2026年8月13日 美国东部时间早上7:21 / 福克斯新闻频道
美国劳工统计局数据显示,自2022年底AI聊天机器人推出以来,失业率一直维持在4.5%以下
作者:利奥·布里塞尼奥,福克斯新闻
直播:众议院民主党提出由AI税收资助的大规模就业计划
众议员格雷格·卡萨尔、瓦莱丽·富西和萨拉·雅各布斯将举办虚拟新闻发布会,提出一项新政策,拟通过对AI征税来资助就业项目,以应对人工智能可能带来的大规模失业问题。
新增功能:现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!
https://www..com/video/6402937131112
收听本文
5分钟
近几个月来,与参议院民主党党团结盟的佛蒙特州独立参议员伯尼·桑德斯等民主党高层,纷纷对人工智能表示担忧,并对其可能给就业市场带来的影响做出悲观预测,敦促政府进行干预。
“在尚未规划好应对措施的情况下,你怎么能继续推进,让数百万人失业?”桑德斯在今年4月的一场新闻发布会上说道。
但据美国劳工统计局数据,自2022年底人工智能聊天机器人问世以来,美国就业岗位持续增加,失业率始终维持在历史低位。民主党人的预测与市场实际情况之间的紧张关系,凸显了自由市场视角与中央计划替代方案之间的分歧。
顶尖经济学家警告“Z世代负担得起的社会主义”兴起
对于美国保守派智库“推进美国自由”的经济学家理查德·斯特恩而言,这场辩论揭示了更根本的世界观冲突。
“这不仅展示了自由市场与中央计划之间的差异,也体现了你对人类价值的定义:你认为人类仅仅是完成他人指派的工作?还是能够为邻居提供新价值和新服务的个体?”斯特恩说道。
斯特恩指出,创新历来都会淘汰部分岗位,但同时也会解放劳动者,让他们投身其他类型的工作并创造新产品。
他回忆起19世纪20年代的一项突破性技术对纺织业构成的威胁。
“我们发明了所谓的雅卡尔织布机,它本质上采用了早期的穿孔卡片系统。织布机可以自动升降织针,无需人类记住图案就能自行复制花纹,”斯特恩说道。
自2022年以来,尽管人工智能在工作场所的应用不断普及,美国劳动力市场仍持续增长,非农就业岗位每年都在增加。同期失业率始终低于4.5%。一些企业似乎也调整了对AI及其在职场中作用的预期。
其中一个案例是,《华尔街日报》报道称,多家企业在意识到AI并不会取代初级员工后,重新开始招聘,这与市场此前的预测相悖。
纽约国会众议院初选在AI之争中成为史上第二昂贵的众议院竞选
尽管短期数据表现积极,民主党仍持续要求政府介入,以遏制AI对劳动力市场的影响。
“AI是世界历史上最具变革性的技术——将对我国每一位男女老少的生活产生深远影响。如果你目前在职,那么你很有可能会失去工作,”桑德斯说道。
“斯坦福大学一篇题为《煤矿里的金丝雀?》的论文发现,在暴露于AI的岗位中,年轻工人的就业率已经下降了16%——比如计算机编程和客户服务岗位,”他补充道。
其他民主党人,如国会进步党团主席、来自德克萨斯州的众议员格雷格·卡萨尔,也表达了类似的担忧。
“似乎有一个实体完全没有意识到这一点:美国政府。本届国会提出的唯一一项重大AI提案,是一项阻止各州监管该行业的失败尝试,”卡萨尔在自己的新闻稿中说道,他指的是特朗普签署的《宏伟法案》中包含的一项为期10年的AI监管禁令条款。
该条款在参议院被否决,并未成为法律。
“我们当前的道路清晰可见,”卡萨尔继续说道。“AI将让少数投资者和高管更加富有,同时让数百万美国人失业——而政府对此无动于衷。”
特朗普政府前副幕僚长泰勒·布多维奇回应道,他告诉福克斯新闻数字频道:“特朗普的AI繁荣只会让美国工人的生产力更高。”
“民主党一直在告诉美国工人,AI会夺走他们的工作,”创新委员会创始人布多维奇说道。“事实是,特朗普总统的AI繁荣只会让美国工人比以往任何时候都更具生产力、更具就业竞争力。”
来自纽约州的众议员亚历山大·奥卡西奥-科特兹和马萨诸塞州的参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦,也参与了关于AI和就业的恐慌言论。
“如果AI能够扰乱一半的劳动力市场,我们就不能等到人们失业后才采取行动,”沃伦在6月说道。
“绝大多数美国人现在都担心AI会夺走他们的工作,让他们永久失业,”奥卡西奥-科特兹在2025年12月说道。
斯特恩认为,尽管新技术往往会扰乱市场,迫使员工、创新者和企业适应,但对市场的信心归根结底取决于信任。他补充道,呼吁政府阻止或控制这种变革,也是一种信任的体现。
“你信任数百万无名无面的企业家和创新者?还是信任政府?”斯特恩说道。
他将对政府的依赖比作一些人对待AI本身的方式——将其视为解决问题且不会出现人为失误的工具。
“‘克劳德,想怎么做就怎么做——不要产生幻觉,不要犯错’,对吧?”斯特恩说道,他指的是Anthropic公司推出的AI聊天机器人。
AI聊天机器人因左翼偏见遭抨击:‘不再被视为中立’
点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP
“民主党人200年来一直将政府视为这样的存在,对吧?他们会说,‘政府,解决这个没人能解决的问题,不要产生幻觉,不要犯错,不要腐败’,而我认为这些人只是不愿意承认,政府是由一群人组成的。”
利奥·布里塞尼奥是福克斯新闻数字频道国会团队的政治记者,此前曾任职于《世界杂志》。
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/9c3d50f9-0b34-4a71-821b-b86909ed3aa6
Democrats sound alarm over AI job apocalypse — but labor market isn’t following script
August 13, 2026 7:21am EDT / Fox News
Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows unemployment has remained below 4.5% since AI chatbots launched in late 2022
By Leo Briceno, Fox News
WATCH LIVE: House Dems propose mass employment plan funded by AI tax
Reps. Greg Casar, Valerie Foushee, and Sara Jacobs host a virtual press call proposing a new policy to address potential mass unemployment from artificial intelligence using an employment program funded by taxing AI.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
https://www..com/video/6402937131112
Listen to this article
5 min
In recent months, top Democrats like Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who caucuses with Senate Democrats, have raised fears about artificial intelligence and cast dismal projections about what it might mean for the job market, pressing for government intervention.
“How the hell do you go forward and throw millions of people out on the street without planning what’s going to happen?” Sanders said at a press conference in April.
But since the introduction of artificial intelligence chatbots in late 2022, the U.S. has continued to add jobs while unemployment has remained at historically low levels, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The tension between Democratic projections and market adjustments underscores the difference between free-market perspectives and more centrally planned alternatives.
LEADING ECONOMIST WARNS OF RISE OF ‘GEN Z AFFORDABILITY SOCIALISM’
U.S. Sen Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., hold a press conference to announce the Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act at the U.S. Capitol on March 25, 2026 in Washington, D.C.(Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)
To Richard Stern, an economist with Advancing American Freedom, a conservative think tank, the debate reveals a more fundamental clash of worldviews.
“It’s showcasing the difference between free market and central planning, but it’s also showing the difference in what you think it is to be human. Do you think it is to merely do the work that you’re told to do? Or is it to do things that provide new value and new service to your neighbors?” Stern said.
Stern pointed out that innovation has routinely eliminated some jobs while freeing up workers to pursue other kinds of work and create new products.
He recalled how the weaving industry was threatened by one such breakthrough in the 1820s.
“We invented something called a Jacquard loom, which had basically an early punch card system. It allowed a loom to automatically raise and lower needles so that it would replicate a pattern on its own without a human having to memorize what the pattern was,” Stern said.
Since 2022, the workforce has continued to grow, adding total non-farm payroll employment every year even as the use of AI has made its way into the workforce. Over the same window, unemployment has remained below 4.5%. Some companies seem to have also adjusted their expectations for AI and the role it plays in the workplace.
In one such case, the Wall Street Journal reported that several companies started hiring again when they realized AI wasn’t replacing junior workers, defying market projections.
NEW YORK CONGRESSIONAL PRIMARY BECOMES SECOND MOST EXPENSIVE HOUSE RACE EVER AMID AI FIGHT
University of Chicago leaders announced new AI-focused education policies, including a ban on electronic devices in first-year law classrooms and expanded instruction on the ethical use of artificial intelligence.(iStock)
Despite encouraging short-term data, Democrats have continued to demand that the government step in to curtail the impact AI has on the workforce.
“AI is the most transformational technology in the history of the world — and will have a profound impact on the life of every man, woman and child in our country. And, if you’re currently in the workforce, there’s a good chance it will take your job,” Sanders said.
“A Stanford paper called ‘Canaries in the Coal Mine?’ found there has already been a 16% decline in employment for younger workers in jobs exposed to AI— like computer programming and customer service,” he added.
Other Democrats, like Rep. Greg Casar, D-Texas, chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, have articulated similar fears.
“One entity seems totally unaware: the United States government. The only major AI proposal advanced this Congress was a failed effort to prevent states from regulating the industry,” Casar said in a press release of his own, referring to a proposed 10-year moratorium on AI regulation included in Trump’s signature One Big Beautiful Bill.
That provision was struck out in the Senate and did not become law.
“The path we are on is clear,” Casar continued. “AI will make a small number of investors and executives even richer, while it eliminates jobs for millions of Americans — and the government does nothing about it.”
The Trump White House’s former deputy chief of staff, Taylor Budowich, fired back, telling Fox News Digital that “Trump’s AI boom will only make the American worker more productive.”
“Democrats keep telling American workers that AI is going to take their jobs,” Budowich, the founder of Innovation Council, said. “The truth is that President Trump’s AI boom will only make the American worker more productive—and more employable—than ever before.”
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., have also participated in fearmongering about AI and jobs.
“If AI could disrupt half the workforce, we can’t wait until people lose their jobs to act,” Warren said in June.
“An overwhelming majority of Americans now worry that AI will take their jobs and leave them permanently unemployed,” AOC said in Dec. 2025.
Stern believes that while new technologies often disrupt markets and force employees, innovators and businesses to adapt, confidence in the market comes down to a matter of trust. He added that calling on the government to prevent that change or somehow control it is also a form of trust.
“Do you trust a million nameless, faceless entrepreneurs and innovators? Or do you trust the government?” Stern said.
He compared the reliance on government to how some people have treated AI itself — as a vehicle for solutions without human error.
“’Claude, do whatever — no hallucinations, make no mistakes,’ right?” Stern said, referring to an AI chat put out by Anthropic.
AI CHATBOTS TAKE HEAT OVER LEFT-WING BIAS: ‘NO LONGER BE CONSIDERED NEUTRAL’
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) waves in the U.S. Capitol on January 27, 2026, in Washington, DC.(Heather Diehl/Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“Democrats have viewed government as that for 200 years, right? They’re like, ‘government, solve this problem that no one else can figure out no hallucination no mistakes no corruption,’ and I think it’s people who are just unwilling to recognize that the government is a collection of people.”
Leo Briceno is a politics reporter for the congressional team at Fox News Digital. He was previously a reporter with World Magazine.
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/9c3d50f9-0b34-4a71-821b-b86909ed3aa6