9名曾参与特朗普机密文件案的被解雇FBI员工提起诉讼,指控非法解雇


2026-10-15T14:15:38-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

撰稿

2026年10月15日 / 美国东部时间下午2:15 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

华盛顿讯——9名前FBI员工周四起诉该局,称他们仅因参与前特别检察官杰克·史密斯对特朗普总统第一任期结束后留存机密记录一事的调查,就遭到非法解雇。

这些前特工、情报分析师和业务运营专员曾参与反情报调查,于2026年2月的两天内被解雇——当时正值美国和以色列即将对伊朗发动军事打击之际。

这9名原告是越来越多因突然被解雇而起诉司法部和FBI的前FBI特工及其他人员中的最新一批。许多被解雇员工都曾参与令特朗普及其盟友不满的案件。

诉讼指控称,这些原告“遭到非法解雇并非出于任何理由或合法原因,仅仅是为了满足总统的个人宿怨”。

诉讼称:“此次解雇未遵循FBI内部任何调查或惩戒程序,原告未收到任何通知、听证或上诉机会。相反,帕特利声称仅依据‘宪法第二条’为解雇行为辩护。”这里指的是FBI局长卡什·帕特利以及规定总统行政权力的宪法第二条。

这份长达70页的诉讼已向华盛顿特区美国地区法院提起,被告包括FBI、帕特利、司法部长托德·布兰奇和司法部。哥伦比亚广播公司新闻已就置评请求联系司法部和FBI。

2022年8月,FBI特工对海湖庄园执行搜查令,据称查获了100多份带有机密标识的文件。2023年,史密斯的办公室以30多项罪名起诉特朗普,指控其涉嫌留存这些文件并试图阻挠政府追回文件的努力。负责审理此案的联邦法官最终驳回了所有指控,称史密斯被非法任命为特别检察官。特朗普赢得2024年大选后,司法部正式放弃了对该裁决的上诉。

周四的诉讼援引司法部高级官员和总统针对原告的公开言论作为解雇行为出于政治敌意的证据。

例如,布兰奇在员工被解雇时任副司法部长,他曾表示,本届政府通过解雇与涉及总统的调查有关的人员,对FBI进行了“大扫除”。

诉讼还披露了此次解雇事件相关的一些新细节。

以反情报部门主管詹妮弗·培根为例,在一名名叫迈尔斯·斯塔尔的特工申请查阅代号为“等离子回声”的文件调查机密档案后不久,她就得知自己被解雇了。

诉讼称,斯塔尔是卡什·帕特利局长顾问团队的成员,该团队由来自全国各地的特工组成,旨在支持帕特利的政策目标。

他还曾作为主案特工在已被驳回的起诉前FBI局长詹姆斯·康利向国会撒谎的案件中作证。该证词后来遭到一名联邦治安法官的批评,该法官指责FBI存在诸多失误,包括未能过滤掉可能受特权保护的材料。

诉讼称,2月23日,斯塔尔致电助理局长罗曼·罗扎夫斯基,称他迫切需要查阅“等离子回声”案档案。

“斯塔尔未说明具体需求,但表示他是奉帕特利的指令查阅该案档案。培根批准他访问FBI案件管理系统中的所有“等离子回声”档案,但某一特定子档案除外。斯塔尔访问的档案中包含了全部9名原告的姓名,”诉讼文件写道。

不到48小时后,培根和其他所有人都被解雇。

诉讼还暗示,此次解雇可能是为了转移外界对帕特利负面新闻的注意力。2月22日,帕特利被拍到在米兰奥运会上“狂饮啤酒,行为极度幼稚且缺乏自制力,在美国男子曲棍球队更衣室里乱扔酒水”。

诉讼称,一名负责告知前特工扎克·费尔德曼其被解雇的负责特工甚至猜测,此次解雇可能“与当天早些时候有关帕特利在冬奥会上饮酒的新闻报道有关”。

针对伊朗的军事打击于2月28日开始。

诉讼称:“这一丑闻对帕特利来说在政治上十分危险:他的行为招致广泛批评,众多消息人士称,他与特朗普总统的关系以及他作为FBI局长的职位因此岌岌可危。”

2月25日,帕特利接受路透社采访时披露,他和白宫办公厅主任苏西·怀尔斯的通话记录已作为史密斯调查的一部分被传唤。

9名原告中有8人于同一天被解雇,第9人于次日被解雇。

“他们之中拥有超过一个世纪的从业经验,这些前FBI特工和分析师曾为国家恪尽职守,调查国家安全和国防信息泄露事件、挫败敌人的威胁和攻击,并响应波士顿马拉松爆炸案等重大突发事件,”律师玛格丽特·多诺万、艾比·洛厄尔和丽贝卡·蒂尼奥在联合声明中表示。

“作为对他们服务的回报,他们因为恪尽职守——始终如一地遵循事实和法律,不偏不倚、不带偏见——而被解雇。”

9 fired FBI employees who worked on Trump documents case sue, alleging unlawful termination

2026-10-15T14:15:38-0400 / CBS News

By

October 15, 2026 / 2:15 PM EDT / CBS News

Washington— Nine former FBI employees sued the bureau on Thursday, saying they were unlawfully terminated merely for working on former special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into President Trump’s retention of classified records after his first term in the White House.

The former special agents, intelligence analysts and staff operation specialists worked on counterintelligence investigations and were fired over the course of two days in February 2026 — just as the United States and Israel were set to begin military strikes against Iran.

The nine plaintiffs represent the latest in a growing number of former FBI agents and other personnel who have filed lawsuits against the Justice Department and the bureau after they were abruptly terminated. Many of the fired employees worked on matters that displeased Mr. Trump and his allies.

The plaintiffs “were unlawfully terminated not for any cause or any legitimate reason, but only to satisfy the President’s personal vendetta,” the lawsuit alleged.

“The firings did not follow any internal investigation or disciplinary process within the FBI, and Plaintiffs were not given any notice, a hearing, or an opportunity to appeal. Instead, Patel claimed to rely solely upon ‘Article II’ to support the firings,” the suit said, referring to FBI Director Kash Patel and Article II of the Constitution, which lays out the president’s executive powers.

The 70-page lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and names the FBI, Patel, Attorney General Todd Blanche and the Department of Justice as defendants. CBS News has reached out to the Justice Department and FBI for comment.

FBI agents executed a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago in August 2022 and allegedly recovered more than 100 documents with classified markings. In 2023, Smith’s office indicted Mr. Trump on more than three dozen charges related to his alleged retention of the records and efforts to obstruct the government’s attempts to get them back. The charges were ultimately dismissed by the federal judge overseeing the case, who said Smith was unlawfully appointed special counsel. The Justice Department formally abandoned its appeal of the ruling after Mr. Trump won the 2024 election.

Thursday’s lawsuit cites public comments made by top Justice Department officials and the president directed toward the plaintiffs as evidence the firings were motivated by political animus.

For example, Blanche, who was deputy attorney general when the employees were let go, stated that the administration had “cleaned house” at the FBI by firing employees associated with investigations involving the president.

The lawsuit contains some new details about the circumstances surrounding the firings.

In the case of counterintelligence section chief Jennifer Bacon, she learned she was being let go shortly after an agent named Miles Starr had requested access to the classified investigative files about Plasmic Echo, the codename given to the documents investigation.

Starr, the lawsuit said, was a member of Kash Patel’s Director’s Advisory Team, a group staffed by agents from around the country who support his policy goals.

He also was the lead case agent who testified in the since-dismissed indictment charging former FBI Director James Comey with lying to Congress. That testimony later was criticized by a federal magistrate judge, who accused the FBI of numerous missteps, including a failure to filter out potentially privileged materials.

On Feb. 23, Starr emailed Assistant Director Roman Rozhavsky to tell him that he urgently needed access to the Plasmic Echo case files, the lawsuit said.

“Starr did not explain what he needed, but stated that he was on instructions from Patel to access the case file. Bacon granted him access to all Plasmic Echo files in the FBI’s case management system, with the exception of one specific subfile. The files Starr had access to contained the names of all nine Plaintiffs,” the lawsuit says.

Less than 48 hours later, Bacon and the others were all fired.

The lawsuit also suggested that the firings may have been an attempt to distract from negative press about Patel, who was spotted on Feb. 22 at the Olympic Games in Milan “chugging a beer and, in a display of wild immaturity and lack of personal control, flinging alcohol around the U.S. men’s hockey team’s locker room.”

A special agent in charge who was assigned to inform former special agent Zach Feldman he was being terminated even surmised that the firing might be “related to the news reports from earlier that day about Director Patel drinking alcohol at the Winter Olympics,” the lawsuit said.

The military strikes against Iran began on Feb. 28.

“This scandal proved politically perilous for Patel: he drew widespread criticism for his conduct, with numerous sources suggesting that his status with President Trump and position as Director of the FBI were in jeopardy as a result,” the lawsuit said.

On Feb. 25, Patel gave an interview to Reuters in which he disclosed that his phone records and those of White House chief of staff Susie Wiles were subpoenaed as part of Smith’s investigations.

Eight of the nine plaintiffs were fired the same day, and the ninth was fired the following day.

“With over a century of experience among them, these former FBI agents and analysts served our country with honor and distinction as they investigated leaks of national security and defense information, thwarted threats and attacks from our enemies, and responded to critical incidents like the Boston Marathon bombing,” attorneys Margaret Donovan, Abbe Lowell and Rebecca Tinio said in a joint statement.

“In return for their service, they were fired because they did their jobs, as they always did, to follow the facts and the law without bias or favor.”

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2