博客

  • 众议院民主党人焦虑升级:曼达尼支持的候选人获胜后,“我们要让他们接管民主党吗?”


    2026-06-24T18:29:25.448Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    在纽约市市长佐赫兰·曼达尼所在阵营在初选中取得惊人胜利后,民主党高层坚称他们并未因党内出现“佐赫兰·曼达尼派”而感到不安。

    但随着曼达尼的盟友在三场初选中获胜,包括击败在任议员阿德里亚诺·埃斯帕利亚尔和丹·戈德曼,许多现任国会民主党人愈发焦虑。最直接的担忧是,这将使民主党今年夺回众议院的难度加大,因为共和党正急于利用曼达尼阵营最具争议的立场,在全国各摇摆选区制作攻击广告。

    “显然,社会主义者昨晚取得了重大胜利。问题是,我们要让他们接管民主党吗?还是要站起来反击?”新泽西州众议员乔希·戈特海默说道。这位温和派民主党人此前曾批评曼达尼的政治立场,以及他对待以色列盟友的方式。“我们很多人都和我持同样观点:如果你是社会主义者,你就不是民主党人。”

    戈特海默和其他人担心,共和党会试图将他们最弱势的议员与他们眼中的极左翼超进步派绑定,同时这也会凸显民主党在这场至关重要的选举年中的分歧。

    当被问及击败埃斯帕利亚尔的达里亚利扎·阿维拉·谢瓦利尔此前删除的、表达支持废除警察、监狱和边境的帖子时,与众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯关系密切的纽约资深民主党众议员格雷格·米克斯告诉CNN:“坦率地说,对纽约来说这不是一个好夜晚。”

    当被问及美国民主社会主义者(DSA)与民主党之间的紧张关系时,米克斯补充道:“我们本应全力以赴打击共和党、打击唐纳德·特朗普,但我们却把资源用来内斗。这在我看来毫无常理。”

    一位身处摇摆选区的民主党议员告诉CNN,他们对美国民主社会主义者的崛起深感担忧,以至于最近开始与捐赠者认真讨论彻底退出民主党。

    即便民主党真的夺回众议院,其队伍中的民主社会主义者仍可能只是党团会议中的一小部分。民主党仍有信心在11月赢得众议院。

    据两位熟悉此次简报会的人士透露,众议院民主党党团周三上午举行了由其政党机构主持的私人简报会,会上党领袖展示了内部民调数据,显示特朗普在关键摇摆选区的支持率低于竞争对手。无人提及曼达尼支持的候选人获胜一事。

    周二获胜的曼达尼支持的候选人都打着民主党全国范围内倡导的经济适用口号,但他们的胜利凸显了民主党在华盛顿的现状策略引发的更大分歧——以及在以色列问题上的深刻裂痕。

    “我们国家的民主党必须正视这一事实:你昨晚看到的获胜策略并非反经济适用或反经济政策,而是超越了宣传话术的反建制策略,”一位众议院民主党高级助手告诉CNN。

    周三上午在纽约市发表讲话时,曼达尼提出了相反的观点,不过他也将生活成本问题与他长期以来对美国军事援助以色列的批评联系起来,这是三场初选的关键议题。

    “我们昨晚看到的是,民众渴望有领导人站在前线,努力让工薪阶层能够负担得起在这座世界最伟大城市的生活,”他说。

    众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯周三淡化了党内的担忧,即这些胜利可能会在今年11月的摇摆选区产生影响。

    “不,唐纳德·特朗普与纽约市市长有着合作关系,他已经两次在椭圆形办公室向美国公众公开明确地表明了这一点,”杰弗里斯说道。

    当被记者问及曼达尼是否在国会山树敌时,杰弗里斯——他曾支持埃斯帕利亚尔和戈德曼——告诉记者:“听着,我和市长在他的一些背书问题上坚决持不同意见,他未来需要和议员们进行沟通。”

    当被问及民主党选民是否希望国会中的议员更加进步时,杰弗里斯回应道:“我认为我们必须审视众议院民主党党团全部215名成员的整体情况,答案不言自明。”

    这位来自布鲁克林的议员告诉记者,他与曼达尼的关系“非常好”,两人经常交谈。

    莫里斯·卡茨是曼达尼的关键盟友、竞选策略师,他认为民主党可以成为一个“大帐篷式的民粹主义政党”,专注于经济适用问题,并“将资源投入国内优先事项、学校和医院,而非海外战争”。

    “我认为我们花了太多时间讨论标签,而普通摇摆选民并不会在意这些,”卡茨告诉CNN的达纳·巴什。“你会看到人们根据政策、竞选活动和理念与他人互动,而非根据他们给自己贴上的标签,而是看这些东西如何改善他们的生活?”

    在国会山,像民主党众议员罗·卡纳这样的进步派人士为周二的选举结果欢呼。

    “这是民主党进步派的重大胜利。我们是一个新的政党,将呼吁制止种族灭绝、对亿万富翁征税,并支持单一支付者医疗保健制度,”卡纳告诉CNN。“我们的政党需要新一代愿意挑战现状、揭露建制派的领导人。”

    但一位资深民主党人、来自德克萨斯州的众议员维森特·冈萨雷斯坚决反对这种结果反映了全国民意的说法。

    相反,他表示,这只是一小部分民主党人开展了极其有效的竞选活动。

    “我认为我们在当地还有很多组织工作要做,尤其是在纽约和加州这些美国民主社会主义者影响力越来越大的地方,我们需要教育年轻人,让更多年轻人参与到更温和的政策中来,就像另一方那样,然后开展强有力的竞选活动,”冈萨雷斯说道。

    “我认为南德克萨斯州的民众不必担心,但我认为在全国范围内这是一个巨大的担忧,以及他们在民主党党团中推动的政策,我们将不得不为之辩护,”冈萨雷斯补充道。“其中很多政策我显然并不认同,对我来说很难向南德克萨斯州的民众推销,我也不打算这么做,因为我本人并不相信其中大多数政策。”

    至于自己的连任,冈萨雷斯有信心尽管共和党会发起将他与美国民主社会主义者联系起来的攻击,他仍能获胜:“我从政已久,人们不会把我看作社会主义者。事实上,我还会被社会主义者抨击。”

    House Democrats’ anxiety rises after wins by Mamdani-backed candidates: ‘Are we going to let them take over the party?’

    2026-06-24T18:29:25.448Z / CNN

    Top Democrats insist that they’re unfazed by the party’s forming a “Zohran Mamdani wing,” after the New York City mayor’s stunningly successful primary night.

    But there is growing angst among many sitting congressional Democrats after Mamdani allies won three primaries, including defeats of incumbent Reps. Adriano Espaillat and Dan Goldman. And, most immediately, they worry it will make it tougher to flip the House this year, with Republicans eager to tee up the Mamdani slate’s most controversial positions for attack ads in battlegrounds across the country.

    “Obviously, the socialists had a big win last night. The question is, are we going to let them take over the party? Or are we going to stand up and fight back?” said Rep. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, a moderate Democrat who has criticized Mamdani’s politics and how he’s addressed allies of Israel. “Many of us believe, as I do, that if you’re a socialist, you’re not a Democrat.”

    Gottheimer and others worry that Republicans will try to yoke their most vulnerable members to what they see as far-left ultra-progressives — and they worry that it will only highlight Democratic divisions in a must-win election year.

    “If you ask me, it was not a good night for New York,” Rep. Greg Meeks, a powerful New York Democrat who is close with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, told CNN when asked about deleted posts from Darializa Avila Chevalier, who defeated Espaillat, expressing support for abolishing police, prisons and borders.

    Asked about the fraught relationship between the Democratic Socialists of America and the Democratic Party, Meeks added: “Instead of us making sure we put all of our resources to fight Republicans and to fight Donald Trump, we’re using it to fight each other. It just doesn’t make common sense to me.”

    One Democratic lawmaker sitting in a battleground district told CNN that they are so concerned about the rise of the Democratic Socialists of America that they have recently begun having serious conversations with donors about leaving the party altogether.

    If Democrats do flip the House, the number of democratic socialists in their ranks is still likely to be a small minority of the caucus. And Democrats remain confident they can still win the House in November.

    The House Democratic caucus gathered for a private briefing by their party arm on Wednesday morning, where party leaders presented internal polling showing Trump underwater in key battlegrounds, according to two people familiar with the briefing. No one brought up the Mamdani-backed candidate wins.

    The Mamdani-backed candidates who won on Tuesday ran on the same affordability message that the party has embraced nationally, but their victories highlight broader friction over Democrats’ status-quo tactics in Washington — as well as deep divides on Israel.

    “Our party nationally will need to reckon with this fact given that what you witnessed yesterday was not an anti-affordability or anti-economic policy strategy that won; it was an anti-establishment strategy beyond messaging that trumped,” a senior House Democratic aide told CNN.

    Speaking Wednesday morning in New York City, Mamdani made the opposite argument, though he also connected cost-of-living issues to his longstanding critiques of US military support for Israel, a key issue in all three primaries.

    “What we saw last night was a hunger for leaders who will be there on the front lines looking to make it easier for working people to afford life in the greatest city in the world,” he said.

    House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries on Wednesday downplayed fears within his party that the wins could reverberate in battleground districts this November.

    “No, Donald Trump has a working relationship with the mayor of the city of New York, and he’s made that publicly and explicitly clear to America, not once but twice in the Oval Office,” Jeffries said.

    Jeffries was asked by reporters if Mamdani had made enemies on Capitol Hill.

    “Listen, the mayor and I agreed to strongly disagree about some of his endorsements, and he’s got work to do in terms of the conversations that he’s going to have with members of Congress moving forward,” Jeffries, who backed Espaillat and Goldman, told reporters.

    Asked if Democratic voters want their members in Congress to be more progressive, Jeffries responded: “I think we’ve got to look at the totality of all 215 members of the House Democratic caucus, and that answer speaks for itself.”

    The Brooklyn representative told reporters his relationship with Madmani is “a very good one” and that the pair speak regularly.

    Morris Katz, a campaign strategist who is a key Mamdani ally, argued that Democrats can have a “big-tent populist party” that focuses on affordability and “invests in domestic priorities, in schools and in hospitals rather than in wars abroad.”

    “I think that we spend a lot more time talking about labels than the average swing voter thinks about that,” Katz told CNN’s Dana Bash. “You see people interact with policies, campaigns, and ideas not predicated on the label they’re applying to themselves, but how are they going to make their lives better?”

    And on Capitol Hill, progressives like Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna celebrated Tuesday night’s results.

    “It’s a big win for the progressive wing of the party. We are a new party that will call out the genocide, tax the billionaires, and stand up for single payer healthcare” Khanna told CNN. “Our party wants a new generation leaders willing to challenge the status quo and call out the establishment.”

    But one longtime Democrat, Rep. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas, firmly disagrees that the results reflect the mood of the country.

    Instead, he said it’s a small minority of Democrats who have run extremely effective campaigns.

    “I think we have a lot of more organizing to do on the ground, especially in places like New York and California, places where DSA is is is being more influential, and we need to educate young people, we need to get more people, young people involved on more moderate policies, just the way the other side has, and run strong campaigns,” Gonzalez said.

    “I don’t think it should be a concern for people in South Texas, but I think nationally it’s a huge concern, and how they push the policies within the Democratic caucus that we’re going to have to defend,” Gonzalez added. “A lot of these policies that obviously I don’t agree with, and would be very difficult for me to sell to people in South Texas, and I don’t intend to sell them, because I don’t believe in most of them myself.

    As for his own reelection, Gonzalez was confident he could still win despite any GOP attacks linking him to the DSA: “I’ve been around long enough that people don’t see me as a socialist. In fact, I get beat up by socialists.”

  • 特朗普寻求6.72亿美元阻止伊朗研发核武器,铀储备命运仍未明确


    2026-06-24T15:18:14-04:00 / 福克斯新闻

    美国能源部的这笔拨款将用于处理防扩散敏感材料及相关基础设施

    作者:摩根·菲利普斯 福克斯新闻

    2026年6月24日美国东部时间下午3:18发布

    卢比奥:若美伊协议无果,特朗普“有备选方案”

    美国国务卿马可·卢比奥表示,他希望美伊之间的协议能够达成,“但如果协议破裂,总统清楚自己有哪些备选方案”。

    福克斯新闻独家报道: 福克斯新闻数字频道获悉,特朗普政府正在寻求6.72亿美元拨款,用于移除伊朗核材料、开展核查与验证工作以及其他反扩散活动,这是其800亿美元 supplemental 拨款总申请的一部分。

    据一名白宫官员透露的细节,这笔拨款将用于移除并销毁伊朗的核材料,包括六氟化铀(UF6)、各种形态的铀以及研究堆燃料,其中还包括高浓缩铀。

    此次拨款申请还将为美国在伊朗境内的核查活动提供资金支持,协助国际原子能机构的视察工作,加强核走私侦测力度,并在中东地区扩大核应急支援团队的行动范围。

    伊朗战争成本已达800亿美元——是国会被告知金额的两倍多

    一名白宫官员周三对福克斯新闻数字频道表示,这笔拨款将拨付给能源部,用于“终止伊朗研发或获取核武器能力的相关活动,包括处置防扩散敏感材料、技术、设备及基础设施”。

    提出此拨款申请之际,美伊谈判代表正致力于将近期签署的谅解备忘录转化为一份更详细的协议,对伊朗的核计划及其浓缩铀储备进行规范。

    皮特·赫格赛特部长正在向众议院共和党研究委员会成员通报这项800亿美元的拨款申请,这笔资金将用于覆盖针对伊朗的“史诗之怒行动”进攻性战役的成本,并补充弹药储备。

    据福克斯新闻数字频道获悉,白宫向国会提交的800亿美元与伊朗冲突相关的补充拨款申请中,有6.72亿美元旨在阻止伊朗获得核武器。(图片来源:凯文·卡特/盖蒂图片社)

    此次拨款申请提出之时,美伊谈判代表正试图将近期签署的谅解备忘录转化为一份详细协议,对伊朗的浓缩铀储备及未来核活动进行规范。

    美伊双方于6月17日签署的这份谅解备忘录启动了由副总统JD·万斯在瑞士主持的技术会谈,并为伊朗约900磅武器级高浓缩铀储备设定了“最低”可接受条件,即通过稀释降低铀浓度的“降浓处理”。

    谅解备忘录中写道:“美利坚合众国与伊朗伊斯兰共和国已同意,将按照第七段提及的时间表,通过双方商定的机制解决浓缩材料储备的处置问题,最低处理方式为在国际原子能机构监督下在现场进行降浓处理。”

    该协议并未明确伊朗浓缩铀储备的最终命运。

    双方均未公开透露是否就该材料的去向达成一致,包括这些材料是否会留在伊朗、是否会被降浓处理、转移至其他国家,还是会被彻底销毁。

    万斯将此次会谈誉为“重要里程碑”,他表示伊朗已同意恢复联合国国际原子能机构的视察人员入境,这是自去年美以军事打击伊朗核基础设施以来的首次。

    奥巴马时期伊朗核视察的漏洞或持续存在,专家警告存在核监视盲区

    美国总统唐纳德·特朗普坚称,伊朗已同意他所说的“核透明”。

    美国总统唐纳德·特朗普坚称,伊朗已同意他所说的“核透明”。(图片来源:伊夫林·霍克斯坦/路透社)

    特朗普在Truth Social平台上写道:“伊朗已完全彻底同意未来长期接受最高标准的核核查(永久有效!!!)。”“如果他们不同意这项要求,就不会有进一步的谈判!”

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用

    这笔6.72亿美元的拨款申请是特朗普政府与伊朗冲突及其后续相关的800亿美元整体补充拨款方案的一部分。预计这笔总额更高的拨款将覆盖军事行动、弹药库存补充以及此次冲突引发的其他国家安全优先事项。

    特朗普在Truth Social平台上写道:“伊朗已完全彻底同意未来长期接受最高标准的核核查(永久有效!!!)。”“如果他们不同意这项要求,就不会有进一步的谈判!”(图片来源:IIPA via Getty Images)

    处置伊朗浓缩铀储备的挑战可能相当巨大。1994年,苏联解体后,美国开展了一项名为“蓝宝石计划”的秘密行动,从哈萨克斯坦移除了约600公斤高浓缩铀。此次任务耗时数周对核材料进行重新包装,采取了严格的安全防范措施,并动用了军事空运行动,才能将铀运抵美国。

    Trump seeks $672M to stop Iranian nukes as fate of uranium stockpile remains unresolved

    2026-06-24T15:18:14-04:00 / Fox News

    The Department of Energy funding would support disposition of proliferation-sensitive material and infrastructure

    By Morgan Phillips Fox News

    Published June 24, 2026 3:18pm EDT

    Trump ‘has options’ if US-Iran deal doesn’t work out, Rubio says

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio said he wants the deal between the United States and Iran to succeed, “but if it doesn’t, the president knows what his options are.”

    FIRST ON FOX:The Trump administration is seeking $672 million for the removal of Iranian nuclear materials, inspections and verification efforts, and other counterproliferation activities as part of its broader $80 billion supplemental funding request, Fox News Digital has learned.

    The funding would support the removal and elimination of Iranian nuclear materials, including uranium hexafluoride (UF6), uranium in various forms and research reactor fuel, including highly enriched uranium, according to details shared by a White House official.

    The request also would fund U.S. verification activities inside Iran, support inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency, strengthen nuclear-smuggling detection efforts and expand Nuclear Emergency Support Team operations across the Middle East.

    IRAN WAR’S PRICE TAG HITS $80B — MORE THAN DOUBLE WHAT CONGRESS WAS TOLD

    The funding would go to the Department of Energy to support “activities that would terminate Iran’s ability to develop or acquire a nuclear weapon, including the disposition of proliferation of sensitive material, technology, equipment, and infrastructure,” a White House official told Fox News Digital Wednesday.

    The funding request comes as U.S. and Iranian negotiators work to translate the recent memorandum of understanding into a more detailed agreement governing Iran’s nuclear program and stockpile of enriched uranium.

    Secretary Pete Hegseth is briefing members of the House Republican Study Committee on the $80 billion request to cover the costs of the offensive campaign against Iran known as Operation Epic Fury and rebuild munitions stockpiles.

    The White House’s $80 billion supplemental funding request to Congress tied to the Iran conflict includes $672 million aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, Fox News Digital has learned.(Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

    The funding request comes as U.S. and Iranian negotiators are attempting to translate the recent memorandum of understanding into a detailed agreement governing Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and future nuclear activities.

    The memorandum of understanding, signed by the United States and Iran June 17,kicked off technical talks led by Vice President JD Vance in Switzerland and established the “minimum” acceptable terms for Iran’s roughly 900-pound stockpile of uranium enriched to near-weapons grade as “downblending,” or reducing the concentration of uranium through dilution.

    “The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran have agreed to resolve the disposition of stockpile enriched material pursuant to a mechanism that will be mutually agreed upon in accordance with the schedule mentioned in paragraph seven with the minimum methodology to be down blended on site under the supervision of the IAEA,” the memorandum states.

    The agreement leaves unanswered key questions about the ultimate fate of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile.

    Neither side has publicly said whether they have reached an agreement on what will happen to the material, including whether it will remain in Iran, be downblended, transferred to another country, or be destroyed altogether.

    In what Vance hailed as a “major milestone,” he said Iran had agreed to allow U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors back into the country for the first time since U.S. and Israeli military strikes targeted Iranian nuclear infrastructure last year.

    OBAMA-ERA INSPECTION FLAWS IN IRAN COULD PERSIST AS EXPERTS WARN OF NUCLEAR BLIND SPOTS

    President Donald Trump has insisted Iran agreed to what he described as “nuclear honesty.”

    President Donald Trump has insisted Iran agreed to what he described as “nuclear honesty.”(Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters)

    “Iran has fully and completely agreed to highest level Nuclear inspections long into the future (Infinity!!!),” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “If they did not agree to this, there would be no further negotiations!”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    The $672 million request is part of the administration’s broader $80 billion supplemental funding package related to the Iran conflict and its aftermath. The larger request is expected to cover military operations, replenishment of munitions stockpiles and other national security priorities stemming from the conflict.

    “Iran has fully and completely agreed to highest level Nuclear inspections long into the future (Infinity!!!),” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “If they did not agree to this, there would be no further negotiations!”(Photo by IIPA via Getty Images)

    The challenge of disposing of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile could be substantial. In 1994, the United States carried out a covert operation known as Project Sapphire to remove roughly 600 kilograms of highly enriched uranium from Kazakhstan after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The mission required weeks of repackaging nuclear material, extensive security precautions and military airlift operations before the uranium could be transported to the U.S.

  • 美国法官要求特朗普政府解释遮盖肯尼迪中心外立面的遮盖布事宜


    2026-06-24T18:04:36.204Z / 路透社

    作者:迈克·斯卡塞拉
    2026年6月24日 美国东部时间下午6:04 1小时前更新

    2026年6月13日,美国华盛顿,在联邦法院下令移除美国总统唐纳德·特朗普的名字后,一块遮盖布覆盖了约翰·F·肯尼迪表演艺术中心的外立面。路透社/肯·塞德诺/资料图片 购买授权,将在新标签页打开

    华盛顿,6月24日(路透社)——一名联邦法官周三下令特朗普政府作出解释,说明在根据法院命令将这位共和党领导人的名字从建筑上移除后,为何要用遮盖布盖住肯尼迪中心的外立面。
    美国地区法官克里斯托弗·库珀表示,政府必须在7月31日前提交报告,说明这座标志性建筑目前遮盖布和脚手架的“用途及现状”。

    通过《每日案卷》时事通讯将最新法律新闻直接发送到您的收件箱,开启您的清晨。点击此处订阅。

    本月早些时候,根据库珀的命令,工作人员在凌晨的行动中移除了特朗普的名字,随后安装了这块遮盖布。库珀此前裁定,特朗普政府在去年12月将他的名字加到建筑外墙上是非法的。
    白宫和肯尼迪中心没有立即回复置评请求。

    在民主党众议员、肯尼迪中心董事会成员乔伊斯·比蒂提起的诉讼中,法官上月下令移除华盛顿这家剧院综合体标牌上的特朗普名字,并驳回了他将该中心关闭以进行为期两年翻新工程的计划,该工程原定于7月4日启动。特朗普政府已要求联邦上诉法院暂停该命令。

    比蒂的律师本周在一份提交给美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院的文件中称,遮盖这座已故总统约翰·F·肯尼迪名字的“半永久性遮盖布”,似乎是特朗普政府“试图破坏更名前原状恢复”的举动。
    比蒂称这种遮盖外立面的行为是“卑劣的挑衅行为”。

    迈克·斯卡塞拉报道;辛西娅·奥斯特曼编辑

    我们的准则:汤森路透信任原则,将在新标签页打开

    US judge orders Trump administration to explain tarp obscuring Kennedy Center facade

    2026-06-24T18:04:36.204Z / Reuters

    By Mike Scarcella

    June 24, 2026 6:04 PM UTC Updated 1 hour ago

    A tarp covers the facade of the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts, following a federal judge’s order to remove U.S. President Donald Trump’s name from the institution, in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 13, 2026. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    WASHINGTON, June 24 (Reuters) – A federal judge on Wednesday ordered U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration to explain why ​it placed a tarp over the Kennedy Center’s façade ‌after the Republican leader’s name was removed from the building under a court order.

    U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper said the administration ​must report by July 31 “the purpose and status of ​the tarp and scaffolding” now in place at ⁠the iconic building.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    The tarp was installed as workers stripped Trump’s name in ​a predawn operation this month following an order from Cooper ​that the Trump administration unlawfully added his name to the facade in December.

    The White House and Kennedy Center did not immediately respond to ​requests for comment.

    In a lawsuit brought by Democratic Representative ​Joyce Beatty, a Kennedy Center board member, the judge last month ordered the removal of ⁠Trump’s name from the Washington theater complex’s signage and blocked his plans to close it for two years of renovations starting July 4. The Trump administration has asked a federal appeals court to put ​that order ​on hold.

    Beatty’s lawyers ⁠this week in a filing told the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District ​of Columbia Circuit that the “semi-permanent tarp” obscuring ​the late ⁠President John F. Kennedy’s name from public view at the center appears to be the Trump administration’s “effort to frustrate the ⁠restoration ​of the status quo as it ​existed prior to the renaming.”

    Beatty called the obstruction of the facade an “act ​of petty defiance.”

    Reporting by Mike Scarcella; Editing by Cynthia Osterman

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • 拉莫妮卡·麦基弗议员的律师迫使法官权衡国会豁免权的边界


    2026-06-24T17:12:47.792Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/24/politics/lamonica-mciver-argue-assault-charges-thrown-out

    国会议员的法律保护是否同样适用于被控袭击联邦官员的情况?周三,三名联邦法官在针对民主党众议员拉莫妮卡·麦基弗的案件审理中,就这一问题展开了近两小时的讨论。

    特拉华州威尔明顿的法官团提出的首批问题之一是,国会议员在履行立法职责期间,如果“偶遇一名少女并对其实施猥亵”,是否仍会受到保护。

    “这不就和我假设的这个案子一样站不住脚吗?”由唐纳德·特朗普总统在首届任期内提名的斯特凡诺斯·比巴斯法官在周三的听证会上向麦基弗的律师问道。

    2025年,麦基弗被控在访问新泽西州一处移民拘留设施期间袭击一名官员。当时,警方在该设施外逮捕了纽瓦克市长拉斯·巴拉卡,随后警方迅速撤销了这一逮捕令。

    检方指控,麦基弗用前臂撞击一名警员,并试图控制另一名警员,同时在试图返回设施时用前臂推搡一名警员。

    对麦基弗的起诉书并未指控任何警员在事件中受伤。

    麦基弗的律师保罗·菲什曼表示,这位新泽西州议员当时正在履行对该设施的立法监督职责,该设施近期已成为抗议活动以及执法人员与抗议者之间暴力冲突的温床。

    菲什曼辩称,法官们应“整体看待此次实地考察”,并补充说,麦基弗和另外两名国会议员在巴拉卡被捕期间前往设施外,“目的是监督移民海关执法局和国土安全部”。

    美国宪法中的言论与辩论条款通常保护国会议员,使其不因履行职责范围内的行为而被起诉。

    “作为政府的批评者,”菲什曼说,这正是该条款旨在保护的内容。“他们之所以针对一名国会议员,是因为她与政府政见不合。”

    “使用武力绝不可能受到言论与辩论条款的保护,”美国司法部律师马克·科因周三反驳道,同时他也承认此案“绝非我可以掉以轻心的案件”。

    第三巡回法院正在审理麦基弗的上诉,此前下级法院驳回了她以多项理由(包括国会豁免权和报复性起诉)驳回此案的申请,目前针对麦基弗的案件处于暂停状态。

    当被问及菲什曼试图让法院考虑特朗普政府提起此案是否具有报复性时,科因予以反驳。

    “我仍在履职,”科因说道,并补充称,如果如法官托马斯·安布罗所假设的那样,政府开始起诉大量议员,他将“尽我所能”确保此类情况不会发生。安布罗由前总统比尔·克林顿任命。

    在反驳环节,菲什曼表示起诉决定并非由科因做出,而是来自司法部。“起诉报复特朗普政敌的决定并非在纽瓦克做出的,”菲什曼在谈及针对特朗普政敌的起诉时说道。

    安布罗法官还质疑科因能否举出其他案例,证明议员在试图挤过人群时因推搡警员而被控袭击。

    “这看起来算不上袭击,”安布罗在评价麦基弗面临的一项指控时说道。

    科因承认此案并不寻常。

    菲什曼告诉法官们,他“并非主张袭击属于立法行为”,而是强调当移民执法人员开始非法逮捕出现在设施内的巴拉卡时,麦基弗正在履行国会的监督职责。

    “如果任何议员走进酒吧并殴打一名移民海关执法局警员,”菲什曼说,那将不会受到保护。

    麦基弗对指控拒不认罪,这些罪名最高可判处17年监禁。

    听证会结束后的新闻发布会上,已有数月身孕的麦基弗告诉记者,此案不过是特朗普在打击其政治对手。

    “我 literally (字面意为‘确切地说’,此处指实实在在地)面临着美国总统和司法部试图将我送入17年监狱——这非常可怕,”她说。“这一切的核心是残忍。司法程序对他们来说就是折磨。”

    Lawyers for Rep. LaMonica McIver force judges to weigh the limits of congressional immunity

    2026-06-24T17:12:47.792Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/24/politics/lamonica-mciver-argue-assault-charges-thrown-out

    Do the legal protections for members of Congress hold even if they’re charged with assaulting a federal officer? That’s the question three federal judges considered Wednesday for nearly two hours in the case against Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver.

    One of the first questions asked by the panel of judges in Wilmington, Delaware, was whether a member of Congress, during their legislative duties, would be protected if he “comes across a teenage girl and gropes her.”

    “Isn’t this as weak a case as I hypothesized?” Judge Stephanos Bibas, who President Donald Trump nominated in his first administration, asked McIver’s attorney during Wednesday’s hearing.

    In 2025, McIver was charged with assaulting an officer during her visit to an immigration detention facility in New Jersey when officers began to arrest Newark Mayor Ras Baraka outside the facility — an arrest that officials quickly dropped.

    Prosecutors allege that McIver slammed her forearm into one officer and tried to restrain another by grabbing him as well as using her forearms to push against an officer when she was trying to get back into the facility.

    The indictment against McIver does not allege that any officers were injured during the incident.

    McIver’s attorney, Paul Fishman, said the New Jersey congresswoman was doing her legislative duty of oversight at the facility, which has become a recent hotbed for protests and violent clashes between law enforcement and protestors.

    Fishman argued that the judges should “look at the field visit as a whole,” adding that the reason McIver and two other members of congress went outside the facility during Baraka’s arrest “was oversight” of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Homeland Security.

    The Speech and Debate clause in the Constitution generally protects members of Congress from prosecution for actions that fall within their duties.

    “Being a critic of the administration,” Fishman said, is what the clause was designed to protect. “They are picking on someone who is a member of Congress” because she disagrees with the administration, Fishman said.

    “Use of physical force is never, never covered by the Speech and Debate clause,” attorney for the Justice Department Mark Coyne shot back Wednesday, while acknowledging the case was “certainly not something I’m taking lightly.”

    The case against McIver is on pause while the Third Circuit considers her appeal of a lower court ruling that rejected her efforts to toss the case on several issues, including congressional protections and vindictive prosecution.

    When asked about Fishman’s effort to have the court consider the issue of whether the case was brought vindictively by the Trump administration, Coyne pushed back.

    “I’m still here,” Coyne said, adding that if the administration started to charge a bevy of lawmakers, a hypothetical posed by Judge Thomas Ambro, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, Coyne would do “everything in my power” to ensure that would not happen.

    On rebuttal, Fishman said the decision to prosecute was not Coyne’s but came from the Justice Department. “They are not made in Newark,” Fishman said of the decision to prosecute enemies of Trump.

    Judge Ambro also questioned if Coyne could point to any other case where a lawmaker was charged with pushing against an officer as they were trying to make their way through a scrum.

    “That doesn’t seem like assault,” Ambro said of one of the charges McIver faces.

    Coyne conceded the case was not normal.

    Fishman told the judges he was “not arguing that an assault is a legislative act” but rather that McIver was doing her congressional duties of oversight when immigration agents began to unlawfully arrest Baraka for his presence in the facility.

    “If any member walks into a bar and decks an ICE officer,” Fishman said, that would not be protected.

    McIver has pleaded not guilty to the charges, which carry a maximum of 17 years in prison.

    During a press conference following the hearing, McIver, several months pregnant, told reporters the case was merely Trump going after his political enemies.

    “I have literally the president of the United States and the Department of Justice trying to send me to jail for 17 years — that’s very frightening,” she said. “The point of it all is cruelty. The process is the pain for them.”

  • 特朗普将请求国会将15%乙醇汽油混合燃料常态化


    2026年6月24日 美国东部时间15:14:00 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    一位知情的美国官员对哥伦比亚广播公司新闻表示,特朗普政府计划请求国会允许在加油站全年销售E15——一种乙醇汽油混合燃料。

    根据美国环境保护署的豁免规定,这种15%乙醇混合燃料通常仅在一年中的部分时段有售,以应对气温升高的情况,帮助缓解高油价问题。该官员透露,政府计划在向议员提交补充拨款申请时提出这一请求。

    原定于周三向国会提交多项预算相关及非预算相关的请求。

    目前全年销售的乙醇混合燃料比例为10%,但15%比例的混合燃料需获得豁免,因为乙醇含量更高的汽油在炎热天气下蒸发更快,会加剧空气污染或烟雾问题。因此,联邦法规通常要求切换至成本更高的混合燃料。

    将E15全年供应的举措,是白宫为平抑因伊朗局势紧张而上涨的油价所采取的最新行动。特朗普总统在竞选活动中曾多次表示支持全年供应E15。

    目前尚不清楚该提案能否获得足够票数通过。

    来自玉米种植州的议员及其他E15支持者认为,这种混合燃料为司机提供了更便宜的加油选择,并能创造农村就业岗位。

    根据可再生燃料协会的数据,E15的价格通常比普通汽油每加仑低约25美分。白宫表示,E15每年可为消费者 collectively over $20 billion in annual fuel costs.(此处原文未译完,保留原文)

    今年3月,特朗普政府曾通过紧急燃料豁免临时放宽汽油法规,允许炼油商和零售商在夏季驾驶季前后的一段时间内销售E15汽油。

    能源分析师谈油价

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/returning-to-pre-iran-war-gas-prices-could-take-awhile-energy-analyst-says/

    能源分析师:油价恢复到伊朗冲突前水平尚需时日

    (09:15)

    Trump to ask Congress to make 15% ethanol-gas blend permanent

    2026-06-24 15:14:00 EDT / CBS News

    The Trump administration intends to ask Congress to allow E15, an ethanol-gas blend, to be sold at the pumps year-round, a U.S. official familiar with the matter told CBS News.

    The 15% ethanol blend is usually only available part of the year under a waiver from the Environmental Protection Agency as temperatures rise to help ease high gas prices. The administration plans to make the request when it submits a supplemental funding request to lawmakers, the official said.

    Several requests on budget matters and non-budgetary matters were scheduled to be sent to the Hill on Wednesday.

    A lower 10% ethanol blend is sold all year, but the 15% blend is subject to waivers because gas with the higher ethanol content evaporates more quickly in hot weather and contributes to higher levels of air pollution or smog. For this reason, federal rules normally require switching back to more costly blends.

    The move to make E15 available year-round represents the White House’s latest effort to tame gas prices that have risen because of the war with Iran. President Trump repeatedly said on the campaign trail that he supported making E15 available year-round.

    It was unclear if the proposal would have the votes to pass.

    Lawmakers from corn-growing states and other proponents of E15 argue the blend gives drivers a cheaper option at the gas pump and creates rural jobs.

    E15 prices are generally about 25 cents per gallon lower than regular gas, according to the Renewable Fuels Association. The White House has said E15 can collectively over $20 billion in annual fuel costs.

    The Trump administration in March this year temporarily lifted gasoline regulations with emergency fuel waivers to allow refiners and retailers to sell E15 gasoline during a period ahead of and during the summer driving season.

    Energy analysts weigh in on gas prices

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/returning-to-pre-iran-war-gas-prices-could-take-awhile-energy-analyst-says/

    Returning to pre-Iran war gas prices could take awhile, energy analyst says

    (09:15)

  • 斯瓦威尔的好友加莱戈为竞选资助的超级碗、迈阿密之行辩护:“要到有钱的地方去”


    2026年6月24日 美国东部时间下午1:36 / 福克斯新闻频道

    亚利桑那州参议员与前众议员埃里克·斯瓦威尔共同设立了一个联合筹款委员会,以此出席2023年的超级碗赛事

    汉娜·布伦南 福克斯新闻
    “这就是你们该做的事”:加莱戈为超级碗筹款活动辩护, amid对竞选开支的质疑

    亚利桑那州民主党参议员鲁本·加莱戈在接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访时为高调活动筹款行为辩护,称候选人必须“到有钱的地方去筹款”。(图片来源:尼古拉斯·巴拉西 摄 福克斯新闻数字频道)

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/62c3583e-8ae1-4985-b9a2-76684ef3a589

    收听本文
    时长3分钟

    亚利桑那州民主党参议员鲁本·加莱戈为其竞选资助的差旅和筹款活动进行了辩护。此前有报道披露,他的政治委员会支付了奢华差旅、育儿及活动相关开支。加莱戈称,前往超级碗和迈阿密的行程都是为其政治运作筹集资金的合法举措。

    “要筹钱就必须到有钱的地方去,”当被问及外界对这些开支的批评时,加莱戈告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。

    近期有报道称,根据财务申报文件,加莱戈利用其领导政治行动委员会支付了多项奢华旅行的费用,包括前往迈阿密、圣巴特、迪士尼乐园、迪士尼世界和芝加哥的行程。据Politico报道,一位熟悉加莱戈开支情况的消息人士透露,这位参议员经常用竞选资金带家人进行这些度假,并使用捐赠资金支付子女的保姆费用。

    亚利桑那州民主党参议员鲁本·加莱戈于2025年12月11日在华盛顿特区参议院会议厅外离场,此前两项旨在抑制保费上涨的 opposing医疗保健法案均未获得通过。(安德鲁·哈尼克/盖蒂图片社)

    联邦选举委员会的记录还显示,加莱戈利用与前众议员埃里克·斯瓦威尔的联合筹款委员会为自己和妻子购买了出席2023年超级碗的门票。斯瓦威尔近期因多名女性指控这名加利福尼亚州民主党议员性侵而辞去了国会职务。

    当被问及近期的财务争议时,加莱戈称此次超级碗之行是一场筹款活动——“斯瓦威尔胜利基金”,他与斯瓦威尔共同主办了这场活动。

    “超级碗当时就在亚利桑那州举办,我代表亚利桑那州,”加莱戈说。“我们2023年在亚利桑那州举办了一场超级碗筹款活动,为我的竞选活动筹集资金。这就是你们该做的事。”

    斯瓦威尔在国会的“挚友”在重磅指控摧毁其政治生涯后倒戈

    2021年卡塔尔之行期间,时为亚利桑那州民主党众议员的鲁本·加莱戈与加利福尼亚州民主党众议员埃里克·斯瓦威尔及各自妻子赤裸上身骑骆驼,此次行程由美卡塔尔商业委员会资助。(福克斯新闻/塔克·卡尔森今夜栏目)

    该活动与捐赠者在亚利桑那州格伦代尔的州立农场体育场举办,距加莱戈宣布竞选亚利桑那州参议员仅20天。Politico获得的邀请函显示,门票售价为5000美元,赛前早午餐需额外支付1000美元。

    此次活动总花费超过3.7万美元,两位议员各自获得约8000美元筹款,赛后该联合委员会随即解散。

    加莱戈的发言人告诉Politico,“门票是以公平市场价格购买的”,并且“在本地体育赛事中接待捐赠者和支持者是两党都普遍采用的做法。”

    “很多人都会在高尔夫锦标赛、纳斯卡赛车、印地赛车赛事中举办筹款活动,”加莱戈告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。“这其实没什么两样。”

    这位亚利桑那州民主党议员还使用政治行动委员会的资金资助了一次迈阿密之行,此次行程恰逢其妻子悉尼·加莱戈的生日。夫妇二人入住了迈阿密海滩的劳厄斯酒店,相关开支超过9000美元。

    “我们在迈阿密的九场活动中筹集了约5万美元,”加莱戈说。

    极左翼激进派动用巨额竞选资金入住奢华酒店、使用“顶级”豪华轿车服务

    亚利桑那州参议员鲁本·加莱戈为民主党延长奥巴马医改补贴的努力辩护。(吴仲贤/路透社)

    加莱戈的发言人告诉Politico,加莱戈夫妇“在迈阿密之行期间参加了多场有大量民众参与的政治活动和筹款活动”,但未具体说明相关活动的数量,也未提及此次行程与生日相关的细节。

    联邦竞选资金通常不能转为个人使用,但联邦选举委员会的指导方针允许与竞选相关的差旅、筹款活动期间的餐饮费用,以及因竞选活动直接产生的育儿开支。若行程同时涉及个人和竞选用途,则需要报销个人部分的费用。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    福克斯新闻数字频道并未援引任何联邦选举委员会的认定结果,称上述开支违反了竞选财务法。

    福克斯新闻数字频道的罗伯特·施马德为本报道撰稿。

    汉娜是福克斯新闻数字频道政治团队的制作助理。

    Swalwell friend Gallego defends campaign-funded Super Bowl, Miami trips: ‘Go where the money is’

    June 24, 2026 1:36pm EDT / Fox News

    The Arizona senator used a joint fundraising committee with former Rep Eric Swalwell to attend the 2023 game

    By Hannah Brennan Fox News

    ‘That’s what you do’: Gallego defends Super Bowl fundraiser amid questions about campaign spending

    Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., defended fundraising at high-profile events, in an interview with Fox News Digital, saying candidates must “go where the money is to raise money.” (Credit: Nicholas Ballasy for Fox News Digital)

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/62c3583e-8ae1-4985-b9a2-76684ef3a589

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., defended his campaign-funded travel and fundraising events after recent reporting detailed luxury travel, childcare and event expenses paid through his political committees, arguing that trips to the Super Bowl and Miami were legitimate efforts to raise money for his political operation.

    “You have to go where the money is to raise money,” Gallego told Fox News Digital when asked about criticism surrounding the expenditures.

    It was recently reported that Gallego used his leadership PAC to pay for a variety of luxurious trips, including trips to Miami, Saint Barthélemy, Disneyland, Disney World and Chicago, according to financial filings. A source familiar with Gallego’s spending said the senator often used campaign cash to bring his family on these vacations and used donor cash to fund babysitting services for his children, as reported by Politico.

    Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., walks out of the Senate Chamber in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 11, 2025, after two opposing health care bills intended to curb rising premiums failed.(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

    Federal Election Commission records also show Gallego using a joint fundraising committee with former Rep. Eric Swalwell, who recently resigned from Congress after multiple women accused the California Democrat of sexual assault, that was used to fund tickets for him and his wife to attend the 2023 Super Bowl.

    When asked about his recent financial controversies, Gallego claimed the Super Bowl endeavor to be a fundraiser event, the “Swallego Victory Fund,” which he hosted with Swalwell.

    “The Super Bowl was in Arizona, I represent Arizona,” Gallego said. “We threw a Super Bowl fundraiser in Arizona where we raised money for my election in 2023. That’s what you do.”

    SWALWELL’S ‘BEST FRIEND’ IN CONGRESS TURNS ON HIM AFTER BOMBSHELL ALLEGATIONS TORPEDO HIS POLITICAL CAREER

    Then-Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., and Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., are pictured with their wives riding camels shirtless during a 2021 trip to Qatar funded by the U.S.-Qatar Business Council.(FOX NEWS/Tucker Carlson Tonight)

    The event was held with donors at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, just 20 days after Gallego launched his Arizona Senate bid. A copy of the invitation obtained by Politico shows tickets costing $5,000, including a brunch that could be attended before the game for an additional $1,000.

    The event cost over $37,000, with both lawmakers each receiving roughly $8,000 and halting the joint committee after the game.

    A Gallego spokesperson told Politico that the “tickets were purchased at fair market value” and that “hosting donors and supporters at sporting events in their areas is a common, bipartisan practice.”

    “There’s a lot of people that do fundraisers at golf tournaments, at NASCAR, at IndyCar,” Gallego told Fox News Digital. “So this is just the very same thing.”

    The Arizona Democrat also used PAC money for a trip to Miami that coincided with his wife, Sydney Gallego’s, birthday. The couple retreated to the Loews hotel on Miami Beach and charged over $9,000 in expenses.

    “We raised about $50,000 in our nine events in Miami,” Gallego said.

    FAR-LEFT FIREBRAND SPENDS EYE-POPPING AMOUNT OF CAMPAIGN CASH ON LUXURY HOTELS, ‘TOP-TIER’ LIMO SERVICES

    Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego defended Democrats’ efforts to extend Obamacare subsidies.(Go Nakamura/Reuters)

    A Gallego spokesperson told Politico that the Gallegos “attended several widely attended political events and fundraisers” on their trip to Miami, but did not specify any specific numbers nor address the birthday aspect of the trip.

    Federal campaign funds generally cannot be converted to personal use, but FEC guidance allows campaign-related travel, meals at fundraising events and childcare expenses incurred as a direct result of campaign activity. Mixed personal and campaign travel can require reimbursement for the personal portion.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Fox News Digital has not cited any FEC finding that the expenses violated campaign finance law.

    Fox News Digital’s Robert Schmad contributed to this report.

    Hannah is a Production Assistant for the Politics team at Fox News Digital.

  • 他们砸下巨资参选国会,却大多铩羽而归


    2026年6月24日 美国东部时间下午12:15 / 《华盛顿邮报》

    在2000年以来花费最高的20场个人自掏腰包的国会竞选中,仅有4场成功获胜。

    image
    当时的马里兰州国会众议员戴维·特龙在2024年民主党参议院初选中落败后发表败选演讲。(克雷格·哈德森 为《华盛顿邮报》拍摄)

    作者:普雷维娜·索马桑德拉姆、克拉拉·恩斯·莫斯、艾琳·考克斯

    美国富豪们不惜动用自己的数十亿美元身家参选国会,却往往难以如愿。

    最近的一例发生在本周二的马里兰州:亿万富翁、前国会众议员戴维·特龙创下2500万美元纪录的复出竞选最终在民主党初选中落败。特龙通过联合创办全国性酒类零售商积累了巨额财富,他是国会竞选中最出手阔绰的自掏腰包竞选者之一。十年来,他在六场竞选中共投入1.34亿美元,三度当选众议院议员,却在另外三场败选竞选中花费了1.01亿美元。

    They poured fortunes into trying to join Congress — and usually lost

    June 24, 2026 at 12:15 p.m. EDT / The Washington Post

    Of the most expensive self-funded congressional campaigns since 2000, only four out of 20 were successful.

    David Trone, then a Maryland congressman, delivers a concession speech after losing the 2024 Democratic Senate primary. (Craig Hudson/For The Washington Post)

    By Praveena Somasundaram, Clara Ence Morse and Erin Cox

    Wealthy Americans have spent hundreds of millions from their fortunes in their quests to join Congress. It usually doesn’t pay off.

    The most recent example came Tuesday in Maryland, when billionaire and former congressman David Trone’s record-breaking $25 million comeback bid ended in defeat in the Democratic primary. Trone, who amassed his fortune by co-founding a national alcohol retailer, has been one of the most prolific self-funders of congressional campaigns. He spent $134 million across six races over the course of a decade, winning three terms in the House but spending $101 million on contests he lost.

  • 特朗普与共和党参议员举行激烈交锋会议,期间曾勒令比尔·卡西迪坐下


    2026年6月24日 美国东部时间下午3:57 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻(CBS News)
    艾伦·贺 撰稿

    据直接了解此次会议的消息人士透露,周三特朗普总统与共和党参议员的会面气氛紧张激烈,期间他曾严厉勒令路易斯安那州参议员比尔·卡西迪坐下,当时双方就《战争权力决议》相关问题产生了争执。

    卡西迪当时正试图回应总统,他告诉总统应该坐下——但卡西迪后来缓和了态度,表示自己会就座,但并非按照特朗普的要求。

    “他提高了嗓门。我也动了怒。这并不妥当。我骨子里有爱尔兰人的火爆脾气,但我当时也跟着他的语气和音量回敬了回去,”卡西迪在会后对记者说道。

    今年早些时候,特朗普曾在路易斯安那州共和党参议院初选中支持众议员朱莉娅·莱特洛。卡西迪未能进入 runoff 选举,其政治生涯大概率就此终结,这一点也在特朗普的讲话中被提及。

    “我不会为对抗总统而道歉,”卡西迪说,“我是在为美国民众挺身而出,哪怕我的对话对象是总统。”

    这场持续了一个多小时的会议主要围绕伊朗战争以及《战争权力决议》展开。周二,参议院通过了由民主党牵头的决议,旨在阻止总统下令对伊朗采取进一步军事行动。四名共和党议员投票支持这项并行决议,该决议仅具有象征意义,不具备法律效力。

    一位直接了解会议情况的消息人士向哥伦比亚广播公司新闻透露,特朗普对包括卡西迪在内的共和党议员表达了不满,这些议员曾与民主党人合作推动该决议。

    总统还表达了对阿拉斯加州参议员丽莎·穆尔科斯基的反感。“他刚说完这话,她就走进来了,场面十分尴尬,”该消息人士说道。

    穆尔科斯基迟到后告诉记者,她此前已安排了其他活动。

    离开午餐会时,共和党参议员将此次会议描述为一场“热烈”且“充满活力”的会面。阿拉巴马州参议员汤米·塔伯维尔对记者表示,会议氛围就像“中场休息时的谈话”。北达科他州参议员凯文·克拉默称,总统谈到了支持伊朗决议的共和党人对他的“暗中破坏”,并“表达了些许失望”。

    “他并没有我可能会有的那么生气,”克拉默说道。

    “我认为我们这场会议办得非常棒。我们为共和党感到骄傲。我们支持多数党领袖约翰·图恩,”特朗普说道,“我们确实喜欢房间里的每一个人。我不喜欢其中几个人,但这没什么。我想你们都知道他们是谁。”

    在抵达国会山前不久,特朗普突然取消了签署两党住房法案的计划。他在社交媒体上写道,只有在国会通过《拯救美国法案》后,他才会签署该住房法案。这项总统的核心提案包含多项条款,其中一项要求选民在登记投票时提供公民身份证明。参议院共和党领袖多次表示,该法案在参议院缺乏足够的支持票数以通过。

    总统告诉参议员们,共和党必须在11月的选举中获胜,需要共和党选民出来投票。特朗普称,如果不通过《拯救美国法案》,共和党选民就不会参与投票。

    总统提议废除议事阻挠规则以推动该法案通过,这将使法案通过所需的票数从60票降至简单多数。截至目前,参议院共和党领导层一直抵制特朗普废除议事阻挠规则的呼吁,而且即便这么做也不能确保法案通过,因为在微弱多数的共和党参议员中,仍有少数人持反对态度。

    一位了解会议情况的消息人士表示,特朗普离开时留下的最后一句话是,必须推进《拯救美国法案》。

    “总统最后呼吁大家团结,”得克萨斯州参议员约翰·科宁说道,他也在共和党初选中输给了特朗普支持的候选人。“但他前一个小时谈论的事情,完全算不上能促进团结。”

    凯亚·哈伯德对本文亦有贡献。

    特朗普威胁搁置住房法案签署计划

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-cancels-bill-signing-for-bipartisan-housing-act-demands-passage-of-save-america-act-first/

    特朗普取消两党住房法案签署计划,要求先通过《拯救美国法案》

    (03:26)

    Trump has testy meeting with GOP senators, telling Cassidy at one point to sit down

    2026-06-24 3:57 PM EDT / CBS News

    By Alan He

    President Trump’s meeting with Republican senators on Wednesday turned testy, and at one point, he sternly told Louisiana Sen. Bill Cassidy to sit down, after questions arose about the War Powers Resolution, according to sources directly familiar with the meeting.

    Cassidy had been trying to respond to the president, telling the president he should sit down — but Cassidy later relented, saying he would be seated, but not at Mr. Trump’s behest.

    “He raised his voice. I lost my temper. That’s not appropriate. It’s the Irish in me, but I again matched his tone and his volume,” Cassidy told reporters after the meeting.

    Earlier this year, Mr. Trump supported Rep. Julia Letlow in the Louisiana Republican Senate primary. Cassidy did not advance to the runoff, likely ending his political career, a point Mr. Trump highlighted in his remarks.

    “I make no apologies for standing up to the president,” Cassidy said. “I am sticking up for the American people, even if I’m speaking to the president.”

    The more-than-hourlong meeting with Mr. Trump focused mostly on the Iran war and the War Powers Resolution. On Tuesday, the Senate approved a Democrat-led resolution to keep the president from ordering further military action in Iran. Four Republicans voted in favor of the concurrent resolution, which is symbolic and does not carry the force of law.

    A source directly familiar with the meeting told CBS News Mr. Trump expressed his discontent with Republicans, including Cassidy, who had worked with the Democrats on the resolution.

    The president also shared his disdain for Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski. “It was very awkward when she walked in right after he said that,” the source said.

    Murkowski arrived at the meeting late, telling reporters that she had a previously scheduled event.

    Leaving the lunch, GOP senators described a “lively” and “spirited” meeting. Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama told reporters the tone was “half-time talk.” Sen. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota said the president talked about being undermined by the Republicans who supported the Iran resolution and “expressed some disappointment.”

    “He wasn’t as upset as I probably would have been about it,” Cramer said.

    “I think we had a really great meeting. We’re very proud of the party. We like Majority Leader John Thune,” Mr. Trump said. “We like everybody really in the room. I don’t like a few people, but that’s okay. I think you know who they are.”

    Shortly before arriving on Capitol Hill, the president abruptly canceled plans to sign a bipartisan housing bill. Mr. Trump wrote on social media that he would only sign it once Congress passed the SAVE America Act, a pet project of the president which, among other provisions, would require voters to show proof of citizenship when they register. Senate GOP leaders have repeatedly said the bill does not have enough support in the upper chamber to pass.

    The president told senators that Republicans must win in November, and need Republican voters to show up. Without passing the Save America Act, the president said, they won’t show up.

    The president suggested eliminating the filibuster in order to pass it, which would lower the threshold for passage from 60 votes to a simple majority. Republican Senate leadership has so far resisted Mr. Trump’s entreaties to do away with the filibuster, and doing so would not guarantee its passage, since a handful of Senate Republicans in the slim GOP majority remain opposed.

    A source familiar with the meeting said Mr. Trump’s parting message as he left was that the SAVE America Act has to get done.

    “The president closed by preaching unity,” said Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who also lost his Republican primary to a Trump-backed candidate. “But he spent the prior hour talking about things which were not exactly unifying.”

    Kaia Hubbard contributed to this report.

    Trump threatens housing bill signing

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-cancels-bill-signing-for-bipartisan-housing-act-demands-passage-of-save-america-act-first/

    Trump cancels bill signing for bipartisan housing act, demands passage of SAVE America Act first

    (03:26)

  • 特朗普在住房法案上的闹剧看起来是个极其糟糕的主意


    2026-06-24T18:16:24.026Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/24/politics/trump-housing-bill-stunt

    唐纳德·特朗普总统是一位众所周知的立法纵火者。他经常在最后一刻抛出出人意料的举动,让国会领袖们焦头烂额——尤其是在他自己的政党内部。

    但很少有特朗普的最后时刻出人意料之举,会像他周三上午抛出的那样显得考虑不周。

    他突然取消了原计划的住房负担能力法案签署仪式,该法案已在两院以压倒性的两党多数票通过。

    他还增加了一个新的转折,称国会通过“拯救美国法案”之前,他不会签署该法案。一些共和党人将这项与选举相关的立法视为关乎存亡的大事,但它似乎没有任何可行的推进路径。

    特朗普不仅改变了主意;他是在庆祝该法案签署的活动已经开始之际做出这一决定的。就在他反悔的时候,知名共和党人还在新闻发布会上称赞该法案的优点,并吹捧特朗普对它的支持。

    一天前,白宫新闻秘书卡罗琳·莱维特还称该法案是“美国历史上最重要的住房负担能力立法之一”。几小时前,特朗普的中期选举政治顾问还称其为“标志性承诺”。

    所以简单回顾一下:截至周三,特朗普将“美国历史上最重要的住房负担能力立法之一”作为人质,用它作为要挟,以换取他真正想要的法案。

    在11月的中期选举不到五个月之际,这看起来是个极其糟糕的主意。

    事实上,特朗普和共和党面临的最大政治问题仍然是通胀、负担能力和经济,而他的这个策略似乎恰好是在强化这些不利因素。

    特朗普在负担能力和经济问题上的糟糕民调数字

    在2月伊朗战争爆发前,特朗普在这些问题上的民调数字就已经糟糕,自那以后更是显著恶化。

    在最近的福克斯新闻(68%)、哥伦比亚广播公司新闻(66%)和美联社-NORC民调(66%)中,他的经济问题不支持率约为三分之二。

    与此同时,他在通胀问题上的不支持率更高——在哥伦比亚广播公司(73%)、Strength in Numbers-Verasight(71%)和路透社-Ipsos(69%)的民调中,该数字约为70%。

    这样的民调数字十分罕见。通常来说,七成美国人很少会在任何事情上达成共识。

    而特朗普最大的问题之一不仅在于民众认为经济糟糕,还在于他们认为他实际上让情况变得更糟。在战争爆发前,民众认为他对该问题重视不足。现在他们认为他在加剧问题。

    战争爆发前几天进行的哥伦比亚广播公司民调显示,75%的美国人表示特朗普政府在降低物价方面“关注不够”。一个月后的CNN民调显示,65%的人表示特朗普在努力降低日常商品价格方面“做得还不够”。

    到了5月,CNN民调显示65%的美国人表示特朗普的政策“恶化了经济状况”,77%的人表示这些政策“推高了所在社区的生活成本”。

    特朗普不仅通过全球关税和伊朗战争将不确定的经济状况归咎于自身,他似乎还对处理负担能力问题表现得近乎不屑。他称这个问题是“骗局”,并在集会和其他场合明确表示,他更愿意关注其他事情。他不断发表不合时宜的言论,表明他并不重视这个问题以及美国人的经济困境。

    总而言之,特朗普周三的举动有可能进一步加剧对其政治不利的舆论。他正在强化自己的形象:一个并不真正重视甚至不愿承认美国人最关切问题的人。

    一些共和党人和特朗普的盟友可能会告诉自己,“拯救美国法案”值得他采取这样的策略;他们会辩称,通过这项要求提供公民身份证明才能登记投票等条款的立法至关重要。

    但不仅几乎没有证据表明无证移民存在非法投票行为,而且有充分理由相信该法案实际上可能会阻止合法投票;这项立法根本不是美国民众热切呼吁的。

    共和党人援引的民调显示,绝大多数美国人支持选民身份证制度,并强烈支持登记投票时提供公民身份证明。这些问题确实在民调中获得了支持。3月的哥伦比亚广播公司民调显示,66%的美国人支持后者。

    但除此之外,美国人对“拯救美国法案”并没有强烈的好感。

    同一项民调显示,只有28%的美国人支持这项前身为“拯救法案”的立法,而31%的人反对。

    仅有43%的人认为该立法会阻止的非法投票多于其阻止的合法投票。

    除此之外,特朗普现在甚至似乎都没有给自己争取到真正的筹码。

    通过“拯救美国法案”可能需要参议院共和党人废除阻挠议事规则及其60票门槛——无论是针对这项法案还是其他所有法案——但这一点没有足够多的共和党人愿意这么做,许多共和党人还明确反对。

    而在此之前这就不太可能实现,现在更是难上加难:特朗普已经在初选中罢免了两名参议员——得克萨斯州的约翰·康恩和路易斯安那州的比尔·卡西迪,这已经疏远了参议院共和党人。

    这次威胁并没有改变这一局面,甚至算不上一张好牌。因为即使总统不签署该法案,10天后法案仍将自动生效。要真正阻止它,他必须行使否决权。

    而如果他这么做,他将面临被推翻否决权的风险,这需要两院三分之二的票数支持。该法案已经在众议院获得92%的赞成票,在参议院获得94%的赞成票。

    事实上,在当今时代,这样的多数票令人震惊。国会除了通过必须立法(如维持政府运转)之外,很少能实质性地办成任何事。最近就连这类法案都难以通过。

    而现在国会已经就一项公众高度关切的问题采取了重要行动——这是一代人以来规模最大的住房负担能力法案——特朗普却威胁要全盘推翻,除非他得到自己想要的东西。

    最有可能的结果是总统最终让步。他之前也曾对“拯救美国法案”发出过类似威胁,包括曾威胁在该法案通过前不再签署任何更多立法。

    但就目前而言,他的这场闹剧巩固了对他自己和 fellow 共和党人在中期选举前非常不利的舆论环境。

    Trump’s stunt on the housing bill seems like a very bad idea

    2026-06-24T18:16:24.026Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/24/politics/trump-housing-bill-stunt

    President Donald Trump is a familiar legislative arsonist. He’ll often throw curveballs at the last minute that give congressional leaders fits — especially in his own party.

    But rarely has one of Trump’s late curveballs seemed as ill-advised as the one he threw Wednesday morning.

    He suddenly canceled his planned signing of a housing affordability bill that had passed in both chambers with overwhelming bipartisan majorities.

    And he added a new twist, saying he wouldn’t sign it until Congress passed the “SAVE America Act.” Some Republicans have cast that election-related legislation as existential, but it doesn’t appear to have any viable path forward.

    And Trump didn’t just change his mind; he did so even as the festivities celebrating the housing bill signing had begun. Prominent Republicans were at a press conference espousing the virtues of the bill and touting Trump’s support for it just as he pulled back.

    A day earlier, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt had called the bill “one of the most significant pieces of housing affordability legislation in American history.” Hours earlier, Trump’s political adviser for the midterms called it a “signature commitment.”

    So just to recap: As of Wednesday, Trump was holding hostage “one of the most significant pieces of housing affordability legislation” ever, using it as leverage for a bill he really wants.

    That seems like a very bad idea less than five months before November’s elections.

    In fact, Trump’s and the GOP’s biggest political problems remain inflation, affordability and the economy, and his gambit seems almost tailor-made to reinforce those liabilities.

    Trump’s bad numbers on affordability and the economy

    Trump’s numbers on these issues were bad before the Iran war began in February, and they’ve gotten significantly worse since then.

    His disapproval rating on the economy was about two-thirds in the most recent polls from Fox News (68%), CBS News (66%) and AP-NORC (66%).

    His disapproval rating on inflation, meanwhile, has hovered even higher — around 70% in polling from CBS (73%), Strength in Numbers-Verasight (71%) and Reuters-Ipsos (69%).

    These kinds of numbers are rare. Typically, 7 in 10 Americans don’t tend to agree on much of anything.

    And one of Trump’s biggest problems is not just that people think the economy is bad; it’s that they think he has actively made it worse. Before the war, they viewed him as neglecting the problem. Now they view him as exacerbating it.

    A CBS poll conducted in the days before the war began showed 75% of Americans said the Trump administration had focused “not enough” on lowering prices. A CNN poll a month later showed 65% said Trump had “not gone far enough” in trying to reduce the prices of everyday goods.

    By May, CNN polling showed 65% of Americans said Trump’s policies had “worsened economic conditions,” and 77% said the policies had “increased the cost of living” in their communities.

    And Trump didn’t just take ownership of an uncertain economy via his global tariffs and the Iran war; he has also seemed almost disdainful of having to deal with affordability issues. He has called the issue a “hoax” and made pretty clear at rallies and elsewhere he’d much rather focus on other things. He keeps making tone-deaf comments that suggest he doesn’t take the issue and Americans’ economic pain seriously.

    All to say, Trump on Wednesday risked furthering a politically damaging narrative. He’s reinforcing his image as a guy who doesn’t really prioritize or even acknowledge Americans’ most important issue.

    Some Republicans and Trump allies might tell themselves that the “SAVE America Act” is worth this gambit; they’d argue it’s just that important to pass legislation requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote, among other provisions.

    But not only is there scant evidence of illegal votes from undocumented migrants and plenty of reason to believe this bill could actually prevent legal votes; this legislation simply isn’t something the American people are clamoring for.

    Republicans have pointed to polling that shows Americans overwhelmingly support voter ID and strongly support proof of citizenship to register. And those issues do poll well. A CBS poll in March showed 66% of Americans supported the latter.

    But otherwise, Americans don’t feel at all strongly about the “SAVE America Act.

    The same poll showed just 28% of Americans said they supported the legislation formerly known as the “SAVE Act,” while 31% opposed it.

    And only 43% thought the legislation would prevent more illegal votes than legal ones.

    Beyond that, it seems unlikely that Trump is even giving himself leverage right now.

    Passing the “SAVE America Act” would likely require Senate Republicans to nuke the filibuster and its 60-vote threshold — for this and everything else — which not enough of them want to do and many of them actively oppose.

    And while that was improbable before, that’s doubly the case now that Trump has alienated Senate Republicans by ousting two senators in primaries — Texas’ John Cornyn and Louisiana’s Bill Cassidy.

    This threat doesn’t change that, and it’s not even a great piece of leverage. Because even if the president doesn’t sign the legislation, it still becomes law after 10 days. To actually stop it, he’d have to veto it.

    And if he did that, he’d be risking a possible veto override, which requires two-thirds votes in both chambers. The legislation already passed with 92% of the House voting for it and 94% of the Senate voting for it.

    Indeed, those majorities are astounding in this day and age. Congress rarely does anything of substance beyond must-pass legislation, such as keeping the government funded. It’s struggled to even do that lately.

    And now that it has done something significant on an issue of major public concern — this is the largest housing affordability bill in a generation — Trump is threatening to blow it all up if he doesn’t get what he wants.

    The likeliest outcome here is that the president eventually backs down. He has made similar threats about the “SAVE America Act” before, including once threatening not to sign any more legislation until it passed.

    But for now, his tantrum cements a very bad narrative for himself and his fellow Republicans ahead of the midterms.

  • 特朗普政府在大美国州博览会上展示11英尺高、人工智能设计的核试验飞行器


    2026年6月24日 美国东部时间上午10:03 / 福克斯新闻

    美国国家核安全管理局将在大美国州博览会上展示人工智能设计的核试验飞行器

    作者:丹妮尔·华莱士 福克斯新闻

    美国国家核安全管理局局长布兰登·威廉姆斯告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,美国“毫无疑问”正处于“与中国的人工智能能力竞赛”中。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/92a99aad-1224-4bb9-a79c-a581ee1c81a0

    收听本文
    6 分钟

    【福克斯新闻独家报道】 特朗普政府宣布,已利用人工智能、先进超级计算机和3D打印技术成功开发并测试了一款新型与核武器相关的飞行器,这一里程碑被美国国家核安全管理局局长布兰登·威廉姆斯比作曼哈顿计划。

    随着大美国州博览会在国家广场开幕,展出的最具意义的展品之一可能是一个11英尺高的飞行器——它并非为博物馆打造,而是用于测试人工智能如何改变美国的核威慑力量。美国能源部下属的国家核安全管理局(NNSA)表示,这个名为“Aires Tide”的项目可以大幅压缩未来国家安全能力的开发周期。

    此次展示正值美国官员警告称,美国正与中国陷入一场争夺人工智能在军事和战略优势上应用的高风险竞赛。


    特朗普签署 landmark 行政令 投资量子计算与密码安全


    美国国家核安全管理局本周将在国家广场展示Aires Tide。(美国国家核安全管理局供图)

    “毫无疑问,我们正与中国展开人工智能能力竞赛。人工智能的力量强大无比,它能够将如此多种类的数据和不同的计算模型整合到一处并实现流程优化,未来这种优势还将持续显现,”威廉姆斯告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,“这一技术一部分应用于国家安全领域,一部分则用于我们的核威慑力量。”

    威廉姆斯表示,Aires Tide项目是美国国家核安全管理局发起的,旨在“展示我们如何利用人工智能,加快核武器生产、维护核武库的速度”。这款飞行试验飞行器被设计用于模拟核武器在飞行过程中会遭遇的极端高温和振动环境。

    该项目是特朗普政府去年签署的“创世纪任务”倡议的首次公开演示,该倡议旨在连接美国能源部的国家实验室,并将人工智能应用于政府面临的一些最复杂的国家安全挑战。

    美国国家核安全管理局在国家广场展示Aires Tide之际,恰逢本届政府加大力度强化美国在战略重要技术领域的领导地位。本周,特朗普签署了两项针对量子计算和网络安全的行政令,旨在加速研究级量子计算机的开发,并保护联邦系统免受未来量子赋能网络威胁。


    Aires Tide是美国国家核安全管理局开发的人工智能设计飞行试验飞行器,用于模拟核武器在飞行过程中经历的极端环境,包括高温和振动。(美国国家核安全管理局供图)

    美国国家核安全管理局表示,其两台超级计算机——韦纳多(Venado)和埃尔卡皮坦(El Capitan)——被用于支持Aires Tide的设计。直到最近,埃尔卡皮坦还被认为是全球最快的超级计算机。然而,在周二发布的最新TOP500排行榜中,中国的“亮线”(LineShine)系统超越埃尔卡皮坦位居榜首,这是自2017年以来中国超级计算机首次登顶全球最快榜单。

    对威廉姆斯而言,计算能力的价值不仅体现在排名上,更体现在其能否快速转化为现实能力。

    威廉姆斯告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,Aires Tide从概念设计到可飞行的硬件仅用了数月时间:官员们利用人工智能在11月完成设计,12月制作出塑料模型,3月前完成多个全尺寸原型机。据威廉姆斯介绍,这一加速流程使该机构开发Aires Tide的速度比传统方法快7倍,成本降低14倍,他称这为美国应对新兴威胁和竞争对手提供了关键优势。

    “这就是人工智能的力量,它真的让我们极具信心,能够快速行动……领先于我们的对手以及我们面临的威胁,”威廉姆斯说道。

    威廉姆斯将人工智能的崛起比作曼哈顿计划,称两者都是能够从根本上改变力量平衡的技术突破。正如富兰克林·罗斯福总统在二战期间认识到利用原子能的军事意义一样,威廉姆斯认为,特朗普及其政府正在拥抱人工智能,以确保美国保持战略优势。

    【计算机竞赛升温 中国超级计算机自2017年以来首次超越美国所有机器】

    “我们拥有追溯至曼哈顿计划的所有出色测试数据。我们能够利用这些强大的资源、测试数据和计算能力,借助智能体工作流——也就是利用人工智能模型快速、迭代地解决这些极其复杂的问题,从而实现快速推进,”他说,“没错,我们绝对与中国处于竞争之中,这具有极其严肃的国家安全 implications。我们确信,我们将做好准备赢得这场竞争。”**_

    威廉姆斯表示,无人机战争、导弹技术和人工智能的快速发展正在实时改变战争形态,因此美国必须比对手更快地部署新工具。他告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,“创世纪”倡议旨在让美国在这一领域处于领先地位。


    二战期间田纳西州克林顿工程 Works 的曼哈顿计划工厂生产了用于打击日本的原子弹。(盖蒂图片社)

    “我们正处于技术变革前所未有的时期。事实上,就在过去五年里,我想我们都认同,战争形态正在我们眼前发生变化,”威廉姆斯告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,“ 正因我们面临这场技术革命,动用所有可用工具让美国保持领先地位比以往任何时候都重要。自第一次海湾战争以来,我们的常规部队已经享受了长达40年的空前优势。”

    “但随着战争形态改变,我们必须随之改变,而人工智能是帮助我们保持领先的最重要工具之一,”他补充道。

    威廉姆斯告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,人工智能的进步并非要取代工人,而是要提高他们的生产力。他认为,人工智能可以将设计和制造周期从10至15年压缩至5年甚至更短,让同样的科学家、工程师和技术人员能够更快、更高效地开发新能力,同时帮助美国领先于竞争对手。

    “Aires Tide让我们将材料科学、设计以及快速迭代等众多领域的专业知识整合在一起,”威廉姆斯说,“快速优化整个流程。这让我们极具信心,能够直面对手摆在我们面前的挑战,并且我们将能够利用这些工具取得成功,保障美国的安全。”_

    丹妮尔·华莱士是福克斯新闻数字频道的突发新闻编辑,在重大历史性政治事件与人工智能时代的交汇点上发挥着关键的编辑部核心作用。

    新闻线索可发送至danielle.wallace@fox.com,或在X平台关注@danimwallace。

    Trump admin unveils 11-foot-tall, AI-designed nuclear test flight vehicle at the Great American State Fair

    June 24, 2026 10:03am EDT / Fox News

    NNSA to unveil AI-designed nuclear test vehicle at Great American State Fair

    By Danielle Wallace Fox News

    National Nuclear Security Administration Administrator Brandon Williams tells Fox News Digital there is “no question” the United States is in an “AI capabilities race with China.”

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/92a99aad-1224-4bb9-a79c-a581ee1c81a0

    Listen to this article

    6 min

    FIRST ON FOX: The Trump administration announced that it has successfully developed and tested a new nuclear-weapons-related flight vehicle using artificial intelligence, advanced supercomputing and 3D printing technology, marking a milestone National Nuclear Security Administrator Brandon Williams compared to the Manhattan Project.

    As the Great American State Fair kicks off on the National Mall, one of the most consequential exhibits on display may be an 11-foot-tall flight vehicle built not for a museum, but as a test of how AI could transform America’s nuclear deterrent. The Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) says the project, known as Aires Tide, could dramatically compress the timeline for developing future national security capabilities.

    The unveiling comes as U.S. officials warn that America is locked in a high-stakes race with China to harness artificial intelligence for military and strategic advantage.

    TRUMP SIGNS LANDMARK EXECUTIVE ORDER INVESTING IN QUANTUM COMPUTING AND CRYPTOGRAPHY SECURITY

    The NNSA is displaying Aires Tide on the National Mall this week.(NNSA)

    “There’s no question that we’re in an AI capabilities race with China. The power of artificial intelligence just to be able to bring together so many kinds of data and different computational models together in one place and to streamline that is incredibly powerful and will continue to be powerful going forward,” Williams told Fox News Digital. “And so part of that is applied to national security. Part of that’s applied to our nuclear deterrence.”

    Williams said Aires Tide was started by the NNSA to demonstrate “how we would use artificial intelligence to move faster in terms of how we produce nuclear weapons, how we maintain our nuclear weapons stockpile.”_ The flight test vehicle was designed to simulate the extreme heat and vibration a nuclear weapon would encounter during a nuclear weapon’s flight.

    The project serves as the first public demonstration of the administration’s Genesis Mission initiative, an effort signed by President Donald Trump last year to connect the Department of Energy’s national laboratories and apply artificial intelligence to some of the government’s most complex national security challenges.

    The Aires Tide unveiling on the National Mall comes amid a broader push by the administration to strengthen U.S. leadership in strategically important technologies. This week, Trump signed two separate executive orders focused on quantum computing and cybersecurity, seeking to accelerate development of a research-grade quantum computer and protect federal systems against future quantum-enabled cyber threats.

    Aires Tide is an AI-designed flight test vehicle developed by the National Nuclear Security Administration to simulate the extreme conditions a nuclear weapon experiences during flight, including intense heat and vibration.(NNSA)

    The NNSA said two of its supercomputers — Venado and El Capitan -— were used to enable the design of Aires Tide. El Capitan until recently was considered the fastest in the world. On Tuesday, however, China’s LineShine system surpassed El Capitan atop the latest TOP500 rankings, the first time a Chinese supercomputer has held the No. 1 position since 2017.

    For Williams, the value of that computing power is measured not by rankings alone, but by how quickly it can translate into real-world capabilities.

    Williams told Fox News Digital that Aires Tide moved from concept to flight-ready hardware in a matter of months, with officials using AI to generate a design by November, produce a plastic model by December and complete multiple full-scale prototypes by March. According to Williams, the accelerated process allowed the agency to develop Aires Tide seven times faster and 15 times cheaper than it could have using traditional methods, providing what he described as a critical advantage as the U.S. seeks to stay ahead of emerging threats and competitors.

    “That’s the power of AI, and it really gave us incredible confidence that we’re going to be able to move fast… to stay ahead of our adversaries, and the threats that face us,” Williams said.

    Williams likened the emergence of artificial intelligence to the Manhattan Project, describing both as technological breakthroughs capable of fundamentally altering the balance of power. Just as President Franklin D. Roosevelt recognized the military implications of harnessing atomic energy during World War II, Williams argued that Trump and his administration are embracing AI to ensure the United States maintains its strategic advantage.

    COMPUTER WARS HEAT UP AS CHINESE SUPERCOMPUTER TOPS ALL US MACHINES IN SPEED FOR FIRST TIME SINCE 2017

    “We have all this fantastic test data going back really to the Manhattan Project. And we’re able to tap into these very powerful resources that we have, test data, computational capabilities, using agentic workflows, which is just a way of leveraging AI models to go out and solve these very complex problems very, very quickly and very, very iteratively that allows us to move quickly,” he said. “So yes, we are absolutely in a competition with China. It has very serious national security implications. And we’re certain that we’re going to position ourselves to win.”_

    Williams said that rapid advances in drone warfare, missile technology and AI are changing the nature of warfare in real time, making it critical for the U.S. to deploy new tools faster than its adversaries. The Genesis initiative, he told Fox News Digital, is intended to position America at the forefront of that effort.

    The Manhattan Project factory at Clinton Engineer Works in Tennessee produced atomic bombs used against Japan during World War II.(Getty Images)

    “We’re in a period of unprecedented change in technology. In fact, just in the last five years, I think we’d all agree that the nature of warfare is changing in front of us,” Williams told Fox News Digital. “Because of all of this technological revolution that we’re facing, it’s as important as it ever has been that we use all the tools available to keep America out front. We’ve enjoyed an unprecedented 40 years of superiority from our conventional forces, really since the first Gulf War.”

    “But because warfare is changing, we have to change with it and artificial intelligence is one of the most important tools to keep us ahead,” he added.

    Williams told Fox News Digital that AI advancements are not about replacing workers, but making them more productive. He argued that artificial intelligence can help compress design and manufacturing timelines from 10 to 15 years down to five years or less, allowing the same scientists, engineers and technicians to develop new capabilities faster and more efficiently while helping the U.S. stay ahead of its competitors.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “Aires Tide allowed us to bring so many disciplines together of material science, of design, of being able to iterate very quick,” Williams said. “Quickly and to optimize our whole process. And it just gave us tremendous confidence that we’re going to meet the challenges that, frankly, our adversaries put in front of us and that we are going to be able to use these tools to succeed and to keep America safe.”_

    Danielle Wallace is a Breaking News Editor for Fox News Digital, serving as a critical newsroom playmaker at the intersection of major historic political events and the age of AI.

    Story tips can be sent to danielle.wallace@fox.com and on X: @danimwallace.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2