马西提出针对赫格斯的弹劾条款 本周将安排投票


2026年11月9日 美国东部时间下午2:38 / CBS新闻

华盛顿讯 众议员托马斯·马西于周一提出针对国防部长皮特·赫格斯的弹劾条款,指控其未经国会授权对伊朗发动战争,并滥用职权。

此次弹劾行动可能获得更多两党支持,因为两党议员均对赫格斯处理对伊战争的方式感到不满,而共和党正因中期选举失利而焦头烂额。议员们于周一返回国会大厦,重新召开由共和党掌控的国会最后几周的会议,马西的举动将迫使领导人在两个立法日内就弹劾决议安排投票。

其实早在中期选举凸显选民对伊朗战争及其对生活成本的担忧之前,国会就已发起弹劾赫格斯的行动。马西是肯塔基州共和党人,过去一年在多个问题上与政府产生分歧,他最初于9月提出针对这位国防部长的弹劾条款。众议院共和党领袖提前休会,将该问题的投票推迟至11月。

马西于周一在众议院会场提交了更新后的弹劾条款,重新启动了共和党领袖安排投票的两日倒计时。

这位肯塔基州共和党人在一份34页的弹劾决议中列出八项条款,指控赫格斯犯下重罪和轻罪。其中三项指控称,赫格斯未经国会授权对伊朗发动战争,滥用国防部职权。

马西还指控,在这场冲突中,赫格斯无视将平民伤亡降至最低的法律,并援引了今年早些时候对伊朗一所学校的袭击事件。另一项弹劾条款指向五角大楼在加勒比海的船只袭击事件,还有一项涉及委内瑞拉总统尼古拉斯·马杜罗的被俘事件。另有一项条款聚焦言论自由问题,以及五角大楼对参议员马克·凯利的审查,此前凯利是一群议员中的一员,他们发布视频呼吁军人“拒绝非法命令”。

马西认为,赫格斯“已证明如果留任,仍将对宪法构成威胁,其行为严重违反职责和法治原则”。

马西写道:“因此,彼得·布莱恩·赫格斯应受到弹劾和审判,被免去职务,并被取消担任美国任何荣誉、受托或有薪酬职务的资格。”

赫格斯抨击了马西的弹劾行动,马西在今年早些时候的初选中失利后即将离开国会。

“一位心怀不满、落败的议员,连同他所有的民主党盟友,也提交了针对本人的虚假弹劾条款,就像他们两次针对特朗普总统所做的那样,”赫格斯上周在X平台发布的一段视频中表示,“要知道,他们的政策行不通,所以痴迷于伪装成权力的政治作秀,驱使他们试图摧毁对手。这完全是出于个人毁谤的政治算计。这一招对特朗普总统没用,对我也不会奏效。”

赫格斯于周一告诉记者:“我们对此并不担心。”他表示计划于周二上午就弹劾一事召开新闻发布会。

其他共和党人是否支持这项行动仍有待观察。不过,在中期选举中遭遇惨败后,一些共和党议员似乎对该计划更为开放,也更迫切地批评这位国防部长。

众议院监督委员会主席、肯塔基州共和党众议员詹姆斯·科默在新闻网(News Nation)节目中表示:“关于赫格斯,存在诸多疑问。”

“我们不清楚未来在伊朗的策略是什么。没人对伊朗问题感到满意,”科默说,“我认为共和党选民比民主党选民更对伊朗的局势感到不满。”

阿肯色州共和党众议员弗伦奇·希尔表示,他仍在考虑是否支持这项行动,他在周日的《玛格丽特·布伦南圆桌会谈》节目中表示,希望听取关于该问题的辩论,“以判断是否应启动弹劾,而非采取其他纪律处分措施,或在国防部长未能胜任领导国防部职责的情况下由总统采取行动”。

“如果你认为他工作做得不好,并不一定意味着他犯了可弹劾的罪行,”希尔说。

即将退休的内布拉斯加州共和党众议员唐·培根曾在一些问题上批评政府,他表示自己在“纠结”是否支持这项弹劾决议。

他称赫格斯在多个问题上的处理方式“让我感到困扰”,并且“我觉得他应该受到适当的对待,但这不是处理弹劾的正确方式”。

“我认为他不是一名称职的部长,但难道因为这个就弹劾他吗?弹劾必须针对重罪或轻罪行为,”培根周一在国会大厦告诉记者。

普遍预计民主党人将支持弹劾行动。众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯在周日美国广播公司《本周》节目中表示,他对弹劾行动“绝对支持”。但由于共和党仅以微弱优势掌控众议院,仍需要共和党的票数。

马西周一在X平台发帖称,他看到一些同僚表示“赫格斯表现出色,他们支持这场战争,因此会投票反对弹劾”。但他表示,“问题不在这里”。

“问题在于他是否犯下了可弹劾的罪行,”马西说,“答案是肯定的,共有八项。”

赫格斯将成为历史上第三位被弹劾的内阁部长。战争部长威廉·贝尔纳普于1876年因腐败指控被弹劾。2024年,共和党控制的众议院以拜登政府处理南部边境事务为由,弹劾了国土安全部长亚历杭德罗·马约尔卡斯。贝尔纳普后来被参议院宣告无罪;马约尔卡斯的指控则被驳回。

贾阿拉·布朗为本文提供了报道支持。

Massie introduces impeachment articles against Hegseth, teeing up vote this week

November 9, 2026 / 2:38 PM EST / CBS News

Washington — Rep. Thomas Massie on Monday introduced articles of impeachment against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, accusing him of waging war against Iran without congressional authorization and abusing the powers of his office.

The impeachment effort could attract more bipartisan support, since members of both parties are frustrated with Hegseth’s handling of the war with Iran and Republicans are reeling from their defeats in the midterm elections.Lawmakers returned to Capitol Hill on Monday to reconvene for the final weeks of the GOP-controlled Congress, and Massie’s move will force leaders to bring the impeachment resolution up for a vote within two legislative days.

Even before the midterm elections highlighted voters’ concerns about the war in Iran and its impact on the cost of living, the push to impeach Hegseth was underway in Congress. Massie, a Kentucky Republican who has broken with the administration on a number of fronts over the past year, originally introduced impeachment articles against the defense secretary in September. House GOP leaders recessed the chamber early, pushing off a vote on the issue until November.

Massie introduced updated impeachment articles on the House floor on Monday, restarting a two-day clock for GOP leaders to schedule a vote.

The Kentucky Republican accused Hegseth of high crimes and misdemeanours in a 34-page impeachment resolution with eight articles. Three charges accuse him of abusing the powers of the Department of Defense by waging war against Iran without congressional authorization.

Massie also alleged that in the conflict, Hegseth ignored laws that minimize civilian casualties, citing the strike on an Iranian school earlier this year. Another impeachment article points to the Pentagon’s boat strikes in the Caribbean, while one cites the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. Another centers on free speech and the Pentagon’s scrutiny of Sen. Mark Kelly after he was among a group of lawmakers who released a video calling on service members to “refuse illegal orders.”

Massie argued that Hegseth “has demonstrated that he will remain a threat to the Constitution if allowed to remain in office, and has acted in a manner grossly incompatible with his duties and the rule of law.”

“Peter Brian Hegseth thus warrants impeachment and trial, removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States,” Massie wrote.

Hegseth has criticized the effort by Massie, who’s leaving Congress after losing his primary earlier this year.

“A disgruntled, defeated congressman, along with all his Democrat allies, has also dropped sham articles of impeachment against yours truly, just like they tried against President Trump twice,” Hegseth said in a video posted on X last week. “You see, their policies don’t work, so their obsession with political theater disguised as power drives them to try to destroy their opponents. It’s all about the politics of personal destruction. Didn’t work against President Trump, and it won’t work with me.”

Hegseth told reporters Monday, “we’re not worried about that.” He said he planned to hold a news conference on the impeachment effort Tuesday morning.

Whether other Republicans support the effort remains to be seen. But some GOP members appeared more open to the prospect, and more eager to criticize the defense secretary, after the brutal losses for their party in the midterms.

Rep. James Comer, a Kentucky Republican who leads the House Oversight Committee, said on News Nation that “there’s a lot of questions about Hegseth.”

“We have no idea what the strategy is moving forward in Iran. No one’s happy about Iran,” Comer said. “I think the Republican voters are more upset about what’s going on in Iran than the Democrat voters.”

GOP Rep. French Hill of Arkansas indicated that he’s still considering whether to support the effort, saying on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on Sunday that he wants to hear the debate on the issue “to see if it merits impeachment versus some other disciplinary action or action by the president if he’s not getting the job done in leading the Department of War.”

“If you don’t think he’s done a good job conducting his job, that doesn’t mean per se that he’s committed an impeachable offense,” Hill said.

Retiring GOP Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska, who has been critical of the administration on some issues, said he’s “wrestling” with whether to support the impeachment resolution.

He said Hegseth’s handling of a number of topics “bothers me” and “I feel like he deserves a little bit of his own treatment, but that’s not the right way to handle impeachment.”

“I don’t think he’s been a good secretary, but do you impeach a guy for that? It has to be a high crime or misdemeanor,” Bacon told reporters Monday at the Capitol.

Democrats are widely expected to support the impeachment effort. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday that he’s a “hard yes” on the impeachment effort. But with a narrow GOP majority, Republican votes will be needed.

Massie said in a post on X on Monday that he’s seen some of his colleagues say “Hegseth has been effective and they agree with the war, so they’ll vote not to impeach.” But he said “that’s not the question.”

“The question is whether he committed impeachable acts,” Massie said. “And the answer is yes, eight times.”

Hegseth would be the third Cabinet secretary in history to be impeached. Secretary of War William Belknap was impeached in 1876 over corruption allegations. Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas was impeached by the GOP-controlled House in 2024 over the Biden administration’s handling of the southern border. Belknap was acquitted by the Senate. Mayorkas had his charges dismissed.

Jaala Brown contributed to this report.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2