特朗普达成的协议下,俄罗斯柴油难以抵达美国市场,面临法律担忧与批评


2026-11-15T17:00:15.416Z / CNN

唐纳德·特朗普总统宣布从俄罗斯进口柴油的意外协议已过去一个多月,受外界强烈反对与法律顾虑影响,这批石油难以进入美国市场。

专家告诉CNN,船舶追踪机构MarineTraffic的数据显示,从俄罗斯主要装油港出发的数艘据称载有柴油的油轮已不再前往美国;美国企业与港口也因担心法律及声誉风险,拒绝接收俄罗斯柴油。

两党议员与欧洲盟友对特朗普声称与俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔·普京达成的、将数万桶俄罗斯柴油引入美国及全球市场的协议表示强烈不满。他们谴责这是俄罗斯在持续对乌克兰发动战争之际获得的让步,并警告进口这些柴油的方可能违反国际制裁与美国法律。

其中一艘载有数万桶俄罗斯柴油的油轮“阿吉奥·范德斯号”(Agioi Fanendes)从俄罗斯出发,原目的地为纽约和新泽西港,预计11月7日左右抵达。

截至周日,该船舶正在美国东海岸数百英里外徘徊,官方显示状态为“等待指令”而非指定目的港。该油轮运营方东地中海海事有限公司(Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited)的发言人周四向CNN表示,“卸货港口尚未确认”。

经CNN查阅MarineTraffic数据,10月中旬从俄罗斯最大装油港之一普里莫尔斯克出发的其他数艘油轮也已改变航向,不再前往美国。其中,“塔列桑号”(Talisman)近日停靠埃及亚历山大港;另一艘“勒鲁号”(Leruo)目前正向巴西航行。这两艘船此前均申报目的地为美国大西洋沿岸。两者均受欧洲和英国制裁,“塔列桑号”还面临美国制裁。

白宫一位官员周三告诉CNN,“根据特朗普总统与普京总统达成的协议,俄罗斯柴油正在运输途中,将进入市场,这将缓解美国民众的油价压力。”

该官员未透露这批柴油是否运往美国。他表示,该协议“旨在为全球市场增加柴油供应——降低美国及全球民众的油价,这正是协议将达成的目标。”

特朗普10月9日在社交媒体帖子中称,他已与普京达成协议,俄罗斯将“立即向美国及全球市场供应超过30万吨柴油”。

该协议在联邦中期选举前数周、燃油价格高企之际公布,政府将其包装为降低美国消费者油价的举措。专家表示,这批柴油对油价的影响微乎其微,甚至不足美国一天的能源消费量。

上月,一组两党议员向摩根大通、美国银行、花旗集团、富国银行、高盛与摩根士丹利的首席执行官,以及纽约/新泽西港务局、得克萨斯州休斯顿、科珀斯克里斯蒂与博蒙特港的负责人发送信件,警告若参与将俄罗斯柴油进口至美国的行为,可能面临法律诉讼。

2022年《终止进口俄罗斯石油法案》禁止将包括柴油在内的俄罗斯能源产品进口至美国,“除非在与国会协商后,总统向国会证明俄罗斯已停止对乌克兰的军事行动、俄罗斯对北约成员国不存在直接军事威胁,且俄罗斯承认乌克兰人民选择政府的权利,”议员们警告道。

尽管美国财政部发放了制裁豁免,允许根据特朗普政府与莫斯科的协议进口柴油,但议员们认为该制裁豁免违反法律。

“任何将俄罗斯柴油进口至美国的行为都引发重大法律问题,可能面临法律诉讼及国会调查,”民主党参议员珍妮·沙希恩、罗恩·怀登、谢尔顿·怀特豪斯、克里斯·库恩斯、伊丽莎白·沃伦,共和党参议员汤姆·蒂利斯,以及民主党众议员格雷戈里·米克斯写道。

“任何故意购买俄罗斯柴油或协助其进口的公司,包括实际进口商在内,都可能面临刑事处罚,”他们写道。

新泽西州州长米基·谢里尔上周警告该州港口与码头运营商,“任何从俄罗斯燃料非法交易中牟利的行为都将面临严厉处罚。”

大西洋理事会地缘经济中心经济洞察与分析主任、C·博伊登·格雷高级研究员查尔斯·利奇菲尔德指出,美国进口商将面临“直接的声誉风险”以及法律后果。

他表示,财政部发放的通用许可证允许企业进口柴油而无需担心制裁,看似提供了充分保护,但2022年法案仍然有效,这引发了法律合规性与未来起诉可能性的疑问。

“这一切都极具政治色彩(且)运输量很小,”他说,“你可能从这批货物中赚取几百万美元,但真的值得吗?”

乌克兰组织Razom的倡导副主任朱利安·海达指出,“如今民主党控制了国会参众两院,他们肯定会对这些公司展开调查,因此对许多公司而言,等这艘船抵达美国海岸时,收购它就不再值得了。”

本故事已更新补充更多信息。

Russian diesel under Trump deal struggles to reach US market amid legal fears and criticism

2026-11-15T17:00:15.416Z / CNN

More than a month after President Donald Trump announced a surprise deal to import Russian diesel, the oil has struggled to reach the US market amid outrage and legal concerns.

Several oil tankers that departed from a key Russian oil-loading port — and are believed to be laden with diesel — are no longer bound for the US, according to ship tracking data from MarineTraffic, and US businesses and ports have steered clear of accepting Russian diesel for fear of legal and reputational risks, experts told CNN.

Bipartisan lawmakers and European allies expressed outrage at the agreement that Trump said he reached with Russian President Vladimir Putin to bring tens of thousands of barrels of Russian diesel into US and global markets. They condemned it as a concession to Russia as it continued its war against Ukraine and warned that those who imported the diesel could run afoul of international sanctions and US law.

One of the tankers, Agioi Fanendes, departed Russia with tens of thousands of barrels of Russian diesel. Its destination was listed as the Port of New York and New Jersey, and it was initially expected to arrive around November 7.

As of Sunday, the vessel was hovering hundreds of miles off the eastern coast of the US. It was officially broadcasting “FOR ORDERS” instead of a destination port. A spokesperson for Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Limited, the company that operates the tanker, told CNN on Thursday that its “discharging port is not confirmed yet.”

Several other oil tankers that departed Primorsk — one of Russia’s largest oil-loading ports — in mid-October have also shifted away from the US, according to data from MarineTraffic reviewed by CNN. One, the Talisman, docked at the Port of Alexandria in Egypt in recent days. Another, the Leruo, is now heading to Brazil. They had earlier declared their destinations as the US Atlantic coast. Both vessels are under European and British sanctions, and the Talisman is also sanctioned in the US.

A White House official told CNN on Wednesday that “consistent with the deal agreed to between President Trump and President Putin, Russian diesel is on the water and heading to the market, which will ease prices for Americans.”

The official did not say the diesel was heading to the US. The person said the deal “was made to add diesel supply to the global market — lowering prices for Americans and the world — which is exactly what will be done.”

Trump announced in a social media post on October 9 that he had reached a deal with Putin for Russia to “immediately supply over 300,000 Tons of Diesel Fuel to the American and Global Marketplace.”

The administration billed the deal, which was announced weeks before the US midterm elections amid steep fuel costs, as a way to lower prices for US consumers. Experts said the diesel would have little to no impact on prices, and amounts to less than a day of US energy consumption.

Last month, a group of bipartisan lawmakers sent letters to the CEOs of JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, and the heads of Port Authorities of New York/New Jersey and of Houston, Corpus Christi and Beaumont, Texas, warning that they could face legal action if they are involved in importing the Russian diesel into the US.

The Ending Importation of Russian Oil Act of 2022 bans Russian-origin energy products, including diesel fuel, from being imported into the US “unless — following a period for consultation with Congress — the President certifies to Congress that Russia has ceased military hostilities in Ukraine, that Russia poses no immediate military threat to NATO members, and that Russia recognizes the right of Ukrainians to choose their government,” the lawmakers warned.

Although the US Treasury Department issued a sanctions waiver to allow the import of the diesel under the deal between the Trump administration and Moscow, the lawmakers consider that sanctions waiver to defy the law.

“Any importation of Russian diesel into the U.S. raises significant legal questions and may be subject to legal action, as well as congressional investigations,” wrote Democratic Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, Ron Wyden, Sheldon Whitehouse, Chris Coons, Elizabeth Warren, GOP Sen. Thom Tillis, and Democratic Rep. Gregory Meeks.

“Criminal penalties may apply to any company that knowingly buys Russian diesel or facilitates its importation, and not simply the importer of record,” they wrote.

New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill warned her state’s port and terminal operators last week that “any effort to profit from the illegal trade in Russian fuel will be met with harsh penalties.”

Charles Lichfield, the director of economic foresight and analysis and the C. Boyden Gray senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s GeoEconomics Center, noted that US importers would face “the immediate reputational risk” as well as the legal ramifications.

He noted that a general license from the Treasury Department, which allows businesses to import the diesel without fear of sanctions, would appear to be good protection but the 2022 law is still on the books, which raises questions about legality and the potential for prosecution down the line.

“All of this is very politically charged (and) the volumes are small,” he said. “You could make a few million dollars off this shipment, but is it really worth it?”

Julian Hayda, the associate director for advocacy at the organization Razom for Ukraine, noted that “now that Democrats have control of both chambers of Congress, they are most certainly going to launch investigations into these companies, so it’s not going to be worth it for many of these companies to buy this vehicle in and when it arrives on American shores.”

This story has been updated with additional information.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2