2026-10-09T18:47:56.325Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/09/politics/fort-hood-execution-hegseth-livestream
美国国防部长皮特·黑格斯瑟周四证实,将对胡德堡大规模枪击案凶手的行刑队处决进行直播,此举迅速引发两党愤怒,同时也引发了关于这场“公开处决”将如何实施的质疑。
行刑队处决在美国极为罕见(尽管最近被零星用作注射死刑的替代方案),而公开展示死刑的情况则更为少见。美国最后一次公开处决被认为是1936年对雷尼·贝西娅的绞刑,这名来自肯塔基州的黑人男子由全白人陪审团认定犯有强奸一名白人女子的罪名。
大约90年后的当地时间12月3日下午1点,公众将能够观看尼达尔·哈桑的处决过程,地点就在得克萨斯州胡德堡——2009年他在此处造成13人死亡的大规模枪击事件现场。
“我们将确保民众能够观看处决,确保其公开透明,因为人们需要明白,这类行为会带来严重后果,”黑格斯瑟周三在亚伯拉罕·林肯号航母上接受极右翼播客主持人杰克·波索比奇采访时说道。
但副总统JD·万斯周五对此次处决是否真的会直播表示怀疑,他称:“我不确定这真的会发生。”他补充道,即便直播,他也不会观看此次处决。
康奈尔大学法学院死刑项目助理主任谢里·林恩·约翰逊告诉CNN,虽然此前媒体、被告律师,在某些情况下还有被告家属曾被允许旁观处决,但允许公众观看可能会让公众对死亡变得麻木。
“这……尤其以极其暴力的方式庆祝死亡,在我看来,这不仅进一步侵犯了被处决者的尊严,也会让公众淡化对‘谋杀是错误的’‘死亡是错误的’这一观念的认知,”约翰逊说道。
以下是我们目前了解到的关于哈桑处决直播计划的详情。
黑格斯瑟表示,哈桑将由美国“携带步枪的士兵”执行死刑。
CNN就多个后勤问题向五角大楼提问,包括这些士兵的身份、选拔方式以及谁将负责直播。国防部表示,将在获得更多细节后予以公布。
军事死刑及其执行方式必须获得总统批准。本周早些时候,唐纳德·特朗普总统同意了黑格斯瑟对哈桑使用行刑队处决的建议。这将是美国陆军自二战以来首次对士兵实施行刑队处决,也是65年来首次对武装部队成员判处死刑。
更广泛地说,根据死刑信息中心的数据,自1977年以来,全美仅有6起行刑队处决案件。其中3起发生在去年的南卡罗来纳州,距上一起行刑队处决已有15年。
作为全美主流死刑执行方式的注射死刑正面临诸多问题,包括囚犯发起的法律挑战、药物供应不足以及处决失败——正如最近田纳西州克里斯塔·派克试图被处决却存活下来的案例所示。作为替代方案,少数美国死刑州正在探索行刑队处决,该方式似乎有卷土重来之势。专家表示,总体而言行刑队处决被认为是快速且有效的。但这种方式过于暴力,可能是各州迟迟不愿采用的原因之一。
据死刑信息中心统计,目前仅有五个州允许使用行刑队处决。截至2026年7月,爱达荷州已将其作为主要处决方式。
1995年俄克拉荷马城爆炸案主犯蒂莫西·麦克维曾要求对其处决进行全国电视直播。
甚至有一家娱乐公司提起法律诉讼,希望能够直播处决,但被联邦法院驳回。
最终,他的注射死刑仅对包括爆炸案幸存者和受害者家属在内的有限人群进行了电视转播。
时任美国司法部长约翰·阿什克罗夫特在批准这次闭路电视转播时承认,对处决进行电视转播存在“先例程序”,但认为麦克维案具有“独特情况”。
据反对死刑的大赦国际的报告显示,近年来阿富汗和伊朗曾举行过公开处决。2025年,阿富汗共有6起公开处决,伊朗则有11起。
该组织今年早些时候还表示,通过采访得知,朝鲜也使用这种方式“以恐吓整个社区服从”。
哈桑公开处决的消息引发了两党人士的批评,有人认为美国不应效仿那些更常见公开处决的专制国家。
即将卸任的北卡罗来纳州共和党参议员汤姆·蒂利斯在X平台上发帖称:“公开处决是伊朗和阿富汗等压迫性独裁政权的做法。美国不应如此。”
佐治亚州共和党众议员奥斯汀·斯科特也表达了类似担忧,他表示虽然自己支持死刑,但“直播处决是圣战分子的做法。美国不应如此。”
共和党参议员约翰·柯蒂斯在X平台上提及古罗马的“血腥 spectacle”(血腥场面),写道:“当一个文明将处决作为娱乐形式加以追捧时,它就开始衰落了。”
“国防部长黑格斯瑟直播胡德堡处决的计划可能会助长这种娱乐心态。受害者理应得到庄重的正义,”柯蒂斯写道。“直播处决会让我们所有人都蒙羞,也不会起到有效的威慑作用。我敦促他重新考虑。”
无独有偶,康涅狄格州民主党参议员克里斯·墨菲称该计划“令人作呕”且“中世纪化”。
“他这是在模仿ISIS的处决方式吗?”他在接受CNN记者艾琳·伯内特采访时谈及黑格斯瑟时说道。
美国天主教主教会议主席称此举是“对死亡文化的野蛮宣扬”。
“即便处决的是犯下严重罪行的人,公开处决也只会进一步破坏我们国家的道德根基,给全体人民的良知蒙上污点,”大主教保罗·科克利在一份声明中说道。
与此同时,今年早些时候因伊朗战争辞职的美国前高级情报官员乔·肯特认为,哈桑的处决可能会被恐怖分子用作宣传工具。
“直播他的处决不仅是我们道德的污点,还会为恐怖分子提供免费的宣传素材,他们将借此激进化并招募更多像哈桑这样的恐怖分子,”肯特在X平台的一篇帖子中说道。
CNN国家安全分析师彼得·伯根表示,这场直播可能会给恐怖组织提供可“利用”的素材。
“只要有视频存在,组织就会试图将其转化为宣传内容,”他说道。曾广泛报道哈桑案件的伯根补充道,这名枪手自视为“宗教战士”,“公开的处决视频将契合他对自身身份的认知”。
CNN的黑利·布里茨基、达金·安多尼和亚历杭德拉·哈拉米略为本报道撰稿。
Hegseth wants America to watch a firing squad execution. It’s drawing backlash
2026-10-09T18:47:56.325Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/09/politics/fort-hood-execution-hegseth-livestream
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s confirmation Thursday that the firing squad death of the Fort Hood mass shooter will be livestreamed was swiftly met with bipartisan outrage and questions over how the public execution will be carried out.
Firing squad executions are rare in the US (though they have been sparingly used as an alternative to lethal injection recently,) and public displays of the death penalty are even less common. The last public execution is considered to be the 1936 hanging of Rainey Bethea, a Black man from Kentucky who was found guilty of raping a White woman by an all-White jury.
About 90 years later, on December 3 at 1 p.m. local time, the public will be able to watch Nidal Hasan’s death at Texas’ Fort Hood, where he killed 13 people in a 2009 mass shooting.
“We’ll make sure that people are able to watch it, that it’s public, because people need to understand that there’s serious consequences for these types of things,” Hegseth told far-right podcaster Jack Posobiec in an interview aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln on Wednesday.
But Vice President JD Vance cast doubt Friday on whether the execution would actually be livestreamed, saying, “I don’t know that that’s actually going to happen.” He added that he would not watch the execution if it were livestreamed.
Sheri Lynn Johnson, the assistant director of the Death Penalty Project at Cornell Law School, told CNN that while access to executions has been given to members of the media, the defendant’s counsel and, in some cases, their family members, allowing the public to watch could desensitize the public to death.
“It’s … particularly celebrating death in a very violent way, which seems to me both an additional infringement on the dignity of the person executed, and, and also something that hardens the public to the idea that murder is wrong or death is wrong,” Johnson said.
Here’s what we know so far about the scheduled livestream of Hasan’s execution.
Hasan’s death will be carried out by US “soldiers with rifles,” Hegseth said.
CNN asked the Pentagon several logistical questions, including who the soldiers would be, how they will be chosen and who will be running the livestream. The department said it will provide more details as it gets them.
Military death penalties and their methods must be approved by the president. Earlier this week, President Donald Trump agreed to Hegseth’s recommendation of a firing squad for Hasan. The move set up what would be the US Army’s first such execution of a soldier since World War II and the first imposition of any death penalty on an armed service member in 65 years.
More broadly, there have only been six firing squad executions since 1977, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. Three of them took place last year in South Carolina — 15 years after the previous one.
Firing squad executions could be making a comeback as a handful of US death penalty states explore alternatives to lethal injection, by far the nation’s dominant execution method.
States have faced several issues with lethal injection deaths, like legal challenges by inmates, inadequate supplies and failed executions, as seen recently in the case of Christa Pike, who survived an execution attempt in Tennessee. In comparison, experts say the firing squad is generally thought to be fast and effective. But the fact that the method is overtly violent has likely contributed to states’ hesitancy to use it.
Only five states permit a firing squad to be used for executions, according to the DPIC. As of July 2026, it is the main method in Idaho.
Timothy McVeigh, the man convicted of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, had requested that his execution be televised nationally.
An entertainment company even filed a legal challenge to be able to live stream it, but a federal court rejected the attempt.
Ultimately, the execution by lethal injection was televised to a limited group of people that included survivors of the bombing and victims’ families.
Then-US Attorney General John Ashcroft, in his approval of the closed-circuit telecast, recognized that there are “precedential procedures” in televising the execution but made the case that the McVeigh case had “unique circumstances.”
According to reports from Amnesty International, which opposes the death penalty, public executions took place in Afghanistan and Iran in recent years. In 2025, there were six public executions in Afghanistan and 11 in Iran.
The organization has also said earlier this year that through interviews, it has learned that North Korea also uses the method “to terrorize entire communities into compliance.”
The announcement of Hasan’s public execution drew criticism from both sides of the aisle, with people making the case that America should not be like authoritarian countries where public executions more commonly take place.
Outgoing Sen. Thom Tillis, a Republican from North Carolina, said in a post on X, “Public executions are what oppressive dictatorships like Iran and Afghanistan do. It should not be happening in America.”
Georgia GOP Rep. Austin Scott raised similar concerns, saying that while he supports the death penalty, “live-streaming executions is what jihadists do. America is better than that.”
Republican Sen. John Curtis on X highlighted the “bloody spectacles” that took place in ancient Rome, writing, “A civilization erodes when it cultivates an appetite for executions as a form of entertainment.”
“Secretary Hegseth’s plan to livestream the Fort Hood execution risks feeding that appetite. The victims deserve justice administered with solemnity,” Curtis wrote. “Broadcasting a death diminishes us and is not an effective deterrent. I urge him to reconsider.”
Similarly, Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut called the plan “disgusting” and “medieval.”
“What is he mimicking ISIS executions?,” he told CNN’s Erin Burnett, referring to Hegseth.
The president of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops called it a “barbaric promotion of a culture of death.”
“The public execution even of one who has done grave harm will only further undermine the moral fabric of our nation and be a blight on the conscience of its people,” Archbishop Paul Coakley said in a statement.
Meanwhile, Joe Kent, a former high-ranking US intelligence official who resigned over the Iran war earlier this year, argued that Hasan’s death could be used as propaganda by terrorists.
“Streaming his execution is not just a stain on our morality—it also gives the terrorists free propaganda that they will use to radicalize & recruit more terrorists like” Hasan, Kent said in a post on X.
Peter Bergen, a CNN national security analyst, said the livestream could give terrorist groups material to “exploit.”
“If a video exists, groups will try to turn it into propaganda,” he said. Bergen, who has covered Hasan extensively, added that the gunman sees himself as a “religious warrior” and a “public video of his execution would play into his narrative of who he is.”
CNN’s Haley Britzky, Dakin Andone and Alejandra Jaramillo contributed to this report.
发表回复