这位退役将军称这些调停国“已被收买”,并指责利雅得拒绝美国使用其空域和一处空军基地
2026年8月6日 美国东部时间早上6:00 / 福克斯新闻频道
作者:埃弗拉特·拉赫特 福克斯新闻
退役陆军将军杰克·基恩警告:伊朗和谈中的巴基斯坦与卡塔尔调停方“已被收买”
福克斯新闻高级战略分析师、退役将军杰克·基恩在《美国新闻室》节目中讨论了唐纳德·特朗普总统取消对伊朗打击一事、中东和谈现状等话题。
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/9545f182-2c19-4758-82ba-fb58ee05d4e0
收听本文
8分钟
退役陆军将军杰克·基恩对巴基斯坦、卡塔尔和沙特阿拉伯能否助力塑造与伊朗的谈判提出质疑,指责这些地区伙伴促使唐纳德·特朗普总统放弃军事施压,却让美国和以色列承担对抗德黑兰的风险。
作为福克斯新闻高级战略分析师、前陆军副参谋长的基恩,周一在福克斯新闻《美国新闻室》节目中表示,巴基斯坦和卡塔尔作为调停国“已被收买”,因为在他看来,它们偏向伊朗而非美国。
“我国情报机构以及所有各方都清楚,在中东地区,巴基斯坦人和卡塔尔人已被收买,因为他们以牺牲美国利益为代价偏袒伊朗,”基恩说,“这是历史遗留问题,并非新鲜事。”
核专家敦促特朗普别让伊朗将谈判偏离该政权的核威胁
2026年4月11日,在伊斯兰堡与伊朗官员会谈后,副总统J·D·万斯(中)与巴基斯坦国防参谋长兼陆军参谋长阿西姆·穆尼尔元帅(左)、巴基斯坦副总理兼外交部长穆罕默德·伊什哈克·达尔一同行走。(杰奎琳·马丁 – 路透社 pool/盖蒂图片社)
基恩的批评与特朗普对巴基斯坦的公开赞扬形成鲜明对比。
4月26日,特朗普在接受福克斯新闻电话采访时表示,他“非常尊重巴基斯坦”,因为巴方官员“表现出色”且“切实努力”推动与伊朗的谈判。他还补充说,巴基斯坦将继续参与相关进程。
6月18日,在法国七国集团峰会结束后对记者发表讲话时,特朗普还称赞巴基斯坦和卡塔尔帮助推动了谈判,促成了美伊谅解备忘录的达成。
白宫发言人安娜·凯利也为政府的地区伙伴辩护,她告诉福克斯新闻数字频道:“特朗普总统与巴基斯坦、卡塔尔和沙特阿拉伯的领导人关系都很好,他感谢所有协助谈判的地区伙伴的参与。”
“如果伊朗无法与美国达成一份好协议,责任将完全在该政权身上,他们将为此承担后果,”凯利补充道。
周三有报道称,调停方正在准备第二份专门针对霍尔木兹海峡的备忘录,这可能会将眼前的海上危机与围绕伊朗核活动的更大争端区分开来。
基恩这位曾担任四星上将的人士认为,这些调停方的参与可能导致华盛顿对伊朗意图产生误解。
“然而他们却是调停者,”基恩说,“因此我认为,他们在这里的影响力在误导美国解读伊朗真实意图方面起到了一定作用。”
特朗普称若无《亚伯拉罕协议》沙特核协议将无法推进:“他们必须成为成员国”
2026年3月3日,富查伊拉工业区发生爆炸后,外国工人望着升腾而起的大片黑烟。自2月28日美国和以色列发动袭击后,伊朗对海湾邻国发动打击,迫使阿联酋关闭空域,让原本以为前往该地区最安全度假胜地之一的游客猝不及防。(法德尔·塞纳 / 法新社 via 盖蒂图片社)
巴基斯坦和卡塔尔在外交进程中扮演了正式角色。
两国6月22日的联合声明称,它们正在根据《伊斯兰堡谅解备忘录》调停美国和伊朗之间的谈判。该框架设立了核问题、制裁、监测和争端解决等工作组,以及旨在防止霍尔木兹海峡商业船只发生事故的机制。
巴基斯坦拒绝就基恩的批评置评。沙特阿拉伯和卡塔尔驻华盛顿大使馆在本文发稿时未予回复。
巴基斯坦《星期五时报》特约主编拉扎·鲁米驳斥了基恩的说法,他认为伊斯兰堡与德黑兰的工作关系并不会让其成为被收买的调停方。
这是特朗普的最后“最后机会”?一连串无休止的破裂停火加剧了人们对伊朗协议的质疑
“成功的调停者通常是那些与各方都保持沟通渠道的国家,”鲁米告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,他表示巴基斯坦的政策更多是受地理、安全和经济担忧驱动,而非与伊朗的意识形态结盟。
他指出,巴基斯坦与伊朗接壤边境漫长,希望防止局势进一步动荡,同时也保持着与美国的长期联系以及与沙特阿拉伯和阿联酋的紧密伙伴关系。鲁米还提到2024年1月巴基斯坦与伊朗之间的交火事件,以此证明两国关系并非始终亲密。
2019年6月13日周四,一艘油轮在阿曼海起火。据报道,战略要地霍尔木兹海峡附近的两艘油轮当日遭遇袭击,导致其中一艘燃起大火并漂流,船员从两艘船只上撤离,在美国和伊朗紧张关系升级之际,美国海军紧急前往协助。(美联社照片/ISNA)
“暗示巴基斯坦 somehow 导致华盛顿对德黑兰意图产生误解,这很难得到证实,”鲁米说,“将美国对伊朗意图的任何误读归咎于巴基斯坦的调停,未免太过牵强。”
基恩对沙特阿拉伯的批评更为尖锐,他表示在准备可能采取的军事行动以强行 reopening 霍尔木兹海峡期间,利雅得拒绝美国使用其空域和一处美国空军基地。他还声称,沙特官员多次劝说特朗普不要恢复针对伊朗的大规模军事行动。
“事实是,沙特阿拉伯不愿为消除中东地区伊朗的侵略行为做出牺牲,”基恩说,他将潜在代价描述为人员伤亡和沙特石油基础设施遭到破坏。
“他们肯定愿意让我们做出这样的牺牲,”他补充道,“他们肯定也愿意让以色列做出这样的牺牲。”
他的言论凸显了一场更广泛的辩论:沙特阿拉伯的谨慎态度究竟是不愿对抗德黑兰,还是为避免一场无限制地区战争而采取的战略举措。
海湾国家强烈谴责伊朗对巴林的无人机袭击,紧张局势升级威胁谅解备忘录
沙特地缘政治分析师萨勒曼·安萨里驳斥了利雅得不愿对抗伊朗的说法,称沙特王国区分了可信威慑和缺乏明确目标的军事行动。(温·麦克纳米/盖蒂图片社)
萨勒曼·安萨里,这位沙特地缘政治分析师,驳斥了利雅得不愿对抗伊朗的说法,称沙特王国区分了可信威慑和缺乏明确目标的军事行动。
“沙特阿拉伯支持对抗伊朗的侵略行为,但不支持一场缺乏明确目标或最终方案的无限制地区战争,”安萨里告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。
“利雅得支持以可信威慑为后盾的外交,但任何协议都必须具有可执行性和可验证性,解决伊朗的核计划、其代理势力以及霍尔木兹海峡的航行自由问题,”他补充道。
一位因议题敏感性而要求匿名的海湾事务分析师给出了不同的评估,称沙特领导人担心更广泛的对抗会使沙特关键基础设施面临伊朗报复的风险。
“沙特阿拉伯认为应该安抚伊朗,因为它非常担心更广泛对抗的后果,”这位分析师说,“利雅得害怕伊朗可能对沙特王国基础设施造成的破坏,因此更倾向于克制和谈判,而非决定性的军事行动。”
这位分析师称海湾国家之间的分歧正在扩大,认为沙特阿拉伯和卡塔尔倾向于和解,而阿联酋、巴林和科威特则支持对伊朗施加更大压力。
理查德·戈德堡是国防民主基金会高级顾问、前国家安全委员会官员,他周三在福克斯新闻的另一场节目中表示,尽管在军事战略上存在分歧,美国仍继续依赖沙特的基础设施。
“当我们谈论海湾国家时,我们谈论的是沙特阿拉伯和基恩将军的言论,请记住,我们也在依靠沙特的陆上管道来维持我们在这里的行动,”戈德堡说,“它们通过红海的运输量已达到最大容量,这也让我们能够继续实施封锁战略。”
特朗普警告伊朗战事尚未结束,他誓言美国将“获胜”,谈判陷入停滞
2025年5月16日,美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在阿联酋阿布扎比访问海湾期间,在扎耶德国家博物馆出席商业论坛。(阿姆鲁·阿尔菲基/路透社)
这场辩论正值美国和伊朗就霍尔木兹海峡继续进行谈判之际。
阿曼、巴基斯坦、卡塔尔和沙特阿拉伯都参与了此次外交努力,而周三的报道显示,调停方正在制定一项临时安排,在更广泛的核谈判继续进行的同时,可在伊朗和阿曼水域设立单独的航运路线。
核心问题是,这些谈判能否达成一份可执行的协议,还是仅仅会让德黑兰保留对该航道的影响力。
基恩表示,他仍然怀疑伊朗是否准备好放弃有意义的控制权。
“他们不会放弃霍尔木兹海峡,”他说,“他们认为这是一项战略资产。”
他预测伊朗将寻求保留对该航道的一定控制权,并警告称,就伊朗核计划达成协议将更加困难。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用
一位反恐专家表示,伊朗派出了前所未有的“整个政权”团队参与美国的谈判,这表明了其优先事项。(乌尔斯·弗吕勒/路透社 pool via 路透社)
“我的直觉是不会,”当被问及伊朗是否准备好达成并执行一项实质性协议时,基恩说,“总统不会在这里达成一份糟糕的协议。”
Gen Keane questions whether Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Qatar can be trusted in Iran talks
The retired general called the mediators ‘compromised’ and alleged Riyadh denied US access to airspace and an air base
August 6, 2026 6:00am EDT / Fox News
By Efrat Lachter Fox News
Gen Jack Keane warns Pakistanian and Qatari mediators in Iran peace talks are ‘compromised’
Fox News senior strategic analyst Ret. Gen. Jack Keane discusses President Donald Trump’s cancellation of Iran strikes, the state of Middle East peace talks and more on ‘America’s Newsroom.’
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/9545f182-2c19-4758-82ba-fb58ee05d4e0
Listen to this article
8 min
Retired Army Gen. Jack Keane questioned whether Pakistan, Qatar and Saudi Arabia can be trusted to help shape negotiations with Iran, accusing the regional partners of steering President Donald Trump away from military pressure while leaving the United States and Israel to bear the risks of confronting Tehran.
Keane, a Fox News senior strategic analyst and former Army vice chief of staff, said during a Monday appearance on Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom” that Pakistan and Qatar were “compromised” as mediators because, in his view, they favor Iran over the United States.
“It is well known in the Middle East region, by our intelligence services, by all the players, that the Pakistanis and the Qataris are compromised because they favor Iran at the expense of the United States,” Keane said. “This is historical. This is not new.”
NUCLEAR EXPERTS URGE TRUMP NOT TO LET IRAN STEER TALKS AWAY FROM REGIME’S ATOMIC THREAT
Vice President JD Vance (center) walks with Pakistan’s Chief of Defence Forces and Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir (left), and Pakistani Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mohammad Ishaq Dar after arriving for talks with Iranian officials on April 11, 2026, in Islamabad.(Jacquelyn Martin – Pool/Getty Images)
Keane’s criticism contrasts with Trump’s public praise for Islamabad.
Trump said April 26 during a phone interview with Fox News that he had “great respect for Pakistan” because its officials had “been terrific” and “really tried” to advance negotiations with Iran. He added that Pakistan would remain involved in the process.
While speaking to reporters after the G7 summit in France on June 18, Trump also credited Pakistan and Qatar with helping advance the negotiations that produced the U.S.–Iran memorandum of understanding.
White House spokesperson Anna Kelly also defended the administration’s regional partners, telling Fox News Digital that, “President Trump has great relationships with leaders from Pakistan, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, and he appreciates the involvement of all of our regional partners who are assisting with negotiations.”
“If Iran cannot agree to a good deal with the United States, the fault will lie squarely with the regime, who will suffer the consequences,” Kelly added.
Mediators were preparing a second memorandum focused exclusively on the Strait of Hormuz, Wednesday reports indicated, potentially separating the immediate maritime crisis from the broader dispute over Iran’s nuclear activities.
Keane, a former four-star general, argued that their involvement may have contributed to Washington misunderstanding Iran’s intentions.
“And yet they’re mediators,” Keane said. “So their influence here, I think, had played a part in misleading the United States in terms of Iran’s real intentions.”
TRUMP SAYS SAUDI NUCLEAR AGREEMENT WON’T MOVE FORWARD WITHOUT ABRAHAM ACCORDS: ‘THEY HAVE TO BE A MEMBER’
Foreign workers look at a tall plume of black smoke ascends following an explosion in the Fujairah industrial zone on March 3, 2026. Iran’s strikes on Gulf neighbors since February 28, following the U.S.-Israeli attack, forced the UAE to shut its airspace, blindsiding travelers who thought they were headed to one of the region’s safest holiday destinations.(Fadel Senna / AFP via Getty Images)
Pakistan and Qatar have played formal roles in the diplomatic process.
A June 22 joint statement from the two countries said they were mediating talks between the United States and Iran under the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding. The framework established working groups on nuclear issues, sanctions, monitoring and dispute resolution, as well as a mechanism intended to prevent incidents involving commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.
Pakistan declined to comment on Keane’s criticism. The Saudi and Qatari embassies in Washington did not respond by the time of publication.
Raza Rumi, editor-at-large of Pakistan’s The Friday Times, disputed Keane’s characterization, arguing that Islamabad’s working relationship with Tehran does not make it a compromised mediator.
IS THIS TRUMP’S LAST ‘LAST CHANCE’? CEASELESS STRING OF BROKEN CEASEFIRES FUELS DOUBT OVER IRAN DEAL
“Successful mediators are often those that enjoy channels of communication with all sides,” Rumi told Fox News Digital, saying Pakistan’s approach is shaped more by geography, security and economic concerns than ideological alignment with Iran.
He noted that Pakistan shares a long border with Iran and wants to prevent further instability, while also maintaining longstanding ties with the United States and close partnerships with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Rumi also pointed to the exchange of strikes between Pakistan and Iran in January 2024 as evidence that relations between the neighbors are not uniformly close.
An oil tanker is on fire in the sea of Oman, Thursday, June 13, 2019. Two oil tankers near the strategic Strait of Hormuz were reportedly attacked on Thursday, an assault that left one ablaze and adrift as sailors were evacuated from both vessels and the U.S. Navy rushed to assist amid heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran.(AP Photo/ISNA)
“The suggestion that Pakistan somehow caused Washington to misunderstand Tehran’s intentions is difficult to substantiate,” Rumi said. “It would be a considerable stretch to attribute any American misreading of Iran’s intentions to Pakistani mediation.”
Keane directed even sharper criticism at Saudi Arabia, saying that Riyadh denied the United States access to Saudi airspace and a U.S. air base during preparations for a possible operation to forcibly reopen the Strait of Hormuz. He also claimed Saudi officials had repeatedly persuaded Trump not to resume major military operations against Iran.
“The fact of the matter is, the Saudis are not willing to sacrifice to rid the Middle East region of Iran’s aggression,” Keane said, describing the potential costs as casualties and damage to Saudi oil infrastructure.
“They’re willing for us to make that sacrifice, for sure,” he added. “They’re willing for Israel to make that sacrifice, for sure.”
His remarks highlighted a broader debate over whether Saudi caution represents an unwillingness to confront Tehran or a strategic effort to prevent an open-ended regional war.
GULF COUNTRIES STRONGLY CONDEMN IRAN’S DRONE ATTACK ON BAHRAIN AS RISING TENSIONS THREATEN MOU
Salman Al-Ansari, a Saudi geopolitical analyst, rejected the suggestion that Riyadh is unwilling to confront Iran, saying the Kingdom distinguishes between credible deterrence and military action without clear objectives.(Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Salman Al-Ansari, a Saudi geopolitical analyst, rejected the suggestion that Riyadh is unwilling to confront Iran, saying the Kingdom distinguishes between credible deterrence and military action without clear objectives.
“Saudi Arabia supports confronting Iranian aggression, but not an open-ended regional war without clear objectives or an endgame,” Al-Ansari told Fox News Digital.
“Riyadh favors diplomacy backed by credible deterrence, but any agreement must be enforceable and verifiable, addressing Iran’s nuclear program, its proxies, and freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz,” he added.
A Gulf affairs analyst who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue offered a different assessment, saying Saudi leaders fear that a wider confrontation would expose the Kingdom’s critical infrastructure to Iranian retaliation.
“Saudi Arabia believes it should appease Iran because it is deeply concerned about the consequences of a broader confrontation,” the analyst said. “Riyadh fears the damage Iran could inflict on the Kingdom’s infrastructure and has therefore favored restraint and negotiations over a decisive military campaign.”
The analyst described a widening divide among Gulf states, arguing that Saudi Arabia and Qatar favor accommodation while the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Kuwait support stronger pressure on Iran.
Richard Goldberg, a senior adviser at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank and former National Security Council official, said during a separate Fox News appearance Wednesday, that Washington continues to depend on Saudi infrastructure even as disagreements persist over military strategy.
“When we talk about the Gulf states, we talk about Saudi Arabia and General Keane’s comments, remember, we also are relying on Saudi Arabia with their overland pipelines to keep us in the game here,” Goldberg said. “The fact that they’re at maximum capacity moving through the Red Sea also allows us to continue the strangulation strategy.”
TRUMP WARNS IRAN FIGHTING ISN’T OVER AS HE VOWS US WILL ‘WIN’ AS TALKS FADE
President Donald Trump attends a business forum at Qasr Al Watan during the final stop of his Gulf visit, in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, May 16, 2025.(Amr Alfiky/Reuters)
The debate comes as the United States and Iran continue negotiations over the Strait of Hormuz.
Oman, Pakistan, Qatar and Saudi Arabia all have been involved in the diplomatic effort, while reports Wednesday indicated that mediators were working on an interim arrangement that could establish separate shipping routes through Iranian and Omani waters as broader nuclear negotiations continue.
The central question is whether those negotiations can produce an enforceable agreement or merely allow Tehran to preserve its leverage over the waterway.
Keane said he remained doubtful that Iran was prepared to surrender meaningful control.
“They are not going to give up the Strait of Hormuz,” he said. “They think it’s a strategic asset.”
He predicted Iran would seek to retain some degree of control over the waterway and warned that reaching an agreement on Iran’s nuclear program would be even more difficult.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Iran sent an unprecedented “whole-regime” team to the U.S. deal talks which signals one priority, a counterterrorism expert said.(URS FLUEELER/Pool via REUTERS)
“My gut feeling here is no,” Keane said when asked whether Iran was prepared to reach and implement a substantive agreement. “The president is not going to make a bad deal here.”