记者手记:共和党遭惨败后众议院领导层职位陷入争夺


众议院与参议院的内部选举将于本周启动,民主党正筹备接管国会
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/Pergram.jpg 作者:查德·佩格拉姆 福克斯新闻

发布时间:美国东部时间2026年11月10日 凌晨6点

新任众议员将在国会山参加入职培训,民主党正公布各项优先事项
国会山新生入职培训启动之际,新任进步派民主党议员要求重大政策调整。福克斯新闻的查德·佩格拉姆带来众议院领导层争夺战的详情。

【新】您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/86918bef-7595-4ec2-a483-9b35edc97d2c

收听文章
9分钟

众议院与参议院的政党领导层内部选举是国会山最受关注的事务之一。

未来几日,众议院与参议院的民主党、共和党都将选出各自的领导层,变动将是翻天覆地的。

不过并非所有人都支持那些看似理所当然的领导候选人,这正是该过程的有趣之处。但领导层选举有两条不成文的规则:你不能击败一个没有支持者的人;更重要的是,选举结果取决于票数。

共和党率先启动选举,参众两院的选举均于周二上午开始。

国会山后续事宜指南

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/steve-scalise-01.jpg

2025年11月5日周三,在美国华盛顿特区国会山的新闻发布会上,众议院多数党领袖史蒂夫·斯卡利斯(左)与美国众议院议长迈克·约翰逊。(Daniel Heuer/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

众议院少数党领袖(即原众议院多数党领袖)、路易斯安那州共和党籍众议员史蒂夫·斯卡利斯正在与俄亥俄州共和党籍众议员吉姆·乔丹竞争该职位。现任众议院议长、路易斯安那州共和党籍众议员迈克·约翰逊,在其所在政党失去控制权后不再谋求留任领导层。

若民主党拿下260个席位,共和党将获得175席。所有新任共和党众议员(包括美国领地的无投票权代表)均可参加党团会议投票。少数党领袖的遴选无需像议长选举那样提交全院投票,因此获胜者只需获得简单多数即可,也就是88票。

众议院多数党 whip(党鞭)、明尼苏达州共和党籍众议员汤姆·埃默与得克萨斯州共和党籍众议员奥古斯特·弗勒格将竞争少数党党鞭职位,规则同理。

参议院共和党领袖、南达科他州共和党籍参议员约翰·图恩将谋求在新一届国会中继续担任该党领导职务。

与此同时,民主党将于周三启动众议院领袖选举,纽约州民主党籍众议员哈基姆·杰弗里斯预计将锁定该提名。参议院民主党领导层的内部选举尚未确定日期。

一些进步派人士以及美国民主社会主义者关联的民主党人(他们将在明年成为众议员)希望人选能替换掉少数党领袖杰弗里斯。

他们希望谁取而代之呢?目前还没有人表态。再说一次,你不可能击败一个没有支持者的人。而且坦白说,很难想象民主党会不选出首位黑人众议院议长。

但从票数来看:

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/schumer-jeffries-cap-hill.png
()

假设民主党在新一届国会中获得260个众议院席位。首先,民主党必须在党团会议中提名一位议长候选人,这需要简单多数。因此杰弗里斯肯定能在议长的无记名投票中获得至少131票。

众议院议长是政府立法分支的宪制职务,就像总统是行政分支的首脑、美国首席大法官是司法分支的首脑一样。因此,当新一届国会于1月3日中午召开会议时,全院将投票选举议长。

众议院共有435名议员。如果所有议员都投票,杰弗里斯只需获得218票即可胜出。就算杰弗里斯失去40票左右,仍能赢得选举。所以这种情况基本不会发生;说实话,他可能连几票都不会失去。

参议院民主党党团会议与共和党党团会议的运作方式与众议院类似:民主党党团中的多数党领袖、共和党党团中的少数党领袖,均以简单多数票产生。不过,参议院多数党领袖的遴选不会在全院投票中进行。“参议院多数党领袖”这一概念仅始于20世纪初,宪法中并未提及。别忘了我们之前说过,众议院议长是立法分支的首脑。

很难想象在参议院彻底倒向民主党之后,参议院少数党领袖、纽约州民主党籍参议员查克·舒默无法成为多数党领袖的情况。

首先,还有谁在参选?夏威夷州民主党籍参议员布莱恩·沙茨在参议院民主党人中人望很高,但他正在竞选多数党党鞭,以接替退休的伊利诺伊州民主党籍参议院少数党党鞭迪克·德宾。如果舒默出现意外,民主党人很可能会转而支持沙茨。

密歇根州民主党籍新任参议员阿卜杜勒·赛义德表示他将考虑自身选择,并支持马里兰州民主党籍参议员克里斯·范霍伦竞选多数党领袖。但范霍伦并未参选。南卡罗来纳州民主党籍新任参议员安妮·安德鲁斯告诉同事布雷特·拜尔,她希望领导层实现“代际更替”。缅因州民主党籍新任参议员特洛伊·杰克逊和堪萨斯州民主党籍新任参议员亚当·汉密尔顿均表示将反对舒默。

但再说一次,你不可能击败一个没有支持者的人。

记者手记:中期选举如何改变对赫格斯的众议院弹劾考量

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/schumer-thune-government-shutdown-fox-news.jpg

参议院多数党领袖、南达科他州共和党籍参议员约翰·图恩及其所在共和党,正与参议院少数党领袖、纽约州民主党籍参议员查克·舒默以及参议院民主党人就特朗普支持的选民身份证立法展开院址斗争。(Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)

票数如下:
假设民主党拿下密西西比州和阿拉斯加州,将获得56名民主党党团参议员。舒默只需在党团中获得29名民主党人的支持,就能成为下一任多数党领袖。

目前针对参议院多数党领袖、南达科他州共和党籍参议员约翰·图恩未来职位的反对声音并不多。迄今为止,特朗普总统尚未要求更换参议院领导层。但一群共和党参议员呼吁推迟定于周二举行的领导层选举。共和党参议员将以无记名投票方式在参议院共和党党团中选出图恩或其他候选人,简单多数即可获胜。如果共和党席位降至44席,获胜者仅需23票。

因此未来几周,大量工作将围绕计票展开:计算弹劾票数、计算领导层选举票数,以及明年民主党为推行其议程所需的票数。

民主党会说,选民正期待着他们。而共和党呢,嗯,他们可能在数着日子等。

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/senator-brian-schatz.jpg

夏威夷州民主党籍参议员布莱恩·沙茨警告称,参议院两党住房法案存在“问题”。(Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

新一届国会的所有事务都将取决于票数,弹劾国防部长皮特·赫格斯一事也是如此。

但民主党明年才会推动弹劾的想法可以暂时搁置。看看共和党吧——今年就有动作。

肯塔基州共和党籍众议员托马斯·马西将于本周重新提交针对国防部长皮特·赫格斯的弹劾条款。众议院可能真的会弹劾赫格斯的几率越来越高。

为什么?

马西在中期选举前就曾试图弹劾赫格斯,但众议院在9月提前休会,他的努力因此告吹。众议院议长、路易斯安那州共和党籍众议员迈克·约翰逊谴责了这位肯塔基州共和党人的行动。不过约翰逊坚称,他没有提前让议员回家,并非因为担心众议院拥有弹劾赫格斯的票数。

马西曾试图推动议会程序,迫使众议院立即审议弹劾条款,但该条款在休会后失效。不过马西将重新提交这些条款。

共和党议员称应让更资深官员领导国防部,质疑赫格斯的“道德底线”

马西共起草了8项弹劾条款,内容涉及从所谓“绑架”委内瑞拉总统尼古拉斯·马杜罗,到国防部在伊朗战争中的运作等各方面。

众议院可能会动议搁置这些条款,或将其送交委员会审查,直接终结弹劾努力。但越来越多的共和党众议员对赫格斯不满,而众议院驳回条款的任何尝试都可能失败。

一切都取决于票数。

所有民主党人几乎都会投票弹劾赫格斯。一些共和党人对赫格斯不满,私下表示希望弹劾他。还有更多共和党人在中期选举后试图与特朗普拉开距离,而共和党人认为伊朗战争导致他们失去了国会控制权,这进一步放大了这种情绪。因此,更多共和党人可能愿意支持弹劾。最后,共和党可能面临出席率问题:落败的共和党议员——或是对落选感到意外的议员——可能不会到场。换句话说,众议院的民主党人数可能会超过共和党人。别忘了,一些共和党人在选举后正寻找替罪羊。

弹劾只需获得简单多数即可通过。

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/secretary-of-war-pete-hegseth.jpg

战争部长皮特·赫格斯于2026年10月15日在弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿的五角大楼出席活动。()

如果弹劾条款获得通过,众议院将把条款送交参议院。根据参议院弹劾规则,参议院必须至少接收并审议这些条款,但也可能迅速驳回。几年前参议院审议前国土安全部部长亚历杭德罗·马约尔卡斯的弹劾条款时就出现过这种情况。整个流程中真正的“审判”环节从未启动,即参议院从未举行听证会、听取证人陈述和证据。

驳回此类条款需要简单多数。信不信由你,在共和党控制的参议院中这种情况可能发生。但即将离任的参议员们——得克萨斯州共和党籍的约翰·科宁、北卡罗来纳州共和党籍的汤姆·蒂利斯、路易斯安那州共和党籍的比尔·卡西迪——会如何投票?更何况还有阿拉斯加的丽莎·穆尔科斯基、阿拉斯加的约翰·柯蒂斯、印第安纳州的托德·扬以及其他参议员呢。

参议院弹劾审判中,罢免官员需要三分之二多数票。

点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

此外,与立法不同,弹劾条款将延续至新一届国会。新一届民主党控制的参议院会从一开始就陷入弹劾审判的泥潭吗?尤其是新任民主党人希望投票解决民生和医疗问题的时候?

又或者,民主党控制的参议院会同意对赫格斯进行全面弹劾审判吗——尤其是伊朗战争的执行情况似乎是本周选举惨败的主要原因之一?

部分结果将取决于参众两院两党各自推举的领导人是谁。

查德·佩格拉姆目前担任福克斯新闻频道(FNC)首席国会记者。他于2007年9月加入该频道,总部位于华盛顿特区。

Reporter’s Notebook: House leadership up for grabs as GOP reckons with devastating losses

Internal elections for House and Senate leadership kicks off this week as Democrats prepare to take control of Congress

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/Pergram.jpg By Chad PergramFox News

Published November 10, 2026 6:00am EST

Incoming House members begin orientation on Capitol Hill as Democrats outline priorities

Capitol Hill freshman orientation begins as incoming progressive Democrats demand major policy updates. Fox News’ Chad Pergram details House leadership battles.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/86918bef-7595-4ec2-a483-9b35edc97d2c

Listen to this article

9 min

Internal House and Senate party leadership elections are some of the most fascinating exercises to unfold on Capitol Hill.

Both House and Senate Democrats and House and Senate Republicans will choose their leaders in the coming days. And the changes are going to be seismic.

But not everyone is on board with heir apparent leaders. That’s what makes this process so intriguing. However, there are only two rules in leadership elections: You can’t beat someone with no one. And — perhaps more importantly — it’s about the math.

Republicans are up first with elections in both chambers starting Tuesday morning.

THE HITCHHIKER’S GUIDE TO WHAT HAPPENS NEXT ON CAPITOL HILL

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/steve-scalise-01.jpg

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, left, and US House Speaker Mike Johnson, during a news conference at the US Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025.(Daniel Heuer/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

For Minority Leader, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., is running against Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio. Current House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., is not seeking to stay in leadership once his party isn’t in charge anymore.

If Democrats have 260 seats, Republicans would have 175. All incoming House Republicans (including non-voting delegates from U.S. territories) are allowed to vote in conference. The selection of Minority Leader does NOT go before the entire House like Speaker. So, the winning candidate only needs a simple majority. That would be 88.

The same for the race between House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., and Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, for Minority Whip.

Senate Republican leader John Thune, R-S.D., is running to keep his leadership position for the party in the new Congress.

Meanwhile, Democrats will begin elections for their House leader on Wednesday where Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., is expected to secure that nomination. No internal Democrat Senate leadership election date has been set.

There are some progressives and Democratic Socialists of America-affiliated Democrats who will be House Members next year who want someone other than Minority Leader Jeffries keep his position.

Who do they want instead? Well, no one has said. Again, you can’t beat someone with no one. And frankly, it’s hard to believe that Democrats would not elect the first Black Speaker of the House.

But drill down on the math.

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/schumer-jeffries-cap-hill.png

()

For the sake of argument, let’s say Democrats have 260 House seats in the new Congress. First, Democrats must tap a nominee for Speaker in their Caucus. That needs a simple majority. So surely Jeffries will score at least 131 votes in a private ballot for Speaker.

The Speaker of the House is the Constitutional officer for the legislative branch of government – much like the President is for the executive branch and the Chief Justice of the United States for the judicial branch. Thus, the ENTIRE House votes for Speaker when it convenes the new Congress at noon on January 3.

There are 435 Members. If all Members cast ballots, Jeffries simply needs 218. Jeffries could lose 40 votes or so and still prevail. So that is not going to happen. He might not even lose more than a couple votes, frankly.

The Senate Democratic Caucus and Republican Conference work much the same way as the House. A simple majority wins for Majority Leader in the Democratic Caucus and Minority Leader in the Republican Conference. However, the selection of Senate Majority Leader is not a vote which plays out on the floor. The concept of “Senate Majority Leader” has only been around since the early 20th Century and is not mentioned in the Constitution. Remember what we said about the House Speaker being the head of this branch of government.

It would be hard to envision a scenario where Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., would not become Majority Leader after Democrats flipped the Senate in a beat down.

First, who else is running? Well, Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, is very popular among Senate Democrats. But he’s running for Majority Whip to succeed retiring Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill. One could see Democrats defaulting to Schatz if something happens with Schumer.

Sen.-elect Abdul El-Sayed, D-Mich., said he wants to look at his options and endorsed Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., for Majority Leader. But Van Hollen isn’t running. Sen.-elect Annie Andrews, D-S.C., told colleague Bret Baier she wants a “generational change” in leadership. Sen.-elect Troy Jackson, D-Maine, and Sen.-elect Adam Hamilton, D-Kan., both said they would oppose Schumer.

But again, you can’t beat someone with no one.

REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK: HOW MIDTERMS MAY CHANGE THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT EQUATION FOR HEGSETH

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/schumer-thune-government-shutdown-fox-news.jpg

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and the GOP are gearing up for a floor battle with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Senate Democrats over Trump-backed voter ID legislation.(Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Here’s the math:

Let’s say Democrats do win Mississippi and Alaska, giving them 56 senators who caucus with the Democrats. All Schumer needs is 29 Democrats to support him in Caucus and he’s the next Majority Leader.

There has not been as much rumbling about the future of Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. Heretofore, President Trump has not called for new leadership in the Senate. But a group of Senate Republicans are calling on a delay in leadership elections slated for Tuesday. Senate Republicans would choose Thune or anyone else on a secret ballot in the Senate GOP Conference. A simple majority would win. If Republicans are down to 44 seats, the winner would just need 23 votes.

So for the next couple of weeks, there’s a lot of counting. Counting about votes for impeachment. Counting in leadership elections. And next year, counting votes as Democrats try to enact their agenda.

Democrats will say voters are counting on them. And Republicans, well, they may be counting the days.

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/senator-brian-schatz.jpg

Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, warned that they was a “problem” with the Senate’s bipartisan housing package.(Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Everything in the new Congress will come down to the math. And there’s the issue of impeaching Pentagon Chief Pete Hegseth.

But forget about Democrats pushing the move next year. Try Republicans — THIS year.

Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., is reintroducing articles of impeachment for Pentagon Chief Pete Hegseth this week. The chances are increasingly high that the House could in fact impeach Hegseth.

Why?

Massie tried to impeach Hegseth before the midterms. But the House adjourned a day early in September. That nixed Massie’s effort. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) condemned the effort by the Kentucky Republican. But Johnson insisted that he didn’t send Members home early because of fear that the House had the votes to impeach Hegseth.

Massie attempted to execute a parliamentary move which would compel the House to consider the impeachment articles right away. But they expired once the House went out of session. But Massie will resuscitate them.

GOP LAWMAKER SAYS MORE QUALIFIED OFFICIALS SHOULD LEAD PENTAGON, QUESTIONS HEGSETH’S ‘MORAL COMPASS

Massie authored a total of eight articles of impeachment, ranging from the “kidnapping” of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro to how the Pentagon is running the war in Iran.

It’s possible the House could move to table the articles, or send them to committee, euthanizing the effort. But a growing number of House Republicans are grumbling about Hegseth. Any effort to dismiss the articles in the House might not work.

It’s about the math.

All Democrats are likely to vote to impeach Hegseth. Some Republicans are exasperated by Hegseth and have said privately they’d like to impeach. There are even more Republicans trying to build distance between themselves and President Trump after the midterms. That’s augmented by the fact that Republicans believe the war in Iran cost them control of Congress. Thus, even more Republicans may be willing to impeach. Finally, the GOP may have attendance problems. Republican Members who lost – or were shocked that they lost – might not show up. In other words, there may be more Democrats in the House than Republicans. And don’t forget that some Republicans are now looking for a scapegoat after the election.

A simple majority is necessary to impeach.

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/secretary-of-war-pete-hegseth.jpg

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is seen on Oct. 15, 2026, at the Pentagon in Arlington, Va.()

If adopted, the House would send the articles of impeachment to the Senate. Under Senate rules of impeachment, the Senate must at least receive and consider the articles. But it could move quickly to dismiss. That’s what happened when the Senate considered articles of impeachment for former Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas a few years ago. The bona fide “trial” part of the process never happened where the Senate heard arguments, listened to witnesses and took evidence.

It takes a simple majority to dismiss such articles. Believe it or not, this could happen under a Republican-controlled Senate. But how might outgoing Sens. John Cornyn, R-Texas, Thom Tillis, R-N.C., and Bill Cassidy, R-La., vote? That’s to say nothing of Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, John Curtis, R-Alaska, Todd Young, R-Ind., and others.

It takes a two-thirds vote to convict and remove in a Senate impeachment trial.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

In addition, unlike legislation, articles of impeachment carry over into the new Congress. Would a new Democratically-controlled Senate want to get bogged down in an impeachment trial from the start? Especially when new Democrats want to vote on affordability and health care?

Or, would a Democratic Senate embrace the idea of a full-blown impeachment trial for Hegseth – especially since the execution of the war in Iran seems to be one of the main reasons for this week’s electoral shellacking?

Some of this hinges on who both parties in each body select as their leaders.

Chad Pergram currently serves as Chief Congressional Correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC). He joined the network in September 2007 and is based out of Washington, D.C.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2