分类: 未分类

  • 美国国防部发布更多不明飞行物相关档案,包含秘密军事项目文件


    2026年9月18日 / 美国东部时间上午11:21 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    作者:斯特凡·贝凯特 数字政治总编辑

    华盛顿讯——美国国防部周五发布了第六批不明异常现象(UAP,即UFO)相关档案,其中包含数十份文件,详细记录了一个委托开展曲速引擎、虫洞研究以及研究人员认为可能与遭遇未知飞行器有关的受伤事件的军事项目。

    此次周五发布的档案共计71份——其中67份来自国防部,4份来自科罗拉多州当地执法部门。档案包含55个PDF文件、15个视频文件和1个音频文件。71份档案中有64份包含打码删减内容。文件日期跨度从1952年至2025年。

    最新UFO档案中有哪些内容?

    最值得关注的文件涉及一个名为“先进航空武器系统应用项目”的秘密军事计划。美国国防情报局于2008年设立该项目,用于研究数十年后的各类航空威胁。该项目于2012年终止。

    其中一份文件描述了该项目的目标以及为其工作的承包商所需满足的要求:“未来威胁环境的一个方面涉及先进航空武器系统应用。本项目的目标是了解这些应用的物理和工程原理,以应对长期外国威胁,也就是从现在到2050年。主要关注点是能够打破当前技术发展趋势的突破性技术及其应用。”

    此次发布的档案包含37份由AAWSAP项目产生的“国防情报参考文件”(DIRDs),内容涉及曲速引擎、虫洞、反重力、负质量推进和隐形斗篷等主题。这37份文件多年来一直对外公开,包括通过国防情报局根据《信息自由法》发布的版本。但周五发布的版本补充了该机构此前 withheld的部分细节,例如制作这些文件的机构办公室名称。

    国防部在随附文件的说明中表示,这些DIRDs“最好被视为参考和综合成果,而非原创研究”,并且“不应被解读为暗示对所讨论概念的当前验证”。

    虽然大多数DIRDs探讨的通常属于科幻领域的概念,但其中一份2010年的38页高技术性研究报告分析了“异常先进航空系统对人类观察者造成意外伤害的证据”。

    研究人员描述称,“三名此前健康状况良好的现役人员经历了一场异常的、‘不符合其专业领域的不规则、不协调且不一致的’航空相关事件”,事后出现了一系列医疗症状,包括皮肤发热发红和脱发。其中一人出现“辐射病迹象”,“数年内出现了恶性病变迹象”。

    该文件未明确导致这些症状的接触源,但表示这三人是“天线工程师”。报告作者将这些案例与42起已公开、约300起未公开的常规射频伤害事件进行了对比,这些事件的辐射源均已明确。

    报告作者得出结论:“已有足够多的事件/事故得到准确报告,并获取了医疗数据,足以支持这样一种假设:某些先进系统已经部署,且美国尚未完全掌握其相关信息。”

    周五披露的大多数视频与此前发布的内容类似:由军用摄像机拍摄的模糊画面,显示不明物体高速掠过屏幕。其中一段2022年的不明事件视频显示,一个UAP“以80至180英里每小时的不同速度飞行”。

    随附的事件报告显示,操作人员在中东执行任务时,在未知高度发现了多个物体。机组人员报告称,这些物体尺寸在1至2米之间,“在目标区域内零散飞行”。

    另一段在中东上空拍摄的视频显示,大约六个物体编队飞行。报告称,这些是“六个小型球形物体”,“看起来机动性很强”,并且“频繁改变方向”。该事件仍未得到解释。

    其中四段视频来自科罗拉多州当地执法部门,他们将报告提交给了国防部负责调查UAP的办公室。国防部表示,这段部分模糊的画面于2023年10月由手机摄像头拍摄。

    军方在其中一段视频的随附说明中表示:“报案官员将该现象描述为‘无声’,并具有‘红、蓝、绿闪烁灯光’。”

    历史档案中包含一段时长一小时的 https://www.war.gov/UFO/#DOW-UAP-PR160-Presentation-by-Captain-Edward-J-Ruppelt-1952 以及空军军官爱德华·鲁佩尔特1952年的讲话文稿,他在其中解释了军方对UFO事件的调查。在这次发言中,鲁佩尔特透露,美国空军调查过的800起UFO报告中,约有20%仍未找到答案。

    “我们梳理了这些报告,发现大约20%的报告来自非常可靠的人士,内容详实……完全无法得出任何结论,”鲁佩尔特说道。

    鲁佩尔特后来主持了蓝皮书计划——一个1952年至1969年间由空军主导的UFO调查项目。周五的披露文件中还包含了几份与蓝皮书计划相关的其他档案。

    周一,美国国防部宣布设立一项法律豁免条款,允许此前受保密协议约束的现任和前任雇员向政府分享与UAP相关的信息。

    Pentagon releases more UFO files, including documents on secretive military program

    September 18, 2026 / 11:21 AM EDT / CBS News

    By Stefan Becket Managing Editor, Digital Politics

    Washington — The Pentagon on Friday released its sixth batch of files on unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UAP or UFOs, including dozens of documents detailing a military program that commissioned studies of warp drives, wormholes and injuries that researchers linked to possible encounters with unknown craft.

    Friday’s release includes a total of 71 files — 67 provided by the Defense Department and four from local law enforcement in Colorado. There are 55 PDF files, 15 video files and one audio file. Most of the files — 64 out of 71 — contain redactions. The dates of the documents range from 1952 to 2025.

    What’s in the latest UFO files?

    The most noteworthy documents deal with a secretive military initiative known as the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program. The Defense Intelligence Agency established the program in 2008 to study various aerospace threats decades into the future. The initiative ended in 2012.

    One document describes the goals of the program and requirements for contractors who would work on it: “One aspect of the future threat environment involves advanced aerospace weapon system applications. The objective of this program is to understand the physics and engineering of these applications as they apply to the foreign threat out to the far term, i.e., from now through the year 2050. Primary focus is on breakthrough technologies and applications that create discontinuities in currently evolving technology trends.”

    The release includes 37 “Defense Intelligence Reference Documents,” or DIRDs, produced under AAWSAP, dealing with topics like warp drives, wormholes, antigravity, negative mass propulsion and invisibility cloaking. All 37 have been publicly available for years, including through Freedom of Information Act releases by the DIA. But Friday’s versions include some details the agency had previously withheld, like the names of the agency offices that produced the documents.

    In notes accompanying the documents, the Pentagon says the DIRDs are “best understood as reference and synthesis products rather than as original research” and that they “should not be read as implying current validation of the concepts discussed.”

    While most of the DIRDs examine ideas that are typically the domain of science fiction, one is a 38-page highly technical study from 2010 analyzing “evidence of unintended injury to human observers by anomalous advanced aerospace systems.”

    Researchers recounted that “three previous fit and active individuals experienced an anomalous [‘irregular, incongruous and inconsistent with their domain’] aerospace-related event” and suffered a range of medical symptoms in the aftermath, including heat and redness on their skin and hair loss. One of the individuals showed “signs of radiation illness” and “over several years developed signs of malignant transformations.”

    The document did not identify the source of the exposure that led to the symptoms, but said the three individuals were “antennae engineers.” The author compared the cases to 42 published and roughly 300 unpublished incidents of conventional radiofrequency injury where the source of the radiation was known.

    “Sufficient incidents/accidents have been accurately reported, and medical data acquired, as to support a hypothesis that some advanced systems are already deployed, and opaque to full US understanding,” the author found.

    Most of the videos in Friday’s disclosure are similar to those from previous releases: grainy footage captured by military cameras of unexplained objects zooming across the screen at high speed. One unexplained incident from 2022 shows a UAP “traveling at various speeds between 80-180 miles per hour.”

    An accompanying report on the encounter shows operators were flying a mission in the Middle East when they spotted various objects at unknown altitudes. The crew reported that the objects were between 1 and 2 meters in size and were “flying spora[d]ically within the target area.”

    Another video captured over the Middle East shows roughly half a dozen objects flying in tandem. The report says there were “six small spherical objects” that “seemed to be agile” and were “frequently changing direction.” The incident remains unexplained.

    Four of the videos originated from local law enforcement in Colorado who submitted reports to the Pentagon’s office that investigates UAP. The Pentagon said the partially blurred footage was captured by cellphone cameras in October 2023.

    “The reporting officer described the phenomenon as ‘silent’ and as featuring ‘red, blue, and green flashing lights,’” the military said in notes accompanying one of the clips.

    The historical files include an hour-long https://www.war.gov/UFO/#DOW-UAP-PR160-Presentation-by-Captain-Edward-J-Ruppelt-1952 and transcript of remarks by Air Force officer Edward Ruppelt from 1952 in which he explains the service’s investigation into UFO incidents. In the presentation, Ruppelt revealed that roughly 20% of the 800 UFO reports the Air Force had investigated were still a mystery.

    “We’ve gone through these reports and come up with the fact that about 20% are very good reports offered by very reliable people and … just absolutely no conclusions can be drawn,” Ruppelt said.

    Ruppelt would go on to run Project Blue Book, an Air Force program that investigated UFOs from 1952 to 1969. Several other files related to Project Blue Book were also included in Friday’s disclosure.

    On Monday, the Pentagon announced the creation of a legal waiver that would allow current and former employees previously bound by nondisclosure agreements to share UAP-related information with the government.

  • 美国人会因高油价指责特朗普总统吗?


    2026年9月18日 美国东部时间上午9:58 / CNN

    美国人会因高油价指责特朗普总统吗?

    CNN《新闻中心》主播约翰·伯曼与CNN首席数据分析师哈里·恩滕分析了民调数据,结果显示美国民众对特朗普总统在油价问题上的不支持率创下了美国总统任职期间的最高纪录。他们还分析了哪些收入群体受高油价影响最严重,以及这对中期选举意味着什么——目前预测市场预计民主党将拿下参议院多数席位。

    3分37秒 • 来源:CNN

    Do Americans blame President Trump for high gas prices?

    2026-09-18 9:58 AM EDT / CNN

    Do Americans blame President Trump for high gas prices?

    CNN News Central anchor John Berman and CNN Chief Data Analyst Harry Enten break down polling that shows President Trump’s disapproval on gas prices is the highest ever recorded for a U.S. president. They break down which income groups are the most impacted by high gas prices and what it means for the midterms, as prediction markets now expect a Democratic takeover of the Senate.

    3:37 • Source: CNN

  • 新闻


    你提供的内容是中文新闻,并非英文新闻,无法按照要求进行英译中翻译。请你提供需要翻译的英文原文内容,我会为你完成精准翻译。

    尼日利亚疑发生大规模酒精中毒 近50人死亡

    2026年9月18日 23:21 / 联合早报

    尼日利亚部分地区广泛饮用价格低廉的自酿酒,近期疑似甲醇中毒事件已造成至少49人死亡。 (Pixabay/示意图)

    尼日利亚西南部发生疑似酒精中毒事件,已造成至少49人死亡,另有180多人住院治疗。

    路透社报道,这起突发卫生事件最早于9月5日报告,当局当时称,翁多州(Ondo)有29人在饮用同一款酒后的一周内死亡。

    翁多州卫生官员星期五(18日)说,死亡人数现已增至49人。

    州当局怀疑,这些受害者因饮用一种名为“猴尾”(Monkey Tail)的自酿杜松子酒而发生甲醇中毒。中毒者早前在奥迪格博区(Odigbo district)参加传统仪式时,饮下了当地生产的这款酒。

    报道称,这类酒精饮料价格低廉且易获取,在尼日利亚部分地区广泛饮用。警方说,已逮捕一名涉案嫌疑人。

  • 美国政府网站使用中国AI模型惹争议


    2026年9月18日 19:36 / 联合早报

    由美国国家档案馆运营的《联邦公报》网站,星期三(9月16日)被发现使用中国企业阿里巴巴开发的人工智能(AI)模型通义千问(Qwen)。 (路透社)

    (华盛顿路透电)美国联邦调查局刚在上周,指控中国企业阿里巴巴抄袭美国Anthropic的人工智能(AI)模型。如今,美国联邦政府旗下网站却被爆出采用阿里巴巴的AI模型通义千问,供用户搜索拟议中的联邦法规。

    由美国国家档案馆运营的《联邦公报》网站,星期三(9月16日)被发现使用通义千问(Qwen)。目前尚不清楚这个搜索工具是在什么时候上线,但在社交媒体上出现相关贴文后,搜索工具已在当天下架。

    联邦调查局上周指控包括阿里巴巴在内的中国科技公司以“工业规模的蒸馏手法”,恶意抄袭美国AI模型,以开发自身的AI工具。

    AI专家指出,在《联邦公报》网站使用中国AI工具未必构成国家安全风险,因为通义千问是一种开放权重模型,可在企业自身的信息技术基础设施上运行,使机构能够更好地控制原本可能与外部服务提供商共享的敏感数据。不过,这起事件仍引发外界质疑:联邦政府有关中国AI模型的表态是否存在自相矛盾之处。

    美国非营利组织信息技术与创新基金会主席卡斯特罗认为,中美两国在构建更先进AI模型方面展开激烈的竞争,而美国某机构却选择使用中国制造的AI模型,两者之间存在矛盾。他说:“这是我见过最荒谬的事情之一。”

    美国联邦众议院中国问题特别委员会的共和党籍主席穆勒纳尔说:“所有联邦政府实体都不应使用中国AI模型。这么做只会让联邦政府更加依赖中国AI模型,而这并不符合国家利益。”

    乔治城大学法学院教授钱德说,使用通义千问似乎并未构成迫在眉睫的网络安全风险,尽管这取决于该模型的训练方式。由于《联邦公报》网站的内容本就是公开的,因此该模型并未处理敏感的政府信息。

    美国弗吉尼亚州民主党议员、参议院情报委员会副主席沃纳在一份声明中指出,风险取决于美国数据是否已离开政府的安全边界,并由阿里巴巴控制的系统进行处理。

    美国国家档案馆和白宫均未回应上述报道,联邦调查局则拒绝置评。中国驻华府大使馆发言人反驳联邦调查局上周的AI抄袭指控,称相关指控毫无依据。

    美国政府网站使用中国AI模型惹争议

    2026年9月18日 19:36 / 联合早报

    由美国国家档案馆运营的《联邦公报》网站,星期三(9月16日)被发现使用中国企业阿里巴巴开发的人工智能(AI)模型通义千问(Qwen)。 (路透社)

    (华盛顿路透电)美国联邦调查局刚在上周,指控中国企业阿里巴巴抄袭美国Anthropic的人工智能(AI)模型。如今,美国联邦政府旗下网站却被爆出采用阿里巴巴的AI模型通义千问,供用户搜索拟议中的联邦法规。

    由美国国家档案馆运营的《联邦公报》网站,星期三(9月16日)被发现使用通义千问(Qwen)。目前尚不清楚这个搜索工具是在什么时候上线,但在社交媒体上出现相关贴文后,搜索工具已在当天下架。

    联邦调查局上周指控包括阿里巴巴在内的中国科技公司以“工业规模的蒸馏手法”,恶意抄袭美国AI模型,以开发自身的AI工具。

    AI专家指出,在《联邦公报》网站使用中国AI工具未必构成国家安全风险,因为通义千问是一种开放权重模型,可在企业自身的信息技术基础设施上运行,使机构能够更好地控制原本可能与外部服务提供商共享的敏感数据。不过,这起事件仍引发外界质疑:联邦政府有关中国AI模型的表态是否存在自相矛盾之处。

    美国非营利组织信息技术与创新基金会主席卡斯特罗认为,中美两国在构建更先进AI模型方面展开激烈的竞争,而美国某机构却选择使用中国制造的AI模型,两者之间存在矛盾。他说:“这是我见过最荒谬的事情之一。”

    美国联邦众议院中国问题特别委员会的共和党籍主席穆勒纳尔说:“所有联邦政府实体都不应使用中国AI模型。这么做只会让联邦政府更加依赖中国AI模型,而这并不符合国家利益。”

    乔治城大学法学院教授钱德说,使用通义千问似乎并未构成迫在眉睫的网络安全风险,尽管这取决于该模型的训练方式。由于《联邦公报》网站的内容本就是公开的,因此该模型并未处理敏感的政府信息。

    美国弗吉尼亚州民主党议员、参议院情报委员会副主席沃纳在一份声明中指出,风险取决于美国数据是否已离开政府的安全边界,并由阿里巴巴控制的系统进行处理。

    美国国家档案馆和白宫均未回应上述报道,联邦调查局则拒绝置评。中国驻华府大使馆发言人反驳联邦调查局上周的AI抄袭指控,称相关指控毫无依据。

  • 特朗普俄克拉荷马州铝冶炼厂项目后续如何发展


    2026-09-18T10:04:08.96Z / reuters.com

    9月18日(路透社)——美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在俄克拉荷马州建设大型铝冶炼厂的目标在8月底跨过了一道重大关卡:在一场异常激烈的初选中,共和党州长候选人获得提名,而该候选人支持这项建厂计划。

    目前,该项目必须克服来自伊诺拉这个小型乡村社区的强烈反对。当地许多居民正致力于阻止阿联酋全球铝业公司(EGA)和世纪铝业(Century Aluminum)
    (CENX.O)
    投资40亿美元建设这座冶炼厂的计划。

    由专栏作家罗恩·布索撰写的路透社《能源动态》新闻简报将为您提供全球能源行业的所有关键资讯。点击此处订阅

    伊诺拉官员于6月实施的冶炼厂许可暂停令原定于9月28日到期,但市议会在9月14日全票通过将该禁令延长至2027年4月,并将就是否建设该冶炼厂举行全民公投。

    此前多年,市政府官员一直支持该项目,直到今年早些时候才转而反对。

    铝是交通运输、国防、航空航天和电力基础设施不可或缺的材料,但美国目前约60%的原铝依赖进口。

    下面我们来梳理一下这个将成为西半球最大关键矿产供应基地、也是自1980年以来美国首座新建铝冶炼厂的项目的后续进展。

    州长竞选为何围绕冶炼厂展开争议?

    这座计划年产能75万吨铝的冶炼厂,成为俄克拉荷马州州长竞选辩论中的核心议题。

    该州总检察长根特纳·德拉蒙德曾参与共和党州长提名竞选,他以环境担忧为由反对该项目,并于6月在州法院提起诉讼,试图阻止项目推进。

    德拉蒙德的对手、前州参议员迈克·马泽伊此前一直反对该项目,直到今年5月特朗普公开支持他的当天才改变立场。

    在6月初选时,德拉蒙德和马泽伊均未获得50%的选票,因此双方在8月25日进行了决选,马泽伊以不到1个百分点的优势、约2000票的差距获胜。

    决选数日前,特朗普在社交媒体帖子中表示,如果这座冶炼厂无法落户俄克拉荷马州,“还有20个其他地区热切希望承接这个项目”。

    德拉蒙德的诉讼目前进展如何?

    阿联酋全球铝业和世纪铝业以铝对美国国家安全的重要性为由,试图将德拉蒙德的诉讼移交联邦法院审理。

    美国司法部发表声明支持该项目并反对移送诉讼,称其“致力于支持军事战备,反对破坏国会制定的环境监管程序的诉讼”。

    但本月早些时候,一名联邦法官批准了德拉蒙德的请求,将案件留在州法院继续审理。

    当地官员对该项目持何态度?

    伊诺拉市议会在6月举行的激烈公开听证会过后投票实施了许可暂停令。会上有居民提议将冶炼厂建在特朗普位于佛罗里达州的私人会员俱乐部海湖庄园。

    此次暂停令已于本周早些时候延长至2027年4月7日,届时将就是否建设冶炼厂举行全民公投。

    市议会拥有管辖权,因为冶炼厂选址在伊诺拉港工业园区,该园区是塔尔萨-罗杰斯县港务局于2019年在该地块收购超过2000英亩(809公顷)土地后开发的。

    即将卸任的州长凯文·斯蒂特表示,如果伊诺拉市议会继续反对该冶炼厂项目,港务局可以将工业园区迁至城市边界之外,这样就能将冶炼厂移出市议会的管辖范围。

    “港务局当初选择落户城市范围内,他们也可以选择离开,”斯蒂特告诉路透社。

    目前尚不清楚斯蒂特将如何实现这一目标,因为州法律要求此类搬迁需获得地方政府批准。市议会官员未回应置评请求。

    涉事企业对此有何表态?

    总部位于阿布扎比的阿联酋全球铝业和总部位于芝加哥的世纪铝业表示,对暂停令延长感到失望,并认为在诉讼程序尚未完结的情况下就举行全民公投为时过早。

    “在上诉程序完成前就启动投票,会破坏基本的正当法律程序,并让伊诺拉纳税人面临重大的财务和法律风险,”两家企业在一份声明中说道。

    两家企业本月在一份监管申报文件中表示,他们计划将拟建冶炼厂的氟化物排放量减少37%。他们还称将在几周内发布一份经济影响研究报告。

    “社区信任、透明度和负责任的开发仍是我们工作的核心原则,”该项目工程团队的齐亚德·法里斯说道。

    What’s next for Trump’s aluminum smelter project in Oklahoma

    2026-09-18T10:04:08.96Z / reuters.com

    Sept 18 (Reuters) – US President Donald Trump’s goal of building a large aluminum smelter in Oklahoma passed a major hurdle in late August when Republican voters nominated a ​candidate for governor who supports its construction after an unusually tough primary battle.

    The project must now overcome significant opposition in the small rural community of ‌Inola, where many residents are working to block plans by Emirates Global Aluminium and Century Aluminum

    (CENX.O)
    to build the $4 billion smelter.

    The Reuters Power Up newsletter by columnist Ron Bousso provides everything you need to know about the global energy industry. Sign up here.

    A moratorium on smelter permits — which Inola officials imposed in June — was set to expire on September 28, but the city council voted unanimously on September 14 to extend it through April 2027 and to hold a referendum on whether it should be built.

    City officials had supported the project for ​years before turning against it earlier this year.

    Aluminum is essential to transportation, defense, aerospace and electrical infrastructure, but the US imports roughly 60% of the primary aluminum ​it uses.

    Here’s a look at what’s next for the project, which would be the Western Hemisphere’s largest source of the critical mineral and ⁠the first aluminum smelter built in the US since 1980.

    WHY IS THE SMELTER AN ISSUE IN THE GOVERNOR’S RACE?

    The proposed smelter, which would produce 750,000 metric tons per year ​of aluminum, emerged as a key issue in the contentious race for Oklahoma governor.

    Gentner Drummond, the state’s attorney general who ran for the Republican nomination for governor, opposes the project over ​environmental concerns and filed a lawsuit in June in state court seeking to block it.

    Drummond’s opponent, former state Senator Mike Mazzei, had opposed the project until the day Trump endorsed him in May.

    Neither Drummond nor Mazzei garnered 50% of the vote in a June primary. That forced an August 25 runoff that Mazzei won by less than a percentage point, roughly 2,000 votes.

    Days ahead of the runoff, Trump said in ​a

    social media post
    that there were “20 other sites that would love to have” the smelter if it were not built in Oklahoma.

    WHAT IS THE STATUS OF DRUMMOND’S LAWSUIT?

    EGA and ​Century Aluminum tried to move Drummond’s lawsuit to federal court, citing aluminum’s importance to US national security.

    The US Justice Department commented in support of the project and against the lawsuit, saying it is “committed to ‌supporting military ⁠readiness and opposing litigation that subverts environmental regulatory processes established by Congress.”

    Earlier this month, though, a federal judge granted Drummond’s request to have the suit remain in state court, where the case is continuing.

    WHAT DO LOCAL OFFICIALS SAY ABOUT THE PROJECT?

    The Inola City Council voted in June for the moratorium after a contentious public hearing in which some residents suggested the smelter should be built at Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s private Florida members’ club.

    That moratorium was extended earlier this week through April 7, 2027, when a referendum will be held on whether the smelter ​should be built.

    The council has jurisdiction because ​the smelter is being developed in Port ⁠of Inola industrial park, which was created after the Tulsa-Rogers County Port Authority bought more than 2,000 acres (809 hectares) at the site in 2019.

    Term-limited Governor Kevin Stitt said the industrial park could be moved outside city limits if the Inola council continues to oppose the smelter. ​That would remove the smelter from the council’s jurisdiction.

    “The port authority has chosen to be in the city limits, and they ​can choose to leave,” Stitt ⁠told Reuters.

    It is not immediately clear how Stitt could achieve that goal as state law requires local approval for such a move. City officials did not respond to requests for comment.

    WHAT ARE THE COMPANIES SAYING?

    Abu Dhabi-based EGA and Chicago-based Century Aluminum said they were disappointed by the moratorium extension and think putting the smelter up for a referendum is premature given the court case.

    “Moving ⁠forward with ​a vote before the appeals process undermines basic due process and exposes Inola taxpayers to significant financial and ​legal risk,” the companies said in a statement.

    Both companies said this month in a regulatory filing they now plan to reduce fluoride emissions from the proposed smelter by 37%. They also said they plan to release an ​economic impact study within weeks.

    “Community trust, transparency and responsible development remain central to our approach,” said Ziad Fares, a developer on the project’s engineering team.

  • 与特朗普有关联的“速成”政治行动委员会在俄亥俄州大举投放广告攻击布朗,这场参议院竞选耗资巨大


    2026-09-18T10:04:31.721Z / 路透社

    作者:唐·科佩基
    2026年9月18日 美国东部时间上午10:04 更新于36分钟前

    [1/2]美国参议员乔恩·赫斯特德(R-俄亥俄州)于2026年9月9日在美国得克萨斯州达拉斯举行的共和党全国中期会议上发言。路透社/杰西卡·科西耶尼亚克

    • 绝不回头政治行动委员会斥资670万美元在俄亥俄州投放广告
    • 联邦选举委员会记录显示,布朗筹款3860万美元,远超赫斯特德的1430万美元
    • 广告追踪机构AdImpact称,俄亥俄州竞选广告总支出达2.98亿美元

    纽约9月18日电(路透社)——过去一周,共和党团体已在俄亥俄州投入1400万美元用于广告宣传,以支持参议员乔恩·赫斯特德。近期民调显示,这位共和党候选人在这场可能影响美国参议院控制权的竞选中落后于民主党人谢罗德·布朗。

    此次广告支出激增由与美国总统唐纳德·特朗普、亿万富翁埃隆·马斯克、科赫政治网络以及参议院共和党领导层有关联的超级政治行动委员会推动,竞选活动将于11月3日举行。获胜者将完成J·D·万斯2025年就任副总统后空出的剩余两年任期。

    每日案卷新闻简报将最新法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱,开启您的清晨时光。点击此处订阅

    广告 · 继续向下滚动

    政治广告追踪机构AdImpact表示,赫斯特德与布朗的这场竞选目前已吸引2.98亿美元广告支出,超过本选举周期内任何其他参议院竞选,有望成为2026年中期选举中耗资最高的广告大战。

    尽管赫斯特德初期在民调中领先,但在最新民调中他已落后布朗3至5个百分点。根据联邦选举委员会记录,曾在2025年前连任三届美国参议员的布朗筹款规模也远超赫斯特德,共筹得3860万美元,而这位共和党候选人仅筹得1430万美元。

    这场竞选对两党都至关重要,因为尽管俄亥俄州在近期联邦选举中倾向共和党,但在全州范围内的竞选中仍竞争激烈。

    广告 · 继续向下滚动

    截至周三提交的联邦选举委员会文件显示,参议院领导基金及其他五个与共和党结盟的超级政治行动委员会——这些委员会可筹集无限额资金——贡献了过去一周1400万美元的广告投放总额。

    联邦选举委员会数据显示,与特朗普的MAGA Inc.超级政治行动委员会关系密切的“绝不回头政治行动委员会”在9月10日至11日期间,已在电视、数字媒体和直邮广告上投入670万美元,成为此次广告攻势的主力。据AdImpact统计,该委员会已在中期选举广告上花费超9200万美元,其中包括在俄亥俄州的1340万美元支出。

    该委员会以及马斯克的美国政治行动委员会和科赫公司支持的“繁荣美国行动”所投放的广告,围绕布朗在跨性别权利和银行救助问题上的立场攻击他,并试图将他描绘成与美国民主社会主义者结盟的人物。

    赫斯特德的发言人拒绝置评。布朗的竞选经理帕特里克·艾森豪尔表示,“大型企业和亿万富翁斥资数千万美元挽救乔恩·赫斯特德摇摇欲坠的竞选活动,这并不令人意外。”

    近期几周,共和党超级政治行动委员会在俄亥俄州针对布朗的每周广告支出已增至三倍。

    “速成”政治行动委员会

    部分最新加入广告投放的团体可能要到选举日前不久才会披露其捐赠者,但他们与特朗普支持者存在关联。追踪竞选资金的非营利组织“公开秘密”的研究主任布伦丹·格拉文将这些团体称为“速成”政治行动委员会,由于它们最近才完成注册,因此要到10月中旬才需要披露捐赠者身份。

    俄亥俄飞行者政治行动委员会和七叶树政治行动委员会这两个此类团体在过去一周合计花费超300万美元。这两个团体的财务主管均与2016年竞选期间由时任竞选经理保罗·马纳福特和亿万富翁共和党捐赠者汤姆·巴拉克创立的亲特朗普超级政治行动委员会相同。

    广告 · 继续向下滚动

    据AdImpact统计,2024年布朗与共和党人伯尼·莫雷诺之间的参议院竞选以4.86亿美元的广告支出创下非总统竞选活动的纪录。

    本报纽约记者唐·科佩基报道;迈克尔·利尔蒙特和辛西娅·奥斯特曼编辑

    我们的报道准则:路透社汤姆森信托原则。

    Trump-linked ‘pop-up’ PACs blitz Ohio with ads against Brown in costly Senate race

    2026-09-18T10:04:31.721Z / Reuters

    By Dawn Kopecki

    September 18, 2026 10:04 AM UTC Updated 36 mins ago

    [1/2]U.S. Senator Jon Husted (R-OH) speaks during the Republican National Midterm Convention in Dallas, Texas, U.S., September 9, 2026. REUTERS/Jessica Koscielniak

    • No Going Back PAC buys $6.7 million in Ohio advertising
    • Brown outraises Husted $38.6 million to $14.3 million, FEC records show
    • Ohio race ad spending reaches $298 million, AdImpact says

    NEW YORK, Sept 18 (Reuters) – Republican groups have poured $14 million into advertising in Ohio over the past week to ​bolster Senator Jon Husted, as recent polls show the Republican trailing Democrat Sherrod Brown in a race that could ‌help determine control of the US Senate.

    The spending surge is driven by super PACs linked to President Donald Trump, billionaire Elon Musk, the Koch political network and Senate Republican leadership ahead of the November 3 special election. The winner will serve out the remaining two years of the term vacated by ​JD Vance when he became vice president in 2025.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    AdImpact, a political advertising tracking firm, said the Husted-Brown contest has attracted $298 ​million in advertising spending so far, more than any other Senate race this cycle, and could become ⁠the costliest advertising battle of the 2026 midterms.

    Despite an early lead in polling, Husted now trails Brown by 3 to 5 ​percentage points in the most recent surveys. Brown, who served three terms in the US Senate until 2025, has also significantly outraised Husted, bringing ​in $38.6 million compared with the Republican’s $14.3 million, according to Federal Election Commission records.

    The race is crucial for both Republicans and Democrats because, while Ohio has leaned Republican in recent federal elections, it remains fiercely contested in statewide races.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    The Senate Leadership Fund and five other Republican-aligned super PACs, which can raise unlimited ​sums of money, accounted for the $14 million advertising blitz over the past week, Federal Election Commission filings through Wednesday showed.

    No Going ​Back PAC, a group closely tied to Trump’s MAGA Inc. super PAC, has led the advertising drive with $6.7 million on television, digital and mail ads ‌over ⁠September 10-11, according to FEC data. It has spent more than $92 million on midterm advertising, including $13.4 million in Ohio, according to AdImpact.

    Ads from that group as well as Musk’s America PAC and Americans for Prosperity Action, backed by Koch Inc., attacked Brown over issues such as his positions on transgender rights and bank bailouts and sought to portray him as aligned with the Democratic Socialists of America.

    A spokesperson for ​Husted declined to comment. Brown’s campaign ​manager Patrick Eisenhauer said it ⁠was “no surprise that giant corporations and billionaires are spending tens of millions of dollars to save Jon Husted’s flailing campaign.”

    The Republican super PACs have tripled their weekly spending against Brown in Ohio in recent weeks.

    ‘POP-UP’ ​PACS

    Some of the newest spenders may not disclose their donors until shortly before Election Day but ​have links to ⁠Trump supporters. Research Director Brendan Glavin of OpenSecrets, a nonprofit that tracks campaign finance, described them as “pop-up” PACs that, because of their recent registration dates, will not have to identify donors until mid-October.

    Two such groups, Ohio Flyer PAC and Buckeyes PAC, spent more than $3 million combined over ⁠the past ​week. Both share a treasurer with a pro-Trump super PAC in the 2016 ​campaign founded by then-campaign manager Paul Manafort and billionaire Republican donor Tom Barrack.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    The US Senate race between Brown and Republican Bernie Moreno in 2024 set a record ​for non-presidential contests with $486 million in advertising spending, according to AdImpact.

    Reporting by Dawn Kopecki in New York; Editing by Michael Learmonth and Cynthia Osterman

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 新闻


    请您提供需要翻译的英文新闻文章内容,我会按照要求为您完成精准的简体中文翻译。

    No English content available

  • 多年来国会未能监管人工智能——几乎没有迹象表明情况正在改变


    2026-09-18T08:00:29.300Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/18/politics/congress-ai-inaction

    2024年12月,一个研究人工智能潜在风险的两党国会专项工作组发布了85项建议,供议员们就该问题采取行动。该工作组的关键人物、共和党众议员杰伊·奥博诺尔特曾要求共和党领导层更进一步,成立一个专门委员会来起草立法。

    但近两年后,仍没有真正的法律来遏制人工智能的快速发展,而特朗普政府已明确表示无意进行监管。奥博诺尔特告诉美国有线电视新闻网(CNN),他甚至无法让自己提出的专门委员会获得共和党领导层的批准。据一位消息人士透露,领导层认为该专项工作组已经完成了既定目标,现有的委员会可以根据其建议开展工作。

    “我认为采取行动的需求十分紧迫,”奥博诺尔特在一次采访中表示,“过去一年半以来我们一直在强调这一点。”

    这一事件典型地反映出人工智能如何困扰着美国议员:这个问题的复杂性与国会强烈的党派分歧和复杂的官僚体制直接碰撞。两党已提出多项法案,包括一项要求最强大的人工智能公司为其技术开发“终止开关”的提案,以及一项为所有人工智能模型建立保障措施的立法。

    许多提案甚至从未提交全院表决,困在委员会的泥潭之中。议员们公开谈论他们中的一些年长同僚并不理解这项技术,并对议员们能否有效就此立法表示怀疑。

    “如果人们把解决世界问题的所有希望都寄托在政府和国会身上,我认为他们会极度失望,”曾在现已解散的人工智能专项工作组任职的共和党众议员埃里克·伯利森告诉CNN。

    近几周来,人工智能问题再次成为公众辩论的焦点:举报人和人工智能企业高管发出警报并呼吁监管,而美国总统唐纳德·特朗普、众议院议长迈克·约翰逊等人则警告称,放缓技术发展只会让中国在这场实质上的军备竞赛中获益。

    本周早些时候,众议院科学、空间与技术委员会成员与Hugging Face、Anthropic、OpenAI及其他第三方审计机构的代表举行了闭门会议,向议员们通报情况,该委员会领导层表示。据两位参会消息人士透露,代表们被问及是否需要监管,或是可以自我监管。他们表示,自己致力于设立保障措施,但无法信任行业内的所有企业都会这么做。

    参议院多数党领袖约翰·瑟恩呼吁采取“轻触式监管方式”。民主党人普遍倾向于更积极的姿态。

    “我担心,作为人类历史上最强大的技术,人工智能正与国会的功能失调发生碰撞,”与奥博诺尔特合作推进人工智能立法已有一年多的民主党众议员洛里·特拉汉告诉CNN。

    自2024年专项工作组发布报告以来,国会仅在人工智能监管的边缘采取了一些行动。一位资深共和党领导层助手表示,他们没有推进专门委员会的设立,因为领导层的普遍看法是,专项工作组已经完成了既定目标,现有拥有人工智能监管权限的常设委员会可以考虑工作组的建议。

    去年,特朗普签署了一项法案,将在网上分享未经同意的露骨图像——无论是实拍还是计算机生成的——定为非法,同时要求科技平台在接到通知后的48小时内删除此类图像。本周三,众议院以压倒性优势通过了一项法案,限制与人工智能数据中心快速扩张相关的公用事业账单上涨。

    但更具实质内容的法案均无进展。众议院科学、空间与技术委员会于6月通过了10项与人工智能相关的法案,但这些法案至今仍未提交全院表决。两党议员——包括瑟恩、民主党众议员艾米·克洛布查尔、共和党参议员乔希·霍利和民主党参议员理查德·布卢门撒尔——都提出了相关提案。与民主党核心小组一致的参议员伯尼·桑德斯近日也强烈警告了人工智能的风险。但在国会山,该问题尚无公认的牵头议员或专家。

    “告诉我,哪位国会议员会去教其他所有议员Anthropic是做什么的。得了吧。国会中有一半议员都70岁了。他们不用工作人员帮忙甚至都不知道怎么打开手机,”曾与奥博诺尔特一同在专项工作组任职的佐治亚州共和党众议员里奇·麦考密克告诉CNN。

    特朗普长期以来一直吹捧人工智能的好处,但其他共和党人在他就职前曾对过度监管持谨慎态度。据一位熟悉相关讨论的消息人士透露,众议院多数党领袖史蒂夫·斯卡利斯在2024年曾对专项工作组成员表示,他不希望看到严苛的监管扼杀人工智能的发展。斯卡利斯当时公开表示,他希望填补监管空白,但不要增加繁重的监管负担。

    一些支持监管的人士认为,人工智能行业领袖的警告为他们的事业提供了支持——尽管他们对最终能否取得进展仍持怀疑态度。

    “我的意思是,‘嘿,谢天谢地,欢迎加入这场讨论。’我很高兴所有人都开始意识到,这件事现在理应得到全国关注,”曾是专项工作组成员、共同发起多项人工智能立法的共和党众议员斯科特·富兰克林告诉CNN。“但我们为了让这些问题得到关注,已经在立法层面努力了很长时间。”

    共和党众议员凯特·卡马克的态度更为直接。

    “我们当然有能力做到这一点。我不知道的是是否存在政治意愿,”她告诉CNN。“我认为政治意愿并不存在,因为有些议员根本不理解这项技术。”

    但也有人表示仍持怀疑态度——包括对人工智能行业异常呼吁国会介入的态度。

    “我不会为你们收拾残局,”麦考密克告诉CNN。“为什么要由我来负责保障你们的安全?做好安全防护是企业的分内之事。你们应该自己设立保障措施。”

    与此同时,民主党人近几周加大了呼吁监管的力度,尤其是在前总统巴拉克·奥巴马呼吁其政党优先处理该问题之后。2024年专项工作组结束工作后,众议院民主党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯成立了自己的委员会。民主党普遍将该问题塑造为普通民众与精英阶层之间的博弈。

    “我认为,长期以来,大型科技公司和政治金钱一直在主导国会的议程,削弱了我们应对国家面临的每一项紧迫问题的能力。因此,我们不能依靠人工智能公司来主导这场监管,不能指望它们自我监管。这是联邦政府的职责。我们绝对必须应对这一时刻,”民主党众议员布里塔尼·佩特森表示。

    民主党人也表示,监管问题并不像一些共和党同僚所说的那么复杂。与中国的竞争力是一个问题,但在一个由人工智能主导的世界里,竞争力又有什么意义呢?诚然,有些议员年事已高——但议员们也不必成为他们所支持的每一项法案的相关领域专家。

    “如果按照这个标准,那么国会永远无法监管航空、医药或能源行业,”曾在两党专项工作组中担任民主党最高职位的民主党众议员泰德·刘表示。他所在的党派在少数党地位,即便没有共和党同僚配合,也仍在继续推进相关工作。“有各种常识性的监管措施,国会可以通过,也应该通过,并不需要任何人成为计算机科学专业人士才能理解这些法案的内容。”

    一个两党议员团体已呼吁约翰逊让众议院继续开会,以便议员们能够就人工智能改革进行谈判。但这并未实现:约翰逊决定将众议院休会时间提前一天,议员们要到11月中期选举后才会返回。

    但一些人表示,这并不是放弃的理由。呼吁约翰逊让众议院继续开会的议员之一、民主党众议员唐·贝耶尔本周早些时候安慰了两位选民,他们有一个四年级的女儿,担心如果人工智能的威胁成真,女儿将没有未来。

    “我对他们说:我认为时间还有的是。”

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/16/politics/video/capitol-hill-lawmakers-ai-congress-vrtc

    Congress has failed to regulate AI for years – and there’s little sign that’s changing

    2026-09-18T08:00:29.300Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/18/politics/congress-ai-inaction

    In December 2024, a bipartisan congressional task force studying the possible perils of artificial intelligence issued 85 recommendations for how lawmakers could act on the issue. GOP Rep. Jay Obernolte, a key figure on the task force, asked Republican leaders to go even further, establishing a special committee to draft legislation.

    But almost two years later, there are no real laws to rein in the rapid advancement of AI, and the Trump administration has made clear it has no appetite for regulation. Obernolte told CNN he couldn’t even get his special committee approved by GOP leaders, who a source said felt the task force had accomplished what it set out to do and that existing committees could work from its recommendations.

    “I think the need for action is urgent,” Obernolte said in an interview. “We have been saying this for the last year and a half.”

    The episode is emblematic of how AI has vexed US lawmakers, the complicated nature of the issue colliding head on with the intense partisanship and convoluted bureaucracy of Congress. Multiple bipartisan bills have been introduced, including a proposal to require the most powerful AI companies develop a kill switch for their technology and legislation to establish safeguards for all AI models.

    Many proposals have never even made it to the floor for a vote, waylaid in a morass of committees. Lawmakers openly talk about how some of their older colleagues don’t understand the technology – and express open skepticism about their ability to effectively legislate it.

    “If people put all of their hopes in government and Congress to solve the problems in the world, I think that they will be woefully disappointed,” GOP Rep. Eric Burlison, who served on the now-disbanded AI task force, told CNN.

    The issue of AI has once again risen to the center of public debate in recent weeks, with whistleblower and AI executives raising alarm bills and pleading for regulation, while President Donald Trump, House Speaker Mike Johnson and others warn that slowing down development of the technology will only serve to benefit China in what effectively amounts to an arms race.

    Earlier this week, members of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology met with representatives of Hugging Face, Anthropic, Open AI and other third party auditors to brief lawmakers, leaders of the committee said. The representatives were asked if they need oversight or if they can self-police, and they said they were committed to instituting guardrails but they couldn’t trust that everyone in the industry would do the same, according to two sources in the meeting.

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune has called for “a light touch approach.” Democrats generally prefer a more aggressive posture.

    “I am worried about the most powerful technology in the history of our world, of humanity, being on a collision course with congressional dysfunction,” Democratic Rep. Lori Trahan, who has been working on AI legislation with Obernolte for over a year, told CNN.

    Since the 2024 task force report, Congress has taken only steps around the margins of AI. A senior GOP leadership aide said they did not proceed with a special committee because the broad view among leadership was that the task force had accomplished what it set out to do and the standing committees that already have AI jurisdiction had the recommendations from the task force to consider.

    Last year, Trump signed into law a bill that made it illegal to share online nonconsensual, explicit images — real or computer-generated — that also required tech platforms to remove such images within 48 hours of being notified about them. On Wednesday, the House overwhelmingly passed a bill to limit the rising cost of utility bills linked to the rapid expansion of data centers that power AI.

    But more substantive bills have gone nowhere. The House Committee on Science, Space and Technology passed 10 AI-related bills out of committee in June that still have not been brought to the floor. Lawmakers in both parties – including Thune, Democratic Rep. Amy Klobuchar, GOP Sen. Josh Hawley and Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal – have put forward proposals. Sen. Bernie Sanders, who caucuses with Democrats, has stridently warned in recent days about the dangers of AI. But there is no agreed-upon leader or expert on the issue in Capitol Hill.

    “Tell me what congressman is going to educate every other congressman on what Anthropic does. Give me a break. Half the Congress is 70 years old. They don’t even know how to turn on their cell phone without help from staff,” GOP Rep. Rich McCormick of Georgia, who served on the task force with Obernolte, told CNN.

    Trump has long touted the benefits of AI, but other Republicans had been wary of over-regulation before he took office. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise told members of the task force in 2024 that he was not interested in seeing heavy regulations stifling AI, according to a source familiar with the discussion. Scalise said publicly at the time that he wanted to fill in gaps but not add burdensome regulations.

    Some who favor regulation see their cause buoyed by warnings from AI industry leaders – even if they’re wary anything will happen.

    “My message is like, ‘Hey, thank goodness. Welcome to the party.’ I’m glad everybody’s getting on board that this now has the national attention that it deserves,’” GOP Rep. Scott Franklin, a former member of the task force and co-sponsor on a number of pieces of AI legislation, told CNN. “But this is something we’ve been working on legislatively for a long time trying to get the attention to have these issues looked at.”

    GOP Rep. Kat Cammack was even more pointed.

    “We certainly have the capability to do it. I don’t know if the political will is there,” she told CNN. “I think the political will doesn’t exist because you have members that don’t really understand it.”

    But others say their skepticism remains – including of the unusual calls from the AI industry for congressional intervention.

    “I’m not bailing you out,” McCormick told CNN. “Why am I responsible for you being safe? That’s good business. Being safe is good business. You put the guardrails on yourself.”

    Democrats, meanwhile, have intensified their calls for regulation in recent weeks, particularly after former President Barack Obama called on his party to prioritize the issue. After the task force concluded its work in 2024, the top Democrat in the House, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, created his own commission. The party has generally sought to frame the issue as one of the everyman vs. the elites.

    “I think that for far too long, big tech and money in politics have driven agendas in Congress that have crippled our ability to meet the moment on every urgent issue facing the country. So, we can’t rely on AI companies to lead the way on this, to regulate themselves. This is the role of the federal government. And it is absolutely essential that we rise to meet this moment,” Democratic Rep. Brittany Pettersen said.

    Democrats, too, suggest the issue of regulation is not as complicated as some of their GOP colleagues suggest. Competitiveness with China is an issue, but what good is competition in a world run by AI? Sure, some lawmakers are aging – but lawmakers have never had to be subject matter experts for every bill they support.

    “If you took that standard, then Congress could never regulate airplanes or medicine or energy,” said Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu, who was the top Democrat on the bipartisan task force and has continued the work in the minority even without a GOP counterpart. “There’s all sorts of regulations that are common sense that Congress can pass and should pass and doesn’t require anyone being a computer science major to understand what these bills do.”

    A bipartisan group of members have called on Johnson to keep the House in session so lawmakers can work on negotiating AI reforms. That’s not happening: Johnson decided instead to send the House home a day early, not to return until after the November midterms.

    But some say it’s not reason to give up. Democratic Rep. Don Beyer, one of the lawmakers calling on Johnson to keep the House in session, found himself consoling two of his constituents earlier this week who have a fourth-grade daughter and are worried there will not be a future for her if the threats of AI come true.

    “I said to them: I think there is still time.”

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/16/politics/video/capitol-hill-lawmakers-ai-congress-vrtc

  • 新闻


    请您提供需要翻译的英文新闻文章内容,我会按照要求为您完成精准的简体中文翻译。

    No English content available

  • 法国政界又一极右翼人士参加明年总统选举


    2026年9月18日 16:36 / 联合早报

    泽穆尔是法国极右翼再征服党党魁,他主张停止接收移民,并支持遣返外国人。 (法新社档案照片)

    法国又一名极右翼政治人物宣布参加2027年总统选举,并誓言打击移民,驱逐失业的外国人。

    法新社报道,“再征服党”党魁泽穆尔(Eric Zemmour)星期五(9月18日)告诉法国媒体,他将参加明年的总统选举。

    泽穆尔主张停止接收移民,并支持遣返外国人。

    “所有有犯罪记录的外国人都必须遣返,哪怕没有在狱中服刑。我们也必须遣返无证移民,以及长期失业和所有完全依靠福利救济生活的外国人。”

    泽穆尔预计会与法国极具影响力的极右翼领袖勒庞展开角逐。近几周的民意调查显示,勒庞料在总统选举首轮投票中领先。

    法国政界又一极右翼人士参加明年总统选举

    2026年9月18日 16:36 / 联合早报

    泽穆尔是法国极右翼再征服党党魁,他主张停止接收移民,并支持遣返外国人。 (法新社档案照片)

    法国又一名极右翼政治人物宣布参加2027年总统选举,并誓言打击移民,驱逐失业的外国人。

    法新社报道,“再征服党”党魁泽穆尔(Eric Zemmour)星期五(9月18日)告诉法国媒体,他将参加明年的总统选举。

    泽穆尔主张停止接收移民,并支持遣返外国人。

    “所有有犯罪记录的外国人都必须遣返,哪怕没有在狱中服刑。我们也必须遣返无证移民,以及长期失业和所有完全依靠福利救济生活的外国人。”

    泽穆尔预计会与法国极具影响力的极右翼领袖勒庞展开角逐。近几周的民意调查显示,勒庞料在总统选举首轮投票中领先。

湘ICP备2026001899号-2