关于美国柴油出口禁令的讨论加剧美国原油期货对全球基准油价的折价


2026-09-25T10:01:49.142Z / 路透社

  • 摘要
  • 西德克萨斯中质原油(WTI)较布伦特原油折价12.02美元/桶,为5月6日以来最大折价幅度
  • 分析师称,若实施柴油出口禁令,美国炼油厂原油加工量或削减12%
  • 消息人士称,美国能源部长正评估炼油商对自愿出口限制的支持意愿

休斯顿9月25日路透电 – 华盛顿方面有关可能实施柴油出口禁令的讨论,正在拉大美国原油期货与全球布伦特原油基准的价差,这一信号表明市场预计,如果美国炼油商的柴油产品被迫滞留在国内,他们将减少原油加工量。

尽管这可能会立即缓解国内居高不下的柴油价格——本周柴油价格曾创下每加仑6.528美元的历史新高,并引发政治抗议,但国内原油期货更大的折价可能是一把双刃剑:它预示着未来汽油价格上涨,而从长期来看,柴油价格也可能再次开始攀升。

路透社专栏作家罗恩·布索撰写的《能源动态》通讯将为您提供全球能源行业的所有重要资讯。点击此处订阅

随着投资者将柴油可能滞留美国的情景计入定价,据伦敦证券交易所集团(LSEG)数据,西德克萨斯中质原油(WTI)期货周四较布伦特原油期货最大折价达12.02美元/桶,为5月6日以来的最大折价幅度。

分析师表示,如果柴油出口被禁止,美国炼油厂的原油加工量可能最多削减12%,关键存储枢纽可能在一个月内被填满。

根据摩根士丹利的数据,美国是全球最大的柴油出口国,净出口量约为120万桶/日,而国内柴油产量为510万桶/日。

此前,霍尔木兹海峡基本处于关闭状态,美国的这些柴油出口在一定程度上填补了中东地区原油供应中断留下的缺口。同时,俄罗斯因本国炼油厂遭乌克兰无人机袭击引发供应短缺,多次实施柴油出口禁令,也进一步加剧了全球柴油供应的缩减。

伍德麦肯兹咨询公司分析师在周四的一份报告中指出,柴油出口禁令将使70万桶/日的柴油和瓦斯油供应过剩转向国内存储,短短一个多月内就会将墨西哥湾沿岸的库存填满至最大容量。

该公司估算,这将迫使美国炼油厂削减超过200万桶/日的原油加工量,以防止库存超出容纳上限——按照当前的加工速率,这相当于美国炼油厂原油总加工量减少12%。

美国实施柴油出口禁令的可能性仍不明朗。

美国白宫周三否认了媒体有关其正准备实施90天柴油出口禁令的报道,而美国能源部长克里斯·赖特也表示,出口禁令无法控制油价飙升。但周二,美国总统唐纳德·特朗普表示他支持实施禁令。

据三位了解相关讨论的人士透露,与此同时,赖特近日已联系了几家美国大型炼油厂的高管,以评估他们对自愿限制柴油出口的支持意愿。特朗普政府正在寻找短期禁令之外的替代方案。

创纪录的柴油价格催生出口禁令呼声

推动美国呼吁实施柴油出口禁令的原因是柴油价格飙升,美国和欧洲的柴油价格均已创下历史新高。据美国汽车协会(AAA)数据,周四美国柴油价格仍维持在每加仑6.514美元的高位,而美国与伊朗的冲突扰乱了全球能源供应。

这可能会给特朗普所在的共和党在11月的中期选举中带来麻烦,因为燃油价格上涨会加剧通货膨胀,并给作为共和党关键票仓的农民带来特别沉重的负担。

美国与伊朗的冲突还以另一种方式加剧了美国石油行业的两难困境:推高了航运成本。

美国原油相对于欧洲原油的折价,也就是WTI与布伦特原油的价差,通常会提振美国石油的出口需求,因为贸易商可以通过跨区域套利,将原油销往海外获利。但这一模式取决于航运成本。

Signal Maritime航运分析师格奥尔基奥斯·萨克莱拉里乌表示,不断上涨的运费和紧张的船舶运力已经削弱了美国原油的出口需求,并导致WTI与布伦特原油的价差进一步扩大。

尽管WTI与布伦特原油的价差在第三季度持续扩大,但据船舶追踪机构Kpler的数据,美国原油出口量并未出现明显增长。

Signal Maritime的数据显示,目前租用超大型原油运输船从美国墨西哥湾沿岸将原油运往亚洲市场的运费约为5000万美元,而在伊朗冲突爆发推高战争风险溢价之前,这一费用仅为1600万美元。

瑞穗证券能源期货总监鲍勃·亚格表示,此前,美国原油为抵消航运成本所需的相对于欧洲原油的折价约为每桶负4美元。亚格称,由于运费飙升,目前这一折价可能已翻倍至负8美元。

“国际原油承载了更高的稀缺性和物流溢价,而以当前的运输成本,美国原油很难在海外市场找到销路,”石油贸易公司NitrolOil首席执行官舒鲁赫·祖赫里季诺夫说道。

据LSEG数据,自7月7日以来,WTI与布伦特原油的价差一直维持在每桶折价4美元或更高的水平。但Kpler的数据显示,美国原油出口量相对平稳,7月至8月仅增长了4.5万桶/日,达到372万桶/日。

据Kpler数据,以三个月平均水平计算,9月美国原油出口量有望连续第三个月下滑,降至伊朗冲突今年2月爆发以来的最低水平。

“纸面价差扩大只是吸引人们尝试套利的信号,而非套利通道已经开启的证明,”祖赫里季诺夫说道。

乔治娜·麦卡特尼、阿拉西·索马塞卡尔在休斯顿,诺埃尔·约翰在班加罗尔报道;埃德蒙·克拉曼编辑

Talk of US export ban on diesel deepens US crude futures’ discount to global benchmark

2026-09-25T10:01:49.142Z / Reuters

  • Summary
  • WTI trades at $12.02 a barrel below Brent, widest discount since May 6
  • Analysts say diesel export ban could cut US refinery crude runs by 12%
  • US energy secretary gauges refiners’ support for voluntary export restraint, sources say

HOUSTON, Sept 25 (Reuters) – Washington’s talk of a possible ban on diesel exports is widening the gap between US crude oil futures and the global Brent benchmark, a signal that markets expect US refiners to ​process less crude oil if their diesel output gets stuck at home.

While that may bring some immediate relief to high domestic diesel prices, which this week hit a record $6.528 a gallon ‌and stirred a political uproar, the bigger discount for domestic crude futures could be a double-edged omen: an indicator of higher gasoline prices to come, while in the longer term diesel prices could also begin rising again.

The Reuters Power Up newsletter by columnist Ron Bousso provides everything you need to know about the global energy industry. Sign up here.

As investors price in a scenario where diesel gets stranded in the US, West Texas Intermediate crude futures traded as much as $12.02 a barrel under Brent futures on Thursday, their largest discount since May 6, according to LSEG data.

Analysts say US refiners could cut their crude runs by ​as much as 12% if diesel exports are banned, with key storage hubs likely to fill up within a month.

The US is the world’s largest diesel exporter, with net exports of about ​1.2 million barrels per day, versus production of 5.1 million bpd, according to Morgan Stanley.

These exports have partially plugged the gap from lost Middle East barrels ⁠while the Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed. Diesel supplies have also dwindled from Russia, which has repeatedly imposed export bans of its own to tackle shortages that followed Ukrainian drone attacks on its oil refineries.

Wood Mackenzie ​analysts, in a note on Thursday, said a diesel export ban would redirect a 700,000 bpd oversupply of diesel and gasoil into storage, effectively filling Gulf Coast inventories to maximum capacity in just over a month.

That ​would force US refiners to cut crude runs by more than 2 million bpd, Wood Mackenzie estimated, to prevent inventories from exceeding capacity — a reduction of 12% of US refinery crude runs at current rates.

The prospects for a US diesel export ban remain uncertain.

The White House on Wednesday denied media reports it was preparing for a 90-day diesel export ban, and US Energy Secretary Chris Wright said a ban would not bring surging prices under control. On Tuesday, however, President Donald Trump said ​he backed a ban.

In the meantime, Wright has contacted executives at several major American refiners in recent days to gauge support for voluntary restraint on diesel exports, as the Trump administration searches for an alternative to a ​short-term ban, according to three people familiar with the discussions.

RECORD DIESEL PRICES STIR CALLS FOR EXPORT BAN

Driving the demand for a US export ban is a surge in diesel prices, which have hit records in both the US and ‌Europe. On Thursday, ⁠US prices remained elevated at $6.514 a gallon, according to the AAA, as the US war with Iran disrupts global supplies.

That could spell trouble for Trump’s Republican Party in the November midterm elections, by fuelling inflation and putting a particularly heavy burden on farmers, one of the party’s key constituencies.

The Iran war is complicating the conundrum in the US oil sector in another way: by boosting shipping costs.

A rise in the discount for US crude relative to European crude, known as the WTI-Brent spread, typically boosts demand for US oil and increases exports, as traders can make a profit through arbitrage by selling it abroad. But that depends on shipping costs.

Rising ​freight rates and tight vessel availability have dimmed demand ​for US exports and contributed to the widening ⁠WTI-Brent spread, Georgios Sakellariou, freight analyst at Signal Maritime, said.

While the WTI-Brent spread has been trending wider in the third quarter, US crude exports have not risen significantly, according to data from ship tracker Kpler.

Shipping crude from the US Gulf Coast to Asian markets on a very large crude carrier currently costs around $50 million ​in freight, according to Signal Maritime, compared with $16 million before the Iran war broke out and drove up war risk premiums.

The discount that a barrel of ​US crude would need versus ⁠a European barrel to offset shipping costs was previously around minus $4 a barrel, according to Bob Yawger, director of energy futures at Mizuho. It is now likely double that, at minus $8, due to surging freight rates, Yawger said.

“International crude is carrying a higher scarcity and logistics premium, while US barrels are struggling to clear abroad at current transportation costs,” said Shohruh Zukhritdinov, chief executive at oil trading firm NitrolOil.

The WTI-Brent spread has traded exclusively at a $4 discount ⁠or wider ​since July 7, according to LSEG. Yet US crude exports have remained relatively flat month over month, rising only 45,000 barrels per ​day from July to August, at 3.72 million bpd, according to Kpler.

On a three-month average basis, US crude exports for September are currently on track to fall for the third consecutive month to their lowest since before the Iran war broke out in February, ​according to Kpler.

“A wide paper spread is an invitation to test the arbitrage, not proof that the arbitrage is open,” said Zukhritdinov.

Reporting by Georgina McCartney, Arathy Somasekhar in Houston, Noel john in Bangalore; Editing by Edmund Klamann

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2