2026-09-29T16:58:35.563Z / 路透社
作者：安德鲁·古兹沃德 丹·罗森茨威格-齐夫
2026年9月29日 下午4:58 UTC 更新于19分钟前
这张2025年4月23日的示意图中，印有美国总统唐纳德·特朗普的3D打印迷你模型，背景为美国国税局标志。路透社/达多·鲁维奇/示意图 购买授权许可
- 内容摘要
- 美国第十一巡回上诉法院发布裁决
- 法院认定法官的命令未违反言论自由权利
- 法官此前认定特朗普谋求个人利益
- 这些利益包括审计豁免和18亿美元基金
华盛顿9月29日路透电 — 美国一家上诉法院周二拒绝立即暂停对唐纳德·特朗普律师的制裁措施。一名法官此前指责这些律师在共和党总统起诉美国国税局的诉讼和解过程中滥用司法体系。
这一驳回特朗普律师和美国司法部申请的裁决，由总部位于亚特兰大的美国第十一巡回上诉法院的三名法官组成的合议庭作出，未出现反对意见。
《虚假信息监控》新闻简报汇总国际虚假信息叙事，每一期都包含“真实还是虚假？”测验。点击此处订阅。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
该裁决暂时维持了总部位于迈阿密的美国地区法官凯瑟琳·威廉姆斯的命令，后者认定特朗普不当提起100亿美元的诉讼，以从美国政府处谋取个人利益，包括一项现已废弃的为其盟友提供近18亿美元补偿的计划，以及免受税务审计的保护。
威廉姆斯认定，该和解协议存在不当串通，原因是特朗普作为总统，掌控着其私人律师提起诉讼所针对的机构。
法官的命令将特朗普的一名私人律师移交佛罗里达州法律纪律部门处理，并禁止该案所有当事人——包括特朗普、他的成年儿子以及同名公司——在未来的法律程序中将该协议称为法庭和解，或引用其任何条款。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
在对法官裁决的上诉中，特朗普的律师和美国司法部辩称，该命令违反了美国宪法第一修正案对言论自由的保护。
第十一巡回上诉法院合议庭认定，针对特朗普的一名律师亚历杭德罗·布里托的律师执业资格暂停决定并非可上诉的最终命令。合议庭还认定，法官禁止特朗普及其企业提及和解协议的限制足够适度，未侵犯言论自由权利。
特朗普法律团队的一名发言人重申了相关主张，称总统针对国税局的诉讼是“追究那些伤害美国和美国民众者责任的恰当方式”。美国司法部的一名发言人未立即回复置评请求。
特朗普今年针对国税局提起诉讼，指控该税务机构在其首任总统任期内未能充分阻止其税务记录泄露。特朗普和司法部律师在5月份达成和解协议，以撤销其诉讼为交换条件，国税局将为特朗普及其企业过往的税务主张提供豁免，司法部将设立近18亿美元的基金，赔偿那些声称此前遭受政府不当对待的盟友。
美国司法部在民主党和共和党议员反对后取消了该基金计划。
第十一巡回上诉法院合议庭表示，特朗普的律师和美国司法部“未提交或提供任何证据来解释他们的诉讼行为，也未证明该诉讼和和解协议不存在串通”。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
补充第6至11段的裁决细节
安德鲁·古兹沃德 报道；达芙妮·普萨莱达基斯 威尔·邓汉姆 编辑
我们的准则：汤姆森路透社信任原则
Appeals court declines to pause sanctions against Trump lawyers in IRS settlement
2026-09-29T16:58:35.563Z / Reuters
By Andrew Goudsward and Dan Rosenzweig-Ziff
September 29, 2026 4:58 PM UTC Updated 19 mins ago
A 3D-printed miniature model of U.S. President Donald Trump with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service logo in the background is seen in this illustration taken April 23, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration Purchase Licensing Rights
- Summary
- 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals issued ruling
- It found judge’s order did not violate free speech rights
- Judge earlier decided that Trump sought personal benefits
- Those included audit protections and a $1.8 billion fund
WASHINGTON, Sept 29 (Reuters) – A US appeals court declined on Tuesday to immediately block sanctions against lawyers for Donald Trump who a judge accused of misusing the court system in settling a lawsuit the Republican president filed against the Internal Revenue Service.
The ruling, rejecting a request made by Trump’s lawyers and the Justice Department, was issued by a three-judge panel of the Atlanta-based 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals, with no dissents noted.
The Misinformation Monitor newsletter rounds up international misinformation narratives, with a “Real or Fake?” quiz in every edition. Sign up here.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
The decision for now lets stand an order by Miami-based US District Judge Kathleen Williams concluding that Trump improperly filed a $10 billion lawsuit to extract personal benefits from the US government, including a now-abandoned plan for a nearly $1.8 billion fund for his allies and protections from tax audits.
Williams determined that the agreement was improperly collusive given that Trump, as president, controls the agencies his personal lawyers sued.
The judge’s order referred one of Trump’s personal lawyers to Florida legal disciplinary authorities and barred any of the parties in the case — including Trump, his adult sons and his namesake company — from referring to the agreement as a court settlement or citing any of its terms in future legal proceedings.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
In their appeal of the judge’s ruling, Trump’s lawyers and the Justice Department argued that it ran afoul of the US Constitution’s First Amendment protections for free speech.
The 11th Circuit panel concluded that the bar referral for one of Trump’s lawyers, Alejandro Brito, was not a final order that could be appealed. The panel also determined that the judge’s prohibition on Trump and his businesses referring to a settlement was sufficiently limited so as not to infringe on free speech rights.
A spokesperson for Trump’s legal team reiterated claims that the president’s lawsuit against the IRS was an appropriate means to “hold those who wrong America and Americans accountable.” A Justice Department spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Trump filed suit this year against the IRS, alleging the tax agency did not do enough to prevent the leak of his tax records during his first term as president. Trump and Justice Department lawyers brokered an agreement in May to dismiss his lawsuit in exchange for the IRS giving immunity to him and his businesses over past tax claims and the department creating a nearly $1.8 billion fund to compensate his allies who allege prior government mistreatment.
The Justice Department scrapped plans for the fund following opposition from Democratic and Republican lawmakers.
Trump’s lawyers and the Justice Department “did not submit or offer any evidence to explain their litigation conduct or demonstrate that the lawsuit and the settlement were not collusive,” the 11th Circuit panel stated.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Adds detail on ruling in paragraphs 6-11
Reporting by Andrew Goudsward; Editing by Daphne Psaledakis and Will Dunham
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
发表回复