻底决裂。

    NEW 你现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/c7931a63-149a-4479-bd89-142c379fa5db

    收听本文
    2分钟

    副总统J·D·万斯周五抨击民主党,称中期选举将是一场“常识与纯粹彻头彻尾的疯狂”的公投。

    万斯在爱荷华州竞选拉票时表示,民主党已经不再是“我祖父母当年谈论的那个政党”。

    万斯由一名工会钢铁工人抚养长大,他表示父亲曾告诉他,“富兰克林·D·罗斯福的民主党,约翰·F·肯尼迪的民主党,是工人阶级的政党”。

    J·D·万斯在共和党 keynote 演讲中的一句话揭示了他的美国愿景

    副总统J·D·万斯周五抨击民主党,称中期选举将是一场“常识与纯粹彻头彻尾的疯狂”的公投。(盖蒂图片社)

    他补充道:“这已经不是富兰克林·D·罗斯福的政党了,哪怕我们多么希望它是。它也不是约翰·F·肯尼迪的政党。女士们先生们,它甚至不再是比尔·克林顿的政党。”

    万斯表示,如今的民主党人不再认为国家需要“基于现有基础建设”,而是要“彻底重塑”。

    他说:“在纽约,一些中期选举候选人呼吁‘彻底消灭西方文明’。纽约有一位国会候选人——我发誓我不是在开玩笑——称7月4日实际上是为了解放巴勒斯坦和波多黎各。”

    万斯在台下的一片嘘声中说道,想到托马斯·杰斐逊起草《独立宣言》时还在想着解放巴勒斯坦和波多黎各,“你几乎要笑出来了”。

    晨报:五个参议院席位竞选凸显民主党为何可能后悔初选选择

    副总统J·D·万斯周五在爱荷华州康瑟尔布拉夫斯的中美中心举行的共和党全国委员会中期选举集会上发表讲话。(盖蒂图片社)

    “但不幸的是,这一点都不好笑,因为这些人是认真的,而这场选举就是一场常识与纯粹彻头彻尾的疯狂的公投。让那些疯子卷铺盖走人,把他们赶出华盛顿特区。”他在欢呼声中说道。

    万斯还称一些民主党候选人是“彻头彻尾的疯子”,已经“彻底丧失了理智”。

    “这些人会告诉你,我们的历史充满邪恶,这个国家需要被推倒重来,从头开始。”他继续说道。

    “耶稣是激进分子”:进步人士在竞选活动中援引基督教来推销左翼议程

    资深牧师亚当·汉密尔顿是堪萨斯州民主党参议院候选人。(论坛新闻服务 via 盖蒂图片社,资料图)

    但他表示,其他民主党候选人“足够聪明,意识到国家并没有疯,所以他们试图稍微掩饰一下”。

    万斯点名抨击了堪萨斯州民主党参议院候选人亚当·汉密尔顿,称他给人的感觉是“‘哎呀,我是个友善的牧师’”,但他实际上告诉会众不要听耶稣基督的福音,而是要为自己的白人特权忏悔。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    最近的民调显示,汉密尔顿与共和党现任堪萨斯州参议员罗杰·马歇尔的竞选势均力敌。

    在集会上,万斯表态支持爱荷华州的共和党候选人,包括州长候选人扎克·莱恩、众议员阿什利·辛森和国会议员候选人克里斯·麦高恩。

    布里·斯廷森是福克斯新闻数字频道驻洛杉矶的娱乐与突发新闻记者。

    Vance calls midterms a referendum on ‘common sense versus pure unadulterated crazy’

    September 18, 2026 7:26pm EDT / Fox News

    The vice president took aim at Democrats while stumping in Iowa, calling some candidates ‘out and out lunatics’

    By Brie Stimson Fox News

    Vice President JD Vance criticized the modern Democratic Party at a campaign speech in Iowa Friday, calling it a radical departure from the legacies of FDR and JFK.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/c7931a63-149a-4479-bd89-142c379fa5db

    Listen to this article

    2 min

    Vice President JD Vance called out Democrats on Friday, saying that the midterms will be a referendum on “common sense versus pure unadulterated crazy.”

    While stumping in Iowa, Vance said Democrats are no longer “the party my grandparents grew up talking about.”

    Raised by a union steelworker, Vance said his father told him that “FDR’s Democrat party, that JFK’s Democrat party was the party of the workingman.”

    THE ONE LINE FROM JD VANCE’S GOP KEYNOTE THAT REVEALS HIS VISION FOR AMERICA

    Vice President JD Vance called out Democrats on Friday, saying that the midterms will be a referendum on “common sense versus pure unadulterated crazy.”(Getty Images)

    He added, “This is not FDR’s party, as much as we might wish it was. It’s not JFK’s party. Ladies and gentlemen, it’s not even Bill Clinton’s party.”

    Vance said that today’s Democrats don’t believe the country needs to be “built upon” but “utterly transformed.”

    “In New York,” he said, some of the midterm candidates are calling for the “total eradication of Western civilization. Somebody running for Congress in New York — and I promise I’m not joking about this — said that July Fourth is actually about the liberation of Palestine and Puerto Rico.”

    To loud boos, Vance said, “you could almost laugh about” the idea of Thomas Jefferson writing the Declaration of Independence and thinking about the liberation of Palestine and Puerto Rico.

    MORNING GLORY: FIVE SENATE RACES SHOW WHY DEMOCRATS MAY REGRET THEIR PRIMARY CHOICES

    Vice President JD Vance speaks during a Republican National Committee Midterm Rally at the Mid-America Center in Council Bluffs, Iowa, on Friday.(Getty Images)

    “But unfortunately, it’s not funny because those people are dead serious, and this election is a referendum on common sense versus pure unadulterated crazy. Let’s send the crazy packing and get them out of Washington, D.C.” he said to cheers.

    Vance also claimed some Democratic candidates are “out-and-out lunatics” who have “lost their ever-loving minds.”

    “These are the ones who will tell you that our history is evil and this country needs to be bulldozed and started over from the beginning,” he continued.

    ‘JESUS WAS A RADICAL’: PROGRESSIVES INVOKE CHRIST TO SELL LEFT-WING AGENDA ON CAMPAIGN TRAIL

    Senior pastor Adam Hamilton is a Kansas Democrat Senate candidate.(Tribune News Service via Getty Images, File)

    But he said that other Democrat candidates are “smart enough to realize that the country hasn’t lost its mind, and so they try to be just a little bit more subtle.”

    Calling out Democrat Senate candidate Adam Hamilton of Kansas, Vance claimed he gave off a “kind of ‘gee whiz, I’m a nice pastor’ vibe,” but he’s a man that tells his congregation not about the gospel of Jesus Christ, but that they need to repent for their White privilege.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Recent polls have shown a tightening race between Hamilton and GOP incumbent Kansas Sen. Roger Marshall.

    During the rally, Vance threw his support behind Iowa Republicans, including gubernatorial nominee Zach Lane, Rep. Ashley Hinson and congressional candidate Chris McGowan.

    Brie Stimson is a Los Angeles-based entertainment and breaking news writer for Fox News Digital.

  • 特朗普将H-1B非移民签证项目限制令再延长一年


    2026-09-18 21:58:30 UTC / 路透社

    image
    2025年9月22日拍摄的资料插画图中,可见美国国旗和H-1B签证申请表。路透社/达多·鲁维奇/插画/资料图

    华盛顿,9月18日(路透社)——白宫在周五发布的一项公告中表示,美国总统唐纳德·特朗普已将2025年9月实施的H-1B非移民签证项目限制令再延长一年。

    《虚假信息监测》简报将汇总国际虚假信息叙事,每一期都设有“真实还是虚假?”问答环节。点击此处注册

    路透社堪尼什卡·辛格华盛顿报道;达芙妮·普萨莱达基斯编辑

    本报准则:汤姆森路透社信任原则

    Trump extends restrictions on H-1B non-immigrant visa program by another year

    2026-09-18 21:58:30 UTC / Reuters

    A U.S. flag and a U.S. H-1B Visa application form are seen in this illustration taken, September 22, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/ File Photo

    WASHINGTON, Sept 18 (Reuters) – US President Donald Trump has extended restrictions imposed in September 2025 on the H-1B non-immigrant visa program by another year, the White House said in a proclamation released on Friday.

    The Misinformation Monitor newsletter rounds up international misinformation narratives, with a “Real or Fake?” quiz in every edition. Sign up here.

    Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Washington; Editing by Daphne Psaledakis

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 特朗普称其子已偿还资助其婚礼部分开支的俄罗斯亿万富翁


    2026-09-18 晚上7:39 美东时间 / CNN
    作者:洛根·斯基恰诺
    21分钟前
    发布于 2026年9月18日 晚上7:39 美东时间

    image 小唐纳德·特朗普于9月10日周四在达拉斯发表讲话。亚历克斯·布兰登/美联社

    美国总统唐纳德·特朗普周五声称,其子小唐纳德·特朗普已偿还了这位为其在巴哈马的婚礼庆祝活动花费数十万美元的俄罗斯亿万富翁。

    “据我所知,他已经把钱还给他了,”特朗普在椭圆形办公室对记者表示,他所说的这位人士是乌马尔·克雷姆廖夫,这位与克里姆林宫有关联的商人曾被ProPublica报道为这场派对的部分活动买单。

    尽管特朗普还表示,由朋友为某人的婚礼庆祝活动买单是很常见的事,但特朗普的这番表态是本届政府对这笔付款可能感到不安的最明确信号。

    “他认识的一个人——我猜是他的朋友——为他举办了婚礼派对。这非常常见。我听说过很多人都会为朋友举办婚礼派对,”特朗普说道。

    当被问及克雷姆廖夫资助这场庆祝活动是否合适时,特朗普表示“这完全没问题”,并对克雷姆廖夫与克里姆林宫的关联相关担忧不予理会,称“或许(小唐纳德·特朗普)没有做背景调查”。

    小唐纳德·特朗普及其妻子贝蒂娜·安德森此前曾在一份声明中证实,克雷姆廖夫为他们的婚礼派对部分活动提供了资助,并为他们接受这份礼物进行了辩护。这份发布在安德森Instagram账号上、署名为“唐与贝蒂娜”的声明称,克雷姆廖夫举办的庆祝活动是在正式婚礼仪式之后举行的。

    “我们亲爱的朋友乌马尔非常慷慨地为我们在婚礼后举办了两晚精彩的庆祝活动。这是一位朋友送出的极其慷慨的结婚礼物,我们当时和现在都对此深表感激,”声明中写道。

    “不幸的是,仅仅因为某人的身份或出身地,如此私人且喜庆的事情就被重新解读为具有政治色彩或险恶用心,”声明继续说道。“友谊不需要政治动机。慷慨未必附带议程。有时候,结婚礼物就只是结婚礼物而已。”

    本周早些时候,在被问及这位俄罗斯亿万富翁相关问题时,司法部长托德·布兰奇称特朗普“不认识这个人”,并对其部门会展开调查的说法不予理会。

    “当你问‘我是否在调查?’我要调查什么?”布兰奇说道。

    Trump says his son paid back Russian billionaire who funded parts of wedding celebration

    2026-09-18 7:39 PM ET / CNN

    By Logan Schiciano

    21 min ago

    PUBLISHED Sep 18, 2026, 7:39 PM ET

    Donald Trump Jr., speaks on Thursday, Septemberr 10, in Dallas.

    Alex Brandon/AP

    President Donald Trump on Friday claimed his son, Donald Trump Jr., paid back the Russian billionaire who spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund parts of Trump Jr.’s wedding celebration in the Bahamas.

    “As I understand it, he paid him back,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, referring to Umar Kremlev, the Kremlin-connected businessman who ProPublica reported paid for aspects of the party.

    The assertion by Trump is the most serious sign from the administration of possible discomfort with the payment, although the president also said it was common for someone’s friend to pay for a celebration connected to their wedding.

    “A person that he knows — I guess, a friend of his — gave him a wedding party. That’s very common. I’ve heard of many people giving wedding parties,” Trump said.

    When asked if it was appropriate for Kremlev to fund the celebration, Trump said, “it’s totally allowed” and dismissed concerns about Kremlev’s ties to the Kremlin, saying “maybe (Trump Jr.) didn’t do a background check.”

    Trump Jr. and his wife Bettina Anderson had previously confirmed in a statement that Kremlev funded aspects of their wedding party, and defended their acceptance of the gift. The statement — posted to Anderson’s Instagram account, but signed “Don & Bettina” — cast the celebration Kremlev hosted as being after the actual wedding ceremony.

    “Our dear friend Umar very generously hosted two incredible nights of celebrations for us AFTER our wedding. It was an extraordinarily generous wedding gift from a friend, and something for which we were and remain incredibly grateful,” the statement said.

    “It’s unfortunate that something so personal and happy can be recast as something political or sinister simply because of who someone is or where they come from,” it continued. “Friendship doesn’t require a political motive. Generosity doesn’t automatically come with an agenda. And sometimes a wedding gift is simply a wedding gift.”

    Addressing a question about the Russian billionaire earlier this week, Attorney General Todd Blanche said Trump “doesn’t know who this person is,” and shrugged off the idea his department would investigate.

    “When you say, ‘Am I investigating?’ Am I investigating what?” Blanche said.

  • 特朗普称已达成协议,确保美国“永久掌控格陵兰岛安全事务”


    2026-09-18 19:15:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    撰稿

    更新于:2026年9月18日 / 美国东部时间晚上7:16 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    美国总统特朗普周五表示,他已达成一项协议,确保美国“永久掌控格陵兰岛的安全及所有其他相关事务”。此前,特朗普一直推动提升美国对这个丹麦管辖岛屿的影响力——必要时甚至直接接管该岛。

    丹麦和格陵兰岛政府证实双方已达成协议。目前细节尚少,但该协议似乎并非美国直接吞并格陵兰岛——特朗普此前曾支持这一想法,引发丹麦及其他北约成员国的不安。

    一名美国国务院官员向哥伦比亚广播公司新闻透露,美国获得了该岛的永久通行权和飞越权,军方可借此增加基地数量。该官员表示,协议还禁止非北约成员国在格陵兰岛建立军事基地,并限制美国的对手在格陵兰岛进行敏感投资。

    这名国务院官员称,该协议将“永久有效,即便格陵兰岛成为完全独立的国家”。

    特朗普在Truth Social的帖子中表示,他计划提升美国在格陵兰岛的存在。自20世纪50年代以来,这座北极岛屿的西海岸一直设有美军基地。

    “我们将立即启动流程,在格陵兰岛合适的地点打造大规模军事存在,合适的地点有很多,”特朗普说道。“我们将与格陵兰岛民众合作开展开发和建设工作。”

    美国国务卿马可·卢比奥称该协议是“巨大胜利”。

    “格陵兰岛将永远属于北美战略防御区域,排除任何对手进入该岛及周边区域,”他在一份声明中表示。“这份协议永久且彻底解决了我们在格陵兰岛的国家安全关切。”

    特朗普今年1月曾表示,他与北约秘书长马克·吕特已就“未来格陵兰岛相关协议达成框架”。目前尚不清楚周五宣布的协议是否源自这些与北约的磋商。

    丹麦首相梅特·弗雷泽里克森的办公室在一份声明中表示,美、丹、格陵兰岛三国政府计划于下周签署该协议,届时众多世界领导人将齐聚纽约出席联合国大会。该协议还需在丹麦完成“必要的议会程序”。

    “我很高兴格陵兰岛、丹麦王国和美国有望达成一项良好协议,”弗雷泽里克森说道。她补充道,该协议“强化了我们在北极和北大西洋地区的共同安全,因此也有利于北约和欧洲”,并且“承认丹麦王国的主权和领土完整,以及格陵兰岛人民的自决权”。

    格陵兰岛首相延斯-弗雷德里克·尼尔森称该协议“令人欣慰”。

    “该协议认可了格陵兰岛的利益以及我们在国际合作中的地位,这符合我们所有人的利益,”他在弗雷泽里克森办公室分享的一份声明中说道。

    奥利维亚·加齐斯对本文亦有贡献。

    前美国驻丹麦大使谈格陵兰岛议题引发的愤怒及特朗普关于北约士兵的言论 https://www.cbsnews.com/video/former-us-ambassador-to-denmark-on-anger-over-greenland-trumps-comments-about-nato-soldiers/

    (03:48)

    Trump says he’s struck deal to give U.S. “permanent control over security” in Greenland

    2026-09-18 19:15:00-0400 / CBS News

    By

    Updated on: September 18, 2026 / 7:16 PM EDT / CBS News

    President Trump said Friday he has struck a deal to give the United States “permanent control over security, and all other needs, in Greenland,” following a push by the president to boost the U.S.’ influence over the Danish-controlled island — or, if possible, take it over.

    The governments of Denmark and Greenland confirmed that they reached a deal. Details are sparse, but the deal does not appear to constitute an outright U.S. takeover of the territory — an idea that Mr. Trump had previously backed, rattling Denmark and other NATO members.

    A State Department official told CBS News the U.S. was guaranteed permanent access to the island and overflight rights, allowing the military to potentially increase the number of bases. The deal also blocks non-NATO members from establishing military bases, and restricts American adversaries from making sensitive investments in Greenland, the official said.

    The deal is set to remain in place permanently, “even if Greenland becomes a fully independent country,” the State Department official said.

    Mr. Trump said in a Truth Social post he plans to boost the U.S.’s presence in Greenland. The Arctic island has hosted a U.S. base on its western coast since the 1950s.

    “We will immediately begin the process of developing a large Military presence in the appropriate part of Greenland, of which there are many,” Mr. Trump said. “We will work with the people of Greenland in its development and construction.”

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the deal a “huge win.”

    “Greenland will forever be part of the strategic defense area of North America and exclude any adversary from it and the surrounding area,” he said in a statement. “This deal permanently and completely addresses our national security concerns in Greenland.”

    Mr. Trump said in January he and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte had formed “the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland.” It’s not clear whether the agreement announced Friday stemmed from those discussions with NATO.

    In a statement, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen’s office said the U.S., Danish and Greenlandic governments are planning to sign the deal next week, when scores of world leaders will be in New York City for the United Nations General Assembly. It will also need to go through “necessary parliamentary procedures” in Denmark.

    “I am pleased that there is a prospect of a good agreement for Greenland, the Kingdom of Denmark and the United States,” Frederiksen said. She added that the deal “strengthens our common security in the Arctic and the North Atlantic area and is thus also good for NATO and Europe,” and “recognizes the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Kingdom and the right of the Greenlandic people to self-determination.”

    Greenland’s prime minister, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, called the deal “gratifying.”

    “The agreement recognizes Greenland’s interests and our place in international cooperation. It is for the benefit of us all,” he said in a statement shared by Frederiksen’s office.

    Olivia Gazis contributed to this report.

    Former U.S. ambassador to Denmark on anger over Greenland, Trump’s comments about NATO soldiers https://www.cbsnews.com/video/former-us-ambassador-to-denmark-on-anger-over-greenland-trumps-comments-about-nato-soldiers/

    (03:48)

  • 法官称:尽管司法部极力主张,特朗普政府反武器化基金案相关争议仍未解决


    2026年9月18日 美国东部时间下午2:33 / 福克斯新闻

    法官对纳税人资金用于向《自由获得诊所准入法案》及1月6日抗议案被告支付赔偿一事表示担忧,此前这些人已获赦免
    作者:杰克·吉布森

    亲生命活动家保罗·沃恩在“周六美国秀”节目中谈及他与司法部达成的七位数和解协议,此前他的家因田纳西州一家堕胎中心的抗议活动遭到FBI搜查。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/7d975f30-6efb-4b75-a981-38857eafb042

    收听本文
    3分钟

    弗吉尼亚州亚历山大讯——司法部律师已要求美国地区法官利奥妮·布林克马驳回一起与特朗普政府17.76亿美元“反武器化基金”相关的诉讼,他们辩称总检察长托德·布兰奇已于8月正式下令撤销该基金,并多次证实——包括在国会宣誓作证时——该基金已不复存在。

    然而,布林克马周五对此表示怀疑。

    “在我看来,本案背后的核心问题仍然存在,”布林克马说道。

    “真正令人担忧的是……纳税人资金被用于推广特定政治观点的问题,”布林克马说道,她提到了因违反《自由获得诊所准入法案》被定罪的亲生命活动人士,以及1月6日试图“推翻合法选举”的“叛乱”参与者。

    克林顿任命法官无限期冻结特朗普政府17.76亿美元反武器化基金

    美国地区法官利奥妮·布林克马质疑特朗普政府现已撤销的17.76亿美元反武器化基金相关问题是否仍未解决。(安娜·莫尼梅克/盖蒂图片社)

    “那个实体已经不存在了,”布林克马在提及反武器化基金时说道,并同意布兰奇在其确认听证会上曾宣誓称该基金已终止。

    “但是否存在功能上的替代方案?”布林克马说道,她指的是司法部的普通判决基金权限。

    判决基金是美国财政部由财政服务局管理的永久性账户,用于支付针对联邦政府的法院判决和司法部法律和解款项。布林克马称该基金“透明度较低”,并暗示一些因违反《自由获得诊所准入法案》被定罪的被告已经从司法部判决基金中获得了巨额赔偿。

    法官暂时冻结特朗普司法部近200亿美元“反武器化”基金

    司法部律师周五要求联邦法官驳回针对反武器化基金的诉讼,辩称总检察长托德·布兰奇已于8月正式终止该基金。(安德鲁·哈恩/盖蒂图片社)

    布林克马随后明确表示,她所指的是保罗·沃恩的案件。

    来自田纳西州森特维尔的沃恩于2024年1月被定罪,罪名是他在2021年3月参与封锁田纳西州芒特朱丽叶的一家堕胎诊所。沃恩最终获得了赦免,并从司法部判决基金中获得了纳税人资助的赔偿,福克斯新闻获悉该赔偿金额为“七位数”。

    拜登政府利用堕胎组织档案,包括未成年人照片,针对基督徒,司法部报告披露

    法官利奥妮·布林克马称,尽管司法部坚称该基金已不复存在,但一起针对反武器化基金的诉讼背后的问题仍然“存在”。(凯文·卡特/盖蒂图片社)

    司法部律师安德鲁·布洛克质疑,鉴于“该基金已不复存在”,原告希望获得何种救济。

    布林克马反驳称,尽管该案远未到救济阶段,但“我认为存在救济途径”。她提出可能需要一名“中立人士”来监督基金,“而非司法部人员,不幸的是,在这件事上我认为他们受到了胁迫”。

    “一次公正、无偏见的审查……行政部门成员此前发表了太多言论,破坏了(司法部的)立场,”布林克马说道,“他们一直在自相矛盾。”

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    布林克马在听证会结束时告诉双方,她计划在未来几天制定新的证据开示命令,这表明该案远未结束。

    杰克·吉布森是福克斯新闻司法部与联邦执法栏目制作人。

    Judge says issues in Trump administration anti-weaponization case ‘alive and kicking’ despite DOJ push

    September 18, 2026 2:33pm EDT / Fox News

    The judge raised concerns about taxpayer money funding payouts to FACE Act and January 6 defendants after pardons

    By Jake Gibson

    Pro-life activist Paul Vaughn discusses his seven-figure settlement with the Department of Justice after his home was raided by the FBI after a protest at a Tennessee abortion center on ‘Saturday In America.’

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/7d975f30-6efb-4b75-a981-38857eafb042

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    ALEXANDRIA, Va. — Department of Justice lawyers have asked U.S. District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema to dismiss a case connected to the Trump administration’s $1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund,” arguing that Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a formal recission order in August and has affirmed many times, including under oath before Congress, that the fund is dead.

    However, Brinkema seemed skeptical Friday.

    “The issues that underlie this case are still alive and kicking in my view,” Brinkema said.

    “The real concern that lurks … is the concept of taxpayer money being used to promote particular political views,” Brinkema said, pointing to pro-life activists convicted of violating the FACE Act and others who attempted an “insurrection” on Jan. 6 “to overthrow the legitimate election.”

    CLINTON JUDGE INDEFINITELY BLOCKS TRUMP’S $1.776B ANTI-WEAPONIZATION FUND

    U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema questioned whether the issues surrounding the Trump administration’s now-rescinded $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund remain unresolved.(Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

    “That entity is gone,” said Brinkema, referring to the Anti-Weaponization Fund and agreeing that Blanche has said under oath at his confirmation hearings that the fund is dead.

    “But is there a functional equivalent?” Brinkema said, referring to the DOJ’s ordinary Judgment Fund authority.

    The Judgment Fund is a permanent U.S. Treasury account managed by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service that pays court judgments and DOJ legal settlements against the federal government. Brinkema called that fund “a less transparent structure” and suggested that some defendants convicted of FACE Act crimes have already received large payouts from the DOJ’s Judgment Fund.

    JUDGE TEMPORARILY BLOCKS TRUMP DOJ’S NEARLY $2B ‘ANTI-WEAPONIZATION’ FUND

    Justice Department lawyers asked a federal judge Friday to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the Anti-Weaponization Fund, arguing Attorney General Todd Blanche formally terminated it Aug. 2.(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

    Here, Brinkema affirmed she was talking about the case of Paul Vaughn.

    Vaugh, of Centerville, Tennessee, was convicted in January 2024 for his role in blockading an abortion clinic in Mount Juliet, Tennessee, in March 2021. Vaughn ultimately received a pardon and a taxpayer-funded payout from the DOJ’s Judgment Fund that confirmed to Fox News is “seven figures.”

    BIDEN ADMIN USED ABORTION GROUP DOSSIERS, INCLUDING PHOTOS OF MINORS, TO TARGET CHRISTIANS, DOJ REPORT REVEALS

    Judge Leonie Brinkema said the issues underlying a lawsuit over the Anti-Weaponization Fund remain “alive and kicking” despite the Justice Department’s insistence that the fund is dead.(Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

    DOJ lawyer Andrew Block asked what remedy the plaintiff wants, given “the fund is dead.”

    Brinkema countered that although the case is nowhere near the remedy stage, “I think there are remedies.” She brought up the possibility of requiring a “neutral” person to oversee a fund, “not someone from the DOJ, which I see unfortunately as coerced” in this matter.

    “A proper, unbiased look. … There’s been too much talk from members of the administration, which undercut [DOJ’s] position,” Brinkema said. “They contradict themselves all the time.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Brinkema closed the hearing by telling both sides she intends to craft a new discovery order in the coming days, suggesting this case is far from over.

    Jake Gibson is the Fox News Department of Justice and Federal Law Enforcement Producer.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2