分类: 未分类

  • 特朗普誓言组建“AI部队”并任命AI沙皇, amid呼吁监管人工智能技术发展


    2026-09-19T17:52:06.083Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:洛根·斯基恰诺

    更新于56分钟前
    更新时间:2026年9月19日美国东部时间下午2:12
    发布时间:2026年9月19日美国东部时间下午1:52

    人工智能 唐纳德·特朗普
    查看所有主题

    image
    美国总统唐纳德·特朗普9月13日在爱尔兰香农机场登上空军一号前向媒体发表讲话。
    布伦丹·斯米亚洛夫斯基/法新社/盖蒂图片社

    美国总统唐纳德·特朗普周六表示,他计划组建一支“AI部队”,并任命一名AI沙皇,因为美国政府正面临越来越多要求为人工智能的快速发展设置监管护栏的呼声。

    这位总统在Truth社交平台上发文时,重申了他认为对人工智能的担忧是一场骗局的观点,同时似乎也承认了这项技术带来的部分风险,他表示:“我们也会警惕有害内容,我们可以利用现有的刑事和民事司法系统轻松做到这一点。”

    “为此,我将组建AI部队,就像我在第一任期内组建太空部队一样,太空部队取得了巨大的成功。为此,我将在不久的将来宣布任命AI‘沙皇’——只有高智商人士才有资格申请!”特朗普在帖子中写道。

    CNN已联系白宫,询问有关AI沙皇职责、总统是否已有该职位人选,以及“AI部队”是否会像太空部队一样成为美军一个分支的更多细节。特朗普2019年创立太空部队,是1947年以来美国新增的首个军种。

    特朗普宣布这一消息之际,白宫和国会近几周来面临着制定人工智能保护措施的压力。这位总统一直淡化相关担忧,声称有“病态的阴谋”正在暗中破坏人工智能的发展。

    “我们绝不会以任何方式阻碍或扼杀这个非凡行业的发展,”特朗普周六在帖子中说道。“我们领先于中国和世界其他国家,我打算保持这种领先地位!”

    特朗普明确表示,他认为超越中国、保住人工智能驱动的经济收益,比应对日益增长的公众担忧更为优先。在行业领袖呼吁全球放缓人工智能发展后,该问题迅速成为美国政治辩论的焦点。

    人工智能的飞速发展推动了股市大幅上涨,并通过数据中心的建设提振了制造业——特朗普将数据中心称为“摇钱树”。然而,人们对该技术可能导致失业以及人工智能数据中心对社区造成影响的担忧,导致公众情绪恶化。

    民主党人在呼吁放缓人工智能发展方面声音更大,前总统巴拉克·奥巴马敦促潜在的2028年民主党总统候选人将人工智能作为其竞选议程的核心。

    “我本周的看法是,一些领先企业表示我们需要放缓发展速度,这是件好事,我们应该鼓励这种做法,”奥巴马周五在科尔盖特大学的炉边谈话中表示,根据CNN获得的演讲节选,“左翼有一些人说我们不应该让他们做出这个决定。我同意那不能成为长期解决方案。政府必须对其进行监管。”

    风险投资家戴维·萨克斯曾担任特朗普的AI和加密货币沙皇,直到今年3月,他因作为政府特殊雇员的任期到期而辞职。他目前担任总统科学技术顾问委员会主席。

    本文已更新补充最新进展。

    CNN的爱德华-艾萨克·多弗雷对本文亦有贡献。

    Trump vows to create ‘AI Force’ and appoint czar amid calls to regulate technology’s development

    2026-09-19T17:52:06.083Z / CNN

    By Logan Schiciano

    Updated 56 min ago

    Updated Sep 19, 2026, 2:12 PM ET

    PUBLISHED Sep 19, 2026, 1:52 PM ET

    AI Donald Trump

    See all topics

    President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media before boarding Air Force One to leave from Shannon Airport in Ireland on September 13.

    Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images

    President Donald Trump said Saturday he plans to create an “AI Force” and name an AI czar as the government faces growing calls to impose guardrails on the rapid development of artificial intelligence.

    The president, writing on Truth Social, repeated his assessment that fears over AI amount to a hoax and also seemed to acknowledge some of the risks the technology presents, saying, “we will also be looking for BAD, and we can do that, very easily, with our already existing Criminal and Civil Justice System.”

    “For this purpose, I am forming the AI Force, much like I did Space Force, which has been a tremendous SUCCESS, in my First Term. To that end, I will be announcing, in the near future, the AI ‘Czar’ — Only High I.Q. individuals need apply!” Trump said in the post.

    CNN has reached out to the White House for more details on the AI czar’s duties, whether the president has anyone in mind for the role, and whether the “AI Force” will be a branch of the military, like the Space Force. Trump’s creation of the Space Force in 2019 marked the first new US military service since 1947.

    Trump’s announcement comes as the White House and Congress have faced pressure to enact AI safeguards in recent weeks. The president has downplayed concerns, claiming that a “SICK conspiracy” was afoot to undermine AI.

    “We will not in any way hinder or stifle the Growth of this incredible Industry,” Trump said in his post Saturday. “We are leading China, and the rest of the World, and I intend to keep it that way!”

    Trump has made clear that he considers outpacing China and preserving AI-driven economic gains a higher priority than addressing growing public concerns. The issue has quickly come to dominate political debate in the United States, after industry leaders called for a global slowdown in development.

    AI’s meteoric growth has led to major stock market gains and buoyed the manufacturing sector through the construction of data centers — which Trump calls “the golden goose.” Yet fears about the technology’s potential to eliminate jobs and AI data centers’ impact on communities have led to a souring in public sentiment.

    Democrats have been more vocal in their calls to slow AI development, with former President Barack Obama urging potential Democratic presidential candidates to put AI at the center of their agendas in 2028.

    “My view this week has been it is good that some of the leading companies have said we need to slow this down, and we should encourage that,” Obama said Friday during a fireside chat at Colgate University, according to excerpts of his speech obtained by CNN. “There have been some on the left who’ve said we shouldn’t allow them to make that decision. I agree that that can’t be a long-term solution. Government has to be regulating this.”

    Venture capitalist David Sacks served as Trump’s AI and cryptocurrency czar until March, when he stepped down after reaching his time limit as a special government employee. He now chairs the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

    This story has been updated with additional developments.

    CNN’s Edward-Isaac Dovere contributed to this report.

  • 特朗普称将任命新人工智能顾问,未透露具体细节


    路透社 / 2026-09-19T17:25:15.887Z / 1小时前更新

    华盛顿特区白宫椭圆形办公室内,美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在与旅游企业高管会面时发表讲话,2026年9月2日摄于美国华盛顿。路透社/伊夫林·霍克斯坦/资料图片

    华盛顿9月19日电(路透社)——美国总统唐纳德·特朗普周六在社交媒体发文称,他计划任命一名新的人工智能顾问,即所谓的“AI沙皇”,并成立一支“AI特遣队”,不过他未透露这两项举措的细节,也未说明将如何落实。

    华盛顿的议员们对人工智能技术给人类和财产带来的风险日益感到担忧。本月早些时候,Anthropic前研究员雅各布·考克森表示,“认真研发人工智能的人都相信,到本世纪末,人工智能可能会将我们全部消灭。”特朗普多次淡化人们对人工智能的担忧,并辩称没有必要增设监管。

    《错误信息监测》简报汇总了国际错误信息叙事,每期都设有“真实还是虚假?”问答环节。点击此处订阅

    “我们绝不会以任何方式阻碍或扼杀这个了不起的行业的发展,”特朗普在其社交媒体平台Truth Social上写道,“相反,我们会珍视它、扶持它,并在它成长的过程中加以监管!不过,我们也会留意防范有害内容,我们可以轻松做到这一点,借助我们现有的刑事和民事司法系统即可。”

    如果特朗普兑现这一承诺,这将是他第二位AI沙皇。风险投资家戴维·萨克斯此前曾担任该职务,今年春季辞职后转而担任外部顾问。

    萨克斯也附和了特朗普对新增AI监管的怀疑态度。周三在Politico的一场活动上,他表示人工智能开发者应当为确保其产品安全负责,若出现问题可能需承担法律责任,并补充称没有必要出台新的联邦监管规定。

    白宫未立即回应置评请求,针对特朗普的这条发文。

    特朗普发表上述言论之际,他计划于周四与中国国家主席习近平举行会晤。美中两国在人工智能领域争夺领导权,双方均认为人工智能对本国经济和军事实力至关重要。特朗普与科技高管们认为,过度监管会减缓美国人工智能的发展,削弱美国企业与中国竞争对手抗衡的能力,而安全倡导者经常驳斥这一说法。

    据一位知情人士周六透露,美国财政部长斯科特·贝森特将于周日在纽约摩根大通总部与中国副总理何立峰会面,讨论人工智能安全、贸易及其他经济议题。

    苏珊·希维、韦伦·坎宁安、马特·斯佩塔尔尼克、考特尼·罗森和乌梅拉·帕穆克报道;塞尔吉奥·农、罗德·尼科尔和千叶·野宫编辑

    我们的报道准则:汤森路透信任原则。

    Trump says he will appoint a new AI adviser, without providing details

    By Reuters / 2026-09-19T17:25:15.887Z / Updated 1 hour ago

    U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with travel executives in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 2, 2026. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo

    WASHINGTON, Sept 19 (Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump said in a social media post on Saturday that he plans to appoint ​a new artificial intelligence adviser, known as an “AI czar,” and create an “AI force,” though ​he did not provide details about either initiative or how they would be implemented.

    Fears are growing in Washington among lawmakers about the risks posed by AI technology on humans and property. Earlier this month, former Anthropic researcher ​Jacob Coxon said that “people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all ​by the end of the decade.” Trump has repeatedly downplayed concerns about AI and ⁠argued that additional regulation is unnecessary.

    The Misinformation Monitor newsletter rounds up international misinformation narratives, with a “Real or Fake?” quiz in every edition. Sign up here.

    “We will not in any way hinder or stifle the Growth ​of this incredible Industry,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, his social media platform. “Rather, we will cherish it, ​help it, and watch over it, as it grows! However, we will also be looking for BAD, and we can do that, very easily, with our already existing Criminal and Civil Justice System.”

    If Trump follows through on ​the pledge, it would be his second AI czar. Venture capitalist David Sacks previously served in ​the role before stepping down in the spring and moving into an external advisory position.

    Sacks has echoed Trump’s skepticism of ‌new ⁠AI regulation. Speaking at a Politico event on Wednesday, he said AI developers should be responsible for ensuring the safety of their products and could be held liable if problems arise, adding that new federal rules are unnecessary.

    The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on ​Trump’s post.

    Trump’s post comes ​ahead of his scheduled ⁠meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday. Washington and Beijing are competing for leadership in artificial intelligence, which both governments view as vital ​to their economic and military strength. Trump and technology executives have argued ​that excessive regulation ⁠would slow US AI development and undermine American companies’ ability to compete with Chinese rivals, a claim that safety advocates often refute.

    US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will meet with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng ⁠on ​Sunday at JPMorgan Chase headquarters in New York to discuss ​AI security, trade and other economic issues, a person familiar with the planning said on Saturday.

    Reporting by Susan Heavey, Waylon ​Cunningham, Matt Spetalnick, Courtney Rozen and Humeyra Pamuk; Editing by Sergio Non, Rod Nickel and Chizu Nomiyama

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • “它永远不会再是从前的样子了”:特朗普如何对肯尼迪中心发难并将其拖至绝境


    2026-09-19T16:00:29.096Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    今年春季,当唐纳德·特朗普总统的名字被下令从肯尼迪中心移除时,人们似乎看到了摆脱这位前总统对这座表演艺术中心管控的契机。

    “我已指示商务部与国会完成所有必要安排,以实现该机构的完全移交,交由国会负责其运营、维护和管理,”总统在5月底的Truth Social帖子中写道,看似放弃了他一年前攫取的控制权。

    两位知情人士告诉CNN,在十几名“当然成员”——这些人没有投票权,且不与特朗普结盟——中,甚至出现了这样的猜测:能否请回前董事会主席、亿万富翁慈善家大卫·鲁宾斯坦,帮助恢复该中心的筹款和节目策划工作。(CNN已向鲁宾斯坦置评请求。)

    但其中一位消息人士称,在特朗普表示他将继续担任主席后,“这种猜测很快就烟消云散了”。人们曾希望他为这座纪念约翰·F·肯尼迪的纪念碑改名的行动已经结束,到头来不过是一厢情愿。

    如今,距离2025年12月起重机首次将特朗普的名字安装到大理石外立面那天已经过去了九个月,这家机构却因这位仍深陷争斗的总统而濒临崩溃:内部灯光被切断,基础设施摇摇欲坠,抗议活动此起彼伏,法律诉讼接踵而至。

    民主党籍俄亥俄州众议员乔伊斯·比蒂——同时也是一名当然董事会成员——提起的诉讼,导致法官作出裁决:必须将特朗普的名字从建筑上移除,且董事会不得完全关闭该设施。

    特朗普却因这一法律挫折,反而加大了拆除这座建筑的威胁:本周,有人在空军一号的窗户内看到特朗普手持一张海报,上面似乎写着“拆除肯尼迪中心”。尽管联邦法官已下令,任何重大变更前都必须提前30天通知,但目前完全不清楚事态将如何发展。

    周五深夜,特朗普政府在法庭上辩称,肯尼迪中心必须关闭两年,请求主审法官批准这一请求,以便对这座“危险破败、年久失修”的建筑进行翻新。

    同一天,据两位知情人士透露,十余名肯尼迪中心员工被裁员,包括首席发言人,这让本已捉襟见肘的员工队伍雪上加霜。肯尼迪中心拒绝对裁员置评。

    特朗普称,此前的领导层应为糟糕的财务状况负责。在本周一场充满争执的董事会电话会议上,他还指责比蒂提起诉讼,称此举加剧了该中心的衰落。

    特朗普和他在董事会的盟友辩称,必须重新将他的名字刻在建筑上,以重振筹款工作,但现任和前任官员、表演者以及行业官员表示,恰恰是特朗普的参与疏远了该中心的捐赠者,促使数十名艺术家取消演出。

    “百老汇剧目不会回来了,艺术家们也不会来了,”一位熟悉节目策划讨论的消息人士说。“只要唐纳德·J·特朗普还是主席,这些捐赠者就不会回来。”

    与该中心有联系的现任和前任肯尼迪中心官员、音乐家、艺术家及其他表演者表示,无论特朗普的名字最终是否留在建筑上,他的接管都已给肯尼迪中心留下了永久性印记。

    “美国各地有许多很棒的剧院,它们无疑都是文化生态的一部分,”玛莎·格雷厄姆舞蹈团总裁兼执行董事拉鲁·艾伦说,该团与该中心有着50年的合作历史。“但肯尼迪中心——它是我们国家的首都,是我们的国家展示台。”

    另一位近期离职的肯尼迪中心消息人士直白地说:“它永远不会再是从前的样子了。”

    CNN已向白宫置评请求。

    特朗普对肯尼迪中心的关注,标志着他从第一任政府到第二任政府的显著转变:除了执意将美国首都按自己的意愿重塑之外,他还将矛头对准了全国范围内的艺术、文化和教育支柱机构。

    在第一任期内,特朗普基本避开该场馆,在肯尼迪中心荣誉奖颁奖典礼上,由于获奖者威胁如果他出席就抵制活动,他也没有到场。白宫甚至在2017年的一份声明中表示,总统和第一夫人梅拉尼娅·特朗普将不参加,“以便获奖者能够在不受任何政治干扰的情况下庆祝”。

    当肯尼迪中心在2020年3月的新冠疫情救助法案中最初获得2500万美元拨款时,特朗普为这项援助辩护称:“肯尼迪中心做得非常出色,令人难以置信。”

    然而九个月后,他在批评随后的2020年12月新冠救助法案时,单独挑出了给该中心的4000万美元专项拨款——这预示了他未来的不满情绪。

    到2024年竞选期间,特朗普明确表示,打击所谓的“觉醒主义”将是第二任总统任期的支柱之一。他在竞选活动中似乎并未专门针对肯尼迪中心,但就职第三周时,他就已经启动了接管计划。

    “按照我的指示,我们将让华盛顿特区的肯尼迪中心‘再次伟大’,”特朗普在2025年2月的Truth Social帖子中写道。

    特朗普称,他已解雇了鲁宾斯坦的董事会主席职务,以及“不认同我们对艺术和文化黄金时代愿景”的董事会受托人。

    这次接管成为特朗普一系列重塑美国首都行动的第一张多米诺骨牌,包括拆除白宫东翼、关闭并改造华盛顿特区最繁忙的公共高尔夫球场,以及他在阿灵顿国家公墓附近建造一座250英尺高的凯旋门的持续努力——所有这些项目目前都在法庭上引发争议。

    尽管特朗普广泛批评文化机构和博物馆,但他对它们的控制能力有限,主要手段是削减其联邦拨款。联邦政府已大幅削减了国家艺术基金会和国家人文基金会等艺术资助机构的预算,并拒绝和收回了数千万美元的拨款,对象是那些与总统价值观不一致的组织。

    但肯尼迪中心是少数几个总统能够通过掌控董事会来施加更大权力的文化机构之一。他也曾试图将联邦资助的史密森学会置于管控之下,但结果喜忧参半。

    特朗普接管董事会一周后,他被任命为该中心主席,并任命长期忠实盟友理查德·格雷内尔担任执行主任。

    “所以我们接管了肯尼迪中心,”特朗普对记者说。“我将担任主席,我们将确保它没问题,不再有‘觉醒’。这个国家再也不会有‘觉醒’了。”

    他的新职位引发了多场演出取消,其中最引人注目的是百老汇音乐剧《汉密尔顿》。

    在特朗普本人主持的2025年12月肯尼迪中心荣誉奖颁奖典礼前夕,总统开始将这座建筑称为“特朗普肯尼迪中心”。

    2025年12月18日,董事会正式投票通过,将该设施更名为“唐纳德·J·特朗普与约翰·F·肯尼迪纪念表演艺术中心”,称这一变更为了表彰特朗普接管中心后所做的工作。

    次日,新的标识被安装,将特朗普的名字添加到建筑外立面。

    一场法律与财务的风波

    随之而来的法律诉讼和演出取消潮,对一家部分预算依赖门票销售的机构来说,构成了特殊挑战。

    作为一家非营利组织,根据最近签署生效的拨款法案,肯尼迪中心上一财年从国会获得了约3700万美元拨款。但其大部分收入来自节目策划和私人捐赠。根据向美国国税局提交的文件,在拜登政府执政的2024财年,肯尼迪中心的收入为3.07亿美元。

    去年,格雷内尔试图重塑该中心的日程表,用他的话说,就是增加更多适合家庭观看的节目。应第二夫人乌莎·万斯的推荐,他引入了改编自热门儿童漫画小说系列的音乐剧《狗狗侠》。

    与此同时,该中心成为举办贴合特朗普阵营活动的场所,包括纪录片《梅拉尼娅》的首映式、查理·柯克纪念活动以及国际足联世界杯抽签仪式(该组织在仪式上授予特朗普和平奖)。

    但在特朗普的名字被添加到建筑后,一波表演者退出,门票销售下滑。多位消息人士今年早些时候告诉CNN,肯尼迪中心的上座率极低,以至于连续数月不得不“填充空座”——这一剧院术语指通过提供免费或折扣票来填满座位。

    “演出周围弥漫着绝望的气氛。没人来看演出,”自2021年起担任肯尼迪中心驻场作曲家的卡洛斯·西蒙告诉CNN。

    西蒙的驻场任期即将结束,他指出,美国国家交响乐团现在正在华盛顿的其他场馆演出。他说,他留在肯尼迪中心的职位“是为了安抚那些仍在那里努力做好音乐呈现工作的员工”。

    “我真的很遗憾,它变成了这样一个政治工具或棋子,但音乐仍得继续,”他说。

    在演出取消的浪潮中,特朗普于2月宣布,肯尼迪中心将于7月4日关闭两年,以进行翻新——批评人士怀疑,此举更多是为了掩盖不断萎缩的观众群体,而非真的需要如此大幅的关闭。

    得益于特朗普的“一项宏伟法案”,肯尼迪中心去年还获得了大量资金,其中包含2.57亿美元,用于该中心“开展资本维修、恢复、维护积压工作和安全设施的必要开支”。

    但董事会辩称,只有特朗普的帮助才能筹集到翻新建筑所需的资金——而特朗普明确表示,他的帮助只会以冠名权为交换条件。

    与此同时,格雷内尔的继任者马特·弗洛卡本周在比蒂一案中告诉法官,出于安全考虑,该中心需要暂时关闭。

    即便这座建筑得以保全,官员们表示,要让该中心的节目恢复——尤其是百老汇剧目——仍将需要数月甚至数年时间。

    当然,这是假设演出方愿意回归的前提下,一位参与中心节目策划的消息人士说。

    “如果我们现在就开始与地产公司接触,来回磋商并达成协议,我们基本上要到2027年中到2028年才能让百老汇巡演重返肯尼迪中心,”这位消息人士说。“完成所有这些筹备工作需要这么长时间。”

    CNN的凯特琳·波兰茨对本报道亦有贡献。

    ‘It will never be the same’: How Trump turned on the Kennedy Center and brought it to its knees

    2026-09-19T16:00:29.096Z / CNN

    When President Donald Trump’s name was ordered removed from the Kennedy Center this spring, it seemed that an opening to move on from his reign over the performing arts center might have emerged.

    “I have instructed the Department of Commerce to make all necessary arrangements with Congress to allow a full and complete transfer of this Institution, giving them the responsibility for its Operation, Maintenance, and Management,” the president wrote in a late-May Truth Social post, seemingly relinquishing the control he’d seized a year prior.

    Speculation even bubbled up among some of the more than a dozen“ex-officio,” board members — who don’t get a vote but are not allied with Trump — over whether the former board chairman, billionaire philanthropist David Rubenstein, could be brought back to help restore the center’s fundraising and programming, two sources familiar with the matter told CNN. (CNN has asked Rubenstein for comment.)

    But after Trump said he would remain chairman, “it kind of all squelched pretty quickly,” one of the sources said. The hope that his crusade to rename a monument dedicated to the memory of John F. Kennedy had ended turned out to be wishful thinking.

    Instead, nine months from a cold December day when cranes first placed Trump’s name on the marble façade, the institution has been brought to the brink by the president still very much engaged in a fight: lights have been turned off inside, infrastructure is crumbling and protests swirl while legal battles mount.

    A lawsuit brought by Democratic Rep. Joyce Beatty of Ohio, an ex-officio board member, led to a judge’s ruling that Trump’s name had to be scraped off the building and that the board could not shut down the facility altogether.

    Trump has only ratcheted up his threats to tear down the building in response to the legal setbacks: The president was seen with a poster this week through the window of Air Force One that appeared to read “Kennedy Center DEMOLISHED.” Though the federal judge has since ordered a 30-day notice be given before any major change happens, it’s not at all clear where things go from here.

    Late Friday night, the administration argued in court that the Kennedy Center must close for two years, asking the federal judge in the case to allow it so that the “dangerously dilapidated and decrepit” building can be renovated.

    On the same day, over a dozen Kennedy Center employees were laid off, including its lead spokesperson, according to two sources familiar with the matter — gutting an already skeleton staff. The Kennedy Center declined to comment on the cuts.

    Trump has said previous leadership is to blame for the dire financial situation. During a contentious board call this week, he also blamed Beatty for bringing litigation that, he said, has contributed to the center’s downfall.

    While the president and his allies on the board argue his name needs to be re-affixed to the building to revive fundraising, current and former officials, performers and industry officials say it is precisely Trump’s involvement that alienated the center’s donors and prompted scores of artists to cancel their performances.

    “The Broadway productions will not come back, the artists will not come back,” said a source familiar with discussions about programming. “None of those donors will come back as long as Donald J Trump is the chairman.”

    Current and former Kennedy Center officials, musicians, artists and other performers with ties to the center suggest that Trump’s takeover has added a permanent imprint on the Kennedy Center, whether or not his name ultimately ends up on the building.

    “There are wonderful theaters throughout this country, and they are certainly part of the cultural ecology,” said LaRue Allen, president and executive director of the Martha Graham Dance Company, which has a 50-year history with the institution. “But the Kennedy Center — it is our nation’s capital. It is our national showcase.”

    Another Kennedy Center source who recently left said simply: “It will never be the same.”

    CNN has asked the White House for comment.

    Trump’s focus on the Kennedy Center is emblematic of a notable shift from his first administration to a second one that has targeted arts, cultural and educational pillars across the country, in addition to Trump’s unrelenting desire to remake the nation’s capital to his liking.

    In his first term, Trump mostly avoided the venue, skipping the Kennedy Center Honors after awardees threatened to boycott the event if he attended. The White House even said in a 2017 statement that the president and First Lady Melania Trump were not participating “to allow the honorees to celebrate without any political distraction.”

    And when the Kennedy Center initially received $25 million in funding in a March 2020 Covid stimulus package, Trump defended the aid, saying: “The Kennedy Center, they do a beautiful job, an incredible job.”

    Nine months later, however, he singled out a $40 million line-item for the center while criticizing a subsequent December 2020 Covid aid bill — a foreshadowing of his future disaffection.

    By his 2024 campaign, Trump made clear that going after so-called “wokeism” would be a pillar of a second presidency. He didn’t appear to single out the Kennedy Center on the campaign trail, but in his third week in office he’d already set a takeover plan in motion.

    “At my direction, we are going to make the Kennedy Center in Washington D.C., GREAT AGAIN,”Trump wrote on Truth Social in February 2025.

    Trump said he had fired Rubenstein as chairman of the board as well as board trustees “who do not share our Vision for a Golden Age in Arts and Culture.”

    The takeover became the first domino in a cascade of Trump moves to remake the nation’s capital, including the demolition of the East Wing of the White House, the closure and remodeling of the busiest public golf course in Washington, DC, and his ongoing efforts to build a 250-foot triumphal arch near Arlington National Cemetery — projects all still being fought over in court.

    Though Trump has widely criticized cultural institutions and museums, he’s been able to exert only so much control over them, primarily by reducing their federal funding. The federal government has gutted the agencies that fund the arts, including the National Endowment for the Arts and National Endowment for the Humanities, and denied and rescinded tens of millions of dollars in grants to organizations that don’t align with the president’s values.

    But the Kennedy Center is one of the few cultural institutions where the president has been able to flex more of his power by seizing control of the board. He has similarly tried to bring the federally funded Smithsonian Institution to heel, with more uneven results.

    A week after Trump’s board takeover, the president was named as its chairman, and he installed longtime loyalist Richard Grenell as executive director.

    “So we took over the Kennedy Center,” Trump told reporters. “I’m going to be chairman of it, and we’re going to make sure that it’s good and it’s not going to be woke. There’s no more woke in this country.”

    His new role prompted several cancellations, including most notably the Broadway show “Hamilton.”

    Leading up to the center’s Kennedy Center Honors in December 2025, which Trump himself was hosting, the president began referring to the building as the “Trump Kennedy Center.”

    On December 18, 2025, the board made that declaration official by voting to rename the facility the “The Donald J. Trump and The John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts,” saying that the change honored Trump’s work at the center after taking over.

    One day later, new signage was installed to add Trump’s name to the building’s façade.

    A legal and financial saga

    The legal battle and wave of cancellations that has ensued present particular challenges for an institution that makes part of its budget from ticket sales.

    Operating as a non-profit, the Kennedy Center received roughly $37 million from Congress in the last fiscal year, according to the latest appropriations legislation signed into law. But the bulk of its revenue comes from programming and private donations. In fiscal year 2024, during the Biden administration, the Kennedy Center reported $307 million in revenues, according to documents filed with the IRS.

    Last year, Grenell sought to revamp the center’s calendar to include, in his words, more family-friendly programming. He brought in “Dog Man: The Musical,” based on the popular kids’ graphic novel series, at the recommendation of second lady Usha Vance.

    At the same time, the center became a place to host events that lean in to Trumpian ties, including the premiere of the documentary “Melania,” a Charlie Kirk memorial and the FIFA World Cup draw (where the organization gave Trump a peace prize).

    But after Trump’s name was added to the building, a wave of performers pulled out, and ticket sales sagged.Multiple sources told CNN earlier this year that attendance at the Kennedy Center had been so low that for months it had to “paper the house” — a theater term that means to fill seats by offering free or discounted tickets.

    “There was a haze of despair around the performances. Nobody was showing up to performances,” Carlos Simon, the Kennedy Center composer-in-residence since 2021, told CNN.

    Simon, who is in the last year of his residence, noted that the National Symphony Orchestra is now playing at other venues in Washington. He said he’s stayed in his role at the Kennedy Center “for the morale of the folks who were still there trying to do the good work of presenting music.”

    “I feel really bad that it’s become this political tool or pawn, but music still has to go on,” he said.

    Amid the cancellations, Trump announced in February that the Kennedy Center would close for two years on July 4 to allow for renovations — a move critics suspected was to being made more to provide cover for the shrinking pool of patrons than because of the need for such a dramatic closure.

    The Kennedy Center also received an influx of funding last year thanks to Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” which contained $257 million for the center to pursue “necessary expenses for capital repair, restoration, maintenance backlog, and security structures.”

    Yet the board has argued only Trump’s help can muster the funds to renovate the building — and Trump has made clear his help will only come with naming rights.

    In the meantime, Matt Floca, Grenell’s successor as executive director, this week told the judge in the Beatty case that the center needs to temporarily close due to safety concerns.

    Even if the building survives, officials say getting the center’s programming to return — particularly Broadway shows — would still take months if not several years.

    That is under the assumption, of course, that performances would be willing to return, said the source involved in the center’s programming.

    “If we started now in terms of engaging with property companies, going back and forth and getting a deal made, we could have Broadway tours back at the Kennedy Center by the basically middle of ‘27 into ’28,” the source said. “That’s how long it takes for all these pieces to be put in place.”

    CNN’s Katelyn Polantz contributed to this report.

  • 特朗普誓言组建“AI部队”,称不会放缓人工智能发展


    2026年9月19日 / 美国东部时间下午2:52 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
    作者:琪琪·因塔拉苏万

    周六,特朗普总统宣布将组建一支“AI部队”,驳斥外界围绕人工智能数据中心的负面情绪,以及科技巨头领导人对人工智能快速发展发出的警告。

    在Truth Social的一篇帖子中,特朗普将外界对人工智能可能演变为超级智能、威胁人类生存的担忧斥为骗局。他誓言将推动美国人工智能产业的发展,并表示司法系统已经起到了保障作用。

    “我们绝不会以任何方式阻碍或扼杀这个了不起的产业的发展。恰恰相反,我们将珍视它、扶持它,并在它成长的过程中加以监管!不过,我们也会警惕不良行为,我们可以通过现有的刑事和民事司法系统轻松做到这一点,”特朗普总统说道。

    特朗普将人工智能称为“下一次工业革命,或是下一次互联网”,但“它的规模和影响力将更大,在美国经济中占比可能高达25%”,当前美国正与中国在该领域展开竞赛。

    除了组建一支类比其首届任期内成立的“太空部队”的“AI部队”之外,特朗普表示,他很快将正式任命一名“AI沙皇”。

    2024年12月,特朗普任命戴维·萨克斯为“白宫人工智能与加密货币沙皇”。2026年3月,萨克斯表示,他作为政府特别雇员担任该职务的任期已满。

    在上周接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访时,萨克斯表示,他认为外界对人工智能可能威胁人类的担忧言过其实,尽管需要保持谨慎,但人工智能的发展应当继续推进。

    萨克斯发表上述言论之际,外界对先进人工智能平台可能给人类带来灾难性伤害的担忧与日俱增。9月8日,Anthropic前研究员雅各布·考克森警告称,Anthropic和OpenAI正在开发自我改进的“超级智能”,这是在“拿我们的生命赌博”。

    Anthropic首席执行官达里奥·阿莫代伊曾呼吁全行业放缓人工智能发展,他在接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻《周日早间》节目采访时表示,人工智能“确实存在风险”,并补充道,该行业“曾就这项技术存在风险一事欺骗民众”。

    玛丽·坎宁安、艾梅·皮奇和亚伦·纳瓦罗对本文亦有贡献。

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/ai-expected-loom-large-trump-xi-summit/

    Trump vows to form “AI Force,” says he won’t allow slowdown of AI development

    September 19, 2026 / 2:52 PM EDT / CBS News
    By Kiki Intarasuwan

    President Trump on Saturday announced he is forming an “AI Force,” rejecting the negative sentiment around AI data centers and tech leaders’ warnings about the rapid development of artificial intelligence.

    In a Truth Social post, Mr. Trump called fears around AI possibly becoming a superintelligence that could pose a threat to human existence a hoax. He vowed to foster AI’s growth in the United States and said the justice system already acts as a safeguard.

    “We will not in any way hinder or stifle the Growth of this incredible Industry. Rather, we will cherish it, help it, and watch over it, as it grows! However, we will also be looking for BAD, and we can do that, very easily, with our already existing Criminal and Civil Justice System,” the president said.

    Mr. Trump called AI “the next Industrial Revolution, or Internet,” but “it will be even larger and more impactful, possibly as much as 25% of our Country’s GDP” as the U.S. races against China.

    In addition to creating an “AI Force,” which he likened to his creation of Space Force in his first term, Mr. Trump said he will soon officially appoint an “AI Czar.”

    In December 2024, Mr. Trump appointed David Sacks as the “White House A.I. & Crypto Czar.” In March 2026, Sacks said his time in this role as a special government employee was up.

    In an interview with CBS News last week, Sacks said he believes that fears about AI’s potential threat to humanity are overblown and that, while caution is warranted, the development of AI should continue.

    Sacks’ comments come amid mounting concerns that advanced AI platforms could inflict catastrophic harm on people. On Sept. 8, former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon warned that Anthropic and OpenAI are “gambling with our lives” by developing self-improving “superintelligence.”

    Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who urged the industry to slow down development, told CBS News “Sunday Morning” that “there are real dangers” with AI, adding that the “industry lied to people about the fact that this technology had risks.”

    Mary Cunningham, Aimee Picchi and Aaron Navarro contributed to this report.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/ai-expected-loom-large-trump-xi-summit/

  • 民主党议员呼吁调查有缺陷的人工智能辅助情报报告


    2026-09-19T17:33:44.198Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/19/politics/democrats-letter-ai-investigation-military

    一批资深民主党参议员呼吁政府监督机构调查美国军方由人工智能导致的一系列 targeting 计划失误,此前CNN的一篇报道披露,据一位知情人士透露,其中一次错误“险些引发战争”。

    参议员们在周六致国防部长皮特·赫格斯西(Pete Hegseth)和国家情报总监杰伊·克莱顿(Jay Clayton)的信中,将CNN关于中东地区一艘中国船只险些酿成危机的报道作为近期事件的例证,称这些事件“让我们日益担忧,你所监督的机构在多大程度上优先加快人工智能能力的采用和‘试验’,而非有效治理”。

    CNN周五报道称,一名特种作战司令部分析师依靠人工智能生成了一份情报报告,错误识别了一艘中国货船上的货物。

    据消息人士透露,这份报告让美军误以为该船正在运输核武器计划相关部件。军方开始制定拦截该船的计划,直到行动实施前夕,官员们才意识到这份报告是在人工智能辅助下生成的,且“完全虚假”。

    一位知情人士告诉CNN,自人工智能在政府中广泛应用以来,这类工具产生的“幻觉”错误在情报界并非孤立事件。

    在信中,参议员马克·华纳(Mark Warner)、杰克·里德(Jack Reed)和克里斯·库恩斯(Chris Coons)呼吁“相关监察长立即展开调查,鉴于这些感知到的失误会影响公众对我们情报和作战任务的信心,最终调查结果应具备更高程度的公开透明度”。

    这封信还提及了今年2月美军对伊朗米纳卜一所学校的致命空袭,造成近200名儿童和成年人死亡。今年早些时候,三位消息人士告诉CNN,此次空袭发生前,美军高级指挥官无视了包括一个人工智能驱动数据库在内的关键数据库中的警告,即有关伊朗潜在目标的情报严重过时。

    参议员们在信中写道:“公开报道显示,人工智能靶向平台反复生成虚假输出(基于过时的输入数据或纯粹的幻觉),除了破坏美国公众和国际合作伙伴对美国情报以及基于情报的致命行动的准确性和可靠性的信心外,还可能导致严重的行动失误。”

    参议员们在信中要求赫格斯西和克莱顿“迅速调查此事”,并向相关监察长“无限制地开放查阅今年媒体报道中提及的人工智能辅助靶向工作流程出现重大错误的两起案例,以及任何尚未公开报道的其他类似案例”。

    这封信发出之际,围绕政府在实施人工智能防护措施方面的角色的辩论已成为国会山的主导议题。民主党议员加大了监管呼吁的力度,而包括总统唐纳德·特朗普和众议院议长迈克·约翰逊在内的共和党人则警告称,放缓发展步伐可能会让美国在与中国的人工智能竞赛中处于劣势。

    在五角大楼,赫格斯西推动将人工智能广泛融入军事行动的举措并非没有障碍。国防部曾与Anthropic发生争执,原因是这家人工智能公司拒绝移除内部安全护栏,这些护栏将阻止军方将其Claude人工智能模型用于自主武器和大规模监控。Anthropic辩称,其模型尚未可靠到可用于此类用途。

    更正:本文已更新,以明确致国防部长皮特·赫格斯西和国家情报总监杰伊·克莱顿的信是在周六发出的。

    Democrats call for investigation into faulty AI-assisted intel report

    2026-09-19T17:33:44.198Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/19/politics/democrats-letter-ai-investigation-military

    A group of top Democratic senators is calling on government watchdogs to investigate a series of mistakes in US military targeting plans caused by artificial intelligence, after a CNN report detailed how one such error, according to a source familiar with the incident, “almost started a war.”

    In a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton sent on Saturday, the senators cite CNN’s reporting on a close call with a Chinese ship in the Middle East as an example of recent events that “have given us growing concern about the extent to which agencies under your oversight have prioritized acceleration of AI capability adoption and ‘experimentation’ over effective governance.”

    CNN reported Friday that a special operations command analyst relied on AI to generate an intelligence report that inaccurately identified the material on a Chinese cargo ship.

    The report led the US military to believe the ship was transporting components of a nuclear weapons program, according to sources. The military began facilitating plans to intercept the vessel before officials realized, only just before the planned operation, that the report had been generated with the help of AI and was “entirely false.”

    The kind of “hallucination” that the tool conjured has not been an isolated incident across the intelligence community since the use of AI began proliferating across government, one source familiar with the episode told CNN.

    In the letter, Sens. Mark Warner, Jack Reed and Chris Coons called for an “immediate investigation by relevant Inspectors General, with a higher degree of public transparency in the ultimate findings, given the impacts these perceived failures have on public confidence in our intelligence and warfighting missions.”

    The letter also references a deadly February US strike on a school in Minab, Iran, that killed nearly 200 children and adults. Three sources told CNN earlier this year the strike came after senior US military commanders bypassed warnings in critical databases, including one powered by AI, that intelligence about potential targets in Iran was severely out of date.

    “Public reports that AI targeting platforms have repeatedly generated spurious outputs (based on outdated input data or outright hallucination) risk serious operational error, in addition to undermining the confidence of both the American public and international partners in the accuracy and reliability of U.S. intelligence and intelligence-informed kinetic action,” the senators wrote.

    The senators’ letter demands Hegseth and Clayton “promptly investigate this matter” and provide relevant inspectors general with “unrestricted access to both instances this year in which media reports have suggested significant errors in AI-enabled targeting workflows, as well as any additional instances that may have so far not been publicly reported.”

    The letter comes as the debate over the government’s role in implementing AI safeguards has come to dominate the halls of Congress. Democratic members have intensified their calls for regulation, while Republicans, including President Donald Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson, have warned that slowing development may cost the US in the AI race with China.

    At the Pentagon, Hegseth’s push to broadly infuse AI into military operations has not come without roadblocks. The Defense Department has sparred with Anthropic over the AI company’s refusal to remove internal safety guardrails that would prevent the military from using its Claude AI model in autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. Anthropic argued its models were not reliable enough to be used for such purposes.

    Correction: This story has been updated to reflect that the letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton was sent on Saturday.

  • 美法院或否决部分内容 TikTok与司法部4亿美元和解面临变数


    2026年9月19日 23:09 / 联合早报

    图为TikTok在美国加利福尼亚州总部的招牌。 (路透社档案照片)

    短视频应用TikTok及其母公司字节跳动为解决违反美国《儿童在线隐私保护法》指控,原本已与美国司法部达成4亿美元(约5.3亿新元)的和解协议,但协议突遭波折,一名美国联邦法院法官称,他倾向于否决这份协议的部分内容。

    路透社报道,TikTok与美国司法部达成的和解协议分为两部分:TikTok同意立即支付3亿美元;此外,若法院终止美国联邦贸易委员会从2019年起对Musical.ly实施的同意令(consent decree),TikTok将再追加支付1亿美元。

    后来并入TikTok的Musical.ly在2019年被指明知有幼童使用,在收集姓名、电子邮件地址和其他个人信息前,却未能获得家长的同意。Musical.ly当时支付了570万美元的罚款达成和解,并签署了在2029年前必须履行特定报告和记录保存义务的同意令。

    洛杉矶联邦地区法院法官乔治·吴(George H. Wu)星期五(9月18日)说,他倾向于拒绝终止该同意令的请求,并安排在星期一(21日)举行听证会。

    吴法官指出,在没有更多细节的情况下,法院无法确定这是否构成持久的补救措施,也无法确定终止同意令是不是针对情况变化而进行的适当调整。

    截至星期六(19日),TikTok和美国司法部未立即就此事作出回应。

    美国司法部在2024年提起诉讼,指控TikTok和字节跳动未能保护儿童隐私,并非法收集他们的个人信息。

    双方达成和解协议时,美国政府称,自起诉以来,TikTok发生了重大变化,包括所有权结构、管理、合规功能和隐私操作等。

    例如今年1月,字节跳动同意成立一家由美资占多数股权的合资企业,旨在保护美国用户的数据,以避免这款拥有超过2亿美国用户的应用在美国被禁。

    美法院或否决部分内容 TikTok与司法部4亿美元和解面临变数

    2026年9月19日 23:09 / 联合早报

    图为TikTok在美国加利福尼亚州总部的招牌。 (路透社档案照片)

    短视频应用TikTok及其母公司字节跳动为解决违反美国《儿童在线隐私保护法》指控,原本已与美国司法部达成4亿美元(约5.3亿新元)的和解协议,但协议突遭波折,一名美国联邦法院法官称,他倾向于否决这份协议的部分内容。

    路透社报道,TikTok与美国司法部达成的和解协议分为两部分:TikTok同意立即支付3亿美元;此外,若法院终止美国联邦贸易委员会从2019年起对Musical.ly实施的同意令(consent decree),TikTok将再追加支付1亿美元。

    后来并入TikTok的Musical.ly在2019年被指明知有幼童使用,在收集姓名、电子邮件地址和其他个人信息前,却未能获得家长的同意。Musical.ly当时支付了570万美元的罚款达成和解,并签署了在2029年前必须履行特定报告和记录保存义务的同意令。

    洛杉矶联邦地区法院法官乔治·吴(George H. Wu)星期五(9月18日)说,他倾向于拒绝终止该同意令的请求,并安排在星期一(21日)举行听证会。

    吴法官指出,在没有更多细节的情况下,法院无法确定这是否构成持久的补救措施,也无法确定终止同意令是不是针对情况变化而进行的适当调整。

    截至星期六(19日),TikTok和美国司法部未立即就此事作出回应。

    美国司法部在2024年提起诉讼,指控TikTok和字节跳动未能保护儿童隐私,并非法收集他们的个人信息。

    双方达成和解协议时,美国政府称,自起诉以来,TikTok发生了重大变化,包括所有权结构、管理、合规功能和隐私操作等。

    例如今年1月,字节跳动同意成立一家由美资占多数股权的合资企业,旨在保护美国用户的数据,以避免这款拥有超过2亿美国用户的应用在美国被禁。

  • 众议员汤姆·巴雷特:“身为社会主义者应当让他在我的选区失去参选资格”


    “如果我们把国家交给那些只会把美国人税收榨干的激进社会主义者……我们的处境会更糟”

    2026-09-19T10:45:19-04:00 / 福克斯新闻频道

    作者:大卫·安斯沃思 福克斯新闻

    发布时间:2026年9月19日美国东部时间上午10:45 | 更新时间:2026年9月19日美国东部时间上午10:55

    众议员汤姆·巴雷特就对手重新浮出水面的激进言论发起抨击

    在这场势均力敌的摇摆选区中,共和党人汤姆·巴雷特就对手此前发表的有关废除警察、开放边境和“核心家庭”的言论提出批评。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/318150c2-997c-4294-8fb0-853cece35be2

    收听本文
    7分钟

    国会的控制权很可能取决于密歇根州第七国会选区。该选区以州首府兰辛为核心,拥有一座大型蓝色城市,周围环绕着红色郊区和深红农村地区。它一直被认为是全美竞争最激烈的摇摆选区之一。

    众议员汤姆·巴雷特作为政坛新人,2024年以微弱优势赢得该选区席位,目前正与气候变化组织“日出运动”的活动家、创始人威廉·劳伦斯展开激烈角逐。

    密歇根州州参议员汤姆·巴雷特——密歇根州第七国会选区共和党国会候选人——在竞选活动中向支持者发表讲话。(汤姆·巴雷特竞选团队 供图)

    巴雷特拥有21年陆军直升机飞行员服役经历,曾多次海外部署,返回密歇根州后在州议会工作了近十年。

    7名共和党议员倒戈 与民主党投票限制伊朗战争权力

    这场竞选近期因一系列有争议的社交媒体帖子引发动荡。劳伦斯在其中一些帖子中称核心家庭“是一种孤立、暴力的社会组织方式”,并赞扬废除警察的运动。

    他如今声称自己的观点已经改变。

    巴雷特认为,这种新的转变是出于政治权宜之计,而非真正的信念转变:
    “我认为我们应该相信他的话,这就是他绝对真实的意识形态,这绝不是他发表的某一次言论。他反复发表反警察言论,不仅呼吁削减经费,而是要彻底废除警察。他想要开放边境。他说,如果我们是一个人道的国家,就必须开放边境,重新分配所有财富。

    “正如你所说,他称核心家庭是一种暴力的社会组织方式。他还有无数其他言论和行动,都表明这是一种行为模式,而非孤立事件。

    “显然,任何中立观察者都能看出,他这么做是因为他在竞争激烈的选区参选,想要当选国会议员。他不会在拉希达·特莱布或奥卡西奥-科特兹的选区参选——那里的选民更同情那些与民主社会主义者组织(DSA)结盟的社会主义候选人。他参选的是我所在的选区,我在这里抚养自己的核心家庭。”

    美国众议员亚历山德里亚·奥卡西奥-科特兹(纽约州民主党)在众议院一系列投票结束后,于2026年7月22日在华盛顿特区国会大厦台阶上对记者发表讲话。(安娜·芒尼梅克/盖蒂图片社 供图)

    巴雷特辩称,劳伦斯提出的边境和移民政策将对美国人的安全构成明确且现实的威胁:
    “嗯,我对手的开放边境政策最明显的风险首先就是公共安全威胁。暂且抛开其他经济因素不谈:仅对我们社区的人身威胁就相当大。

    “存在犯罪团伙活动。在拜登政府时期,贩毒集团得以在边境两侧自由活动。我们有超过1000万甚至1500万非法移民未经任何审查就进入我国。”

    巴雷特还认为,芬太尼危机也与边境和移民政策直接相关。
    “和我同年龄段的美国人的首要死亡原因不是癌症,也不是心脏病,而是芬太尼过量致死。我在军队服役时的战友,他们从战场幸存下来,却死于芬太尼过量……这些毒品正是通过我国边境涌入的。

    “在我的人生中,我们首次看到芬太尼过量致死人数大幅下降,这主要归功于我们加强边境安保的努力。而我的对手威廉·劳伦斯则会完全推翻这一成果,再次开放边境,同时废除警察。

    “我们只能推测,其后果将是更多美国人死于芬太尼过量,以及帮派活动和其他因边境开放、缺乏公共安全保障而引发的悲剧。”

    美国众议院候选人威廉·劳伦斯与参议院候选人阿卜杜勒·赛义德、联邦参议员伯尼·桑德斯和众议员亚历山德里亚·奥卡西奥-科特兹于2026年7月19日在密歇根州兰辛的集会上发表讲话。(安德鲁·罗斯/希帕美国通过路透社 供图)

    威廉·劳伦斯也是民主社会主义者组织(DSA)的长期成员,但最近声称自己的会员资格已经过期。巴雷特认为,劳伦斯仍然是社会主义意识形态的狂热信徒,只是为了赢得竞争激烈的选举而试图淡化自己的真实信仰:
    “嗯,我认为身为社会主义者应当让他在我的选区失去参选资格。你看看社会主义的核心原则以及他们想要推行的政策,还有他们对此的支持。

    密歇根民主党候选人试图为已删除的、暴露极左立场的帖子辩解

    “我的对手……巧妙地声称自己在初选前两周,也就是他即将获胜的前夕,停止了会员资格。他现在要在这场全国竞争最激烈的国会选举之一中与我对决,而这场选举很可能决定众议院的控制权。

    “所以他并没有否认民主社会主义者的主张……他接受了他们的所有立场,获得了他们的全部支持,确实从民主社会主义运动的支持中获益匪浅。

    “而当需要为这些立场辩护时,他却想说,好吧,我已经停止会员资格了,所以你不能因为他们的所有立场而问责我。但我退出并不是因为与他们有任何实质性分歧,我退出纯粹是出于政治原因,因为他如此专注于试图赢得这场选举,不顾一切地不想为自己的记录负责,而是想转移人们对社会主义破坏性影响的注意力,以及如果他当选国会议员,这对我们国家意味着什么。”

    前西弗吉尼亚州参议员乔·曼钦于2025年9月15日周一参加了ABC的《观点》节目。(ABC/《观点》 供图)

    劳伦斯最具争议的言论之一是一篇帖子,表达了对政客们在气候政策上的不满和愤怒。劳伦斯特别针对西弗吉尼亚州参议员乔·曼钦写道:“快点去死吧,这样我们才能开始行动。”

    巴雷特认为,这类言论应当让第七选区的选民提高警惕:
    “显然,这完全不合适,确实应该引起每一个理智美国人的注意,这种言论在我们国家是行不通的。政治是一场硬碰硬的较量……但在我的政治生涯中,任何竞选活动中,我都从未呼吁过政治人物‘去你的,快点去死吧’。

    “这表明了极端化倾向……他是密歇根州《绿色新政联盟》的创始成员,呼吁禁止在我选区生产的汽油动力汽车,而这些汽车为我选区雇佣了数千名工人。”

    中期选举通常取决于经济问题,而负担能力问题如今正推动着全美各地激烈选战的政治叙事。巴雷特辩称,国会共和党人已经在日常民生问题上取得了成果:
    “嗯,我们降低了民众的税收负担,当然……我们扩大了儿童税收抵免。我们通过扩大标准扣除额为家庭节省了税款,简化了个人报税流程。小费不征税,加班费不征税,社会保障福利不征税。我想更进一步,实现医疗保健免税。为每位美国人提供免税健康储蓄账户,并扩大可使用该账户的范围,用于购买健康食品、健身房会员资格和健身器材。

    民主社会主义者组织的成员于2019年5月1日劳动节在特朗普拥有的建筑外集会。(盖蒂图片社 供图)

    “显然,随着伊朗冲突,我们也可以降低汽油价格,我再次按照自己的良知投了票,希望看到汽油价格下降,这也将影响经济中其他许多与负担能力相关的领域。这些都是我们可以实现的目标。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用

    “但如果我们把国家交给那些只会把美国人税收榨干的激进社会主义者,然后把福利发放给非法移民和那些拒绝工作、不参与经济活动的人,我们的处境会更糟。

    “所以这是一场非常、非常重要的选举。我凭自己的实绩说话。我知道自己在国会里做了什么。我的工作就是走出去,向选区的选民阐明我的立场,并将其与我的对手所说的一切、他所支持的东西,以及他如果当选国会议员将会采取的行动所体现的行为模式进行对比。”

    大卫·安斯沃思报道拉美事务。您可以在推特@LatinAmerUpdate关注大卫·安斯沃思

    Congressman Tom Barrett: ‘Being a socialist should disqualify him for people’s consideration in my district’

    ‘If we hand our country over to radical socialists who are simply going to tax Americans to death…we will be worse off for that’

    2026-09-19T10:45:19-04:00 / Fox News

    By David Unsworth Fox News

    Published September 19, 2026 10:45am EDT | Updated September 19, 2026 10:55am EDT

    Rep. Tom Barrett slams opponent over resurfaced radical posts

    In a razor-thin swing district, Republican Tom Barrett calls out opponent over past comments on abolishing the police, open borders, and the “nuclear family.”

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/318150c2-997c-4294-8fb0-853cece35be2

    Listen to this article

    7 min

    Control of Congress may very well run through Michigan’s seventh district. Anchored by Lansing, the state capital, it features a large blue city, surrounded by reddish suburbs, and deep red rural areas. It is consistently described as one of the closest swing districts in the country.

    Freshman Congressman Tom Barrett narrowly won the district in 2024, and is now locked in a tight race with William Lawrence, an activist and founder of the climate change-focused Sunrise Movement.

    Republican Michigan state Sen. Tom Barrett, his party’s nominee for Congress in Michigan’s 7th Congressional District, speaks to supporters on the campaign trail.(Tom Barrett For Congress)

    Barrett is a 21-year Army veteran helicopter pilot, who served numerous deployments overseas, before returning to Michigan and spending nearly a decade in the state legislature.

    7 REPUBLICANS REBEL AGAINST TRUMP, VOTE WITH DEMS TO REIN IN IRAN WAR POWERS

    The race has recently been roiled by a series of controversial social media posts. In some of them, Lawrence called the nuclear family “an isolating, violent way of organizing society” and praised campaigns to abolish the police.

    He now claims that his views have changed.

    Barrett argues that the newfound shift is about political expediency, not genuine conviction:

    “I think we got to take him at his word that this was his absolute true ideology and it wasn’t just this one statement that he made. He made repetitive statements against police, calling to not just defund but abolish the police altogether. He wanted to throw open the borders. He said if we’re a humane country, we’ve got to throw open the borders and redistribute all of the wealth.

    “He called the nuclear family a violent way to organize society, as you said. Countless other statements that he’s made and other things that he has done that show a pattern of behavior that this is not an isolated incident.

    “And obviously it’s clear to any neutral observer that he is doing this because he is running in a competitive district trying to get elected to Congress. He’s not running in Rashida Tlaib’s district or AOC’s district where they’re far more sympathetic to these DSA-aligned socialist candidates. He’s running in the district that I live in where I’m raising my own nuclear family.”

    U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters on the House steps after a series of votes at the U.S. Capitol on July 22, 2026 in Washington, D.C.(Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

    Barrett contends that the implementation of Lawrence’s border and immigration policies would pose a clear and present danger to the safety of Americans:

    “Well, the foremost obvious risk of these open border policies of my opponent is just starting with the public safety threat. So take out all of the other economic factors: just the physical threats to our communities are substantial.

    “There are criminal gang activities. We have cartels that were freely operating both ways across the border under the Biden administration. We had upwards of ten or even fifteen million illegal immigrants that came into our country completely unvetted.”

    Barrett also argues that the fentanyl crisis is directly tied to border and immigration policies as well.

    “The leading cause of death of Americans my age wasn’t cancer, wasn’t heart disease, it was fentanyl overdose deaths. People that I served with in the military that came home and survived combat and died of fentanyl overdose…because of drugs that were pouring across our border.

    “For the first time in my life, we have seen a significant decline in fentanyl overdose deaths, really because of the efforts…to secure our border, and my opponent, William Lawrence, would entirely reverse that, throw the border open again, abolish the police at the same time.

    “And we can only assume the outcome of that would be far more Americans dying of fentanyl deaths, as well as gang activity and other tragic circumstances that arise when you have an open border and no public safety to protect Americans.”

    U.S. House candidate William Lawrence speaks at a rally with U.S. Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders and U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in Lansing, Mich., on July 19, 2026.(Andrew Roth/Sipa USA via Reuters)

    William Lawrence is also a longtime member of the DSA (Democratic Socialists of America), but recently claims that he let his membership lapse. Barrett argues that Lawrence remains a fervent believer in socialist ideology, but is merely trying to downplay his true beliefs to win a competitive race:

    “Well, I think being a socialist should disqualify him for people’s consideration in my district. You look at the tenets of socialism and what they want to do and the endorsement of that.

    MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE TRIES TO JUSTIFY DELETED POSTS THAT REVEAL FAR-LEFT BELIEFS

    “My opponent…cleverly claims that he let his membership lapse, I don’t know, two weeks before the primary election on the eve of him winning…to face off against me in one of the most competitive congressional races in the country that will arguably decide control of the House of Representatives.

    “So he doesn’t disavow the democratic socialists…He has embraced all of their positions, gathered all of their support, really benefited from the support of the democratic socialist movement.

    “And then when the time comes to defend those positions, he wants to say, well I let my membership lapse so you can’t hold me accountable for all their positions. But I didn’t leave under any actual disagreement with them. I’m simply leaving for political reasons because he’s so focused on trying to win this election in a desperate attempt to not be accountable to his own record, but to distract away from the devastating effects of socialism and what that would mean for our country if he were elected.”

    Former West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin joined ABC’s “The View” on Monday, September 15, 2025.(ABC/TheView)

    Perhaps the most controversial of Lawrence’s statements involved a post expressing frustration and outrage with politicians on climate policy. Lawrence, specifically targeting West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin, wrote: ‘Hurry up and die so that we can get started.’

    Barrett believes that this type of rhetoric should put the voters of the seventh district on high alert:

    “Obviously that’s entirely inappropriate, something that should really raise the attention of every single reasonable American to say that that’s not how we go about our rhetoric here in our country. Politics is a full contact sport…but I’ve never in my political life, in any campaign, called on political figures to ‘F you and hurry up and die.’

    “And that shows the radicalization…He was a founding member of the Green New Deal Alliance in Michigan, calling to ban gasoline-powered vehicles that we build in my district that employ thousands of people in my district.”

    Midterm elections generally hinge on economics and affordability issues are driving the political narrative today in tight races around the country. Barrett makes the case that congressional Republicans have delivered on everyday pocketbook issues:

    “Well, we lowered costs on people’s taxes, certainly…and we expanded the child tax credit. We saved families taxes to the expanded standard deduction, streamlined filing for individuals. No taxes on tips, no taxes on overtime, no tax on Social Security. I wanna take that a step further and have no taxes health care. Give every American a tax-exempt health savings account and expand the things that they can use it for, for healthy groceries, gym memberships, fitness equipment.

    Members of the Democratic Socialists of America gather outside a Trump-owned building on May Day, May 1, 2019, in New York City.(Getty Images)

    “Obviously bring down the cost of gas as well with the conflict in Iran that I have again voted my conscience on as well and want to see gas prices come down and that will affect a lot of other parts of the economy as well around affordability. These are things that we can face.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “But if we hand our country over to radical socialists who are simply going to tax Americans to death and then pass on benefits to illegal immigrants and people who refuse to go to work and participate in the economy. We will be worse off for that.

    “So this is a very, very important election. I stand on my own merits. I know what I’ve done here in Congress. It’s my job to go out and make the case to the voters in my district, and contrast that with the exact things that my opponent has said what he has stood for and what his pattern of behavior has shown in what he would do if he were elected to Congress.”

    David Unsworth reports on Latin America. You can follow David Unsworth on Twitter @LatinAmerUpdate

  • 律师称:250英尺高特朗普拱门破坏退伍军人安葬阿灵顿国家公墓时珍视的历史视线


    2026年9月19日 美国东部时间上午9:00 / 福克斯新闻网

    原告方称,这座250英尺高的建筑将阻断林肯纪念堂与阿灵顿庄园之间的历史景观
    路易斯·卡西阿诺 福克斯新闻网报道

    特朗普政府一项拟建拱门遭到批评,批评人士称该建筑将遮挡历史视线。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章!
    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/33fe7048-742a-4f79-b995-69c6c536140b

    收听本文
    3分钟

    唐纳德·特朗普总统提议在华盛顿特区纪念圈建造的250英尺高拱门——他曾称这将是世界上最大的拱门——遭到三名越南退伍军人的反对,他们表示该项目将阻断林肯纪念堂、阿灵顿国家公墓和阿灵顿庄园之间的景观,这些景观是华盛顿特区及周边地区最知名的景观之一。

    退伍军人迈克尔·莱蒙、肖恩·伯恩斯和乔恩·贡德森,以及建筑历史学家考尔德·洛思,已经就这座“伟大凯旋门”与特朗普政府打了数月的法律战。

    “我们的原告是三名越南退伍军人和一名建筑历史学家。他们都与阿灵顿国家公墓有着深厚的私人渊源,”代表原告的公共公民诉讼小组律师尼古拉斯·桑松告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。“其中两名退伍军人原告希望日后能安葬在这里。”


    民主党人抨击特朗普最新华盛顿特区项目:“基督教民族主义”抨击与法律施压

    2025年10月15日在华盛顿特区,展示在坚毅书桌的美国总统唐纳德·特朗普提议的为纪念美国建国250周年的凯旋门模型。该项目遭到一些退伍军人和一名建筑历史学家的反对,他们都表示该建筑将遮挡该地区其他历史建筑的景观,尤其是阿灵顿国家公墓。(凯文·迪奇/盖蒂图片社)

    特朗普曾表示,该拱门应建在阿灵顿国家公墓附近。这里是超过40万名军人的最终安息地。

    该项目的批评者认为,这座拟建建筑有失公墓庄严肃穆的氛围。此外,特朗普政府在一份规划文件中承认,该项目将“对历史建筑产生不利影响”。

    “在保留该项目依赖特定地点的设计初衷的同时,无法完全避免此类不利影响,”国家公园管理局在文件中写道。

    桑松表示,美国首都的设计初衷是防止历史地标被其他建筑遮挡。


    林肯纪念堂隐藏1.5万平方英尺地下层 地下百年后首次对公众开放

    一名民众在阿灵顿国家公墓士兵墓前摆放玫瑰,人们正在参观阿灵顿国家公墓。(杰拉尔·居内什/阿纳多卢通讯社)

    “美国首都的规划有一个核心设计特征,即以非常刻意的方式打造波托马克河东侧的林肯纪念堂与西侧阿灵顿国家公墓内的罗伯特·E·李纪念堂阿灵顿庄园之间的无遮挡景观,”他说。

    “因此我们的原告……真正担心的是这座巨型建筑将对这种历史性的象征性景观造成影响,而他们每个人都认为这种景观意义非凡,”他补充道。


    金雕、狮子与带翼自由女神像 特朗普提议的250英尺高华盛顿特区凯旋门设计方案曝光

    在哈里森设计公司根据谷歌地球航拍图提供的模型中,清晰展示了“凯旋门”与附近华盛顿特区和弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿纪念碑的规模和距离。(哈里森设计公司 美国白宫美术委员会供图)

    本月早些时候,政府宣布该项目的挖掘工作将在未来两周内启动。

    原告已请求联邦法官发布临时禁制令,阻止该项目推进,称该建筑未经国会授权不得建造。


    特朗普签署法案 为国家广场上的荣誉勋章纪念碑扫清障碍

    2026年5月26日在华盛顿特区,示威者聚集在阿灵顿纪念桥附近,抗议唐纳德·特朗普总统提议的250英尺高“凯旋门”。第三行动DMV组织的组织者表示,这座拟建建筑有失阿灵顿国家公墓的庄严肃穆氛围。(盖蒂图片社)

    特朗普政府援引了1925年的一项法律,该法律最初授权在华盛顿特区建造一对166英尺高的柱子,但该项目从未动工。

    政府官员辩称,过去国会的批准为该凯旋门项目“祖父条款”豁免,使他们无需获得国会授权。

    “问题的核心其实是一个制度性问题:谁有权做决定?是坐在白宫里的一个人,还是应该通过民主审议程序来决定这些纪念碑应该是什么样子、建在哪里、纪念什么,诸如此类的问题,”桑松说。

    “国会授权在特定时间、特定价格上限下在特定地点建造特定项目,而如今该授权委员会早已解散,我们不能合理地依靠这项授权来批准一个截然不同的独立项目,这个项目在数百年后的今天花费将远超当初,”他补充道。

    2026年周三白宫每日新闻发布会上展示的为纪念美国建国250周年而提议的纪念圈拱门效果图。(温·麦克纳米)


    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    路易斯·卡西阿诺是福克斯新闻数字频道的记者。新闻线索请发送至louis.casiano@fox.com。

    Lawyer says 250-foot Trump arch disrupts historic sightlines cherished by veterans seeking burial at Arlington

    September 19, 2026 9:00am EDT / Fox News

    The plaintiffs say the 250-foot structure would block the historic view between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington House

    By Louis Casiano Fox News

    The Trump administration is being challenge of a proposed arch that critics say will obstruct historical sightlines.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/33fe7048-742a-4f79-b995-69c6c536140b

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    President Donald Trump’s proposed 250-foot arch at Memorial Circle in Washington, D.C.—which he said would be the largest in the world—is being opposed by three Vietnam veterans who say the project would block views between the Lincoln Memorial, Arlington National Cemetery, and Arlington House, some of the most well-known views in and around the city.

    Veterans Michael Lemmon, Shaun Byrnes, and Jon Gundersen—along with architectural historian Calder Loth—have been engaged in a months-long legal battle with the Trump administration over the “Great Triumphal Arch”.

    “Our plaintiffs are three Vietnam veterans and an architectural historian. All of them have a deep personal relationship with Arlington National Cemetery,” Nicolas Sansone, an attorney with the Public Citizen Litigation Group representing the plaintiffs, told Fox News Digital. “Two of our veteran plaintiffs hope to be buried there.”

    DEMS UNLOAD ON TRUMP’S LATEST DC UPDATE WITH ‘CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST’ BROADSIDE, LEGAL PUSH

    A model of President Donald Trump’s proposed triumphal arch to commemorate the country’s 250th anniversary is seen on the Resolute Desk on October 15, 2025 in Washington, D.C. The project is being opposed by some veterans and an architectural historian who all said the structure will obscure views to other historic properties in the area, particularly Arlington National Cemetery.(Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

    Trump has said the arch should be built near Arlington National Cemetery, which serves as the final resting place for more than 400,000 military service members.

    Critics of the project contend that the planned structure is disrespectful to the solemn character of the cemetery. In addition, the Trump administration acknowledged in a planning document that the project will have “adverse effects on historic properties”.

    “Such adverse effects cannot be fully avoided while retaining the location-dependent purpose of the undertaking,” the National Park Service wrote in the document.

    The nation’s capital was designed to keep historic landmarks from being obscured by other structures, Sansone said.

    LINCOLN MEMORIAL’S HIDDEN 15,000-SQUARE-FOOT UNDERCROFT OPENS TO THE PUBLIC AFTER A CENTURY UNDERGROUND

    A person lays a rose on the grave of a soldier as people visit the Arlington National Cemetery.(Celal Gunes/Anadolu Agency)

    “One of the sort of central design features is that the capital has been laid out in a very deliberate way to create this uninterrupted view between the Lincoln Memorial on the east side of the Potomac River and Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial, on the west side in Arlington National Cemetery,” he said.

    “So our plaintiffs… are really sort of concerned about the impact that this sort of enormous structure is going to have on that sort of historic symbolic view that each of them finds really meaningful,” he added.

    GOLDEN EAGLES, LIONS AND A WINGED LADY LIBERTY TOP TRUMP’S PROPOSED 250-FOOT DC TRIUMPHAL ARCH DESIGNS

    In this mockup provided by Harrison Design using an overhead map from Google Earth, the scale and distance of the “Triumphal Arch” to nearby Washington, D.C., and Arlington, Va., monuments is clarified.(Harrison Design via the White House Commission of Fine Arts)

    Earlier this month, the administration announced that excavation work for the project would begin within the next two weeks.

    The plaintiffs have asked a federal judge to issue a temporary restraining order to keep the project from moving forward, saying it can’t be built without authorization from Congress.

    TRUMP SIGNS ACT CLEARING THE WAY FOR MEDAL OF HONOR MONUMENT ON NATIONAL MALL

    Demonstrators gather near Arlington Memorial Bridge to protest President Donald Trump’s proposed 250-foot “Triumphal Arch” on May 26, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Organizers from Third Act DMV say the planned structure is disrespectful to the solemn character of Arlington National Cemetery.(Getty Images)

    The Trump administration has cited a 1925 law that originally authorized a pair of 166-foot columns in Washington, D.C., that were never built.

    Administration officials argue that past congressional approval grandfathers the triumphal arch project and allows them to avoid authorization from Congress.

    “The idea is that really it’s just an institutional question of who gets to decide: Is it one person, the person sitting in the White House, or should it be a sort of democratic deliberative process to sort of figure out what these monuments should look like, where they should be situated, what they should commemorate, and the like,” Sansone said.

    A rendering of the proposed Memorial Circle arch marking the nation’s 250th birthday was shown during Wednesday’s White House daily press briefing.(Win McNamee)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “Congress’s authorization to have a particular project built at a particular time subject to a specific price cap by a now-disbanded commission can’t reasonably be relied on to authorize a totally different independent project that’s going to cost way more money centuries into the future,” he added.

    Louis Casiano is a reporter for Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent to louis.casiano@fox.com.

  • 家属起诉堕胎禁令,称其导致孕妇死亡


    发布于 美国东部时间2026年9月19日周六上午9:51 / CNN政治频道

    视频广告反馈

    家属起诉堕胎禁令,称其导致孕妇死亡

    蒂拉·沃克的家人表示,德克萨斯州严苛的堕胎禁令导致了这名37岁女子的死亡。他们现已提起诉讼,被告包括德克萨斯州总检察长、共和党参议院候选人肯·帕克斯顿。蒂拉·沃克的姑姑拉坦娅以及该家庭的律师莫莉·杜恩做客维克多·布莱克本的节目。

    4:09 • 来源:CNN

    当日政治 11个视频

    视频广告反馈

    家属起诉堕胎禁令,称其导致孕妇死亡

    4:09
    正在播放
    • 来源:CNN

    视频广告反馈

    特朗普称他将“禁止”CNN、MS NOW和《政治报》进入白宫

    3:33
    正在播放
    • 来源:CNN

    肯尼迪家族侄女谈特朗普与肯尼迪中心的争执:“这些是无法得逞就恼羞成怒的 petty tyrant(小暴君)的行径”

    1:12
    正在播放
    • 来源:CNN

    视频广告反馈

    关于绿卡政策调整你需要知道的事

    1:46
    正在播放
    • 来源:CNN

    视频广告反馈

    国土安全部部长马克韦恩·马林就ICE官员在冲突后殴打青少年的视频作出回应

    2:35
    正在播放
    • 来源:CNN

    视频广告反馈

    随着汽油价格上涨,特朗普支持率创历史新低

    3:37
    正在播放
    • 来源:CNN

    视频广告反馈

    CNN分析:共和党制作了500多条广告,其中仅有12条播出的广告提及特朗普

    3:53
    正在播放
    • 来源:CNN

    视频广告反馈

    特拉汉众议员:议长约翰逊让众议院提前休会“完全不负责任”

    2:16
    正在播放
    • 来源:CNN

    共和党保守派警告共和党内部反犹太主义现象加剧

    5:11
    正在播放
    • 来源:CNN

    国会或将通过重要的俄罗斯制裁法案

    1:12
    正在播放
    • 来源:CNN

    视频广告反馈

    美联储全票通过加息决议

    2:41
    正在播放
    • 来源:CNN

    查看更多视频

    Family sues over abortion ban they say led to pregnant woman’s death

    Published 9:51 AM EDT, Sat September 19, 2026 / CNN Politics

    Video Ad Feedback

    Family sues over abortion ban they say led to pregnant woman’s death

    The family of Tierra Walker says the strict abortion ban in Texas led to the 37-year-old’s death. They’ve now filed a lawsuit, and among those named is Texas Attorney General and Republican senate candidate Ken Paxton. Tierra Walker’s aunt, Latanya, and the family’s attorney, Molly Duane, join Victor Blackwell.

    4:09 • Source: CNN

    Politics of the Day 11 videos

    Video Ad Feedback

    Family sues over abortion ban they say led to pregnant woman’s death

    4:09

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Trump says he’s ‘banning’ CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House

    3:33

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    JFK’s niece on Trump’s Kennedy Center fight: ‘These are the actions of a petty tyrant who can’t get his way’

    1:12

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    What to know about the green card policy change

    1:46

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin reacts to video showing ICE officer punching teenager after altercation

    2:35

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Trump hits record disapproval rating as gas prices rise

    3:37

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    CNN Analysis: GOP produced 500+ ads. Only 12 that aired were about Trump

    3:53

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Rep. Trahan: Speaker Johnson sending the House home early is ‘completely irresponsible’

    2:16

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Conservatives warn of growing antisemitism in the GOP

    5:11

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Congress on track to approve major Russia sanctions bill

    1:12

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Federal Reserve unanimously votes to raise interest rates

    2:41

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    See more videos

  • 美军误信AI幻觉情报 险拦截中国船只酿冲突


    2026年9月19日 20:33 / 联合早报

    • 据CNN引述消息人士报道,今年初美伊战争期间,美军因误信AI生成的虚假情报,险些在中东海域强行拦截一艘中国船只。
    • 分析员使用聊天机器人整合开源与机密情报后,错误判断船上运载核武相关组件,并据此整理发布标准情报报告。
    • 美军启动应急机制准备登船拦截时,官员深入核查发现情报完全基于AI生成,聊天机器人错误识别了船上货物。
    • 消息人士称该报告“完全错误”且“差点引发一场战争”,多名美国官员指出目前尚无统一标准核实AI生成的信息。

    8月16日,美国海军亨利·J·凯泽号补给舰给亚伯拉罕·林肯号航空母舰进行海上补给。美军今年初误信AI幻觉情报,差一点就对一艘在中东海域航行的中国船只采取强行登船拦截行动。 (路透社)


    (华盛顿综合电)美国军方在今年初美伊战争期间,因误信由人工智能(AI)生成的虚假情报,险些在海上强行拦截一艘中国船只。这起差点引发战火的重大失误,暴露出美军在情报分析与军事决策中盲目依赖AI技术的致命缺陷与极高风险。

    美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)星期五(9月18日)引述四名消息人士报道,美军当时接获一份由美国特种作战司令部(USSOCOM)分析员整理的标准情报报告,称一艘在中东海域航行的中国船只正运送与核武器计划相关的敏感组件。

    美军随即启动应急机制,计划拦截这艘船。就在美国军人准备强行登船、军机已升空戒备的紧要关头,美国官员深入核查报告来源,发现情报完全基于AI生成,而分析员使用的聊天机器人错误识别了船上运载的货物。

    消息人士说,这份报告是“完全错误的”,且“差点引发一场战争”。若美军当时对中国船只采取任何强制军事行动,极可能导致事态升级,甚至引发两国间的直接武装冲突。

    美军和情报界如今正推动把AI融入几乎所有工作环节,从分析收集到的海量原始情报、选择打击目标,到更日常的应用如管理预算、物流和供应链。

    这起事件凸显出在战争期间利用AI技术进行目标识别,存在重大风险。分析人士担心,如果国家依赖质量低劣或被窜改的数据,AI可能导致灾难性误判。

    在此次事件中,位于夏威夷的美国太平洋司令部获取有关上述中国船只载货清单的情报,分析员就此询问聊天机器人,聊天机器人整合了开源情报与美国政府内部的机密信号情报后,判断船上运载的是核武计划相关的组件。分析员随后再次使用AI,将此“发现”整理成标准情报报告发布出去。

    美军之所以积极推动使用AI,是因为相信AI能协助加快战场决策,例如选定打击目标或决定军事资产调动。

    一名消息人士指出,在目标锁定方面,AI的应用无疑正日益增加,但对于如何通过让人类介入来避免平民伤亡或误伤友军,目前尚无明确的指导方针。

    分析员使用的AI工具产生“幻觉”,在情报界并非首例。AI给分析员带来压力,迫使他们须更快生成和传播情报,这同时也增加了出错的风险。消息人士称,年轻分析员尤其熟悉这类工具,更容易不加鉴别地信任AI输出的结果。

    多名知情的美国官员也指出,政府各部门使用不同的AI工具,遵循不同指令与安全标准,目前没有一套标准来核实这些工具生成的信息。由于军方和情报界部署了多种不同的AI系统,这意味着可靠性和功能表现也存在巨大差异。

    美军误信AI幻觉情报 险拦截中国船只酿冲突

    2026年9月19日 20:33 / 联合早报

    • 据CNN引述消息人士报道,今年初美伊战争期间,美军因误信AI生成的虚假情报,险些在中东海域强行拦截一艘中国船只。 – 分析员使用聊天机器人整合开源与机密情报后,错误判断船上运载核武相关组件,并据此整理发布标准情报报告。 – 美军启动应急机制准备登船拦截时,官员深入核查发现情报完全基于AI生成,聊天机器人错误识别了船上货物。 – 消息人士称该报告“完全错误”且“差点引发一场战争”,多名美国官员指出目前尚无统一标准核实AI生成的信息。

    8月16日,美国海军亨利·J·凯泽号补给舰给亚伯拉罕·林肯号航空母舰进行海上补给。美军今年初误信AI幻觉情报,差一点就对一艘在中东海域航行的中国船只采取强行登船拦截行动。 (路透社)

    (华盛顿综合电)美国军方在今年初美伊战争期间,因误信由人工智能(AI)生成的虚假情报,险些在海上强行拦截一艘中国船只。这起差点引发战火的重大失误,暴露出美军在情报分析与军事决策中盲目依赖AI技术的致命缺陷与极高风险。

    美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)星期五(9月18日)引述四名消息人士报道,美军当时接获一份由美国特种作战司令部(USSOCOM)分析员整理的标准情报报告,称一艘在中东海域航行的中国船只正运送与核武器计划相关的敏感组件。

    美军随即启动应急机制,计划拦截这艘船。就在美国军人准备强行登船、军机已升空戒备的紧要关头,美国官员深入核查报告来源,发现情报完全基于AI生成,而分析员使用的聊天机器人错误识别了船上运载的货物。

    消息人士说,这份报告是“完全错误的”,且“差点引发一场战争”。若美军当时对中国船只采取任何强制军事行动,极可能导致事态升级,甚至引发两国间的直接武装冲突。

    美军和情报界如今正推动把AI融入几乎所有工作环节,从分析收集到的海量原始情报、选择打击目标,到更日常的应用如管理预算、物流和供应链。

    这起事件凸显出在战争期间利用AI技术进行目标识别,存在重大风险。分析人士担心,如果国家依赖质量低劣或被窜改的数据,AI可能导致灾难性误判。

    在此次事件中,位于夏威夷的美国太平洋司令部获取有关上述中国船只载货清单的情报,分析员就此询问聊天机器人,聊天机器人整合了开源情报与美国政府内部的机密信号情报后,判断船上运载的是核武计划相关的组件。分析员随后再次使用AI,将此“发现”整理成标准情报报告发布出去。

    美军之所以积极推动使用AI,是因为相信AI能协助加快战场决策,例如选定打击目标或决定军事资产调动。

    一名消息人士指出,在目标锁定方面,AI的应用无疑正日益增加,但对于如何通过让人类介入来避免平民伤亡或误伤友军,目前尚无明确的指导方针。

    分析员使用的AI工具产生“幻觉”,在情报界并非首例。AI给分析员带来压力,迫使他们须更快生成和传播情报,这同时也增加了出错的风险。消息人士称,年轻分析员尤其熟悉这类工具,更容易不加鉴别地信任AI输出的结果。

    多名知情的美国官员也指出,政府各部门使用不同的AI工具,遵循不同指令与安全标准,目前没有一套标准来核实这些工具生成的信息。由于军方和情报界部署了多种不同的AI系统,这意味着可靠性和功能表现也存在巨大差异。

湘ICP备2026001899号-2