作者: root

  • 代孕纠纷中的婴儿现已由父母监护并接受医疗护理,律师透露


    2026年8月13日 美国东部时间下午3:15 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    撰稿人

    代孕者与父母之间纠纷的核心婴儿现已由其父母监护并接受治疗,他们的律师周四表示。

    这名于周三上午在得克萨斯州出生的婴儿患有左心发育不全综合征,这是一种罕见的心脏缺陷,需要接受一系列手术,首次手术通常在出生后数周内进行。

    据本周介入此案的得克萨斯州总检察长肯·帕克斯顿称,这对父母——法庭文件中显示为加利福尼亚州的瑙欣·吉尔卡尔和奥马尔·艾哈迈德——在数月前得知诊断结果后,曾要求代孕者、来自阿拉斯加州的麦肯纳·韦斯特进行堕胎。

    韦斯特拒绝了,并在婴儿出生前前往了得克萨斯州,这促使帕克斯顿获得了一项法院命令,要求婴儿在出生后必须接受挽救生命的医疗护理。法院还裁定,吉尔卡尔和艾哈迈德,而非韦斯特,有权在法院命令的要求范围内做出医疗决定。

    “我们当事人的儿子于昨日上午出生,目前已由他们实际监护,正在一家三级护理中心接受专业医疗护理,”代表吉尔卡尔和艾哈迈德的律师李·巴德纳在一份声明中表示。“值得庆幸的是,麦肯纳·韦斯特毫无根据的干预其医疗护理的企图已被法院坚决驳回。目前,我们的当事人一如既往地将孩子的健康和福祉放在首位,遵循婴儿医疗团队的建议,就像任何充满爱意的父母会做的那样。”

    “仿佛他的病情带来的伤心还不够,他们看到自己的家庭悲剧被得克萨斯州总检察长办公室和麦肯纳·韦斯特演变成政治闹剧,感到悲痛欲绝,”巴德纳的声明继续说道。“目前,我们的当事人唯一的关注点是确保他们的孩子得到至关重要的医疗护理,以及作为父母的他们能够尽可能多地陪伴他们美丽的新生儿子,珍惜每一刻宝贵的时光。”

    根据法院命令,韦斯特在婴儿出生后不得与孩子有任何接触,她的律师林肯·戴维斯·威尔逊周三告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻。威尔逊表示,韦斯特打算继续争取孩子的监护权。

    “我们正在挑战这些亲子关系命令,因为我们认为得克萨斯州法律规定,分娩的女性才是孩子的母亲,”他说。

    威尔逊还表示,除了已知的心脏疾病外,这名被他称为加布里埃尔的婴儿的各项体征良好。威尔逊无法透露孩子正在何处接受治疗,但表示孩子正在“一家在实施该手术方面有着出色成功记录的机构”接受护理。

    杰森·艾伦和克里·布林对本篇报道亦有贡献。

    Baby in surrogate dispute now in custody of parents and getting medical care, lawyer says

    2026-08-13 3:15 PM EDT / CBS News

    By

    The baby at the center of a dispute between a surrogate and the parents is now in his parents’ custody and receiving care, their lawyer said Thursday.

    The baby, born Wednesday morning in Texas, has hypoplastic left heart syndrome, a rare heart defect that requires a series of surgeries, the first typically happening in the first weeks of life.

    When they learned of the diagnosis months ago, the parents, identified in court documents as Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed of California, requested that the surrogate, McKenna West of Alaska, get an abortion, according to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who intervened in the case this week.

    West refused and went to Texas before the baby was born, prompting Paxton to secure a court order saying the baby must receive lifesaving medical care after birth. The court also ruled that Gilkar and Ahmed, not West, are responsible for medical decisions within the requirements of the court order.

    “Our clients’ son was born yesterday morning and he is now in their physical custody while he receives expert medical care at a tertiary care center,” attorney Lee Budner, who represents Gilkar and Ahmed, said in a statement. “Thankfully, McKenna West’s baseless attempt to interfere with his medical care has been soundly rejected by the courts. Right now, our clients are continuing to place their baby’s health and well-being first, following the advice of the baby’s medical team, as they always have and just as any loving parent would.”

    “As if the heartbreak of his condition were not enough, they are devastated to see their family tragedy transformed into political theater by the Texas Attorney General’s office and McKenna West,” Budner’s statement continued. “Our clients’ only focus at this time is ensuring that their baby receives the medical care that he vitally needs and that they, as his parents, are able to spend every precious moment they can with their beautiful newborn son.”

    Due to the court orders, West was not allowed any contact with the child after his birth, her attorney, Lincoln Davis Wilson, told CBS News Wednesday. Wilson said West intended to continue efforts to gain custody of the child.

    “We are working on challenging those orders of parentage because we think that Texas law makes a woman who gives birth to a child, the mother of the child,” he said.

    Wilson also said that aside from the known heart condition, signs were positive for the baby, whom he referred to as Gabriel. Wilson could not comment on where the child was being treated, but said he was receiving care “at a facility that has an excellent track record of success in performing it.”

    Jason Allen and Kerry Breen contributed to this report.

  • 搁浅的阿拉斯加液化天然气管道法案发出“负面信号”,州长称


    2026-08-13T18:18:18.086Z / 路透社

    阿拉斯加州州长迈克·邓利维2025年3月14日在美国得克萨斯州休斯顿举行的CERAWeek能源会议上发言。路透社/凯莉·格林利/档案照片 购买授权,将在新标签页打开

    • 摘要
    • 企业
    • 邓利维称阿拉斯加面临可负担且可靠的天然气短缺问题日益严峻
    • 特朗普政府支持该项目,称其可加强与包括日本在内的盟友的安全与贸易合作
    • 格伦法恩计划于今年及明年做出最终投资决定,2031年启动液化天然气出口

    华盛顿8月13日路透电 – 阿拉斯加州州长迈克·邓利维表示,他对一项旨在推进阿拉斯加液化天然气项目管道建设、以便向亚洲出口天然气的法案在州议会搁浅一事“深感失望”。

    邓利维周三晚在X平台上发帖称,州议会决定不在本届会期复会就推进这个价值500亿美元的管道和终端项目所需的税收调整法案进行投票,这将向投资者和潜在合作伙伴发出“负面信号”。据当地新闻电台KTUU报道,议员们称该法案的支持度不足。

    该项目还将增加国内天然气供应渠道。

    “阿拉斯加正在耗尽可负担且可靠的天然气,”邓利维说,“这是一个长期存在的问题,数十年来因无所作为而愈发紧迫。拖延行动只会增加风险、推高成本并限制未来的选择。”

    KTUU报道称,邓利维目前正敦促议员们在8月20日复会进行投票。

    特朗普政府将阿拉斯加液化天然气项目宣传为加强美国与包括日本在内的伙伴及盟友的国家安全和贸易的一种方式。

    白宫和美国能源部未立即回应置评请求。

    该项目的牵头开发商格伦法恩未立即回应置评请求。

    格伦法恩高管今年3月表示,中东战争引发了亚洲对阿拉斯加液化天然气的兴趣。他们当时表示,公司计划于今年及明年做出最终投资决定,并于2031年开始运输液化天然气。

    日本两大液化天然气进口商JERA和东京燃气
    (9531.T),将在新标签页打开
    ,已签署初步协议,将合计每年从阿拉斯加液化天然气项目采购200万吨液化天然气。

    该项目的管道和出口终端的最终审批陷入延误,原因是格伦法恩尚未完成目标:为其每年2000万吨的计划液化天然气出口产能的80%签订具有约束力的承购协议。

    今年3月,格伦法恩高管表示,他们已敲定每年1300万吨的采购承诺。他们称,还需要再达成300万吨的采购协议,并将所有承诺转为具有约束力的协议,以筹集项目资金。

    由柯蒂斯·威廉姆斯和蒂莫西·加德纳报道 罗德·尼克尔编辑

    我们的标准:路透社信托原则,将在新标签页打开

    Stalled Alaska LNG pipeline bill sends ‘negative signal,’ governor says

    2026-08-13T18:18:18.086Z / Reuters

    Alaska Governor, Mike Dunleavy speaks during CERAWeek in Houston, Texas, U.S., March 14, 2025. REUTERS/Kaylee Greenlee/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    • Summary
    • Companies
    • Dunleavy says Alaska faces worsening shortages of affordable, reliable natural gas
    • Trump administration backs project as strengthening security and trade with allies including Japan
    • Glenfarne targets final investment decisions this year and ​next, with LNG exports starting in 2031

    WASHINGTON, Aug 13 (Reuters) – Alaska ‌Governor Mike Dunleavy said he was “deeply disappointed” that a bill to advance a pipeline for the Alaska LNG project to export natural gas to Asia stalled in the state legislature.

    Dunleavy said in a post on X ​late on Wednesday that the legislature’s decision not to reconvene this session to vote ​on a tax change needed to advance the $50 billion pipeline and terminal project ⁠would send a “negative signal” to investors and potential partners. Legislators cited insufficient support for the bill, ​local news station KTUU reported.

    The project would also increase access to gas for domestic use.

    “Alaska is ​running out of affordable, reliable natural gas,” Dunleavy said. “This is a long-standing issue that has grown more urgent over decades of inaction. Delaying action only increases risk, raises costs, and limits future options.”

    KTUU reported Dunleavy was now ​urging lawmakers to reconvene on August 20 to vote.

    The Trump administration has promoted the Alaska LNG ​project as a way to boost national security and trade with partners and allies, including Japan.

    The White House ‌and ⁠the Department of Energy did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    Glenfarne, the lead developer, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The war in the Middle East is spurring interest in Asia for gas from Alaska LNG, Glenfarne executives said in March. They said at the time ​the company aimed to make ​final investment decisions ⁠this year and next, and start shipping liquefied natural gas in 2031.

    Japan’s two biggest LNG importers, JERA and Tokyo Gas

    (9531.T), opens new tab
    , have signed preliminary deals ​to buy a combined 2 million metric tons a year from Alaska ​LNG.

    Final approvals ⁠for the project’s pipeline and export terminal are delayed as Glenfarne has yet to reach its target of signing binding offtake deals for 80% of the planned export capacity of 20 million tons ⁠a year ​of LNG.

    In March, Glenfarne executives said they had lined up ​commitments for 13 million tons a year. It needed agreements for another 3 million tons, and to make all commitments ​binding to line up financing, they said.

    Reporting by Curtis Williams and Timothy Gardner Editing by Rod Nickel

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • 克鲁兹就和平委员会计划中4亿美元哈马斯时代拨款敲响警钟——发出严厉警告


    2026年8月13日美国东部时间下午1:38 / 福克斯新闻

    委员会官员坚称,目前尚未承诺拨付任何资金,且任何款项在支付前都将经过严格审查

    作者:埃弗拉特·拉赫特 福克斯新闻

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6402521624112

    杰克·基恩:特朗普的加沙和平协议是“向前迈出的一大步”

    退役四星上将杰克·基恩在《福克斯与朋友们》节目中剖析了唐纳德·特朗普总统加沙和平协议的下一阶段。基恩解释称,这项历史性协议要求哈马斯及其他武装组织彻底解除武装,进而推动以色列军队撤离,并将权力移交至新的巴勒斯坦政府。

    新增功能:您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    多年来,美国官员一直警告称,哈马斯会利用表面上用于民用和人道主义的资金流来支持其恐怖主义基础设施,这引发了人们的担忧:在美国支持的新治理结构准备接管加沙之际,进入加沙的资金能否被阻断,不会落入恐怖组织手中。

    美国财政部多次打击其所称的哈马斯融资网络,包括秘密投资组合、虚假慈善机构以及打着人道主义工作幌子筹集资金、实则支持哈马斯军事 wing 的组织。

    本周,以色列卡恩新闻报道称,和平委员会的加沙路线图中的一项条款可能允许拨付高达4亿美元,用于清偿哈马斯统治期间积累的未偿债务,包括欠公共部门员工、供应商和承包商的款项,这些担忧因此再次浮现。

    这场争议的焦点在于,继任政府能否清偿哈马斯近二十年统治期间遗留的合法债务,而又不会间接惠及这个恐怖组织。批评人士警告称,这样做可能会减轻哈马斯统治期间带来的财政负担,或为该集团在保留当地影响力的同时,创造挪用资源的机会。委员会官员则辩称,该机制的目的是让继任政府能够维持基本服务,并与合法员工和供应商保持关系——每一项索赔都将经过单独审查,任何可能惠及哈马斯的付款都将被拒绝。

    特朗普政府调查近东救济工程处涉嫌雇佣1500名恐怖分子

    2026年1月22日,美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在瑞士达沃斯举行的第56届世界经济论坛(WEF)期间,参与了其旨在解决全球冲突的和平委员会倡议的宪章发布活动,该倡议旨在解决全球冲突。(乔纳森·恩斯特/路透社)

    和平委员会加沙问题高级代表尼古拉·姆拉德诺夫强烈驳斥了该条款等同于与哈马斯达成财务协议的说法。

    “有关和平委员会与哈马斯之间存在财务协议的说法是虚假的,”姆拉德诺夫周三在X平台上用希伯来语写道,并补充称,此类提议从未“被讨论、谈判或考虑过”。他表示,委员会的目标仍然是彻底解除哈马斯的武装,并建立由国际安全力量支持的民用治理机制。

    得克萨斯州联邦参议员、共和党人特德·克鲁兹告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,他仍对该条款感到担忧。

    “我对这些报道深感担忧。恐怖分子会将资金视为可替代资产,他们通过让国际捐赠者为其债务提供资金来建立信誉,这就是为什么国会很久以前就禁止向西约旦的巴勒斯坦政府提供资金的原因,”克鲁兹说。

    “我们也知道,国际捐赠者最初资助哈马斯在加沙地带修建了恐怖主义基础设施,因此不应信任他们来指导还款资金的使用,”克鲁兹继续说道。“在新资源流入加沙之前,应该彻底根除哈马斯。”

    哈马斯同意根据“历史性”加沙协议完成解除武装:特朗普

    2025年2月22日,在拉法(加沙地带南部),作为哈马斯与以色列之间停火及人质交换协议的一部分,巴勒斯坦哈马斯恐怖分子在移交自2023年10月7日致命袭击以来被扣押在加沙的人质当天担任警戒。(哈提姆·哈立德/档案照片/路透社)

    一位不愿透露姓名的和平委员会高级官员周四对福克斯新闻数字频道表示,反驳了路线图承诺拨付4亿美元用于清偿哈马斯债务的说法。

    “实际上,我们只是承诺在获取数据后进行分析。我们没有承诺资助任何项目。我们甚至没有义务支出4亿美元,”这位官员说。

    这位官员将该条款描述为一项为期三年的审查流程,上限为4亿美元。根据该流程,继任的加沙政府可以确定是否需要解决特定的未偿债务,以维持基本服务以及与合法供应商的关系。

    希拉里·克林顿与民主党批评者分道扬镳,支持特朗普的加沙计划,称其为“唯一可行方案”

    2025年,以色列宣布在加沙的一次空袭中击毙哈马斯新任命的军事 wing 负责人穆罕默德·奥德赫数小时后,巴勒斯坦人在加沙拥挤的宰牲节市场购物。(来源:Jusoor News)

    “所谓存在4亿美元的‘偿付工具’,哈马斯对此拥有承诺的说法,没有一个是真实的,”这位官员说。“如果有人开始宣扬4亿美元的承诺支出已经开始……那将是错误的报道。这不是协议的内容。”

    “目前没有人需要承担任何费用,”这位官员补充道,称只有在新的加沙政府能够获取财务记录,确定债权人是谁、他们提供了哪些服务以及未来是否需要这些关系之后,才会进行任何审查。

    “即便是4亿美元中的第一美元,我们也会对其进行评估,”这位官员说。“这不会是一张交给哈马斯的空白支票。它将经过评估和严格分析。”

    这位官员将该流程比作企业重组,称尽管哈马斯将被永久排除在政府之外,但继任政府未必能完全摆脱前政府统治期间积累的每一项合法债务。

    哈马斯表示将解散加沙政府,但以色列警告该组织仍寻求类似真主党的控制

    在汗尤尼斯,加沙地带的流离失所者聚集在一起,拿着锅碗瓢盆领取慈善机构分发的热餐,准备开斋饭。许多家庭,包括儿童,在艰难的生活条件下排队等候。(阿卜德·拉希姆·哈提卜/安纳多卢通讯社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    他以一家向加沙医院供应药品但从未收到付款的欧洲制药公司为例。他说,如果新政府需要该公司继续供应药品,解决部分未付发票可能是维持合作关系的必要之举。

    “这里的核心主题,实际上是服务的连续性,”这位官员说。

    解除武装可能分区域先行于付款

    这位官员并未表示,在首批潜在付款获批之前,哈马斯必须在整个加沙地带完全解除武装。

    “实际情况是,这将逐个社区推进,”这位官员解释道,称继任政府预计将在哈马斯解除某个地区武装后进驻该区域。

    伊朗重申对哈马斯的支持,与此同时特朗普推动解除该恐怖组织武装

    哈马斯长期以来负责与以色列进行间接停火和人质谈判的首席谈判代表哈亚,现在将领导其政治政治局。(卢艾·贝沙拉/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    当被问及新政府是否必须在哈马斯完全撤离加沙后才能解决未偿债务——例如涉及拉法一家医院的债务——这位官员表示,即便哈马斯尚未完全撤离加沙其他地区,也可能进行付款。

    “其理念是,做出这些决策的地方,哈马斯将不复存在,”他说。

    当福克斯新闻数字频道特别询问“资金不会转入仍由哈马斯控制的地区”这一说法是否准确时,这位官员表示:“这种说法是准确的。”

    这位官员承认,如果同一家供应商在哈马斯控制区和非哈马斯控制区都有业务,可能会出现更复杂的情况。届时官员们可能不得不确定,是否仅报销与继任政府控制地区相关的部分费用,或者为维持服务进行其他谈判。

    美国敦促捐赠者放弃对近东救济工程处的资助,联合国为该机构的使命辩护

    2025年2月22日,在拉法,作为哈马斯与以色列之间停火及人质交换协议的一部分,哈马斯恐怖分子在移交自2023年10月7日致命袭击以来被扣押在加沙的人质当天担任警戒。(哈提姆·哈立德/路透社)

    委员会驳斥资金可替代性质疑

    克鲁兹的核心批评是,资金具有可替代性:如果国际捐赠者清偿了哈马斯统治期间积累的债务,原本可能用于偿还这些负债的资源理论上可以被挪作他用。

    这位委员会官员驳斥了这一论点,称哈马斯已经资不抵债,一开始就无力偿还许多未偿债权人的债务。

    “这并不是说我们要缓解他们的预算压力,让他们原本打算支付的100美元现在可以节省下来,”这位官员说。

    “他们一开始就没打算支付这笔钱,”他继续说道。“我们做出的决定与哈马斯无关,而是要判断这是否符合我们的预算和合作关系。”

    哈马斯任命“终极制度幸存者”为恐怖组织头目,向以色列传递信息:专家

    2025年10月13日,在加沙汗尤尼斯,哈马斯与以色列之间达成停火及人质交换协议,巴勒斯坦恐怖分子在纳赛尔医院采取安保措施,为迎接被释放的加沙人做好准备。(杜阿·阿尔巴兹/安纳多卢通讯社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    这位官员将哈马斯描述为“目前彻底资不抵债”且“财务上完全、彻底一团糟”。

    福克斯新闻数字频道还向这位官员提出了另一个担忧:即便资金从未直接转移给哈马斯,该组织是否可以从仍在武装控制其他地区的供应商或领取资金的员工那里收取税款、付款或其他好处?

    “如果存在部分资金最终仍会落入哈马斯手中的风险,那么我们就会终止这项计划,”这位官员说。

    他表示,官员们将审查每一位受款人、提供的服务以及资金的最终流向。

    “如果哈马斯尚未完全解除武装……资金最终会不会落入他们手中?如果答案是肯定的,那么他们就拿不到钱,”他说。“这一点非常明确。”

    这位官员还透露,委员会打算设法追回其认为哈马斯窃取的资产,并在可能的情况下利用这些资产来清偿合法债务。

    “我们将切实努力追回这些资产,并在发现盗窃行为时,利用其中一部分资产来清偿部分此类债务,”他说。

    这位官员表示,如果追回的资产不足,外部资金将来自该地区国家,而非美国。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    2026年8月1日,在加沙中部代尔拜拉赫,据医护人员称,巴勒斯坦人在以色列 overnight 袭击药品仓库的现场进行检查,旁边是流离失所者的帐篷。居民们此前已收到以色列军方的疏散预警。(马哈茂德·伊萨/路透社)

    “这笔资金来自地区合作伙伴。不是来自美国,”他说。

    埃弗拉特(埃菲)·拉赫特是福克斯新闻数字频道的记者,拥有超过15年报道冲突、全球事务、人权和政治问责的经验。她执导并制作了200多段纪录片片段,足迹遍布40多个国家,记录了冲突、人道主义危机、腐败、人口贩运、基于性别的暴力以及重大世界事件背后的人性故事。

    拉赫特的报道带她进入了中东、欧洲、亚洲和非洲的冲突区和危机地区。她的工作包括揭露人口贩运网络、揭露叙利亚境内的伊斯兰国地下酷刑监狱、记录乌克兰战争以及采访高级政治人物和世界领导人。她也是战争开始后进入俄罗斯的西方记者之一,带回了普京反对派的证词。拉赫特曾获得2022年佩雷斯和平中心奖,并曾担任2023-2024年密歇根大学奈特-华莱士新闻研究员。她还曾两次获得洛克沃尔卓越报道奖。她拥有传播学学士学位和政治学硕士学位。

    Cruz sounds alarm over $400M Hamas-era provision in Board of Peace plan — issues blunt warning

    August 13, 2026 1:38pm EDT / Fox News

    Board officials insist no funds are committed and every dollar would be rigorously vetted before any payment is made

    By Efrat Lachter Fox News

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6402521624112
    Jack Keane: Trump’s Gaza peace deal is a ‘huge step forward’

    Ret. Four-Star Gen. Jack Keane breaks down the next phase of President Donald Trump’s Gaza peace deal on ‘Fox & Friends.’ Keane explains how the historic agreement mandates the complete disarmament of Hamas and other armed groups, leading to the withdrawal of Israeli forces and the transition of power to a new Palestinian government.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    U.S. officials have for years warned that Hamas has exploited ostensibly civilian and humanitarian funding streams to support its terrorist infrastructure, fueling concerns over whether money entering Gaza can be kept out of the terror group’s hands as a new U.S.-backed governing structure prepares to take control.

    The Treasury Department has repeatedly targeted what it describes as Hamas financing networks, including a secret investment portfolio, sham charities and organizations that raised money under the guise of humanitarian work while supporting Hamas’ military wing.

    Those concerns resurfaced this week after Israel’s Kan News reported that a provision in the Board of Peace’s Gaza roadmap could allow up to $400 million to address unpaid obligations accumulated during Hamas’ rule, including money owed to public-sector workers, suppliers and contractors.

    The dispute is over whether a successor government can settle legitimate obligations inherited from nearly two decades of Hamas rule without indirectly benefiting the terrorist group. Critics warn that doing so could relieve financial burdens associated with Hamas’ rule or create opportunities for the group to siphon off resources while it retains influence on the ground. Board officials argue the mechanism is instead designed to allow a successor government to preserve essential services and relationships with legitimate workers and suppliers — with each claim individually vetted and any payment that could benefit Hamas rejected.

    TRUMP ADMINISTRATION PROBES UNRWA OVER ALLEGED EMPLOYMENT OF 1,500 TERRORISTS

    U.S. President Donald Trump takes part in a charter announcement for his Board of Peace initiative aimed at resolving global conflicts, alongside the 56th annual World Economic Forum (WEF), in Davos, Switzerland, Jan. 22, 2026.(Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

    Nickolay Mladenov, the Board of Peace’s high representative for Gaza, sharply rejected the characterization that the provision amounted to a financial agreement with Hamas.

    “The claims that there is a financial agreement between the Board of Peace and Hamas are false,” Mladenov wrote in Hebrew on X Wednesday, adding that no such proposal had been “discussed, negotiated, or considered.” He said the Board’s objective remained the complete disarmament of Hamas and the establishment of civilian governance backed by an international security presence.

    Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital that he remained alarmed by the provision.

    “I’m deeply concerned about these reports. Terrorists use money as fungible and they build credibility by having international donors finance their debts, which is why Congress long ago banned money from going to Palestinian governments in the West Bank,” Cruz said.

    “We also know that international donors paid for Hamas to build terrorist infrastructure across the Gaza Strip in the first place, and shouldn’t be trusted to direct reimbursement money,” Cruz continued. “Hamas should be utterly eradicated before new resources flow into Gaza.”

    HAMAS AGREES TO COMPLETE DISARMAMENT UNDER ‘HISTORIC’ GAZA AGREEMENT: TRUMP

    Palestinian Hamas terrorists stand guard on the day of the handover of hostages held in Gaza since the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attack, as part of a ceasefire and a hostages-prisoners swap deal between Hamas and Israel, in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, Feb. 22, 2025.(Hatem Khaled/File Photo/Reuters)

    A senior Board of Peace official, speaking to Fox News Digital on background Thursday, pushed back on the premise that the roadmap commits $400 million to paying Hamas’ debts.

    “There’s really just a commitment to analyze when we get the data. There’s no commitment to fund anything. We don’t have an obligation to even do $400 million,” the official said.

    The official described the provision as a three-year review process, capped at $400 million, under which the successor Gaza administration could determine whether particular unpaid obligations need to be resolved in order to maintain essential services and relationships with legitimate suppliers.

    HILLARY CLINTON BREAKS WITH DEMOCRATIC CRITICS BY BACKING TRUMP’S GAZA PLAN AS THE ‘ONLY GAME IN TOWN’

    Palestinians shop at a crowded Eid al-Adha market in Gaza hours after Israel announced the killing of Mohammed Odeh, the newly appointed head of Hamas’ military wing, in an airstrike in Gaza.(Credit: Jusoor News)

    “This notion that there’s, like, a $400 million payoff vehicle, Hamas kind of has a commitment for it — none of that is true,” the official said. “If anybody’s gonna start running with a narrative that a $400 million committed tab is beginning now … that would just be incorrect reporting. That’s not the deal.”

    “No one’s picking up a tab right now,” the official added, saying any review would take place only after the new Gaza administration gains access to financial records allowing it to determine who the creditors are, what services they provided and whether those relationships are needed going forward.

    “Even the first dollar of the $400 million, we’re going to evaluate that first dollar,” the official said. “It’s not going to be a blank check handed to Hamas. It’s going to be evaluated, rigorously analyzed.”

    The official compared the process to a corporate restructuring, arguing that while Hamas is being permanently removed from government, the successor administration cannot necessarily walk away from every legitimate obligation accumulated during the previous government’s rule.

    HAMAS SAYS IT WILL DISSOLVE GAZA GOVERNMENT, BUT ISRAEL WARNS GROUP STILL SEEKS HEZBOLLAH-STYLE CONTROL

    Displaced Palestinians gather with pots and containers to receive hot meals distributed by charities ahead of Iftar in Khan Yunis, Gaza Families, including children, wait in line amid difficult living conditions.(Abed Rahim Khatib/Anadolu via Getty Images)

    He offered the example of a European pharmaceutical company that supplied medicine to Gaza hospitals but was never paid. If the new administration needs that company to continue supplying medicine, he said, resolving some of its unpaid invoices could be necessary to maintain the relationship.

    “The theme here, really, is continuity of services,” the official said.

    Disarmament could precede payments area by area

    The official did not say that Hamas would have to be fully disarmed across the entire Gaza Strip before the first claim could potentially be paid.

    “The reality is that this is going to be community by community,” the official said, explaining that the successor administration is expected to move into individual areas as Hamas disarms there.

    IRAN REAFFIRMS SUPPORT FOR HAMAS AS TRUMP PUSHES TO DISARM TERROR GROUP

    Al-Hayya, Hamas’ longtime chief negotiator in indirect ceasefire and hostage talks with Israel, will now lead its political bureau.(LOUAI BESHARA / AFP via Getty Images)

    Asked whether Hamas would have to be completely removed from Gaza before the new administration could resolve an outstanding liability — for example, involving a hospital in Rafah — the official said a payment could occur even if Hamas had not yet been fully removed elsewhere in the Strip.

    “The idea is that where those decisions are made, Hamas is not gonna be there,” he said.

    When Fox News Digital asked specifically whether it was accurate to say money would not be transferred into areas where Hamas remained in control, the official said: “It’s accurate to say.”

    The official acknowledged that more complicated cases could arise if the same supplier operates in both Hamas-free and Hamas-controlled portions of Gaza. Officials might then have to determine whether to reimburse only the portion associated with the area controlled by the successor government or negotiate some other arrangement necessary to maintain the service.

    US URGES DONORS TO ABANDON UNRWA FUNDING AS UN DEFENDS AGENCY’S MISSION

    Hamas terrorists stand guard on the day of the handover of hostages held in Gaza since the deadly October 7, 2023, attack, as part of a ceasefire and a hostages-prisoners swap deal between Hamas and Israel, in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, Feb. 22, 2025.(Hatem Khaled/Reuters)

    Board pushes back on fungibility concern

    Cruz’s central criticism is that money is fungible: if international donors satisfy obligations accumulated under Hamas rule, resources that might otherwise have been needed to cover those liabilities could theoretically be used elsewhere.

    The Board official rejected that argument, saying Hamas is insolvent and was never going to pay many of the outstanding creditors in the first place.

    “It’s not as though we’re alleviating them from, like, their budget that they actually were gonna actually go pay that $100 and now they get to save it,” the official said.

    “They were never paying it in the first place,” he continued. “We’re making a decision separate and apart from Hamas, whether this fits into our budget and our relationships.”

    HAMAS TAPS ‘ULTIMATE INSTITUTIONAL SURVIVOR’ AS TERROR CHIEF, SENDING MESSAGE TO ISRAEL: EXPERT

    Hamas terrorists take security measures as preparations are completed at Nasser Hospital to welcome Gazans to be released under the ceasefire and hostage-prisoner exchange deal between Israel and Hamas in Khan Yunis, Gaza, on October 13, 2025.(Doaa Albaz/Anadolu via Getty Images)

    The official described Hamas as “dead insolvent right now” and “financially, completely, completely in shambles.”

    Fox News Digital also pressed the official on a separate concern: even if money is never transferred directly to Hamas, could the group extract taxes, payments or other benefits from suppliers or employees receiving funds while it remains armed elsewhere?

    “If there’s a risk that some of the money is going to still end up in the hands of Hamas, then we’re gonna shut it down,” the official said.

    He said officials would examine each recipient, the services provided and where the money ultimately would go.

    “If Hamas is not fully disarmed … can it end up in their hands? If the answer to that question is yes, then they’re not gonna get money,” he said. “Like, that is crystal clear.”

    The official also disclosed that the Board intends to try to recover assets it believes Hamas stole and use those assets, where possible, to satisfy legitimate obligations.

    “We are going to make a real effort to go and try to recover those assets and use some of those assets, where we have found theft … to satisfy some of these obligations,” he said.

    If recovered assets are insufficient, the official said outside funding would come from countries in the region rather than Washington.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Palestinians inspect the site of an overnight Israeli strike on a medicine warehouse, according to medics, next to tents sheltering displaced Palestinians, in Deir al-Balah, in the central Gaza Strip, August 1, 2026. Residents had been pre-warned by the Israeli military to evacuate.(Mahmoud Issa/Reuters)

    “This is coming from regional partners. This is not coming from the United States,” he said.

    Efrat (Effie) Lachter is a reporter for Fox News Digital with more than 15 years of experience covering conflict, global affairs, human rights and political accountability.She has directed and produced more than 200 documentary segments across more than 40 countries, documenting conflicts, humanitarian crises, corruption, human trafficking, gender-based violence and the human stories behind major world events.

    Lachter’s reporting has taken her into conflict zones and crisis areas across the Middle East, Europe, Asia and Africa. Her work has included uncovering human trafficking networks, revealing an ISIS underground torture prison in Syria, documenting the war in Ukraine and interviewing senior political figures and world leaders. She was also among the Western journalists who entered Russia after the war began to bring testimonies from Putin’s opposition. Lachter is the recipient of the 2022 Peres Center for Peace Award and was a 2023–2024 Knight-Wallace Journalism Fellow at the University of Michigan. She also won two Rockower Awards for Excellence in Reporting. She holds a bachelor’s degree in communication and a master’s degree in political science.

  • 特朗普的伊朗难题日益加剧


    2026-08-13T19:02:42.935Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/13/politics/trump-iran-war-developments

    自伊朗战争打响后不久,对总统唐纳德·特朗普而言,这场战争就进展得并不顺利。

    尽管美军发动了大规模军事打击并施加了经济压力,但伊朗并未觉得有必要屈服于特朗普的要求。即便曾达成对伊朗有利的停火协议,德黑兰依旧没有遵守。

    但特朗普在这场战争中面临的难题正日益加剧,其中许多问题已超出战场和谈判桌范畴。

    近期出现的一些动向包括:

    • 据最新报道,特朗普上月在土耳其临时更换专机,原因是伊朗可能发动袭击的威胁,这一事件引发了外界对政府将工作人员和媒体当作诱饵的强烈质疑。该爆料还削弱了政府有关伊朗军事能力已被削弱的说法,并招致包括伊朗国家媒体在内的各方对特朗普的嘲讽。
    • 美国弹药短缺问题似乎正到了紧要关头,而特朗普在战争爆发前就已收到相关警告。
    • 越来越多迹象显示,特朗普政府官员及其盟友对战争感到厌倦,正在寻找或敦促找到“下台台阶”以结束战事。
    • 此外,越来越多报告指出,“亚伯拉罕·林肯”号航母上的舰员生活条件不断下降,心理健康状况堪忧。该航母为支持战事已进行了超长部署。CNN周四报道称,一名舰员穿着救生衣跳入海中,一名美国官员表示海军将这一事件视为“心理健康问题”。

    而在这一切背后,伊朗似乎只会变得更加大胆,且不断提高其要求——或许是认为自身的影响力正在增强。

    所有这些都对特朗普继续推进战争的能力构成威胁。这场战争已持续六个月,而美国民众从一开始就从未对其开战理由信服。如今,这些事态发展更是增加了战争的代价。总统坚称自己没有感受到时间压力,但随着中期选举临近,他所在政党中的一些人并不同意这一说法。

    专机更换事件尤其可能为本已不受欢迎的战争再添一层丑闻。而最关键的是,这一事件削弱了政府有关已重创伊朗军事力量的说法。

    本周我们得知,特朗普政府担忧来自伊朗的威胁十分严重,足以让总统有必要在他上月离开土耳其时,悄悄将他从“空军一号”转移走。(CNN周三报道称,该威胁涉及肩扛式导弹。)

    弹药供应问题长期以来就像一颗沉睡的定时炸弹。CNN此前曾报道,美军参谋长联席会议主席丹·凯恩将军和其他军方领导人在战争爆发前就曾警告特朗普,若战事旷日持久,弹药储备可能会成为问题。

    特朗普原本预计战争会短暂得多,大约持续四到六周。但事与愿违。包括CNN在内的越来越多报道显示,凯恩的警告并非危言耸听,关键弹药已大幅耗尽。美军用于一款关键导弹防御系统——“萨德”系统——的拦截弹已消耗了近80%。

    特朗普政府曾声称拥有足够弹药完成对伊朗的作战任务,但这并未提及这场战争可能会让美国陷入关键弹药短缺的困境——而 replenish弹药需要时间——这可能会让美国暴露在风险之中,或助长中国等对手试图入侵台湾的野心。

    这日益成为政府官员需要权衡的成本收益问题。但这一态势本身就已威胁到特朗普对伊朗施加压力的能力。

    当然,一个核心问题是,如果军方或政府官员认为弹药问题已十分严峻,他们是否能说服特朗普改变策略。但越来越多迹象表明,核心人物正对战争感到厌倦,并释放出可能是时候调整战略的信号。

    CNN上周报道称,凯恩已私下向其他特朗普高级顾问明确表示,政府需要找到结束战争的“台阶”,因为当前可供选择的升级冲突的军事手段可能会适得其反,仅靠空中力量不太可能实现特朗普的作战目标。

    还有迹象显示,特朗普的忠实盟友也越来越担心这场战争会让共和党在2026年中期选举中付出代价。众议院议长迈克·约翰逊近日表示,“我们必须结束这场战争”,福克斯新闻主持人劳拉·英格拉哈姆则称“时间不多了”。(事实上,英国《卫报》近期报道称,连一向支持战争的福克斯新闻频道也出现了越来越多对伊朗战争的质疑声音。)就连支持特朗普及其战争行动的右翼网红本尼·约翰逊也发出了该是收手的时候的信号。

    “看不到尽头的对外战争向来不得人心,永远都是政治毒瘤,”约翰逊两周前在X平台上发帖称。他补充道:“结束这场战争。就此打住。把重心放回美国国内。汽油、杂货、房价和移民问题。这才是我们取胜之道。”

    战争的持续时间似乎也加剧了另一个阻碍政府继续推进战事的问题:承担作战支援任务的美军官兵出现厌战情绪、生活条件恶劣以及心理健康状况下滑。

    美军《星条旗报》和《海军时报》此前报道称,“亚伯拉罕·林肯”号航母上的舰员曾多次试图跳海。CNN报道称,近期又有一名舰员跳海,后被救起。

    上周在圣地亚哥举行的市政厅会议上,约200名“林肯”号航母舰员家属表达了对现状的担忧——包括物资短缺、食物不足以及水污染等问题。该航母自去年11月以来一直在部署状态,已超过200天未靠港休整。康涅狄格州民主党参议员理查德·布卢门撒尔称,这创下了现代海军连续海上部署天数的纪录。

    美国海军表示,其“高度重视每一名官兵的福祉,并配备了宗教、医疗和心理健康专业人员,以评估并解决出现的任何问题”。

    但这一不断浮现的事态集中体现了特朗普面临的困境。

    他似乎认为继续推进战争并维持对伊朗的经济压力基本上无需付出代价。美国没有派遣地面部队,也没有不断出现士兵阵亡的报道。油价上涨是这场战争在政治层面面临的最大问题。

    但如今,战事已远超政府此前预计的结束时间,其他问题也随之浮现。其中一些问题从实际层面加大了继续作战的难度,而另一些问题则表明,这场僵局将持续给政府及其盟友带来需要应对的政治麻烦。

    鉴于这场战争原本就已像是一副沉重的负担和泥潭,而中期选举仅剩不到三个月时间,这些事态发展无疑是相当不祥的预兆。

    Trump’s Iran headaches are mounting

    2026-08-13T19:02:42.935Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/13/politics/trump-iran-war-developments

    The Iran war hasn’t gone well for President Donald Trump since, well, shortly after it began.

    Despite extensive US military attacks and economic pressure, Iran hasn’t felt the need to capitulate to Trump’s demands. And even when there have been ceasefires with favorable terms for Iran, Tehran still didn’t abide by them.

    But Trump’s headaches with the war are mounting. And many of them extend beyond the battlefield and the negotiating table.

    Some of the recent developments:

    • Trump’s newly reported secret plane switch in Turkey due to a potential Iranian threat is raising major questions about the administration using staff and media as decoys. The revelation is also undercutting the administration’s claims about Iran’s diminished capabilities and leading to mockery of Trump, including by Iranian state media.
    • The United States’ munitions shortfall problem — which Trump was warned about before the war began — appears to be coming to a head.
    • There are increasing signs of Trump administration officials and allies growing weary of the war and looking for or urging an off-ramp.
    • There are now also increasing reports of declining living conditions and mental health aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln amid an extraordinarily long deployment to support the war effort. CNN reported Thursday that one sailor went overboard wearing a life vest, with a US official saying the Navy viewed the event as a “mental health” incident.

    And through it all, Iran only appears to be growing bolder and upping its demands — perhaps believing that its leverage is increasing.

    All of the above threatens Trump’s ability to keep prosecuting the war. And these developments add to the costs of a war — now in its sixth month — whose purpose Americans have never been convinced of in the first place. The president insists he’s not feeling the time pressure, but some in his party would beg to differ with the midterms looming.

    The plane switch in particular threatens to add a layer of scandal over the already unpopular war. And as much as anything, it undercuts the administration’s claims to have decimated Iran militarily.

    This week we learned that the Trump administration feared a threat from Iran was serious enough that it warranted sneaking the president off Air Force One for his departure from Turkey last month. (CNN reported Wednesday that the threat involved a shoulder-fired missile.)

    The munitions supply has long been a sleeping giant. CNN has reported that Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dan Caine and other military leaders warned Trump before the war began that the stockpiles could be an issue in a protracted conflict.

    Trump seemed to anticipate a much shorter war, lasting four to six weeks or so. But that’s not what he’s gotten. And increasing reports, including from CNN, suggest Caine’s warnings were well-founded and that key munitions are significantly depleted. The US military has exhausted nearly 80% of its interceptors for a key missile defense system, known as THAAD.

    The Trump administration has claimed it has plenty of munitions to finish the job in Iran. But that doesn’t address whether the war might cause the US to be so short of critical munitions — which take time to replenish — that it leaves the country exposed or might embolden an adversary like China to try and invade Taiwan.

    That’s increasingly a cost-benefit analysis that administration officials will need to consider. But it’s already a dynamic that threatens Trump’s ability to apply pressure on Iran.

    A major question, of course, is whether military or administration officials could even prevail upon Trump if they regard the munitions issue as being dire. But there are increasing signs that key figures are growing weary of the war and sending signals that it might be time to ramp it up.

    CNN reported last week that Caine has privately made clear to other top Trump advisers that the administration needs to find an off-ramp from the war because the military options on the table to escalate the conflict could backfire, and airpower alone is unlikely to achieve Trump’s objectives.

    There are also signs that loyal Trump allies are increasingly concerned about the war costing Republicans in the 2026 midterm elections. House Speaker Mike Johnson said recently that “we’ve got to wrap it up,” and Fox News host Laura Ingraham has said the “clock is ticking.” (Indeed, the Guardian recently reported that more Iran war skepticism is seeping in on the normally rah-rah airwaves of Fox.) Even cheerleaders for Trump and his war effort like right-wing influencer Benny Johnson have signaled it’s time to move on.

    “Foreign wars with no end in sight are always unpopular. They will always be political cancer,” Johnson posted on X two weeks ago. He added: “End the war. Be done. Refocus on America. Gas, grocery, home prices and immigration. Thats how we win.”

    The length of the war also appears to be contributing to another problem for the administration’s ability to keep prosecuting it: fatigue, poor living conditions and declining mental health among the service members tasked with supporting the war effort.

    News outlets Stars and Stripes and the Navy Times have reported multiple attempts by crew members aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln to jump overboard. A sailor recently went overboard, CNN reported, before being rescued.

    And around 200 family members of Lincoln crew members voiced concerns about the situation — including lack of supplies, food shortages and water contamination — at town halls last week in San Diego. The Lincoln has been deployed since November and hasn’t made a port call in more than 200 days, which Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut said is a modern-day record for consecutive days at sea.

    The US Navy said it takes “every service member’s well-being seriously and have religious, medical and mental health professionals available to assess and address concerns as they arise.”

    But the emerging story epitomizes Trump’s problems.

    He seems to regard continuing the war and keeping up the economic pressure on Iran as largely a cost-free endeavor. The US doesn’t have boots on the ground and there aren’t constant stories about troop deaths. Rising gas prices have been the war’s biggest political problem.

    But as the situation stretches months beyond when the administration signaled it would end, other problems are seeping in. Some of them make continuing the war more difficult on a practical level, while others suggest the stalemate will keep giving the administration political problems that it — and its allies — have to reckon with.

    And given the war was already looking like an albatross and a quagmire – with the midterms less than three months away — these are pretty inauspicious developments.

  • 民主党建制派或已躲过一劫——但仍身处险境


    2026年8月13日18:56:08.345 UTC / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    这场被一些人称为“民主社会主义者火热之夏”的政治季,正迎来一场格外多事的收尾。

    密歇根州民主党联邦参议院候选人阿卜杜勒·埃尔赛义德(他实际上并不自称民主社会主义者,但认同该运动的理念)以一场意义重大却意外胶着的初选获胜仅一周后,民主社会主义者弗朗西斯卡·洪周二在威斯康星州州长初选中以微弱劣势落败,着实令人大跌眼镜。

    民主党建制派对此结果松了一口气,他们此前曾担忧洪会破坏该党在这个关键州的选情。

    但这并不意味着民主党已脱离险境,也不代表这种动荡局势会就此平息。

    今夏的整体选举结果表明,民主社会主义者仍处于上升势头,在民主党今年力争拿下众议院和参议院多数席位的过程中,仍可能给该党带来麻烦。不过民主党选民已经展现出识别并应对这种潜在风险的能力。

    我们来梳理一下目前得到的几点启示。

    人们或许高估了民主党这一派别的崛起势头和影响力,但它显然正日益壮大。

    在佐赫兰·马姆达尼去年在纽约市市长选举中大获全胜一年后,我们已经看到:

    • 民主社会主义者击败了三名现任联邦众议员——分别在纽约州、科罗拉多州,以及上周的密歇根州。
    • 他们还在其他多场初选中获胜,这意味着下一届国会中的民主社会主义者党团规模虽仍为个位数,但可能会创下历史新高。
    • 他们有望将华盛顿特区以及可能的洛杉矶纳入囊中,加上已拿下的纽约市和西雅图市市长职位。
    • 埃尔赛义德获得提名,以及前民主社会主义者成员威廉·劳伦斯在密歇根州竞争激烈的第七国会选区初选中获胜,让民主党这一派别在深蓝城市之外拥有了一个难得的试验场。

    哦,别忘了部分民主社会主义议员似乎已是民主党阵营的耀眼明星。马姆达尼如今声望颇高,伯尼·桑德斯在全国范围内仍颇具人气,所有人都在等待亚历山德里亚·奥卡西奥-科特兹的下一个重大政治举动——无论是参选参议院议员,甚至是竞选总统。

    不少人都在追问,为何埃尔赛义德和洪这两位此前被视为初选热门人选的候选人,最终会陷入势均力敌的苦战。

    一个可能的影响因素是:民主党选民比外界认为的更加务实和讲究策略。很有可能,全国民主党领导层对提名埃尔赛义德和洪的担忧,在选举临近之际被选民所感知。

    毕竟,民主党此前从未在摇摆选区提名过埃尔赛义德这样的候选人,是有其原因的。

    近年来,共和党提名了一批极端且有争议的联邦参议院和州长候选人,令他们在选举中失分——比如道格·马斯特里亚诺、托德·阿金、理查德·穆尔多克、莎伦·安格尔、马克·罗宾逊——但民主党其实从未遇到过这类问题。

    事实上,在2020年民主党总统初选初期,民调显示伊丽莎白·沃伦对阵唐纳德·特朗普总统的表现不如其他民主党候选人,民主党选民就曾对她持观望态度。

    与此同时,威斯康星州的选情胶着也表明,非洪阵营的支持者在最后阶段团结在了更为温和的密尔沃基县行政长官戴维·克劳利身后。

    因此,尽管这类候选人如今或许比以往更有机会,但民主党选民仍看重候选人的胜选可能性。

    洪的落败并不意味着民主党已摆脱危险。她或许比埃尔赛义德更难成为合格候选人,但我们仍不清楚埃尔赛义德这样的候选人在摇摆州的表现会如何。

    而且选民可能一开始就持怀疑态度。

    最近的一项民调显示,美国人对民主社会主义者组织(DSA)的负面评价率为36%,正面评价率仅为18%。另一项民调显示,仅有38%的美国人支持更多的社会主义政策。还有一项民调显示,50%的选民表示他们不太会投票给自称民主社会主义者的候选人,仅有32%的选民表示会更倾向于投票给这类候选人。

    话说回来,埃尔赛义德并不自称民主社会主义者。但他的左翼立场足够鲜明,这些民调数据仍具有参考意义。

    他在11月的选举表现,将极大反映民主党选民在未来竞争性选举中,对提名他这类候选人的接受程度。

    如果他获胜,对左翼来说将是一个重要时刻。如果他落败,对这场运动来说可能是更大的挫折——甚至可能让民主党失去参议院多数席位。

    (事实上,一些极左翼人士似乎也对提名洪心存顾虑,担心她的最终表现会连累他们。几乎没有知名左翼人士公开支持她。)

    无论周二的选举结果如何,都不应忽略一个细节:威斯康星州民主党州长初选的投票人数接近80万。

    这比2022年共和党州长初选的投票人数多出约10万,比2018年上一次竞争激烈的民主党州长初选投票人数多出约25万。

    洪获得的31万多张选票,对一名民主社会主义者候选人来说已是可观的票数;事实上,这一票数足以在该职位的任何竞争性初选中胜出。但当前的政治环境也让更多主流民主党选民的投票率大幅提升。

    这种情况不只出现在威斯康星州。美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)上月的一项分析显示,民主党初选的投票人数较前两届中期选举大幅飙升,远超共和党初选的投票人数。明尼苏达州刚刚创下初选投票人数纪录,且绝大多数选票都来自民主党阵营——该州两党初选都竞争激烈,民主党初选投票人数约为70万,而共和党仅约40万。

    民主党当下的关键,是确保党内两派都能被动员起来,即便可能会有人对进入大选的候选人人选心存不满。

    The Democratic establishment might have avoided disaster — but it’s still in danger

    2026-08-13T18:56:08.345Z / CNN

    The political season some have christened as “hot DSA summer” is lurching to an awfully eventful close.

    Just a week after a momentous but surprisingly tight primary victory for Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed (who doesn’t actually identify as a democratic socialist but shares the movement’s sensibilities), democratic socialist Francesca Hong narrowly lost in the Wisconsin governor’s primary Tuesday in a bit of a shocker.

    The latter result is being greeted with a sigh of relief from the Democratic establishment, which feared Hong torpedoing their chances in an important state.

    But that doesn’t mean the party is out of the woods or that this dynamic is going anywhere.

    The totality of the results this summer suggests democratic socialists remain ascendant and could still cause the party problems as it seeks to flip the House and Senate this year. But Democratic voters have shown an ability to recognize and respond to that potential danger.

    Let’s recap what we’ve learned.

    It’s possible to oversell just how ascendant and significant this wing of the party is. But it’s clearly gaining steam.

    A year after Zohran Mamdani’s big win in the New York City mayor’s race, we’ve seen:

    • Democratic socialists defeat three incumbent House members – in New York, Colorado and last week in Michigan.
    • They also won a handful of other primaries, meaning the DSA contingent in the next Congress, while still in the single digits, will likely be bigger than ever.
    • They’re on course to add Washington, DC, and possibly Los Angeles to their mayorships in New York City and Seattle.
    • El-Sayed’s nomination and former DSA member William Lawrence’s primary win in Michigan’s battleground 7th Congressional District give this wing of the Democratic Party a rare proving ground outside of deep-blue urban areas.

    Oh, and don’t forget that some democratic socialist lawmakers appear to be among the party’s bright shining stars. Mamdani’s stock is pretty high right now, Bernie Sanders remains quite popular nationally, and everyone is waiting for Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s next big political move – whether that be running for Senate or even for president.

    Plenty of people have asked why El-Sayed and Hong – both of whom were considered favorites in their primaries – wound up in nail-biters.

    One likely contributing factor: Democratic voters are more pragmatic and strategic than people give them credit for. It’s quite possible that the national party’s worries about nominating El-Sayed and Hong registered with voters late in the race.

    There would seem to be a reason, after all, that the party hasn’t previously nominated candidates like El-Sayed in swing races.

    Republicans have nominated a bunch of extreme and problematic Senate and gubernatorial candidates that cost them in recent years – think: Doug Mastriano, Todd Akin, Richard Mourdock, Sharron Angle, Mark Robinson – but Democrats really haven’t had those kinds of problems.

    In fact, they seemed to balk at Elizabeth Warren early in the 2020 Democratic presidential primaries after polling showed her performing worse against President Donald Trump than other Democrats.

    The tightness of the race in Wisconsin, meanwhile, suggested that supporters of non-Hong candidates coalesced behind the more-moderate Milwaukee County executive David Crowley at the very end.

    So maybe these kinds of candidates have a better chance today than they used to,but Democratic voters still value electability.

    Just because Hong lost doesn’t mean the danger is behind Democrats. She might have been a more problematic nominee than El-Sayed, but we still don’t know how a candidate like El-Sayed will play in a battleground state.

    And voters could start out skeptical.

    A recent poll shows Americans viewed DSA unfavorably by a 36%-18% margin. Another showed just 38% of Americans preferred more socialism. And yet another showed 50% of voters said they would be less likely to vote for a self-described democratic socialist, while just 32% would be more likely.

    Again, El-Sayed doesn’t label himself a democratic socialist. But he’s left-wing enough that these numbers are instructive.

    How he performs in November will say a lot about how comfortable Democratic voters will be with nominating candidates like him in competitive races moving forward.

    If he wins, it’s a big moment for the left. If he loses, it could be an even bigger setback for the movement – and cost Democrats the Senate majority.

    (Indeed, some on the far-left appeared wary of nominating Hong for fear of how her performance might ultimately reflect on them. Very few high-profile left-wingers publicly supported her.)

    Regardless of who won Tuesday, it shouldn’t escape notice that nearly 800,000 voters participated in the Wisconsin Democratic gubernatorial primary.

    That’s about 100,000 more than turned out for the GOP gubernatorial primary in 2022, and it’s about 250,000 more than turned out for the last competitive Democratic gubernatorial primary, in 2018.

    The 310,000-plus votes that Hong got was a lot for a democratic socialist candidate; indeed, it would have won pretty much any competitive primary for that office. But the current political environment is also turning out huge numbers of more mainstream Democratic voters.

    And it’s not just Wisconsin. A CNN analysis last month showed Democratic primary turnout surging far beyond the last two midterms and far surpassing GOP turnout. Minnesota just set a primary turnout record, and it was overwhelmingly on the Democratic side – with about 700,000 votes in that primary, compared to about 400,000 on the GOP side, even as both featured competitive contests.

    The key for Democrats now is in keeping both sides of the party mobilized, even if there might be hard feelings about who made it to the general election.

  • 美国司法部维持放宽消音器、霰弹枪及部分步枪监管的裁决


    2026年8月13日 / 美国东部时间中午12:24 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    在特朗普政府拒绝暂停本月早些时候由得克萨斯州一名法官作出的放宽此类武器监管的裁决后,部分美国民众现在无需在联邦政府登记即可持有短管步枪、霰弹枪和消音器。

    美国北得克萨斯州地区联邦地区法官詹姆斯·韦斯利·亨德里克斯8月5日作出的裁决给予美国司法部一周的宽限期,以便在该裁决生效前申请暂停执行。

    该最后期限于周四午夜到期。

    控枪组织布雷迪协会主席克里斯·布朗表示:“如今,我们的政府正在辜负我们。午夜时分,包括消音器、短管步枪和霰弹枪在内的极具致命性的武器和装置,近一个世纪以来首次解除了监管。”

    不过,美国司法部仍有时间对该裁决提起上诉。

    司法部发言人在发给哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的一份声明中表示:“司法部尊重美国人的第二修正案权利,目前正在评估法院裁决的影响。”

    《全国枪支法》是监管部分特种枪支及相关设备买卖的主要法律,其中包括短管步枪和消音器。该法案于1934年颁布,对这些枪支征税,并建立了监管制度,要求民众向烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局登记。

    这一监管架构还有助于联邦烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局特工在调查涉枪犯罪时追踪枪支所有权链条。

    2025年,国会在《宏大美好法案》中加入一项条款,规定不再对转让或制造受监管枪支收取200美元的税费。

    随着该税费被取消,亨德里克斯认定《全国枪支法》针对消音器、霰弹枪和短管步枪的监管方案违宪。

    他在裁决中写道:“《宏大美好法案》将‘除机枪或破坏性装置外的任何枪支’的转让税和制造税归零,这消除了《全国枪支法》对这些枪支进行监管的合宪性基础。”

    控枪组织吉福德斯组织执行董事艾玛·布朗表示:“司法部的这一决定未能捍卫公共安全。”

    她补充道:“国会近100年前设立了这些保障措施。因此,如今消音器、短管步枪和短管霰弹枪极少在犯罪中被使用。但现在,消音器和危险、易于隐藏的武器可以轻易落入不法分子手中,用于伤害无辜民众。”

    得克萨斯州的这起诉讼合并了两起独立案件。

    其中一起由B&T美国公司、枪支监管问责联盟、枪支所有者基金会、美国枪支所有者协会、帕梅特州军械库、西尔encerco武器研究公司、西尔encer商店基金会、15个由共和党控制的州以及多名个人提起。

    另一起则由得克萨斯州步枪协会(美国全国步枪协会的得克萨斯州分支)、公民保有和携带武器权利委员会、FPC行动基金会、Hot Shots Custom以及其他多方提起。

    法官的禁令仅适用于两起案件中的当事人,其中可能包括美国枪支所有者协会的任何成员。

    美国枪支所有者协会和西尔encer商店于周四宣布,其两名成员“在未遵守目前已暂停执行的《1934年全国枪支法》登记要求的情况下,合法购买了消音器”,以此庆祝司法部决定不对该裁决申请暂停执行。

    该组织补充道:“这标志着自1934年6月26日《全国枪支法》颁布以来,美国人首次可以合法购买消音器而无需遵守联邦登记制度。我们的胜利于中部时间凌晨12点01分生效,我们已通知烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局和司法部,我们将进行92年来首次未登记的消音器转让。”

    目前尚不清楚司法部最终是否会对法院的命令提起上诉。

    司法部长托德·布兰奇在参议院确认其职位前提交的书面答复中,回应了多个关于他个人对枪支监管看法的问题。

    在其中一份答复中,他写道:“我尊重国会关于是否应废除或削弱《全国枪支法》的审慎判断。司法部的职责是捍卫本届国会通过的法律的合宪性。”

    Justice Dept. leaves in place ruling that deregulates silencers, shotguns and certain rifles

    August 13, 2026 / 12:24 PM EDT / CBS News

    Some Americans can now possess short-barreled rifles, shotguns and silencers without registering them with the federal government, after the Trump administration declined to pause a Texas judge’s ruling issued earlier this month that deregulated those weapons.

    The Aug. 5 ruling by U.S. District Judge James Wesley Hendrix of the Northern District of Texas gave the Justice Department a one-week deadline to request a stay before his ruling went into effect.

    That deadline expired at midnight on Thursday.

    “Today, our government is failing us,” said Kris Brown, the president of the gun-control group Brady. “At midnight, uniquely lethal weapons and devices — including silencers, short-barreled rifles, and shotguns — were deregulated for the first time in nearly a century.”

    The Justice Department still has time to appeal the ruling, however.

    “The Department respects Americans’ Second Amendment rights and is currently assessing the impact of the court’s ruling,” a department spokesperson told CBS News in a statement.

    The National Firearms Act is the primary law that regulates the purchase and sale of certain specialized firearms and related equipment, including short-barreled rifles and silencers. Enacted in 1934, it imposes taxes on these firearms, and created a regulatory regime that requires people to register them with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

    That regulatory structure also helps federal ATF agents trace the chain of firearm ownership when they are investigating gun-related crimes.

    In 2025, Congress included a provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that no longer requires a $200 tax to be collected when a regulated firearm is transferred or made.

    With that tax eliminated, Hendrix determined that the NFA’s regulatory scheme for silencers, shotguns and short-barreled rifles is unconstitutional.

    “By zeroing out the transfer and making taxes on “any firearm” except for “a machinegun or a destructive device,” the One Big Beautiful Bill Act eliminated the constitutional basis for the NFA’s regulation of those firearms,” he wrote.

    “The Department of Justice’s decision is a failure to defend public safety,” said Emma Brown, the executive director for the gun-control group Giffords.

    “Congress put these safeguards in place nearly 100 years ago. As a result, silencers, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns are rarely used in crimes today. But now, silencers and dangerous, easily concealable weapons can now easily get into the wrong hands and be used to harm innocent people,” she added.

    The lawsuit in Texas represents a consolidation of two separate cases.

    One was brought by B&T USA, Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Gun Owners Foundation, Gun Owners of America, Palmetto State Armory, Silencerco Weapons Research, Silencer Shop Foundation, 15 Republican-controlled states and several individuals.

    The other was brought by the Texas State Rifle Association (NRA’s Texas affiliate), Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, FPC Action Foundation, Hot Shots Custom, and several others.

    The injunction by the judge only applies to the parties in the two cases, which could include anyone who is a member of the Gun Owners of America.

    The Gun Owners of America and Silencer Shop celebrated the Justice Department’s decision not to seek a stay of the ruling on Thursday by announcing that two of its members had “lawfully acquired suppressors without complying with the currently enjoined registration requirements of the National Firearms Act of 1934.”

    “This marks the first time since the NFA was enacted on June 26, 1934, that Americans can lawfully acquire suppressors without complying with the federal registration scheme. Our victory went into effect at 12:01 A.M. CT and we notified ATF and DOJ that we intended to conduct the first unregistered suppressor transfer in 92 years,” the group added.

    It is unclear whether the Justice Department will ultimately appeal the court’s order.

    Attorney General Todd Blanche, in his written responses to questions from senators ahead of his confirmation, addressed several questions about his personal beliefs on firearms regulations.

    In one response to the questions, he wrote: “I defer to the measured judgment of Congress on whether the NFA should be repealed or weakened. The Department’s duty is to defend the constitutionality of the laws passed by this body.”

  • 黑格斯思称航母恶劣条件相关报道失实


    2026-08-13T16:01:39.616Z / 路透社

    作者:菲尔·斯图尔特

    2026年8月13日 世界协调时下午4:01 更新于2小时前

    [1/5]2026年3月3日,美国海军尼米兹级航空母舰“亚伯拉罕·林肯”号在一处保密地点航行,支援针对伊朗的“史诗愤怒行动”空袭。美国海军/路透社供图

    路透社巴拿马城8月13日电——美国国防部长皮特·黑格斯思周四表示,有关中东地区“亚伯拉罕·林肯”号航空母舰恶劣服役条件的报道“完全失实”。

    两家军事类媒体《海军时报》和《星条旗报》曾报道,这艘搭载5000名船员的舰艇自2025年11月起在外部署期间发生多起自杀未遂事件,士气持续低迷。

    《路透社每日简报》通讯为您提供开启每日所需的全部新闻。点击此处订阅。

    该航母自1月起部署于中东地区,支援美国对伊朗的作战行动。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    “我们确保每一艘舰艇、每一名船员、每一位舰长在任何时刻都能获得我们所能提供的一切支持。有些部署任务时长超过其他任务,我比任何人都更尊重和感激这些水兵。他们在公海严苛环境中、靠岸次数极少的情况下坚守岗位,这实在令人钦佩,”黑格斯思在访问巴拿马期间对记者表示。

    通常海军部署时长为6至9个月,但在冲突时期,部署时间可能延长。

    延长部署会对船员的心理健康造成巨大压力,在战时尤其如此,这一直是美国海军面临的难题。水兵们必须保持高度戒备和待命状态,尤其是在面临伊朗无人机和导弹袭击威胁的情况下。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    一位不愿透露姓名的美国官员表示,“乔治·华盛顿”号航空母舰正前往该区域,意图替换“林肯”号。该官员称,这一调动是预先计划好的。

    民主党议员对“林肯”号的延长部署以及舰上状况表示不满。

    “有广泛报道称,舰上存在基本物资短缺、水污染、管道故障、心理健康状况恶化、甲板安全隐患以及邮件系统中断等问题,导致许多运往该舰的包裹在运输途中丢失数月,”美国参议员理查德·布卢门撒尔本周在致黑格斯思和海军部长的信中写道。

    当被问及“亚伯拉罕·林肯”号恶劣服役条件的相关报道时,白宫发言人奥利维亚·威尔士表示,总统唐纳德·特朗普和黑格斯思致力于确保美军“配备必要资源,以应对对美国的任何威胁”。

    blob:https://www.reuters.com/d250b4db-acaa-4e57-963e-ab40d7d35ec9

    菲尔·斯图尔特报道,伊德里斯·阿里、史蒂夫·霍兰补充报道;米歇尔·尼科尔斯撰稿;大卫·伦格伦、安迪·沙利文和妮娅·威廉姆斯编辑

    我们的准则:路透社信托原则

    Hegseth says reports about poor conditions aboard carrier are misrepresented

    2026-08-13T16:01:39.616Z / Reuters

    By Phil Stewart

    August 13, 2026 4:01 PM UTC Updated 2 hours ago

    [1/5]The U.S. Navy Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln sails in support of the Operation Epic Fury attack on Iran from an undisclosed location March 3, 2026. U.S. Navy/Handout via REUTERS

    PANAMA CITY, Aug 13 (Reuters) – U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Thursday that reports about poor conditions aboard aircraft carrier the USS Abraham Lincoln ​in the Middle East were “completely misrepresented.”

    Two military-focused outlets, Navy Times and Stars and ‌Stripes, reported suicide attempts and declining morale on the 5,000-person ship, which has been at sea since November 2025.

    The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

    The carrier has been in the Middle East since January, supporting the U.S. war with Iran.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    “We ​make sure every ship, every crew, every captain has everything we can provide ​them at every single moment. Some deployments are longer than others, and ⁠I have more respect and gratitude for those sailors than anybody. What they do in ​those high seas in those austere conditions with less port calls — it’s incredible,” Hegseth told reporters ​during a visit to Panama.

    Typically naval deployments are for between six and nine months, but during times of conflict, that can be extended.

    Extended deployments can pose enormous strain on crews’ mental health, particularly in wartime, ​and have always been a challenge for the U.S. Navy. Sailors must maintain a heightened ​state of alert and readiness, especially with the threat of drone and missile attack from Iran.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    A U.S. ‌official, ⁠speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the George Washington aircraft carrier is heading to the region with the intention of replacing the Lincoln carrier. That move was pre-planned, the official said.

    Democratic lawmakers are unhappy about the extended deployment of the Lincoln carrier and the conditions on the ship.

    “There ​have been widespread reports ​of shortages of ⁠basic supplies, water contamination, plumbing issues, deteriorating mental health, deck safety concerns, and disruptions in the mail system, which have caused many care ​packages in route to the ship to be lost in transit ​for months,” ⁠U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal wrote to Hegseth and the Navy secretary this week.

    When asked about reports of poor conditions on the Abraham Lincoln, White House spokesperson Olivia Wales said President Donald Trump ⁠and ​Hegseth were committed to ensuring the U.S. military was “equipped ​with the resources necessary to counter any threat to the United States”.

    blob:https://www.reuters.com/d250b4db-acaa-4e57-963e-ab40d7d35ec9

    Reporting by Phil Stewart, additional reporting by Idrees ​Ali and Steve Holland; writing by Michelle Nichols; Editing by David Ljunggren, Andy Sullivan and Nia Williams

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 众议员迈克·劳勒为同事马克斯·米勒政治行动委员会提供的1万美元竞选捐款辩护,米勒此前被控虐待


    2026-08-13T17:29:39.645Z / CNN 政治频道

    作者:达娜·巴什,CNN
    发布于美国东部时间2026年8月13日周四下午1:29

    众议员迈克·劳勒为同事马克斯·米勒政治行动委员会提供的1万美元竞选捐款辩护

    政坛内幕

    达娜·巴什就其同事众议员马克斯·米勒的政治行动委员会提供的竞选捐款询问共和党众议员迈克·劳勒。米勒此前被控家暴,他否认了相关指控。劳勒告诉巴什:“此事令人痛心,显然我不会宽恕任何形式的虐待行为。但最终,目前没有任何证据证实这项指控。”

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/13/politics/video/ny-rep-mike-lawler-max-miller-ip

    Rep. Mike Lawler defends $10,000 campaign donation from colleague Max Miller’s PAC, who’s accused of abuse

    2026-08-13T17:29:39.645Z / CNN Politics

    By Dana Bash, CNN

    Published 1:29 PM EDT, Thu August 13, 2026

    Rep. Mike Lawler defends $10,000 campaign donation from colleague Max Miller’s PAC, who’s accused of abuse

    Inside Politics

    Dana Bash asks Republican Rep. Mike Lawler about campaign donations coming from his colleague Rep. Max Miller’s political action committee. Miller has been accused of domestic abuse and denies the allegations. Lawler tells Bash, “It is tragic, and obviously I don’t condone any level of abuse. But ultimately, there’s been nothing that has been corroborated here.”

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/13/politics/video/ny-rep-mike-lawler-max-miller-ip

  • 沃伦的血统争议卷土重来:民主党盟友吹捧首位原住民女性参议员候选人,网友嘲讽“箭已射出”


    2026年8月13日 美国东部时间12:17 / 福克斯新闻

    明尼苏达州联邦参议员民主党候选人佩吉·弗拉纳根是白地球族奥吉布瓦族成员,她在竞选筹款邮件中提出了这一主张
    撰文:罗伯特·施马德,福克斯新闻
    发布时间:2026年8月13日 美国东部时间12:17

    伊丽莎白·沃伦为佩吉·弗拉纳根助选拉票
    沃伦呼吁明尼苏达州选民支持佩吉·弗拉纳根参选联邦参议员,称她是“我们在华盛顿需要的斗士”。(图片来源:@ewarren via X)

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/03ba5668-7eb2-48a3-bd27-9747f951d67f

    收听本文
    3分钟

    明尼苏达州民主党联邦参议员候选人佩吉·弗拉纳根向捐赠者宣传自己有望成为首位出任美国联邦参议员的原住民女性,这一宣传也将目光投向了她的一位重要背书人——参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦,后者此前有关原住民身份的主张曾引发长达数年的政治争议。

    “近250年来,从未有原住民女性担任过美国参议员。现在是改变这一现状的时候了,”邮件中写道。“我是奥吉布瓦族人,是白地球族引以为傲的一员。我的家族属于狼族。我们狼族的使命是绝不抛弃任何人——这一直是我的行事准则……目前,美国参议院中没有原住民的声音。如果我赢得这场选举,我们就能改变这一局面。”

    在其整个职业生涯中,沃伦曾自称有原住民血统,她在得克萨斯州律师注册卡上填写了“美国印第安人”,并在《美国法学院协会名录》中将自己描述为少数族裔。自2019年以来,沃伦已经收回了自己的原住民身份表述,澄清自己并非有色人种,也不是任何部落的公民,并表示她本不应将自己归类为美国印第安人。


    塔福亚向不满的民主党人打出“常识牌”,承诺对抗明尼苏达州的“社会主义堕落”


    资料图: 马萨诸塞州联邦参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦(民主党)在佐治亚州的一场竞选集会上曾因原住民血统主张短暂遭到起哄。(美联社照片/约翰·洛彻 资料图)

    “哇,箭已射出,”播客主持人迈克尔·邓肯在谈及这封邮件时写道。

    沃伦曾在明尼苏达州民主党联邦参议员初选中支持弗拉纳根。

    “明尼苏达州联邦参议员民主党候选人佩吉·弗拉纳根刚刚通过民主党全国委员会的名单发送了一封筹款邮件,承认伊丽莎白·沃伦并非原住民,”保守派评论员史蒂夫·盖斯特在X平台上发帖称,并补充道,“‘假印第安人’这下不好过了。”

    “有人去看看伊丽莎白·沃伦吗?”共和党全国委员会在X平台上调侃道。

    “伊丽莎白·沃伦刚拿着她的和平烟斗回家发脾气去了,”另一位用户回复道。


    沃伦曾推动“便捷自由”的国税局报税系统,但文件显示她自己用的却是另一套


    (斯蒂芬·马图伦/盖蒂图片社)(斯蒂芬·马图伦/盖蒂图片社)

    前总统唐纳德·特朗普曾以给沃伦贴上“波卡洪塔斯”的标签来嘲讽她自称的原住民血统。两人的争执在2018年达到顶峰,当时沃伦接受了基因检测,结果显示她的原住民血统占比在0.1%至1.6%之间。

    “不好意思?她怎么敢这样侮辱伊丽莎白·沃伦?”自由派评论员布拉德·波伦博反讽道。


    伊丽莎白·沃伦被问及将有争议的参议院候选人格雷厄姆·普拉特纳称为“我欣赏的那种人”

    [图片5]

    资料图: 马萨诸塞州联邦参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦(民主党,排名第一的议员)在2026年4月21日周二的参议院银行、住房和城市事务委员会确认听证会上,对美联储主席提名人选凯文·沃什进行质询。(汤姆·威廉姆斯/CQ滚石公司 via 盖蒂图片社)

    多位X平台用户发布了AI生成的图片,图中沃伦身着原住民服饰,神情沮丧或愤怒,以此回应这封筹款邮件。

    “伊丽莎白·沃伦正在弗拉纳根头上发表土地确认声明,”《纽约邮报》专栏作家柯尔斯滕·弗莱明调侃道。

    “我是切罗基族的一员,所以我可以这么说:这俩人应该开个原住民议事会好好聊聊,”播客戴夫·范德瓦勒开玩笑道。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    [图片6]

    福克斯新闻数字频道周四联系弗拉纳根的竞选团队和沃伦的办公室置评,但双方均未回应。

    Warren’s ancestry saga roars back after Dem ally touts Native Senate first: ‘Arrows fired’

    2026-08-13 12:17pm EDT / Fox News

    Peggy Flanagan, an Ojibwe member of the White Earth Nation, made the claim in a fundraising email for her campaign

    By Robert Schmad, Fox News

    Published August 13, 2026 12:17pm EDT

    Elizabeth Warren makes Election Day push for Peggy Flanagan

    Warren is urging Minnesota voters to back Peggy Flanagan for U.S. Senate, calling her “the fighter we need in Washington.” (Credit: @ewarren via X)

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/03ba5668-7eb2-48a3-bd27-9747f951d67f

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    Minnesota Democratic Senate nominee Peggy Flanagan is pitching donors on the prospect of becoming the first Native American woman to serve in the U.S. Senate — drawing attention to one of her prominent endorsers, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, whose past claims of Native American identity became a yearslong political controversy.

    “In almost 250 years, there’s never been a Native woman serving in the US Senate. It’s time to change that,” the email reads. “I am Ojibwe and a proud member of the White Earth Nation. My family is the Wolf Clan. The mission of my clan is to never leave anyone behind — and that’s been my guiding principle … Right now, there are no Native voices in the US Senate. If I win this race, we can change that.”

    Throughout her career, Warren identified herself as a Native American, writing “American Indian” on her Texas bar-registration card and describing herself as a minority in the Association of American Law Schools directory. Since 2019, Warren has walked back her indigenous identity, clarifying that she is not a person of color nor a citizen of a tribe, and stating that she should not have identified herself as an American Indian.

    TAFOYA MAKES ‘COMMON SENSE’ PITCH TO DISAFFECTED DEMOCRATS AS SHE VOWS TO FIGHT MINNESOTA’S ‘SOCIALIST LURCH’

    FILE – Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., was briefly heckled during a campaign rally in Georgia over her Native American ancestry claims.(AP Photo/John Locher, File)

    “Wow, arrows fired,” podcast host Michael Duncan wrote of the email.

    Warren supported Flanagan in Minnesota’s Democratic Senate primary.

    “The Democrat nominee for Senate in Minnesota, Peggy Flanagan , just sent out a fundraising email on the DNC list that admits that Elizabeth Warren is NOT Native American,” conservative commentator Steve Guest posted to X, adding, “tough break for Fauxcahontas.”

    “Has anybody checked on Elizabeth Warren?” the Republican Party quipped on X.

    “Elizabeth Warren just took her peace pipe and went home to throw a tantrum,” another user replied.

    WARREN PUSHED ‘FREE AND EASY’ IRS FILING SYSTEM, BUT DOCS REVEAL WHAT SHE USED INSTEAD

    (Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)(Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)

    President Donald Trump famously lampooned Warren’s claimed ancestry by labeling her “Pocahontas.” The feud between the two culminated in Warren taking a genetic test in 2018, which found she was between 0.1% and 1.6% Native American.

    “Excuse me? How dare she disrespect Elizabeth Warren like that?” libertarian commentator Brad Polumbo wrote, ironically.

    ELIZABETH WARREN CONFRONTED ON CALLING CONTROVERSIAL SENATE CANDIDATE GRAHAM PLATNER HER ‘KIND OF MAN’

    [image_5]

    Ranking member Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., questions Kevin Warsh, nominee to chairman of the Federal Reserve, during his Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee confirmation hearing on Tuesday, April 21, 2026.(Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

    Multiple X users posted AI-generated images of Warren in Native American garb looking dejected or angry in response to the fundraising email.

    “Elizabeth Warren is doing a land acknowledgement on Flanagan’s head,” New York Post columnist Kirsten Fleming quipped.

    “I can say this because I am part of the Cherokee Nation, but these two should powwow over this,” podcaster Dave Van de Walle joked.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    [image_6]

    The Flanagan campaign and Warren’s office did not respond to requests for comment when reached by Fox News Digital on Thursday.

  • 特朗普政府针对哈佛大学的反犹太主义诉讼被联邦法官驳回


    2026-08-13T13:43:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻(CBS News)

    作者:雅各布·罗森 司法部记者
    杰克·罗森是负责报道美国司法部的记者。此前他曾担任竞选数字记者,报道特朗普总统2024年竞选活动,还曾担任《与玛格丽特·布伦南面对全国》节目的助理制片人。

    阅读完整简历

    更新时间:2026年8月13日 / 美国东部时间下午2:05 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    在谷歌上添加哥伦比亚广播公司

    马萨诸塞州一名联邦法官周四驳回了特朗普政府针对哈佛大学的诉讼,该诉讼指控哈佛大学未能保护犹太和以色列裔学生。法官认定,政府援引的所谓歧视事件“过于孤立和零散”,不足以支持联邦民权侵权指控。

    美国马萨诸塞州地区法官理查德·斯滕斯发布了一份四页的裁决书,批准了哈佛大学提出的驳回诉讼的动议。

    斯滕斯写道:“我不会淡化这些事件引发的任何担忧,但法院认定,无论单独来看还是综合来看,这些事件都过于孤立和零散,无法合理推断出哈佛大学至今仍存在制度化的《民权法案第六篇》违规行为。”

    斯滕斯指出,政府的诉状“缺乏任何针对特朗普政府通知哈佛大学其认为该校违反联邦民权法之后发生的事实指控”,而这是提起任何法律诉讼的必要前提;诉状中提及的另外四起事件均发生在2023年至2024年之间。

    今年3月,美国司法部针对哈佛大学提起联邦民权诉讼,指控该校在2023年10月7日哈马斯发动恐怖袭击后未能保护学生,称哈佛大学“对犹太和以色列裔学生遭受的歧视性骚扰采取了故意行为和蓄意漠视态度,营造了充满敌意的教育环境”。当时的特朗普政府要求追回哈佛大学从联邦机构获得的数十亿美元纳税人资金。

    司法部在诉讼中指控哈佛大学“毫无悔意”地歧视学生,学生们因种族或民族血统在校园内遭受“严重、持续且主观上具有冒犯性的骚扰”,其中包括在针对以色列的抗议活动期间。政府指控哈佛大学明知针对犹太和以色列裔学生的骚扰行为却未加以制止。

    这起诉讼是特朗普政府自总统特朗普重新就职以来针对该大学采取的诸多举措之一,此外该政府还试图取消哈佛大学获得的数十亿美元联邦资助。

    司法部在一份声明中回应称,其“对裁决结果表示异议,并正在评估后续举措”。声明还提及了司法部民权司正在进行的反犹太主义调查。

    哈佛大学和白宫未立即回复置评请求。

    梅利莎·奎因参与了报道。

    梅利莎·奎因为本报道撰稿。

    Trump administration’s antisemitism lawsuit against Harvard dismissed by federal judge

    2026-08-13T13:43:00-0400 / CBS News

    By Jacob Rosen Justice Department Reporter
    Jake Rosen is a reporter covering the Department of Justice. He was previously a campaign digital reporter covering President Trump’s 2024 campaign and also served as an associate producer for “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.”

    Read Full Bio

    Updated on: August 13, 2026 / 2:05 PM EDT / CBS News

    Add CBS News on Google

    A federal judge in Massachusetts on Thursday dismissed a Trump administration lawsuit against Harvard University that accused the school of failing to protect Jewish and Israeli students, finding the instances of alleged discrimination cited by the government were “too isolated and episodic” to support federal civil rights violations.

    U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns in Massachusetts issued a four-page order granting Harvard’s motion to dismiss the suit.

    “Without diminishing any concern arising from these occurrences, the court finds them, singly and collectively, to be too isolated and episodic to support a plausible inference that any institutionalized noncompliance with Title VI persists at Harvard to this day,” Stearns wrote.

    Stearns wrote that the government’s complaint was “devoid of any factual allegations” that occurred after the Trump administration notified Harvard that it believed it had failed to comply with federal civil rights law, as is required before any legal action can be taken, and the other three instances in the complaint occurred between 2023 and 2024.

    In March, the Justice Department filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the university, alleging that it violated the law by failing to protect the students after the Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack by Hamas, claiming Harvard’s “intentional conduct and its deliberate indifference to discriminatory harassment of Jewish and Israeli students and creation of a hostile educational environment.” The administration sought to recover billions of dollars in taxpayer money that Harvard has received from federal agencies.

    In its lawsuit, the Justice Department alleged that Harvard defied federal law by discriminating against the students “without remorse” and the students were subjected to “severe, pervasive and objectively offensive harassment” on campus, including during protests against Israel, because of their race or national origin. The government alleged that Harvard knew about the harassment against the Jewish and Israeli students but did not stop it.

    The lawsuit was one of many steps against the university that the Trump administration has taken since President Trump’s return to office, in addition to attempting to cancel billions of dollars in federal funding.

    The Justice Department responded in a statement saying it “disagreed with the ruling and are assessing the next steps.” The statement also pointed to an ongoing antisemitism investigation by the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division.

    Harvard and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    Melissa Quinn contributed reporting.

    Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2