堪萨斯州、阿拉斯加州、阿肯色州、南达科他州和西弗吉尼亚州均以超60%的支持率通过了非公民投票禁令
作者:伊莱恩·马伦 福克斯新闻
发布时间:2026年11月5日 美国东部时间下午3:34
公平选举项目行动执行主任杰森·斯尼德表示,尽管出现“蓝色浪潮”,非公民投票禁令仍获得广泛支持,他还敦促最高法院为各州核实选民注册资格扫清障碍。
新功能:现在您可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!
五个州的选民以压倒性多数通过了禁止非公民投票的公投措施,其中在民主党参议院取得重大意外胜利的堪萨斯州,以及仍未公布选举结果的阿拉斯加州都位列其中。
联邦法律已禁止非公民在联邦选举中投票,但堪萨斯州、阿拉斯加州、阿肯色州、南达科他州和西弗吉尼亚州通过的措施,明确了州及地方选举的公民身份要求,每个州的支持率均超过60%。
选举诚信倡导者将投票结果作为证据,支持唐纳德·特朗普总统和共和党人的主张——他们推动的联邦选民注册需提供公民身份证明的举措“得到两党广泛支持”。
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif
共和党遭遇历史性参议院意外失利 民主党近百年来首次翻转深红州
“我完全赞同非公民投票禁令极受欢迎的说法,”公平选举项目执行主任杰森·斯尼德告诉福克斯新闻数字平台,“它们得到两党的支持。”
2024年盖洛普民调显示,83%的美国人(包括66%的民主党人)支持首次选民注册时提供公民身份证明。
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/voter-id-sign.jpg
2026年3月2日,在河滨县选民登记处的新闻发布会上,一名志愿者拿起一块“要求出示选民身份证”的标语,当时共和党议员正聚集支持将选民身份证提案提交11月投票。(安贾利·谢里夫-保罗/媒体新闻集团/《太阳报》/Getty Images)
公投措施的通过恰逢由保守派主导的最高法院准备审理一起相关争议:亚利桑那州能否在其州选民登记表上要求提供公民身份证明,并在选举前将疑似非公民从选民名单中移除,该裁决可能影响各州执行公民身份要求的方式。
相关选举措施在加利福尼亚州和亚利桑那州未能通过。加利福尼亚州的第39号提案以58.5%对41.4%的结果被否决,差距约为17个百分点;该提案原本要求出示选民身份证并增加公民身份验证程序。
“我要指出的独特之处在于,不仅加州民选领导层公开反对阻止非公民投票的举措,而且左翼阵营还投入了超过3000万美元用于公投活动以击败该提案,”斯尼德告诉福克斯新闻数字平台。
斯尼德表示,亚利桑那州的提案是一项更宽泛的立法,包含了除非公民投票之外的多项条款,这可能是其未能通过的原因。
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif
禁止非公民投票措施的胜利,是在特朗普政府和国会共和党推动《拯救美国法案》失败之后取得的;该法案要求提供公民身份证明才能注册投票。
亚利桑那州选民法律斗争提交最高法院 选举组织警告或引发“荒谬”后果
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/maine-election-worker.jpg
2025年10月28日,在缅因州波特兰市的提前投票期间,一名选举工作人员整理选票。(罗伯特·F·布卡蒂/美联社)
《拯救美国法案》也成为国会的一个爆发点,共和党和民主党就是否将其纳入预算和解法案展开争执。特朗普将该法案与国土安全部资金捆绑的努力,导致该部门在政府停摆期间陷入长期僵局。
参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩表示,共和党缺乏通过该法案的票数,而民主党则称这会剥夺合格选民的投票权。
联邦选举委员会前成员、“推进美国自由”高级法律研究员汉斯·冯·斯帕科夫斯基表示,民主党已完全“脱离”其选民。
斯尼德对此表示赞同,称民主党将一个“支持率达90%的议题”转化为高度政治化的斗争。
“左翼与美国公众的立场严重脱节,他们确实应该回答这个问题:‘你们为什么要反对一项90%公众都支持的举措?’”斯尼德说。
“只有公民应该在我们的选举中投票。如果左翼声称自己支持民主,那么我们首先应确保自由公正的选举仅由美国公民决定。”
不过,斯帕科夫斯基虽称赞公投措施通过,却警告称除非允许各州核实选民的公民身份,否则这些措施可能证明无效。
“听着,我很高兴那些州通过了公投,但这些条款效果不会太好,除非各州能够做到两件事,”斯帕科夫斯基说。
斯帕科夫斯基提及了“共和党全国委员会诉米·家庭投票案”,最高法院将在该案中裁定联邦法律是否禁止亚利桑那州要求提供公民身份证明才能注册联邦选举投票,以及将疑似非公民从选民名单中移除。
他表示,该裁决可能会影响各州执行公民身份要求的成效。
选举专家警告非公民如何进入选民名单
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/senator-john-thune-august-2026.jpg
美国参议院多数党领袖、南达科他州共和党人约翰·图恩,2026年8月8日在华盛顿特区国会大厦对记者发言。(芬恩·戈麦斯/Getty Images)
斯尼德表示,仅在联邦表格上勾选“公民身份”一项并不足够。
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif
“正如我们最近从司法部的多次逮捕中看到的,针对非公民的起诉书已经发出,而且新泽西州的自动选民登记系统失败,增加了6600名非公民到选民名单中,其中近400人已投票,显然,‘勾选’制度让我们失望了,”斯尼德说。
不过,斯帕科夫斯基表示,亚利桑那州胜诉的裁决作用有限,认为公民身份证明仅适用于未来的选民注册。
“他们试图核实已登记选民的公民身份,唯一途径是使用国土安全部的《拯救》数据库,而民主党完全控制国会后,我毫不怀疑他们的首批举措之一就是试图削减该数据库的资金,使各州无法使用它,”斯帕科夫斯基说。
斯尼德称赞特朗普政府扩大各州访问《拯救》数据库以清理选民名单的努力,称之前追踪不合格选民的过程“繁琐”。他还表达了对民主党将大幅削弱该数据库的担忧。
注册订阅获取政治时事通讯
“我不会感到惊讶,如果他们试图削减整个《拯救》系统的资金,或通过立法阻止其用于清理选民名单,”斯尼德说。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用
“我认为我们正快速接近一个可以合理发问的时刻:‘为什么民主党积极推动非公民投票?’”斯尼德继续说道,“我认为我们正朝着这个方向发展。”
伊莱恩·马伦是福克斯新闻数字平台和福克斯商业的记者,负责报道全国政治。
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6407965553112320
Democrats ‘divorced from voters’ as 5 states back citizen-only voting, bolstering GOP push
Kansas, Alaska, Arkansas, South Dakota and West Virginia each passed noncitizen voting bans with more than 60% support
By Elaine Mallon Fox News
Published November 5, 2026 3:34pm EST
Noncitizen voting bans won broad support despite ‘blue wave,’ advocate says
Honest Elections Project Action Executive Director Jason Snead says voters overwhelmingly support proof-of-citizenship requirements and urges the Supreme Court to clear the way for states to verify voter registrations.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
Voters in five states overwhelmingly approved ballot measures barring noncitizens from voting, including Kansas, where Democrats scored a major Senate upset, and Alaska, where the Senate race remains uncalled.
Federal law already prohibits noncitizens from voting in federal elections, but measures approved in Kansas, Alaska, Arkansas, South Dakota and West Virginia clarify or explicitly codify citizenship requirements for voting in state and local elections, with support exceeding 60% in each state.
Election integrity advocates pointed to the results as evidence supporting President Donald Trump and Republicans’ argument that their push to require proof of citizenship for federal voter registration has “overwhelming bipartisan support.”
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif
REPUBLICANS SUFFER HISTORIC SENATE UPSET AS DEM FLIPS DEEP-RED STATE FOR FIRST TIME IN NEARLY A CENTURY
“I would absolutely agree that noncitizen voting bans are overwhelmingly popular,” Jason Snead, executive director of Honest Elections Project, told Fox News Digital. “They enjoy bipartisan support.”
A 2024 Gallup poll found that 83% of Americans, including 66% of Democrats, support requiring first-time voters to provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote.
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/voter-id-sign.jpg
A volunteer picks up a “Require Voter ID” sign at a news conference at the Riverside County Registrar of Voters March 2, 2026, as GOP lawmakers gather in support of placing a voter ID measure on the November ballot.(Anjali Sharif-Paul/MediaNews Group/The Sun via Getty Images)
The ballot measure wins also come as the conservative-majority Supreme Court prepares to consider a related dispute over whether Arizona can require proof of citizenship on its state voter registration form and remove suspected noncitizens from the rolls before an election, a ruling that could affect how states enforce citizenship requirements.
Related election measures failed in California and Arizona. California’s Proposition 39 was defeated 58.5% to 41.4%, a margin of roughly 17 percentage points; the measure would have required voter ID and additional citizenship-verification procedures.
“I would note that the unique thing there is not only that California is openly hostile to the idea of trying to prevent noncitizen voting in terms of its elected leadership, but also the left poured more than $30 million into the ballot measure campaign to defeat that,” Snead told Fox News Digital.
Snead said Arizona’s measure was broader legislation that included several provisions beyond noncitizen voting, which may have contributed to its defeat.
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif
The victories for the measures barring noncitizens from voting follow the Trump administration and congressional Republicans’ failed efforts to pass the SAVE America Act, which would require proof of citizenship to register to vote.
ARIZONA VOTER LAW FIGHT REACHES SCOTUS AS ELECTION GROUPS WARN ‘ABSURD’ CONSEQUENCE COULD ENSUE
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/maine-election-worker.jpg
An election official sorts ballots during early voting Oct. 28, 2025, in Portland, Maine.(Robert F. Bukaty/AP)
The SAVE America Act also became a flashpoint in Congress, with Republicans and Democrats sparring over whether to attach it to a budget reconciliation package. Trump’s effort to tie the bill to Department of Homeland Security funding contributed to a prolonged standoff during the department’s shutdown.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Republicans lacked the votes to pass it, while Democrats argued it would disenfranchise eligible voters.
Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission and senior legal fellow of Advancing American Freedom, said the Democratic Party is completely “divorced” from its voters.
Snead agreed, saying Democrats took a “90-10 issue” and turned it into a highly politicized fight.
“The left is far out of step with the American public, and they really should be answering the question, ‘Why are you opposed to something that 90% of the public is in favor of?” Snead said.
“Only citizens should vote in our elections. And if you believe, as the left claims to, in democracy, well then, we should start by making sure that we have free and fair elections that are decided only by American citizens.”
But while Spakovsky applauded the passage of the ballot measures, he warned they could prove ineffective unless states are allowed to verify voters’ citizenship.
“Look, I’m glad those states passed that referendum, but those provisions aren’t going to be much good unless states are able to do two things,” Spakovsky said.
Spakovsky pointed to Republican National Committee v. Mi Familia Vota, a case in which the Supreme Court will decide whether federal law prevents Arizona from requiring documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections and from removing suspected noncitizens from its voter rolls.
He said the ruling could affect how effectively states can enforce citizenship requirements.
ELECTION EXPERT SOUNDS ALARM ON HOW NONCITIZENS ARE LANDING ON VOTER ROLLS
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/senator-john-thune-august-2026.jpg
U.S. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., speaks to reporters in the U.S. Capitol on Aug. 8, 2026, in Washington, D.C.(Finn Gomez/Getty Images)
Snead said simply checking a box attesting to citizenship on a federal form has not been sufficient.
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif
“As we have seen in a number of recent arrests by the Justice Department, with indictments going out against noncitizens, and with the failures of the automatic voter registration system in New Jersey, which added 6,600 noncitizens to the rolls, with almost 400 of them voting, we clearly have been let down by that check-a-box system,” Snead said.
However, Spakovsky said a ruling in favor of Arizona would only go so far, arguing that proof of citizenship would only apply to future voter registrations.
“The only way for them to try to check the citizenship of people who are already registered is by using the SAVE database at the Department of Homeland Security, and with complete control of Congress, I have no doubt that one of the first things Democrats will do is try to defund the database so that states can’t use it,” Spakovsky said.
Snead applauded the Trump administration’s efforts to expand states’ access to the SAVE database to clean up their voter rolls, arguing the previous process of tracking down ineligible voters was “cumbersome.” He also voiced concerns that Democrats will gut the database.
SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER
“I would not be surprised if they try to defund the entire safe system or pass legislation to prevent its use for cleaning up voter rolls,” Snead said.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“I think that we are fast approaching the point where it is fair to say, ‘Why are Democrats actively pushing for noncitizen voting?’” Snead continued. “I think that’s the direction that we are going.”
Elaine Mallon is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business covering national politics.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6407965553112
发表回复