2026年9月3日 1:06 UTC / 路透社
戴维·谢泼德森 撰稿
华盛顿9月2日电(路透社)——华盛顿一名法官周三阻止美国环境保护署(EPA)将具有里程碑意义的加州汽车排放规则提交由共和党掌控的国会,以寻求可能的废除。
美国环保署此前向国会提交了四项豁免权供其审议,这些豁免权授予加州制定自身汽车、卡车以及园林设备排放标准的权力。特朗普政府正采取多方面行动,剥夺加州要求汽车和卡车更清洁、更多使用电力的能力。美国环保署和国会还颁布了相关规则,允许汽车制造商销售更多燃油汽车和卡车,同时提高电动汽车的购买成本。
通过《每日案卷》新闻简报将最新法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱,开启您的晨间阅读。点击此处订阅
如果特朗普政府的行动成功,将无限期禁止加州监管汽车尾气排放,未来的民主党总统也无法轻易恢复加州的监管权力。
今年6月,美国环保署表示,根据此前民主党政府时期通过的《联邦清洁空气法》授予加州的汽车排放豁免权,应按照《国会审查法案》(CRA)提交给议员们审议。根据该法案,美国参议院只需简单多数票即可废除这些豁免权,而非大多数立法所需的60票。
《国会审查法案》仅允许废除监管规则。加州就此在联邦法院提起诉讼,阻止美国环保署的这一行动,称根据《国会审查法案》将豁免权提交参议院是非法的,因为这些是豁免权而非监管规则。
该州指出,其中一项豁免权于2009年获得批准。
美国地区法官贝里尔·豪厄尔在一项初步禁制令裁决中表示,美国环保署在寻求法院批准并辩称该机构无视严重不一致之处时,曾敦促法院“采取奥威尔式的双重思想”。
“美国环保署不能在对国会说一套的同时,无视将这些豁免权重新归类为规则所带来的任何后果,”豪厄尔说道。“这种耍花招的行为看似是精明的政策举措,但却破坏了对法律的诚实遵守。”
她指示美国环保署“在其机构权限内采取一切必要措施,恢复6月份之前的现状”。
美国环保署未立即置评。
环境保护基金律师安迪·苏对这一裁决表示赞赏,称其将有助于“保护4000万加州人长期以来赖以减少污染、保护健康和节省开支的重要保障措施”。
议员们原本准备最早在本月晚些时候就这些豁免权进行投票。
去年,在丰田、通用汽车等汽车制造商游说要求放宽加州的排放法规后,国会废除了加州在2035年后禁止燃油汽车销售的权力。
这一行动是在美国环保署将豁免权提交国会以寻求废除之后发生的。加州就此提起的另一项法律挑战仍在审理中。
戴维·谢泼德森 华盛顿报道;穆拉利库马尔·安南塔拉曼与托马斯·德平豪斯 编辑
US judge bars EPA effort to send California vehicle emissions rules to Congress
September 3, 2026 1:06 AM UTC / Reuters
By David Shepardson
Morning traffic makes its way along a Los Angeles freeway in Los Angeles, California, U.S., September 19, 2019. REUTERS/Mike Blake
WASHINGTON, Sept 2 (Reuters) – A judge in Washington on Wednesday blocked the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency from sending landmark California vehicle emissions rules for a potential repeal to the Republican-controlled Congress.
The four waivers sent by the EPA to Congress for review granted California authority to enact its own emission standards for cars and trucks as well as lawn-and-garden equipment. The Trump administration has mounted a multi-pronged effort to deny California the ability to require cleaner and more electric vehicles. The EPA and Congress have also enacted rules making it easier for automakers to sell more gas-powered cars and trucks, while making it more expensive to buy EVs.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
If the Trump administration is successful, it would bar California indefinitely from regulating tailpipe emissions and a future Democratic president would be unable to easily reinstate its regulatory powers.
In June, the EPA said the vehicle emissions waivers granted to California by the federal Clean Air Act under prior Democratic administrations should have been sent to lawmakers under the Congressional Review Act (CRA), which would allow the U.S. Senate to repeal them by a simple majority rather than the 60 votes needed for most legislation.
The CRA allows only regulations to be repealed. California sued to block the action in federal court, saying it was illegal to send the waivers to the Senate under the CRA since they were waivers and not regulations.
The state noted one waiver had been approved in 2009.
U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell said in a preliminary injunction ruling that the EPA had urged the court to “engage in Orwellian doublethink” in seeking approval and arguing the agency is ignoring serious inconsistencies.
“The EPA cannot say one thing to Congress while ignoring any consequence from reclassifying these waivers as rules,” Howell said. “Such gamesmanship may seem like a clever policy move, but undermines honest compliance with the law.”
She directed EPA “to take all necessary steps within the agency’s control to restore the status quo” before June.
The EPA did not immediately comment.
Andy Su, a lawyer at the Environmental Defense Fund, praised the ruling, saying it will help “protect vital safeguards that 40 million Californians have long relied on to cut pollution, protect health and save money.”
blob:https://www.reuters.com/b6ab46ce-8df5-4b56-abfe-bd0361e6c39d
Lawmakers had been preparing to vote on the waivers as soon as later this month.
Last year, Congress rescinded authority for California to outlaw gas-powered vehicles after 2035 after Toyota, General Motors and other automakers lobbied for relief from the state’s emissions regulations.
The action came after the EPA sent the waivers to Congress for repeal. A separate legal challenge from California on that action is pending.
Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Muralikumar Anantharaman and Thomas Derpinghaus
发表回复