英国 tiny 村庄投票“脱英”,以象征性抗议安置寻求庇护者计划


2026年9月16日 / 美国东部时间下午2:14 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

英格兰皮丁顿讯 — 英国一个微型村庄以压倒性多数投票决定“脱离英国”,这是一场象征性全民公投,导火索是政府计划在附近一处前军事基地安置1200多名男性寻求庇护者。

牛津郡乡村村庄皮丁顿的居民以285票对26票投票决定“脱离英国,追求自决权”,投票率接近92%。此次投票不具备法律效力。

皮丁顿总人口约350人。根据安置计划,将在距离皮丁顿半英里的前英国军事基地比斯特基地容纳多达1256名寻求庇护者,人数是该村人口的三倍多。

英国内政部表示,该基地将作为非拘留式寻求庇护者住宿点运营,意味着寻求庇护者可以自由进出。这项拟议开发项目将持续运营10年。

村民们告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,他们认为政府对该计划的磋商不足,并对安全、犯罪以及他们生活可能受到的影响表示担忧。

此次公投特意选在9月15日英国不列颠之战纪念日举行,纪念1940年第二次世界大战期间英国皇家空军击退纳粹德国空军大规模空袭的关键一天。投票当天,皮丁顿村公所外悬挂了纪念该周年纪念日的横幅。

这场争议凸显了英国政府在寻求庇护者安置地点问题上面临的 broader 政治困境。皮丁顿是一个相对富裕的乡村社区。从历史上看,寻求庇护者不成比例地集中在英国较贫困地区,部分原因是那里的住宿成本更低。

针对此次投票结果,首相安迪·伯纳姆告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的合作机构英国广播公司,他理解该村民众“强烈的情绪”。

但他辩称,较富裕的社区应该承担更多的寻求庇护者安置负担。

“我们不能出现这样的情况:全国只有最贫困的社区承担所有难民和寻求庇护者的安置任务,”伯纳姆在接受GB新闻采访时表示。

英国政府正寻求将寻求庇护者安置到包括前军事基地在内的其他场所,以减少对 asylum 酒店的依赖,后者的成本已成为一个重大政治问题。

但正如皮丁顿事件所显示的那样,当一个大型寻求庇护者安置设施被提议建在一个历史上接收寻求庇护者相对较少的小型社区附近时,这一战略可能会引发挑战。

皮丁顿教区议会主席、反对该设施运动的领导人之一蒂姆·麦克纳利告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,该村特意从美国历史中汲取了灵感。

“我们发起这次公投……是为了纪念美国独立250周年,理解他们为争取自决权所经历的艰辛和斗争,”麦克纳利说道。

麦克纳利对没有政府官员到访该社区或与居民对话表示不满。

“我距离议会只有60英里,但他们甚至连放下身段来看我,或者邀请我去见他们都做不到,”他说。

麦克纳利表示,这场运动受到的关注反映了更广泛的政治不满情绪。

“这种政治行为就是你们所说的‘沼泽政治’,”他提到美国政治口号“抽干沼泽”时说道,“这就是沼泽政治的一个例子。”

对一些居民来说,担忧集中在该开发项目可能对村庄日常生活造成的影响。

“我担心村里的孩子和妇女的安全,”投票支持“脱英”的詹妮弗·欧文说道,“小镇会变样的,会人满为患,村庄会被挤垮。一切都不会再和以前一样了。”

在邻埃塞克斯郡,政府计划扩建现有的寻求庇护者安置点,埃塞克斯郡警察局长瑞秋·诺兰告诉英国广播公司,与该设施相关的犯罪“非常少”。

英国国家统计局表示,其未持有按寻求庇护者或移民身份划分的犯罪分类数据,这意味着目前没有全面的全国性数据能够表明寻求庇护者比普通民众更有可能或更不可能犯罪。

欧文的丈夫赫伯特·欧文已在该地区居住了33年,同样投票支持“脱英”。他表示,他担心该提议将对房价产生不利影响。

“工作的意义是什么?就是偿还抵押贷款、支付人生中的各项开支,而政府甚至不与我们沟通就将这种事强加给我们?”他说。

尽管皮丁顿目前仍是英国的一部分,但此次投票的组织者希望这种策略能够推广开来。

麦克纳利表示,在发布该村庄运动的蓝图后,他收到了来自全国教区和镇议会以及居民的500多份咨询,他们都有兴趣采用类似策略。

此次争议爆发之际,英国寻求庇护者的数量仍处于历史高位。2025年英国约有10.06万人申请庇护,是2019年的两倍多。内政部的数据显示,其中41%的人是乘小船抵达的,39%的人此前曾以签证或其他合法许可方式进入英国。

根据英国政府的数据,过去十年间,英国约有63万人申请庇护。根据市场研究机构舆观的民调,对移民和寻求庇护者的担忧始终是英国选民最关注的三大问题之一。

Tiny English village votes to leave U.K. in symbolic protest over plan to house asylum seekers

September 16, 2026 / 2:14 PM EDT / CBS News

Piddington, England — A tiny English village has voted overwhelmingly to leave the United Kingdom in a symbolic referendum triggered by government plans to house more than 1,200 male asylum seekers at a former military site nearby.

Residents of Piddington, a rural village in Oxfordshire, voted 285 to 26 to “secede from the UK and pursue self-determination,” with a turnout of nearly 92%. The vote has no legal force.

Piddington has a population of around 350 people. The asylum accommodation plan would house up to 1,256 asylum seekers, more than three times the population of the village, at a former British military base in Bicester, half a mile from Piddington.

The site would operate as a non-detained asylum accommodation, meaning the asylum seekers would be able to come and go. The proposed development would operate for 10 years, the U.K. Home Office said.

Village residents told CBS News they believe there has been insufficient consultation over the plans and raised concerns about safety, crime and the potential impact on their lives.

The referendum was deliberately held on Sept. 15, Battle of Britain Day, commemorating a pivotal day in 1940 during World War II when Britain’s Royal Air Force fought off major attacks by Nazi Germany’s Luftwaffe. A banner commemorating the anniversary was displayed outside Piddington’s village hall during the vote.

The dispute highlights a wider political dilemma for the U.K. government over where asylum seekers should be accommodated. Piddington is a relatively affluent rural community. Historically, asylum seekers have been disproportionately concentrated in poorer parts of Britain, in part because accommodation there has been cheaper.

Reacting to the news of the vote, Prime Minister Andy Burnham told the BBC, a CBS News partner, that he understood the village’s “strength of feeling.”

But he has argued that wealthier communities should shoulder more of the asylum accommodation burden.

“We cannot have a situation where it’s only the poorest communities in the country that receive all of the dispersal of refugees and asylum seekers,” Burnham told GB News.

The government is seeking to reduce its reliance on asylum hotels, the cost of which has become a major political issue, by moving asylum seekers into other spaces, including former military sites.

But, as seen in Piddington, that strategy can create challenges when a large asylum facility is proposed near a small community that has historically accommodated relatively few asylum seekers.

Tim McNally, chairman of Piddington Parish Council and one of the leaders of the campaign against the facility, told CBS News the village deliberately drew inspiration from American history.

“We actually did this referendum … recognizing the United States’ 250 years of independence and understanding the strife and struggle they went through to get their self-determination,” McNally said.

McNally expressed frustration that no government officials have visited the community or spoken to the residents.

“I’m only 60 miles away [from Parliament], and they can’t even be gracious enough to get off their seat and come and see me, or invite me to come and see them,” he said.

McNally said the attention the campaign has received reflects wider political discontent.

“The political behavior is of a type that you guys call the swamp,” he said, referring to the American political slogan “Drain the swamp.” “This is an example of the swamp.”

For some residents, concerns center on what the development could mean for everyday life in the village.

“I’m worried about the safety of the children and the women of the village,” said Jennifer Owen, who voted to leave the U.K. “The towns won’t be the same, they’ll be overrun, village will be overrun. It just won’t be the same again.”

In the neighboring county of Essex, where the government plans to expand an existing asylum accommodation site, Chief Constable Rachel Nolan told the BBC that crime linked to the facility is “very low.”

The U.K.’s Office for National Statistics says it does not hold breakdowns of crime by asylum-seeker or migrant status, meaning there is currently no comprehensive national data showing whether asylum seekers are more or less likely to commit crimes than the wider population.

Owen’s husband, Herbert Owen, who has lived in the area for 33 years, also voted to leave the U.K. He said he’s worried the proposal would have a detrimental impact on house prices.

“What has been the point of working? To pay your mortgage, to pay this in your life, when the government are gonna impose this on you without even talking to you?” he said.

While Piddington remains part of the U.K., organizers of the vote hope the tactic will spread.

McNally said that after publishing a blueprint for the village’s campaign, he received more than 500 inquiries from parish and town councillors and residents around the country interested in adopting similar tactics.

The controversy comes as the number of people seeking asylum in Britain remains historically high. Around 100,600 people claimed asylum in the U.K. in 2025, more than twice the number in 2019. Home Office figures show that 41% had arrived by small boat, while 39% had previously entered the country on a visa or other form of legal permission.

Over the past decade, roughly 630,000 people have claimed asylum in the U.K., according to U.K. government figures. Concerns about immigration and asylum seekers consistently rated as one of the top three issues for voters in Britain, according to YouGov polling.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2