博客

  • 内布拉斯加州牧场遭野火焚毁,匿名捐助者伸出援手:“他们不想张扬”


    2026-05-01 19:59 美东夏令时 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    作者:史蒂夫·哈特曼

    史蒂夫·哈特曼 通讯员

    史蒂夫·哈特曼是哥伦比亚广播公司新闻通讯员,他通过每周获奖专题栏目“在路上”,为观众带来他偶遇的普通人的动人故事。

    查看完整简介

    史蒂夫·哈特曼
    更新于:2026年5月1日 / 晚8:03 美东夏令时 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    内布拉斯加州沙丘区——前往荒无人烟之地的深处,你最终会抵达迈克和凯拉·温茨的家。这对牧场主在内布拉斯加州西部沙丘区深处生活和劳作。这里有多偏僻?

    “买一加仑牛奶要花一个多小时,”迈克告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻。

    尽管与世隔绝,迈克和凯拉却说他们从未像现在这样与这个伟大的国家如此紧密相连,这都要归功于一场灾难带来的幸运转机。

    今年3月,莫里尔野火——内布拉斯加州历史上最大的野火——焚毁了约1000平方英里的牧场,其中包括迈克和凯租借的土地。这场野火吞噬了他们全部1.1万英亩的土地。

    “两个小时之内一切都没了,太令人难受了,”迈克说。

    牧草被毁后,牛群无法放牧,迈克和凯拉真的面临失去生计的危险。该地区其他本可以伸出援手的牧场主也处境相同:他们也没有干草。但随后迈克的电话开始响起,全是捐助来电。

    迈克表示,到目前为止,他已经收到了价值约8万美元的捐赠干草,其中大部分来自匿名捐助者。

    “他们不想张扬,”迈克谈到捐助者时说。

    凯拉补充道:“他们知道自己做了好事,这就足够了。”

    萨拉·卡弗是一名志愿者,一直在为该地区其他同样失去所有牧草和干草的牧场主牵线搭桥联系捐助者。

    “每天最多能接到200通想要捐赠干草的来电,”卡弗告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻。“……你会看到一队20多辆满载干草的卡车组成的车队,还有学童们在路边为他们欢呼。”

    没有人主动要求过这种帮助。这份善意来自数千名远至南卡罗来纳州的农民、牧场主和卡车司机。同理心、慈善和仁爱——这些品质确保了无论你多么与世隔绝,你永远不会孤身一人。

    卡弗说:“我们联系过的每一位愿意运送干草的牧场主,都要求我们先把干草送给他们的邻居。”

    After a wildfire torched their Nebraska ranch, anonymous donors came to their rescue: “They don’t want the glory”

    2026-05-01 19:59 EDT / CBS News

    By Steve Hartman

    Steve Hartman Correspondent

    Steve Hartman is a CBS News correspondent. He brings viewers moving stories from the unique people he meets in his weekly award-winning feature segment “On the Road.”

    Read Full Bio

    Steve Hartman

    Updated on: May 1, 2026 / 8:03 PM EDT / CBS News

    Sandhills, Nebraska — Go to the edge of nowhere and keep heading toward the middle of it and you will eventually come to the home of Mike and Kayla Wintz, ranchers who live and work deep in the sandhills of western Nebraska. How remote is it?

    “A gallon of milk is a little over an hour away,” Mike told CBS News.

    Although they are isolated, Mike and Kayla say they have never felt more connected to this great nation, thanks to the blessing of a curse.

    In March, the Morrill Fire, the largest wildfire in Nebraska history, burned about 1,000 square miles of ranchland, including the fields that Mike and Kayla lease. The wildfire burned all 11,000 acres of their land.

    “Within two hours it’s all gone, it’s tough,” Mike said.

    With the grass gone, the cattle couldn’t graze, and Mike and Kayla were in real danger of losing their livelihoods. Other ranchers in the area who might have helped were in the same boat: They didn’t have hay either. But then Mike’s phone started ringing with donations.

    So far, Mike says, he has been gifted about $80,000 worth of hay, mostly from anonymous donors.

    “They don’t want the glory,” Mike said of the donors.

    Added Kayla: “They know they did it and that’s all they need.”

    Sara Cover is a volunteer who has been connecting donors with other ranchers in the area who lost all their grass and hay too.

    “Up to 200 phone calls a day of people wanting to donate hay,” Cover told CBS News. “… You see these convoys of 20-plus trucks loaded with hay. And there’s school kids cheering them on.”

    No one asked for this help. It just came from thousands of farmers, ranchers and truck drivers as far away as South Carolina. Empathy, charity and grace — qualities that guarantee that no matter how isolated you are, you are never alone.

    Said Cover: “Every rancher that we have called to send them hay has asked us to send it to their neighbor first.”

  • 美国批准向中东盟友出售逾86亿美元军售装备


    2026年5月1日 世界协调时22:27 / 路透社

    作者:卡尼什卡·辛格
    更新于28分钟前

    节点运行失败

    2025年4月23日合成图中展示的美国国务院标识与美国国旗。路透社/达多·鲁维奇/合成图 购买授权许可

    华盛顿,5月1日(路透社)——美国国务院周五表示,已批准向中东盟友以色列、卡塔尔、科威特和阿联酋出售总额逾86亿美元的军事装备。

    此次宣布之际,美以联合对伊朗的军事行动已迎来第九周,距离脆弱的停火协议生效也已超过三周。

    《路透社伊朗简报》新闻简报将为您带来伊朗局势的最新进展与分析。点击此处订阅。

    国务院周五宣布的军售项目包括:向卡塔尔出售价值40.1亿美元的爱国者防空反导补充服务,以及价值9.924亿美元的先进精确杀伤武器系统(APKWS)。

    广告 · 继续向下滚动

    同时获批的还有向科威特出售价值25亿美元的一体化战场指挥系统,以及向以色列出售价值9.924亿美元的先进精确杀伤武器系统。

    美国国务院还批准向阿联酋出售价值1.476亿美元的先进精确杀伤武器系统。

    国务院表示,向卡塔尔、以色列和阿联酋出售先进精确杀伤武器系统的主承包商是BAE系统公司(BAES.L)。

    美国国务院补充称,雷神技术公司(RTX.N)和洛克希德·马丁公司(LMT.N)是向科威特出售一体化战场指挥系统、以及向卡塔尔出售爱国者防空反导补充服务的主承包商。

    诺斯罗普·格鲁曼公司(NOC.N)同样是此次科威特军售项目的主承包商之一。

    广告 · 继续向下滚动

    卡尼什卡·辛格、瑞安·帕特里克·琼斯与克里斯蒂安·马丁报道;科斯塔斯·皮塔斯编辑

    我们的报道准则:汤森路透信托原则。

    US approves military sales of over $8.6 billion to Middle East allies

    May 1, 2026 10:27 PM UTC / Reuters

    By Kanishka Singh

    Updated 28 mins ago

    节点运行失败

    United States Department of State logo and U.S. flag are seen in this illustration taken April 23, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration Purchase Licensing Rights

    WASHINGTON, May 1 (Reuters) – The U.S. State Department said ​on Friday it was approving military sales ‌totaling over $8.6 billion to Middle Eastern allies Israel, Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates.

    The announcements came as the U.S. ​and Israel’s war against Iran marked nine ​weeks since its start and more than three ⁠weeks since a fragile ceasefire came into ​effect.

    The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

    Friday’s announcements by the State Department included approving military ​sales to Qatar of Patriot air and missile defense replenishment services costing $4.01 billion and of Advanced Precision Kill Weapon Systems (APKWS) ​costing $992.4 million.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    They also included approval of the ​sale to Kuwait of an integrated battle command system costing $2.5 billion ‌and ⁠to Israel of Advanced Precision Kill Weapon Systems costing $992.4 million.

    The State Department approved a sale to the UAE of APKWS for $147.6 million.

    The principal contractor ​in the APKWS ​sales to ⁠Qatar, Israel and the UAE was BAE Systems BAES.L, the State Department said.

    RTX RTX.N and Lockheed ​Martin LMT.N were the principal contractors in the integrated ​battle ⁠command system sale to Kuwait and in the Patriot air and missile defense replenishment sale to Qatar, the ⁠State ​Department added.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Northrop Grumman NOC.N was also ​a principal contractor in the Kuwaiti sale.

    Reporting by Kanishka Singh, Ryan ​Patrick Jones and Christian Martinez; editing by Costas Pitas

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 上诉法院阻止美国邮寄堕胎药米索前列醇


    2026年5月1日 / 美国东部时间晚上7:24 / 哥伦比亚广播公司/美联社

    美国联邦上诉法院周五限制了美国最常见的堕胎手段之一的使用途径,禁止邮寄米非司酮处方。

    总部位于新奥尔良的美国第五巡回上诉法院的一个合议庭要求,这种堕胎药只能在诊所内面对面发放。

    “食品药品监督管理局的行为所促成的每一例堕胎,都将推翻路易斯安那州对药物堕胎的禁令,并破坏其‘每个未出生的孩子从受孕那一刻起就是人类,因此是法律意义上的人’的政策,”裁决书中写道。

    法官们在裁决中表示,现行规定“为跨州开药者提供了一种有效途径,使其能够无视路易斯安那州法律,将药物交到该州居民手中”。

    长期以来,法官们一直尊重美国食品药品监督管理局对药物安全性和适当监管的判断。

    特朗普政府时期的FDA官员曾多次表示,应总统指示,该机构正在对米非司酮的安全性进行新一轮审查。

    法官们在裁决中指出,FDA“无法说明该审查何时完成,并承认仍在收集数据”。

    在一份法庭文件中,路易斯安那州总检察长和一名声称自己被迫服用堕胎药的女性要求FDA将相关规定恢复到仅允许面对面开具和发放堕胎药的状态。

    一名路易斯安那州联邦法官上月裁定,这些许可规定破坏了该州的堕胎禁令,但并未立即撤销相关监管条例。

    自2022年最高法院推翻“罗伊诉韦德案”裁决并允许各州实施堕胎禁令以来,通过邮寄处方进行药物堕胎已成为提供堕胎服务的主要方式之一——包括在实施堕胎禁令的州。

    “路易斯安那州对米非司酮的法律攻击无耻地将谎言和宣传包装成限制堕胎的借口,而第五巡回法院却对其照单全收,”美国公民自由联盟律师朱莉娅·凯周五在一份声明中说道。“对无数人来说,尤其是那些生活在农村地区、遭受亲密伴侣暴力或残疾人士,失去远程医疗选项将意味着彻底无法获得这种至关重要的药物。”

    米非司酮于2000年获批,作为一种安全有效的早期妊娠终止手段。它通常与另一种药物米索前列醇联合使用。

    由于存在罕见的大出血病例,FDA最初对该药物的开具和发放设定了严格限制——仅允许经过专门认证的医生开具,且必须在患者当面就诊时给药。

    新冠疫情期间,这两项要求均被取消。当时拜登政府的FDA官员表示,在对米非司酮的使用情况进行了20多年的监测,并审查了涉及数千名女性的数十项研究后,显然女性无需直接监督即可安全使用该药物。

    周五的裁决可能会引发向最高法院的上诉。

    在一份声明中,“生殖自由支持组织”表示,周五的裁决“距离全国性堕胎禁令又近了一步”。

    “路易斯安那州的这起案件建立在早已被驳倒的伪科学之上,”生殖自由支持组织主席兼首席执行官米妮·蒂马鲁在一份声明中说道。“米非司酮的安全性从未真正受到过质疑。随着这起案件进入美国最高法院,我们将继续斗争,直到每个人都能获得所需的医疗服务。”

    以保守派占多数的最高法院于2022年废除了全国范围内的堕胎权,但在两年后一致裁定保留米非司酮的使用许可。

    然而,2024年的这项裁决回避了核心问题,裁定提起诉讼的反堕胎医生不具备起诉的法律资格。

    Appeals court blocks mailing of abortion pill mifepristone in U.S.

    May 1, 2026 / 7:24 PM EDT / CBS/AP

    A federal appeals court on Friday restricted access to one of the most common means of abortion in the U.S. by blocking mailing of prescriptions of mifepristone.

    A panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is requiring that the abortion pill be distributed only in person at clinics.

    “Every abortion facilitated by FDA’s action cancels Louisiana’s ban on medical abortions and undermines its policy that ‘every unborn child is human being from the moment of conception and is, therefore, a legal person,’” the ruling states.

    In their ruling, the judges stated that the current regulation “creates an effective way for an out-of-state prescriber to place the drug in the hands of Louisianans in defiance of Louisiana law.”

    Judges have long deferred to the Food and Drug Administration’s judgments on the safety and appropriate regulation of drugs.

    FDA officials under President Trump have repeatedly stated the agency is conducting a new review of mifepristone’s safety, at the direction of the president.

    The judges noted in their ruling that the FDA “could not say when that review might be complete and admitted it was still collecting data.”

    In a court filing, Louisiana’s attorney general and a woman who says she was coerced into taking abortion pills requested that the FDA rules be rolled back to when the pills were allowed to be prescribed and dispensed only in person.

    A Louisiana-based federal judge last month ruled that those allowances undermined the state’s abortion ban but stopped short of undoing the regulations immediately.

    Since the Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade and allowed enforcement of abortion bans, prescriptions by mail have become a major way that abortions are provided — including to states where bans are in place.

    “Louisiana’s legal attack on mifepristone shamelessly packaged lies and propaganda as an excuse to restrict abortion — and the Fifth Circuit rubber-stamped it,” American Civil Liberties Union lawyer Julia Kaye said Friday in a statement. “For countless people, especially those who live in rural areas, face intimate partner violence, or live with disabilities, losing a telemedicine option will mean losing access to this vital medication altogether.”

    Mifepristone was approved in 2000 as a safe and effective way to end early pregnancies. It is typically used in combination with a second drug, misoprostol.

    Because of rare cases of excessive bleeding, the FDA initially imposed strict limits on who could prescribe and distribute the pill — only specially certified physicians and only after an in-person appointment where the person would receive the pill.

    Both those requirements were dropped during the COVID-19 years. At the time, FDA officials under President Joe Biden said that after more than 20 years of monitoring mifepristone use, and reviewing dozens of studies involving thousands of women, it was clear that women could safely use the pill without direct supervision.

    Friday’s ruling sets up a likely appeal to the Supreme Court.

    In a statement, Reproductive Freedom for All said Friday’s ruling is “one step closer to a national abortion ban.”

    “Louisiana built this case on debunked, junk science,” Reproductive Freedom for All President and CEO Mini Timmaraju said in a statement. “The safety of mifepristone has never actually been in question. As this case moves towards the U.S. Supreme Court, we will fight until every person has access to the care they need.”

    The conservative-majority high court overturned abortion as a nationwide right in 2022 but unanimously preserved access to mifepristone two years later.

    That 2024 decision sidestepped the core issues, however, by ruling that the anti-abortion doctors behind the case didn’t have legal standing to sue.

  • 新闻


    你所提供的内容是中文新闻,并非英文新闻,请你提供需要翻译的英文原文,我会按照要求为你完成翻译。

    榜鹅组屋一晚两单位失火 四楼单位疑孩童玩火被烧毁

    2026年5月2日 07:07 / 联合早报

    据观察,失火的四楼单位的卧室被烧得一片焦黑,衣物、床垫和衣橱尽毁,现场一片狼藉。 (梁麒麟摄)

    榜鹅一座组屋星期五(5月1日)接连发生两起火患,大约30名居民被紧急疏散。其中一间失火单位疑因6岁男童玩打火机引起,卧室被烧得面目全非。

    这起事故发生在星期五傍晚时分,地点是榜鹅苏芒巷(Sumang Lane)第223A座组屋。

    《联合早报》记者事发晚上10时30分赶抵现场时,发现起火单位分别位于四楼和九楼。据了解,九楼火患发生在前,随后四楼单位也传出火警。

    四楼失火单位的男屋主司德念(35岁,送餐员)受访时说,他与妻子(35岁)及四名儿女住在失火的一房一厅单位约八年。事发时,只有他们两夫妇和两名6岁和2岁的儿子在家。

    他说,当晚8时许,一家人在卧室陆续入睡,并猜测当时仍醒着的6岁儿子在房内玩打火机,不慎点燃纸巾,火势迅速蔓延至一旁的尿布和床垫,最终酿成大火。

    “妻子发现起火后立刻叫醒我,我赶忙让她带孩子逃离。我离开卧室时,浓烟已弥漫客厅,气味呛鼻,视线也非常模糊。”

    司德念说,他在逃生时觉得单位内酷热难耐,也听到卧室玻璃窗因高温碎裂的声音。他切断了门外正在充电的行动辅助工具的电源,随后请邻居拨打求助电话。

    据记者观察,失火单位的卧室被烧得一片焦黑,衣物、床垫和衣橱尽毁;整个客厅也被熏黑,橱柜和冰箱等家具无一幸免。

    住家尽毁,司德念深感无奈与痛心。他透露,当局已为他们一家安排临时住所,建屋局也将尽快修复单位。

    住在同一座组屋17楼的纳比拉(22岁,自雇人士)透露,事发时她正在洗澡,惊见浴室内的排水孔竟不断冒出浓烟。

    “我担心是楼下失火,立刻带着孩子逃生。当时楼梯间只听见邻居的喊叫声,烟味非常刺鼻。后来才知道是四楼起火,火势显然很大。”

    目前,九楼单位的失火原因尚不明确,但从走廊可观察到外墙已被熏黑。

    《联合早报》已针对这两起火患向新加坡民防部队和榜鹅市镇理事会了解更多。

  • 上诉法院叫停FDA允许女性通过邮寄获取堕胎药的规定


    2026-05-01T21:30:34.618Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    上诉法院叫停FDA允许女性通过邮寄获取堕胎药的规定

    作者:蒂尔尼·斯尼德
    更新于1小时41分钟前
    更新时间:2026年5月1日,美国东部时间下午6:26
    发布时间:2026年5月1日,美国东部时间下午5:30

    美国联邦上诉法院暂时恢复了全国范围内堕胎药需线下获取的要求。

    纳塔莉·贝林/盖蒂图片社

    美国联邦上诉法院暂时恢复了全国范围内堕胎药需线下获取的要求,这削弱了药物流产的可及性——自美国最高法院推翻《罗伊诉韦德案》以来,药物流产的普及程度反而不断提高。

    美国第五巡回上诉法院周五的裁决,是反堕胎运动对抗药物流产的一次重大胜利。目前药物流产约占美国所有堕胎手术的三分之二。

    此次裁决源于路易斯安那州去年针对美国食品药品监督管理局提起的诉讼。此前唐纳德·特朗普政府拒绝通过监管程序恢复堕胎药线下配药要求的呼吁。

    该意见由特朗普任命的巡回法官凯尔·邓肯撰写,另外两位参与联署的巡回法官莱斯利·索思威克和库尔特·恩格尔哈特分别由乔治·W·布什和特朗普任命。

    相关报道 CNN分析:药物流产比青霉素、伟哥和手术流产更安全 阅读时长4分钟

    法官们在提及路易斯安那州的堕胎禁令时写道,现行联邦监管规定为“州外医生绕过路易斯安那州法律,将药物交到路易斯安那州居民手中提供了有效途径”。

    自新冠疫情以来,寻求堕胎的民众可以通过远程医疗问诊获取米非司酮——药物流产方案中的两种药物之一。在最高法院2023年通过“多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案”推翻1973年保护全国堕胎权的《罗伊诉韦德案》先例后,乔·拜登政府最终敲定规则,终止了堕胎药需线下就诊获取的要求。

    路易斯安那州声称,这一监管举措旨在破坏该州随罗伊案被推翻而生效的堕胎禁令,并表示目前该州境内每年有数百例堕胎手术,原因是女性可以通过远程医疗问诊后通过邮寄获取药物。

    “美国食品药品监督管理局的每一次堕胎操作,都在抵消路易斯安那州对药物流产的禁令,破坏其‘每个未出生的孩子从受孕那一刻起就是人类,因此是法律意义上的人’的政策,”上诉法院周五在裁决书中写道。

    米非司酮制造商GenBioPro的首席执行官埃文·马辛吉尔作为本案原告之一,在一份声明中表示,公司“对该法院的裁决感到震惊,它无视了FDA严谨的科学依据以及米非司酮数十年来的安全使用记录,这起诉讼由极端反堕胎人士发起。……我们将继续采取一切必要行动,让米非司酮可供国内尽可能多的民众获取,无论反堕胎特殊利益集团如何试图破坏患者的可及性。”

    此次裁决是围绕堕胎药可及性展开的多年法律战的最新进展。两年前,这一问题曾提交至美国最高法院,当时大法官们裁定反堕胎医生没有起诉资格挑战相关监管规定。

    CNN对米非司酮数据的分析显示,该药物的安全性极高,报告的副作用数量远低于伟哥或青霉素。米非司酮也比手术流产更安全,而手术流产在十多个州已被禁止或严格限制。

    相关报道 2022年6月17日,在新墨西哥州圣特雷莎的女性生殖诊所,工作人员展示米非司酮(米非司酮片)和米索前列醇,这两种药物用于药物流产。米非司酮首先服用以终止妊娠,随后服用米索前列醇以诱导出血。 – 在美国最高法院推翻《罗伊诉韦德案》并取消联邦保护的堕胎权后,来自德克萨斯州和其他州的女性前往新墨西哥州等州的诊所,根据该州更宽松的法律获取合法的堕胎服务。 – 仅限编辑使用(照片由罗宾·贝克/法新社拍摄)/ 仅限编辑使用(照片由ROBYN BECK/法新社通过盖蒂图片社拍摄) 罗宾·贝克/法新社/盖蒂图片社 什么是米非司酮? 阅读时长4分钟

    远程医疗堕胎案例日益增多

    美国大多数堕胎手术仍为线下进行,但通过远程医疗提供的药物流产正变得越来越普遍。根据家庭计划协会赞助的研究项目#WeCount的最新数据,2025年上半年,全国超过四分之一的堕胎手术通过远程医疗完成,这一比例在2022年还不到十分之一。

    “多布斯案”裁决后,部分州开始制定庇护法,为在合法堕胎地区执业的医疗提供者提供法律保护,使其可以通过远程医疗为生活在堕胎禁令或限制地区的民众开具药物流产药物。据古特马赫研究所的数据,目前已有八个州出台了庇护法,无论患者身处何地,都可覆盖远程医疗配药服务。

    古特马赫研究所的估算显示,2025年,约有9.1万例远程医疗堕胎手术通过庇护法为全面禁止堕胎的州的民众提供服务。仍有数万人跨州线下接受堕胎手术,但这一数字随着远程医疗堕胎的普及而不断下降。古特马赫研究所估计,2024年至2025年间,全面禁止堕胎州内跨州堕胎的人数减少了约1.2万,而向全面禁止堕胎州民众提供的远程医疗堕胎手术数量增加了约1.9万。

    最新的#WeCount数据显示,堕胎合法州的民众也会通过远程医疗获取堕胎护理,但不同州通过远程医疗完成的堕胎手术占比差异巨大。

    其他多个反堕胎州也提出了与路易斯安那州类似的主张。与路易斯安那州一同作为原告起诉FDA的还有一名女性,她声称自己被胁迫服用从外州邮寄来的堕胎药物终止妊娠。

    此前,负责审理此案的法官对路易斯安那州的论点表示同情,但拒绝发布初步命令推翻相关监管规定。美国地区法官戴维·约瑟夫转而批准了特朗普政府的请求,将此案搁置,等待FDA对现行米非司酮监管规定进行自身审查。

    特朗普政府并未在实质问题上为FDA针对米非司酮的监管方式辩护,但辩称路易斯安那州的诉讼存在程序缺陷,应判该州败诉。第五巡回上诉法院驳回了这些论点,同时也驳回了介入此案全力为放宽堕胎药获取规则辩护的两家米非司酮制造商的论点。

    维权人士称裁决“无视明确科学依据”

    “远程医疗一直是许多寻求堕胎者的最后一道护理桥梁,这也正是路易斯安那州官员想要禁止它的原因,”生殖权利中心主席兼首席执行官南希·诺斯鲁普在一份声明中表示。“这与科学无关——这是在尽可能让堕胎变得困难、昂贵且难以企及。远程医疗改变了医疗行业。选择性地剥夺堕胎患者的这一权利,是一种政治封锁。”

    美国公民自由联盟生殖自由项目高级法律顾问朱莉娅·凯伊在一份声明中表示,该裁决“无视明确的科学依据和既定法律,推进了深受美国民众反对的反堕胎议程。对于无数人来说,尤其是那些生活在农村地区、遭受亲密伴侣暴力或残疾人士,失去远程医疗选项将意味着彻底无法获取这一关键药物。”

    生殖自由组织表示,法院正在“规定医疗实践并推翻合法堕胎地区的州法律”。

    “法院的裁决使全国堕胎禁令又近了一步。民众获取堕胎护理的难度 now 大大增加了,”该组织主席兼首席执行官米妮·蒂马拉朱在一份声明中说。“反堕胎政客知道他们的政策不受欢迎,所以他们正在动用政府的所有手段。路易斯安那州的案件建立在被揭穿的伪科学之上。米非司酮的安全性从未真正受到过质疑。随着此案提交至美国最高法院,我们将继续斗争,直到每个人都能获得所需的护理。”

    _CNN记者迪尔德雷·麦克菲利普斯和凯瑟琳·迪林杰对本文亦有贡献。

    By Tierney Sneed

    Updated 1 hr 41 min ago

    Updated May 1, 2026, 6:26 PM ET

    PUBLISHED May 1, 2026, 5:30 PM ET

    A federal appeals court temporarily reinstated a nationwide requirement that abortion pills be obtained in person.

    Natalie Behring/Getty Images

    A federal appeals court temporarily reinstated a nationwide requirement that abortion pills be obtained in person, undermining access to the method of abortion that has only grown more widespread since the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

    Friday’s ruling from the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals is a major victory in the anti-abortion movement’s war against medication abortion, which now accounts for roughly two-thirds of all abortions in the United States.

    The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by Louisiana last year against the US Food and Drug Administration, after President Donald Trump’s administration refused to act on calls to reinstate the in-person dispensing requirement for abortion pills through the regulatory process.

    The opinion was written by Trump-appointed Circuit Judge Kyle Duncan, joined by Circuit Judges Leslie Southwick and Kurt Engelhardt, who were appointed by Presidents George W. Bush and Trump, respectively.

    Related article Medication abortion pill is safer than penicillin, Viagra and procedural abortion, CNN analysis shows 4 min read

    Referring to Louisiana abortion prohibitions, they wrote that the current federal regulations create “an effective way for an out-of-state prescriber to place the drug in the hands of Louisianans in defiance of Louisiana law.”

    Since the Covid-19 pandemic, abortion-seekers have been able to obtain mifepristone – one of the two drugs in the medication abortion regimen – through telehealth appointments. President Joe Biden’s administration finalized rules that ended the requirement that the pills be obtained through an in-person doctor’s visit in 2023, after the US Supreme Court overturned the 1973 Roe precedent protecting abortion rights nationwide with Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

    Louisiana alleged that that regulatory maneuver was aimed at undermining the abortion ban that went into effect in the state with the reversal of Roe and says that now, hundreds of abortions are occurring every year within its borders because women are able to obtain pills via mail after telehealth visits with providers.

    “Every abortion facilitated by FDA’s action cancels Louisiana’s ban on medical abortions and undermines its policy that ‘every unborn child is human being from the moment of conception and is, therefore, a legal person,’” the appeals court wrote Friday.

    Evan Masingill, CEO of mifepristone manufacturer GenBioPro, a plaintiff in the lawsuit, said in a statement that the company is “alarmed by this court’s decision to ignore the FDA’s rigorous science and decades of safe use of mifepristone in a case pursued by extremist abortion opponents. … We remain committed to taking any actions necessary to make mifepristone available and accessible to as many people as possible in the country, regardless of anti-abortion special interests trying to undermine patients’ access.”

    The ruling is the latest development in a yearslong legal battle over access to abortion pills. The issue reached the US Supreme Court two years ago, in a case in which the justices ruled that anti-abortion doctors lacked standing to challenge the regulations.

    A CNN analysis of mifepristone data shows that the drug is overwhelmingly safe and has fewer reported side effects than Viagra or penicillin. Mifepristone is also safer than procedural abortions, which are banned or heavily restricted in more than a dozen states.

    Related article Mifepristone (Mifeprex) and Misoprostol, the two drugs used in a medication abortion, are seen at the Women’s Reproductive Clinic, which provides legal medication abortion services, in Santa Teresa, New Mexico, on June 17, 2022. Mifepristone is taken first to stop the pregnancy, followed by Misoprostol to induce bleeding. – In the wake of Friday’s ruling by the US Supreme Court striking down Roe v Wade and the federally protected right to an abortion, women from Texas and other states are traveling to clinics like the Women’s Reproductive Health Clinic in New Mexico for legal abortion services under the state’s more liberal laws. – RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE (Photo by Robyn Beck / AFP) / RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE (Photo by ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images) Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images What is mifepristone? 4 min read

    Telehealth abortions on the rise

    Most abortions in the United States happen in person, but medication abortion provided through telehealth is becoming more common. More than 1 in 4 abortions nationwide were provided through telehealth in the first half of 2025, according to the latest data from #WeCount, a research project sponsored by the Society of Family Planning — up from fewer than 1 in 10 in 2022.

    After the Dobbs decision, some states started to enact shield laws that offer some legal protections for providers who practice where abortion remains legal to prescribe medication abortion drugs via telehealth to people living in states with bans or restrictions. Eight states now have shield laws that cover telehealth provision regardless of where the patient is located, according to the Guttmacher Institute.

    In 2025, about 91,000 telehealth abortions were provided under shield laws to people in states with total abortion bans, Guttmacher estimates show. Tens of thousands of people still travel across state lines to receive an abortion in person, but that number is falling as telehealth abortion becomes more common. Between 2024 and 2025, about 12,000 fewer people in states with total abortion bans traveled out-of-state for an abortion, while the number of telehealth abortions to people in states with total abortion bans increased by about 19,000, according to Guttmacher estimates.

    The latest #WeCount data shows that people in states where abortion remains legal also utilize telehealth for abortion care, but the share of abortions provided via telehealth varies widely by state.

    Several other states with anti-abortion laws are making claims similar to Louisiana’s. Joining Louisiana as a plaintiff in the lawsuit against the FDA is a woman who alleges that she was coerced into terminating a pregnancy by taking abortion pills that were shipped in from out of state.

    Previously, the judge overseeing the case expressed sympathy with Louisiana’s arguments but declined to issue a preliminary order reversing the regulations. US District Judge David Joseph had instead granted a Trump administration request to put the case on hold while the FDA does its own review of the current mifepristone regulations.

    The Trump administration had stopped short of defending the FDA’s regulatory approach to the mifepristone on the merits, but it argued that Louisiana’s lawsuit suffered procedural defects that warranted ruling against the state. The 5th Circuit rejected those arguments and the arguments of two mifepristone manufacturers that intervened in the case to put up a full-throated defense of the rules that made abortion pills easier to obtain.

    Advocates say decision ‘defies clear science’

    “Telehealth has been the last bridge to care for many seeking abortion, which is precisely why Louisiana officials want it banned,” Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement. “This isn’t about science – it’s about making abortion as difficult, expensive, and unreachable as possible. Telehealth has transformed healthcare. Selectively stripping that away from abortion patients is a political blockade.”

    Julia Kaye, senior staff attorney for the Reproductive Freedom Project of the ACLU, said in a statement that the decision “defies clear science and settled law and advances an anti-abortion agenda that is deeply unpopular with the American people. For countless people, especially those who live in rural areas, face intimate partner violence, or live with disabilities, losing a telemedicine option will mean losing access to this vital medication altogether.”

    Reproductive Freedom for All said the court is “dictating medical practice and overriding state laws” in places where abortion is legal.

    “The court’s decision moves us one step closer to a national abortion ban. It is now much more difficult for people to access abortion care,” President and CEO Mini Timmaraju said in a statement. “Anti-abortion politicians know their policies are unpopular, so they are using every lever of government they can. Louisiana built this case on debunked, junk science. The safety of mifepristone has never actually been in question. As this case moves towards the U.S. Supreme Court, we will fight until every person has access to the care they need.”

    CNN’s Deidre McPhillips and Katherine Dillinger contributed to this report.

  • 新闻


    这篇是中文新闻,无需翻译,请您提供英文新闻内容以便我为您翻译。

    中国教育部长:打好首批疏解高校雄安校区开门办学攻坚战

    2026年5月2日 07:24 / 联合早报

    中国教育部部长怀进鹏要求全力以赴打好首批疏解高校雄安校区开门办学、高质量发展、创新引领三大攻坚战,确保高校疏解承接工作有序推进。

    据中国教育部官网消息,雄安新区高校建设发展座谈会星期三(4月29日)在河北雄安新区召开。会议强调,要深入贯彻落实中共总书记习近平在雄安新区考察时的讲话精神,推动北京地区高校向雄安疏解和承接工作提速提质。

    教育部中共党组书记、部长怀进鹏,河北省委副书记、省长王正谱,河北省政协主席、省委常委、雄安新区党工委书记、管委会主任张国华出席会议并讲话。

    怀进鹏强调,要深刻认识做好高校疏解和建设发展工作的重大政治意义、战略意义,确保高校疏解工作始终沿着正确方向前进。当前首批高校疏解工作重心已经从建设为主转向建设、开办、保障并行的新阶段,要全力以赴打好首批疏解高校雄安校区开门办学、高质量发展、创新引领三大攻坚战。

    怀进鹏提出,要倒排工期、挂图作战、压茬推进,全面做好教学、科研、生活等各方面条件准备,确保按时开门办学。要统筹“硬投资”和“软建设”,主动推动解决办学所涉各种困难问题。要统筹布局创新研究院、大学科技园等,汇聚国内外创新要素,促进教育科技人才一体发展。

    延伸阅读

    习近平:中共中央关于建设雄安新区决策完全正确
    北交大等四所高校2027年启用雄安校区

    王正谱表示,河北省把服务疏解高校落地建设作为重大政治任务,目前各项工作正在有力有序推进。下一步将积极配合做好服务保障工作,满足疏解高校师生学习、工作、生活需求。希望教育部继续支持雄安新区建设发展和河北教育事业发展,深化部省合作,共同推进首批疏解高校平稳落地。

    雄安新区管委会、北京交通大学、北京科技大学、中国地质大学(北京)、北京林业大学、北京市教委、中国华能集团,以及中央编办、国家发展改革委、财政部、人力资源社会保障部、国务院国资委有关司局作交流发言。教育部有关司局、驻部纪检监察组、有关高校及在雄央企负责人参加会议。

    中共总书记习近平今年3月23日到河北雄安新区考察时说,要牢牢把握雄安新区作为北京非首都功能疏解集中承载地的首要功能定位,并称中共中央关于建设雄安新区的决策是完全正确的。

    雄安新区上星期五(4月24日)召开加快推动疏解高校雄安校区规划建设工作座谈会。北京交通大学、北京科技大学、北京林业大学、中国地质大学(北京)等北京四所高校在会上表示,已于2025年底全面进入施工高峰期,预计2027年实现开门办学。

  • 福特CEO吉姆·法利称公司正致力于让车辆更亲民


    2026-05-01 美国东部时间下午6:43 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻(CBS News)

    作者:克里斯·范·克利夫、法里斯·坦约斯

    曾获艾美奖的记者克里斯·范·克利夫是哥伦比亚广播公司新闻驻亚利桑那州凤凰城的资深交通通讯员,同时也担任全国通讯员,为哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的所有广播和平台供稿。

    福特CEO吉姆·法利表示,让车辆价格更亲民必须成为汽车行业的优先事项,他在周五接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻独家专访时称,他的公司正采取行动实现这一目标。

    当被问及如今美国人是否买得起新车时,法利回应道:“部分美国人可以。”

    “但我们作为品牌、作为整个行业,都需要在让车辆更亲民这件事上做出出色表现,”他继续说道,“未来几年,大家肯定会在福特看到这一点。”

    根据凯利蓝皮书的数据,新车的平均售价接近5万美元,比2019年高出30%,而消费者还面临着油价大幅上涨的冲击。

    法利表示,福特的目标是让部分新车型售价降至4万美元及以下。

    “我们的大多数新车型都将推出亲民版本,”法利说,“我们将在这类价格区间,也就是4万美元左右、不到4万美元的价位,提供更多选择。关键是要在美国本土生产它们。而要做到这一点,我们需要来自全球的实惠零部件。”

    他还提到了一项新促销活动:福特将在7月4日之前以员工折扣价销售几乎所有新车。他承认,车价是许多美国人关心的问题。

    “这就是我们推出亲民车型的原因,”法利说,“这也是我们推出员工折扣、提供399美元至499美元月租的租赁方案的原因,同时我们也为我们最畅销的F-150和探险者车型推出了亲民版本。”

    特朗普总统周五在Truth Social的帖子中宣布,他将对欧洲制造的车辆征收25%的关税,高于去年实施的15%关税,并称欧盟未遵守去年8月达成的贸易协议。法利表示,他不想就具体的贸易政策置评,但表示应将重点放在快速增长的中国汽车市场上,该市场的车型通常比欧洲车型价格更低。

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/ford-ceo-jim-farley-most-new-models-more-affordable-versions/

    Ford CEO Jim Farley says company is focusing on making its vehicles more affordable

    2026-05-01 6:43 PM EDT / CBS News

    By Kris Van Cleave, Faris Tanyos

    Emmy Award-winning journalist Kris Van Cleave is the senior transportation correspondent for CBS News based in Phoenix, Arizona, where he also serves as a national correspondent reporting for all CBS News broadcasts and platforms.

    Ford CEO Jim Farley says making vehicles more affordable must be a priority for the industry, and he told CBS News in an exclusive interview Friday that his company is taking steps to do just that.

    When asked whether Americans can afford the price of new cars today, Farley responded, “Some Americans can.”

    “But we need to do a great job as a brand, and as an industry, to make our vehicles more affordable,” he continued. “I think you’re certainly going to see that at Ford over the next couple of years.”

    According to data from Kelley Blue Book, the average price of a new car is nearly $50,000 — 30% higher than in 2019 — and consumers are also being hit by sharply higher fuel prices.

    Farley says Ford’s goal is to offer some of its new models at prices of $40,000 or less.

    “Most of our new models are going to be more affordable versions,” Farley said. “We are going to offer more choice in those kind of price points, around $40,000, less than $40,000. The trick is to make them in America. And to do that we need, you know, affordable parts from around the world.”

    He also pointed to a new promotion in which Ford will sell nearly all its new vehicles through July 4 at employee pricing. He acknowledged that prices are a concern for many Americans.

    “That is why we’re coming up with more affordable vehicles,” Farley said. “And that’s why we’re offering employee pricing, and $399 to $499 leases, and why we have more affordable versions of the F-150, and Explorer, our most popular models.”

    President Trump in a Truth Social post Friday announced he would implement a 25% tariff on European-made vehicles — up from the 15% tariff that was put in place last year — saying the European Union is not complying with the trade deal reached last August. Farley said he didn’t want to comment on specific trade policy, but said the focus should be on dealing with the rapidly growing Chinese auto market, which is focused on lower-priced vehicles than typically come from Europe.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/ford-ceo-jim-farley-most-new-models-more-affordable-versions/

  • 新疆阿克苏地区库车市发生4.5级地震


    2026年5月2日 07:50 / 联合早报

    中国新疆阿克苏地区库车市发生4.5级地震,震源深度18千米。

    据中国国家地震台网官方微博消息,中国地震台网正式测定,星期六(5月2日)6时17分,在新疆阿克苏地区库车市(北纬41.29度,东经83.92度)发生4.5级地震,震源深度18千米。

    星期六6时19分,库车市(北纬41.23度,东经83.90度)发生4.3级地震,震源深度23千米。

    当地最近几天已连续发生不同程度地震,包括:4月30日18时38分发生3.1级地震,20时49分发生3.0级地震,21时15分发生3.9级地震;4月29日3时16分发生4.8级地震,3时58分发生3.0级地震,15时20分发生4.3级地震等。

    新疆阿克苏地区库车市发生4.5级地震

    2026年5月2日 07:50 / 联合早报

    中国新疆阿克苏地区库车市发生4.5级地震,震源深度18千米。

    据中国国家地震台网官方微博消息,中国地震台网正式测定,星期六(5月2日)6时17分,在新疆阿克苏地区库车市(北纬41.29度,东经83.92度)发生4.5级地震,震源深度18千米。

    星期六6时19分,库车市(北纬41.23度,东经83.90度)发生4.3级地震,震源深度23千米。

    当地最近几天已连续发生不同程度地震,包括:4月30日18时38分发生3.1级地震,20时49分发生3.0级地震,21时15分发生3.9级地震;4月29日3时16分发生4.8级地震,3时58分发生3.0级地震,15时20分发生4.3级地震等。

  • 民主党议员就最高法院《选举权法案》裁决逻辑发声:我们并未身处“色盲社会”


    2026年5月1日 美国东部时间下午6:39 / CNN政治频道

    视频广告反馈

    民主党议员就最高法院《选举权法案》裁决逻辑发声:我们并未身处“色盲社会”

    节目焦点
    路易斯安那州众议员特洛伊·卡特做客《节目焦点》
    1分55秒 • 消息来源:CNN

    Democrat on Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Act reasoning: We’re not in a ‘colorblind society’

    2026-05-01 06:39 PM EDT / CNN Politics

    Video Ad Feedback

    Democrat on Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Act reasoning: We’re not in a ‘colorblind society’

    The Lead

    Louisiana Rep. Troy Carter joins The Lead

    1:55 • Source: CNN

  • 共和党州长在美国最高法院裁决后推动重新制定国会选区地图


    2026年5月1日 晚上10:22 UTC / 路透社

    作者:约瑟夫·阿克斯

    2026年51月1日 晚上10:22 UTC 1小时前更新

    节点运行失败

    [1/2]美国路易斯安那州州长杰夫·兰德瑞于2025年6月28日在路易斯安那州新奥尔良的一场洗礼仪式上发表讲话。路透社/凯瑟琳·弗林 资料图

    • 内容摘要
    • 阿拉巴马州、田纳西州、南卡罗来纳州或推动重新制定选区地图
    • 民主党就暂停选举起诉路易斯安那州州长
    • 最高法院裁决削弱了具有里程碑意义的《选举权法案》
    • 特朗普麾下共和党人力争掌控国会

    5月1日(路透社)——美国阿拉巴马州、南卡罗来纳州和田纳西州的共和党州长周五明确表示,他们将在11月中期选举前推动出台更有利于本党的国会选区地图,这是美国最高法院周三作出的重磅投票权裁决引发的最新连锁反应。

    与此同时,民主党选民、民权团体以及一名美国众议院民主党候选人提起诉讼,起诉路易斯安那州共和党州长杰夫·兰德瑞暂停该州国会初选并推动重新制定选区地图的决定。

    通过《每日案卷》新闻简报,将最新法律新闻直接发送到您的收件箱,开启您的清晨。点击此处订阅。

    广告 · 继续滚动浏览

    兰德瑞于周四推迟了原定于5月16日举行的初选投票,以便州议员有时间重新制定选区地图,取消至少一个由民主党掌控的黑人选民占多数的国会选区。此前最高法院裁定现行地图违宪。原计划于周六启动的提前投票已被搁置。

    总统唐纳德·特朗普所在的共和党正力争在中期选举中继续掌控众议院以及参议院。

    事态的快速发展凸显出,最高法院这项大幅削弱1965年通过的具有里程碑意义的《选举权法案》的裁决,给原本就已令人眼花缭乱的全国范围内的选区重划之争增添了新一轮混乱。

    广告 · 继续滚动浏览

    阿拉巴马州州长凯·艾维宣布,她已召集州议会于周一召开特别会议,以便议员们考虑推迟5月19日的初选,希望最高法院能允许该州使用新的地图。

    阿拉巴马州黑人选民占选民总数的四分之一,目前该州使用的是法院下令制定的地图,7个选区中有2个是黑人选民占多数的选区,这两个席位均由黑人民主党人占据。

    最高法院作出裁决后,阿拉巴马州立即提起紧急动议,请求法院允许该州恢复使用仅包含一个黑人选民占多数选区的旧版地图。

    黑人选民通常支持民主党候选人。

    “我仍对阿拉巴马州能从美国最高法院获得有利裁决抱有希望,”艾维在一份声明中说道。

    共和党籍田纳西州州长比尔·李周五也宣布召集州议会于周二召开特别会议,对该州的国会选区地图进行“审查”。他在一份声明中表示,官员们必须“确保我们的国会选区准确反映田纳西州选民的意愿”。

    共和党籍南卡罗来纳州州长亨利·麦克马斯特则暗示,他希望州议会考虑重新制定选区地图。南卡罗来纳州目前仅有的一个民主党席位是由长期担任美国众议员的吉姆·克莱伯恩占据的黑人选民占多数选区,该选区涵盖州首府哥伦比亚的部分区域。

    “鉴于法院最近就《选举权法案》作出的裁决,州议会确保南卡罗来纳州的国会选区地图仍然符合联邦法律和美国宪法的所有要求是恰当的,”麦克马斯特在X平台上写道。

    在路易斯安那州,新提起的诉讼辩称,兰德瑞暂停选举的行为超越了其职权范围,且允许其他职位的选举继续进行会让选民感到困惑。原告还指出,至少已有部分缺席选票被寄出。

    “路易斯安那州一直在依法行事,”兰德瑞在周五的社交媒体帖子中回应诉讼时说道。

    在被称为“选区重划”的流程中,美国各地的立法选区边界会根据每十年一次的全国人口普查统计的人口变化进行重新调整。选区重划通常每十年由州议会进行一次。

    去年特朗普发起了前所未有的中期改划选区行动,从德克萨斯州开始在共和党领导的州重新绘制地图,由此引发了多州的选区重划之争,共和党和民主党目前仍在就此展开较量。

    约瑟夫·阿克斯 报道;唐娜·布赖森与威尔·邓汉姆 编辑

    我们的准则:路透社信任原则。

    Republican governors pursue new congressional maps after US Supreme Court ruling

    2026-05-01 10:22 PM UTC / Reuters

    By Joseph Ax

    May 1, 2026 10:22 PM UTC Updated 1 hour ago

    节点运行失败

    [1/2]Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry speaks during a christening ceremony in New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S., June 28, 2025. REUTERS/Kathleen Flynn/File Photo

    • Summary
    • Alabama, Tennessee, South Carolina could pursue new maps
    • Democrats sue Louisiana governor over suspended election
    • Supreme Court ruling weakened landmark Voting Rights Act
    • Trump’s Republicans fighting to keep control of Congress

    May 1 (Reuters) – The Republican governors of Alabama, South Carolina and Tennessee made clear on Friday they will try ​to push through congressional maps more favorable to their party ahead of November’s midterm elections, the latest fallout from the U.S. Supreme Court’s ‌seismic voting rights ruling on Wednesday.

    Democratic voters, civil rights groups and a Democratic candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives meanwhile filed lawsuits challenging Republican Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry’s decision to suspend his state’s congressional primary elections and pursue a new map.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Landry on Thursday postponed the scheduled May 16 primary vote to give state lawmakers time to draw a new map ​that would dismantle at least one Democratic-held majority-Black U.S. House district, after the Supreme Court found the current map unconstitutional. Early voting had ​been set to begin on Saturday.

    President Donald Trump’s fellow Republicans are fighting to maintain their control of the House, as well ⁠as the Senate, in the midterm elections.

    The rapid developments underscored how the court’s decision, which severely weakened the landmark Voting Rights Act passed in 1965, has ​injected a fresh dose of chaos into what had already been a dizzying national fight over redistricting.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Alabama Governor Kay Ivey announced that she had called a ​special legislative session starting on Monday so lawmakers can consider postponing the May 19 primary election in the hope that the Supreme Court will permit the state to use a different map.

    Alabama, where Black voters make up a quarter of the electorate, is currently using a court-ordered map that includes two majority-Black districts out of seven. Both are held by ​Black Democrats.

    Following the Supreme Court’s decision, Alabama immediately filed emergency motions asking the court to allow it to revert to an older map with only a ​single majority-Black district.

    Black voters tend to support Democratic candidates.

    “I remain hopeful Alabama will receive a favorable outcome from the U.S. Supreme Court,” Ivey said in a statement.

    Republican Tennessee Governor ‌Bill Lee ⁠on Friday also called a special legislative session beginning on Tuesday to “review” the state’s congressional map, saying in a statement that officials must “ensure our congressional districts accurately reflect the will of Tennessee voters.”

    And Republican South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster suggested that he would like his state’s legislature to consider a new map. South Carolina’s lone Democratic seat, a majority-Black district that includes parts of the capital Columbia, is represented by longtime U.S. Representative Jim Clyburn.

    “In light of the court’s most ​recent decision on the Voting Rights ​Act, it would be appropriate for ⁠the General Assembly to ensure that South Carolina’s congressional map still complies with all requirements of federal law and the U.S. Constitution,” McMaster wrote on X.

    In Louisiana, the new lawsuits argued that Landry had overstepped his authority in suspending the ​election and that allowing the contests for other offices to proceed would confuse voters. The plaintiffs also noted that ​at least some absentee ⁠ballots had already been cast.

    “Louisiana is following the law,” Landry said in response to the litigation in a social media post on Friday.

    In a process called redistricting, the boundaries of legislative districts across the United States are reconfigured to reflect population changes as measured by the national census conducted every 10 years. Redistricting typically has ⁠been carried ​out by state legislatures once per decade.

    Republicans and Democrats have been waging a multistate redistricting fight ​ignited last year when Trump initiated an unprecedented mid-decade effort to redraw maps in Republican-led states, starting with Texas.

    Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by Donna Bryson and Will Dunham

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2