2026-11-07T11:30:15.189Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)
美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在本周共和党遭遇惨败后,起初暗示可能缓和立场,表达了与民主党合作的意愿。
但在对中期选举结果日益不满后,特朗普突然改变了路线,在盟友敦促加强抗争的推动下,将幕僚长苏西·威尔士替换为长期助手斯蒂芬·米勒。
米勒的晋升释放了一个明确信号:特朗普正在加倍下注。
选择一名被视为其核心圈子中最具影响力强硬派声音之一的MAGA(特朗普“让美国再次伟大”运动)忠实支持者,标志着一项将动用更大行政权力的计划。米勒是特朗普激进驱逐移民运动及其他多项挑战白宫权力边界的争议政策的策划者——但这些政策也引发了选民的强烈反对,导致共和党遭遇历史性选举失利。
甚至有一些共和党人对米勒的提名表示震惊,公开担忧这表明他们严重误读了选民彻底拒绝共和党施政的动机。
印第安纳州众议员马林·施图茨曼在当地电台节目中指出:“我们因移民驱逐政策失去了拉美裔选民,”他特别指责米勒“不断谈论驱逐移民”。
他还表示:“共和党需要清醒过来,意识到我们将沦为少数党。”
特朗普听取了不同的建议。
据知情人士透露,当他为周二的历史性失利感到恼火,并向朋友和盟友征求意见时,他听到了一群人敦促他换掉威尔士——并考虑让米勒接替她。
这些盟友认为,米勒已经证明自己能够坚决执行特朗普的意愿,而且与外部候选人不同,他无需时间适应工作。
此外,他们辩称,中期选举结果表明共和党已经失去了特朗普自己的MAGA运动的信任。修复这种关系、让重回胜利轨道需要像米勒这样的运动型人物来完成。
这一判断与许多其他共和党人对中期选举结果的看法截然不同,后者将失利责任完全归咎于特朗普的议程和决策。
但知情人士表示,面对选择,特朗普始终倾向于升级抗争。
“在影响MAGA和政府的关键问题上,斯蒂芬态度极为强硬,”特朗普前顾问、亲密盟友史蒂夫·班农表示。“他是绝佳人选。”
此次人事变动是一个预兆,预示着特朗普的白宫与刚掌控国会的民主党未来两年可能会日益对抗。
“如果你想与民主党合作,他是你最不愿聘用的人,”一名特朗普顾问这样评价米勒,称他“才华出众但过于激进”。“但不管是约翰·凯利、苏西还是斯蒂芬,归根结底,唐纳德·特朗普才是自己的幕僚长。”
这次任命标志着米勒在特朗普核心圈子内长达十年的崛起达到了顶峰,他长期以来影响力巨大,以至于盟友和敌人都私下称他为“首相”。
米勒长期以来主张积极推动特朗普在移民、犯罪和政府机构改革方面的优先事项,认为总统拥有绕过国会推行其议程的广泛单边权力。他已展现出为实现目标挑战法律先例和行政规范的意愿,同时对阻碍自己的批评者放出煽动性言论。
“民主党不是政党,”去年,在回应特朗普向多个城市部署国民警卫队的反对意见时,米勒曾这样表示。“它是一个国内极端组织。”
同时,因中期选举大获全胜而信心倍增的民主党议员誓言将发起一系列针对政府及其高级官员,包括米勒的调查——同时承诺将特朗普的议程按下暂停键。
“斯蒂芬·米勒应该请律师了,”众议院监督委员会高级成员罗伯特·加西亚众议员周五表示。
在这种背景下,特朗普选择米勒担任高级助手被一些民主党人视为一种挑衅。
“这是那帮人从非常糟糕变得更糟的表现,”缅因州民主党众议员切莉·平格里对CNN表示。“但我一点也不惊讶。”
或许最直接的影响是,特朗普表示将于周一生效的米勒任命,可能会阻碍早期就某种形式的全面移民立法进行谈判的希望。民主党议员、国会助手和移民权益人士此前私下表示,乐观认为两党可能在未来几个月就这类努力达成共识,但现在这已不太可能。
“这最清楚地表明,(特朗普)在跛脚鸭任期内的首要任务是制造尽可能多的混乱,”支持移民改革的“保障美国承诺”倡议创始人安德烈·弗洛雷斯表示。“只要斯蒂芬·米勒还在白宫,与他合作推进移民改革的呼吁就不现实。”
米勒是一位自信且经常展现战斗姿态的思想家,也是特朗普2016年胜选几率极低的竞选活动中最早加入的助手之一,他当时作为演讲稿撰写人磨练了这位新手候选人的信息,并帮助塑造了其强烈反移民的竞选纲领。
米勒后来跟随特朗普进入白宫担任高级国内政策助手,主要致力于推进一系列旨在进一步限制移民的举措——其中包括引发民主党甚至许多共和党强烈反对的家庭分离政策。
尽管如此,特朗普仍将米勒视为自己最信任的顾问之一,很大程度上是因为他的绝对忠诚,以及他经常公开为特朗普及其议程辩护。
在返回白宫开启特朗普第二任期后,米勒迅速扩大了自己的权力——监督了一场史无前例的大规模移民驱逐行动,同时将影响力扩展到其他高关注度和争议性领域,比如政府在加勒比地区频繁针对和击毙涉嫌贩毒者的行动。
在政府内部,米勒向国土安全部施加了巨大压力,要求其实现每天逮捕3000名移民的指标,同时也越来越主张采取更严格的合法移民政策。
“他的目标是减少移民——这点毫不避讳,”去年年底驱逐行动达到高潮时,米勒的盟友、主张限制移民的移民研究中心主任马克·克里科里安表示。“不只是管理边境或减少非法移民,他是一位真正的移民限制论者。”
这场驱逐行动在全国多个城市引发了暴力视频画面,联邦移民特工追捕逃跑的无证移民,与抗议者发生冲突,并有数例错误逮捕美国公民的情况。
局势不断升级最终导致联邦特工在明尼苏达州连续击毙两名美国公民——蕾妮·古德和亚历克斯·普雷蒂——引发全国愤怒,并迫使政府撤回其行动。
米勒在事件发生后立即保持相对低调,当时政府正试图处理影响并调整策略。
但他仍然是白宫内部有影响力的人物,也是特朗普最亲密的心腹之一,最终在中期选举前的最后几个月里,在倡导政府的反欺诈举措中扮演了主导角色。据知情人士透露,在有传言称选举后威尔士可能离职时,米勒的盟友开始四处奔走,推举他作为白宫最高幕僚职位的潜在继任者。
当时特朗普断然否认任何改组核心团队的计划,10月中旬坚称威尔士将“长期”留在白宫。
但仅三周后,总统的说法就变了。
“人生中有时你必须采取行动,”周五宣布人事变动后,他对记者表示。“斯蒂芬从一开始就陪伴着我。他深谙此道。政治上非常出色。而且是个非常优秀的人。”
How one of Trump’s most controversial advisers rose to chief of staff – and what it means
2026-11-07T11:30:15.189Z / CNN
President Donald Trump responded to this week’s GOP drubbing by initially suggesting that he might soften his approach, expressing openness to collaborating with Democrats.
But after growing increasingly agitated by the midterm results, Trump abruptly changed course, replacing chief of staff Susie Wiles with longtime aide Stephen Miller amid encouragement from allies to ramp up the fight.
Miller’s elevation sent a clear message: Trump is doubling down.
Choosing a MAGA loyalist considered one of the most powerful hardline voices in his inner circle signaled a plan to flex even greater executive authority. Miller was the architect of Trump’s aggressive deportation campaign and other controversial policies that tested the bounds of White House power — yet also spurred voter backlash, contributing to the GOP’s historic electoral losses.
And even some Republicans expressed dismay about Miller’s selection, openly worrying that it represented an extreme misread of the motives behind voters’ wholesale rejection of GOP governance.
“We lost Latinos because of the deportation look,” Rep. Marlin Stutzman of Indiana said in a local radio appearance, singling out Miller for “constantly talking about deportation.”
“The Republican Party needs to wake up and realize we’re going to be in the minority,” he said.
Trump took different advice.
As he stewed over Tuesday’s historic losses and surveyed friends and allies about what he should do, he heard from a contingent who urged him to replace Wiles — and consider replacing her with Miller, people familiar with the matter said.
Those allies argued that Miller had already proven his ability to militantly carry out Trump’s whims and, unlike outside candidates, wouldn’t require any time to get up to speed.
Plus, they contended, the midterm results had revealed a Republican Party that had lost the trust of Trump’s own MAGA movement. Repairing that relationship and getting the GOP back on the winning track would require a movement figure like Miller to do it.
It was a diagnosis far removed from many other Republicans’ view of the midterm results, which put responsibility for the losses squarely on Trump’s agenda and decisionmaking.
But given the choice, the people familiar said, Trump has always gravitated toward escalating the fight.
“On the key issues that impact MAGA and the administration, Stephen is very aggressive,” said Steve Bannon, a former Trump adviser and close ally. “He’s a perfect pick.”
The staff shakeup serves as an omen for what is now likely to be an increasingly confrontational two years between the Trump White House and Democrats newly in charge of Congress.
“He is the last person you want to hire if you want to try to work with the Democrats,” one Trump adviser said of Miller, who they characterized as “brilliant” but overly intense. “But no matter if it’s John Kelly or Susie or Stephen, at the end of the day, Donald Trump is his own chief of staff.”
The appointment marks the culmination of Miller’s decadelong ascent within Trump’s orbit, where he has long wielded so much influence that allies and enemies alike privately refer to him as “the prime minister.”
Miller has long argued for aggressively advancing Trump’s priorities on immigration, crime and overhauling government institutions, contending that the president has vast unilateral power to bypass Congress and carry out his agenda. He’s demonstrated a willingness to challenge legal precedents and administrative norms in pursuing his goals, while leveling incendiary accusations at critics standing in the way.
“The Democrat Party is not a political party,” Miller said at one point last year, in response to opposition to Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops to various cities. “It is a domestic, extremist organization.”
Democratic lawmakers emboldened by their sweeping midterm victories, meanwhile, have vowed to launch a slew of investigations into the administration and its top officials, including Miller — while also promising to grind Trump’s agenda to a halt.
“Stephen Miller should lawyer up,” Rep. Robert Garcia, the ranking member on the House Oversight Committee, said on Friday.
Against that backdrop, Trump’s selection of Miller as his top aide was viewed by some Democrats as akin to a show of defiance.
“That is those guys going from very bad to worse than you could possibly imagine,” Democratic Rep. Chellie Pingree of Maine told CNN. “But that doesn’t surprise me a bit.”
Perhaps most immediately, Miller’s appointment — which Trump said takes effect on Monday — is likely to derail early hopes of negotiating some form of comprehensive immigration legislation. Democratic lawmakers, congressional aides and immigrant advocates had privately expressed optimism that the parties might coalesce behind such an effort in the coming months. But that’s unlikely to happen now.
“This is the clearest sign that (Trump’s) lame duck priority is to cause as much chaos as possible,” said Andrea Flores, founder of pro-immigration reform initiative Securing America’s Promise. “Calls to work with him on immigration reform are not realistic as long as Stephen Miller is in the White House.”
A self-assured and often-combative ideologue, Miller was among the earliest aides on Trump’s longshot 2016 campaign, where he honed the then-novice candidate’s message as a speechwriter and helped shape his forcefully anti-immigration platform.
Miller later followed Trump into the White House as a senior domestic policy aide, working primarily to advance a series of efforts aimed at further restricting immigration — including a family separation policy that triggered extended blowback among Democrats and even many Republicans.
Trump nevertheless came to regard Miller as among his most trusted advisers, in large part because of his ardent loyalty and frequent public defenses of him and his agenda.
After returning to the White House for Trump’s second term, Miller quickly grew his power — overseeing an unprecedented mass deportation operation while expanding his reach into other high-profile and controversial areas, like the administration’s frequent targeting and killing of alleged narcotraffickers in the Caribbean.
Inside the administration, Miller exerted immense pressure on the Department of Homeland Security to meet immigration arrest quotas of 3,000 people per day, while advocating for an increasingly restrictive approach to legal immigration as well.
“His goal is to reduce immigration — I don’t think there’s any secret about that,” Mark Krikorian — a Miller ally and director of the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for limited immigration — said as the deportation operation reached its height late last year. “Not just managing the border or reducing illegal immigration. He’s an actual immigration restrictionist.”
The deportation campaign prompted viral scenes of violence in cities across the country, as federal immigration agents chased fleeing undocumented immigrants, clashed with protesters and, in several cases, mistakenly arrested US citizens.
The escalating situation ultimately led to the successive killings by federal agents of two Americans in Minnesota — Renee Good and Alex Pretti — that sparked nationwide anger and forced the administration to pull back on its efforts.
Miller adopted a relatively low profile in the immediate aftermath, as the administration sought to manage the fallout and adjust its tactics.
But he remained an influential figure within the White House and one of Trump’s closest confidants, eventually seizing a lead role in advocating for the administration’s anti-fraud initiatives in the final months before the midterms. And amid speculation that Wiles might depart after the elections, Miller’s allies worked to circulate his name as a potential successor to the top staff spot in the West Wing, the people familiar with the matter said.
Trump at the time flatly denied any plans to make changes to his senior team, insisting in mid-October that Wiles would remain at the White House “for a long time.”
But as little as three weeks later, the president was singing a different tune.
“Sometimes in life, you have to make moves,” he told reporters on Friday after announcing the staff shakeup. “Stephen’s been with me from the beginning. He gets it. Very good politically. And he’s a very good man.”
发表回复