美联储穆萨勒姆:需进一步加息以遏制通胀


2026-09-21T18:23:36.792Z / 路透社

华盛顿,9月21日(路透社)——圣路易斯联邦储备银行行长阿尔贝托·穆萨勒姆周一表示,美联储可能需要进一步加息,以降低由强劲需求以及已不限于石油的大宗商品价格冲击引发的通胀,并补充称美国央行早行动比晚行动更好。

“持续的需求压力和反复出现的供给因素都在持续推高通胀风险,我判断,如果不对通胀采取进一步的政策抑制措施,那么18个月后通胀大幅高于2%目标的可能性,要远高于恰好达到目标的可能性,”穆萨勒姆在接受路透社采访时说道。

路透社每日简报通讯为您提供开启一天所需的全部新闻。点击此处订阅。

“我认为,政策对通胀实施有意义的抑制至关重要,”这样美联储就能在大约一年半的时间内实现通胀目标,并为紧缩政策影响经济留出时间,他说道。

穆萨勒姆目前并非美联储利率制定机构联邦公开市场委员会的投票成员,他不愿就美联储可能的下一步行动或为降低通胀所需的政策利率预估水平置评。

但他表示,“未来更早地、渐进式地收紧政策,比之后采取更大幅度、潜在更激进的政策行动更好,破坏性也更小”。

通胀“不是一种风险,它已经存在”,穆萨勒姆说道,他指出即使剔除石油和其他供给相关因素的影响,核心通胀率仍可能比美联储的目标高出一个百分点,且“正朝着错误的方向运行”。

近期在将通胀拉回2%目标的战斗中进展甚微。美联储主要通胀指标个人消费支出价格指数7月同比上涨3.7%,而2025年4月曾达到2.3%的近期低点,当时特朗普政府推出了全球进口关税计划。

进口价格冲击之后,今年美国与伊朗的以伊战争爆发,推高了全球燃油成本,柴油价格近期创下历史新高。穆萨勒姆表示,作为人工智能投资热潮的副产品,铜等大宗商品价格也一直在上涨。

尽管如此,美国国内支出和增长依然强劲——从某个角度看这是好消息,但也给美联储带来了额外的通胀挑战。

“我们的经济中同时存在强劲的需求因素和供给因素在发挥作用,”穆萨勒姆说道。

「劳动力市场并非通胀之源」

美联储上周将利率上调了25个基点,并在政策声明中删除了将近期通胀“部分”归因于供给冲击的表述,仅称“通胀仍处于高位”。

这一变化反映出美联储内部日益增长的质疑:如果不采取美联储行动,当前的价格压力可能会随时间消退。尽管关税和油价上涨曾被视为可能短暂的一次性价格水平变动,但事实证明其影响比预期更持久,如今通胀也由需求因素驱动。

“我认为,人们已经认识到,消费和投资正以非常健康、强劲的速度增长,与此同时,包括地缘政治因素在内的多种原因导致通胀风险有所上升,”穆萨勒姆说道。

这位圣路易斯美联储行长表示,他认为当前3.75%-4.00%的政策利率“处于宽松区间”,这意味着利率尚未高到足以限制经济活动的程度。

投资者目前预计,在明年4月之前的五次政策会议中,美联储将再加息三次,且美联储在10月——美国中期选举前夕——再次加息的概率大致相当。上周会议后发布的美联储官员中位预测显示,政策制定者预计今年还会加息一次,而2027年是否需要再次加息的观点几乎势均力敌,这一结果比投资者当前的预期更为温和。

尽管可能需要实施更紧缩的政策,但穆萨勒姆表示,他认为这不必以失业率上升为代价,也不会增加经济衰退的可能性。

“劳动力市场并非通胀之源。我们不一定需要放缓劳动力市场增长或使其降温来实现通胀目标,”穆萨勒姆说道,当前就业市场“稳定且平衡,处于充分就业水平附近”。

但他表示,他希望企业能够放缓其所在美联储辖区内企业接触到的即将到来的涨价步伐。

企业“报告称非劳动力投入成本大幅上升,包括燃料、其他原材料、运输、保险和熟练劳动力”,穆萨勒姆说道。“他们计划提高销售价格……有充分证据表明,通胀是我们当前面临的主要问题。”

霍华德·施奈德报道;保罗·西mao编辑

Fed’s Musalem says more rate hikes likely needed to quell inflation

2026-09-21T18:23:36.792Z / Reuters

WASHINGTON, Sept 21 (Reuters) – The Federal Reserve will likely need to hike interest rates further to lower inflation resulting from strong demand as ​well as a commodity price shock that has moved beyond oil, St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem said on Monday, adding that it would be better for the ‌US central bank to act sooner than wait.

“Both persistent demand and recurring supply forces are continuing to contribute to keeping inflation risks elevated, and I judge that without further policy restraint on inflation it is more likely to be substantially above our 2% target in 18 months than at target,” Musalem said in an interview with Reuters.

The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

“I think it’s crucial that policy puts a meaningful restraint on inflation” so the Fed reaches its inflation target in about a year and ​a half, allowing time for tighter policy to impact the economy, he said.

Musalem, who is not currently a voting member of the central bank’s rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee, would not comment ​on the Fed’s possible next steps or the estimated level the policy rate may need to reach to lower inflation.

But “earlier and incremental policy firming ⁠is better and less disruptive than later and larger and potentially more abrupt policy action” further in the future, he said.

Inflation “is not a risk. It’s there,” Musalem said, noting that even after stripping ​out the impact of oil and other supply-related factors, underlying inflation is running perhaps a percentage point above the Fed’s target and is “moving in the wrong direction.”

Little progress has been made recently in the ​battle to bring inflation back down to the 2% target. The Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index, the Fed’s main inflation gauge, was at 3.7% on a year-over-year basis in July, compared to a recent low of 2.3% in April of 2025, as the Trump administration rolled out its plan for global import tariffs.

The shock to import prices was followed this year by the start of the US-Israeli war with Iran, which pushed up fuel costs globally, with the price of diesel ​hitting a record high recently. Prices for commodities like copper have also been rising, Musalem said, as an offshoot of the artificial intelligence investment boom.

Through it all, US domestic spending and growth have remained resilient — ​good news from one perspective, but an additional inflation challenge for the Fed.

“We have both strong demand forces and supply forces working themselves through the economy,” Musalem said.

‘LABOR MARKET IS NOT A SOURCE OF INFLATION’

The Fed last raised ‌interest rates by ⁠a quarter of a percentage point last week and dropped a reference in its policy statement that attributed recent inflation “in part” to supply shocks, saying only that “inflation remains elevated.”

The change reflects growing skepticism at the central bank that current price pressures are likely to fade over time without Fed action. Though things like tariffs and oil price increases were seen as potentially fleeting, one-off changes in the price level, their influence has proved more persistent than expected, with inflation now being driven by demand aspects as well.

“I think there’s a recognition that consumption and investment are growing at a very healthy, very strong ​clip, and at the same time the risks ​on the inflation side seem to have ⁠increased for a variety of reasons, including geopolitical forces,” Musalem said.

The St. Louis Fed chief said he views the current 3.75%-4.00% policy rate as “on the accommodative side,” meaning it is not yet high enough to restrict economic activity.

Investors currently expect the Fed to approve three more quarter-percentage-point rate hikes over the five policy meetings between now ​and April, with roughly even odds the central bank will hike again in October, on the eve of the US midterm elections. The median projection ​of Fed officials issued after ⁠last week’s meeting showed policymakers anticipate one more hike this year, with a near-even split over the need for another such move in 2027, a less aggressive outcome than investors currently anticipate.

Though tighter policy may be needed, Musalem said he did not think it would need to come at the cost of higher unemployment, or that it would boost the likelihood of a recession.

“The labor market is not a source of inflation. There’s not ⁠necessarily a need ​to slow the labor market down or to cool it to attain our inflation target,” Musalem said, with the ​job market “stable and balanced and around full employment.”

But he said he hoped businesses would scale back the pace of price increases that contacts in his Fed district say are on the horizon.

Firms are “reporting sharply higher non-labor input costs, in fuel and other raw materials, ​transportation, insurance, and skilled labor,” Musalem said. “They’re planning to raise their selling prices. … There is ample evidence that inflation is the principal problem we have right now.”

Reporting by Howard Schneider; Editing by Paul Simao

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2