2026年7月31日 美国东部时间上午11:15 / 福克斯新闻
该合议庭由两名拜登任命的法官和一名特朗普任命的法官组成，就南苏丹和埃塞俄比亚移民的临时保护身份作出裁决
作者：伊莱恩·马隆 福克斯新闻
美国国土安全部首席法律顾问詹姆斯·珀西瓦尔表示，尽管最高法院已有裁决，但一群联邦地区法官——而非整个司法系统——仍在屡次阻挠驱逐行动和临时保护身份撤销，称这是“赤裸裸的政治激进主义”。
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了！
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/7e22d56a-15a5-4843-b19a-e834ee6f6102
收听本文
4 分钟
周三，由自由派主导的联邦上诉法院为唐纳德·特朗普总统带来了两项移民胜利，推翻了此前推迟终止南苏丹和埃塞俄比亚移民临时保护身份（TPS）的两项地区法院命令。
美国第一巡回上诉法院作出上述判决之前，联邦地区法官布莱恩·墨菲和帕蒂·萨里斯上周晚些时候先后发布命令，分别临时阻止特朗普政府终止埃塞俄比亚和南苏丹的临时保护身份。这些裁决遭到了法律专家和特朗普政府官员的尖锐批评，他们称这些法官是“流氓法官”，并辩称他们的判决无视最高法院的裁决。
由三名法官组成的第一巡回上诉法院合议庭成员为朱莉·里克尔曼和塞思·阿夫拉姆——两人均由乔·拜登总统任命，以及约书亚·邓拉普——由唐纳德·特朗普总统任命。
拜登任命的法官不顾最高法院裁决阻挠埃塞俄比亚驱逐行动，曾与移民海关执法局发生冲突
2026年7月29日，唐纳德·特朗普总统在华盛顿特区白宫椭圆形办公室宣布相关事项时的画面。（亚伦·施瓦茨/CNP/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社）
最高法院正在审理特朗普终止海地、叙利亚移民临时保护身份的诉求
在几乎完全一致的裁决中，占多数的自由派合议庭认定，下级法院法官的命令与最高法院在“马伦诉多案”中的裁决相冲突。该裁决认为，法院不得基于非宪法诉求阻止临时保护身份的终止。
“马伦案裁定，‘临时保护身份法案中的司法审查禁令适用于所有非宪法诉求’，这些诉求挑战国土安全部部长关于终止临时保护身份指定的决定，”法官们写道。
艾奥瓦州副检察长埃里克·韦桑告诉福克斯新闻数字频道，第一巡回上诉法院正确适用了最高法院确立的先例。
“在特朗普总统于美国最高法院取得重大胜利之后，这是又一次明确的胜利。最高法院解释称，地区法院不应干预临时保护身份的终止决定。即便诉讼仍在进行中，我们也正走向这场诉讼的终点，因为地区法院本不应审理此类纠纷，而这正是最高法院的裁决内容，”韦桑告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。
2026年7月21日，美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在白宫椭圆形办公室与黎巴嫩总统约瑟夫·奥恩举行双边会晤期间回答媒体提问。2025年3月25日，美国地区法官帕蒂·萨里斯在美国马萨诸塞州波士顿联邦法院举行的斯蒂芬·G·布雷耶社区学习中心——关于法院与宪法——的开幕仪式上。（凯文·迪奇/盖蒂图片社；布莱恩·斯奈德/路透社）
律师警告：最高法院最新移民裁决将导致美国人“死亡和受苦”
美国国土安全部（DHS）发言人对这些裁决表示欢迎，称其“是法治和常识的胜利”。
“临时保护身份确实如其名——是临时的，”该发言人在给福克斯新闻数字频道的一份声明中表示。“长期以来，临时保护身份一直被当作事实上的特赦计划运作，尽管国会从未打算让它成为永久性的。”
这些诉讼由总部位于纽约的移民倡导组织“非洲社区共同行动”提起，该组织是两起案件的主要原告，同时加入诉讼的还有来自埃塞俄比亚和南苏丹的个人临时保护身份受益人。原告方认为，国土安全部非法终止保护措施，违反了《行政程序法》和宪法，指控该机构未能正确评估两国的局势，且相关决定出于种族歧视动机。
上周，墨菲和萨里斯临时阻止特朗普政府终止临时保护身份，发布了程序性命令以维持现状，同时考虑是否允许原告方修改诉状，提出新的宪法诉求。
国土安全部抨击媒体对“最恶劣的激进法官名单”的担忧是“绝对荒谬的”
尽管最高法院在“马伦诉多案”中的裁决否决了大多数针对临时保护身份终止的法定诉求，但它仍为法院审理指称存在宪法违规的诉求留下了可能性。
美国地区法官布莱恩·墨菲曾临时阻止特朗普政府终止多项关键的临时保护身份决定。（美国参议院司法委员会/路透社/内森·霍华德）
不过，韦桑表示，地区法院法官在任何宪法诉求都未得到证实的情况下就阻止临时保护身份的终止，超出了“法律界限”。
“如果他们想让原告修改诉状，他们有权这么做，但与此同时，临时保护身份已经失效，”韦桑告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
第一巡回上诉法院的裁决是墨菲和萨里斯遭遇的最新挫折，此前特朗普政府指责两位法官实际上回避了最高法院6月份的裁决。在墨菲发布命令后，国土安全部总法律顾问詹姆斯·珀西瓦尔在X平台上写道，这位地区法官正在“背叛最高法院”，并将萨里斯的裁决描述为对大法官们的“公然反抗”。
福克斯新闻数字频道已联系墨菲和萨里斯的办公室置评。
伊莱恩·马隆是福克斯新闻数字频道和福克斯商业频道的记者，报道全国政治。
Liberal court stuns with ruling that hands Trump major immigration win
July 31, 2026 11:15am EDT / Fox News
The panel of two Biden appointees and one Trump appointee ruled on TPS for migrants from South Sudan and Ethiopia
By Elaine Mallon Fox News
DHS Chief Counsel James Percival said a group of federal district judges—not the judiciary as a whole—are repeatedly blocking deportations and Temporary Protected Status rollbacks despite SCOTUS rulings, calling it “naked political activism.”
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/7e22d56a-15a5-4843-b19a-e834ee6f6102
Listen to this article
4 min
A liberal-led federal appeals court handed President Donald Trump two immigration victories Wednesday, reversing separate district court orders that had delayed the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for migrants from South Sudan and Ethiopia.
The judgments from the First Circuit Court of Appeals come after U.S. District Judges Brian Murphy and Patti Saris issued back-to-back orders temporarily blocking the Trump administration’s termination of TPS for Ethiopia and South Sudan, respectively, late last week. The rulings drew sharp criticism from legal experts and Trump administration officials, who called the judges “rogue” and argued their decisions defied the Supreme Court.
The three-judge First Circuit panel consisted of Judges Julie Rikelman and Seth Aframe, both appointed by President Joe Biden, and Judge Joshua Dunlap, who was appointed by President Donald Trump.
BIDEN JUDGE BLOCKING ETHIOPIAN DEPORTATIONS DESPITE SCOTUS RULING CLASHED WITH ICE BEFORE
President Donald Trump during an announcement in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 29, 2026.(Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
SUPREME COURT WEIGHS TRUMP EFFORT TO TERMINATE TEMPORARY PROTECTIONS FOR HAITIAN, SYRIAN MIGRANTS
In nearly identical rulings, the majority liberal panel found that the lower court judges’ orders conflicted with the Supreme Court’s decision in Mullin v. Doe, which held that courts cannot block TPS terminations based on non-constitutional claims.
“Mullin held that ‘the TPS statute’s judicial-review bar applies to all non-constitutional claims’ challenging the Secretary of Homeland Security’s determination with respect to the termination of a TPS designation,” the judges wrote.
Iowa Solicitor General Eric Wessan told Fox News Digital that the First Circuit correctly applied the precedent established by the Supreme Court.
“These are clear wins for President Trump following his big win at the U.S. Supreme Court, explaining that district courts are not supposed to second guess TPS terminations, and even as this plays out, we’re moving towards the end of this litigation because district courts should not be hearing these disputes, and that’s what the Supreme Court said,” Wessan told Fox News Digital.
U.S. President Donald Trump takes questions from the media during a bilateral meeting with President of Lebanon Joseph Aoun in the Oval Office of the White House on July 21, 2026 in Washington, DC. U.S. District Court Judge Patti Saris attends the opening ceremony for the Justice Stephen G. Breyer Community Learning Center on Courts and the Constitution at the federal courthouse in Boston, Massachusetts, U.S., March 25, 2025.(Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images; Brian Snyder/Reuters)
SUPREME COURT’S LATEST IMMIGRATION RULING WILL CAUSE AMERICANS TO ‘DIE AND SUFFER’ ATTORNEY WARNS
A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spokesperson welcomed the rulings as “a win for the rule of law and common sense.”
“Temporary Protected Status is exactly that—temporary,” the spokesperson said in a statement to Fox News Digital. “For too long, TPS has been allowed to function as a de facto amnesty program despite Congress never intending it to be permanent.”
The lawsuits were brought by African Communities Together, a New York-based immigrant advocacy organization that serves as the lead plaintiff in both cases, alongside individual TPS recipients from Ethiopia and South Sudan. The plaintiffs argue DHS unlawfully ended the protections in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act and the Constitution, alleging the agency failed to properly assess conditions in the two countries and that the decisions were motivated by racial discrimination.
Murphy and Saris temporarily blocked the Trump administration from terminating TPS last week, issuing procedural orders to preserve the status quo while they considered whether the plaintiffs should be permitted to amend their complaints to pursue renewed constitutional claims.
DHS EVISCERATES MEDIA FOR ‘ABSOLUTE ABSURDITY’ OVER CONCERN ABOUT ‘WORST OF THE WORST’ ACTIVIST JUDGES LIST
While the Supreme Court’s decision in Mullin v. Doe foreclosed most statutory challenges to TPS terminations, it left open the possibility that courts could consider claims alleging constitutional violations.
U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy has temporarily blocked key Trump administration decisions to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS)(United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary/ REUTERS/Nathan Howard)
However, Wessan said the district judges were operating outside the “legal bounds” by blocking the TPS terminations before any constitutional claims had been established.
“If they want to let the plaintiffs amend their complaint, they’re allowed to do that, but in the meantime, TPS is over,” Wessan told Fox News Digital.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The First Circuit’s decisions mark the latest setback for Murphy and Saris after the Trump administration accused both judges of effectively sidestepping the Supreme Court’s June ruling. After Murphy’s order, DHS General Counsel James Percival wrote on X that the district judge was engaged in “mutiny against the Supreme Court,” while he described Saris’ ruling as “open defiance” of the justices’ decision.
Fox News Digital reached out to the offices of Murphy and Saris for comment.
Elaine Mallon is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business covering national politics.
发表回复