作者: root

  • 特朗普关于共和党将在2026年中期选举失利的虚假说法


    2026-08-31T17:35:10.665Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    唐纳德·特朗普总统一直在试图提前为共和党国会成员在2026年中期选举中遭遇惨败找借口,但他如今提出的论调完全站不住脚。

    他在最近一次采访中的表态,凸显出如果共和党在今年秋季选举中失利,他本人也难辞其咎。

    在周日播出的接受福克斯新闻主持人特雷·高迪采访时,特朗普似乎证实了相关报道,即他的中期选举造势活动将主要围绕吹捧自己的执政业绩展开。“我会走出去,像为自己竞选时那样开展拉票活动,”他说道。

    随后特朗普抛出了最新的甩锅言论,试图将民众的不满指向国会共和党人,而非他自己。

    “但有些人喜欢我的程度超过他们对共和党的好感,”特朗普说,“我的意思是,你没必要为此感到被冒犯。对此你无能为力。”

    这呼应了这位总统此前的言论,包括他本月在接受《Punchbowl News》采访时称,选民“对共和党感到愤怒,但不会对我愤怒”。

    在选举前数月就提前指责 fellow 共和党同僚,此举非同寻常。

    但这同样是错误的。不仅有证据表明特朗普应为共和党在中期选举中的困境负责,而且所谓“很多人喜欢特朗普却不喜欢他所在的政党”的说法也不符合事实。

    关于这一点,CNN最近一次民调是在上个月开展的。结果显示共和党形象的负面评价比正面评价低21个百分点:52%的受访者对共和党持负面看法,仅有31%的人持正面看法(其余受访者未发表意见)。

    但特朗普的支持率则低32个百分点:66%的美国民众不认可他的表现,仅有34%的人认可。

    (支持率通常是对执政表现的衡量标准,而好感度则是对个人魅力的衡量。但两者的数值往往存在相关性。)

    本月CBS新闻的民调显示,美国民众对共和党的负面评价为60%对40%。该机构7月的民调则显示,61%的美国人不认可特朗普,认可比例为39%。

    马凯特大学法学院7月开展的民调专门针对国会共和党人进行了测试,结果显示民众对他们的看法与对特朗普的看法几乎没有差别。

    尽管63%的美国人不认可国会共和党人,认可比例为37%,但他们对特朗普的不认可率为60%,认可率为40%。

    该民调还测试了民众对共和党整体形象的看法,结果显示共和党与特朗普的形象差距极小。美国民众对特朗普的负面评价为60%对38%,对共和党的负面评价则为58%对39%。

    因此,特朗普的不受欢迎程度与共和党不相上下——尽管他声称民众喜欢他却不喜欢其他共和党人。而这种情况实际上并不寻常。

    如今的政客通常比其所在政党以及国会整体团队更受欢迎,因为绝大多数民众普遍厌恶政党政治。事实上,CNN2006年以来的民调数据显示,在67次民调中,有49次至少有50%的美国人不喜欢共和党。

    除此之外,几乎没有理由认为共和党的中期选举困境主要是国会共和党人造成的,反而有充分理由证明责任在特朗普身上。

    民调显示独立选民正压倒性地反对特朗普。同时越来越多的共和党倾向选民也在一系列议题上对特朗普幻想破灭——这类选民的比例通常达到30%、40%,甚至超过50%。

    当总统的支持率像特朗普这样低迷(通常维持在30%出头)时,其所在政党几乎必然会在中期选举中遭遇重大失利。

    CNN7月的民调还显示,认为自己的中期选举投票是为了表达反对特朗普的登记选民比例(40%),是表达支持特朗普的选民比例(18%)的两倍。自乔治·W·布什与2006年中期选举以来(当时比例为41%对16%),我们还从未见过如此悬殊的差距。皮尤研究中心的民调也印证了CNN的这一发现。

    即便如此,考虑到特朗普的支持率如此糟糕,国会共和党人的表现或许比预期的要好一些。左翼部分人士有些担忧民主党在“通用选票”问题上未能拉开更大领先优势,所谓通用选票即民调人员询问受访者会投票给民主党候选人还是共和党候选人。https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stXOo9RmOVI

    甚至在特朗普接受福克斯采访的次日周一,又有新的数据显示特朗普正在打压其支持者基础。

    马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校2025年4月的民调显示,74%的特朗普选民曾表示对自己2024年的投票“非常有信心”,而此次最新民调中这一比例已降至58%。

    中期选举通常都是对在任总统的全民公投。这场公投对特朗普来说显然并不顺利,因此他试图转移舆论焦点。但数据并不支持他的说法。

    Trump’s bogus narrative about the GOP losing in the 2026 midterms

    2026-08-31T17:35:10.665Z / CNN

    President Donald Trump keeps trying to preemptively blame congressional Republicans if they lose big in the 2026 midterms — but he’s now making an argument that’s flat-out wrong.

    His talking point in a recent interview underscored how culpable he would be if his party loses this fall.

    In the interview with Fox News host Trey Gowdy that aired Sunday, Trump appeared to confirm reports that his midterm efforts will largely focus on touting his own record. “I’m going to go out, and I’m going to campaign like I did for myself,” he said.

    Then Trump slipped in his latest effort to suggest it’s congressional Republicans — not him — whom people dislike.

    “But some people like me more than they like the party,” Trump said. “I mean, you can’t be insulted by it. There’s nothing you can do about it.”

    This echoes the president’s prior commentary, including telling Punchbowl News this month that voters are “angry at Republicans, but they’re not angry at me.”

    Spending time months before the election pre-blaming your fellow Republicans is remarkable.

    But it’s also just wrong. Not only is there evidence that Trump is to blame for his party’s midterm woes, but it’s not true that there are a bunch of people who like Trump but not his party.

    The most recent CNN polling on this is from last month. It showed the Republican Party’s image was 21 points underwater; 52% viewed it unfavorably, compared with 31% who viewed it favorably. (The rest offered no opinion.)

    But Trump’s approval rating was 32 points underwater; 66% of Americans disapproved of him, while 34% approved.

    (Approval is generally a measure of job performance, while favorability is a measure of personal appeal. But the numbers are often correlated.)

    CBS News polling this month showed Americans viewed the GOP unfavorably 60%-40%. Its July poll showed Americans disapproved of Trump 61%-39%.

    Polling from Marquette University Law School in July specifically tested Republicans in Congress, and it also showed little difference in perceptions between them and Trump.

    While Americans disapproved of congressional Republicans 63%-37%, they disapproved of Trump 60%-40%.

    The poll also tested the broader party’s image and found little difference between the GOP and Trump. While Americans viewed Trump unfavorably 60%-38%, they viewed the party unfavorably 58%-39%.

    So Trump is about as unpopular as the GOP — despite his claims that people like him but not other Republicans. And that’s actually unusual.

    Politicians these days are usually more popular than their parties and their broader congressional contingents because clear majorities generally dislike political parties. In fact, in CNN polling dating to 2006, at least 50% of Americans have disliked the GOP in 49 out of 67 polls.

    Beyond that, there is little reason to believe the GOP’s midterm problems are predominantly because of congressional Republicans, and all kinds of reason to believe they’re about Trump.

    Polling has shown independents turning overwhelmingly against Trump. And it also increasingly shows large numbers of Republican-leaning voters growing disillusioned with Trump on a series of issues — often 30%, 40% or even 50%-plus.

    When presidents’ approval ratings are as low as Trump’s (which is generally in the 30s), their party almost always suffers large losses in the midterms.

    The July CNN poll also showed that twice as many registered voters said their midterm vote was intended to send a message of opposition to Trump (40%) rather than a message of support for him (18%). We haven’t seen a gap like that on this question since George W. Bush and the 2006 midterms (41%-16%). And the Pew Research Center’s polling echoes CNN’s finding.

    If anything, congressional Republicans might be doing a little better than one might expect, given how bad Trump’s numbers are. Some on the left are a little concerned that their party hasn’t opened up a wider lead on the “generic ballot,”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stXOo9RmOVI in which pollsters ask people whether they would vote for a generic Democrat or a generic Republican.

    And even on Monday, a day after Trump’s Fox interview aired, there was yet more data showing how Trump has depressed his base.

    The percentage of Trump voters who said they were “very confident” about their 2024 vote dropped all the way to 58%— from 74% when the University of Massachusetts Amherst asked the question in April 2025.

    Midterms are almost always a referendum on the president. That referendum doesn’t appear to be going well for Trump, so he’s trying to shift the narrative. But the data doesn’t back him up.

  • 特朗普政府宣布与梯瓦、安斯泰来等药企达成药品定价协议


    2026-08-31T16:09:45.05Z / 路透社

    记者:史蒂夫·霍兰德斯与迈克尔·厄曼
    2026年8月31日 世界协调时16:09 更新于12分钟前


    [1/2]美国商务部长霍华德·卢特尼克、美国卫生与公众服务部长小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪,以及美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)署长穆罕默德·奥兹博士站在美国总统唐纳德·特朗普身后,特朗普正在白宫椭圆形办公室就其政府的医疗政策发表讲话,华盛顿特区,美国,2026年8月31日。路透社/伊芙琳·霍克斯坦

    完整报道请点击此处

    • 与梯瓦、CSL、安斯泰来及多家小型生物技术公司签署新协议
    • 路透社此前曾报道,小型药企参与此类协议的经济激励有限
    • 美国处方药价格往往是其他发达国家的近三倍

    华盛顿8月31日电(路透社)——美国总统唐纳德·特朗普周一宣布与国际制药公司及部分小型生物技术公司达成新一轮药品定价协议,这是其推动降低美国民众医疗负担举措的一部分。

    特朗普与相关药企高管在椭圆形办公室的活动中表示,已与包括安斯泰来、比昂医药、CSL、BridgeBIO、太阳药业、梯瓦以及UCB SA在内的九家公司签署协议。这些公司将以最惠国价格向州医疗补助计划供应药品,特朗普称此举“力度极大的折扣,将大幅降低你的医疗护理成本”。

    订阅《每日案卷》新闻简报,将最新法律资讯直接发送至您的收件箱,开启您的晨间资讯。点击此处注册。

    广告 · 继续滚动阅读

    美国患者目前在处方药上的花费遥遥领先于其他国家,往往是其他发达国家的近三倍,特朗普一直向制药商施压,要求其将药品价格降至与其他国家患者支付水平相当的程度。

    此次协议将延续特朗普政府去年起与包括辉瑞、礼来和安进在内的全球17家大型制药商达成的协议框架。这些制药商同意提供与其他发达国家定价相当的低价,即所谓的“最惠国”定价。

    这些公司同意为联邦医疗项目降低部分药品价格,并通过特朗普旗下网站直接向患者销售部分药品,以此换取关税减免。

    小型药企迟迟未签署协议

    路透社此前曾报道,中小型制药商在签署药品定价协议方面进展缓慢。

    路透社6月的一篇报道显示,截至当时仅有日本的安斯泰来确认申请加入医疗补助定价计划,伊奥尼斯制药等公司的高管表示,他们认为参与此类协议几乎没有经济收益。

    目前尚不清楚这些协议将为政府或患者节省多少开支。根据现行法律,医疗补助计划已从制药商处获得大幅折扣,且该计划覆盖的大多数患者自付处方药费用极低。

    今年以来,白宫已多次与制药业高管举办高调活动,宣传其在医疗成本控制方面的努力,这是其在今年决定国会控制权的中期选举前突出民生负担议题整体举措的一部分。

    blob:https://www.reuters.com/65a45596-880f-4f4c-9c48-2eb4fe1ceb1f

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/trump-administration-announce-drug-pricing-deals-2026-08-31/

    美国政府表示,其更广泛的药品定价举措,包括此前与大型制药公司达成的协议,未来十年可为联邦和州政府节省643亿美元开支,但这一数字尚未得到证实。

    广告 · 继续滚动阅读

    additional reporting by Kamal Choudhury and Sriparna Roy in Bengaluru and Yasmeen Abutaleb in Washington; Editing by Caroline Humer and Bill Berkrot

    我们的准则:汤森路透信任原则。

    Trump administration announces drug pricing deals with Teva, Astellas and others

    2026-08-31T16:09:45.05Z / Reuters

    By Steve Holland and Michael Erman

    August 31, 2026 4:09 PM UTC Updated 12 mins ago

    Item 1 of 2 U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and U.S. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz stand behind U.S. President Donald Trump, as he delivers remarks on his administration’s healthcare policies, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 31, 2026. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

    [1/2]U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and U.S. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz stand behind U.S. President Donald Trump, as he delivers remarks on his administration’s healthcare… Read more

    • New agreements signed with Teva, CSL, Astellas, some smaller biotechs
    • Reuters previously reported smaller drugmakers see limited financial incentive to participate
    • US prescription drug costs often nearly triple those of other developed nations

    WASHINGTON, Aug 31 (Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump announced a new round of drug-pricing agreements with international pharmaceutical companies and some smaller biotechs on Monday, part of a push to make healthcare more affordable for Americans.

    Deals were signed with nine companies including Astellas, BeOne Medicines, ​CSL, BridgeBIO, Sun Pharmaceutical, Teva and UCB SA.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    These companies have offered drugs to state Medicaid programs ​at most-favored-nation prices, Trump said in an Oval Office event with executives of ⁠the companies, describing this as “a tremendous discount, which should bring down the cost of your medical care ​by tremendous amounts.”

    U.S. patients currently pay by far the most for prescription medicines, often nearly three times more ​than in other developed nations, and Trump has been pressuring drugmakers to lower their prices to what patients pay elsewhere.

    The deals will build on agreements the administration struck with 17 of the world’s largest drugmakers, including Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Amgen, ​starting last year. The drugmakers agreed to offer lower prices comparable to what is paid in other ​developed countries, referred to as “most-favored-nation” pricing.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Those companies agreed to cut some prices for federal health programs and sell some medicines ‌directly ⁠to patients through a Trump-branded website, in return for tariff relief.

    SMALL DRUGMAKERS HAVE DELAYED DEALS

    Smaller and mid-sized drugmakers had been slow to sign onto drug-pricing deals, Reuters has reported.

    A Reuters report in June found that only Japan’s Astellas had confirmed applying for the Medicaid pricing program by that point, with executives at companies such as ​Ionis Pharmaceuticals saying they saw ​little financial benefit in ⁠joining.

    It is not yet clear how much the deals will save the government or patients. Medicaid already gets steep discounts from drugmakers under existing law, and ​most people covered by the program pay little out of pocket for prescriptions.

    The ​White House ⁠has held several high-profile events with pharmaceutical executives this year to promote its efforts on healthcare costs, part of a broader push to highlight affordability before this year’s midterm elections that will decide control of Congress.

    blob:https://www.reuters.com/65a45596-880f-4f4c-9c48-2eb4fe1ceb1f

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/trump-administration-announce-drug-pricing-deals-2026-08-31/

    The administration ⁠has said ​its broader drug pricing push, including the earlier deals with ​large pharmaceutical companies, could save $64.3 billion in federal and state spending over the next decade, but that number is speculative.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Additional reporting by Kamal ​Choudhury and Sriparna Roy in Bengaluru and Yasmeen Abutaleb in Washington; Editing by Caroline Humer and Bill Berkrot

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 艾尔-赛义德回避关于哈森·皮克竞选关联的问题后遭网络炮轰:“真是‘好伙伴’”


    2026年8月31日 美国东部时间下午2:37 / 福克斯新闻

    这位民主党参议院候选人将皮克斥为“来自加利福尼亚的一名普通主播”,尽管后者曾多次现身竞选活动

    作者:基拉·麦克唐纳、安德鲁·马克·米勒、彼得·达布罗萨、保罗·施陶瑟 福克斯新闻

    密歇根州民主党参议院候选人阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德谈支持者哈森·皮克:“我不想和你们讨论加利福尼亚的一名Twitch主播”

    密歇根州民主党参议院候选人阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德认为,记者们在询问有争议的主播哈森·皮克相关问题时“抓错了重点”。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/dbaa9b58-3a8c-4be6-a4e8-04e3f02867b6

    收听本文
    3分钟

    民主党参议院候选人阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德因回避与极左翼主播哈森·皮克的关联问题,正面临一波强烈的网络反对声。皮克曾多次现身密歇根州的竞选活动。

    当被问及皮克对其竞选活动的影响时,艾尔-赛义德告诉记者,这场选举关乎密歇根州,他“没兴趣讨论加利福尼亚的一名社交媒体人士”。

    “但我真的不想和你们讨论加利福尼亚的一名Twitch主播,”艾尔-赛义德说道,“这不是一场严肃的对话。”

    福克斯新闻数字频道随后追问艾尔-赛义德,既然他如此认为,那当初为何邀请皮克前往密歇根。他对此不予理会,当另一名记者问及他是否会谴责皮克时,他再次坚称皮克只是“来自加利福尼亚的一名普通主播”。

    阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德在主播引发反犹主义舆论风暴后淡化与哈森·皮克的关联

    密歇根州兰辛市,民主党参议院候选人阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德在竞选活动中接受记者采访。(福克斯新闻数字频道/保罗·施陶瑟)

    这段视频在社交媒体上疯传,引发广泛嘲讽,艾尔-赛义德正急于与这位拥有约1000万社交媒体粉丝的主播划清界限。

    作家兼政治评论员斯蒂芬·L·米勒在X平台上发帖称:“太离谱了。他们怕他怕到连问题都不敢问深。”

    “到底谁才是候选人?”米勒在另一篇帖子中写道。

    “情况越来越糟了,”共和党政治战略家凯尔·马廷森在X平台上发帖称。

    “我对此很感兴趣,所以这里面肯定有问题,”《市政厅》高级专栏作家库尔特·施利希特在X平台上发帖称。

    在另一篇X平台帖子中,“查理·柯克秀”执行制片人安德鲁·科尔维特写道:“很明显,阿布勒·艾尔-赛义德慌了。他从和哈森·皮克一起参加六场竞选活动、和他一起拍宣传照,到拒绝提及他的名字,现在只把他说成‘加利福尼亚的某个媒体人士’。真是‘好伙伴’。”

    哈森·皮克坚称阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德曾邀请他为密歇根竞选活动“站台”,反对声浪四起

    2026年8月3日,底特律,一场支持艾尔-赛义德竞选的内容创作者派对上,阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德与主播哈森·皮克在泳池边交谈。(朱莉娅·德马雷·尼基森/美联社照片)

    “他可能比卡玛拉还糟……”福克斯新闻撰稿人乔·孔查在X平台上发帖称。

    亲以色列活动家、慈善家亚当·米尔斯坦也在X平台发帖称:“艾尔-赛义德再次拒绝谴责哈森·皮克——而皮克本人最近已经证实,是艾尔-赛义德邀请他为其竞选活动造势,而非反过来。”

    皮克因过往有争议的言论成为民主党内部日益凸显的争议焦点,其中包括他声称“美国活该遭遇9·11袭击”。

    上周,这名主播一段涉及密歇根州民主党联邦众议员第11选区候选人杰里米·莫斯的争议音频片段引发公愤,艾尔-赛义德随后回应了外界对其与皮克交往的不满。

    “我想明确说明,除了我本人和我的竞选发言人之外,没有人能代表本竞选团队,”艾尔-赛义德在一份声明中说道。

    在密歇根州参议院关键选举前一天,艾尔-赛义德与极左翼主播哈森·皮克亲密互动

    2026年4月7日,密歇根州安阿伯市密歇根大学,一场竞选活动结束后,主播哈森·皮克(左)与阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德(中右)与年轻粉丝自拍。(朱莉娅·德马雷·尼基森/美联社照片)

    尽管艾尔-赛义德试图与皮克划清界限,但这名主播曾公开谈及自己受邀加入竞选活动的经历,他在4月与艾尔-赛义德共同参加的一场集会上表示:“阿卜杜勒邀请我和他一起踏上这场征程时,我当即答应了。”

    在周五接受《塞莫福》专栏作家大卫·韦格尔采访时,皮克称艾尔-赛义德还邀请他为自己的竞选活动“站台”。

    艾尔-赛义德将与共和党参议院候选人迈克·罗杰斯角逐现任民主党参议员加里·彼得斯留下的席位,这场选举可能决定参议院的控制权归属。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    福克斯新闻数字频道已联系艾尔-赛义德的竞选团队置评。

    基拉·麦克唐纳是福克斯新闻数字频道制作助理。

    El-Sayed torched online after brushing off questions about Hasan Piker campaign ties: ‘What a pal’

    August 31, 2026 2:37pm EDT / Fox News

    The Democratic Senate nominee dismissed Piker as ‘a single streamer from California’ despite campaign trail appearances

    By Kiera McDonald, Andrew Mark Miller, Peter D’Abrosca, Paul Steinhauser, Fox News

    Michigan Dem Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed on supporter Hasan Piker: ’I don’t want to have a conversation about a Twitch streamer in California’

    Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic Senate nominee in Michigan, argues reporters are ‘missing the boat’ when asking about controversial streamer Hasan Piker.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/dbaa9b58-3a8c-4be6-a4e8-04e3f02867b6

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed is facing a wave of online blowback after dodging questions about his ties to far-left streamer Hasan Piker, a frequent presence on the campaign trail in Michigan.

    When asked about Piker’s influence on his campaign, El-Sayed told reporters the race is about Michigan and that he is “not interested in a conversation about a social media person in California.”

    “But I don’t want to have a conversation about a Twitch streamer in California,” El-Sayed said. “This is not a serious conversation.”

    Fox News Digital then pressed El-Sayed on why he brought Piker to Michigan if that was the case, which he waved off before doubling down and calling Piker “a single streamer from California” when another reporter asked if he would condemn him.

    ABDUL EL-SAYED PLAYS DOWN HASAN PIKER TIES AFTER STREAMER’S VIRAL ANTISEMITISM FIRESTORM

    Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed speaks to reporters on the campaign trail in Lansing, Michigan.(Fox News Digital/Paul Steinhauser)

    The clip exploded across social media and drew widespread ridicule as El-Sayed scrambles to distance himself from the streamer, who has roughly 10 million social media followers.

    In a post on X, writer and political commentator Stephen L. Miller wrote, “Amazing. They are so terrified of him that she literally jumps in one question deep.”

    “Who is the candidate here?” Miller wrote in another post.

    “This keeps getting worse,” Republican political strategist Kyle Martinsen posted on X.

    “I’m interested in it so there’s a problem here,” Townhall senior columnist Kurt Schlichter posted on X.

    In another post on X, “The Charlie Kirk Show” executive producer Andrew Kolvet wrote, “It’s very clear Abul El Sayed is panicking. He went from doing a half dozen campaign stops with Hasan Piker and taking glamor shots with him, to refusing to say his name. Now he’s just ‘some media person in California.’ What a pal.”

    HASAN PIKER INSISTS ABDUL EL-SAYED ASKED HIM TO ‘STUMP’ FOR MICHIGAN CAMPAIGN AMID BACKLASH

    Abdul El-Sayed talks poolside with streamer Hasan Piker at a party for content creators supporting his campaign, Aug. 3, 2026, in Detroit.(Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Photo)

    “He might be worse than Kamala…,” Fox News contributor Joe Concha posted on X.

    Pro-Israel activist and philanthropist Adam Milstein also wrote in a post on X, “El Sayed again refuses to condemn Hasan Piker — who himself recently confirmed it was El Sayed that asked him to campaign for him, not the reverse.”

    Piker has emerged as a growing flashpoint within the Democratic Party over his past controversial remarks, including his claim that “America deserved 9/11.”

    Last week, El-Sayed responded to outrage over his association with Piker after the streamer’s comments on a viral audio clip involving Jewish Michigan state Sen. Jeremy Moss, the Democratic nominee in the state’s 11th Congressional District, sparked outrage.

    “I want to be crystal clear, nobody speaks for this campaign besides me and my campaign spokespeople,” El-Sayed said in a statement.

    EL-SAYED PALS AROUND WITH FAR-LEFT STREAMER HASAN PIKER THE DAY BEFORE CRUCIAL MICHIGAN SENATE ELECTION

    Streamer Hasan Piker, left, and Abdul El-Sayed, center right, take a selfie with young fans following a campaign event, April 7, 2026, at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Mich.(Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Photo)

    Despite El-Sayed’s attempts to distance himself from Piker, the streamer has spoken openly about his invitation to join the campaign, saying at an April rally with El-Sayed, “The reason why, when Abdul asked for me to come on this journey with him, I said yes, absolutely.”

    In a Friday interview with Semafor columnist David Weigel, Piker said El-Sayed also asked him to “stump” for his campaign.

    El-Sayed will face Republican Senate nominee Mike Rogers for retiring Democratic Sen. Gary Peters’ seat in a race that could determine control of the Senate.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Fox News Digital reached out to El-Sayed’s campaign for comment.

    Kiera McDonald is a Production Assistant for Fox News Digital.

  • 黑客泄露从美国司法部窃取的敏感执法文件


    2026-08-31T17:11:15.798Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:肖恩·林加斯(Sean Lyngaas)

    更新于31分钟前
    更新于美国东部时间2026年8月31日下午3:37
    发布于美国东部时间2026年8月31日下午1:11

    数字安全 联邦机构 俄罗斯

    image

    2022年7月,华盛顿特区烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局(ATF)总部讲台上的该局标识。

    塞缪尔·科鲁姆 摄 / 盖蒂图片社 资料图

    一个疑似操俄语的网络犯罪团伙于周一泄露了其从美国司法部烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局窃取的疑似敏感执法文件。

    据美国有线电视新闻网和一名独立网络安全研究人员对数据的审查,此次泄露的文件似乎包含过往烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局调查目标的信息,以及对他们手机通讯的分析内容。部分文件涉及特定烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局探员以及他们参与的知名案件。

    该研究人员罗恩·法贝拉(Ron Fabela)表示,这批数据涵盖与武装抢劫、纵火、爆炸物案件和凶杀案相关的调查。他还提到,文件中提及的案件有很大一部分属于该局休斯顿外勤分局的工作范畴。

    烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局周一在一份声明中称,目前“无法证实泄露数据的真实性、性质或范围”,该机构正与司法部及其他联邦机构合作,“评估相关情况并采取适当行动”。

    “正如烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局此前所言,受影响的系统并未连接至——且此次事件也未波及——该局其他业务系统。该局履行职责的能力未受影响,”该机构的声明补充道。

    烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局上周首次披露此次黑客攻击事件,称其达到了需要通知国会的“重大”网络安全事件标准。根据联邦法律,“重大”网络事件通常指可能损害美国国家安全、外交政策或经济利益的事件。

    一个名为麒麟(Qilin)的活跃勒索软件团伙此前已宣称对此次入侵负责;周一,该团伙开始在其暗网受害者网站上泄露文件。近年来,该团伙以制造业、零售业和医疗行业为攻击目标,思科公司的网络情报部门因此将其列为“全球范围内最活跃、破坏性最强的勒索软件威胁之一”。

    另一家追踪勒索软件团伙的网络安全公司哈尔西恩(Halcyon)表示,该公司“有高度把握”认定麒麟团伙为俄语使用者。

    此次烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局遭黑客攻击,是联邦机构面临的又一困扰——这些机构本就时常追捕网络犯罪分子。2023年,美国法警局遭遇勒索软件攻击,导致该局调查对象的个人信息泄露。同年,据知情人士透露,黑客入侵了联邦调查局纽约外勤办公室用于调查儿童色情制品图像的计算机系统,其中包括用于存储与杰弗里·爱泼斯坦案相关图像的系统。

    数字安全 联邦机构 俄罗斯

    Hackers leak sensitive law enforcement files stolen from the DOJ

    2026-08-31T17:11:15.798Z / CNN

    By Sean Lyngaas

    Updated 31 min ago

    Updated Aug 31, 2026, 3:37 PM ET

    PUBLISHED Aug 31, 2026, 1:11 PM ET

    Digital security Federal agencies Russia

    The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives logo is seen on a podium at the ATF headquarters in Washington, DC, in July 2022.

    Samuel Corum/Getty Images/File

    A likely Russian-speaking cybercriminal gang on Monday leaked what appear to be sensitive law enforcement files it stole from the Justice Department’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

    The dumped files appear to include information on targets of past ATF investigations and analyses of their phone communications, according to a review of the data by CNN and an independent cybersecurity researcher. Some of the files correspond to specific ATF agents and high-profile cases they apparently worked on.

    The data cover investigations related to armed robbery, arson, explosives and homicide, according to the researcher, Ron Fabela. A chunk of the cases mentioned in the files fall under the work the ATF’s Houston Field Division, Fabela said.

    In a statement on Monday, ATF said it “cannot confirm the authenticity, nature, or scope” of the leaked data at this time and that the agency was working with the Department of Justice and other federal agencies to “assess the claims and take appropriate actions.”

    “As ATF previously stated, the affected system was not connected to – and the incident did not affect – ATF’s other operational systems. ATF’s ability to carry out its mission has not been impacted,” the agency’s statement continued.

    ATF originally disclosed the hack last week, saying it met the threshold for a “major” cybersecurity incident that requires notifying Congress. Under federal law, a “major” cyber incident is generally one that could harm US national security, foreign policy or economic interests.

    A prolific ransomware group called Qilin previously claimed responsibility for the breach; on Monday, the group began leaking the files from its dark -web victim site. The group has claimed victims in the manufacturing, retail and healthcare sectors in recent years, leading Cisco’s cyber-intelligence unit to brand it one of the “most prolific and damaging ransomware threats on a global scale.”

    Halcyon, another cybersecurity firm that tracks ransomware groups, has said it has “high-confidence” that Qilin are Russian speakers.

    The ATF hack is the latest headache for federal agencies involving the cybercriminals they often pursue. A 2023 ransomware attack on the US Marshals Service affected personal information of the subjects of the service’s investigations. That same year, hackers breached a computer system the FBI’s New York field office used in investigations of images of child sexual exploitation, including a system used to store images related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, according to people briefed on the matter.

    Digital security Federal agencies Russia

  • 共和党斥巨资攻击民主党数据中心,特朗普为何却喊出“让数据说了算”?


    2026年8月31日 美国东部时间下午1:21 / CNN政治频道

    作者:达纳·巴什,CNN

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/31/politics/video/cnn-reporting-data-center-ad-spending-ip

    共和党斥巨资攻击民主党数据中心。特朗普为何却喊出“让数据说了算”?

    《政坛内参》节目

    在《政坛内参》节目中,达纳·巴什剖析了CNN最新报道:今年全美与数据中心相关的政治广告支出高达3100万美元,其中几乎全为负面广告。节目嘉宾小组深入探讨了两党对数据中心日益高涨的反对声浪、候选人如何调整竞选说辞,以及这一议题对中期选举的潜在影响。

    Republicans are spending big attacking Democrats on data centers. So why is Trump saying ‘let data reign’?

    2026-08-31 1:21 PM EDT / CNN Politics

    By Dana Bash, CNN

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/31/politics/video/cnn-reporting-data-center-ad-spending-ip

    Republicans are spending big attacking Democrats on data centers. So why is Trump saying ‘let data reign’?

    Inside Politics

    On “Inside Politics,” Dana Bash breaks down new CNN reporting on $31 million in political ad spending tied to data centers this year, almost all negative. The panel unpacks growing bipartisan backlash to data centers, how candidates are recalibrating their messages and the potential impact on the midterms.

  • “落后又贫穷”:特朗普向抵制关键技术的社区发出严厉警告


    2026年8月31日 美国东部时间下午2:21 / 福克斯新闻

    总统称反对数据中心正中中国下怀
    作者:阿曼达·马西亚斯

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/6a80bac3-c74a-4701-a9f9-92ba3d9070fa

    收听本文
    3分钟

    唐纳德·特朗普总统周一针对针对数据中心的日益强烈的反对声浪发出警告,那些拒绝建设此类设施的社区可能会错失美国人工智能繁荣带来的就业和经济收益。

    “全美各地的社区之所以不想要数据中心,唯一的原因就是他们最终想变得落后又贫穷,”特朗普在Truth Social的一篇帖子中写道。“如果他们想要成功致富,实现更低的税率和遍地的工作机会,那就让数据产业蓬勃发展吧,”他补充道。

    特朗普将能源主导地位和美国在人工智能领域的领导地位作为其第二任期的核心支柱,将数据中心作为他推动美国保持对中国领先优势的核心举措。

    “中国对这场反数据中心运动再满意不过了,”特朗普写道,他认为对新建数据中心的抵制可能会削弱美国在全球人工智能竞赛中的优势。

    选举举报人警告外国势力斥巨资让美国人反对人工智能

    唐纳德·特朗普总统已将能源主导地位和人工智能作为其第二任期的核心优先事项。(彭博社/盖蒂图片社)

    数据中心热潮也已成为中期选举的一个热点问题,人们对电价上涨、水资源消耗和快速开发的担忧,与数据中心能带来的就业、投资和美国人工智能领域的主导地位承诺产生了冲突。

    这种紧张局势已在全美各地上演。

    特朗普特别批评了得克萨斯州州长格雷格·阿博特的做法,称这个孤星州对待数据中心的态度是一个“错误”,并指出数据中心项目能为愿意接纳它们的社区带来经济投资。

    德克萨斯州已巩固了其在该行业的巨头地位,在高纬环球2026年全球数据中心市场排名中,达拉斯位列全球第一大主要数据中心市场。但数十亿美元的新投资也带来了巨大的电力需求,以及谁应为支持这一热潮所需的基础设施买单的争议。

    阿博特已着手解决这些担忧,他指示监管机构确保数据中心承担为其服务所需的基础设施成本,并呼吁开发商自行增加发电能力,而非将成本转嫁给德克萨斯州居民。

    美国南部某州在全球增长最快的行业之一中登顶

    包括州长格雷格·阿博特在内的德克萨斯州领导人一直致力于将该州打造成大型数据中心开发的目的地,尽管官员们仍在应对新项目可能给电网带来的压力。(安塔内·塔维提安/路透社)

    与此同时,在宾夕法尼亚州,州长乔希·夏皮罗最近对大型数据中心开发实施了新的限制要求。

    其他州州长则采取了更为严格的立场。纽约州民主党州长安德鲁·科莫(注:原文此处应为Kathy Hochul,即凯西·霍楚尔)对新建超大规模数据中心实施了为期一年的禁令,各州都在应对电价上涨、电网可靠性和开发速度方面的担忧。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    数据中心开发在孤星州如火如荼,北德克萨斯州在该行业领先市场的新全球排名中位居榜首。(靖家洋/特约撰稿人/法新社/盖蒂图片社)

    数据中心容纳了为人工智能和云服务提供动力的服务器和计算设备,需要大量电力来运行和冷却。大多数美国人可能从未进过数据中心,但他们一直在不知不觉中依赖数据中心。

    各州日益多样化的限制和要求可能会使特朗普推动数据中心快速扩张的计划复杂化,因为社区需要在美国的人工智能雄心与对电力成本、水资源使用和开发的担忧之间做出权衡。

    阿曼达·马西亚斯报道商业、经济与政治的交集,重点关注政策决策如何塑造市场、企业和美国工人。

    ‘Backwards and poor’: Trump issues dire warning to communities blocking critical technology

    August 31, 2026 2:21pm EDT / Fox News

    The president said opposition to data centers plays into China’s hands

    By Amanda Macias

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/6a80bac3-c74a-4701-a9f9-92ba3d9070fa

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    President Donald Trump took aim Monday at the growing backlash against data centers, warning that communities that shut the door on the facilities risk missing out on the jobs and economic gains of America’s AI boom.

    “The only reason that communities throughout the U.S.A. should not want Data Centers is if they want to end up being backwards and poor,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. “If they want to be successful and rich, with far lower taxes and jobs all over the place, let Data Reign,” he added.

    Trump has made energy dominance and U.S. leadership in artificial intelligence central pillars of his second term, placing data centers at the center of his push to maintain America’s edge over China.

    “China could not be happier with this anti Data Center movement,” Trump wrote, arguing that resistance to new facilities risks undercutting America’s edge in the global AI race.

    ELECTION WHISTLEBLOWER WARNS FOREIGN ACTORS ARE SPENDING BILLIONS TO TURN AMERICANS AGAINST AI

    President Donald Trump has made energy dominance and artificial intelligence key priorities for his second term.(Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    The data center boom has also emerged as a midterm flashpoint, as concerns over rising electricity costs, water use and rapid development collide with promises of jobs, investment and U.S. dominance in artificial intelligence.

    That tension is already playing out across the country.

    Trump has specifically criticized Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s approach, calling the Lone Star State’s stance toward data centers a “mistake” and pointing to the economic investment the projects can bring to communities willing to host them.

    Texas has cemented its status as a heavyweight in the industry, with Dallas ranking as the world’s No. 1 primary data center market in Cushman & Wakefield’s 2026 Global Data Center Market Comparison. But billions of dollars in new investment have also brought enormous electricity demands and questions over who should pay for the infrastructure needed to support the boom.

    Abbott has moved to address those concerns, directing regulators to ensure data centers cover the infrastructure costs needed to serve them and calling on developers to add their own power generation rather than shift costs onto Texas residents.

    A SOUTHERN STATE JUST TOOK THE TOP SPOT IN ONE OF THE WORLD’S FASTEST-GROWING INDUSTRIES

    Texas leaders, including Gov. Greg Abbott, have sought to position the state as a destination for large-scale data center development even as officials grapple with the strain new projects could place on the electric grid.(Antranik Tavitian/Reuters)

    Meanwhile, in Pennsylvania, Gov. Josh Shapiro recently imposed new requirements on large data center developments.

    Other governors have taken a more restrictive stance. Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul imposed a one-year moratorium on new hyper-scale data centers as states grapple with concerns over electricity costs, grid reliability and the pace of development.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Data center development is surging across the Lone Star State, with North Texas taking the top spot in a new global ranking of the industry’s leading markets.(Yasuyoshi Chiba/Contributor/AFP/Getty Images)

    Data centers house the servers and computing equipment that power artificial intelligence and cloud services, requiring vast amounts of electricity to operate and cool. Most Americans may never see the inside of one, but they rely on data centers constantly, often without realizing it.

    The growing patchwork of state restrictions and requirements could complicate Trump’s push for rapid data center expansion as communities weigh America’s AI ambitions against concerns over electricity costs, water use and development.

    Amanda Macias covers the intersection of business, economics and politics, with a focus on how policy decisions shape markets, businesses and American workers.

  • 共和党委员会请求美国最高法院保留低价广告费率使用权


    2026年8月31日 下午4:38 UTC / 路透社

    作者:约翰·克鲁泽尔
    2026年8月31日 下午4:38 UTC 更新于3小时前

    image

    • 摘要
    • 下级法院裁定委员会无权享受低价广告费率
    • 最高法院6月驳回联合支出上限规定
    • 共和党主要委员会的资金储备远超民主党

    华盛顿8月31日路透电 — 在唐纳德·特朗普所在政党力争在11月中期选举中掌控国会之际,两个共和党委员会已向美国最高法院请求保留一项联邦政策,该政策可让它们获得长期以来政治候选人享有的广播电视广告折扣费率。

    美国全国共和党参议员竞选委员会和美国全国共和党国会竞选委员会在周一公开的一份文件中请求大法官们叫停下级法院的裁决,该裁决实际上阻止了它们享受联邦通信委员会(FCC)所谓的“最低单位收费”规则带来的优惠。

    即刻开启您的晨间资讯:每日法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱,订阅《每日案卷》通讯。点击此处注册。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    该政策要求广播公司在大选前60天内播出特定政治广告时收取折扣费率,今年的这一窗口将于本周五开启。联邦通信委员会于3月发布指南称,政党委员会在购买与候选人联合投放的广告时,有资格享受低价费率。

    最高法院6月裁决支持共和党挑战者,废除了政党与候选人之间的联合支出联邦限制,此后该FCC政策的重要性显著提升。一名共和党官员向路透社表示,该裁决与委员会获得低价广告时段的资格相结合,意味着“我们的资金能比以往发挥更大作用”。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    共和党希望在11月3日的中期选举中保住对众议院和参议院的控制权。

    根据联邦选举委员会8月提交的文件,三大共和党委员会——共和党全国委员会、全国共和党国会竞选委员会和全国共和党参议员竞选委员会——截至7月底的现金储备约为2.79亿美元,是民主党同行约1.36亿美元资金的两倍多,民主党委员会还背负着近1800万美元的债务。

    包括佐治亚州参议员乔恩·奥索夫在内的一群民主党候选人于6月提起诉讼,试图阻止最低单位收费政策适用于政党委员会。

    位于里士满的美国第四巡回上诉法院于8月25日支持民主党挑战者,裁定政党无权享受低价广告费率。该裁决促使共和党委员会向最高法院提出请求,要求在FCC广告费率政策于本周生效前叫停第四巡回上诉法院的裁决。

    在法庭文件中,共和党委员会表示,它们已经“根据这些规则编制了数千万美元的广告采购预算”。它们补充道:“但由于第四巡回上诉法院的裁决,广播电台已经取消了这些费率。”

    最高法院6月以6票赞成、3票反对的裁决,凭借其保守派多数席位,认定限制政党在候选人参与下用于竞选活动的支出金额违反了美国宪法第一修正案对政府剥夺言论自由的保护。

    这是近几十年来取消竞选资金限制的最新一项裁决,也是最高法院在近期结束的任期内作出的多项有利于共和党人的裁决之一。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    约翰·克鲁泽尔 报道;威尔·邓汉姆 编辑

    我们的标准:路透社信任原则,打开新标签页

    Republican committees ask US Supreme Court to preserve access to cheaper ad rates

    2026-08-31 4:38 PM UTC / Reuters

    By John Kruzel

    August 31, 2026 4:38 PM UTC Updated 3 hours ago

    People walk in front of the Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 30, 2026. REUTERS/Cheney Orr Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    • Summary
    • Lower court said committees not entitled to lower ad rates
    • Supreme Court in June rejected coordinated-spending caps
    • Major Republican committees’ war chest dwarfs Democrats

    WASHINGTON, Aug 31 (Reuters) – Two Republican committees have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to preserve a federal policy ​that would give them access to discounted television and radio advertising rates long available to political ‌candidates, as President Donald Trump’s party seeks to keep control of Congress in the November midterm elections.

    The National Republican Senatorial Committee and National Republican Congressional Committee asked the justices in a filing made public on Monday to halt a lower court’s ruling that effectively blocked them from benefiting ​from the Federal Communications Commission’s so-called “lowest unit charge” rule.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    That policy requires broadcasters to charge discounted rates for ​airing certain political advertisements within 60 days of a general election, a window that opens this ⁠year on Friday. The FCC in March published guidance saying that party committees are eligible for the cheaper rates ​when buying ads coordinated with candidates.

    The FCC policy gained greater significance after the Supreme Court in June struck down federal restrictions ​on spending coordinated between parties and their candidates, siding with Republican challengers. One Republican official told Reuters that the combination of that ruling and the committees’ eligibility for cheaper airtime means, “Our dollars can go further than they could before.”

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Republicans are hoping to retain control of ​the House of Representatives and Senate in the November 3 midterms.

    The three major Republican committees — the Republican National Committee, the ​National Republican Congressional Committee and the National Republican Senatorial Committee — ended July with about $279 million in cash. That was more than double ‌the ⁠roughly $136 million held by their Democratic counterparts, which also carried nearly $18 million in debt, according to Federal Election Commission filings in August.

    A group of Democratic candidates including Senator Jon Ossoff of Georgia sued in June to try to block the lowest unit charge policy from applying to party committees.

    The Richmond-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on August 25 sided ​with the Democratic challengers, ruling ​that political parties are not ⁠entitled to the low-cost ad rate. That ruling prompted the Republican committees to ask the Supreme Court to halt the 4th Circuit’s ruling before the FCC ad-rate policy takes effect ​this week.

    In court papers, the Republican committees said they have already budgeted “tens of millions ​of dollars in ⁠ad buys under these rules.” They added, “But because of the 4th Circuit’s decision, broadcast stations are already rescinding those rates.”

    The Supreme Court in a 6-3 ruling in June powered by its conservative majority decided that a cap on the amount of ⁠money parties ​can spend on campaigns with input from candidates violates the U.S. Constitution’s ​First Amendment protections against government abridgment of freedom of speech.

    It was the latest decision eliminating campaign funding limits in recent decades and marked one of ​several rulings the court issued during its recently concluded term that favored Republicans.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • 乔治·桑托斯成为首位被卡尔希终身禁赛者


    2026-08-31T16:53:53.715Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/31/politics/george-santos-kalshi-ban

    预测市场平台卡尔希(Kalshi)周一对一场竞争激烈的众议院选区共和党候选人处以罚款,并对前众议员乔治·桑托斯实施了该平台有史以来首次终身禁赛,此前双方已就内幕交易展开调查。

    北卡罗来纳州候选人劳里·巴克哈特在给美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)的一份声明中承认,她曾押注自己的竞选,并表示自己犯了一个“愚蠢的错误”。

    这是迄今为止最受关注的政治内幕交易案例,即候选人或工作人员利用自身掌握的内幕信息或能够影响选举结果的优势进行市场交易。专家警告称,随着今年预测平台的普及,这种行为正日益成为一种风险。

    “我押注了自己,真的,”巴克哈特说道,“这是个愚蠢的错误,我一发现问题就努力弥补了。可以说,我在卡尔希的交易生涯很短暂。”

    卡尔希在周一的一份法律文件中指出,巴克哈特的交易金额不足1000美元,且配合了平台的内部调查,因此将被禁赛三年。

    而针对桑托斯的终身禁赛,则源于他今年早些时候就自己能否出席国情咨文演讲所下的内幕赌注。桑托斯曾在2023年臭名昭著地被国会驱逐,后因一起无关的欺诈案入狱,但去年凭借特朗普的减刑提前获释。

    如今,像卡尔希和Polymarket这类允许用户对体育、选举、娱乐等事件下注的预测市场,每周的交易量已达数十亿美元。相关企业和联邦监管机构已承诺将打击内幕交易和市场操纵行为。

    今年早些时候,卡尔希曾因类似行为暂停了两党共三名小型政治候选人的账户。

    CNN与卡尔希存在合作关系,并使用其数据报道重大事件。CNN的编辑人员不得在预测市场进行交易。

    巴克哈特一案是首个公开披露的国会竞选候选人押注自身竞选的案例,且该案发生在一个关键选区。

    唐纳德·特朗普总统已背书退役陆军上校巴克哈特,她也是全国共和党国会委员会“让美国再次强大多数派”计划首批提名的候选人之一,该计划旨在助力共和党人拿下民主党掌控的席位。

    北卡罗来纳州第一国会选区是中期选举中竞争最激烈的众议院选区之一。该区域涵盖北卡罗来纳州东部大部分乡村地区,自2023年起由民主党众议员唐·戴维斯担任代表。

    共和党州议员去年对该选区进行了重新划分,这是特朗普在中期选举前在全国范围内推动有利于共和党的选区重划计划的一部分。根据库克政治报告的分类,该选区目前被评为“倾向共和党”,是共和党有望拿下民主党席位的最佳机会之一。

    巴克哈特曾在2024年与戴维斯竞选该席位,在选区重划前以不到2个百分点的差距落败。她在启动本次竞选前,去年曾在国防部短暂任职。

    民主党人抓住卡尔希公布的这一结果攻击巴克哈特。

    戴维斯在社交媒体帖子中称,巴克哈特的行为是“丧失公众信任的不可饶恕的失信行为”,并指责她将竞选活动当作“牟利的机会”。

    民主党国会竞选委员会发言人麦迪逊·安德鲁斯在一份声明中表示,“绝不可能信任她能为北卡罗来纳州民众担任一名有道德操守的议员”。

    卡尔希平台的一位发言人证实,针对桑托斯的终身禁赛是该平台首例。

    “嘿@卡尔希,感谢你们把我终身禁赛出你们的赌博平台。咱们看看你们还能撑多久,”桑托斯周一在X平台上发文称,这番话针对的是当下的一场法律纠纷,即卡尔希这类预测公司应被各州归类为赌博平台,还是继续由联邦政府按金融市场进行监管。

    监管预测市场的联邦监管机构也对桑托斯的行为展开了调查。美国商品期货交易委员会今年7月宣布达成和解,对桑托斯处以17500美元罚款,并结案。

    卡尔希执法主管鲍比·德诺尔周一表示,该公司正对巴克哈特、桑托斯以及其他几名违反平台规则的交易员采取行动。

    “除乔治·桑托斯外,所有人员都配合了我们合规部门的调查,他们将被暂时禁赛,”德诺尔说道。

    CNN已联系桑托斯置评。

    他此前否认存在不当行为,并称相关指控“荒谬可笑”。在有关其可疑交易的公开报道传出后,他曾在社交媒体上抨击卡尔希,称其为“掠夺性应用程序”。

    本文已更新最新信息。

    George Santos becomes first person to get lifetime ban from Kalshi

    2026-08-31T16:53:53.715Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/31/politics/george-santos-kalshi-ban

    The prediction market Kalshi on Monday fined the Republican nominee in a competitive House race and imposed its first-ever lifetime ban, against former Rep. George Santos, after insider trading investigations.

    The North Carolina candidate, Laurie Buckhout, admitted in a statement to CNN that she bet on her own campaign and said she made a “dumb mistake.”

    This is the highest-profile example to date of political insider trading, where candidates or staffers trade on markets where they possess inside information or can influence the outcome. Experts have warned the practice is a growing danger as prediction platforms have exploded in popularity this year.

    “I bet on myself. Literally,” Buckhout said. “It was a dumb mistake, and as soon as I learned there was an issue, I worked to make it right. Safe to say my career as a Kalshi trader was short-lived.”

    Kalshi noted in a legal filing on Monday that she traded less than $1,000, cooperated with their internal investigation, and will get a three-year suspension.

    The lifetime ban against Santos, meanwhile, stems from insider bets he placed about his potential appearance at the State of the Union earlier this year. Santos infamously was expelled from Congress in 2023 and went to prison in an unrelated fraud case but was released early thanks to a Trump commutation last year.

    Prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket – where people can wager on sports, elections, entertainment and more – now see billions of dollars in weekly trading volume. The companies and federal regulators have pledged to crack down on insider trading and market manipulation.

    Earlier this year, Kalshi suspended three minor political candidates, hailing from both parties, for similar conduct.

    CNN has a partnership with Kalshi and uses its data to cover major events. CNN’s editorial employees aren’t permitted to trade on prediction markets.

    The Buckhout case is the first publicly known instance of a nominee running for Congress caught betting on their own campaign. And it came in a critical district.

    President Donald Trump has endorsed Buckhout, a retired Army colonel, and she was one of the first candidates named to the National Republican Congressional Committee’s “MAGA Majority” program for the midterms. The program promotes the party’s most promising recruits to flip Democratic-held seats.

    North Carolina’s 1st Congressional District is one of the most competitive House districts in the midterms. It covers a mostly rural region of eastern North Carolina and has been represented by Democratic Rep. Don Davis since 2023.

    Republican state lawmakers redrew the district last year as part of Trump’s nationwide push for GOP-friendly redistricting ahead of the midterms. It is now classified as “Lean Republican” by the Cook Political Report, making it one of Republicans’ best shots at netting a seat.

    Buckhout ran against Davis in 2024 and lost by fewer than 2 percentage points before the district was redrawn. She briefly worked for the Department of Defense last year before launching her latest campaign.

    Democrats seized on the Kalshi announcement to attack Buckhout.

    In a social media post, Davis said Buckhout’s actions were “a disqualifying breach of public trust” and chided her for using the campaign as “an opportunity to cash in.”

    Madison Andrus, a spokeswoman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said in a statement “there is no chance she can be trusted as an ethical representative for North Carolina families.”

    The Santos case is the first lifetime ban on the Kalshi platform, a spokesperson confirmed.

    “Hey @Kalshi thanks for the lifetime ban from your gambling platform. Let’s see how much longer you guys are around for,” Santos posted Monday on X, referring to the ongoing legal battle over whether prediction companies like Kalshi should be regulated by the states as gambling or continue to be regulated by the federal government as financial markets.

    Federal regulators that oversee prediction markets also investigated Santos for his conduct. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced a settlement in July, imposing a $17,500 fine against Santos and closing the government’s probe.

    Kalshi’s head of enforcement, Bobby DeNault, said Monday that the company was taking action against Buckhout, Santos, and a few other traders who broke the site’s rules.

    “All but one individual (George Santos) cooperated with our Compliance Department inquiries and will be banned temporarily,” DeNault said.

    CNN has reached out to Santos for comment.

    He previously denied wrongdoing and called the allegations “preposterous.” After public reports about his questionable trades, he attacked Kalshi on social media, calling it “a predatory app.”

    This story has been updated with new information.

  • 美国联邦贸易委员会与22个州起诉亚马逊,指控其存在秘密广告加价计划


    2026年8月31日 / 美国东部时间下午4:00 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    美国联邦贸易委员会与22个州于周一起诉亚马逊,指控这家电商巨头在其在线搜索广告拍卖中暗中抬高价格,可能让消费者损失数百亿美元。

    这起诉讼指控,未披露的加价行为已持续七年,导致超过100万个亚马逊品牌和卖家在该平台投放广告时需支付的费用上涨。

    参与此次诉讼的还有阿拉斯加、亚利桑那、加利福尼亚、科罗拉多、佛罗里达、爱达荷、伊利诺伊、印第安纳、艾奥瓦、肯塔基、路易斯安那、马里兰、内布拉斯加、新泽西、纽约、北卡罗来纳、俄克拉荷马、宾夕法尼亚、罗德岛、南卡罗来纳、佛蒙特和华盛顿州的总检察长。

    此次诉讼的核心是所谓的第二价格拍卖——这是数字广告交易的行业标准。亚马逊曾告知广告商,他们只需比第二名出价高出“1美分”即可获得某个广告关键词的投放权,但诉讼指控称,亚马逊在约80%的情况下实际向中标者收取了他们自身的出价。

    美国联邦贸易委员会及联合起诉的各州称,这抬高了企业的广告成本。

    “全球最大的在线零售商之一从事不公平和欺骗性行为,其影响可能极为惊人,”美国联邦贸易委员会主席安德鲁·N·弗格森在一份声明中表示。“亚马逊有数百万广告客户被误导,支付了远高于正常水平的价格。这些额外成本很大程度上转嫁给了美国消费者。”

    亚马逊称此次诉讼“毫无根据”,并表示2019年至2025年间,其赞助商品广告的平均中标出价下降了50%。

    “美国联邦贸易委员会的指控从根本上误解了广告商的运营方式,”该公司在一份声明中说道。“广告商是根据实际表现调整出价,而非依据拍卖机制的描述。”

    亚马逊补充道:“即便接受美国联邦贸易委员会存在缺陷的前提,即广告商不会调整出价,我们估计,由于亚马逊优先考虑广告相关性而非仅根据出价选择广告,广告商在2021年至2025年间已节省了超过80亿美元。”

    内部文件

    根据美国联邦贸易委员会诉状中援引的一位亚马逊高管的说法,亚马逊内部文件显示,该零售商清楚广告商是基于他们参与真正第二价格拍卖的信念进行出价的,但员工们据称曾讨论过抬高价格,同时“希望广告商不会注意到并减少出价或广告支出”。

    北卡罗来纳州总检察长杰夫·杰克逊称,亚马逊曾测试在不被广告商察觉的情况下,最多可以增加多少隐藏收费。

    诉讼指控称:“亚马逊煞费苦心地主动向消费者隐瞒其抬高所谓拍卖价格的事实。随着亚马逊越来越确信其广告客户未察觉其行为,它大幅提高了隐藏加价幅度。”

    纽约州总检察长莱蒂西亚·詹姆斯在一份声明中表示,美国联邦贸易委员会和各州正寻求法院禁令,禁止亚马逊实施这一“非法计划”,并要求该公司支付罚款、赔偿金及其他损害赔偿。

    编辑:阿兰·谢特

    FTC and 22 states sue Amazon over alleged secret ad surcharge scheme

    August 31, 2026 / 4:00 PM EDT / CBS News

    The Federal Trade Commission and 22 states on Monday sued Amazon over allegations that the e-commerce giant secretly inflated prices in its online search advertising auctions, potentially costing customers tens of billions of dollars.

    The lawsuit alleges that the undisclosed surcharges were applied for seven years, increasing the prices that more than 1 million Amazon brands and sellers were required to pay to advertise on its platform.

    The FTC’s lawsuit was joined by the attorneys general of Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Vermont and Washington.

    The lawsuit centers on so-called second-price auctions, the industry standard for digital ad deals. Amazon informed businesses that they would pay only “one cent more” than the second-place bidder for an advertising keyword, but the lawsuit alleges that the retailer charged the winners their own price about 80% of the time.

    That raised costs for businesses, alleged the FTC and states joining the suit.

    “When one of the world’s largest online retailers engages in unfair and deceptive conduct, the impact can be staggering,” FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson said in a statement. “Amazon has millions of advertising customers who were misled into paying significantly higher prices. These higher costs were largely passed on to American consumers.”

    Amazon called the lawsuit “misguided,” and said that the average winning bids for sponsored product ads dropped 50% from 2019 to 2025.

    “The FTC’s claim fundamentally misunderstands how advertisers operate,” the company said in a statement. “Advertisers adjust bids based on real-world performance, not descriptions of auction mechanics.”

    Amazon added, “Even accepting the FTC’s flawed premise that advertisers do not adjust bids, we estimate they saved over $8 billion from 2021 to 2025 as a result of Amazon prioritizing ad relevancy over selecting ads on bid price alone.”

    Internal documents

    Internal Amazon documents suggest the retailer was aware that advertisers were bidding based on their belief they were taking part in a true second-price auction, but that employees allegedly discussed raising prices while “hoping that advertisers don’t notice and decrease bids or ad spend,” according to an Amazon executive cited in the FTC’s complaint.

    Amazon allegedly tested how much it could increase hidden charges without being detected by advertisers, according to North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson.

    “Amazon takes great pains to actively conceal from customers the fact that it inflates its purported auction prices,” the lawsuit alleged. “As Amazon’s confidence that its advertising customers are unaware of its conduct has grown, it has substantially increased its hidden surcharges.”

    New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement that the FTC and states are seeking a court order to bar Amazon from pursuing the “illegal scheme” and to require the company to pay penalties, restitution and other damages.

    Edited by Alain Sherter

  • 美加贸易战中的经济专家:“局势正变得越来越糟”


    美国东部时间2026年8月31日星期一下午2:10 / 克里斯顿·刘易斯 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)报道

    美加贸易战中的经济专家:“局势正变得越来越糟”

    加拿大总理马克·卡尼誓言将采取“等额关税”作为反击,以应对美国对价值200亿美元的加拿大商品加征50%关税的举措,此前双方未能达成贸易协议。卡尼的针锋相对措施定于9月8日生效,涉及钢铁、乳制品、家电、农业设备、纸浆、纸张和电子产品。

    经济专家接受了CNN的采访,探讨了这些关税对两国边境地区可能造成的影响。

    15:07 • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/31/politics/video/econ-experts-on-canada-tariffs-83126-ytc

    Economy experts on US-Canada trade war: ‘This is getting worse’

    2:10 PM EDT, Mon August 31, 2026 / By Kriston Lewis, CNN

    Economy experts on US-Canada trade war: ‘This is getting worse’

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney vowed “dollar-for-dollar” tariffs in response to the United States’ 50 percent tariffs on $20 billion in Canadian goods after the two sides failed to reach a trade deal. Carney’s tit-for-tat measures, set to take effect on September 8, will include tariffs on steel, dairy, appliances, agricultural equipment, pulp, paper and electronics.

    Economic experts spoke to CNN about the potential effects of these tariffs on both sides of the border.

    15:07 • Source: CNN

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/31/politics/video/econ-experts-on-canada-tariffs-83126-ytc

湘ICP备2026001899号-2