2026年6月18日 / 美国东部时间下午6:47 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
作者：扎克·胡达克、娜塔莉·麦考密克、玛丽亚·沙利文、加布里埃拉·比耶洛
华盛顿讯——美国于2月底对伊朗发动战争数小时后，特朗普总统就列出了一系列激进的战争目标。他承诺“摧毁他们的导弹”，阻止该政权重建核计划，并为伊朗人“接管”该国政府铺平道路。
如今，随着特朗普政府宣扬刚刚签署的延长美伊停火协议并重启核谈判的谅解备忘录，总统已经放弃了其中部分目标。
特朗普本周对记者表示，伊朗保留部分弹道导弹是“可以接受的”。他表示并不急于收回伊朗的高浓缩铀库存，也不谋求在伊朗“政权更迭”。这份谅解备忘录还将伊朗核计划命运的大部分细节留待未来60天内的额外谈判确定。
总统还对伊朗现任领导层表达了一些赞许。
“我们正在打交道的这些人，我认为他们非常理智，而且很好打交道，”特朗普周二在法国举行的七国集团峰会活动上谈及伊朗现任领导层时说道，并指出一些前伊朗领导人在战争中被击毙。“他们是强大的人，聪明的人……他们没有被极端化，而且他们希望帮助自己的国家。”
以下是总统及政府高级官员过去和现在就伊朗相关关键问题发表的言论：
消除弹道导弹
特朗普，2月28日：“我们将摧毁他们的导弹，将他们的导弹工业彻底夷为平地。一切都会被彻底、彻底地消灭。”
国务卿马可·卢比奥，3月2日：“我现在可以告诉你们这次行动的目标。这次行动的目标是摧毁他们的弹道导弹能力，确保他们无法重建这种能力，确保他们无法以此为幌子发展核计划。这就是本次任务的目标。”
特朗普，6月17日：“如果其他国家拥有弹道导弹，那么不让伊朗拥有一些就有点不公平。弹道导弹和我们所说的核武器不是一回事。但如果沙特阿拉伯、卡塔尔以及其他国家都拥有一些——相对而言，我认为这是可以接受的。”
背景情况：尽管特朗普曾表示，防止伊朗获得核武器是他的首要目标，但美国政府及中东盟友长期以来一直担忧伊朗常规军事力量构成的威胁——尤其是其弹道导弹，这些导弹能够覆盖以色列以及美国在该地区的盟友和军事设施。整个战争期间，美军一直在重点打击伊朗的导弹库存和导弹工厂。
美伊谅解备忘录并未提及弹道导弹，不过特朗普周三表示，他的政府将与波斯湾国家开展“平行行动”，以解决伊朗的常规导弹及其他“非核问题”。
特朗普周三辩称，伊朗的大部分导弹库存要么在战争中被摧毁，要么被埋在了废墟之下。但他暗示，他并不打算彻底消除伊朗的弹道导弹。
他似乎还调侃了一些希望彻底摧毁伊朗导弹项目的强硬派特朗普支持者。“我有一些支持者——我喜欢他们中的一些人，但我认为他们并不聪明——他们会说‘先生，你不应该让他们拥有任何导弹’。我会说：‘好吧，那我该怎么办？我要让沙特阿拉伯拥有导弹，却不让他们拥有？……事情不是这么运作的。’”
“核尘埃”
特朗普，4月17日：“美国将获取所有核尘埃——你们知道核尘埃是什么吗？就是7个月前某个深夜，我们的B-2轰炸机投下的那种白色粉末状物质。”
特朗普，4月26日：“我们必须取回那些核尘埃。我们会取回它们，这也是我们与伊朗谈判的一部分。我们不希望他们拥有这些东西。”
特朗普，6月16日：“目前的情况是，在合适的时机——完全不必急于求成。我们有太空摄像头监视着那里。我们知道所有进出那里的人，其实根本没人去那里。B-2轰炸机已经击中了那里。整座山都在里面坍塌了。挖掘工作非常困难。除了我们，可能还有中国，没人能做到。他们有设备，我们也有设备。我们并不着急，但我们会拿到的。等我们拿到后，会把它们销毁。”
背景情况：在战争爆发前的几年里，伊朗积累了60%纯度的浓缩铀库存，距离武器级纯度仅一步之遥。这些材料大多储存在少数几个地下设施中，美国去年对这些设施进行了轰炸，使得获取这些材料变得困难。
在今年的战争期间，特朗普政府策划了回收这些铀的方案，总统将其称为“核尘埃”。专家表示，通过挖掘废墟来回收这些材料的行动，将是美国历史上最具挑战性和风险性的特种作战任务之一。
在谅解备忘录中，美国和伊朗“同意在未来60天的谈判中解决库存浓缩材料的处置问题”。“最低限度的处置方式”是在国际原子能机构的监督下，在现场将铀浓缩至较低纯度。
但特朗普本周表示，回收这些材料并非紧急任务，并对伊朗能否取回这些材料表示怀疑。他周三说：“我们心理上希望拿到它，但没人能碰得到。”
铀浓缩
特朗普，2月27日：“他们想进行一点浓缩。但当你拥有那么多石油时，根本没必要搞浓缩……我说，不行，不能浓缩。不能是20%，也不能是30%。他们总是想要20%、30%的浓缩铀……他们说是用于民用。我认为这根本算不上民用。”
特朗普，6月14日：最终协议必须永久确保伊朗“只能为非军事目的进行铀浓缩”，并且“永远不能超过特定的数量”，总统在接受《纽约时报》采访时说道，他表示希望将铀浓缩暂停15至20年。
特朗普，6月17日：“我一直对他们说：‘你们可能拥有世界第三大石油储备。你们到底为什么需要核能？’……不过，当你说某个人想要拥有核能，而其他国家都有，周边国家也有，却不让他们为了发电之类的用途拥有核能时，这确实有点难办。这总是有点棘手。你得用点常识。”
副总统J·D·万斯，6月18日：“奥巴马时期的核协议允许铀浓缩。我们的协议不会。”
背景情况：伊朗长期以来拒绝完全放弃其铀浓缩计划。伊朗官员坚称该计划旨在和平用途，就在去年，美国情报机构还发现伊朗并未积极制造核武器，尽管近年来伊朗将铀浓缩至远高于大多数非军事用途所需的纯度水平。
奥巴马政府在2015年签署的核协议允许伊朗将铀浓缩至3.67%，远低于武器级的90%，同时对伊朗的库存规模以及伊朗可运行的离心机数量和类型加以限制。当时这项安排遭到了批评，特朗普在其第一任期内让美国退出了该协议。
战争爆发前，特朗普曾表示，他希望伊朗同意“完全不进行铀浓缩”。
美伊谅解备忘录将铀浓缩的具体细节留待后续谈判，仅表示两国“同意就浓缩问题以及与伊朗伊斯兰共和国核需求相关的其他双方商定的事项进行讨论”。目前尚不清楚最终协议会是什么样子。特朗普本周表示，让伊朗彻底放弃其核计划可能“很困难”，但万斯表示，总统设定的不允许铀浓缩的红线仍然有效。
政权更迭
特朗普，2月28日在Truth社交平台上向伊朗民众发表视频讲话：“接管你们的政府。它将属于你们。这可能是你们几代人才能遇到的唯一机会。”
特朗普，3月29日：“如果你看看现状，我们已经实现了政权更迭，因为前一个政权被摧毁了，他们都死了。下一个政权也基本完蛋了，第三个政权，我们打交道的是一群前所未有的不同的人。这是完全不同的一群人。所以我认为这就是政权更迭。”
特朗普，6月16日：“你们谈论政权更迭。我从来都不在乎政权更迭。”
背景情况：战争打响后的最初几个小时，特朗普明确将这场战争视为伊朗民众推翻1979年以来执政的伊斯兰共和国的机会。在最高领袖阿里·哈梅内伊在空袭中被击毙后，特朗普曾表示他希望参与挑选伊朗的下一任领导人，并对哈梅内伊的儿子被提拔为最高领袖的决定感到“失望”。
最近，随着伊朗政权继续存在，特朗普给出了略有不同的说法，称击毙前伊朗领导人实际上就是一种“政权更迭”。
冻结资产与制裁解除
特朗普，5月27日：“不，我们不会讨论任何放宽制裁或给钱的问题。没有制裁减免，没有资金返还，什么都没有。”
特朗普，6月17日：“那不是我们的钱，是他们的钱。我们在某个时间点冻结了它们，我想我们得把它们还回去。”
背景情况：对伊朗来说的一个关键问题是解除或暂停美国的严厉制裁，这些制裁严重破坏了伊朗的经济并冻结了其资产，其中许多制裁都可以追溯到特朗普第一任期内的“极限施压”运动，甚至更早。奥巴马时期的核协议解除了制裁，以换取伊朗对其核计划的限制，特朗普在2018年曾辩称，这种安排给了伊朗“数百亿美元”。
本周的谅解备忘录表示，美国将“按照最终协议中商定的时间表”解除对伊朗的“所有类型的制裁”。特朗普政府表示，除非伊朗证明自己遵守了协议，否则不会解除任何制裁或解冻任何资产。
Trump’s goals for the Iran war and what he’s saying now
June 18, 2026 / 6:47 PM EDT / CBS News
By Zak Hudak, Natalie McCormick, Maria Sullivan, Gabriella Biello
Washington — Hours after the U.S. launched its war against Iran in late February, President Trump laid out an aggressive list of war aims. He pledged to “destroy their missiles,” prevent the regime from rebuilding its nuclear program and set the stage for Iranians to “take over” the country’s government.
Now, as the Trump administration touts a newly signed memorandum of understanding to extend the U.S.-Iran ceasefire and jumpstart nuclear talks, the president has backed off some of those ambitions.
Mr. Trump told reporters this week it’s “OK” for Iran to keep some of its ballistic missiles. He said he isn’t in a hurry to recover Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium, and isn’t vying for “regime change” in Iran. The memorandum of understanding also leaves most specifics on the fate of Iran’s nuclear program to be determined in additional negotiations over the next 60 days.
The president also shared some praise for Iran’s current leadership.
“We’re dealing with people that I think are very rational people, and they were nice to deal with,” Mr. Trump said of Iran’s current leadership during an event at the G7 summit in France on Tuesday, noting that some prior Iranian leaders were killed during the war. “They were strong people, smart people. … They’re not radicalized and they’re looking to help their country.”
Here’s what the president and top administration officials have said about key issues related to Iran, then and now:
Eliminating ballistic missiles
Trump, Feb. 28: “We’re going to destroy their missiles and raze their missile industry to the ground. It will be totally, again, obliterated.”
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, March 2: “I’m telling you what the objectives of this operation are. The objectives of this operation are to destroy their ballistic missile capability and make sure they can’t rebuild it, and make sure that they can’t hide behind that to have a nuclear program. That’s the objective of the mission.”
Trump, June 17: “If other countries have them, it’s a little bit unfair for [Iran] not to have some. A ballistic missile is not the same thing as what we’re talking about, when we talk nuclear. But if Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and they all have some — in relative proportion, I think it’s OK.”
Context: While Mr. Trump has said preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon is his primary goal, the administration and U.S. allies in the Middle East have long raised concerns about threats posed by Iran’s conventional military — especially its ballistic missiles, which can reach Israel and U.S. allies and military assets around the region. Throughout the war, U.S. forces heavily targeted Iran’s missile stockpile and missile factories.
The U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding does not make any references to ballistic missiles, though Mr. Trump said Wednesday his administration will work on a “parallel effort” with Persian Gulf countries to address Iran’s conventional missiles and other “non-nuclear issues.”
Mr. Trump argued Wednesday that most of Iran’s missile stockpile was either destroyed or buried under rubble during the war. But he suggested he isn’t looking to fully eliminate Iran’s ballistic missiles.
He also appeared to mock some hawkish Trump supporters who want the country’s missile program to be more thoroughly decimated. “I have guys — I like some of these guys, but I don’t think they’re smart — ‘Sir, you shouldn’t let them have any missiles.’ I said: ‘Well, what am I going to do? Am I going to let Saudi Arabia have missiles, but they can’t have them?’ … It doesn’t work that way.”
“Nuclear dust”
Trump, April 17: “The USA will get all nuclear dust — you know what the nuclear dust is? That was that white, powdery substance created by our B2 bombers, those great B2 bombers, late one evening 7 months ago.”
Trump, April 26: “We have to take that nuclear dust. We’re going to take it, and that’s part of our negotiation with Iran. We don’t want them to have it.”
Trump, June 16: “What’s happening is that at an appropriate time — there’s no rush at all. We have cameras from space on it. We know everybody that goes there, which is, like, nobody. The B2 bombers hit it. The entire mountain collapsed inside it. It’s a very tough excavation. Nobody else can do it, but us, and probably China. They have the equipment, we have the equipment. We’re in no rush, but we get it. And when we get it, we’ll destroy it.”
Context: In the years leading up to the war, Iran amassed a stockpile of 60% enriched uranium, which is just a short step away from weapons-grade material. Much of that material was held in a handful of subterranean facilities that were bombed by the U.S. last year, making it difficult to access.
During this year’s war, the Trump administration strategized on ways to recover the uranium, which the president calls “nuclear dust.” An operation to dig through the rubble and take the material would have been among the most challenging and risky special operations missions in U.S. history, experts say.
In the memorandum of understanding, the U.S. and Iran “agreed to resolve the disposition of stockpiled enriched material” in their talks over the next 60 days. The “minimum methodology” is “down-blending” the uranium to a lower level of purity onsite, under the International Atomic Energy Agency’s supervision.
But Mr. Trump suggested this week taking the material is not an urgent task, expressing doubt that Iran can recover it. He said Wednesday “we’d like to get it psychologically, but nobody’s touching it.”
Uranium enrichment
Trump, Feb. 27: “They want to enrich a little bit. You don’t have to enrich when you have that much oil. … I say, no enrichment. Not 20%, 30%. They always want 20%, 30%. … They want it for civil. I think it’s uncivil.”
Trump, June 14: The final deal must permanently ensure that Iran “can only enrich for nonmilitary purposes” and “can never go beyond a certain amount,” the president said in an interview with The New York Times in which he said he wants a suspension on uranium enrichment for 15 or 20 years.
Trump, June 17: “I’ve said to them always: ‘You have probably the third-largest oil reserves in the world. What the hell do you need nuclear for?’ … It is a little hard, though, when you say that somebody wants it, other people have it, other adjoining states have it, and you’re not letting them have it for purposes of electricity and things like that. It’s always a little tough. You have to use a little common sense.”
Vice President JD Vance, June 18: “The Obama nuclear deal allowed enrichment. Ours will not.”
Context: Iran has long refused to fully give up its uranium enrichment program. Iranian officials insist the program is intended for peaceful purposes, and as recently as last year, U.S. intelligence agencies found Iran was not actively building a nuclear weapon, though Iran has enriched uranium in recent years to levels well beyond what’s necessary for most non-military purposes.
The 2015 nuclear deal inked by the Obama administration allowed Iran to keep enriching uranium to 3.67%, significantly below the 90% used for bombs, with limits on the size of Iran’s stockpile and the number and types of centrifuges Iran could operate. That structure drew criticism at the time, and Mr. Trump withdrew the U.S. from the deal during his first term in office.
Prior to the outbreak of war, Mr. Trump said he wanted Iran to agree to “no enrichment.”
The U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding leaves specifics on uranium enrichment for later, saying only that the two countries “agreed to discuss the issue of enrichment and other mutually agreed matters related to the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear needs.” It’s unclear what a final deal could look like. Mr. Trump suggested this week it could be “hard” to get Iran to fully give up its nuclear program, but Vance suggested the president’s red line of no enrichment is still in place.
Regime change
Trump, addressing the Iranian people in a video on Truth Social on Feb. 28: “Take over your government. It will be yours to take. This will be, probably, your only chance for generations.”
Trump, March 29: “We’ve had regime change, if you look already, because the one regime was decimated, destroyed, they’re all dead. The next regime is mostly dead, and the third regime, we’re dealing with different people than anybody’s dealt with before. It’s a whole different group of people. So I would consider that regime change.”
Trump, June 16: “You talk about regime change. I never cared about regime change.”
Context: In the war’s opening hours, Mr. Trump explicitly framed it as an opportunity for the Iranian people to overthrow the Islamic Republic, which has governed Iran since 1979. After Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in strikes, Mr. Trump said he wanted a role in picking Iran’s next leader, and was “disappointed” by the decision to elevate Khamenei’s son to the post of supreme leader.
More recently, as the Iranian regime has remained in place, Mr. Trump offered a slightly different view, arguing the killing of prior Iranian leaders was effectively a form of “regime change.”
Frozen assets and sanctions relief
Trump, May 27: “No, we’re not talking about any easing of sanctions or giving money. No sanctions, no money, no nothing.”
Trump, June 17: “It’s not our money, it’s their money. And we froze it at a certain point in time, I guess we’re going to have to give it back.”
Context: A key issue for Iran is the removal — or suspension — of intense U.S. sanctions that have hobbled Iran’s economy and frozen its assets, many of which date back to the “maximum pressure” campaign in Mr. Trump’s first term or even earlier. The Obama-era nuclear deal lifted sanctions in exchange for limits on Iran’s nuclear program, an arrangement Mr. Trump argued in 2018 gave Iran “many billions of dollars.”
This week’s memorandum of understanding says the U.S. will lift “all types of sanctions” against Iran on an “agreed-upon schedule as part of the final deal.” The Trump administration has said no sanctions will be removed or assets unfrozen unless Iran demonstrates compliance.
