2026-09-08 11:16:36 EDT / 福克斯新闻
艾德·米利班德同时宣布对真主党融资机构哈桑信贷（Al-Qard Al-Hassan）实施制裁，并重新恢复对伊朗的制裁
作者：埃弗拉特·拉赫特，福克斯新闻
发布于2026年9月8日美国东部时间上午11:16
美国驻以色列大使迈克·哈卡比表示，英国对以色列的制裁将引发美国反应
美国驻以色列大使迈克·哈卡比在接受《BBC世界服务新闻日报》采访时，就英国禁止进口约旦河西岸以色列定居点商品的计划发出警告，称其将产生负面影响。（图片来源：路透社 via 《BBC世界服务新闻日报》）
英国周二公布了针对约旦河西岸以色列定居点的全面新制裁措施，随即引发以色列与英国的外交破裂，以及一名特朗普政府高级官员的严厉警告。
以色列外交部长吉德翁·萨尔在总理本雅明·内塔尼亚胡的批准下，于周二宣布，以色列将关闭位于耶路撒冷的英国领事馆，并实施一系列反制措施以回应英国的制裁。
以色列的反制措施还包括将英国代表从基利亚特加特的国际加沙援助中心驱逐出去，终止英国在约旦河西岸训练巴勒斯坦权力机构部队的活动，并拒绝12名英国民选官员及其他英国国民入境——以色列指控这些人从事反犹太或反以色列活动。
英国拟制裁以色列定居点，首相伯恩曼或与特朗普爆发冲突：报道
2026年6月23日，英国外交大臣艾德·米利班德在伦敦议会宣布对定居点实施制裁政策。（托比·梅尔维尔/路透社）
“针对以色列的举措不会得不到回应，”萨尔说道。“任何针对以色列的行为，以色列都会反击，他们将在该地区失去影响力和存在感。”
这场升级发生在外交大臣艾德·米利班德告诉议会的数小时后，他表示英国将禁止进口来自以色列定居点的商品，瞄准那些协助定居点扩张的公司和个人，并拒绝发放任何实质性推动占领行动的武器及其他出口许可证。
此举是与法国、加拿大及其他欧洲伙伴协调推进的一部分，各国政府周二称约旦河西岸的“定居者暴力和定居点扩张达到前所未有的程度”，其中包括以色列的E1项目，他们认为该项目威胁到未来巴勒斯坦国的生存空间。这些措施出台之际，距世界各国领导人齐聚纽约参加联合国大会仅数周，距以色列10月27日的大选也不到两个月，这给以色列与其传统西方盟友之间本已紧张的关系增添了外交和政治风险。
与此同时，各国外长承认以色列“合法的安全利益”，并重申对哈马斯10月7日恐怖袭击的谴责，称其为“大屠杀以来最严重的反犹太屠杀”。他们表示，其目标仍是实现两国方案，让以色列和“一个主权、民主且有生存能力的巴勒斯坦国”和平安全地毗邻共存。
英国规避伊朗进攻角色引批评，同时暴露国防短板
约旦河西岸，又称犹地亚和撒马利亚。（马哈茂德·伊利安/美联社）
此次制裁的时机在英国国内也成为一个政治议题。一名不愿具名的工党议员告诉《每日电讯报》，首相安迪·伯恩曼面临同僚的压力，这些同僚担心与加沙相关的竞选活动会让工党失去席位给绿党；而以色列官员则指责伦敦试图干预以色列大选——英国政府否认了这些指控，称这些措施是为了维护两国方案。
“今天，我宣布英国政府的官方立场是，占领是非法的，”米利班德周二对议员们说道。
米利班德在发言开篇称自己是“自豪的英国犹太人”，“对以色列国怀有最深切的感激”，并回忆起他的祖母在纳粹手中失去丈夫和其他60名家人后在以色列避难的经历。
他强调，这些措施的目标是定居点，而非以色列本身。
“制裁制度将针对非法定居点和定居点扩张。而非以色列，”米利班德说道，并补充称英国将继续支持绿线以内与以色列的贸易，他还“全心全意”反对更广泛的“抵制、撤资、制裁”运动。
米利班德同时谴责英国国内日益猖獗的反犹太主义，称“将英国犹太人对以色列政府行为的责任归咎于他们，就是反犹太主义，直白而简单。”
他重申以色列有权打击恐怖主义，呼吁哈马斯在美国主导的20点加沙计划框架下解除武装并拆除其恐怖设施，并宣布对真主党融资机构哈桑信贷实施制裁。他还表示，英国将重新对伊朗实施重大经济制裁，并将继续与以色列开展针对共同威胁的安全合作。
这些措施立即遭到美国驻以色列大使迈克·哈卡比的批评，他在接受《BBC世界服务新闻日报》采访时警告，英国可能会在美国面临经济后果。
以色列官员称欧盟制裁暴露“社会可接受面具”下的反犹太主义
美国驻以色列大使迈克·哈卡比在耶路撒冷美国大使馆接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访时发言。（约阿夫·达德基维奇/ TPS-IL for 福克斯新闻）
“毫无疑问，会有后果的，”当被问及英国是否应做好承担后果的准备时，哈卡比说道。
哈卡比提到佛罗里达州和其他州的反抵制法，认为英国公司可能会面临在这些州开展业务的限制。
“如果英国人对以色列这个伙伴采取这样的行动，他们将无法在佛罗里达州开展业务，”他说道，警告这将“对英国企业造成巨大的经济影响”。
他还从实质层面质疑英国的政策，辩称根据奥斯陆协定，以色列有权在C区建设社区，并预测制裁将“产生非常负面的影响，无法实现英国人可能设定的任何目标”。
在BBC采访的另一个环节中，哈卡比说道：“我觉得这是对以色列政府的歧视，是对犹太人民的歧视。我无法理解这种逻辑。”
以色列真的被孤立了？民调与外交指向截然相反
以色列总统艾萨克·赫尔佐格在耶路撒冷接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访。（约阿夫·达德基维奇/TPS-IL for 福克斯新闻数字频道）
萨尔还指责伦敦干预以色列的选举活动，并表示对定居点的制裁是受英国国内工党会议前的政治因素驱动。
“英国的此举在道德上是扭曲的，构成了对主权国家事务及其选举进程的公然干涉，”他说道。
根据以色列总统办公室的声明，以色列总统艾萨克·赫尔佐格周二称英国的举动是“严重的误判”，并认为这相当于“严重干涉”以色列即将到来的选举。
位于特拉维夫的以色列法律中心舒拉特·哈丁（Shurat HaDin）的主席兼创始人尼察娜·达尚-莱特纳也批评了这些措施，称其经济影响有限，而政治后果可能相当严重。
“这些制裁并非严肃的经济政策；它们是以牺牲以色列为代价上演的政治闹剧，”达尚-莱特纳告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。她驳斥了英国对这片领土的法律定性，称“这片领土存在争议，并非主权巴勒斯坦土地，其未来应由双方在奥斯陆框架内通过谈判解决。”
达尚-莱特纳还指出，英国与以色列每年约80亿美元的贸易中，几乎没有来自约旦河西岸定居点的产品，因此这些措施几乎不会产生直接的经济影响，但可能会影响以色列大选前的政治辩论。
然而，米利班德辩称，若不采取行动，将任由定居点持续扩张，摧毁两国方案的可能性。他特别提到了耶路撒冷以东的以色列E1项目，英国和众多其他政府认为该项目威胁到未来巴勒斯坦国的领土生存空间。
萨尔驳斥了英国关于E1定居点项目威胁未来巴勒斯坦国生存空间的立场。
英国将多起反犹太袭击归咎于伊朗关联组织，禁止伊斯兰革命卫队
2026年4月30日，以色列约旦河西岸希洛定居点的利比基础设施和建筑工厂。（路透社/阿马尔·阿瓦德）
这项政策也暴露了英国国内的分歧。
保守党议员汤姆·图根达特在议会中承认，非法定居点是错误的，部分定居者对巴勒斯坦人犯下了“令人发指的暴行”，但辩称政府的回应有可能伤害到普通以色列人和巴勒斯坦人。
“我们反对的并非其意图，而是这种表演式政治，”图根达特说道，并警告在未获得足够广泛的国际支持的情况下采取行动是不可取的。
米利班德驳斥了这些措施旨在孤立以色列的说法。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP
2024年7月26日，一名以色列士兵在约旦河西岸贝塔镇的抗议活动中出现。（瓦哈杰·班尼·穆夫莱赫/中东图片社/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社）
“我们的分歧并非与以色列人民，英国与以色列人民有着不可动摇的联系，”他说道。“我们的分歧在于其政府的行为。”
埃弗拉特（埃菲）·拉赫特是福克斯新闻数字频道的记者，拥有超过15年报道冲突、全球事务、人权和政治问责的经验。
她执导并制作了200多段纪录片片段，足迹遍布40多个国家，记录冲突、人道主义危机、腐败、人口贩运、基于性别的暴力以及重大世界事件背后的人文故事。
拉赫特的报道带她进入中东、欧洲、亚洲和非洲的冲突地区和危机地带。她的工作包括揭露人口贩运网络、曝光叙利亚境内的ISIS地下酷刑监狱、记录乌克兰战争以及采访高级政治人物和世界各国领导人。她也是战争开始后进入俄罗斯的西方记者之一，带回了普京反对派的证词。拉赫特曾获得2022年佩雷斯和平中心奖，2023-2024年担任密歇根大学奈特-华莱士新闻研究员，还曾两次获得洛克沃尔优秀报道奖。她拥有传播学学士学位和政治学硕士学位。
Britain’s dramatic crackdown on Israeli settlements sparks fierce response as US blowback looms
2026-09-08 11:16:36 EDT / Fox News
Ed Miliband also announced sanctions against Hezbollah financing institution Al-Qard Al-Hassan and reimposed Iran sanctions
By Efrat Lachter, Fox News
Published September 8, 2026 11:16am EDT
Amb. Mike Huckabee says UK sanctions on Israel will see US reaction
US Amb. Mike Huckabee warns of negative impact over UK plan to ban Israeli West Bank settlement goods, speaking to ‘BBC World Service Newsday.’ (Credit: ‘BBC World Service Newsday’ via Reuters.)
The United Kingdom unveiled sweeping new measures targeting Israeli settlements in the West Bank on Tuesday, triggering an immediate diplomatic rupture with Israel and a sharp warning from a senior Trump administration official.
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar announced Tuesday, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s approval, that Israel would close the British Consulate in Jerusalem and impose a series of countermeasures in response to the UK sanctions.
The Israeli measures also include removing British representatives from the International Gaza Support Center in Kiryat Gat, ending British activities training Palestinian Authority forces in the West Bank and denying entry to 12 British elected officials and other British nationals whom Israel accused of antisemitic or anti-Israel activity.
UK MOVES TO SANCTION ISRAELI SETTLEMENTS AS PM BURNHAM RISKS CLASH WITH TRUMP: REPORT
Ed Miliband, the British Foreign Secretary who announced the settlement sanctions policy in Parliament on Tuesday in London, Britain, June 23, 2026.(Toby Melville/Reuters)
“Measures against Israel will not go unanswered,” Sa’ar said. “Whoever acts against Israel, Israel will act against them, and they will lose their influence and relevance in the region.”
The escalation came hours after Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband told Parliament that Britain would ban imports of goods from Israeli settlements, target companies and individuals facilitating settlement expansion and refuse licenses for arms and other exports that materially contribute to the occupation.
The move is part of a coordinated push with France, Canada and other European partners amid what the governments described Tuesday as “unprecedented levels of settler violence and settlement expansion” in the West Bank, including Israel’s E1 project, which they argue threatens the viability of a future Palestinian state. The measures come just weeks before world leaders gather for the UN General Assembly in New York and less than two months before Israel’s Oct. 27 election, adding diplomatic and political stakes to an already strained relationship between Israel and several of its traditional Western allies.
At the same time, the foreign ministers recognized Israel’s “legitimate security interests” and reiterated their condemnation of Hamas’ Oct. 7 terrorist attack, which they described as “the worst antisemitic massacre since the Holocaust.” They said their objective remained a two-state solution allowing Israel and “a sovereign, democratic and viable Palestinian state” to live side by side in peace and security.
UK DEFENSE SHORTFALLS HIGHLIGHTED AS BRITAIN AVOIDS IRAN OFFENSIVE ROLE AMID TRUMP CRITICISM
The West Bank, also known as Judea and Samaria.(Mahmoud Illean/AP)
The timing has also become a political issue inside Britain. An unnamed Labour MP told The Telegraph that Prime Minister Andy Burnham had faced pressure from colleagues worried about Gaza-related campaigning and losing seats to the Greens, while Israeli officials have accused London of trying to influence Israel’s election — claims the British government rejects as it frames the measures as an effort to preserve the two-state solution.
“Today, I announce that the official view of the British government is that the occupation is unlawful,” Miliband told lawmakers Tuesday.
Miliband opened the statement by describing himself as a “proud British Jew” with “the deepest gratitude to the State of Israel,” recalling how his grandmother found refuge there after losing her husband and 60 other family members at the hands of the Nazis.
He stressed that the measures were aimed at settlements rather than Israel itself.
“The sanctions regime will target illegal settlement and settlement expansion. Not Israel,” Miliband said, adding that Britain would continue to support trade with Israel inside the Green Line and that he “wholeheartedly” opposed the broader Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement.
Miliband also condemned rising antisemitism in Britain, saying, “Holding British Jews responsible for the actions of the Israeli government is anti-Semitism, plain and simple.”
He reaffirmed Israel’s right to defend itself against terrorism, called for Hamas to disarm and dismantle its terrorist infrastructure under the U.S. -led 20-point Gaza plan, and announced sanctions against Hezbollah financing institution Al-Qard Al-Hassan. He also said Britain was reimposing major economic sanctions on Iran and would continue security cooperation with Israel against shared threats.
The measures drew immediate criticism from US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, who warned in an interview with BBC World Service Newsday that Britain could face economic repercussions in the United States.
ISRAELI OFFICIAL SAYS EU SANCTIONS REVEAL ANTISEMITISM HIDING BEHIND ‘SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE MASK’
U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee speaks to Fox News Digital during an interview at the American embassy in Jerusalem, Israel.(Yoav Dudkevitch/ TPS-IL for Fox News)
“I think without a doubt there will be,” Huckabee said when asked whether the UK should expect consequences.
Huckabee pointed to Florida and other states with anti-boycott laws, arguing that British companies could face restrictions on doing business there.
“If the Brits do something like this with a partner, Israel, then they will not be able to do business in Florida,” he said, warning of a “huge economic impact on British businesses.”
He also challenged Britain’s policy on substantive grounds, arguing that Israel is permitted under the Oslo agreements to build communities in Area C and predicting that the sanctions would have “a very negative effect that does not meet whatever goal maybe that the Brits have.”
In a separate portion of the BBC interview, Huckabee said, “I feel like that it’s a discrimination against the Israeli government. It’s a discrimination against the Jewish people. And I don’t understand the rationale.”
IS ISRAEL REALLY ISOLATED? POLLS AND DIPLOMACY POINT IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS
Israeli President Isaac Herzog during an interview with Fox News Digital in Jerusalem, Israel.(Yoav Dudkevitch/TPS-IL for Fox News Digital)
Sa’ar also accused London of interfering in Israel’s election campaign and said the settlement sanctions were driven by domestic British politics ahead of the Labour Party conference.
“The British move is morally distorted and constitutes blatant interference in the affairs of a sovereign state and in its electoral process,” he said.
Israeli President Isaac Herzog called Britain’s move a “grave miscalculation” Tuesday and argued that it amounted to “gross interference” in Israel’s upcoming election, according to a statement from his office.
Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, president and founder of the Tel Aviv-based Shurat HaDin-Israel Law Center, also criticized the measures, arguing that their economic impact would be limited while their political consequences could be significant.
“These sanctions are not serious economic policy; they are political theatre staged at Israel’s expense,” Darshan-Leitner told Fox News Digital.She disputed Britain’s legal characterization of the territory, saying, “The territories are disputed, not sovereign Palestinian land, and their future must be negotiated by the parties under the Oslo framework.”
Darshan-Leitner also argued that because little of the roughly $8 billion in annual UK-Israel trade originates in West Bank settlements, the measures would have little direct economic effect while potentially influencing Israel’s political debate ahead of elections.
Miliband, however, argued that failing to act would allow continued settlement expansion to destroy the possibility of a two-state solution. He focused particularly on Israel’s E1 project east of Jerusalem, which Britain and numerous other governments say threatens the territorial viability of a future Palestinian state.
Sa’ar rejected Britain’s position that the E1 settlement project threatens the viability of a future Palestinian state.
UK PINS STRING OF ANTISEMITIC ATTACKS ON IRAN-LINKED GROUP, BANS IRGC
The Libi Infrastructure and Construction factory in the Israeli settlement of Shilo in the West Bank, April 30, 2026.(Reuters/Ammar Awad)
The policy has also exposed divisions within Britain.
Conservative lawmaker Tom Tugendhat acknowledged in Parliament that illegal settlements were wrong and that some settlers had committed “outrageous abuses” against Palestinians, but argued that the government’s response risked hurting ordinary Israelis and Palestinians.
“What we reject here is not the intent, but the performative politics,” Tugendhat said, warning against acting without sufficiently broad international support.
Miliband rejected arguments that the measures were intended to isolate Israel.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
An Israeli soldier is seen during a protest in the town of Beita, in West Bank on July 26, 2024.(Wahaj Bani Moufleh/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)
“Our argument is not with the people of Israel, with whom the UK has unshakable bonds,” he said. “Our argument is with the conduct of its government.”
Efrat (Effie) Lachter is a reporter for Fox News Digital with more than 15 years of experience covering conflict, global affairs, human rights and political accountability.She has directed and produced more than 200 documentary segments across more than 40 countries, documenting conflicts, humanitarian crises, corruption, human trafficking, gender-based violence and the human stories behind major world events.
Lachter’s reporting has taken her into conflict zones and crisis areas across the Middle East, Europe, Asia and Africa. Her work has included uncovering human trafficking networks, revealing an ISIS underground torture prison in Syria, documenting the war in Ukraineand interviewing senior political figures and world leaders. She was also among the Western journalists who entered Russia after the war began to bring testimonies from Putin’s opposition. Lachter is the recipient of the 2022 Peres Center for Peace Award and was a 2023–2024 Knight-Wallace Journalism Fellow at the University of Michigan. She also won two Rockower Awards for Excellence in Reporting. She holds a bachelor’s degree in communication and a master’s degree in political science.
