US Supreme Court turns away free speech claim by anti-abortion student

2026-06-15T13:45:30.587Z / https://www.reuters.com/world/us-supreme-court-turns-away-free-speech-claim-by-anti-abortion-student-group-2026-06-15/

A banner is seen during a protest to ban the abortion pill, outside the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in Washington, D.C., U.S., January 22, 2026. REUTERS/Aaron Schwartz/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

WASHINGTON, June 15 (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a former high school student’s free-speech challenge to an Indiana public school ​district’s policy that barred her from displaying a flyer with an anti-abortion message on school walls.

The justices turned away the former ‌student’s appeal of a lower court’s decision that the Noblesville Schools district’s policy did not violate the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment protections against government abridgment of freedom of speech.

The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

The former student, who has since graduated, is known in court papers as “E.D.” due to her status as a minor when her parents Michael and Lisa Duell filed the 2021 ​lawsuit against the school district, which is located outside Indianapolis.

The dispute arose in connection with an anti-abortion student club called Noblesville Students for ​Life, a local chapter of Students for Life of America, that E.D. formed during her freshman year at Noblesville ⁠High School.

The school approved the formation of the group and permitted the girl to advertise it at an activities fair during which she displayed a ​table-top poster with the group’s mission statement and a sign that stated, “I am the pro-life generation.” She also wore a shirt bearing the same slogan.

But the ​school prevented her from hanging on school walls flyers that included photographs of students in front of the Supreme Court building in Washington carrying signs that read, “I Reject Abortion,” “Defund Planned Parenthood,” “I Am the Pro-Life Generation,” and other similar messages.

The school has said its policy “categorically prohibited political content in flyers posted on its walls.”

A school official told the girl ​that student group flyers appearing on school walls should contain only the club’s name and the location, time and date of its meeting, but not ​photographs of signage, according to court papers.

According to court papers filed by the school, the girl and her mother then sought approval for the same flyer from a ‌different school ⁠administrator. The mother’s involvement fueled concerns among school officials that the group was not truly student-led, prompting the club’s suspension for the rest of the semester, the school’s court papers said.

The former student filed a lawsuit in response to the denial of her proposed flyers and her club’s revocation. She said in court papers that an administrator expressed concerns about the political nature of flyers, especially the “Defund Planned Parenthood” signage.

The girl is represented by the Alliance Defending ​Freedom, a conservative legal group that has ​brought other cases on behalf ⁠of anti-abortion plaintiffs.

The dispute implicates a 1988 Supreme Court ruling in a case from Missouri called Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier. In that case, the court ruled that schools may restrict student speech in channels that are not deemed “public ​forums” or where the speech at issue is inconsistent with the school’s educational mission.

An Indianapolis-based federal judge in ​2024 sided with ⁠Noblesville Schools, finding the district was authorized to regulate the content of student flyers displayed on school walls. The Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed in 2025, prompting the girl’s appeal to the Supreme Court.

Conservative Justice Samuel Alito dissented from the court’s decision denying the appeal, writing that the justices should have ⁠used the ​opportunity to revisit the 1988 decision in the Hazelwood case.

John Bursch, a lawyer at the Alliance ​Defending Freedom, said his group supports Alito’s view.

“We agree with Justice Alito’s dissent that the court should have granted the petition to clarify the line between government and student speech,” Bursch ​said. “Public-school officials should not be in the business of censoring student speech that takes place outside the school’s curriculum.”

Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

克宫：特朗普告诉普京 愿协助结束俄乌战争

2026年6月15日 20:01 / 联合早报

AI摘要

• 特朗普与普京通话55分钟，重申愿协助结束俄乌战争，并计划在G7峰会推动相关会谈。
• 克宫称特朗普特使威特科夫及库什纳将再访俄罗斯；普京称乌方加大袭击不会改变战局。
• 泽连斯基称与特朗普通话良好，双方同意在G7峰会深入讨论和平措施。
• 通话后俄对乌多城发动袭击，致至少11死；乌亦袭击俄南部城市致3死。
• 基辅洞窟修道院遭袭起火，乌指俄犯下文化罪行，俄否认并称系乌防空导弹故障所致。

本摘要由AI辅助生成，仅供参考

位于乌克兰首都基辅的东正教建筑群基辅洞窟修道院遭遇袭击，其中的圣母升天大教堂陷入火海。 （路透社）

（莫斯科/基辅综合电）俄罗斯总统普京和乌克兰总统泽连斯基星期天分别致电美国总统特朗普，祝贺他80岁生日。克里姆林宫称，特朗普在与普京通话中重申，结束俄乌战争至关重要，并愿意为推动这一进程提供帮助。

克宫外交政策顾问乌沙科夫星期天（6月14日）告诉记者，普京和特朗普通话55分钟。特朗普再次强调，俄乌停止敌对行动至关重要，并表示准备与欧洲伙伴和基辅方面共同采取行动，包括在七国集团（G7）峰会上展开相关会谈。G7峰会星期一（15日）起在法国埃维昂举行。

乌沙科夫也透露，领导美国斡旋工作的特使威特科夫以及特朗普的女婿库什纳即将再次访问俄罗斯。他引述特朗普说，迅速解决俄乌冲突将“为美俄关系开启新的前景”。

他说，普京告诉特朗普，乌克兰加大对俄目标的打击力度，并不会改变战场局势。普京在通话中提到，“在埃维昂，欧洲人和泽连斯基会试图把一切都描绘成截然相反的局面，并提出旨在拖延冲突、延续敌对行动的方案”。

泽连斯基早前曾说，战场上的局势正朝着有利于乌克兰的方向发展，为达成和平协议打开一扇机会之窗。

就在克宫宣布普京与特朗普通话之前，泽连斯基也在社交媒体上说，他与特朗普进行了一次“很好的通话”。他祝贺特朗普生日快乐，两人还谈及外交问题。

泽连斯基说：“我们讨论了有助于实现和平的措施，我向总统通报战场上的最新进展以及乌军阵地巩固的情况。我们一致同意在G7峰会期间进行更深入的讨论。”泽连斯基和特朗普都预定出席星期二（16日）召开的一场G7工作会议。

基辅世界遗产遇袭烧毁

不过，在普京和特朗普通话数小时后，俄罗斯向乌克兰多个主要城市发动一系列导弹和无人机袭击，造成至少11人死亡；乌克兰也对莫斯科以南的一座城市发动袭击，造成三人死亡。

俄军被指袭击位于基辅市中心历史悠久的东正教建筑群基辅洞窟修道院（Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra），其中的圣母升天大教堂陷入火海。修道院建于1051年，被联合国教科文组织列为世界遗产。

泽连斯基随即呼吁G7领导人加大对莫斯科的施压力度。他在社媒平台X发文指，俄军对基辅洞窟修道院的袭击是俄方对基督教文化犯下的最严重罪行之一。

本届G7峰会东道主、法国总统马克龙也在推特发文，谴责俄方袭击修道院的行为毫无道理。他也说，法国将在G7峰会上继续努力促成俄乌停火。

俄罗斯则否认袭击修道院，称此次行动的目标是无人机制造厂。

俄国防部发表声明说：“根据已确认的报告，基辅洞窟修道院是遭一枚美国‘爱国者’防空导弹系统发射的导弹袭击。相关系统发生故障的原因之一，可能是西方国家向基辅政权提供了过期导弹。”

US Supreme Court won’t hear bid by suspended judge, 98, to keep her job

2026-06-15T13:52:55.417Z / Reuters

U.S. Circuit Judge Pauline Newman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit delivers remarks at a reception honoring her life and work at George Mason University during their annual Center for Intellectual Property x Innovation policy conference in Arlington, Virginia, U.S., October 12, 2023. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

• Summary

• Judge Pauline Newman seeks to undo suspension
• Newman says her constitutional rights were violated

WASHINGTON, June 15 (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a bid by the nation’s oldest federal ​judge, 98-year-old Pauline Newman, to overturn her suspension from duties in 2023 during an investigation into ‌her fitness to serve.

The justices turned away Newman’s appeal of a lower court’s decision to reject her legal challenge to her suspension from the Washington-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Newman had argued that the Federal Circuit violated her constitutional rights by suspending ​her and is seeking reinstatement.

The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

Newman, a respected figure in patent law, was appointed in 1984 by Republican President ​Ronald Reagan to the Federal Circuit. It handles patent appeals nationwide and frequently rules in ⁠intellectual property cases involving major companies.

A panel of Federal Circuit judges cited staff reports of Newman’s “memory loss, confusion, paranoia ​and angry rants” in documents released by the court in 2023. A council of all of the court’s active judges, led ​by Chief Judge Kimberly Moore, unanimously voted to suspend Newman later that year after finding that she refused to cooperate with an investigation into her fitness.

The Federal Circuit’s suspension of Newman remains in place.

Newman has maintained that she is fit to serve and sued Moore and the council in ​federal court in Washington. A judge dismissed Newman’s case in 2024 after finding that courts have “consistently affirmed the judiciary’s authority ​to police itself.”

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld that ruling in 2025.

The Committee on Judicial Conduct and ‌Disability of ⁠the Judicial Conference of the United States, part of the federal judiciary’s governing body, also has upheld Newman’s suspension.

Newman told the Supreme Court that the Federal Circuit overstepped its authority under the U.S. Constitution, and argued against the D.C. Circuit’s ruling that federal law barred court review of her suspension. Newman said the suspension violated her rights to due process and ​ran afoul of the constitutional ​provision giving Congress the power ⁠to remove federal judges through impeachment.

“Chief Judge Moore has invoked the Disability Act improperly to perpetually sideline Judge Newman until she gives in to the bullying and retires or ​takes senior status,” Newman said in a filing, referring to a 1980 law that empowers ​a circuit court’s ⁠judicial council to investigate misconduct or disability allegations against its judges.

Moore, represented by U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer, responded in a filing to the Supreme Court that Newman’s claims are without merit, and that the Judicial Conference, not a federal court, ⁠is responsible ​for reviewing her suspension.

Andrew Morris, an attorney at the conservative legal group ​New Civil Liberties Alliance that represents Newman, expressed disappointment that the justices “did not take this opportunity to protect judicial independence.”

“We will continue to pursue available ​avenues to vindicate Judge Newman against her stealth impeachment,” Morris said.

Reporting by Blake Brittain in Washington; Editing by Will Dunham

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Blake Brittain reports on intellectual property law, including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets, for Reuters Legal. He has previously written for Bloomberg Law and Thomson Reuters Practical Law and practiced as an attorney.

特朗普6月14日迎来80岁生日，他当晚在白宫门前观看综合格斗赛，并称这是庆祝独立250周年活动的一环。 （法新社）

美国总统特朗普宣布7月4日在华盛顿举办“迄今为止最盛大的特朗普集会”，主题为“致敬美国”，庆祝美国独立250周年。

特朗普星期一（6月15日）在社媒平台“真相社交”发贴说：“7月4日，在风景优美且安全的华盛顿特区，我们会在林肯纪念堂和华盛顿纪念碑前举办迄今为止最盛大的特朗普集会——‘致敬美国’。”

他说，这场集会定于美东时间当天晚上7时（新加坡时间7月5日早上7时）开始，旨在向美国人民、民族精神、国家力量和坚定决心，以及辉煌成就致敬。

特朗普5月底曾呼吁取消为独立250周年举行的音乐会，改由他亲自主持一场大型政治造势集会。这场音乐会邀请众多艺人，但多名艺人决定退出。

今年满80岁高龄的特朗普还在白宫门前举办综合格斗赛，并称这也是庆祝独立250周年活动的一环。

根据特朗普星期一的贴文，“致敬美国”集会将有300多名军乐队、管弦乐队和仪仗队成员表演爱国旋律和美国经典曲目，还会播放他“亲自挑选的歌单”。

他强调，这场集会将成为“有史以来最大规模、兼具军事音乐与仪仗表演阵容的集会”，而且“绝对不会让令人昏昏欲睡、满腹牢骚的人登台”。

届时也会有顶尖军事飞行人员和装备，呈现飞行表演和空中秀。

“我也会发表主旨演讲，绝对不容错过。”

特朗普6月14日迎来80岁生日，他当晚在白宫门前观看综合格斗赛，并称这是庆祝独立250周年活动的一环。 （法新社）

美国总统特朗普宣布7月4日在华盛顿举办“迄今为止最盛大的特朗普集会”，主题为“致敬美国”，庆祝美国独立250周年。

特朗普星期一（6月15日）在社媒平台“真相社交”发贴说：“7月4日，在风景优美且安全的华盛顿特区，我们会在林肯纪念堂和华盛顿纪念碑前举办迄今为止最盛大的特朗普集会——‘致敬美国’。”

他说，这场集会定于美东时间当天晚上7时（新加坡时间7月5日早上7时）开始，旨在向美国人民、民族精神、国家力量和坚定决心，以及辉煌成就致敬。

特朗普5月底曾呼吁取消为独立250周年举行的音乐会，改由他亲自主持一场大型政治造势集会。这场音乐会邀请众多艺人，但多名艺人决定退出。

今年满80岁高龄的特朗普还在白宫门前举办综合格斗赛，并称这也是庆祝独立250周年活动的一环。

根据特朗普星期一的贴文，“致敬美国”集会将有300多名军乐队、管弦乐队和仪仗队成员表演爱国旋律和美国经典曲目，还会播放他“亲自挑选的歌单”。

他强调，这场集会将成为“有史以来最大规模、兼具军事音乐与仪仗表演阵容的集会”，而且“绝对不会让令人昏昏欲睡、满腹牢骚的人登台”。

届时也会有顶尖军事飞行人员和装备，呈现飞行表演和空中秀。

“我也会发表主旨演讲，绝对不容错过。”

南非一周遣返超过2700多名外国人

2026年6月15日 21:06 / 联合早报

6月14日，非洲东南部的内陆国家马拉维派出七辆大巴到南非接收自愿遣返的移民。 （法新社）

（约翰内斯堡综合电）南非内政部长施赖伯说，在总统拉马福萨誓言对非法移民采取更强硬措施后，南非政府在一周内遣返了2745名外国人。

作为非洲最大的经济体之一，南非长期以来吸引非洲各地的移民工，包括非法移民。由于失业率超过30%，引发国内强烈的反移民排外情绪，近期南非各地爆发反移民示威，甚至有暴民上街威胁无居留证的外国人限期离境。

由于一些企业遭到抢劫，外国人成为袭击目标，安全形势日益严峻。尼日利亚、马拉维、加纳、津巴布韦和莫桑比克的公民为了安全考量，决定接受他们所属政府组织的自愿遣返。南非政府说，大多数自愿遣返的都是非法移民。

南非政府不仅针对非法移民，同时也开始对雇佣非法劳工的企业和雇主采取监禁等更严厉的惩处措施。根据统计，南非目前约有300万名外籍居民，占总人口的5.1%。

焚烧与英首相相关房产 乌克兰男子纵火罪成

2026年6月15日 21:10 / 联合早报

英国警方公布的监控录像显示，涉斯塔默房产纵火案的嫌犯拉夫里诺维奇去年5月11日登上一辆巴士。 （路透社）

一名乌克兰男子因受指使焚烧英国首相斯塔默的相关房产，被判定犯有纵火罪。

路透社报道，22岁的拉夫里诺维奇（Roman Lavrynovych）受代号为“钱佬”（El Money）的神秘人指使，去年在伦敦制造纵火案，焚烧与斯塔默有关联的房屋。

英国警方去年5月在短短五天内处理三起火灾。其中一起发生在伦敦北部一处与斯塔默有关的住宅；另一起发生在斯塔默曾居住过的附近房产；还有一起丰田汽车起火事件，车辆也曾属于斯塔默。

拉夫里诺维奇与27岁的罗马尼亚籍男子卡皮乌克（Stanislav Carpiuc）被判定犯有共谋纵火罪，两人定于星期五（6月19日）接受宣判。

陪审团获悉，拉夫里诺维奇曾通过“钱佬”的Telegram账号收到报酬，奉命实施纵火。这个账号用俄语和乌克兰语同他联系，但检方并未说明账号背后的可能人物或实体。

伦敦反恐警察负责人弗拉纳根说，没有证据表明俄罗斯是这次袭击的幕后主使。

U.K. announces plan to ban social media for children under 16

2026-06-15 09:16:00-0400 / CBS News

By Leigh Kiniry,

Emmet Lyons Producer
Emmet Lyons is a news desk editor at the CBS News London bureau, coordinating and producing stories for all CBS News platforms. Prior to joining CBS News, Emmet worked as a producer at CNN for four years.

Read Full Bio

Updated on: June 15, 2026 / 9:24 AM EDT / CBS News

Add CBS News on Google

London— The United Kingdom is the latest country to announce plans to ban children under 16 from using social media apps.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Monday that the U.K. would go even further than other nations, by also blocking children from accessing “harmful functions” such as livestreaming and the ability to communicate with strangers, and by extending the restrictions to gaming sites. He said the ban would protect children from content that is “designed to be addictive.”

The proposed law would bar children under 16 from platforms such as Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook and X, but the government said messaging services like WhatsApp would still be accessible.

People under 18 would also be banned from having artificial intelligence “romantic companions,” but the details of that restriction and how it might be implemented remained unclear.

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is seen during a news conference announcing plans to ban young teenagers from using social media, at 10 Downing Street in London, June 15, 2026. Jaimi Joy/Bloomberg/Getty

The legislation would put the onus on tech companies to ensure children aren’t using their platforms, and they could face huge fines for failing to comply. Starmer said he hoped to have the regulations passed by lawmakers by late December so the ban can come into force by the spring of 2027.

Australia banned under-16s from social media in December 2025 — the first country to impose such a measure. But around 70% of parents polled by Australia’s internet regulator in March said their children remained on the platforms, having found ways to bypass age-gating systems.

Starmer said he wasn’t deterred by such challenges.

“We don’t say: ‘Oh, look, a teenager managed to get a drink somehow, so let’s not bother banning drinks from children.’ That would be utterly ridiculous!”

Big tech companies are likely to fight the effort, and the U.S. Embassy in London published a notice about the proposed restrictions 10 days ago, voicing concern that age-gating would not work and calling for children to be protected in other ways while freedom of speech is preserved.

The embassy called parents “the first and best line of defense” for children.

A 14-year-old boy and a 15-year-old boy look at smartphones as the sun sets on June 1, 2026 in Cornwall, England. Anna Barclay/Getty

Starmer and his government note, however, that polling shows British parents overwhelmingly support a ban for under 16s.

In March, a Los Angeles jury ruled that Meta and YouTube were liable for creating products that led to harmful and addictive behavior by young users. The landmark decision in the U.S. could set a legal precedent for similar allegations brought against social media companies.

More than a dozen other countries, including France, Denmark and Malaysia, were already weighing up legislation to restrict children’s access to social media platforms before the U.K. announced its plans. Ireland is among those nations, but in one small town on the Emerald Isle, residents have already gone further on their own — much further.

Does a social media ban go far enough to protect kids?

Overlooking the Irish Sea just south of Dublin, Greystones is one of Ireland’s most affluent and scenic towns. Its coastal views, independent shops and tight-knit community have made it one of the most desirable places to live in the country.

In recent years, Greystones has also become known for something else: Raising children without smartphones.

At a local youth cafe last month, CBS News asked a room of 11- and 12-year-olds if they owned smartphones, and not a single hand went up.

“My mom probably won’t let me till I’m 22,” quipped a girl named Sienna, drawing giggles from her classmates.

“My Mum told me scientists did this brain scan,” chimed in a boy named Sam. “It’s the same brain as people — they’re thinking the same thing if they’re scrolling and drinking alcohol.”

Rachel Harper, a principal at St. Patrick’s National School, where our group of kids are students, said she noticed a worrying trend three years ago after children returned to in-person classes following the COVID-19 pandemic.

“I noticed an increase in anxiety levels in my school,” she told CBS News.

Harper organized a community-wide survey, drawing 800 responses from educators across the town. The results were striking, with 95% of teachers reporting heightened anxiety in their classrooms.

“We started looking at what were some of the reasons for the increase in anxiety levels,” she said. “The online world was definitely having an effect on the children.”

In response, Harper started “It Takes a Village,” a community initiative built around one central idea: Give kids their childhood back.

The first concrete step was a voluntary code, with parents pledging not to give their children smartphones until they reached middle school. Many parents said the collective commitment made all the difference.

“For me, it gave me the strength and the power I needed to say, ‘No, you’re not having this app, or I’m going to put that block on your phone,’” said Alex Dobbs, a mother of four who signed on early.

Many in the community said they understood that just removing something wasn’t enough, however. Game nights at the youth cafe were organized, and kids were given alternative methods of entertainment. Dobbs even let her children get pet lambs.

“Greystones has gotten that right,” she told CBS News. “As a parent, you’ve got to understand that you don’t just tell them ‘oh, don’t do this,’ you’ve got to give them something else. I’m not saying you have to have a lamb flock out the back. But it’s a great excuse to get out.”

Now in its third year, the It Takes a Village initiative has introduced a mentor program at St Patrick’s National School, with 15- and 16-year-old students coming into the middle school to teach younger kids how to navigate phones and the online world responsibly, when the time comes.

In the local high school, those older kids also have their phones locked away in pouches during the school day. The results have appeared significant, with teachers reporting students more focused during lessons and parents reporting their children are sleeping better.

The kids say they’ve noticed a difference, too.

“I’m talking to my friends more,” high schooler Anne told CBS News. “I’m not worried about the notifications I have.”

“I feel like you should just be playing outside,” said Alex, 12. “Just not being on social media or having your nose stuck in a screen.”

6月14日，非洲东南部的内陆国家马拉维派出七辆大巴到南非接收自愿遣返的移民。 （法新社）

（约翰内斯堡综合电）南非内政部长施赖伯说，在总统拉马福萨誓言对非法移民采取更强硬措施后，南非政府在一周内遣返了2745名外国人。

作为非洲最大的经济体之一，南非长期以来吸引非洲各地的移民工，包括非法移民。由于失业率超过30%，引发国内强烈的反移民排外情绪，近期南非各地爆发反移民示威，甚至有暴民上街威胁无居留证的外国人限期离境。

由于一些企业遭到抢劫，外国人成为袭击目标，安全形势日益严峻。尼日利亚、马拉维、加纳、津巴布韦和莫桑比克的公民为了安全考量，决定接受他们所属政府组织的自愿遣返。南非政府说，大多数自愿遣返的都是非法移民。

南非政府不仅针对非法移民，同时也开始对雇佣非法劳工的企业和雇主采取监禁等更严厉的惩处措施。根据统计，南非目前约有300万名外籍居民，占总人口的5.1%。

焚烧与英首相相关房产 乌克兰男子纵火罪成

2026年6月15日 21:10 / 联合早报

英国警方公布的监控录像显示，涉斯塔默房产纵火案的嫌犯拉夫里诺维奇去年5月11日登上一辆巴士。 （路透社）

一名乌克兰男子因受指使焚烧英国首相斯塔默的相关房产，被判定犯有纵火罪。

路透社报道，22岁的拉夫里诺维奇（Roman Lavrynovych）受代号为“钱佬”（El Money）的神秘人指使，去年在伦敦制造纵火案，焚烧与斯塔默有关联的房屋。

英国警方去年5月在短短五天内处理三起火灾。其中一起发生在伦敦北部一处与斯塔默有关的住宅；另一起发生在斯塔默曾居住过的附近房产；还有一起丰田汽车起火事件，车辆也曾属于斯塔默。

拉夫里诺维奇与27岁的罗马尼亚籍男子卡皮乌克（Stanislav Carpiuc）被判定犯有共谋纵火罪，两人定于星期五（6月19日）接受宣判。

陪审团获悉，拉夫里诺维奇曾通过“钱佬”的Telegram账号收到报酬，奉命实施纵火。这个账号用俄语和乌克兰语同他联系，但检方并未说明账号背后的可能人物或实体。

伦敦反恐警察负责人弗拉纳根说，没有证据表明俄罗斯是这次袭击的幕后主使。