最高法院临时允许白宫宴会厅施工继续进行


2026年8月21日 / 美国东部时间下午3:01 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

作者:雅各布·罗森

华盛顿讯——美国最高法院周五临时允许白宫宴会厅的施工继续进行,暂时搁置了下级法院原本会叫停该项目地上工程的裁决。

首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨下达了一项暂缓执行令,将持续有效直至最高法院采取进一步行动。该命令为临时性措施,为最高法院留出更多时间来考虑司法部提出的暂停地区法院禁令的请求——若最高法院未采取行动,该禁令将于午夜生效。

特朗普政府上周已请求最高法院介入,允许这座占地9万平方英尺的宴会厅继续施工。

罗伯茨的暂缓令出台之前,联邦上诉法院本月早些时候作出了分裂裁决,认定国会而非特朗普总统或白宫拥有“对联邦财产及其维护和发展资金的完整宪法控制权”,并指出“不存在任何明示或默示的授权”允许特朗普建造这座耗资4亿美元的宴会厅。

美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院维持了地区法院今年早些时候下达的禁令,该禁令本应叫停白宫宴会厅的施工。但哥伦比亚特区巡回法院将其裁决暂缓14天至周五,以便司法部有时间向最高法院寻求救济。

在提交给最高法院的文件中,司法部副部长D.约翰·佐尔请求大法官们暂停下级法院叫停地上工程的裁决,以待该项目的法律纠纷得到解决。此次翻新工程还包括地下掩体、医疗设施及其他设施,法官已允许相关工程继续进行。

“本案涉及一项非同寻常且非法的禁令,该禁令将叫停白宫东翼综合军事设施的在建工程,其中包括完全安全的宴会厅空间,而这对国家安全至关重要,”佐尔写道。

特朗普也重申了这一担忧,辩称施工必须继续,因为这“至关重要”地关系到他本人、后续总统以及美国的国家安全,尤其是考虑到最近针对他的几起暗杀阴谋被挫败。本月早些时候,特朗普在Truth Social的帖子中称美国国家历史保护信托基金为“叛国者”,并毫无根据地指控他们“泄露了顶级军事机密!”

但特朗普经常将拟议宴会厅下方新建的总统安全掩体施工与宴会厅本身的施工混为一谈。在下级法院审理法律挑战期间,所有用于国家安全设施的地下工程都在继续进行,目前争议仅涉及宴会厅实体建筑的地上施工部分。

“没有上部结构,下部结构就无法发挥作用,同样,没有下部结构,上部结构也无法发挥作用。这全是一个高度一体化的整体,”特朗普在批评该信托基金的同一篇Truth Social帖子中写道。他随后在同一条消息中补充道,这场诉讼“是这种严重且公然的司法滥用,这正是美国人对我们的司法系统失去信心的原因所在。”

政府已向最高法院警告称,宴会厅的施工进度已无法叫停。负责该项目的白宫官员约书亚·费希尔在提交给大法官的声明中表示,即便法院下令拆除或改建该建筑,“也无法做到”。佐尔在提交给最高法院的文件中也写道,地区法院的“停工令”“根本无法执行”。

他表示,下级法院此前的暂缓令允许宴会厅工程继续进行,已使施工“到了无法回头的地步”。

作为回应,美国国家历史保护信托基金指责特朗普政府试图“逃避司法审查”。他们在文件中称,在案件提交哥伦比亚特区巡回法院审理期间,白宫“以250名工人每天工作20小时、每周工作7天的速度加快了施工进度”。

特朗普声称,他已通过私人捐赠者以及洛克希德·马丁、亚马逊和微软等大型企业的捐款,筹集到了完成该项目所需的4亿美元中的大部分资金。

负责监督该项目法律挑战的美国地区法官理查德·莱昂认定,特朗普政府的项目筹资方式非法:捐款通过一家非营利组织募集,先转给国家公园管理局,再转入用于常规白宫维护和修缮的基金。

宴会厅项目于10月动工,此前已拆除了东翼建筑。美国国家历史保护信托基金于12月提起诉讼,要求叫停宴会厅施工,称该工程非法。

莱昂于3月下达初步禁令,叫停相关施工,并于4月澄清,其命令不涵盖地下国家安全设施的施工。

哥伦比亚特区巡回法院随后以2比1的投票结果作出有利于该信托基金的裁决,认定白宫未经国会授权不得建造宴会厅。

Supreme Court temporarily allows White House ballroom construction to continue

August 21, 2026 / 3:01 PM EDT / CBS News

By Jacob Rosen

Washington — The Supreme Court on Friday temporarily allowed construction of the White House ballroom to continue, freezing for now a lower court decision that would have halted above-ground work on the project.

Chief Justice John Roberts issued a stay that will remain in place until the Supreme Court takes further action. His order is temporary and gives the high court additional time to consider the Justice Department’s request to pause a district court’s injunction, which was set to take effect at midnight unless the Supreme Court acted.

The Trump administration asked the high court last week to intervene and allow construction of the 90,000-square-foot ballroom to continue.

Roberts’ stay came after a divided federal appeals court concluded earlier this month that Congress, not President Trump or the White House, has “full constitutional control over federal property and the funding of its maintenance and development,” and noted an “absence of any express or implied authorization” that grants Mr. Trump the ability to construct the $400 million ballroom.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the injunction issued by the district court earlier this year that would’ve stopped construction on the White House ballroom. But the D.C. Circuit halted its ruling for 14 days, through Friday, to give the Justice Department time to seek relief from the Supreme Court.

In a filing with the court, Solicitor General D. John Sauer had asked the justices to pause the lower court ruling that blocked above-ground construction while the legal battle over the project plays out. The overhaul also includes an underground bunker, medical facilities and other features, and judges have allowed that work to continue.

“This case involves an extraordinary and unlawful injunction that will halt the ongoing construction of the integrated military complex, including a totally secure ballroom space, at the East Wing of the White House, which is vitally required by national security,” Sauer wrote.

Mr. Trump has reiterated that concern, arguing that construction must continue because it is “vital” to his safety and the safety of future presidents, and American national security, especially in light of recent foiled assassination plots against him. In a Truth Social post earlier this month, Mr. Trump called the National Trust for Historic Preservation “TREASONISTS” and alleged without evidence that they “revealed Top Military Secrets!”

But Mr. Trump has often conflated the ongoing construction of a new presidential security bunker that is being built underneath the proposed ballroom, and the construction of the ballroom itself. As the legal challenge has played out in lower courts, all below-ground construction on national security facilities has continued, and only above-ground work on the physical construction of the ballroom is at issue.

“The lower section does not work without the upper section and, likewise, the upper section does not work without the lower. It is all one highly integrated unit,” Mr. Trump wrote in the same Truth Social post criticizing the Trust. He later added in the same message that the lawsuit “is this kind of gross and flagrant abuse of our Courts that is exactly why Americans are losing faith in our System of Justice.”

The administration has warned the Supreme Court that work on the ballroom is too far along to stop. The White House official managing the project, Joshua Fisher, said in a declaration submitted to the justices that even if a court ordered the building to be taken down or altered, “there would be no way to do so.” And Sauer wrote in the filing with the high court that the “stop-work mandate” from the district court is “impossible.”

Lower court stays, which have allowed ongoing work on the ballroom, have pushed construction “beyond the point of return,” he said.

In response, the National Trust for Historic Preservation has accused the Trump administration of trying to “outrun judicial review.” While the case was before the D.C. Circuit, the White House “accelerated construction” with a 250-person crew working 20 hours a day, seven days a week, they wrote.

Mr. Trump has claimed to have raised most of the $400 million he says he needs to complete the project through donations from private donors and major corporations like Lockheed Martin, Amazon and Microsoft.

U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, the judge who is overseeing the legal challenge to the project, found that the Trump administration’s means of funding the project — in which donations were collected through a nonprofit organization, transferred first to the National Park Service and then to a fund used for typical White House maintenance and repairs — was unlawful.

Construction on the ballroom project began in October following demolition of the East Wing. The National Trust for Historic Preservation filed its lawsuit to halt ballroom construction in December, arguing the work is unlawful.

Leon issued his preliminary injunction that would block construction in March and clarified in April that work on the below-ground, national security facilities was not covered by his order.

The D.C. Circuit then ruled in favor of the Trust in a 2-1 decision, finding that the White House could not build the ballroom without authorization from Congress.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2