博客

  • 特朗普对杰罗姆·鲍威尔的讨伐适得其反


    2026年4月30日 美国东部时间下午1:35 / CNN
    作者:亚伦·布莱克
    2小时前
    发布于 2026年4月30日,美国东部时间下午1:35

    image
    美国联邦储备委员会主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔4月29日在华盛顿特区美联储大楼的新闻发布会上发言。

    唐纳德·特朗普总统的报复性讨伐行动中,最令人好奇的问题之一是:此举在多大程度上出于战略考量——也就是将对手打造成警示案例——又在多大程度上源于个人怨恨与恼怒。

    美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的案例似乎表明,背后主要是后者。

    因为如今特朗普因迟迟不肯放手,让这场讨伐彻底适得其反。

    早在这项行动在政治上显得不明智之后很久,总统仍在持续针对鲍威尔。如今,任期将于5月15日结束的鲍威尔决定留任美联储理事会理事,而这正是拜特朗普所赐。

    简言之:鲍威尔周三成为1948年以来首位在主席任期结束后选择留任美联储理事会的主席。他的理事任期至2028年,因此此举完全符合他的合法权利,但这一情况极为罕见。

    他的决定至少暂时剥夺了特朗普由自己任命的人员占据美联储理事会多数席位的可能。(鲍威尔由特朗普提名担任主席,但最初的理事提名来自巴拉克·奥巴马。)

    鲍威尔也明确表示,他做出这一决定的动机是特朗普试图以站不住脚的证据为依据,在法律层面针对他本人和美联储。多年来,特朗普一直抨击鲍威尔,只因美联储没有按照他的意愿下调利率。

    “我真正担忧的是针对美联储的一系列法律攻击,这些攻击威胁到我们在制定货币政策时不受政治因素干扰的能力,”鲍威尔周三说道。他称这些法律攻击“在美联储113年的历史上前所未有”,并提及“不断出现的采取更多此类行动的威胁”。

    鲍威尔补充道:“我留任完全是因为目前发生的这些行动。我原本早就计划退休了。你知道,过去三个月里发生的这些事情,我认为让我别无选择。”

    尽管鲍威尔没有直接明说,但他留任或许是为了保护自己。

    特朗普的司法部近期终止了对鲍威尔的刑事调查,并将问题交由监察长处理。此前,北卡罗来纳州共和党参议员汤姆·提利斯曾要求先结束这项调查,他才会投票确认特朗普提名的凯文·沃什担任新任美联储主席。

    但不难理解鲍威尔为何会担心司法部有朝一日重启调查。如果他辞职,届时在相关问题上就会失去筹码。

    提利斯曾表示,司法部告知他,除非监察长提出刑事转介,否则不会重新启动此案。但特朗普上周坚称此事并未“了结”,并继续就美联储大楼的翻新成本抨击鲍威尔。

    总统的这番表态颇具深意。政府当时正试图搁置这一问题,推动沃什的确认程序,但特朗普就是不肯善罢甘休。

    这早已是常态。

    早在特朗普第一任期时,鲍威尔就多次明确表示,不会屈服于总统的压力。

    去年鲍威尔站在特朗普身边,当场纠正了特朗普关于美联储翻新工程的虚假言论,这一细节体现了他的态度;当特朗普试图以同样站不住脚的指控罢免美联储 fellow 理事丽莎·库克时,鲍威尔出席了最高法院关于该案的口头辩论,这同样能说明问题;而在去年12月鲍威尔的刑事调查曝光后不久,他发布了一段 defiant 视频,更是将这种态度展现得淋漓尽致。

    但即便鲍威尔的主席任期即将结束,施压他的政治效用越来越低,特朗普仍在持续施压。

    就在4月15日——距鲍威尔主席任期结束恰好一个月——特朗普还在福克斯商业频道放话,如果鲍威尔留任美联储理事会,他就会将其解雇。(目前尚不清楚特朗普是否拥有这项权力。)

    随后在上周接受CNBC采访时,特朗普的友好主持人乔·克南扮演了类似福克斯新闻主持人肖恩·汉尼提常做的角色。他委婉建议特朗普换一条政治上更稳妥的道路——放过鲍威尔,以便沃什能够获得确认。

    在长达五分钟的对话中,克南多次提出这一想法,却都被特朗普摆手否决。

    “但不知为何——不行,”特朗普打断克南说道,“不过,乔,我们总得查清楚这种事怎么会发生。”

    克南最终说道:“我只是想帮你找个台阶下——”

    特朗普回应道:“嗯,情况确实如此又不尽然,乔。你得搞清楚为什么这种事会发生。”随后他继续纠缠不放。

    几天后,司法部似乎听从了克南的建议,结束了对鲍威尔的调查,但特朗普坚称此事并未了结。

    特朗普针对对手的报复行动大多进展不顺。对前联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米和纽约州检察长利蒂夏·詹姆斯的最初指控均被撤销。科米如今再次面临起诉,但这项指控几乎无人看好能在法庭上成立。司法部多次尝试重新起诉詹姆斯均告失败。未能以“告知服役人员违抗非法命令”起诉六名民主党议员。针对加州民主党参议员亚当·希夫等人的其他审查行动也都毫无结果。

    但即便这些报复行动没有一项能成功定罪,仅仅让他人的生活变得糟糕也算是有所“收获”。其他可能揭发真相或阻碍特朗普的人看到这一幕,或许会重新考虑自己的选择。

    与此同时,如果特朗普的报复行动持续无果,可能会对他的政治形象造成损害,毕竟民众从一开始就不太支持他的讨伐行动。

    (民调显示,与针对特朗普的指控相比,美国人认为最初针对科米和詹姆斯的指控合法性更低——尽管“让美国再次伟大”阵营抱怨不断,但多数美国人总体上认可针对特朗普的指控。)

    而针对某些特朗普的目标,总统的施压显然反而会让对方更加坚定立场,成为他更难对付的眼中钉。

    鲍威尔的情况似乎正是如此。特朗普的施压并未奏效,如今他还要和鲍威尔打更长时间的交道。

    How Trump’s crusade against Jerome Powell backfired

    2026-04-30 1:35 PM ET / CNN

    Analysis by

    Aaron Blake

    2 hr ago

    PUBLISHED Apr 30, 2026, 1:35 PM ET

    Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell speaks during a press conference at the Federal Reserve Board Building in Washington, DC, on April 29.

    Kent Nishimura/AFP/Getty Images

    One of the biggest questions about President Donald Trump’s retribution crusade is how much of it is driven by strategy — i.e. making cautionary tales out of his foes — and how much if it is driven by personal grievance and pique.

    The case of Fed Chair Jerome Powell would seem to suggest it’s largely the latter.

    Because it has now backfired spectacularly thanks to Trump’s inability to let it go.

    The president continued his campaign against Powell long after it started looking politically unwise. And now, Powell, whose term as chair ends on May 15, has decided to stay on the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors because of that.

    To sum up: Powell on Wednesday become the first chair since 1948 to opt to stay on the Fed board after his tenure as chair expires. His term as governor ends in 2028, so he’s well within his rights to do that. But it’s unusual.

    His decision deprives Trump of a Fed board majority made up of his own appointees, at least for now. (Powell was elevated to chair by Trump but initially nominated by Barack Obama.)

    And Powell made it abundantly clear that his motivation was Trump’s attempts to legally target him and the Fed (based on remarkably thin evidence). The president has attacked and targeted Powell for years over the Fed failing to lower interest rates like he wants.

    “My concern is really about the series of legal attacks on the Fed which threaten our ability to conduct monetary policy without considering political factors,” Powell said Wednesday. He called the legal attacks “unprecedented in our 113-year history” and cited “ongoing threats of additional such actions.”

    Powell added: “I’m literally staying because of the actions that have been taken. I had long planned to be retiring. And, you know, the things that have happened in, really, in the last three months have, I think, left me no choice.”

    While Powell didn’t say it directly, it seems possible that he might want to stay on in order to insulate himself.

    Trump’s Department of Justice recently closed its criminal investigation and left the issue to an inspector general, after GOP Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina demanded the investigation be closed before he would vote to confirm Kevin Warsh, Trump’s pick, as the new Fed chair.

    But you could understand if Powell might be concerned about the DOJ one day picking the case back up. Resigning would rob him of leverage in that circumstance.

    Tillis has said the DOJ informed him the case wouldn’t be rekindled without a criminal referral from the IG. But Trump last week insisted the matter hadn’t been “dropped” and continued attacking Powell over the cost of renovations to the Fed building.

    It was a telling comment from the president. The administration was trying to move past the issue and get Warsh confirmed, but Trump wouldn’t let it go.

    That’s been a theme.

    For years — dating back to Trump’s first term — Powell has made it abundantly clear that he wouldn’t buckle to the president’s pressure.

    That was evident when Powell corrected Trump’s false claims about the Fed renovations in real time last year while standing next to him. It was evident when Powell attended Supreme Court oral arguments over Trump’s attempt to fire fellow Fed Governor Lisa Cook over similarly thin allegations. And it was perhaps most evident in the defiant video Powell released shortly after his criminal investigation became public in December.

    But even as his tenure as chair wound down and the utility of pressuring him became less and less, Trump kept pushing.

    As recently as April 15 — exactly one month before Powell’s tenure expires — Trump was on Fox Business Network threatening to fire him if he stayed on the Fed board. (It’s not clear Trump has this power.)

    Then during an appearance last week on CNBC, Trump-friendly host Joe Kernen played a role often played by Fox News’ Sean Hannity. He gently suggested that maybe Trump should take a different, more politically expedient course — by letting go of Powell so Warsh could get confirmed.

    In a five-minute exchange, Kernen repeatedly floated the idea, only to have Trump shrug it off.

    “And somehow – no,” Trump said while talking over Kernen. “But, Joe, somehow we have to find out how this can happen.”

    Kernen eventually said: “I’m just trying to look for an off-ramp to get for you –”

    Trump responded: “Well, it is and it isn’t, Joe. You have to find out why a thing like that could happen.” And he plowed forward.

    Then, after the DOJ seemed to heed Kernen’s advice a few days later and ended its Powell probe, Trump insisted the matter wasn’t finished.

    His attempts at retribution against his foes have largely gone poorly. The initial indictments of former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James were vacated. Comey has now been reindicted, but for something few expect to hold up in court. The DOJ has failed repeatedly to re-indict James. It failed to indict six Democratic lawmakers for telling servicemembers to disobey illegal orders. Other efforts to scrutinize the likes of Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California have failed to bear fruit.

    But even if none of these efforts at retribution results in a conviction, there’s something to be said for merely making people’s lives hell. Others who might blow the whistle or stand in your way will see that and perhaps reconsider their choices.

    At the same time, if Trump’s pursuits keep fizzling, that could hurt him politically, given people were never too keen on his retribution crusade in the first place.

    (Polls have shown Americans saw the initial charges against Comey and James as less legitimate than the charges against Trump, which – despite MAGA’s complaints – majorities of Americans generally approved of.)

    And when it comes to certain Trump targets, the president’s efforts can apparently steel their spine and make them even more of a thorn in his side.

    That appears to be what’s happening with Powell. Trump’s pressure didn’t work, and now he gets to deal with Powell for even longer.

  • 众议院通过参议院法案 为国土安全部拨款并结束创纪录的76天停摆


    2026年4月30日 / 美国东部时间下午3:45 / 哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)新闻

    华盛顿——众议院周四以全票通过了参议院此前通过的一项法案,为美国国土安全部的大部分机构提供拨款,此举将很快结束这场已导致多个关键机构难以维持运转、无法支付员工薪酬的76天停摆。

    国会众议院当天下午以无记名口头表决方式通过该法案,过程低调,这标志着议员们终于准备好打破僵局。众议院的表决结果将法案提交至特朗普总统办公桌,待总统签署生效后,此次停摆即可结束。

    国土安全部自2月14日起停摆,成为美国历史上最长的部分政府停摆事件。民主党曾反对为移民海关执法局(ICE)和边境巡逻队提供拨款,这两个隶属于国土安全部的机构是执行特朗普移民收紧政策的主力。

    参议院上月全票通过了为国土安全部其余机构拨款的法案,但众议院共和党人否决了该计划,辩称这是向民主党要求取消总统移民政策的要求妥协。

    参议院多数党领袖约翰逊、约翰·图恩以及特朗普总统最终就分两步全面为国土安全部拨款达成共识。第一步是众议院通过参议院提交的国土安全部拨款法案,立即恢复该部门运转。第二步则是通过预算协调程序为移民海关执法局和边境巡逻队提供资金,此举将允许共和党人无需民主党参议院议员支持即可通过法案。

    总统今年3月下令国土安全部重新调配资金以支付员工薪酬。国土安全部部长马克韦恩·马伦曾警告称,用于发放工资的资金将在5月初耗尽,这加大了议员们通过参议院法案的压力。

    众议院领导层此前一直在等待协调程序推进后再就参议院法案进行投票。本周参众两院均朝着制定协调法案迈出了第一步,通过了一项预算计划,指示相关委员会起草法案为移民执法机构提供资金。

    “我们搁置了国土安全部基础拨款法案,因为我们必须确保他们无法孤立并撤销这两个关键机构,”约翰逊在周四投票结束后对记者表示,“我们现在正在推进相关工作。我们首先通过了这项决议,这对我们而言至关重要,以确保我们能够保护国土安全,尽管民主党不愿这么做。既然这一目标已经达成,我们就可以继续推进其余工作。”

    特朗普曾表示,希望协调法案能在6月1日前提交至他的办公桌。

    移民海关执法局和边境巡逻队在去年的《超级宏伟法案》中获得了数百亿美元拨款,这意味着它们的运作在停摆期间基本未受影响。

    资金短缺的冲击主要落在海岸警卫队、运输安全管理局和联邦紧急事务管理局等国土安全部其他部门身上。海岸警卫队司令凯文·伦迪海军上将在接受CBS新闻独家采访时表示,他的团队对僵局持续如此之久“感到愤怒”,称这“令人极其沮丧”。

    贾拉·布朗为本报道撰稿。

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/coast-guard-officers-are-going-into-debt-to-follow-orders-during-shutdown-chief-says/

    House approves Senate bill to fund DHS and end record-setting 76-day shutdown

    April 30, 2026 / 3:45 PM EDT / CBS News

    Washington — The House on Thursday unanimously approved a Senate-passed bill to fund most of the Department of Homeland Security, a move that will soon end the 76-day shutdown that has left many critical agencies struggling to maintain operations and pay employees.

    The chamber approved the bill by voice vote Thursday afternoon with little fanfare, a sign that lawmakers were finally ready to put the impasse behind them. The House’s action sends the legislation to President Trump’s desk, and the shutdown will end once he signs the bill into law.

    The department has been shut down since Feb. 14, making it the longest partial government shutdown in U.S. history. Democrats have objected to funding Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol, the two agencies under DHS that have led the charge on enforcing Mr. Trump’s immigration crackdown.

    The Senate unanimously passed legislation to fund the rest of DHS last month. But House Republicans rejected that plan, arguing that the bill would be caving to Democratic demands to defund the president’s immigration agenda.

    Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune and President Trump eventually coalesced around a plan to fund the entirety of DHS on two parallel tracks. The first would involve the House passing the Senate DHS bill to immediately reopen the department. The second involves funding ICE and Border Patrol through the budget reconciliation process, which will allow Republicans to approve a bill without support from Senate Democrats.

    The president ordered DHS to redirect money to pay employees in March. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin warned that funding to make payroll would dry up by the beginning of May, increasing pressure on lawmakers to pass the Senate bill.

    House leaders had been waiting for the reconciliation process to move forward before bringing up the Senate legislation. Both chambers took the first step toward crafting the reconciliation package this week, adopting a budget plan that instructs the relevant committees to write legislation to fund the immigration agencies.

    “We held the homeland bill, the underlying funding bill, because we had to ensure that they could not isolate and eliminate those two critical agencies,” Johnson told reporters after Thursday’s vote. “We are getting those done now. We passed the resolution first. That was critically important for us to do, to ensure that we’re going to protect the homeland, even though Democrats are unwilling to do it. So now that that box is checked, we’re allowed then to proceed and go through with the rest of it.”

    Mr. Trump has said he wants the reconciliation package on his desk by June 1.

    Both ICE and Border Patrol received tens of billions of dollars in funding in last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, meaning their operations have continued mostly unimpeded during the shutdown.

    The brunt of the funding lapse has thus been felt by other DHS components like the Coast Guard, Transportation Security Administration and Federal Emergency Management Agency. Adm. Kevin Lunday, the commandant of the Coast Guard, told CBS News in an exclusive interview that his workforce was “furious” that the impasse had dragged on so long, calling it “incredibly frustrating.”

    Jaala Brown contributed to this report.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/coast-guard-officers-are-going-into-debt-to-follow-orders-during-shutdown-chief-says/

  • 民主党未能在关键伊朗问题截止日前动摇共和党立场


    2026-04-30T15:11:25-04:00 / 福克斯新闻网

    五角大楼高级官员披露伊朗战争已耗资250亿美元

    作者:亚历克斯·米勒 福克斯新闻网
    发布于2026年4月30日 美国东部时间下午3:11

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6393112638112

    民主党推动就伊朗战争授权新投票

    福克斯新闻首席国会记者查德·珀格拉姆在《特别报道》节目中报道了民主党推动投票结束伊朗战争,以及当前正在进行的国土安全部资金争夺战。

    全新功能:您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    在限制特朗普总统战争权力的周五截止日期临近之际,参议院民主党人再次未能动摇共和党对唐纳德·特朗普总统对伊朗冲突的统一支持。
    此次投票是共和党第六次否决民主党牵头的决议,该决议旨在限制总统的权力并终止这场冲突。加州民主党参议员亚当·希夫在截止日期前做出最后努力,以限制特朗普的行动,届时国会将就是否继续美国在中东的作战行动做出决定。

    特朗普首次向国会通报对伊朗打击行动后的60天,议员们本应批准或终止这场战争。这一截止日期将于5月周五到来,届时议员们将离开华盛顿特区,开始为期一周的休会。

    赫格塞斯出席参议院听证会,伊朗战争250亿美元代价与60天战争权力截止日期临近


    美国总统唐纳德·特朗普2026年4月25日在马里兰州安德鲁斯联合基地降落后挥手致意,返回华盛顿。(罗伯托·施密特/盖蒂图片社)

    尽管一些共和党人对将冲突延长至60天期限后表示担忧,并正在审议一项《使用军事力量授权法》(AUMF),但希夫表示,这方面的努力“为时已晚”。
    “仅仅提出一项法案是不够的,”希夫说,“而且今天不可能在两院通过并获得总统签署。”

    与此同时,共和党人辩称,特朗普拥有单方面权力,无需国会明确批准即可继续战争30天。然而,这一窗口本应是撤军期,用于撤离军事资产,防止突然且可能混乱的撤军,而非继续一场激烈的现役冲突。
    到目前为止,特朗普无限期延长该地区停火的举措得以维持。

    第三次暗杀企图发生后,围绕特朗普的袭击是否 warrant 另一项调查的辩论愈演愈烈


    加州民主党参议员亚当·希夫2025年10月5日在华盛顿特区出席《与媒体见面》节目。(香农·芬尼/全国广播公司)

    就目前而言,似乎没有人希望将授权投票付诸表决。参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩(南达科他州共和党)将这一决定权交给了共和党同僚,而非单方面强行推动此事。
    “在这一点上,我看不到这种可能性,”图恩说,“我的意思是,显然他们会定期从我们的军方领导层那里获取情况简报,我认为这有助于塑造我们议员们的看法,让他们了解自己对……当地发生的一切以及未来走向的接受程度。但就目前而言,我没有听到这种呼声。”

    国会推迟行使权力之际,战争部长皮特·赫格塞斯本周自战争爆发以来首次现身国会山。

    共和党人计划承担特朗普舞会4亿美元账单的一部分,部分民主党人愿意“讨论”这一想法


    2026年4月21日,参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩(南达科他州共和党)与参议院共和党领袖在华盛顿特区美国国会大厦举行政策午餐会后的新闻发布会上发言。(内森·波斯纳/阿纳多卢通讯社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    尽管他在众议院和参议院军事委员会的听证会原本被视为深入探讨五角大楼高达1.5万亿美元的预算申请的机会,但议员们反而利用这段时间就伊朗战争质问赫格塞斯。
    一段颇具电视效果的交锋环节披露,这场战争迄今已让纳税人付出了250亿美元的代价。

    民主党人辩称这一数字不合情理,并辩称这些资金本可以用于其他地方,以应对美国人日益上涨的生活成本。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    参议院少数党领袖查克·舒默(纽约州民主党)表示,共和党早就该脱离本届政府了,他将持续的战争归咎于特朗普和赫格塞斯。
    “我们在伊朗面临的最大挑战是唐纳德·特朗普和国防部长赫格塞斯,美国人都清楚这一点,”舒默说,“这场战争不得人心。当然,他们将责任归咎于特朗普。”
    “和平面临的最大障碍是国防部长和美国总统的无能,”他补充道。

    亚历克斯·米勒是福克斯新闻数字频道负责报道美国参议院的撰稿人。

    Democrats fail to shatter Republicans’ resolve on eve of crucial Iran deadline

    2026-04-30T15:11:25-04:00 / Fox News

    Top Pentagon official revealed the Iran war has cost $25B

    By Alex Miller Fox News

    Published April 30, 2026 3:11pm EDT

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6393112638112

    Democrats push for new Iran war powers vote

    Fox News chief congressional correspondent Chad Pergram reports on Democrats’ push to force a vote to end the Iran war and the ongoing DHS funding battle on ‘Special Report.’

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Senate Democrats again failed to splinter Republicans’ unified support for President Donald Trump’s conflict with Iran amid the looming Friday deadline to curb his war powers.

    The vote marks the sixth time Republicans have rejected a Democrat-led resolution aimed at handcuffing the president’s authority and halting the conflict. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., made one final push to limit Trump ahead of the deadline requiring Congress to decide whether the U.S. should or should not continue fighting in the Middle East.

    Sixty days after Trump’s first notification to Congress of his strikes in Iran is when lawmakers are supposed to either authorize or halt the war. That deadline hits Friday, May 1, when lawmakers are expected to be gone from Washington, D.C., for a weeklong recess.

    HEGSETH TESTIFIES AT SENATE AS IRAN WAR’S $25B PRICE TAG AND 60-DAY WAR POWERS DEADLINE LOOM

    U.S. President Donald Trump waves after landing at Joint Base Andrews as he returns to Washington on April 25, 2026 in Joint Base Andrews, Maryland.(Roberto Schmidt/Getty Images)

    While some Republicans have raised issue with extending the conflict past the 60-day mark, and are mulling an Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF), Schiff said that side effort was “too late.

    “The mere introduction of one is not sufficient,” Schiff said. “And there’s no way that’s going to pass both houses and get signed by the president today.”

    Meanwhile, Republicans argue that Trump has unilateral authority, without Congress’ explicit say-so, to continue the war for 30 more days. However, that window is meant to be a drawdown period to pull out military assets and prevent a sudden and possibly chaotic exit rather than continue a raging and active conflict.

    So far, Trump’s move to indefinitely extend the ceasefire in the region has held.

    AFTER THIRD ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT, DEBATE GROWS OVER WHETHER TRUMP ATTACK WARRANTS ANOTHER INVESTIGATION

    Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., appears on “Meet the Press” in Washington, D.C., on Oct. 5, 2025.(Shannon Finney/NBC)

    For now, it appears there isn’t a desire to put an authorization vote on the floor. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R.S.D., has deferred that decision to his Republican colleagues, rather than unilaterally force the issue.

    “At this point, I don’t see that,” Thune said. “I mean, I think they’re, you know, obviously getting readouts from our military leadership on a somewhat regular basis that, I think, will be helpful in terms of shaping the views of our members about how comfortable they are with … everything that’s happening there and the direction heading forward. But as of right now, I’m not hearing that.”

    The decision to punt Congress’ authority comes as Secretary of War Pete Hegseth this week made his first appearance on Capitol Hill since the war began.

    REPUBLICANS EYE PICKING UP $400M TAB FOR TRUMP’S BALLROOM AS SOME DEMS OPEN TO ‘DISCUSS’ IDEA

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., speaks at a press conference with Senate Republican leaders following a policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on April 21, 2026.(Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)

    Though his hearings before the House and Senate Armed Services committees were billed as an opportunity to dig into the Pentagon’s eye-popping $1.5 trillion budget request, lawmakers instead used their time to grill Hegseth on the Iran war.

    One made-for-TV back-and-forth included the revelation that the war has so far cost taxpayers $25 billion.

    Democrats contend that figure doesn’t add up and argue that the money could be spent elsewhere to combat rising costs for Americans.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said it was past time for Republicans to break from the administration, and he blamed Trump and Hegseth for the ongoing war.

    “Our greatest challenge in Iran is Donald Trump and Secretary Hegseth, and Americans know it,” Schumer said. “The war is unpopular. They blame Trump for it, of course.”

    “The greatest obstacle to peace is the incompetence of the Secretary of Defense and of the President of the United States,” he continued.

    Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.

  • 外国情报监控法:即将到期的美国核心间谍权力需了解事项


    2026年4月30日 美国东部时间下午1:58 / CNN

    作者:安妮·格雷尔


    image
    汤姆·布伦纳/路透社/资料图

    续签这项强力监控法案的最后期限暴露了共和党内部的深刻分歧,也让美国国家安全官员陷入忙乱,因为情报收集出现盲区的可能性与日俱增。

    数月来,众议院共和党人一直在寻求途径,重新授权这项饱受争议的间谍权力。这部法律即《外国情报监控法》第702条,允许美国经授权官员收集外国目标的电话和短信,但在此过程中也可能顺带收集到美国人的数据。

    以下是议员们面临午夜最后期限续签该权限时需要了解的内容。

    美国政府如何使用《外国情报监控法》?

    根据2008年修订的《外国情报监控法》,美国政府有权强制美国电信公司和互联网服务商提供对互联网“骨干网”上通信内容的访问权限。政府还可强制获取电话信息,从而获取通话内容,也可要求电子邮件服务商等提供特定地址的通信记录。

    根据隐私和公民自由监督委员会2023年9月发布的公开监督报告——该委员会的设立宗旨是定期评估该项目——除上述数据收集方式外,委员会还提到了一项仅在2022年才获得授权的“高度敏感技术”。

    这批包括大量美国互联网流量在内的海量数据,旨在让美国情报机构能够快速获取有关其他国家外国人的信息。

    正如美国全国广播公司此前报道的那样,美国国家安全局表示,总统每日简报中的很大一部分内容都来自第702条项目收集的数据。

    如果该法案到期,会有什么风险?

    这取决于你询问的对象。

    多年来,高级国家安全官员一直表示,第702条对于挫败恐怖袭击、遏制芬太尼流入美国以及阻止针对关键基础设施的勒索软件攻击至关重要。

    官员们称,在美国与伊朗的战争目前处于脆弱停火状态、威胁环境升级的背景下,这项权限现在比以往任何时候都更加关键。

    与此同时,左右两派的民权组织都认为,这项监控权力存在侵犯美国人隐私的风险。该项目目前在很大程度上属于无证监控,因为其目标是外国人而非美国人,但美国公民在与境外目标互动时,确实会被卷入监控范围。

    这部即将到期的法律在近几个月来与共和党内部围绕政府监控权力范围的更大规模争论纠缠在一起。

    一些此前支持该间谍项目的民主党人现在担忧,在他们不信任的特朗普政府领导下续签该法案,这使得共和党必须依靠的投票优势进一步缩小。

    起初,特朗普政府并未就希望共和党议员如何处理该法案的续签问题表态,这导致分歧加剧并愈演愈烈。特朗普总统及其支持者此前曾将该法律与其他用于调查俄罗斯干预美国大选的法律手段混为一谈,也将其与2016年特朗普竞选团队相关人员与俄罗斯干预行动有关的指控联系起来。

    但本月早些时候,唐纳德·特朗普总统呼吁对该法案进行18个月的无附加条件续签。这并未说服保守派共和党人,他们坚持要求法案纳入相关改革,例如在查询美国人通信内容前必须获得搜查令。

    该法案可延长多长时间?

    在无数次会议和听证会均告失败后,众议院议长迈克·约翰逊提出了一项将该法案延长三年的提案。

    保守派态度坚决,拒绝投出赞成票,直到议长妥协,在这项必须通过的间谍权力法案中加入了一项无关的加密货币条款,导致该法案在参议院刚提出就胎死腹中。

    美国国会参议院领袖们在国会山另一端旁观此事,最终陷入忙乱,并最终提议进行另一项短期延长,但这只会延长这场闹剧,因为他们并不希望附加加密货币条款。

    国会必须在午夜前通过这项延长法案。

    这将是一个临时补丁,但问题并不会消失,因为45天后,议员们将再次回到原点。

    美国有线电视新闻网的扎卡里·沃尔夫为本报道贡献了内容。

    FISA: What to know about the government’s key spy powers on the verge of expiration

    2026-04-30 1:58 PM ET / CNN

    By Annie Grayer

    A visitor captures a cell phone image of the Washington Monument, near the US Capitol on September 29, 2021.

    Tom Brenner/Reuters/File

    The deadline to renew a powerful surveillance law has exposed deep divisions in the Republican Party and left US national security officials scrambling as the potential for blind spots in intelligence collection becomes an ever increasing possibility.

    For months, House Republicans have been trying to find a path forward to reauthorize the controversial spy powers. The law, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), allows authorized US officials to gather phone calls and text messages of foreign targets, but can also scoop up the data of Americans in the process.

    Here’s what to know as lawmakers face a midnight deadline to re-up the authority.

    How does the government use FISA?

    Under updates to the FISA law enacted in 2008, the government has the ability to compel US phone companies and internet providers to provide access to communications across the “backbone” of the internet. The government can also compel access to phone information that can allow it to obtain the content of calls and also require email providers and others to provide communications from a specific address.

    And according to a September 2023 public oversight report by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board – which was formed to periodically assess the program – in addition to the above methods of collecting data, the board refers to an additional “highly sensitive technique” that was only authorized in 2022.

    The trove of data, including a large portion of US internet traffic, is meant to provide US intelligence agencies with quick access to data regarding foreigners in other countries.

    As CNN has reported, a good portion what what appears in the Presidential Daily Brief has some data that comes from the 702 program, according to the National Security Agency.

    What’s at risk if it expires?

    It depends who you ask.

    Senior national security officials have for years said Section 702 is critical to thwarting terror attacks, stemming the flow of fentanyl into the US and stopping ransomware attacks on critical infrastructure.

    The authority is now more critical than ever, officials say, amid the delicate ceasefire in the US war with Iran and a heightened threat environment.

    Civil liberties groups on the left and the right, meanwhile, argue the surveillance authority risks infringing on Americans’ privacy. The program is currently warrantless, in large part because it is aimed at foreigners not Americans, but US citizens do get swept up in the surveillance when they are interacting with targets abroad.

    The law, which is on the verge of expiration, has in recent months become embroiled in the broader Republican battle over the reach of the government’s surveillance powers.

    And some Democrats who have previously supported the spy program are now concerned about renewing the it under a Trump administration that they do not trust, making the margins Republicans have to rely on even smaller.

    At first, the Trump administration did not weigh in on how they wanted Republican lawmakers to handle the renewal of the law, allowing divisions to build and fester. The president and his supporters have previously conflated the law with other legal methods used to investigate Russian interference in US elections and allegations that people associated with the Trump campaign in 2016 were connected to those Russian efforts.

    But earlier this month, President Donald Trump called for a clean reauthorization of the law for 18 months. That did not sway conservative Republicans who have insisted that the bill include reforms like warrants before querying Americans’ communications.

    How long could the law be extended?

    After countless meetings and listening sessions failed, House Speaker Mike Johnson put forward a proposed three-year extension of the law.

    Conservatives stood firm and withheld their votes until the speaker obliged and attached on an unrelated crypto measure to the must-pass spy powers bill that made it dead on arrival in the Senate.

    Senate leaders, who looked on from across the US Capitol, were left scrambling and ultimately suggested another short-term extension, which will only prolong the drama since they do not want the crypto provision attached.

    Congress has until midnight to clear that extension.

    That will serve as a temporary patch, but the problem isn’t going away because in 45 days lawmakers will be right back where they started.

    CNN’s Zachary Wolf contributed to this report.

  • 路易斯安那州因最高法院裁决暂停5月16日众议院初选,其他选举将按计划举行


    2026-04-30 14:59 美国东部时间 / 哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)新闻

    作者:艾伦·纳瓦罗

    艾伦·纳瓦罗 数字记者

    艾伦·纳瓦罗是哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的数字记者,曾报道2024年大选,还在2021年和2022年选举周期中担任哥伦比亚广播公司新闻政治部门的助理制片人。

    查看完整简历

    艾伦·纳瓦罗

    更新时间:2026年4月30日 / 3:17 美国东部时间 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    在谷歌上添加哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    路易斯安那州务卿南希·兰德里周四表示,在最高法院否决该州国会选区地图后,该州将暂停5月16日即将举行的选举中的众议院初选。

    兰德里表示,尽管美国众议院议员选举仍会出现在选民的选票上,但“任何在这些选区投出的选票都不会被计入”。

    “根据18:401.1(B)条款,鉴于最高法院的裁决,我已认定进入紧急状态。这是州长发布行政命令暂停路易斯安那州即将举行的联邦众议院选举之前的强制性步骤,”兰德里在社交媒体上的一份声明中说道。

    兰德里表示,包括参议院初选在内的其他选举将按计划进行。她表示,其办公室将在提前投票站点张贴通知。

    最高法院周三维持了下级法院的裁决,该裁决认定路易斯安那州的地图绘制者在重新划分该州选区边界以符合《选举权法案》第2条时,过度依赖种族因素。在由大法官塞缪尔·阿利托撰写的6比3裁决中,最高法院的保守派多数意见认为,符合第2条不能成为该州在重新划分众议院选区界线时使用种族因素的理由。

    佛罗里达州共和党人本周早些时候批准了由州长罗恩·德桑蒂斯推动的新国会选区地图,德桑蒂斯此前曾重新划分了佛罗里达州中部的西班牙裔少数族裔选区。该州州检察官还辩称,最高法院最近的裁决意味着该州《公平选区修正案》中的相关条款违宪。

    梅利莎·奎因为本报道撰稿。

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/supreme-court-strikes-down-louisianas-congressional-map-weakening-voting-rights-act/

    Louisiana suspends House primaries for May 16 following Supreme Court ruling, other races will go on scheduled

    2026-04-30 14:59 EDT / CBS News

    By Aaron Navarro

    Aaron Navarro Digital Reporter

    Aaron Navarro is a CBS News digital reporter. He covered the 2024 elections and was previously an associate producer for the CBS News political unit in the 2021 and 2022 election cycles.

    Read Full Bio

    Aaron Navarro

    Updated on: April 30, 2026 / 3:17 PM EDT / CBS News

    Add CBS News on Google

    Louisiana Secretary of State Nancy Landry said Thursday that the state will suspend the House primaries for the upcoming elections on May 16 in the wake of the Supreme Court striking down the state’s Congressional map.

    Landry said that while the U.S. House races will remain on voters’ ballots, “any votes cast in those races will not be counted.”

    “Pursuant to 18:401.1(B), I have certified the emergency in light of the Supreme Court ruling. This is a mandatory step prior to the Governor issuing an executive order suspending the upcoming Louisiana U.S. House races,” Landry said in a statement on social media.

    The other races, including the Senate primaries, are set to go on as planned, Landry said. She said her office will post noises at early voting sites.

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a lower court ruling that found Louisiana mapmakers relied too heavily on race when they redrew the state’s voting boundaries to comply with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. In a 6-3 decision authored by Justice Samuel Alito, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority found that compliance with Section 2 could not justify the state’s use of race in redrawing its House district lines.

    Florida Republicans earlier this week approved a new congressional map pushed by Gov. Ron DeSantis, who had redrawn a Hispanic-minority district in central Florida. State attorneys also argued the recent Supreme Court ruling means provisions in the state’s Fair Districts Amendment are unconstitutional.

    Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/supreme-court-strikes-down-louisianas-congressional-map-weakening-voting-rights-act/

  • 特朗普撤回备受争议的卫生局局长提名,第三次提名该职位人选


    2026年4月30日,美国东部时间下午1:06 / CNN

    作者:亚历杭德拉·哈拉米略
    更新于2026年4月30日,美国东部时间下午2:24

    image
    约翰·兰帕尔斯基/盖蒂图片社/资料图
    2024年4月3日,妮可·萨菲尔医生在纽约福克斯新闻频道工作室亮相福克斯国民台《爱妈妈直播秀》。

    唐纳德·特朗普总统周四撤回了陷入困境的卫生局局长提名人选凯西·米恩斯医生,原因是外界对其疫苗观点存在质疑,并宣布提名妮可·萨菲尔医生作为该职位的第三名人选。

    “妮可堪称明星医生,她整个职业生涯都在帮助罹患乳腺癌的女性患者度过诊断和治疗难关,同时孜孜不倦地倡导加强癌症早期筛查与预防,与此同时也参与各类其他癌症的诊断和治疗工作,”特朗普在Truth Social平台上写道。

    “她同时也是一名极其出色的沟通者,能够让所有美国民众轻松理解复杂的健康议题,”他补充道。

    萨菲尔长期担任福克斯新闻频道特约撰稿人,是纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心的放射科医生。

    这是特朗普在第二任期内第三次提名卫生局局长。他的首名人选珍妮特·内舍瓦特医生是纽约家庭医生,也曾是福克斯新闻医疗特约撰稿人,其提名在参议院确认听证会原定开始前几天被撤回。

    米恩斯的提名自2月那场紧张的确认听证会以来便迟迟未能推进。这位毕业于斯坦福大学的医生与“让美国更健康”(MAHA)运动关系密切,曾撰写畅销书《良好能量》,同时也是美国卫生与公众服务部部长小罗伯特·肯尼迪的亲密盟友。

    即便在MAHA运动支持者和特朗普的拥趸当中,她也面临质疑。部分MAHA阵营人士对她在疫苗问题上的模棱两可态度表示惋惜,而特朗普自称“忠诚执行者”的劳拉·洛默则频频质疑米恩斯对总统的支持度。

    米恩斯的提名之争也逐渐演变为围绕肯尼迪的代理战。过去一年,肯尼迪在疫苗政策上的变革举措激怒了多位共和党议员。

    在宣布萨菲尔接替米恩斯前不久,特朗普在Truth Social平台上抨击了参议员比尔·卡西迪——后者在其所辖委员会主持的米恩斯确认听证会上就疫苗政策对其进行了质询。

    特朗普指责这位路易斯安那州共和党人阻碍了米恩斯的提名进程,而米恩斯的提名此前一直由肯尼迪大力推动。特朗普曾背书卡西迪参与参议院连任竞选。

    “我是应肯尼迪部长的推荐提名了凯西,一名坚定的MAHA斗士。肯尼迪比任何人都更了解MAHA运动,或许除了我本人之外!”特朗普写道。

    “尽管如此,无论卡西迪参议员的顽固不化和政治把戏如何阻挠,凯西将继续在我国面临的诸多重要健康议题上为MAHA而战,比如日益严重的儿童疾病流行、自闭症发病率上升、营养失衡、过度医疗化,以及研究不孕症根源等诸多棘手的医疗问题,”他补充道。

    但从一开始,米恩斯的提名就伴随着对其政策立场的批评和资质质疑:她未完成住院医师培训,且其行医执照已过期。

    CNN此前曾报道,在提名被撤回前的一个多月里,米恩斯曾寻求与两位威胁要否决其提名的共和党参议员进行私下会面。

    但截至本月初,她仍未与丽莎·穆尔科斯基和苏珊·柯林斯参议员举行会面。穆尔科斯基在3月中旬告诉CNN,她“对她并不热衷”。

    被称为“全国医生”的卫生局局长是一名医师,其职责是通过发布 advisories、报告和行动呼吁,提供有关关键议题的最佳科学信息,教育并建议美国人如何改善健康状况。

    卫生局局长同时在美国公共卫生服务军官团任职,监督这支身着制服的团队致力于促进国民健康。

    本文已更新,补充了更多信息。

    CNN的杰米·冈布雷希特、亚当·坎林和莎拉·奥弗莫赫勒对本文亦有贡献。

    Trump pulls controversial surgeon general pick and makes third nomination for the role

    Apr 30, 2026, 1:06 PM ET / CNN

    By Alejandra Jaramillo

    Updated Apr 30, 2026, 2:24 PM ET

    Dr. Nicole Saphier appears on FOX Nation’s “Love Mom The Live Show” at Fox News Channel Studios in New York, on April 3, 2024.

    John Lamparski/Getty Images/File

    President Donald Trump on Thursday pulled his embattled surgeon general nominee Dr. Casey Means amid questions over her vaccine views and announced his third pick for the role in Dr. Nicole Saphier.

    “Nicole is a STAR physician who has spent her career guiding women facing breast cancer through their diagnosis and treatment while tirelessly advocating to increase early cancer detection and prevention, while at the same time working with men and women on all other forms of cancer diagnoses and treatments,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

    “She is also an INCREDIBLE COMMUNICATOR, who makes complicated health issues more easily understood by all Americans,” he added.

    Saphier, a longtime Fox News contributor, is a radiologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

    This is Trump’s third nominee for surgeon general in his second term. His first, Dr. Janette Nesheiwat, a New York family physician and former Fox News medical contributor, saw her nomination pulled just days before her Senate confirmation hearing was set to begin last year.

    Means’ nomination had languished since her tense confirmation hearing in February. A Stanford-educated medical doctor, she’s well-connected to the “Make America Healthy Again” movement as the author of a best-selling book, “Good Energy,” and a close ally of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

    Even among MAHA and Trump supporters, she faced skepticism. Some in the MAHA sphere lamented her noncommittal stance on vaccines, while Laura Loomer, Trump’s self described “loyalty enforcer” frequently questioned Means’ support for the president.

    And increasingly, the Means vote had looked like a proxy battle over Kennedy, who over the past year has plunged ahead on vaccine policy changes that have rankled some Republicans across the spectrum.

    Shortly before announcing Saphier as Means’ replacement, Trump took to Truth Social to blast Sen. Bill Cassidy, who pressed Means on vaccine policy during her confirmation hearing before the committee he chairs.

    Trump accused the Louisiana Republican, whom he’s endorsed against in his Senate reelection campaign, of standing in the way of Means, whose nomination had been championed by Kennedy.

    “I nominated Casey, a strong MAHA Warrior, at the recommendation of Secretary Kennedy, who understands the MAHA Movement better than anyone, with perhaps the possible exception of ME!” Trump wrote.

    “Nevertheless, despite Senator Cassidy’s intransigence and political games, Casey will continue to fight for MAHA on the many important Health issues facing our Country, such as the rising childhood disease epidemic, increased autism rates, poor nutrition, over-medicalization, and researching the root causes of infertility, and many other difficult medical problems,” he added.

    But from the beginning, her nomination was trailed by criticisms of her policy positions and questions about her credentials: She did not complete her residency, and her medical license has lapsed.

    CNN previously reported that prior to being withdrawn, Means had for more than a month, sought private meetings with the two Republican senators threatening to sink her nomination.

    But as of earlier this month, the meetings with Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins hadn’t happened. Murkowski told CNN in mid-March she was “not enthusiastic about her.”

    The surgeon general, known as “the nation’s doctor,” is a physician who focuses on educating and advising Americans on how to improve their health by issuing advisories, reports and calls to action to offer the best available scientific information on crucial issues.

    The surgeon general also serves in the US Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, overseeing this group of uniformed officers who seek to promote the nation’s health.

    This story has been updated with additional information.

    CNN’s Jamie Gumbrecht, Adam Cancryn and Sarah Owermohle contributed to this report.

  • 黑格斯回击沃伦有关伊朗战争关联内幕交易的言论:“没人能支配我”


    2026年4月30日 美国东部时间下午3:54 / 福克斯新闻频道

    “没人能支配我。没人能支配这个部门,没人能支配这位总统,”黑格斯说道

    摩根·菲利普斯 福克斯新闻报道

    新功能:您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    美国陆军部长皮特·黑格斯周四在参议院一场激烈的听证会上强烈否认有关他或其他人可能从对伊朗战争中牟利的指控,他对马萨诸塞州民主党参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦表示“没人能支配我”,当时沃伦正在就她所称的与这场冲突相关的可疑交易行为向他施压。

    沃伦指出,她发现存在这样一种模式:在唐纳德·特朗普总统就战争发表公开声明前几分钟,有人进行了大额且时机精准的石油交易,这暗示内部人员可能利用非公开信息牟利。

    此次交锋反映出华盛顿方面对与伊朗冲突相关的敏感信息是否被用于谋取经济利益的审查日益加强,同时也引发了对规范高级官员和国会议员的道德准则的广泛担忧。

    美国陆军部长皮特·黑格斯周四在参议院激烈听证会上强烈否认有关他或其他人可能从对伊朗战争中牟利的指控。(凯文·迪奇/盖蒂图片社)

    “短短几分钟内,看起来内部人员就在利用有关战争的机密信息大发横财,”沃伦说道。

    她一再追问黑格斯,对于这类交易“除了内幕交易之外,是否还有其他解释”。

    黑格斯没有直接回应这一前提,而是表示该部门的运作“完全光明正大”,并强调他的重点始终是军事行动而非金融市场。他补充说,保护敏感信息被“高度重视”。

    “市场上发生的事情……我们并不参与,”黑格斯说道。

    当沃伦提及有关黑格斯个人财务往来的报道时,交锋升级,其中包括一名经纪人试图在冲突爆发前投资国防相关基金的指控。

    “整个报道都是虚假的,”黑格斯回应道。“任何暗示我曾从中牟利的影射……我从政不是为了钱。我不是为了利润。我不是为了股票。”

    他补充道:“没人能支配我。没人能支配这个部门,没人能支配这位总统。”

    沃伦的这番质询源于近期的一篇报道,该报道对伊朗冲突爆发前黑格斯的财务往来提出了质疑。英国《金融时报》报道称,一名为黑格斯工作的经纪人在2月份联系了贝莱德,希望在军事行动开始前几周投资一只与洛克希德·马丁公司和诺斯罗普·格鲁曼公司等主要国防承包商相关的基金,投资规模达数百万美元。

    根据该报道,这笔投资最终并未成行,因为当时该基金不对该经纪人开放。

    五角大楼强烈否认了这篇报道,称其“完全虚假且捏造”,黑格斯在周四的听证会上也重申了这一否认立场。

    黑格斯与沃伦(凯文·迪奇/盖蒂图片社)

    “短短几分钟内,看起来内部人员就在利用有关战争的机密信息大发横财,”沃伦声称。(希瑟·迪尔/盖蒂图片社)

    联邦法律对国防官员的投资有严格限制,以防止利益冲突。五角大楼的总统任命人员通常被禁止拥有或购买获得最大政府合同的顶级国防承包商的股票,多元化基金等少数情况除外。道德准则还要求高级官员避免哪怕是看起来有自我交易的嫌疑,并对某些金融活动进行披露或寻求批准。

    沃伦的此番言论正值近期一起备受关注的案件:一名美国军人被指控利用非公开军事信息牟利。

    联邦检察官指控陆军特种部队总军士长甘农·肯·范戴克利用有关抓捕委内瑞拉领导人尼古拉斯·马杜罗的秘密行动的机密情报,在预测市场上下注,据称获利超过40万美元。

    当局称,范戴克参与了该行动的策划,并利用相关知识在行动公开前对其结果下注,因此面临电信欺诈和非法使用政府信息等指控。

    批评人士指出,这似乎存在双重标准:一名美国军人可能因内幕交易面临牢狱之灾,但历史上对国会议员类似规则的执行力度要弱得多。

    联邦检察官指控陆军特种部队总军士长甘农·肯·范戴克利用有关抓捕委内瑞拉领导人尼古拉斯·马杜罗的秘密行动的机密情报,在预测市场上下注,据称获利超过40万美元。(甘农·肯·范戴克/美联社)

    “这名男子面临数十年监禁,”佛罗里达州共和党众议员安娜·保利娜·卢纳周六在接受福克斯新闻《英格拉汉姆视角》节目采访时表示。“与此同时,国会山每天都有许多两党议员正在从事内幕交易。”

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    特朗普周六对此发表了看法,将这起案件与棒球传奇人物皮特·罗斯相提并论。

    “这有点像皮特·罗斯,”当被问及这起案件时特朗普说道。“皮特·罗斯因为赌自己的球队而被禁止进入名人堂。如果他赌自己的球队输,那确实不好,但他赌的是自己的球队赢。我会调查此事。”

    福克斯新闻数字频道已联系沃伦和黑格斯征求评论。

    Hegseth fires back at Warren’s insider trading comments tied to Iran war: ‘No one owns me’

    April 30, 2026 3:54pm EDT / Fox News

    ‘No one owns me. No one owns this department, no one owns this president,’ Hegseth said

    By Morgan Phillips Fox News

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    War Secretary Pete Hegseth forcefully denied allegations that he or others may have profited from the war with Iran during a heated Senate exchange Thursday, telling Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., that “no one owns me” as she pressed him on what she said was suspicious trading activity tied to the conflict.

    Warren pointed to what she described as a pattern of large, well-timed oil trades occurring minutes before public announcements by President Donald Trump related to the war, suggesting the possibility that insiders were using nonpublic information to profit.

    The exchange reflects growing scrutiny in Washington over whether sensitive information tied to the Iran conflict could be used for financial gain, as well as broader concerns about ethics rules governing senior officials and lawmakers.

    War Secretary Pete Hegseth forcefully denied allegations that he or others may have profited from the war with Iran during a heated Senate exchange Thursday.(Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

    “In just the space of minutes, it looks like insiders have been making out like bandits, using secret information about the war,” Warren said.

    She pressed Hegseth repeatedly on whether he had any explanation for the activity “other than insider trading.”

    Hegseth declined to engage directly with the premise, saying the department had operated “completely aboveboard” and emphasizing that his focus remained on military operations rather than financial markets. He added that safeguarding sensitive information is taken “very seriously.”

    “What happens in markets … is not something we’re involved in,” Hegseth said.

    The exchange escalated when Warren referenced reporting about Hegseth’s own financial dealings, including a claim that a broker attempted to invest in a defense-related fund ahead of the conflict.

    “That entire story is false,” Hegseth responded. “Any insinuation that I have ever profited … I don’t do it for money. I don’t do it for profit. I don’t do it for stocks.”

    He added: “No one owns me. No one owns this department, no one owns this president.”

    Warren’s line of questioning follows recent reporting that raised questions about Hegseth’s financial dealings ahead of the Iran conflict. The Financial Times reported that a broker working on Hegseth’s behalf contacted BlackRock in February about making a multimillion-dollar investment in a fund tied to major defense contractors, including Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman, in the weeks before military action began.

    According to the report, the investment ultimately did not take place because the fund was not available to the broker at the time.

    The Pentagon has strongly denied the reporting, calling it “entirely false and fabricated,” and Hegseth reiterated that denial during Thursday’s hearing.

    Hegseth and Warren(Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

    “In just the space of minutes, it looks like insiders have been making out like bandits, using secret information about the war,” Warren claimed.(Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

    Federal law places strict limits on defense officials’ investments to prevent conflicts of interest. Presidential appointees at the Pentagon generally are barred from owning or buying stock in top defense contractors that receive the largest government contracts, with narrow exceptions such as diversified funds. Ethics rules also require senior officials to avoid even the appearance of self-dealing and to disclose or seek approval for certain financial activity.

    Warren’s comments come amid a recent high-profile case involving a U.S. service member accused of profiting from nonpublic military information.

    Federal prosecutors charged Army Special Forces Master Sgt. Gannon Ken Van Dyke with using classified intelligence about a covert operation to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro to place bets on a prediction market, allegedly earning more than $400,000.

    Authorities allege Van Dyke was involved in planning the operation and used that knowledge to wager on its outcome before it became public, prompting charges including wire fraud and unlawful use of government information.

    Critics have pointed to a perceived double standard, noting that while a U.S. service member faces potential prison time for insider trading, enforcement of similar rules governing members of Congress historically has been less aggressive.

    Federal prosecutors charged Army Special Forces Master Sgt. Gannon Ken Van Dyke with using classified intelligence about a covert operation to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro to place bets on a prediction market, allegedly earning more than $400,000.(Gannon Ken Van Dyke/AP)

    “This man is facing decades in prison,” Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., told Fox News’ Ingraham Angle Saturday. “Meanwhile, every single day on Capitol Hill, there are many members of Congress on both sides that are currently engaging in insider trading.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Trump weighed in Saturday, comparing the case to baseball legend Pete Rose.

    “That’s a little like Pete Rose,” Trump said when asked about the case. “Pete Rose, they kept him out of the Hall of Fame for betting on his own team. Now, if he bet against his team, that would be no good, but he bet on his own team. I’ll look into it.”

    Fox News Digital reached out to Warren and Hegseth for comment.

  • 参议院在60天期限前否决民主党第六份伊朗战争权力决议


    2026年4月30日 / 美国东部时间下午3:13 / 哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)新闻

    华盛顿——参议院否决了民主党限制特朗普总统对伊朗发动战争权力的第六次尝试,随着冲突临近关键的60天期限,共和党人继续支持本届政府。

    周四,一项推进加州民主党参议员亚当·希夫提出的战争权力决议的程序性投票以47票对50票失败。该法案本应指示总统将美军撤出与伊朗的敌对行动。

    共和党参议员、肯塔基州的兰德·保罗和缅因州的苏珊·柯林斯投票支持该法案。柯林斯此前曾投票反对伊朗战争权力决议。唯一投反对票的民主党人是宾夕法尼亚州参议员约翰·费特曼。

    1973年《战争权力决议》规定,如果国会未批准战争,总统必须在60天后将武装部队撤出敌对行动。60天的计时从总统向国会提交正式通知开始。特朗普于3月2日在一封信中通知议员们美国与伊朗处于敌对状态,这意味着60天窗口将于5月1日周五结束。总统可以将期限延长30天,以便撤军。

    参众两院的民主党人表示,他们计划继续就伊朗战争问题推动投票,并在最近几周推出了一系列决议以做好准备。国会进步核心小组的议员们自上周以来每天都推出一项决议。

    在持续停火期间,美伊之间的战斗已经暂停了数周,但民主党人仍继续就限制总统发动战争的权力进行投票。大多数共和党人拒绝加入他们的行动,但一些人表示,他们可能会在60天结束时改变立场。少数共和党参议员表示,他们正在起草一项明确授权对伊朗使用武力的法案,这将完全绕过战争权力辩论。

    与此同时,国防部长皮特·赫格斯瑟在周四参议院军事委员会的听证会上表示,鉴于当前主动战斗停止,本届政府认为60天的计时窗口已暂停。

    “我们目前处于停火状态,根据我们的理解,这意味着60天的计时在停火期间会暂停或停止,”他说。

    弗吉尼亚州民主党参议员蒂姆·凯恩对这一说法表示质疑,称:“我不认为该法规会支持这一点。”

    “这将给本届政府带来一个非常重要的法律问题,”凯恩说。

    众议院议长迈克·约翰逊告诉NBC新闻,国会无需采取行动,因为美国“并未处于战争状态”。

    “我认为我们没有进行主动的、动态的军事轰炸、射击或类似行动。目前,我们正在努力促成和平,”约翰逊说。“在这些非常敏感的谈判过程中,我非常不愿站在政府一边,所以我们将拭目以待事态发展。”

    赫格斯瑟与议员就伊朗问题、五角大楼政策展开交锋
    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/hegseth-spars-with-lawmakers-about-iran-pentagon-policies/

    Senate rejects Democrats’ 6th Iran war powers resolution ahead of 60-day deadline

    April 30, 2026 / 3:13 PM EDT / CBS News

    Washington — The Senate rejected Democrats’ sixth attempt to limit President Trump’s authority to wage war on Iran, with Republicans continuing to stand behind the administration as the conflict approaches a key 60-day deadline.

    A procedural vote to advance a war powers resolution brought by California Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff failed 47 to 50 on Thursday. The measure would have directed the president to remove American forces from hostilities with Iran.

    Republican Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Susan Collins of Maine voted in favor of the measure. Collins had voted against prior Iran war powers resolutions. The only Democrat to vote against the measure was Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania.

    The War Powers Resolution of 1973 says the president must remove armed forces from hostilities after 60 days if Congress has not authorized the war. The 60-day clock starts once the president sends formal notification to Congress. Mr. Trump notified lawmakers of the hostilities with Iran in a letter on March 2, meaning the 60-day window closes on Friday, May 1. The president can extend the deadline by 30 days to allow for the removal of troops.

    Democrats in both the House and Senate have said they plan to keep forcing votes on the Iran war and have introduced a wave of resolutions in recent weeks in preparation. Members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus have been rolling out one each day since last week.

    The fighting between the U.S. and Iran has been mostly paused for weeks during an ongoing ceasefire, but Democrats have continued to bring votes on whether to limit the president’s authority to wage war. Most Republicans have declined to join their efforts, but some have indicated that they might change their tune at the end of 60 days. A handful of GOP senators have said they are working on drafting legislation that would explicitly authorize the use of force against Iran, which would bypass the war powers debate entirely.

    Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told the Senate Armed Services Committee at a hearing on Thursday that the administration considers the 60-day window to be paused given the cessation of active fighting.

    “We are in a ceasefire right now, which in our understanding means the 60-day clock pauses or stops in a ceasefire,” he said.

    Virginia Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine cast doubt on that assertion, saying, “I do not believe the statute would support that.”

    “That’s going to pose a really important legal question for the administration,” Kaine said.

    House Speaker Mike Johnson told NBC News that Congress doesn’t need to act because the U.S. is “not at war.”

    “I don’t think we have an active, kinetic military bombing, firing or anything like that. Right now, we are trying to broker a peace,” Johnson said. “I would be very reluctant to get in front of the administration in the midst of these very sensitive negotiations, so we’ll have to see how that plays out.”

    Hegseth spars with lawmakers about Iran, Pentagon policies
    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/hegseth-spars-with-lawmakers-about-iran-pentagon-policies/

  • FEMA恢复举报人职位,特朗普政府推翻诺姆的政策


    2026-04-30T19:13:29.516Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:盖布·科恩
    16分钟前发布
    发布于2026年4月30日,美国东部时间下午3:13

    联邦机构 唐纳德·特朗普 飓风 风暴

    时任国土安全部部长克里斯蒂·诺姆于1月24日在华盛顿特区联邦紧急事务管理局总部的国家反应协调中心举行的新闻发布会上发言。
    阿尔·德拉戈/盖蒂图片社

    据五名了解内情的FEMA官员透露,联邦紧急事务管理局(FEMA)已恢复一批举报人的工作。这些人在去年8月联名向国会发表公开信,警告特朗普政府对该联邦机构的拆解正为一场类似卡特里娜飓风级别的灾难应对崩溃埋下隐患。

    其中三名官员告诉CNN,国土安全部及其监管的FEMA的官员还重新聘用了多名一年多前接受测谎并被带薪停职的高级官员。

    此次人事调整是国土安全部部长马克韦恩·马林上任仅几周后展开的全面重启计划的一部分,部分目的是在飓风季来临前稳定该机构。马林一直在推翻前国土安全部部长克里斯蒂·诺姆时期出台的最具争议的多项改革措施。诺姆已于上月被唐纳德·特朗普总统解雇。

    特朗普在执政初期就提出过撤销FEMA,而诺姆对此表示支持——她誓言要解散该机构,并将灾难应对的更多责任转移给各州。

    诺姆的大刀阔斧式改革掏空了FEMA的高层领导团队,赶走了超过20%的员工,士气跌至谷底,这让FEMA内部许多人警告称,该机构对大规模跨州灾难的应对能力正日益薄弱。在被解雇前的几个月里,由于包括共和党议员在内的众多共和党人反对废除FEMA,诺姆的相关言论有所缓和。

    但情况出现了显著转变:作为特朗普任命的新内阁负责人,马林已开始扭转人员裁减政策,并放宽了拖慢灾难应对流程的严格审批流程。本月在北卡罗来纳州的一次访问中,马林对FEMA予以赞扬,并表示将加快援助发放速度,削减可能阻碍灾后复苏的繁文缛节。

    另一个引人注目的转折是,特朗普预计将提名卡梅伦·汉密尔顿担任FEMA署长。而就在不到一年前,汉密尔顿因违背政府立场,向国会表明自己不支持撤销该机构,被突然免去了代理署长职务。

    “随着2026年飓风季和国际足联世界杯的临近,FEMA正在采取有针对性的措施稳定员工队伍,提升应急准备能力,”FEMA的一位发言人在给CNN的声明中表示,“在新领导层的带领下,FEMA正在处理未决的人事事务,以确保员工队伍稳定,并为即将到来的全国性活动和潜在灾难打造一支强大、可随时部署的应急力量。”

    举报人员工恢复职位

    去年8月,超过180名FEMA现任和前任员工联名向国会发表公开信,警告该机构内部日益严重的混乱局面,不过大多数人选择匿名。其中14名FEMA现任员工签署了这份文件,诺姆的团队随即对他们处以停职处分,并启动了行为调查。

    去年12月,CNN获悉FEMA已批准这些员工复职,但在CNN就此询问后,国土安全部改变了决定,将他们再次停职。

    “接到通报后,高层领导迅速纠正了这次未经授权的复职行为,”国土安全部的一位发言人当时表示,“本届政府不会容忍越权行为、未经授权的行动,或是顽固的官僚抵制改革。”

    民主党议员和举报人权利律师认为,对这些员工的处罚是非法的。在马林的确认听证会上,新泽西州民主党参议员安迪·金敦促马林复职这些员工,称诺姆的行为“违反法律”。

    “现有法律已经能够保护举报人,我也曾多次表示,我会依法行事,履行作为部长的职责,”马林回应道。

    这14名员工已于本周四返回工作岗位。

    “过去八个月并不容易,能够重返工作岗位对我意义重大,”复职的外部事务官员弗吉尼亚·凯斯告诉CNN,“展望未来,我希望我们机构能够解决我们在《卡特里娜宣言》中提出的担忧。我现在的工作重心是重返岗位,尽我所能支持受灾难影响的社区。”

    至少两名在诺姆追查泄密者行动中受牵连的高级官员也已重返工作岗位。据三名了解内情的消息人士透露,他们在去年春天接受了测谎,随后毫无征兆地被停职且未给出任何解释。本周,在带薪休假一年多后,他们接到了返回工作岗位的通知。

    “这就是你们缴纳的税款的用处,”一名FEMA高级官员在谈及复职决定时对CNN表示。

    本周,FEMA还恢复了一名去年9月因社交媒体帖子批评查理·柯克(在其遇刺后)的员工的工作。

    人员裁减与支出规则

    此外,FEMA正在扭转人员裁减政策。CNN在1月首次报道称,国土安全部在合同到期时开始解雇灾难救援人员,FEMA现已证实这一点。

    在一场重大冬季风暴迫使诺姆的团队暂停裁员并将员工合同延长90天之前,约有200名员工被解雇。三名消息人士称,其中一些被裁减的员工现在有机会重返岗位。未来,大多数即将到期的合同将延长一年——这是FEMA在人手本已紧张的情况下为应对飓风季采取的权宜之计。

    两名消息人士告诉CNN,在为期一年的招聘冻结后,国土安全部计划批准FEMA填补另外400个空缺的灾难救援岗位——但这与同期离职的数千名员工相比只是杯水车薪。

    “别夸大其词,”另一名高级官员表示,“鉴于我们的人才储备流失,不可能在这么短的时间内招聘到那么多人。而飓风季只剩30天就要到来了。”

    数千名在灾难性风暴期间部署的临时灾难救援人员也获得了合同延期,他们的合同将于未来几周到期。

    马林已经废除了诺姆时代最具影响的一项政策:一项要求她个人审批任何超过10万美元支出的开支规则。诺姆曾表示,该规则旨在杜绝浪费、欺诈和滥用职权。但它却造成了严重的瓶颈和大量积压——数十亿美元的合同、拨款和灾难相关支出在FEMA内部停滞不前。

    这项政策还引发了共和党人的强烈反对。北卡罗来纳州参议员汤姆·蒂利斯和特德·巴德曾一度阻挠国土安全部的提名,指责诺姆扣留了2024年飓风海伦袭击社区所需的援助资金。

    在确认听证会上,马林告诉议员们,他计划废除这项10万美元规则,称其是“微观管理”。在担任国土安全部部长后的首次出访中,他前往北卡罗来纳州,巴德参议员陪同他参加了圆桌会议,并对这项政策的撤销表示赞扬——称此举已经在加快该州资金拨付速度方面发挥了作用。

    国土安全部部长马克韦恩·马林于3月26日在白宫出席内阁会议。
    奇普·索莫德维拉/盖蒂图片社

    高风险季来临,担忧仍存

    此次政策调整之际,FEMA内部人士仍对该机构的应对能力深感担忧,因为未来一段时期任务艰巨:飓风季来临,大范围干旱可能加剧野火风险,同时还要为世界杯做准备。而在诺姆执政期间,由于资金拨付延迟,相关筹备工作进展缓慢,尽管官员们曾就此提出国家安全方面的担忧。

    两名高级官员透露,FEMA目前仍不允许开展飓风应对培训和演练活动。尽管国土安全部领导层将此归咎于近期的停摆,但此类工作通常由不受影响的救灾基金提供资金支持。

    高级官员警告称,FEMA已不再是特朗普第二任期伊始时的那个机构。领导层流失和人员空缺可能需要数年时间才能重建。诺姆时代的政策还打乱了培训计划,加剧了与州和地方合作伙伴的沟通不畅。

    “所有岗位都是新人,他们也没有经过充分的实操演练,所以当效率和至关重要的时刻来临时,每个人都要在灾难发生过程中摸索应对办法,”另一名高级官员表示,“如果遭遇重大灾难,我们完全束手无策。”

    FEMA reinstates whistleblowers as Trump administration reverses Noem’s policies

    2026-04-30T19:13:29.516Z / CNN

    By Gabe Cohen

    16 min ago

    PUBLISHED Apr 30, 2026, 3:13 PM ET

    Federal agencies Donald Trump Hurricanes Storms

    Then-Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem speaks during a news conference in the National Response Coordination Center at the Federal Emergency Management Agency headquarters in Washington, DC, on January 24.

    Al Drago/Getty Images

    FEMA has reinstated a group of whistleblowers who signed an open letter to Congress last August warning that the Trump administration’s dismantling of the federal agency was setting the stage for a disaster-response breakdown on the scale of Hurricane Katrina, according to five FEMA officials with knowledge of the matter.

    Officials at the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which it oversees, also brought back multiple senior officials who were polygraphed and placed on paid administrative leave more than a year ago, three of the officials told CNN.

    The reversals are part of a broader reset unfolding just weeks into Secretary Markwayne Mullin’s tenure at DHS, partly in an effort to stabilize the agency ahead of hurricane season. He has been rolling back some of the most contentious changes made under former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who was fired by President Donald Trump last month.

    Trump floated eliminating FEMA early in his term, and Noem embraced the idea — vowing to dismantle the agency and shift more responsibility for disaster response to the states.

    Noem’s heavy-handed overhaul – which gutted the senior leadership, drove out more than 20% of the workforce, and sent morale into a sleep slide – left many inside FEMA warning the agency was increasingly unprepared for a major, multi-state disaster. Her rhetoric softened in the months before her ouster when it became clear many Republicans — including GOP lawmakers — did not support abolishing FEMA.

    But in a striking pivot, Mullin, as Trump’s new pick to run the department, has begun unwinding staffing cuts and easing strict spending approval processes that slowed disaster operations. During a trip to North Carolina this month, Mullin praised FEMA and said he would get aid out more quickly and cut red tape that can bog down recovery.

    In another remarkable twist, Trump is expected to nominate Cameron Hamilton to serve as FEMA administrator less than a year after he was abruptly fired from that role — which he held in an acting capacity — after breaking from the administration’s script and telling Congress he did not support eliminating the agency.

    “As we approach the 2026 hurricane season and the FIFA World Cup, FEMA is taking targeted steps to stabilize our workforce and strengthen readiness,” a FEMA spokesperson told CNN in a statement. “Under new leadership, FEMA is addressing outstanding personnel actions to ensure workforce stability and a strong, deployable surge force for upcoming national events and potential disasters.”

    Whistleblower staffers reinstated

    More than 180 current and former FEMA staffers signed the open letter to Congress last August, warning of the growing turmoil inside the agency, though most did so anonymously. Fourteen current FEMA staffers put their names on the document, and Noem’s team promptly placed them on administrative leave and opened an investigation into their conduct.

    In December, CNN learned FEMA had cleared the workers to return — but after CNN asked about it, DHS reversed course and put them back on leave.

    “Once alerted, the unauthorized reinstatement was swiftly corrected by senior leadership,” a DHS spokesperson wrote at the time. “This Administration will not tolerate rogue conduct, unauthorized actions, or entrenched bureaucrats resisting change.”

    Democratic lawmakers and whistleblower rights attorneys argued the employees were being illegally targeted. During Mullin’s confirmation hearing, Sen. Andy Kim, a Democrat from New Jersey, pressed Mullin to reinstate the workers, calling Noem’s actions “unlawful.”

    “There are already laws in place to protect whistleblowers, and I’ve said multiple times, I’ll work within the law and the requirements of me as Secretary,” Mullin responded.

    The 14 staffers were directed to return to work on Thursday**.

    “The past eight months have not been easy, and being able to come back to this work means a great deal to me,” Virginia Case, a reinstated external affairs officer, told CNN. “Moving forward, I hope our agency will address the concerns we raised in the Katrina Declaration. My focus now is getting back to work and doing everything I can to support communities impacted by disaster.”

    At least two senior officials who were swept up in Noem’s hunt for leakers are also back on the job. They were polygraphed last spring, then abruptly put on administrative leave without explanation, according to three sources with knowledge of the matter. This week, after more than a year on the sidelines collecting a paycheck, they were told to report back to work.

    “There’s your tax dollars at work,” a senior FEMA official told CNN in response to the reinstatements.

    This week, FEMA also reinstated a staffer who was put on leave in September for a social media post criticizing Charlie Kirk after his murder.

    Staffing cuts and spending rules

    In addition, FEMA is reversing staffing cuts first reported by CNN in January, when DHS began terminating disaster workers as their contracts expired, the agency confirmed.

    Roughly 200 workers were pushed out before a major winter storm prompted Noem’s team to pause the cuts and start extending workers for 90 days. Some of the cut staff will now have a chance to get their jobs back, three sources said. And going forward, most expiring contracts will be extended for one year — a stopgap move as FEMA braces for hurricane season with staffing already stretched thin.

    After a yearlong hiring freeze, DHS is planning to greenlight FEMA to fill another 400 vacant disaster-worker jobs, two sources told CNN – a fraction of the thousands of staffers who left over that time.

    “Don’t oversell it,” another senior official said. “It’s simply not possible to hire that many that quickly given the losses to our human capital staffing. And hurricane season is 30 days away.”

    Thousands of temporary disaster responders who deploy during catastrophic storms were also offered extensions with their contracts set to expire in the coming weeks.

    Mullin has already eliminated one of the most consequential Noem-era policies: a spending rule requiring her personal approval for any expenditure over $100,000. Noem said it was meant to root out waste, fraud and abuse. But it created a major bottleneck and a massive backlog — billions of dollars in contracts, grants and disaster-related spending that stalled inside FEMA.

    The policy also triggered blowback from Republicans. North Carolina Sens. Thom Tillis and Ted Budd, at one point, blocked DHS nominees, accusing Noem of withholding aid needed for communities hit by Hurricane Helene in 2024.

    In his confirmation hearing, Mullin told lawmakers he planned to scrap the $100,000 rule, calling it “micromanagement.” On his first trip as DHS secretary, he went to North Carolina, where Sen. Budd joined him for a roundtable and praised the rollback — saying it was already helping get money flowing to the state faster.

    Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin attends a Cabinet meeting at the White House on March 26.

    Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

    Concerns remain heading into a high-risk season

    The rollbacks are unfolding as FEMA insiders remain deeply concerned about the agency’s response capabilities with a demanding stretch ahead: hurricane season, widespread drought conditions that could worsen wildfire risk, and preparations tied to the World Cup — planning that was slowed by delayed funding during Noem’s tenure, even as officials raised national security concerns.

    FEMA still isn’t allowing travel for hurricane readiness training and exercises, according to two senior officials. While DHS leaders have cited the recent shutdown, that work is typically funded through the unaffected Disaster Relief Fund.

    Senior officials warn FEMA is not the same agency it was at the start of Trump’s second term. The leadership exodus and staffing losses could take years to rebuild. Noem-era policies also disrupted training and strained communication with state and local partners.

    “It’s all new people in new positions that haven’t been properly exercised, so everyone is going to be just figuring things out mid-disaster when efficiency and effectiveness are critical,” another high-ranking official said. “We are completely screwed if there is a bad disaster.”

  • 特朗普提名妮可·萨皮尔出任美国卫生局局长,撤回凯西·米恩斯的提名


    2026年4月30日 美国东部时间下午4:41 / 路透社

    2026年2月25日,在美国华盛顿国会山,时任美国卫生与公众服务部提名的下一任卫生局局长凯西·米恩斯出席参议院卫生、教育、劳工与养老金委员会的提名听证会。路透社/凯莉·库珀 购买授权,打开新标签页

    • 撤回米恩斯的提名对卫生部长肯尼迪造成打击
    • 特朗普抨击卡西迪阻挠米恩斯的提名
    • 萨皮尔以乳腺癌 advocacy(倡导活动)和为福克斯新闻撰稿闻名

    华盛顿,4月30日(路透社)——美国总统唐纳德·特朗普周四提名放射科医生、福克斯新闻撰稿人妮可·萨皮尔博士出任美国卫生局局长,这是他第三次提名该职位人选,此前他已撤回凯西·米恩斯的提名。

    此举引发特朗普与路易斯安那州共和党参议员比尔·卡西迪之间的对峙,特朗普指责卡西迪阻挠米恩斯的提名,并称其为“非常不忠的人”。

    路透社伊朗简报新闻简报将为您提供伊朗局势的最新动态与分析,点击此处订阅。

    米恩斯是卫生部长小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪的核心盟友,但未能获得足够票数通过由卡西迪担任主席的参议院卫生、教育、劳工与养老金委员会的审议。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    她并非执业医生,且是破坏疫苗接种的“让美国再次健康”运动的核心成员。她的兄弟考利·米恩斯在白宫任职。

    卡西迪的办公室未立即回复置评请求,无法回应特朗普的指控或对萨皮尔的提名发表看法。

    记者未能立即联系到米恩斯。

    获提名的福克斯新闻撰稿人

    作为美国的“全民医生”,卫生局局长将为美国人提供关于如何改善健康、降低患病和受伤风险的最佳科学信息。

    任职于纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心的萨皮尔著有《让美国再次健康:不良行为与大政府如何引发万亿美元危机》等书籍。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    “妮可(Nicole)是一位杰出的医生,她毕生致力于指导乳腺癌患者度过诊断与治疗过程,并不懈倡导提高癌症早期筛查与预防率,”特朗普在Truth Social的帖子中写道。

    他在更早的一篇帖子中表示,尽管卡西迪反对米恩斯的提名,米恩斯仍将继续为肯尼迪领导的“让美国再次健康”运动而战。

    “尽管参议员卡西迪态度顽固、玩弄政治把戏,凯西仍将继续就我国面临的诸多重要卫生议题,为‘让美国再次健康’运动发声,”特朗普说道。

    肯尼迪在X平台的帖子中称赞米恩斯是其运动“最具影响力的倡导者之一”,并指责卡西迪“为根深蒂固的利益集团做脏活”,拖延其提名进程。他表示米恩斯仍将是亲密合作伙伴。

    填补该职位的第三次尝试

    今年5月,特朗普撤回了此前的提名人选珍妮特·内谢瓦特,米恩斯是他的第二任提名者。两次提名都遭到极右翼活动人士的反对,其中包括与特朗普关系密切的劳拉·卢默。

    在2月充满争议的提名听证会上,米恩斯面临民主党人和包括卡西迪在内的部分共和党人的尖锐质询,内容涉及她对疫苗、避孕措施及其他公共卫生政策的看法,以及潜在的经济利益冲突。

    她曾表示疫苗是“任何传染病公共卫生战略的关键组成部分”,但拒绝直接驳斥由长期反疫苗活动人士肯尼迪推广的、早已被证伪的疫苗与自闭症相关论调。

    公共监督组织“公共公民”联合主席丽莎·吉尔伯特称,撤回米恩斯的提名是“公共卫生的明确胜利”。

    “凯西·米恩斯没有资格也不适合担任卫生局局长,撤回她的提名是美国公众的胜利,”她在一份电子邮件声明中说道。

    与米恩斯不同,萨皮尔持有有效的行医执照。她是纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心乳腺影像科主任,拥有巴巴多斯罗斯大学医学院医学博士学位,并在梅奥诊所完成研修。

    她与肯尼迪领导的运动存在一些共同点:她的书中讨论了通过饮食与运动等生活方式因素预防慢性病。

    艾哈迈德·阿布勒内恩报道;芝加哥的朱莉·斯廷胡森、华盛顿的苏珊·希维与瑞安·帕特里克·琼斯补充报道;凯特琳·韦伯、卡罗琳·休默与安德里亚·里奇编辑

    我们的报道标准:路透社信托原则,打开新标签页

    Trump names Nicole Saphier as Surgeon General pick, withdraws Means

    April 30, 2026 4:41 PM UTC / Reuters

    节点运行失败

    Casey Means, nominated to serve as the next U.S. Surgeon General, testifies before a Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 25, 2026. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    • Withdrawing Means deals a setback to Health Secretary Kennedy
    • Trump attacks Cassidy for blocking Means’ nomination
    • Saphier known for breast cancer advocacy, Fox ​News contributions

    WASHINGTON, April 30 (Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump named radiologist and Fox News contributor Dr. Nicole Saphier as his pick ‌for U.S. Surgeon General on Thursday, his third nominee for the post, after withdrawing the nomination of Casey Means.

    The move sets up a standoff between Trump and Republican Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, whom he accused of blocking Means’ nomination and called “a very disloyal person.”

    The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

    Means was a key ally of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. but lacked the ​votes to advance from the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, which Cassidy chairs.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    She is not a practicing doctor and is ​an integral part of the Make America Healthy Again movement that has undermined vaccines. Her brother Calley Means works ⁠for the White House.

    Cassidy’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Trump’s accusation or Saphier’s nomination.

    Means was not immediately reachable.

    FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR ​TAPPED FOR ROLE

    As the nation’s doctor, the surgeon general provides Americans with the best scientific information available on how to improve their health and reduce ​risk of illness and injury.

    Saphier, who works at Memorial Sloan Kettering, is the author of books including “Make America Healthy Again: How Bad Behavior and Big Government Caused a Trillion Dollar Crisis.”

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    “Nicole is a STAR physician who has spent her career guiding women facing breast cancer through their diagnosis and treatment while tirelessly advocating to increase early cancer detection and ​prevention,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.

    He said in an earlier post that Means would continue to fight for the Kennedy-led Make America ​Healthy Again movement despite Cassidy’s opposition to her nomination.

    “Despite Senator Cassidy’s intransigence and political games, Casey will continue to fight for MAHA on the many important Health issues ‌facing our ⁠Country,” Trump said.

    Kennedy praised Means as one of his movement’s “most powerful evangelist” in a post on X and accused Cassidy of “doing the dirty work for entrenched interests” by stalling her nomination. He said Means would remain a close partner.

    THIRD ATTEMPT TO FILL POST

    Means was Trump’s second nominee for the role after he withdrew his prior pick, Janette Nesheiwat, in May. Both nominations faced opposition from far-right activists, including Laura Loomer, who is known to have Trump’s ear.

    Means ​faced pointed questioning from Democrats and some ​Republicans, including Cassidy, at a contentious ⁠February confirmation hearing over her views on vaccines, birth control and other areas of public health policy, as well as potential financial conflicts of interest.

    She said vaccines are “a key part of any infectious disease public health strategy” but ​declined to directly reject a long-discredited claim linking vaccines to autism promoted by Kennedy, a longtime anti-vaccine activist.

    ​Lisa Gilbert, co-president of ⁠watchdog Public Citizen, called the withdrawal of Means’ nomination a “clear-cut victory for public health.”

    “Casey Means is unqualified and unfit to be Surgeon General and the withdrawal of her nomination is a win for the American public,” she said in an emailed statement.

    Saphier, unlike Means, holds an active medical license. She is director of ⁠breast imaging ​at Memorial Sloan Kettering, with a doctor of medicine degree from Ross University School of ​Medicine in Barbados and fellowships at the Mayo Clinic.

    She shares some commonalities with the Kennedy-led movement; her book discusses preventing chronic diseases through lifestyle factors such as diet and exercise.

    Reporting by ​Ahmed Aboulenein; Additional reporting by Julie Steenhuysen in Chicago, Susan Heavey and Ryan Patrick Jones in Washington; Editing by Caitlin Webber, Caroline Humer and Andrea Ricci

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

湘ICP备2026001899号-2