作者: root

  • 特朗普提名基思·松德林担任劳工部长


    2026年6月29日 / 美国东部时间晚上7:23 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    作者:凯特琳·伊莱克

    凯特琳·伊莱克是哥伦比亚广播公司新闻网驻华盛顿特区政治记者。她曾供职于《华盛顿考察家报》和《国会山报》,并入选美国国家新闻基金会2022年保罗·米勒华盛顿报道奖学金项目。

    华盛顿讯——特朗普总统周一表示,他将提名基思·松德林正式出任劳工部长。

    此前在劳工部长洛里·查韦斯-德雷默于今年4月离职后,松德林以代理身份履职该职位。

    特朗普在其Truth Social账号的帖子中写道:“基思在其职业生涯中,始终展现出为美国辛勤劳作的民众争取切实成果的决心,我相信他会在新岗位上表现出色。”

    这是一则突发新闻,后续将持续更新。

    Trump nominates Keith Sonderling as labor secretary

    June 29, 2026 / 7:23 PM EDT / CBS News

    By Caitlin Yilek

    Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter at CBSNews.com, based in Washington, D.C. She previously worked for the Washington Examiner and The Hill, and was a member of the 2022 Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellowship with the National Press Foundation.

    Washington — President Trump said Monday he will nominate Keith Sonderling to lead the Department of Labor permanently.

    Sonderling was elevated to the role in an acting capacity after Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer left the position in April.

    “Throughout his career, Keith has proven his dedication to delivering strong results for the Hardworking People of our Country, and I know he will do an incredible job in his new role,” Mr. Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.

    This is a breaking story; it will be updated.

  • 特朗普:美伊多哈会议或许重要或不重要


    2026年6月30日 07:48 / 联合早报

    特朗普6月29日在椭圆形办公室坚称,美国“在军事上正在取得胜利”,并重申必须阻止伊朗制造核武器。 (彭博社)

    美国总统特朗普说,美伊多哈会议“或许重要或不重要”,而伊朗总统佩泽希齐扬说,伊朗在决策中“秉持理性,维护人类尊严”。

    路透社报道,特朗普星期一(6月29日)在白宫椭圆形办公室告诉记者,“我们在军事上正在取得胜利”,并重申必须阻止伊朗制造核武器。

    谈到美伊多哈会议,他说:“多哈会议或许重要,或许不重要。我们拭目以待。”


    伊朗电视台6月18日发布照片​​,显示伊朗总统佩泽希齐扬手持美伊谅解备忘录,上面有他和美国总统特朗普的签名。(法新社)

    美伊技术团队本周赴卡塔尔首都多哈,特朗普29日早前在社媒平台发文说,应伊朗请求,美伊代表团星期二(30日)在多哈举行会议。但伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃(Esmaeil Baghaei)同日接受媒体采访时说,伊朗技术代表团前往多哈与美方“无关”,双方未来几天并未安排任何级别的会谈。

    佩泽希齐扬在X平台贴文说:“我们应对‘无理吹嘘和无端威胁’的方式,是在决策中秉持理性,维护人类尊严,并在采取行动时‘果断且无畏’。”

    佩泽希齐扬也说:“谅解是双边事情,如果美方遵守谅解备忘录,我们也会履行我们的义务。”

    特朗普:美伊多哈会议或许重要或不重要

    2026年6月30日 07:48 / 联合早报

    特朗普6月29日在椭圆形办公室坚称,美国“在军事上正在取得胜利”,并重申必须阻止伊朗制造核武器。 (彭博社)

    美国总统特朗普说,美伊多哈会议“或许重要或不重要”,而伊朗总统佩泽希齐扬说,伊朗在决策中“秉持理性,维护人类尊严”。

    路透社报道,特朗普星期一(6月29日)在白宫椭圆形办公室告诉记者,“我们在军事上正在取得胜利”,并重申必须阻止伊朗制造核武器。

    谈到美伊多哈会议,他说:“多哈会议或许重要,或许不重要。我们拭目以待。”

    伊朗电视台6月18日发布照片​​,显示伊朗总统佩泽希齐扬手持美伊谅解备忘录,上面有他和美国总统特朗普的签名。(法新社)

    美伊技术团队本周赴卡塔尔首都多哈,特朗普29日早前在社媒平台发文说,应伊朗请求,美伊代表团星期二(30日)在多哈举行会议。但伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃(Esmaeil Baghaei)同日接受媒体采访时说,伊朗技术代表团前往多哈与美方“无关”,双方未来几天并未安排任何级别的会谈。

    佩泽希齐扬在X平台贴文说:“我们应对‘无理吹嘘和无端威胁’的方式,是在决策中秉持理性,维护人类尊严,并在采取行动时“果断且无畏”。

    佩泽希齐扬也说:谅解是双边事情,如果美方遵守谅解备忘录,我们也会履行我们的义务。”

  • 加列戈发言人:特朗普正通过司法部调查“针对”这位民主党参议员


    2026-06-29T21:48:44.691Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:摩根·里默

    发布于 2026年6月29日,美国东部时间下午5:48

    Sen. Ruben Gallego speaks during a news conference at the US Capitol on June 18, 2026.

    亚利桑那州联邦参议员鲁本·加列戈的一位发言人周一表示,唐纳德·特朗普总统正通过一项针对其竞选资金的司法部调查“针对”这位民主党议员。

    在回应Axios关于此次调查的报道时,这位发言人指责司法部被“武器化”,并称本届政府实际上正试图压制那些批评它的人。

    “特朗普正在针对加列戈参议员,而这个史上被武器化程度最高的司法部却对特朗普前所未有的腐败视而不见——这种腐败正在抬高美国家庭的生活成本,反而将矛头指向任何阻碍他们的人——比如美联储、履行监督职责的国会议员,现在还有加列戈参议员,”这位发言人在一份声明中说道。

    该发言人表示,除了Axios的报道外,加列戈的办公室没有独立消息源了解这项司法部调查的情况,也不清楚调查旨在揭露什么。Axios报道称,此次调查源于南加州的一起“举报人投诉”。

    司法部未立即回应置评请求。

    加列戈的发言人还表示:“就在参议院道德委员会于几周前驳回了本届政府推动的针对加列戈参议员的右翼抹黑指控后,这则消息出炉,这一点都不令人意外。”

    Rep. Anna Paulina Luna speaks with reporters as she departs a vote at the US Capitol on June 24.

    周一早些时候,加列戈的办公室公布了参议院道德委员会的一封信件,显示该委员会已了结共和党联邦众议员安娜·波琳娜·卢纳对他提起的投诉。这项指控曾称加列戈存在“竞选资金违规行为以及不恰当的性接触行为”,将与联邦执法部门的调查各自独立。

    “根据委员会的调查结果,委员会未发现证据表明你的行为违反了联邦法律、参议院规则或相关行为准则,”信件中写道。

    Gallego spokesperson says Trump is ‘targeting’ the Democratic senator with DOJ investigation

    2026-06-29T21:48:44.691Z / CNN

    By Morgan Rimmer

    PUBLISHED Jun 29, 2026, 5:48 PM ET

    Sen. Ruben Gallego speaks during a news conference at the US Capitol on June 18, 2026.

    Alex Wong/Getty Images/File

    A spokesperson for Sen. Ruben Gallego said Monday that President Donald Trump is “targeting” the Arizona Democrat with a Justice Department investigation into his campaign finances.

    Reacting to a report of the inquiry in Axios, the spokesperson accused the Justice Department of having been “weaponized” and said the administration was effectively trying to quiet those who criticize it.

    “Trump is targeting Senator Gallego while the most weaponized Department of Justice in history is turning a blind eye to Trump’s unprecedented corruption that’s raising costs for families, and instead targeting anyone who gets in their way — like the Federal Reserve, members of Congress doing their oversight duty, and now Senator Gallego,” the spokesperson said in a statement.

    The spokesperson said Gallego’s office did not have independent knowledge, outside of the Axios report, into the DOJ investigation or what it was seeking to uncover. Axios reported that the investigation stemmed from a “whistleblower complaint” out of Southern California.

    The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    “It’s the least surprising news of the week that this comes immediately after the Senate Ethics Committee cleared Senator Gallego of rightwing smears pushed by the administration weeks ago,” the Gallego spokeperson said.

    Rep. Anna Paulina Luna speaks with reporters as she departs a vote at the US Capitol on June 24.

    Francis Chung/Politico/AP

    Earlier Monday, Gallego’s office released a letter from the Senate Ethics Committee revealing the panel closed a complaint filed against him by Republican Rep. Anna Paulina Luna. The inquiry, which alleged “campaign finance violations and inappropriate conduct of a sexual nature,” would be separate from an investigation by federal law enforcement.

    “Based on the investigation of the Committee, the Committee did not find evidence that your actions violated Federal law, Senate Rules, or related standards of conduct,” the letter said.

  • 道德委员会认定加列戈无责,卢娜放话:“狗改不了吃屎”


    该委员会在历时近一个月的调查后,未发现加列戈违反联邦法律或参议院规则的证据

    2026年6月29日 美国东部时间下午2:04 / 福克斯新闻
    作者:亚历克斯·米勒、亚当·帕克 福克斯新闻

    加列戈称与深陷丑闻的斯沃威尔的友谊“影响了自己的判断力”
    亚利桑那州民主党参议员鲁本·加列戈——前众议员埃里克·斯沃威尔在国会中的“挚友”——表示,两人的关系让他在针对其行为的传言四起时“判断出现偏差”。

    你现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!
    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/be6baa44-dc8a-4531-a4ef-512d7e7c9d6f

    收听本文
    3分钟

    参议院道德委员会驳回了针对亚利桑那州民主党参议员鲁本·加列戈的投诉,该投诉指控这名议员存在性行为不端和竞选财务违规行为。

    此次调查由佛罗里达州共和党众议员安娜·宝琳娜·卢娜发起,她今年早些时候指控,在前加州民主党众议员埃里克·斯沃威尔——加列戈的密友——因丑闻缠身倒台后,一名在任参议员存在“令人极为不安”的指控。

    但在对该事件进行近一个月的调查后,该委员会周一在给加列戈的一封信中表示,没有证据支持卢娜的说法。


    国会丑闻余波:针对匿名参议员的“令人不安”指控正接受审查

    参议院道德委员会在周一经过约一个月的调查后,驳回了佛罗里达州共和党众议员安娜·宝琳娜·卢娜对亚利桑那州民主党参议员鲁本·加列戈提出的性行为不端和竞选财务违规指控。(格雷姆·斯隆/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社;安德鲁·卡瓦列罗-雷耶斯/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    “我们写信通知您,参议院道德委员会(以下简称‘委员会’)已驳回众议员安娜·宝琳娜·卢娜针对您提起的投诉,”该委员会在信中写道,“具体而言,投诉内容包括竞选财务违规以及不当的性接触行为。”

    “应您的调查请求,委员会于2026年4月17日和5月15日将这些指控转交予您,并要求您提供更多信息,”信件继续写道,“基于委员会的调查结果,未发现您的行为违反联邦法律、参议院规则或相关行为标准的证据。”

    加列戈在一份声明中表示,道德委员会的决定“重申了我从一开始就对这些指控的看法:它们是右翼活动人士安娜·宝琳娜·卢娜、白宫及其盟友散布的右翼阴谋论。”


    加列戈参议员称,随着华盛顿特区谣言四起,他与斯沃威尔的长期友谊“影响了我的判断力”

    “我期待卢娜众议员为利用道德程序、却拒绝调查让民众生活更加艰难的历史性腐败行为道歉,”加列戈说,“与此同时,我将继续为亚利桑那州民众而战,并追究特朗普共和党人推高生活成本、发动新战争的责任。”

    但卢娜不太可能道歉。

    这名议员在X平台上反驳称,这些指控“并非阴谋论。你是民众代表中一个令人厌恶的例子。”


    加列戈为竞选资金支付的超级碗、迈阿密行程辩护:“去哪里能筹到钱就去哪里”

    加州民主党众议员埃里克·斯沃威尔因性行为不端指控辞职。(凯文·迪特施/盖蒂图片社)

    “需要我提醒你吗?你在竞选参议员期间抛下怀孕的妻子?有很多人知道你的荒唐行径,”卢娜说道。

    “华盛顿特区的好处在于人人都在议论,最终记者会公开你的短信,”她继续说道,“帮自己一个忙,继续为你的法律辩护基金筹款。狗改不了吃屎,你肯定用得上这笔钱。”

    卢娜对加列戈的指控正值斯沃威尔辞职后不久,此前《旧金山纪事报》曝出重磅报道,指称这位前议员涉嫌性侵一名前工作人员。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    加列戈迅速试图与斯沃威尔划清界限,并表示,针对这位前议员在华盛顿流传多年的谣言,他与斯沃威尔的亲密关系“影响了我的判断力”。

    近期,一则政治报的报道让加列戈受到审查,报道称他动用数千竞选资金用于奢华旅行、超级碗门票和儿童保育费用。

    “这不是什么新闻,”加列戈告诉该媒体,“随着育儿成本不断上涨,美国家庭的预算负担沉重,国会和白宫的两党议员都会像联邦选举委员会允许的那样,经常带着妻子和孩子出行。”

    亚历克斯·米勒是福克斯新闻数字频道的撰稿人,负责报道美国参议院事务。

    Ethics panel clears Gallego as Luna declares, ‘Once a creep, always a creep’

    The panel found no evidence that Gallego violated federal law or Senate rules after a nearly monthlong investigation

    June 29, 2026 2:04pm EDT / Fox News

    By Alex Miller, Adam Pack, Fox News

    Gallego says friendship with embattled Swalwell ‘clouded his judgment’

    Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., former Rep. Eric Swalwell’s “best friend” in Congress, said that their relationship “clouded his judgment” over rumors about his conduct.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/be6baa44-dc8a-4531-a4ef-512d7e7c9d6f

    Listen to this article
    3 min

    The Senate Ethics Committee has dismissed a complaint against Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., that alleged the lawmaker committed sexual misconduct and campaign finance violations.

    The probe was spurred by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., who earlier this year charged that there were “very disturbing” allegations against a sitting senator in the wake of the scandal-filled downfall of former-Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., a close friend of Gallego’s.

    But after a nearly monthlong investigation into the matter, the committee told Gallego in a letter on Monday that there wasn’t evidence to back up Luna’s claims.

    ‘DISTURBING’ ALLEGATIONS AGAINST UNNAMED SENATOR UNDER REVIEW IN WAKE OF SCANDALS ROCKING CONGRESS

    The Senate Ethics Committee dismissed allegations of sexual misconduct and campaign finance violations made by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., against Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., on Monday after a roughly monthlong investigation.(Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)

    “We are writing to inform you that the Select Committee on Ethics (the Committee) dismissed a complaint filed against you by Representative Anna Paulina Luna,” the panel stated. “Specifically, the complaint alleged campaign finance violations and inappropriate conduct of a sexual nature.”

    “In response to your request for an investigation, the Committee referred these allegations to you and requested additional information on April 17 and May 15, 2026,” the letter continued. “Based on the investigation of the Committee, the Committee did not find evidence that your actions violated Federal law, Senate Rules, or related standards of conduct.”

    Gallego said in a statement that the Ethics Committee’s decision “reaffirms what I have said about these accusations from the beginning: they were right-wing conspiracies peddled by far-right activists like Anna Paulina Luna, the White House and their allies.”

    SENATOR GALLEGO SAYS LONGTIME FRIENDSHIP WITH SWALWELL ‘CLOUDED MY JUDGMENT’ AS RUMORS SWIRLED IN DC

    “I look forward to an apology from Rep. Luna for weaponizing the ethics process while refusing to investigate historic corruption that’s making life harder for families,” Gallego said. “In the meantime, I will continue fighting for Arizonans and holding Trump Republicans accountable for high costs and new wars.”

    But an apology from Luna is unlikely.

    The lawmaker shot back on X that the allegations “are not conspiracy theories. You’re a gross example of representation.”

    SWALWELL FRIEND GALLEGO DEFENDS CAMPAIGN-FUNDED SUPER BOWL, MIAMI TRIPS: ‘GO WHERE THE MONEY IS’

    Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., resigned amid sexual misconduct allegations.(Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

    “Need I mention you leaving your pregnant wife during your campaign for Senate? There are plenty of people who know about your antics,” Luna said.

    “The good news about D.C. is everyone talks, and eventually the reporters come forward with your texts,” she continued. “Do yourself a favor and keep raising for your legal defense fund. Once a creep, always a creep, and you’re gonna need it.”

    Luna’s allegations against Gallego came shortly after Swalwell resigned from the House following a bombshell report from The San Francisco Chronicle that the ex-lawmaker allegedly sexually assaulted a former staffer.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Gallego moved to quickly put distance between himself and Swalwell and argued that his tight-knit relationship “clouded my judgment,” regarding rumors that swirled about the ex-lawmaker for years in Washington, D.C.

    Gallego has recently come under scrutiny for a report from Politico that he spent thousands in campaign cash on luxury travel, Super Bowl tickets and childcare.

    “This is not breaking news,” Gallego told the outlet. “With the rising costs of childcare and the burden it has on the budgets of American families, Democrats and Republicans in Congress and the White House alike regularly travel with their wives and children, as is permitted by the FEC.”

    Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.

  • 特朗普任命的巴雷特与自由派联手作出“大错特错”的邮寄选票裁决,引发保守派反弹


    2026年6月29日 美国东部时间13:52 / 福克斯新闻

    这份以5票赞成、4票反对的裁决认定,联邦法律并未规定选票必须在何时收到才能被计入有效票

    作者:安德鲁·马克·米勒 福克斯新闻
    发布于2026年6月29日美国东部时间下午1:52

    周一,最高法院大法官艾米·科尼·巴雷特出具多数意见裁决支持密西西比州一项法律,允许在选举日后收到的邮寄选票仍可计入选举结果,随即在社交媒体上遭到保守派的强烈抨击。

    此次裁决以5票对4票作出,由特朗普总统任命的巴雷特撰写多数意见,首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨以及索尼娅·索托马约尔、埃琳娜·卡根和凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊大法官加入了这一意见。

    巴雷特的意见认为,就联邦法律而言,选举日是选民必须完成对心仪候选人选择的截止日期,但相关法律并未规定选票必须在何时收到才能被视为有效。

    巴雷特随即遭到保守派评论人士和政客的批评。

    艾米·科尼·巴雷特称罗伊诉韦德案是法官“强行解读进”宪法的“飘忽不定”裁决

    图片
    2025年9月10日,美国最高法院大法官艾米·科尼·巴雷特在加利福尼亚州约巴林达的尼克松总统图书馆及博物馆接受尼克松基金会董事会成员休·休伊特的采访。(保罗·伯瑟巴赫/媒体新闻集团/橙县纪事报)

    “这一意见大错特错,”共和党参议员埃里克·施密特在X平台上发帖称,“巴雷特大法官与自由派大法官联手认定,联邦选举法不会 preempt 那些允许统计逾期邮寄选票的州。这对选举诚信而言极为糟糕。这也是我们必须通过完整的《拯救美国法案》(SAVE American Act)的又一理由。”

    “巴雷特是自苏特以来最糟糕的保守派司法灾难,”保守派作家汉斯·曼克在X平台上发帖称,“区别在于,几乎没有保守派曾对苏特抱有太多期待,而巴雷特本应是最高法院的未来。最糟糕的是,她还将在未来40年里推行左翼政策。”

    “艾米·科尼·巴雷特在太多备受瞩目的案件中持续令人失望,”政治评论员乔希·哈默在X平台上发帖称。

    “还记得选举日吗?”共和党众议员艾贝·哈马德的办公室在X平台上发帖称,“巴雷特大法官出具的这一灾难性最高法院裁决,确保我们会持续背离选举日原则——因为我们神圣的选举将被无休止的邮寄选票和永无止境的计票拖入泥潭。”

    “艾米·科尼·巴雷特是所有共和党籍大法官中最差的选择,”退役美国陆军上尉赛斯·凯谢尔在X平台上发帖称,“包括罗伯茨在内都是如此。她太令人失望了。”

    记者手记:共和党考虑“摧毁” filibuster 以通过特朗普的《拯救法案》

    图片
    2026年6月18日,华盛顿特区美国最高法院大楼上空乌云密布。(奇普·索莫德维拉/盖蒂图片社)

    “她援引了《联邦党人文集》第59篇中的亚历山大·汉密尔顿言论,谈及建国者的意图,并反复以历史为指导,”宪法律师克里斯安·霍尔在X平台上发帖称,“但当历史证据变得不便时,巴雷特会悄悄将其搁置一旁。巴雷特将司法激进主义伪装成选择性原旨主义。”

    诚实选举项目执行主任杰森·斯尼德在一份声明中表示,该裁决“令人深感失望,未切中要害”。

    “联邦法律明确规定:所有选票必须在选举日前收到才能被计入,”斯尼德写道,“最高法院错失了强化选举诚信的重大机会,反而站在了加州式混乱的一边。正如阿利托大法官在异议意见中明确指出的那样,看着选举日后陆续收到的选票翻转选举结果,只会损害公众对我们政府体系的信任。”

    前联邦选举委员会委员、美国企业研究所埃德温·米斯三世法治研究所高级法律研究员汉斯·冯·斯帕科夫斯基在一份声明中称,该裁决“令人极度失望”。

    “正如塞缪尔·阿利托大法官在其联合其他三名大法官的异议意见中所说,艾米·科尼·巴雷特大法官的意见不仅与这些法律的字面文本、历史惯例和先例不符,还‘有可能进一步削弱美国人对选举诚信的信心’,”冯·斯帕科夫斯基写道。

    这一裁决促使许多人重申《拯救法案》的重要性——这是特朗普长期以来推动的选民身份证和公民身份验证立法,包括共和党众议员格雷格·斯特鲁布在X平台上发帖称:“参议院的议事阻挠规则是唯一的障碍。摧毁它!”

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    [image_4]

    图片
    2020年10月12日,最高法院提名人艾米·科尼·巴雷特在国会山参议院司法委员会的确认听证会上宣誓就职。(佚名)

    特朗普在Truth Social平台上对该裁决作出回应,称这是“巨大损失”,并强调所有选民必须出示带照片的身份证件和公民身份证明,且除特定例外情况外“不应存在邮寄选票”。

    “没有任何理由让政客或其他人反对以上三项要求,”特朗普写道,“反对的唯一原因——作弊!”

    特朗普补充道:“众议院已经三次通过了这项至关重要的法案。美国参议院似乎无法做到这一点。在我们国家正经历一场比第一次世界大战、第二次世界大战、珍珠港事件或911事件都更危险的强大共产主义运动之际,所有民主党人,以及我们的五名共和党参议院摇摆票:丽莎·穆尔科斯基、苏珊·柯林斯、汤姆·蒂利斯、比尔·卡西迪和米奇·麦康奈尔,必须投票拯救我们的国家。不能再有任何借口了!”

    福克斯新闻数字频道的罗伯特·施马德和安德斯·哈格斯塔姆为本报告撰稿。

    安德鲁·马克·米勒是福克斯新闻记者。可在推特@andymarkmiller关注他,或发送爆料邮件至AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com。

    Conservatives revolt after Trump-appointed Barrett joins liberals in ‘shockingly wrong’ mail ballot ruling

    2026-06-29 13:52 EDT / Fox News

    The 5-4 decision held that federal law sets no standard for when ballots must be received to be counted

    By Andrew Mark Miller Fox News

    Published June 29, 2026 1:52pm EDT

    Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett faced the wrath of conservatives on social media on Monday after she authored the majority opinion ruling in favor of a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted in elections even if they are received after Election Day.

    The court was split 5-4 on the ruling with Barrett, appointed by President Donald Trump, writing the majority opinion joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, as well as justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

    Barrett’s opinion held that Election Day, in the context of federal law, set a deadline for when voters must make a choice regarding their preferred candidate but said that relevant laws have no standard for when ballots must be received to be considered valid.

    Barrett was quickly criticized by conservative commentators and politicians.

    AMY CONEY BARRETT CALLS ROE V WADE ‘FREE-FLOATING’ DECISION THAT JUDGES ‘READ INTO’ CONSTITUTION

    U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett is interviewed by Nixon Foundation board member Hugh Hewitt at the Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in Yorba Linda, Calif., on Sept. 10, 2025.(Paul Bersebach/MediaNews Group/Orange County Register)

    “A shockingly wrong opinion,” Republican Sen. Eric Schmitt posted on X. “Justice Barrett joins with the liberal justices to hold that federal election law does not preempt states who allow late mail-in ballots to be counted. This is terrible for election integrity. Another reason we must pass the full SAVE American Act.”

    “Barrett is the biggest conservative judicial disaster since Souter,” conservative author Hans Mahncke posted on X. “The difference is that few conservatives expected much from Souter whereas Barrett was supposed to be the future of the Court. The worst part is that she’ll be there pushing leftist policies for another 40 years.”

    “Amy Coney Barrett continues to disappoint in far too many high-profile cases,” political commentator Josh Hammer posted on X.

    “Remember Election Day?” Republican Rep. Abe Hamadeh’s office posted on X. “This disastrous SCOTUS decision, authored by Justice Barrett, guarantees we’ll keep drifting away from it — as our sacred elections get bogged down by endless mail-in ballots and never-ending counts.”

    “Amy Coney Barrett is the worst choice ever among all GOP justices,” retired U.S. Army captain Seth Keshel posted on X. “And that includes Roberts. What a disappointment she is.”

    REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK: GOP WEIGHS ‘NUKING’ FILIBUSTER TO PASS TRUMP’S SAVE ACT

    Rain clouds roll over the United States Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., on June 18, 2026.(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

    “She quotes Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 59, speaks of the Framers’ intent, and repeatedly invokes history as its guide,” Constitutional attorney Krisanne Hall posted on X. “But when the historical evidence becomes inconvenient, Barrett quietly sets it aside. Barrett engages in judicial activism disguised as selective originalism.”

    Jason Snead, executive director of Honest Elections Project, said in a statement that the ruling is “deeply disappointing and misses the mark.”

    “Federal law is clear: all ballots must be received by Election Day to be counted,” Snead wrote. “The Court missed a major opportunity to reinforce election integrity and instead sides with California-style chaos. As Justice Alito makes clear in his dissent, watching ballots trickle in after Election Day and flip races does nothing but damage public trust in our system of government.”

    Hans von Spakovsky, a former Federal Election Commissioner and Senior Legal Fellow in AAF’s Edwin Meese III Institute for the Rule of Law, said in a statement that the ruling is a “grave disappointment.”

    “As Justice Samuel Alito says in his dissent, joined by three other justices, not only is Justice Amy Comey Barrett’s opinion inconsistent with the plain text of those laws and historical practice and precedents, it ‘risks further undermining Americans’ confidence in election integrity,’” von Spakovsky wrote.

    The ruling prompted many to reiterate the importance of the SAVE Act, Trump’s long-sought voter ID and citizenship verification legislation, including Republican Rep. Greg Steube who posted on X, “The Senate filibuster is the only thing standing in the way. Nuke it!”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    [image_4]

    Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett is sworn in during a confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Oct. 12, 2020.(Unknown)

    Trump reacted to the ruling on Truth Social, calling it a “tremendous loss” and stressing the importance that all voters must show a photo ID and proof of citizenship and that there should be “no mail-in” ballots except for specific exceptions.

    “There is no excuse for a politician, or otherwise, to be against the above three requirements,” Trump wrote. “There is only one reason to oppose — CHEATING!”

    Trump added, “The House of Representatives has approved this vital Act, THREE TIMES. The United States Senate seems unable to do so. In a time when there is a powerful Communist Movement taking place in our Country, one more dangerous than World War I, World War II, Pearl Harbor, or September 11th, all Dumocrats, and our five Republican Senate Hold Outs, Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins, Thom Tillis, Bill Cassidy, and Mitch McConnell must vote to SAVE OUR COUNTRY. There can be no more excuses!”

    Fox News Digital’s Robert Schmad and Anders Hagstrom contributed to this report.

    Andrew Mark Miller is a reporter at Fox News. Find him on Twitter @andymarkmiller and email tips to AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com.

  • 斯潘伯格的最新“抢枪闹剧”引发特朗普政府司法部行动:“敬请期待!”


    2026年6月29日 美国东部时间12:04 / 福克斯新闻

    助理司法部长哈米特·迪隆表示,她的办公室正在全面调查弗格森在弗吉尼亚州枪支商店指出的背景调查延误问题

    作者:查尔斯·克赖茨,福克斯新闻

    一名司法部高级检察官回应了一名弗吉尼亚州居民及前特朗普政府官员提出的担忧,此前一名法官临时叫停了一项原本将于周三生效的全面“攻击性武器”禁令,期间背景调查被指故意拖延。

    这场争议发生之际,里士满成为最新一个民主党主导的州府,试图限制与第二修正案相关的活动。最高法院近期驳回纽约和哥伦比亚特区枪支法规的裁决,为保守派挑战类似法案提供了重要法律胜利。

    在弗吉尼亚州的法律诉讼期间,批评者指责州警方故意拖延背景调查,以便在诉讼期间通过迂回方式执行该法律。负责民权事务的助理司法部长哈米特·迪隆回应称,她的办公室正在“全面调查”这起案件以及全国范围内的“抢枪闹剧”。

    弗吉尼亚州基尔马诺克的一名居民与美国枪支拥有者协会一同提起诉讼,要求叫停里士满的新法案。该法案规定买卖“攻击性武器”将面临刑事处罚,批评者称这严重违反了第二修正案。

    弗吉尼亚州7月1日攻击性武器禁令生效前枪支销量激增 由州长斯潘伯格签署签署

    image
    2026年5月18日,周一,弗吉尼亚州州长阿比盖尔·斯潘伯格在里士满高地泉高中举行的法案签署仪式上发言。(迈克·克罗普夫/《里士满时报快讯》)

    该诉讼将弗吉尼亚州北颈地区共和党友好的兰开斯特县的基尔马诺克枪支商店纳入其中,约翰·马丁法官因此裁定该禁令至12月31日暂停执行。

    裁决发布后,联邦贸易委员会委员安德鲁·弗格森发推文称,他在当地枪支商店体验到了所谓的“大规模”背景调查延误。背景调查由弗吉尼亚州警察局负责。

    弗吉尼亚州警察局局长杰弗里·卡茨上校既是斯潘伯格任命的官员,也是兰开斯特县诉讼案的被告方。

    “弗吉尼亚州警察局正在大规模拖延背景调查,这是我见过的最公然侵犯我们权利的行为之一。这太离谱了,”弗格森说道。
    “我们的警察正在协助激进左翼分子解除美国人的武装。”

    当被问及这一指控时,弗吉尼亚州警察局表示不存在故意拖延的情况,并称过去一个月来枪支申请数量激增。
    “枪支交易中心正处理大量交易。仅6月份该中心就处理了超过10万笔交易,日均处理量超过5000笔,”州警察局监察员马修·德姆莱因说道。
    “该中心正全力以赴完成每一笔交易。”

    独家报道:哈米特·迪隆称MLB警告巨人队球员或面临法律后果:“非美国式”

    image

    弗吉尼亚州公民防卫联盟——该案共同原告方——负责人菲利普·范·克利夫也表示,考虑到马丁法官的裁决,他并不认为弗吉尼亚州警察局是故意拖延背景调查。
    “我不想对弗吉尼亚州警察局不公,”范·克利夫在推文中说道。“我不认为这些延误是故意的。”
    “我只是认为弗吉尼亚州警察局及其计算机系统没有做好准备,应对州议会那些控枪蠢货制造的巨大交易量。”

    另一位禁令批评者援引了《弗吉尼亚州法典》的一部分内容,该条款似乎规定,即使背景调查出现延误,枪支交易仍可照常进行。
    如果枪支经销商已经履行了弗吉尼亚州警察局规定的所有程序,但警方在五个工作日内未给出回复,经销商可在不违反法律的情况下完成枪支销售或转让。

    与此同时,州长阿比盖尔·斯潘伯格的发言人表示,弗吉尼亚州民众压倒性支持严格的背景调查制度,该法案将保障“老自治领州”的安全。
    “民调多次显示,超过80%的弗吉尼亚州民众支持普及背景调查——包括大多数枪支拥有者和来自各个政治阵营的弗吉尼亚州居民。斯潘伯格州长签署这项广受支持的法案,旨在恢复合理的背景调查制度,帮助执法人员保护我们社区的安全,”该发言人说道,并承诺斯潘伯格将“继续采取合理措施,保护全州的执法人员、儿童和家庭免受枪支暴力威胁”。

    鉴于弗格森等人的指控,福克斯新闻数字频道联系了司法部,询问正在采取或计划采取哪些行动。

    订阅获取政治新闻通讯

    image
    2025年9月29日,民权事务助理司法部长哈米特·迪隆抵达华盛顿特区司法部参加新闻发布会。(安德鲁·哈尼克/盖蒂图片社)

    马丁法官的裁决指出,禁令中规定的枪支特征缺乏合理依据,因为尽管手枪符合立法者所称的军用风格特征,但却被排除在外。

    该禁令最初由众议院民主党议员丹·赫尔默(费尔法克斯)和参议院民主党议员萨达姆·萨利姆(邓恩洛林)起草。

    据《法庭新闻服务》报道,范·克利夫还指出,民主党前州长蒂姆·凯恩在弗吉尼亚理工大学枪击案后设立的委员会曾发现,像新法案中规定的弹匣限制“对案件结果不会产生任何影响”。

    代表州政府出庭的司法部长杰伊·琼斯在一份声明中表示:“枪支暴力是本州乃至全国暴力犯罪的主要诱因,而攻击性武器的设计初衷就是在数秒内造成最大程度的伤害。”

    在2025年竞选期间,琼斯曾发送的短信被曝光,内容显示他曾设想枪击弗吉尼亚州前共和党众议院议长。
    “州议会通过并由州长签署的攻击性武器禁令将拯救本州的生命,且符合《弗吉尼亚州宪法》,”琼斯说道。

    斯潘伯格5月签署该法案时曾遗憾表示,州议会拒绝接受她提出的修改方案,该方案原本可以将常用的狩猎用枪支排除在外。

    image
    左:弗吉尼亚州州长阿比盖尔·斯潘伯格;右:一家枪支商店。(迈克·克罗普夫/盖蒂图片社;查利·特里巴洛/盖蒂图片社)

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    “我签署这项法案成为法律,因为那些旨在造成最大伤亡的枪支不应出现在我们的街道上。我们采取这一举措是为了保护家庭,支持每天都在努力保护我们社区安全的执法人员,”她说道,并补充称她将与萨利姆和赫尔默合作,澄清法案措辞,以安抚狩猎爱好者。

    福克斯新闻数字频道联系了弗吉尼亚州共和党少数派议员以获取更多评论。众议院预计将于周一晚些时候召开会议,可能会讨论这一议题。

    作者在宾夕法尼亚州阿伦敦出生并长大,自2013年起在福克斯新闻纽约和华盛顿分社工作。

    Spanberger’s latest ‘gun-grabbing nonsense’ prompts action from Trump DOJ: ‘Stay tuned!’

    June 29, 2026 12:04pm EDT / Fox News

    Assistant AG Harmeet Dhillon said her office is ‘all over’ background check slowdowns flagged by Ferguson at VA gun stores

    By Charles Creitz, Fox News

    A top DOJ prosecutor responded to concerns raised by a Virginia resident and fellow Trump administration official over alleged slow-walking of background checks after a judge temporarily blocked a sweeping “assault weapons” ban that otherwise was set to take effect Wednesday.

    The uproar comes as Richmond becomes the latest Democrat-run capital to pursue restrictions on Second Amendment-related activities. The Supreme Court’s recent rulings against New York’s and the District of Columbia’s gun laws have given conservatives major legal victories in their efforts to challenge similar measures.

    Amid Virginia’s legal fight, critics accused state police of intentionally slow-walking background checks to effectively backdoor-enforce the law while it is litigated. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon responded that her office is “all over this” case and other instances of “gun-grabbing nonsense nationally.”

    Joined by Gun Owners of America, a Virginia resident seeking to purchase firearms from a dealer in Kilmarnock, Virginia, sued to block Richmond’s new law imposing criminal penalties for selling or purchasing “assault firearm[s],” which critics said is a sweeping violation of the Second Amendment.

    VIRGINIA GUN SALES SPIKE AHEAD OF JULY 1 ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN SIGNED BY GOV. SPANBERGER

    Gov. Abigail Spanberger speaks during a ceremonial bill signing event at Highland Springs High School in Richmond, Virginia, Monday, May 18, 2026.(Mike Kropf/Richmond Times-Dispatch)

    The inclusion of the Kilmarnock gun store established legal standing in GOP-friendly Lancaster County in Virginia’s Northern Neck, where Judge John Martin blocked enforcement of the law through Dec. 31.

    After the ruling, FTC Commissioner Andrew Ferguson tweeted that he encountered what he called an “en masse” delay in background checks after visiting his local gun store. The checks are handled by the Virginia State Police.

    The top cop at VSP, Col. Jeffrey Katz, is both a Spanberger appointee and listed the defendant in the Lancaster case.

    “The Virginia State Police is is delaying background checks en masse in one of the most flagrant violations of our rights that I’ve seen. This is outrageous,” Ferguson said.

    “Our police are aiding radical leftists to disarm Americans.”

    When asked about the allegation, VSP suggested there was no intentional slow-walking and said troopers have seen a spike in applications over the past month.

    “The Firearms Transaction Center is seeing a large number of transactions. The center has processed over 100,000 transactions in June alone and have been averaging over 5,000 transactions a day,” said Matthew Demlein, an ombudsman for the state police.

    “The center is working diligently to complete each transaction.”

    EXCLUSIVE: HARMEET DHILLON SAYS MLB MIGHT FACE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES FOR WARNING GIANTS PLAYERS: ‘UN-AMERICAN’

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/f1b1ca1f-95d3-4592-bc57-221e3bc6673d

    Philip Van Cleave — whose Virginia Citizens Defense League is a co-plaintiff in the case — also said he was not convinced VSP was intentionally holding up background checks in light of the Lancaster decision.

    “I don’t want to be unfair to the Virginia State Police,” Van Cleave tweeted. “I’m not convinced that the delays are intentional.”

    “I just don’t think VSP and their computer system is geared up to handle the immense volume that the gun-control idiots in the general assembly have created.”

    Another critic of the ban shared a section of the Code of Virginia that appeared to allow firearm transfers to proceed despite background check delays.

    If a dealer fulfills the requirements laid out by VSP but police do not respond within five business days, the dealer may complete the sale or transfer of the firearm without violating the law.

    Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Gov. Abigail Spanberger said Virginians overwhelmingly support stringent background checks and that the law keeps the Old Dominion safe.

    “Polls have repeatedly shown that more than 80 percent of Virginians support universal background checks — including a majority of gun owners and Virginians from every part of the political spectrum. Governor Spanberger signed this widely supported law to restore commonsense background checks and help law enforcement officers keep our communities safe,” the spokesperson said, pledging that Spanberger will “continue to take commonsense steps to protect law enforcement officers, kids, and families across the Commonwealth from gun violence.”

    Fox News Digital reached out to DOJ to determine what actions are being taken or planned, given allegations from Ferguson and others.

    SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

    Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon arrives for a news conference at the Justice Department on September 29, 2025 in Washington, DC(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

    Martin’s ruling stated that the firearm characteristics identified in the ban lack a rational basis because handguns are excluded despite fitting the lawmakers’ stated military-style rationale.

    The ban was originally authored in the House by Del. Dan Helmer, D-Fairfax, and in the Senate by Sen. Saddam Salim, D-Dunn Loring.

    In comments reported by Courthouse News Service, Van Cleave separately noted that a commission set up by Democratic then-Gov. Tim Kaine following the Virginia Tech massacre found that gun-magazine limits like those focused on in the new law would have “made no difference in the outcome.”

    Attorney General Jay Jones, arguing for the state, said in a statement that “gun violence is the key driver of violent crime in this commonwealth and nation, and assault weapons are designed intentionally to inflict maximum damage in a matter of seconds.”

    During his 2025 campaign, text messages surfaced showing Jones had envisioned the shooting of the former Republican speaker of the Virginia House.

    “The assault weapons ban passed by the General Assembly and signed by the Governor will save lives in the Commonwealth and is compliant with the Constitution of Virginia,” Jones said.

    When she signed the law in May, Spanberger lamented that the legislature declined to accept her proposed changes that would have carved out commonly used hunting firearms.

    Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger, left; a gun shop, right.(Mike Kropf/Getty Images; Charly Triballeau/Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “I am signing this bill into law because firearms designed to inflict maximum casualties do not belong on our streets. We are taking this step to protect families and support the law enforcement officers who work every day to keep our communities safe,” she said, adding that she would work with Salim and Helmer to clarify the law’s language to assuage hunters.

    Fox News Digital reached out to Virginia’s Republican legislative minority for additional comment. The House was expected to go into session late Monday, where the subject could come up.

    Born and raised in Allentown, Pennsylvania, worked in both the New York and Washington bureaus for Fox News since 2013.

  • 托马斯、戈萨奇直指标志性裁决:特朗普称其保护“假新闻”


    2026年6月29日 美国东部时间下午2:12 / 福克斯新闻频道

    保守派大法官认为,《纽约时报诉沙利文案》中的“实际恶意”标准在宪法中毫无依据

    作者:查尔斯·克赖茨,福克斯新闻

    唐纳德·特朗普总统在周日《60分钟》节目采访中提及他对哥伦比亚广播公司新闻部的胜诉诉讼,告诉主持人诺拉·奥唐奈,该媒体向他支付了“巨额赔偿金”。

    新增功能:你现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/491ef378-fbaa-47c9-ad95-9961620e620c

    收听本文
    4分钟

    美国最高法院两名保守派大法官批评多数派大法官拒绝受理律师艾伦·德肖维茨起诉美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)的诽谤案,称最高法院错失了重新审视1960年代一项颇具争议的诽谤先例的机会。

    最高法院保守派阵营的异议意见实质上呼吁大法官们重新审视长期存在的诽谤先例,呼应了唐纳德·特朗普总统2016年呼吁放宽美国诽谤法的主张。

    曾代表特朗普、O·J·辛普森和利昂娜·赫尔姆斯利等知名人物的德肖维茨指控CNN恶意剪辑了他在特朗普首次弹劾审判中关于“交换条件”的辩护片段,使其听起来仿佛他发表了与完整陈述完全相反的言论,并利用该片段损害他的声誉。

    最高法院大法官克拉伦斯·托马斯和尼尔·戈萨奇——分别由乔治·H·W·布什总统和特朗普总统任命——批评同僚在评估CNN是否诽谤德肖维茨时依赖“实际恶意”标准,辩称该标准并非植根于宪法,而是由最高法院1964年具有里程碑意义的《纽约时报公司诉沙利文案》判决所创设。

    以色列总理内塔尼亚胡就争议性“狗强奸”报道起诉《纽约时报》诽谤
    视频

    “不出所料,德肖维茨在这项由本院在《纽约时报公司诉沙利文案》中确立的严苛标准下未能胜诉。德肖维茨如今请求本院推翻沙利文案及相关先例,”这两名保守派大法官在异议意见中写道。

    德肖维茨也在接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访时对该异议意见作出回应,称多数派所采用的标准“不可能”达成。

    “所有法官都认可CNN对我撒谎了,”他周一说道。

    “但多数派在异议声中裁定,我必须以清晰且有说服力的证据证明实际恶意——这是一项我认为未来数年必将被推翻的不可能达成的标准。”

    沙利文案缘起于阿拉巴马州蒙哥马利市一名专员起诉《纽约时报》诽谤,原因是该报刊登了一则整版广告,批评该市对待民权抗议者的方式。

    尽管广告中并未提及L·B·沙利文的名字,阿拉巴马州陪审团仍裁定其获得损害赔偿。最高法院随后推翻了该判决,认定公职人员若要在诽谤案中胜诉,必须证明相关言论是在“实际恶意”——即明知其为虚假或不顾事实真相肆意妄为——的情况下作出的。

    “针对公众人物的实际恶意标准与宪法的文本、历史或结构毫无关联,”托马斯和戈萨奇在周一就德肖维茨一案发表的异议意见中写道。

    “相反,建国一代认为,若有区别的话,公众人物在遭受诽谤时本应拥有更强的损害赔偿请求权。”

    托马斯和戈萨奇援引了1798年《煽动法》作为历史例证,该法律针对公职人员的诽谤性言论设定的门槛要低得多。

    时任佛蒙特州联邦众议员的马修·莱昂因将约翰·亚当斯总统描述为“对荒谬排场、愚蠢谄媚和自私贪婪有着无限渴望”而在美法紧张关系期间被依据该法律起诉。

    法官驳回特朗普针对《华尔街日报》提起的100亿美元诽谤诉讼,该报道涉及爱泼斯坦相关内容
    视频

    托马斯·杰斐逊总统在1801年让该法律到期失效,并赦免了许多因此法案落网的人。

    近年来,特朗普一直呼吁放宽美国诽谤法,呼应了托马斯和戈萨奇对最高法院诽谤判例的类似担忧。

    2016年总统竞选期间,特朗普承诺如果当选,将“放宽我们的诽谤法”,以便起诉他经常贴上“假新闻”标签的意识形态综合体。

    订阅获取政治新闻通讯

    那些“蓄意撰写负面、恶劣且虚假文章的记者——我们可以起诉他们,并且赢下大笔赔偿金,”特朗普说道。

    他经常将CNN作为主要抨击目标——长期与其时任白宫记者、播客主持人吉姆·阿科斯塔互怼,这一点广为人知。

    2017年的一次新闻发布会上,阿科斯塔多次打断特朗普的发言,特朗普要求他“别这么无礼”。特朗普告知阿科斯塔,不会让他提问,因为“你就是假新闻”。

    2025年1月20日,在美国华盛顿特区国会大厦圆形大厅举行的就职典礼结束后,最高法院大法官塞缪尔·阿利托和克拉伦斯·托马斯离开舞台。(奇普·索莫德维拉/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    “我们将放宽诽谤法,届时人们起诉你的方式会让你前所未闻,”特朗普在2016年的这场活动中说道,随后还点名提及了《纽约时报》和《华盛顿邮报》。

    此次最高法院拒绝受理德肖维茨的案件,加上特朗普针对特纳创立的CNN提起的诉讼——指控其使用“大谎言”一词描述他关于2020年大选的主张——为最高法院重新审视沙利文案留下了可能性,尽管短期内此类变革似乎不太可能发生。

    福克斯新闻数字频道已联系CNN征求其对该异议意见的置评。

    作者在宾夕法尼亚州阿伦敦出生并长大,自2013年起在福克斯新闻纽约和华盛顿分社工作。

    Thomas, Gorsuch target landmark ruling Trump says protects the ‘fake news’

    June 29, 2026 2:12pm EDT / Fox News

    The conservative justices argued the ‘actual malice’ standard from New York Times v. Sullivan has no basis in the Constitution

    By Charles Creitz, Fox News

    President Donald Trump brought up his successful lawsuit against CBS News during an interview on “60 Minutes” on Sunday, telling host Norah O’Donnell they had to pay him “a lot of money.”

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/491ef378-fbaa-47c9-ad95-9961620e620c

    Listen to this article

    4 min

    Two of the Supreme Court’s conservative justices criticized the majority’s decision not to take up attorney Alan Dershowitz’s defamation case against CNN, saying the high court missed an opportunity to revisit a controversial 1960s defamation precedent.

    The dissent from the court’s conservative wing effectively called on the justices to revisit longstanding libel precedent, echoing President Donald Trump’s 2016 calls to loosen U.S. libel laws.

    Dershowitz, who has represented famous figures like Trump, O.J. Simpson and Leona Helmsley, claimed CNN deceptively edited a snippet of his defense during Trump’s first impeachment trial about “quid pro quo[s]” to make it sound like he said the opposite of his fuller statements and used that clip to damage his reputation.

    Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch — appointees of Presidents George H.W. Bush and Trump, respectively — criticized their colleagues for relying on the “actual malice” standard in evaluating whether CNN defamed Dershowitz, arguing the standard is not rooted in the Constitution and instead was created in the Supreme Court’s landmark 1964 decision in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan.

    ISRAELI PM NETANYAHU INITIATING DEFAMATION LAWSUIT AGAINST NEW YORK TIMES OVER CONTROVERSIAL ‘DOG RAPE’ STORY

    Video

    “Predictably, Dershowitz did not prevail under that exacting standard, which this Court created in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. Dershowitz now asks this Court to overrule Sullivan and related precedents,” the conservatives wrote.

    Dershowitz also reacted to the dissent in remarks to Fox News Digital, calling the majority’s standard “impossible” to overcome.

    “All the judges agreed that CNN lied about me,” he said Monday.

    “But the majority ruled, over dissents, that I had to prove actual malice by clear and convincing evidence— an impossible standard that I believe will be overruled in years to come.”

    The Sullivan case arose after a Montgomery, Alabama, commissioner sued the Times for libel over a full-page advertisement criticizing how the city treated civil rights protesters.

    An Alabama jury awarded damages to L.B. Sullivan even though he was not mentioned by name in the ad. The Supreme Court later reversed the ruling, holding that a public official cannot prevail in a defamation case unless he proves the statement was made with “actual malice” — knowing it was false or acting with reckless disregard for the truth.

    “The actual-malice standard for public figures bears no relation to the text, history, or structure of the Constitution,” Thomas and Gorsuch wrote Monday in Dershowitz’ case.

    “Instead, the founding generation believed that, if anything, public figures had stronger claims for damages when they were defamed.”

    As one historical example, Thomas and Gorsuch pointed to the Sedition Act of 1798, which imposed a far lower threshold for defamatory statements about public officials.

    Then-Rep. Matthew Lyon, D-Vt., was prosecuted under the law for characterizing President John Adams as someone with “unbounded thirst for ridiculous pomp, foolish adulation and selfish avarice” during American tensions with France.

    JUDGE DISMISSES TRUMP’S $10B DEFAMATION LAWSUIT AGAINST THE WALL STREET JOURNAL OVER EPSTEIN STORY

    Video

    President Thomas Jefferson allowed that law to expire in 1801 and pardoned many caught in its net.

    More recently, Trump has called for loosening U.S. libel laws, echoing concerns similar to those expressed by Thomas and Gorsuch about the court’s defamation jurisprudence.

    While running for president in 2016, Trump pledged to “open up our libel laws” if elected to pursue the ideological conglomerate he often labels “fake news.”

    SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

    Journalists who “write purposefully negative and horrible and false articles — we can sue them and win lots of money,” Trump said.

    He has often singled out defendant CNN more than most – famously warring regularly with its then-White House correspondent, podcaster Jim Acosta.

    During one 2017 incident, Acosta repeatedly interrupted Trump during a news conference, leading the president to demand he not “be rude.” Trump informed Acosta that he would not be taking a question from him because “you are fake news.”

    Supreme Court Associate Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas wait to leave the stage after the inauguration ceremonies in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 20, 2025.(Chip Somodevilla/AFP via Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “We’re going to open up libel laws, and we’re going to have people sue you like you’ve never got sued before,” Trump said at the 2016 event, going on to further name-drop the Times and Washington Post.

    The ruling, along with Trump’s own lawsuit against the Ted Turner-founded network over its use of the term “Big Lie” to describe his claims about the 2020 election, leaves open the possibility that the court could revisit Sullivan, though such a shift appears unlikely in the near term.

    Fox News Digital reached out to CNN for comment on the dissent.

    Born and raised in Allentown, Pennsylvania, worked in both the New York and Washington bureaus for Fox News since 2013.

  • 特朗普选民称高成本压垮钱包,但不愿归咎于现任总统


    2026-06-29T13:29:24-04:00 / 福克斯新闻

    全国汽油均价5月底达到每加仑4.56美元的峰值,6月底前回落至每加仑3.87美元

    作者:阿什利·J·迪梅拉 福克斯新闻
    发布于2026年6月29日美国东部时间下午1:29

    美国人承认物价居高不下,但表示特朗普正在推行选民支持的施政纲领

    福克斯新闻数字频道采访了“伟大美国州博览会”集会的参与者,了解他们在伊朗冲突期间对高物价的担忧。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/84a5de6d-e94d-4eec-b18c-232f60eaa155

    收听本文
    3分钟

    出席总统唐纳德·特朗普在国家广场集会的支持者承认,汽油价格上涨让他们感到拮据,但他们大多不愿将责任归咎于特朗普——反而将矛头指向伊朗冲突,以及对前总统乔·拜登任内通胀的长期不满。

    “我最不喜欢的那位总统毫无理由地把油价推到了每加仑5美元左右,那个人就是拜登先生,”来自北卡罗来纳州的比利说道。

    福克斯新闻数字频道采访了周三晚间聚集在国家广场的美国人,他们前来参加特朗普总统的集会,这场集会拉开了纪念美国建国250周年的“伟大美国州博览会”的序幕。与会者纷纷就自己是否感受到钱包压力发表了看法,负担能力问题随着伊朗战争和11月的中期选举日益凸显。

    “负担能力很大程度上与利率有关,拜登总统任内利率涨幅达到48年来最高,要让价格回落至之前的水平还需要一段时间,”来自马里兰州的詹姆斯·麦克奈尔说道。

    油价飙升波及摇摆州,考验特朗普的低油价承诺

    田纳西州一对夫妇在“伟大美国州博览会”启动仪式上接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访。(福克斯新闻数字频道)

    “我不太担心负担能力问题。我认为我们的总统可能是有史以来最优秀的商人总统,情况会好转的,”詹姆斯的兄弟大卫补充道。

    “作为Z世代,现在所有东西都很贵,”来自纽约的威廉总结道。

    许多与会者表示,虽然他们意识到汽油价格居高不下,但将近期的油价飙升归咎于与伊朗不断升级的冲突——他们仍对这一局势表示支持。

    特朗普曾承诺降低成本;伊朗冲突如今威胁到这一承诺

    2026年6月24日,在华盛顿特区国家广场,人们出席唐纳德·特朗普总统拉开“伟大美国州博览会”序幕的集会,观看其发表演讲。(塔索斯·卡托佐迪斯/盖蒂图片社)

    “我认为总体物价并没有比拜登政府时期更糟糕,”来自马里兰州的丽莎说道。

    冲突爆发前,全国汽油均价为每加仑2.98美元。5月底油价攀升至每加仑4.56美元的峰值,随后在6月底前逐步回落至每加仑3.87美元。

    丽莎和丈夫马特都曾在陆军服役,两人在负担能力问题和特朗普对伊朗的处理方式上存在分歧。

    五角大楼在闭门国会听证会上估算:伊朗战争头六天耗资113亿美元:报道

    2026年6月24日,在华盛顿特区国家广场,与会者手持美国国旗海报参加“伟大美国州博览会”启动庆祝活动。该博览会将持续至7月10日,纪念美国建国250周年。(阿尔·德拉戈/盖蒂图片社)

    “物价确实上涨了,这确实引起了我的注意,”来自马里兰州的马特说道。

    马特回忆称,他的 Drill 教官早在1985年就曾警告他可能会被部署到伊朗。“如今到了2026年,我们仍在处理这个问题。”

    “如果我们担心汽油价格,那么在我们彻底解决那些不认同我们价值观的政权之前,我们会一直担心下去,”马特说道。

    贝莱德CEO拉里·芬克认为:尽管汽油价格飙升,美伊冲突不会破坏经济

    一对来自纽约的父子。(阿什利·迪梅拉/福克斯新闻数字频道)

    来自印第安纳州的诺玛·霍尔姆也表示,她认为伊朗问题最终必须得到解决,与其留给下一代,不如直面问题。

    “我们正和油价及其他一切问题一起承担代价,但局势正在稳定,特朗普总统——别低估他。”

    华盛顿和德黑兰已同意暂停该地区的军事打击,双方代表团计划于6月30日在卡塔尔多哈举行会谈。

    【点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP】

    其他与会者希望伊朗冲突得到解决后,油价能够回落。

    “随着伊朗战争结束,希望和平协议能达成,我们拭目以待。我认为油价已经在下跌了,虽然跌幅不大,没有达到我们的预期,但这类事情需要时间,”来自纽约的詹姆斯说道。

    阿什利·J·迪梅拉为福克斯新闻数字频道报道政治新闻。

    Trump voters say costs are crushing their wallets — but look past president for blame

    2026-06-29T13:29:24-04:00 / Fox News

    National average gas prices peaked at $4.56 per gallon in late May before declining to $3.87 by end of June

    By Ashley J. DiMella Fox News

    Published June 29, 2026 1:29pm EDT

    Americans acknowledge stubborn prices but say Trump is carrying out the agenda voters backed

    Fox News Digital spoke with attendees at the Great American State Fair rally about their concern over high prices during the Iran conflict.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/84a5de6d-e94d-4eec-b18c-232f60eaa155

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    Supporters attending President Donald Trump’s rally on the National Mall acknowledged feeling the pinch from higher gas prices, but they largely declined to blame Trump — instead pointing to the Iran conflict and lingering frustration with inflation under former President Joe Biden.

    “My least favorite president ran gas up to about $5 a gallon for no reason, and that was Mr. Biden,” said Billy of North Carolina.

    Fox News Digital spoke with Americans who gathered on the National Mall Wednesday evening for President Donald Trump’s rally kicking off the “Great American State Fair” celebrating the nation’s 250th anniversary, where attendees weighed in on whether they are feeling pain in their pockets as affordability concerns loom over the war with Iran and midterm elections in November.

    “Affordability has a lot to do with just interest rates that went up the highest in 48 years under President Biden, so it’s going to take some time to get those prices back down to where we were before that,” said James McNair of Maryland.

    GAS SURGE TIED TO IRAN CONFLICT HITS SWING STATES, TESTING TRUMP’S LOW-PRICE PITCH

    Couple from Tennessee talk to Fox News Digital at the Great American State Fair kickoff.(Fox News Digital)

    “I’m not that concerned about the affordability thing. I think that our president is probably the best businessman to ever be president, and things will turn,” added James’ brother, David.

    “Being in Gen Z, everything’s very expensive now,” William of New York said in summary.

    Many attendees shared that while they recognize gas prices are high, they attribute the recent spike to the escalating conflict with Iran—a development they continue to support.

    TRUMP PROMISED LOWER COSTS; THE IRAN CONFLICT NOW THREATENS THAT PLEDGE

    People watch as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a rally to kick off the Great American State Fair on the National Mall on June 24, 2026, in Washington, DC.(Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)

    “I don’t think the prices in general have gotten any worse than when Biden was in the administration,” said Lisa of Maryland.

    Before the war, the national average price of gasoline was $2.98 per gallon. Prices climbed to a peak of $4.56 per gallon in late May before gradually declining to $3.87 per gallon by the end of June.

    Lisa and her husband, Matt, both served in the Army and expressed diverging opinions on affordability and Trump’s handling of Iran.

    PENTAGON ESTIMATES IRAN WAR COST $11.3B IN THE FIRST SIX DAYS IN CLOSED-DOOR CONGRESSIONAL HEARING: REPORT

    Attendees hold American flag posters during the Great American State Fair kickoff celebration on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., on June 24, 2026. The fair runs through July 10 celebrating the 250th anniversary of the United States.(Al Drago/Getty Images)

    “Prices have definitely gone up and they do get my attention,” said Matt of Maryland.

    Matt shared that his drill sergeants were warning him of being deployed to Iran back in 1985. “Here we are today in 2026, still dealing with this problem.”

    “If we’re worried about gas prices, we’re going to be worrying again and again and again until we get a handle on regimes that just don’t share our values,” said Matt.

    BLACKROCK CEO LARRY FINK ARGUES US-IRAN CONFLICT WON’T DERAIL ECONOMY AS GAS PRICES SURGE

    A father and son traveled from New York.(Ashley DiMella/Fox News Digital)

    Norma Holm of Indiana also said she believed Iran would eventually have to be dealt with and that it was better to address the issue head-on than leave it for the next generation.

    “We are taking it for the team with the gas prices and everything else, but things are stabling, and President Trump, don’t underestimate him.”

    Washington and Tehran agreed to halt military strikes in the region with delegations scheduled to meet June 30 in Doha, Qatar for talks.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Other attendees are hoping that a resolution to the Iran conflict will lead to lower prices.

    “As the Iran war comes to an end and the peace deal hopefully gels, we’ll see. I think gas prices are already coming down, not tremendously, not where we would like to see, but those things take time,” said James of New York.

    Ashley J. DiMella reports on politics for Fox News Digital.

  • 民调显示:身陷争议的缅因州民主党候选人与柯林斯势均力敌,这场关键参议院席位争夺战仍悬而未决


    这场可能决定参议院控制权的角逐中,这位民粹主义民主党候选人在可能投票选民中以49%对47%小幅领先柯林斯

    作者:保罗·斯坦豪瑟,福克斯新闻
    发布时间:2026年6月29日 美国东部时间下午3:10

    美联社预测:格雷厄姆·普拉特纳赢得缅因州联邦参议院民主党提名

    格雷厄姆·普拉特纳在选举夜派对上庆祝赢得缅因州联邦参议院民主党提名。

    一项最新民调显示,作为缅因州联邦参议院民主党提名候选人的民粹主义人士格雷厄姆·普拉特纳,在与资深共和党参议员苏珊·柯林斯的关键参议院对决中几乎势均力敌。

    普拉特纳这位身陷多重争议的候选人,在《纽约时报》/《波特兰新闻先驱报》/锡耶纳学院周一发布的民调中,获得了49%的可能投票选民支持率,柯林斯为47%,另有3%的受访者未表态或拒绝回答。普拉特纳两百分点的领先优势处于本次调查的抽样误差范围内,意味着这场竞争实际上不分伯仲。

    柯林斯这位温和派共和党人有时会投票反对唐纳德·特朗普总统的议程,此次正寻求连任参议院第六个六年任期。

    这场备受关注、可能充满火药味且耗资巨大的竞选,是少数几战将决定共和党能否在11月中期选举中保住微弱参议院多数席位的选战之一。共和党目前以53席对47席掌控参议院,拿下倾向民主党执政的缅因州的参议院席位,是民主党夺回参议院多数席位的关键一步。

    普拉特纳拿下民主党提名,关键参议院选战正式打响
    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6399112653112

    普拉特纳是一名退伍军人兼牡蛎养殖户,得到了进步派议员、佛蒙特州参议员伯尼·桑德斯、马萨诸塞州参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦以及加利福尼亚州众议员罗·卡纳的支持。本月早些时候,他在缅因州联邦参议院民主党初选中轻松击败两名实力较弱的对手。

    普拉特纳主张经济民粹主义议程,矛头直指企业势力,为工薪阶层发声。他还在初选中击败了两届任期的缅因州州长珍妮特·米尔斯。尽管米尔斯此前得到参议院少数党领袖查克·舒默以及参议院民主党竞选机构的支持,但由于筹款和民调结果大幅落后于普拉特纳,她于今年春季暂停了竞选,但其名字仍留在了选票上。

    普拉特纳的胜利来得并不容易,当时他正面临竞选以来最艰难的一段时期。

    过去几个月里,他一直在为自己辩护,期间曝出多起争议事件:包括他在Reddit上发表的煽动性在线评论、广为人知且后来被覆盖的类似纳粹标志的胸前纹身、近期曝光的他婚内与多名女性发送露骨色情信息,以及前女友指控他存在强奸幻想、酗酒和暴力行为的历史。普拉特纳称这些暴力指控不实。

    十大将决定参议院控制权的选战

    image
    2026年6月9日,在缅因州布鲁姆希尔的一家基督教青年会,格雷厄姆·普拉特纳在赢得联邦参议院民主党提名后,与妻子艾米·格特纳向支持者致意。(马修·西蒙斯 福克斯新闻数字频道 摄)

    初选前一天,普拉特纳竞选团队的一名前高级幕僚在《华盛顿邮报》撰文称,普拉特纳“不是对缅因州或国家有益的人选”。

    愈演愈烈的争议引发了大量关注,也让华盛顿的一些民主党人质疑普拉特纳是否已是“受损的候选人”,但这并未阻止他凭借民粹主义浪潮赢得提名。民调中超过九成的普拉特纳支持者表示,他们已经听说了他的争议事件,但投票给他是基于他的政策立场。

    普拉特纳曾承认自己患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),他曾以海军陆战队身份在伊拉克战场执行三次任务,还以陆军国民警卫队身份在阿富汗执行过一次任务。去年秋季,他的部分Reddit帖子成为新闻头条后,他就有争议的帖子道歉。

    普拉特纳称,他的骷髅头交叉骨纹身是2007年与驻扎在克罗地亚的海军陆战队战友喝酒时纹的。他表示,去年得知该纹身类似纳粹标志后,就用新图案覆盖了它。但一名前女友的指控对普拉特纳声称自己知晓纹身含义的时间线提出了质疑。

    在初选之夜的胜选演讲中,普拉特纳强调自己已经脱胎换骨。

    “如果你和我一样相信,我们可以改变政治、改变国家,那你也必须相信人是可以改变的,”普拉特纳对人群说道,“我之所以相信这一点,是因为我亲身经历过改变。而我之所以能做到这一点,全靠我的妻子。”

    2026年民主选举:关注福克斯新闻选举中心获取最新动态

    image
    2026年6月9日,缅因州联邦参议院民主党候选人格雷厄姆·普拉特纳与妻子在缅因州布鲁姆希尔的初选胜选演讲后与支持者交谈。(保罗·斯坦豪瑟/福克斯新闻数字频道 摄)

    6月19日至26日进行的本次民调显示,普拉特纳在争取部分希望民主党夺回国会控制权的选民方面遇到了一些困难。

    54%的受访者表示希望民主党在中期选举中夺回参议院多数席位,比支持普拉特纳的49%高出5个百分点。另有10%支持民主党掌控参议院的选民将票投给了柯林斯。

    民调还显示,大多数缅因州选民认为普拉特纳“品格不佳”或“缺乏正确的道德价值观”,近半数选民认为他过于极端。

    相比之下,超过六成的选民认为柯林斯“品格良好”且“拥有正确的道德价值观”,仅有三分之一的选民认为她过于极端,不适合缅因州。

    image
    2026年5月5日,缅因州共和党参议员苏珊·柯林斯在缅因州哈里森的一家食品银行参观。这家食品银行得益于这位参议员协助争取到的联邦资助得以扩建。(保罗·斯坦豪瑟/福克斯新闻)

    与此同时,一些民主党选民担忧,现年41岁的普拉特纳从未担任过民选公职,“经验过于匮乏”。

    但柯林斯也面临警示信号。

    多数受访选民认为这位参议员会过于支持特朗普,甚至部分她的支持者也担忧,现年73岁的柯林斯年纪太大,无法高效履职参议员。

    柯林斯曾在2021年1月6日国会山遇袭事件后的第二次弹劾审判中投票弹劾特朗普。去年年初,她还反对现任国防部长皮特·赫格斯的提名确认。

    但她2018年投票确认布雷特·卡瓦诺大法官的举动仍令人印象深刻,该投票最终帮助最高法院保守派多数席位推翻了具有里程碑意义的“罗诉韦德案”裁决,该裁决曾将堕胎在全美范围内合法化。

    击败柯林斯并非易事。

    六年前,民调显示这位参议员将落败,但柯林斯打破预期,以9个百分点的优势击败当时的民主党州众议院议长萨拉·吉迪恩成功连任。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用

    最新民调显示普拉特纳对柯林斯略有领先,不过新罕布什尔大学上月末开展的松树州民调显示,普拉特纳领先柯林斯9个百分点。

    普拉特纳竞选团队在社交媒体帖子中针对此次新发布的民调写道:“苏珊·柯林斯坐拥亿万富翁、说客、超级政治行动委员会和华盛顿建制派的支持。但我们拥有缅因州。”

    保罗·斯坦豪瑟为福克斯新闻横跨全美报道全国竞选活动

    Embattled Maine Democrat deadlocked with Collins despite controversies in key Senate race, new poll shows

    The populist Democrat edges Collins 49% to 47% among likely voters in a contest that could determine Senate control

    By Paul Steinhauser, Fox News

    Published June 29, 2026 3:10pm EDT

    Graham Platner wins Democratic nomination for US Senate in Maine, AP projects

    Graham Platner speaks after winning Maine’s Democratic U.S. Senate primary at an election night party.

    Graham Platner, the populist Democratic Senate nominee in Maine, is in a virtual dead heat in a crucial Senate showdown with longtime Republican Sen. Susan Collins, according to a new poll.

    Platner, the embattled candidate who has been facing a slew of controversies, stands at 49% support among likely voters questioned in a New York Times/Portland Press Herald/Siena poll released on Monday, with Collins at 47%, and 3% of respondents undecided or refusing to answer. Platner’s two-point edge is within the survey’s sampling error, meaning the contest is virtually tied.

    Collins, a moderate Republican who at times votes against President Donald Trump’s agenda, is running for a sixth six-year term in the Senate.

    The high-profile and likely combustible and expensive race is among a handful that will determine if the GOP holds onto its slim Senate majority in November’s midterm elections. Republicans currently control the chamber 53-47 and flipping the Senate seat in left-leaning Maine is a key part of the Democrats’ path to retake the majority.

    GAME ON IN KEY SENATE RACE AS PLATNER CAPTURES DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6399112653112

    Platner, a military combat veteran and oyster farmer who is backed by progressive champions Sens. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, and Rep. Ro Khanna of California, earlier this month easily defeated two longshot rivals in Maine’s Democratic Senate primary.

    Platner, who advocates an economically populist agenda as he takes aim at corporate influences and advocates for the working class, also topped two-term Democratic Gov. Janet Mills in the primary. The governor’s name remained on the ballot even though Mills, who had been backed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and the Senate Democrats’ campaign arm, suspended her bid this spring after significantly trailing Platner in fundraising and polling.

    Platner’s victory also came as he was facing one of the roughest stretches of his bid for the U.S. Senate.

    He was playing defense the past couple of months amid multiple controversies. They included inflammatory online comments made on Reddit, a well-publicized and now covered-up tattoo on his chest that resembled a Nazi symbol, recent reports that he exchanged sexually explicit messages with several women while married, and allegations from ex-girlfriends of a history of rape fantasies, heavy drinking and violent episodes. Platner has called the allegations of violence untrue.

    THE TEN RACES THAT WILL DETERMINE THE SENATE’S MAJORITY

    Graham Platner and his wife Amy Gertner acknowledge the crowd at his watch party after winning the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate at a YMCA in Blue Hill, Maine, on June 9, 2026.(Matthew Symons for Fox News Digital)

    A day before the primary, a former high-level staffer from the Platner campaign wrote in the Washington Post that Platner “is not someone who would be good for Maine or for the country.”

    The mounting controversies grabbed plenty of attention and triggered some Democrats in the nation’s capital to question whether Platner was damaged goods, but didn’t stop him from riding a populist wave to capture the nomination. More than 9 in 10 Platner supporters questioned in the poll said they had heard about his controversies but that their vote for him was based on where he stands on the issues.

    Platner, who has acknowledged his battle with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from his three tours of duty in the war in Iraq with the Marines and one tour with the Army National Guard in Afghanistan, apologized for his controversial Reddit posts after some of them made headlines last fall soon after he launched his Senate campaign.

    And Platner has said he got the skull and crossbones tattoo in 2007 while drinking with fellow Marines stationed in Croatia. He said that he covered up the tattoo with a new design after learning last year that it resembled a Nazi symbol. But allegations from an ex-girlfriend raise questions about Platner’s timeline regarding knowledge of the tattoo.

    In his primary night victory speech, Platner emphasized that he’s a changed man.

    “If you believe, as I do, that we can change our politics and change our country, then you must also believe that people can change,” Platner told the crowd. “And the reason I believe that is because I have lived it. And the reason that I have lived it is because of my wife.”

    DEMOCRACY ’26: STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE FOX NEWS ELECTION HUB

    Democratic Senate nominee in Maine Graham Platner and his wife speak with supporters following his primary night victory speech, in Blue Hill, Maine in June 9, 2026.(Paul Steinhauser/Fox News Digital)

    The new poll, conducted June 19-26, suggests Platner is having some difficulty winning over some voters who want the Democrats to take back power in Congress.

    Fifty-four percent of respondents said they’d like to see the Democrats win back the Senate majority in the midterms, five points higher than the 49% who are supporting Platner. And Collins is capturing 10% of voters who prefer the Democrats control the Senate.

    The poll also indicates that a majority of Maine voters don’t believe Platner has “good character” or the “right kind of moral values” and nearly half say he’s too extreme.

    By contrast, more than 6 in 10 say Collins has “good character” and the “right kind of moral values” and only a third said she was too extreme for Maine.

    Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine tours a food bank in Harrison, Maine, on May 5, 2026. The food bank was able to expand thanks to federal funding that the senator helped obtain.(Paul Steinhauser/Fox News)

    Meanwhile, some Democratic respondents worried that the 41-year-old Platner, who has never held elective office, would be “too inexperienced.”

    But there are also warning signs for Collins.

    A majority questioned said they thought the senator would be too supportive of Trump and even some of her own supporters worry that the 73-year-old Collins is too old to be an effective senator.

    The senator voted to convict Trump in his second impeachment trial, in 2021, soon after the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. And early last year she opposed the confirmation of now-Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

    But she is also remembered for her 2018 vote to confirm Justice Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, which eventually helped the court’s conservative majority overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade ruling that had legalized abortion nationwide.

    Beating Collins won’t be easy.

    Six years ago, public opinion polls indicated the senator was headed to defeat, but Collins defied expectations and won re-election by topping then-Democratic state House Speaker Sara Gideon by nine points.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    The new survey is the latest to indicate Platner with a slight edge over Collins, although a Pine Tree Poll conducted by the University of New Hampshire late last month suggested Platner held a nine-point lead.

    Spotlighting the new poll, the Platner campaign wrote in a social media post that “Susan Collins has the billionaires. The lobbyists. The Super PACs. The Washington establishment. But we have Maine.”

    Paul Steinhauser covers the national campaign trail from coast to coast for Fox News

  • 吹嘘“强大职业道德”的爱荷华州民主党议员缺席众议院超半数投票


    2026年6月29日 美国东部时间下午3:41 / 福克斯新闻

    林赛·詹姆斯在州议会就关键法案投票期间,在锡达拉皮兹和迪科拉举行竞选活动
    作者:利奥·布里塞尼奥 福克斯新闻

    记录显示,爱荷华州州议员、国会民主党候选人林赛·詹姆斯去年在州众议院的投票缺席率超过半数。

    根据州议会的记录,詹姆斯在2026年的342次投票中缺席了177次,占比达51.7%。

    这些缺席情况与詹姆斯此前就竞选活动可能对其立法职责产生的影响作出的承诺相悖,也让她遭到共和党方面的批评,称其优先考虑自己的潜在公职身份,而非现任职位。

    “林赛·詹姆斯曾向爱荷华州选民承诺,竞选不会让她分心于当选后的工作。但这并没有持续多久,”美国全国共和党国会委员会发言人艾米丽·塔特尔说道。

    民主党众议员米基·谢里尔缺席145次众议院投票,新泽西州州长竞选升温

    爱荷华州议会大厦(左)与爱荷华州民主党众议员林赛·詹姆斯同框,詹姆斯正竞选该州第二国会选区议员席位。(斯蒂芬·马图伦/盖蒂图片社;爱荷华州众议院)

    “詹姆斯将自己的政治野心置于为选民履职之上,这证明了当在服务选民和服务自己之间做出选择时,她会把自己放在第一位,”塔特尔补充道。

    詹姆斯的竞选团队表示,她有着出色的选民服务记录。

    “林赛一直为爱荷华州的家庭而奋斗,对抗企业贪婪和掠夺性房东,还起草了 capped 胰岛素价格的法案,”竞选团队发言人杰克逊·史密斯在给福克斯新闻的一份声明中说道。

    “当林赛倾听并为因乔·米切尔及其华盛顿盟友而陷入艰难经济抉择的爱荷华州民众奔走时,米切尔却一直在用竞选资金与华盛顿内部人士厮混,并且会成为推高爱荷华州家庭生活成本政策的橡皮图章,”史密斯说道,这里指的是前州议员、共和党该席位候选人乔·米切尔。

    在竞选初期,詹姆斯在一次采访中告诉观众,尽管打算“全身心投入”竞选,但她仍会优先推进在众议院的工作。

    “全身心投入竞选,当然也会完成我在爱荷华州议会的重要工作,”当被问及是否会继续担任牧师时,詹姆斯说道。

    “你们了解我,我在州议会大厦就有着极强的职业道德,早到晚走,为选民服务。这永远不会改变。这就是我的本性,也是我的行事方式,”詹姆斯说道。

    即便如此,2019年首次进入爱荷华州众议院的詹姆斯还是缺席了议会多次关键投票。

    莱肯·赖利法案搅动新泽西州州长竞选,两名民主党议员缺席投票:‘竞选越卖力,投票越少’

    2019年10月9日,爱荷华州议会大厦在爱荷华州得梅因市拍摄,当时距2020年2月3日举行的爱荷华州民主党党团会议仅剩数月。(乔·雷德莱/盖蒂图片社)

    4月20日,她没有参加一项限制学生在校屏幕使用时间的法案投票,而是在距离得梅因约两小时车程的锡达拉皮兹举行了一场竞选活动。

    仅仅十天后的4月30日,詹姆斯又缺席了一项将虐待动物定为重罪的投票,转而在爱荷华州迪科拉的一家啤酒厂举办了一场见面会。

    第三次缺席是,她为了在迪比克——距离议会大厦三小时车程的地方——举办另一场候选人活动,而错过了众议院就降低财产税提案进行的审议。

    詹姆斯本月早些时候赢得民主党初选,目前正在竞选接替现任议员、共和党人阿什利·辛普森的席位。

    斯沃韦尔‘我本该去工作’的健身房、泳池视频重出水面,民主党对手抨击其缺席众议院投票

    2025年8月23日,众议员阿什利·辛普森在爱荷华州锡达拉皮兹举行的“阿什利烧烤派对”筹款活动上与来宾交谈。(斯科特·奥尔森/盖蒂图片社)

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    辛普森自2021年起代表该选区,她宣布不会寻求连任,转而竞选接替即将离任的爱荷华州共和党参议员乔尼·恩斯特的参议院席位。

    利奥·布里塞尼奥是福克斯新闻数字频道国会团队的政治记者,此前曾任职于《世界杂志》。

    Iowa Dem who touted ‘strong work ethic’ misses more than half of her House votes

    June 29, 2026 3:41pm EDT / Fox News

    Lindsay James held campaign events in Cedar Rapids and Decorah while the chamber voted on key bills

    By Leo Briceno Fox News

    Lindsay James, a state legislator and Democratic candidate for Congress in Iowa, missed over half of her votes in the state’s House of Representatives this past year, records show.

    In 2026, James missed 177 of 342 votes, according to the legislature’s records, accounting for 51.7% of the whole.

    The absences clash with assurances James made about how her campaign might impact her legislative duties and has opened her up to Republican-led criticisms that she has prioritized her potential role instead of the one she has now.

    “Lindsay James promised Iowans that campaigning wouldn’t distract her from the job she was elected to do. That didn’t last long,” Emily Tuttle, a spokesperson for the National Republican Congressional Committee, said.

    DEM REP MIKIE SHERRILL SKIPS 145 HOUSE VOTES AS NJ GOVERNOR’S RACE HEATS UP

    The Iowa state capitol, left, pictured alongside Iowa Rep. Lindsay James, D-Iowa, a candidate for Congress in the state’s second congressional district.(Stephen Maturen/Getty Images; Iowa House of Representatives)

    “James chose her own political ambitions over showing up for work, proving that when given the choice between serving constituents and serving herself, she puts herself first,” Tuttle continued.

    James’ campaign said that she has a track record of representing constituents well.

    “Lindsay has always fought for Iowa families, taking on corporate greed and predatory landlords and writing the bill to cap the cost of insulin,” Jackson Smith, a spokesperson for the campaign, said in a statement to Fox.

    “While Lindsay listens to and works for the Iowans making impossible economic choices caused by Joe Mitchell and his Washington allies, Mitchell has been using his campaign cash to party with Washington insiders and will be a rubber stamp for the policies raising Iowa families’ costs,” Smith said, referring to Joe Mitchell, a former state representative and a Republican candidate for the seat.

    At the outset of her campaign, James told viewers in an interview that she would continue to prioritize her work in the House of Representatives despite intentions to campaign “full-time.”

    “Full-time campaigning and, of course, fulfilling my important work in the Iowa legislature,” James said when asked whether she would also continue working as a minister.

    “You know me, I have a pretty strong work ethic at the capitol, early, very late, providing for my constituents. That will never stop. That’s just who I am and how I’m wired,” James said.

    Even so, James, who first joined the Iowa House in 2019, has missed several key votes in the chamber.

    LAKEN RILEY ACT ROILS NJ GOVERNOR’S RACE AS 2 DEMS SKIP ROLL: ‘THE MORE SOMEONE CAMPAIGNS THE LESS THEY VOTE’

    The Iowa State Capitol building is seen in Des Moines, Iowa, on Oct. 9, 2019, ahead of the 2020 Iowa Democratic caucuses scheduled for Feb. 3, 2020.(Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

    Instead of voting on a bill to limit screen time for students in schools, she held a campaign event in Cedar Rapids on April 20, roughly two hours from Des Moines.

    Just ten days later, James also missed a vote on whether to make animal torture a felony on April 30 to host a meet-and-greet at a brewery in Decorah, Iowa.

    In a third case, she also skipped the chamber’s consideration of whether to lower property taxes in order to host another candidate activity in Dubuque — a three-hour drive from the capitol.

    James recently won a Democratic primary earlier this month as she wages a campaign to fill the seat currently held by Rep. Ashley Hinson, R-Iowa.

    SWALWELL’S ‘I SHOULD BE WORKING’ GYM, POOL VIDEOS RESURFACE AS DEM RIVAL HAMMERS HIS MISSED HOUSE VOTES

    Rep. Ashley Hinson speaks to guests during her Ashley’s BBQ Bash fundraiser in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, on Aug. 23, 2025.(Scott Olson/Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Hinson, who has represented the district since 2021, announced she would not seek reelection as she pursues a Senate seat to replace outgoing Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa.

    Leo Briceno is a politics reporter for the congressional team at Fox News Digital. He was previously a reporter with World Magazine.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2