特朗普真的在乎俄罗斯帮助伊朗 targeting 美军吗?


2026-07-29T04:00:25.443Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/29/politics/trump-russia-iran-us-troops

当唐纳德·特朗普总统发动对伊朗战争时,他的主要目标之一是阻止德黑兰资助中东的代理武装组织。他指出,这些代理武装组织曾造成数十名美军伤亡。

但当被问及俄罗斯是否在帮助伊朗 targeting 这些美军时,特朗普似乎出奇地漠不关心。

而这已经成为他相当常见的态度。

最近的例子来自国防部长皮特·赫格斯瑟上周在参议院委员会的证词。

当被问及中国和俄罗斯是否在帮助伊朗时,赫格斯瑟表示,“这两个国家都在以各种方式”“为伊朗的一些行径提供便利,没错”。

两天后,国务卿马可·卢比奥在与俄罗斯外交部长谢尔盖·拉夫罗夫会谈时,回避了相关提问。

随后特朗普在社交媒体上发文反驳赫格斯瑟。他称,在他看来,中国和俄罗斯“没有参与”对伊战争,因为两国领导人向他保证过,不会向德黑兰出售武器。

“我信任他们,你懂的,”特朗普当天晚些时候说道,并补充道:“他们可能会做一些小动作。但至少到目前为止,情况还不算严重。我认为他们不会想让我失望。”

但俄罗斯被指控的不仅是可能向伊朗提供武器;乌克兰总统弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基曾表示,莫斯科向伊朗提供了美军基地的卫星图像。

当周一被问及此事时,特朗普再次淡化了其重要性——称这将是“无足轻重的”——但补充道:“我们会查明此事是否属实。我会(俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔)普京询问此事。”

但这并非特朗普首次需要向普京提及这一旧闻。CNN对此的首次报道可追溯至近五个月前的3月初,当时据多位熟悉美国情报消息的人士透露,CNN首次报道俄罗斯向伊朗提供美军目标情报。

(《纽约时报》此后报道称,美国和欧洲官员也认为莫斯科正向伊朗提供无人机及无人机零部件,克里姆林宫对此予以否认。)

特朗普对CNN3月的报道反应与如今如出一辙。他表示自己“完全没有收到任何相关迹象”,但战争初期的结果表明此事影响不大。

“老实说,无论此事是否发生,其实都没那么重要,”白宫新闻秘书卡罗琳·莱维特补充道,“因为特朗普总统和美国军方正在彻底击溃这个流氓伊朗恐怖政权。”

特朗普的俄乌战争谈判代表之一史蒂夫·维特科夫表示,他曾“强烈”告知俄罗斯不要向伊朗提供 targeting 信息及其他援助。但特朗普从未如此明确地公开表态。

即便本月美军再次因伊朗方面的行动身亡,此事显然仍未让他太过担忧。

这一切都与特朗普的第一任期颇为相似,当时也有情报显示俄罗斯与 targeting 美军有关联。当时的情况是,俄罗斯可能在阿富汗为美军士兵悬赏取人头。

截至2020年中期,特朗普否认曾口头听取过相关简报。但CNN等媒体报道称,该情报曾出现在2020年2月的每日简报中(众所周知他并未完整阅读过简报),且白宫早在2019年初就已收到相关可能性的情报。

特朗普将该报道斥为可能的“骗局”和“假新闻”,在报道发出数周后,他表示自己曾在与普京的通话中拒绝提及此事。

“我从未和普京讨论过此事,”特朗普当时对Axios表示,“如果讨论过,我也没问题。”

特朗普政府强调相关情报并非确凿无疑,而拜登政府在2021年表示,中情局对该情报仅“低到中度置信度”。但这仍不排除可能性。且鉴于此事关乎美军士兵的生命,总统似乎理应对此极为关注。

但特朗普一如既往地采取了类似做法——明显将美国的行为与之划上等号。在第一任期内,他将俄罗斯在阿富汗为美军士兵悬赏的可能性,与美国在20世纪80年代援助阿富汗反苏武装相提并论。而早在今年3月,他就曾表示俄罗斯会“说我们也会对他们这么做,不是吗?”

这种态度的问题不仅在于将美国置于与俄罗斯相似的道德立场上;还在于这向俄罗斯传递了一个信号:如果俄罗斯确实在帮助伊朗 targeting 美军,这对特朗普而言并非红线。

Does Trump even care if Russia helps Iran target US troops?

2026-07-29T04:00:25.443Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/29/politics/trump-russia-iran-us-troops

When President Donald Trump launched the Iran war, one of his chief goals was to stop Tehran from funding proxy groups in the Middle East. Those proxy groups, he noted, were responsible for wounding and killing scores of US troops.

When it comes to whether Russia is helping Iran target those Americans, though, Trump seems remarkably incurious.

And that’s become a pretty familiar posture for him.

The most recent example stems from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s testimony before a Senate committee last week.

When asked whether China and Russia were helping Iran, Hegseth cited “ways in which both of those countries” have been “enabling some of the things Iran is doing, yes.”

Two days later, Secretary of State Marco Rubio ignored a question about the subject while seated across from Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

Then Trump issued a social media post contradicting Hegseth. He said China and Russia were “in my opinion, not participating” in the Iran war because their leaders had assured him they weren’t selling weapons to Tehran.

“I think, you know, I trust them,” Trump said later in the day, adding: “There could be some things they do. But, thus far, at least, it has not been major. I don’t think they’d want to have me disappointed.”

But Russia isn’t just accused of potentially arming Iran; Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said Moscow has given Iran satellite imagery of US bases.

When asked about this Monday, Trump again downplayed how much it mattered — saying it would have been “unimpactful” — but added, “We’ll find out if that’s true. I’ll ask (Russian President Vladimir) Putin about it.”

But it’s not like this is a new story for him to suddenly broach with Putin. CNN’s first story on this dates back nearly five months, to early March, when it first reported that Russia was providing intel on US military targets to Iran, according to multiple sources familiar with US intelligence.

(The New York Times has reported since then that US and European officials also believed Moscow was providing drones and drone parts to Iran, which the Kremlin denied.)

The president greeted CNN’s March reporting much like the news today. He said he had “had no indication of that whatsoever” but that the results in the war’s early days suggested it didn’t matter much.

“Whether or not this happened, frankly, it does not really matter,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt added, “because President Trump and the United States military are absolutely decimating the rogue Iranian terrorist regime.”

One of Trump’s negotiators to end the Russia-Ukraine war, Steve Witkoff, said he had “strongly” told Russia not to give Iran targeting information and other aid. But Trump never came out and said it so firmly.

And even after additional US deaths at the hands of Iran this month, the subject apparently still doesn’t concern him too much.

All of it sounds a lot like Trump’s first term, when there was also intelligence linking Russia to the targeting of US troops. Back then, it was Russia possibly placing bounties on those troops in Afghanistan.

As of mid-2020, Trump denied he had been orally briefed on it. But CNN and others reported it had been in his daily briefing in February 2020 (which he is not known to fully read) and that the White House had received intelligence about the possibility as far back as early 2019.

Trump knocked the story as possibly a “hoax” and “fake news” and, weeks after it was reported, said he had declined to bring it up during a call with Putin.

“I have never discussed it with Putin,” Trump told Axios at the time. “I would, I have no problem with it.”

The Trump administration emphasized that the intelligence wasn’t conclusive, and the Biden administration said by 2021 that the CIA had only “low to moderate confidence” in it. But that still leaves open the possibility. And given it involves the lives of US troops, it would seem to be something a president might be pretty interested in.

Trump, though, has done what he often does — draw an apparent moral equivalency to what the US does. During his first term, he likened the possibility of Russia placing bounties on US troops to the United States aiding anti-Soviet forces in Afghanistan in the 1980s. And back in March, he said that Russia would “say we do it against them, wouldn’t they?”

The problem with this posture is not just that it places the United States on similar moral ground to Russia; it’s that it sends a message to Russia that helping Iran target US troops — if that indeed is happening — isn’t a red line for Trump.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2